Next Article in Journal
Development of Pure Certified Reference Material of Cannabidiol
Previous Article in Journal
Broad Spectral Response FeOOH/BiO2−x Photocatalyst with Efficient Charge Transfer for Enhanced Photo-Fenton Synergistic Catalytic Activity
Previous Article in Special Issue
Machine-Learning- and Structure-Based Virtual Screening for Selecting Cinnamic Acid Derivatives as Leishmania major DHFR-TS Inhibitors
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

In Vitro Anti-Toxoplasma Activity of Extracts Obtained from Tabebuia rosea and Tabebuia chrysantha: The Role of β-Amyrin

by
Maria Camila Cardona-Trujillo
1,
Francisco Javier Jiménez-González
2,
Luz Angela Veloza
2 and
Juan Carlos Sepúlveda-Arias
1,*
1
Grupo Infección e Inmunidad, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira, Pereira 660003, Colombia
2
Grupo Polifenoles, Facultad de Tecnologías, Escuela de Química, Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira, Pereira 660003, Colombia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2024, 29(5), 920; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29050920
Submission received: 30 December 2023 / Revised: 1 February 2024 / Accepted: 2 February 2024 / Published: 20 February 2024

Abstract

:
Toxoplasmosis is a parasitic disease caused by the protozoan Toxoplasma gondii that is highly prevalent worldwide. Although the infection is asymptomatic in immunocompetent individuals, it severely affects immunocompromised individuals, causing conditions such as encephalitis, myocarditis, or pneumonitis. The limited therapeutic efficacy of drugs currently used to treat toxoplasmosis has prompted the search for new therapeutic alternatives. The aim of this study was to determine the anti-Toxoplasma activity of extracts obtained from two species of the genus Tabebuia. Twenty-six extracts, 12 obtained from Tabebuia chrysantha and 14 from Tabebuia rosea, were evaluated by a colorimetric technique using the RH strain of T. gondii that expresses β-galactosidase. Additionally, the activity of the promising extracts and their active compounds was evaluated by flow cytometry. β-amyrin was isolated from the chloroform extract obtained from the leaves of T. rosea and displayed important anti-Toxoplasma activity. The results show that natural products are an important source of new molecules with considerable biological and/or pharmacological activity.

1. Introduction

Toxoplasma gondii is an obligate intracellular parasite belonging to the phylum Apicomplexa, which causes the most common parasitic zoonosis worldwide [1,2]. It is known to be the causative agent of toxoplasmosis, a disease that affects approximately 1–3 billion people [3].
The sexual stages of T. gondii occur in members of the Felidae family, and for this reason, they are considered definitive hosts, while warm-blooded animals, including sheep, goats, rodents, pigs, and birds, are intermediate hosts [4]. Transmission to intermediate hosts, including humans, can result from the ingestion of tissue cysts present in raw or undercooked meat from infected animals, raw vegetables, and water contaminated with T. gondii oocysts. Moreover, vertical or transplacental transmission can occur from mother to fetus when tachyzoites cross the placenta during pregnancy and infect the fetus, causing congenital toxoplasmosis. The risk of vertical transmission increases with gestational age during pregnancy in mammals [5].
Parasitic infection causes various symptoms in birds, animals, marine mammals, and humans [6]. The clinical manifestations vary depending on the immune status of the host and the type of infecting strain. Generally, in immunocompetent individuals, there are no associated symptoms; however, in immunosuppressed individuals, several organs can be affected, promoting the development of encephalitis, myocarditis, or pneumonitis [2,7]. Similarly, the disease is considered serious in pregnant women because it can cause congenital toxoplasmosis, a neurological or ocular disease that can result in blindness [8].
Currently, the treatment regimens are based on the use of pyrimethamine, trimethoprim, and sulfadiazine. These drugs inhibit the enzymes dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) and dihydropteroate synthetase (DHPS), which are involved in the synthesis of DNA in the parasite (folic acid pathway) [9]. Other medications, such as cotrimoxazole, have also been used, and steroids have been added to the treatment regimen for ocular toxoplasmosis [10,11]. However, therapeutic failures associated with current treatment regimens have been reported, which are due to individual factors such as intolerance and malabsorption, as well as the development of parasite resistance [12,13]. Due to therapeutic failures and the limited action of the available drugs, it is necessary to search for alternative sources for the development of new effective and safe drugs for the treatment of toxoplasmosis.
Natural products have played a very important role in developing therapeutic drugs due to the novel structural variety and large number of bioactive molecules they contain. Between 1981 and 2014, 221 chemical compounds were approved as anti-infective drugs worldwide, of which 148 came from natural products, representing approximately 67% of the total number of approved compounds [14]. The importance of natural products as a new source of molecules with anti-Toxoplasma activity has been reported [9].
Tabebuia, a large genus within the Bignoniaceae family, includes hundreds of trees found in the intertropical zone of America [15]. This genus has a wide phytochemical diversity, and between 1967 and 2018, more than 163 natural compounds were isolated, including iridoids, phenolic acids, phenylpropanoids, flavonoids, quinones, naphthoquinones, and triterpenes. Quinones and naphthoquinones are the most frequently isolated compounds and show various pharmacological properties, including cytotoxic, antioxidant, fungicidal, and analgesic properties. Therefore, Tabebuia species are a promising source of new compounds with great bioactive potential [16]. Tabebuia rosea has been well-studied and is frequently used to treat skin conditions. An iridoid isolated from the bark of Tabebuia rosea has been shown to have antimalarial properties [17,18]. Moreover, studies have shown that Tabebuia chrysantha has antitumor activity, which is attributable to its naphthoquinone and polyphenol components [19]. Similarly, various anti-infective activities of extracts obtained from plants of the genus Tabebuia have been evaluated, showing promising results [15]. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the in vitro anti-Toxoplasma activity of extracts obtained from the leaves and inner bark of Tabebuia rosea and Tabebuia chrysantha and the active component isolated from T. rosea (β-amyrin).

2. Results

2.1. Preliminary Phytochemical Analysis

The preliminary phytochemical analysis of the extracts prepared from the inner bark and leaves of T. rosea showed the presence of flavonoids, lignans, terpenes, aldehydes, ketones, and unsaturated fatty acids. Moreover, the preliminary phytochemical analysis of the extracts prepared from the inner bark and leaves of T. chrysantha showed the presence of lignans, coumarins, terpenes, sterols, iridoids, triterpenes, saponins, and unsaturated fatty acids in all of the extracts. The results are supplied as Supplementary Material (Tables S1–S4).

2.2. Effect of Extracts on Cell Viability

When the effect of different concentrations of the extracts on the viability of human foreskin fibroblasts (HFF-1) was evaluated (from 50 to 6.25 µg/mL), it was found that the chloroform extract obtained from the inner bark of T. rosea reduced the percentage of viability of HFF-1 cells (83.3%) at a concentration of 12.5 µg/mL; however, this difference was not statistically significant compared with untreated cells. At concentrations lower than 25 µg/mL, the ethyl acetate extracts obtained from the inner bark of T. rosea and the n-hexane, ethyl acetate, n-butanol, and water extracts prepared from the leaves of T. rosea did not affect cell viability (Table 1). Regarding the effect of the extracts obtained from T. chrysantha, it was found that the extracts in n-hexane, ethyl acetate, and n-butanol obtained from the inner bark, as well as the extracts in chloroform, ethyl acetate, and n-butanol obtained from the leaves, did not significantly affect cell viability (Table 2).

2.3. Screening of Extracts with Anti-Toxoplasma Activity

The inhibition of T. gondii proliferation induced by the extracts prepared from T. rosea and T. chrysantha was evaluated using the β-galactosidase assay. The extracts were evaluated at concentrations of 20, 10, 5, and 1 µg/mL. As a positive control, a mixture of pyrimethamine (0.3 µg/mL) and sulfadiazine (93.75 µM) was used. Of the 26 extracts evaluated, three showed an inhibitory effect on the proliferation of T. gondii. The chloroform extracts obtained from the leaves and inner bark of T. rosea and the chloroform extract obtained from the leaves of T. chrysantha significantly affected the proliferation of T. gondii, as shown in Table 3 and Table 4. The results indicate that the inhibitory effect of the extracts at concentrations of 10 and 20 μg/mL was similar to that of the sulfadiazine–pyrimethamine mixture (2.745 ± 0.29).

2.4. Determination of Anti-Toxoplasma Activity by Flow Cytometry

The activity of the promising extracts was evaluated using the RH-GFP strain of T. gondii. The extracts were evaluated at concentrations of 1, 5, 10, and 20 µg/mL. Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), and a cocktail of pyrimethamine (0.3 µg/mL) and sulfadiazine (93.75 µM) were used as controls. Using the flow cytometry technique, it was possible to determine the percentage of infected cells and the percentage of parasites found at the extracellular level, as shown in Figure 1. The chloroform extract of T. rosea leaves at a concentration of 20 µg/mL considerably reduced the percentage of infected cells by up to 11.5% (Figure 1A, p < 0.001), achieving a greater effect than the antibiotic cocktail (13.6%). The results are related to the number of extracellular parasites, which significantly decreased with increasing extract concentration from 5 to 20 µg/mL (Figure 1B, p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively).
Figure 2 shows the results obtained from the evaluation of the chloroform extract prepared from T. rosea inner bark. The extract induced a greater inhibition of HFF-1 cell infection and T. gondii proliferation than that exhibited by the chloroform extract of T. rosea leaves. The concentration of 20 µg/mL notably reduced the percentage of infected cells to a value of 18.3% (Figure 2A), similar to the result obtained with the antibiotic cocktail used (13.6%). It was also observed that the extract mainly reduced free Toxoplasma since concentrations of 5, 10, and 20 µg/mL decreased the percentage of Toxoplasma by more than 80% (Figure 2B).
The chloroform leaf extract of T. chrysantha also inhibited the infection of HFF-1 cells (Figure 3). However, this effect was not as robust as the effects of the T. rosea extracts because the 5 µg/mL concentration of T. chrysantha leaf chloroform extract did not reduce the percentage of infected cells (Figure 3A). For this extract, the effect on the percentage of free Toxoplasma was greater than that on the percentage of infected cells (Figure 3B).
For the three promising extracts, a concentration-dependent effect was observed (Figure 4); the higher the concentration, the lower the percentage of infected cells and free Toxoplasma.
In Figure 4, the Y-axis is the size scale, and the fluorescence scale is on the X-axis. In the upper quadrant, the cells are shown, divided into two populations. The fluorescent cells on the right side are the cells infected with the GFP-RH strain of T. gondii. The cells on the left are those that the parasite did not infect. In the lower right are the extracellular tachyzoites, as they are smaller but fluorescent. The results indicate that as the extract concentration increases, the number of infected cells decreases, as well as extracellular tachyzoites, as previously indicated.

2.5. Determination of the Effect of a Fraction and Pure Compound on Cell Viability

The cytotoxicity test was carried out for a fraction and a pure compound (β-amyrin) isolated from the chloroform extract prepared from T. rosea leaves, as it was one of those that presented the best anti-Toxoplasma activity, according to the screening carried out in the β-galactosidase assay. The concentrations of β-amyrin used were 20, 10, and 5 µg/mL. The results obtained are shown in Figure 5 and indicate that the concentration of the fraction and the compound, β-amyrin, that does not affect cell viability was 5 μg/mL. Additionally, it was observed that the sulfadiazine pyrimethamine mixture used as a positive control did not affect cell viability.
Another compound that was evaluated was catalposide, which was obtained from the butanol extract of the inner bark of T. rosea [20]. In this case, concentrations of 10, 5, 2.5, and 1.25 µg/mL were evaluated. The obtained results are shown in Figure 6 and indicate that the concentration of catalposide that does not affect cell viability was also 5 μg/mL.

2.6. Determination of the Anti-Toxoplasma Activity of the Fraction and Pure Compounds by Flow Cytometry

The activity of the fraction obtained from the chloroform extract of T. rosea leaves was evaluated using the RH strain of T. gondii that expresses the green fluorescent protein (GFP). The fraction was evaluated at concentrations of 1, 2.5, and 5 µg/mL, and DMEM and a cocktail of pyrimethamine (0.3 µg/mL) and sulfadiazine (93.75 µM) were used as controls. Using the flow cytometry technique, it was possible to determine the percentage of infected cells, as well as the percentage of parasites found at the extracellular level, as shown in Figure 7. The fraction evaluated at a concentration of 5 μg/mL significantly reduced the percentage of infected cells up to 54% (p < 0.01, Figure 7A); however, its effect was lower than that observed when using the SDZ-Pyri mixture (36%). Similar results were observed when evaluating the number of extracellular or free parasites after treatment (Figure 7B).
The activity of the β-amyrin isolated from the chloroform extract prepared from the leaves of T rosea was also evaluated using the RH-GFP strain of T. gondii. β-amyrin was tested at concentrations of 1, 2.5, and 5 µg/mL, and DMEM and a cocktail of pyrimethamine (0.3125 µg/mL) and sulfadiazine (93.75 µM) were used as controls. The percentage of infected cells was determined, as well as the percentage of parasites found at the extracellular level after treatment, as shown in Figure 8. The results indicate that β-amyrin significantly decreased the percentage of infected cells up to 35% at a dose of 5 μg/mL (p < 0.001, Figure 8A), an effect similar to that observed with the use of pyrimethamine–sulfadiazine (36%). This decrease in the percentage of infected cells was correlated with a significant decrease of 28% in the percentage of free or extracellular parasites (p < 0.01, Figure 8B).
In Figure 9A,B, the results obtained (dot plot) in a flow cytometry assay are shown. The results indicate that as the concentration of β-amyrin increases, the number of infected cells, as well as extracellular tachyzoites, decreases.
Finally, the activity of catalposide isolated from the n-butanol extract of T. rosea inner bark was also evaluated. However, this extract had no effect on the inhibition of infection and did not significantly reduce the percentage of free Toxoplasma.
Concerning the extracts and promising compounds, the therapeutic index was calculated based on the evaluated activity (Table 5). As expected, the chloroform extract obtained from the T. rosea inner bark showed the best therapeutic index.

3. Discussion

Natural products, especially the secondary metabolites produced by plants, are the source of most of the drugs used today. Natural products have been used as precursors for the development of new synthetic or semisynthetic drugs with antimicrobial activity, including antiprotozoal activity [15]. The use of natural products with anti-Toxoplasma activity has received increasing attention. In vitro models, and in some cases, in vivo models, have been used for the evaluation of plant extracts, showing promising results [21,22,23,24].
Plants of the genus Tabebuia, found mainly in the intertropical zone of the Americas, have been considered an important source of bioactive molecules such as naphthoquinones, quinones, phenols, and other molecules with anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, anti-proliferative, and antimicrobial activity [15,18,20,25,26,27]. Additionally, the results of ethnopharmacological studies highlight the use of plants from this genus for the treatment of various diseases [28]. Therefore, in the search for new sources of molecules with anti-Toxoplasma activity, the extracts obtained from the leaves and inner bark of T. rosea and T. chrysantha were evaluated in this study.
Preliminary phytochemical analysis showed the presence of coumarins in all extracts of the inner bark of T. rosea, as previously reported [25,26]. The presence of sesquiterpene lactones was not observed in any extract, which differs from the information reported by Jiménez-Gonzalez et al. [26]. Iridoids were found mainly in the methanol, hexane, chloroform, and ethyl acetate extracts, given the low polarity of these solvents. Terpenes were found in all of the extracts. It should be noted that the secondary metabolites that have been reported in the genus Tabebuia include flavonoids, iridoids, phenolic compounds, and naphthoquinones, compounds with high biological interest [28]. These compounds were present in the extracts evaluated in this study. Moreover, it is important to note that the metabolites found in a plant can change depending on conditions, such as the time of plant material collection, the type of soil in which the plant is cultivated, and the species [29]. Regarding the presence of antioxidant compounds, the compounds obtained in this study were in accordance with those that have been reported in the literature since the antioxidant activity of extracts obtained from T. rosea has been previously reported [26].
Cell viability tests showed that in general, the n-hexane, chloroform, ethyl acetate, n-butanol, and water extracts obtained from the leaves and inner bark of T. rosea and T. chrysantha did not affect the viability of HFF-1 cells when they were used at concentrations less than 25 μg/mL, so it was possible to evaluate the effect of these extracts on the proliferation of T. gondii using two different assays (colorimetric and flow cytometry). From the screening carried out using the RH strain of T. gondii that expresses the enzyme β-galactosidase, three promising extracts among the twenty-six evaluated were selected, including the chloroform extracts prepared from the leaves and inner bark of T. rosea, as well as the chloroform extract of T. chrysantha leaves. These compounds decreased the proliferation of T. gondii to numbers similar to those obtained with the pyrimethamine–sulfadiazine mixture, which was used as a positive control. It should be noted that the three extracts were obtained from the fractionation of the methanol extract with chloroform, so the nature of the molecules present in them is quite similar.
Similarly, the flow cytometry results showed that the extracts have a greater effect on the percentage of free Toxoplasma than on the percentage of infected cells. This finding suggested that the mechanism of action may be based on a direct cytotoxic effect on tachyzoites and not on the inhibition of cell infection.
The chloroform extract from the inner bark of T. rosea showed the greatest effect on the inhibition of infection and free Toxoplasma with an IC50 of 2.91 μg/mL; however, better results were obtained using the chloroform extract of T. rosea leaves and the RH-β1 strain. This is because, being transgenic strains, the virulence varies, and, therefore, the effect of the extract on the tachyzoites does as well. Additionally, the therapeutic indexes calculated from the flow cytometry results (Table 5) are the same and may even be higher than those of currently used drugs (pyrimethamine and sulfadiazine) since, in previous investigations, it was shown that sulfadiazine and pyrimethamine have lower TIs of ≤1 and ≤8, respectively [30,31].
Phytochemical studies of the extracts obtained from the leaves and inner bark of T. rosea show the presence of lignans, terpenes, aldehydes, and ketones; however, the chloroform extracts obtained from the leaves and bark of this species also showed the presence of iridoids, anthrones, quinones, and triterpenes, which is similar to what was previously found in the literature for extracts of leaves and inner bark of T. rosea [26]. Naphthoquinones, compounds identified in the vast majority of species from the genus Tabebuia, have been reported to inhibit the growth of T. gondii in vitro [32]. Although the mechanism of action of these compounds against T. gondii is unknown, it seems that a great variety of natural and synthetic naphthoquinones have antiprotozoal activity because they can generate reactive oxygen species (hydroxyl radical and superoxide anion), which can induce lipid peroxidation and inhibit the electron transport chain in the parasite [33,34,35]. Previous studies on Tabebuia ochracea ssp. Neochrysanta reported that the chloroform extract of this species has antimalarial activity in vitro against strains of Plasmodium berghei, a protozoan that causes malaria in rodents, which is associated with the furanonaphthoquinones present in the extract [36].
Various naphthoquinones isolated from species of the genus Tabebuia, such as T. serratifolia, T. cassinoides, and T. ochracea, have also been reported to have antileishmanial and trypanocidal activity in vitro [37,38], affecting, as previously mentioned, the electron transport chain in the parasite. It is important to note that lapachol [2-hydroxy-3- (3-methyl-2-butenyl)-1,4-naphthoquinone], abundant in the genus Tabebuia (Handroanthus) [39], has anti-Trypanosome [40], anti-Leishmania [41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48], and antimalarial activity [49].
This study and others have shown that the phytochemical profile of chloroform extracts obtained from the leaves and inner bark of T. rosea and T. chrysantha also include the presence of terpenoids, molecules that have been shown to have suitable antiprotozoal activity [50]. It is important to indicate that for the chloroform extracts obtained from the leaves and inner bark of T. rosea, an important antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antiproliferative activity has been reported in vitro [26].
Fractionation of the T. rosea chloroform extract was carried out, and the anti-Toxoplasma activity of this fraction was evaluated, as well as the β-amyrin isolated from the fraction TrH- CHF4- A [20,25], a pentacyclic triterpenoid. β-amyrin showed anti-Toxoplasma activity, significantly decreasing the intracellular proliferation of the parasite and, therefore, the number of infected cells, as well as the number of free tachyzoites in the culture medium, with an IC50 of 4.75 μg/mL and a TI of 15 (Table 5), a value much higher than that reported in the literature for antibiotics used as controls. To our knowledge, there are no reports in the literature regarding the anti-Toxoplasma activity of β-amyrin; however, there are studies that have reported the anti-Toxoplasma activity of pentacyclic triterpenoids such as ursolic acid and its derivatives [51,52]. It should be noted that terpenoids are considered promising compounds for the alternative treatment of various diseases of parasitic origin, among which are important drugs such as artemisinin [53,54]. This sesquiterpene lactone is known for its antimalarial activity; however, its mechanism of action is not clear, and it is believed that its activity is related to the production of reactive oxygen species [55]. Terpenoids, due to their great structural diversity, have various antiparasitic activities due to different mechanisms of action, including destabilization of the cell membrane, inhibition of essential enzymes in the parasite that trigger structural changes, arrest of the cell cycle, and finally, cell death [50].
A systematic review of the recent literature shows the importance of pentacyclic triterpenes and their derivatives in the search for new molecules with antiparasitic activity, which include α-amyrin and β-amyrin, among others [54]. Additionally, recent reports indicate that terpenoids have toxoplasmicidal activity, and their effect is focused on the reduction of extracellular tachyzoites since these types of compounds induce the apoptosis of tachyzoites by generating an imbalance in calcium levels and altering the mitochondrial membrane potential [56]. The characterization of phytochemical compounds within the extracts showed that the chloroform extracts were rich in terpenes, supporting previous reports. Moreover, the flow cytometry results indicated a direct cytotoxic activity on T. gondii tachyzoites.
The findings of this study show the potential of natural products in the search for new molecules with anti-Toxoplasma activity. Among these molecules, β-amyrin exerted a promising effect, although its in vitro activity was lower than that of the sulfadiazine–pyrimethamine combination. This pentacyclic triterpenoid or its derivatives could become new candidates for the treatment of toxoplasmosis; however, more studies would be needed to confirm its efficacy and to determine its mechanism of action. Other extracts with promising activity were identified in this study and should be further evaluated to determine the presence of new compounds with therapeutic potential against T. gondii.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Reagents

Analytical grade organic solvents were purchased from JT Baker (Phillipsburg, NJ, USA) and Mallinckrodt Baker (San Diego, CA, USA). Molecular-grade dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO 99.9%) and MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazole bromide) were obtained from Sigma–Aldrich (Deutschland, Germany) and X-Gal (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-galactopyranoside) was obtained from Sigma–Aldrich. Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM), Glutamax supplement, fetal bovine serum (FBS), trypsin, sodium pyruvate, and phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) were obtained from Gibco (Gaithersburg, MD, USA).

4.2. Plant Material and Preparation of Extracts

The leaves and stems of Tabebuia rosea (Bertol.) DC and Tabebuia chrysantha (JACQ) G. Nicholson were collected on the Campus of the Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira in May 2021. The collection and processing of the material was supported by the collection permission number 1133/2014, issued by the National Environmental Licensing Authority (Autoridad Nacional de Licencias Ambientales—ANLA) of Colombia.
The plant material was dried at room temperature and subsequently heated in an oven at 40 °C. Once dry, it was crushed in a grinder. After grinding up the leaves and the inner bark of the species of interest, approximately 800 g of crushed plant material was added to methanol at a 1:3 (w:v) ratio for extraction. The extraction process was carried out using an ultrasonic homogenizer for 2 h, followed by passive extraction. For the leaves of T. chrysantha, three extractions with dichloromethane were carried out, and the mixture was ultrasonicated for one hour, followed by passive extraction. Finally, repeated extractions were performed with methanol until exhaustion.
Once the extractions were complete, the extracts were dried by rotary evaporation in a water bath at 50 °C. For fractionation, approximately 50 g of the extracts of the inner bark and leaves of T. rosea and 25 g of the extracts of the inner bark and leaves of T. chrysantha were used. Once weighed, these were dissolved in 400 mL of distilled water, and a liquid–liquid extraction was carried out with solvents of increasing polarity: n-hexane, chloroform, ethyl acetate, and n-butanol. Subsequently, the extracts were concentrated in a rotary evaporator at reduced pressure and dried in an oven at 50 °C for subsequent analysis, as reported previously [26].

4.3. Preliminary Phytochemical Analysis

Preliminary phytochemical analysis was performed by selective derivatization reactions to characterize the secondary metabolites present in the methanol, n-hexane, chloroform, ethyl acetate (soluble and insoluble fractions), n-butanol, and water extracts. The characterization was carried out using thin-layer chromatography (TLC) in normal phase (silica) and reversed-phase (RP-18) with hexane–ethyl acetate (7:3) and water–isopropanol (7:3) elution systems, respectively. The chromatographic plates were developed with aluminum chloride (AlCl3, Sigma Chemical Co., Saint Louis, MO, USA), ferric chloride (FeCl3, Sigma Chemical Co., Saint Louis, MO, USA), and a mixture of vanillin–phosphoric acid (H3PO4) for the detection of flavonoids, phenols, and lignans. Potassium hydroxide (KOH, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) in analytical grade ethanol was used for the detection of anthrones, quinones, and coumarins; a mixture of anisaldehyde–acetic acid–sulfuric acid (H2SO4) with vanillin–phosphoric acid (H3PO4) was used for the detection of iridoids; a mixture of anisaldehyde–acetic acid–sulfuric acid (H2SO4) with antimony chloride (SbCl3) was used for the detection of saponins and triterpenes; oleum (Sigma Chemical Co., Saint Louis, MO, USA) was used for the detection of sesquiterpene lactones; 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine was used for the determination of aldehydes and ketones; and the Liebermann–Burchard reagent was used for the detection of terpenes and steroids. The extracts and fractions showed a specific color when they reacted with the developing reagents for each test. The absence or presence of this color was taken as a negative (−) or positive (+) result for the presence of these phytochemical components.

4.4. Fractionation and Isolation of β-Amyrin

From the chloroform extract obtained from the leaves of T. rosea, chromatographic separation was carried out on a column packed with silica gel 60 using a step-by-step elution system until the fractions CHF1 (2 mg), CHF2 (13 mg), CHF3 (7 mg), CHF4 (2281 mg), CHF5 (131 mg), and CHF6 (962 mg) were obtained; each of the collected fractions was monitored by CCD [Hex/(CH3)2CO (7:3)] in the normal phase using Oleum as a developer. In this case, the CHF4 fraction showed a single spot at Rf = 0.47, which was intensely red with Oleum reagent, indicating the presence of sesquiterpene lactones and/or triterpenes.
Subsequently, the CHF4 fraction was separated by CC packed with silica gel in a reversed phase until the CHF4-A (471 mg), CHF4-B (50 mg), CHF4-C (31 mg), CHF4-D (8 mg), and CHF4-E (6 mg) fractions were obtained. The fractions were analyzed by TLC and developed with Oleum reagent, identifying the fractions CHF4-A and CHF4-C as promising fractions, which showed Rf stains of 0.5 and 0.32, respectively. The β-amyrin was isolated from the CHF4-A fraction using a semipreparative HPLC-DAD system (Hitachi-Merck) in reversed-phase (LiChrocart 250-10, LiChrospher 100; 10 µm, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) by isocratic elution with H2O-ACN (70:30% v/v) containing 1% v/v CH3COOH.
Full assignments from the 1H and 13C NMR spectra were made through the use of 1H-1H COSY, HSQC, and HMBC experiments. All the experiments were performed on a 400 MHz Agilent spectrometer (125.6 MHz for 13C) using deuterated chloroform as solvent. β-amyrin showed an 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) spectrum with characteristic signals at δ 5.25 (t, J = 3.6 Hz, 1H) and 3.21 (dd, J = 11.1, 4.9 Hz, 1H) for protons at H-12 (C-12 at 125.84 ppm) and H-3 (C-3 at 79.02 ppm), respectively, which were observed in the HSQC spectra. Additionally, signals characteristic of the presence of hydrogens at position H-5 at 0.72 ppm (dd, J = 11.6, 1.3 Hz, 1H) with C-5 at 55.19 ppm; H-9 at 1.49 ppm (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H) with C-9 at 47.88 ppm; and finally, the proton at H-11 at 1.91 ppm (dd, J = 8.9, 3.6, 6.3 Hz, 2H) with C-11 at 23.27 ppm. The 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) spectrum, together with the COSY, HSQC, and HMBC spectra, showed the presence of 29 signals corresponding to carbon atoms at δ 137.90 (C-13), 47.51 (C-18), 41.98 (C-14), 39.46 (C-8), 38.83 (C-4), 38.58 (C-1), 36.98 (C-22), 36.68 (C-10), 32.94 (C-7), 28.11 (C-23), 27.20 (C-15), 23.55 (C-30), 18.27 (C-6), 16.96 (C-26), 15.57 (C-25), and 15.45 (C-24). These results are similar to those previously reported in the literature [57]. Characteristic 1H NMR, 13C NMR, COSY, HSQC, and HMBC spectra are supplied as Supplementary Material. The structure of the β-amyrin isolated is shown in Figure 10.

4.5. Cell Culture

The human foreskin fibroblast HFF-1 cell line (ATCC) was used. The cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 1% penicillin, streptomycin, neomycin (PSN), amphotericin B (2.5 µg/mL), and 1% sodium pyruvate. Trypsin was used to detach the cells from the culture flask. The cells were collected and resuspended in a supplemented culture medium for passage. The cells were cultured at a density of 1 × 104 cells per well at 37 °C and 5% CO2 until reaching 90% confluence. The extracts were resuspended in DMSO and further diluted in the culture medium. Final concentrations lower than 0.1% were used to avoid affecting the viability of HFF-1 cells.

4.6. Parasites

The tachyzoites of the Toxoplasma strains RHβ1 and RH-GFP (kindly provided by Dr. Jorge Enrique Gómez-Marin, Universidad del Quindío) were propagated by infection of HFF-1 cells. The infected cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 2% FBS, 1% PSN, amphotericin B (2.5 µg/mL), and 1% sodium pyruvate. Once infected, the cells were incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2. After cell lysis, the supernatant was centrifuged, and the tachyzoites were filtered through a 3 µm membrane to remove cells and cellular debris. The viability of the parasites was determined by the trypan blue method. The isolated parasites were resuspended in the corresponding medium for the inoculation of HFF-1 cells in the subsequent experiments.

4.7. Cell Viability Assay

The viability of HFF-1 cells was determined using the MTT method [58]. The cells were cultured at a density of 1 × 104 cells per well in 96-well plates and incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2. The extracts were evaluated at concentrations of 50, 25, 12.5, and 6.25 μg/mL. The fractions were used at concentrations of 20, 10, and 5 μg/mL, and the pure compounds were used at 20, 10, 5, 2.5, and 1.25 μg/mL. A solution of 0.3 µg/mL pyrimethamine and 93.75 µM sulfadiazine was used as a positive control. DMSO was used as the solvent control. The viability of cells treated with pyrimethamine–sulfadiazine was also evaluated.

4.8. Screening of Extracts with Potential Anti-Toxoplasma Activity

The anti-Toxoplasma activity of the 26 extracts was evaluated using the β-galactosidase colorimetric assay. HFF-1 cells were cultured in a 96-well plate at a density of 1 × 104 cells per well and were allowed to grow to 90% confluence at 37 °C and 5% CO2. The medium was discarded, and each well was infected with 2 × 104 tachyzoites of the RHβ1 strain and incubated for 6 h. After 6 h, the culture medium was removed, the cells were washed with PBS, and the extracts were added at concentrations of 20, 10, 5, and 1 µg/mL. The plates were incubated again for 48 h. As time passed, the medium was removed, and 25 µL of lysis solution (100 mM HEPES, 1 mM MgSO4, 0.1% Triton X-100, 5 mM dithiothreitol) was added for 15 min. Then, 25 µL of buffer (100 mM PBS pH 7.3, 102 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 9 mM MgCl2) was added, followed by 100 µL of X-Gal (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-galactopyranoside), which was diluted to a concentration of 0.5 mg/mL in PBS. The plates were incubated for 15 h, after which the absorbance was measured at 630 nm in a Multiskan GO microplate spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The antibiotics pyrimethamine and sulfadiazine were added to infected cells as a positive control. Culture medium served as the negative control, and 0.1% DMSO served as the solvent control [59,60]. The concentrations of pyrimethamine and sulfadiazine were determined experimentally by means of three-dimensional curves, where it was found that at concentrations of 0.3 µg/mL pyrimethamine and 93.75 µM sulfadiazine, parasite viability was decreased to 43% without affecting the viability of HFF-1 cells.

4.9. Determination of Anti-Toxoplasma Activity by Flow Cytometry

The anti-Toxoplasma activity of the promising extracts, fractions, and pure compounds was evaluated using a Toxoplasma gondii strain that expresses green fluorescent protein (GFP). HFF-1 cells were cultured in a 24-well plate at a density of 6 × 104 cells per well and allowed to grow to 90% confluence at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Each well was infected with 12 × 104 tachyzoites of the RH-GFP strain and incubated for 4 h. After 4 h, the medium was removed, the cells were washed with PBS, and the extracts were added at concentrations of 20, 10, 5, and 1 μg/mL. The fractions and pure compounds were used at concentrations of 5, 2.5, and 1 μg/mL. After incubation for 48 h, the culture medium was removed, 200 μL of TrypLE™ Express was added and incubated for 3 min at 37 °C, then 600 μL of culture medium was used to perform well washes. The tubes were centrifuged for 5 min at 3500 rpm, the supernatant was removed, and 100 μL of 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) was added for 10 min for fixation. Subsequently, 300 μL of PBS was added, and the samples were centrifuged again. Finally, the supernatant was removed, and the pellet was resuspended in 300 μL of flow cytometry buffer (2% FBS in PBS). The analysis was performed on a Guava EasyCyte (Merck) flow cytometer using InCyte software (version 3.1).

4.10. Statistical Analysis

The data obtained are the average of three independent tests in which each concentration of each extract was tested in triplicate, both for the cytotoxicity test and for anti-Toxoplasma activity. The data were analyzed and plotted with GraphPad Prism version 8.0.1 (GraphPad software, Boston, MA, USA). For the anti-Toxoplasma activity tests, a Kruskal–Wallis test was performed, with Dunn’s test as a post hoc test, to analyze the differences between the negative control and the activity of the extracts at different concentrations. Differences were considered significant when p < 0.05.

5. Conclusions

The results of this study indicate that the chloroform extracts obtained from the leaves and inner bark of T. rosea, the chloroform extract from the leaves of T. chrysantha, and β-amyrin isolated from the chloroform extract of T. rosea leaves have anti-Toxoplasma activity in vitro, reinforcing the importance of the study of plants in the genus Tabebuia to search for new molecules with promising biological activity.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules29050920/s1. Supplementary information Cardona et al.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.A.V. and J.C.S.-A.; methodology, M.C.C.-T., F.J.J.-G. and L.A.V.; investigation, M.C.C.-T., F.J.J.-G., L.A.V. and J.C.S.-A.; resources, L.A.V. and J.C.S.-A.; writing—original draft preparation, M.C.C.-T. and J.C.S.-A.; writing—review and editing, M.C.C.-T., F.J.J.-G., L.A.V. and J.C.S.-A.; supervision, L.A.V. and J.C.S.-A.; project administration, J.C.S.-A.; funding acquisition, L.A.V. and J.C.S.-A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira (Grant 5-21-8), Universidad del Quindío, and Sistema General de Regalías de Colombia (BPIN 2020000100077).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank all the members of the Infección e Inmunidad and Polifenoles Research Groups for their support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Dubey, J.P. Toxoplasmosis of Animals and Humans; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  2. Sepulveda-Arias, J.C.; Gomez-Marin, J.E.; Bobic, B.; Naranjo-Galvis, C.A.; Djurkovic-Djakovic, O. Toxoplasmosis as a travel risk. Travel. Med. Infect. Dis. 2014, 12, 592–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hadfield, S.J.; Guy, E.C. Toxoplasmosis. Medicine 2021, 49, 770–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Dubey, J.P.; Cerqueira-Cezar, C.K.; Murata, F.H.A.; Kwok, O.C.H.; Yang, Y.R.; Su, C. All about toxoplasmosis in cats: The last decade. Vet. Parasitol. 2020, 283, 109145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Almeria, S.; Dubey, J.P. Foodborne transmission of Toxoplasma gondii infection in the last decade. An overview. Res. Vet. Sci. 2021, 135, 371–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Al-Malki, E.S. Toxoplasmosis: Stages of the protozoan life cycle and risk assessment in humans and animals for an enhanced awareness and an improved socio-economic status. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2021, 28, 962–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dubey, J.P.; Jones, J.L. Toxoplasma gondii infection in humans and animals in the United States. Int. J. Parasitol. 2008, 38, 1257–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ahmed, M.; Sood, A.; Gupta, J. Toxoplasmosis in pregnancy. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2020, 255, 44–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sepulveda-Arias, J.C.; Veloza, L.A.; Mantilla-Muriel, L.E. Anti-Toxoplasma activity of natural products: A review. Recent. Pat. Antiinfect. Drug Discov. 2014, 9, 186–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Alavi, S.M.; Alavi, L. Treatment of toxoplasmic lymphadenitis with co-trimoxazole: Double-blind, randomized clinical trial. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2010, 14 (Suppl. S3), e67–e69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. O’Connor, G.R.; Frenkel, J.K. Editorial: Dangers of steroid treatment in toxoplasmosis. Periocular injections and systemic therapy. Arch. Ophthalmol. 1976, 94, 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Meneceur, P.; Bouldouyre, M.A.; Aubert, D.; Villena, I.; Menotti, J.; Sauvage, V.; Garin, J.F.; Derouin, F. In vitro susceptibility of various genotypic strains of Toxoplasma gondii to pyrimethamine, sulfadiazine, and atovaquone. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2008, 52, 1269–1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lilue, J.; Muller, U.B.; Steinfeldt, T.; Howard, J.C. Reciprocal virulence and resistance polymorphism in the relationship between Toxoplasma gondii and the house mouse. Elife 2013, 2, e01298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Deng, Y.; Wu, T.; Zhai, S.Q.; Li, C.H. Recent progress on anti-Toxoplasma drugs discovery: Design, synthesis and screening. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 183, 111711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jiménez-González, F.J.; Veloza, L.A.; Sepúlveda-Arias, J.C. Anti-infectious activity in plants of the genus Tabebuia. Univ. Sci. 2013, 18, 257–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hamed, A.N.E.; Mahmoud, B.K.; Samy, M.N.; Kamel, M.S. An extensive review on genus “Tabebuia”, family bignoniaceae: Phytochemistry and biological activities (1967 to 2018). J. Herb. Med. 2020, 24, 100410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Vega Orcasitas, M. Etnobotánica de la Amazonia Peruana, 1st ed.; Abya Yala: Quito, Ecuador, 2001; pp. 9–166. [Google Scholar]
  18. Gomez-Estrada, H.; Diaz-Castillo, F.; Franco-Ospina, L.; Mercado-Camargo, J.; Guzman-Ledezma, J.; Medina, J.D.; Gaitan-Ibarra, R. Folk medicine in the northern coast of Colombia: An overview. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2011, 7, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Panda, S.P.; Panigrahy, U.P.; Panda, S.; Jena, B.R. Stem extract of Tabebuia chrysantha induces apoptosis by targeting sEGFR in Ehrlich Ascites Carcinoma. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2019, 235, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Garzon-Castano, S.C.; Jimenez-Gonzalez, F.J.; Veloza, L.A.; Sepulveda-Arias, J.C. Activation of the Keap1-Nrf2 pathway by specioside and the n-butanol extract from the inner bark of Tabebuia rosea (Bertol) DC. F1000Research 2020, 9, 1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Khamesipour, F.; Pourmohammad, A.; Jafarian-Dehkordi, M. Anti-Toxoplasma Effects of Dracocephalum Polychaetum Essential Oil. Interdiscip. Perspect. Infect. Dis. 2022, 6091834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Abdou, A.M.; Seddek, A.S.; Abdelmageed, N.; Badry, M.O.; Nishikawa, Y. Extracts of wild Egyptian plants from the desert inhibit the growth of Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum in vitro. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2022, 84, 1034–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Souza, L.V.; Almeida, M.P.O.; Silva, N.M.; de Miranda, N.C.; Nebo, L.; da Silva, C.A.; Moraes, D.; Rodrigues, R.M. Siparuna guianensis Controls Toxoplasma gondii Infection In Vitro. Rev. Bras. Farmacogn. 2021, 31, 741–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Miranda, N.C.; Araujo, E.C.B.; Justino, A.B.; Cariaco, Y.; Mota, C.M.; Costa-Nascimento, L.A.; Espindola, F.S.; Silva, N.M. Anti-parasitic activity of Annona muricata L. leaf ethanolic extract and its fractions against Toxoplasma gondii in vitro and in vivo. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2021, 273, 114019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Garzón-Castaño, S.; Lopera-Castrillón, I.; Jiménez-González, F.; Siller-López, F.; Veloza, L.; Sepúlveda-Arias, J. Nrf2-Mediated Antioxidant Activity of the inner bark extracts obtained from Tabebuia rosea (Bertol) DC and Tabebuia chrysantha (JACQ) G. Nicholson. [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2019, 7, 1937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jiménez-González, F.; Vélez-Gómez, J.; Melchor-Moncada, J.; Veloza, L.; Sepúlveda-Arias, J. Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antiproliferative activity of extracts obtained from Tabebuia Rosea (Bertol.) DC. Phcog Mag. 2018, 14, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gentry, A.H. A Synopsis of Bignoniaceae Ethnobotany and Economic Botany. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 1992, 79, 53–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. El-Hawary, S.S.; Taher, M.A.; Amin, E.; Fekry AbouZid, S.; Mohammed, R. Genus Tabebuia: A comprehensive review journey from past achievements to future perspectives. Arab. J. Chem. 2021, 14, 103046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kunle, O.F.; Egharevba, H.O.; Ahmadu, P.O. Standardization of herbal medicines—A review. Int. J. Biodivers. Conserv. 2012, 4, 101–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liu, S.; Wu, M.; Hua, Q.; Lu, D.; Tian, Y.; Yu, H.; Cheng, L.; Chen, Y.; Cao, J.; Hu, X.; et al. Two old drugs, NVP-AEW541 and GSK-J4, repurposed against the Toxoplasma gondii RH strain. Parasit. Vectors 2020, 13, 242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kamau, E.T.; Srinivasan, A.R.; Brown, M.J.; Fair, M.G.; Caraher, E.J.; Boyle, J.P. A focused small-molecule screen identifies 14 compounds with distinct effects on Toxoplasma gondii. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 5581–5590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. da Silva, L.L.; Portes Jde, A.; de Araujo, M.H.; Silva, J.L.; Renno, M.N.; Netto, C.D.; da Silva, A.J.; Costa, P.R.; De Souza, W.; Seabra, S.H.; et al. Further evidence that naphthoquinone inhibits Toxoplasma gondii growth in vitro. Parasitol. Int. 2015, 64, 622–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Docampo, R.; Cruz, F.S.; Boveris, A.; Muniz, R.P.; Esquivel, D.M. Lipid peroxidation and the generation of free radicals, superoxide anion, and hydrogen peroxide in beta-lapachone-treated Trypanosoma cruzi epimastigotes. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1978, 186, 292–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kumar, M.R.; Aithal, K.; Rao, B.N.; Udupa, N.; Rao, B.S. Cytotoxic, genotoxic and oxidative stress induced by 1,4-naphthoquinone in B16F1 melanoma tumor cells. Toxicol. Vitr. 2009, 23, 242–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ferreira, R.A.; de Oliveira, A.B.; Gualberto, S.A.; Miguel Del Corral, J.M.; Fujiwara, R.T.; Gazzinelli Guimaraes, P.H.; de Almeida Vitor, R.W. New naphthoquinones and an alkaloid with in vitro activity against Toxoplasma gondii RH and EGS strains. Exp. Parasitol. 2012, 132, 450–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Díaz, F.; Medina, J.D. Furanonaphthoquinones from Tabebuia ochracea ssp. neochrysanta. J. Nat. Prod. 1996, 59, 423–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gonzalez-Coloma, A.; Reina, M.; Saenz, C.; Lacret, R.; Ruiz-Mesia, L.; Aran, V.J.; Sanz, J.; Martinez-Diaz, R.A. Antileishmanial, antitrypanosomal, and cytotoxic screening of ethnopharmacologically selected Peruvian plants. Parasitol. Res. 2012, 110, 1381–1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zani, C.L.; De Oliveira, A.B.; De Oliviera, G.G. Furanonaphthoquinones from Tabebuia ochracea. Phytochemistry 1991, 30, 2379–2381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Cipriani, F.A.; Figueiredo, M.R.; Soares, G.L.G.; Kaplan, M.A.C. Implicações químicas na sistemática e filogenia de Bignoniaceae. Quím Nova 2012, 35, 2125–2131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Salas, C.O.; Faundez, M.; Morello, A.; Maya, J.D.; Tapia, R.A. Natural and synthetic naphthoquinones active against Trypanosoma cruzi: An initial step towards new drugs for Chagas disease. Curr. Med. Chem. 2011, 18, 144–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Araujo, I.A.C.; de Paula, R.C.; Alves, C.L.; Faria, K.F.; Oliveira, M.M.; Mendes, G.G.; Dias, E.; Ribeiro, R.R.; Oliveira, A.B.; Silva, S.M.D. Efficacy of lapachol on treatment of cutaneous and visceral leishmaniasis. Exp. Parasitol. 2019, 199, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ali, A.; Assimopoulou, A.N.; Papageorgiou, V.P.; Kolodziej, H. Structure/antileishmanial activity relationship study of naphthoquinones and dependency of the mode of action on the substitution patterns. Planta Med. 2011, 77, 2003–2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Costa, E.V.; Brigido, H.P.; Silva, J.V.; Coelho-Ferreira, M.R.; Brandao, G.C.; Dolabela, M.F. Antileishmanial Activity of Handroanthus serratifolius (Vahl) S. Grose (Bignoniaceae). Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2017, 8074275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lima, N.M.; Correia, C.S.; Leon, L.L.; Machado, G.M.; Madeira Mde, F.; Santana, A.E.; Goulart, M.O. Antileishmanial activity of lapachol analogues. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2004, 99, 757–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Odonne, G.; Houel, E.; Bourdy, G.; Stien, D. Treating leishmaniasis in Amazonia: A review of ethnomedicinal concepts and pharmaco-chemical analysis of traditional treatments to inspire modern phytotherapies. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2017, 199, 211–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Passero, L.F.; Laurenti, M.D.; Santos-Gomes, G.; Soares Campos, B.L.; Sartorelli, P.; Lago, J.H. Plants used in traditional medicine: Extracts and secondary metabolites exhibiting antileishmanial activity. Curr. Clin. Pharmacol. 2014, 9, 187–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Rocha, M.N.; Nogueira, P.M.; Demicheli, C.; de Oliveira, L.G.; da Silva, M.M.; Frezard, F.; Melo, M.N.; Soares, R.P. Cytotoxicity and In Vitro Antileishmanial Activity of Antimony (V), Bismuth (V), and Tin (IV) Complexes of Lapachol. Bioinorg. Chem. Appl. 2013, 961783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Teixeira, M.J.; de Almeida, Y.M.; Viana, J.R.; Holanda Filha, J.G.; Rodrigues, T.P.; Prata, J.R., Jr.; Coelho, I.C.; Rao, V.S.; Pompeu, M.M. In vitro and in vivo Leishmanicidal activity of 2-hydroxy-3-(3-methyl-2-butenyl)-1,4-naphthoquinone (lapachol). Phytother. Res. 2001, 15, 44–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hussain, H.; Green, I.R. Lapachol and lapachone analogs: A journey of two decades of patent research (1997–2016). Expert. Opin. Ther. Pat. 2017, 27, 1111–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Isah, M.B.; Tajuddeen, N.; Umar, M.I.; Alhafiz, Z.A.; Mohammed, A.; Ibrahim, M.A. Chapter 7—Terpenoids as Emerging Therapeutic Agents: Cellular Targets and Mechanisms of Action against Protozoan Parasites. In Studies in Natural Products Chemistry; Attaur, R., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; Volume 59, pp. 227–250. [Google Scholar]
  51. Zhang, L.H.; Jin, L.L.; Liu, F.; Jin, C.; Jin, C.M.; Wei, Z.Y. Evaluation of ursolic acid derivatives with potential anti-Toxoplasma gondii activity. Exp. Parasitol. 2020, 216, 107935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Wang, Y.-L.; Jin, L.-L.; Cheng, X.; Yan, W.-F.; Deng, H.; Shen, Q.-K.; Quan, Z.-S.; Jin, C.-M.; Zhang, C.-H. Synthesis and evaluation of in vitro and in vivo anti-Toxoplasma gondii activity of tetraoxane-substituted ursolic acid derivatives. Nat. Prod. Res. 2022, 37, 3654–3662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Gregori-Puigjane, E.; Setola, V.; Hert, J.; Crews, B.A.; Irwin, J.J.; Lounkine, E.; Marnett, L.; Roth, B.L.; Shoichet, B.K. Identifying mechanism-of-action targets for drugs and probes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 11178–11183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Isah, M.B.; Ibrahim, M.A.; Mohammed, A.; Aliyu, A.B.; Masola, B.; Coetzer, T.H. A systematic review of pentacyclic triterpenes and their derivatives as chemotherapeutic agents against tropical parasitic diseases. Parasitology 2016, 143, 1219–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. van Agtmael, M.A.; Eggelte, T.A.; van Boxtel, C.J. Artemisinin drugs in the treatment of malaria: From medicinal herb to registered medication. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 1999, 20, 199–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Jiang, Z.Y.; Dong, K.; Huang, Z.S.; Yuan, C.C.; Liu, B.; Chen, Q.W.; Chen, J.P. Evaluation of the inhibitory effects and the mechanism of terpenoids on Toxoplasma gondii tachyzoites. Acta Trop. 2023, 237, 106741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Mosmann, T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: Application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J. Immunol. Methods 1983, 65, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Singh, D.; Arya, P.V.; Sharma, A.; Dobhal, M.P.; Gupta, R.S. Modulatory potential of α-amyrin against hepatic oxidative stress through antioxidant status in Wistar albino rats. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2015, 161, 186–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. McFadden, D.C.; Seeber, F.; Boothroyd, J.C. Use of Toxoplasma gondii expressing beta-galactosidase for colorimetric assessment of drug activity in vitro. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1997, 41, 1849–1853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Borges, I.P.; Castanheira, L.E.; Barbosa, B.F.; de Souza, D.L.; da Silva, R.J.; Mineo, J.R.; Tudini, K.A.; Rodrigues, R.S.; Ferro, E.A.; de Melo Rodrigues, V. Anti-parasitic effect on Toxoplasma gondii induced by BnSP-7, a Lys49-phospholipase A2 homologue from Bothrops pauloensis venom. Toxicon 2016, 119, 84–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Evaluation of the anti-Toxoplasma activity of the chloroform extract prepared from T. rosea leaves by flow cytometry. The percentage of infected cells (A) and the percentage of extracellular or free parasites (B) were evaluated. DMEM and the sulfadiazine (93.75 µM)–pyrimethamine (0.3 µg/mL) mixture (SDZ-Pyri) were used as negative and positive controls, respectively. DMSO was also used as a vehicle control. The means were determined from four values obtained in three independent experiments (Kruskal–Wallis test), * p < 0.1, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 compared to the negative control.
Figure 1. Evaluation of the anti-Toxoplasma activity of the chloroform extract prepared from T. rosea leaves by flow cytometry. The percentage of infected cells (A) and the percentage of extracellular or free parasites (B) were evaluated. DMEM and the sulfadiazine (93.75 µM)–pyrimethamine (0.3 µg/mL) mixture (SDZ-Pyri) were used as negative and positive controls, respectively. DMSO was also used as a vehicle control. The means were determined from four values obtained in three independent experiments (Kruskal–Wallis test), * p < 0.1, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 compared to the negative control.
Molecules 29 00920 g001
Figure 2. Evaluation of the anti-Toxoplasma activity of the chloroform extract prepared from T. rosea inner bark by flow cytometry. The percentage of infected cells (A) and the percentage of extracellular or free parasites (B) were evaluated. DMEM and sulfadiazine (93.75 µM)–pyrimethamine (0.3 µg/mL) mixture (SDZ-Pyri) were used as negative and positive controls, respectively. DMSO was also used as a vehicle control. The means were determined from four values obtained in three independent experiments (Kruskal–Wallis test), ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001 compared to the negative control.
Figure 2. Evaluation of the anti-Toxoplasma activity of the chloroform extract prepared from T. rosea inner bark by flow cytometry. The percentage of infected cells (A) and the percentage of extracellular or free parasites (B) were evaluated. DMEM and sulfadiazine (93.75 µM)–pyrimethamine (0.3 µg/mL) mixture (SDZ-Pyri) were used as negative and positive controls, respectively. DMSO was also used as a vehicle control. The means were determined from four values obtained in three independent experiments (Kruskal–Wallis test), ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001 compared to the negative control.
Molecules 29 00920 g002
Figure 3. Evaluation of the anti-Toxoplasma activity of the chloroform extract prepared from the leaves of T. chrysantha by flow cytometry. The percentage of infected cells (A) and the percentage of extracellular or free parasites (B) were evaluated. DMEM and the sulfadiazine (93.75 µM)–pyrimethamine (0.3 µg/mL) mixture (SDZ-Pyri) were used as negative and positive controls, respectively. DMSO was also used as a vehicle control. The means were determined from four values obtained in three independent experiments (Kruskal–Wallis test), ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001 compared to the negative control.
Figure 3. Evaluation of the anti-Toxoplasma activity of the chloroform extract prepared from the leaves of T. chrysantha by flow cytometry. The percentage of infected cells (A) and the percentage of extracellular or free parasites (B) were evaluated. DMEM and the sulfadiazine (93.75 µM)–pyrimethamine (0.3 µg/mL) mixture (SDZ-Pyri) were used as negative and positive controls, respectively. DMSO was also used as a vehicle control. The means were determined from four values obtained in three independent experiments (Kruskal–Wallis test), ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001 compared to the negative control.
Molecules 29 00920 g003
Figure 4. Evaluation of the anti-Toxoplasma activity of the chloroform extracts prepared from the leaves and inner bark of T. rosea and the chloroform extract prepared from the leaves of T. chrysantha by means of flow cytometry. The dot-plot result of a representative experiment is shown. Yellow color dots correspond to free (extracellular) Toxoplasma, and blue color dots represent Toxoplasma infected cells.
Figure 4. Evaluation of the anti-Toxoplasma activity of the chloroform extracts prepared from the leaves and inner bark of T. rosea and the chloroform extract prepared from the leaves of T. chrysantha by means of flow cytometry. The dot-plot result of a representative experiment is shown. Yellow color dots correspond to free (extracellular) Toxoplasma, and blue color dots represent Toxoplasma infected cells.
Molecules 29 00920 g004
Figure 5. Effect of the chloroform fraction (A) and β-amyrin isolated from the chloroform fraction (B) from the chloroform extract of T. rosea on the HFF-1 cell viability method at concentrations of 20, 10, and 5 µg/mL. The MTT (3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5 diphenyl tetrazolium bromide) assay was used. Additionally, the effect of the sulfadiazine (SDZ, 93.75 µM) pyrimethamine (Pyri, 0.3 µg/mL) cocktail on the viability of HFF cells was evaluated. The means were determined from two values obtained in two independent experiments (Kruskal–Wallis Test), ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001 compared to the negative control.
Figure 5. Effect of the chloroform fraction (A) and β-amyrin isolated from the chloroform fraction (B) from the chloroform extract of T. rosea on the HFF-1 cell viability method at concentrations of 20, 10, and 5 µg/mL. The MTT (3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5 diphenyl tetrazolium bromide) assay was used. Additionally, the effect of the sulfadiazine (SDZ, 93.75 µM) pyrimethamine (Pyri, 0.3 µg/mL) cocktail on the viability of HFF cells was evaluated. The means were determined from two values obtained in two independent experiments (Kruskal–Wallis Test), ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001 compared to the negative control.
Molecules 29 00920 g005
Figure 6. Effect of the catalposide isolated from the butanol extract of T. rosea inner bark on HFF-1 cell viability using the MTT assay. The concentrations of 10, 5, 2.5, and 1.25 µg/mL were used. The means were determined from two values obtained in two independent experiments (Kruskal–Wallis test), *** p < 0.001 compared to the negative control.
Figure 6. Effect of the catalposide isolated from the butanol extract of T. rosea inner bark on HFF-1 cell viability using the MTT assay. The concentrations of 10, 5, 2.5, and 1.25 µg/mL were used. The means were determined from two values obtained in two independent experiments (Kruskal–Wallis test), *** p < 0.001 compared to the negative control.
Molecules 29 00920 g006
Figure 7. Evaluation of the anti-Toxoplasma activity of the fraction obtained from the chloroform extract of T. rosea leaves by flow cytometry. The percentage of infected cells (A) and the percentage of extracellular or free parasites (B) were evaluated. DMEM and the sulfadiazine (93.75 µM)–pyrimethamine (0.3 µg/mL) mixture (SDZ-Pyri) were used as negative and positive controls, respectively. The means were determined from three values obtained in three independent experiments (Kruskal–Wallis test), ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001 compared to the negative control.
Figure 7. Evaluation of the anti-Toxoplasma activity of the fraction obtained from the chloroform extract of T. rosea leaves by flow cytometry. The percentage of infected cells (A) and the percentage of extracellular or free parasites (B) were evaluated. DMEM and the sulfadiazine (93.75 µM)–pyrimethamine (0.3 µg/mL) mixture (SDZ-Pyri) were used as negative and positive controls, respectively. The means were determined from three values obtained in three independent experiments (Kruskal–Wallis test), ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001 compared to the negative control.
Molecules 29 00920 g007
Figure 8. Evaluation of the anti-Toxoplasma activity of β-amyrin isolated from the chloroform extract of T. rosea leaves by flow cytometry. The percentage of infected cells (A) and the percentage of extracellular or free parasites (B) were evaluated. DMEM and the sulfadiazine (93.75 µM)–pyrimethamine (0.3 µg/mL) mixture (SDZ-Pyri) were used as negative and positive controls, respectively. The means were determined from three values obtained in three independent experiments (Kruskal–Wallis test), * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001 compared to the negative control.
Figure 8. Evaluation of the anti-Toxoplasma activity of β-amyrin isolated from the chloroform extract of T. rosea leaves by flow cytometry. The percentage of infected cells (A) and the percentage of extracellular or free parasites (B) were evaluated. DMEM and the sulfadiazine (93.75 µM)–pyrimethamine (0.3 µg/mL) mixture (SDZ-Pyri) were used as negative and positive controls, respectively. The means were determined from three values obtained in three independent experiments (Kruskal–Wallis test), * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001 compared to the negative control.
Molecules 29 00920 g008
Figure 9. Evaluation of the anti-Toxoplasma activity of β-amyrin isolated from the chloroform extract of T. rosea leaves by flow cytometry. The dot plot from an independent test is shown. (A). Treatment with different β-amyrin concentrations ranging from 1 to 5 µg/mL. (B). Experimental controls (uninfected cells, infected cells, and treatment control). Yellow dots at the upper right side represent Toxoplasma infected cells.
Figure 9. Evaluation of the anti-Toxoplasma activity of β-amyrin isolated from the chloroform extract of T. rosea leaves by flow cytometry. The dot plot from an independent test is shown. (A). Treatment with different β-amyrin concentrations ranging from 1 to 5 µg/mL. (B). Experimental controls (uninfected cells, infected cells, and treatment control). Yellow dots at the upper right side represent Toxoplasma infected cells.
Molecules 29 00920 g009
Figure 10. β-amyrin isolated from the chloroform extract obtained from the leaves of T. rosea.
Figure 10. β-amyrin isolated from the chloroform extract obtained from the leaves of T. rosea.
Molecules 29 00920 g010
Table 1. Effect of T. rosea extracts on the viability of HFF-1 cells.
Table 1. Effect of T. rosea extracts on the viability of HFF-1 cells.
Part of the PlantExtractPercentage of Viable Cells (Mean ± SEM)
6.25 µg/mL12.5 µg/mL25 µg/mL50 µg/mL
Inner barkMethanol101.1 ± 3.298.8 ± 4.696.9 ± 3.092.5 ± 2.8
n-hexane99.2 ± 2.795.6 ± 1.989.6 ± 2.484.2 ± 2.7
Chloroform93.1 ± 2.583.3 ± 2.368.1 ± 4.331.7 ± 9.5
Insoluble ethyl acetate104.0 ± 2.6100.5 ± 2.2102.0 ± 1.699.3 ± 2.1
Soluble ethyl acetate99.3 ± 2.7101.8 ± 2.9101.9 ± 3.3102.5 ± 3.2
n-butanol90.7 ± 1.990.4 ± 2.592.1 ± 2.297.0 ± 3.0
Aqueous88.4 ± 1.589.9 ± 1.786.3 ± 5.294.4 ± 3.2
LeavesMethanol106.7 ± 1.3102.8 ± 1.8105.3 ± 1.9107.9 ± 1.3
n-hexane106.9 ± 3.498.5 ± 2.295.7 ± 2.599.3 ± 4.1
Chloroform113.1 ± 2.0109.5 ± 1.8130.0 ± 3.158.8 ± 8.3
Ethyl acetate 1105.2 ± 2.8105.2 ± 2.0111.1 ± 1.9113.5 ± 1.9
Ethyl acetate 298.3 ± 2.998.6 ± 2.4102.0 ± 2.1107.2 ± 1.0
n-butanol95.5 ± 1.596.9 ± 1.0103.6 ± 1.7104.7 ± 2.8
Aqueous93.2 ± 1.495.5 ± 1.496.6 ± 2.1100.2 ± 1.4
Table 2. Effect of T. chrysantha extracts on the viability of HFF-1 cells.
Table 2. Effect of T. chrysantha extracts on the viability of HFF-1 cells.
Part of the PlantExtractPercentage of Viable Cells (Mean ± SEM)
6.25 µg/mL12.5 µg/mL25 µg/mL50 µg/mL
Inner barkMethanol98.3 ± 2.2102.3 ± 3.199.1 ± 1.1103.3 ± 2.0
n-hexane105.4 ± 2.2109.3 ± 2.3108.4 ± 2.1106.1 ± 4.1
Chloroform102.7 ± 2.496.8 ± 1.792.0 ± 1.166.3 ± 2.8
Soluble ethyl acetate96.4 ± 2.099.1 ± 1.7100.0 ± 3.7102.5 ± 3.1
Insoluble ethyl acetate95.4 ± 1.894.6 ± 1.6101.3 ± 1.5107.9 ± 1.5
n-butanol100.3 ± 4.595.6 ± 1.294.0 ± 2.4100.5 ± 1.9
Aqueous97.1 ± 2.598.0 ± 1.596.6 ± 1.596.8 ± 1.2
LeavesMethanol105.3 ± 3.298.8 ± 3.5100.6 ± 2.9129.1 ± 4.3
Chloroform98.2 ± 3.298.5 ± 1.9112.6 ± 4.5123.0 ± 2.9
Ethyl acetate105.9 ± 5.499.3 ± 2.7100.8 ± 4.0100.0 ± 3.4
n-butanol97.4 ± 4.191.6 ± 2.792.2 ± 2.6101.5 ± 1.9
Aqueous96.4 ± 3.389.7 ± 3.193.1 ± 4.888.8 ± 4.7
Table 3. Effect of extracts prepared from T. rosea on the proliferation of T. gondii in HFF-1 cells.
Table 3. Effect of extracts prepared from T. rosea on the proliferation of T. gondii in HFF-1 cells.
Part of the PlantExtractPercentage of Proliferation (Mean ± SEM)
1 µg/mL5 µg/mL10 µg/mL20 µg/mL
Inner barkMethanol85.4 ± 8.898.2 ± 5.7104.5 ± 8.9106.4 ± 9.8
n-hexane103.0 ± 11.1108.4 ± 7.394.6 ± 5.961.7 ± 10.0
Chloroform103.5 ± 17.340.5 ± 9.04.0 ± 0.81.3 ± 0.4
Insoluble ethyl acetate110.6 ± 13.7125.1 ± 15.9115.5 ± 13.3121.3 ± 14.2
Soluble ethyl acetate108.3 ± 12.5113.8 ± 13.8121.9 ± 12.799.7 ± 15.6
n-butanol107.3 ± 11.9120.8 ± 10.3119.3 ± 12.3113.6 ± 14.0
Aqueous45.9 ± 7.741.4 ± 7.848.8 ± 7.562.0 ± 7.9
LeavesMethanol84.8 ± 8.4111.5 ± 4.3115.6 ± 8.191.6 ± 6.3
n-hexane119.7 ± 3.6129.0 ± 5.5125.5 ± 7.9121.4 ± 4.7
Chloroform89.0 ± 9.536.9 ± 8.31.1 ± 0.22.4 ± 0.5
Ethyl acetate 1115.5 ± 7.2120.9 ± 8.0113.5 ± 7.087.5 ± 6.1
Ethyl acetate 265.5 ± 14.989.3 ± 15.9105.2 ± 10.8103.1 ± 6.9
n-butanol94.6 ± 11.893.4 ± 13.7100.7 ± 13.4110.0 ± 13.2
Aqueous56.1 ± 12.463.6 ± 11.461.4 ± 12.881.3 ± 10.6
Table 4. Effect of extracts prepared from T. chrysantha on the proliferation of T. gondii in HFF-1 cells.
Table 4. Effect of extracts prepared from T. chrysantha on the proliferation of T. gondii in HFF-1 cells.
Part of the PlantExtractPercentage of Viability (Mean ± SEM)
1 µg/mL5 µg/mL10 µg/mL20 µg/mL
Inner barkMethanol95.8 ± 5.2125.4 ± 6.6139.3 ± 10.6132.2 ± 9.2
n-hexane109.2 ± 3.3115.1 ± 3.3106.5 ± 5.970.1 ± 8.9
Chloroform129.1 ± 2.5100.8 ± 2.248.8 ± 8.86.9 ± 0.7
Soluble ethyl acetate110.9 ± 10.8136.2 ± 15.6127.6 ± 13.599.9 ± 13.6
Insoluble ethyl acetate98.1 ± 11.6126.4 ± 12.1141.0 ± 14.3138.9 ± 13.4
n-butanol65.6 ± 8.198.6 ± 13.4100.0 ± 15.597.7 ± 14.7
Aqueous89.0 ± 14.097.0 ± 11.998.6 ± 12.782.6 ± 8.4
LeavesMethanol82.8 ± 6.8106.8 ± 10.182.3 ± 5.241.2 ± 7.4
Chloroform93.3 ± 5.257.9 ± 9.823.5 ± 7.33.6 ± 0.4
Ethyl acetate93.2 ± 12.0112.9 ± 8.1116.6 ± 8.5113.2 ± 9.2
n-butanol104.4 ± 14.091.0 ± 11.4101.5 ± 8.785.4 ± 12.3
Aqueous60.4 ± 9.179.2 ± 7.388.4 ± 8.686.3 ± 8.8
Table 5. Effect of promising extracts on the proliferation of Toxoplasma gondii in HFF-1 cells.
Table 5. Effect of promising extracts on the proliferation of Toxoplasma gondii in HFF-1 cells.
TreatmentCC50 a
(μ g/mL)
IC50 b
(μ g/mL)
TI c
Chloroform extract of T. rosea leaves508.156.13
Chloroform extract of T. rosea inner bark>502.91>17.18
Chloroform extract of T. chrysantha leaves >507.92>6.31
β-amyrin15.14.753.18
a CC50—Cytotoxicity concentration of 50%. b IC50—Mean inhibitory concentration, a measure of the inhibition of tachyzoites. c TI—Therapeutic index, a measure of efficacy, calculated as CC50/IC50.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cardona-Trujillo, M.C.; Jiménez-González, F.J.; Veloza, L.A.; Sepúlveda-Arias, J.C. In Vitro Anti-Toxoplasma Activity of Extracts Obtained from Tabebuia rosea and Tabebuia chrysantha: The Role of β-Amyrin. Molecules 2024, 29, 920. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29050920

AMA Style

Cardona-Trujillo MC, Jiménez-González FJ, Veloza LA, Sepúlveda-Arias JC. In Vitro Anti-Toxoplasma Activity of Extracts Obtained from Tabebuia rosea and Tabebuia chrysantha: The Role of β-Amyrin. Molecules. 2024; 29(5):920. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29050920

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cardona-Trujillo, Maria Camila, Francisco Javier Jiménez-González, Luz Angela Veloza, and Juan Carlos Sepúlveda-Arias. 2024. "In Vitro Anti-Toxoplasma Activity of Extracts Obtained from Tabebuia rosea and Tabebuia chrysantha: The Role of β-Amyrin" Molecules 29, no. 5: 920. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29050920

APA Style

Cardona-Trujillo, M. C., Jiménez-González, F. J., Veloza, L. A., & Sepúlveda-Arias, J. C. (2024). In Vitro Anti-Toxoplasma Activity of Extracts Obtained from Tabebuia rosea and Tabebuia chrysantha: The Role of β-Amyrin. Molecules, 29(5), 920. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29050920

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop