Next Article in Journal
Enhanced Levels of Interleukin-8 Are Associated with Hepatitis B Virus Infection and Resistance to Interferon-Alpha Therapy
Previous Article in Journal
Nickel Nanoparticles Exposure and Reproductive Toxicity in Healthy Adult Rats
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cartilage Turnover Reflected by Metabolic Processing of Type II Collagen: A Novel Marker of Anabolic Function in Chondrocytes
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 15
Issue 11
10.3390/ijms151121270
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Acquiring Chondrocyte Phenotype from Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells under Inflammatory Conditions

by
Masahiro Kondo
1,2,
Kunihiro Yamaoka
1,3 and
Yoshiya Tanaka
1,*
1
The First Department of Internal Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, 1-1 Iseigaoka, Yahatanishi-ku, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka 807-8555, Japan
2
Pharmacology Research Laboratories I, Research Division, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, 1000 Kamoshida-cho, Aoba-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 227-0033, Japan
3
Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Keio University, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15(11), 21270-21285; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms151121270
Submission received: 15 July 2014 / Revised: 30 October 2014 / Accepted: 3 November 2014 / Published: 17 November 2014
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Chondrocyte Phenotype in Cartilage Biology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
An inflammatory milieu breaks down the cartilage matrix and induces chondrocyte apoptosis, resulting in cartilage destruction in patients with cartilage degenerative diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis. Because of the limited regenerative ability of chondrocytes, defects in cartilage are irreversible and difficult to repair. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are expected to be a new tool for cartilage repair because they are present in the cartilage and are able to differentiate into multiple lineages of cells, including chondrocytes. Although clinical trials using MSCs for patients with cartilage defects have already begun, its efficacy and repair mechanisms remain unknown. A PubMed search conducted in October 2014 using the following medical subject headings (MeSH) terms: mesenchymal stromal cells, chondrogenesis, and cytokines resulted in 204 articles. The titles and abstracts were screened and nine articles relevant to “inflammatory” cytokines and “human” MSCs were identified. Herein, we review the cell biology and mechanisms of chondrocyte phenotype acquisition from human MSCs in an inflammatory milieu and discuss the clinical potential of MSCs for cartilage repair.

1. Introduction

Defects in the cartilage are irreversible and currently difficult to repair in patients with cartilage degenerative diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and osteoarthritis (OA), because of the poor regenerative ability of articular cartilage. In particular, activities of daily living (ADL) are impaired in patients with progressive cartilage destruction due to the long duration of the illness and articular hypofunction, resulting in deterioration in the quality of life (QOL). Therefore, it is desirable to develop a new articular cartilage regenerative therapy for cartilage degenerative diseases. Surgical approaches including microfracture, mosaic plasty, and autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) have been performed for cartilage defects in OA. Marrow-inducing reparative techniques, such as microfracture, aimed at stimulating chondroprogenitor cells localized in the underlying marrow, may affect their mechanical properties in the long term because cartilage defects in OA are repaired by the fibrous cartilage rather than the hyaline cartilage. Mosaic plasty, a treatment strategy involving the implantation of autologous or allogenic osteochondral grafts also has its limitations, such as loss of healthy cartilage, risk of immune response against the implanted graft, and infections [1]. ACI is the most widely used strategy for articular cartilage repair, implanting autologous in vitro-expanded chondrocytes. However, the drawbacks of this procedure are complexity, cost, and the loss of cartilage capacity as a result of dedifferentiation during in vitro expansion [2]. Although these methods exhibit measurable efficacies with reduced pain and production of cartilage-like tissue, satisfactory long-term therapeutic effects have not been obtained to date [3,4,5,6]. In patients with RA, application of these techniques, particularly mosaic plasty and ACI, is even more difficult due to the advanced degeneration of remaining cartilaginous tissues and the vulnerability of the entire subchondral bone [7]. Thus, a cell-based therapeutic approach for cartilage regeneration using mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) has gained attention in the recent years [8,9,10,11].
MSCs are multipotent stem cells capable of differentiating into various cell types, including chondrocytes. MSC-like cells have been found in the cartilage [12,13,14] and are considered to be involved in cartilage homeostasis [15,16,17]. MSCs also possess anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive activities and have been reported to show efficacy without serious adverse reactions in a clinical trial for graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) [18]. Although several clinical trials for articular cartilage regeneration using MSCs have been conducted with proven efficacy in some of them [19,20,21], further accumulation of evidence and development of effective methodologies are required [22]. The fundamental etiologies of RA and OA are considered to be different, and both conditions develop distinct degrees and patterns of articular cartilage impairment; however, the pathophysiology of inflammation in the affected joints is similar in both diseases [23]. Thus, when a regenerative therapy for articular cartilage using MSCs is sought, deep understanding of the mechanisms underlying the differentiation of MSCs into chondrocytes and the influences therein from the inflammatory milieu are likely to be important for the development of an efficient cell therapeutic strategy.

2. Inflammation in Cartilage Degenerative Disease

Although the etiologies of OA and RA differ from each other, both diseases exhibit inappropriate articular cartilage destruction, which is mainly due to elevated levels of proteolytic enzymes. RA is an autoimmune disease in which excessive inflammatory reactions resulting from abnormal immune function destroy the joints. Because biological agents targeting proinflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α and IL-6, exhibit high efficacy in clinical practice, it is clear that inflammation has an important role in the pathological process of the disease. Synovial hyperplasia contributes to the local production of inflammatory cytokines and proteolytic enzymes that degrade the cartilage matrix. The disease characteristically involves the small joints of the hands and feet, although inflammation of larger joints is also frequent. On the other hand, although the causes of OA remain largely unknown, changes due to aging, genetic factors, excessive mechanical stresses, direct injuries, and articular surface deformation caused by trauma are considered to be involved in OA pathogenesis. In addition, the occurrence of episodic intra-articular inflammation with synovitis indicates that the synovium may also be a source of inflammatory cytokines and proteolytic enzymes because >90% of patients with OA develop synovitis [24] with infiltration of activated B and T cells [25]. Thus, as in RA, inflammation appears to be a major factor contributing to cartilage destruction and progression of symptoms in OA [26].
The proinflammatory cytokines released during synovitis, such as IL-1β and TNF-α act on chondrocytes and inhibit the production of type II collagen and aggrecan, the major components of the cartilage matrix [27,28]. In addition, they increase the release of matrix metalloproteinases and aggrecanase, enzymes that degrade the matrices, resulting in cartilage destruction [29,30,31] and disturbing the metabolic balance of the cartilage matrix [32]. The sources of these inflammatory cytokines and proteolytic enzymes are not just the synovial cells but also the chondrocytes themselves, which contribute to cartilage destruction [33]. Moreover, IL-1β and TNF-α induce apoptosis of chondrocytes by promoting the production of other proinflammatory factors such as nitric oxide (NO) and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) [34]. Several reports have suggested that other proinflammatory factors such as IL-17, produced by T cells, have similar effects on chondrocytes [35,36] and synergize with other inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6, IL-17, and oncostatin M), disturbing the anabolic/catabolic balance of the cartilages [37,38,39,40].

3. Molecular Mechanisms of Chondrogenic Differentiation

MSCs are multipotent stem cells capable of differentiating into chondrocytes [41]. This differentiation is an important process during cartilaginous tissue and bone formation by endochondral ossification and occurs during the development and growth of the skeletal system [42]. Majority of the molecular mechanisms are common with the chondrogenesis of adult MSCs. MSCs are present in various tissues in the adult body. Among the articular tissues, bone marrow [43], synovial membrane [44], tendon [45], meniscus [46], adipose tissue [47], and even the articular cartilage itself [15,16,17] contain MSCs. It is likely that the process of chondrogenic differentiation of MSCs is not only limited to development and growth but also involved in the repair of injured skeletal tissues such as fractured endochondral bone and the maintenance of cartilage homeostasis in adult life [12,13,14].
The process of chondrogenesis is triggered by factors such as bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) [48], transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) [49] and wingless-type MMTV integration site family members (Wnts) [50], leading to the expression of the master transcription factor SRY-box 9 (Sox9), which is essential for chondrocyte differentiation [51]. Sox9 controls the transcription of genes characteristic to the cartilage matrix, such as type II collagen and aggrecan, and it also suppresses the subsequent formation of hypertrophic chondrocytes [52,53]. Therefore, conditional Sox9-deficient mice are born without limbs due to the lack of cartilage matrix production [53,54]. In addition, Sox9 has been identified as a causative gene of campomelic dysplasia, a lethal congenital bone disease accompanied by severe limb shortening in humans [55]. Sox9 induces the expression of coupling factors, l-Sox5, and Sox6, forming a transcription complex, which activates the transcription of cartilage-related genes such as Col2a1 [53,56]. In addition, cofactors such as p300/adenosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (cAMP) response-element binding protein binding protein (p300/CBP), Scleraxis/E47, Tip60, and c-Maf are also involved in transcriptional regulation [57,58,59]. On the other hand, some reports have pointed out poor correlations between the Sox9 expression levels and its target genes [60,61]. Similar to other transcription factors, phosphorylation of Sox9 has been intensively studied, and it has been observed that phosphorylation of Sox9 by protein kinase A (PKA) [62,63], cytidine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (cGMP)-dependent protein kinase II (cGKII) [64], and Rho kinase (ROCK) [65], increase DNA binding to target genes and the transcriptional activity of the Sox9 gene. The regulation of Sox9 expression itself remains largely unknown. However, novel regulatory factors important for the initial differentiation of adult MSCs into chondrocytes have recently been identified, and their involvement in the regulation of Sox9 expression has been revealed. The transcription factor runt-related gene 1 (Runx1) induces Sox trio expression, i.e., Sox9, Sox5, and Sox6, and directly increases the promoter activity of Col2a1 [66]. In addition, post-transcriptional regulation mediated by microRNAs (miRNAs), small RNAs that do not encode a protein, control chondrogenic differentiation [67]. For instance, miR-145 directly targets Sox9 [68], whereas miR-140 shows expression variation parallel to those of Sox9 and Col2a1 and is induced by the abovementioned Sox trio [69,70,71] contributing to both development and maintenance of cartilage [72]. Prechondrocytes differentiate into mature chondrocytes producing abundant aggrecan and collagen fibers (types II, IX, and XI). Chondrocytes begin to express alkaline phosphatase in conjunction with the transcription factors, Indian hedgehog (Ihh), and parathyroid hormone-related protein receptor (PTHrP-R) and produce type X collagen instead of type II collagen [73]. Transcription factors Runx2 and Osterix also have important roles in cartilaginous hypertrophy [74,75] and cause calcification of the matrix by promoting calcium deposition [76]. The transcription factor Runx2 promotes the differentiation of MSCs into hypertrophic chondrocytes, whereas Sox9 expression is lost during this process.

4. Effect of Inflammation on Chondrogenic Differentiation

Proinflammatory cytokines induce cartilage destruction by disturbing its metabolic balance through the suppression of cartilage matrix production, enhancement of production of cartilage matrix-degrading enzymes by chondrocytes, and induction of chondrocyte apoptosis. Although a number of studies have focused on the effect of inflammation on chondrocytes and the anabolic/catabolic balance of the cartilage matrix, very few reports on chondrogenic differentiation have been published so far. A PubMed search using the following medical subject headings (MeSH) terms: mesenchymal stromal cells, chondrogenesis, and cytokines, was conducted in October 2014, resulting in a total of 204 articles. The titles and abstracts were screened and nine articles relevant to “inflammatory” cytokines and “human” MSCs were identified (Table 1). Several major studies have described the molecular mechanisms behind the influence of inflammation on the MSC differentiation into chondrocytes. IL-1α, IL-1β, and TNF-α inhibit chondrogenic differentiation, based on an investigation using human MSCs [77,78,79,80,81]. Moreover, Wehling et al. have reported that the role of IL-1β in suppressing chondrogenic differentiation was dependent on the activation of NF-κB, given that it was cancelled by inhibition of nuclear transport of NF-κB. Similarly, the role of TNF-α in suppressing chondrogenic differentiation is also NF-κB-dependent and is caused by post-transcriptional down-regulation of Sox9 [82]. Both cytokines suppress Sox9 expression by suppressing TGF-β receptor II expression, an important initiation factor of chondrogenic differentiation, thereby suppressing the activation of Smad2/3, a downstream signaling molecule of TGF-β receptor II, and enhancing the inhibitory molecule Smad7 expression [83,84,85]. In other words, IL-1β and TNF-α inhibit chondrogenic differentiation by the inhibition of TGF-β/Smad signaling, which is an important trigger of initial chondrogenic differentiation. In addition to these findings, it has been reported that CXC chemokine ligand 7 (CXCL7), but not IFN-γ, inhibits chondrogenic differentiation [79,86].
The over-expression of IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra) improved the ability to repair full-thickness cartilage defects formed by microfracture in animals in vivo [87]. We recently reported that IL-17, a key cytokine of chronic inflammation, suppressed the MSC differentiation into chondrocytes [88]. IL-17, unlike IL-1β and TNF-α, acts by the suppression of the phosphorylation of Sox9, important for transcriptional activation, with no influence on TFG-β/Smad signaling or Sox9 protein expression. The conditioned medium of synovial cells from patients with OA and synovial fluid from patients with RA were reported to strongly suppress MSC differentiation into chondrocytes [80,89,90]. Unknown factors are likely to be involved in this activity, given that inhibition of IL-1 or TNF-α leads to partial recovery of cartilage differentiation induction, but not full recovery [80]. These findings suggest that chondrocyte differentiation is suppressed in the joints of patients with OA or RA when compared with healthy joints.
Table
Table 1. Effect of cytokines on chondrogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells.
Table 1. Effect of cytokines on chondrogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells.
Inflammatory CytokineCell SourceCulture MethodOutcomeReferences
IL-1αBM-MSCspellet cultureinhibit[79,80]
IL-1αBM-MSCsPCL scaffoldsinhibit[81]
IL-1βBM-MSCspellet cultureinhibit[77,78]
IL-17BM-MSCspellet cultureinhibit[88]
TNF-αBM-MSCspellet cultureinhibit[77,79,80]
IFN-γBM-MSCspellet cultureno effect[79]
CXCL7BM-MSCsmicro-mass cultureinhibit[86]
Conditioned mediun from OA synoviumBM-MSCspellet cultureinhibit[80]
RA synovial fluidPrechondrogenic mesenchymal cellsHigh density cultureinhibit[89,90]
BM-MSCs = Bone marrow derived MSCs; PCL = poly (ɛ-caprolactone).
Given that miRNA (miR-140, -145 and -199a) expression levels, which have been reported to be involved in chondrogenic differentiation, are altered by IL-1β stimulation, changes in the miRNA network are also likely to be a mechanism by which inflammation suppresses chondrogenic differentiation [70,91,92]. Thus, MSC differentiation into chondrocytes is strongly suppressed in an inflammatory milieu by the suppression of both Sox 9 expression and transcriptional activation, mediated by proinflammatory cytokines including IL-1, TNF-α, and IL-17 (Figure 1).
Ijms 15 21270 g001 1024
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the potential role of inflammation on chondrogenic differentiation. Inflammatory mediators, such as IL-1β, TNF-α, and IL-17, contribute to the inhibition of chondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) through several mechanisms. Abbreviation: BMPs, bone morphogenetic proteins; Wnts, wingless-type MMTV integration site family members; TGF, transforming growth factor; Runx, runt-related gene; Sox, SRY-box.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the potential role of inflammation on chondrogenic differentiation. Inflammatory mediators, such as IL-1β, TNF-α, and IL-17, contribute to the inhibition of chondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) through several mechanisms. Abbreviation: BMPs, bone morphogenetic proteins; Wnts, wingless-type MMTV integration site family members; TGF, transforming growth factor; Runx, runt-related gene; Sox, SRY-box.
Ijms 15 21270 g001

5. Clinical Application of Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs)

Clinical trials of cell therapies using MSCs for articular cartilage regeneration in patients with OA have been conducted and have been proven successful in some cases [93]. In particular, the result from a proof-of-concept clinical trial reported by Jo et al. is noticeable; intra-articular injection of adipose-derived MSCs was demonstrated to lead to apparent repair by the hyaline cartilage-like cartilaginous tissue, based on arthroscopic and histopathological evaluations [19]. The results obtained from these clinical trials have raised hopes for the potential of MSCs in cartilage regenerative therapies. However, additional studies involving various protocols are still ongoing (National Library of Medicine ClinicalTrials.gov, available online: http://clinicaltrials.gov/) due to insufficient evidence and unsatisfactory regenerative effects. Development of safer and more efficient therapeutic protocols for the establishment of cartilage regenerative therapies using MSCs still remains a challenge [5,6].
Studies focused on improving the efficiency of MSC differentiation into chondrocytes are also being aggressively conducted to develop more effective cartilage regenerative therapies using MSCs. Various additional factors including TGF-β1–3; BMP-2, -4, -6, -7; fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2); insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1); insulin; and PTHrP promote MSC differentiation into chondrocytes [94]. Furthermore, dexamethasone, adenosine 5'-triphosphate (ATP), stromal-derived factor-1β (SDF-1β), growth and differentiation factor-5 (GDF-5), FGF-18, among others, have also been reported to positively regulate MSC differentiation into chondrocytes [9]. TD-198946 [66] and kartogenin (KGN) [95] were recently reported as synthetic low molecular weight compounds with chondrogenic differentiation promoting activity. These compounds were confirmed to possess cartilage regeneration effects in animal OA models by acting on the transcription factor Runx1 involved in initial cartilage differentiation. In addition, curcumin was found to rescue the inhibitory effect of IL-1β on chondrogenic differentiation of human MSCs in vitro [96]. Chondrogenic differentiation is also enhanced by environmental stimulation such as hypoxic conditions [97,98] and mechanical stress [99]. Moreover, hypoxia has been shown to reduce the inhibitory effect of IL-1β on chondrogenesis in vitro [78].
MSCs also possess immunosuppressive and anti-inflammatory properties depending on their trophic functions, secreting a number of soluble mediators such as IL-10, TGF-β and indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) [100,101]. Injection of MSCs prevented the irreversible damage of bone and cartilage in type II collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) based on their immuno-modulatory function and ability to induce regulatory T cells [102]. In humans, the use of MSCs has been reported to be safe and efficacious in a variety of autoimmune diseases such as GvHD [103], multiple sclerosis [104], and systemic erythematosus [105]. Therefore, intra-articular injection of MSCs is expected to be beneficial for immune regulation and cartilage regeneration. However, relatively large numbers of cells are required to express the anti-inflammatory effect in vivo and their retentivity and undifferentiated status, after intra-articular injection, is poorly known.
In several clinical trials, MSCs injected into the joints by the least-invasive intra-articular method, were expected to differentiate into chondrocytes locally in the joint. Whether or not the intra-articular environment of the joints is suitable for chondrogenic differentiation of MSCs is a major concern. As mentioned earlier, cartilage regenerative therapy is likely to be indicated when the affected joints in patients with OA and RA present with inflammatory reactions. However, the inflammatory milieu, including proinflammatory cytokines, strongly inhibits MSC differentiation into chondrocytes. On the other hand, we had previously demonstrated the influence of inflammation (proinflammatory cytokines) on MSC differentiation into osteoblasts, resulting in the formation of calcifications [106,107]. These findings indicate the risk of developing osteophytes and ectopic calcifications when MSCs are injected into the joint in an inflammatory milieu. Therefore, sufficient suppression of articular inflammation prior to the operation is important for efficient cartilage regeneration while using MSCs in cartilage regenerative therapy. This can be achieved by a combination of an existing anti-inflammatory agent or a biologic targeting proinflammatory cytokine and a chondro-enhancing agent (Figure 2). Further evidence and studies are warranted for the improvement and maintenance of intra-articular environment suitable for cartilage regeneration.
Ijms 15 21270 g002 1024
Figure 2. Strategies for efficient cartilage repair therapy by intra-articular injection of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). The inflammatory environment is present in the joints affected by rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or osteoarthritis (OA). Chondrogenic differentiation of intra-articular injected MSCs is inefficient under inflammatory conditions. Therefore, preoperative treatment with anti-inflammatory drugs and/or chondrogenic agents should be important for efficient cartilage repair therapy.
Figure 2. Strategies for efficient cartilage repair therapy by intra-articular injection of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). The inflammatory environment is present in the joints affected by rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or osteoarthritis (OA). Chondrogenic differentiation of intra-articular injected MSCs is inefficient under inflammatory conditions. Therefore, preoperative treatment with anti-inflammatory drugs and/or chondrogenic agents should be important for efficient cartilage repair therapy.
Ijms 15 21270 g002

6. Conclusions

The inflammatory milieu is known to cause cartilage destruction by causing disturbances in the anabolic/catabolic balance of the cartilage matrix. The inflammatory milieu has also been understood to exert a suppressive action during the process of differentiation from progenitor MSCs to chondrocytes. Therefore, sufficient suppression of articular inflammation prior to the operation may be important for efficient regeneration of the cartilage in regenerative therapies using MSCs. While continuous studies to develop more efficient techniques for chondrogenic differentiation using MSC-based cell therapies are important, it will also be necessary to establish a protocol including the use of existing agents and development of novel agents for the improvement and maintenance of the intra-articular environment, where MSCs are transferred, to be suitable for cartilage regeneration.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all medical staff members at the associated institutions for providing the data.

Author Contributions

Masahiro Kondo contributed to article design, data interpretation and integration, drafting of the manuscript, critical revision of the manuscript, and approval of the article. Kunihiro Yamaoka contributed to article design, data interpretation, drafting of the manuscript, critical revision of the manuscript, and approval of the article. Yoshiya Tanaka contributed to concept generation, article design, data interpretation, drafting of the manuscript, critical revision of the manuscript and approval of the article.

Conflicts of Interest

Dr. Tanaka has received consulting fees, speaking fees, and/or honoraria from Abbvie, Chugai, Astellas, Takeda, Santen, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Pfizer, Janssen, Eisai, Daiichi-Sankyo, UCB, GlaxoSmithKline, Bristol-Myers, and has received research grants from Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Chugai, MSD, Astellas, Novartis. Dr. Yamaoka has received consulting fees and /or speaking fees from Pfizer, Chugai Pharma, Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma, Takeda Industrial Pharma, GlaxoSmithKline, Nippon Shinyaku, Eli Lilly, Janssen Pharma, Eisai Pharma, Astellas Pharma and Actelion Pharmaceuticals. M Kondo is an employee of the Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation.

References

  1. Hunziker, E.B. Articular cartilage repair: Basic science and clinical progress. A review of the current status and prospects. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2002, 10, 432–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Schulze-Tanzil, G.; Mobasheri, A.; de Souza, P.; John, T.; Shakibaei, M. Loss of chondrogenic potential in dedifferentiated chondrocytes correlates with deficient Shc–Erk interaction and apoptosis. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2004, 12, 448–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Simon, T.M.; Jackson, D.W. Articular cartilage: Injury pathways and treatment options. Sports Med. Arthrosc. 2006, 14, 146–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Rodriguez-Merchan, E.C. The treatment of cartilage defects in the knee joint: Microfracture, mosaicplasty, and autologous chondrocyte implantation. Am. J. Orthop. 2012, 41, 236–239. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Mobasheri, A.; Kalamegam, G.; Musumeci, G.; Batt, M.E. Chondrocyte and mesenchymal stem cell-based therapies for cartilage repair in osteoarthritis and related orthopaedic conditions. Maturitas 2014, 78, 188–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Mobasheri, A.; Csaki, C.; Clutterbuck, A.L.; Rahmanzadeh, M.; Shakibaei, M. Mesenchymal stem cells in connective tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: Applications in cartilage repair and osteoarthritis therapy. Histol. Histopathol. 2009, 24, 347–366. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  7. Sakai, T.; Ishiguro, N. Cartilage implantation for the bone and cartilage destruction in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin. Calcium 2012, 22, 245–249. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Barry, F.; Murphy, M. Mesenchymal stem cells in joint disease and repair. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2013, 9, 584–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Ahmed, T.A.; Hincke, M.T. Mesenchymal stem cell-based tissue engineering strategies for repair of articular cartilage. Histol. Histopathol. 2014, 29, 669–689. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  10. Richardson, S.M.; Hoyland, J.A.; Mobasheri, R.; Csaki, C.; Shakibaei, M.; Mobasheri, A. Mesenchymal stem cells in regenerative medicine: Opportunities and challenges for articular cartilage and intervertebral disc tissue engineering. J. Cell. Physiol. 2010, 222, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Guilak, F.; Estes, B.T.; Diekman, B.O.; Moutos, F.T.; Gimble, J.M. Nicolas Andry Award: Multipotent adult stem cells from adipose tissue for musculoskeletal tissue engineering. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2010, 468, 2530–2540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Alsalameh, S.; Amin, R.; Gemba, T.; Lotz, M. Identification of mesenchymal progenitor cells in normal and osteoarthritic human articular cartilage. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2004, 50, 1522–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dowthwaite, G.P.; Bishop, J.C.; Redman, S.N.; Khan, I.M.; Rooney, P.; Evans, D.J.R.; Haughton, L.; Bayram, Z.; Boyer, S.; Thomson, B.; et al. The surface of articular cartilage contains a progenitor cell population. J. Cell Sci. 2004, 117, 889–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Pretzel, D.; Linss, S.; Rochler, S.; Endres, M.; Kaps, C.; Alsalameh, S.; Kinne, R. Relative percentage and zonal distribution of mesenchymal progenitor cells in human osteoarthritic and normal cartilage. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2011, 13, R64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Williams, R.; Khan, I.M.; Richardson, K.; Nelson, L.; McCarthy, H.E.; Analbelsi, T.; Singhrao, S.K.; Dowthwaite, G.P.; Jones, R.E.; Baird, D.M.; et al. Identification and clonal characterisation of a progenitor cell sub-population in normal human articular cartilage. PLoS One 2010, 51, e13246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Grogan, S.P.; Miyaki, S.; Asahara, H.; D’Lima, D.D.; Lotz, M.K. Mesenchymal progenitor cell markers in human articular cartilage: Normal distribution and changes in osteoarthritis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2009, 11, R85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Fickert, S.; Fiedler, J.; Brenner, R.E. Identification of subpopulations with characteristics of mesenchymal progenitor cells from human osteoarthritic cartilage using triple staining for cell surface markers. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2004, 6, R422–R432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Bassi, E.J.; Aita, C.A.; Camara, N.O. Immune regulatory properties of multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells: Where do we stand? World J. Stem Cells 2011, 3, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Jo, C.H.; Lee, Y.G.; Shin, W.H.; Kim, H.; Chai, J.W.; Jeong, E.C.; Kim, J.E.; Shim, H.; Shin, J.S.; Shin, I.S.; et al. Intra-articular injection of mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: A proof-of-concept clinical trial. Stem Cells 2014, 32, 1254–1266. [Google Scholar]
  20. Orozco, L.; Munar, A.; Soler, R.; Alberca, M.; Soler, F.; Huguet, M.; Sentis, J.; Sanchez, A.; Garcia-Sancho, J. Treatment of knee osteoarthritis with autologous mesenchymal stem cells: A pilot study. Transplantation 2013, 95, 1535–1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Wong, K.L.; Lee, K.B.; Tai, B.C.; Law, P.; Lee, E.H.; Hui, J.H. Injectable cultured bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in varus knees with cartilage defects undergoing high tibial osteotomy: A prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial with 2 years’ follow-up. Arthroscopy 2013, 29, 2020–2028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Gopal, K.; Amirhamed, H.A.; Kamarul, T. Advances of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of cartilage defects: A systematic review. Exp. Biol. Med. 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kapoor, M.; Martel-Pelletier, J.; Lajeunesse, D.; Pelletier, J.-P.; Fahmi, H. Role of proinflammatory cytokines in the pathophysiology of osteoarthritis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2011, 7, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Roemer, F.W.; Guermazi, A.; Felson, D.T.; Niu, J.; Nevitt, M.C.; Crema, M.D.; Lynch, J.A.; Lewis, C.E.; Torner, J.; Zhang, Y. Presence of MRI-detected joint effusion and synovitis increases the risk of cartilage loss in knees without osteoarthritis at 30-month follow-up: The MOST study. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2011, 70, 1804–1809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Benito, M.J.; Veale, D.J.; FitzGerald, O.; van den Berg, W.B.; Bresnihan, B. Synovial tissue inflammation in early and late osteoarthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2005, 64, 1263–1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Sellam, J.; Berenbaum, F. The role of synovitis in pathophysiology and clinical symptoms of osteoarthritis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2010, 6, 625–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Saklatvala, J. Tumour necrosis factor alpha stimulates resorption and inhibits synthesis of proteoglycan in cartilage. Nature 1986, 322, 547–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Goldring, M.B.; Fukuo, K.; Birkhead, J.R.; Dudek, E.; Sandell, L.J. Transcriptional suppression by interleukin-1 and interferon-gamma of type II collagen gene expression in human chondrocytes. J. Cell. Biochem. 1994, 54, 85–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Mengshol, J.A.; Vincenti, M.P.; Coon, C.I.; Barchowsky, A.; Brinckerhoff, C.E. Interleukin-1 induction of collagenase 3 (matrix metalloproteinase 13) gene expression in chondrocytes requires p38, c-Jun N-terminal kinase, and nuclear factor κB: Differential regulation of collagenase 1 and collagenase 3. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2000, 43, 801–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lefebvre, V.; Peeters-Joris, C.; Vaes, G. Modulation by interleukin 1 and tumor necrosis factor α of production of collagenase, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases and collagen types in differentiated and dedifferentiated articular chondrocytes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1990, 1052, 366–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Reboul, P.; Pelletier, J.P.; Tardif, G.; Cloutier, J.M.; Martel-Pelletier, J. The new collagenase, collagenase-3, is expressed and synthesized by human chondrocytes but not by synoviocytes. A role in osteoarthritis. J. Clin. Investig. 1996, 97, 2011–2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Rengel, Y.; Ospelt, C.; Gay, S. Proteinases in the joint: Clinical relevance of proteinases in joint destruction. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2007, 9, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Loeser, R.F. Molecular mechanisms of cartilage destruction: Mechanics, inflammatory mediators, and aging collide. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2006, 54, 1357–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lotz, M.; Hashimoto, S.; Kuhn, K. Mechanisms of chondrocyte apoptosis. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 1999, 74, 389–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lubberts, E.; Koenders, M.I.; van den Berg, W.B. The role of T-cell interleukin-17 in conducting destructive arthritis: Lessons from animal models. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2005, 7, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Koenders, M.I.; Joosten, L.A.; van den Berg, W.B. Potential new targets in arthritis therapy: Interleukin (IL)-17 and its relation to tumour necrosis factor and IL-1 in experimental arthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2006, 65, iii29–iii33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Goldring, M.B.; Marcu, K.B. Cartilage homeostasis in health and rheumatic diseases. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2009, 11, 224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Rowan, A.D.; Koshy, P.J.; Shingleton, W.D.; Degnan, B.A.; Heath, J.K.; Vernallis, A.B.; Spaull, J.R.; Life, P.F.; Hudson, K.; Cawston, T.E. Synergistic effects of glycoprotein 130 binding cytokines in combination with interleukin-1 on cartilage collagen breakdown. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2001, 44, 1620–1632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Koshy, P.J.; Henderson, N.; Logan, C.; Life, P.F.; Cawston, T.E.; Rowan, A.D. Interleukin 17 induces cartilage collagen breakdown: Novel synergistic effects in combination with proinflammatory cytokines. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2002, 61, 704–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Barksby, H.E.; Hui, W.; Wappler, I.; Peters, H.H.; Milner, J.M.; Richards, C.D.; Cawston, T.E.; Rowan, A.D. Interleukin-1 in combination with oncostatin M up-regulates multiple genes in chondrocytes: Implications for cartilage destruction and repair. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2006, 54, 540–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Pittenger, M.F.; Mackay, A.M.; Beck, S.C.; Jaiswal, R.K.; Douglas, R.; Mosca, J.D.; Moorman, M.A.; Simonetti, D.W.; Craig, S.; Marshak, D.R. Multilineage Potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science 1999, 284, 143–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Goldring, M.B.; Tsuchimochi, K.; Ijiri, K. The control of chondrogenesis. J. Cell. Biochem. 2006, 97, 33–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Barry, F.P.; Murphy, J.M. Mesenchymal stem cells: Clinical applications and biological characterization. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2004, 36, 568–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. De Bari, C.; Dell’Accio, F.; Tylzanowski, P.; Luyten, F.P. Multipotent mesenchymal stem cells from adult human synovial membrane. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2001, 44, 1928–1942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Steinert, A.F.; Kunz, M.; Prager, P.; Barthel, T.; Jakob, F.; Noth, U.; Murray, M.M.; Evans, C.H.; Porter, R.M. Mesenchymal stem cell characteristics of human anterior cruciate ligament outgrowth cells. Tissue Eng. 2011, 17, 1375–1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Segawa, Y.; Muneta, T.; Makino, H.; Nimura, A.; Mochizuki, T.; Ju, Y.J.; Ezura, Y.; Umezawa, A.; Sekiya, I. Mesenchymal stem cells derived from synovium, meniscus, anterior cruciate ligament, and articular chondrocytes share similar gene expression profiles. J. Orthop. Res. 2009, 27, 435–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Zuk, P.A.; Zhu, M.; Mizuno, H.; Huang, J.; Futrell, J.W.; Katz, A.J.; Benhaim, P.; Lorenz, H.P.; Hedrick, M.H. Multilineage cells from human adipose tissue: Implications for cell-based therapies. Tissue Eng. 2001, 7, 211–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Barna, M.; Niswander, L. Visualization of cartilage formation: Insight into cellular properties of skeletal progenitors and chondrodysplasia syndromes. Dev. Cell 2007, 12, 931–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Chimal-Monroy, J.; Diaz de Leon, L. Expression of N-cadherin, N-CAM, fibronectin and tenascin is stimulated by TGF-β1, β2, β3 and β5 during the formation of precartilage condensations. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 1999, 43, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  50. Tuli, R.; Tuli, S.; Nandi, S.; Huang, X.; Manner, P.A.; Hozack, W.J.; Danielson, K.G.; Hall, D.J.; Tuan, R.S. Transforming growth factor-beta-mediated chondrogenesis of human mesenchymal progenitor cells involves N-cadherin and mitogen-activated protein kinase and Wnt signaling cross-talk. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 41227–41236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Ng, L.J. Sox9 binds DNA, activates transcription, and coexpresses with type II collagen during chondrogenesis in the mouse. Dev. Biol. 1997, 183, 108–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. De Crombrugghe, B.; Lefebvre, V.; Nakashima, K. Regulatory mechanisms in the pathways of cartilage and bone formation. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2001, 13, 721–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Akiyama, H.; Chaboissier, M.C.; Martin, J.F.; Schedl, A.; de Crombrugghe, B. The transcription factor Sox9 has essential roles in successive steps of the chondrocyte differentiation pathway and is required for expression of Sox5 and Sox6. Genes Dev. 2002, 16, 2813–2828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Bi, W.; Deng, J.M.; Zhang, Z.; Behringer, R.R.; de Crombrugghe, B. Sox9 is required for cartilage formation. Nat. Genet. 1999, 22, 85–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Foster, J.W.; Dominguez-Steglich, M.A.; Guioli, S.; Kwok, C.; Weller, P.A.; Stevanović, M.; Weissenbach, J.; Mansour, S.; Young, I.D.; Goodfellow, P.N. Campomelic dysplasia and autosomal sex reversal caused by mutations in an SRY-related gene. Nature 1994, 372, 525–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Lefebvre, V.; Li, P.; de Crombrugghe, B. A new long form of Sox5 (l-Sox5), Sox6 and Sox9 are coexpressed in chondrogenesis and cooperatively activate the type II collagen gene. EMBO J. 1998, 17, 5718–5733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Furumatsu, T.; Tsuda, M.; Taniguchi, N.; Tajima, Y.; Asahara, H. Smad3 induces chondrogenesis through the activation of Sox9 via CREB-binding protein/p300 recruitment. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 8343–8350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Furumatsu, T.; Shukunami, C.; Amemiya-Kudo, M.; Shimano, H.; Ozaki, T. Scleraxis and E47 cooperatively regulate the Sox9-dependent transcription. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2010, 42, 148–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Hattori, T.; Coustry, F.; Stephens, S.; Eberspaecher, H.; Takigawa, M.; Yasuda, H.; de Crombrugghe, B. Transcriptional regulation of chondrogenesis by coactivator Tip60 via chromatin association with Sox9 and Sox5. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36, 3011–3024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Aigner, T.; Gebhard, P.M.; Schmid, E.; Bau, B.; Harley, V.; Pöschl, E. Sox9 expression does not correlate with type II collagen expression in adult articular chondrocytes. Matrix Biol. 2003, 22, 363–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Kypriotou, M.; Fossard-Demoor, M.; Chadjichristos, C.; Ghayor, C.; de Crombrugghe, B.; Pujol, J.P.; Galera, P. Sox9 exerts a bifunctional effect on type II collagen gene (COL2A1) expression in chondrocytes depending on the differentiation state. DNA Cell Biol. 2003, 22, 119–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Huang, W.; Zhou, X.; Lefebvre, V.; de Crombrugghe, B. Phosphorylation of Sox9 by cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase A enhances Sox9’s ability to transactivate a Col2a1 chondrocyte-specific enhancer. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2000, 20, 4149–4158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Huang, W.; Chung, U.-I.; Kronenberg, H.M.; de Crombrugghe, B. The chondrogenic transcription factor Sox9 is a target of signaling by the parathyroid hormone-related peptide in the growth plate of endochondral bones. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 160–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Chikuda, H.; Kugimiya, F.; Hoshi, K.; Ikeda, T.; Ogasawara, T.; Shimoaka, T.; Kawano, H.; Kamekura, S.; Tsuchida, A.; Yokoi, N.; et al. Cyclic GMP-dependent protein kinase II is a molecular switch from proliferation to hypertrophic differentiation of chondrocytes. Genes Dev. 2004, 18, 2418–2429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Haudenschild, D.R.; Chen, J.; Pang, N.; Lotz, M.K.; D’Lima, D.D. Rho kinase-dependent activation of SOX9 in chondrocytes. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2010, 62, 191–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Yano, F.; Hojo, H.; Ohba, S.; Fukai, A.; Hosaka, Y.; Ikeda, T.; Saito, T.; Hirata, M.; Chikuda, H.; Takato, T.; et al. A novel disease-modifying osteoarthritis drug candidate targeting Runx1. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2013, 72, 748–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Harfe, B.D.; McManus, M.T.; Mansfield, J.H.; Hornstein, E.; Tabin, C.J. The RNaseIII enzyme Dicer is required for morphogenesis but not patterning of the vertebrate limb. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 10898–10903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Yang, B.; Guo, H.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, L.; Ying, D.; Dong, S. MicroRNA-145 regulates chondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells by targeting Sox9. PLoS One 2011, 6, e21679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Yamashita, S.; Miyaki, S.; Kato, Y.; Yokoyama, S.; Sato, T.; Barrionuevo, F.; Akiyama, H.; Scherer, G.; Takada, S.; Asahara, H. l-Sox5 and Sox6 proteins enhance chondrogenic miR-140 microRNA expression by strengthening dimeric Sox9 activity. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 22206–22215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Yang, J.; Qin, S.; Yi, C.; Ma, G.; Zhu, H.; Zhou, W.; Xiong, Y.; Zhu, X.; Wang, Y.; He, L.; et al. MiR-140 is co-expressed with Wwp2-C transcript and activated by Sox9 to target Sp1 in maintaining the chondrocyte proliferation. FEBS Lett. 2011, 585, 2992–2997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Nakamura, Y.; He, X.; Kato, H.; Wakitani, S.; Kobayashi, T.; Watanabe, S.; Iida, A.; Tahara, H.; Warman, M.L.; Watanapokasin, R.; et al. Sox9 is upstream of microRNA-140 in cartilage. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2012, 166, 64–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Miyaki, S.; Sato, T.; Inoue, A.; Otsuki, S.; Ito, Y.; Yokoyama, S.; Kato, Y.; Takemoto, F.; Nakasa, T.; Yamashita, S.; et al. MicroRNA-140 plays dual roles in both cartilage development and homeostasis. Genes Dev. 2010, 24, 1173–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. St-Jacques, B.; Hammerschmidt, M.; McMahon, A.P. Indian hedgehog signaling regulates proliferation and differentiation of chondrocytes and is essential for bone formation. Genes Dev. 1999, 13, 2072–2086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Yoshida, C.A.; Yamamoto, H.; Fujita, T.; Furuichi, T.; Ito, K.; Inoue, K.; Yamana, K.; Zanma, A.; Takada, K.; Ito, Y.; et al. Runx2 and Runx3 are essential for chondrocyte maturation, and Runx2 regulates limb growth through induction of Indian hedgehog. Genes Dev. 2004, 18, 952–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Nakashima, K.; Zhou, X.; Kunkel, G.; Zhang, Z.; Deng, J.M.; Behringer, R.R.; de Crombrugghe, B. The novel zinc finger-containing transcription factor osterix is required for osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. Cell 2002, 108, 17–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Alvarez, J.; Balbin, M.; Fernandez, M.; Lopez, J.M. Collagen metabolism is markedly altered in the hypertrophic cartilage of growth plates from rats with growth impairment secondary to chronic renal failure. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2001, 16, 511–524. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  77. Wehling, N.; Palmer, G.D.; Pilapil, C.; Liu, F.; Wells, J.W.; Müller, P.E.; Evans, C.H.; Porter, R.M. Interleukin-1β and tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibit chondrogenesis by human mesenchymal stem cells through NF-κB-dependent pathways. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2009, 60, 801–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Felka, T.; Schafer, R.; Schewe, B.; Benz, K.; Aicher, W.K. Hypoxia reduces the inhibitory effect of IL-1β on chondrogenic differentiation of FCS-free expanded MSC. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2009, 17, 1368–1376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Liu, L.N.; Wang, G.; Hendricks, K.; Lee, K.; Bohnlein, E.; Junker, U.; Mosca, J.D. Comparison of drug and cell-based delivery: Engineered adult mesenchymal stem cells expressing soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor II prevent arthritis in mouse and rat animal models. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2013, 2, 362–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Heldens, G.T.; Blaney Davidson, E.N.; Vitters, E.L.; Schreurs, B.W.; Piek, E.; van den Berg, W.B.; van der Kraan, P.M. Catabolic factors and osteoarthritis-conditioned medium inhibit chondrogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells. Tissue Eng. 2012, 18, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Ousema, P.H.; Moutos, F.T.; Estes, B.T.; Caplan, A.I.; Lennon, D.P.; Guilak, F.; Weinberg, J.B. The inhibition by interleukin 1 of MSC chondrogenesis and the development of biomechanical properties in biomimetic 3D woven PCL scaffolds. Biomaterials 2012, 33, 8967–8974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Sitcheran, R.; Cogswell, P.C.; Baldwin, A.S. NF-κB mediates inhibition of mesenchymal cell differentiation through a posttranscriptional gene silencing mechanism. Genes Dev. 2003, 17, 2368–2373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Roman-Blas, J.A.; Stokes, D.G.; Jimenez, S.A. Modulation of TGF-β signaling by proinflammatory cytokines in articular chondrocytes. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2007, 15, 1367–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Baugé, C.; Legendre, F.; Leclercq, S.; Elissalde, J.M.; Pujol, J.P.; Galéra, P.; Boumédiene, K. Interleukin-1β impairment of transforming growth factor β1 signaling by down-regulation of transforming growth factor β receptor type II and up-regulation of Smad7 in human articular chondrocytes. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2007, 56, 3020–3032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Baugé, C.; Attia, J.; Leclercq, S.; Pujol, J.P.; Galéra, P.; Boumédiene, K. Interleukin-1β up-regulation of Smad7 via NF-κB activation in human chondrocytes. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2008, 58, 221–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Kalwitz, G.; Neumann, K.; Ringe, J.; Sezer, O.; Sittinger, M.; Endres, M.; Kaps, C. Chondrogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells in micro-masses is impaired by high doses of the chemokine CXCL7. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2011, 5, 50–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Morisset, S.; Frisbie, D.D.; Robbins, P.D.; Nixon, A.J.; McIlwraith, C.W. IL-1ra/IGF-1 gene therapy modulates repair of microfractured chondral defects. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2007, 462, 221–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Kondo, M.; Yamaoka, K.; Sonomoto, K.; Fukuyo, S.; Oshita, K.; Okada, Y.; Tanaka, Y. IL-17 inhibits chondrogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. PLoS One 2013, 8, e79463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Mohamed-Ali, H. Influence of synovial cells on cartilage in vitro: Induction of breakdown and inhibition of synthesis. Virchows Arch. B 1992, 62, 227–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Mohamed-Ali, H.; Scholz, P.; Merker, H.J. Inhibition of the effects of rheumatoid synovial fluid cells on chondrogenesis and cartilage breakdown in vitro: Possible therapeutical conclusions. Virchows Arch. B 1993, 64, 45–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Miyaki, S.; Nakasa, T.; Otsuki, S.; Grogan, S.P.; Higashiyama, R.; Inoue, A.; Kato, Y.; Sato, T.; Lotz, M.K.; Asahara, H. MicroRNA-140 is expressed in differentiated human articular chondrocytes and modulates interleukin-1 responses. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2009, 60, 2723–2730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Akhtar, N.; Haqqi, T.M. MicroRNA-199a* regulates the expression of cyclooxygenase-2 in human chondrocytes. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2012, 71, 1073–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Wang, W.; Cao, W. Treatment of osteoarthritis with mesenchymal stem cells. Sci. China. Life Sci. 2014, 57, 586–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Kim, J.H.; Lee, M.C.; Seong, S.C.; Park, K.H.; Lee, S. Enhanced proliferation and chondrogenic differentiation of human synovium-derived stem cells expanded with basic fibroblast growth factor. Tissue Eng. 2011, 17, 991–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Johnson, K.; Zhu, S.; Tremblay, M.S.; Payette, J.N.; Wang, J.; Bouchez, L.C.; Meeusen, S.; Althage, A.; Cho, C.Y.; Wu, X.; et al. A stem cell-based approach to cartilage repair. Science 2012, 336, 717–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Buhrmann, C.; Mobasheri, A.; Matis, U.; Shakibaei, M. Curcumin mediated suppression of nuclear factor-κB promotes chondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in a high-density co-culture microenvironment. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2010, 12, R127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Duval, E.; Bauge, C.; Andriamanalijaona, R.; Benateau, H.; Leclercq, S.; Dutoit, S.; Poulain, L.; Galera, P.; Boumediene, K. Molecular mechanism of hypoxia-induced chondrogenesis and its application in in vivo cartilage tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2012, 33, 6042–6051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Buckley, C.T.; Vinardell, T.; Kelly, D.J. Oxygen tension differentially regulates the functional properties of cartilaginous tissues engineered from infrapatellar fat pad derived MSCs and articular chondrocytes. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2010, 18, 1345–1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Schumann, D.; Kujat, R.; Nerlich, M.; Angele, P. Mechanobiological conditioning of stem cells for cartilage tissue engineering. Biomed. Mater. Eng. 2006, 16, S37–S52. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  100. Ghannam, S.; Bouffi, C.; Djouad, F.; Jorgensen, C.; Noel, D. Immunosuppression by mesenchymal stem cells: Mechanisms and clinical applications. Stem Cell. Res. Ther. 2010, 1, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Meisel, R.; Zibert, A.; Laryea, M.; Gobel, U.; Daubener, W.; Dilloo, D. Human bone marrow stromal cells inhibit allogeneic T-cell responses by indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase-mediated tryptophan degradation. Blood 2004, 103, 4619–4621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Augello, A.; Tasso, R.; Negrini, S.M.; Cancedda, R.; Pennesi, G. Cell therapy using allogeneic bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells prevents tissue damage in collagen-induced arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2007, 56, 1175–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Le Blanc, K.; Rasmusson, I.; Sundberg, B.; Gotherstrom, C.; Hassan, M.; Uzunel, M.; Ringden, O. Treatment of severe acute graft-versus-host disease with third party haploidentical mesenchymal stem cells. Lancet 2004, 363, 1439–1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Liang, J.; Zhang, H.; Hua, B.; Wang, H.; Wang, J.; Han, Z.; Sun, L. Allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells transplantation in treatment of multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. 2009, 15, 644–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Sun, L.; Akiyama, K.; Zhang, H.; Yamaza, T.; Hou, Y.; Zhao, S.; Xu, T.; Le, A.; Shi, S. Mesenchymal stem cell transplantation reverses multiorgan dysfunction in systemic lupus erythematosus mice and humans. Stem Cells 2009, 27, 1421–1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Sonomoto, K.; Yamaoka, K.; Oshita, K.; Fukuyo, S.; Zhang, X.; Nakano, K.; Okada, Y.; Tanaka, Y. Interleukin-1β induces differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells into osteoblasts via the Wnt-5a/receptor tyrosine kinase-like orphan receptor 2 pathway. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2012, 64, 3355–3363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Fukuyo, S.; Yamaoka, K.; Sonomoto, K.; Oshita, K.; Okada, Y.; Saito, K.; Yoshida, Y.; Kanazawa, T.; Minami, Y.; Tanaka, Y. IL-6-accelerated calcification by induction of ROR2 in human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells is STAT3 dependent. Rheumatology 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kondo, M.; Yamaoka, K.; Tanaka, Y. Acquiring Chondrocyte Phenotype from Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells under Inflammatory Conditions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 21270-21285. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms151121270

AMA Style

Kondo M, Yamaoka K, Tanaka Y. Acquiring Chondrocyte Phenotype from Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells under Inflammatory Conditions. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2014; 15(11):21270-21285. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms151121270

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kondo, Masahiro, Kunihiro Yamaoka, and Yoshiya Tanaka. 2014. "Acquiring Chondrocyte Phenotype from Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells under Inflammatory Conditions" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 15, no. 11: 21270-21285. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms151121270

APA Style

Kondo, M., Yamaoka, K., & Tanaka, Y. (2014). Acquiring Chondrocyte Phenotype from Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells under Inflammatory Conditions. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 15(11), 21270-21285. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms151121270

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop