Next Article in Journal
Neuroprotective Effects of Polysaccharides and Gallic Acid from Amauroderma rugosum against 6-OHDA-Induced Toxicity in SH-SY5Y Cells
Next Article in Special Issue
An Electrochemical Immunosensor Based on Chitosan–Graphene Nanosheets for Aflatoxin B1 Detection in Corn
Previous Article in Journal
Intensive Treatment of Organic Wastewater by Three-Dimensional Electrode System within Mn-Loaded Steel Slag as Catalytic Particle Electrodes
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 29
Issue 5
10.3390/molecules29050951
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Interfacial Interaction in NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 for Enhanced Electrocatalytic Water Splitting

by
Tingxia Wang
*,
Xu Zhang
,
Xiaojiao Yu
*,
Junpeng Li
,
Kai Wang
and
Jinfen Niu
School of Science, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an 710054, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2024, 29(5), 951; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29050951
Submission received: 25 January 2024 / Revised: 16 February 2024 / Accepted: 17 February 2024 / Published: 21 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Carbon-Based Electrochemical Materials for Energy Storage)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A bifunctional electrocatalyst with high efficiency and low costs for overall water splitting is critical to achieving a green hydrogen economy and coping with the energy crisis. However, developing robust electrocatalysts still faces huge challenges, owing to unsatisfactory electron transfer and inherent activity. Herein, NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 heterojunctions have been designed as freestanding bifunctional electrocatalysts to split water, exhibiting enhanced electron transfer and abundant catalytic sites. The optimum NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 electrocatalyst exhibits a small overpotential of 380 mV at 10 mA cm−2 for overall water splitting and superior electrocatalytic performance in both hydrogen and oxygen evolution reactions (HER/OER). Specifically, the electrocatalyst requires overpotentials of 76 and 286 mV at 10 mA cm−2 for HER and OER, respectively, in alkaline electrolytes, which originate from the synergistic interaction among the facilitated electron transfer and increasingly exposed active sites due to the modulation of interfaces and construction of heterojunctions.

1. Introduction

Electrocatalytic overall water splitting, as a promising green hydrogen (ideal zero-carbon energy carrier)-producing strategy, has attracted more attention for developing carbon-neutral alternatives [1,2,3]. However, electrocatalytic water-splitting activity is severely limited, owing to the sluggish catalytic kinetics for OER and HER [4,5,6,7]. Electrocatalysts of excellent efficiency are essential to reducing the overpotential by lowering the activation energy of water splitting [8,9]. At present, although IrO2, RuO2 and Pt-based materials have been employed as highly effective electrocatalysts for OER and HER, respectively, their scarcity and high price have hampered their industrialized application on a large scale [10,11]. The preparation of cost-effective bifunctional electrocatalysts with superior activity for OER and HER is crucial to promoting the practical applications and industrialized development of overall electrocatalytic water splitting.
Non-noble transition metal sulfides (TMSs) have presented themselves as appealing catalysts for both HER and OER on the basis of their favorable electrocatalytic activity and electrical conductivity [12,13]. Recently, vanadium disulfide (VS2) has attracted considerable attention as a candidate electrocatalyst, owing to its intrinsic catalytic properties, which exhibit weak van der Waals interlayer interactions and an interlayer spacing of 5.76 Å [14]. In particular, benefiting from its metallic conductivity and electrocatalytic active sites both on the surface and at the active edge, the 1T phase VS2 has been widely employed as an electrocatalyst for HER and OER [15]. Nevertheless, previous research reveals that individual TMSs exhibit insufficient active sites due to their strong van der Waals forces [16]. Massive efforts have been directed at constructing multi-component nanomaterial, which has been expected to improve its electrocatalytic activity by providing an abundance of active sites [17,18]. Ru cluster-modified VS2 can achieve a current density of 50 mA cm−2 at an overpotential of 245 mV, and this can be attributed to the optimization of intermediate adsorption/desorption through the interactions between Ru and VS2 and the sufficient catalytic sites afforded by electro-oxidized of Ru species [19]. Benefiting from induced-layer electron transfer between NiCo2S4 and ReS2 interfaces, the NiCo2S4/ReS2 nanocomposite showed excellent HER properties in both acidic and alkaline conditions [20]. The CoS2-ReS2 heterojunction exhibited improved electrocatalytic activity for HER and OER, which can be accounted for by the rich catalytic sites on the edge and the optimized catalytic kinetics of the interfacial modulation of ReS2 via modifying CoS2 [21]. Therefore, constructing binary transition metal sulfide-based electrocatalysts is beneficial to creating abundant catalytic active sites.
Interfacial regulation has been regarded as a powerful method to adjust electronic structure and catalytic kinetics to significantly enhance electrocatalysis [22,23,24,25,26]. NiFe layered double hydroxides (LDHs) have been widely investigated for OER because they can convert into γ-NiOOH by surface reconstruction, which has been proven to be the actual active sites [27,28]. Nevertheless, NiFe LDH exhibits limited electrocatalytic activity for OER due to weak conductivity and insufficient active sites [29]. Constructing heterostructures has been employed to improve its intrinsic catalytic activity by facilitating electron transfer kinetics and promoting the conversion of NiFe LDH into γ-NiOOH active species [30]. Urchin-like Co9S8@NiFe layered double-hydroxide heterostructured hollow spheres have been designed to enhance the electrocatalytic OER process by improving electrical conductivity and reducing the reaction energy barrier, requiring a smaller overpotential of 220 mV at 10 mA cm−2 [31]. By virtue of the abundant Ni3S2-NiFe LDH interfaces, this catalyst is regarded as one of the most productive non-precious metal-based OER catalysts [32]. Furthermore, the in-situ growth of heterogeneous structure electrocatalysts using a binder-free method can provide intimate contact between multi-components and electrodes, which can induce facilitated electron transfer [33,34]. Electrodeposition is a useful technique to rapidly fabricate multi-component nanomaterials through an in-situ growth process [35,36].
Inspired by the above-mentioned facts, a heterogeneous structure-based binary metal sulfide-modified carbon cloth (NiS2/VS2) has been constructed via a one-step hydrothermal process. Subsequently, an active OER electrocatalyst, NiFe LDH, was integrated into the surface of NiS2/VS2 (NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2) using a facile electrochemical deposition method, which was simultaneously exploited as a bifunctional electrocatalyst for both HER and OER. This designed heterostructure of NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 nanosheets exhibits interfacial charge transfer from NiS2 to VS2 and promotes electron transfer during the electrocatalytic process. Moreover, the formed porous nanoflower-like structure is favorable for exposing more active sites and facilitating bubble releasing, all of which can promote the electrocatalytic performance for overall water splitting. As a bifunctional electrocatalyst, the obtained NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 can deliver a current density of 10 mA cm−2 at an overpotential of 76 and 286 mV severally for HER and OER, together with excellent electrocatalytic stability. Furthermore, the solar-driven electrocatalytic overall splitting system constructed by NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 demonstrated that it has good potential for practical applications.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Characterization of Samples

The synthetic pathway of NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 is schematically illustrated in Scheme 1, in which VS2 was in-situ deposited on the surface of carbon cloth (decorated as VS2/CC) by a facile hydrothermal method. Similarly, the NiS2/VS2 decorated CC was constructed by the above-mentioned method with the addition of NiSO4·6H2O. Subsequently, the NiFe LDH was modified onto the surface of NiS2/VS2 via a simple electrodeposition method, resulting in NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2.
The phase and composition of pure VS2, NiS2/VS2 and NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 were measured by XRD. As shown in Figure S1a, the diffraction peaks located at 2θ values of 15.2, 35.64, 45.07, 47.06 and 57.02° can be ascribed to the (001), (011), (012), (003) and (110) lattice planes of VS2 (JCPDS No. 89-1640) [37,38]. The additional peaks at 31.58, 38.76, 53.43, 58.50 and 60.91° appeared when NiS2 was modified on the surface of VS2, which can be indexed to the (200), (211), (311), (230) and (321) plane of NiS2 (JCPDS No. 11-0099), respectively [39,40,41]. Compared with the XRD pattern of NiS2/VS2, the characteristic diffraction peaks at 11.26 and 35.28° appeared after the electrodeposition of NiFe LDH, which can be assigned to the (003) and (006) planes of NiFe LDH species (JCPDS No. 51-0463) [42,43]. The above-mentioned results suggest the co-existence of VS2, NiS2 and NiFe LDH in NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2.
The morphology of the electrocatalysts was studied using SEM and TEM. As shown in Figure 1a, the pure VS2 exhibits a nanoflower-like structure, which is distinguished from the NiS2/VS2 by a nanosheet morphology (Figure 1b). By contrast, the NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 has a thin nanosheets structure (Figure 1c), which was beneficial for exposing more active sites. Furthermore, the TEM image (Figure 1d) reveals that NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 exhibits a nanosheet structure. An interplanar spacing of 2.0, 2.3 and 1.9 Å is shown in the HRTEM image (Figure 1e) and can be identified as the (012) plane of VS2, (220) plane of NiS2 and (018) plane of NiFe LDH, respectively [44,45,46]. As illustrated in Figure 1f, the selected area electron diffraction (SAED) reveals that the (012) plane of NiFe LDH, (012) plane of VS2 and (321) plane of NiS2 appeared in the NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 sample, suggesting the successful construction of the NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 electrode [44,47,48]. The EDS-mapping measurement (Figure 2) was employed to investigate the element distribution of NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2, revealing an evenly distribution of V, S, Ni, Fe and O elements in the NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2.
To investigate the superficial element composition and the chemical state of the respective elements of the as-prepared electrocatalysts, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) characterization was utilized for the VS2, NiS2/VS2 and NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2. Compared with the XPS survey spectra of the VS2 (Figure S1b), an obvious signal of the Ni element appears in the survey spectra of the NiS2/VS2 and NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 samples. The XPS survey of NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 reveals the co-existence of Ni, Fe, V, O and S elements, which corresponds to the result of the EDS-mapping images. As revealed in Figure 3a, the high-resolution XPS spectrum of V for VS2 contains typical characteristic peaks at 514.12 and 521.62 eV, which can be related to the V2+ 2p3/2 and V2+ 2p1/2, respectively [49,50]. Additionally, there are two dominant peaks at 516.87 and 524.10 eV that can be indexed to the V4+ 2p3/2 and V4+ 2p1/2, respectively [49,50,51]. By contrast, the V4+ 2p3/2 peak around 517.49 eV and V4+ 2p1/2 around 524.72 eV of NiS2/VS2 display a positive shift, demonstrating the electronic interaction between NiS2 and VS2. Similarly, the V 2p XPS pattern of NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 exhibits the two characteristic peaks at 517.61 and 524.86 eV, which can be ascribed to the V4+ 2p3/2 and V4+ 2p1/2, respectively [49,50,51]. Consequently, this indicates that the valence state of V does not change after the electrodeposition of NiFe LDH, while an obvious positive shift occurs for V4+ 2p3/2 and V4+ 2p1/2 in NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 compared with NiS2/VS2 and VS2. In the S 2p XPS survey of VS2, NiS2/VS2 and NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 (Figure 3b), the peaks at 162.2 and 163.4 eV can be fitted to the S2- 2p3/2 and S2- 2p1/2, respectively [50,52]. Moreover, the peak at 168.5 eV in the S 2p XPS of NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 can be attributed to the S-O bond, owing to slight oxidization [38].
As revealed in Figure 3c, the high-resolution Ni 2p XPS survey of NiS2/VS2 reveals a negative shift compared with NiS2, further suggesting the strong interfacial electronic interaction of NiS2 and VS2. In detail, the Ni 2p XPS of NiS2 displays a peak at 857.23 eV with a satellite peak of 862.45 eV and a peak at 874.44 eV with a satellite peak of 881.11 eV, belonging to the Ni 2p3/2 and Ni 2p1/2 of Ni2+, respectively [53,54,55]. In comparison, the characteristic peaks of Ni 2p3/2 and Ni 2p1/2 of NiS2/VS2 shift to 856.83 and 874.30 eV, respectively. For further exploring the potential effects of the introduction of NiFe LDH, the high-resolution Fe 2p XPS of NiFe LDH and NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 was measured. As revealed in Figure 3d, the peaks of Fe3+ 2p3/2 and Fe3+ 2p1/2 in the NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 are separately located at 712.33 and 725.84 eV, which reveals a negative shift of Fe 2p XPS compared with the peaks of Fe3+ 2p3/2 (713.10 eV) and Fe3+ 2p1/2 (726.5eV) in the NiFe LDH [55,56,57].

2.2. Electrocatalytic Oxygen Evolution Reaction Performance

The electrocatalytic OER performance of the prepared products (VS2, NiS2/VS2, NiFe LDH and NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2) was evaluated in 1.0 M KOH with a typical three-electrode system. As shown in Figure 4a,b, the VS2 shows poor electrocatalytic performance for OER, which exhibits a high overpotential of 540 mV to reach a current density of 10 mA cm−2, suggesting that the VS2 is inactive for electrocatalytic OER. Obviously, the NiS2/VS2 heterogeneous structure exhibits enhanced electrocatalytic activity for OER, revealing that the formed multi-phase interface is a key factor in boosting the electrocatalytic activity of OER. Figure S2a shows the electrocatalytic OER activity of the VS2-based electrocatalysts with different additive ratios of NiSO4, in which the 1:5 NiS2/VS2 (denoted as NiS2/VS2) exhibits an optimal electrocatalytic activity with an overpotential of 386 mV at 10 mA cm−2. Additionally, the electrodeposition time of NiFe LDH was optimized, ranging from 0 to 400 s. Figure S2b reveals that the 350 s NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 exhibits superior electrocatalytic activity when the electrodeposition time of NiFe LDH is 350 s, which has been denoted as NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2. The NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 exhibits better electrocatalytic performance for OER compared with VS2, NiS2/VS2 and NiFe LDH, which provides a lower overpotential of 286 mV to deliver a current density of 10 mA cm−2. Additionally, the LSV curves of NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 and NiFe LDH show small peaks around 1.35 V, which can be interpreted as the redox reactions of the Ni species. These results imply that the formed heterogeneous structure and NiFe LDH decoration are beneficial to improving the electrocatalytic performance of OER.
Moreover, the electrocatalytic kinetics of as-prepared catalysts were evaluated by measuring Tafel plots. As shown in Figure 4c, the NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 exhibits a smaller Tafel slope of 99 mV dec−1 than NiFe LDH (167 mV dec−1), NiS2/VS2 (221 mV dec−1) and VS2 (442 mV dec−1), suggesting the facilitated catalytic kinetics of NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 for OER. The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurement was utilized to evaluate the charge transfer properties. As Figure 4d depicts, the NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 exhibits the smallest charge transfer resistance (Rct) among the as-prepared electrocatalysts, indicating that the lower resistance and accelerated electron transfer can be achieved by constructing a heterogeneous structure and decorating NiFe LDH.
The electrochemically active surface area (ECSA) of the as-prepared electrocatalysts was evaluated by calculating the Cdl according to the CV curves at various scan rates. As displayed in Figure 5a, the NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 exhibits a much larger Cdl of 3.38 mF cm−2 than NiFe LDH (2.55 mF cm−2), NiS2/VS2 (1.41 mF cm−2) and VS2 (0.43 mF cm−2), which can be attributed to the formed heterogeneous structure and the NiFe LDH decoration. Accordingly, the NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 exhibits an ECSA of 84.80 cm2, which is higher than that of NiFe LDH (63.75 cm2), NiS2/VS2 (35.25 cm2) and VS2 (10.75 cm2) (Figure S5a). The current density was normalized by the ECSA to evaluate the specific activity. As observed in Figure S5b and Figure 5c, the NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 exhibits intrinsic activity compared to the others, suggesting that the formed heterogeneous structure and modulated electronic structure are favorable to enhancing electrocatalytic activity. Additionally, the electrocatalytic stability of NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 was evaluated by i–t curves in 1.0 M KOH. In Figure 5b, we can observe that the NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 can maintain its superior electrocatalytic activity over 24 h, demonstrating that the prepared NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 can sustain long-term electrolysis without obvious attenuation. Furthermore, an XPS measurement of the NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 was employed after the stability test to investigate the structural stability. As observed in Figure S6, the NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 can maintain its initial chemical composition and chemical state after a long-term stability test. The thin nanosheet structure also can be observed (Figure S7) after long-term stability, demonstrating the structural stability of NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2.

2.3. Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution Reaction and Overall Water-Splitting Performance

To investigate its potential for efficient overall water splitting, the electrocatalytic performance of the NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 for HER was evaluated in 1.0 M KOH. Figure 6a,b shows that the NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 electrocatalyst exhibits excellent electrocatalytic activity, acquiring a smaller overpotential of 76 mV to deliver a current density of 10 mA cm−2, which is greatly superior to that of the VS2 (546 mV), NiS2/VS2 (270 mV) and NiFe LDH (122 mV). The corresponding Tafel plots are illustrated in Figure 6c. The NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 has a smaller Tafel slope of 79 mV dec−1 than VS2 (202 mV dec−1), NiS2/VS2 (175 mV dec−1) and NiFe LDH (145 mV dec−1). Moreover, the NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 exhibits remarkable stability during 24 h electrochemical measurement and maintains its electrocatalytic activity for HER (Figure 6d).
Electrocatalytic overall water splitting was measured by a two-electrode system composed of NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 in 1.0 M KOH. As shown in Figure 7a, the constructed overall water-splitting system is able to deliver a current density of 10 mA cm−2 at 1.61 V, confirming its potential to drive the overall water splitting. Furthermore, a commercial solar cell under 2.0 V was employed to explore its solar-drive overall water-splitting performance. As shown in Figure 7b, a number of microbubbles of H2 and O2 gas at the cathode and anode, respectively, evolved, which clearly demonstrates the superior electrocatalytic activity of the NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2. Furthermore, the corresponding Video S1 recorded this dynamic state.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Materials

Ammonium metavanadate (NH4VO3, AR, Tianjin Damao Chemical Reagent Factory, Tianjin, China), thioacetamide (CH3CSNH2, Aladdin Industrial Corporation, Shanghai, China), nickel sulfate hexahydrate (NiSO4·6H2O, AR, Zhongxin Fine Chemical Co., Ltd., Jinan, China), (FeSO4·7H2O, AR, Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) ammonium hydroxide (NH4OH, AR, Tianjin Fuyu Fine Chemical Co., Ltd., Tianjin, China), and carbon cloth (CC, SCI Materials Hub, Taiwan, China) were employed as substrates for the in-situ formation of VS2 and NiS2/VS2 on its surface via hydrothermal synthesis. Potassium hydroxide (KOH, Tianjin Kemiou Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Tianjin, China), nitric acid (HNO3, AR, Chengdu Kelong Chemical, Chengdu, China), and ethyl alcohol (C2H6O, AR, Tianjin Fuyu Fine Chemical Co., Ltd., Tianjin, China) were obtained to pretreat CC. Deionized water was prepared in our laboratory. All chemicals mentioned were utilized as received without further purification.

3.2. Pretreatment of Carbon Cloth (CC) Substrate

Carbon cloth (CC) with a geometric area of 2 × 4 cm2 was sonicated in an ultrasonic bath with deionized water and ethanol (C2H5OH) severally for 15 min to clean its surface thoroughly. Then, the hydrophilic surface was obtained via pretreatment in concentrated HNO3 at 100 °C for 2 h. Finally, the CC surface was fully rinsed with deionized water to remove residual HNO3, and the pretreated CC was obtained.

3.3. Preparation of 1:5 NiS2/VS2

A typical procedure to synthesize 1:5 NiS2/VS2 was performed as follows: 1 mmol NH4VO3 was added to a weak alkaline solution produced by 25 mL deionized water and 2 mL NH4OH while stirring constantly. At the same time, 10 mmol CH3CSNH2 and 0.2 mmol NiSO4·6H2O were dispersed in 10 mL deionized water with stirring. The above two solutions were blended and stirred vigorously at room temperature for 1 h. The mixture solution and prepared CC (2 × 4 cm2) were sealed and maintained at 160 °C for 24 h in a 50 mL Teflon-lined autoclave. The sample was cooled to an ambient temperature naturally after the reaction. Then, the prepared sample was rinsed several times with absolute ethanol and deionized water, respectively. Finally, it was dried at 60 °C for 6 h, and the 1:5 NiS2/VS2 was obtained.
For investigating the effect of NiS2 on electrocatalytic HER and OER activities, VS2, 1:10 NiS2/VS2, 1:7.5 NiS2/VS2, and 1:2 NiS2/VS2 were synthesized by a similar method with 1:5 NiS2/VS2 in terms of finely varying the additive amount of NiSO4·6H2O. More specifically, 0 mmol, 0.1 mmol, 0.133 mmol, and 0.5 mmol NiSO4·6H2O were added into the precursor solution for preparing VS2, 1:10 NiS2/VS2, 1:7.5 NiS2/VS2, and 1:2 NiS2/VS2, individually.

3.4. Preparation of 350 s NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2

The hydrothermal synthetic method for 1:5 NiS2/VS is based on the above-mentioned method. NiFe LDH was grown through an electrodeposition method on the surface of 1:5 NiS2/VS2. Then, 0.025 M NiSO4 and 0.0125 M FeSO4 solutions were homogeneously mixed in a three-electrode system with saturated calomel electrode (SCE), NiS2/VS2, and Pt plate as the reference, working, and counter electrode, respectively. The electrodeposition process was operated at a constant voltage of -1.0 V (vs. SCE) at room temperature with different electrodeposition times (250 s, 300 s, 350 s and 400 s), and the corresponding samples were denoted 250 s NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2, 300 s NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2, 350 s NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 and 400 s NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2, respectively. Finally, these as-obtained catalytic electrodes were gently washed several times using deionized water and then dried naturally.
As a reference, NiFe LDH was grown on pretreated CC using the same electrodeposition synthetic process for 350 s with the absence of 1:5 NiS2/VS2.

3.5. Structural Characterization

The phase composition was determined on an XRD-7000 s device (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å) in a 2 Theta scanning range from 10 to 80° at a current of 40 mA and a voltage of 40 kV. The morphology of the electrocatalysts was measured by means of a scanning electron microscope (SEM, Sigma 300, ZEISS, Oberkochen, Germany), and the energy dispersive spectrum (EDS) was recorded on Oxford Xplore. The transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) images were determined using a TEM instrument (Talos F200×, FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA) with a field-emission gun operated at 200 kV, and the EDS was recorded. Surface chemical analysis was performed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Thermo Scientific, K-Alpha Nexsa, Waltham, MA, USA) using monochromatic Al Kα radiation (1486.6 eV).

3.6. Electrochemical Measurements

The electrocatalytic performances for both HER and OER were carried out on a CHI660E electrochemical workstation using a traditional three-electrode system and an H-type electrochemical cell in an electrolyte of 1.0 M KOH. The as-prepared electrode with a geometric area of 1.0 cm2, the saturated calomel electrode (SCE), and the Pt plate were individually employed as working, reference and counter electrodes. The working electrode and SCE reference electrode were placed in the same chamber, and the Pt plate was placed in the others. All potentials in the present work were measured compared to reversible hydrogen evolution (RHE) in accordance with the following formula (ERHE = ESCE + 0.0591pH + EθSCE) [58,59]. Before testing, the working electrode was stabilized and the surface was cleaned using a cyclic voltammetry (CV) method. The catalytic activity of each electrocatalyst for HER and OER was estimated through linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) at a scanning rate of 5 mV s−1. According to the formula (ECSA = Cdl/Cs), the electrochemical active area (ECSA) was determined by calculating the double-layer capacitance (Cdl) values, where Cdl can be calculated by CV measurements in the non-Faradaic region with variable scan rates, and Cs represents the specific capacitance [60,61]. The Tafel plots were measured in the same testing system for unraveling the electrocatalytic kinetics of the as-prepared samples. To probe the electron transfer, the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was measured by application of an alternating voltage of 10 mV amplitude with a frequency ranging from 0.1 Hz to 100 kHz. The electrocatalytic stability was evaluated by current–time curves (i–t). Moreover, the potentials related to OER and HER were set as 0.5 V (vs. SCE) and −1.2 V (vs. SCE), respectively. The electrocatalytic overall water-splitting activity of the as-prepared electrocatalyst was measured by a two-electrode configuration, in which the NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 was employed as an electrocatalyst for the HER cathode and the OER anode in 1.0 M KOH.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 heterostructured electrocatalysts have been designed as bifunctional high-efficiency electrocatalysts to split water using a simple method, in which VS2 with metallic properties and the heterostructured construction endow enhanced electron conductivity and smaller charge transfer resistance to the NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 electrocatalyst. Furthermore, the formation of a nanoflower structure through decorating NiFe LDH on the surface of NiS2/VS2 via a facile electrodeposited method realizes more exposed active sites. The interfacial electron interaction between NiS2/VS2 and NiFe LDH was expected to enhance its electrocatalytic activity for overall water splitting. Remarkably, the NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 exhibits superior electrocatalytic activity compared to VS2, NiS2/VS2 and NiFe LDH; it can achieve a current density of 10 mA cm−2 at an overpotential of 76 and 286 mV for HER and OER, respectively. At the same time, the corresponding Tafel plots also decreased significantly. Furthermore, the two-electrode system for overall water splitting was constructed by employing the NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 as a bifunctional electrocatalyst, which requires an overpotential of 380 mV to achieve a current density of 10 mA cm−2. This study presents a tactic base regarding the interfacial regulation of NiFe LDH, NiS2 and VS2 to enhance electrocatalytic OER and HER activity, which is helpful for developing highly efficient electrocatalysts to split water.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules29050951/s1, Figure S1. (a) XRD patterns and (b) XPS survey spectra of the prepared VS2, NiS2/VS2 and NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2. Figure S2. Electrocatalytic OER activity of (a) the VS2 and NiS2/VS2 with different addition ratios of nickel source and (b) the NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 with different electrodeposition times. Figure S3. Cyclic voltammetry curves of the (a) VS2, (b) NiS2/VS2, (c) 250 s NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2, (d) 300 s NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2, (e) 350 s NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2, (f) 400 s NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 and (g) 350 s NiFe LDH in the non-faradaic region with different scan rates. (h) The Cdl value of the corresponding samples. Figure S4. Electrocatalytic HER activity of (a) the VS2 and NiS2/VS2 with different addition ratios of nickel source and (b) the NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 with different electrodeposition times. Figure S5. (a) ECSA and the electrocatalytic activity normalized by ECSA for (b) OER and (c) HER of the as-prepared VS2, NiS2/VS2, NiFe LDH and NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2. Figure S6. High-resolution XPS survey of the NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 before and after stability test; (a) V 2p, (b) S 2p, (c) Ni 2p and (d) Fe 2p. Table S1. Comparisons of HER and OER activity of NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 with other electrocatalysts in 1.0 M KOH. Figure S7. SEM of NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 after stability test. Video S1: The dynamic state of the constructed overall water-splitting system. Refs [62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74] are cited in the Supplementary Materials.

Author Contributions

Investigation, T.W. and X.Z.; Methodology, J.L. and K.W.; Supervision, X.Y.; Validation, J.N.; Writing—Original Draft, T.W. and X.Z.; Resources, X.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is financially supported by the Doctoral Scientific Research Fund of Xi’an University of Technology, the Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi (No. 2023-JC-QN-0131, No. 2022JM-082), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2020M673615XB).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Xu, H.; Shang, H.; Wang, C.; Du, Y. Surface and interface engineering of noble-metal-free electrocatalysts for efficient overall water splitting. Coordin. Chem. Rev. 2020, 418, 213374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ahsan, M.; He, T.; Noveron, J.; Reuter, K.; Santiago, A.; Luque, R. Low-dimensional heterostructures for advanced electrocatalysis: An experimental and computational perspective. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2022, 51, 812–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Tang, J.; Xu, X.; Tang, T.; Zhong, Y.; Shao, Z. Perovskite-Based Electrocatalysts for Cost-Effective Ultrahigh-Current-Density Water Splitting in Anion Exchange Membrane Electrolyzer Cell. Small Methods 2022, 6, 2201099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Abdelghafar, F.; Xu, X.; Jiang, S.P.; Shao, Z. Designing single-atom catalysts toward improved alkaline hydrogen evolution reaction. Mater. Rep. Energy 2022, 2, 100144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Luo, Z.; Zhang, L.; Wu, L.; Wang, L.; Zhang, Q.; Ren, X.; Sun, X. Atomic-scale insights into the role of non-covalent interactions in electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution reaction. Nano Energy 2022, 102, 107654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yang, Y.; Liu, L.; Chen, S.; Yan, W.; Zhou, H.; Zhang, X.; Fan, X. Tuning Binding Strength of Multiple Intermediates towards Efficient pH-universal Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution by Mo8O26-NbNxOy Heterocatalysts. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202306896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Hou, Z.; Cui, C.; Li, Y.; Gao, Y.; Zhu, D.; Gu, Y.; Pan, G.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, T. Lattice-Strain Engineering for Heterogenous Electrocatalytic Oxygen Evolution Reaction. Adv. Mater. 2023, 35, e2209876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, C.; Zhao, J.; Xie, L.; Wu, J.; Ren, Q.; Wang, Y.; Li, G. Surface-Adsorbed Carboxylate Ligands on Layered Double Hydroxides/Metal–Organic Frameworks Promote the Electrocatalytic Oxygen Evolution Reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 18129–18137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jiao, S.; Fu, X.; Wang, S.; Zhao, Y. Perfecting electrocatalysts via imperfections: Towards the large-scale deployment of water electrolysis technology. Energy Environ. Sci. 2021, 14, 1722–1770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jiao, Y.-Q.; Yan, H.-J.; Tian, C.-G.; Fu, H.-G. Structure Engineering and Electronic Modulation of Transition Metal Interstitial Compounds for Electrocatalytic Water Splitting. Acc. Mater. Res. 2022, 4, 42–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. He, X.; Han, X.; Zhou, X.; Chen, J.; Wang, J.; Chen, Y.; Yu, L.; Zhang, N.; Li, J.; Wang, S.; et al. Electronic modulation with Pt-incorporated NiFe layered double hydroxide for ultrastable overall water splitting at 1000 mA cm−2. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2023, 331, 122683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zahran, Z.N.; Mohamed, E.A.; Tsubonouchi, Y.; Ishizaki, M.; Togashi, T.; Kurihara, M.; Saito, K.; Yui, T.; Yagi, M. Electrocatalytic water splitting with unprecedentedly low overpotentials by nickel sulfide nanowires stuffed into carbon nitride scabbards. Energy Environ. Sci. 2021, 14, 5358–5365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Guo, Y.; Park, T.; Yi, J.W.; Henzie, J.; Kim, J.; Wang, Z.; Jiang, B.; Bando, Y.; Sugahara, Y.; Tang, J.; et al. Nanoarchitectonics for Transition-Metal-Sulfide-Based Electrocatalysts for Water Splitting. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1807134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bhosale, M.; Thangarasu, S.; Murugan, N.; Kim, Y.; Oh, T. Engineering 2D heterostructured VS2-rGO-Ni nanointerface to timulate electrocatalytic water splitting and supercapacitor applications. J. Energy Storage 2023, 73, 109133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. He, W.; Zheng, X.; Peng, J.; Dong, H.; Wang, J.; Zhao, W. Mo-dopant-strengthened basal-plane activity in VS2 for accelerating hydrogen evolution reaction. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 396, 125227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wu, Y.; Liu, X.; Han, D.; Song, X.; Shi, L.; Song, Y.; Niu, S.; Xie, Y.; Cai, J.; Wu, S.; et al. Electron density modulation of NiCo2S4 nanowires by nitrogen incorporation for highly efficient hydrogen evolution catalysis. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, L.; Rong, J.; Lin, Y.; Yang, Y.; Zhu, H.; Yu, X.; Kang, X.; Chen, C.; Cheng, H.; Liu, G. Mesoporous Single Crystal NiS2 Microparticles with FeS Clusters Decorated on the Pore Walls for Efficient Electrocatalytic Oxygen Evolution. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 33, 2307947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cheng, Y.; Fu, P.; Yang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Jin, S.; Liu, H.; Shen, Y.; Guo, X.; Chen, L. MoP4/Ni3S2/MoO3 heterogeneous structure nanorod arrays for efficient solar-enhanced overall water splitting. J. Mater. Chem. A 2023, 11, 24764–24776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hou, Z.; Cui, C.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, T. Electrochemical Oxidation Encapsulated Ru Clusters Enable Robust Durability for Efficient Oxygen Evolution. Small 2023, 19, 2207170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pei, C.; Kim, M.; Li, Y.; Xia, C.; Kim, J.; So, W.; Yu, X.; Park, H.; Kim, J. Electron Transfer-Induced Metal Spin-Crossover at NiCo2S4/ReS2 2D-2D Interfaces for Promoting pH-universal Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022, 33, 2210072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yu, J.; Qian, Y.; Seo, S.; Liu, Y.; Bui, H.T.; Tran, N.Q.; Lee, J.; Kumar, A.; Wang, H.; Luo, Y.; et al. Exploring catalytic behaviors of CoS2-ReS2 heterojunction by interfacial engineering. J. Energy Chem. 2023, 85, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Xu, X.; Pan, Y.; Ge, L.; Chen, Y.; Mao, X.; Guan, D.; Li, M.; Zhong, Y.; Hu, Z.; Peterson, V.K.; et al. High-Performance Perovskite Composite Electrocatalysts Enabled by Controllable Interface Engineering. Small 2021, 17, 2101573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gu, B.S.; Dutta, S.; Hong, Y.; Okello, O.F.N.; Im, H.; Ahn, S.; Choi, S.; Han, J.W.; Ryu, S.; Lee, I.S. Harmonious Heterointerfaces Formed on 2D-Pt Nanodendrites by Facet-Respective Stepwise Metal Deposition for Enhanced Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202307816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, X.; Wang, P.; Liang, X.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Zheng, Z.; Dai, Y.; Huang, B. Research progress and surface/interfacial regulation methods for electrophotocatalytic hydrogen production from water splitting. Mater. Today Energy 2020, 18, 100524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Feng, X.; Jiao, Q.; Chen, W.; Dang, Y.; Dai, Z.; Suib, S.L.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, Y.; Li, H.; Feng, C. Cactus-like NiCo2S4@NiFe LDH hollow spheres as an effective oxygen bifunctional electrocatalyst in alkaline solution. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2021, 286, 119869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cao, D.; Shao, J.; Cui, Y.; Zhang, L.; Cheng, D. Interfacial Engineering of Copper-Nickel Selenide Nanodendrites for Enhanced Overall Water Splitting in Alkali Condition. Small 2023, 19, 2301613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Yu, L.; Zhou, H.; Sun, J.; Mishra, I.; Luo, D.; Yu, F.; Yu, Y.; Chen, S.; Ren, Z. Amorphous NiFe layered double hydroxide nanosheets decorated on 3D nickel phosphide nanoarrays: A hierarchical core-shell electrocatalyst for efficient oxygen evolution. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 13619–13623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhao, Y.; Zhang, X.; Jia, X.; Waterhouse, G.; Shi, R.; Zhang, X.; Zhan, F.; Tao, Y.; Wu, L.; Tung, C.; et al. Sub-3 nm ultrafine monolayer layered double hydroxide nanosheets for electrochemical water oxidation. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1703585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhai, Y.; Ren, X.; Sun, Y.; Li, D.; Wang, B.; Liu, S. Synergistic effect of multiple vacancies to induce lattice oxygen redox in NiFe-layered double hydroxide OER catalysts. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2023, 323, 122091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Du, Y.; Liu, D.; Li, T.; Yan, Y.; Liang, Y.; Yan, S.; Zou, Z. A phase transformation-free redox couple mediated electrocatalytic oxygen evolution reaction. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2022, 306, 121146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Feng, X.; Jiao, Q.; Dai, Z.; Dang, Y.; Suib, S.L.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, Y.; Li, H.; Feng, C.; Li, A. Revealing the effect of interfacial electron transfer in heterostructured Co9S8@NiFe LDH for enhanced electrocatalytic oxygen evolution. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 12244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wu, S.-W.; Liu, S.-Q.; Tan, X.-H.; Zhang, W.-Y.; Cadien, K.; Li, Z. Ni3S2-embedded NiFe LDH porous nanosheets with abundant heterointerfaces for high-current water electrolysis. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 442, 136105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jia, L.; Du, G.; Han, D.; Hao, Y.; Zhao, W.; Fan, Y.; Su, Q.; Ding, S.; Xu, B. Ni3S2/Cu-NiCo LDH heterostructure nanosheet arrays on Ni foam for electrocatalytic overall water splitting. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 27639–27650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Li, J.; Liu, X.; Zhao, H.; Zhang, Q.; Du, B.; Lu, L.; Liu, N.; Yang, Y.; Zhao, N.; Pang, X.; et al. Hybrid Nano-Phase Ion/Electron Dual Pathways of Nickel/Cobalt–Boride Cathodes Boosting Intercalation Kinetics for Alkaline Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 2843–2851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Shit, S.; Bolar, S.; Murmu, N.C.; Kuila, T. Tailoring the bifunctional electrocatalytic activity of electrodeposited molybdenum sulfide/iron oxide heterostructure to achieve excellent overall water splitting. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 417, 1293333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, T.; Liu, X.; Yan, Z.; Teng, Y.; Li, R.; Zhang, J.; Peng, T. Facile Preparation Process of NiCoP-NiCoSe2 Nano-Bilayer Films for Oxygen Evolution Reaction with High Efficiency and Long Duration. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 1240–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhu, J.; Cai, L.; Yin, X.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, L.; Ma, H.; Ke, Y.; Du, Y.; Xi, S.; Wee, A.T.S.; et al. Enhanced Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution Activity in Single-Atom Pt-Decorated VS2 Nanosheets. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 5600–5608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Singh, V.K.; Nakate, U.T.; Bhuyan, P.; Chen, J.; Tran, D.T.; Park, S. Mo/Co doped 1T-VS2 nanostructures as a superior bifunctional electrocatalyst for overall water splitting in alkaline media. J. Mater. Chem. A 2022, 10, 9067–9079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Xu, D.; Ke, J.; Liu, H.; Bi, Y.; Liu, J. In situ construction of Ni-based N doped porous carbon induced by sulfurization or phosphorization for synergistically enhanced photo/electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2023, 179, 66–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, H.; Liang, M.; Miao, Z. Engineering accordion-like Fe-doped NiS2 enabling high-performance aqueous supercapacitors and Zn-Ni batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 470, 144148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tong, L.; Song, C.; Liu, Y.; Xing, R.; Sekar, K.; Liu, S. Open and porous NiS2 nanowrinkles grown on non-stoichiometric MoOx nanorods for high-performance alkaline water electrolysis and supercapacitor. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 14404–14413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yang, Z.; Lin, Y.; Jiao, F.; Li, J.; Wang, J.; Gong, Y. In situ growth of 3D walnut-like nano-architecture Mo-Ni2P@NiFe LDH/NF arrays for synergistically enhanced overall water splitting. J. Energy Chem. 2020, 49, 189–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Li, X.; Zheng, L.; Liu, S.; Ouyang, T.; Ye, S.; Liu, Z. Heterostructures of NiFe LDH hierarchically assembled on MoS2 nanosheets as high-efficiency electrocatalysts for overall water splitting. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2022, 33, 4761–4765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Qu, Y.; Shao, M.; Shao, Y.; Yang, M.; Xu, J.; Kwok, C.T.; Shi, X.; Lu, Z.; Pan, H. Ultra-high electrocatalytic activity of VS2 nanoflowers for efficient hydrogen evolution reaction. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 15080–15086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chen, X.; Cheng, N.; Ding, Y.-L.; Liu, Z. NiS2 microsphere/carbon nanotubes hybrids with reinforced concrete structure for potassium ion storage. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2021, 904, 115852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zheng, Y.; Deng, H.; Feng, H.; Luo, G.; Tu, R.; Zhang, L. Triethanolamine-assisted synthesis of NiFe layered double hydroxide ultrathin nanosheets for efficient oxygen evolution reaction. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2023, 629, 610–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Wang, S.; Xiong, D.; Chen, C.; Gu, M.; Yi, F. The controlled fabrication of hierarchical CoS2@NiS2 core-shell nanocubes by utilizing prussian blue analogue for enhanced capacitive energy storage performance. J. Power Sources 2020, 450, 227712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhang, J.; Zhang, H.; Huang, Y. Electron-rich NiFe layered double hydroxides via interface engineering for boosting electrocatalytic oxygen evolution. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2021, 297, 120453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wu, S.; Wang, W.; Shan, J.; Wang, X.; Lu, D.; Zhu, J.; Liu, Z.; Yue, L.; Li, Y. Conductive 1T-VS2-MXene heterostructured bidirectional electrocatalyst enabling compact Li-S batteries with high volumetric and areal capacity. Energy Storage Mater. 2022, 49, 153–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hussain, S.; Vikraman, D.; Sarfraz, M.; Faizan, M.; Patil, S.; Batoo, K.; Nam, K.; Kim, H.; Jung, J. Design of XS2 (X = W or Mo)-Decorated VS2 Hybrid Nano-Architectures with Abundant Active Edge Sites for High-Rate Asymmetric Supercapacitors and Hydrogen Evolution Reactions. Small 2022, 19, 2205881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Feng, T.; Ouyang, C.; Zhan, Z.; Lei, T.; Yin, P. Cobalt doping VS2 on nickel foam as a high efficient electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution reaction. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 10646–10653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yu, S.H.; Tang, Z.; Shao, Y.; Dai, H.; Wang, H.Y.; Yan, J.; Pan, H.; Chua, D.H.C. In Situ Hybridizing MoS2 Microflowers on VS2 Microflakes in a One-Pot CVD Process for Electrolytic Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2019, 2, 5799–5808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zhou, W.; Li, X.; Li, X.; Shao, J.; Yang, H.; Chai, X.; Hu, Q.; He, C. Crafting amorphous VO2–crystalline NiS2 heterostructures as bifunctional electrocatalysts for efficient water splitting: The different cocatalytic function of VO2. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 470, 144146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zhang, K.; Jia, J.; Tan, L.; Qi, S.; Li, B.; Chen, J.; Li, J.; Lou, Y.; Guo, Y. Morphological and electronic modification of NiS2 for efficient supercapacitors and hydrogen evolution reaction. J. Power Sources 2023, 577, 233239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Jiang, K.; Li, Q.; Lei, S.; Zhai, M.; Cheng, M.; Xu, L.; Deng, Y.; Xu, H.; Bao, J. Nb-doped NiFe LDH nanosheet with superhydrophilicity and superaerophobicity surface for solar cell-driven electrocatalytic water splitting. Electrochim. Acta 2022, 429, 140947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Li, Y.; Xu, H.; Yang, P.; Li, R.; Wang, D.; Ren, P.; Ji, S.; Lu, X.; Meng, F.; Zhang, J.; et al. Interfacial engineering induced highly efficient CoNiP@NiFe layered double hydroxides bifunctional electrocatalyst for water splitting. Mater. Today Energy 2022, 25, 100975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zhou, Y.; Guo, Q.; Luo, J.; Wang, X.; Sun, F.; Wang, C.; Wang, S.; Zhang, J. The influence of increased content of Ni(III) in NiFe LDH via Zn doping on electrochemical catalytic oxygen evolution reaction. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2023, 48, 4984–4993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Liu, X.; Zhao, X.; Cao, S.; Xu, M.; Wang, Y.; Xue, W.; Li, J. Local hydroxyl enhancement design of NiFe sulfide electrocatalyst toward efficient oxygen evolution reaction. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2023, 331, 122715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Geng, S.; Sheng, J.; Yang, W.; Tian, F.; Li, M.; Yu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Hou, Y. Activating interfacial S sites of MoS2 boosts hydrogen evolution electrocatalysis. Nano Res. 2021, 15, 1809–1816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zhou, S.; Wang, J.; Li, J.; Fan, L.; Liu, Z.; Shi, J.; Cai, W. Surface-growing organophosphorus layer on layered double hydroxides enables boosted and durable electrochemical freshwater/seawater oxidation. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2023, 332, 122749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Jiang, Q.; Wang, S.; Zhang, C.; Sheng, Z.; Zhang, H.; Feng, R.; Ni, Y.; Tang, X.; Gu, Y.; Zhou, X.; et al. Active oxygen species mediate the iron-promoting electrocatalysis of oxygen evolution reaction on metal oxyhydroxides. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 6826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Bolar, S.; Samanta, P.; Jang, W.; Yang, C.M.; Murmu, N.C.; Kuila, T. Regulating the Metal Concentration for Selective Tuning of VS2/MoS2 Heterostructures toward Hydrogen Evolution Reaction in Acidic and Alkaline Media. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2022, 5, 10086–10097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Patil, S.A.; Rabani, I.; Hussain, S.; Seo, Y.S.; Jung, J.; Shrestha, N.K.; Im, H.; Kim, H. A Facile Design of Solution-Phase Based VS2 Multifunctional Electrode for Green Energy Harvesting and Storage. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Patil, S.A.; Shrestha, N.K.; Bui, H.T.; Chavan, V.D.; Kim, D.-K.; Shaikh, S.F.; Ubaidullah, M.; Kim, H.; Im, H. Solvent modulated self-assembled VS2 layered microstructure for electrocatalytic water and urea decomposition. Int. J. Energy Res. 2022, 46, 8413–8423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Dhakal, P.P.; Pan, U.N.; Paudel, D.R.; Kandel, M.R.; Kim, N.H.; Lee, J.H. Cobalt-manganese sulfide hybridized Fe-doped 1T-Vanadium disulfide 3D-Hierarchical core-shell nanorods for extreme low potential overall water-splitting. Mater. Today Nano 2022, 20, 100272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Sekar, K.; Raji, G.; Chen, S.; Liu, S.H.; Xing, R.M. Ultrathin VS2 nanosheets vertically aligned on NiCo2S4@C3N4 hybrid for asymmetric supercapacitor and alkaline hydrogen evolution reaction. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 527, 146856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ghorui, U.K.; Mondal, P.; Adhikary, B.; Mondal, A.; Sarkar, A. Newly Designed One-Pot In-Situ Synthesis of VS2/rGO Nanocomposite to Explore Its Electrochemical Behavior towards Oxygen Electrode Reactions. ChemElectroChem 2022, 9, e202200526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zhang, L.L.; Yang, Y.Q.; Zhu, H.Z.; Cheng, H.M.; Liu, G. Iron-doped NiS2 microcrystals with exposed {0 0 1} facets for electrocatalytic water oxidation. J. Colloid. Interf. Sci. 2022, 608, 599–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Wen, F.S.; Pang, L.; Zhang, T.; Huang, X.L.; Xu, Y.; Li, Y.L. Fe doped NiS2 derived from metal-organic framework embedded into g-C3N4 for efficiently oxygen evolution reaction. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2023, 48, 33525–33536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Zhang, X.Y.; Qiu, Y.L.; Li, Q.; Liu, F.G.; Cui, L.; Li, C.M.; Liu, J.Q. Sandwich structured Fe3O4/NiFe LDH/Fe3O4 as a bifunctional electrocatalyst with superior stability for highly sustained overall water splitting. J. Alloys Compd. 2023, 932, 167612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Wang, J.; Lv, G.; Wang, C. A highly efficient and robust hybrid structure of CoNiN@NiFe LDH for overall water splitting by accelerating hydrogen evolution kinetics on NiFe LDH. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 570, 151182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Li, Y.T.; Dai, T.Y.; Wu, Q.X.; Lang, X.Y.; Zhao, L.J.; Jiang, Q. Design heterostructure of NiS-NiS2 on NiFe layered double hydroxide with Mo doping for efficient overall water splitting. Mater. Today Energy 2022, 23, 100906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Zhang, X.; Fan, J.J.; Lu, X.Y.; Han, Z.J.; Cazorla, C.; Hu, L.; Wu, T.; Chu, D. Bridging NiCo layered double hydroxides and Ni3S2 for bifunctional electrocatalysts: The role of vertical graphene. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 415, 129048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Lee, Y.J.; Park, S.K. Metal-Organic Framework-Derived Hollow CoSx Nanoarray Coupled with NiFe Layered Double Hydroxides as Efficient Bifunctional Electrocatalyst for Overall Water Splitting. Small 2022, 18, 2200586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 29 00951 sch001
Scheme 1. Schematic illustration of the preparation process of NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2.
Scheme 1. Schematic illustration of the preparation process of NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2.
Molecules 29 00951 sch001
Molecules 29 00951 g001
Figure 1. SEM images of (a) VS2, (b) 1:5 NiS2/VS2, and (c) 350 s NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2. (d) TEM, (e) HRTEM image and (f) SAED pattern of 350 s NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2.
Figure 1. SEM images of (a) VS2, (b) 1:5 NiS2/VS2, and (c) 350 s NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2. (d) TEM, (e) HRTEM image and (f) SAED pattern of 350 s NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2.
Molecules 29 00951 g001
Molecules 29 00951 g002
Figure 2. (a) High-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM) image of NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 and the corresponding elemental mapping of (b) V, (c) S, (d) Ni, (e) Fe and (f) O in NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2.
Figure 2. (a) High-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM) image of NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 and the corresponding elemental mapping of (b) V, (c) S, (d) Ni, (e) Fe and (f) O in NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2.
Molecules 29 00951 g002
Molecules 29 00951 g003
Figure 3. (a) High-resolution XPS spectra of (a) V 2p, (b) S 2p, (c) Ni 2p and (d) Fe 2p of the prepared VS2, NiS2/VS2 and NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2.
Figure 3. (a) High-resolution XPS spectra of (a) V 2p, (b) S 2p, (c) Ni 2p and (d) Fe 2p of the prepared VS2, NiS2/VS2 and NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2.
Molecules 29 00951 g003
Molecules 29 00951 g004
Figure 4. Electrochemical OER performance of the as-prepared VS2, NiS2/VS2, NiFe LDH and NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 samples: (a) polarization curves, (b) the corresponding overpotential to deliver a current density of 10 and 50 mA cm−2 in 1.0 M KOH, (c) the Tafel plots and (d) the EIS spectra.
Figure 4. Electrochemical OER performance of the as-prepared VS2, NiS2/VS2, NiFe LDH and NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 samples: (a) polarization curves, (b) the corresponding overpotential to deliver a current density of 10 and 50 mA cm−2 in 1.0 M KOH, (c) the Tafel plots and (d) the EIS spectra.
Molecules 29 00951 g004
Molecules 29 00951 g005
Figure 5. (a) The Cdl of the as-prepared VS2, NiS2/VS2, NiFe LDH and NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 samples and (b) the long-term stability of NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 under the potential of 0.5 V (vs. SCE).
Figure 5. (a) The Cdl of the as-prepared VS2, NiS2/VS2, NiFe LDH and NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 samples and (b) the long-term stability of NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 under the potential of 0.5 V (vs. SCE).
Molecules 29 00951 g005
Molecules 29 00951 g006
Figure 6. Electrochemical HER performance of the as-prepared VS2, NiS2/VS2, NiFe LDH and NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 samples: (a) polarization curves, (b) the corresponding overpotential to deliver a current density of 10 and 50 mA cm−2 in 1.0 M KOH, (c) the Tafel plots and (d) the long-term stability text of NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 under the potential of −1.2 V (vs. SCE).
Figure 6. Electrochemical HER performance of the as-prepared VS2, NiS2/VS2, NiFe LDH and NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 samples: (a) polarization curves, (b) the corresponding overpotential to deliver a current density of 10 and 50 mA cm−2 in 1.0 M KOH, (c) the Tafel plots and (d) the long-term stability text of NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 under the potential of −1.2 V (vs. SCE).
Molecules 29 00951 g006
Molecules 29 00951 g007
Figure 7. (a) The LSV curves of LDH/NiS2/VS2 (+, −) device for overall water splitting, (b) image of the solar-driven water-splitting system in 1.0 M KOH electrolyte.
Figure 7. (a) The LSV curves of LDH/NiS2/VS2 (+, −) device for overall water splitting, (b) image of the solar-driven water-splitting system in 1.0 M KOH electrolyte.
Molecules 29 00951 g007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, T.; Zhang, X.; Yu, X.; Li, J.; Wang, K.; Niu, J. Interfacial Interaction in NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 for Enhanced Electrocatalytic Water Splitting. Molecules 2024, 29, 951. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29050951

AMA Style

Wang T, Zhang X, Yu X, Li J, Wang K, Niu J. Interfacial Interaction in NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 for Enhanced Electrocatalytic Water Splitting. Molecules. 2024; 29(5):951. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29050951

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Tingxia, Xu Zhang, Xiaojiao Yu, Junpeng Li, Kai Wang, and Jinfen Niu. 2024. "Interfacial Interaction in NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 for Enhanced Electrocatalytic Water Splitting" Molecules 29, no. 5: 951. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29050951

APA Style

Wang, T., Zhang, X., Yu, X., Li, J., Wang, K., & Niu, J. (2024). Interfacial Interaction in NiFe LDH/NiS2/VS2 for Enhanced Electrocatalytic Water Splitting. Molecules, 29(5), 951. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29050951

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop