Next Article in Journal
Simultaneous Quantification of Nine Target Compounds in Traditional Korean Medicine, Bopyeo-Tang, Using High-Performance Liquid Chromatography–Photodiode Array Detector and Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry
Next Article in Special Issue
Efficient Recovery of Phosphate from Water Media by Iron-Magnesium Functionalized Lignite: Adsorption Evaluation, Mechanism Revelation and Potential Application Exploration
Previous Article in Journal
Construction of Bi2WO6/g-C3N4 Z-Scheme Heterojunction and Its Enhanced Photocatalytic Degradation of Tetracycline with Persulfate under Solar Light
Previous Article in Special Issue
Research Progress on the Degradation of Organic Pollutants in Water by Activated Persulfate Using Biochar-Loaded Nano Zero-Valent Iron
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 29
Issue 5
10.3390/molecules29051170
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Research Progress of Ozone/Peroxymonosulfate Advanced Oxidation Technology for Degrading Antibiotics in Drinking Water and Wastewater Effluent: A Review

by
Hai Lu
1,
Xinglin Chen
1,
Qiao Cong
1,
Qingpo Li
1,
Xiaoyan Wang
1,
Shuang Zhong
2,
Huan Deng
3 and
Bojiao Yan
3,*
1
Key Laboratory of Songliao Aquatic Environment, Ministry of Education, Jilin Jianzhu University, Changchun 130118, China
2
Key Laboratory of Groundwater Resources and Environment, Ministry of Education, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
3
College of Visual Arts, Changchun Sci-Tech University, Changchun 130600, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2024, 29(5), 1170; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29051170
Submission received: 31 January 2024 / Revised: 2 March 2024 / Accepted: 4 March 2024 / Published: 6 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Wastewater Treatment: Functional Materials and Advanced Technology, 2nd Edition)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Nowadays, antibiotics are widely used, increasing the risk of contamination of the water body and further threatening human health. The traditional water treatment process is less efficient in degrading antibiotics, and the advanced oxidation process (AOPs) is cleaner and more efficient than the traditional biochemical degradation process. The combined ozone/peroxymonosulfate (PMS) advanced oxidation process (O3/PMS) based on sulfate radical (SO4•−) and hydroxyl radical (•OH) has developed rapidly in recent years. The O3/PMS process has become one of the most effective ways to treat antibiotic wastewater. The reaction mechanism of O3/PMS was reviewed in this paper, and the research and application progress of the O3/PMS process in the degradation of antibiotics in drinking water and wastewater effluent were evaluated. The operation characteristics and current application range of the process were summarized, which has a certain reference value for further research on O3/PMS process.

1. Introduction

As an emerging pollutant, pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) include various antibiotics and other common drugs [1,2,3,4]. These substances enter the environment through various channels, including veterinary medicine, agricultural medicine, human medicine, and the use of cosmetics. Antibiotics are small molecular substances synthesized by secondary metabolism after organisms grow to a certain stage, and their function is to produce resistance to pathogenic microorganisms. Since the discovery of penicillin, antibiotics have been widely used to prevent or treat infectious diseases in human and animal bodies. According to the data [5,6], between 2000 and 2015, the global use of antibiotics increased by 65%. In recent years, the use of antibiotics has increased due to the prevalence of COVID-19. According to the report [7,8], antibiotics are used globally in an amount of about 200,000 tons/year, among which, China has the highest consumption and output of antibiotics in the world. Antibiotics result in toxic effects of refractory parts on aquatic organisms in the water environment, and the residual antibiotics in the water promote the formation of drug-resistant bacteria. Antibiotic microbial resistance (AMR) is carried by antibiotic resistant bacteria (ARB) and expressed by antibiotic resistant genes (ARGs). Therefore, the accumulation of antibiotics in the water body results in the production of ARB and ARGs [9,10].
Research has shown that with the rapid development of the pharmaceutical industry and animal husbandry, more and more antibiotics are being used every year as veterinary drugs and feed in many countries across the globe. Nearly 90% of antibiotics enter various water bodies through parent or metabolites and cannot be absorbed by human beings and animals [11]. The detection of antibiotics in surface water body, drinking water, and sewage effluent has been reported widely, with a concentration ranging from ng/L–μg/L [12,13,14]. Although there are few residues, the long-term persistence of antibiotics affects the stability and health of the environment and organisms. Therefore, an economical and effective treatment method for antibiotic wastewater becomes indispensable.
In the process of antibiotic degradation, AOPs can produce the two highly active free radicals of hydroxyl radical (•OH) and sulfate radical (SO4•−) to oxidize the target pollutants [15]. Both •OH and SO4•− have strong oxidizability, which means they can react with most organic matter and remove various antibiotic pollutants efficiently. Therefore, the process shows good prospects for application in the treatment of antibiotic wastewater and is expected to replace the traditional process. For example, O3/PMS oxidation, Fenton/Fenton-like oxidation, photocatalytic oxidation, electrochemical oxidation, and O3/H2O2 oxidation are recognized as effective treatment processes for removing organic pollutants from wastewater. In recent years, perovskite-based oxides have shown high catalytic efficiency in AOPs, in which non-free radical and free radical optimization pathways may occur simultaneously. Xu X. et al. [16] reviewed the latest progress of double perovskite in various catalytic reactions such as electrocatalysis and photocatalysis. Yang L. et al. [17] uses Ruddlesden–Popper (RP) layered perovskite oxide as the material to activate PMS. The active oxygen in RP perovskite has high activity and mobility and promotes the formation of non-radical singlet oxygen. Through the adjustment and optimization of singlet oxygen, LaSrCo0.8Fe0.2O4, which can effectively activate PMS, was found.
Table 1 listed several currently prevailing AOPs, some of which are combined to further improve the degradation efficiency. Compared with other AOPs, the O3/PMS process can produce SO4•− with higher selectivity and longer half-life. The O3/PMS has broad application prospects in the field of antibiotics, in the treatment of drinking water and wastewater effluent [18].
Because the O3/PMS process has the advantages of being green, highly efficient, and brings a strong oxidation ability, and at the same time residual antibiotics in water environments are gradually increasing, the development of the O3/PMS process and the degradation of antibiotics have attracted more and more attention from scholars. In this review, the reaction mechanism of the O3/PMS advanced oxidation process, the latest progress in treating antibiotic pollutants in water based on this process, and the countermeasures for by-products generated by the O3/PMS system were described in detail. Compared with other reviews, firstly, this review focused on the treatment of antibiotic pollutants, and specifically summarizes the efficiency of AOPs based on O3/PMS to degrade antibiotic pollutants in drinking water and wastewater effluent. Therefore, it is convenient for scholars who have just stepped into the field of AOPs to read. Secondly, most of the objects reviewed in this paper are representative antibiotic pollutants with high concentration in water. Finally, the by-products produced in the process of pollutant degradation and the corresponding inhibition methods were summarized. Therefore, this paper provided reference for further study of the O3/PMS process and offered both theoretical support and a scientific basis for the development of antibiotic degradation process in the water body.

2. Study on the Application of O3/PMS Advanced Oxidation Technology in the Treatment of Water Body Containing Antibiotics

2.1. Proposal of O3/PMS Advanced Oxidation Technology

Ozone oxidation is mainly used in the field of water and wastewater treatment, including drug source treatment in medical wastewater, post treatment of secondary sewage effluent, etc. [24,25,26]. While the combined process of ozone oxidation with other oxidants/catalysts generally exhibits a high degradation effect in treating antibiotic wastewater, the experiments showed that [27] ozone is effective in disinfection, decoloration and removal of micro-pollutants. Ozone is a strong oxidant with the main property of generating •OH in water. Ozone itself is a selective strong oxidant, the order of oxidation being as follows: alkene > amine > phenol > polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon > alcohol > aldehyde > alkane. Ozone is likely to attack the double bonds of organic compounds, activated aromatic groups, and unprotonated amines [28]. Its reaction rate is much faster than that of ozone molecules, and its reaction rate constant is 108–1010 mol−1·s−1 [29,30,31]. Therefore, the degradation of micro-pollutants by O3 is usually achieved through the co-action of molecular O3 and •OH. However, for the refractory pollutants in water, the oxidation efficiency of O3 alone is low, because only a small amount of •OH is produced by O3 decomposition and the molecular O3 is selective.
Therefore, •OH-based AOPs have attracted wide attention. The combined process of O3 and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) is one of the most common advanced oxidation technologies used to degrade pollutants by •OH [32]. Table 2 showed the reaction equation for the O3/H2O2 system, see reference for detailed principles [33].
As a strong oxidant, SO4•− has a higher oxidation–reduction potential (E0 = 2.5–3.1 V) and higher selectivity than •OH. In addition to this, the reaction of SO4•− with micro-pollutants is less affected by alkalinity and natural organic matter [34,35,36]. SO4•− is formed by the activation of persulfate (PS) (that is, persulfacte (PDS) and peroxymonosulfate (PMS)). Both PMS and PDS have strong oxidizability, but when PMS and PDS are used alone to degrade organic matter, the oxidation effect is not obvious. Therefore, a certain activation mode is required to activate them to produce SO4•− and •OH with strong oxidizability. Activation methods mainly include ultraviolet irradiation, heating or addition of transition metals and carbon materials, etc. PS has the same peroxy bonds as H2O2, generating free radicals in the form of breaking peroxy bonds, the only difference being that they form SO4•− and •OH, respectively [37]. Cong J. et al. [38] proposed that the O3-activated PMS process could enhance the degradation effect of chlorobenzoic acid (pCBA), and verify that PMS had the effect of promoting the generation of free radicals, similar to H2O2. In addition, the research of Li S. et al. [39] proved that the high chemical reactivity and low kinetic stability of PMS promoted it to react with O3. The molecular formulas of H2O2, PMS and PDS are shown in Figure 1. PDS exists in a symmetrical structure, and the peroxy group is stable and can hardly react with O3 [30]. Therefore, extensive research has been conducted on the use of O3 to activate PMS, thereby simultaneously producing •OH and SO4•−, which can rapidly and effectively degrade a variety of micro-pollutants [33].

2.2. Reaction Mechanism of O3/PMS Advanced Oxidation Technology

Researchers have proposed various methods for activating PMS to generate SO4•−, including thermal decomposition, ultrasonic method, ultraviolet irradiation, alkali activation, laser flash method, transition metal or metal oxide catalysis, and so on [29]. Table 3 shows the reaction equations for the generation of •OH and SO4•− in the O3/PMS system, see reference for detailed principles [20,33]. Figure 2 and Figure 3 show the reaction paths of •OH and SO4•− in the O3/PMS system and the generation mechanism of •OH promoted by PMS and SO4•−, respectively (the serial numbers in the figures correspond to the serial numbers of reaction equations in Table 3).

2.3. Research Status of O3/PMS Advanced Oxidation Technology for Treatment of Antibiotics in Drinking Water and Wastewater Effluent

2.3.1. Treatment Efficacy of O3/PMS Advanced Oxidation Technology for Antibiotics in Drinking Water and Wastewater Effluent

Due to the incomplete degradation of pollutants in water by traditional water treatment methods, clean and efficient advanced oxidation technology has attracted extensive attention from scholars. The O3/PMS process has more advantages in oxidation and can be used for the treatment of antibiotic pollutants in the water body.
Sulfame-thoxazo (SMX), sulfamethazine (SMZ), and sulfadiazine (SDZ) are typical sulfonamide antibiotics in drinking water and wastewater effluent. Research has shown that the sulfate radical-based advanced oxidation process (SR-AOPs) can effectively degrade SMX, such as Fe0/PS [40], Fe(II)/PS [41], Co(II)/PMS [42]. Liu Z. et al. [43] studied the degradation of SMX by adding novel catalysts CuCo2O4-GO and CuCo2O4 as heterogeneous catalysts in the O3/PMS process. Liu Z. et al. prepared CuCo2O4 and CuCo2O4-GO nanoparticles by sol-gel method and hydrothermal method, respectively, and synthesized CuCo2O4-GO with different proportions of GO (5%, 10%, 20%, and 40%). The experiment was carried out in a 1000 mL hemispherical glass bottle. The experimental conditions were as follows: the temperature was 20 ± 2 °C, the pH was 7.0, the initial concentration of SMX was 30 μmol/L, the concentration of PMS was 100 μmol/L, the concentration of O3 was 1.30 mg/min, and the concentration of CuCo2O4 and CuCo2O4-GO was 100 mg/L. The degradation rate of SMX reached more than 98% after 10 min in the O3/PMS/CuCo2O4 and O3/PMS/CuCo2O4-GO system, while the O3/PMS process could almost completely degrade SMX after 25 min. Figure 4 shows that the addition of CuCo2O4 and CuCo2O4-GO promoted the degradation of SMX and greatly shortened the time for complete degradation of SMX. It is an effective way to strengthen the degradation of SMX. Du X. et al. [44] adopted a PMS/(oxidation/coagulation) coupled ceramic membrane process to remove Fe2+, Mn2+, and SMZ. The experimental conditions were as follows: the initial concentration of SMZ was 400 μg/L, the concentration of PMS was 100 μmol/L, the concentration of O2 was 0.14 mg/L, the concentration of Fe(II) was 4.2 mg/L, the concentration of Mn was 1.0 mg/L, and the initial pH was 7.3. A large number of humus substances are oxidized by the •OH radical and SO4•− radicals. The results showed that Fe2+ and Mn2+ in groundwater played an in situ catalytic role in the system, which accelerated the yield of •OH and SO4•− and further oxidized SMZ or natural organic matter (NOM). The particularity of the method was that Fe2+ in the groundwater could be used to activate the PMS in situ. In the oxidation process, the NOM in the water was also degraded. In recent years, Lu H. et al. [45] studied the degradation of SDZ in water by the O3/PMS process and compared the experimental results with the O3 alone and the O3/UV method. The experiment was carried out in a cylindrical glass reactor with a volume of 6 L. The experimental conditions were as follows: the temperature was 25 ± 0.5 °C, the initial concentration of SDZ was 10 mg/L, the concentration of O3 was 3 mg/L, the concentration of PMS was 22.8 mg/L, the UV intensity was 0.9 mw/cm2, and the pH was 6.8 ± 0.1. In the O3/PMS system, the degradation rate of SDZ reached 95.9% at 12 min, and the degradation rate of SDZ was below the detection limit at 13 min. However, at 12 min, the degradation rates of O3 and O3/UV were only 73.8% and 76.5%, respectively. The time required for O3/PMS to degrade SDZ was about 7 min shorter than that required by the O3 and O3/UV processes. In the O3/PMS system, the most suitable pH range is weak alkalinity. O3/PMS could effectively degrade SDZ and fluorescent substances dissolved in water, which showed a good prospect for practical engineering applications.
Ciprofloxacin (CIP) is a quinolone antibiotic considered to be a high-risk environmental pollutant [46]. In recent years, Li S. et al. [47] proposed a pore confinement method based on green ball milling, in which Co-Ce nanoparticles were immobilized on a mesoporous silica support as a catalyst to promote the degradation of CIP using the O3/PMS process. The catalyst exhibited higher activity due to enhanced interfacial mediated electron transfer. The heterogeneous O3/PMS reaction was carried out in a cylindrical reactor containing 500 mL 10 ppm CIP solution. The experimental conditions were as follows: the initial concentration of CIP was 10 mg/L, the concentration of PMS was 0.4 g/L, the concentration of the catalyst was 0.2 g/L, and the initial pH was 2.8. The total organic carbon removal rate of CIP was more than 70% after the treatment by the O3/PMS/Co-Ce-CS process for 10 min. The catalyst provides new possibilities for the treatment of organic pollutants in water environment.
The isothiazolinone bactericide is an antibiotic insecticide [48]. Li A. et al. [49] studied the kinetics and mechanism of oxidative degradation of methyl-isothiazolinone (MIT) by ozone. The experiment was carried out in a reactor with a volume of 3 L. The research showed that ozone could react with MIT at a low temperature. The molar concentration of ozone should be more than four times higher than that of MIT to achieve a higher removal rate. Ozone could reduce the toxicity of MIT by converting sulfur atoms in MIT to sulfate ions. The primary ozonation products of MIT showed toxicity, but the toxicity could be minimized by the ozonation reaction for 80 min. Yang Z. et al. [50] used O3/PMS to degrade isothiazolinone bactericide. The batch degradation experiment was carried out in a 100 mL conical flask. The experimental conditions were as follows: phosphate buffered saline with a concentration of 5 mmol/L was used as the medium, the concentration of O3 was 42 μmol/L, the concentration of PMS was 21 μmol/L, the initial concentration of MIT and CMIT was 1 mg/L, and the pH was 7. O3/PMS could degrade MIT and Chloro-methyl-isothiazolin (CMIT) by 91% and 81.8%, respectively, within 90 s, which were 30.6% and 62.5% higher than those of ozone oxidation alone. The experimental results showed that the total generation amount of O3/PMS free radicals was 24.6 times higher than O3 alone, indicating that •OH and SO4•− played a major role in the oxidation of MIT and CMIT. Compared with O3/H2O2, it was found that the reaction rate of the deprotonation component of O3/PMS was higher than that of O3/H2O2. This shows that PMS can consume ozone molecules efficiently and improve the utilization rate of ozone.
Both cefalexin (CFX) and Amoxicillin (AM) belong to β-lactam antibiotics. Nguyen V. et al. [51] developed 2-Co2SnO4 and 2-Co2SnO4@rGO nanocomposites with different compounding ratios using a sol-gel method. Then, these nanocomposites were used as heterogeneous catalysts to degrade CFX in the form of a O3/PMS/2-Co2SnO4@rGO system. The experiment was carried out in a cylindrical borosilicate glass reactor with a height of 450 mm and a diameter of 60 mm. The experimental conditions were as follows: the concentration of CFX was 100 mg/L, the concentration of catalyst was 0.3 g/L, the concentration of PMS was 300 mg/L, the O3 flow rate was 15 mL/min, and the initial pH was 7. The CFX degradation efficiencies of Co2SnO4@rGO/PMS and O3/Co2SnO4@rGO/PMS reached 95.07% and 99.07%, respectively, at the compounding ratio of 2-Co2SnO4 and 1-rGO. The synergistic effect of O3/Co2SnO4@rGO/PMS led to the production of more •OH and SO4•−, thereby increasing the degradation rate of CFX in the system. Therefore, it is feasible to adopt the nano-composite catalyst to activate PMS in combined ozone oxidation to degrade antibiotic residues in wastewater. Gholikandi G. et al. [52] degraded AM in wastewater from a sewage treatment plant using the O3/PMS process and compared it with O3/PS, O3/H2O2 and O3 alone processes. In this experiment, a cylindrical glass reactor with a diameter of 3 cm and a height of 40 cm was used. The experimental conditions were as follows: the temperature was 17.6 °C, the concentration of O3 was 0.083 mmol/L, the concentration of PMS was 0.09 mmol/L, the concentration of H2O2 was 1.05 mmol/L, the concentration of PS was 3 mmol/L, and the initial pH was 6.9 ± 0.1. The removal rate of AM by O3/PMS reached 90 ± 2% within 30 min, while that of O3/PS and O3/H2O2 methods was only about 60–70%. Therefore, the removal rate of AM by O3/PMS was higher than that of the other three methods, and it could be used as an effective new method for sewage disinfection and removal of organic pollutants.
In recent years, biochar has exhibited great potential in environmental remediation due to low cost, large specific surface area, high porosity, and high conductivity. Biochar-assisted methods have attracted more and more attention in the degradation of organic pollutants in water [53]. Fang G. et al. [54] carried out research on the utilization of manganese oxide/biochar composite (MnxOy @BC) to activate periodate (PI) to degrade oxytetracycline (OTC). The experimental conditions were as follows: the temperature was 25 °C, the concentration of PI was 0.25 mmol/L, the initial concentration of OTC was 20 mg/L, the concentration of MnxOy @BC was 0.3 g/L, and the pH was 3.0. The degradation rate of OTC in MnxOy @BC/PI system was almost 98%, and the TOC removal rate was 75%. Various characterization analyses also verified that the functional groups on the surface of biochar and manganese active species (Mn (II), Mn (III) and Mn (IV)) could effectively activate PI. The MnxOy @BC system has great room for improvement and great practical application potential. Miao J. et al. [55] improved the activation efficiency of persulfate heterogeneous catalysts by loading metals on N-doped carbon materials. They studied and synthesized a Co/NC composite catalyst derived from Co3O4/PPY and used it to activate PMS to degrade benzothiazole (BTH). The catalytic degradation experiment confirmed the synergistic catalytic effect of Co, C, and N on PMS activation. The experimental conditions were as follows: the concentration of Co/NC-0.4 was 0.05 g/L, the concentration of PMS was 0.4 g/L, the initial concentration of BTH was 20 ppm, and the pH was 7.21. BTH was completely degraded within 20 min at 25 °C. In addition, under the same conditions, the production rate of free radicals in the Co/NC-0.4/PMS system is faster than that in other systems, and the effective utilization rate of PMS is also improved. The metal leaching of Co/NC-0.4/PMS system is also obviously inhibited by the coating of NC layer.
The O3/PMS process is an effective technology for treating antibiotics in various water bodies. But the generation of by-products cannot be ignored in practical application, and appropriate measures should be taken to inhibit the generation of by-products.

2.3.2. Inhibition of By-Product Generation in O3/PMS System by Adding Carbon Materials

The O3/PMS process can effectively remove organic pollutants from water by utilizing •OH and SO4•−, and meanwhile, a large number of by-product bromate (BrO3−) is formed due to the existence of Br− [56]. Figure 5 showed the formation mechanism of bromate in O3/PMS system [33].
Wen G. et al. [57] studied the formation mechanism of BrO3− in the O3/PMS system. The first path was as follows: Br− was oxidized to Br• by SO4•− and •OH, then Br• reacted with O3 to form BrO2•, and then BrO• was oxidized to BrO3− by SO4•− and •OH; another path was that O3 oxidized Br− to hypobromous acid (HOBr/OBr−), then HOBr/OBr− reacted with O3 to form BrO2•, and BrO2• continued to be oxidized to BrO3−. It could be seen that SO4•− and •OH promoted the generation of by-products, so the O3/PMS process was more likely to produce BrO3− than ozone oxidation alone.
Liu Z. et al. [43] proposed the addition of novel catalysts CuCo2O4-GO and CuCo2O4 as heterogeneous catalysts to the O3/PMS process for the degradation of SMX. Compared with CuCo2O4, CuCo2O4-GO not only retained the catalytic performance of CuCo2O4, but also inhibited the generation of BrO3− in the O3/PMS system. HOBr/OBr− was a decisive intermediate in the generation of BrO3−. The addition of CuCo2O4-GO mainly inhibited the further transformation of HOBr/OBr− to reduce HOBr/OBr− to Br−, thereby inhibiting the generation of BrO3−. The results showed that the optimal dosage of GO in CuCo2O4-GO was 20%. Under this ratio, CuCo2O4-GO had the highest first-order rate constant for the degradation of SMX and the lowest utilization efficiency of O3。This almost completely inhibited the generation of BrO3−, indicated that it promoted the decomposition of O3 to produce •OH, thereby reducing the reaction of O3 with Br−, and indirectly resulting in a large decrease in the generation of BrO3−. Meanwhile, when CuCo2O4-GO was added into actual water samples, the generation of BrO3− was significantly inhibited. In addition, after CuCo2O4-GO was recycled three times, the degradation efficiency of SMX reached 90% within 10 min, and the inhibition efficiency of CuCo2O4-GO on BrO3− could reach over 80% after the first two uses. Wen G. et al. [58] studied the addition of low-dose carbon materials to inhibit the generation of BrO3− in the O3/PMS process. The added carbon materials included powdered activated carbon (PAC), carbon nanotubes (CNT) and graphene oxide (GO). The results showed that all three of the carbon materials played the role of reducing the intermediate product (HOBr/OBr−) in the reaction, thereby inhibiting the generation of BrO3− in the system. The order of inhibition ability was as follows: GO > CNT > PAC. It can be seen from Figure 6 that adding low-dose carbon material is an effective way to promote the degradation of organic pollutants and control the formation of bromate. But, the inhibition methods are far more than that, including the adoption of NH3, Cl2-NH3, NH3-Cl2, and other treatment methods. See references [56,59] for details.

3. Conclusions

The O3/PMS process can simultaneously produce two highly active free radicals: •OH and SO4•−, in which O3 reacts with H2O to generate •OH, and O3 activates PMS to produce SO4•−. SO4•− and •OH co-oxidize pollutants, which makes it possible to treat more complex organic pollution in water environment. SO4•− and •OH have strong oxidizability, so the process has the advantages of rapidly degrading organic pollutants and mineralizing the same into CO2 and H2O. Meanwhile, for the research of the O3/PMS process, the generation of by-product BrO3− should be considered. In the reaction, a low dosage of carbon material can reduce HOBr/OBr− to Br−, thereby inhibiting the generation of bromate.
This paper focuses on the treatment efficiency of O3/PMS and its composite system for different kinds of antibiotic pollutants in drinking water and wastewater effluent. The addition of a catalyst composite can generate more •OH radicals and SO4•− radicals. The addition of carbon materials can inhibit the generation of by-products, greatly shorten the reaction time, and improve the degradation efficiency. This also can realize the efficient removal of antibiotic pollutants in the water environment. This has great implications for protecting water resources and ecosystems and reducing human health risks.

4. Future Directions

The O3/PMS process has wide application potential in water treatment, and future directions for research include the following: Firstly, it is necessary to combine other technologies on the basis of the O3/PMS system, which can improve the degradation efficiency to some extent [60]. Secondly, researchers should look for or independently develop economic and environmental catalyst materials. By adding a catalyst composite and optimizing reaction conditions, the process can be cleaner and more efficient, and the catalytic activity and stability of the system can be further improved [61]. Thirdly, the evaluation of side reactions and toxicity of intermediate products in the process of degradation needs further study, including in the areas of degradation mechanisms and degradation pathways. It is necessary to explore more targeted treatment methods to degrade pollutants and reduce toxic by-products from the treatment of antibiotic wastewater [57]. At the same time, it is important to develop a combined process with other water treatment technologies [62], and to deeply study the scale of AOPs process to protect human health and ecological environment.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.L.; methodology, X.C.; software, Q.L.; validation, X.C.; formal analysis, X.W.; investigation, B.Y.; resources, S.Z.; data curation, Q.L.; writing—original draft preparation, H.L.; writing—review and editing, X.C.; visualization, H.D.; supervision, B.Y.; project administration, Q.C.; funding acquisition, Q.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 42130705).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

We thank Jianhui Wang and Xiaoling Wang for their help during this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Pruden, A.; Pei, R.; Storteboom, H.; Carlson, K.H. Antibiotic Resistance Genes as Emerging Contaminants: Studies in Northern Colorado. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 7445–7450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wiszniowski, J.; Robert, D.; Surmacz-Gorska, J.; Miksch, K.; Weber, J.V. Landfill leachate treatment methods: A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2006, 4, 51–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Luo, Y.; Guo, W.; Ngo, H.H.; Nghiem, L.D.; Hai, F.I.; Zhang, J.; Liang, S.; Wang, X.C. A review on the occurrence of micropollutants in the aquatic environment and their fate and removal during wastewater treatment. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 473–474, 619–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Schwarzenbach, R.P.; Escher, B.I.; Fenner, K.; Hofstetter, T.B.; Johnson, C.A.; Von Gunten, U.; Wehrli, B. The Challenge of Micropollutants in Aquatic Systems. Science 2006, 313, 1072–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Klein, E.Y.; Van Boeckel, T.P.; Martinez, E.M.; Pant, S.; Gandra, S.; Levin, S.A.; Goossens, H.; Laxminarayan, R. Global increase and geographic convergence in antibiotic consumption between 2000 and 2015. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 3463–3470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Chen, G.; Yu, Y.; Liang, L.; Duan, X.; Li, R.; Lu, X.; Yan, B.; Li, N.; Wang, S. Remediation of antibiotic wastewater by coupled photocatalytic and persulfate oxidation system: A critical review. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 408, 124461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Anjali, R.; Shanthakumar, S. Insights on the current status of occurrence and removal of antibiotics in wastewater by advanced oxidation processes. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 246, 51–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Wei, Z.; Liu, J.; Shangguan, W. A review on photocatalysis in antibiotic wastewater: Pollutant degradation and hydrogen production. Chin. J. Catal. 2020, 41, 1440–1450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hiller, C.X.; Hübner, U.; Fajnorova, S.; Schwartz, T.; Drewes, J.E. Antibiotic microbial resistance (AMR) removal efficiencies by conventional and advanced wastewater treatment processes: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 685, 596–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Salcedo, D.E.; Lee, J.H.; Ha, U.H.; Kim, S.P. The effects of antibiotics on the biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance gene transfer. Desalin. Water. Treat. 2014, 54, 3582–3588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Du, L.; Liu, W. Occurrence, fate, and ecotoxicity of antibiotics in agro-ecosystems. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2011, 32, 309–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, S.H.; Lv, X.; Han, B.; Gu, X.; Wang, P.F.; Wang, C.; He, Z. Prevalence of antibiotic resistance genes in antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli isolates in surface water of Taihu Lake Basin, China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 11412–11421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Xu, Y.; Guo, C.; Luo, Y.; Lv, J.; Zhang, Y.; Lin, H.; Wang, L.; Xu, J. Occurrence and distribution of antibiotics, antibiotic resistance genes in the urban rivers in Beijing, China. Environ. Pollut. 2016, 213, 833–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lekunberri, I.; Villagrasa, M.; Balcazar, J.L.; Borrego, C.M. Contribution of bacteriophage and plasmid DNA to the mobilization of antibiotic resistance genes in a river receiving treated wastewater discharges. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 601–602, 206–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Fatta-Kassinos, D.; Vasquez, M.I.; Kummerer, K. Transformation products of pharmaceuticals in surface waters and wastewater formed during photolysis and advanced oxidation processes—Degradation, elucidation of byproducts and assessment of their biological potency. Chemosphere 2011, 85, 693–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Xu, X.; Zhong, Y.; Shao, Z. Double Perovskites in Catalysis, Electrocatalysis, and Photo(electro)catalysis. Trends Chem. 2019, 1, 410–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yang, L.; Jiao, Y.; Xu, X.; Pan, Y.; Su, C.; Duan, X.; Sun, H.; Liu, S.; Wang, S.; Shao, Z. Superstructures with Atomic-Level Arranged Perovskite and Oxide Layers for Advanced Oxidation with an Enhanced Non-Free Radical Pathway. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 1899–1909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wu, W.T.; Zhang, L.L.; Li, Z.F.; Wang, C.X.; Yu, C.S.; Wang, Q.G. Research progress of advanced oxidation technology in degradation of antibiotics and removal of antibiotic resistance. Chem. Ind. Eng. Prog. 2021, 40, 4551–4561. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  19. Yang, Y.; Jiang, J.; Lu, X.; Ma, J.; Liu, Y. Production of sulfate radical and hydroxyl radical by reaction of ozone with peroxymonosulfate: A novel advanced oxidation process. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 7330–7339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chen, Y.J.; Fan, T.Y.; Wang, L.P.; Cheng, T.W.; Chen, S.S.; Yuan, M.H.; Cheng, S. Application of Fenton Method for the Removal of Organic Matter in Sewage Sludge at Room Temperature. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Miklos, D.B.; Wang, W.L.; Linden, K.G.; Drewes, J.E.; Hübner, U. Comparison of UV-AOPs (UV/H2O2, UV/PDS and UV/Chlorine) for TOrC removal from municipal wastewater effluent and optical surrogate model evaluation. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 362, 537–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zou, J.P.; Chen, Y.; Liu, S.S.; Xing, Q.J.; Dong, W.H.; Luo, X.B.; Dai, W.L.; Xiao, X.; Luo, J.M.; Crittenden, J. Electrochemical oxidation and advanced oxidation processes using a 3D hexagonal Co3O4 array anode for 4-nitrophenol decomposition coupled with simultaneous CO2 conversion to liquid fuels via a flower-like CuO cathode. Water Res. 2019, 150, 330–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Rosenfeldt, E.J.; Linden, K.G.; Canonica, S.; Von Gunten, U. Comparison of the efficiency of *OH radical formation during ozonation and the advanced oxidation processes O3/H2O2 and UV/H2O2. Water Res. 2006, 40, 3695–3704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Lu, H.; Li, Q.; Feng, W.; Zhang, X. Application Progress of O3/PMS Advanced Oxidation Technology in the Treatment of Organic Pollutants in Drinking Water. Sustainability 2022, 14, 11718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hansen, K.M.S.; Spiliotopoulou, A.; Chhetri, R.K.; Escolà Casas, M.; Bester, K.; Andersen, H.R. Ozonation for source treatment of pharmaceuticals in hospital wastewater—Ozone lifetime and required ozone dose. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 290, 507–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zheng, J.; Su, C.; Zhou, J.; Xu, L.; Qian, Y.; Chen, H. Effects and mechanisms of ultraviolet, chlorination, and ozone disinfection on antibiotic resistance genes in secondary effluents of municipal wastewater treatment plants. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 317, 309–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Camel, V.; Bermond, A. The use of ozone and associated oxidation processes in drinking water treatment. Water Res. 1998, 32, 3208–3222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Von Gunten, U. Ozonation of drinking water: Part I. Oxidation kinetics and product formation. Water Res. 2003, 37, 1443–1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yuan, Z.; Sui, M.; Yuan, B.; Li, P.; Wang, J.; Qin, J.; Xu, G. Degradation of ibuprofen using ozone combined with peroxymonosulfate. Environ. Sci. Water Res. Technol. 2017, 3, 960–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Von Sonntag, C.; Von Sonntag, U. Chemistry of Ozone in Water and Wastewater Treatment; IWA Publishing: London, UK, 2012; pp. 225–248. [Google Scholar]
  31. Buxton, G.V.; Greenstock, C.L.; Helman, W.P.; Ross, A.B. Critical Review of rate constants for reactions of hydrated electrons, hydrogen atoms and hydroxyl radicals (⋅OH/O− in Aqueous Solution. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1988, 17, 513–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Piras, F.; Santoro, O.; Pastore, T.; Pio, I.; De Dominicis, E.; Gritti, E.; Caricato, R.; Lionetto, M.G.; Mele, G.; Santoro, D. Controlling micropollutants in tertiary municipal wastewater by O3/H2O2, granular biofiltration and UV254/H2O2 for potable reuse applications. Chemosphere 2020, 239, 124635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Liu, Z.; Liang, Z.; Li, K.; Huang, T.; Ma, J.; Wen, G. Degradation of Micropollutants and Formation of Oxidation By-Products during the Ozone/Peroxymonosulfate System: A Critical Review. Water 2021, 13, 3126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Neta, P.; Hule, R.E. Rate Constants for Reactions of Inorganic Radicals in Aqueous Solution. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1988, 17, 1027–1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lutze, H.V.; Bircher, S.; Rapp, I.; Kerlin, N.; Bakkour, R.; Geisler, M.; Von Sonntag, C.; Schmidt, T.C. Degradation of chlorotriazine pesticides by sulfate radicals and the influence of organic matter. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 1673–1680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Gara, P.M.D.; Bosio, G.N.; Gonzalez, M.C.; Mártire, D.O. Kinetics of the sulfate radical-mediated photo-oxidation of humic substances. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 2007, 40, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wang, J.; Wang, S. Activation of persulfate (PS) and peroxymonosulfate (PMS) and application for the degradation of emerging contaminants. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 334, 1502–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cong, J.; Wen, G.; Huang, T.; Deng, L.; Ma, J. Study on enhanced ozonation degradation of para-chlorobenzoic acid by peroxymonosulfate in aqueous solution. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 264, 399–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Li, S.; Huang, J.; Li, X.; Li, L. The relation of interface electron transfer and PMS activation by the H-bonding interaction between composite metal and MCM-48 during sulfamethazine ozonation. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 398, 125529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ghauch, A.; Ayoub, G.; Naim, S. Degradation of sulfamethoxazole by persulfate assisted micrometric Fe0 in aqueous solution. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 228, 1168–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ji, Y.; Ferronato, C.; Salvador, A.; Yang, X.; Chovelon, J.M. Degradation of ciprofloxacin and sulfamethoxazole by ferrous-activated persulfate: Implications for remediation of groundwater contaminated by antibiotics. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 472, 800–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Mahdi Ahmed, M.; Barbati, S.; Doumenq, P.; Chiron, S. Sulfate radical anion oxidation of diclofenac and sulfamethoxazole for water decontamination. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 197, 440–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Liu, Z.; Wang, S.; Ma, W.; Wang, J.; Xu, H.; Li, K.; Huang, T.; Ma, J.; Wen, G. Adding CuCo2O4-GO to inhibit bromate formation and enhance sulfamethoxazole degradation during the ozone/peroxymonosulfate process: Efficiency and mechanism. Chemosphere 2022, 286, 131829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Du, X.; Yang, W.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, W.; Wang, Z.; Nie, J.; Li, G.; Liang, H. Removal of manganese, ferrous and antibiotics from groundwater simultaneously using peroxymonosulfate-assisted in-situ oxidation/coagulation integrated with ceramic membrane process. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2020, 252, 117492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Lu, H.; Feng, W.; Li, Q. Degradation Efficiency Analysis of Sulfadiazine in Water by Ozone/Persulfate Advanced Oxidation Process. Water 2022, 14, 2476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hartmann, A.; Golet, E.M.; Gartiser, S.; Alder, A.C.; Koller, T.; Widmer, R.M. Primary DNA Damage But Not Mutagenicity Correlates with Ciprofloxacin Concentrations in German Hospital Wastewaters. Sep. Purif. Technol. 1999, 36, 115–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Li, S.; Fan, X.; Gu, M.; Cagnetta, G.; Huang, J.; Yu, G. Confined-space strategy for anchoring catalytic nanoparticles on Si-OH by ball milling for enhanced O3/PMS oxidation of ciprofloxacin. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 429, 132318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Silva, V.; Silva, C.; Soares, P.; Garrido, E.M.; Borges, F.; Garrido, J. Isothiazolinone Biocides: Chemistry, Biological, and Toxicity Profiles. Molecules 2020, 25, 991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Li, A.; Wu, Q.Y.; Tian, G.P.; Hu, H.Y. Effective degradation of methylisothiazolone biocide using ozone: Kinetics, mechanisms, and decreases in toxicity. J. Environ. Manag. 2016, 183, 1064–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Yang, Z.W.; Wang, W.L.; Lee, M.Y.; Wu, Q.Y.; Guan, Y.T. Synergistic effects of ozone/peroxymonosulfate for isothiazolinone biocides degradation: Kinetics, synergistic performance and influencing factors. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 294, 118626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Nguyen, V.L.; Le, M.T.; Nguyen, L.H. Synthesising nanocomposite Co2SnO4@rGO for peroximonosulphate activation in a hybrid ozonation system to effectively degrade cefalexin from wastewater. Environ. Sci. 2023, 65, 50–58. [Google Scholar]
  52. Gholikandi, G.B.; Mollazadeh, A.; Farimaniraad, H.; Masihi, H. Using Peroxymonosulfate-Ozone Advanced Oxidation For The Treated Wastewater Disinfection and Amoxicillin Micro-Pollutant Removal Simultaneously. Res. Sq. 2021, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Jiang, T.; Wang, B.; Gao, B.; Cheng, N.; Feng, Q.; Chen, M.; Wang, S. Degradation of organic pollutants from water by biochar-assisted advanced oxidation processes: Mechanisms and applications. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 442, 130075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Fang, G.; Li, J.; Zhang, C.; Qin, F.; Luo, H.; Huang, C.; Qin, D.; Ouyang, Z. Periodate activated by manganese oxide/biochar composites for antibiotic degradation in aqueous system: Combined effects of active manganese species and biochar. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 300, 118939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Miao, J.; Wang, P.; Zhou, X.; Zhang, N.; Zhang, R.; Wei, X.; Peng, S. Cobalt oxide/polypyrrole derived Co/NC to activate peroxymonosulfate for benzothiazole degradation: Enhanced conversion efficiency of PMS to free radicals. J. Water Process Eng. 2024, 57, 104639. [Google Scholar]
  56. Liu, Z.; Wen, G.; Ni, Y.; Wang, S.; Wang, S.; Yu, Y.; Huang, T.; Ma, J. Inhibition of bromate formation in the ozone/peroxymonosulfate process by ammonia, ammonia-chlorine and chlorine-ammonia pretreatment: Comparisons with ozone alone. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021, 278, 119600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wen, G.; Qiang, C.; Feng, Y.; Huang, T.; Ma, J. Bromate formation during the oxidation of bromide-containing water by ozone/peroxymonosulfate process: Influencing factors and mechanisms. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 352, 316–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Wen, G.; Wang, S.; Wang, T.; Feng, Y.; Chen, Z.; Lin, W.; Huang, T.; Ma, J. Inhibition of bromate formation in the O3/PMS process by adding low dosage of carbon materials: Efficiency and mechanism. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 402, 126207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ling, L.; Deng, Z.; Fang, J.; Shang, C. Bromate control during ozonation by ammonia-chlorine and chlorine-ammonia pretreatment: Roles of bromine-containing haloamines. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 389, 123447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lim, H.J.; Kim, D.J.; Rigby, K.; Chen, W.; Xu, H.; Wu, X.; Kim, J.H. Peroxymonosulfate-Based Electrochemical Advanced Oxidation: Complication by Oxygen Reduction Reation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 57, 19054–19063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Li, Y.; Zhou, C.; Zhang, X.; Hui, B. Charcoal-based block catalyst boosts peroxymonosulfate activation for ciprofloxacin degradation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2024, 329, 125194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Wang, J.; Long, X.; Zhang, I.; Huang, R. Pulsed versus direct current electrochemical co-catalytic peroxymonosulfate-based system: Elevated degradation and energy efficiency with enhanced oxidation mechanisms. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 458, 132004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Molecules 29 01170 g001
Figure 1. Molecular formulas of H2O2, PMS and PDS.
Figure 1. Molecular formulas of H2O2, PMS and PDS.
Molecules 29 01170 g001
Molecules 29 01170 g002
Figure 2. Reaction paths of •OH and SO4•− in the O3/PMS system.
Figure 2. Reaction paths of •OH and SO4•− in the O3/PMS system.
Molecules 29 01170 g002
Molecules 29 01170 g003
Figure 3. Reaction mechanism promoting the generation of •OH in the O3/PMS system.
Figure 3. Reaction mechanism promoting the generation of •OH in the O3/PMS system.
Molecules 29 01170 g003
Molecules 29 01170 g004
Figure 4. The removal effect of different reaction systems on SMX [43]. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [43]. Copyright 2022, Elsevier.
Figure 4. The removal effect of different reaction systems on SMX [43]. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [43]. Copyright 2022, Elsevier.
Molecules 29 01170 g004
Molecules 29 01170 g005
Figure 5. Formation mechanism of bromate in O3/PMS system (the red path represents the adding of carbon materials).
Figure 5. Formation mechanism of bromate in O3/PMS system (the red path represents the adding of carbon materials).
Molecules 29 01170 g005
Molecules 29 01170 g006
Figure 6. Effect of three materials on bromate formation efficiency in O3/PMS system [58]. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [58]. Copyright 2022, Elsevier.
Figure 6. Effect of three materials on bromate formation efficiency in O3/PMS system [58]. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [58]. Copyright 2022, Elsevier.
Molecules 29 01170 g006
Table 1. Comparison of mainstream advanced oxidation technologies.
Table 1. Comparison of mainstream advanced oxidation technologies.
ProcessAdvantagesDisadvantagesReferences
O3/PMS oxidationSimple equipment, mild reaction conditions, and normal temperature and pressure operation; the production of two active free radicals, strong oxidation ability, high efficiency and stronger applicability.Weak mineralization ability, and the running in weak alkaline environment.[19]
Fenton oxidationFriendly to the environment, occupies a small space, high oxidation efficiency and strong oxidation ability.High treatment cost, harsh operating conditions and the running in strong acid conditions.[20]
Photochemical catalytic oxidationGreen and environment-friendly lighting, little impact on water quality, low operating cost and long service life.Needs to be combined with other technologies to achieve better results: such as UV/H2O2, and UV/PDS; ultraviolet light beam with built-in light tube harmful to human body.[21]
Electrochemical oxidationSimple electrolysis device, convenient operation and control, the oxidization of pollutants by the anode, and the changes of the anode material to destroy different types of organic matter.Excessive energy consumption, low reactor efficiency and high equipment cost.[22]
O3/H2O2 oxidationFast oxidation speed and high oxidation efficiency.Complex equipment, high energy consumption, high cost and easy to produce bromate.[23]
Table 2. Reaction equation for the generation of •OH in O3/H2O2 system.
Table 2. Reaction equation for the generation of •OH in O3/H2O2 system.
EquationSerial Number
H O 2 − + O 3 → H O 5 − (1)
H O 5 − → O 3 • − + H O 2 • (2)
H O 5 − → 2 O 2 + O H − (3)
O 3 • − ⇌ O • − + O 2 (4)
O • − + H 2 O ⇌ • O H + O H − (5)
H O 2 • ⇌ O 2 • − + H + (6)
O 2 • − + O 3 → O 3 • − + O 2 (7)
Table 3. Reaction equation and reaction rate constant for the generation of •OH and SO4•− in the O3/PMS system.
Table 3. Reaction equation and reaction rate constant for the generation of •OH and SO4•− in the O3/PMS system.
EquationReaction Rate Constant
(L·mol−1·s−1)		Serial Number
− O 3 S O O − + O 3 → − O 3 S O 5 − 2.12 × 10 4 (8)
− O 3 S O 5 − → S O 5 • − + O 3 • − none(9)
− O 3 S O 5 − → S O 4 2 − + 2 O 2 none(10)
S O 5 • − + O 3 → S O 4 • − + 2 O 2 1.6 × 10 5 (11)
2 S O 5 • − → 2 S O 4 • − + O 2 2.1 × 10 8 (12)
2 S O 5 • − → S 2 O 8 2 − + O 2 2.1 × 10 8 (13)
O 3 • − ⇌ O • − + O 2 none(14)
O • − + H 2 O → • O H + O H − none(15)
H S O 5 − + H 2 O → H 2 O 2 + H S O 4 − none(16)
S O 5 2 − + H 2 O → H 2 O 2 + S O 4 2 − none(17)
2 O 3 + H 2 O 2 → 2 • O H + 3 O 2 none(18)
S O 4 • − + O H − → S O 4 2 − + • O H ( 6.5 ± 1.0 ) × 10 7 (19)
S O 4 • − + H 2 O → H + + S O 4 − + • O H < 3 × 10 3 (20)
S O 5 2 − + H S O 5 − → H S O 4 − + S O 4 2 − + O 2 none (21)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lu, H.; Chen, X.; Cong, Q.; Li, Q.; Wang, X.; Zhong, S.; Deng, H.; Yan, B. Research Progress of Ozone/Peroxymonosulfate Advanced Oxidation Technology for Degrading Antibiotics in Drinking Water and Wastewater Effluent: A Review. Molecules 2024, 29, 1170. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29051170

AMA Style

Lu H, Chen X, Cong Q, Li Q, Wang X, Zhong S, Deng H, Yan B. Research Progress of Ozone/Peroxymonosulfate Advanced Oxidation Technology for Degrading Antibiotics in Drinking Water and Wastewater Effluent: A Review. Molecules. 2024; 29(5):1170. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29051170

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lu, Hai, Xinglin Chen, Qiao Cong, Qingpo Li, Xiaoyan Wang, Shuang Zhong, Huan Deng, and Bojiao Yan. 2024. "Research Progress of Ozone/Peroxymonosulfate Advanced Oxidation Technology for Degrading Antibiotics in Drinking Water and Wastewater Effluent: A Review" Molecules 29, no. 5: 1170. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29051170

APA Style

Lu, H., Chen, X., Cong, Q., Li, Q., Wang, X., Zhong, S., Deng, H., & Yan, B. (2024). Research Progress of Ozone/Peroxymonosulfate Advanced Oxidation Technology for Degrading Antibiotics in Drinking Water and Wastewater Effluent: A Review. Molecules, 29(5), 1170. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29051170

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop