Next Article in Journal
Potential of Anti-Leukotriene Drugs as New Therapeutic Agents for Inhibiting Cholangiocarcinoma Progression
Previous Article in Journal
Insights into the Interaction Mechanisms of Peptide and Non-Peptide Inhibitors with MDM2 Using Gaussian-Accelerated Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Deep Learning
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Transformation of Terpenoids and Steroids Using Actinomycetes of the Genus Rhodococcus

by
Polina Yu. Maltseva
1,2,
Natalia A. Plotnitskaya
1,2 and
Irina B. Ivshina
1,2,*
1
Institute of Ecology and Genetics of Microorganisms of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Perm Federal Research Center of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 13 Golev Str., 614081 Perm, Russia
2
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Perm State University, 15 Bukirev Str., 614990 Perm, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2024, 29(14), 3378; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29143378
Submission received: 25 June 2024 / Revised: 12 July 2024 / Accepted: 17 July 2024 / Published: 18 July 2024

Abstract

:
Terpenoids and steroids are secondary plant and animal metabolites and are widely used to produce highly effective pharmacologically significant compounds. One of the promising approaches to the transformation of these compounds to form bioactive metabolites is their transformation using microorganisms. Rhodococcus spp. are one of the most developed objects in biotechnology due to their exceptional metabolic capabilities and resistance to extreme environmental conditions. In this review, information on the processes of biotransformation of terpenoid and steroid compounds by actinomycetes of the genus Rhodococcus and their molecular genetic bases are most fully collected and analyzed for the first time. Examples of the use of both native whole-cell catalysts and mutant strains and purified enzyme systems for the production of derivatives of terpenoids and steroids are given.

1. Introduction

Actinomycetes are a large group of Gram-positive bacteria that are widespread in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. The phylum Actinomycetota is represented by six valid classes: Actinomycetes, Acidimicrobiia, Coriobacteriia, Nitriliruptoria, Rubrobacteria, and Thermoleophilia (https://lpsn.dsmz.de/phylum/actinomycetota, assessed on 18 June 2024). Among actinomycetes, there are various phenotypes, such as anaerobes, aerobes, spore-forming, unicellular, and filamentous forms. They have a relatively large genome, often exceeding 5 Mb, and are characterized by a high (from 50 to more than 70 mol. %) GC content in DNA. Morphology of different actinomycetal species varies from coccoid (e.g., Micrococcus) and rod-shaped (e.g., Arthrobacter) forms to fragmented (e.g., Nocardia) or highly differentiated branched mycelium (e.g., Streptomyces). Actinomycetes exist in a free-living form or as commensals or symbionts of other organisms [1]. They play an important role in the decomposition of organic substances such as cellulose and chitin and take part in the natural carbon cycle [2].
Representatives of Actinomycetes produce a large number of biotechnologically significant enzymes, such as amylases, cellulases, proteases, chitinases, xylanases, peroxidases, nitrile hydratases, and pectinases [3]. More than 22,000 biologically active microbial metabolites are known, 45% of which are catalyzed by actinomycetes [4].
One of the groups of microorganisms widely developed in biotechnology is actinomycetes of the genus Rhodococcus sensu stricto, characterized by a wide variety of transformable, hard-to-reach compounds [2,5,6]. The non-mycelial growth, the ability to produce biosurfactants, the polytrophy, and the lability of metabolic systems of rhodococci determine the expediency of their using in biocatalysis and fine synthesis [7,8,9,10,11]. A number of review articles have been published regarding the use of the biotechnological potential of rhodococci for the degradation and transformation of complex organic compounds [5,6,12,13,14,15,16]. At the same time, this prepared review is the first work on the summarizing and analysis of data on the use of actinomycetes only of the genus Rhodococcus for the transformation of terpenoid and steroid compounds.
Terpenoids and steroids are secondary metabolites of plants and animals with a wide range of biological activity. These compounds are actively used as scaffolds for the synthesis of new substances with high pharmacological potential. Steroids and their derivatives are widely used in medical practice [17,18], while terpenoids and their derivatives are just gaining popularity. At the moment, only a few terpene compounds have been used in clinical trials [19,20,21]. One of the most common ways to obtain valuable derivatives of terpenoids and steroids is by chemical modification. This usually requires high temperature and pH, the use of expensive reagents, and the introduction of protective groups of molecule reactive centers. Microbial transformation of terpenoids and steroids allows biologically active derivatives with high regio- and stereoselectivity under normal and environmentally friendly conditions to be obtained [10,22,23]. This review is an attempt to highlight the role of actinomycetes of the genus Rhodococcus as biotransformers of terpenoid and steroid compounds and show directions of research development in this field.

2. Using the Biochemical Potential of Whole Bacterial Cells

The use of native bacterial cells in biocatalysis is economically more profitable in comparison with the use of transforming enzyme systems or individual enzymes. Despite the exceptional selectivity and substrate specificity of individual enzymes, their use is limited by low stability and a narrow range of metabolizable substrates. The range of substances that can be transformed by whole bacterial cells is much wider. Their use allows complex transformations to be carried out in one technological stage with a high degree of selectivity and in environmentally friendly conditions. In addition, bacteria secrete all necessary cofactors and provide a natural environment for enzymes, preventing conformational changes in the structure of proteins and loss of their reactivity [24]. Thus, the specificity of multi-purpose enzyme systems, the absence of problems with the regeneration of coenzymes, and stable activity in extreme environmental conditions make the use of living cells of rhodococci in biocatalysis technologically promising.

2.1. Transformation of Terpene Compounds

Terpenes are widespread and structurally diverse unsaturated hydrocarbons that are derivatives of mevalonic acid, whose structure is based on isoprene units (C5H8). Terpenes are the largest class of natural compounds and have more than 50,000 known representative molecules [25].
Oxygen-containing terpenes are called terpenoids [26]. They are secondary metabolites of plants and often highly hydrophobic. According to the number of isoprene units in the structure of the molecule, there are mono-, sesqui-, di-, tri-, tetra-, and polyterpenoids (Figure 1).
In plants, terpenoids and their derivatives perform a variety of functions, acting as photosynthetic pigments, electron carriers, and regulators of growth and development. In addition, these compounds are involved in protection against insects, pathogens, and extreme environmental factors [27]. Terpenoids have a wide range of biological activity, exhibiting anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, antiviral, analgesic, antitumor, antifungal, and other actions [25,28]. It is also worth noting that in recent years there has been a growing interest in plant terpenoids as a promising base for the production of biofuels [29]. In this regard, there is an active development of modern ways of using terpenoids and their derivatives in various fields of industry. One of the promising directions is their microbial transformation, aimed at obtaining biologically active derivatives. This approach makes it possible to eliminate the difficulties associated with the use of native substrates, and at the same time carry out transformation reactions according to the principles of “green chemistry” and the strategy of sustainable development [30].
At the moment, a large amount of knowledge has been accumulated about biotransformations of mono-, di-, and triterpene compounds using bacteria, fungi, and even insect larvae. The vast majority of the described studies on bioconversion by actinomycetes of the genus Rhodococcus are devoted to the transformation of monoterpene substrates such as limonene, carveol, 1,8-cineol, etc. Only in recent years, has a tendency to study biotransformations of more complex cyclic terpene compounds been traced.
The first information about the catalytic activity of Rhodococcus spp. in relation to terpenoids was obtained in the late 1980s. Already at that time, much attention was paid not only to the technological process of conversion and its optimization but also to the features of microorganism enzyme systems involved in the studied transformations. Williams et al. (1989) reported that the isolated strain Rhodococcus sp. C1 utilizing 1,8-cineole (1) as the only carbon source accumulated 6-endo-hydroxycineol (2) and 6-oxocyneol (3) (Figure 2) [31]. Subsequently, the obtained metabolites, together with the initial substrate, were oxidized by washed bacterial cells. The studies revealed that 6-endo-hydroxycineol dehydrogenase and NADH-dependent 6-oxocineol oxygenase were presumably involved in the conversion.
It was shown that R. opacus PWD4 is capable of conducting toluene-induced enantioselective hydroxylation of D-limonene (4) to form (+)-trans-carveol (up to 97%) (5) and small amounts of (+)-carvone (6) (Figure 3). It was suggested that toluene-degrading enzymes may participate in the catalysis, since the change of the co-substrate from toluene to glucose led to a loss in the transformation activity of rhodococci in relation to limonene [32].
An extensive series of studies carried out by various scientific groups is devoted to the catalytic activity of R. erythropolis DCL14 against monoterpenoids limonene-1,2-epoxide, carveol, and limonene. The first data on this strain as an effective biotransformer of (+)-limonene were presented by van der Werf and de Bont in 1998 [33]. The intermediate products obtained during degradation, limonene oxide and p-menth-7-ene-l,2-diol, did not represent great biotechnological value; however, they enabled an expansion of the understanding of the pathways of microbial metabolism of limonene and created a foundation for future research.
Subsequently, a research group led by Carla C.C.R. de Carvalho (Portugal) selected optimal conditions for the use of native R. erythropolis DCL14 cells. Thus, the inclusion of an organic solvent containing the substrate in the reaction system made it possible to increase the rate of hydrolysis of limonene-1,2-epoxide (7) to limonene-1,2-diol (8), oxidation of (−)-carveol (9) to carvone (6), and conversion of limonene (4) to carveol (9) and carvone (6) (Figure 4) [34,35,36]. Fractions of essential oils of Citrus and Cymbopogon plants contained carvone, cis-carveol, and trans-carveol possess antibacterial, antioxidant, and antiproliferative properties [37,38].
A strain of Rhodococcus sp. GR3 isolated from soil carried out the oxidation of geraniol (10) to geranic acid (11) with a yield of up to 54.6% (Figure 5) [39]. Geranic acid has tyrosinase inhibitory activity [40] and is used for the synthesis of esters, with pronounced insecticidal activity against aphids [41].
We previously studied the bioconversion of monoterpene alcohol (−)-isopulegol (12) by R. rhodochrous IEGM 1362 cells with the formation of two new 10-hydroxy (13) and 10-carboxy (14) derivatives (Figure 6) [11]. According to the results of the in silico analysis, the obtained metabolites may have antitumor activity, and are also promising as respiratory analeptics and agents for the prevention of cancer of the genitourinary system.
The ability of resting cells of R. erythropolis MLT1 to transform the acyclic monoterpene β-myrcene (15) was revealed (Figure 7) [42]. On the basis of this substrate being used as the only carbon source, the monoterpene alcohol geraniol (10), which has antibacterial activity against clinical strains of staphylococci and enterobacteria [43] and is widely used in perfumery, the food industry, and as an insect repellent [44], was obtained.
In recent years, in addition to monoterpene substrates, the ability of Rhodococcus actinomycetes to convert more complex organic compounds such as diterpene resin acids and lupane and oleanane pentacyclic triterpenoids has been revealed [45,46,47]. Interestingly, of the rather large species diversity of cultures used in screening studies, representatives of R. rhodochrous showed the greatest catalytic activity. At the same time, the greatest efficiency of microbial conversion was achieved using resting rhodococcal cells (washed from the medium at the end of the exponential growth phase and placed in a buffer with a substrate) [47]. Being in this state, bacterial cells have an increased energy resource specifically for biotransformation of the substrate. In addition to increasing the amount of the resulting transformation product, this approach allows for more precise control of the amount of biomass and also does not require sterile transformation conditions.
An effective biocatalyst of the biodegradation process of toxic dehydroabietic acid (16) has recently been developed using resting cells of R. rhodochrous IEGM 107 [45], and the formation of two less ecotoxic intermediates, 7-oxo-DHA (17) with moderate antibacterial activity [48] and 11,12-dihydroxy-7-oxo-abieta-8,13-dien-18-oic acid (18), has been detected (Figure 8).
The regioselective oxidation of the 3β-hydroxyl group of the pentacyclic triterpenoid betulin (19) was studied using R. rhodochrous IEGM 66 cells (Figure 9) [46]. The metabolite betulone (20) obtained as a result of transformation is a promising intermediate in the synthesis of cytotoxic derivatives [49]. The highest yield of the product (up to 75%) was achieved using resting actinomycete cells, while the maximum catalytic activity of growing cells was only 45%.
Resting cells of R. rhodochrous IEGM 1360 showed high catalytic activity against oleanolic (21) and glycyrretinic (22) acids with the formation of 3-oxo derivatives (23, 24) (with an efficiency of 61% and 100%, respectively) (Figure 10) [47]. The use of a suspension of resting cells in comparison with the transformation in growth conditions allowed the conversion time to be reduced from 7 to 3 days. 3-Oxo derivatives of oleanolic and glycyrrhetinic acids are known as anti-inflammatory [50,51], cytotoxic [52,53,54], antiparasitic [55,56], and antiviral [57] agents.
More complex transformations of oleanolic acid (21) were achieved using R. rhodochrous IEGM 757 [58]. As a result of the complete conversion of the initial substrate, a new bioactive metabolite, 3β,5α,22α-trihydroxyolean-12-ene-23,28-dioic acid (25), was obtained (Figure 11).

2.2. Transformation of Steroid Compounds

Steroids and sterols are biogenetically close to terpenoids and are formed from triterpene precursors. Steroids and sterols are compounds of animal or plant origin that are widespread in nature and have high biological activity. They are components of cell membranes, act as signaling molecules, and also play an important role in the development of cancer.
The basis of the steroid skeleton is cyclopentane perhydrophenanthrene (sterane, gonane), the structure of which consists of four carbon rings, three cyclohexane and one cyclopentane. Based on biological function or activity, steroids can be classified into several types: bile acids, steroid hormones, cardioactive glycosides and aglycones, and steroid saponins (Figure 12) [59].
Native steroid compounds, when used as medicines, often cause various side effects. Modification of the side chain of steroid molecules makes it possible to obtain compounds with more pronounced biological activity, which helps to reduce drug dosages and, as a result, reduce the manifestation of undesirable side effects.
There are many steroid compounds among environmental pollutants, which accumulate in reservoirs and exhibit negative environmental effects. In this regard, another area of microbial transformations of steroids is their degradation in order to purify the environment from pharmaceutical pollutants [60]. Having a relatively high hydrophobicity, steroids do not biodegrade easily. Nevertheless, the mechanisms of steroid metabolism using aerobic (including Rhodococcus) and anaerobic microorganisms, as well as the key stages and enzymes involved in the process of steroid conversion and genes encoding them, have been studied in detail [61]. Of particular interest to researchers are methods of obtaining pharmacologically significant steroid derivatives based on the use of genetic engineering of Rhodococcus spp. cells.
9α-Hydroxy derivatives of steroids are valuable intermediates in the synthesis of compounds with targeted anti-inflammatory activity. A large part of studies on the hydroxylation of androst-4-ene-3,17-dione (AD) by actinomycetes of the genus Rhodococcus was carried out by a group of scientists from Bulgaria [62]. The difficulty of this reaction lies in the high activity of Δ1-steroid dehydrogenase of microorganisms. When this enzyme is combined with 9α-steroid hydroxylase, an unstable intermediate 9α-hydroxy-l,4-androstadiene-3,17-dione is formed, and subsequently complete degradation of the initial substrate occurs. For the first time, the ability of rhodococci to direct biotransformation of AD (26) into 9α-hydroxy-4-androstene-3,17-dione (9α-OH-AD) (27) was recorded using Rhodococcus sp. isolated from oil-contaminated soil (Figure 13) [62]. However, the yield of the product when using the substrate in a concentration of no more than 3 g/L reached only 70%.
The subsequent series of research concerned the optimization of the process of 9α-hydroxylation of AD using Rhodococcus sp. IOC-77 cells by the selection of optimal substrate solvents, the composition and characteristics of the reaction medium, and the effect on the enzyme systems of microorganisms [63,64,65,66,67]. The most significant results were achieved in experiments with blocking protein synthesis and preliminary adaptation of bacterial cells to the substrate, which allowed for the complete conversion of AD to 9α-OH-AD [64]. Recently, data have been obtained on the use of rhodococci pre-grown on n-alkanes to double the yield of 9α-OH-AD compared with the efficiency of using cells grown on glucose [67].
The strain R. erythropolis Ac-1740 obtained as a result of directed selection showed the ability to completely convert AD to 9α-OH-AD [68]. The advantage of this strain is its low degradation activity against the steroid core due to the absence of 3-ketosteroid-1,2-dehydrogenase, which greatly simplifies the selection of optimal reaction conditions and the further use of a biocatalytic system for the production of the target product. Thus, a method has been developed for the production of 9α-OH-AD from a mixture of soy sterols using the microbial association Mycobacterium neoaurum Ac-1634 and R. erythropolis Ac-1740. According to Andryushina et al. [69], M. neoaurum Ac-1634 cells transformed the initial mixture of phytosterols (sitosterol, stigmasterol, campesterol, and saturated sterols) into AD, the subsequent 9α-hydroxylation of which to the target product occurred with the participation of R. erythropolis Ac-1740 cells. It should be noted that the use of these biocatalysts for the first time made it possible to increase the initial concentration of the substrate to 13.5 g/L.
In addition to 9α-hydroxylation, another reaction catalyzed by rhodococci is aromatization of the A ring of steroid molecules. A group of scientists from Egypt [70] discovered the ability of Rhodococcus sp. DSM 92-344 to aromatize 19-nortestosterone (28) to form estrone (29) and estradiol (30) (Figure 14), with a maximum overall conversion efficiency of up to 77%. Further optimization of the steroid biotransformation process using an air-lift column allowed for an increase in the yield of products to 56 and 23%, respectively [71].
The transformation of progestin dienogest (31) using R. erythropolis FZB 53 cells was studied in order to obtain pharmaceutically active compounds [72]. Despite the authors’ supposed manifestation of nitrile hydrolase activity by this strain, the main direction of dienogest transformation was the aromatization of the A ring with the formation of estra-1,3,5(10)-triene (32) and 1,3,5(10),9(11)-tetraene (33) compounds, which subsequently transformed to 17α-acetamide derivatives of estradiol (34) and 9(11)-dehydroestradiol (35) (Figure 15). However, the process of obtaining target products 34 and 35 turned out to be quite long and was up to 27 days.
Costa et al. [73] conducted research on the development of an alternative method for the synthesis of therapeutically effective steroids prednisone and prednisolone. The glucocorticoids cortisone and hydrocortisone have anti-inflammatory activity, but their use is difficult due to many side effects. In this regard, it is promising to use more effective derivatives of these compounds, prednisone and prednisolone, which allows for lower doses of the drug. According to the results of screening 13 rhodococcal strains, R. coprophilus DSM 43347 showed the highest target activity, catalyzing Δ1-dehydrogenation of cortisone (36) and hydrocortisone (37), with the formation of prednisone (38) (94%) and prednisolone (39) (97%), respectively (Figure 16).
Based on cortisone (36), new compounds with potential cytotoxic activity, 1,9β,17,21-tetrahydroxy-4-methyl-19-nor-9β-pregna-1,3,5(10)-trien-11,20-dione (70%) (40) and 1,9β,17,20β,21-pentahydroxy-4-methyl-19-nor-9β-pregna-1,3,5(10)-trien-11-one (20%) (41), were obtained using whole R. rhodnii DSM 43960 cells (Figure 17) [74]. Additionally, the time of complete conversion of the initial substrate was only 24 h.
It has been shown that R. erythropolis MTCC 3951 is a promising strain for the biodegradation of 7-ketocholesterol (42), which has a cytotoxic effect and causes various age-related pathologies [75]. As a result of optimization, 93% degradation of the substrate was achieved and the participation of the enzymes cholesterol oxidase, lipase, dehydrogenase, and reductase in the process of biodegradation of 7-ketocholesterol (42) was revealed. 4-Cholesten-3,7-dione (43), chol-5-en-3,7-dione (44), and androsta-4-ene-3,7,17-trione (45) were identified as intermediates (Figure 18).
Hao et al. (2024) obtained interesting data on Rhodococcus sp. RSBS9 isolated from dairy farm soil capable of efficient degradation of 17β-estradiol under low-temperature conditions [76]. The strain retained catabolic activity against the steroid at 10 °C (up to 94%) and even 5 °C (56%). The obtained information indicates the prospects of using rhodococci to develop methods for the treatment of polluted ecosystems at low temperatures.

3. Using Bacterial Enzymes

The ability of bacterial cells to transform various compounds is due to the action of their enzyme systems. A logical trend in the development of biotechnology is the isolation and purification of bacterial enzymes, as well as their overexpression in model organisms in order to scale the production of target compounds. The use of individual enzymes allows for highly selective reactions with repeated use, reduces sterility requirements, and simplifies the process of isolation and purification of the target product [24]. In this regard, studies of the catalytic activity of Rhodococcus spp. in relation to terpene and steroid substrates were accompanied by the study of microbial enzymes involved in transformations, as well as functional genes encoding them.

3.1. Transformation of Terpene Compounds

At the end of the last century, Dutch microbiologists obtained data about a new pathway for the biodegradation of (4R)- and (4S)-isomers of limonene by R. erythropolis DCL14 cells [77,78]. The enzymes limonene-1,2-monooxygenase, limonene-1,2-epoxide hydrolase, limonene-1,2-diol dehydrogenase, and 1-hydroxy-2-oxo-limonene-1,2-monooxygenase participated in these transformations of limonene. In addition, the limA gene encoding limonene-1,2-epoxide hydrolase was identified and overexpressed in E. coli [79].
The same research group isolated and purified a new enzyme from R. erythropolis DCL14, nicotinoprotein dichlorophenolindophenol-dependent carveol dehydrogenase, which catalyzes the oxidation of carveol to carvone (see Figure 4), and revealed limonene and carveol-induced specific action of this enzyme [80].
The cinA1 gene localized in the CinTMP1 operon and encoding cytochrome P450 was identified in the genome of R. josii TMP1, a biotransformer of 1,8-cineol [81]. Using recombinant E. coli and R. erythropolis cells, it was found that this enzyme catalyzes the oxidation of 1,8-cineol to 6-oxocineol (see Figure 2).
The strain R. globerulus JDV-SF1993 isolated from the rhizosphere of Eucalyptus sp. contains genes of the enzyme CYP102N12, belonging to the cytochrome P450 family [82]. It was found that CYP108N12 catalyzes the region-specific hydroxylation of p-cymene (45), (R/S)-limonene (4), and p-xylene (46) to 4-isopropylbenzyl alcohol (47), perillyl alcohol (48), and p-tolylmethanol (49), respectively (Figure 19).
Subsequent studies of the genome of R. globerulus JDV-SF1993 revealed a gene encoding CYP108N14 [83]. This enzyme, like the previously described CYP102N12, hydroxylates p-cymene (45) and (R/S)-limonene (4), and also transforms (S)-α-terpineol (50) to (S)-7-hydroxyterpineol (51) and (S)-4-terpineol (52) to (S)-7-hydroxy-4-terpineol (53) (Figure 20).

3.2. Transformation of Steroid Compounds

Currently, there is a tendency to isolate, analyze, and heterologously express enzymes that catalyze the reactions of the microbial transformation of steroids. This approach allows you to expand the range of target products and scale their production in the future [84].
Steroid NADPH-dependent monooxygenase isolated from R. rhodochrous cells catalyzes the oxidation of progesterone (54) through the Bayer–Villiger reaction to form testosterone acetate (55) (Figure 21) [85].
Many representatives of Rhodococcus sp. are characterized by the presence of extracellular cholesterol oxidase, which catalyzes the conversion of 3β-hydroxy-Δ5-sterols into the corresponding 3-keto-Δ4-derivatives (Figure 22). The ChoG gene corresponding to this enzyme is found in strains belonging to the species R. erythropolis [86], R. ruber [87], R. triatomae [88], and Rhodococcus sp. [89], and is often located next to the genes of 3-ketosteroid-∆1-dehydrogenase (KstD) and 3-ketosteroid-9α-hydroxylase (KshAB).
The regulation and transcription mechanisms of various isoforms of the KshAB gene are of particular interest to researchers. Based on data obtained by Baldanta et al. (2021), it appears that isoforms KshA2 and KshA3 are the primary enzymes involved in the degradation of AD and cholesterol, respectively, while KshA1 has a supporting role in these processes [90].
Using a mutant strain derived from Rhodococcus sp. MIL 1038, a new compound identified as 7aβ-methyl-1β-[1,5-dimethyl-6-hydroxyl-hexyl]-5-oxo-3aα-hexa-4-indanepropionic acid was obtained from cholesterol. The resulting metabolite can be used as an intermediate for the chemical synthesis of steroids with pharmaceutical potential [91].
It was revealed that R. erythropolis SQ1 contains two isoforms of 3-ketosteroid-1-dehydrogenase [92]. Complete suppression of the activity of this enzyme by deletion of the KstD functional gene and UV mutagenesis made it possible to block the formation of by-products and subsequent degradation of the steroid skeleton. As a result, the resulting mutant strain R. erythropolis RG1-UV29 catalyzed the reaction of effective transformation of AD to the target product 9-OH-AD, with a yield of 93%.
A new (NAD+)-dependent 12α-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (Rr12α-HSDH) has been identified in the genomic sequence of R. ruber [93]. The purified enzyme demonstrated high catalytic activity against cholic acid (58), carrying out its oxidation to 12-oxochenodeoxycholic acid (59) (85%) (Figure 23).
It is known that the initial stage of microbial degradation of steroids is dehydrogenation in the C17 position, which determines the prospects of using steroid dehydrogenases for bioremediation. A gene encoding 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (17β-HSD) was identified in the genome of Rhodococcus sp. P14 [94]. Recombinant E. coli BL21 cells expressing this enzyme were able to transform estradiol (60) into estrone (61) with an efficiency of up to 94%. Later, the same research group showed that Rhodococcus sp. P14 also uses other steroids, including estriol and testosterone, as a sole carbon source [95]. Genome screening made it possible to identify the gene for short-chain dehydrogenase (17β-HSDx), which catalyzes the conversion of estradiol (60) to estrone (61), estriol (62) to 16-hydroxyestrone (63), and testosterone (64) to androst-4-en-3,17-dione (65) (Figure 24).
The 14α-demethylase CYP51 of R. triatomae BKS 15-14, which catalyzes the demethylation of lanosterol (66), has been identified and characterized (Figure 25) [96].
Rhodococci can be used not only as sources of steroid transformation enzymes but also as effective recipients for heterologous expression of functional genes. Thus, the R. erythropolis RG9 strain containing the P450 BM3 mutant M02 enzyme from Bacillus megaterium transformed 17-ketosteroid norandrostenedione (68) into 16β-OH norandrostenedione (69), with a product yield of more than 95% (Figure 26) [97].
R. ruber Chol-4 was used as a model organism for overexpression of the 17-ketoreductase gene (17β-hsd) of the pathogenic fungus Cochliobolus lunatus in order to obtain testosterone (64) from AD (26) (Figure 27) [98]. In addition, the genome of the resulting mutant strain was characterized by the deletion of four genes (KshB, KstD1,2,3), which prevented degradation of the substrate. Despite the low yield of the target product (61%) and the rather complex process of mutagenesis, R. ruber Chol-4 is of interest for further research, since the overwhelming amount of testosterone was secreted extracellularly.
Recently, the 4,5-seco pathway of biodegradation of 17β-estradiol by R. equi DSSKP-R-001 was discovered, and enzymes and their encoding genes involved in the initial stages of catabolism were identified [99]. It was found that the initial 17β-estradiol (60) is dehydrogenated by short-chain dehydrogenase (hsd17b14 gene) to estrone (61), which, in turn, is transformed by flavin-binding monooxygenase (At1g12200) to form 4-hydroxyestrone (65) (Figure 28). The subsequent cleavage of the steroid ring A is catalyzed by 3-hydroxy-9,10-secoandrosta-1,3,5(10)-triene-9,17-dion monooxygenase (hsaC) and catechol-1,2-dioxygenase (catA).

4. Conclusions

Taking into account the historical development of the discussed topic and focusing on data from recent years, we conducted an extensive analysis of information on the use of actinomycetes of the genus Rhodococcus for the transformation of terpenoid and steroid compounds. It was shown that the biotransformation of terpenoid compounds is accompanied, as a rule, by hydroxylation, carboxylation, and dehydration reactions, whereas the conversion of steroids proceeds along more complex pathways, with the reactions of aromatization of the steroid ring and the introduction of double bonds and amide groups. Currently obtained derivatives of terpenoids and steroids are known for their anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, antioxidant, antitumor, insecticidal, and antiviral activity, etc. [25,28,100]. Analysis of Rhodococcus species used as biotransformers revealed that R. erythropolis, R. globerulus, and R. rhodochrous possess the highest catalytic activity (Table 1).
Among the advantages of using whole-cell catalysts, it may be noted that they are cheap and stable, and there is no need to add additional cofactors for enzyme systems. At the same time, such catalysts as a rule have limitations on the maximum concentration of the transformed starting substrate (usually up to 5 g/L) and the rate of transformation, often require additional sources of carbon (such as toluene, succinate, ethanol, yeast extract, etc.), and also carry out undesirable side reactions [11,31,32,45,70,72,74] due to the redundancy of metabolic systems, which leads to contamination of the product and an increase in its final cost. The tendency to use purified enzyme systems for the directed conversion of terpenoid and steroid substrates makes it possible to obtain valuable metabolites with a high level of purity in a short amount of time but requires additional costs for the purification and stabilization of such systems.
The rhodococcal genes and enzyme systems involved in the processes of steroid transformation were studied in detail. Data on the genes and enzymes responsible for the transformation of terpene compounds are scarce. Among the identified enzyme systems of rhodococci involved in the conversion of terpenes and steroids, enzymes of the families of hydrolases, hydroxylases, dehydrogenases, demethylases, oxidases, and oxygenases, including CYP450, were identified.
The data obtained indicate the pronounced biocatalytic potential of actinomycetes of the genus Rhodococcus and the prospects for further research aimed at studying the features and molecular genetic basis of the biotransformation processes of natural compounds of the terpenoid and steroid groups. According to the PubMed service, since the middle of the 20th century, the number of articles devoted to the biotransformation of terpenoids and steroids has grown (Figure 29). Though Rhodococcus actinomycetes started to be actively used for terpenoid and steroid biotransformation in the beginning of the 21st century (Figure 29, light green), research in this field is expected to significantly expand.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.B.I.; writing—original draft preparation, P.Y.M. and N.A.P.; writing—review and editing, I.B.I.; visualization, P.Y.M. and N.A.P.; supervision, I.B.I.; funding acquisition, I.B.I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Russian Science Foundation, grant No. 24-14-20015.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

The work was carried out using the equipment of The Core Facilities Centers “Regional Specialised Collection of Alkanotrophic Microorganisms” and “Research of Materials and Matter” at the Perm Federal Research Center, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Lewin, G.R.; Carlos, C.; Chevrette, M.G.; Horn, H.A.; McDonald, B.R.; Stankey, R.J.; Fox, B.G.; Currie, C.R. Evolution and Ecology of Actinobacteria and Their Bioenergy Applications. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2016, 70, 235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Anteneh, Y.S.; Franco, C.M.M. Whole Cell Actinobacteria as Biocatalysts. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Mukhtar, S.; Zaheer, A.; Aiysha, D.; Abdulla Malik, K.; Mehnaz, S. Actinomycetes: A Source of Industrially Important Enzymes. J. Proteom. Bioinform. 2017, 10, 316–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bérdy, J. Bioactive Microbial Metabolites. J. Antibiot. 2005, 58, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Busch, H.; Hagedoorn, P.L.; Hanefeld, U. Rhodococcus as a Versatile Biocatalyst in Organic Synthesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Krivoruchko, A.; Kuyukina, M.; Ivshina, I. Advanced Rhodococcus Biocatalysts for Environmental Biotechnologies. Catalysts 2019, 9, 236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kylosova, T.I.; Elkin, A.A.; Grishko, V.V.; Ivshina, I.B. Biotransformation of Prochiral Sulfides into (R)-Sulfoxides Using Immobilized Gordonia terrae IEGM 136 Cells. J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 2016, 123, 8–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tarasova, E.V.; Grishko, V.V.; Ivshina, I.B. Cell Adaptations of Rhodococcus rhodochrous IEGM 66 to Betulin Biotransformation. Process Biochem. 2017, 52, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cheremnykh, K.M.; Luchnikova, N.A.; Grishko, V.V.; Ivshina, I.B. Bioconversion of Ecotoxic Dehydroabietic Acid Using Rhodococcus Actinobacteria. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018, 346, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Luchnikova, N.A.; Grishko, V.V.; Ivshina, I.B. Biotransformation of Oleanane and Ursane Triterpenic Acids. Molecules 2020, 25, 5526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ivshina, I.B.; Luchnikova, N.A.; Maltseva, P.Y.; Ilyina, I.V.; Volcho, K.P.; Gatilov, Y.V.; Korchagina, D.V.; Kostrikina, N.A.; Sorokin, V.V.; Mulyukin, A.L.; et al. Biotransformation of (–)-Isopulegol by Rhodococcus rhodochrous. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Larkin, M.J.; Kulakov, L.A.; Allen, C.C.R. Biodegradation by Members of the Genus Rhodococcus: Biochemistry, Physiology, and Genetic Adaptation. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 2006, 59, 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Martínková, L.; Uhnáková, B.; Pátek, M.; Nešvera, J.; Křen, V. Biodegradation Potential of the Genus Rhodococcus. Environ. Int. 2009, 35, 162–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kim, D.; Choi, K.Y.; Yoo, M.; Zylstra, G.J.; Kim, E. Biotechnological Potential of Rhodococcus Biodegradative Pathways. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 28, 1037–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Cappelletti, M.; Presentato, A.; Piacenza, E.; Firrincieli, A.; Turner, R.J.; Zannoni, D. Biotechnology of Rhodococcus for the Production of Valuable Compounds. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 104, 8567–8594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ivshina, I.; Bazhutin, G.; Tyumina, E. Rhodococcus Strains as a Good Biotool for Neutralizing Pharmaceutical Pollutants and Obtaining Therapeutically Valuable Products: Through the Past into the Future. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 967127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Broekman, M. Applications of Steroid in Clinical Practice. Ann. Clin. Trials Vaccines Res. 2023, 13, 7–10. [Google Scholar]
  18. Ericson-Neilsen, W.; Kaye, A.D. Steroids: Pharmacology, Complications, and Practice Delivery Issues. Ochsner J. 2014, 14, 203–207. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  19. Arici, C.; Mergen, B.; Yildiz-Tas, A.; Bahar-Tokman, H.; Tokuc, E.; Ozturk-Bakar, Y.; Kutlubay, Z.; Sahin, A. Randomized Double-Blind Trial of Wipes Containing Terpinen-4-ol and Hyaluronate versus Baby Shampoo in Seborrheic Blepharitis Patients. Eye 2022, 36, 869–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hermann, C.; Lang, S.; Popp, T.; Hafner, S.; Steinritz, D.; Rump, A.; Port, M.; Eder, S. Bardoxolone-Methyl (CDDO-Me) Impairs Tumor Growth and Induces Radiosensitization of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 11, 607580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Alavinezhad, A.; Khazdair, M.R.; Boskabady, M.H. Possible Therapeutic Effect of Carvacrol on Asthmatic Patients: A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase II Clinical Trial. Phyther. Res. 2018, 32, 151–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Feng, J.; Wu, Q.; Zhu, D.; Ma, Y. Biotransformation Enables Innovations toward Green Synthesis of Steroidal Pharmaceuticals. ChemSusChem 2022, 15, e202102399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Aminudin, N.I.; Ridzuan, M.; Susanti, D.; Zainal Abidin, Z.A. Biotransformation of Sesquiterpenoids: A Recent Insight. J. Asian Nat. Prod. Res. 2022, 24, 103–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. de Carvalho, C.C.C.R.; da Fonseca, M.M.R. Biotransformations. In Comprehensive Biotechnology, 2nd ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011; Volume 2, pp. 451–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yang, W.; Chen, X.; Li, Y.; Guo, S.; Wang, Z.; Yu, X. Advances in Pharmacological Activities of Terpenoids. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2020, 15, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Moss, G.P.; Smith, P.A.S.; Tavernier, D. Glossary of Class Names of Organic Compounds and Reactive Intermediates Based on Structure (IUPAC Recommendations 1995). Pure Appl. Chem. 1995, 67, 1307–1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tetali, S.D. Terpenes and Isoprenoids: A Wealth of Compounds for Global Use. Planta 2019, 249, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Carocho, M.; Heleno, S.A.; Barros, L. Natural Secondary Metabolites: From Nature, Through Science, to Industry; Springer Nature: Berlin, Germany, 2023; ISBN 9783031185878. [Google Scholar]
  29. Mewalal, R.; Rai, D.K.; Kainer, D.; Chen, F.; Külheim, C.; Peter, G.F.; Tuskan, G.A. Plant-Derived Terpenes: A Feedstock for Specialty Biofuels. Trends Biotechnol. 2017, 35, 227–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Hegazy, M.E.F.; Mohamed, T.A.; ElShamy, A.I.; Mohamed, A.E.H.H.; Mahalel, U.A.; Reda, E.H.; Shaheen, A.M.; Tawfik, W.A.; Shahat, A.A.; Shams, K.A.; et al. Microbial Biotransformation as a Tool for Drug Development Based on Natural Products from Mevalonic Acid Pathway: A Review. J. Adv. Res. 2015, 6, 17–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Williams, D.R.; Trudgill, P.W.; Taylor, D.G. Metabolism of 1,8-Cineole by a Rhodococcus Species: Ring Cleavage Reactions. Microbiology 1989, 135, 1957–1967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Duetz, W.A.; Fjallman, A.H.; Ren, S.; Jourdat, C.; Witholt, B. Biotransformation of D-Limonene to (+)-Trans-Carveol by Toluene-Grown Rhodococcus opacus PWD4 Cells. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2001, 67, 2829–2832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. van der Werf, M.J.; de Bont, J.A.M. Screening for Microorganisms Converting Limonene into Carvone. Stud. Org. Chem. 1998, 53, 231–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. De Carvalho, C.C.C.R.; Van Keulen, F.; Da Fonseca, M.M.R. Biotransformation of Limonene-1,2-epoxide to Limonene-1,2-diol by Rhodococcus erythropolis Cells: An Introductory Approach to Selective Hydrolysis and Product Separation. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2000, 38, 181–185. [Google Scholar]
  35. De Carvalho, C.C.C.R.; Da Fonseca, M.M.R. Maintenance of Cell Viability in the Biotransformation of (–)-Carveol with Whole Cells of Rhodococcus erythropolis. J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 2002, 19–20, 389–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. De Carvalho, C.C.C.R.; Da Fonseca, M.M.R. Towards the Bio-Production of trans-Carveol and Carvone from Limonene: Induction after Cell Growth on Limonene and Toluene. Tetrahedron Asymmetry 2003, 14, 3925–3931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yagi, S.; Mohammed, A.B.A.; Tzanova, T.; Schohn, H.; Abdelgadir, H.; Stefanucci, A.; Mollica, A.; Zengin, G. Chemical Profile, Antiproliferative, Antioxidant, and Enzyme Inhibition Activities and Docking Studies of Cymbopogon schoenanthus (L.) Spreng. and Cymbopogon nervatus (Hochst.) Chiov. from Sudan. J. Food Biochem. 2019, 44, e13107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Ambrosio, C.M.S.; Diaz-Arenas, G.L.; Agudelo, L.P.A.; Stashenko, E.; Contreras-Castillo, C.J.; da Gloria, E.M. Chemical Composition and Antibacterial and Antioxidant Activity of a Citrus Essential Oil and Its Fractions. Molecules 2021, 26, 2888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Chatterjee, T. Biotransformation of Geraniol by Rhodococcus sp. Strain GR3. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2004, 39, 303–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Masuda, T.; Odaka, Y.; Ogawa, N.; Nakamoto, K.; Kuninaga, H. Identification of Geranic Acid, a Tyrosinase Inhibitor in Lemongrass (Cymbopogon citratus). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 597–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Pan, S.; Li, W.; Qin, Y.; Yang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Shi, Z.; Qu, C.; Luo, C.; Yang, X. Discovery of Novel Potential Aphid Repellents: Geranic Acid Esters Containing Substituted Aromatic Rings. Molecules 2022, 27, 5949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Thompson, M.L.; Marriott, R.; Dowle, A.; Grogan, G. Biotransformation of β-Myrcene to Geraniol by a Strain of Rhodococcus erythropolis Isolated by Selective Enrichment from Hop Plants. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 85, 721–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Fajdek-Bieda, A.; Pawlińska, J.; Wróblewska, A.; Łuś, A. Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Activity of Geraniol and Selected Geraniol Transformation Products against Gram-Positive Bacteria. Molecules 2024, 29, 950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Mączka, W.; Wińska, K.; Grabarczyk, M. One Hundred Faces of Geraniol. Molecules 2020, 25, 3303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ivanova, K.M.; Grishko, V.V.; Ivshina, I.B. Highly Efficient Biodegradation of Ecotoxic Dehydroabietic Acid by Resting Cells of Rhodococcus rhodochrous IEGM 107. Microbiology 2022, 91, 364–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Grishko, V.V.; Tarasova, E.V.; Ivshina, I.B. Biotransformation of Betulin to Betulone by Growing and Resting Cells of the Actinobacterium Rhodococcus rhodochrous IEGM 66. Process Biochem. 2013, 48, 1640–1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Luchnikova, N.A.; Tarasova, E.V.; Grishko, V.V.; Ivshina, I.B. Rhodococcus rhodochrous IEGM 1360, an Effective Biocatalyst of C3 Oxidative Transformation of Oleanane Triterpenoids. Microbiology 2023, 92, 204–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Savluchinske-Feio, S.; Gigante, B.; Carlos Roseiro, J.; Marcelo-Curto, M.J. Antimicrobial Activity of Diterpene Resin Acid Derivatives. J. Microbiol. Methods 1999, 35, 201–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Dehaen, W.; Mashentseva, A.A.; Seitembetov, T.S. Allobetulin and Its Derivatives: Synthesis and Biological Activity. Molecules 2011, 16, 2443–2466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Giner-Larza, E.M.; Máez, S.; Recio, M.C.; Giner, R.M.; Prieto, J.M.; Cerdá-Nicolás, M.; Ríos, J.L. Oleanonic Acid, a 3-Oxotriterpene from Pistacia, Inhibits Leukotriene Synthesis and Has Anti-Inflammatory Activity. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2001, 428, 137–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Iqbal Choudhary, M.; Ali Siddiqui, Z.; Ahmed Nawaz, S. Microbial Transformation of 18β-Glycyrrhetinic Acid by Cunninghamella elegans and Fusarium lini, and Lipoxygenase Inhibitory Activity of Transformed Products. Nat. Prod. Res. 2009, 23, 507–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Huang, D.; Ding, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhang, W.; Fang, W.; Chen, X. Anti-Tumor Activity of a 3-Oxo Derivative of Oleanolic Acid. Cancer Lett. 2006, 233, 289–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wu, S.B.; Bao, Q.Y.; Wang, W.X.; Zhao, Y.; Xia, G.; Zhao, Z.; Zeng, H.; Hu, J.F. Cytotoxic Triterpenoids and Steroids from the Bark of Melia azedarach. Planta Med. 2011, 77, 922–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Irungu, B.N.; Orwa, J.A.; Gruhnojic, A.; Fitzpatrick, P.A.; Landberg, G.; Kimani, F.; Midiwo, J.; Erdélyi, M.; Yenesew, A. Constituents of the Roots and Leaves of Ekebergia capensis and Their Potential Antiplasmodial and Cytotoxic Activities. Molecules 2014, 19, 14235–14246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Begum, S.; Ayub, A.; Shaheen Siddiqui, B.; Fayyaz, S.; Kazi, F. Nematicidal Triterpenoids from Lantana camara. Chem. Biodivers. 2015, 12, 1435–1442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Funari, C.S.; de Almeida, L.; Passalaqua, T.G.; Martinez, I.; Ambrosio, D.L.; Cicarelli, R.M.B.; Silva, D.H.S.; Graminha, M.A.S. Oleanonic Acid from Lippia lupulina (Verbenaceae) Shows Strong in vitro Antileishmanial and Antitrypanosomal Activity. Acta Amaz. 2016, 46, 411–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Florez, H.; Singh, S. Bioinformatic Study to Discover Natural Molecules with Activity against COVID-19. F1000Research 2020, 9, 1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Luchnikova, N.A.; Grishko, V.V.; Kostrikina, N.A.; Sorokin, V.V.; Mulyukin, A.L.; Ivshina, I.B. Biotransformation of Oleanolic Acid Using Rhodococcus rhodochrous IEGM 757. Catalysts 2022, 12, 1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Russel, C.A. Organic Chemistry: Natural Products, Steroids; Russell, C.A., Roberts, G.K., Eds.; RSC Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  60. Chiang, Y.R.; Wei, S.T.S.; Wang, P.H.; Wu, P.H.; Yu, C.P. Microbial Degradation of Steroid Sex Hormones: Implications for Environmental and Ecological Studies. Microb. Biotechnol. 2020, 13, 926–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Olivera, E.R.; Luengo, J.M. Steroids as Environmental Compounds Recalcitrant to Degradation: Genetic Mechanisms of Bacterial Biodegradation Pathways. Genes 2019, 10, 512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Datcheva, V.K.; Voishvillo, N.E.; Kamernitskii, A.V.; Vlahov, R.J.; Reshetova, I.G. Synthesis of 9a-Hydroxysteroids by a Rhodococcus sp. Steroids 1989, 54, 271–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Angelova, B.; Mutafov, S.; Avramova, T.; Dimova, I.; Boyadjieva, L. 9α-Hydroxylation of 4-Androstene-3,17-dione by Resting Rhodococcus sp. Cells. Process Biochem. 1996, 31, 179–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Mutafov, S.; Angelova, B.; Avramova, T.; Boyadjieva, L.; Dimova, I. The Inducibility of 9α-Steroid Hydroxylating Activity in Resting Rhodococcus sp. Cells. Process Biochem. 1997, 32, 585–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Angelova, B.; Fernandes, P.; Cruz, A.; Pinheiro, H.M.; Mutafov, S.; Cabral, J.M.S. Hydroxylation of Androstenedione by Resting Rhodococcus sp. Cells in Organic Media. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2005, 37, 718–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Avramova, T.; Spassova, D.; Mutafov, S.; Momchilova, S.; Boyadjieva, L.; Damyanova, B.; Angelova, B. Effect of Tween 80 on 9α-Steroid Hydroxylating Activity and Ultrastructural Characteristics of Rhodococcus sp. Cells. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 26, 1009–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Mutafova, B.; Momchilova, S.; Pomakova, D.; Avramova, T.; Mutafov, S. Enhanced Cell Surface Hydrophobicity Favors the 9α-Hydroxylation of Androstenedione by Resting Rhodococcus sp. Cells. Eng. Life Sci. 2018, 18, 949–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Rodina, N.V.; Andryushina, V.A.; Stytsenko, T.S.; Turova, T.P.; Baslerov, R.V.; Panteleeva, A.N.; Voishvillo, N.E. Introduction of a 9α-Hydroxy Group into Androst-4-ene-3,17-dione Using a New Actinobacterium Strain. Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 2009, 45, 439–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Andryushina, V.A.; Rodina, N.V.; Stytsenko, T.S.; Huy, L.D.; Druzhinina, A.V.; Yaderetz, V.V.; Voishvillo, N.E. Conversion of Soybean Sterols into 3,17-Diketosteroids Using Actinobacteria Mycobacterium neoaurum, Pimelobacter simplex, and Rhodococcus erythropolis. Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 2011, 47, 270–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Sallam, L.A.; El-Abyad, M.S.; El-Refai, A.M.H.; El-Menofi, H.A.; Adham, N.Z. Bioconversion of 19-Nortestosterone by Rhodococcus sp. DSM 92-344. I: Optimization of Transformation Parameters. Process Biochem. 1995, 30, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. El-Refai, A.M.H.; El-Abyad, M.S.; Sallam, L.A.; El-Menofi, H.A.; Adham, N.Z. Bioconversion of 19-Nortestosterone by Rhodococcus sp. DSM 92-344. II: Utilization of Cell-Free-Extract and Immobilization Techniques. Process Biochem. 1995, 30, 35–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Kaufmann, G.; Dautzenberg, H.; Henkel, H.; Müller, G.; Schäfer, T.; Undeutsch, B.; Oettel, M. Nitrile Hydratase from Rhodococcus erythropolis: Metabolization of Steroidal Compounds with a Nitrile Group. Steroids 1999, 64, 535–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Costa, S.; Zappaterra, F.; Summa, D.; Semeraro, B.; Fantin, G. Δ1-Dehydrogenation and C20 Reduction of Cortisone and Hydrocortisone Catalyzed by Rhodococcus Strains. Molecules 2020, 25, 2192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Zappaterra, F.; Costa, S.; Summa, D.; Bertolasi, V.; Semeraro, B.; Pedrini, P.; Buzzi, R.; Vertuani, S. Biotransformation of Cortisone with Rhodococcus rhodnii: Synthesis of New Steroids. Molecules 2021, 26, 1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Ghosh, S.; Khare, S.K. Biodegradation of 7-Ketocholesterol by Rhodococcus erythropolis MTCC 3951: Process Optimization and Enzymatic Insights. Chem. Phys. Lipids 2017, 207, 253–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Hao, P.; Lv, Z.; Pan, H.; Zhang, J.; Wang, L.; Zhu, Y.; Basang, W.; Gao, Y. Characterization and Low-Temperature Biodegradation Mechanism of 17β-Estradiol-Degrading Bacterial Strain Rhodococcus sp. RCBS9. Environ. Res. 2024, 240, 117513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Van Der Werf, M.J.; Swarts, H.J.; De Bont, J.A.M. Rhodococcus erythropolis DCL14 Contains a Novel Degradation Pathway for Limonene. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1999, 65, 2092–2102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Van Der Werf, M.J.; Orru, R.V.A.; Overkamp, K.M.; Swarts, H.J.; Osprian, I.; Steinreiber, A.; De Bont, J.A.M.; Faber, K. Substrate Specificity and Stereospecificity of Limonene-1,2-epoxide Hydrolase from Rhodococcus erythropolis DCL14; an Enzyme Showing Sequential and Enantioconvergent Substrate Conversion. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1999, 52, 380–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Barbirato, F.; Verdoes, J.C.; De Bont, J.A.M.; Van Der Werf, M.J. The Rhodococcus erythropolis DCL14 Limonene-1,2-epoxide Hydrolase Gene Encodes an Enzyme Belonging to a Novel Class of Epoxide Hydrolases. FEBS Lett. 1998, 438, 293–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Van Der Werf, M.J.; Van Der Ven, C.; Barbirato, F.; Eppink, M.H.M.; De Bont, J.A.M.; Van Berkel, W.J.H. Stereoselective Carveol Dehydrogenase from Rhodococcus erythropolis DCL14. A Novel Nicotinoprotein Belonging to the Short Chain Dehydrogenase/Reductase Superfamily. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 26296–26304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Jakubovska, J.; Meškys, R. Characterization of 1,8-Cineole Degradation Encoding Operon from Rhodococcus sp. TMP1. Chemija 2016, 27, 84–91. [Google Scholar]
  82. Giang, P.D.; Churchman, L.R.; Stok, J.E.; Soo, R.M.; De Voss, J.J. CYP108N12 Initiates p-Cymene Biodegradation in Rhodococcus globerulus. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2022, 730, 109410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Giang, P.D.; Churchman, L.R.; Buczynski, J.B.; Bell, S.G.; Stok, J.E.; De Voss, J.J. CYP108N14: A Monoterpene Monooxygenase from Rhodococcus globerulus. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2024, 752, 109852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Donova, M.V. Current Trends and Perspectives in Microbial Bioconversions of Steroids. In Microbial Steroids: Methods and Protocols; Barreiro, C., Barredo, J.-L., Eds.; Springer US: New York, NY, USA, 2023; pp. 3–21. ISBN 978-1-0716-3384-7. [Google Scholar]
  85. Miyamoto, M.; Matsumoto, J.; Iwaya, T.; Itagaki, E. Bacterial Steroid Monooxygenase Catalyzing the Baeyer-Villiger Oxidation of C21-Ketosteroids from Rhodococcus rhodochrous: The Isolation and Characterization. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Protein Struct. Mol. 1995, 1251, 115–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Fernández de las Heras, L.; Mascaraque, V.; García Fernández, E.; Navarro-Llorens, J.M.; Perera, J.; Drzyzga, O. ChoG Is the Main Inducible Extracellular Cholesterol Oxidase of Rhodococcus sp. Strain CECT3014. Microbiol. Res. 2011, 166, 403–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Fernández De Las Heras, L.; Perera, J.; Navarro Llorens, J.M. Cholesterol to Cholestenone Oxidation by ChoG, the Main Extracellular Cholesterol Oxidase of Rhodococcus ruber Strain Chol-4. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2014, 139, 33–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Kumar, S.; Bala, M.; Raghava, G.P.S.; Mayilraj, S. Draft Genome Sequence of Rhodococcus triatomae Strain BKS 15-14. Genome Announc. 2013, 1, e00129-13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Kreit, J.; Germain, P.; Lefebvre, G. Extracellular Cholesterol Oxidase from Rhodococcus sp. Cells. J. Biotechnol. 1992, 24, 177–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Baldanta, S.; Navarro Llorens, J.M.; Guevara, G. Further Studies on the 3-Ketosteroid 9α-Hydroxylase of Rhodococcus ruber Chol-4, a Rieske Oxygenase of the Steroid Degradation Pathway. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Iida, M.; Tsuyuki, K.I.; Kitazawa, S.; Iizuka, H. Production of 20-Carboxy-pregna-1,4-dien-3-one from Sterols by Mutants of Rhodococcus sp. J. Ferment. Technol. 1987, 65, 525–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Van Der Geize, R.; Hessels, G.I.; Van Gerwen, R.; Van Der Meijden, P.; Dijkhuizen, L. Unmarked Gene Deletion Mutagenesis of KstD, Encoding 3-Ketosteroid Δ1-Dehydrogenase, in Rhodococcus erythropolis SQ1 Using SacB as Counter-Selectable Marker. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2001, 205, 197–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Shi, S.C.; You, Z.N.; Zhou, K.; Chen, Q.; Pan, J.; Qian, X.L.; Xu, J.H.; Li, C.X. Efficient Synthesis of 12-Oxochenodeoxycholic Acid Using a 12α-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase from Rhodococcus ruber. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2019, 361, 4661–4668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Ye, X.; Wang, H.; Kan, J.; Li, J.; Huang, T.; Xiong, G.; Hu, Z. A Novel 17β-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase in Rhodococcus sp. P14 for Transforming 17β-Estradiol to Estrone. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2017, 276, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Ye, X.; Peng, T.; Feng, J.; Yang, Q.; Pratush, A.; Xiong, G.; Huang, T.; Hu, Z. A Novel Dehydrogenase 17β-HSDx from Rhodococcus sp. P14 with Potential Application in Bioremediation of Steroids Contaminated Environment. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 362, 170–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Ke, X.; Ding, G.J.; Ma, B.X.; Liu, Z.Q.; Zhang, J.F.; Zheng, Y.G. Characterization of a Novel CYP51 from Rhodococcus triatomae and Its NADH-Ferredoxin Reductase-Coupled Application in Lanosterol 14α-Demethylation. Process Biochem. 2017, 62, 59–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Venkataraman, H.; te Poele, E.M.; Rosłoniec, K.Z.; Vermeulen, N.; Commandeur, J.N.M.; van der Geize, R.; Dijkhuizen, L. Biosynthesis of a Steroid Metabolite by an Engineered Rhodococcus erythropolis Strain Expressing a Mutant Cytochrome P450 BM3 Enzyme. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 99, 4713–4721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Guevara, G.; Flores, Y.O.; De Las Heras, L.F.; Perera, J.; Navarro Llorens, J.M. Metabolic Engineering of Rhodococcus ruber Chol-4: A Cell Factory for Testosterone Production. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0220492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Tian, K.; Meng, Q.; Li, S.; Chang, M.; Meng, F.; Yu, Y.; Li, H.; Qiu, Q.; Shao, J.; Huo, H. Mechanism of 17β-Estradiol Degradation by Rhodococcus equi via the 4,5-Seco Pathway and Its Key Genes. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 312, 120021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Dembitsky, V.M. Biological Activity and Structural Diversity of Steroids Containing Aromatic Rings, Phosphate Groups, or Halogen Atoms. Molecules 2023, 28, 5549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Representatives of terpenes.
Figure 1. Representatives of terpenes.
Molecules 29 03378 g001
Figure 2. Scheme of biotransformation of 1,8-cineol (1) by Rhodococcus sp. C1 cells [31].
Figure 2. Scheme of biotransformation of 1,8-cineol (1) by Rhodococcus sp. C1 cells [31].
Molecules 29 03378 g002
Figure 3. Scheme of biotransformation of limonene (4) by R. opacus PWD4 cells [32].
Figure 3. Scheme of biotransformation of limonene (4) by R. opacus PWD4 cells [32].
Molecules 29 03378 g003
Figure 4. Scheme of biotransformations of limonene-1,2-epoxide (7), (−)-carveol (9), and limonene (4) by R. erythropolis DCL14 cells [34,35,36].
Figure 4. Scheme of biotransformations of limonene-1,2-epoxide (7), (−)-carveol (9), and limonene (4) by R. erythropolis DCL14 cells [34,35,36].
Molecules 29 03378 g004
Figure 5. Scheme of biotransformation of geraniol (10) by Rhodococcus sp. GR2 cells [39].
Figure 5. Scheme of biotransformation of geraniol (10) by Rhodococcus sp. GR2 cells [39].
Molecules 29 03378 g005
Figure 6. Scheme of biotransformation of (−)-isopulegol (12) by R. rhodochrous IEGM 1362 cells [11].
Figure 6. Scheme of biotransformation of (−)-isopulegol (12) by R. rhodochrous IEGM 1362 cells [11].
Molecules 29 03378 g006
Figure 7. Scheme of biotransformation of β-myrcene (15) by resting cells of R. erythropolis MLT1 [42].
Figure 7. Scheme of biotransformation of β-myrcene (15) by resting cells of R. erythropolis MLT1 [42].
Molecules 29 03378 g007
Figure 8. Scheme of biotransformation of dehydroabietic acid (16) by resting cells of R. rhodochrous IEGM 107 [45].
Figure 8. Scheme of biotransformation of dehydroabietic acid (16) by resting cells of R. rhodochrous IEGM 107 [45].
Molecules 29 03378 g008
Figure 9. Scheme of biotransformation of betulin (19) by R. rhodochrous IEGM 66 cells [46].
Figure 9. Scheme of biotransformation of betulin (19) by R. rhodochrous IEGM 66 cells [46].
Molecules 29 03378 g009
Figure 10. Scheme of biotransformations of oleanolic (21) and glycyrretinic (22) acids by R. rhodochrous IEGM 1360 cells [47].
Figure 10. Scheme of biotransformations of oleanolic (21) and glycyrretinic (22) acids by R. rhodochrous IEGM 1360 cells [47].
Molecules 29 03378 g010
Figure 11. Scheme of biotransformation of oleanolic acid (21) by R. rhodochrous IEGM 757 cells [58].
Figure 11. Scheme of biotransformation of oleanolic acid (21) by R. rhodochrous IEGM 757 cells [58].
Molecules 29 03378 g011
Figure 12. Representatives of steroids.
Figure 12. Representatives of steroids.
Molecules 29 03378 g012
Figure 13. Scheme of biotransformation of AD (26) by Rhodococcus sp. cells [62].
Figure 13. Scheme of biotransformation of AD (26) by Rhodococcus sp. cells [62].
Molecules 29 03378 g013
Figure 14. Scheme of biotransformation of 19-nortestosterone (28) by Rhodococcus sp. DSM 92-344 cells [70].
Figure 14. Scheme of biotransformation of 19-nortestosterone (28) by Rhodococcus sp. DSM 92-344 cells [70].
Molecules 29 03378 g014
Figure 15. Scheme of biotransformation of dienogest (31) by R. erythropolis FZB 53 cells [72].
Figure 15. Scheme of biotransformation of dienogest (31) by R. erythropolis FZB 53 cells [72].
Molecules 29 03378 g015
Figure 16. Scheme of biotransformation of cortisone (36) and hydrocortisone (37) by R. coprophilus DSM 43347 cells [73].
Figure 16. Scheme of biotransformation of cortisone (36) and hydrocortisone (37) by R. coprophilus DSM 43347 cells [73].
Molecules 29 03378 g016
Figure 17. Scheme of biotransformation of cortisone (36) by R. rhodnii DSM 43960 cells [74].
Figure 17. Scheme of biotransformation of cortisone (36) by R. rhodnii DSM 43960 cells [74].
Molecules 29 03378 g017
Figure 18. Scheme of biotransformation of 7-ketocholesterol (42) by R. erythropolis MTCC 3951 cells [75].
Figure 18. Scheme of biotransformation of 7-ketocholesterol (42) by R. erythropolis MTCC 3951 cells [75].
Molecules 29 03378 g018
Figure 19. Scheme of biotransformations of p-cymene (45), (R/S)-limonene (4), and p-xylene (46) using CYP102N12 [82].
Figure 19. Scheme of biotransformations of p-cymene (45), (R/S)-limonene (4), and p-xylene (46) using CYP102N12 [82].
Molecules 29 03378 g019
Figure 20. Scheme of biotransformations of (S)-α-terpineol (50) and (S)-4-terpineol (52) using CYP102N14 [83].
Figure 20. Scheme of biotransformations of (S)-α-terpineol (50) and (S)-4-terpineol (52) using CYP102N14 [83].
Molecules 29 03378 g020
Figure 21. Scheme of biotransformation of progesterone (54) using R. rhodochrous monooxygenase [85].
Figure 21. Scheme of biotransformation of progesterone (54) using R. rhodochrous monooxygenase [85].
Molecules 29 03378 g021
Figure 22. Scheme of biotransformation of cholesterol (56) using cholesterol oxidase.
Figure 22. Scheme of biotransformation of cholesterol (56) using cholesterol oxidase.
Molecules 29 03378 g022
Figure 23. Scheme of biotransformation of cholic acid (58) using (NAD+)-dependent 12α-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase [93].
Figure 23. Scheme of biotransformation of cholic acid (58) using (NAD+)-dependent 12α-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase [93].
Molecules 29 03378 g023
Figure 24. Scheme of biotransformations of estradiol (60), estriol (62), and testosterone (64) using 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase [94,95].
Figure 24. Scheme of biotransformations of estradiol (60), estriol (62), and testosterone (64) using 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase [94,95].
Molecules 29 03378 g024
Figure 25. Scheme of biotransformation of lanosterol (66) using CYP51 [96].
Figure 25. Scheme of biotransformation of lanosterol (66) using CYP51 [96].
Molecules 29 03378 g025
Figure 26. Scheme of biotransformation of norandrostenedione (68) by mutant cells of R. erythropolis RG9 [97].
Figure 26. Scheme of biotransformation of norandrostenedione (68) by mutant cells of R. erythropolis RG9 [97].
Molecules 29 03378 g026
Figure 27. Scheme of biotransformation of AD (26) by mutant cells of R. ruber Chol-4 [98].
Figure 27. Scheme of biotransformation of AD (26) by mutant cells of R. ruber Chol-4 [98].
Molecules 29 03378 g027
Figure 28. Scheme of biotransformation of 17β-estradiol (60) by R. equi DSSKP-R-001 cells [99].
Figure 28. Scheme of biotransformation of 17β-estradiol (60) by R. equi DSSKP-R-001 cells [99].
Molecules 29 03378 g028
Figure 29. Number of articles devoted to the biotransformation of terpenoids and steroids (according to PubMed). Light green indicates the number of articles where Rhodococcus actinomycetes were used.
Figure 29. Number of articles devoted to the biotransformation of terpenoids and steroids (according to PubMed). Light green indicates the number of articles where Rhodococcus actinomycetes were used.
Molecules 29 03378 g029
Table 1. Biotransformation of terpenoids and steroids by actinomycetes of the genus Rhodococcus.
Table 1. Biotransformation of terpenoids and steroids by actinomycetes of the genus Rhodococcus.
SubstrateStrainType of CatalystType of ReactionDerivatives Reference
Terpenoids
1,8-CineoleRhodococcus sp. C1Native cellsHydroxylation, oxidation6-endo-Hydroxycineol, 6-oxocyneol[31]
R. josii TMP1Enzyme P450cin
(gene cinA1)
Oxidation6-Oxocineol[81]
LimoneneR. opacus PWD4Native cellsHydroxylation, oxidation(+)-trans-Carveol,
(+)-carvone
[32,36]
R. erythropolis DCL14Native cellsOxidationLimonene oxide,
p-menth-7-ene-l,2-diol
[33]
R. erythropolis DCL14Enzymes limonene 1,2-monooxygenase, limonene-1,2-epoxide hydrolaseOxidation, epoxidationLimonene-1,2-diol[77,78]
R. globerulus JDV-SF1993Enzymes CYP108N12, CYP108N14HydroxylationPerillyl alcohol[82,83]
Limonene-
1,2-epoxide
R. erythropolis DCL14Native cellsHydrolysisLimonene-1,2-diol[34]
Enzyme limonene-1,2-epoxide hydrolase
(gene limA)
HydrolysisLimonene-1,2-diol,
hydroxy-2-oxolimonene,
3-isopropenyl-6-oxoheptanoate
[79]
CarveolR. erythropolis DCL14Native cellsOxidationCarvone[35]
Enzyme carveol dehydrogenase - CDH
(gene limC)
OxidationCarvone[80]
GeraniolRhodococcus sp. GR3Native cellsOxidationGeranic acid [39]
(−)-IsopulegolR. rhodochrous IEGM 1362Native cellsHydroxylation,
carboxylation
10-Hydroxy-(−)-isopulegol,
10-carboxy-(−)-isopulegol
[11]
β-MyrceneR. erythropolis MLT1Resting cellsDehydrogenationGeraniol[42]
p-CymeneR. globerulus JDV-SF1993Enzymes CYP108N12, CYP108N14Hydroxylation4-Isopropylbenzyl alcohol[82,83]
p-XyleneR. globerulus JDV-SF1993Enzyme CYP108N12Hydroxylationp-Tolylmethanol[82]
(S)-α-TerpineolR. globerulus JDV-SF1993Enzyme CYP108N14Hydroxylation(S)-7-Hydroxyterpineol[83]
(S)-4-TerpineolR. globerulus JDV-SF1993Enzyme CYP108N14Hydroxylation(S)-7-Hydroxy-4-terpineol[83]
Dehydroabietic acidR. rhodochrous IEGM 107Resting cellsOxidation,
hydroxylation
7-Oxo-dehydroabietic acid,
11,12-dihydroxy-7-oxo-abieta-8,13-dien-18-oic acid
[45]
BetulinR. rhodochrous IEGM 66Native cells, resting cellsOxidationBetulone[46]
Oleanolic acidR. rhodochrous IEGM 1360Resting cellsOxidation3-Oxo-oleanolic acid[47]
R. rhodochrous IEGM 757Native cellsHydroxylation,
carboxylation
3β,5α,22α-Trihydroxyolean-12-ene-23,28-dioic acid[58]
Glycyrretinic acidR. rhodochrous IEGM 1360Resting cellsOxidation3-Oxo-glycyrretinic acid[47]
Steroids
Androst-4-ene-
3,17-dione
Rhodococcus sp.Native cellsHydroxylation9α-Hydroxy-4-androstene-3,17-dione[62]
Rhodococcus sp. IOC-77[63,64,65,66,67]
R. erythropolis Ac-1740[68,69]
R. erythropolis RG1-UV29Mutant strain
(deletion of gene KstD, UV irradiation)
Hydroxylation9α-Hydroxy-4-androstene-3,17-dione[92]
R. ruber Chol-4Mutant strain
(insertion of gene 17β-hsd, deletion of genes KshB, KstD1,2,3)
DehydrogenationTestosterone[88]
19-NortestosteroneRhodococcus sp. DSM 92-344Native cellsAromatizationEstrone,
estradiol
[70,71]
DienogestR. erythropolis FZB 53Native cellsAromatization,
amination
17α-Acetamide-estradiol,
17α-acetamide-9(11)-dehydroestradiol
[72]
CortisoneR. coprophilus DSM 43347Native cellsDehydrogenationPrednisone[73]
R. rhodnii
DSM 43960
Native cellsHydroxylation,
methylation
1,9β,17,21-Tetrahydroxy-4-methyl-19-nor-9β-pregna-1,3,5(10)-trien-11,20-dione, 1,9β,17,20β,21-pentahydroxy-4-methyl-19-nor-9β-pregna-1,3,5(10)-trien-11-one[74]
HydrocortisoneR. coprophilus DSM 43347Native cellsDehydrogenationPrednisolone [73]
7-KetocholesterolR. erythropolis MTCC 3951Native cellsOxidation,
dehydrogenation
4-Cholesten-3,7-dione,
chol-5-en-3,7-dione,
androsta-4-ene-3,7,17-trione
[75]
17β-EstradiolRhodococcus sp. RSBS9Native cellsND *ND *[76]
Rhodococcus sp. P14Enzyme 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase
(gene 17β-HSD)
DehydrogenationEstrone[94]
R. equi DSSKP-R-001Enzyme
short-chain dehydrogenase (gene hsd17b14), flavin-binding monooxygenase (gene At1g12200)
Dehydrogenation,
hydroxylation
Estrone,
4-hydroxyestrone
[99]
EstriolRhodococcus sp. P14Enzyme
short-chain 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (gene 17β-HSDx)
Dehydrogenation16-Hydroxyestrone[94]
TestosteroneRhodococcus sp. P14Enzyme
short-chain 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (gene 17β-HSDx)
DehydrogenationAndrost-4-en-3,17-dione[94]
ProgesteroneR.rhodochrousEnzyme
steroid monooxygenase
OxidationTestosterone acetate[85]
CholesterolR. erythropolisEnzyme
extracellular cholesterol oxidase (gene ChoG)
Oxidation3-Keto-Δ4-cholesterol[86]
R. ruber[87]
R. triatomae[88]
Rhodococcus sp.[89]
Rhodococcus sp. MIL 1038Mutant strain (biochemical mutagenesis by NTG)Hydroxylation,
oxidation,
carboxylation,
carbon cycle decomposition
7aβ-Methyl-1β-[1,5-dimethyl-6-hydroxyl-hexyl]-5-oxo-3aα-hexa-4-indanepropionic acid[91]
Cholic acidR. ruberEnzyme 12α-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (gene Rr12α-HSDH)Dehydrogenation12-Oxochenodeoxycholic acid[93]
LanosterolR. triatomae BKS 15-14Enzyme
CYP51 (gene RtCYP51)
Demethylation14α-Dimethyllanosterol[96]
NorandrostenedioneR. erythropolis RG9Mutant strain
(insertion of CYP450 BM3 mutant M02 enzyme genes)
Hydroxylation16β-Hydroxy-norandrostenedione[97]
* No data.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Maltseva, P.Y.; Plotnitskaya, N.A.; Ivshina, I.B. Transformation of Terpenoids and Steroids Using Actinomycetes of the Genus Rhodococcus. Molecules 2024, 29, 3378. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29143378

AMA Style

Maltseva PY, Plotnitskaya NA, Ivshina IB. Transformation of Terpenoids and Steroids Using Actinomycetes of the Genus Rhodococcus. Molecules. 2024; 29(14):3378. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29143378

Chicago/Turabian Style

Maltseva, Polina Yu., Natalia A. Plotnitskaya, and Irina B. Ivshina. 2024. "Transformation of Terpenoids and Steroids Using Actinomycetes of the Genus Rhodococcus" Molecules 29, no. 14: 3378. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29143378

APA Style

Maltseva, P. Y., Plotnitskaya, N. A., & Ivshina, I. B. (2024). Transformation of Terpenoids and Steroids Using Actinomycetes of the Genus Rhodococcus. Molecules, 29(14), 3378. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29143378

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop