Next Article in Journal
In Vitro and In Vivo Preventive Effects of Thymoquinone against Breast Cancer: Role of DNMT1
Previous Article in Journal
Six New Compounds from the Herbaceous Stems of Ephedra intermedia Schrenket C. A. Meyer and Their Lung-Protective Activity
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 29
Issue 2
10.3390/molecules29020433
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Raman Spectroscopy and Cystic Fibrosis Disease: An Alternative Potential Tool for Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR) Modulator Response Differentiation—A Pilot Study Based on Serum Samples

by
Giuseppe Acri
1,
Barbara Testagrossa
1,*,
Maria Cristina Lucanto
2,
Simona Cristadoro
2,
Salvatore Pellegrino
2,
Elisa Ruello
1 and
Stefano Costa
2
1
Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche, Odontoiatriche, e delle Immagini Morfologiche e Funzionali, Università degli Studi di Messina, 98125 Messina, Italy
2
Unità Operativa Semplice Dipartimentale Gastroenterologia Pediatrica e Fibrosi Cistica, Azienda, Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico G. Martino, Via Consolare Valeria, 98125 Messina, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2024, 29(2), 433; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29020433
Submission received: 17 November 2023 / Revised: 6 January 2024 / Accepted: 10 January 2024 / Published: 16 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomedical Applications of Infrared and Raman Spectroscopy II)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a genetic disorder that alters chloride transport in mucous membranes. Recent studies have demonstrated that treatment with modulators of the chloride channel reduces inflammatory markers, restoring, among others, the imbalance of lipids. In this study, we analyzed the serum samples of treated and non-treated patients with modulators with Raman spectroscopy. Nineteen (eight treated an eleven non-treated) patients were considered. The main difference between the two groups appeared in the 3020–2800 cm−1 range. A Voigt deconvolution fit was performed, and nine sub-bands were identified. To distinguish between treated and non-treated patients, the area ratio between the CH3 and CH2 vibration modes was calculated for each patient. The results were validated using statistical analyses. In particular, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and Youden index (Y) were calculated (Area Under Curve (AUC): 0.977; Y: 3.30). An ROC curve represents the performance of the classification, illustrating the diagnostic ability of Raman spectroscopy. It was demonstrated that Raman spectroscopy is able to highlight peculiar differences between elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI)-treated and non-treated patients, in relation with lipids biomarkers.

1. Introduction

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a genetic disorder caused by cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene mutations. This results in defective or insufficient CFTR protein and altered chloride transport in mucous membranes throughout the body, consequently causing salt and water dysregulation, and electrolyte imbalance, and progressive damage within multiple organs systems such as the respiratory system, the pancreas, the gastrointestinal tract, and the reproductive system [1,2]. CF is present in all ethnicities with an incidence varying from ~1:1000 to ~1:30,000 live births depending on the genetic ancestry of the population.
The CFTR protein is a membrane ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter-class ion channel that conducts chloride and bicarbonate ions across epithelial cell membranes, and it is regulated by cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) and protein kinase A phosphorylation [3,4]. Different mutations lead to a variety of malfunctions in the CFTR protein, ranging from folding defects (leading to decreases in anion transport) to complete absence of mature proteins due to premature degradation of aberrant proteins or stop codon mutations (nonsense mutations) that results in a shorter, unfinished protein product. The CFTR protein is predominantly expressed in epithelial cells and serves as a fundamental ion and water regulator in different organs [2]. Generally, the severity of the protein disfunction correlates with the severity of clinical disease [5].
CFTR modulators are a heterogeneous group of drugs that bind the CFTR protein in specific sites either during or after protein processing. There are several categories of therapies that may interact with the CFTR protein to increase its function. These include potentiators, correctors, read-through agents, amplifiers, and stabilizers [6]. Potentiators and correctors are clinically available, while the development of the other categories of molecules is still under study. Potentiators enhance or restore ion channel activity and thereby improve chloride and bicarbonate transport across the CFTR protein. This class of drug is particularly effective for those mutations affecting the stability or the opening of the channel in the cell membrane, where the primary protein defect is related to ion channel dysregulation. Correctors bind to the immature CFTR protein and improve protein folding, processing, and trafficking to the cellular membrane. This class of drug has been extensively tested with specific mutations, such as F508del (the most frequent CFTR mutation). Of these, different combinations of potentiators (e.g., ivacaftor) and correctors (e.g., lumacaftor, tezacaftor, elexacaftor) have now been approved and are commercially available; this has revolutionized the lives of people with CF, changing the disease trajectory and improving the clinical outcomes [7,8,9,10].
In particular, the triple combination of CFTR modulators (elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor, or ETI) was approved by the Food and Drug Administration through fast-track and orphan drug study status on October 21, 2019, for people with at least one copy of the F508del mutation [10]. After approval, therapy became quickly available all over the world for the majority of people with CF, initially for patients aged 12 or over and shortly after for patients in the 6–11 age group. ETI was reported as safe and highly effective in two large randomized clinical trials, with clear evidence of improving multiple clinical outcomes at 4, 24, and 48 weeks [11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. ETI is administered orally. The recommended dose is two tablets (each containing elexacaftor 100 mg/tezacaftor 50 mg/ivacaftor 75 mg) taken in the morning and one tablet (containing ivacaftor 150 mg) taken in the evening, approximately 12 h apart. It is suggested to take ETI together with a fat-containing meal in order to improve drug absorption [10].
Beyond the clinical results obtained by ETI treatment, its impact on the inflammatory status remains unclear. in vitro demonstrations have shown that ETI combination partially restores lipid imbalance (i.e., abnormalities in fatty acid, ceramides and cholesterol metabolism) [18]. Veltman et al. reported that elevated oxidative stress, an abnormal lipid fingerprint, and enhanced pro-inflammatory signaling in well-differentiated bronchial epithelial cells isolated from neonatal CFTR KO pigs and adult CF patients undergoing lung transplantation were partially corrected after incubation with a combination of ETI and antioxidants [18]. More recently, a study conducted by De Vuyst et al. showed that ETI treatment reduced inflammatory markers and positive bacterial cultures on bronchoalveolar lavage in patients with CF [19]. In order to verify if the differences in the molecular responses between treated and non-treated patients were due to ETI treatment, Raman spectroscopy was used as a non-invasive methodology and serum samples were analyzed.
Raman spectroscopy, a vibrational technique, is a powerful analytic modality widely used in the study of complex biological samples [20]. In Raman spectroscopy, a sample is irradiated by a laser beam and the resultant scattered light is observed [21,22]. The Raman spectra are very sensitive to the structure, conformation and environment of the molecules [23]. This methodology has been proposed as a valid alternative tool in clinical diagnosis [24]. It has been applied to detect different diseases [24,25] as well as protein and lipid identification to investigate metabolic changes [26,27,28,29].
In recent years, there have been numerous studies related to biofluid analysis using vibrational spectroscopy [23,30,31,32]; this is because it requires minimal sample preparation and is easy to apply.
This study, based on Raman spectroscopy, was conducted on blood serum samples of ETI-treated and non-treated patients to differentiate the ETI response, thus confirming the treatment efficacy.
The reliability of the proposed experimental methodology was evaluated by conducting statistical analyses. In particular, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and Youden index (Y) were used, with its associated cut-off point was determined.

2. Results

In Figure 1, the average Raman spectra and standard deviation (SD) of serum samples of the ETI-treated (blue line, SD: cyan area) and non-treated (red line, SD: light red area) patients are shown after baseline corrections and normalization to the phenylalanine peak. The spectra show the main features assigned to the serum constituents [33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42].
To better compare the two different sets of Raman data, a spectral subtraction between the average Raman spectra of the serum samples of ETI-treated and non-treated patients was performed. The difference spectrum is reported in Figure 2. The main differences between the ETI-treated and non-treated average spectra appear in the 3020–2800 cm−1 spectral range (center of the Raman band: about 2935 cm−1). As reported in the literature, this band can be attributed to C-H anti-symmetric and symmetric stretching vibration modes [41,43]. The above spectral modifications, induced by an inflammatory state, could be associated with changes in the secondary structure.
For this reason, the behavior of the 3020–2800 cm−1 band was analyzed using a Voigt fit. Nine components were identified theoretically in a first step by using the second derivative analysis and were experimentally identified by the Voigt deconvolutions. The deconvoluted spectra of the serum samples of the ETI-treated and non-treated patients are reported in Figure 3a and Figure 3b, respectively. In these Figures, all the sub-bands that contribute to the Raman spectrum are included, as identified using the Omnic software (OMNIC for Dispersive Raman 9.1.24).
In Table 1, we indicate the Raman peak positions of all the sub-bands and their tentative assignment based on the literature.
From the tentative assignment, as reported in Table 1, the sub-bands can be associated with the CH3 and CH2 symmetric and anti-symmetric stretching of lipids. This is due to the fact that lipids in serum are composed by different compounds, i.e., saturated/unsaturated fatty acids, triacylglycerols, cholesterol, cholesteryl esters and phospholipids.
We focused our attention to these sub-bands to assess the quantitative changes due to chemical structural modifications. We computed the area ratio using
A R = ∑ A C H 3 ∑ A C H 2 ,
where AR represents the area ratio, ∑ A C H 3 is the sum of all sub-bands referred to as the CH3 stretching vibration modes, and ∑ A C H 2 is the sum of all sub-bands referred to as the CH2 stretching vibration modes.
The first step was to determine the AR values for the average spectra of the ETI-treated and non-treated patients, resulting in values of 3.17 and 3.42, respectively. After this, the AR was calculated for all the patients, and the values obtained were statistically analyzed. The sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic test were determined to evaluate if Raman analysis could distinguish between the ETI-treated and non-treated patients. The ROC curve and Youden index were also determined.
The results of the statistical analysis are depicted in Figure 4 and Figure 5. Figure 4a accurately and reliably describes the discrete distribution of data by using a plot box graph. The box represents the first and third quartile of the data. Inside it, the median value is drawn as a horizontal line. The whiskers only extend to the most extreme observations within 1.5 of the difference between the third and first quartiles. The observed data points outside the boundary of the whiskers are plotted as outliers. For all the analyzed patients, the AR is reported in Figure 4b as a scatter plot.
Figure 5a shows the ROC curve calculated for the AR for all patients enrolled in this preliminary study. In the same figure, the line of equality and the optimal cut-off point are depicted. Figure 5b shows the trend of sensitivity (red line) and specificity (blue line) vs. the AR value. The optimal cut-off point is displayed as a vertical dotted line. The optimal cut-off point, calculated following the Youden method, was equal to 3.30.
The accuracy of the statistical analysis was evaluated calculating the Area Under Curve (AUC) value for the AR, and the AUC value is reported in Table 2. In the same table, the sensitivity and specificity are also indicated. The lower and upper limits for all the parameters, which represent the 95% confidence interval, are also reported.

3. Discussion

The present study was performed with the objective of determining the potential of Raman spectroscopy to differentiate the response of patients to ETI treatment, which represents the most recent therapy available for CF disease.
The starting point was the analysis of the serum samples from the ETI-treated and non-treated patients. All the obtained spectra exhibited the main typical protein vibrational modes. The disulfide band was centered at ~520 cm−1 [33], the band at ~760 cm−1 can be assigned to tryptophan [38], and the tyrosine doublet peaks were present at ~830 cm−1 and ~850 cm−1 [34,35]. The peak at about 1003 cm−1 can be assigned to phenylalanine [36]. The bands at ~1300 cm−1 and ~1450 cm−1 can be assigned to amide III vibration and CH2 scissoring deformation, respectively [37,38]. The amide II and amide I vibration bands were located at 1550 cm−1 and 1650 cm−1, respectively [39,40]. The large band centered at ~2935 cm−1 can be associated with C-H stretching vibration [41]. Our attention was focused on this band, as the main difference between the mean spectra of patients treated ETI and those not treated was qualitatively evident in this band. In particular, to assess the quantitative changes due to chemical structural modifications, we computed the area ratio as expressed in Equation (1). Based on the literature, the involved sub-bands could be associated with the CH3 and CH2 symmetric and anti-symmetric stretching of lipids. We observed a decrease in the AR value when the CF patients were treated with ETI. This behavior suggested a change in vibrational modes, which could be associated with lipid conformational modifications induced by a decrease in the inflammatory status, implying an active role of ETI in restoring the imbalance of lipids.
Statistical analysis showed an AUC value of 0.977, which can be considered outstanding. Sensitivity and specificity values were 0.909 and 1, respectively, with a 95% confidence level. The optimal cut-off point to maximize the Youden index was 3.30.
It is interesting to note that impaired CFTR function leads to perinuclear free cholesterol accumulation [52] and, at the same time, this perinuclear cholesterol accumulation is reversible. The ETI treatment seems to precisely act on this lipid imbalance to promote a repairing action. We would like to highlight that the response to treatment is not the same in all patients and the rate of adherence to treatment is variable. In addition, in clinical practice, a reduction in the effectiveness of ETI was taken into consideration. From all the considerations, we explored, through Raman spectroscopy, the possibility of finding a rapid, inexpensive test that did not require any additional effort from the patient and could identify their response to treatment.
The obtained results must be seen prospectively; the observed variation in the AR values can be associated with different clinical situations, such as differences in patient response rates to the drug and/or in evaluating adherence to treatment.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Patients and Serum Samples

Patients were selected during a routine visit to the Cystic Fibrosis Unit, University Hospital G Martino, Messina.
To perform this preliminary study, the observations did not imply any further evaluation for the patient other than routine clinical assessment. In fact, for our research, the analyzed serum samples were the same as the ones used during the clinical evaluation. Informed consent was obtained from all patients before performing the test.
We selected 8 patients on ETI treatment for at least one year. As controls, we selected 11 patients with genotypes unresponsive to ETI. In order to better evaluate the difference between the treated and non-treated patient, assuming that this difference is dependent on a reduction in systemic inflammation in the treated patients, we excluded patients with pulmonary exacerbations. It is well known that in CF pulmonary exacerbations are associated with higher levels of inflammation biomarkers, which could invalidate the results of our pilot study [53,54]. In Table 3, the demographic and clinical features of the patients are presented. As a measurement of treatment efficacy and therapeutic adherence, patients treated with ETI underwent sweat chloride determination, a robust endpoint of ETI efficacy. For non-treated patients, we considered the most recent sweat chloride determination.
For each patient, a whole-blood sample was collected into 5 mL vacuum tubes and then separated by centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 10 min at room temperature. A total of 2 mL of supernatant (serum) was collected. The obtained serum samples were stored in a refrigerator at 0–4 °C until use in Raman analysis.

4.2. Raman Spectroscopy Analysis

All serum samples were analyzed within 6 h after collection. Raman analysis was performed using a DXR-SmartRaman Spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with a diode laser with an excitation wavelength of 785 nm. Before each measurement, the DXR-SmartRaman Spectrometer was calibrated using standard samples of known wavenumber provided by the manufacturer.
To acquire the Raman spectra, the 180-degree sampling accessory for the DXR-SmartRaman Spectrometer was used, and 100 μL of serum was pipetted into a vial; the vial was then placed into the sample holder. All the samples were irradiated with a 24 mW excitation laser (at the sample location) leaving a 50 µm spot pinhole, and the CCD collected the Raman signals with a grating of 400 lines/mm. The Raman measurements were conducted over a wavenumber range of 400–3300 cm−1 with a resolution of about 2.0 cm−1, as specified by the manufacturer.
To obtain high signal-to-noise ratio (S/R) spectra, each Raman spectrum was acquired for 30.0 s and averaged over 16 accumulations. The total acquisition time was 8 min for each spectrum. On average, three spectra were acquired from each serum sample.
For each spectrum a spline baseline correction was performed to reduce the attenuation of the weak Raman scattering signal, and the obtained spectrum was then normalized to the phenylalanine peak band, centered at about 1003 cm−1, which is typically intense and relatively isolated from any other peaks. Here, it showed no interference from neighboring peaks. Usually, the Phe ν-ring peak is used as an internal standard, as it has been reported to be insensitive to the micro-environment and exhibits the absence of interference with other peaks and bands [36].
Additionally, the normalization choice has an important impact on the vibrational features highlighted for their contribution in the spectral variability of a data set. In all cases, normalization was performed to cancel out the effect of laser fluctuation and the heterogeneity of the sample configuration on the mirror. Spectra and biochemical assays have demonstrated that biological sample peaks (not bands) are mostly stable, with phenylalanine being the most stable peak (1003 cm−1) [55]. Due to the stability of this peak, normalization of the spectra to the phenylalanine peak is common in Raman spectroscopy [56]. For this reason, we chose “peak normalization”, unlike other methods, because the Phe peak is insensitive to external reactions.
The obtained spectra were classified into two groups as follows: ETI-treated and non-treated. For each group, the average spectrum was determined. The difference spectrum of the CF patients was also computed by subtracting the average spectrum of the ETI-treated patients from the average spectrum of the non-treated patients.
The main difference between the mean Raman spectra of the ETI-treated and non-treated patients was observed in the 3020–2800 cm−1 wavenumber range. For this reason, our attention was focused on this region, and the experimental data were fitted using the functions available on the Omnic for dispersive Raman 9.0 software. Starting from the assumption that a serum Raman spectrum band can be considered as the linear sum of fundamental elements of the secondary structure, a quantitative analysis of the secondary structure was performed, and the second derivative was computed on the fitted curves of the spectra using the OriginPro 9.0 software (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA). The analysis of the second derivative was important, as it permitted a preliminary indication of the minimum number of band components and their peak positions, according to a procedure already successfully applied in the analysis of Raman serum spectra [57].
In fact, the computed minima in the Raman spectra derivative profiles represent the center frequencies of the sub-bands.
One of the main advantages of the analysis of the n-th derivative, and, in particular, the second derivative, is the possibility to perform this action without arbitrary deconvoluted parameters.
To distinguish between superimposed and very close bands and reducing band noise, the above band was deconvoluted using a Voigt profile with 10 cm−1 bandwidths.
The Voigt profile, consisting of a mixed convolution of Gaussian and Lorentzian curves, represents a good starting point for liquid sample analysis.
The CH3 to CH2 ratio was used to evaluate changes due to chemical structure modifications.

4.3. Statistical Analysis

To evaluate the validity of Raman spectroscopy for the ETI-treated and non-treated respondence, the sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic test were determined by clinical evaluation, as this is considered the gold standard in the evaluation of pharmacological responses. The ROC curve and its related area under the curve were also determined. They represent the plot of sensitivity vs. 1-specificity and overall accuracy of the test, respectively. In this study, sensitivity referred to the ability of Raman spectroscopy to correctly identify ETI-treated patients; conversely, specificity referred to the ability of Raman spectroscopy to correctly identify non-treated patients.
The optimal cut-off point was determined using the Youden index [58], which represents the maximum vertical distance or difference between the ROC curve and the diagonal. This is used to choose the optimal threshold value or cut-off point for a biomarker of interest. In this study, we used it to measure the effectiveness of Raman spectroscopy in differentiating between ETI-treated and non-treated patients.

5. Conclusions

A growing number of clinical studies have demonstrated the efficacy of ETI therapy and its ability to significantly reduce pulmonary and gastrointestinal manifestations, sweat chloride concentration, exocrine pancreatic dysfunction, and infertility/subfertility, among other disease signs and symptoms [59,60,61]. Among the markers of lipid metabolism, cholesterol levels have been shown to notably improve following one year of ETI treatment. Likewise, the fat-soluble vitamins D and E, known to be deficient in CF patients, tend to return to their normal levels in individuals undergoing ETI therapy [62].
On the other hand, little is known about ETI non-responders, and when side effects occur or a poor adherence is suspected, it is difficult to monitor drug levels and define a safe drug threshold level [63]. Finding a marker for EI activity based on the anti-inflammatory response could be helpful in these scenarios.
Even though the number of enrolled patients was small, the preliminary results are very encouraging.
The obtained results demonstrate that Raman spectroscopy could allow us to evaluate the response of CF patients to ETI treatment and the rate of adherence, providing important information about the active role of ETI in restoring lipid imbalance.
We are fully aware that the low number of patients does not allow us to draw definitive conclusions, and thus our future efforts will be oriented towards expanding the number of patients. At present, the only truly effective test used for the response evaluation to treatment (other than a full clinical evaluation) is the measurement of sweat chloride levels. This test is not easy to carry out and requires a certain amount of time. In this context, Raman spectroscopy could represent an additional, rapid, and inexpensive test that could be combined with routine laboratory methods to obtain diagnostic information.
Other differences in the Raman spectra, which we were unable to exclude, could become more evident when a larger patient cohort is considered. For this reason, our intention is to continue increasing the number of patients and extend Raman spectroscopy to ETI-treated patients failing to response to treatment, as well as enrolling patients with pulmonary exacerbations.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.A., B.T. and S.C. (Stefano Costa); methodology, B.T.; validation, E.R.; formal analysis, G.A.; investigation, G.A., M.C.L., S.C. (Simona Cristadoro) and S.P.; resources, M.C.L., S.C. (Simona Cristadoro), S.P. and S.C. (Stefano Costa); data curation, B.T and E.R.; writing—original draft preparation, G.A., B.T. and S.C. (Stefano Costa). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The protocols for the studies performed by using serum samples obtained during routinely clinical evaluation were approved by UO Dipartimentale Gastroenterologia Pediatrica e Fibrosi Cistica University Hospital Messina. Prot. 000078/23—2 February 2023.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in this study.

Data Availability Statement

The data generated or analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Riordan, J.R.; Rommens, J.M.; Kerem, B.-S.; Alon, N.; Rozmahel, R.; Grzelczak, Z.; Zielenski, J.; Lok, S.; Plavsic, N.; Chou, J.-L.; et al. Identification of the Cystic Fibrosis Gene: Cloning and Characterization of Complementary DNA. Science 1989, 245, 1066–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Elborn, J.S. Cystic fibrosis. Lancet 2016, 388, 2519–2531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Anderson, M.P.; Gregory, R.J.; Thompson, S.; Souza, D.W.; Paul, S.; Mulligan, R.C.; Smith, A.E.; Welsh, M.J. Demonstration That CFTR Is a Chloride Channel by Alteration of Its Anion Selectivity. Science 1991, 253, 202–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Liu, F.; Zhang, Z.; Csanády, L.; Gadsby, D.C.; Chen, J. Molecular Structure of the Human CFTR Ion Channel. Cell 2017, 169, 85–95.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. The Clinical and Functional TRanslation of CFTR (CFTR2). Available online: https://cftr2.org/ (accessed on 30 April 2023).
  6. Haq, I.; Almulhem, M.; Soars, S.; Poulton, D.; Brodlie, M. Precision Medicine Based on CFTR Genotype for People with Cystic Fibrosis. Pharmacogenomics Pers. Med. 2022, 15, 91–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Kalydeco (Ivacaftor). Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Cambridge, MA, USA. Available online: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2012/203188lbl.pdf (accessed on 26 April 2023).
  8. ORKAMBI (Lumacaftor/Ivacaftor). Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Boston, MA, USA. Available online: https://pi.vrtx.com/files/uspi_lumacaftor_ivacaftor.pdf (accessed on 26 April 2023).
  9. SYMDEKO (Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor). Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Boston, MA, USA. Available online: https://pi.vrtx.com/files/patientpackageinsert_tezacaftor_ivacaftor.pdf (accessed on 26 April 2023).
  10. TRIKAFTA (Elexacaftor, Tezacaftor and Ivacaftor Tablets; Ivacaftor Tablets). Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Boston, MA, USA. Available online: https://pi.vrtx.com/files/uspi_elexacaftor_tezacaftor_ivacaftor.pdf (accessed on 26 April 2023).
  11. Taylor-Cousar, J.L.; Mall, M.A.; Ramsey, B.W.; McKone, E.F.; Tullis, E.; Marigowda, G.; McKee, C.M.; Waltz, D.; Moskowitz, S.M.; Savage, J.; et al. Clinical development of triple-combination CFTR modulators for cystic fibrosis patients with one or two F508del alleles. ERJ Open Res. 2019, 5, 00082–02019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Keating, D.; Marigowda, G.; Burr, L.; Daines, C.; Mall, M.A.; McKone, E.F.; Ramsey, B.W.; Rowe, S.M.; Sass, L.A.; Tullis, E.; et al. VX-445–Tezacaftor–Ivacaftor in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis and One or Two Phe508del Alleles. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 379, 1612–1620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Davies, J.C.; Moskowitz, S.M.; Brown, C.; Horsley, A.; Mall, M.A.; McKone, E.F.; Plant, B.J.; Prais, D.; Ramsey, B.W.; Taylor-Cousar, J.L.; et al. VX-659–Tezacaftor–Ivacaftor in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis and One or Two Phe508del Alleles. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 379, 1599–1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Middleton, P.G.; Mall, M.A.; Dřevínek, P.; Lands, L.C.; McKone, E.F.; Polineni, D.; Ramsey, B.W.; Taylor-Cousar, J.L.; Tullis, E.; Vermeulen, F.; et al. Elexacaftor–Tezacaftor–Ivacaftor for Cystic Fibrosis with a Single Phe508del Allele. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019, 381, 1809–1819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Heijerman, H.G.M.; McKone, E.F.; Downey, D.G.; Van Braeckel, E.; Rowe, S.M.; Tullis, E.; Mall, M.A.; Welter, J.J.; Ramsey, B.W.; McKee, C.M.; et al. Efficacy and safety of the elexacaftor plus tezacaftor plus ivacaftor combination regimen in people with cystic fibrosis homozygous for the F508del mutation: A double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2019, 394, 1940–1948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zemanick, E.T.; Taylor-Cousar, J.L.; Davies, J.; Gibson, R.L.; Mall, M.A.; McKone, E.F.; McNally, P.; Ramsey, B.W.; Rayment, J.H.; Rowe, S.M.; et al. A Phase 3 Open-Label Study of Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor in Children 6 through 11 Years of Age with Cystic Fibrosis and at Least One F508del Allele. Am. J. Resp. Crit. Care 2021, 203, 1522–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Griese, M.; Costa, S.; Linnemann, R.W.; Mall, M.A.; McKone, E.F.; Polineni, D.; Quon, B.S.; Ringshausen, F.C.; Taylor-Cousar, J.L.; Withers, N.J.; et al. Safety and Efficacy of Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor for 24 Weeks or Longer in People with Cystic Fibrosis and One or More F508del Alleles: Interim Results of an Open-Label Phase 3 Clinical Trial. Am. J. Resp. Crit. Care 2021, 203, 381–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Veltman, M.; De Sanctis, J.B.; Stolarczyk, M.; Klymiuk, N.; Bähr, A.; Brouwer, R.W.; Oole, E.; Shah, J.; Ozdian, T.; Liao, J.; et al. CFTR Correctors and Antioxidants Partially Normalize Lipid Imbalance but not Abnormal Basal Inflammatory Cytokine Profile in CF Bronchial Epithelial Cells. Front. Physiol. 2021, 12, 619442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. De Vuyst, R.C.; Bennard, E.; Kam, C.W.; McKinzie, C.J.; Esther, C.R. Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor treatment reduces airway inflammation in cystic fibrosis. Pediatr. Pulm. 2023, 58, 1592–1594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kong, K.; Kendall, C.; Stone, N.; Notingher, I. Raman spectroscopy for medical diagnostics—From in-vitro biofluid assays to in-vivo cancer detection. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2015, 89, 121–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Chen, T.; Yavuz, A.; Wang, M.C. Dissecting lipid droplet biology with coherent Raman scattering microscopy. J. Cell Sci. 2022, 135, jcs252353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Acri, G.; Micali, A.; D’Angelo, R.; Puzzolo, D.; Aragona, P.; Testagrossa, B.; Aragona, E.; Wylegala, E.; Nowinska, A. Raman Spectroscopic Study of Amyloid Deposits in Gelatinous Drop-like Corneal Dystrophy. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Verma, T.; Majumdar, S.; Yadav, S.; Ahmed, S.M.; Umapathy, S.; Nandi, D. Cell-free hemoglobin is a marker of systemic inflammation in mouse models of sepsis: A Raman spectroscopic study. Analyst 2021, 146, 4022–4032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Acri, G.; Falcone, A.; Giannetto, C.; Giudice, E.; Piccione, G.; Testagrossa, B.; Cicero, L.; Cassata, G.; Di Pietro, S. Preliminary study for the application of Raman spectroscopy for the identification of Leishmania infected dogs. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 7489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Acri, G.; Sansotta, C.; Salmeri, F.M.; Romeo, M.; Ruello, E.V.; Denaro, L.; Testagrossa, B. Use of Raman Spectroscopy, Scanning Electron Microscopy and Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy in a Multi-Technique Approach for Physical Characterization of Purple Urine Bag Syndrome. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 4034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Silveira, L.J.; de Cassia Fernandes Borges, R.; Navarro, R.S.; Giana, H.E.; Zangaro, R.A.; Pacheco, M.T.T.; Fernandes, A.B. Quantifying glucose and lipid components in human serum by Raman spectroscopy and multivariate statistic. Lasers Med. Sci. 2017, 32, 787–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Birech, Z.; Mwangi, P.W.; Bukachi, F.; Mandela, K.M. Application of Raman spectroscopy in type 2 diabetes screening in blood using leucine and isoleucine amino-acids as biomarkers and in comparative anti-diabetic drugs efficacy studies. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0185130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Atkins, C.G.; Buckley, K.; Blades, M.W.; Turner, R.F.B. Raman Spectroscopy of Blood and Blood Components. Appl. Spectrosc. 2017, 71, 767–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Giannetto, C.; Acri, G.; Giudice, E.; Arfuso, F.; Testagrossa, B.; Piccione, G. Quantifying Serum Total Lipids and Tryptophan Concentrations by Raman Spectroscopy During Standardized Obstacle Course in Horses. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2022, 108, 103820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Parachalil, D.R.; McIntyre, J.; Byrne, H.J. Potential of Raman spectroscopy for the analysis of plasma/serum in the liquid state: Recent advances. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2020, 412, 1993–2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Lister, A.P.; Highmore, C.J.; Hanrahan, N.; Read, J.; Munro, A.P.S.; Tan, S.; Allan, R.N.; Faust, S.N.; Webb, J.S.; Mahajan, S. Multi-Excitation Raman Spectroscopy for Label-Free, Strain-Level Characterization of Bacterial Pathogens in Artificial Sputum Media. Anal. Chem. 2022, 94, 669–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Acri, G.; Venuti, V.; Costa, S.; Testagrossa, B.; Pellegrino, S.; Crupi, V.; Majolino, D. Raman Spectroscopy as Noninvasive Method of Diagnosis of Pediatric Onset Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 6974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. O’Regan, G.M.; Kemperman, P.M.J.H.; Sandilands, A.; Chen, H.; Campbell, L.E.; Kroboth, K.; Watson, R.; Rowland, M.; Puppels, G.J.; McLean, W.H.I.; et al. Raman profiles of the stratum corneum define 3 filaggrin genotype–determined atopic dermatitis endophenotypes. J. Allergy Clin. Immun. 2010, 126, 574–580.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Rygula, A.; Majzner, K.; Marzec, K.M.; Kaczor, A.; Pilarczyk, M.; Baranska, M. Raman spectroscopy of proteins: A review. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2013, 44, 1061–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kurouski, D.; Van Duyne, R.P.; Lednev, I.K. Exploring the structure and formation mechanism of amyloid fibrils by Raman spectroscopy: A review. Analyst 2015, 140, 4967–4980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Herrero, A.M.; Cambero, M.I.; Ordóñez, J.A.; de la Hoz, L.; Carmona, P. Raman spectroscopy study of the structural effect of microbial transglutaminase on meat systems and its relationship with textural characteristics. Food Chem. 2008, 109, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Acri, G.; Testagrossa, B.; Giudice, E.; Arfuso, F.; Piccione, G.; Giannetto, C. Application of Raman Spectroscopy for the Evaluation of Metabolomic Dynamic Analysis in Athletic Horses. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2021, 96, 103319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Parachalil, D.R.; Bruno, C.; Bonnier, F.; Blasco, H.; Chourpa, I.; McIntyre, J.; Byrne, H.J. Raman spectroscopic screening of high and low molecular weight fractions of human serum. Analyst 2019, 144, 4295–4311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Movasaghi, Z.; Rehman, S.; Rehman, I.U. Raman Spectroscopy of Biological Tissues. Appl. Spectrosc. Rev. 2007, 42, 493–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Acri, G.; Romano, C.; Costa, S.; Pellegrino, S.; Testagrossa, B. Raman Spectroscopy Technique: A Non-Invasive Tool in Celiac Disease Diagnosis. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Pezzotti, G.; Zhu, W.; Adachi, T.; Horiguchi, S.; Marin, E.; Boschetto, F.; Ogitani, E.; Mazda, O. Metabolic machinery encrypted in the Raman spectrum of influenza A virus-inoculated mammalian cells. J. Cell Physiol. 2020, 235, 5146–5170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Czamara, K.; Majzner, K.; Pacia, M.Z.; Kochan, K.; Kaczor, A.; Baranska, M. Raman spectroscopy of lipids: A review. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2015, 46, 4–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Balan, V.; Mihai, C.-T.; Cojocaru, F.-D.; Uritu, C.-M.; Dodi, G.; Botezat, D.; Gardikiotis, I. Vibrational Spectroscopy Fingerprinting in Medicine: From Molecular to Clinical Practice. Materials 2019, 12, 2884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Delfino, I.; Ricciardi, V.; Manti, L.; Lasalvia, M.; Lepore, M. Multivariate Analysis of Difference Raman Spectra of the Irradiated Nucleus and Cytoplasm Region of SH-SY5Y Human Neuroblastoma Cells. Sensors 2019, 19, 3971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Oleszko, A.; Hartwich, J.; Wójtowicz, A.; Gąsior-Głogowska, M.; Huras, H.; Komorowska, M. Comparison of FTIR-ATR and Raman spectroscopy in determination of VLDL triglycerides in blood serum with PLS regression. Spectrochim. Acta A 2017, 183, 239–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Duan, P.; Li, J.; Yang, W.; Li, X.; Long, M.; Feng, X.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, C.; Morais, C.L.M.; Martin, F.L.; et al. Fourier transform infrared and Raman-based biochemical profiling of different grades of pure foetal-type hepatoblastoma. J. Biophotonics 2019, 12, e201800304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wood, B.R.; Chernenko, T.; Matthäus, C.; Diem, M.; Chong, C.; Bernhard, U.; Jene, C.; Brandli, A.A.; McNaughton, D.; Tobin, M.J.; et al. Shedding New Light on the Molecular Architecture of Oocytes Using a Combination of Synchrotron Fourier Transform-Infrared and Raman Spectroscopic Mapping. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 9065–9072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Krafft, C.; Neudert, L.; Simat, T.; Salzer, R. Near infrared Raman spectra of human brain lipids. Spectrochim. Acta A 2005, 61, 1529–1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Zhang, F.; Huang, Q.; Yan, J.; Zhang, X.; Li, J. Assessment of the Effect of Trichostatin A on HeLa Cells through FT-IR Spectroscopy. Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 2511–2517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Chen, T.; Lee, M.-J.; Kim, Y.S.; Lee, S.; Kummar, S.; Gutierrez, M.; Hewitt, S.M.; Trepel, J.B.; Levin, I.W. Pharmacodynamic Assessment of Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors: Infrared Vibrational Spectroscopic Imaging of Protein Acetylation. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 6390–6396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bonizzi, A.; Magri, F.; Mazzucchelli, S.; Truffi, M.; Rizzi, A.; Corsi, F.; Cazzola, R.; Morasso, C. Determination of the quality of lipoproteins by Raman spectroscopy in obese and healthy subjects. Analyst 2023, 148, 2012–2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Manson, M.E.; Corey, D.A.; Bederman, I.; Burgess, J.D.; Kelley, T.J. Regulatory role of β-arrestin-2 in cholesterol processing in cystic fibrosis epithelial cells. J. Lipid Res. 2012, 53, 1268–1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ordoñez, C.L.; Henig, N.R.; Mayer-Hamblett, N.; Accurso, F.J.; Burns, J.L.; Chmiel, J.F.; Daines, C.L.; Gibson, R.L.; McNamara, S.; Retsch-Bogart, G.Z.; et al. Inflammatory and microbiologic markers in induced sputum after intravenous antibiotics in cystic fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2003, 168, 1471–1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Colombo, C.; Costantini, D.; Rocchi, A.; Cariani, L.; Garlaschi, M.L.; Tirelli, S.; Calori, G.; Copreni, E.; Conese, M. Cytokine levels in sputum of cystic fibrosis patients before and after antibiotic therapy. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 2005, 40, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Alsamad, F.; Gobinet, C.; Vuiblet, V.; Jaisson, S.; Piot, O. Correction: Towards normalization selection of Raman data in the context of protein glycation: Application of validity indices to PCA processed spectra. Analyst 2020, 145, 3157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zoladek, A.; Pascut, F.C.; Patel, P.; Notingher, I. Non-invasive time-course imaging of apoptotic cells by confocal Raman micro-spectroscopy. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2011, 42, 251–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Acri, G.; Testagrossa, B.; Piccione, G.; Arfuso, F.; Giudice, E.; Giannetto, C. Central and Peripheral Fatigue Evaluation during Physical Exercise in Athletic Horses by Means of Raman Spectroscopy. Animals 2023, 13, 2201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Youden, W.J. Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer 1950, 3, 32–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Bacalhau, M.; Camargo, M.; Magalhães-Ghiotto, G.A.V.; Drumond, S.; Castelletti, C.H.M.; Lopes-Pacheco, M. Elexacaftor-Tezacaftor-Ivacaftor: A Life-Changing Triple Combination of CFTR Modulator Drugs for Cystic Fibrosis. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Petersen, M.C.; Begnen, L.; Wallendorf, M.; Litvin, M. Effect of elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor on body weight and metabolic parameters in adults with cystic fibrosis. J. Cyst. Fibros. 2021, 21, 265–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Francalanci, M.; Terlizzi, V.; Fevola, C.; Di Rosa, G.; Pierattini, V.; Roselli, E.; Bonomi, P.; Cavicchi, M.C.; Galici, V.; Neri, A.S.; et al. Nutritional Status and Circulating Levels of Fat-Soluble Vitamins in Cystic Fibrosis Patients: A Cohort Study and Evaluation of the Effect of CFTR Modulators. Children 2023, 10, 252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Gelzo, M.; Iacotucci, P.; Caputo, M.; Cernera, G.; Comegna, M.; Carnovale, V.; Corso, G.; Castaldo, G. Lumacaftor/ivacaftor improves liver cholesterol metabolism but does not influence hypocholesterolemia in patients with cystic fibrosis. J. Cyst. Fibros. 2020, 20, e1–e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Hong, E.; Li, R.; Shi, A.; Almond, L.M.; Wang, J.; Khudari, A.Z.; Haddad, S.; Sislyan, S.; Angelich, M.; Chung, P.S.; et al. Safety of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor dose reduction: Mechanistic exploration through physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling and a clinical case series. Pharmacotherapy 2023, 43, 291–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 29 00433 g001
Figure 1. Average Raman spectra and SD of the sera of ETI-treated patients (blue line—SD cyan area) and non-treated patients (red line—SD light red area).
Figure 1. Average Raman spectra and SD of the sera of ETI-treated patients (blue line—SD cyan area) and non-treated patients (red line—SD light red area).
Molecules 29 00433 g001
Molecules 29 00433 g002
Figure 2. The difference spectrum of the CF patients. The difference spectrum was computed by subtracting the average spectrum of the ETI-treated patients from the average spectrum of the non-treated patients. The green line represents the zero line.
Figure 2. The difference spectrum of the CF patients. The difference spectrum was computed by subtracting the average spectrum of the ETI-treated patients from the average spectrum of the non-treated patients. The green line represents the zero line.
Molecules 29 00433 g002
Molecules 29 00433 g003
Figure 3. The Voigt deconvolution of the 3020–2800 cm−1 band. Nine sub-bands are present in both the ETI-treated patients (a) and non-treated patients (b). The straight line represents the original spectrum (blue for ETI-treated patients (a); red for non-treated patients (b)), whereas the black dotted lines in both spectra show the composite spectrum obtained from the deconvolution computation. The identified nine sub-bands are shown in the following colors: purple, yellow, cyan, brown, olive green, orange, black, green and reddish purple.
Figure 3. The Voigt deconvolution of the 3020–2800 cm−1 band. Nine sub-bands are present in both the ETI-treated patients (a) and non-treated patients (b). The straight line represents the original spectrum (blue for ETI-treated patients (a); red for non-treated patients (b)), whereas the black dotted lines in both spectra show the composite spectrum obtained from the deconvolution computation. The identified nine sub-bands are shown in the following colors: purple, yellow, cyan, brown, olive green, orange, black, green and reddish purple.
Molecules 29 00433 g003
Molecules 29 00433 g004
Figure 4. Box plot (a) and distribution graph (b) of the ETI-treated and non-treated patients.
Figure 4. Box plot (a) and distribution graph (b) of the ETI-treated and non-treated patients.
Molecules 29 00433 g004
Molecules 29 00433 g005
Figure 5. The ROC curve with the line of equality (dotted line) and the best cut-off point (black point) (a). The sensitivity and specificity vs. the AR value trend with the best cut-off point (vertical dotted points) (b).
Figure 5. The ROC curve with the line of equality (dotted line) and the best cut-off point (black point) (a). The sensitivity and specificity vs. the AR value trend with the best cut-off point (vertical dotted points) (b).
Molecules 29 00433 g005
Table 1. Raman peak position, tentative assignment and related reference of the nine sub-bands obtained from the Voigt deconvolution of the 3020–2800 cm−1 band.
Table 1. Raman peak position, tentative assignment and related reference of the nine sub-bands obtained from the Voigt deconvolution of the 3020–2800 cm−1 band.
Raman Peak Sub-Band (cm−1)AssignmentReferences
2858CH2 symmetric stretch[42,44]
2877CH3 symmetric stretch[45]
2897CH2 anti-symmetric stretch[45]
2912C-H vibrational mode[46]
2924CH2 anti-symmetric stretch[42,47]
2940CH3 symmetric stretch[42,48]
2960CH3 anti-symmetric stretch[42,49]
2977CH3 symmetric stretch[50]
2984CH2 group vibration[51]
Table 2. The AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and confidence intervals (CI) for the statistical analysis.
Table 2. The AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and confidence intervals (CI) for the statistical analysis.
ValueCI
AUC0.9770.924–1
Sensitivity0.9090.587–1
Specificity10.631–1
Table 3. The demographic and clinical features of the tested patients.
Table 3. The demographic and clinical features of the tested patients.
TreatedNon-Treated
Age (mean ± SD)22.4 ± 6.326.2 ± 8.5
F/M2:34:1
FEV1 1 (mean ± SD)104.4 ± 22.887.2 ± 18.9
BMI 2 (mean ± SD)20.9 ± 3.722.4 ± 3.9
C-reactive protein 3 (mean ± SD)0.50 ± 0.440.78 ± 0.52
Sweat chloride 4 (mean ± SD)42.4 ± 13.486.6 ± 19.8
1 forced expiratory volume per 1 s. 2 body mass index expressed as kg/cm, 3 expressed as mg/L, and 4 expressed as mEq/mg.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Acri, G.; Testagrossa, B.; Lucanto, M.C.; Cristadoro, S.; Pellegrino, S.; Ruello, E.; Costa, S. Raman Spectroscopy and Cystic Fibrosis Disease: An Alternative Potential Tool for Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR) Modulator Response Differentiation—A Pilot Study Based on Serum Samples. Molecules 2024, 29, 433. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29020433

AMA Style

Acri G, Testagrossa B, Lucanto MC, Cristadoro S, Pellegrino S, Ruello E, Costa S. Raman Spectroscopy and Cystic Fibrosis Disease: An Alternative Potential Tool for Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR) Modulator Response Differentiation—A Pilot Study Based on Serum Samples. Molecules. 2024; 29(2):433. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29020433

Chicago/Turabian Style

Acri, Giuseppe, Barbara Testagrossa, Maria Cristina Lucanto, Simona Cristadoro, Salvatore Pellegrino, Elisa Ruello, and Stefano Costa. 2024. "Raman Spectroscopy and Cystic Fibrosis Disease: An Alternative Potential Tool for Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR) Modulator Response Differentiation—A Pilot Study Based on Serum Samples" Molecules 29, no. 2: 433. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29020433

APA Style

Acri, G., Testagrossa, B., Lucanto, M. C., Cristadoro, S., Pellegrino, S., Ruello, E., & Costa, S. (2024). Raman Spectroscopy and Cystic Fibrosis Disease: An Alternative Potential Tool for Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR) Modulator Response Differentiation—A Pilot Study Based on Serum Samples. Molecules, 29(2), 433. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29020433

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop