Next Article in Journal
Effects of an Inhibitor of Monocyte Recruitment on Recovery from Traumatic Brain Injury in Mice Treated with Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor
Previous Article in Journal
Inborn Errors of Metabolism and Epilepsy: Current Understanding, Diagnosis, and Treatment Approaches
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 18
Issue 7
10.3390/ijms18071415
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Theranostic Liposome–Nanoparticle Hybrids for Drug Delivery and Bioimaging

by
Muharrem Seleci
,
Didem Ag Seleci
,
Thomas Scheper
and
Frank Stahl
*
Institute of Technical Chemistry, Leibniz University of Hanover, Callinstr. 5, 30167 Hanover, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18(7), 1415; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18071415
Submission received: 2 June 2017 / Revised: 24 June 2017 / Accepted: 26 June 2017 / Published: 2 July 2017
(This article belongs to the Section Materials Science)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Advanced theranostic nanomedicine is a multifunctional approach which combines the diagnosis and effective therapy of diseased tissues. Here, we investigated the preparation, characterization and in vitro evaluation of theranostic liposomes. As is known, liposome–quantum dot (L–QD) hybrid vesicles are promising nanoconstructs for cell imaging and liposomal-topotecan (L-TPT) enhances the efficiency of TPT by providing protection against systemic clearance and allowing extended time for it to accumulate in tumors. In the present study, hydrophobic CdSe/ZnS QD and TPT were located in the bilayer membrane and inner core of liposomes, respectively. Dynamic light scattering (DLS), zeta potential (ζ) measurements and fluorescence/absorption spectroscopy were performed to determine the vesicle size, charge and spectroscopic properties of the liposomes. Moreover, drug release was studied under neutral and acidic pH conditions. Fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry analysis were used to examine the cellular uptake and intracellular distribution of the TPT-loaded L–QD formulation. 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay was utilized to investigate the in vitro cytotoxicity of the formulations on HeLa cells. According to the results, the TPT-loaded L–QD hybrid has adequate physicochemical properties and is a promising multifunctional delivery vehicle which is capable of a simultaneous co-delivery of therapeutic and diagnostic agents.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Nanomedicine is an innovative field with enormous potential for treatment by a combination of smart nanoparticles with small molecules carrying a wide range of functions [1]. Quantum dots (QDs) are one of the promising nanoparticles with excellent fluorescence properties, including broad absorption spectra, narrow emission spectra, high quantum yields, resistance to photobleaching, and high photochemical stability [2,3,4]. Due to these characteristics, they have been explored as fluorescent probes for biomedical applications and are useful in particular for in vivo cell labeling and imaging [5,6,7,8].
Most QDs are typically produced in organic solvents, making them unsuitable for direct use in biomedical and clinical applications. To overcome this limitation, different surface coatings have been applied to increase the hydrophilicity of QDs [9,10]. However, surface modifications often lead to decreases in the QDs’ fluorescence intensity and photostability. In an alternative approach, organic QDs are inserted into lipid bilayers to enhance their hydrophilicity, stability and biocompatibility [11,12,13,14].
Liposomes are self-assembled, spherical lipid-bilayer vesicles that are the most clinically established nanometer-scale systems [15]. They have the capacity to entrap both lipophilic and hydrophobic compounds in a lipid membrane and aqueous core, respectively. Thus, the stability, biocompatibility and solubility of the payloads could be enhanced with the use of several loading strategies.
Liposome–QD (L–QD) hybrid vesicles have shown a great potential for theranostic applications [16]. Tian et al. studied the loading of doxorubicin (DOX) into L–QD hybrid vesicles by the pH-gradient technique; they characterized these DOX-loaded vesicles using dynamic light scattering (DLS) and monitored DOX release [17]. Furthermore, Muthu et al. synthesized folic acid-conjugated theranostic liposomes for the targeted co-delivery of quantum dots and docetaxel [12]. In another study, apomorphine and QDs were integrated into multifunctional liposomes for brain targeting and bioimaging and the results showed that these liposomes can be accumulated to a large extent in the brain [18].
Topotecan (TPT) is a hydrophilic analog of camptothecin. It is a cell-cycle-specific drug and well established for the treatment of several cancers, including ovarian, small-cell lung and cervical cancer [19,20]. However, TPT is unstable in physiological conditions and undergoes a pH-dependent rapid and reversible hydrolysis from a closed lactone ring to the inactive carboxylated form. This causes the loss of the antitumor activity of the drug. To protect TPT from the hydrolysis, liposome has been used for encapsulation [21]. Liposomal encapsulation of TPT enhances its efficacy by protecting it from systemic clearance, allowing greater uptake and extended tissue exposure in solid tumors [22].
In the present study, the aim was to develop multifunctional theranostic liposomes which contain both the model drug TPT and QDs for cell therapy and imaging. For this purpose, L–QD hybrids were synthesized by the incorporation of hydrophobic QD within the lipid bilayer. The biocompatibility of the QDs was increased, retaining its fluorescence characteristics. The pH-gradient technique was used to encapsulate TPT in the aqueous core of the liposome. Thus, TPT therapeutic activity and QD optical properties could be successfully integrated into one nanocarrier.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Synthesis and Characterization of TPT-Loaded Liposomal Formulations

The proportion of the lipids, distearoylphosphatidylcholine (DSPC) and cholesterol, was chosen to be 7:3. DSPC was selected as the bulk phospholipid component instead of egg phosphatidylcholine (EPC) or dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine (DMPC) to increase membrane rigidity, which can also increase drug retention in liposomes [23,24]. The influence of cholesterol on the stability of the liposomes has been intensively investigated, which has revealed that cholesterol in sufficient quantity (≤30%) reduces the leakage of loaded materials from liposome by increasing their stability and decreasing their permeability [25,26]. Furthermore, cholesterol could enhance the hydrophobicity of the membrane [27]. Among various synthesis methods, the thin lipid layer hydration method is the most widely-used and simple method for the preparation of the liposomes. pH-gradient technique, which is based on pH gradients as a driving force for the accumulation of the weakly-basic molecules into acidic vesicles, was used to encapsulate TPT into the aqueous core of the liposomes, protecting its active lactone form until released. The fluorescence spectra of the free drug and liposomal formulations were measured and indicated that both QD and TPT peaks could be simultaneously observed in the spectrum (Figure 1). This indicates the coexistence of both molecules in the vesicle. Fluorescence localizations of the molecules are also photographed in a large liposome (Figure S1).
The physicochemical properties of nanoparticles are an important factor in protein interactions [28]. It has been reported that nanoparticles having a size less than 150 nm are more suitable for permeating through the disorganized and leaky microvasculature of the tumor cells. Besides, their more pronounced surface curvature may also reduce the clearance of the particles as a result of reduced interaction with the surface receptors on macrophages [29,30]. In this regard, to determine hydrodynamic diameters and the surface charge of the liposomes, DLS and ζ-potential analysis were carried out (Table 1). The average size of the plain liposomes was measured as ~132 nm. After QD entrapment in the lipid bilayer, a ~6 nm increase in liposome size was detected. This could be associated with the successful encapsulation of the molecules. TPT encapsulation into L–QD did not have an effect on the size (Figure S2). Besides, liposomes were tested for stability upon storage. Over 2 months, no significant differences in size distribution, ζ-potential as well as PDI occurred at 4 °C.
The higher surface charge of nanoparticles affects the amount of protein adsorption as well as protein corona composition on the surface [31,32]. Studies have signified that liposomes which contain highly charged lipids are more susceptible to rapid clearance by the reticuloendothelial system (RES). However, neutral and slightly negatively charged nanoparticles have a longer circulation lifetime and less accumulation in RES [33,34,35]. In the present study, ζ-potential measurements revealed that the surface potential of the liposomes was slightly negative and encapsulations did not show significant alteration in surface charge. TPT encapsulation efficiency was calculated around 40%. QD incorporation into the lipid bilayer of liposomes affected just ~4% of TPT loading through the lipid membrane. Besides, the obtained polydispersity index values were lower than 0.1, confirming the homogeneity of the liposomes (Table 1). Accordingly, the hybrid liposomes have better physicochemical properties.

2.2. In Vitro Drug Release

The in vitro drug release profile of L–QD–TPT was investigated by the dialysis method, which is one of the most common methods for the determination of drug release from the nanoparticles. The analysis was carried out in simulated conditions of normal human tissue (pH 7.4) and a tumor microenvironment (pH 5.6) at 37 °C. The acidic environment led to an increased TPT release as compared to neutral conditions (Figure 2). The drug was released with an initial modest burst in the first 4 h followed by slower rates of release up to 32 h. After 32 h, the release rates of TPT were 39% at pH 7.4 and 45% at pH 5.6. The higher release rate at an acidic pH can be ascribed to the solubility of the TPT, which increased with decreasing pH as a result of protonation [36].

2.3. Cellular Uptake and Internalization

Cellular uptake of liposomal formulations was examined via flow cytometry. Cells were treated with the samples for 2 h and analyzed using a flow cytometer (BD FACSAria Fusion, Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). A UV excitation laser (at 400 nm) was used for all measurements. Higher fluorescence signals (geometric mean values) were obtained from cells treated with the samples compared with untreated control cells. As is clear from Figure 3a, intracellular TPT level for L–TPT (3839 a.u.) and L–QD–TPT (4007 a.u.) in HeLa cells was higher than that of free TPT (2472 a.u.). This difference can be explained by their different uptake mechanisms. Free TPT, a small molecule, is mainly taken into the cells via passive diffusion, whereas liposomes enter the cells through endocytosis [37,38]. Besides, QD-loaded liposomes were also successfully taken up by the cells (Figure 3b).
Fluorescence microscopy was used to observe the cellular internalization of the liposomes. The images were acquired with separate filter sets. In cells treated with L–QD–TPT, the selected fluorescent model drug TPT, which is a topoisomerase-I inhibitor, localized, unsurprisingly, in cell nuclei to exert its toxicity [39,40]. The fluorescence from green TPT and blue 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (nuclear stain) matched well (Figure 4a,c). Besides, the Figure 4b and merged picture (Figure 4d) showed punctate red spots, indicating that QDs had escaped from the endosomes and co-localized in the cytoplasm and partially in the nucleus. The results are compatible with the outcomes of flow cytometry analysis as well as with the literature [12]. Dubertret et al. reported the encapsulation of CdSe/ZnS QDs into phospholipid block-copolymer micelles for in vitro and in vivo imaging. The QD-micelles injected into individual cells of an early embryo and the internalized QDs were localized to both the cytosol and nuclear envelope. Besides, QD cytotoxicity was dose dependent [41].

2.4. Cytotoxicity

The cytotoxicity of the liposomal formulations and free TPT on HeLa cells were determined by 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. Only viable cells with active metabolism are able to convert MTT into purple-colored formazan; the quantity of the formazan is measured by recording the changes in absorbance at 570 nm to 630 nm as the reference wavelength. According to the results, L–QD had no toxic effect due to effective shielding of QD by lipid bilayer from the surroundings. Similar results were also obtained by Chinnathambi and his colleagues. They used phosphoethanolamine(polyethylene glycol)-based phospholipid micelles to encapsulate CdSe/ZnS QDs and QD-micelles showed almost no toxicity in the concentration range of 0–25 µg/mL in HeLa and A549 cell lines exposed for up to 24 h [42], whereas L–TPT and L–QD–TPT showed obvious toxic effects on HeLa cells compared to free TPT for 24 h (p < 0.05, Figure 5). This is attributed to the facts that L–TPT and L–QD–TPT were taken up into the cells more efficiently (Figure 3) and that the TPT concentration released from liposomes is somewhat higher compared to that of free TPT. Hao et al. also found similar results regarding the enhancement of the antiproliferation ability of TPT with liposomal encapsulation [43].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

The 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT), 4,6-diamino-2-phenylindol (DAPI), Dulbecco’s modified eagle medium (DMEM) and cholesterol were ordered from Sigma Aldrich (Munich, Germany). CdSe/ZnS core/shell hydrophobic quantum dots (QDs) with an overall diameter of ~5 nm were obtained from PlasmaChem GmbH (Berlin, Germany). Topotecan and 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-PC (DSPC) were purchased from Cayman Chemical (Ann Arbor, MI, USA).

3.2. Synthesis of L–QD Hybrids

L–QD hybrids were synthesized by the thin film hydration method [44]. Briefly, DSPC:Cholesterol (7:3 molar ratio) and 30 µg/mL CdSe/ZnS QD (λem = 600 nm) solutions in chloroform were added into a round bottom flask. The mixture was placed in an evaporator to obtain a thin QD-containing lipid film and exposed to N2 gas for just a few minutes to remove the residual of organic solvents. The dried film was hydrated with 250 mM ammonium sulphate (pH 6.5) at 60 °C, which is above the gel–liquid melting transition temperature (Tm) of all lipids. Small unilamellar vesicles (SUVs) were prepared starting from multilamellar vesicles (MLVs) by using sonication and extruding through 0.4 µm and 0.1 µm pore size polycarbonate membranes in mini-extruder set (Avanti Polar Lipids, Alabaster, AL, USA). Afterward, liposomes were centrifuged at 11,000 rpm for 15 min to remove the excess non-incorporated quantum dots [45].

3.3. Encapsulation of Model Drug TPT

L–QD hybrids were loaded actively with TPT using the pH-gradient technique [46]. The obtained lipid-QD dried thin film was hydrated with 250 mM ammonium sulphate (pH 6.5) at 60 °C. After sonication, dialyzed against 10 mM HEPES buffered saline (HBS, pH 7.5) to adjust the exterior pH value of the liposomes as in physiological conditions. The suspension was then mixed with 0.1 mM TPT solution (in 0.9% NaCl) followed by 1 h incubation in a 60 °C water bath. L–QD–TPT was extruded through 0.4 µm and 0.1 µm polycarbonate membranes, respectively. Finally, liposomes were centrifuged at 11,000 rpm for 15 min to remove the excess non-incorporated molecules.

3.4. Encapsulation Efficiency

The percent of encapsulation efficiency (EE%) of TPT was calculated according to the following Equation (1):
E E % TPT = ( W en /   W total )   ×   100 %
where Wen is the analyzed weight of the drug encapsulated in liposome and Wtotal is the initial amount of the drug [47]. It was determined after lysis of the liposomes by diluting purified liposomes in acidic methanol (1% trifluoroacetic acid in methanol). Calibration curves were established with known concentrations of free TPT by fluorescence emission measurements at 530 nm using a fluorospectrometer (NanoDrop 3300, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA).

3.5. Characterization

The fluorescence spectra of the free drug and liposomal formulations were measured using a spectrofluorometer. The localizations of QD and TPT in a large liposome were photographed using an Olympus BX41 fluorescence microscope (Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with an Olympus SC30 camera and processed by Image J software [48].
The particle size distribution and zeta potential (ζ) of the liposomes were determined by Zetasizer Nano-ZS (Malvern Instruments, Malvern, UK). The polydispersity index (PDI) was reported as a measure of the width of size distribution. The samples were diluted at the ratio of 1:100 (v/v) with ddH2O and equilibrated for 3 min before the measurements. Measurements were taken three times at room temperature. To test their stability, liposomal formulations were stored at 4 °C in the dark. After 2 months, their size distribution, ζ-potential and PDI were analyzed.

3.6. In Vitro Drug Release

The dialysis technique was used for drug release experiments. L–QD–TPT was prepared and transferred into a pre-washed dialysis tubing (Slide-A-Lyzer MINI Dialysis Devices, 10K MWCO, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). The tubing was immersed in 10 mL of the Phosphate buffered saline (PBS) buffer (pH 5.6 and 7.4), placed in an incubator at 37 °C and stirred at 100 rpm. At specific time intervals, 0.5 mL samples were removed from the release medium and replaced with the same volume of fresh buffer. The amount of released TPT was calculated according to the calibration curves. They were established with a known concentration of free TPT by fluorescence emission measurements at 530 nm using a spectrofluorometer.

3.7. Cell Culture

Human cervical cancer cell (HeLa cell) line was provided from the German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures (DSMZ) (Braunschweig, Germany). Cells were grown in DMEM containing 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) and 1.0% penicillin/streptomycin (P/S). HeLa cells were cultivated in this medium and incubated with samples and reagents at 37 °C in a humidified environment with 5.0% CO2.

3.8. Cytotoxicity

The MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assays were used to determine the cytotoxicity of the liposomal formulations. Cells (8 × 103) were seeded out in 96-well tissue plates (Sarstedt, Newton, MA, USA) in a volume of 200 µL and cultivated for three days. After this cultivation period, cells were washed once with PBS and treated with L–QD, L–TPT, L–QD–TPT and free TPT for 24 h. The equivalent concentration of free TPT was used in liposomal formulations. The samples were then removed and the cells were incubated in 110 µL/well 10% MTT solution (5.0 mg/mL in PBS) in the medium for 4 h. During this incubation time, formazan complex was produced by the cells. A 100 µL SDS solution (1.0 g SDS in 10 mL 0.01 M HCl) was added to each well to release the purple-colored salt from the cells. After 24 h of incubation, UV-Vis absorption was measured at 570 nm to 630 nm as the reference wavelength using a microplate reader (Epoch BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA).

3.9. Cellular Uptake and Internalization

The cellular uptake of TPT and liposomal formulations by HeLa cells was examined through flow cytometry. Cells (5 × 105) were collected and incubated with the samples for 2 h, followed by washing two times with PBS. Just before the analysis, cells were resuspended in 500 µL of PBS and then analyzed in a BD FACSAria Fusion flow cytometer (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). At least 20,000 gated events were observed in total and living cells were gated in a dot plot of forward versus side scatter signals. The dot plot and histogram data were analyzed by Flowing Software 2 [49].
Cellular internalization of L–QD–TPT was determined via fluorescence microscopy studies. HeLa cells were cultivated for 2 days on the chamber slides (8-well µ slides purchased from ibidi GmbH, Munich, Germany) in a volume of 200 µL of the medium. Samples were diluted with the medium and then added to the cells. The cells were incubated for 4 h at 37 °C and washed twice in PBS. Afterwards, 100 µL DAPI solution (1.0 mg/mL) was added to the cells, which were then incubated for 15 min. Cells were washed with PBS once following DAPI staining. Images were taken using an Olympus BX41 fluorescence microscope equipped with an Olympus SC30 camera and processed by Image J software.

3.10. Statistical Analysis

Statistical data analysis was performed using the Student’s t-test. The difference between two groups was considered to be significant when the p-value was less than 0.05.

4. Conclusions

The theranostic liposomes, with a mean size of about 135 nm, were developed for the co-delivery of imaging and therapeutic agents. Both hydrophobic QD and hydrophilic TPT were encapsulated into liposomes by thin film hydration and pH-gradient methods, respectively. Thus, bioavailability of a poorly water-soluble molecule was enhanced and moreover, the therapeutic efficacy and stability of the drug were improved. The well-characterized liposomal TPT formulations showed significantly higher cellular uptake as well as higher cytotoxicity than free TPT. QD internalization into cells was achieved and enabled simultaneous imaging. This liposome–nanoparticle hybrid system might offer new opportunities for the development of novel co-delivery platforms.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/18/7/1415/s1.

Acknowledgments

Part of this work was founded by BioFabrication for NIFE. We wish to thank André Jochums for his help with flow cytometry analysis. Konrad Adenauer Foundation is acknowledged for the financial support to Didem Ag Seleci. The publication of this article was funded by the Open Access Fund of the Leibniz Universität Hannover.

Author Contributions

Muharrem Seleci designed and performed the experiments, analyzed data and wrote the paper; Didem Ag Seleci carried out the cytotoxicity and cellular uptake experiments; Thomas Scheper and Frank Stahl contributed writing the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Seleci, M.; Ag Seleci, D.; Joncyzk, R.; Stahl, F.; Blume, C.; Scheper, T. Smart multifunctional nanoparticles in nanomedicine. BioNanoMaterials 2016, 17, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bruchez, M.; Moronne, M.; Gin, P.; Weiss, S.; Alivisatos, A.P. Semiconductor nanocrystals as fluorescent biological labels. Science 1998, 281, 2013–2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Jaiswal, J.K.; Mattoussi, H.; Mauro, J.M.; Simon, S.M. Long-term multiple color imaging of live cells using quantum dot bioconjugates. Nat. Biotechnol. 2003, 21, 47–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Resch-Genger, U.; Grabolle, M.; Cavaliere-Jaricot, S.; Nitschke, R.; Nann, T. Quantum dots versus organic dyes as fluorescent labels. Nat. Methods 2008, 5, 763–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Rizvi, S.B.; Rouhi, S.; Taniguchi, S.; Yang, S.Y.; Green, M.; Keshtgar, M.; Seifalian, A.M. Near-infrared quantum dots for HER2 localization and imaging of cancer cells. Int. J. Nanomed. 2014, 9, 1323–1337. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ag, D.; Bongartz, R.; Dogan, L.E.; Seleci, M.; Walter, J.-G.; Demirkol, D.O.; Stahl, F.; Ozcelik, S.; Timur, S.; Scheper, T. Biofunctional quantum dots as fluorescence probe for cell-specific targeting. Colloids Surf. B 2014, 114, 96–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Gao, X.; Cui, Y.; Levenson, R.M.; Chung, L.W.K.; Nie, S. In vivo cancer targeting and imaging with semiconductor quantum dots. Nat. Biotechnol. 2004, 22, 969–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Sounderya, N.; Zhang, Y. Use of core/shell structured nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Recent Pat. Biomed. Eng. 2008, 1, 34–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Akin, M.; Bongartz, R.; Walter, J.G.; Demirkol, D.O.; Stahl, F.; Timur, S.; Scheper, T. PAMAM-functionalized water soluble quantum dots for cancer cell targeting. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 11529–11536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Smith, A.M.; Duan, H.; Rhyner, M.N.; Ruan, G.; Nie, S. A systematic examination of surface coatings on the optical and chemical properties of semiconductor quantum dots. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2006, 8, 3895–3903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Al Jamal, W.T.; Al Jamal, K.T.; Bomans, P.H.; Frederik, P.M.; Kostarelos, K. Functionalized Quantum dot liposome hybrids as multimodal nanoparticles for cancer. Small 2008, 4, 1406–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Muthu, M.S.; Kulkarni, S.A.; Raju, A.; Feng, S.-S. Theranostic liposomes of TPGS coating for targeted co-delivery of docetaxel and quantum dots. Biomaterials 2012, 33, 3494–3501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Gopalakrishnan, G.; Danelon, C.; Izewska, P.; Prummer, M.; Bolinger, P.Y.; Geissbahler, I.; Demurtas, D.; Dubochet, J.; Vogel, H. Multifunctional lipid/quantum dot hybrid nanocontainers for controlled targeting of live cells. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 5478–5483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Yang, C.; Chen, W.; Bui, B.Q.; Xiang, G. Recent progress on the liposomes loaded with quantum dots. Rev. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2012, 1, 257–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Riehemann, K.; Schneider, S.W.; Luger, T.A.; Godin, B.; Ferrari, M.; Fuchs, H. Nanomedicine-challenge and perspectives. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 872–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Muthu, M.S.; Leong, D.T.; Mei, L.; Feng, S.-S. Nanotheranostics-application and further development of nanomedicine strategies for advanced theranostics. Theranostics 2014, 4, 660–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Tian, B.; Kostarelos, K. The engineering of doxorubicin-loaded liposome-quantum dot hybrids for cancer theranostics. Chin. Phys. B. 2014, 23, 087805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wen, C.J.; Zhang, L.-W.; Al-Suwayeh, S.A.; Yen, T.-C.; Fang, J.-Y. Theranostic liposomes loaded with quantum dots and apomorphine for brain targeting and bioimaging. Int. J. Nanomed. 2012, 7, 1599–1611. [Google Scholar]
  19. Grahn, A.Y.; Bankiewicz, K.S.; Dugich-Djordjevic, M.; Bringas, J.R.; Hadaczek, P.; Johnson, G.A.; Eastman, S.; Luz, M. Non-PEGylated liposomes for convection-enhanced delivery of topotecan and gadodiamide in malignant glioma: Initial experience. J. Neurooncol. 2009, 95, 185–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Chen, Z.J.; Zhang, Z.; Xie, B.B.; Zhang, H.Y. Development and evaluation of topotecan loaded solid lipid nanoparticles: A study in cervical cancer cell lines. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2016, 165, 182–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Hao, Y.L.; Deng, Y.-J.; Chen, Y.; Wang, X.M.; Zhong, H.-J.; Suo, X.-B. In vitro and in vivo studies of different liposomes containing topotecan. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2005, 28, 626–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Tardi, P.; Choice, E.; Masin, D.; Redelmeier, T.; Bally, M.; Madden, T.D. Liposomal encapsulation of topotecan enhances anticancer efficacy in murine and human xenograft models. Cancer Res. 2000, 60, 3389–3393. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  23. Mayer, L.D.; Tai, L.C.; Ko, D.S.; Masin, D.; Ginsberg, R.S.; Cullis, P.R.; Bally, M.B. Influence of vesicle size, lipid composition, and drug-to-lipid ratio on the biological activity of liposomal doxorubicin in mice. Cancer Res. 1989, 49, 5922–5930. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  24. Lim, H.J.; Masin, D.; McIntosh, N.L.; Madden, T.D.; Bally, M.B. Role of drug release and liposome-mediated drug delivery in governing the therapeutic activity of liposomal mitoxantrone used to treat human A431 and LS180 solid tumors. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2000, 292, 337–345. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  25. Semple, S.C.; Chonn, A.; Cullis, P.R. Influence of cholesterol on the association of plasma proteins with liposomes. Biochemistry 1996, 35, 2521–2525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Bozzuto, G.; Molinari, A. Liposomes as nanomedical devices. Int. J. Nanomed. 2015, 10, 975–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Magarkar, A.; Dhawan, V.; Kallinteri, P.; Viitala, T.; Elmowafy, M.; Róg, T.; Bunker, A. Cholesterol level affects surface charge of lipid membranes in saline solution. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 5005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Rahman, M.; Laurent, S.; Tawil, N.; Yahia, L.H.; Mahmoudi, M. Nanoparticle and protein corona. In Protein–Nanoparticle Interactions; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2013; pp. 21–44. ISBN 978-3-642-37554-5. [Google Scholar]
  29. Farokhzad, O.C.; Jon, S.; Langer, R. A. Ptamers and cancer nanotechnology. In Nanotechnology for Cancer Therapy; Amiji, M.M., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2006; pp. 289–341. ISBN 978-0-8493-7194-3. [Google Scholar]
  30. Brigger, I.; Dubernet, C.; Couvreur, P. Nanoparticles in cancer therapy and diagnosis. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev 2002, 54, 631–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Deng, Z.J.; Liang, M.; Toth, I.; Monteiro, M.; Minchin, R.F. Plasma protein binding of positively and negatively charged polymer-coated gold nanoparticles elicits different biological responses. Nanotoxicology 2013, 7, 314–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Gessner, A.; Lieske, A.; Paulke, B.R.; Muller, R.H. Influence of surface charge density on protein adsorption on polymeric nanoparticles: Analysis by two-dimensional electrophoresis. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2002, 54, 165–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Blanco, E.; Shen, H.; Ferrari, M. Principles of nanoparticle design for overcoming biological barriers to drug delivery. Nat. Biotechnol. 2015, 33, 941–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Levchenko, T.S.; Rammohan, R.; Lukyanov, A.N.; Whiteman, K.R.; Torchilin, V.P. Liposome clearance in mice: The effect of a separate and combined presence of surface charge and polymer coating. Int. J. Pharm. 2002, 240, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhao, W.; Zhuang, S.; Qi, X.-R. Comparative study of the in vitro and in vivo characteristics of cationic and neutral liposomes. Int. J. Nanomed. 2011, 6, 3087–3098. [Google Scholar]
  36. Padhi, S.; Mirza, M.A.; Verma, D.; Khuroo, T.; Panda, A.K.; Talegaonkar, S.; Khar, R.K.; Iqbal, Z. Revisiting the nanoformulation design approach for effective delivery of topotecan in its stable form: An appraisal of its in vitro Behavior and tumor amelioration potential. Drug Deliv. 2016, 23, 2827–2837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Yingchoncharoen, P.; Kalinowski, D.S.; Richardson, D.R. Lipid-based drug delivery systems in cancer therapy: What is available and what is yet to come. Pharmacol. Rev. 2016, 68, 701–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Torchilin, V.P. Recent advances with liposomes as pharmaceutical carriers. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2005, 4, 145–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Zoorob, G.; Burke, T. Enzymology and drugs. In DNA Topoisomerase Protocols; Osheroff, N., Bjornsti, M.A., Eds.; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2001; Volume II, pp. 215–227. ISBN 978-1-59259-057-5. [Google Scholar]
  40. Kollmannsberger, C.; Mross, K.; Jakob, A.; Kanz, L.; Bokemeyer, C. Topotecan—A novel topoisomerase I inhibitor: Pharmacology and clinical experience. Oncology 1999, 56, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Dubertret, B.; Skourides, P.; Norris, D.J.; Noireaux, V.; Brivanlou, A.H.; Libchaber, A. In vivo imaging of quantum dots encapsulated in phospholipid micelles. Science 2002, 298, 1759–1762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Chinnathambi, S.; Abu, N.; Hanagata, N. Biocompatible CdSe/ZnS quantum dot micelles for long-term cell imaging without alteration to the native structure of the blood plasma protein human serum albumin. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 2392–2402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hao, Y.L.; Deng, Y.J.; Chen, Y.; Hao, A.J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, K.Z. In Vitro cytotoxicity, in vivo biodistribution and anti-tumour effect of PEGylated liposomal topotecan. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2005, 57, 1279–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Tian, B.; Al-Jamal, K.T.; Kostarelos, K. Doxorubicin-loaded lipid-quantum dot hybrids: Surface topography and release properties. Int. J. Pharm. 2011, 416, 443–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Sonali; Singh, R.P.; Singh, N.; Sharma, G.; Vijayakumar, M.R.; Koch, B.; Singh, S.; Singh, U.; Dash, D.; Pandey, B.L. Transferrin liposomes of docetaxel for brain-targeted cancer applications: Formulation and brain theranostics. Drug Deliv. 2016, 23, 1261–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Abraham, S.A.; Edwards, K.; Karlsson, G.; Hudon, N.; Mayer, L.D.; Bally, M.B. An evaluation of transmembrane ion gradient-mediated encapsulation of topotecan within liposomes. J. Control. Release 2004, 96, 449–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Yang, S.; Liu, C.; Liu, W.; Yu, H.; Zheng, H.; Zhou, W.; Hu, Y. Preparation and characterization of nanoliposomes entrapping medium-chain fatty acids and vitamin C by lyophilization. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 19763–19773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Flowing Software; 1.47v; Software for Image Processing; National Institutes of Health: Bethesda, ML, USA, 1997. Available online: https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/index.html (accessed on 27 June 2017).
  49. Flowing Software; 2.5.1v; Software for Flow Cytometry Data Analysis; Turku Centre for Biotechnology: Turku, Finland, 2013; Available online: http://flowingsoftware.btk.fi/index.php?page=1 (accessed on 27 June 2017).
Ijms 18 01415 g001 550
Figure 1. The fluorescence spectra of liposome-quantum dot (L–QD) (red), liposome-topotecan (L-TPT) (turquoise), L–QD–TPT (orange) and free TPT (green). The excitation wavelength was set at 450 nm.
Figure 1. The fluorescence spectra of liposome-quantum dot (L–QD) (red), liposome-topotecan (L-TPT) (turquoise), L–QD–TPT (orange) and free TPT (green). The excitation wavelength was set at 450 nm.
Ijms 18 01415 g001
Ijms 18 01415 g002 550
Figure 2. Cumulative drug release profile for L–QD–TPT at mild acidic (pH 5.6) and neutral conditions (pH 7.4). Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3).
Figure 2. Cumulative drug release profile for L–QD–TPT at mild acidic (pH 5.6) and neutral conditions (pH 7.4). Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3).
Ijms 18 01415 g002
Ijms 18 01415 g003 550
Figure 3. Cellular uptakes of the conjugates were determined in HeLa cells by flow cytometry. TPT, L–TPT, L–QD–TPT (a) (excitation at 400 nm, emission filter FL1 (525/50 nm)); L–QD and L–QD–TPT (b) (excitation at 400 nm, emission filter FL2 (610/20 nm)).
Figure 3. Cellular uptakes of the conjugates were determined in HeLa cells by flow cytometry. TPT, L–TPT, L–QD–TPT (a) (excitation at 400 nm, emission filter FL1 (525/50 nm)); L–QD and L–QD–TPT (b) (excitation at 400 nm, emission filter FL2 (610/20 nm)).
Ijms 18 01415 g003
Ijms 18 01415 g004 550
Figure 4. Fluorescence microscopy of HeLa cells after incubation with L–QD–TPT. Liposomes released the payload into the cell (a: TPT; b: QD). Nuclei were stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (c). The obtained images were merged into the same picture (d). All pictures are in 40× magnification.
Figure 4. Fluorescence microscopy of HeLa cells after incubation with L–QD–TPT. Liposomes released the payload into the cell (a: TPT; b: QD). Nuclei were stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (c). The obtained images were merged into the same picture (d). All pictures are in 40× magnification.
Ijms 18 01415 g004
Ijms 18 01415 g005 550
Figure 5. Cytotoxicity of the liposomal formulations and free TPT on HeLa cells. Cells were incubated with, L–QD, L–TPT, L–QD–TPT and free TPT (equivalent concentration of loaded TPT, 2.0 µg/mL) for 24 h. 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay was applied. Error bars represent the standard deviation from the mean (n = 3). Data were analyzed using t-test, and * p < 0.05 was considered significant. ns: not significant.
Figure 5. Cytotoxicity of the liposomal formulations and free TPT on HeLa cells. Cells were incubated with, L–QD, L–TPT, L–QD–TPT and free TPT (equivalent concentration of loaded TPT, 2.0 µg/mL) for 24 h. 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay was applied. Error bars represent the standard deviation from the mean (n = 3). Data were analyzed using t-test, and * p < 0.05 was considered significant. ns: not significant.
Ijms 18 01415 g005
Table
Table 1. Physicochemical properties and EE% of the liposomes.
Table 1. Physicochemical properties and EE% of the liposomes.
SamplesSize (nm)PDIζ-Potential (mV)EE (%)
L131.8 ± 0.80.082−13.6 ± 1.6-
L–QD138.1 ± 0.70.014−7.8 ± 0.1-
L–TPT134.1 ± 1.20.073−10.6 ± 0.143.8
L–QD–TPT137.1 ± 1.70.069−6.0 ± 0.139.5
The data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). PDI: Polydispersity index; ζ-potential: zeta potential; EE: Encapsulation efficiency %.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Seleci, M.; Ag Seleci, D.; Scheper, T.; Stahl, F. Theranostic Liposome–Nanoparticle Hybrids for Drug Delivery and Bioimaging. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 1415. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18071415

AMA Style

Seleci M, Ag Seleci D, Scheper T, Stahl F. Theranostic Liposome–Nanoparticle Hybrids for Drug Delivery and Bioimaging. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2017; 18(7):1415. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18071415

Chicago/Turabian Style

Seleci, Muharrem, Didem Ag Seleci, Thomas Scheper, and Frank Stahl. 2017. "Theranostic Liposome–Nanoparticle Hybrids for Drug Delivery and Bioimaging" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 18, no. 7: 1415. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18071415

APA Style

Seleci, M., Ag Seleci, D., Scheper, T., & Stahl, F. (2017). Theranostic Liposome–Nanoparticle Hybrids for Drug Delivery and Bioimaging. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 18(7), 1415. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18071415

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop