Next Article in Journal
Aquaporin Protein-Protein Interactions
Next Article in Special Issue
Gastric Cancer Cell Glycosylation as a Modulator of the ErbB2 Oncogenic Receptor
Previous Article in Journal
Development of A Chimeric Antigen Receptor Targeting C-Type Lectin-Like Molecule-1 for Human Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Previous Article in Special Issue
Kinases of eIF2a Switch Translation of mRNA Subset during Neuronal Plasticity
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 18
Issue 11
10.3390/ijms18112258
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Peptidylarginine Deiminase Inhibitor Cl-Amidine Suppresses Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase Expression in Dendritic Cells

by
Byungki Jang
1,
Akihito Ishigami
2,
Yong-Sun Kim
1,3 and
Eun-Kyoung Choi
1,4,*
1
Ilsong Institute of Life Science, Hallym University, Anyang, Gyeonggi-do 14066, Korea
2
Molecular Regulation of Aging, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology, Tokyo 173-0015, Japan
3
Department of Microbiology, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Gangwon-do 24252, Korea
4
Department of Biomedical Gerontology, Graduate School of Hallym University, Chuncheon, Gangwon-do 24252, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18(11), 2258; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18112258
Submission received: 7 September 2017 / Revised: 16 October 2017 / Accepted: 17 October 2017 / Published: 27 October 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Kinase Signal Transduction 2017)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The conversion of peptidylarginine into peptidylcitrulline by calcium-dependent peptidylarginine deiminases (PADs) has been implicated in the pathogenesis of a number of diseases, identifying PADs as therapeutic targets for various diseases. The PAD inhibitor Cl-amidine ameliorates the disease course, severity, and clinical manifestation in multiple disease models, and it also modulates dendritic cell (DC) functions such as cytokine production, antigen presentation, and T cell proliferation. The beneficial effects of Cl-amidine make it an attractive compound for PAD-targeting therapeutic strategies in inflammatory diseases. Here, we found that Cl-amidine inhibited nitric oxide (NO) generation in a time- and dose-dependent manner in maturing DCs activated by lipopolysaccharide (LPS). This suppression of NO generation was independent of changes in NO synthase (NOS) enzyme activity levels but was instead dependent on changes in inducible NO synthase (iNOS) transcription and expression levels. Several upstream signaling pathways for iNOS expression, including the mitogen-activated protein kinase, nuclear factor-κB p65 (NF-κB p65), and hypoxia-inducible factor 1 pathways, were not affected by Cl-amidine. By contrast, the LPS-induced signal transducer and the activator of transcription (STAT) phosphorylation and activator protein-1 (AP-1) transcriptional activities (c-Fos, JunD, and phosphorylated c-Jun) were decreased in Cl-amidine-treated DCs. Inhibition of Janus kinase/STAT signaling dramatically suppressed iNOS expression and NO production, whereas AP-1 inhibition had no effect. These results indicate that Cl-amidine-inhibited STAT activation may suppress iNOS expression. Additionally, we found mildly reduced cyclooxygenase-2 expression and prostaglandin E2 production in Cl-amidine-treated DCs. Our findings indicate that Cl-amidine acts as a novel suppressor of iNOS expression, suggesting that Cl-amidine has the potential to ameliorate the effects of excessive iNOS/NO-linked immune responses.

1. Introduction

Peptidylarginine deiminase (PAD) enzymes mediate the citrullination process—which involves the conversion of arginine to citrulline on a protein or peptide but not to free arginine—through the generation of an active site cleft via conformational changes in the presence of high calcium concentrations both in vivo and in vitro [1]. Five PAD (1–4 and 6) enzymes have been identified in humans and rodents and share 70–95% amino acid identity; the calcium binding sites show very high levels of conservation, with the exception of those of PAD6 [1,2].
Citrullination, a class of post-translational modifications, plays key roles in chromatin remodeling, gene transcription, conformational stability, the generation of autoantibodies to self-proteins, and neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation. Consequently, citrullination has been linked to autoimmune diseases, inflammatory diseases, cancer, and neurodegeneration [2,3,4,5]. For example, citrullination of myelin basic protein (MBP), a major protein in the myelin sheath, results in open confirmation, rapid degradation by proteases, and less compact protein-lipid interactions, which are associated with a disorganized myelin structure. Notably, citrullinated MBP accounts for 45% of the total MBP in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients and for more than 80% in fulminant MS patients, whereas 20% of MBP is citrullinated in healthy brain and other neurological disorders [2]. Therefore, citrullinated MBP has been suggested as a hallmark of central nervous system demyelination in MS. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is characterized by a chronic inflammation of synovial joints with high amounts of citrullinated proteins and infiltration of inflammatory cells, including PAD2/PAD4-expressing macrophages, neutrophils, and dendritic cells [2,6]. Citrullinated proteins are a source of autoantigens that are responsible for the production of anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs). ACPAs are detected in 60–80% of RA patients with a specificity of 85–99%; therefore, they are a useful diagnostic marker for RA. Moreover, immune complexes containing ACPA and citrullinated proteins stimulate a cytokine release, and glycosylation of ACPA leads to the differentiation of osteoclasts and bone loss [6,7].
A variety of PAD inhibitors have been shown to directly bind the enzyme active site. Currently, PAD inhibitors are widely studied as potential anti-cancer and anti-inflammatory drugs, and they can dramatically attenuate the disease course, severity, and clinical manifestations in many disease models, including collagen-induced arthritis [8], MS [9], colitis [10,11], atherosclerosis [12], lupus [13], kidney injury [14], hypoxic ischemia [15], and cancer [11,16]. The pan-PAD inhibitor Cl-amidine was designed to irreversibly inhibit PADs through covalent modification at the enzyme active site [17], and its therapeutic potential has been demonstrated in the aforementioned disease models. Recently, Cl-amidine was also shown to modulate dendritic cell (DC) functions, such as cytokine production, antigen presentation, and T-cell proliferation capacity, in vitro and in vivo [18].
In the present study, we found that Cl-amidine acts as a suppressor of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), leading to decreased NO (represented without a dot for the unpaired electron) production in DCs. NO is a gaseous free radical and is derived from free l-arginine catalyzed by the NOS family, which is divided into three types: calcium (Ca2+)-dependent constitutive neuronal NOS (nNOS), endothelial NOS (eNOS), and Ca2+-insensitive iNOS. Constitutive NOS induces low levels of NO, whereas iNOS produces high levels of NO for prolonged periods of time. The expression of iNOS primarily depends on pro-inflammatory molecules (signals) and pathogens, and this enzyme is therefore generally associated with the immune system [19,20]. NO modulates a number of physiological and pathophysiological processes, including inflammation, neurotransmission, platelet aggregation, vascular relaxation, and defense against pathogens [19,21]. Therefore, iNOS and NO have been linked to many inflammatory diseases, including cardiovascular diseases, septic shock, asthma, RA, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [21,22,23]. For these reasons, selective inhibition of iNOS is a promising approach for the treatment of various inflammatory diseases.
Our findings suggest that the suppression of NO generation underlies the therapeutic effects of Cl-amidine in a number of diseases, and that Cl-amidine may have therapeutic benefits for the treatment of iNOS/NO-associated disorders.

2. Results

2.1. Cl-Amidine Suppresses NO Generation in Lipopolysaccharide-Stimulated Dendritic Cells

During LPS-induced DC maturation, we determined NO levels in the absence or presence of Cl-amidine. In DCs treated with Cl-amidine (50, 100, or 200 μM), LPS-induced NO production was significantly reduced by up to 30%, 60%, and 85%, respectively (Figure 1A). The pan-NOS inhibitor NG-methyl-l-arginine (l-NMMA) was used as a positive control and completely inhibited NO production. We also found that the decreased NO production induced by Cl-amidine occurs at an early time point (6 h) and in a time-dependent manner (Figure 1B). These results suggest that Cl-amidine acts as a suppressor of NO production.

2.2. NOS Activity Is not Inhibited by Cl-Amidine

Next, we determined whether the decreased NO production we observed was caused by Cl-amidine-induced inhibition of NOS activity. Recombinant NOS enzymes (iNOS, eNOS, and nNOS) were pretreated with Cl-amidine, and we then measured NOS activity. As shown in Figure 2, Cl-amidine had no effect on the enzymatic activity of any NOS enzymes we tested. These results indicate that the inhibition of NO production by Cl-amidine likely occurs through the misregulation of an upstream signaling pathway for NO production.

2.3. Cl-Amidine Suppresses iNOS Expression

In DCs, iNOS is responsible for NO production. Therefore, we measured iNOS expression during DC maturation induced by LPS in the absence or presence of Cl-amidine. In the DCs that were treated with 50 μM, 100 μM, and 200 μM of Cl-amidine, LPS-induced iNOS expression was markedly suppressed by ~30%, 60%, and 80%, respectively (Figure 3A), in a dose-dependent manner. To confirm whether decreased iNOS expression was due to the cell death, we analyzed cell viability using Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) staining. No significant decrease in viability was observed in our experimental conditions (Figure 3B). Similar to our NO production results, iNOS expression was suppressed at an early time point (6 h) by Cl-amidine (Figure 3C). These results indicate that the down-regulation of NO production by Cl-amidine treatment is caused by suppression of iNOS expression.
Next, we used RT-PCR to investigate whether Cl-amidine affects the production of iNOS mRNA transcripts. As shown in Figure 3D, Cl-amidine affected transcription of the iNOS gene at an early time point (3 h). Taken together, these findings suggest that the pan-PAD inhibitor Cl-amidine is a candidate for suppression of iNOS.

2.4. Cl-Amidine Does not Affect Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases (MAPKs), Nuclear Factor-κB p65 (NF-κB p65) Signaling, or Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1α (HIF-1α) Expression but Instead Attenuates STAT Activation

The expression of iNOS is regulated by multiple upstream signaling pathways, including MAPK, NF-κB, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), STAT-1, and AP-1 [23,24,25]. To determine whether the MAPK, NF-κB, or PI3K pathways are involved in NO generation, we first assessed NO production after exposure to SB203580 (a p38 inhibitor), U0126 (an MAPK/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)1/2 inhibitor), SP600125 [a C-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) inhibitor], BAY 11-7085 (an NF-κB, IκBα inhibitor), and PI-103 (a PI3K inhibitor). NO generation was significantly attenuated by the p38, JNK, NF-κB, and PI3K inhibitors (~47%, ~22%, ~60%, and ~18%, respectively), whereas the inhibitor U0126 enhanced NO generation (Figure 4A). Unchanged MAPK phosphorylation, nuclear translocation of NF-κB p65 and phosphorylation of IκBα by Cl-amidine have been reported previously [18]. Here, we confirmed that Cl-amidine had no effect on the phosphorylation of MAPKs or NF-κB p65 (Figure 4B). Next, we examined whether Cl-amidine affects the DNA binding activity of NF-κB p65. Enhanced DNA binding activity of NF-κB p65 by LPS was not changed by Cl-amidine treatment (Figure 4C). Hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) can stimulate iNOS expression, but its expression was also unchanged (Figure 4D). Interestingly, LPS-induced STAT1, STAT2, and STAT3 phosphorylation was decreased by Cl-amidine treatment for 2 h and/or 4 h (Figure 4D). Next, we confirmed that the JAK and STAT inhibitors effectively down-regulated iNOS expression. The JAK inhibitor tofacitinib and STAT inhibitor niclosamide dramatically decreased LPS-induced NO production and iNOS expression (Figure 4E,F). These results indicate that decreased STAT phosphorylation by Cl-amidine preferentially suppressed iNOS expression, resulting in reduced production of NO in DCs.

2.5. Cl-Amidine Impairs AP-1 Family Member Activity

Next, we examined whether Cl-amidine can affect the activity of the AP-1 family, a candidate regulatory factor for iNOS expression. When AP-1 dimers are activated, they bind to a specific double-stranded DNA sequence containing the TPA-responsive element (5′-TGAGTCA-3′), and this AP-1 family activity also regulates iNOS expression [24]. Therefore, we examined whether Cl-amidine regulates LPS-induced activation of AP-1 using nuclear extract. As shown in Figure 5, the expression levels of the LPS-induced AP-1 family members (c-Fos, JunD, p-c-Jun, and JunB) were significantly decreased by Cl-amidine treatment.
In addition, we determined whether the inhibition of AP-1 activity can decrease NO production and iNOS expression. As shown in Figure 5B, treatment with the AP-1 inhibitor T-5224 (20 μM) slightly inhibited NO production (~11%) but not iNOS expression. Moreover, the other AP-1 inhibitor, SR113201, had no effect on NO production. These results indicate that AP-1 activity may not be involved in the regulation of iNOS expression in LPS-activated DCs.

2.6. Ineffective Regulation of Cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) Expression and Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) Production due to Cl-Amidine Treatment

PGE2 is a major inflammatory mediator along with NO and is derived from cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2). Inflammatory stimuli elicit the synthesis of iNOS and COX-2 proteins over similar time courses, and these two proteins also interact [26,27,28]. To investigate whether Cl-amidine affects COX-2 expression and PGE2 production, we measured COX-2 expression by Western blotting with an anti-COX-2 antibody and PGE2 levels using ELISA in LPS-stimulated DCs in the absence or presence of Cl-amidine. Expression of the COX-2 protein was down-regulated by ~20% in the presence of Cl-amidine treatment compared with the LPS alone treatment (Figure 6A,B), concomitant with a similar reduction in PGE2 formation (Figure 6C). This result indicates that Cl-amidine also exerts a mild effect on COX-2 induction and PGE2 production.

3. Discussion

Recently, PAD enzymes and protein citrullination have been reported to possess a variety of physiological activities, such as tumorigenesis, bactericidal effects, and immunomodulatory effects [5,18,29], suggesting that the inhibition of PAD is a potential therapeutic strategy for the treatment of various disease models. Indeed, the PAD inhibitor Cl-amidine abrogates citrullinated, histone-linked NET formation in vitro and in vivo [3,13], enhances p53-targeted gene expression [5], and regulates the function of immune cells such as T cells and DCs [18]. In the present study, we found that Cl-amidine acts as a potential inhibitor for NO production and iNOS expression (Figure 1 and Figure 3). NO is involved in NET activity, autoimmune diseases, and inflammatory diseases [23,30,31,32,33]. Therefore, it is also possible that the suppression of NO production by Cl-amidine, as described here, might attenuate NO/iNOS-involved disease phenotypes.
NETs have roles in many infectious and noninfectious diseases, including lupus, RA, and cancer [34,35]. NETs are highly decondensed chromatin structures containing histones, protease, and extracellular DNA, which can result in suicidal NETosis or vital NETosis [29,34,35]. The generation of NETs primarily protects the host from infection, but reducing NETs protects against tissue injury [34,36]. PAD4 deficiency and Cl-amidine treatment block NET formation and its release [29,37]. Moreover, exogenous NO promotes NET release, which is blocked by the reactive oxygen species scavenger N-acetyl cysteine [38]. In addition, NO is produced during NET release, and the iNOS inhibitor l-NG-nitroarginine methyl ester (l-NAME) reduces NET formation [39,40]. Therefore, we hypothesized that reduced NET formation by Cl-amidine treatment not only blocked histone citrullination but also inhibited NO generation by suppressing iNOS expression. In other words, reduced disease activity by Cl-amidine treatment may be attributed to PAD inactivation with reduced NO generation in a number of diseases, such as lupus, MS, and RA [41].
The expression of iNOS is regulated by multiple upstream signaling pathways in mouse macrophages and DCs, including MAPK, NF-κB, STAT, PI3K, HIF-1α, and the AP1 family [23,24,25]. The inhibition of the MAPK, NF-κB p65, and PI3K signaling pathways inhibited NO production (Figure 4A). The p38 (SB203580) and NF-κB p65 (BAY 11-7085) inhibitors suppressed ~50% of NO production compared with controls. The JNK and PI3K inhibitors were less effective, reducing NO production by ~22% and ~18%, respectively. Both a PI3K deficiency and a PI3K inhibitor impaired NO generation in peritoneal macrophages [42]. By contrast, it was found that two PI3K inhibitors, wortmannin and LY294002, actually increased iNOS and NO production in RAW264.7 macrophages [43]. This discrepancy may have been due to the different types of cells used in each set of experiments. Altogether, our observations indicate that multiple signaling pathways are involved in NO generation in DCs. Interestingly, the ERK inhibitor U0126 enhanced NO production (Figure 4A). U126 was previously shown to enhance NO production in RAW264.7 macrophages [44]. Therefore, ERK may negatively regulate NO production in LPS-stimulated DCs. Because Cl-amidine had no effect on MAPK and NF-κB p65 signaling pathways (Figure 4B) and the DNA-binding activity of NF-κB p65 (Figure 4C), these signaling pathways are not likely associated with Cl-amidine-mediated iNOS suppression, although the MAPK and NF-κB p65 signaling pathways are involved in the regulation of iNOS expression.
The PAD inhibitor BB-Cl-amidine {N-[(1S)-1-(1H-benzimidazol-2-yl)-4-[(2-chloro-1-iminoethyl)amino]butyl]-[1,1′-biphenyl]-4-carboxamide} inhibited LPS-induced expression of interleukin (IL)-1β and tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) by preventing nuclear translocation of NF-κB p65 in neutrophils [45]. Interestingly, citrullination of NF-κB p65 by LPS-mediated PAD4 enzyme activity enhanced its interaction with importin α3 and nuclear translocation. Similarly, PAD4 promoted nuclear translocation of NF-κB p65 in renal proximal tubules [46]. By contrast, Cl-amidine had no impact on LPS-induced phosphorylation and DNA binding activity of NF-κB p65 (Figure 4B,C) and degradation of IκBα in DCs, although Cl-amidine inhibits LPS-induced cytokine production of IL-1β, TNFα, and IL-12p70 [18]. Because PAD activity is effectively inhibited by both BB-Cl-amidine and Cl-amidine, we hypothesized that PAD-targeted proteins and their function are different in each cell type, i.e., histone H3 citrullination is involved in NET formation in neutrophils and regulates gene expression in cancer cells [3,5,13]. Moreover, LPS promotes citrullination [18], and histone H3 is predominantly citrullinated in DCs. It is still unclear whether histone H3 citrullination is important during DC maturation, including gene expression, which should be further investigated in detail.
JAK/STAT were implicated in NO generation in a variety of cells [47,48,49]. As JAK undergoes transphosphorylation and, subsequently, phosphorylate STATs, activated STAT proteins dimerize and translocate into the nucleus, where they activate or repress target gene promoters [50]. In this study, Cl-amidine down-regulated STAT phosphorylation (Figure 4D). Involvement of STAT signaling in iNOS expression was also confirmed by treatment with the JAK inhibitor tofacitinib and the STAT inhibitor niclosamide (Figure 4E,F). Although AP-1 activity, a potential regulator for iNOS expression, was significantly decreased by Cl-amidine, both iNOS expression and NO production in DCs were not affected by AP-1 inhibition (T-5224) (Figure 5). Therefore, Cl-amidine-mediated suppression of iNOS expression may be due to the suppression of STAT phosphorylation but not the MAPK, NF-κB, HIF-1α, and AP-1 signaling pathways.
Inflammatory stimuli elicit both NO and PGE2 production through the induction of iNOS and COX-2 over similar time courses. More specifically, NO enhances PGE2 production through S-nitrosylation of COX-2 [28]. Our data showed that LPS-induced COX-2 expression and PGE2 production still maintained ~80% of their normal expression levels by Cl-amidine (Figure 6). Therefore, our results indicate that Cl-amidine selectively inhibits iNOS induction rather than COX-2 induction signaling. It is possible that a combination of Cl-amidine with a COX-2 inhibitor may have synergistic therapeutic benefits in inflammatory diseases.
Physiologically, NO attacks the thiol groups of cysteines on proteins, forms S-nitrosothiols, and reacts with superoxide anions radical (O2−) to generate peroxynitrite (ONOO−), which can modify proteins (e.g., tyrosine nitration) [23]. These modifications are involved in a number of disease models and cellular processes, such as signal transduction and apoptosis [51,52]. Furthermore, ONOO− secreted from DCs can kill tumor cells [53]. Therefore, further studies are needed to determine whether Cl-amidine can reduce S-nitrosothiol levels and nitration formation and modulate associated signaling pathways.
In this study, we determined that Cl-amidine inhibits NO generation by suppressing iNOS transcription in DCs. It is also possible that Cl-amidine may have effects on iNOS expression in other cell types, including macrophages. Indeed, Witalison et al. showed that Cl-amidine suppressed iNOS induction in mouse macrophages [54]. NO also plays an important role in epithelial cells and endothelial cells, and further studies will be needed to determine whether Cl-amidine has an effect on these cell types.
In summary, iNOS expression and NO production are reduced in DCs by the PAD inhibitor Cl-amidine through the repression of STAT activities. We hypothesized that Cl-amidine may downregulate NO production via modulation of iNOS expression in the other cell types, including macrophages. Taken together, these findings indicate that Cl-amidine could improve excessive NO-mediated inflammatory responses and damage in certain disease states. Therefore, PAD inhibitors should be further examined to determine whether they have potential therapeutic effect on the disease(s) associated with iNOS activity and/or NO production.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Chemicals and Reagents

Cl-amidine (Calbiochem, Darmstadt, Germany), the TLR4 agonist lipopolysaccharide (ultrapure LPS; Invivogen, San Diego, CA, USA), SB203580, U0126, SP600125, BAY 11-7085, PI-103 (Adooq, Irvine, CA, USA), Tofacitinib, niclosamide (Tocris, Bristol, UK), and T-5224 (APExBIO, Houston, TX, USA) were purchased commercially. Unless otherwise stated, all chemicals and reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Ten or twenty millimoles stock solution of Cl-amidine was dissolved in phosphate buffer solution (PBS), and other inhibitors were dissolved in DMSO. PBS or DMSO were used as vehicle controls in each experiment.

4.2. Cell Culture

C57BL/6 female mice (6–8 weeks of age) were purchased commercially (Orient bio, Seongnam, Korea). Animal experiments and research protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Hallym University (HMC2015-0-1130-16; 23 December 2015). DCs were cultured as described previously [16]. Briefly, bone marrow cells from the femurs and tibiae of C57BL/6 female mice (6–8 weeks) were cultured in RPMI-1640 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (Biowest, Riverside, MO, USA), 10 mM HEPES buffer (pH 7.4, Sigma-Aldrich), 2 mM l-alanyl-l-glutamine dipeptide (Sigma-Aldrich), 50 μM 2-mercaptoethanol, MEM non-essential complements (Sigma-Aldrich), 20 ng/mL recombinant mouse granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (JW CreaGene, Seongnam, Korea), 0.5 ng/mL interleukin (IL)-4 (JW CreaGene), 100 units/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 incubator. Fresh medium was added on days 4 and 7, and all experiments were performed after 8 days of culture. The samples had more than 80% CD11c+ cells, as determined by flow cytometry.

4.3. NO Detection and NOS Activity

The culture medium was obtained from LPS (0.1 μg/mL)- or vehicle-stimulated DCs (5 × 105 or 1 × 106 cells) in the absence or presence of Cl-amidine (50–200 μM). The levels of NO in the culture medium were measured by ELISA according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Intron Biotechnology, Seongnam, Korea). To assay NOS activity, recombinant NOS (180 ng iNOS; 210 ng eNOS; 420 ng nNOS; Enzo Life Sciences, New York, NY, USA) was incubated with or without Cl-amidine (200 μM) for 1 h, and then activity was measured for 1 h by ELISA, according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Biovision, Milpitas, CA, USA).

4.4. Western Blotting Analysis

C57BL/6 DCs were lysed in PRO-PREP lysis buffer (Intron Biotechnology), and protein concentrations were measured using the Bicinchoninic Acid Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Samples (40–50 μg) were loaded into sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide electrophoresis gels and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Merck-Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). Rabbit monoclonal anti-phospho-p38 (1:1000), rabbit monoclonal anti-phospho-ERK (1:1000), rabbit monoclonal anti-phospho-JNK (1:1000), rabbit monoclonal anti-phospho-NF-κB p65 (1:1000), rabbit monoclonal anti-phospho-STAT1 (1:1000), rabbit monoclonal anti-phospho-STAT3 (1:1000), rabbit monoclonal anti-STAT1 (1:2000), rabbit monoclonal anti-STAT2 (1:2000), rabbit monoclonal anti-STAT3 (1:2000) (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA), and rabbit polyclonal anti-phospho-STAT2 antibodies (Merck-Millipore; 1:1000) were purchased and used in the Western blotting experiments. Mouse monoclonal anti-HIF-1α (1:1000; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), mouse monoclonal anti-β-actin (1:10,000; Sigma-Aldrich), mouse monoclonal anti-GAPDH (1:10,000; BETHYL, Montgomery, TX, USA), rabbit polyclonal anti-iNOS (1:1000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), and goat polyclonal anti-COX-2 (1:1000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) antibodies were used in the Western blotting experiments. The primary antibodies were detected with appropriate horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse, rabbit anti-goat, or goat anti-rabbit secondary antibodies (1:5000; Cell Signaling or Merck-Millipore). Chemiluminescent signals were detected on X-ray film (Agfa HealthCare, Mortsel, Belgium) using ECL Western blotting detection reagents (ATTO, Tokyo, Japan).

4.5. Semi-Quantitative Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR)

DCs were stimulated with LPS (0.1 μg/mL) with or without Cl-amidine (200 μM) for the indicated times, and then total RNA was extracted using the Ribospin RNA extraction kit following the manufacturer’s instructions (GeneAll, Seoul, Korea). The cDNA synthesis was performed with AMV reverse transcriptase (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) according to the instructions of the manufacturer. RT-PCR was performed using primers specific to the iNOS (600 bp; forward, 5′-GGTATGCTGTGTTTGGCCTT-3′ and reverse, 5′-GCAGCCTCTTGTCTTTGACC-3′) and GAPDH (200 bp; forward, 5′-TGGTATCGTGGAAGGACTCATGAC-3′ and reverse, and 5′-ATGCCAGTGAGCTTCCCGTTCAGC-3′) genes with GoTaq DNA polymerase, according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Promega). The resulting RT-PCR products were separated by gel electrophoresis on a 1.0% agarose gel with the SafeView nucleic acid gel stain (ABM, Richmond, BC, Canada) and then visualized using UV light.

4.6. NF-κB p65 Transcription Factor Activity Assay

DCs (8 × 106 cells) were stimulated with LPS (0.1 μg/mL), with or without Cl-amidine (200 μM), for 1 h, and then cell lysates (20 μg) were assessed with the NF-κB p65 Transcription Factor Assay Kit, following the manufacturer’s instructions (Abcam).

4.7. Activator Protein-1 (AP-1) Transcription Activity Assay

DCs (1 × 107 cells) were stimulated with LPS (0.1 μg/mL), with or without Cl-amidine (200 μM), for 1 h, and then nuclear proteins were isolated using the Nuclear Extraction Kit, following the manufacturer’s instructions (Abcam). To determine AP-1 family member activity, ten micrograms of total nuclear protein used with the AP-1 Transcription Factor Assay Kit, according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Abcam).

4.8. Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) Assay

LPS (0.1 μg/mL)-treated or -untreated DCs (1 × 105 cells) were cultured in the absence or presence of Cl-amidine (50, 100, or 200 μM) for 24 h. PGE2 production was measured by ELISA, according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Enzo Life Sciences, Farmingdale, NY, USA).

4.9. Statistical Analysis

All data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) values. The probability of statistically significant differences between experimental groups was assessed by a two-sample t test or by one-way analysis of variance.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2013R1A1A2009822 and NRF-2015R1D1A1A01059584), and by a grant of the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (HI16C0965).

Author Contributions

Byungki Jang designed the study, performed the experiments, and analyzed the data. Akihito Ishigami, Yong-Sun Kim, and Eun-Kyoung Choi discussed the data and read the manuscript. Byungki Jang and Eun-Kyoung Choi supervised the study and wrote the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

PADPepitylarginine deiminase
iNOSInducible nitric oxide synthase
DCDendritic cell
LPSLipopolysaccharide
AP-1Activator protein 1
MAPKMitogen-activated protein kinases
HIF-1Hypoxia-inducible factor 1
NF-κB p65Nuclear factor-kappaB p65
PI3KPhosphatidylinositol 3-kinase
JNKC-Jun N-terminal kinase
ILInterleukin
COX-2Cyclooxygenase 2
PGE2Prostaglandin E2
JAKJanus kinase
STATSignal transducer and activator of transcription

References

  1. Arita, K.; Hashimoto, H.; Shimizu, T.; Nakashima, K.; Yamada, M.; Sato, M. Structural basis for Ca2+-induced activation of human PAD4. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2004, 11, 777–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Vossenaar, E.R.; Zendman, A.J.; van Venrooij, W.J.; Pruijn, G.J. PAD, a growing family of citrullinating enzymes: Genes, features and involvement in disease. Bioessays 2003, 25, 1106–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Wang, Y.; Li, M.; Stadler, S.; Correll, S.; Li, P.; Wang, D.; Hayama, R.; Leonelli, L.; Han, H.; Grigoryev, S.A.; et al. Histone hypercitrullination mediates chromatin decondensation and neutrophil extracellular trap formation. J. Cell Biol. 2009, 184, 205–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Jang, B.; Ishigami, A.; Maruyama, N.; Carp, R.I.; Kim, Y.S.; Choi, E.K. Peptidylarginine deiminase and protein citrullination in prion diseases: Strong evidence of neurodegeneration. Prion 2013, 7, 42–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Witalison, E.E.; Thompson, P.R.; Hofseth, L.J. Protein Arginine Deiminases and Associated Citrullination: Physiological Functions and Diseases Associated with Dysregulation. Curr. Drug Targets 2015, 16, 700–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Conigliaro, P.; Chimenti, M.S.; Triggianese, P.; Sunzini, F.; Novelli, L.; Perricone, C.; Perricone, R. Autoantibodies in inflammatory arthritis. Autoimmun. Rev. 2016, 15, 673–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Derksen, V.F.A.M.; Huizinga, T.W.J.; van der Woude, D. The role of autoantibodies in the pathophysiology of rheumatoid arthritis. Semin. Immunopathol. 2017, 39, 437–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Willis, V.C.; Gizinski, A.M.; Banda, N.K.; Causey, C.P.; Knuckley, B.; Cordova, K.N.; Luo, Y.; Levitt, B.; Glogowska, M.; Chandra, P.; et al. N-α-benzoyl-N5-(2-chloro-1-iminoethyl)-l-ornithine amide, a protein arginine deiminase inhibitor, reduces the severity of murine collagen-induced arthritis. J. Immunol. 2011, 186, 4396–4404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Moscarello, M.A.; Lei, H.; Mastronardi, F.G.; Winer, S.; Tsui, H.; Li, Z.; Ackerley, C.; Zhang, L.; Raijmakers, R.; Wood, D.D. Inhibition of peptidyl-arginine deiminases reverses protein-hypercitrullination and disease in mouse models of multiple sclerosis. Dis. Model. Mech. 2013, 6, 467–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Chumanevich, A.A.; Causey, C.P.; Knuckley, B.A.; Jones, J.E.; Poudyal, D.; Chumanevich, A.P.; Davis, T.; Matesic, L.E.; Thompson, P.R.; Hofseth, L.J. Suppression of colitis in mice by Cl-amidine: A novel peptidylarginine deiminase inhibitor. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2011, 300, G929–G938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Witalison, E.E.; Cui, X.; Causey, C.P.; Thompson, P.R.; Hofseth, L.J. Molecular targeting of protein arginine deiminases to suppress colitis and prevent colon cancer. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 36053–36062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Knight, J.S.; Luo, W.; O’Dell, A.A.; Yalavarthi, S.; Zhao, W.; Subramanian, V.; Guo, C.; Grenn, R.C.; Thompson, P.R.; Eitzman, D.T.; et al. Peptidylarginine deiminase inhibition reduces vascular damage and modulates innate immune responses in murine models of atherosclerosis. Circ. Res. 2014, 114, 947–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Knight, J.S.; Zhao, W.; Luo, W.; Subramanian, V.; O’Dell, A.A.; Yalavarthi, S.; Hodgin, J.B.; Eitzman, D.T.; Thompson, P.R.; Kaplan, M.J. Peptidylarginine deiminase inhibition is immunomodulatory and vasculoprotective in murine lupus. J. Clin. Investig. 2013, 123, 2981–2993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ham, A.; Rabadi, M.; Kim, M.; Brown, K.M.; Ma, Z.; D’Agati, V.; Lee, H.T. Peptidyl arginine deiminase-4 activation exacerbates kidney ischemia-reperfusion injury. Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. 2014, 307, F1052–F1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Lange, S.; Rocha-Ferreira, E.; Thei, L.; Mawjee, P.; Bennett, K.; Thompson, P.R.; Subramanian, V.; Nicholas, A.P.; Peebles, D.; Hristova, M.; et al. Peptidylarginine deiminases: Novel drug targets for prevention of neuronal damage following hypoxic ischemic insult (HI) in neonates. J. Neurochem. 2014, 130, 555–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Wang, Y.; Li, P.; Wang, S.; Hu, J.; Chen, X.A.; Wu, J.; Fisher, M.; Oshaben, K.; Zhao, N.; Gu, Y.; et al. Anticancer peptidylarginine deiminase (PAD) inhibitors regulate the autophagy flux and the mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 activity. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 25941–25953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Luo, Y.; Arita, K.; Bhatia, M.; Knuckley, B.; Lee, Y.H.; Stallcup, M.R.; Sato, M.; Thompson, P.R. Inhibitors and inactivators of protein arginine deiminase 4: Functional and structural characterization. Biochemistry 2006, 45, 11727–11736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Jang, B.; Kim, H.W.; Kim, J.S.; Kim, W.S.; Lee, B.R.; Kim, S.; Kim, H.; Han, S.J.; Ha, S.J.; Shin, S.J. Peptidylarginine deiminase inhibition impairs Toll-like receptor agonist-induced functional maturation of dendritic cells, resulting in the loss of T cell-proliferative capacity: A partial mechanism with therapeutic potential in inflammatory settings. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2015, 97, 351–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Corinti, S.; Pastore, S.; Mascia, F.; Girolomoni, G. Regulatory role of nitric oxide on monocyte-derived dendritic cell functions. J. Interferon Cytokine Res. 2003, 23, 423–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Wink, D.A.; Hines, H.B.; Cheng, R.Y.; Switzer, C.H.; Flores-Santana, W.; Vitek, M.P.; Ridnour, L.A.; Colton, C.A. Nitric oxide and redox mechanisms in the immune response. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2011, 89, 873–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Nagy, G.; Clark, J.M.; Buzás, E.I.; Gorman, C.L.; Cope, A.P. Nitric oxide, chronic inflammation and autoimmunity. Immunol. Lett. 2007, 111, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Rochette, L.; Lorin, J.; Zeller, M.; Guilland, J.C.; Lorgis, L.; Cottin, Y.; Vergely, C. Nitric oxide synthase inhibition and oxidative stress in cardiovascular diseases: Possible therapeutic targets? Pharmacol. Ther. 2013, 140, 239–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Bogdan, C. Nitric oxide synthase in innate and adaptive immunity: An update. Trends Immunol. 2015, 36, 161–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kleinert, H.; Pautz, A.; Linker, K.; Schwarz, P.M. Regulation of the expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2004, 500, 255–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Sakai, K.; Suzuki, H.; Oda, H.; Akaike, T.; Azuma, Y.; Murakami, T.; Sugi, K.; Ito, T.; Ichinose, H.; Koyasu, S.; et al. Phosphoinositide 3-kinase in nitric oxide synthesis in macrophage: Critical dimerization of inducible nitric-oxide synthase. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 17736–17742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Misko, T.P.; Trotter, J.L.; Cross, A.H. Mediation of inflammation by encephalitogenic cells: Interferon gamma induction of nitric oxide synthase and cyclooxygenase 2. J. Neuroimmunol. 1995, 61, 195–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Appleton, I.; Tomlinson, A.; Willoughby, D.A. Induction of cyclo-oxygenase and nitric oxide synthase in inflammation. Adv. Pharmacol. 1996, 35, 27–78. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  28. Kim, S.F.; Huri, D.A.; Snyder, S.H. Inducible nitric oxide synthase binds, S-nitrosylates, and activates cyclooxygenase-2. Science 2005, 310, 1966–1970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Li, P.; Li, M.; Lindberg, M.R.; Kennett, M.J.; Xiong, N.; Wang, Y. PAD4 is essential for antibacterial innate immunity mediated by neutrophil extracellular traps. J. Exp. Med. 2010, 207, 1853–1862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Farrell, A.J.; Blake, D.R.; Palmer, R.M.; Moncada, S. Increased concentrations of nitrite in synovial fluid and serum samples suggest increased nitric oxide synthesis in rheumatic diseases. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 1992, 51, 1219–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Keshari, R.S.; Jyoti, A.; Kumar, S.; Dubey, M.; Verma, A.; Srinag, B.S.; Krishnamurthy, H.; Barthwal, M.K.; Dikshit, M. Neutrophil extracellular traps contain mitochondrial as well as nuclear DNA and exhibit inflammatory potential. Cytometry 2012, 81, 238–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Benchabane, S.; Boudjelida, A.; Toumi, R.; Belguendouz, H.; Youinou, P.; Touil-Boukoffa, C. A case for IL-6, IL-17A, and nitric oxide in the pathophysiology of Sjögren’s syndrome. Int. J. Immunopathol. Pharmacol. 2016, 29, 386–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Nagy, G.; Koncz, A.; Telarico, T.; Fernandez, D.; Ersek, B.; Buzás, E.; Perl, A. Central role of nitric oxide in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2010, 12, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Jorch, S.K.; Kubes, P. An emerging role for neutrophil extracellular traps in noninfectious disease. Nat. Med. 2017, 23, 279–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Papayannopoulos, V. Neutrophil extracellular traps in immunity and disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Liu, F.C.; Chuang, Y.H.; Tsai, Y.F.; Yu, H.P. Role of neutrophil extracellular traps following injury. Shock 2014, 41, 491–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Kusunoki, Y.; Nakazawa, D.; Shida, H.; Hattanda, F.; Miyoshi, A.; Masuda, S.; Nishio, S.; Tomaru, U.; Atsumi, T.; Ishizu, A. Peptidylarginine Deiminase Inhibitor Suppresses Neutrophil Extracellular Trap Formation and MPO-ANCA Production. Front. Immunol. 2016, 7, 227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Patel, S.; Kumar, S.; Jyoti, A.; Srinag, B.S.; Keshari, R.S.; Saluja, R.; Verma, A.; Mitra, K.; Barthwal, M.K.; Krishnamurthy, H.; et al. Nitric oxide donors release extracellular traps from human neutrophils by augmenting free radical generation. Nitric Oxide 2010, 22, 226–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Lim, M.B.; Kuiper, J.W.; Katchky, A.; Goldberg, H.; Glogauer, M. Rac2 is required for the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2011, 90, 771–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Zhao, M.L.; Chi, H.; Sun, L. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps of Cynoglossus semilaevis: Production Characteristics and Antibacterial Effect. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Konig, M.F.; Andrade, F. A Critical Reappraisal of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps and NETosis Mimics Based on Differential Requirements for Protein Citrullination. Front. Immunol. 2016, 7, 461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Xia, X.; Hu, X.; Xu, H.; Wu, L.; Dai, Y.; Yang, L.; Xu, Z. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor suppresses inducible nitric oxide synthase expression in bronchiole epithelial cells in asthmatic rats. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2012, 359, 293–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Díaz-Guerra, M.J.; Castrillo, A.; Martín-Sanz, P.; Boscá, L. Negative regulation by phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase of inducible nitric oxide synthase expression in macrophages. J. Immunol. 1999, 162, 6184–6190. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  44. Koide, N.; Ito, H.; Mu, M.M.; Sugiyama, T.; Hassan, F.; Islam, S.; Mori, I.; Yoshida, T.; Yokochi, T. Inhibition of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 augments nitric oxide production in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated RAW264.7 macrophage cells. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 2005, 45, 213–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Sun, B.; Dwivedi, N.; Bechtel, T.J.; Paulsen, J.L.; Muth, A.; Bawadekar, M.; Li, G.; Thompson, P.R.; Shelef, M.A.; Schiffer, C.A.; et al. Citrullination of NF-κB p65 promotes its nuclear localization and TLR-induced expression of IL-1β and TNFα. Sci. Immunol. 2017, 2, eaal3062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Rabadi, M.; Kim, M.; D’Agati, V.; Lee, H.T. Peptidyl arginine deiminase-4-deficient mice are protected against kidney and liver injury after renal ischemia and reperfusion. Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. 2016, 311, F437–F449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Cruz, M.T.; Duarte, C.B.; Gonçalo, M.; Carvalho, A.P.; Lopes, M.C. Involvement of JAK2 and MAPK on type II nitric oxide synthase expression in skin-derived dendritic cells. Am. J. Physiol. 1999, 277, C1050–C1057. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  48. Stempelj, M.; Kedinger, M.; Augenlicht, L.; Klampfer, L. Essential role of the JAK/STAT1 signaling pathway in the expression of inducible nitric-oxide synthase in intestinal epithelial cells and its regulation by butyrate. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 9797–9804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Dell’Albani, P.; Santangelo, R.; Torrisi, L.; Nicoletti, V.G.; de Vellis, J.; Giuffrida Stella, A.M. JAK/STAT signaling pathway mediates cytokine-induced iNOS expression in primary astroglial cell cultures. J. Neurosci. Res. 2001, 65, 417–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Jatiani, S.S.; Baker, S.J.; Silverman, L.R.; Reddy, E.P. Jak/STAT pathways in cytokine signaling and myeloproliferative disorders: Approaches for targeted therapies. Genes Cancer. 2010, 1, 979–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Ischiropoulos, H. Protein tyrosine nitration—An update. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2009, 484, 117–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Benhar, M. Emerging Roles of Protein S-Nitrosylation in Macrophages and Cancer Cells. Curr. Med. Chem. 2016, 23, 2602–2617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Fraszczak, J.; Trad, M.; Janikashvili, N.; Cathelin, D.; Lakomy, D.; Granci, V.; Morizot, A.; Audia, S.; Micheau, O.; Lagrost, L.; et al. Peroxynitrite-dependent killing of cancer cells and presentation of released tumor antigens by activated dendritic cells. J. Immunol. 2010, 184, 1876–1884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Witalison, E.E.; Cui, X.; Hofseth, A.B.; Subramanian, V.; Causey, C.P.; Thompson, P.R.; Hofseth, L.J. Inhibiting protein arginine deiminases has antioxidant consequences. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2015, 353, 64–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 18 02258 g001 550
Figure 1. Cl-amidine suppresses nitric oxide (NO) generation in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-treated dendritic cells (DCs). (A) DCs (5 × 105 cells) were stimulated with LPS (0.1 μg/mL), with or without Cl-amidine (50, 100, or 200 μM), for 24 h. l-NMMA (500 μM) was used as a positive control for nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibition. (B) DCs (1 × 106 cells) were stimulated with LPS (0.1 μg/mL), with or without Cl-amidine (200 μM), for the indicated lengths of time. Quantitative NO levels are represented by bars (mean ± SD; n = 3). *** p < 0.001.
Figure 1. Cl-amidine suppresses nitric oxide (NO) generation in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-treated dendritic cells (DCs). (A) DCs (5 × 105 cells) were stimulated with LPS (0.1 μg/mL), with or without Cl-amidine (50, 100, or 200 μM), for 24 h. l-NMMA (500 μM) was used as a positive control for nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibition. (B) DCs (1 × 106 cells) were stimulated with LPS (0.1 μg/mL), with or without Cl-amidine (200 μM), for the indicated lengths of time. Quantitative NO levels are represented by bars (mean ± SD; n = 3). *** p < 0.001.
Ijms 18 02258 g001
Ijms 18 02258 g002 550
Figure 2. Cl-amidine does not directly inhibit NOS activity. Recombinant NOS (180 ng inducible NO synthase (iNOS); 210 ng endothelial NOS (eNOS); and 420 ng nNOS) was preincubated with or without Cl-amidine (200 μM) for 1 h, and then activity was measured for 1 h. Quantitative levels are represented by bars (mean ± SD; n = 3).
Figure 2. Cl-amidine does not directly inhibit NOS activity. Recombinant NOS (180 ng inducible NO synthase (iNOS); 210 ng endothelial NOS (eNOS); and 420 ng nNOS) was preincubated with or without Cl-amidine (200 μM) for 1 h, and then activity was measured for 1 h. Quantitative levels are represented by bars (mean ± SD; n = 3).
Ijms 18 02258 g002
Ijms 18 02258 g003 550
Figure 3. Cl-amidine suppresses iNOS induction in LPS-treated DCs. LPS (0.1 μg/mL)-treated or -untreated DCs (5 × 106 cells) were cultured in the absence or presence of Cl-amidine (50, 100, or 200 μM) for 24 h. (A) iNOS expression was detected by Western blotting with an anti-iNOS antibody. Anti-glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was used as the loading control. Bottom panel: relative intensity of iNOS in upper panels with loading controls using three individuals of each group. Error bars represent SD. ** p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001. (B) Cell viability was measured using a CCK-8 staining. (C) In the absence or presence of Cl-amidine (200 μM), DCs (4 × 106 cells) were incubated with LPS (0.1 μg/mL) for the indicated lengths of time. iNOS expression was detected by Western blotting with an anti-iNOS antibody. β-actin was used as the loading control. (D) In the absence or presence of Cl-amidine (200 μM), DCs (5 × 106 cells) were incubated with LPS (0.1 μg/mL) for the indicated lengths of time. mRNA levels of iNOS and GAPDH were analyzed by RT-PCR.
Figure 3. Cl-amidine suppresses iNOS induction in LPS-treated DCs. LPS (0.1 μg/mL)-treated or -untreated DCs (5 × 106 cells) were cultured in the absence or presence of Cl-amidine (50, 100, or 200 μM) for 24 h. (A) iNOS expression was detected by Western blotting with an anti-iNOS antibody. Anti-glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was used as the loading control. Bottom panel: relative intensity of iNOS in upper panels with loading controls using three individuals of each group. Error bars represent SD. ** p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001. (B) Cell viability was measured using a CCK-8 staining. (C) In the absence or presence of Cl-amidine (200 μM), DCs (4 × 106 cells) were incubated with LPS (0.1 μg/mL) for the indicated lengths of time. iNOS expression was detected by Western blotting with an anti-iNOS antibody. β-actin was used as the loading control. (D) In the absence or presence of Cl-amidine (200 μM), DCs (5 × 106 cells) were incubated with LPS (0.1 μg/mL) for the indicated lengths of time. mRNA levels of iNOS and GAPDH were analyzed by RT-PCR.
Ijms 18 02258 g003
Ijms 18 02258 g004a 550Ijms 18 02258 g004b 550
Figure 4. Cl-amidine does not affect MAPK/NF-κB signaling but attenuates STAT activation. (A) After pretreatment with SB203580 (20 μM; p38 inhibitor), U0126 (20 μM; ERK inhibitor), SP600125 (20 μM; JNK inhibitor), BAY 11-7085 (20 μM; NF-κB and IκBα inhibitor), or PI-103 (5 μM; PI3K inhibitor) for 2 h, DCs (5 × 105 cells) were incubated with LPS for 24 h. NO was measured by ELISA at 540 nm (mean ± SD; n = 3). *** p < 0.001. (B–D) In the absence or presence of Cl-amidine (200 μM), DCs (4 × 106–8 × 106 cells) were incubated with LPS (0.1 μg/mL) for the indicated lengths of time. Expression levels of phosphorylated (p-) p38, ERK, JNK, p65 (B), HIF-1α, STAT1, and STAT3 (D) were probed by Western blotting with appropriate antibodies. β-actin and GAPDH were used as the loading controls. (C) After DCs were activated with LPS for 1 h, DNA binding activity of NF-κB p65 was measured by ELISA as described in the Materials and Methods. (E,F) After pretreatment with tofacitinib (E: Tofa; JAK inhibitor) or niclosamide (F: Niclo; STAT inhibitor) for 1.5 h, NO production and iNOS expression were measured by ELISA (left panel) and Western blotting (right panel). *** p < 0.001.
Figure 4. Cl-amidine does not affect MAPK/NF-κB signaling but attenuates STAT activation. (A) After pretreatment with SB203580 (20 μM; p38 inhibitor), U0126 (20 μM; ERK inhibitor), SP600125 (20 μM; JNK inhibitor), BAY 11-7085 (20 μM; NF-κB and IκBα inhibitor), or PI-103 (5 μM; PI3K inhibitor) for 2 h, DCs (5 × 105 cells) were incubated with LPS for 24 h. NO was measured by ELISA at 540 nm (mean ± SD; n = 3). *** p < 0.001. (B–D) In the absence or presence of Cl-amidine (200 μM), DCs (4 × 106–8 × 106 cells) were incubated with LPS (0.1 μg/mL) for the indicated lengths of time. Expression levels of phosphorylated (p-) p38, ERK, JNK, p65 (B), HIF-1α, STAT1, and STAT3 (D) were probed by Western blotting with appropriate antibodies. β-actin and GAPDH were used as the loading controls. (C) After DCs were activated with LPS for 1 h, DNA binding activity of NF-κB p65 was measured by ELISA as described in the Materials and Methods. (E,F) After pretreatment with tofacitinib (E: Tofa; JAK inhibitor) or niclosamide (F: Niclo; STAT inhibitor) for 1.5 h, NO production and iNOS expression were measured by ELISA (left panel) and Western blotting (right panel). *** p < 0.001.
Ijms 18 02258 g004aIjms 18 02258 g004b
Ijms 18 02258 g005 550
Figure 5. Cl-amidine impairs LPS-induced AP-1 family activity. (A) Nuclear proteins (10 μg) isolated from DCs (1 × 107 cells) were stimulated with LPS (0.1 μg/mL) with or without Cl-amidine (200 μM) for 1 h, and then c-Fos, JunD, p-c-Jun, JunB, and Fra-1 activity was measured as described in the Materials and Methods (mean ± SD; n = 3). * p < 0.05. NS, not significant. (B) After DCs (5 × 105 cells or 5 × 106 cells) were incubated with the AP-1 inhibitor T-5224 for 2 h, cells were stimulated with LPS for 24 h, and then NO production (left panel) and iNOS expression (right panel) were assessed by ELISA and Western blotting. ** p < 0.01.
Figure 5. Cl-amidine impairs LPS-induced AP-1 family activity. (A) Nuclear proteins (10 μg) isolated from DCs (1 × 107 cells) were stimulated with LPS (0.1 μg/mL) with or without Cl-amidine (200 μM) for 1 h, and then c-Fos, JunD, p-c-Jun, JunB, and Fra-1 activity was measured as described in the Materials and Methods (mean ± SD; n = 3). * p < 0.05. NS, not significant. (B) After DCs (5 × 105 cells or 5 × 106 cells) were incubated with the AP-1 inhibitor T-5224 for 2 h, cells were stimulated with LPS for 24 h, and then NO production (left panel) and iNOS expression (right panel) were assessed by ELISA and Western blotting. ** p < 0.01.
Ijms 18 02258 g005
Ijms 18 02258 g006 550
Figure 6. Mild suppression of COX-2 expression and PGE2 production by Cl-amidine treatment. (A) LPS (0.1 μg/mL)-treated or -untreated DCs (1 × 107 cells) were cultured in the absence or presence of Cl-amidine (50, 100, and 200 μM) for 24 h. COX-2 expression was measured by Western blotting with an anti-COX-2 antibody. β-actin was used as the loading control. (B) Columns represent the relative intensity of COX-2 from three independent experiments. (C) DCs (1 × 105 cells) were stimulated with LPS (0.1 μg/mL), with or without Cl-amidine (50, 100, or 200 μM), for 24 h. PGE2 production was measured as described in the Materials and Methods (mean ± SD; n = 3). * p < 0.05.
Figure 6. Mild suppression of COX-2 expression and PGE2 production by Cl-amidine treatment. (A) LPS (0.1 μg/mL)-treated or -untreated DCs (1 × 107 cells) were cultured in the absence or presence of Cl-amidine (50, 100, and 200 μM) for 24 h. COX-2 expression was measured by Western blotting with an anti-COX-2 antibody. β-actin was used as the loading control. (B) Columns represent the relative intensity of COX-2 from three independent experiments. (C) DCs (1 × 105 cells) were stimulated with LPS (0.1 μg/mL), with or without Cl-amidine (50, 100, or 200 μM), for 24 h. PGE2 production was measured as described in the Materials and Methods (mean ± SD; n = 3). * p < 0.05.
Ijms 18 02258 g006

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jang, B.; Ishigami, A.; Kim, Y.-S.; Choi, E.-K. The Peptidylarginine Deiminase Inhibitor Cl-Amidine Suppresses Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase Expression in Dendritic Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2258. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18112258

AMA Style

Jang B, Ishigami A, Kim Y-S, Choi E-K. The Peptidylarginine Deiminase Inhibitor Cl-Amidine Suppresses Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase Expression in Dendritic Cells. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2017; 18(11):2258. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18112258

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jang, Byungki, Akihito Ishigami, Yong-Sun Kim, and Eun-Kyoung Choi. 2017. "The Peptidylarginine Deiminase Inhibitor Cl-Amidine Suppresses Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase Expression in Dendritic Cells" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 18, no. 11: 2258. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18112258

APA Style

Jang, B., Ishigami, A., Kim, Y. -S., & Choi, E. -K. (2017). The Peptidylarginine Deiminase Inhibitor Cl-Amidine Suppresses Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase Expression in Dendritic Cells. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 18(11), 2258. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18112258

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop