Next Article in Journal
Editorial of the Special Issue Antimicrobial Polymers
Previous Article in Journal
Mechanisms of Action of Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) and Mesalazine in the Chemoprevention of Colorectal Cancer
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 14
Issue 9
10.3390/ijms140917986
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparative Analysis of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells from Bone Marrow, Adipose Tissue, and Umbilical Cord Blood as Sources of Cell Therapy

by
Hye Jin Jin
1,2,†,
Yun Kyung Bae
1,†,
Miyeon Kim
1,
Soon-Jae Kwon
1,
Hong Bae Jeon
1,
Soo Jin Choi
1,
Seong Who Kim
2,
Yoon Sun Yang
1,
Wonil Oh
1 and
Jong Wook Chang
1,*
1
Biomedical Research Institute, MEDIPOST Co., Ltd., Seoul 137-874, Korea
2
Molecular Biology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 138-736, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14(9), 17986-18001; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms140917986
Submission received: 27 May 2013 / Revised: 18 July 2013 / Accepted: 22 August 2013 / Published: 3 September 2013
(This article belongs to the Section Biochemistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Various source-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been considered for cell therapeutics in incurable diseases. To characterize MSCs from different sources, we compared human bone marrow (BM), adipose tissue (AT), and umbilical cord blood-derived MSCs (UCB-MSCs) for surface antigen expression, differentiation ability, proliferation capacity, clonality, tolerance for aging, and paracrine activity. Although MSCs from different tissues have similar levels of surface antigen expression, immunosuppressive activity, and differentiation ability, UCB-MSCs had the highest rate of cell proliferation and clonality, and significantly lower expression of p53, p21, and p16, well known markers of senescence. Since paracrine action is the main action of MSCs, we examined the anti-inflammatory activity of each MSC under lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced inflammation. Co-culture of UCB-MSCs with LPS-treated rat alveolar macrophage, reduced expression of inflammatory cytokines including interleukin-1α (IL-1α), IL-6, and IL-8 via angiopoietin-1 (Ang-1). Using recombinant Ang-1 as potential soluble paracrine factor or its small interference RNA (siRNA), we found that Ang-1 secretion was responsible for this beneficial effect in part by preventing inflammation. Our results demonstrate that primitive UCB-MSCs have biological advantages in comparison to adult sources, making UCB-MSCs a useful model for clinical applications of cell therapy.

1. Introduction

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) possess self-renewal and multi-lineage differentiation potentials, and are thus an attractive source of stem cells for tissue engineering [1,2]. Although adult bone marrow (BM) and adipose tissue (AT) are the main sources for clinical use, they are limited because harvesting requires invasive procedures and there are stringent donor age requirements [3,4]. MSCs derived from elderly patients may be clinically ineffective. Therefore, alternative sources have been strongly pursued in primitive or neonatal tissues, including placenta, umbilical cord, and amnion. However, these tissues require complex processing for cell isolation [5–7].
Umbilical cord blood (UCB) is considered most suitable because it is free from ethical complications, and easy to isolate via non-invasive methods. UCB produces large yields of MSCs and possess immunosuppressive activities, making it useful in allogeneic settings [8,9]. Thus, its application has been attempted in a wide spectrum of diseases. We recently demonstrated the therapeutic efficacy of UCB-MSCs in various disease models [10–14]. UCB-MSCs exhibit characteristics similar to BM-MSCs and AT-MSCs, including fibroblastoid morphology, surface proteins, and differentiation potential as defined by the proposed International Society for Cellular Therapy (ISCT) criteria [15,16]. However, the ISCT criteria lack information of MSCs’ potential as therapeutic cell sources. Therefore, we must evaluate the potential of MSCs from various origins to select the best source for cell-based therapy. Comparative studies of the therapeutic potential of UCB-MSCs and other MSCs are lacking. As the number of clinical trials and variety of adult cells used in regenerative therapy increases, cell therapeutic potential will be a primary concern.
MSCs proliferation and senescence have been considered important issues by scientists seeking to use them for therapeutic purposes. Ex vivo expansion of MSCs is required to generate a pure cell population in an amount sufficient for the clinical indication. During this expansion process, cells enter cellular senescence, which leads to a gradual reduction of their potency and significant changes in protein expression [17,18]. However, studies of cellular senescence in various MSCs have not been published. It is also necessary to understand the mechanism by which MSCs induce their physiological effect, as this may explain the key mechanisms of tissue repair. Mechanistic evidence of the benefits of MSCs has been based on their paracrine effect, controlling inflammation or promoting regeneration via soluble factors [19,20]. There is convincing evidence that MSCs from diverse tissue are different. However, the benefits and mechanisms of these variously sourced MSCs remain unexplored.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to directly compare the therapeutic potentials of BM-, AT-, and UCB-MSCs in the context of cellular senescence, anti-inflammatory properties, and secreted proteins.
We examined cell expansion, surface markers, immune suppression, multi-differentiation potential, senescence, anti-inflammatory activity, and secreted factors in UCB-MSCs (n = 12), BM-MSCs (n = 12), and AT-MSCs (n = 7) from many donors under the same conditions. Such information may be crucial to identify the most suitable cell source for a given clinical application.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Characterization of MSCs from BM, AT, and UCB

To determine whether UCB-MSCs share stem cell properties with BM-MSCs or AT-MSCs, we compared their morphology and surface markers. In Passage 5, UCB-MSCs exhibited a spindle-shaped morphology comparable to that of BM- and AT-MSCs (Figure 1a). FACSCalibur flow cytometer (FACS) analysis revealed all MSCs were positive for expression of cluster of differentiation (CD29), CD44, CD73, CD90, CD105, and human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-ABC, but negative for CD14, CD19, CD34, CD45, CD79a, or HLA-DR, according to ISCT criteria (Table 1). To investigate the differentiation capacity of variously derived MSCs, cells were cultured in osteogenic, adipogenic, and chondrogenic differentiating media. For example, the three-lineage potential for osteogenesis, chondrogenesis, and adipogenesis is a standard for defining multi-potent MSCs. Tri-lineage potential in all MSCs was tested by staining for typical lineage marker. Osteogenesis was defined by a bone-type marker, determined by alkaline phosphatage (ALP) staining; chondrogenesis, characterized by an increase in proteoglycans, was demonstrated by safranin O staining; adipogenesis was observed by staining of cytoplasmic lipid droplets with oil Red O (Figure 1b). These results confirm that MSCs from three sources can successfully differentiate into multiple cell types including osteoblasts, chondrocytes, and adipocytes. Direct comparison of UCB- to BM- and AT-MSCs demonstrated the similar pattern of extent and level of original MSCs features.

2.2. Growth Profiling and Cellular Senescence

For therapeutic purposes, large-scale expansion and slow senescence are important. Here, we determined the cell proliferation rate and cellular senescence in all isolated MSCs. Cells were cultured until growth ceased. Population-doubling (PD) was measured for every passage (Figure 2a). UCB-MSCs could be cultured for significantly longer periods and exhibited the greatest expansion capacity, whereas AT-MSCs had the shortest culture time and lowest growth rate. In most BM- and AT-MSCs, cell growth arrested in Passage 11–12, whereas UCB-MSC proliferation stopped in Passage 14–16. A comparison of the clonogenic ability in different tissues by colony forming unit-fibroblast (CFU-F) assay showed that more colonies formed from UCB-MSCs (23.7 ± 5.8) than from BM-MSCs (16.5 ± 4.4) or AT-MSCs (6.4 ± 1.6) in Passage 3 (Figure 2b). Growth profiling of all MSCs was summarized as the final PD number through long-term cultivation. The final PD of the AT-MSCs was found to be significantly less than that of the BM and UCB. Therefore, UCB-MSC is the highest proliferative MSC among BM-MSC and AT-MSC (Figure 2c). Population doubling time (PDT) was calculated in Passages 6 and 12; at both points, the shortest PDT was found in UCB-MSCs (Figure 2d).
To determine whether various features of cellular senescence were similar in BM-, AT, and UCB-MSCs, we tested senescence-associated β-galactosidase staining (Gal staining) and senescence-related protein in several donors. First, Gal staining revealed almost no positive cells in UCB-MSCs, while the mean in BM- and AT-MSCs was 11% to 13% by Passage 6. Also, Gal expression dramatically increased in all MSCs from Passages 9 to 12, but the level in UCB-MSCs was significantly lower than in the comparators (Figure 3a). Second, because cell cycle regulators are associated with stem cell senescence, we observed senescence-related proteins p53, p21, and p16 by Western blotting. In three sources of stem cells, expression of p53, p21, and p16 were gradually increased during the indicated passage of culture expansion (Passages 5, 8 and 11). However, expression of these proteins was lower in UCB-MSCs, compared to that of BM- and AT-MSC (Figure 3b). In addition, we confirmed expression level of three proteins in Passage 12 of each MSC from three different donors. BM-MSCs and AT-MSCs strongly expressed p53, p21, and p16, but UCB-MSCs weakly expressed these proteins (Figure 3c). Thus, UCB-MSCs could be maintained for the longest period. Also, UCB-MSCs exhibited the highest PD in all passages analyzed and expanded later than the comparators.

2.3. Anti-Inflammation and Angiopoietin-1 Secretion

To quantitatively analyze the paracrine anti-inflammatory properties of MSCs, rat alveolar macrophage NR8383 cells were used as an in vitro model. LPS-activated macrophages were co-cultured with MSCs from different sources. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) revealed up-regulation of inflammatory cytokines IL-1α, IL-6, and IL-8 in NR8383 after LPS stimulation. Secretion of these cytokines was significantly down-regulated in the UCB-MSCs treatment group (Figure 4a). Next, to investigate whether the observed anti-inflammation effect was connected to secreted proteins, we analyzed the cell culture medium for the presence of secreted proteins with reported anti-inflammatory activity [21,22]. Human interleukin 1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra), stromal derived factor-1α (SDF-1a), and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) were negative or expressed at very low levels in co-culture conditions, insufficient to demonstrate anti-inflammatory potential. At the same time, there was no difference in expression of keratinocyte growth factor (KGF) (data not shown). However, UCB-MSCs stimulated by co-culture with LPS secreted a significantly higher level of angiopoietin-1 (Ang-1, Figure 4b). Since Ang-1 may have an anti-inflammatory role, we analyzed whether human recombinant Ang-1 (hrAng-1) rescues LPS inflammation. LPS-stimulated NR8383 were treated with hrAng-1 (0.1 or 10 ng/mL). Compared to the positive control, secretion of IL-1α, IL-6, and IL-8 were significantly down-regulated in the hrAng-1 treatment group (Figure 4c). In order to confirm the role of Ang-1 in anti-inflammatory effect of UCB-MSCs, small interference RNA (siRNA) of Ang-1 was pre-treated in UCB-MSCs and these were co-cultured with LPS-activated macrophage. Inhibitory effect for secretion of Ang-1 by siRNA was confirmed by ELISA (Figure S1). To check induction of inflammatory condition in LPS-activated macrophage, released inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1α, IL-6, and IL-8 in conditioned media were measured by each specific ELISA. Although control siRNA treated UCB-MSCs or naïve UCB-MSCs reduced the level of three inflammatory cytokines in a co-culture system, these effects were reversed by siRNA of Ang-1. These results strongly indicate differences in the anti-inflammatory potential of MSCs from different sources, and demonstrate the superior capacity of UCB-MSCs. Furthermore, our data suggest Ang-1 secreted by UCB-MSCs provides an anti-inflammatory effect in LPS-stimulated cells.

2.4. Discussion

Over the last few years, BM, AT, and UCB have become readily accessible sources of cell-based therapy for utilization in tissue engineering. Multiple efforts by different laboratories have aimed to identify and compare the cellular and molecular aspects of cell morphology, surface markers, and differentiation capacity of stem cells from these various sources [16,23]. Kern et al. [23] concluded that AT is suitable as it contains MSCs at the highest frequency and UCB as it seems to be expandable to higher numbers. However, these studies seem to be focused on an understanding of biology of various MSCs. A major concern that remains is to determine which cell source is most appropriate and effective. In our report, we compared UCB-MSCs to MSCs from BM and AT, which exhibit typical MSCs characteristics. All cells exhibited the original MSCs features as defined by the ISCT minimum criteria: spindle shape, multi-lineage differentiation, and surface marker expression [15]; Here, we also directly compare the therapeutic potentials of BM-, AT-, and UCB-MSCs in the context of cellular senescence, anti-inflammatory properties, homing effect to injury site and paracrine action.
The growth kinetics and clonality of UCB-MSCs was significantly higher and these cells could be propagated for longer periods in culture than comparator MSCs (Figure 2). Greater proliferation of MSCs allowing for shorter culture time or large expansion to generate a sufficient population of MSCs for clinical use would clearly be beneficial. In fact, BM and AT are reliable sources for expanding MSCs in autologous settings, as all preparations gave rise to MSCs. By definition, autologous cell therapy has been limited to these adult stem cells. In particular, Zhang et al. reported that UCB-MSCs obtained from a single donor were sufficient to generate 1 × 109 cells within Passage 3–4 in a cell factory system [24]. For clinical application, cell doses of 1 × 109 cells are desirable, making UCB-MSCs a useful model in allogeneic settings. In addition, UCB-MSCs are able to expand over 16 passages with normal karyotype [24,25]. Taken together, the higher growth rate of UCB is thought to reflect the relatively primitive source of MSCs compared to adult BM and AT.
After extensive culture expansion, senescence becomes important; it is defined by growth arrest and differentiation loss of MSCs. For the first time, we demonstrated that senescence of UCB-MSCs was slower than that of BM- or AT-MSCs, indicating the superiority of UCB-MSCs. Gal staining revealed significantly less of this senescence marker in UCB-MSCs than in the comparators (Figure 3a). In addition, senescence can be trigged by p53 and its downstream target p21, followed by activation of p16 [26,27]. In our study, expression of p53, p21, and p16 was measured in Passage 12. According to the literature, higher passages, namely p12, are considered “late” passage [28]. These proteins were strongly expressed in BM- and AT-MSCs, consistent with previous reports. However, expression of these proteins was significantly lower in UCB-MSCs (Figure 3b). In Passages 14–16, UCB-MSCs exhibited strong expression of p53 and p21 and weak expression of p16 (data not shown). This may suggest senescence of UCB-MSCs is not correlated with p16. In some BM-MSCs, low p16 expression has been demonstrated during long-term culture [29]. It has also been suggested that senescence patterns differ between MSCs sources [30]. We also observed that senescence was age-dependent, as described by Zaim et al. [31]. Many authors have suggested that MSCs from neonatal tissues showed no sign of cellular senescence over long-term culture [32]. Neonatal tissues exhibit certain biological properties that differ from MSCs originating from adult sources. Several studies have found remarkable decrease in stem cell characteristics with increasing donor age in humans MSCs [17]. Further study of senescence in MSCs may help address these issues.
Finally, it is essential to understand the mechanism of MSCs-induced physiological effects, since this may explain the several mechanisms of tissue repair. Most early studies asserted that the mechanical effect was from the capacity of MSCs to migrate to damaged tissues and differentiate into specific cell lineages such as bone or cartilage [33]. In our data, MSCs from three sources have a strong migratory ability toward site of inflammation (Figure S2). Lately, the mechanistic role underlying the therapeutic benefit of MSCs changed principally to the paracrine role of secreted factors [34]. Inflammatory disease is a suitable model for comparison of paracrine effects; thus, we used a macrophage model with LPS stimulation. Several studies have suggested MSCs of different origins inhibit LPS-induced inflammation in vivo and in vitro [35,36]. Our study therefore demonstrated that MSCs derived from BM, AT, and UCB have significantly different anti-inflammatory capacities and confirmed that UCB-MSCs exhibit the greatest anti-inflammatory effect (Figure 4a). Another study supported this finding in a spinal cord injury model [37]. Moreover, we also searched for the main anti-inflammatory secreted factor based on the other report which suggests MSCs secrete various soluble factors during inflammation [22]. Ang-1, one of the major inflammatory factors, controls important anti-inflammatory processes such as in vitro and in vivo experimental lung injury [38,39]. Our study revealed that it was also secreted most highly by UCB-MSCs in a pathological model (Figure 4b). To verify the anti-inflammation role of Ang-1, we investigated whether recombinant Ang-1 reduces LPS inflammation. We obtained data that treatment with recombinant Ang-1 inhibited LPS inflammation (Figure 4c). Moreover, blocking of Ang-1 secretion by siRNA reduced the anti-inflammatory effect of UCB-MSC in inflammatory condition (Figure 4d). Intriguingly, secretion of Ang-1 was closely associated with up-regulation of anti-inflammatory factors, which ultimately affect the outcome of the paracrine effect by UCB-MSCs, suggesting UCB contains more anti-inflammatory effect than BM or AT. In addition, MSCs have immune-regulation effects through the production of several soluble factors [40]. In our comparative study, the high immune-suppression effect of UCB-MSCs was similar to the comparators by mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR, Figure S3). Therefore, these results indicated that UCB-MSCs may be useful as an alternative source in the treatment of inflammatory disease such as acute lung injury (ALI) or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).
Despite the many merits of UCB-MSCs, their utility remains controversial because of the low isolation efficiency. Many groups have reported that UCB has a maximum isolation efficiency of 65% in various culture methods; depletion of lymphocytes and monocyte from mononuclear cell (MNC) before cell seeding, addition of cytokines supplements or platelet lysate to the medium, or cultivation of cells under hypoxia [25,41–44]. However, the success rate can be increased above 90% by using density gradient purification [24]. This could also help improve the utility of UCB-MSCs as a therapeutic resource. Further studies should be performed to validate these methods for clinical utilization.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Cell Culture

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of MEDIPOST Co., Ltd. (Seoul, Korea).
BM-MSCs: Bone marrow (BM) was isolated by aspiration from 10 donors aged 20 to 30 years old, with informed consent. BM aspirates were isolated over Ficoll-Hypaque solution (d = 1.077 g/cm3; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) [23].
AT-MSCs: Adipose tissue (AT) from 5 donors, aged 23 to 40 years, was obtained during elective liposuction procedures with informed consent. AT was isolated using collagenase (type I, Sigma) [23].
UCB-MSCs: Umbilical cord blood (UCB) was collected from umbilical veins after neonatal delivery with maternal informed consent (n = 24). All UCB were collected within 24 h. UCB was isolated by separating mononuclear cells (MNCs) with Ficoll-Hypaque solution [23].
Mononuclear cells were isolated by centrifugation in a Ficoll-Hypaque gradient (d = 1.077 g/cm3; Sigma). The separated mononuclear cells were washed, suspended in a-minimum essential medium (a-MEM, Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Gibco), and seeded at a concentration of 5 × 105 cells/cm2. Cultures were maintained at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2 with a change of culture medium twice a week. After cultivation, both isolating frequency for BM and AT were found be 100%, while that of UCB were 50%.
Primary BM-MSC or AT-MSC controls: BM-MSCs (2 lots) were purchased from Cambrex (Walkerville, MD, USA). AT-MSCs (2 lots) were purchased from American type culture collection (ATCC, Rockville, MD, USA) and Promocell (Heidelberg, Germany).
In time-dependant cell cultivation, the expansion of cell was analyzed by using the trypan blue exclusion method. In each passage, MSC was cultured for 7 day; cells were collected by trysin-EDTA (Gibco), counted and reseeded with the initial cell density (2000 cells/cm2). Culture medium was replaced twice weekly. The number of PD (population doubling) was calculated based on the total cell number at each passage; PD was calculated for every passage by dividing the logarithm of the fold increase value obtained at the end of the passage by the logarithm of 2. This procedure was repeated until the cell stopped proliferating. At this point, number of cells was counted to calculate the final PD [29].
Population doubling time (PDT) was examined using the formula: (t – t0)·log2/log(N – N0), where t – t0 is culture time (h), N the number of harvested cells and N0 is the number of cells in the initial.
CFU-F (colony forming unit-fibroblast) assay was performed by seeding cells in a culture dish (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) and incubating in humidified 5% CO2 at 37 °C; culture medium was exchanged every 3 days. After 2 weeks, the dishes were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, Invitrogen, La Jolla, CA, USA), fixed with 100% methanol, and stained with 3% Crystal violet (Sigma). The number of colonies was counted.

3.2. Immunophenotyping

For cytometric analysis of cultured cell phenotypes, cells were stained with antibodies against human CD14, CD19, CD34, CD45, HLA-DR (FITC, BD Biosciences), CD29, CD44, CD73, CD90, CD146, CD271 (PE, Pharmingen, Los Angeles, CA, USA), and CD105 (PE, Serotec, Kidlington, UK) for 15 min at room temperature. Corresponding mouse isotype antibodies were used as controls. The cells were washed with PBS and fixed with 1% (v/v) paraformaldehyde (PFA). MSCs immunotypes were determined by FACS instrument (BD Biosciences) and the percentage of expressed cell surface antigen was calculated for 10,000 gated-cell events.

3.3. In Vitro Multi-Lineage Differentiation

Multi-lineage potential was assessed by incubating cells under specific conditions to induce differentiation into osteoblasts, chondrocytes, and adipocytes [45]. After differentiation, multi-lineage potential was evaluated [45]. Briefly, osteoblast formation was assessed by measuring the level of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) staining (Sigma); chondrocyte formation was determined by safranin O staining (Sigma); adipocyte formation was assessed based on staining of accumulated lipid vacuoles with oil Red O (Sigma).

3.4. Senescence-Associated β-Gal Staining (Gal Staining)

Senescence-associated β-galactosidase staining (Gal staining) was used as a biomarker of senescence in MSCs. Gal activity was qualitatively assessed with a histochemical staining kit (Sigma) per the manufacturer’s instructions, followed by inversion microscopy. The percentage of senescent cells was represented by the number of stained cells in the total population.

3.5. Western Blotting

Cell extracts were prepared in buffer containing 9.8 M urea, 4% CHAPS, 130 mM dithiothreitol, 40 mM Tris-HCl, and 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS). Protein concentration was measured by bicinchoninate assay (BCA, Sigma). Protein extract (10 μg) was separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE, Invitrogen) and the resolved proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Each membrane was incubated with anti-Phospho53 (p53, Cell signaling, Danvers, MA, USA), anti-p21 (Cell Signaling), anti-p16 (Cell Signaling), and anti-β actin (Sigma).

3.6. Inflammatory Condition in Vitro

The rat alveolar macrophage cell line NR8383 (ATCC) was cultured in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Invitrogen). Cells were maintained at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (1 μg/mL; Sigma) was used to activate NR8383, serving as a positive control for inflammation. LPS-exposed NR8383 were co-cultured with MSCs or human recombinant angiopoitin-1 (hrAng-1, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) for 72 h. Cytokines was measured in the co-culture supernatants. Rat interleukin-1α (IL-1α), rat IL-6, rat IL-8, and human angiopoietin-1 (Ang-1) were quantified by Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA, R&D Systems) according to manufacturer protocols. Results were acquired by measuring absorbance at 450 nm.

3.7. Small Interfering RNAs (siRNA) Treatment

For siRNA experiments, Ang-1 or control siRNA were designed by Dharmacon (Chicago, IL, USA). siRNA was treated with the Dharmafect reagent (Dharmacon) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.

3.8. Statistical Analyses

All data are reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and were analyzed by SPSS (version 18, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Differences and significance were verified by one-way ANOVA followed by the Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) post hoc test. p-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we suggest MSCs from various sources have different therapeutic potential. UCB-MSCs have a longer culture, a large scale expansion, a retardation of senescence, and a higher anti-inflammation effect via Ang-1 than other MSCs. Therefore, our results demonstrate that primitive UCB-MSCs have biological advantages in comparison to adult sources, making UCB-MSCs a useful model for clinical applications of cell therapy.

Supplementary Information

ijms-14-17986-s001.pdf

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a grant of the Korea Healthcare technology R&D Project, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Korea (A121968).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jiang, Y.; Jahagirdar, B.N.; Reinhardt, R.L.; Schwartz, R.E.; Keene, C.D.; Ortiz-Gonzalez, X.R.; Reyes, M.; Lenvik, T.; Lund, T.; Blackstad, M.; et al. Pluripotency of mesenchymal stem cells derived from adult marrow. Nature 2002, 418, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [Green Version]
  2. Caplan, A.I. Adult mesenchymal stem cells for tissue engineering versus regenerative medicine. J. Cell Physiol 2007, 213, 341–347. [Google Scholar]
  3. Mosna, F.; Sensebe, L.; Krampera, M. Human bone marrow and adipose tissue mesenchymal stem cells: A user’s guide. Stem Cells Dev 2010, 19, 1449–1470. [Google Scholar]
  4. Alves, H.; van Ginkel, J.; Groen, N.; Hulsman, M.; Mentink, A.; Reinders, M.; van Blitterswijk, C.; de Boer, J. A mesenchymal stromal cell gene signature for donor age. PLoS One 2012, 7, e42908. [Google Scholar]
  5. Karamzadeh, R.; Eslaminejad, M.B.; Aflatoonian, R. Isolation, characterization and comparative differentiation of human dental pulp stem cells derived from permanent teeth by using two different methods. J. Vis. Exp. 2012, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lu, L.L.; Liu, Y.J.; Yang, S.G.; Zhao, Q.J.; Wang, X.; Gong, W.; Han, Z.B.; Xu, Z.S.; Lu, Y.X.; Liu, D.; et al. Isolation and characterization of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells with hematopoiesis-supportive function and other potentials. Haematologica 2006, 91, 1017–1026. [Google Scholar]
  7. Han, K.; Lee, J.E.; Kwon, S.J.; Park, S.Y.; Shim, S.H.; Kim, H.; Moon, J.H.; Suh, C.S.; Lim, H.J. Human amnion-derived mesenchymal stem cells are a potential source for uterine stem cell therapy. Cell Prolif 2008, 41, 709–725. [Google Scholar]
  8. Oh, W.; Kim, D.S.; Yang, Y.S.; Lee, J.K. Immunological properties of umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stromal cells. Cell. Immunol 2008, 251, 116–123. [Google Scholar]
  9. Reinisch, A.; Bartmann, C.; Rohde, E.; Schallmoser, K.; Bjelic-Radisic, V.; Lanzer, G.; Linkesch, W.; Strunk, D. Humanized system to propagate cord blood-derived multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells for clinical application. Regen. Med 2007, 2, 371–382. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kim, D.S.; Kim, J.H.; Lee, J.K.; Choi, S.J.; Kim, J.S.; Jeun, S.S.; Oh, W.; Yang, Y.S.; Chang, J.W. Overexpression of CXC chemokine receptors is required for the superior glioma-tracking property of umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells Dev 2009, 18, 511–519. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kim, J.Y.; Kim, D.H.; Kim, D.S.; Kim, J.H.; Jeong, S.Y.; Jeon, H.B.; Lee, E.H.; Yang, Y.S.; Oh, W.; Chang, J.W. Galectin-3 secreted by human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells reduces amyloid-β42 neurotoxicity in vitro. FEBS Lett 2010, 584, 3601–3608. [Google Scholar]
  12. Kim, S.M.; Kim, D.S.; Jeong, C.H.; Kim, D.H.; Kim, J.H.; Jeon, H.B.; Kwon, S.J.; Jeun, S.S.; Yang, Y.S.; Oh, W.; et al. CXC chemokine receptor 1 enhances the ability of human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells to migrate toward gliomas. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun 2011, 407, 741–746. [Google Scholar]
  13. Chang, Y.S.; Choi, S.J.; Sung, D.K.; Kim, S.Y.; Oh, W.; Yang, Y.S.; Park, W.S. Intratracheal transplantation of human umbilical cord blood derived mesenchymal stem cells dose-dependently attenuates hyperoxia-induced lung injury in neonatal rats. Cell Transpl 2011, 20, 1843–1854. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kim, J.Y.; Kim, D.H.; Kim, J.H.; Lee, D.; Jeon, H.B.; Kwon, S.J.; Kim, S.M.; Yoo, Y.J.; Lee, E.H.; Choi, S.J.; et al. Soluble intracellular adhesion molecule-1 secreted by human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cell reduces amyloid-beta plaques. Cell Death Differ 2012, 19, 680–691. [Google Scholar]
  15. Dominici, M.; Le Blanc, K.; Mueller, I.; Slaper-Cortenbach, I.; Marini, F.; Krause, D.; Deans, R.; Keating, A.; Prockop, D.; Horwitz, E. Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy 2006, 8, 315–317. [Google Scholar]
  16. Bosch, J.; Houben, A.P.; Radke, T.F.; Stapelkamp, D.; Bunemann, E.; Balan, P.; Buchheiser, A.; Liedtke, S.; Kogler, G. Distinct differentiation potential of “MSC” derived from cord blood and umbilical cord: Are cord-derived cells true mesenchymal stromal cells? Stem Cells Dev 2012, 21, 1977–1988. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kretlow, J.D.; Jin, Y.Q.; Liu, W.; Zhang, W.J.; Hong, T.H.; Zhou, G.; Baggett, L.S.; Mikos, A.G.; Cao, Y. Donor age and cell passage affects differentiation potential of murine bone marrow-derived stem cells. BMC Cell Biol. 2008, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jo, C.H.; Kim, O.S.; Park, E.Y.; Kim, B.J.; Lee, J.H.; Kang, S.B.; Lee, J.H.; Han, H.S.; Rhee, S.H.; Yoon, K.S. Fetal mesenchymal stem cells derived from human umbilical cord sustain primitive characteristics during extensive expansion. Cell Tissue Res 2008, 334, 423–433. [Google Scholar]
  19. Caplan, A.I.; Dennis, J.E. Mesenchymal stem cells as trophic mediators. J. Cell Biochem 2006, 98, 1076–1084. [Google Scholar]
  20. Singer, N.G.; Caplan, A.I. Mesenchymal stem cells: Mechanisms of inflammation. Annu. Rev. Pathol 2011, 6, 457–478. [Google Scholar]
  21. Abreu, S.C.; Antunes, M.A.; Pelosi, P.; Morales, M.M.; Rocco, P.R. Mechanisms of cellular therapy in respiratory diseases. Intensive Care Med 2011, 37, 1421–1431. [Google Scholar]
  22. Lee, J.W.; Fang, X.; Krasnodembskaya, A.; Howard, J.P.; Matthay, M.A. Concise review: Mesenchymal stem cells for acute lung injury: Role of paracrine soluble factors. Stem Cells 2011, 29, 913–919. [Google Scholar]
  23. Kern, S.; Eichler, H.; Stoeve, J.; Kluter, H.; Bieback, K. Comparative analysis of mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow, umbilical cord blood, or adipose tissue. Stem Cells 2006, 24, 1294–1301. [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhang, X.; Hirai, M.; Cantero, S.; Ciubotariu, R.; Dobrila, L.; Hirsh, A.; Igura, K.; Satoh, H.; Yokomi, I.; Nishimura, T.; et al. Isolation and characterization of mesenchymal stem cells from human umbilical cord blood: Reevaluation of critical factors for successful isolation and high ability to proliferate and differentiate to chondrocytes as compared to mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow and adipose tissue. J. Cell. Biochem 2011, 112, 1206–1218. [Google Scholar]
  25. Avanzini, M.A.; Bernardo, M.E.; Cometa, A.M.; Perotti, C.; Zaffaroni, N.; Novara, F.; Visai, L.; Moretta, A.; del Fante, C.; Villa, R.; et al. Generation of mesenchymal stromal cells in the presence of platelet lysate: A phenotypic and functional comparison of umbilical cord blood- and bone marrow-derived progenitors. Haematologica 2009, 94, 1649–1660. [Google Scholar]
  26. Herbig, U.; Jobling, W.A.; Chen, B.P.; Chen, D.J.; Sedivy, J.M. Telomere shortening triggers senescence of human cells through a pathway involving ATM, p53, and p21CIP1, but not p16INK4a. Mol. Cell 2004, 14, 501–513. [Google Scholar]
  27. Jin, Y.; Kato, T.; Furu, M.; Nasu, A.; Kajita, Y.; Mitsui, H.; Ueda, M.; Aoyama, T.; Nakayama, T.; Nakamura, T.; et al. Mesenchymal stem cells cultured under hypoxia escape from senescence via down-regulation of p16 and extracellular signal regulated kinase. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun 2010, 391, 1471–1476. [Google Scholar]
  28. Wagner, W.; Horn, P.; Castoldi, M.; Diehlmann, A.; Bork, S.; Saffrich, R.; Benes, V.; Blake, J.; Pfister, S.; Eckstein, V.; et al. Replicative senescence of mesenchymal stem cells: A continuous and organized process. PLoS One 2008, 3, e2213. [Google Scholar]
  29. Shibata, K.R.; Aoyama, T.; Shima, Y.; Fukiage, K.; Otsuka, S.; Furu, M.; Kohno, Y.; Ito, K.; Fujibayashi, S.; Neo, M.; et al. Expression of the p16INK4A gene is associated closely with senescence of human mesenchymal stem cells and is potentially silenced by DNA methylation during in vitro expansion. Stem Cells 2007, 25, 2371–2382. [Google Scholar]
  30. Cheng, H.; Qiu, L.; Ma, J.; Zhang, H.; Cheng, M.; Li, W.; Zhao, X.; Liu, K. Replicative senescence of human bone marrow and umbilical cord derived mesenchymal stem cells and their differentiation to adipocytes and osteoblasts. Mol. Biol. Rep 2011, 38, 5161–5168. [Google Scholar]
  31. Zaim, M.; Karaman, S.; Cetin, G.; Isik, S. Donor age and long-term culture affect differentiation and proliferation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Ann. Hematol 2012, 91, 1175–1186. [Google Scholar]
  32. Hass, R.; Kasper, C.; Bohm, S.; Jacobs, R. Different populations and sources of human mesenchymal stem cells (MSC): A comparison of adult and neonatal tissue-derived MSC. Cell Commun. Signal. 2011, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Charbord, P. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells: Historical overview and concepts. Hum. Gene. Ther 2010, 21, 1045–1056. [Google Scholar]
  34. Doorn, J.; Moll, G.; Le Blanc, K.; van Blitterswijk, C.; de Boer, J. Therapeutic applications of mesenchymal stromal cells: Paracrine effects and potential improvements. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev 2012, 18, 101–115. [Google Scholar]
  35. Ortiz, L.A.; Dutreil, M.; Fattman, C.; Pandey, A.C.; Torres, G.; Go, K.; Phinney, D.G. Interleukin 1 receptor antagonist mediates the antiinflammatory and antifibrotic effect of mesenchymal stem cells during lung injury. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 11002–11007. [Google Scholar]
  36. Xu, J.; Qu, J.; Cao, L.; Sai, Y.; Chen, C.; He, L.; Yu, L. Mesenchymal stem cell-based angiopoietin-1 gene therapy for acute lung injury induced by lipopolysaccharide in mice. J. Pathol 2008, 214, 472–481. [Google Scholar]
  37. Ryu, H.H.; Kang, B.J.; Park, S.S.; Kim, Y.; Sung, G.J.; Woo, H.M.; Kim, W.H.; Kweon, O.K. Comparison of mesenchymal stem cells derived from fat, bone marrow, Wharton’s jelly, and umbilical cord blood for treating spinal cord injuries in dogs. J. Vet. Med. Sci 2012, 74, 1617–1630. [Google Scholar]
  38. Gamble, J.R.; Drew, J.; Trezise, L.; Underwood, A.; Parsons, M.; Kasminkas, L.; Rudge, J.; Yancopoulos, G.; Vadas, M.A. Angiopoietin-1 is an antipermeability and anti-inflammatory agent in vitro and targets cell junctions. Circ. Res 2000, 87, 603–607. [Google Scholar]
  39. Mei, S.H.; McCarter, S.D.; Deng, Y.; Parker, C.H.; Liles, W.C.; Stewart, D.J. Prevention of LPS-induced acute lung injury in mice by mesenchymal stem cells overexpressing angiopoietin 1. PLoS Med 2007, 4, e269. [Google Scholar]
  40. Nasef, A.; Chapel, A.; Mazurier, C.; Bouchet, S.; Lopez, M.; Mathieu, N.; Sensebe, L.; Zhang, Y.; Gorin, N.C.; Thierry, D.; Fouillard, L. Identification of IL-10 and TGF-β transcripts involved in the inhibition of T-lymphocyte proliferation during cell contact with human mesenchymal stem cells. Gene Expr 2007, 13, 217–226. [Google Scholar]
  41. Lee, O.K.; Kuo, T.K.; Chen, W.M.; Lee, K.D.; Hsieh, S.L.; Chen, T.H. Isolation of multipotent mesenchymal stem cells from umbilical cord blood. Blood 2004, 103, 1669–1675. [Google Scholar]
  42. Fan, X.; Liu, T.; Liu, Y.; Ma, X.; Cui, Z. Optimization of primary culture condition for mesenchymal stem cells derived from umbilical cord blood with factorial design. Biotechnol. Prog 2009, 25, 499–507. [Google Scholar]
  43. Laitinen, A.; Nystedt, J.; Laitinen, S. The isolation and culture of human cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells under low oxygen conditions. Methods Mol. Biol 2011, 698, 63–73. [Google Scholar]
  44. Dos Santos, F.; Andrade, P.Z.; Boura, J.S.; Abecasis, M.M.; da Silva, C.L.; Cabral, J.M. Ex vivo expansion of human mesenchymal stem cells: A more effective cell proliferation kinetics and metabolism under hypoxia. J. Cell. Physiol 2010, 223, 27–35. [Google Scholar]
  45. Jin, H.J.; Nam, H.Y.; Bae, Y.K.; Kim, S.Y.; Im, I.R.; Oh, W.; Yang, Y.S.; Choi, S.J.; Kim, S.W. GD2 expression is closely associated with neuronal differentiation of human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Cell. Mol. Life Sci 2010, 67, 1845–1858. [Google Scholar]
Ijms 14 17986f1 1024
Figure 1. Characterization of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) from bone marrow (BM), adipose tissue (AT), and umbilical cord blood (UCB) in Passage 5. (a) Morphology of cultured BM-, AT-, and UCB-MSCs. All MSCs exhibited spindle-shaped morphology. Scale bar = 50 μm; and (b) During incubation in specialized induction media, multi-lineage differentiation was measured by staining for typical lineage markers. In MSCs from three sources, osteogenic cells were evaluated by bone type alkaline phosphatase staining (top). Chondrogenic cells accumulated sulfated proteoglycan that stained with safranin O (middle). Adipogenic cells accumulated lipid vacuoles within the cytoplasm that stained with oil red O (bottom). Scale bar = 50 μm (Magnificiation: 100×).
Figure 1. Characterization of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) from bone marrow (BM), adipose tissue (AT), and umbilical cord blood (UCB) in Passage 5. (a) Morphology of cultured BM-, AT-, and UCB-MSCs. All MSCs exhibited spindle-shaped morphology. Scale bar = 50 μm; and (b) During incubation in specialized induction media, multi-lineage differentiation was measured by staining for typical lineage markers. In MSCs from three sources, osteogenic cells were evaluated by bone type alkaline phosphatase staining (top). Chondrogenic cells accumulated sulfated proteoglycan that stained with safranin O (middle). Adipogenic cells accumulated lipid vacuoles within the cytoplasm that stained with oil red O (bottom). Scale bar = 50 μm (Magnificiation: 100×).
Ijms 14 17986f1
Ijms 14 17986f2 1024
Figure 2. Growth kinetics of BM-, AT-, and UCB-MSCs. (a) UCB-MSCs showed more population-doubling (PD) than other tissues in all passages; (b) Clonogenetic capacity was measured by colony forming unit-fibroblast (CFU-F) assay. UCB-MSCs formed more colonies than BM- or AT-MSCs in Passage 3; (c) Comparison of final PD indicates maximal expansion potential. (a–c) Error bars represent the means ± SD. BM (n = 12), AT (n = 7), UCB (n = 12); *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01; and (d) Each population doubling time (PDT) was analyzed in Passage 5 to 6 and in Passage 11 to 12, respectively. In both passages, the PDT of UCB-MSCs was significantly lower. Error bars represent the means ± SD, n = 5; **p < 0.01; P, passage.
Figure 2. Growth kinetics of BM-, AT-, and UCB-MSCs. (a) UCB-MSCs showed more population-doubling (PD) than other tissues in all passages; (b) Clonogenetic capacity was measured by colony forming unit-fibroblast (CFU-F) assay. UCB-MSCs formed more colonies than BM- or AT-MSCs in Passage 3; (c) Comparison of final PD indicates maximal expansion potential. (a–c) Error bars represent the means ± SD. BM (n = 12), AT (n = 7), UCB (n = 12); *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01; and (d) Each population doubling time (PDT) was analyzed in Passage 5 to 6 and in Passage 11 to 12, respectively. In both passages, the PDT of UCB-MSCs was significantly lower. Error bars represent the means ± SD, n = 5; **p < 0.01; P, passage.
Ijms 14 17986f2
Ijms 14 17986f3 1024
Figure 3. Cellular senescence of BM-, AT-, and UCB-MSCs. (a) Senescence stage evidenced by positive Gal staining in P6, P9 and P12. Staining was quantified by positive cell count. Error bars represent the means ± SD, n = 5; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01; (b) Expression of senescence-associated proteins (p53, p21, and p16) in each MSC was gradually increased during cell expansion (P5, P8 and P11); and (c) In Passage 12, protein expression was measured by Western blotting. (b–c) β-actin was used as an internal control. Results were quantified by densitometry with signals normalized to the standard signal (BM), set as 100%. UCB-MSCs expressed significantly lower levels of senescence-associated proteins. Error bars represent the means ± SD, n = 3; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01; P, passage.
Figure 3. Cellular senescence of BM-, AT-, and UCB-MSCs. (a) Senescence stage evidenced by positive Gal staining in P6, P9 and P12. Staining was quantified by positive cell count. Error bars represent the means ± SD, n = 5; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01; (b) Expression of senescence-associated proteins (p53, p21, and p16) in each MSC was gradually increased during cell expansion (P5, P8 and P11); and (c) In Passage 12, protein expression was measured by Western blotting. (b–c) β-actin was used as an internal control. Results were quantified by densitometry with signals normalized to the standard signal (BM), set as 100%. UCB-MSCs expressed significantly lower levels of senescence-associated proteins. Error bars represent the means ± SD, n = 3; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01; P, passage.
Ijms 14 17986f3
Ijms 14 17986f4 1024
Figure 4. Anti-inflammatory effects of BM-, AT-, and UCB-MSCs in an LPS-induced inflammatory model. (a) Rat alveolar macrophages were stimulated with LPS and co-cultured with MSCs. The co-cultures were maintained for 3 days and the supernatants were analyzed for inflammatory cytokines (rat IL-1α, IL-6 and IL-8) by ELISA. UCB-MSCs exhibited significantly lower levels of inflammatory cytokines. Error bars represent means ± SD, n = 5; **p < 0.01; (b) Ang-1 secretion. UCB-MSCs secreted a significantly higher level of Ang-1; (c) Human recombinant Ang-1 (hrAng-1) significantly reduced expression of inflammatory cytokines in LPS-treated macrophages; and (d) Pretreatment of siRNA for Ang-1 significantly reduced anti-inflammatory effect of UCB-MSC in a co-culture system; (b–d) Error bars represent means ± SD, n = 3 per group; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01; MΦ, macrophage.
Figure 4. Anti-inflammatory effects of BM-, AT-, and UCB-MSCs in an LPS-induced inflammatory model. (a) Rat alveolar macrophages were stimulated with LPS and co-cultured with MSCs. The co-cultures were maintained for 3 days and the supernatants were analyzed for inflammatory cytokines (rat IL-1α, IL-6 and IL-8) by ELISA. UCB-MSCs exhibited significantly lower levels of inflammatory cytokines. Error bars represent means ± SD, n = 5; **p < 0.01; (b) Ang-1 secretion. UCB-MSCs secreted a significantly higher level of Ang-1; (c) Human recombinant Ang-1 (hrAng-1) significantly reduced expression of inflammatory cytokines in LPS-treated macrophages; and (d) Pretreatment of siRNA for Ang-1 significantly reduced anti-inflammatory effect of UCB-MSC in a co-culture system; (b–d) Error bars represent means ± SD, n = 3 per group; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01; MΦ, macrophage.
Ijms 14 17986f4
Table
Table 1. Surface markers are indicated as positive or negative in the box.
Table 1. Surface markers are indicated as positive or negative in the box.
MarkerCD11bCD14CD19aCD34CD45CD79aHLA
DR		CD29CD44CD73CD90CD105CD166HLA
ABC
BM−−−−−−−+++++++
AT−−−−−−−+++++++
UCB−−−−−−−+++++++
+: more than 95%; −: less than 5%.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jin, H.J.; Bae, Y.K.; Kim, M.; Kwon, S.-J.; Jeon, H.B.; Choi, S.J.; Kim, S.W.; Yang, Y.S.; Oh, W.; Chang, J.W. Comparative Analysis of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells from Bone Marrow, Adipose Tissue, and Umbilical Cord Blood as Sources of Cell Therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 17986-18001. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms140917986

AMA Style

Jin HJ, Bae YK, Kim M, Kwon S-J, Jeon HB, Choi SJ, Kim SW, Yang YS, Oh W, Chang JW. Comparative Analysis of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells from Bone Marrow, Adipose Tissue, and Umbilical Cord Blood as Sources of Cell Therapy. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2013; 14(9):17986-18001. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms140917986

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jin, Hye Jin, Yun Kyung Bae, Miyeon Kim, Soon-Jae Kwon, Hong Bae Jeon, Soo Jin Choi, Seong Who Kim, Yoon Sun Yang, Wonil Oh, and Jong Wook Chang. 2013. "Comparative Analysis of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells from Bone Marrow, Adipose Tissue, and Umbilical Cord Blood as Sources of Cell Therapy" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 14, no. 9: 17986-18001. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms140917986

APA Style

Jin, H. J., Bae, Y. K., Kim, M., Kwon, S. -J., Jeon, H. B., Choi, S. J., Kim, S. W., Yang, Y. S., Oh, W., & Chang, J. W. (2013). Comparative Analysis of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells from Bone Marrow, Adipose Tissue, and Umbilical Cord Blood as Sources of Cell Therapy. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 14(9), 17986-18001. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms140917986

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop