A. Infrared Microwave Double Resonance
As an example of the double resonance signals where infrared transitions are well saturated, a recorder tracing of the double resonance signal of CH
3OH at a sample pressure of 6 mTorr for the vt = 0, E, (J, K) = (16,2) ← (16,1) transition in the v
CO = 1 state is shown in
Figure1.
Figure 1.
Recorder tracing of the microwave transition υco = 1, E, 162 ← 161, of CH3OH at 49908.35 MHz with the infrared transition 161, υco = 1 ← 151, υco = 0. The sample pressure is 6 mTorr. The maximum and the minimum of the signal are separated by 2 MHz in frequency, coming from the microwave frequency modulation.
Figure 1.
Recorder tracing of the microwave transition υco = 1, E, 162 ← 161, of CH3OH at 49908.35 MHz with the infrared transition 161, υco = 1 ← 151, υco = 0. The sample pressure is 6 mTorr. The maximum and the minimum of the signal are separated by 2 MHz in frequency, coming from the microwave frequency modulation.
The relevant energy levels involved in the double resonance are shown in
Figure 2. Many other rotational transitions in this excited vibrational state have been observed with high signal-to-noise ratios [
2].
Figure 2.
Energy levels relevant to the signal shown in
Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Energy levels relevant to the signal shown in
Figure 1.
Theoretical calculation for the pressure dependence of the double resonance signal [
2,
5] shows that a signal is strongest at an optimum pressure where Δν~μE/h. The optimum pressures for many observed signals are ~10 mTorr, which show that Rabi-frequencies are ~0.2 MHz since the pressure broadening parameter of CH
3OH is 20 MHz/Torr [
6]. For the C-O stretching fundamental band, μ
v = 0.195 D [
2]. When μ = μ
v Φ
R is assumed to be 0.06 D, the infrared power is 4 mW for a beam width of 3 mm diameter, which agrees with the available power for our infrared source.
As an example of the double resonance signals in case that signals are observed due to the changes in populations in the ground state levels, a recorder tracing of the double resonance signal of CH
3OH for E, (J, K) = (1, 0) ← (2, -1) at 60531.47 MHz in the ground state at a sample pressure of 167 mTorr is shown in
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Recorder tracing of the microwave transition E, 10 ← 2−1 in the ground state at 60531.47 MHz with the infrared transition 1−1, υco = 1 ← 2−1, υco = 0. The sample pressure is 167 mTorr. The maximum and the minimum of the signal are separated by 2 MHz in frequency, coming from the microwave frequency modulation.
Figure 3.
Recorder tracing of the microwave transition E, 10 ← 2−1 in the ground state at 60531.47 MHz with the infrared transition 1−1, υco = 1 ← 2−1, υco = 0. The sample pressure is 167 mTorr. The maximum and the minimum of the signal are separated by 2 MHz in frequency, coming from the microwave frequency modulation.
The relevant energy levels are shown in
Figure 4. It is noted that the sign of the signal in
Figure 3 is inverted from that shown in
Figure 1. When the sample pressure is increased from zero, the signal intensity increases with the pressure, reaches a maximum at 10 - 20 mTorr, decreases with the pressure until it becomes zero at the crossover pressure p
c. The signal changes its sign at higher pressures, reaches a maximum (
Figure 3) and then decreases with the pressure. A theoretical calculation shows that (μE/h)/Δν= 2δ
1/2 at p
c for δ = (N
1 - N
2)/N
1 = 0.01 where N
1 and N
2 are the thermal equilibrium populations of levels 1 and 2, respectively. The transition moment μ for E, (J, K) = (1,-1), v
CO = 1 ← (J, K) = (2, -1), v
CO = 0 is ~0.08 D ( 0.076 D and 0.087 D for M = 1 and 0, respectively, where M is the magnetic quantum number). For an observed value of p
c ~0.08 Torr the infrared power in the cell is 6 mW using a beam diameter of 3 mm, which also agrees with the available power of the infrared source.
Figure 4.
Energy levels relevant to the signal shown in
Figure 3.
Figure 4.
Energy levels relevant to the signal shown in
Figure 3.
B. Saturation Spectroscopy - Observation of Inverse Lamb Dips for the (2, A, 4) Sequence Lines
Spectral lines for the (vt, A/E, K) = (2, A, 4) and (2, E, -2) sequences in the C-O stretching fundamental band were searched near the wave numbers listed in Ref. [
1]. The (2, A, 4) sequence transitions have been assigned and their wave numbers have been measured with an uncertainty of 6 × 10
-6 cm
-1 (0.2 MHz) as are shown in
Table 1.
Table 1.
Observed Transitions for the (2,A, 4) Sequence in the C − O Stretching Fundamental Band of Methanol
Table 1.
Observed Transitions for the (2,A, 4) Sequence in the C − O Stretching Fundamental Band of Methanol
Transition (J, K) | CO2 Laser Sideband (MHz) | | νobsa (cm−1) | νcalcb (cm−1) | νobs − νcalc (MHz) |
P(5, 4) | 9P(40) +15994.38 | | 1027.915686 | 1027.915693 | −0.21 |
Q(14, 4) | 9P(34) +16060.73 | | 1034.023727 | 1034.023724 | 0.08 |
Q(10, 4) | 9P(32) −13067.16 | | 1035.037742 | 1035.037751 | −0.27 |
Q(9, 4) | −6979.01 | | 1035.240821 | 1035.240818 | 0.09 |
Q(6, 4) | +7644.13 | | 1035.728597 | 1035.728618 | −0.62 |
Q(5, 4) | +11302.30 | | 1035.850620 | 1035.850625 | −0.15 |
Q(4, 4) | +14351.03 | | 1035.952315 | 1035.952293 | −0.65 |
R(5, 4) | 9P(22) +10506.94 | | 1045.372144 | 1045.372158 | −0.41 |
R(7, 4) | 9P(18) −11406.03 | | 1048.280346 | 1048.280305 | 1.23 |
R(10, 4) | 9P(14) +8781.12 | | 1052.488452 | 1052.488471 | −0.57 |
R(12, 4) | 9P(10) −13012.84 | | 1055.191006 | 1055.190996 | 0.29 |
R(14, 4) | 9P(8) +15321.56 | | 1057.811234 | 1057.811237 | −0.09 |
| | | | | |
Stark effects on all the observed lines were observed to confirm their assignments.
Figure 5 shows a Stark pattern of the P(5) line at the electric field of 62.5 V/cm. For a pair of P(5) and Q(4) and that of R(5) and Q(6), the assignments have been confirmed by use of the Ritz’s combination rule. For the former pair with a rotational frequency of 240932.018 MHz for the E, vt = 2, (J, K) = (5, 4) ← (4, 4) transition for v
CO = 0 [
7], the loop error is 0.06 MHz; the latter pair with a rotational frequency of 289106.109 MHz for the E, vt = 2, J, K = (6, 4) ← (5, 4) transition for v
CO = 0 [
7], the loop error is 0.16 MHz: the both errors are within an experimental uncertainty.
Figure 5.
Stark pattern of the P(5,4) line in the (2,A, 4) sequence observed with the upper sideband of 9P(40) CO2 laser line. The horizontal axis is the modulation frequency. The Stark field is dc-bias of 62.5 V/cm with sine-wave modulation of 12.5 V/cm p-p.
Figure 5.
Stark pattern of the P(5,4) line in the (2,A, 4) sequence observed with the upper sideband of 9P(40) CO2 laser line. The horizontal axis is the modulation frequency. The Stark field is dc-bias of 62.5 V/cm with sine-wave modulation of 12.5 V/cm p-p.
From observed wave numbers in
Table 1 and term values in the v
CO = 0 state [
1], term values W (J) for the (2, A, 4) state have been determined as shown in
Table 2. These term values are expanded to a Taylor series in J(J + l) as
and the expansion coefficients have been determined as shown in
Table 3 with one standard deviation. The obs - calc values for the term values are a little larger than experimental uncertainties or the uncertainties in the ground state term values [
1], showing small perturbation for this sequence lines. The (2, E, -2) sequence lines were searched for several tens megahertz near the (2, A, 4) lines but are yet to be observed. Intensities of these lines may be much weaker than those of the (2, A, 4) lines or their frequencies may be much more separated from those of (2, A, 4) lines than we expected.
Table 2.
Term Values W (J) of the (2,A, 4) Levels in the υco = 1 State of Methanol
Table 2.
Term Values W (J) of the (2,A, 4) Levels in the υco = 1 State of Methanol
J | W obs a (cm−1) | Wobs – Wcalca (MHz) |
4 | 1607.101201 | 0.23 |
5 | 1615.036120 | –0.19 |
6 | 1624.557641 | –0.58 |
8 | 1648.359696 | 1.12 |
9 | 1662.639601 | 0.01 |
10 | 1678.505092 | –0.33 |
11 | 1695.955802 | –0.58 |
13 | 1735.611386 | 0.36 |
14 | 1757.815367 | 0.13 |
15 | 1781.602874 | –0.14 |
| | |
Table 3.
Taylor-Series Expansion Coefficients (in cm−1)a for the (2,A, 4) Levels in the υco = 1 State of Methanol
Table 3.
Taylor-Series Expansion Coefficients (in cm−1)a for the (2,A, 4) Levels in the υco = 1 State of Methanol
na0 | na1 | na2 × 1010 | na3 × 1012 |
1591.230451(26) | 0.793566(1) | −14668(95) | 70(25) |
| | | |