Next Article in Journal
MicroRNA-16 Modulates HuR Regulation of Cyclin E1 in Breast Cancer Cells
Next Article in Special Issue
Subcellular Sequestration and Impact of Heavy Metals on the Ultrastructure and Physiology of the Multicellular Freshwater Alga Desmidium swartzii
Previous Article in Journal
Blunt Snout Bream (Megalobrama amblycephala) MyD88 and TRAF6: Characterisation, Comparative Homology Modelling and Expression
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Identification and Functional Analysis of MicroRNAs and Their Targets in Platanus acerifolia under Lead (Pb) Stress

1
Institute of Paulownia, Henan Agricultural University, 95 Wenhua Road, Jinshui District, Zhengzhou 450002, China
2
Department of Landscape Architecture, Henan Vocational College of Agriculture, Zhengzhou 451450, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16(4), 7098-7111; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms16047098
Submission received: 1 March 2015 / Revised: 25 March 2015 / Accepted: 26 March 2015 / Published: 30 March 2015

Abstract

:
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) play important regulatory roles in development and stress responses in plants. Lead (Pb) is a non-essential element that is highly toxic to living organisms. Platanus acerifolia is grown as a street tree in cities throughout temperate regions for its importance in improving the urban ecological environment. MiRNAs that respond to abiotic stresses have been identified in plants; however, until now, the influence of Pb stress on P. acerifolia miRNAs has not been reported. To identify miRNAs and predict their target genes under Pb stress, two small RNA and two degradome libraries were constructed from Pb-treated and Pb-free leaves of P. acerifolia seedlings. After sequencing, 55 known miRNAs and 129 novel miRNAs were obtained, and 104 target genes for the miRNAs were identified by degradome sequencing. Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway analyses were performed to predict the functions of the targets. The expressions of eight differentially expressed miRNAs were validated by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). This is the first report about P. acerifolia miRNAs and their target genes under Pb stress. This study has provided data for further research into molecular mechanisms involved in resistance of P. acerifolia to Pb stress.

1. Introduction

Lead (Pb) is a non-essential element that is toxic to organisms [1]. Pb accumulates in soils via atmospheric deposition. Because of its mobility, Pb is readily taken up by plants where it accumulates in different tissues. Pb inhibits shoot and root growth, reduces photosynthesis, disturbs mitosis and DNA synthesis, and alters enzyme activity [2,3]. It has been reported that excessive generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) can reduce the speed of DNA replication and inhibit the mitotic process [4,5], which can result in cell membrane peroxidation of lipids and even cause plant death [6]. Scavenging ROS and forming metal chelates are effective mechanisms that plants use for the detoxification of heavy metal stresses [7].
Platanus acerifolia is a hybrid of Platanus orientalis and Platanus occidentalis [8]. It is cultivated widely as a street tree in cities throughout the temperate regions of the world for its good characteristics, such as rapid growth, excellent shadow capability because of its broad crown, root development, and good tolerance to air pollution, that make it amenable to growth in urban environments. The tree has been called the “king of avenue trees” [9]. The use of automobiles is increasingly frequent accompanied by the rapid development of modern social economies and technologies. Pb, a main heavy metal element in automobile exhausts, is constantly released into the urban air. As a result, P. acerifolia suffers serious stress from Pb. In recent years, numerous studies on the physiology and biochemistry in P. acerifolia have been carried out [10,11], but until now there are no reports about miRNAs in P. acerifolia under Pb stress.
MiRNAs are endogenous non-coding RNAs that modulate gene expression either by cleaving target mRNAs to which they bind with near perfect complementarity or by repressing the translation of target mRNAs to which they bind with lower complementarity [12,13]. Double-stranded miRNA/miRNA* is obtained by cutting the stem-loop region of primary miRNAs (pri-miRNAs) [14,15]. The miRNA and miRNA* separate and the miRNA stand is incorporated into the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) with the endonuclease Argonaute (Ago) [16]. Several reports have revealed the roles of miRNAs in plant development and hormone signaling [17,18,19,20,21]. Understanding the species-specific roles of miRNAs in response to Pb stress will provide new insights for plant development and for regulating their responses to environmental stresses. To date, the P. acerifolia genome sequence has not been published and information about its genetics and functional genes are limited. Deep sequencing of small RNA (sRNA) associated with transcriptome date is an effective way to identify conserved and novel miRNAs. Identifying stress-responsive genes may help provide insights into the complex response mechanisms underlying Pb stress. MiRNAs have been reported to have vital functions in response to a variety of heavy metal stresses in many plants such as cotton [22], Brassica juncea [23] and rice [24]. To understand the molecular mechanism of the response of P. acerifolia to Pb stress, two sRNA libraries and two degradome libraries were sequenced by high-throughput sequencing, numbers of conserved and novel miRNAs were identified, and the differentially expressed miRNAs and their target genes were analyzed. The results will help lay a theoretical foundation to understand the toxic/tolerant mechanisms of P. acerifolia under Pb stress.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Analyses of Small RNAs of P. acerifolia

Two sRNA libraries were constructed and sequenced by high-throughput sequencing. A total of 14,326,641 raw reads were obtained in the control library (XLM-0) and 14,091,676 raw reads were obtained in the Pb-treated library (XLM-12-40). After removing low-quality reads, adaptors, contaminants, poly(A), and sequences shorter than 18 nucleotides (nt), 13,993,838 (XLM-0) and 13,818,458 (XLM-12-40) clean reads remained. The sequencing statistics for the two libraries are shown in Figure 1. The most abundant sRNA sequences were 21 nt followed by 24 nt (Figure 2) and the percentage of 20–24 nt long sRNAs accounted for 92.94% (XLM-0) and 85.58% (XLM-12-40) of the sequences in the two libraries. The clean reads were mapped to Rfam (http://rfam.sanger.ac.uk/), miRBase, Release 19.0 (http://www.mirbase.org) and the P. acerifolia UniGenes, and classified as miRNAs, rRNAs, snRNAs and snoRNAs (Table 1). The proportion of non-annotated unique sRNAs was 93.04% (XLM-0) and 91.50% (XLM-12-40), implying that some unknown sRNAs are yet to be discovered. The non-annotated sRNAs were analyzed to predict novel miRNAs.
Figure 1. The distribution of sRNA in two libraries (A) sRNA counts; (B) unique sRNA.
Figure 1. The distribution of sRNA in two libraries (A) sRNA counts; (B) unique sRNA.
Ijms 16 07098 g001
Figure 2. Length distribution of sRNA in two libraries.
Figure 2. Length distribution of sRNA in two libraries.
Ijms 16 07098 g002
Table 1. sRNA category and statistics of P. acerifolia.
Table 1. sRNA category and statistics of P. acerifolia.
Categoryxlm-0xlm-12-40
Unique sRNAsPercent%TotalPercent%UniquePercent%TotalPercent%
sRNAssRNAssRNAs
total1,938,169100%13,993,838100%1,882,090100%13,818,458100%
miRNA13,0160.67%6,795,53748.56%11,2640.60%4,945,63535.79%
rRNA105,8375.46%1,544,17511.03%126,4686.72%2,464,24317.83%
snRNA12060.06%38450.03%18160.10%10,2790.07%
snoRNA4830.02%17470.01%7950.04%39890.03%
tRNA14,3160.74%578,0954.13%19,6981.05%1,226,7738.88%
unannote1,803,31193.04%5,070,43936.23%1,722,04991.50%5,167,53937.40%

2.2. Identification of Conserved miRNAs in P. acerifolia

To identify the conserved miRNAs of P. acerifolia, unique reads were mapped to the mature miRNA sequences in miRBase, Release 19.0, with no more than two mismatches. A total of 55 conserved miRNAs belonging to 18 families were identified, and most of these miRNAs had similar abundances in the two sRNA libraries. MiR156 with eight members was the most abundant family, which accounted for more than 90% of all conserved miRNAs in both libraries (Table S1). The abundances of miR156 family members were between 1384 and 2,484,342 in XLM-0, and between 1135 and 1,300,938 in XLM-12-40; thus, some members of the family had low expression while others had high expression. Notably, the miR156, miR167, miR408, miR2118, miR168, miR482, miR827, and miR398 families were highly abundant in both libraries, while others, such as miR393, miR397, and miR477, had much lower abundances. The abundances of the miRNAs family in the two sRNA libraries are shown in Figure 3.
Figure 3. Abundance of conserved miRNAs families in P. acerifolia.
Figure 3. Abundance of conserved miRNAs families in P. acerifolia.
Ijms 16 07098 g003

2.3. Identification of Novel miRNAs in P. acerifolia

To identify potential novel miRNAs, the non-annotated sRNAs were mapped to the P. acerifolia UniGenes using SOAP (http://soap.genomics.org.cn/) software. A total of 129 novel miRNAs were identified and 25 of them had the corresponding miRNA*. They included 94 novel miRNAs in XLM-0 and 115 novel miRNAs in XLM-12-40. The minimal folding free energies for the novel precursor pre-miRNA sequences (Table S2) varied from −125 to −19.3 kcal·mol−1, with an average of −60.05 kcal·mol−1. The novel mature miRNA sequences were 20–23 nt long and 83.72% of them were 21 nt in length. Compared with the conserved miRNAs, the novel miRNAs were lower in abundance.

2.4. Analysis of the Differential Expression miRNAs under Pb Stress

To determine the differentially expressed miRNAs under Pb stress, the expressions of all the miRNAs were normalized and their fold-changes and p-values were calculated. The expression levels of the miRNAs in the XLM-12-40 library were compared with their expression levels in XLM-0. MiRNAs with p-values less than 0.05 and fold-changes >1 or <−1 were designated as “up-regulated” or “down-regulated” in XLM-12-40, respectively. Among the conserved miRNAs, 14 were differentially expressed (one was up-regulated, 13 were down-regulated). Among the novel miRNAs, 67 were differentially expressed (50 were up-regulated, 17 were down-regulated). Among all the differentially expressed miRNAs, pla-miR90, which had the highest fold-change between the two libraries, was down-regulated under Pb stress. The significantly differentially expressed miRNAs between the two libraries are listed in Table S1 and Table S2.

2.5. Identification of miRNA Targets by Degradome Sequencing

Most miRNAs are involved in plant resistance to abiotic stress via cleavage of their target genes [25]. To understand the functions and potential regulatory roles of the identified miRNAs, two degradome libraries were constructed as described previously [26,27]. After removing low-quality adapter and redundant sequences, 22,818,398 (XLM-0) and 22,781,045 (XLM-12-40) clean reads were obtained. The CleaveLand pipeline [28] was used to identify the sliced target genes. The miRNA target genes were grouped into five categories (Figure S1) according to the relative abundances of the degradome fragments at the transcript site compared with the abundances of fragments at other sites. A total of 104 targets were predicted to be cleaved by seven conserved miRNA families and 24 novel miRNAs (Table S3) by degradome sequencing. Among these target genes, the largest category in XLM-0 was Category “0” (25 targets), while Category “2” was the largest categories in XLM-12-40 (30 targets). To better understand the roles of the identified miRNAs and illustrate the miRNA-mRNA regulatory network, the target genes were functionally annotated with Gene Ontology (GO) biological process, cellular component, and molecular function terms as described previously [29]. The target genes were classified further using the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway database (Table S4). The most abundant pathways among the target genes were “Metabolic pathways”, “Biosynthesis of secondary metabolites”, “Plant hormone signal transduction”, “Plant–pathogen interaction”, “Spliceosome”, “RNA transport”, “Endocytosis”, “Glycerophospholipid metabolism”, and “Ribosome”.

2.6. Validation of miRNAs and Their Targets with qRT-PCR

To verify the accuracy of the sRNA sequencing results and the potential correlation between the miRNAs and their transcript targets, eight of the differentially expressed miRNAs and eight target genes were selected randomly for validation with qRT-PCR. As shown in Figure S2, the expression patterns of the selected miRNAs determined by qRT-PCR showed similar trends as the corresponding expression patterns in the two libraries as determined by high-throughput sequencing. The results showed that except for the Unigene6816 and CL6054.Contig5 target genes, the expression levels of the other target genes were inversely correlated with their corresponding miRNAs (Figure S3). Interestingly, all the target genes were found to be expressed at a relatively lower level, except for CL11307.Contig2, which was targeted by pla-mir3; pla-mir3 was not expressed in XLM-12-40 through high-throughput sequencing. The expression of pla-mir95 in XLM-0 was seven-fold higher than in XLM-12, while the expression of its target gene, Unigene23581, was almost equal in the two libraries. These results indicated that the expression patterns of miRNAs and their target genes are complex and varied under Pb stress.

2.7. Discussion

It has been reported that miRNAs play important roles in the response of plants to environmental stresses [30,31,32]. To understand the roles of P. acerifolia miRNAs in regulating gene expression under Pb stress, two sRNA libraries and two degradome libraries were constructed by high-throughput and degradome sequencing, respectively. We found that the most abundant sequences were 21 nt in length (Figure 2), which is consistent with the lengths of the mature miRNAs for eudicotyledons in miRBase (http://www.mirbase.org/cgi-bin/browse.pl), indicating that the two sRNA libraries were likely to contain numerous miRNAs. A total of 55 conserved miRNAs and 128 novel miRNAs were identified in this study. Among the conserved miRNAs, about 61% (33) had more than 100 reads in the two libraries, and only one conserved miRNA had less than 10 reads in the two libraries, indicating that conserved miRNAs were highly expressed. Conversely, only 21% (27) of the novel miRNAs had more than 100 reads in the two libraries, indicating that novel miRNAs were lowly expressed. The numbers of candidate novel miRNAs and their predicted target genes was more than the numbers of conserved miRNAs and their predicted target genes, which is consistent with a previous report that suggested that novel miRNAs may have evolved in plants to help them adapt to different environmental conditions [33].
To help understand the functions of the P. acerifolia miRNAs, a total of 124 target genes were identified. Some of the predicted target genes were not annotated in the public databases, suggesting that these unannotated target genes may be in regions of the P. acerifolia genome that are not conserved in other plant species [34]. Some of the target genes were transcription factors that may play vital roles in signal transduction under Pb stress [30]. The expression of pla-miR159a-3p was down-regulated in XLM-12-40 compared with its expression in XLM-0, and pla-miR159a-3p was predicted to target a MYB transcription factor. Several reports have found that MYB transcription factors were involved in drought stress [35], salt stress [36], temperature stress [37], metal stress [38], and wounding stress [39]. In common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris), MYB transcription factors have been reported to be involved in abscisic acid (ABA) signaling under aluminum stress [40]. Exogenous processing of ABA could significantly increase the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (APX) and glutathione reductase [41]. These enzymes might be regulated by MYB transcription factors through ABA signal transduction. In this study, the expression of a MYB transcription factor (CL13287.Contig1_All) was up-regulated in XLM-12-40, and several MYB transcription factors were targeted by pla-miR159a/b-3p, pla-miR828a/b/c, and pla-mir67a/b-3p, suggesting that these three miRNAs may respond to Pb tolerance by cleaving mRNAs encoding MYB transcription factors.
Immunity in plants might be influenced by abiotic stresses. Their resilience reactions have been considered to be a series of complex signal regulatory network that allow plants to make appropriate response to stresses. In this study, four disease resistance protein RPM1 encoding genes and one nucleotide-binding site (NBS)-containing resistance gene were identified as miRNA targets. It has been reported that most plant disease resistance proteins have supervisory roles in cellular homeostasis [42]. They contain a series of leucine-rich repeats (LRRs), a putative amino-terminal signaling domain, and a NBS, and are termed NBS-LRR proteins [43]. LRR domains have been identified in resistance proteins involved in pathogen recognition and activation of innate immune responses [44]. Further, LRR-receptor-like kinases (LRR-RLKs) were reported to be involved in a diverse signaling processes under biotic and abiotic stresses [45]. In this study, disease resistance protein RPM1 and NBS-containing resistance genes were targeted by the differentially expressed miRNAs pla-miR482a-3p and pla-mir39, implying that a series of signal transduction pathways related to plants’ defense against pathogens might be triggered in P. acerifolia under Pb stress. It has been shown that miR169 not only responded to abiotic stresses such as drought and salinity [31,46], but also responded to biotic stresses [47,48]. In this study, pla-miR169a-3p was significantly up-regulated under Pb stress, suggesting that it might be involved in the response to biotic stress in P. acerifolia.
Heavy metal stress leads to the accumulation of ROS that can cause damage of lipids, proteins, and nucleic acids and disturb the activity of antioxidative enzymes [49]. Scavenging ROS and forming metal chelates are effective methods of detoxification in plants [7]. ROS accumulation in plants is counteracted by enzymatic antioxidant systems that include scavengers, such as SOD, CAT, and APX [6,50,51]. In this study, several genes encoding proteins involved in scavenging ROS and forming metal chelates were targeted by some of the novel miRNAs. For example, two APX genes that were targeted by pla-mir59 were up-regulated under Pb stress and pla-mir59 was down-regulated, which indicated that APX might be involved in scavenging ROS in P. acerifolia under Pb stress. Glutathione S-transferase, which is involved in glutathione metabolism, was reported to not only catalyze the conjugation of glutathione with heavy metal, but also to have peroxidase activity that allowed it to scavenge ROS to relieve oxidative stress [52,53]. Previous study has found that thiol compounds such as glutathione and the phytochelatins were synthesized to reduce free heavy ions in the cytoplasm, which affected the glutathione redox potential [54,55]. Glutaredoxin is an oxidoreductase that can perceive the glutathione redox potential and act as a mediator for the reversible transfer of electrons between the glutathione redox buffer and thiol groups of target proteins [56]. In this study, a glutaredoxin gene was targeted by pla-mir3, and a glutathione S-transferase gene was targeted by pla-mir108-3p and pla-mir45-3p. The qRT-PCR confirmed the expressions of pla-mir108-3p, pla-mir3, and pla-mir59 were down-regulated in XLM-12-40 compared with their expressions in XLM-0, and the expressions of glutathione S-transferase and glutaredoxin were up-regulated in XLM-12-40. These results suggested that there may be synergy among the novel miRNAs pla-mir3, pla-mir59, pla-mir108-3p, and pla-mir45-3p in eliminating ROS and forming phytochelatins in P. acerifolia under Pb stress. In addition, analysis of the GO terms assigned to the target genes indicated that they were involved mainly in metabolic processes, and the majority of target genes had functions such as binding, catalytic activity, and transporter activity, suggesting that the target genes might be associated with scavenging ROS and forming phytochelatins.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Experimental Materials

Plantlets were cultivated in the Biotechnology Laboratory of Henan Agricultural University, China under an illumination intensity of 130 µmol·m−2·s−1 and illumination time 16 h·d−1 for 60 days at 25 °C. Uniform seedlings were picked out and soaked in 12 g·L−1 Pb(NO3)2 for 40 h for Pb treatment (XLM-12-40) and in distilled water as a control (XLM-0). Each treatment was repeated twice. Five seedlings were selected randomly from each group and 1–4 uppermost leaves of the seedlings were picked separately after 40 h and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen for RNA extraction.

3.2. Construction and Sequencing of P. acerifolia sRNA

Total RNA was extracted using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Two sRNA libraries (XLM-0 and XLM-12-40) were constructed and sequenced using the Solexa GAIIx platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). Briefly, the sRNAs were ligated successively with 5' and 3' adapters using T4 RNA ligase (Takara Bio Inc., Dalian, China). Reverse transcription was used to create single-stranded cDNA, which was then amplified by 12 PCR cycles. The cDNA library were purified by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) to select fragments 140–160 bp in length, which were used to produce the sRNA libraries for high-throughput sequencing. The data used in this publication have been deposited in the NIH Short Read Archive database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra) with accession umber SRP056506.

3.3. Bioinformatics Analysis sRNA and Identification miRNA of P. acerifolia

After filtering low quality reads, adapters, and contaminated reads from the raw sequence data, clean reads remained and the unique reads among them were selected for analysis. The length distribution of the unique reads was analyzed and the reads were mapped to the P. acerifolia UniGenes using miRDeep2 [57]. Perfectly matched reads were analyzed by running Blastall (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/staff/tao/URLAPI/blastall/) against the Rfam and GenBank datebases (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) to remove ncRNAs (including tRNAs, rRNAs, snoRNAs, and other ncRNAs). The remaining sRNAs were regarded as candidate miRNAs and were searched against the plant mature miRNAs in the miRBase database (Release 19.0; http://www.mirbase.org/) using Blastall. The reads that aligned to the mature miRNA with a maximum of two mismatches were regarded as conserved miRNAs. To identify novel miRNAs, Mireap (http://sourceforge.net/projects/mireap) and RNAfold (http://rna.tbi.univie.ac.at/cgi-bin/RNAfold.cgi) were used to fold the flanking sequences of the mature miRNAs to predicted secondary structures. The criteria used to select the novel miRNAs were described by Meyers [58].

3.4. Analysis of the Differentially Expressed miRNAs under Pb Stress

To identify differentially expressed miRNAs in response to Pb stress, the abundances of the miRNAs in the two libraries were normalized to one million [normalized expression = (number of miRNA reads/total number of clean reads) × 1,000,000]. The normalized reads were used to calculate the miRNA expression levels and p-values [59]. MiRNAs with fold-changes >1 or <−1 and p-values < 0.05 were considered differentially expressed.

3.5. Identification of miRNA Targets with Degradome Sequencing

To predict the potential target mRNAs, two degradome libraries of P. acerifolia were constructed as described previously [26,27]. In brief, poly(A) RNA was extracted from the total RNA using a Oligotex mRNA mini kit (Qiagen, Shanghai, China) and an RNA adapter containing a 3' MmeI recognition site was ligated. The ligated products were reverse transcribed and amplified to obtain the PCR products, which were purified and digested with MmeI (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA). T4 DNA ligase (New England Biolabs) was used to ligate the digested products, and the PCR products were sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq™ 2000 system (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA).
After the initial processing, high quality 20–22 nt long sequences were selected for subsequent analysis. The unique sequences were aligned to the database of P. acerifolia sequences using SOAP software (http://soap.genomics.org.cn/) to define the coverage rate. Alignments with no more than five mismatches and with no mismatches between the 10th and 11th nucleotides were considered as potential targets. The CleaveLand pipeline [28] was used to find the miRNA targets. According to the abundance of sequences and cleavage sites on the transcript, the cleaved targets were classified into five categories: Category “0”, the most abundant tags are found at the cleavage site and only one maximum on the transcript; Category “1”, more than one tag at the cleavage site, the abundance of tags at the site is equal to the maximum, and there is more than one maximum on the transcript; Category “2”, more than one tag at the cleavage site and the abundance of tags at the site is higher than the median but less than the maximum for the transcript; Category “3”, more than one tag at the cleavage site and the abundance of tags at the site is equal or less than the median for the transcript; and Category “4”, only one tag at the cleavage site. The perfect matched sequences were kept and extended to approximately 35 nt by adding 15 nt of the upstream sequences. All the resulting reads (t-signature) were reverse complemented and mapped to the miRNAs identified in this study. T-plots were built according to the distribution of the t-signatures (and abundances) along the transcripts. The identified targets were subjected to BLASTX analysis and the best hits were used to assign GO annotations (http://www.geneontology.org/) to the targets. Furthermore, to assign pathways, the targets were searched against the KEGG database using Blastall with an E-value threshold of <10−5.

3.6. miRNA Verification by qRT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted using a Plant RNA Extraction Kit (Aidlab Biotechnologies Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) from seedlings soaked in 0, 3, 6, and 12 g·L−1 lead nitrate Pb(NO3)2 for 40 h (XLM-0, XLM-3, XLM-6 and XLM-12, respectively). Three biological replications were run for each sample. qRT-PCR was performed using a SuperScript III Platinum SYBR Green One-step qRT-PCR Fit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and CFX96 Real Time PCR system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The PCR program was run with the following cycles: 50 °C for 3 min; 95 °C for 5 min; then 40 cycles (95 °C for 15 s and 55 °C for 30 s); and 40 °C for 10 min. Technical repetitions were performed three times for each sample. U6 and 18S rRNA were the endogenous internal reference genes for the miRNAs and targets, respectively. The primers used for the qRT-PCR are listed in Table S5. The expression levels were calculated as described by Livak and Schmittgen [60].

4. Conclusions

In this study, 55 conserved miRNAs and 129 novel miRNAs were identified, and 104 target genes were detected in P. acerifolia. The expressions of some of these miRNAs and their corresponding targets varied under Pb stress, suggesting that Pb could trigger protective mechanisms involving miRNAs that helped enhance the plant’s tolerance to Pb toxicity. These observations contribute valuable information for understanding the gene regulatory frameworks in response to Pb phytotoxicity and provide further insights into the roles of miRNAs and their target genes in regulating P. acerifolia tolerance to Pb stress.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/16/04/7098/s1.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the special fund for forest scientific research in the public welfare (Project No. 201004022).

Author Contributions

Guoqiang Fan, Yuanlong Wang, Zhenli Zhao, Minjie Deng, Rongning Liu, Suyan Niu conceived and designed the experiments; Guoqiang Fan, Yuanlong Wang, Zhenli Zhao, Minjie Deng, Rongning Liu, Suyan Niu performed the experiments; Guoqiang Fan, Yuanlong Wang, Zhenli Zhao, Minjie Deng, Rongning Liu, Suyan Niu analyzed the data; Guoqiang Fan, Yuanlong Wang, Zhenli Zhao, Minjie Deng, Rongning Liu, Suyan Niu contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools; Yuanlong Wang, Guoqiang Fan contributed to the writing of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Slam, E.; Yang, X.; Li, T.; Liu, D.; Jin, X.; Meng, F. Effect of Pb toxicity on root morphology, physiology and ultrastructure in the two ecotypes of Elsholtzia argyi. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 147, 806–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Shu, X.; Yin, L.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, W. Effect of Pb toxicity on leaf growth, antioxidant enzyme activities, and photosynthesis in cuttings and seedlings of Jatropha curcas L. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2012, 19, 893–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kopittke, P.M.; Asher, C.J.; Kopittke, R.A.; Menzies, N.W. Toxic effects of Pb2+ on growth of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). Environ. Pollut. 2007, 150, 280–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Jiang, W.; Liu, D. Effects of Pb2+ on root growth, cell division, and nucleolus of Zea mays L. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2000, 65, 786–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Reichheld, J.P.; Vernoux, T.; Lardon, F.; van, M.M.; Inze, D. Specific checkpoints regulate plant cell cycle progression in response to oxidative stress. Plant J. 1999, 17, 647–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sengar, R.S.; Gautam, M.; Sengar, R.S.; Garg, S.K.; Sengar, K.; Chaudhary, R. Lead stress effects on physiobiochemical activities of higher plants. Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2008, 196, 73–93. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  7. Matsouka, I.; Beri, D.; Chinou, I.; Haralampidis, K.; Spyropoulos, C.G. Metals and selenium induce medicarpin accumulation and excretion from the roots of fenugreek seedlings: A potential detoxification mechanism. Plant Soil 2011, 150, 280–287. [Google Scholar]
  8. Besnard, G.; Tagmount, A.; Baradat, P.; Vigouroux, A.; Berville, A. Molecular approach of genetic affinities between wild and ornamental Platanus. Euphytica 2002, 126, 401–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, Y.M. Landscape Dendrology. China Forestry Press: Beijing, China, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  10. Fang, L.J.; Shi, J.S.; He, Z.X. A study on character variation of the P. occidentalis L. seed source at seedling stage. J. Nanjing For. Univ. 2003, 27, 44–46. [Google Scholar]
  11. Wang, A.X.; Fang, Y.M. Tissue distribution of 6 kinds of transport heavy metal pollutants in Platanus hispanica leaves and annual branches. Plant Res. 2011, 4, 478–488. [Google Scholar]
  12. Bartel, D.P. MicroRNAs: Target recognition and regulatory functions. Cell 2009, 136, 215–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Brodersen, P.; Sakvarelidze-Achard, L.; Bruun-Rasmussen, M.; Dunoyer, P.; Yamamoto, Y.Y.; Sieburth, L.; Voinnet, O. Widespread translational inhibition by plant miRNAs and siRNAs. Science 2008, 320, 1185–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bartel, D.P. MicroRNAs: Genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell 2004, 116, 281–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kurihara, Y.; Watanabe, Y. Arabidopsis micro-RNA biogenesis through Dicer-like 1 protein functions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 12753–12758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Baumberger, N.; Baulcombe, D.C. Arabidopsis ARGONAUTE1 is an RNA Slicer that selectively recruits microRNAs and short interfering RNAs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 11928–11933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Guo, H.S.; Xie, Q.; Fei, J.F.; Chua, N.H. MicroRNA directs mRNA cleavage of the transcription factor NAC1 to downregulate auxin signals for arabidopsis lateral root development. Plant Cell 2005, 17, 1376–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Floyd, S.K.; Bowman, J.L. Gene regulation: Ancient microRNA target sequences in plants. Nature 2004, 428, 485–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Rhoades, M.W.; Reinhart, B.J.; Lim, L.P.; Burge, C.B.; Bartel, B.; Bartel, D.P. Prediction of plant microRNA targets. Cell 2002, 110, 513–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Sunkar, R.; Kapoor, A.; Zhu, J.K. Posttranscriptional induction of two Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase genes in Arabidopsis is mediated by downregulation of miR398 and important for oxidative stress tolerance. Plant Cell 2006, 18, 2051–2065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Liu, Q.; Chen, Y.Q. Insights into the mechanism of plant development: Interactions of miRNAs pathway with phytohormone response. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2009, 384, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. He, Q.; Zhu, S.; Zhang, B. MicroRNA-target gene responses to lead-induced stress in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Funct. Integr. Genomics 2014, 14, 507–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Srivastava, S.; Srivastava, A.K.; Suprasanna, P.; D’Souza, S.F. Identification and profiling of arsenic stress-induced microRNAs in Brassica juncea. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 303–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Liu, Q.; Zhang, H. Molecular identification and analysis of arsenite stress-responsive miRNAs in rice. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 6524–6536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zhang, B.; Wang, Q.; Pan, X. MicroRNAs and their regulatory roles in animals and plants. J. Cell. Physiol. 2007, 210, 279–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Addo-Quaye, C.; Eshoo, T.W.; Bartel, D.P.; Axtell, M.J. Endogenous siRNA and miRNA targets identified by sequencing of the Arabidopsis degradome. Curr. Biol. 2008, 18, 758–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. German, M.A.; Pillay, M.; Jeong, D.H.; Hetawal, A.; Luo, S.; Janardhanan, P.; Kannan, V.; Rymarquis, L.A.; Nobuta, K.; German, R.; et al. Global identification of microRNA-target RNA pairs by parallel analysis of RNA ends. Nat. Biotechnol. 2008, 26, 941–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Addo-Quaye, C.; Miller, W.; Axtell, M.J. CleaveLand: A pipeline for using degradome data to find cleaved small RNA targets. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 130–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Morin, R.D.; O’Connor, M.D.; Griffith, M.; Kuchenbauer, F.; Delaney, A.; Prabhu, A.L.; Zhao, Y.; McDonald, H.; Zeng, T.; Hirst, M.; et al. Application of massively parallel sequencing to microRNA profiling and discovery in human embryonic stem cells. Genome Res. 2008, 18, 610–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Jones-Rhoades, M.W.; Bartel, D.P.; Bartel, B. MicroRNAS and their regulatory roles in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2006, 57, 19–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Ni, Z.; Hu, Z.; Jiang, Q.; Zhang, H. GmNFYA3, a target gene of miR169, is a positive regulator of plant tolerance to drought stress. Plant Mol. Biol. 2013, 82, 113–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Naya, L.; Paul, S.; Valdes-Lopez, O.; Mendoza-Soto, A.B.; Nova-Franco, B.; Sosa-Valencia, G.; Reyes, J.L.; Hernandez, G. Regulation of copper homeostasis and biotic interactions by microRNA 398b in common bean. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e84416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Fahlgren, N.; Jogdeo, S.; Kasschau, K.D.; Sullivan, C.M.; Chapman, E.J.; Laubinger, S.; Smith, L.M.; Dasenko, M.; Givan, S.A.; Weigel, D.; et al. MicroRNA gene evolution in Arabidopsis lyrata and Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 2010, 22, 1074–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Hou, R.; Bao, Z.; Wang, S.; Su, H.; Li, Y.; Du, H.; Hu, J.; Wang, S.; Hu, X. Transcriptome sequencing and de novo analysis for Yesso scallop (Patinopecten yessoensis) using 454 GS FLX. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e21560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Bhardwaj, J.; Chauhan, R.; Swarnkar, M.K.; Chahota, R.K.; Singh, A.K.; Shankar, R.; Yadav, S.K. Comprehensive transcriptomic study on horse gram (Macrotyloma uniflorum): De novo assembly, functional characterization and comparative analysis in relation to drought stress. BMC Genomics 2013, 14, 647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Wang, R.K.; Cao, Z.H.; Hao, Y.J. Overexpression of a R2R3 MYB gene MdSIMYB1 increases tolerance to multiple stresses in transgenic tobacco and apples. Physiol. Plant. 2014, 150, 76–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Tian, D.Q.; Pan, X.Y.; Yu, Y.M.; Wang, W.Y.; Zhang, F.; Ge, Y.Y.; Shen, X.L.; Shen, F.Q.; Liu, X.J. De novo characterization of the Anthurium transcriptome and analysis of its digital gene expression under cold stress. BMC Genomics 2013, 14, 827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Palmer, C.M.; Hindt, M.N.; Schmidt, H.; Clemens, S.; Guerinot, M.L. MYB10 and MYB72 are required for growth under iron-limiting conditions. PLoS Genet. 2013, 9, e1003953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Akagi, T.; Ikegami, A.; Yonemori, K. DkMyb2 wound-induced transcription factor of persimmon (Diospyros kaki Thunb.), contributes to proanthocyanidin regulation. Planta 2010, 232, 1045–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Yang, Z.B.; Eticha, D.; Albacete, A.; Rao, I.M.; Roitsch, T.; Horst, W.J. Physiological and molecular analysis of the interaction between aluminium toxicity and drought stress in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 3109–3125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Jiang, M.; Zhang, J. Effect of abscisic acid on active oxygen species, antioxidative defence system and oxidative damage in leaves of maize seedlings. Plant Cell Physiol. 2001, 42, 1265–1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Van der Biezen, E.A.; Jones, J.D. Plant disease-resistance proteins and the gene-for-gene concept. Trends Biochem. Sci 1998, 23, 454–456. [Google Scholar]
  43. Belkhadir, Y.; Subramaniam, R.; Dangl, J.L. Plant disease resistance protein signaling: NBS-LRR proteins and their partners. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2004, 7, 391–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Van der Biezen, E.A.; Jones, J.D.G. The NB-ARC domain: A novel signalling motif shared by plant resistance gene products and regulators of cell death in animals. Curr. Biol. 1998, 8, R226–R228. [Google Scholar]
  45. Shiu, S.H.; Bleecker, A.B. Receptor-like kinases from Arabidopsis form a monophyletic gene family related to animal receptor kinases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 10763–10768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Luan, M.; Xu, M.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, C.; Fan, Y.; Lang, Z.; Wang, L. Family-wide survey of miR169s and NF-YAs and their expression profiles response to abiotic stress in maize roots. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e91369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Radwan, O.; Liu, Y.; Clough, S.J. Transcriptional analysis of soybean root response to Fusarium virguliforme, the causal agent of sudden death syndrome. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2011, 24, 958–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Zhang, W.; Gao, S.; Zhou, X.; Chellappan, P.; Chen, Z.; Zhou, X.; Zhang, X.; Fromuth, N.; Coutino, G.; Coffey, M.; et al. Bacteria-responsive microRNAs regulate plant innate immunity by modulating plant hormone networks. Plant Mol. Biol. 2011, 75, 93–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Gielen, H.; Remans, T.; Vangronsveld, J.; Cuypers, A. MicroRNAs in metal stress: Specific roles or secondary responses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 13, 15826–15847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Noctor, G.; Foyer, C.H. Ascorbate and glutathione: Keeping active oxygen under control. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1998, 49, 249–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. May, M.J.; Vernoux, T.; Leaver, C.; van Montagu, M.; Inzé, D. Glutathione homeostasis in plants: Implications for environmental sensing and plant development. J. Exp. Bot. 1998, 49, 649–667. [Google Scholar]
  52. Adamis, P.D.; Gomes, D.S.; Pinto, M.L.; Panek, A.D.; Eleutherio, E.C. The role of glutathione transferases in cadmium stress. Toxicol. Lett. 2004, 154, 81–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Marrs, K.A. The functions and regulation of glutatione S-transferases in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1996, 47, 127–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Grill, E.; Mishra, S.; Srivastava, S.; Tripathi, R.D. Role of phytochelatins in phytoremediation of heavy metals. In Environmental Bioremediation Technologies; Singh, S., Tripathi, R., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2007; pp. 101–146. [Google Scholar]
  55. Mishra, S.; Tripathi, R.D.; Srivastava, S.; Dwivedi, S.; Trivedi, P.K.; Dhankher, O.P.; Khare, A. Thiol metabolism play significant role during cadmium detoxification by Ceratophyllum demersum L. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 2155–2161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Meyer, A.J. The integration of glutathione homeostasis and redox signaling. J. Plant Physiol. 2008, 165, 1390–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Mackowiak, S.D. Identification of novel and known miRNAs in deep-sequencing data with miRDeep2. Curr. Protoc. Bioinform. 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Meyers, B.C.; Axtell, M.J.; Bartel, B.; Bartel, D.P.; Baulcombe, D.; Bowman, J.L.; Cao, X.; Carrington, J.C.; Chen, X.; Green, P.J.; et al. Criteria for annotation of plant MicroRNAs. Plant Cell 2008, 20, 3186–3190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Audic, S.; Claverie, J.M. The significance of digital gene expression profiles. Genome Res. 1997, 7, 986–995. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  60. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−∆∆Ct Method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Deng, M.; Liu, R.; Niu, S.; Fan, G. Identification and Functional Analysis of MicroRNAs and Their Targets in Platanus acerifolia under Lead (Pb) Stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 7098-7111. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms16047098

AMA Style

Wang Y, Zhao Z, Deng M, Liu R, Niu S, Fan G. Identification and Functional Analysis of MicroRNAs and Their Targets in Platanus acerifolia under Lead (Pb) Stress. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2015; 16(4):7098-7111. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms16047098

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Yuanlong, Zhenli Zhao, Minjie Deng, Rongning Liu, Suyan Niu, and Guoqiang Fan. 2015. "Identification and Functional Analysis of MicroRNAs and Their Targets in Platanus acerifolia under Lead (Pb) Stress" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 16, no. 4: 7098-7111. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms16047098

APA Style

Wang, Y., Zhao, Z., Deng, M., Liu, R., Niu, S., & Fan, G. (2015). Identification and Functional Analysis of MicroRNAs and Their Targets in Platanus acerifolia under Lead (Pb) Stress. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 16(4), 7098-7111. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms16047098

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop