Next Article in Journal
Effect of TiO2 Morphology on the Properties and Photocatalytic Activity of g-C3N4/TiO2 Nanocomposites Under Visible-Light Illumination
Previous Article in Journal
An Efficient Synthesis of 3,5-Bis-Aminated Pyrazolo[1,5-a]Pyrimidines: Microwave-Assisted Copper Catalyzed C-3 Amination of 5-Amino-3-Bromo-Substituted Precursors
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Scandium(III)-Enlarged Salen Complex-Catalyzed Asymmetric Michael Addition of Indoles to Enones

State Key Laboratory of Chemical Resource Engineering, Department of Organic Chemistry, College of Chemistry, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2025, 30(3), 459; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30030459
Submission received: 29 December 2024 / Revised: 17 January 2025 / Accepted: 19 January 2025 / Published: 21 January 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Organic Chemistry)

Abstract

:
Salens are a class of important ligands and have been widely applied in asymmetric catalytic organic reactions. Enlarged salen-like ligands containing flexible chains were synthesized from L-phenylalanine, ethane/propanediamines, and salicylaldehydes, and successfully utilized in the scandium-catalyzed enantioselective Michael addition of indoles and enones (2-cinnamoylpyridine 1-oxides). The catalytic system demonstrates excellent reactivity and stereoselective control over electron-rich indole substrates with up to 99% yield and 99% enantiomeric excess. The enlarged Salen ligands with flexible and rigid combined linkers fit their coordination with large rare earth elements. Their coordination abilities were tuned by the electronic effect of substituents on their salicylaldehyde moiety, facilitating the construction of excellent chiral environments in the scandium(III)-catalyzed asymmetric Michael addition of indoles to 2-cinnamoylpyridine 1-oxides.

1. Introduction

Most indole compounds exhibit electron-rich properties and are prevalent in nature [1]. Optically active 3-substituted indole compounds serve as the core skeleton for numerous biologically active natural products and pharmaceutical agents, including the natural product Colletotryptins BD [2], Dragmacidin 3 [3], Gliocladin C [4], the mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist MCRA [5], the melatonin agonist TIK-301 [6], and the protein allosteric agonist CB1 [7], revealing the significance of these compounds (Figure 1).
In recent decades, the efficient synthesis of optically active 3-substituted indole compounds has been particularly appealing. The asymmetric Michael addition reaction is a significant method for constructing optically active molecules and has been widely utilized in organic synthesis [8,9,10]. Due to their electron-rich aromatic systems, indoles generally serve as excellent Michael donors [11], participating in the 1,4-addition reaction with α,β-unsaturated ketones [12,13]. α,β-unsaturated carbonyl derivatives are ideal Michael acceptors for enantioselective catalytic Michael reactions. Lewis acids have been typically employed to activate the carbon–carbon double bond of α,β-unsaturated ketones via reducing the energy of their lowest unoccupied molecular orbitals (LUMO). This activation mode facilitates the attack of the highest occupied molecular orbitals (HOMO) of electron-rich reagents, such as indoles [14].
Catalytic asymmetric Michael additions of indoles and enones have been successfully developed by using rare earth and transition metals in the presence of chiral ligands, including Feng’s diamine N,N-dioxide [15], PyBoxes [16], sugar-derived Boxes [17], and even aluminum–Salen complex [18] (Scheme 1, top). In comparison to transition metals, rare earth metal cations function as hard Lewis acids and display distinctive characteristics, including high oxophicility and elevated coordination numbers, and demonstrate excellent stereoselectivities in the catalytic asymmetric reactions involving enones [19,20]. The introduction of an auxiliary group at the α-position of the carbonyl group in unsaturated ketones would benefit coordination with rare earth metal cations, realizing superior chiral control. For example, 2-alk-2-enoylpyridines proceeded the PyBox–La(OTf)3-catalyzed asymmetric Diels–Alder cycloaddition with cyclopentadiene with excellent enantioselectivity [20]. China has abundant rare-earth metal resources. There is a demand to explore their application in catalytic asymmetric organic reactions. Herein, we present the La(OTf)3-enlarged Salen-complex catalyzed asymmetric Michael addition of indoles and 2-enoyl-pyridine N-oxides, which possess bidentate chelating sites to coordinate with rare earth metals, showing good to excellent stereoselectivities (Scheme 1, bottom).

2. Results and Discussion

To facilitate coordination with large rare-earth meat cations, various enantiopure enlarged Salen ligands L were prepared by referring to the reported procedure with a slight modification [21] (Scheme 2). In the enlarged Salen ligands, the original cyclohexane linker was displaced with linear linkers composed of rigid bisamides connected to flexible ethane-1,2-diyl or propane-1,3-diyl groups, enlarging their coordinate cavities to facilitate coordination with rare earth metal cations. The synthetic method was efficient. The desired ligands, L0L7, were obtained in good to excellent yields.
To investigate the influence of the structure of enlarged Salen ligands with flexible and rigid combined linkers on the stereoselectivity in the 1,4-conjugate addition reaction of indoles and unsubstituted α,β-unsaturated ketones, the reaction of 6-methoxyindole (1a) and 2-cinnamoylpyridine 1-oxide (2a) was selected as a model reaction to evaluate the ligands (Table 1) and optimize the reaction conditions (Table 2). To ensure the formation of the ligand–Sc(OTf)3 complex, the selected ligand, Sc(OTf)3, and 2-cinnamoylpyridine 1-oxide (2a) were pre-mixed before adding 6-methoxyindole (1a). The results indicated that the ligand L2, which has a longer flexible chain consisting of three carbon atoms, and salicylaldehyde, possessing a strongly electron-withdrawing 3-trifluoromethyl group, exhibited the best stereoselective control (Table 1, entry 3). Notably, the displacement of the trifluoromethyl group with Br (L3) and CH3 (L4) groups significantly reduced the enantiomeric excess values (Table 1, entries 3–5). The ligands L5 and L6, prepared from 5-bromo and 5-methoxysalicylaldehydes, presented low stereoselectivities (Table 1, entires 6 and 7). The ligand L7, derived from electron-rich and bulky 3,5-di(tert-butyl)salicyaldehyde, gave an excellent yield but low stereoselectivity (Table 1, entry 8). Thus, the ligand L2 was chosen as the optimal ligand for further optimizations. These results suggest that the trifluoromethyl group in the ligand L2 exerts an electron-withdrawing electronic effect, increasing the acidity of the phenolic group and favoring the formation of phenoxide, thereby enhancing the coordination with rare earth metal cations and forming the stable ligand–rare earth complex, which plays a critical role in controlling stereoselectivity. The stereostructure of product 3aa was identified on the basis of chiral HPLC analysis on the same type of chiral column in comparison with the reported relative retention time.
The influence of different solvents on the stereoselectivity of the model reaction was investigated under the catalytic conditions of the ligand L2. The results revealed that dichloromethane is the best choice of solvent for stereochemical control (Table 2). Commercially available dichloromethane was also tested, affording the desired product in a low yield of 42% without enantioselectivity (Table 2, entry 10). Thus, the optimal conditions are identified as follows: 2a (0.2 mmol), ligand L2 (6 mol%), and Sc(OTf)3 (5 mol%) in dried DCM (2 mL) were stirred under N2 atmosphere at R.T. for 1 h. 1a (0.24 mmol) was added and the resulting mixture was stirred at −20 °C for several hours, as determined by TLC monitoring.
With the optimal conditions in hand, the scope of indoles 1 was first studied (Table 3). Indoles 1a1d, with electron-rich and weak electron-poor 6-substituents, accomplished the reactions well, affording desired products 3aa3da in good yields (60–86%) and excellent enantioselectivities (94–99% ee) (Table 3, entries 1–4). However, indole 1e, which has a strongly electron-withdrawing 6-ethoxycarbonyl group generated the desired product 3ea in a low yield of 38% and 23% ee. This is possibly because the carboxylate group can also coordinate with the metal center, resulting in no activation of the enone moiety and leading to different stereocontrol in the reaction system (Table 3, entry 5). For 5-substituted indoles, electron-rich 5-methoxy- and 5-benzyloxyindoles 1f and 1g produced the corresponding products 3fa and 3ga in good to excellent yields (67% and 98%) and good enantioselectivities (88% ee and 78% ee) (Table 3, entries 6 and 7). In contrast, 5-chloro- and 5-fluoroindoles 1h and 1i gave rise to the expected products 3ha and 3ia in good yields (69% and 84%) and excellent enantioselectivities (98% ee and 93% ee) (Table 3, entries 8 and 9). However, 4-methoxyindole (1j) showed moderate yield (79%) and enantioselectivity (57% ee) due to steric hindrance (Table 3, entry 10). Both 1-methylindole (1k) and indole (1m) proceeded in the reaction, affording the expected products 3ka and 3ma in moderate yields (65% and 70%) but low enantioselectivities (38% ee and 51% ee) (Table 3, entries 11 and 13). However, 1-benzenesulfonylindole (1l) did not work due to low electron density, which significantly diminishes its nucleophilicity (Table 3, entry 12).
To further explore the applicable scope of unsaturated ketones 2, para-substituted 2-cinnamoylpyridine 1-oxides, 2b2g, were first tested. Substrates 2b, 2c, 2f, and 2g with both strong electron-donating and withdrawing groups proceeded the reaction well, showing excellent reactivities (86–99% yields), but all of them exhibited moderate stereoselectivities (50–77% ee) (Table 4, entries 1–6). In comparison with para-substituted 2-cinnamoylpyridine 1-oxides 2b2g, their ortho-substituted partners, 2h2k, showed slightly low reactivities (74–95% yields), and low enantioselectivities (38–53% ee) (Table 4, entries 7–10). Fused 2-naphthyl- and heteroaryl 2-furyl substrates, 2l and 2m, also worked, giving the corresponding products 3al and 3am in 96% and 84% yields, respectively, but low stereocontrol (60% ee and 41% ee) (Table 4, entries 11 and 12). The results indicate that both steric and electronic effects of substitution govern stereoselectivity. Less steric furan-containing substrate 2m exhibited poor stereoselectivity possibly because of the existence of additional coordinating oxygen atom in the furan ring (Table 4, entry 12).
To identify the generated catalyst and to investigate the coordination behavior of ligands and rare earth metals, ligand L3 (0.22 mmol, 161.6 mg) and Sc(OTf)3 (0.2 mmol, 98.4 mg) were added into anhydrous tetrahydrofuran (10 mL) under nitrogen atmosphere. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h. After the excess solvent was removed under vacuum, the resulting residue was washed with dry dichloromethane and subsequently recrystallized using a mixture of THF/DCM, yielding 152 mg of the complex. High-resolution mass spectrometric analysis suggests that its potential structure is L3-Sc(III), which provides an indirect evidence for the catalyst in the asymmetric Michael addition reaction (Figure 2).
Furthermore, we synthesized enantiomer of the ligand L2 to prepare complexes of L2 and Sc(OTf)3 with varying enantiomeric excess (ee) values, which were utilized to investigate their catalytic effect on the model reaction (Figure 3 and Table 5). The results illustrate that the chiral enlarged Salen ligand L2–Sc(III) complex acts as a catalyst for the reaction and displays a negative nonlinear effect. This observation suggests that the Sc(III)/L2 complex form diastereomeric dimer (or greater) structures with differing reactivity/solubility. The resulting reactive catalyst mixture reacts with diminished facial selectivity in the indole Michal addition. Understanding this phenomenon will enhance our ability to develop additional applications for these types of ligands in asymmetric contexts.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials and Instruments

Unless otherwise noted, all materials were purchased from commercial suppliers. Dichloromethane (DCM) and 1,2-dichloroethane (DCE) were refluxed over CaH2; Chloroform was dried by refluxed over anhydrous calcium carbonate; tetrahydrofuran (THF) and toluene (PhMe) were refluxed over lithium aluminum hydride. The solvents were freshly distilled prior to use. Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE), Ethyl acetate (EA), and CH3CN are all commercially available anhydrous solvents. All solvents were dried and then further dried over 4 Å molecular sieves for 12 h. 1H NMR spectra were recorded in CDCl3 or DMSO-d6 on a Bruker 400 NMR spectrometer (Bruker Corporation, Billerica, MA USA) usually with TMS as an internal standard. The chemical shifts were recorded in ppm relative to tetramethylsilane (TMS) and with the solvent resonance as the internal standard. The data are reported as follows: chemical shift, multiplicity: s (singlet), d (doublet), t (triplet), q (quartet), dd (double doublet), quin (quintet), m (multiplet), and br (broad), coupling constants (Hz), integration. The 13C NMR (101 MHz) and 19F NMR (377 MHz) data were collected in CDCl3 or DMSO-d6 on the same instrument with complete proton decoupling. Unless otherwise noted, all the solvents were purified by usual methods prior to use. Column chromatography was performed on silica gel (normal phase, 200–300 mesh) from Anhui Liangchen Silicon Material Co., Ltd. CH2Cl2 and MeOH (50:1, v/v) were used as eluent. The reactions were monitored using thin-layer chromatography (TLC) on GF254 silica gel plates (0.2 mm) from Anhui Liangchen Silicon Material Co., Ltd. (Liuan, Anhui province, China) The plates were visualized by UV light. The specific rotations were measured on an Anton Paar MCP500 polarimeter (Anton Paar GmbH—Headquarters, Graz, Austria) and reported as follows: [ α ] D T (c: g/100 mL, in solvent). The HRMS measurements were carried out on an Agilent LC/MSD TOF mass spectrometer (Agilent Technologies Inc. Palo Alto, CA, USA). The melting points were determined using a micro-melting point instrument, model SGW® X4A, manufactured by Shanghai INESA Physico-Optical Instrument Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The enantiomeric excesses were determined by chiral HPLC analysis using an Agilent 1260 LC instrument (Agilent Technologies Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA) with Daicel Chiralcel AD-H, OD-H, or AS-H column with a mixture of isopropyl alcohol and hexane as eluents.

3.2. General Procedure for the Synthesis of Ligands L

The ligands were prepared according to the reported procedure with slight modification [21,22].
In a 500 mL round-bottom flask, N-Boc-L-phenylalanine (1A) (13.27 g, 50 mmol) and tetrahydrofuran (200 mL) were added and the mixture was cooled in an ice-water bath at 0 °C. N-Methylmorpholine (NMM) (5.50 mL, 50 mmol) and isobutyl chloroformate (IBCF) (6.49 mL, 50 mmol) were then added into the reaction mixture under stirring. After stirring for 30 min, ethane-1,2-diamine or propane-1,3-diamine (50 mmol) was added, and the reaction mixture was warmed to 40 °C in an oil bath. The reaction mixture was stirred at the same temperature for 5 h. After the removal of the solvent, the resulting residue was extracted with dichloromethane. The combined organic phase was washed sequentially with hydrochloric acid (2 M, 60 × 3 mL) and saturated brine, and dried over anhydrous Na2SO4. After the solvent was evaporated in vacuum, a pure product 2A was obtained with a yield of 83%.
The product 2A obtained from the previous step was completely dissolved in methanol (100 mL) in a 250 mL round-bottom flask and the flask was placed in an ice-water bath at 0 °C, to which acetyl chloride (17.84 mL, 250 mmol) was added dropwise. After the ice-water bath was removed, the reaction mixture was allowed to warm to 50 °C in an oil bath and the reaction mixture was stirred at the same temperature for 5 h. After the removal of the solvent, the residue was dissolved in dichloromethane. The solution was washed with ammonia solution (25%~28%, w/w, 10 × 2 mL) and saturated brine sequentially, and dried over anhydrous Na2SO4. After the solvent was evaporated under vacuum conditions, the resulting residue was purified by recrystallization in petroleum ether, yielding product 3A in 86% yield.
3A (2 mmol) was dissolved in 20 mL of methanol, then salicylaldehyde (8 mmol) was added (noncommercially available salicylaldehydes were prepared referring to the reported procedure [23]). The resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature for 0.5 h. Upon completion of the reaction, the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. The resulting crude product was then filtered and washed using suction to remove unreacted salicylaldehyde. Finally, the product was recrystallized from a mixture of DCM/MeOH, yielding yellow crystalline product ligand L.
  • (2S,2′S)-N,N′-(Propane-1,3-diyl)bis(2-(((E)-2-hydroxybenzylidene)amino)-3-phenylpropanamide) (L0)
Yellow crystals, 1.02 g, yield 90%; m.p. 143.1−144.5 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 12.36 (s, 2H), 7.95 (s, 2H), 7.33 (ddd, J = 8.6, 7.3, 1.7 Hz, 2H), 7.26–7.12 (m, 12H), 6.98 (dd, J = 8.4, 1.1 Hz, 2H), 6.87 (td, J = 7.5, 1.1 Hz, 2H), 6.57 (t, J = 6.3 Hz, 2H), 4.03 (dd, J = 8.6, 3.8 Hz, 2H), 3.36 (dd, J = 13.5, 3.8 Hz, 2H), 3.22–3.05 (m, 6H), 1.55 (quin, J = 6.4 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 171.2, 167.6, 160.6, 137.0, 133.1, 132.1, 129.8, 128.4, 126.8, 119.1, 118.4, 117.0, 75.5, 40.9, 35.9, 29.6.,29.4 HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C35H37N4O4+ [M + H]+: 577.2809, found: 577.2813.
  • (2S,2′S)-N,N′-(Ethane-1,2-diyl)bis(2-(((E)-2-hydroxy-3-(trifluoromethyl)benzylidene)amino)-3-phenylpropanamide) (L1) [21]
Yellow crystals, 1.26 g, yield 90%; m.p. 110.3–112.3 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 13.35 (s, 2H), 7.88 (s, 2H), 7.60 (dd, J = 7.8, 1.6 Hz, 2H), 7.26–7.09 (m, 12H), 6.90 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 6.72 (t, J = 4.3 Hz, 2H), 4.07 (dd, J = 9.2, 3.8 Hz, 2H), 3.41 (ddd, J = 13.7, 6.1, 3.6 Hz, 6H), 3.05 (dd, J = 13.6, 9.3 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 171.6, 166.9, 159.0, 136.7, 135.7, 130.3, 129.7, 128.6, 126.9, 119.1, 118.3, 77.24, 75.3, 40.8, 40.4. 19F NMR (377 MHz, CDCl3) δ −2.41.
  • (2S,2′S)-N,N′-(Propane-1,3-diyl)bis(2-(((E)-2-hydroxy-3-(trifluoromethyl)benzylidene)amino)-3-phenylpropanamide) (L2) [21]
Yellow crystals, 1.40 g, yield 98%; m.p. 149.6–151.2 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 13.49 (s, 2H), 7.96 (s, 2H), 7.61 (dd, J = 7.9, 1.6 Hz, 2H), 7.31–7.09 (m, 12H), 6.91 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 6.77 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 2H), 4.07 (dd, J = 9.0, 4.0 Hz, 2H), 3.41 (dd, J = 13.6, 4.0 Hz, 2H), 3.24–3.14 (m, 4H), 3.06 (dd, J = 13.6, 9.0 Hz, 2H), 1.59 (quin, J = 6.3 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 170.8, 166.8, 159.2, 136.8, 135.7, 130.3, 129.7, 128.6, 126.9, 119.2, 118.2, 77.4, 77.1, 76.7, 75.3, 40.7, 35.8, 29.3. 19F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3) δ −62.57.
  • (2S,2′S)-N,N′-(Propane-1,3-diyl)bis(2-(((E)-3-bromo-2-hydroxybenzylidene)amino)-3-phenylpropanamide) (L3)
Yellow crystals, 1.45 g, yield 99%; m.p. 109.4.1–110.6 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 13.43 (s, 2H), 7.91 (s, 2H), 7.57 (dd, J = 7.9, 1.5 Hz, 2H), 7.28–7.05 (m, 12H), 6.76 (q, J = 6.5 Hz, 4H), 4.09 (dd, J = 9.0, 3.8 Hz, 2H), 3.43 (dd, J = 13.6, 3.8 Hz, 2H), 3.20 (tt, J = 6.6, 3.8 Hz, 4H), 3.08 (dd, J = 13.6, 9.0 Hz, 2H), 1.60 (quin, J = 6.3 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 170.8, 166.8, 157.5, 136.8, 136.3, 131.3, 129.7, 128.6, 126.9, 119.9, 119.2, 110.8, 75.1, 40.8, 36.0, 29.4. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C35H35Br2N4O4+ [M + H]+: 733.1020, found: 733.1024.
  • (2S,2′S)-N,N′-(Propane-1,3-diyl)bis(2-(((E)-2-hydroxy-3-methylbenzylidene)amino)-3-phenylpropanamide) (L4)
Yellow crystals, 1.14 g, yield 94%; m.p. 135.9–138.6 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 12.59 (s, 2H), 7.93 (s, 2H), 7.25–7.12 (m, 12H), 6.96 (dd, J = 7.7, 1.7 Hz, 2H), 6.77 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 6.63–6.48 (m, 2H), 4.02 (dd, J = 8.8, 3.7 Hz, 2H), 3.38 (dd, J = 13.5, 3.7 Hz, 2H), 3.18 (tq, J = 11.1, 6.3 Hz, 4H), 3.08 (dd, J = 13.5, 8.7 Hz, 2H), 2.29 (s, 6H), 1.56 (quin, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 171.3, 167.8, 158.9, 137.1, 134.2, 129.9, 129.8, 128.5, 126.8, 126.0, 118.7, 117.7, 75.4, 40.9, 36.0, 29.6, 15.5. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C37H41N4O4+ [M + H]+: 605.3122, found: 6053.3124.
  • (2S,2′S)-N,N′-(Propane-1,3-diyl)bis(2-(((E)-5-bromo-2-hydroxybenzylidene)amino)-3-phenylpropanamide) (L5)
Yellow crystals, 1.45 g, yield 99%; m.p. 140.3–141.9 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 12.39 (s, 2H), 7.89 (s, 2H), 7.42 (dd, J = 8.9, 2.5 Hz, 2H), 7.31–7.18 (m, 8H), 7.17–7.06 (m, 4H), 6.90 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 6.64 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 2H), 4.05 (dd, J = 8.7, 3.8 Hz, 2H), 3.38 (dd, J = 13.5, 3.8 Hz, 2H), 3.18 (ddd, J = 21.0, 13.6, 6.9 Hz, 4H), 3.14–3.02 (m, 2H), 1.58 (quin, J = 6.2 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 171.0, 166.3, 159.6, 136.8, 135.8, 134.1, 129.7, 128.5, 126.9, 119.8, 119.1, 110.6, 75.4, 40.8, 35.8, 29.4. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C35H35Br2N4O4+ [M + H]+: 733.1020, found: 733.1024.
  • (2S,2′S)-N,N′-(Propane-1,3-diyl)bis(2-(((E)-2-hydroxy-5-methoxybenzylidene)amino)-3-phenylpropanamide) (L6)
Yellow crystals, 1.13 g, yield 89%; m.p. 147.4–148.8 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 11.91 (s, 2H), 7.89 (s, 2H), 7.25–7.11 (m, 10H), 6.96–6.85 (m, 4H), 6.68–6.56 (m, 4H), 4.02 (dd, J = 8.6, 3.8 Hz, 2H), 3.72 (s, 6H), 3.35 (dd, J = 13.5, 3.8 Hz, 2H), 3.17 (qd, J = 6.4, 3.3 Hz, 4H), 3.09 (dd, J = 13.5, 8.7 Hz, 2H), 1.55 (quin, J = 6.4 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 171.2, 167.3, 154.7, 152.3, 137.0, 129.8, 128.5, 126.8, 120.3, 118.1, 117.8, 115.3, 75.5, 55.9, 40.9, 35.9, 29.6. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C37H41N4O6+ [M + H]+: 637.3021, found: 637.3022.
  • (2S,2′S)-N,N′-(Propane-1,3-diyl)bis(2-(((E)-3,5-di-tert-butyl-2-hydroxybenzylidene)amino)-3-phenylpropanamide) (L7)
Yellow crystals, 1.39 g, yield 87%; m.p. 193.4–195.2 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 12.79 (s, 2H), 8.04 (s, 2H), 7.41 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 2H), 7.25–7.14 (m, 10H), 6.97 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 2H), 6.52 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H), 4.03 (dd, J = 8.3, 3.9 Hz, 2H), 3.34 (dd, J = 13.6, 4.0 Hz, 2H), 3.13 (ddd, J = 13.8, 9.5, 5.2 Hz, 6H), 1.46 (s, 20H), 1.27 (s, 18H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 171.3, 168.6, 157.7, 140.6, 137.2, 136.8, 129.8, 128.4, 127.9, 126.7, 117.6, 75.4, 41.0, 35.9, 35.1, 34.2, 31.5, 29.5. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C51H69N4O4+ [M + H]+: 801.5313, found: 801.5314.

3.3. General Procedure for the Asymmetric Catalytic Michael Addition of Indoles 1 and Enones 2

A solution of ligand L2 (8.6 mg, 0.012 mmol), trans-2-enoyl pyridine 1-oxide (0.20 mmol), and Sc(OTf)3 (4.9 mg, 0.01 mmol) in dry chloroform (2 mL) was stirred at room temperature for 1 h under nitrogen atmosphere at room temperature. The reaction mixture was cooled to −20 °C and stirred for 10 min. Indole (0.24 mmol) was added, and the reaction mixture was stirred at −20 °C until the completion of the reaction (monitored by TLC). The mixture was concentrated in vacuo and the residue was purified over silica gel by column chromatography (methanol/dichloromethane 1:50, v/v as eluent) to afford product 3.
  • (R)-2-(3-(6-Methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)-3-phenylpropanoyl)pyridine 1-oxide (3aa)
Colorless crystals, 48 mg, yield 65%; m.p. 167.9–169.1 °C. ee 96%, HPLC analysis: chiralpak AD-H (i-PrOH/hexane = 40:60, v/v, 1.0 mL/min, 254 nm) major tR = 15.57 min and minor tS = 18.27 min. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.06 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 1H), 7.90 (brs, 1H), 7.23–7.11 (m, 6H), 7.08–6.99 (m, 3H), 6.89 (dd, J = 2.4, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 6.70 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H), 6.57 (dd, J = 8.7, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 4.80 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 3.98 (dd, J = 16.4, 7.6 Hz, 1H), 3.86 (dd, J = 16.4, 8.0 Hz, 1H), 3.71 (s, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 197.2, 153.8, 147.1, 143.7, 140.1, 131.6, 128.4, 127.9, 127.5, 127.1, 126.5, 126.4, 125.6, 122.4, 118.5, 112.2, 111.7, 101.3, 55.8, 49.0, 38.6. HRMS (ESI): m/z Calcd for C23H20N2O3Na+ [M + Na]+: 395.1366, found: 395.1370.
  • (R)-2-(3-(6-Methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-3-phenylpropanoyl)pyridine 1-oxide (3ba)
Yellow crystals, 53 mg, yield 74%; m.p. 185.9–189.4 °C. ee 94%, HPLC analysis: chiralpak AD-H (i-PrOH/hexane = 40:60, v/v, 1.0 mL/min, 230 nm) major tR = 13.48 min and minor tR = 16.79 min. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.70 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 8.32 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 1H), 7.51 (ddd, J = 7.5, 6.5, 2.2 Hz, 1H), 7.38–7.29 (m, 3H), 7.25–7.08 (m, 7H), 6.71 (dd, J = 8.2, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 4.76 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 3.99 (dd, J = 16.7, 8.0 Hz, 1H), 3.80 (dd, J = 16.7, 7.4 Hz, 1H), 2.34 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 197.8, 146.8, 145.1, 140.5, 137.3, 130.5, 128.8, 128.6, 128.1, 126.4, 126.3, 126.2, 124.7, 121.8, 120.5, 118.8, 117.6, 111.6, 48.6, 38.3, 21.8. HRMS (ESI): m/z Calcd for C23H20N2NaO2+ [M + Na]+: 379.1417, found: 379.1427.
  • (R)-2-(3-(6-Bromo-1H-indol-3-yl)-3-phenylpropanoyl)pyridine 1-oxide (3ca)
Brown crystals, 50 mg, yield 60%; m.p. 198.7–201.7 °C. ee 98%, HPLC analysis: chiralpak AD-H (i-PrOH/hexane = 30:70, v/v, 1.0 mL/min, 254 nm) major tR = 10.97 min and minor tS = 12.26 min. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 11.05 (d, J = 2.6 Hz, 1H), 8.39–8.27 (m, 1H), 7.57–7.46 (m, 2H), 7.38–7.17 (m, 8H), 7.13 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.01 (dd, J = 8.5, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 4.78 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 4.01 (dd, J = 16.9, 8.1 Hz, 1H), 3.79 (dd, J = 16.9, 7.2 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 197.6, 146.8, 144.8, 140. 6, 137.7, 128.9, 128.7, 128.0, 126.6, 126.3, 126.3, 125.8, 123.7, 121.6, 120.8, 118.1, 114.4, 114.3, 48.5, 37.9. HRMS (ESI): m/z Calcd for C22H17N2O2BrNa+ [M + Na]+: 443.0366, found: 443.0432.
  • (R)-2-(3-(6-Fluoro-1H-indol-3-yl)-3-phenylpropanoyl)pyridine 1-oxide (3da)
Colorless crystals, 62 mg, yield 86%; m.p.147.4–149.5 °C. ee 99%, HPLC analysis: chiralpak AD-H (i-PrOH/hexane = 40:60, v/v, 1.0 mL/min, 254 nm) major tR = 9.42 min and minor tS = 10.38 min. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.16 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H), 7.98 (brs, 1H), 7.31–7.25 (s, 5H), 7.24–7.17 (m, 4H), 7.14 (tdd, J = 7.9, 3.7, 1.3 Hz, 2H), 7.03 (dd, J = 9.7, 2.5 Hz, 1H), 6.86 (td, J = 9.0, 2.5 Hz, 1H), 4.87 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 4.08 (dd, J = 16.6, 7.6 Hz, 1H), 3.93 (dd, J = 16.7, 7.8 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 197.7, 160.4, 158.1, 146.8, 144.8, 140.5, 136.7, 136.6, 128.9, 128.7, 128.1, 126.6, 126.3, 123.6, 123.2, 120.1, 120.0, 118.0, 107.4, 107.1, 97.9, 97.6, 48.5, 38.1. 19F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3) δ −124.39. HRMS (ESI): m/z Calcd for C22H17N2O2FNa+ [M + Na]+: 383.1166, found: 383.1169.
  • (R)-2-(3-(6-(Methoxycarbonyl)-1H-indol-3-yl)-3-phenylpropanoyl)pyridine 1-oxide (3ea)
Colorless crystals, 30 mg, yield 38%; ee 23%, m.p. 194.5–196.3 °C. HPLC analysis: chiralpak AD-H (i-PrOH/hexane = 30:70, v/v, 1.0 mL/min, 230 nm) major tR = 39.17 min and minor tS = 54.22 min. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 11.35 (s, 1H), 8.32 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 1H), 7.99 (s, 1H), 7.64–7.40 (m, 4H), 7.37–7.28 (m, 3H), 7.27–7.17 (m, 3H), 7.16–7.08 (m, 1H), 4.82 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 4.03 (dd, J = 16.9, 8.1 Hz, 1H), 3.83 (s, 4H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 197.6, 167.7, 146.8, 144.8, 140.6, 136.0, 130.2, 128.9, 128.7, 128.1, 126.7, 126.6, 126.3, 126.3, 122.5, 119.5, 118.9, 118.4, 113.9, 52.2, 48.5, 37.9. HRMS (ESI): m/z Calcd for C24H20N2O4Na+ [M + Na]+: 423.1315, found: 423.1320.
  • (R)-2-(3-(5-Methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)-3-phenylpropanoyl)pyridine 1-oxide (3fa) [17]
Yellow crystals, 50 mg, yield 67%; ee 88%, m.p. 169.1–171.9 °C. HPLC analysis: chiralpak AD-H (i-PrOH/hexane = 40:60, v/v, 1.0 mL/min, 254 nm) major tR = 16.29 min and minor tS = 19.35 min. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.17 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H), 8.04 (s, 1H), 7.38–7.30 (m, 2H), 7.30–7.10 (m, 7H), 7.09–7.05 (m, 1H), 6.88 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.80 (dd, J = 8.8, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 4.90 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 4.11 (dd, J = 16.4, 7.6 Hz, 1H), 3.96 (dd, J = 16.4, 8.0 Hz, 1H), 3.76 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 197.2, 153.8, 147.1, 143.7, 140.1, 131.6, 128.4, 127.9, 127.5, 127.1, 126.5, 126.4, 125.6, 122.4, 118.5, 112.2, 111.7, 101.3, 55.8, 49.0, 38.6.
  • (R)-2-(3-(5-(Benzyloxy)-1H-indol-3-yl)-3-phenylpropanoyl)pyridine 1-oxide (3ga)
Yellow crystals, 88 mg, yield 98%; m.p. 126.1.9–128.0 °C. ee 78%, HPLC analysis: chiralpak AD-H (i-PrOH/hexane = 40:60, v/v, 1.0 mL/min, 254 nm) major tR = 24.97 min and minor tS = 29.80 min. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.26 (brs, 1H), 7.97 (dd, J = 6.4, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 7.34–7.27 (m, 2H), 7.27–7.15 (m, 5H), 7.11–6.99 (m, 5H), 6.96–6.83 (m, 4H), 6.72 (dd, J = 8.8, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 4.86 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 2H), 4.75 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 3.96 (dd, J = 16.5, 7.5 Hz, 1H), 3.83 (dd, J = 16.4, 8.0 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 197.8, 152.3, 146.9, 144.9, 140.5, 138.3, 132.2, 128.8, 128.8, 128.7, 128.1, 128.1, 127.1, 126.4, 126.3, 126.2, 123.3, 117.6, 112.5, 112.1, 102.8, 70.3, 48.4, 38.2. HRMS (ESI): m/z Calcd for C29H24N2O3Na+ [M + Na]+: 471.1679, found: 471.1680.
  • (R)-2-(3-(5-Chloro-1H-indol-3-yl)-3-phenylpropanoyl)pyridine 1-oxide (3ha) [17]
Orange-red crystals, 52 mg, yield 69%; m.p. 196.9–201.9 °C. ee 98%, HPLC analysis: chiralpak AD-H (i-PrOH/hexane = 40:60, v/v, 1.0 mL/min, 230 nm) major tR = 10.06 min and minor ts = 12.04 min, 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 11.11 (s, 1H), 8.33 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 1H), 7.52 (td, J = 7.0, 2.2 Hz, 1H), 7.45–7.29 (m, 6H), 7.27–7.19 (m, 3H), 7.14 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 7.03 (dd, J = 8.6, 2.1 Hz, 1H), 4.79 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 4.04 (dd, J = 16.9, 8.2 Hz, 1H), 3.79 (dd, J = 16.9, 7.2 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 197.6, 146.8, 144.8, 140.6, 135.3, 128.9, 128.7, 128.1, 127.9, 126.6, 126.4, 126.3, 124.5, 123.5, 121.5, 118.3, 117.7, 113.4, 48.5, 37.9.
  • (R)-2-(3-(5-Fluoro-1H-indol-3-yl)-3-phenylpropanoyl)pyridine 1-oxide (3ia) [17]
Colorless crystals, 61 mg, yield 84%; m.p. 198.6–202.2 °C. ee 93%, HPLC analysis: chiralpak AD-H (i-PrOH/hexane = 40:60, v/v, 1.0 mL/min, 254 nm) major tR = 8.09 min and minor tS = 8.84 min, 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.99 (d, J = 2.6 Hz, 1H), 8.41–8.28 (m, 1H), 7.52 (ddd, J = 7.6, 6.5, 2.1 Hz, 1H), 7.42–7.27 (m, 5H), 7.26–7.17 (m, 3H), 7.16–7.05 (m, 2H), 6.86 (td, J = 9.1, 2.5 Hz, 1H), 4.75 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 4.02 (dd, J = 16.8, 8.1 Hz, 1H), 3.79 (dd, J = 16.8, 7.4 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 197.7, 158.1, 155.8, 146.8, 144.8, 140.6, 133.5, 128.9, 128.7, 128.1, 127.0, 126.9, 126.6, 126.3, 126.3, 124.7, 118.1, 112.8, 112.8, 109.7, 109.5, 103.8, 103.6, 48.4, 38.0. 19F NMR (377 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ −125.29.
  • (R)-2-(3-(4-Methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)-3-phenylpropanoyl)pyridine 1-oxide (3ja)
Yellow crystals, 59 mg, yield 79%; m.p. 81.7–85.8 °C. ee 57%, HPLC analysis: chiralpak AD-H (i-PrOH/hexane = 30:70, v/v, 1.0 mL/min, 254 nm) major tR = 8.46 min and minor tS = 9.19 min. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.31 (brs, 1H), 8.14 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H), 7.38–7.30 (m, 2H), 7.22 (dd, J = 9.2, 5.9 Hz, 3H), 7.15–7.09 (m, 1H), 7.08–6.99 (m, 3H), 6.93–6.79 (m, 2H), 6.40 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 5.32 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 4.02 (dd, J = 7.9, 3.8 Hz, 2H), 3.78 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 197.6, 154.7, 147.4, 144.8, 139.9, 138.1, 128.1, 128.1, 127.3, 126.3, 125.9, 125.6, 122.9, 120.5, 119.5, 116.8, 104.4, 99.6, 54.9, 49.8, 39.2. HRMS (ESI): m/z Calcd for C23H20N2O3Na+ [M + Na]+: 395.1366, found: 395.1363.
  • (R)-2-(3-(1-Methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-3-phenylpropanoyl)pyridine 1-oxide (3ka) [17]
Yellow crystals, 46 mg, yield 65%; m.p. 42.9–44.8 °C. ee 38%, HPLC analysis: chiralpak OD-H (i-PrOH/hexane = 30:70, v/v, 1.0 mL/min, 254 nm) major tR = 18.26 min and minor tS = 24.19 min. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.07 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 1H), 7.43 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.35–7.26 (m, 2H), 7.24–7.03 (m, 8H), 7.02–6.89 (m, 3H), 4.91 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 4.08 (dd, J = 16.5, 7.4 Hz, 1H), 3.95 (dd, J = 16.5, 8.1 Hz, 1H), 3.65 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 197.1, 147.1, 144.1, 140.1, 137.2, 128.4, 127.9, 127.6, 127.1, 126.6, 126.4, 126.3, 125.4, 121.70, 119.6, 118.9, 117.4, 109.2, 77.4, 49.2, 38.6, 32.7.
  • (R)-2-(3-(1H-Indol-3-yl)-3-phenylpropanoyl)pyridine 1-oxide (3ma) [17]
Yellow crystals, 52 mg, yield 69%; m.p. 149.8–151.3 °C. ee 51%, HPLC analysis: chiralpak AD-H (i-PrOH/hexane = 30:70, v/v, 1.0 mL/min, 210 nm) major tR = 10.59 min and minor tS = 12.40 min, 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.17 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 1H), 8.00 (s, 1H), 7.35 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.28–7.19 (m, 4H), 7.18–7.00 (m, 7H), 6.95–6.88 (m, 1H), 4.85 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 4.02 (dd, J = 16.4, 7.7 Hz, 1H), 3.89 (dd, J = 16.4, 7.9 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 200.1, 153.3, 148.7, 144.5, 137.1, 136.6, 128.3, 128.0, 127.2, 126.8, 126.2, 122.1, 122.0, 121.5, 119.6, 119.5, 119.3, 111.0, 44.2, 38.2.
  • (R)-2-(3-(6-Methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)-3-(4-methoxyphenyl)propanoyl)pyridine 1-oxide (3ab)
Brown crystals, 79 mg, yield 98%; m. p. 65.7–66.8 °C. ee 50%, HPLC analysis: chiralpak AS-H (i-PrOH/hexane = 30:70, v/v, 1.0 mL/min, 210 nm) major tR = 18.01 min and minor tR = 22.06 min. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.17 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 1H), 8.10 (brs, 1H), 7.29–7.11 (m, 6H), 6.94 (s, 1H), 6.82–6.73 (m, 3H), 6.66 (dd, J = 8.7, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 4.84 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 4.05 (dd, J = 16.3, 7.5 Hz, 1H), 3.98–3.87 (m, 1H), 3.79 (s, 3H), 3.75 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 197.3, 158.0, 156.5, 147.2, 140.1, 137.3, 136.0, 128.8, 127.5, 126.5, 125.7, 121.1, 120.3, 120.1, 119.0, 113.7, 109.3, 94.6, 55.6, 55.2, 49.2, 37.9. HRMS (ESI): m/z Calcd for C24H22N2O4Na+ [M + Na]+: 425.1472, found: 425.1470.
  • (R)-2-(3-(4-Fluorophenyl)-3-(6-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)propanoyl)pyridine 1-oxide (3ac)
White crystals, 77 mg, yield 99%; m. p. 69.4–71.9 °C. ee 73%, HPLC analysis: chiralpak OD-H (i-PrOH/hexane = 30:70, v/v, 1.0 mL/min, 254 nm) major tR = 18.26 min and minor tS = 24.19 min. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.21 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 1H), 8.07 (brs, 1H), 7.28–7.16 (s, 6H), 6.99 (s, 1H), 6.94–6.88 (m, 2H), 6.81 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H), 6.67 (dd, J = 8.7, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 4.89 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 4.05 (dd, J = 16.6, 7.5 Hz, 1H), 3.94 (dd, J = 16.6, 8.0 Hz, 1H), 3.80 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 196.7, 162.6, 160.2, 156.5, 146.9, 140.2, 139.7, 137.3, 129.4, 129.3, 127.7, 126.6, 126.1, 121.0, 120.3, 119.9, 118.5, 115.2, 115.0, 109.4, 94.6, 55.6, 49.2, 37.8. 19F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3) δ -116.86. HRMS (ESI): m/z Calcd for C23H19N2O3FNa+ [M + Na]+: 413.1272, found: 413.1281.
  • (R)-2-(3-(4-Chlorophenyl)-3-(6-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)propanoyl)pyridine 1-oxide (3ad)
Yellow crystals, 65 mg, yield 80%; m. p. 66.6–68.1 °C. ee 67%, HPLC analysis: chiralpak AS-H (i-PrOH/hexane = 30:70, v/v, 1.0 mL/min, 210 nm) major tR = 21.68 min and minor tR = 29.63 min. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.17 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H), 8.04 (brs, 1H), 7.34–7.15 (m, 8H), 6.99 (dd, J = 2.3, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 6.81 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H), 6.68 (dd, J = 8.7, 2.2 Hz, 1H), 4.90 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 4.06 (dd, J = 16.7, 7.4 Hz, 1H), 3.95 (dd, J = 16.7, 7.9 Hz, 1H), 3.81 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 196.6, 156.6, 146.9, 142.6, 140.3, 137.3, 132.0, 129.3, 128.5, 127.7, 126.8, 125.6, 120.9, 120.4, 119.9, 118.3, 109.4, 94.6, 55.6, 49.0, 37.9. HRMS (ESI): m/z Calcd for C23H19N2O3ClNa+ [M + Na]+: 429.0976, found: 429.1003.
  • (R)-2-(3-(4-Bromophenyl)-3-(6-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)propanoyl)pyridine 1-oxide (3ae)
Yellow crystals, 68 mg, yield 75%; m. p. 163.7–165.9 °C. ee 63%, HPLC analysis: chiralpak AS-H (i-PrOH/hexane = 40:60, v/v, 1.0 mL/min, 254 nm) major tR = 14.18 min and minor tS = 17.78 min.1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.26 (brs, 1H), 8.17 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H), 7.36–7.31 (m, 2H), 7.28 (s, 3H), 7.21–7.11 (m, 3H), 6.97–6.92 (m, 1H), 6.78 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H), 6.67 (dd, J = 8.7, 2.2 Hz, 1H), 4.87 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 4.05 (dd, J = 16.8, 7.4 Hz, 1H), 3.95 (dd, J = 16.7, 8.0 Hz, 1H), 3.78 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 196.4, 156.6, 146.8, 143.1, 140.3, 137.3, 131.4, 129.7, 127.8, 126.76, 125.9, 120.9, 120.4, 120.1, 119.9, 118.2, 109.4, 94.6, 55.6, 48.9, 37.9. HRMS (ESI): m/z Calcd for C23H19N2O3BrNa+ [M + Na]+: 473.0471, found: 473.0479.
  • (R)-2-(3-(4-Cyanophenyl)-3-(6-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)propanoyl)pyridine 1-oxide (3af)
Yellow crystals, 69 mg, yield 87%; m. p. 85.9–87.5 °C. ee 71%, HPLC analysis: chiralpak AD-H (i-PrOH/hexane = 30:70, v/v, 1.0 mL/min, 254 nm) major tR = 38.39 min and minor tS = 47.41 min. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.38 (brs, 1H), 8.18 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 1H), 7.60–7.42 (m, 4H), 7.38–7.30 (m, 2H), 7.19 (t, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.06–6.96 (m, 1H), 6.79 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 6.67 (dd, J = 8.7, 2.2 Hz, 1H), 4.99 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 4.17–3.94 (m, 2H), 3.82–3.68 (m, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 195.6, 156.7, 149.8, 146.5, 140.4, 137.3, 132.3, 128.8, 128.1, 126.9, 126.3, 120.7, 120.6, 119.6, 119.0, 117.3, 110.1, 109.6, 94.7, 55.6, 48.8, 38.3. HRMS (ESI): m/z Calcd for C24H19N3O3Na+ [M + Na]+: 420.1319, found: 420.1330.
  • (R)-2-(3-(6-Methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)-3-(4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)propanoyl)pyridine 1-oxide (3ag)
Yellow crystals, 76 mg, yield 86%; m. p. 73.2–74.5°C. ee 77%, HPLC analysis: chiralpak AD-H (i-PrOH/hexane = 40:60, v/v, 1.0 mL/min, 254 nm) major tR = 15.65 min and minor tS = 21.80 min. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.18 (dt, J = 6.2, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 8.09 (brs, 1H), 7.56–7.43 (m, 4H), 7.39–7.13 (m, 4H), 7.02 (dq, J = 3.2, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 6.81 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H), 6.69 (dd, J = 8.7, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 5.00 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 4.22–3.92 (m, 2H), 3.81 (d, J = 1.0 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 196.2, 156.7, 148.2, 146.7, 140.3, 137.3, 128.3, 127.8, 126.8, 125.6, 125.3, 120.9, 120.5, 119.8, 117.9, 109.5, 94.7, 55.6, 48.9, 38.2. 19F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3) δ −62.34. HRMS (ESI): m/z Calcd for C24H19N2O3F3Na+ [M + Na]+: 463.1240, found: 463.1252.
  • (S)-2-(3-(6-Methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)-3-(2-methoxyphenyl)propanoyl)pyridine 1-oxide (3ah)
Yellow crystals, 60 mg, yield 74%; m. p. 88.4–90.5 °C. ee 38%, HPLC analysis: chiralpak AS-H (i-PrOH/hexane = 40:0, v/v, 1.0 mL/min, 214 nm) major tR = 18.51 min and minor tS = 23.56 min. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.13 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H), 7.94 (brs, 1H), 7.36 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 7.23 (ddd, J = 6.6, 5.5, 4.2 Hz, 1H), 7.16–7.05 (m, 4H), 6.95 (dd, J = 2.4, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 6.83–6.72 (m, 3H), 6.66 (dd, J = 8.7, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 5.31 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 4.14 (dd, J = 16.4, 8.3 Hz, 1H), 3.78 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 7H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 197.5, 156.6, 156.4, 147.4, 140.0, 137.2, 131.9, 128.6, 127.4, 127.2, 126.4, 125.3, 121.5, 120.7, 120.6, 120.2, 118.6, 110.4, 109.2, 94.5, 55.6, 55.4, 47.7, 31.3. HRMS (ESI): m/z Calcd for C24H22N2O4Na+ [M + Na]+: 425.1472, found: 425.1475.
  • (S)-2-(3-(2-Fluorophenyl)-3-(6-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)propanoyl)pyridine 1-oxide (3ai)
Brown crystals, 60 mg, yield 77%; m. p. 60.8–63.1 °C. ee 53%, HPLC analysis: chiralpak AD-H (i-PrOH/hexane = 30:70, v/v, 1.0 mL/min, 254 nm) major tR = 23.97 min and minor tS = 38.42 min. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.18 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 1H), 8.03 (brs, 1H), 7.38 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 7.34–7.22 (m, 3H), 7.22–7.08 (m, 2H), 7.06–6.95 (m, 3H), 6.80 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H), 6.71 (dd, J = 8.7, 2.2 Hz, 1H), 5.25 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 4.22 (dd, J = 17.0, 7.6 Hz, 1H), 3.93 (dd, J = 17.0, 7.7 Hz, 1H), 3.81 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 196.4, 159.3, 156.6, 146.9, 140.3, 137.2, 130.7, 129.4, 128.0, 127.9, 127.7, 126.7, 125.6, 124.1, 121.1, 120.6, 119.8, 117.7, 115.5, 115.3, 109.4, 94.6, 55.6, 47.7, 31.1. 19F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3) δ −117.82. HRMS (ESI): m/z Calcd for C23H19N2O3FNa+ [M + Na]+: 413.1272, found: 413.1273.
  • (S)-2-(3-(2-Chlorophenyl)-3-(6-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)propanoyl)pyridine 1-oxide (3aj)
Colorless crystals, 72 mg, yield 89%; m. p. 162.6–164.5 °C. ee 44%, HPLC analysis: chiralpak AD-H (i-PrOH/hexane = 40:60, v/v, 1.0 mL/min, 254 nm) major tR = 14.79 min and minor tS = 19.25 min. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.16 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 1H), 7.92 (brs, 1H), 7.36–7.17(s, 5H), 7.18 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.12–6.99 (m, 3H), 6.79 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H), 6.68 (dd, J = 8.7, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 5.42 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 4.22 (dd, J = 17.0, 8.3 Hz, 1H), 3.79 (s, 4H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 196.3, 156.6, 146.9, 141.1, 140.3, 137.3, 133.5, 129.5, 129.3, 127.7, 127.0, 126.7, 125.6, 121.2, 120.9, 120.1, 117.8, 109.5, 94.6, 55.6, 47.7, 34.6. HRMS (ESI): m/z Calcd for C23H19N2O3ClNa+ [M + Na]+: 429.0976, found: 429.0992.
  • (S)-2-(3-(2-Bromophenyl)-3-(6-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)propanoyl)pyridine 1-oxide (3ak)
Yellow crystals, 86 mg, yield 95%; m. p. 108.7–110.3 °C. ee 41%, HPLC analysis: chiralpak AD-H (i-PrOH/hexane = 40:60, v/v, 1.0 mL/min, 254 nm) major tR = 13.40 min and minor tS = 17.21 min. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.17 (d, J = 5.9 Hz, 2H), 7.54 (dd, J = 8.0, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 7.36 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 7.31–7.08 (m, 5H), 7.01 (td, J = 6.8, 2.6 Hz, 2H), 6.79 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H), 6.70 (dd, J = 8.7, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 5.41 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 4.23 (dd, J = 16.9, 8.5 Hz, 1H), 3.79 (s, 4H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 197.8, 152.3, 146.9, 145.0, 140.5, 138.3, 132.2, 128.8, 128.8, 128.7, 128.1, 128.1, 127.1, 126.4, 126.3, 126.2, 123.3, 117.6, 112.5, 112.1, 102.8, 70.3, 48.4, 38.2. HRMS (ESI): m/z Calcd for C23H19N2O3BrNa+ [M + Na]+: 473.0471, found: 473.0470.
  • (R)-2-(3-(6-Methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)-3-(naphthalen-2-yl)propanoyl)pyridine 1-oxide (3al)
Yellow crystals, 81 mg, yield 96%; m. p. 80.9–82.6 °C. ee 60%, HPLC analysis: chiralpak AD-H (i-PrOH/hexane = 40:60, v/v, 1.0 mL/min, 254 nm) major tR = 20.71 min and minor tS = 23.55 min. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.12 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H), 8.03 (brs, 1H), 7.78–7.69 (m, 3H), 7.66 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.44–7.35 (m, 3H), 7.28 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 7.19 (td, J = 7.1, 2.6 Hz, 1H), 7.08 (dt, J = 7.9, 2.2 Hz, 1H), 6.99 (tt, J = 5.3, 2.6 Hz, 2H), 6.76 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H), 6.61 (dd, J = 8.7, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 5.05 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 4.14 (dd, J = 16.5, 7.4 Hz, 1H), 4.05 (dd, J = 16.5, 8.0 Hz, 1H), 3.75 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 197.1, 156.5, 147.1, 141.4, 140.1, 137.3, 133.4, 132.3, 128.1, 127.8, 127.5, 126.6, 126.5, 126.1, 125.9, 125.5, 125.4, 121.2, 120.5, 120.1, 118.6, 109.4, 94.6, 55.6, 48.9, 38.7. HRMS (ESI): m/z Calcd for C27H22N2O3Na+ [M + Na]+: 445.1523, found: 445.1530.
  • (S)-2-(3-(Furan-2-yl)-3-(6-methoxy-1H-indol-3-yl)propanoyl)pyridine 1-oxide (3am)
Yellow crystals, 61 mg, yield 84%; m. p. 78.9–80.6 °C. ee 41%, HPLC analysis: chiralpak AS-H (i-PrOH/hexane = 30:70, v/v, 1.0 mL/min, 214 nm) major tR = 29.72 min and minor tS = 32.99 min. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.14 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 1H), 7.91 (brs, 1H), 7.43 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 7.29–7.23 (m, 4H), 7.15 (td, J = 7.4, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 6.97 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.79 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H), 6.72 (dd, J = 8.6, 2.2 Hz, 1H), 6.23 (dd, J = 3.2, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 6.04 (d, J = 3.1 Hz, 1H), 4.99 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 4.00 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 3.81 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 196.5, 156.8, 156.5, 146.92, 141.2, 140.2, 137.1, 127.6, 126.6, 125.4, 120.8, 120.0, 116.3, 110.1, 109.5, 105.6, 94.6, 55.7, 47.2, 32.4. HRMS (ESI): m/z Calcd for C21H18N2NaO4+ [M + Na]+: 385.1159, found: 385.1124.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we prepared a series of enantiopure enlarged Salen ligands containing flexible and rigid combined linkers. The enlarged Salen ligands are more suitable for coordination with large rare earth elements. At the same time, the electronic effect of the coordinating sites of the ligands is tuned by substituents of the salicylaldehyde moiety. The results indicate that the enlarged Salen ligand linked with a flexible and rigid combined linker of trimethylene-connected diamide and a strong electron-withdrawing trifluoromethyl substituent group can achieve high reactivity and excellent stereoselectivity in the catalytic asymmetric Michael addition reaction of indoles and 2-cinnamoylpyridine 1-oxides, which provides an efficient way for the optically active modification of the 3-position of indoles in the future.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules30030459/s1. Copies of 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR, and 19F-NMR spectra and HPLC profiles of compounds 3 and L, and HRMS spectra of unknown products L and 3 are included in the Supporting Information.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.X.; methodology, N.L.; validation, N.L., Q.M. and J.X.; formal analysis, N.L.; investigation, N.L. and Q.M.; data curation, N.L.; writing—original draft preparation, N.L.; writing—review and editing, J.X.; visualization, J.X.; supervision, J.X.; project administration, J.X.; funding acquisition, J.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2022YFF0709803).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article or Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, M.Z.; Chen, Q.; Yang, G. A Review on Recent Developments of Indole-Containing Antiviral Agents. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 89, 421–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Saetae, W.; Chantana, C.; Saithong, S.; Chayajarus, K.; Jaratjaroonphong, J. Short Total Synthesis of (+)-Colletotryptins B-D and Mucronatin B Derivative. J. Org. Chem. 2024, 89, 8620–8631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Yi, Z.J.; Sun, J.T.; Yang, T.Y.; Yu, X.Y.; Han, X.L.; Wei, B.G. Cu(OTf)2-Catalyzed C3 Aza-Friedel-Crafts Alkylation of Indoles with N,O-Acetals. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2022, 20, 2261–2270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Jing, C.C.; Xing, D.; Hu, W.H. Catalytic Asymmetric Four-Component Reaction for the Rapid Construction of 3,3-Disubstituted 3-Indol-3′-yloxindoles. Org. Lett. 2015, 17, 4336–4339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Song, H.; Zhou, H.; Shen, Y.; Wang, H.; Song, H.; Cai, X.W.; Xu, C. HFIP as Protonation Reagent and Solvent for Regioselective Alkylation of Indoles with All-Carbon Centers. J. Org. Chem. 2022, 87, 1086–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wolfard, J.; Xu, J.; Zhang, H.M.; Chung, C.K. Synthesis of Chiral Tryptamines via a Regioselective Indole Alkylation. Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 5431–5434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cui, B.B.; Gao, J.; Fan, L.; Jiao, Y.; Lu, T.; Feng, J. Dehydroxylated C-3 Alkylation of Indole Accompanied by 1,2-SulfurMigration. Org. Lett. 2015, 17, 4336–4339. [Google Scholar]
  8. Almaşi, D.; Alonso, D.A.; Nájera, C. Organocatalytic Asymmetric Conjugate Additions. Tetrahedron Asymmetry 2007, 18, 299–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, R.C.; Xu, J.X. Enantioselective sulfur-Michael addition of thioacetic acid to nitroalkenes catalyzed by bifunctional amine-thiourea catalysts. Helv. Chim. Acta 2014, 97, 1700–1707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, R.C.; Liu, J.; Xu, J.X. Organocatalytic enantioselective sulfur-Michael addition of thioacetic acid to arylmethylidenemalonates. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2015, 357, 159–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lu, S.F.; Du, D.M.; Xu, J. Enantioselective Friedel-Crafts alkylation of indoles with nitroalkenes catalyzed by bifunctional tridentate bis(oxazoline)-Zn(II) complex. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 2115–2118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wang, W.T.; Liu, X.H.; Cao, W.D.; Wang, J.; Lin, L.L.; Feng, X.M. Highly Enantioselective Synthesis of β-Heteroaryl-Substituted Dihydrochalcones Through Friedel-Crafts Alkylation of Indoles and Pyrrole. Chem. Eur. J. 2010, 16, 1664–1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zheng, K.; Liu, X.H.; Feng, X.M. Recent Advances in Metal-Catalyzed Asymmetric 1,4-Conjugate Addition (ACA) of Nonorganometallic Nucleophiles. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 7586–7656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Desimoni, G.; Faita, G.; Quadrelli, P. Enantioselectively-Catalyzed Reactions with (E)-2-Alkenoyl-pyridines, Their N-Oxides, and the Corresponding Chalcones. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 6081–6129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Chen, D.H.; Chen, Z.L.; Xiao, X.; Yang, Z.G.; Lin, L.L.; Liu, X.H.; Feng, X.M. Highly Enantioselective Michael Addition of Malonate Derivatives to Enones Catalyzed by an N,N’-Dioxide–Scandium(III) Complex. Chem. Eur. J. 2009, 15, 6807–6810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Singh, V.K.; Singh, P.K. Highly Enantioselective Friedel—Crafts Reaction of Indoles with 2-Enoylpyridine 1-Oxides Catalyzed by Chiral Pyridine 2,6-Bis(5′,5′-diphenyloxazoline)−Cu(II) Complexes. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 4121–4124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Georgea, J.; Reddy, B.V. Enantioselective Friedel-Crafts Alkylation of Indoles with 2-Enoylpyridine-N-oxides Catalyzed by glucoBOX-Cu(II) Complex. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2012, 10, 4731–4738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Bandini, M.; Fagioli, M.; Melchiorre, P.; Melloni, A.; Umani-Ronchi, A. Catalytic Enantioselective Conjugate Addition of Indoles to Simple α,β-Unsaturated Ketones. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 5843–5846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, C.Z.; Chen, N.; Yang, Z.H.; Xu, J.X. Y(OTf)3-Salazin-Catalyzed Asymmetric Aldol Condensation. Molecules 2024, 29, 1963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Wei, H.; Zhang, Y.J.; Jin, S.L.; Yu, Y.; Chen, N.; Xu, J.X.; Yang, Z.H. PyBox-La(OTf)3-Catalyzed Enantioselective Diels-Alder Cycloadditions of 2-Alkenoylpyridines with Cyclopentadiene. Molecules 2024, 29, 2978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Li, L.J.; Zhang, S.; Hu, Y.B.; Li, Y.N.; Li, C.; Zha, Z.G.; Wang, Z.Y. Highly Diastereo- and Enantioselective Michael Addition of Nitroalkanes to 2-Enoyl-Pyridine N-Oxides Catalyzed by Scandium(III)/Copper(II) Complexes. Chem. Eur. J. 2015, 21, 12885–12888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Hansen, T.R.; Skattebøl, L. ortho-Formylation of Phenols; Preparation of 3-Bromosalicylaldehyde. Org. Synth. 2005, 82, 64–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lansing, M.; Engler, H.; Leuther, T.M.; Neudörfl, J.M.; Berkessel, A. Titanium cis-1,2-Diaminocyclohexane Salen Catalysts of Outstanding Activity and Enantioselectivity for the Asymmetric Epoxidation of Nonconjugated Terminal Olefins with Hydrogen Peroxide. ChemCatChem 2016, 8, 3706–3709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Biologically active 3-substituted indole derivatives.
Figure 1. Biologically active 3-substituted indole derivatives.
Molecules 30 00459 g001
Scheme 1. Asymmetric catalytic reactions of indoles with unsaturated enones.
Scheme 1. Asymmetric catalytic reactions of indoles with unsaturated enones.
Molecules 30 00459 sch001
Scheme 2. Synthesis of enlarged Salen ligands L.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of enlarged Salen ligands L.
Molecules 30 00459 sch002
Figure 2. Preparation of L3–Sc(III) complex and its HRMS spectrum.
Figure 2. Preparation of L3–Sc(III) complex and its HRMS spectrum.
Molecules 30 00459 g002
Figure 3. Stereoselectivity of product 3aa as a function of the L2 ee value.
Figure 3. Stereoselectivity of product 3aa as a function of the L2 ee value.
Molecules 30 00459 g003
Table 1. Screening of ligands for the asymmetric Michael addition of indole and enone a.
Table 1. Screening of ligands for the asymmetric Michael addition of indole and enone a.
Molecules 30 00459 i001
EntryLigandYield b/%ee c/%
1L08121
2L19035
3L26596
4L39560
5L48818
6L5776
7L69112
8L79811
a 2a (0.2 mmol), ligand L (6 mol%), and Sc(OTf)3 (5 mol%) in dried CH2Cl2 (2 mL) were stirred under N2 atmosphere at R.T. for 1 h. 1a (0.24 mmol) was added, and the resulting mixture was stirred at −20 °C for 2 h. b Isolated yield. c Determined by HPLC using a Chiralpak AD-H column.
Table 2. Optimization of reaction conditions for asymmetric Michael addition of indole and enone a.
Table 2. Optimization of reaction conditions for asymmetric Michael addition of indole and enone a.
Molecules 30 00459 i002
EntrySolventTime/hYield c/%ee d/%
1CH2Cl226596
2CHCl327988
3DCE44214
4CH3CN36158
5Toluene33766
6DME46219
7MTBE43424
8THF46275
9EA48914
10 bCH2Cl22420
a 2a (0.2 mmol), ligand L2 (6 mol%), and Sc(OTf)3 (5 mol%) in dried solvent (2 mL) were stirred under N2 atmosphere at R.T. for 1 h. 1a (0.24 mmol) was added and the resulting mixture was stirred at −20 °C for the indicated time. b Commercially available solvent. c Isolated yield. d Determined by HPLC using a Chiralpak AD-H column.
Table 3. Catalytic asymmetric Michael addition of indole derivatives and enone 2a a.
Table 3. Catalytic asymmetric Michael addition of indole derivatives and enone 2a a.
Molecules 30 00459 i003
EntryIndoleProduct 3Time/hYield b/%ee c/%
11a, R′: 6-MeO3aa26596
21b, R′: 6-Me3ba17494
31c, R′: 6-Br3ca36098
41d, R′: 6-F3da48699
51e, R′: 6-CO2Me3ea183823
61f, R′: 5-MeO3fa26788
71g, R′: 5-BnO3ga49878
81h, R′: 5-Cl3ha36998
91i, R′: 5-F3ia58493
101j, R′: 4-MeO3ja67957
111k, R′: 1-Me3ka16538
121l, R′: 1-PhSO23la4N.R./
131m, R′: H3ma26951
a All reactions were carried out with 2a (0.2 mmol) and ligand L2 (6 mol%)–Sc(OTf)3 complex (5 mol%) in dry CH2Cl2 (2 mL) under N2 atmosphere at R.T. for 1 h. Then, 1 (0.24 mmol) was added, and the resulting mixture was stirred at −20 °C. b Isolated yield. c Determined by HPLC analysis.
Table 4. Catalytic asymmetric Michael addition of 6-methoxyindole (1a) with various 2-enoylpyridine N-oxides 2 a.
Table 4. Catalytic asymmetric Michael addition of 6-methoxyindole (1a) with various 2-enoylpyridine N-oxides 2 a.
Molecules 30 00459 i004
EntryProduct 3RTime/hYield b/%ee c/%
13ab4-MeOC6H429850
23ac4-FC6H429973
33ad4-ClC6H428067
43ae4-BrC6H427563
53af4-NCC6H428771
63ag4-CF3C6H448677
73ah2-MeOC6H427438
83ai2-FC6H417753
93aj2-ClC6H428944
103ak2-BrC6H429541
113al2-Naphthyl29660
123am2-Furyl28441
a All the reactions were carried out with 2 (0.2 mmol) and ligand L2 (6 mol%)–Sc(OTf)3 complex (5 mol%) in dry CH2Cl2 (2 mL) with under N2 atmosphere at R.T. for 1 h. Then, 1a (0.24 mmol) as added, and the resulting mixture was stirred at −20 °C. b Isolated yield. c Determined by HPLC analysis.
Table 5. Stereoselectivities of the model reaction under the catalysis of different enantiomeric excesses of ligand L2.
Table 5. Stereoselectivities of the model reaction under the catalysis of different enantiomeric excesses of ligand L2.
L2 ee (%)0.512193064829099
3aa ee (%)15101919395494
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, N.; Ma, Q.; Xu, J. Scandium(III)-Enlarged Salen Complex-Catalyzed Asymmetric Michael Addition of Indoles to Enones. Molecules 2025, 30, 459. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30030459

AMA Style

Li N, Ma Q, Xu J. Scandium(III)-Enlarged Salen Complex-Catalyzed Asymmetric Michael Addition of Indoles to Enones. Molecules. 2025; 30(3):459. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30030459

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Ningning, Quanyu Ma, and Jiaxi Xu. 2025. "Scandium(III)-Enlarged Salen Complex-Catalyzed Asymmetric Michael Addition of Indoles to Enones" Molecules 30, no. 3: 459. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30030459

APA Style

Li, N., Ma, Q., & Xu, J. (2025). Scandium(III)-Enlarged Salen Complex-Catalyzed Asymmetric Michael Addition of Indoles to Enones. Molecules, 30(3), 459. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30030459

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop