2.2. Discussion
The mechanism of the development of chronic hepatitis C is complicated and it is necessary to look for some important clinical and genetic markers to help those who have a higher risk of developing chronic HCV. To our knowledge, the viral protein, immune response and interactions between the two sides certainly play a decisive role in the outcomes of HCV infection. HCV F protein is a derivative of the Core, expressed during HCV natural infection. Because the half-time of the HCV F protein is less than 10 min, we detected the anti-F antibody instead of the F protein itself in this study [
29]. It is worth mentioning that the rate of F-seropositivity was increased along with the progression of the hepatitis C, in part because the virus produces a novel variant to adapt to the immune response of host [
17]. In view of the pathogenicity of the HCV F protein which plays a special role in the progression of chronic hepatitis, research on the function of the HCV F protein in the immune response might explain a possible new vision of HCV evasion strategy or the propensity of HCV persistent infection. Meanwhile, several reports have described the association of
HLA and non-
HLA genes with chronic HCV or F protein, but few studies have been well-focused on the
HLA-DP locus [
7,
17,
19,
20,
21,
30].
Table 5.
Distribution of HLA-DP alleles among the group of anti-F negative patients, anti-F positive patients and healthy controls.
Table 5.
Distribution of HLA-DP alleles among the group of anti-F negative patients, anti-F positive patients and healthy controls.
Alleles | Anti-F Positive
n = 516 (%) | Anti-F Negative
n = 186 (%) | Healthy Controls *
n = 334 (%) | Cases † vs. Healthy Controls | Anti-F Positive vs. Anti-F Negative |
---|
OR (95% CI) | Padj ** | OR (95% CI) | Padj ** |
---|
HLA-DPA1 alleles |
DPA1*0103 | 410 (39.7) | 150 (40.3) | 218 (32.6) | 2.45 (2.0–3.0) | <0.001 | 0.98 (0.77–1.24) | NS |
DPA1*0201 | 96 (9.3) | 56 (15.1) | 82 (12.3) | 1.23 (0.93–1.65) | NS | 0.58 (0.41–0.82) | 0.006 |
DPA1*0202 | 526 (51.0) | 166 (44.6) | 368 (55.1) | 0.79 (0.66–0.95) | 0.042 | 1.29 (1.02–1.64) | NS |
HLA-DPB1 alleles |
DPB1*0201 | 218 (21.1) | 73 (19.6) | 91 (13.6) | 1.66 (1.28–2.14) | <0.001 | 1.10 (0.82–1.48) | NS |
DPB1*0202 | 124 (20.7) | 29 (7.8) | 108 (16.2) | 0.63 (0.49–0.83) | 0.016 | 1.62 (1.06–2.47) | NS |
DPB1*0301 | 28 (2.7) | 8 (2.2) | 8 (1.2) | 2.17 (1.00–4.70) | NS | 1.27 (0.57–2.81) | NS |
DPB1*0401 | 64 (6.2) | 22 (5.9) | 52 (7.8) | 0.78 (0.54–1.11) | NS | 1.05 (0.64–1.73) | NS |
DPB1*0402 | 160 (15.5) | 57 (15.3) | 124 (18.6) | 0.80 (0.63–1.02) | NS | 1.01 (0.73–1.41) | NS |
DPB1*0501 | 314 (30.4) | 121 (32.5) | 210 (31.4) | 0.98 (0.80–1.19) | NS | 0.91 (0.70–1.17) | NS |
DPB1*0601 | 2 (0.2) | 2 (0.5) | 6 (0.9) | 0.32 (0.09–1.12) | NS | 0.26 (0.04–1.88) | NS |
DPB1*0901 | 12 (1.2) | 7 (1.9) | 10 (1.5) | 0.90 (0.42–1.95) | NS | 0.61 (0.24–1.57) | NS) |
DPB1*1301 | 20 (1.9) | 4 (1.1) | 8 (1.2) | 1.44 (0.64–3.21) | NS | 1.82 (0.62–5.36) | NS |
DPB1*1401 | 0 (0) | 8 (2.2) | 12 (1.8) | 0.31 (0.13–0.77) | NS | 4.86 (4.43–5.32) | <0.001 |
DPB1*1701 | 16 (1.6) | 11(3.0) | 12 (1.8) | 1.07 (0.54–2.13) | NS | 0.52 (0.24–1.12) | NS |
DPB1*1901 | 20 (1.9) | 7 (1.9) | 7 (1.0) | 1.85 (0.80–4.27) | NS | 1.03 (0.43–2.46) | NS |
DPB1*1001 | 18 (1.7) | 10 (2.7) | 8 (1.2) | 1.68 (0.76–3.70) | NS | 0.64 (0.29–1.41) | NS |
DPB1*1601 | 8 (0.8) | 5 (1.3) | 3 (0.4) | 2.07 (0.59–7.30) | NS | 0.42 (0.14–1.29) | NS |
DPB1*2101 | 16 (1.6) | 3 (0.8) | 3 (0.4) | 3.04 (0.90–10.31) | NS | 1.94 (0.56–6.69) | NS |
DPB1*3901 | 2 (0.2) | 0 (0) | 2 (0.3) | 0.48 (0.07–3.38) | NS | 1.36 (1.32–1.41) | NS |
Table 6.
Distribution of HLA-DPA1-HLA-DPB1 haplotypes among the group of anti-F negative patients, anti-F positive patients and healthy controls.
Table 6.
Distribution of HLA-DPA1-HLA-DPB1 haplotypes among the group of anti-F negative patients, anti-F positive patients and healthy controls.
Haplotype | Anti-F Positive (%) | Anti-F Negative (%) | Healthy Controls (%) | Cases † vs. Healthy Controls | Anti-F Positive vs. Anti-F Negative |
---|
OR (95% CI) * | p * | OR (95% CI) * | p * |
---|
DPB1*0402-DPA1*0103 | 6.8 | 8.6 | 7.9 | 0.91 (0.71–1.16) | 0.440 | 0.77 (0.57–1.05) | 0.101 |
DPB1*0402-DPA1*0202 | 7.5 | 5.6 | 8.2 | 0.84 (0.66–1.07) | 0.149 | 1.35 (0.95–1.92) | 0.096 |
DPB1*0501-DPA1*0103 | 7.8 | 9.1 | 5.2 | 1.60 (1.21–2.11) | 0.001 | 0.84 (0.62–1.12) | 0.235 |
DPB1*0501-DPA1*0201 | 1.6 | 1.3 | 1.6 | 0.91 (0.54–1.53) | 0.713 | 1.16 (0.57–2.36) | 0.691 |
DPB1*0501-DPA1*0202 | 21.1 | 21.6 | 24.6 | 0.83 (0.71–0.97) | 0.017 | 0.97 (0.79–1.19) | 0.768 |
DPB1*0401-DPA1*0103 | 3.2 | 4.3 | 4.6 | 0.74 (0.54–1.03) | 0.072 | 0.74 (0.48–1.13) | 0.160 |
DPB1*0401-DPA1*0202 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 2.7 | 1.02 (0.68–1.52) | 0.930 | 1.51 (0.85–2.66) | 0.157 |
DPB1*0201-DPA1*0103 | 12.4 | 9.3 | 6.9 | 1.76 (1.39–2.25) | <0.001 | 1.38 (1.04–1.83) | 0.024 |
DPB1*0201-DPA1*0202 | 6.7 | 5.0 | 4.8 | 1.30 (0.97–1.74) | 0.078 | 1.37 (0.94–1.99) | 0.098 |
DPB1*0202-DPA1*0202 | 7.0 | 4.7 | 9.3 | 0.67 (0.52–0.85) | 0.001 | 1.52 (1.04–2.22) | 0.030 |
In this study, we found that rs3077 in the
DPA1 locus significantly increased the risk of chronic HCV infection. This means that persons who carry the minor T alleles of the rs3077 have higher risk of chronic HCV than those subjects with wild type allele C. This finding may provide a novel way to understand the complex mechanism of the formation of chronic hepatitis C. In addition, we also found that the rs3077 in the
DPA1 locus was a potentially protective marker of anti-F antibody generation in the Chinese population. Specific antibodies and T-cell responses against HCV F protein were detected in the sera of HCV-infected patients and F protein generation after viral exposure varies enormously among individuals. This study also found that the number of platelets were reduced with HCV F protein expression. The low platelet secretion by the bone marrow is an important causative factor of thrombocytopenia in liver cirrhosis, and the relationship between functional liver mass and peripheral platelet count has been well established [
31,
32,
33]. Meanwhile, the relationship between HCV F protein and liver fibrosis stage also verify the conclusion. Apart from these, several reports have found that the production of HCV F protein might be influenced by the treatment (PEG-IFNα/RBV) and be associated with a sustained virological response (SVR) in hepatitis C patients. Branch
et al. reported that chronic HCV patients with IFN therapy have a higher proportion of HCV F-seropositive than those not [
34]. Deyong
et al. found that the rate of F-seronegative patients who achieved a SVR was higher than those patients with F-seropositive [
28]. Moreover, our group previously also demonstrated that the HCV F protein may inhibit peripheral blood mononuclear cells IFN-α secretion by regulating the production of interleukin (IL)-10, and may also contribute to apoptosis in plasmacytoid dendritic cells [
35]. These findings all indicate that the presence of F antibodies may be an indicator that predicts the efficacy of antiviral treatment in patients with HCV infection. In addition, the F protein could induce type 2 T helper (Th2) cell biased cytokine response and IL-6 secretion in HCC patients [
15,
17]. The imbalance of Th1/Th2 responses in patients with HCV infection may contribute to the disease progression, and further, IL-6 is a proinflammatory cytokine for which increased levels can result in chronic liver inflammation, and even progression to HCC. Therefore, based on these points, we suspect that with continuous development of the disease and the increased proportion of F-seropositive under the pressure of host immune response and medications, the F protein may be a novel product to adapt to the host environment and prompt virus survival in the host. Thus, the variant alleles of two SNPs decrease the risk of anti-F antibody generation, and may also decrease the risk of HCV F protein generation after HCV infection to reduce the pathogenicity of the antigen. On the other hand, other studies also considered that the increased expression of F protein under the virus-host struggle, compared with Core expression and function, would relatively decrease virus pathogenicity and play a protective role in the host. The reasons are as follows: firstly, HCV F is a double-frame shift product of the HCV core gene and the discovery of the F protein certainly challenges various biological functions attributed to Core. The F protein, not a substitute for Core, is not involved in HCV replication and regulation of some proto-oncogene or anti-oncogenes, including c-myc, p53 [
36,
37]. Secondly, the level of Core expression was also downregulated by the intracellular synthesized F protein, which has interrelated HCV RNA secondary stem-loop structure [
36,
38]. Our team previously found that the HCV F protein can induce the protective T-cell-mediated immune response [
15]. We reveal here for the first time, the risk factors (variants in
HLA-DPA1 and
HLA-DPB1) associated with chronic HCV infection and anti-F antibody generation. In order to better illustrate the issues raised above, we conducted the haplotype analysis by logistic regression and considered that those persons with a T–A haplotype may have a higher risk of HCV persistent infection than those persons with a C–A haplotype, whereas people with T–A or T–G may have a lower risk of F protein production when compared with the most frequent haplotype.
Furthermore, according to the report rs3077 and rs9277534, located in the 3'-UTR of
HLA-DPA1 and
HLA-DPB1, respectively, were not only identified as the SNPs with the highest significance level associated with disease progression, but also reported to be strongly associated with decreased mRNA expression of
HLA-DPA1 and
HLA-DPB1 [
23,
27,
39]. Based on the web-based SNP analysis tool [
40], we explored the S ariants in the gene affect the binding site of some microRNA (miRNA), affecting the stability and translation of mRNA. According to the report, the variants of the miRNA-binding site are likely to destroy the interaction between the miRNA and the target gene, and result in the deregulation of target gene expression [
41]. Further, it is reported that the miRNA is also significantly associated with the cleavage and release of the HCV genome RNA [
42]. Moreover, some reports also revealed that the variation in the 3’-UTR of the genes may also affect the 3' end formation of pre-messenger RNA, messenger RNA secondary structure and related genes’ methylation [
43,
44,
45,
46]. Taken together, the above evidence suggests that the variants in the
HLA-DP might lead to lower levels of
HLA-DP molecular expression on target cells surfaces and cause less effective processing and presenting of viral antigen to CD4
+ T helper cells, resulting in an impaired immune response to the virus infection. Moreover, the variants in the
HLA-DP locus may also damage the interactions between the
HLA molecular and rested antigen-presenting cells, including cytotoxic T lymphocytes, B lymphocytes, dendritic cells (DC), and natural killer (NK) cells, and affect the innate immune response and adaptive immune response [
47]. Specially, according to the report of Png
et al., the variants in
HLA-DR (rs3135363),
HLA-DPB1 (rs9277542) and
HLA class III (rs9267665) loci strongly influenced the antibody titers after HBV vaccination [
48]. This is partly because the abnormal or lower level of the
HLA molecule on the surface of CD4
+ T affects B lymphocyte activation to secrete the neutralizing antibodies [
49]. Based on this point, we also suspected the variants in
HLA-DP may also influence the anti-F antibody titers. However, this hypothesis needs to be validated by experiments in further functional studies.
HLAs play a vital role in humoral and cellular immunity, and its allele polymorphisms have been reported to be involved in the immune responses to viruses, including HIV, HBV and HCV [
21,
23,
50].
HLA-DRB1*11,
HLA-DQB1*0301 and
HLA-DRB1*07 were found to be associated with HCV clearance or persistence, and
HLA-DPA1*0103,
HLA-DPB1*0402 and
HLA-DPB1*0501 were found to be candidate predictive factors for antibody production after HBV vaccination [
51,
52,
53]. Moreover, Bain
et al. previously identified a specific CD8
+ memory T cell response for
HLA-A2 and/or
HLA-B7 predicted epitopes derived from the HCV F protein in patients with HCV natural infection [
16]. Based on this evidence, we considered that the
HLA II alleles polymorphism may also have significant association with chronic HCV infection or anti-F antibody generation, and the relationship between these parts will be beneficial in predicting the outcomes of disease or therapeutic regimens. Moreover,
HLA-DP genes, highly polymorphic in exon 2, encode antigen-binding sites and are receptors for processed peptides derived predominantly from membrane and extracellular proteins. So the polymorphism of the
HLA-DP alleles may lead to amino acids substitutions in antigen-binding sites or change the ligand–receptor binding affinity leading to a weakening of the immune response to HCV invasion. In our analysis, we revealed susceptibility or protective haplotype to chronic HCV infection and anti-F antibody generation.
HLA-DPs belong to the
HLA class II molecules that form heterodimers on the cell surface and present antigens to CD4
+ T cells. The strong response of helper T cells to HCV has been considered a vital way to resolve acute HCV infection [
54]. The haplotype analysis suggested that chronic HCV and anti-F antibody generation were associated with haplotypes containing the
HLA-DPA1 and
HLA-DPB1 genes, so firstly, we considered that polymorphism of
HLA-DP molecules would affect the ability of effective epitope presentation on immune cells and result in weak immune response to virus invasion. Gao
et al. reported that at least three peptides within HCV F protein were identified as
HLA-DRB1*01 or
HLA-DP*0401 presenting epitopes in humanized mouse models by the splenocyte proliferation assay [
55]. Secondly, we also inferred that the different
HLA-DP alleles may exhibit different protein expression level or antigen receptor repertoires to influence the ability of HCV antigen presentation. Several studies might support this hypothesis, that the
DPA1 residues 9, 11, 35, 55, 56, 69 and 84–87 and a single protein substitute (K to E at position 69) of
DPB1 influence T cell allorecognition or peptide binding, and the impact of
HLA-DP to HBV may depend on different expression levels rather than differences in peptide presentation [
27,
56,
57,
58]. However, this is just a deduction, more studies are warranted to clarify this problem. Interestingly, we also found that
DPB1*0202-
DPA1*0202 not only protects from chronic HCV infection but also is associated with anti-F antibody generation. This result may verify that the F protein acts as a double-edged sword in the pathogenesis of chronic HCV, because, on the one hand, the protective T-cell-mediated immune response specific to F protein may lead to viral clearance and have anti-tumor effects; on the other hand, F protein may be a virulence factor by helping HCV to survive in the adverse conditions, with molecular events that likely contribute to viral persistence at a low level of replication [
15]. Compared with healthy subjects, we think that the haplotype
DPB1*0202-
DPA1*0202 may protect from chronic HCV infection. Once a person is infected with HCV, the expression of the F protein not only decreases the generation of HCV core protein, but also relatively reduces virus pathogenicity. On the other side, F protein may be a new causative factor in regulation of the host environment and prompting virus survival in the host. However, it is remain unclear that how the F protein balances between positive and negative effects.
Our study had several strengths: first of all, subjects with HCV infection came from a systematic screening of HBV and HIV markers in a population-based study conducted in Jiangsu Province which may have reduced potential selection bias. Secondly, the subjects with or without anti-F antibody were selected from people with chronic HCV infection, decreasing the bias of different pathological states. Thirdly, the study was conducted with novel pathogenic antigens and thus provides a new perspective to understand the mechanism of HCV evasion strategy. However, the number of patients in our study was relatively small, and the statistical power of the research was limited. Further, many important clinical data values, including α-fetoprotein level, were not included in this study. Also, larger sample studies with ethnically diverse populations are warranted. Moreover,
IL-28B genotypes (rs8099917, rs12979860) influence the SVR and spontaneous HCV clearance, partly because the favorable
IL-28B genotypes influence the production of IFNλs in hepatitis C [
9,
59]. Whether there are some relationships among
IL-28B genotypes,
HLA alleles and HCV F protein remains to be further elucidated.