Next Article in Journal
Mast Cell Responses to Viruses and Pathogen Products
Next Article in Special Issue
Omega-3 Fatty Acids and Neurodegenerative Diseases: New Evidence in Clinical Trials
Previous Article in Journal
Vine Waste Valorisation: Integrated Approach for the Prospection of Bioactive Lipophilic Phytochemicals
Previous Article in Special Issue
Marine-Derived Omega-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids and Heart Failure: Current Understanding for Basic to Clinical Relevance
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Omega-3 Docosahexaenoic Acid Is a Mediator of Fate-Decision of Adult Neural Stem Cells

Univ-Lyon, Inserm UMR 1060, Inra UMR 1397, IMBL, INSA-Lyon, 69100 Villeurbanne, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20(17), 4240; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20174240
Submission received: 29 July 2019 / Revised: 26 August 2019 / Accepted: 27 August 2019 / Published: 30 August 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Omega-3 Fatty Acids in Health and Disease: New Knowledge 2019)

Abstract

:
The mammalian brain is enriched with lipids that serve as energy catalyzers or secondary messengers of essential signaling pathways. Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) is an omega-3 fatty acid synthesized de novo at low levels in humans, an endogenous supply from its precursors, and is mainly incorporated from nutrition, an exogeneous supply. Decreased levels of DHA have been reported in the brains of patients with neurodegenerative diseases. Preventing this decrease or supplementing the brain with DHA has been considered as a therapy for the DHA brain deficiency that could be linked with neuronal death or neurodegeneration. The mammalian brain has, however, a mechanism of compensation for loss of neurons in the brain: neurogenesis, the birth of neurons from neural stem cells. In adulthood, neurogenesis is still present, although at a slower rate and with low efficiency, where most of the newly born neurons die. Neural stem/progenitor cells (NSPCs) have been shown to require lipids for proper metabolism for proliferation maintenance and neurogenesis induction. Recent studies have focused on the effects of these essential lipids on the neurobiology of NSPCs. This review aimed to introduce the possible use of DHA to impact NSPC fate-decision as a therapy for neurodegenerative diseases.

1. Introduction

The human brain is a network of a great diversity of cells that ensure proper cerebral function. Neurodevelopment during embryogenesis is particularly important. It was thought for a long time that neurons, the main actors of cerebral electrical activity, were only produced during neurodevelopment and that their number was definite at the end of brain maturation. While still debated, the process of the creation of new neurons has been observed more and more in the adult human brain [1,2,3,4,5]. Adult neurogenesis is made possible by the maintenance of a pool of pluripotent cells, neural stem/progenitor cells (NSPCs), and their subsequent differentiation into mature functional cells, namely neuronal cells for neurogenesis [6,7,8,9]. There is, however, a loss of neurogenesis rate with age [10], which could explain the still ongoing debate around the existence of adult neurogenesis.
Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), an omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid, is uniquely enriched in the brain and the retina [11,12], and is required for proper human brain development and visual functions [13,14,15,16]. Several studies conducted both in animal models and in humans have suggested that an adequate dietary intake of omega-3 fatty acids can prevent cognitive decline and attenuate the physiological disturbances of the brain that are associated with ageing or with neurological disorders, such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and Parkinson’s disease (PD) [17,18,19,20,21]. This is particularly interesting and could be linked to the important role played by DHA in NSPC metabolism. With descriptions of adult neurogenesis and DHA metabolism, we have emphasized the importance of DHA for NSPC cell fate decision-making, and updated the current knowledge of DHA and omega-3 fatty acid effects on neurogenesis and neuroprotection.

2. Adult Neurogenesis Is Linked with a Metabolic Shift

2.1. Adult NSPC Origin and Neurogenic Niches

Mammalian brains are composed of a diversity of cell types that ranges from glial cells (i.e., astrocytes, microglia, and oligodendrocytes) to neuronal cells (i.e., neurons). During embryonic development, all cells are generated from a single cell type: the embryonic neural stem progenitor cells. These are pluripotent cells that can divide symmetrically to increase the cell population pool, or proliferate—divide asymmetrically to produce fate-committed cells, a process of differentiation or specification [22,23,24,25]. Rapid proliferation followed by differentiation into glial cells, gliogenesis, or neuronal cells, neurogenesis, has been observed in mice embryos [26,27,28,29]. This ensures proper brain development for cognitive functions. In rodent neocortex, neurogenesis mainly occurs from E12 to E18, followed by gliogenesis starting from E18 up to postnatal age. Oligodendrogenesis happens in several waves during embryogenesis and postnatally. It is generally accepted that NSPCs that have divided less are more likely to produce neurons compared to NSPCs that have undergone more divisions, which are considered more gliogenic [30].
However, two neurogenic niches are found in mouse brain: the subgranular zone (SGZ) of the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus [8,31,32] and the subventricular zone of the lateral ventricles (SVZ) [6,33,34,35]. Some research groups suggest that adult NSPCs originate from embryonic NSPCs that went into a quiescent state for maintenance of a life-long pool [36,37,38,39,40]. Adult NSPCs from the two niches both have the same capacity to differentiate into neuronal or glial cells [6,7,8,9], although the functions they serve are suggested to be different depending on the production site and their migration trajectory. The SVZ NSPCs have been mainly observed to integrate into the olfactory bulb and to serve the functions of olfactory recognition and memory [41,42], while the SGZ NSPCs are mainly involved in hippocampal functions, including learning and spatial memory and mood [43,44,45].
In adult age, neurogenesis is significantly lower than in young individuals [10]. The determining factors for the cell-fate decision of adult NSPCs are still under study, but most studies have converged to the hypothesis that low adult neurogenesis is observed because most NSPCs are dormant/quiescent [46], and that exiting this stage to proliferate or differentiate does not lead to the birth of healthy and functional cells, rather leading to the premature death of the cells [47,48,49,50]. This phenomenon has also been suggested to be involved in neurodegenerative diseases [51]. It is thus important to identify the signaling pathway behind adult NSPCs’ complex metabolism. We note that human adult neurogenesis is still an open debate, although evidence of the existence of neural stem cells has been observed in human brains [1,2,3,4,5]. Numerous reviews have detailed the biology of adult NSPCs [52,53,54,55,56,57,58].

2.2. Cell-fate Decision and Increased Lipogenesis

The factors inducing the transitions between proliferation and differentiation and between neurogenesis and gliogenesis are still not fully understood. They include extrinsic factors: cytokines, growth factors, neurotransmitters, and morphogens. Intrinsic factors are also involved, and include transcription factors, epigenetic regulators, and non-coding RNAs such as microRNAs [59,60,61]. They have been covered extensively in previous reviews [56,58,62,63,64]. Proliferation and differentiation of NSPCs is energy-consuming, and cells need substrates to initiate cell cycle entry and progression [65]. Possible stocks include glucose and lipids from the cell membrane, as well as uptake from the extracellular environment. Proliferating stem cells favor high glycolysis for energy production and proliferate in hypoxic conditions with low oxygen consumption, as observed in other stem cells [66,67]. This has also been observed in quiescent stem cells with less glycolysis and even less oxygen consumption. However, a metabolic shift has been observed during fate commitment of the stem cells, ensuring differentiation and maturation. The energy production site of stem cells is the mitochondria. Mitochondria use oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) to produce ATP (adenosine triphosphate), which has been shown to be required to initiate differentiation [68,69]. As a result, there is an elevation in reactive oxygen species (ROS) during neurogenesis [70]. ROS might act on differentiating pathways [71] but have a downfall effect. ROS elevation intracellularly is linked with oxidative stress and DNA damage [72,73,74], and could lead to the premature death of newly differentiated cells [75,76,77]. The essential role of the mitochondria has been detailed in previous reviews [78,79,80].
NSPC metabolism has also been shown to depend on lipid biogenesis and metabolism. One research group showed that impairment of lipogenesis, the production of lipids from end-products of glucose metabolism, could prevent NSPC differentiation [81]. They also discovered that fatty acid oxidation (FAO) inhibition in SGZ NPSCs led to quiescent cell death and reduction of cell proliferation [82]. Another group found that FAO blocking decreased proliferation of SVZ NSPCs [83]. Both discoveries suggest that FAO is required for sustaining energy production in proliferating cells, while lipogenesis is necessary for differentiation. Interestingly, providing fatty acids as a source of energy instead of glucose increased the developmental stage of human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes, with a preferential switch to energy production via FAO [84]. In another model of human pluripotent stem cells, researchers observed that lipid deprivation maintained cells in a pluripotent state [85]. FAO occurs in mitochondria, while de novo lipogenesis takes place in the cytoplasm, emphasizing once more the close link between mitochondrial function and NSPC metabolism [86] (see summary in Figure 1). Lipids are stored in cell bilayer membranes, in structures of higher complexity such as glycerophospholipids. They serve many purposes, like the above-mentioned energy production, but are also key players of signaling pathways for inflammation, oxidation, or apoptotic cascades. Among the abundant lipids composing brain cells, there is evidence of an enrichment in the omega-3 fatty acid DHA in the brain and the retina compared to other tissues [11,12], and poor DHA and other omega-3 fatty acid dietary supply during pregnancy leads to high risks of poor visual and cerebral development of infants and to increased risk of cognitive function impairments and possibly neurodegenerative diseases (as reviewed previously [16,87,88,89,90]). This hints at the important role played by DHA and other omega-3 fatty acids in NSPC metabolism.

3. DHA Is a Major Component of Brain Lipids

3.1. Omega-3 DHA Levels in the Brain

Omega-3 fatty acids are polyunsaturated fatty acids that are characterized by the presence of double bonds, the first double bond being present at the carbon 3, counting opposite to the terminal methyl group. They are essential fatty acids that are synthesized at low levels de novo in human metabolism and are mainly incorporated through our diets. The main omega-3 fatty acids are, in increasing chain length order: alpha-linoleic acid (ALA,18:3n-3), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA,20:5n-3), and DHA (22:6n-3). Omega-3 fatty acids are particularly enriched in oily fishes such as salmon, anchovies, or sardines for DHA dietary supply, but also in vegetable oils (i.e., soybeans) for ALA supply [91]. DHA synthesis is possible via the elongation-desaturation pathway from ALA through conversion into EPA. Although this DHA supplementation is considered to be sufficient for proper brain DHA accretion [92], it still requires the dietary supplementation of ALA.
DHA is seldom observed in the free fatty acid form in brain cells; it is mostly incorporated into the glycerophospholipids contained in the cell membranes. The main phospholipids are phosphatidylcholines (PC), phosphatidylethanolamines (PE), phosphatidylinositols (PI), and phosphatidylserines (PS), with a preferential abundance in ethanolamine glycerophospholipids (EtnGpl) [93,94,95]. In aged mammalian brain, DHA is recovered mainly in the cortex and cerebellum [95]. An exhaustive study of determination of the fatty acid composition in several brain regions according to experimental models of mice and different diets was performed and showed that DHA content is very dependent on dietary supply [96].

3.2. DHA Metabolism and Oxygenated Metabolites

There is competition for enzymes and incorporation into phospholipids between omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids, which are polyunsaturated fatty acids with double bonds starting from the carbon 6, away from the terminal methyl group. Moreover, omega-6 signaling cascades include the formation of cytokines, some of which are key players of inflammatory pathways, through synthesis involving the same enzymes as those required by omega-3-derived metabolite generation [97]. Being highly unsaturated, DHA has the potential to be oxygenated by various lipoxygenases to produce oxylipins that regulate several biological processes within the brain. Although being identified only at low levels in vivo in the brain, these mediators are mainly produced by lipoxygenase action and include hydroxylated DHA, while some of them can be metabolized into potent mediators, such as protectin D1 (PD1), resolvins, and maresins [98,99]. One isomer of PD1 was identified by our group and named protectin DX (PDX [100]), and was observed in mice brains in vivo [101]. Other reviews have explored in more details the different derivatives of omega-3 fatty acids and their potent effects as neuroprotective agents or neurogenesis inducers [102,103,104]. As mentioned before, fatty acids also participate in cell energy production by serving as substrates for FAO.

3.3. DHA Delivery Strategy for Better Brain Accretion

For therapeutic use, the primary step is to ensure proper DHA delivery to the brain from blood through the blood–brain barrier (BBB). We previously published a summary of the known mechanisms of DHA brain accretion [105]. BBB is a physiological barrier preventing the invasion of toxic compounds and ensuring correct homeostasis for the healthiest brain conditions. Nutrients from diet are transported in the blood stream up to the BBB. DHA is either bound to albumin in its free form and within lysophosphatidylcholine (LysoPC) [106], or is taken up by lipoproteins [107]. The mechanisms of entry into endothelial cells are still under debate and may include passive diffusion of cleaved DHA or LysoPC–DHA from albumin and lipoproteins [108], and active transportation via specific membrane proteins. An emerging candidate is the major facilitator superfamily domain-containing protein 2A (Mfsd2a), which has been proven to preferentially bind LysoPC–DHA compared to the free fatty acid form [109,110]. Mfsd2a-knockout animal models showed decreased DHA brain levels [109], microencephaly [111], and dysregulated lipogenesis and phospholipid accretion in cell membranes [112]. Other studies showed that LysoPC–DHA supplementation through diet increased brain DHA content as compared to free fatty acid DHA [113,114], in particular in the cerebellum, hippocampus, striatum, and amygdala, with improvement of memory functions [115]. One group recently showed that DHA esterified in PE or PC was better taken up by the brain compared to DHA in triacylglycerols in adult rats [116], as was shown previously [117].
We showed previously that a synthetic analog of LysoPC–DHA, called AceDoPC® for 1-acetyl,2-docosahexaenoyl-PC [118,119,120], was better incorporated into the brain of rats injected intravenously with AceDoPC compared to the free fatty acid form of DHA and PC–DHA [121]. Preliminary results showed that DHA was particularly accumulated in specific brain regions that included the hippocampus, one neurogenic niche of mammalian brains. Moreover, we also observed that this preferred vector of DHA to the brain was neurogenic on adult NPSCs in a model of hypoxia in vitro [122], and thus could serve two purposes: increasing DHA accretion and providing neuroprotection. DHA and other fatty acid transport intracellularly is also of primary importance, and is mainly handled by fatty acid binding proteins [123,124]. Several studies have highlighted the importance of these proteins for brain development [125,126]. DHA, and phospholipids containing DHA, also have the ability to modulate membrane composition through lipid rafts and act on the trafficking of signaling molecules, which could, in turn, impact neuronal processes [127,128]. A comprehensive review of DHA brain uptake and metabolism was published recently [129] (see Figure 2).

4. DHA Modulation of Neuroprotection and Neurogenesis for Therapeutics

4.1. DHA Impacts Cell-Fate Decision and Survival of Newly Born Cells

Much work is now ongoing to determine the exact mechanisms underlying the possible use of DHA and other omega-3 fatty acids to influence the fate and behavior of neural stem cells. As mentioned above, DHA can serve as a substrate for the production of energy for the progression of cell cycle and cell division. To our knowledge, only a few studies have focused on the effects of DHA on the proliferation of adult NSPCs, compared to numerous studies on embryonic NSPCs as well as studies on cancer cells. We report here the work of Sakayori et al., who showed that arachidonic acid (ARA, an omega-6 fatty acid) and DHA have distinct effects on the metabolism of NSPCs [130]. DHA supplementation to adult NSPCs from rats showed increased proliferation, as did ARA supplementation. However, in a medium deprived of growth factors, DHA induced neurogenesis while ARA increased astrogliogenesis. They observed that high concentrations of DHA (10 micromolar and above) could be detrimental to the proliferation capacity of the NSPCs, which was also observed by our group [122], and which interestingly was not observed when DHA as esterified within AceDoPC®, a DHA-containing phospholipid. These high concentrations of DHA have also been studied in cancer cells, and they were shown to reduce proliferation, invasion, and also survival of the cells [131,132], due to the accumulation of ROS intracellularly and damage to the mitochondria that led to the activation of the apoptotic pathway [133].
One emerging hypothesis is that DHA induces the exit of the cells from the S-phase of the cell cycle to initiate differentiation into specialized mature cells [134]. If the right balance is found between the non-detrimental effects of DHA, this could lead to an enrichment in mature cells from NSPCs, as well as maintained cell proliferation. Transgenic mice expressing the Caenorhabditis elegans fat-1 gene are able to convert omega-3 fatty acids from omega-6 fatty acids, leading to an abundance of the former lipids. These mice showed an enhancement of proliferating cells in the SGZ of young adult mice and an increase in performance in spatial learning tests [135], which the authors explained as an increase in neurogenesis that in turn helped with hippocampal memory. Numerous reviews have reported the effects of DHA on the neurogenesis of neural stem cells, mainly embryonic [136,137,138,139]. DHA promotes neurogenesis in vitro but does not promote gliogenesis [130,140,141,142]. DHA can act on transcription factors such as Hes1 (hairy and enhancer of split 1, a basic helix–loop–helix transcription factor), increasing p27kip1 level, a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, thus stopping cell cycle progression [143] and inducing differentiation [144,145,146]. NeuroD (helix–loop–helix transcription factor) and MAP2 (microtubule-associated protein 2) levels were also increased with DHA addition, suggesting that protein kinase C-dependent mechanisms might be involved. Another candidate pathway is the activation of G-protein coupled receptor 40 [140]. The increased number of neurons derived from NSPCs could also be due to a combination between an increased number of NSPCs differentiating into neurons and a pro-survival effect on newly born neurons. DHA and omega-3 fatty acids enhance neuroprotection by anti-apoptotic [143,147,148], anti-oxidative [149,150,151,152], and anti-inflammatory effects [153,154]. Furthermore, as mentioned above, DHA metabolites also present pro-survival activity.

4.2. DHA Induces Neuroprotection and Increased Neurogenesis

Normal aging is marked by neurogenesis loss, and thus could be impacted by DHA supply. However, most studies have indicated that DHA effects on neurogenesis were mostly relevant when compared with subjects fed with DHA-deficient diets [155,156], except for the recent study mentioned previously with DHA supplementation through LysoPC–DHA [115]. This could hint at the hypothesis that DHA effects could be more relevant in patients with impaired neurogenesis and cognitive functions rather than healthy patients, and that the form of DHA supply is particularly important. Therefore, DHA has been studied as a potent therapy to treat neurodegeneration.
These studies are, however, limited, as there is no common agreement on the best animal models with which to study major neurodegenerative diseases such as AD or PD. The most studied pathology is AD, and our group previously published a review of the effects of DHA on this widespread neurodegenerative disease [157]. It was recently published that AD patients have impaired adult hippocampal neurogenesis compared to healthy patients [5], as was hypothesized before [158]. DHA exerts neuroprotective effects mainly by impairing beta-amyloid production [159,160]. Few of these studies showed enhancement of memory performances, and only one reported higher proliferation of cells in the SGZ with the administration of 2-hydroxy-DHA [161]. One explanation could be that the models of AD used did not completely recapitulate the disease symptoms and did not impair neurogenesis; however, this recent review hinted at the use of a model of AD with disturbed lipid metabolism in the SVZ [162]. In PD animal models, DHA has proven to be neuroprotective [163,164,165,166], but there are no reports of increased neurogenesis.
As for acute brain injuries, two recent studies were published on DHA effects upon traumatic brain injury (TBI) [167,168]. Of particular interest, one group transplanted NSPCs following TBI, with DHA or without, and observed an increase of neurogenesis with DHA supplementation compared to NSPCs transplanted alone in the SVZ [167]. Stroke induces important brain lesions, and improvement of recovery is of particular interest. Numerous studies have been published on DHA supply post-stroke, and some showed increased neurogenesis in the cortex and striatum with DHA complexed with albumin [169], increased neurogenesis and oligodendrogenesis in the striatum with an omega-3 diet [170], and improvement of neurobehavioral scores [21]. We also observed increased proliferation with DHA supply to NSPCs after oxygen and glucose deprivation, a protocol mimicking hypoxia–ischemia, and we noted an increase in neurogenesis, this effect being higher when DHA was esterified in AceDoPC® [122]. However, only a few studies have focused on the capacity of NSPCs to regenerate the brain, and particular interest lies in the study of the neurogenic niches that are the SVZ and SGZ of the hippocampus.

5. Conclusions

This review has summed up the current knowledge of the effects of omega-3 fatty acids on adult NSPCs, with a particular focus on DHA. Omega-3 fatty acids can be incorporated into the cell membrane in different forms, but they have first to cross the BBB in order to reach the brain and the currently known neurogenic niches. They are actors and coordinators of the metabolic pathways involved in NSPC dynamics, and could be applied for therapeutics as prevention or cure to neurodegenerative diseases, via better survival of the newly born cells from the remaining pool, a neuroprotective effect, and the induction of neurogenesis in spite of astrogliogenesis. Delivery strategies for better brain accretion of DHA are currently being tested in animal models and are necessary for enhancement of the putative neurogenic and neuroprotective effects. To bypass the effect of ROS accumulation and the risk of DHA toxicity, it is also suggested to focus future work on the effects of potent derivatives of omega-3, such as resolvins and protectins. We propose that further interdisciplinary studies which combine the understanding of NSPC fate decision and fate commitment with the comprehension of omega-3 fatty acid biogenesis and downstream signaling, are of uttermost interest for the development of a relevant, putative, and non-invasive therapy against neurodegeneration and towards brain regeneration therapy.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the support of National Institute of Applied Sciences-Lyon and the French Ministry of Education and Research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

DHADocosahexaenoic acid
NSPCNeural stem/progenitor cells
ADAlzheimer’s disease
PDParkinson’s disease
SGZSubgranular zone
SVZSubventricular zone
OXPHOSOxidative phosphorylation
ROSReactive oxygen species+
ATPAdenosine triphosphate
FAOFatty acid oxidation
ALAAlpha-linoleic acid
EPAEicosapentaenoic acid
PCPhosphatidylcholine
PEPhosphatidylethanolamine
PIPhosphatidylinositol
PSPhosphatidylserine
EtnGplEthanolamine glycerophospholipid
PD1Protectin D1
PDXProtectin DX
BBBBlood–brain barrier
LysoPCLysophosphatidylcholine
LysoPC-DHALysophosphatidylcholine-DHA
Mfsd2aMajor facilitator superfamily domain-containing protein 2A
AceDoPC®1-acetyl,2-docosahexaenoyl-PC
PC-DHAPhosphatidylcholine-DHA
NE-DHANon-esterified DHA
LysoPLLysophospholipid
SPMSpecialized pro-resolving mediators
ARAArachidonic acid
Hes1Hairy and enhancer of split 1
MAP2Microtubule-associated protein 2
TBITraumatic brain injury

References

  1. Eriksson, P.S.; Perfilieva, E.; Björk-Eriksson, T.; Alborn, A.-M.; Nordborg, C.; Peterson, D.A.; Gage, F.H. Neurogenesis in the adult human hippocampus. Nat. Med. 1998, 4, 1313–1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Manganas, L.N.; Zhang, X.; Li, Y.; Hazel, R.D.; Smith, S.D.; Wagshul, M.E.; Henn, F.; Benveniste, H.; Djuric, P.M.; Enikolopov, G.; et al. Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Identifies Neural Progenitor Cells in the Live Human Brain. Science 2007, 318, 980–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Spalding, K.L.; Bergmann, O.; Alkass, K.; Bernard, S.; Salehpour, M.; Huttner, H.B.; Boström, E.; Westerlund, I.; Vial, C.; Buchholz, B.A.; et al. Dynamics of Hippocampal Neurogenesis in Adult Humans. Cell 2013, 153, 1219–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Boldrini, M.; Fulmore, C.A.; Tartt, A.N.; Simeon, L.R.; Pavlova, I.; Poposka, V.; Rosoklija, G.B.; Stankov, A.; Arango, V.; Dwork, A.J.; et al. Human Hippocampal Neurogenesis Persists throughout Aging. Cell Stem Cell 2018, 22, 589–599.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Moreno-Jiménez, E.P.; Flor-García, M.; Terreros-Roncal, J.; Rábano, A.; Cafini, F.; Pallas-Bazarra, N.; Ávila, J.; Llorens-Martín, M. Adult hippocampal neurogenesis is abundant in neurologically healthy subjects and drops sharply in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Med. 2019, 25, 554–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Reynolds, B.; Weiss, S. Generation of neurons and astrocytes from isolated cells of the adult mammalian central nervous system. Science 1992, 255, 1707–1710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Lois, C.; Alvarez-Buylla, A. Proliferating subventricular zone cells in the adult mammalian forebrain can differentiate into neurons and glia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1993, 90, 2074–2077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Cameron, H.A.; Woolley, C.S.; McEwen, B.S.; Gould, E. Differentiation of newly born neurons and glia in the dentate gyrus of the adult rat. Neuroscience 1993, 56, 337–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Babu, H.; Claasen, J.H.; Kannan, S.; Rünker, A.E.; Palmer, T.; Kempermann, G. A protocol for isolation and enriched monolayer cultivation of neural precursor cells from mouse dentate gyrus. Front. Neurosci. 2011, 5, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Encinas, J.M.; Michurina, T.V.; Peunova, N.; Park, J.H.; Tordo, J.; Peterson, D.A.; Fishell, G.; Koulakov, A.; Enikolopov, G. Division-Coupled Astrocytic Differentiation and Age-Related Depletion of Neural Stem Cells in the Adult Hippocampus. Cell Stem Cell 2011, 8, 566–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Breckenridge, W.C.; Gombos, G.; Morgan, I.G. The Lipid Composition of Adult Rat Brain Synaptosomal Plasma Membranes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1972, 266, 695–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bazan, N.G.; Scott, B.L. Dietary omega-3 fatty acids and accumulation of docosahexaenoic acid in rod photoreceptor cells of the retina and at synapses. Ups. J. Med. Sci. Suppl. 1990, 48, 97–107. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Bourre, J.M.; Francois, M.; Youyou, A.; Dumont, O.; Piciotti, M.; Pascal, G.; Durand, G. The effects of dietary alpha-linolenic acid on the composition of nerve membranes, enzymatic activity, amplitude of electrophysiological parameters, resistance to poisons and performance of learning tasks in rats. J. Nutr. 1989, 119, 1880–1892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Birch, E.E.; Garfield, S.; Hoffman, D.R.; Uauy, R.; Birch, D.G. A randomized controlled trial of early dietary supply of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids and mental development in term infants. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 2000, 42, 174–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Innis, S.M.; Friesen, R.W. Essential n-3 fatty acids in pregnant women and early visual acuity maturation in term infants. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008, 87, 548–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Innis, S.M. Dietary omega 3 fatty acids and the developing brain. Brain Res. 2008, 1237, 35–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Peet, M.; Stokes, C. Omega-3 fatty acids in the treatment of psychiatric disorders. Drugs 2005, 65, 1051–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Young, G.; Conquer, J. Omega-3 fatty acids and neuropsychiatric disorders. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 2005, 45, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Gao, X.; Chen, H.; Fung, T.T.; Logroscino, G.; Schwarzschild, M.A.; Hu, F.B.; Ascherio, A. Prospective study of dietary pattern and risk of Parkinson disease. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2007, 86, 1486–1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Belayev, L.; Khoutorova, L.; Atkins, K.D.; Bazan, N.G. Robust Docosahexaenoic Acid–Mediated Neuroprotection in a Rat Model of Transient, Focal Cerebral Ischemia. Stroke 2009, 40, 3121–3126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hong, S.-H.; Belayev, L.; Khoutorova, L.; Obenaus, A.; Bazan, N.G. Docosahexaenoic acid confers enduring neuroprotection in experimental stroke. J. Neurol. Sci. 2014, 338, 135–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Temple, S. Division and differentiation of isolated CNS blast cells in microculture. Nature 1989, 340, 471–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Reynolds, B.; Tetzlaff, W.; Weiss, S. A multipotent EGF-responsive striatal embryonic progenitor cell produces neurons and astrocytes. J. Neurosci. 1992, 12, 4565–4574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Reynolds, B.A.; Weiss, S. Clonal and population analyses demonstrate that an EGF-responsive mammalian embryonic CNS precursor is a stem cell. Dev. Biol. 1996, 175, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Temple, S. The development of neural stem cells. Nature 2001, 414, 112–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Franco, S.J.; Müller, U. Shaping Our Minds: Stem and Progenitor Cell Diversity in the Mammalian Neocortex. Neuron 2013, 77, 19–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Florio, M.; Huttner, W.B. Neural progenitors, neurogenesis and the evolution of the neocortex. Development 2014, 141, 2182–2194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Paridaen, J.T.; Huttner, W.B. Neurogenesis during development of the vertebrate central nervous system. EMBO Rep. 2014, 15, 351–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Fernández, V.; Llinares-Benadero, C.; Borrell, V. Cerebral cortex expansion and folding: what have we learned? EMBO J. 2016, 35, 1021–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Qian, X.; Shen, Q.; Goderie, S.K.; He, W.; Capela, A.; Davis, A.A.; Temple, S. Timing of CNS Cell Generation. Neuron 2000, 28, 69–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Altman, J.; Das, G.D. Autoradiographic and histological evidence of postnatal hippocampal neurogenesis in rats. J. Comp. Neurol. 1965, 124, 319–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Kuhn, H.; Dickinson-Anson, H.; Gage, F. Neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus of the adult rat: age-related decrease of neuronal progenitor proliferation. J. Neurosci. 1996, 16, 2027–2033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Altman, J. Autoradiographic and histological studies of postnatal neurogenesis. IV. Cell proliferation and migration in the anterior forebrain, with special reference to persisting neurogenesis in the olfactory bulb. J. Comp. Neurol. 1969, 137, 433–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Doetsch, F.; García-Verdugo, J.M.; Alvarez-Buylla, A. Cellular Composition and Three-Dimensional Organization of the Subventricular Germinal Zone in the Adult Mammalian Brain. J. Neurosci. 1997, 17, 5046–5061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Lim, D.A.; Alvarez-Buylla, A. The Adult Ventricular–Subventricular Zone (V-SVZ) and Olfactory Bulb (OB) Neurogenesis. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2016, 8, a018820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Morshead, C.M.; Reynolds, B.A.; Craig, C.G.; McBurney, M.W.; Staines, W.A.; Morassutti, D.; Weiss, S.; van der Kooy, D. Neural stem cells in the adult mammalian forebrain: A relatively quiescent subpopulation of subependymal cells. Neuron 1994, 13, 1071–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Young, K.M.; Fogarty, M.; Kessaris, N.; Richardson, W.D. Subventricular Zone Stem Cells Are Heterogeneous with Respect to Their Embryonic Origins and Neurogenic Fates in the Adult Olfactory Bulb. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27, 8286–8296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lugert, S.; Basak, O.; Knuckles, P.; Haussler, U.; Fabel, K.; Götz, M.; Haas, C.A.; Kempermann, G.; Taylor, V.; Giachino, C. Quiescent and Active Hippocampal Neural Stem Cells with Distinct Morphologies Respond Selectively to Physiological and Pathological Stimuli and Aging. Cell Stem Cell 2010, 6, 445–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Furutachi, S.; Miya, H.; Watanabe, T.; Kawai, H.; Yamasaki, N.; Harada, Y.; Imayoshi, I.; Nelson, M.; Nakayama, K.I.; Hirabayashi, Y.; et al. Slowly dividing neural progenitors are an embryonic origin of adult neural stem cells. Nat. Neurosci. 2015, 18, 657–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Fuentealba, L.C.; Rompani, S.B.; Parraguez, J.I.; Obernier, K.; Romero, R.; Cepko, C.L.; Alvarez-Buylla, A. Embryonic Origin of Postnatal Neural Stem Cells. Cell 2015, 161, 1644–1655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Gould, E.; Beylin, A.; Tanapat, P.; Reeves, A.; Shors, T.J. Learning enhances adult neurogenesis in the hippocampal formation. Nat. Neurosci. 1999, 2, 260–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Kempermann, G.; Gast, D.; Gage, F.H. Neuroplasticity in old age: Sustained fivefold induction of hippocampal neurogenesis by long-term environmental enrichment. Ann. Neurol. 2002, 52, 135–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Clelland, C.D.; Choi, M.; Romberg, C.; Clemenson, G.D.; Fragniere, A.; Tyers, P.; Jessberger, S.; Saksida, L.M.; Barker, R.A.; Gage, F.H.; et al. A functional role for adult hippocampal neurogenesis in spatial pattern separation. Science 2009, 325, 210–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Jessberger, S.; Clark, R.E.; Broadbent, N.J.; Clemenson, G.D.; Consiglio, A.; Lie, D.C.; Squire, L.R.; Gage, F.H. Dentate gyrus-specific knockdown of adult neurogenesis impairs spatial and object recognition memory in adult rats. Learn. Mem. 2009, 16, 147–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Toda, T.; Gage, F.H. Review: adult neurogenesis contributes to hippocampal plasticity. Cell Tissue Res. 2018, 373, 693–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Codega, P.; Silva-Vargas, V.; Paul, A.; Maldonado-Soto, A.R.; DeLeo, A.M.; Pastrana, E.; Doetsch, F. Prospective Identification and Purification of Quiescent Adult Neural Stem Cells from Their In Vivo Niche. Neuron 2014, 82, 545–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Winner, B.; Cooper-Kuhn, C.M.; Aigner, R.; Winkler, J.; Kuhn, H.G. Long-term survival and cell death of newly generated neurons in the adult rat olfactory bulb. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2002, 16, 1681–1689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Rao, M.S.; Hattiangady, B.; Shetty, A.K. The window and mechanisms of major age-related decline in the production of new neurons within the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus. Aging Cell 2006, 5, 545–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Artegiani, B.; Calegari, F. Age-related cognitive decline: Can neural stem cells help us? Aging (Albany. NY) 2012, 4, 176–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Lupo, G.; Gioia, R.; Nisi, P.S.; Biagioni, S.; Cacci, E. Molecular Mechanisms of Neurogenic Aging in the Adult Mouse Subventricular Zone. J. Exp. Neurosci. 2019, 13, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Curtis, M.A.; Eriksson, P.S.; Faull, R.L.M. Progenitor cells and adult neurogenesis in neurodegenerative diseases and injuries of the basal ganglia. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 2007, 34, 528–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Taupin, P.; Gage, F.H. Adult neurogenesis and neural stem cells of the central nervous system in mammals. J. Neurosci. Res. 2002, 69, 745–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Pevny, L.; Rao, M.S. The stem-cell menagerie. Trends Neurosci. 2003, 26, 351–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Abrous, D.N.; Koehl, M.; Le Moal, M. Adult Neurogenesis: From Precursors to Network and Physiology. Physiol. Rev. 2005, 85, 523–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Silva-Vargas, V.; Crouch, E.E.; Doetsch, F. Adult neural stem cells and their niche: A dynamic duo during homeostasis, regeneration, and aging. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2013, 23, 935–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Urbán, N.; Guillemot, F. Neurogenesis in the embryonic and adult brain: same regulators, different roles. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2014, 8, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Bond, A.M.; Ming, G.L.; Song, H. Adult Mammalian Neural Stem Cells and Neurogenesis: Five Decades Later. Cell Stem Cell 2015, 17, 385–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Pino, A.; Fumagalli, G.; Bifari, F.; Decimo, I. New neurons in adult brain: distribution, molecular mechanisms and therapies. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2017, 141, 4–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Bielefeld, P.; Mooney, C.; Henshall, D.C.; Fitzsimons, C.P. miRNA-Mediated Regulation of Adult Hippocampal Neurogenesis; Implications for Epilepsy. Brain Plast. 2016, 3, 43–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Pons-Espinal, M.; de Luca, E.; Marzi, M.J.; Beckervordersandforth, R.; Armirotti, A.; Nicassio, F.; Fabel, K.; Kempermann, G.; De Pietri Tonelli, D. Synergic Functions of miRNAs Determine Neuronal Fate of Adult Neural Stem Cells. Stem Cell Reports 2017, 8, 1046–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Pons-Espinal, M.; Gasperini, C.; Marzi, M.J.; Braccia, C.; Armirotti, A.; Pötzsch, A.; Walker, T.L.; Fabel, K.; Nicassio, F.; Kempermann, G.; et al. MiR-135a-5p Is Critical for Exercise-Induced Adult Neurogenesis. Stem Cell Reports 2019, 12, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Shivraj Sohur, U.; Emsley, J.G.; Mitchell, B.D.; Macklis, J.D. Adult neurogenesis and cellular brain repair with neural progenitors, precursors and stem cells. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2006, 361, 1477–1497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Barca-Mayo, O.; De Pietri Tonelli, D. Convergent microRNA actions coordinate neocortical development. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2014, 71, 2975–2995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Encinas, J.M.; Fitzsimons, C.P. Gene regulation in adult neural stem cells. Current challenges and possible applications. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2017, 120, 118–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Ito, K.; Suda, T. Metabolic requirements for the maintenance of self-renewing stem cells. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2014, 15, 243–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Simsek, T.; Kocabas, F.; Zheng, J.; DeBerardinis, R.J.; Mahmoud, A.I.; Olson, E.N.; Schneider, J.W.; Zhang, C.C.; Sadek, H.A. The Distinct Metabolic Profile of Hematopoietic Stem Cells Reflects Their Location in a Hypoxic Niche. Cell Stem Cell 2010, 7, 380–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Choi, J.R.; Pingguan-Murphy, B.; Wan Abas, W.A.B.; Noor Azmi, M.A.; Omar, S.Z.; Chua, K.H.; Wan Safwani, W.K.Z. Impact of low oxygen tension on stemness, proliferation and differentiation potential of human adipose-derived stem cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2014, 448, 218–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Inoue, S.I.; Noda, S.; Kashima, K.; Nakada, K.; Hayashi, J.I.; Miyoshi, H. Mitochondrial respiration defects modulate differentiation but not proliferation of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. FEBS Lett. 2010, 584, 3402–3409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Beckervordersandforth, R.; Ebert, B.; Schäffner, I.; Moss, J.; Fiebig, C.; Shin, J.; Moore, D.L.; Ghosh, L.; Trinchero, M.F.; Stockburger, C.; et al. Role of Mitochondrial Metabolism in the Control of Early Lineage Progression and Aging Phenotypes in Adult Hippocampal Neurogenesis. Neuron 2017, 93, 560–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Walton, N.M.; Shin, R.; Tajinda, K.; Heusner, C.L.; Kogan, J.H.; Miyake, S.; Chen, Q.; Tamura, K.; Matsumoto, M. Adult Neurogenesis Transiently Generates Oxidative Stress. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e35264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Khacho, M.; Clark, A.; Svoboda, D.S.; Azzi, J.; MacLaurin, J.G.; Meghaizel, C.; Sesaki, H.; Lagace, D.C.; Germain, M.; Harper, M.E.; et al. Mitochondrial Dynamics Impacts Stem Cell Identity and Fate Decisions by Regulating a Nuclear Transcriptional Program. Cell Stem Cell 2016, 19, 232–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Venkatachalam, G.; Surana, U.; Clément, M.-V. Replication stress-induced endogenous DNA damage drives cellular senescence induced by a sub-lethal oxidative stress. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, 10564–10582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Wang, W.; Osenbroch, P.; Skinnes, R.; Esbensen, Y.; Bjørås, M.; Eide, L. Mitochondrial DNA integrity is essential for mitochondrial maturation during differentiation of neural stem cells. Stem Cells 2010, 28, 2195–2204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Wang, W.; Esbensen, Y.; Kunke, D.; Suganthan, R.; Rachek, L.; Bjoras, M.; Eide, L. Mitochondrial DNA Damage Level Determines Neural Stem Cell Differentiation Fate. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31, 9746–9751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Madabhushi, R.; Pan, L.; Tsai, L.H. DNA damage and its links to neurodegeneration. Neuron 2014, 83, 266–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Chow, H.; Herrup, K. Genomic integrity and the ageing brain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2015, 16, 672–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Singh, A.; Kukreti, R.; Saso, L.; Kukreti, S. Oxidative Stress: A Key Modulator in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Molecules 2019, 24, 1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Ahlqvist, K.J.; Suomalainen, A.; Hämäläinen, R.H. Stem cells, mitochondria and aging. Biochim. Biophys. Acta - Bioenerg. 2015, 1847, 1380–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Wanet, A.; Arnould, T.; Najimi, M.; Renard, P. Connecting Mitochondria, Metabolism, and Stem Cell Fate. Stem Cells Dev. 2015, 24, 1957–1971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Khacho, M.; Harris, R.; Slack, R.S. Mitochondria as central regulators of neural stem cell fate and cognitive function. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2019, 20, 34–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Knobloch, M.; Braun, S.M.; Zurkirchen, L.; von Schoultz, C.; Zamboni, N.; Araúzo-Bravo, M.J.; Kovacs, W.J.; Karalay, O.; Suter, U.; Machado, R.A.; et al. Metabolic control of adult neural stem cell activity by Fasn-dependent lipogenesis. Nature 2013, 493, 226–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Knobloch, M.; Pilz, G.-A.; Ghesquière, B.; Kovacs, W.J.; Wegleiter, T.; Moore, D.L.; Hruzova, M.; Zamboni, N.; Carmeliet, P.; Jessberger, S. A Fatty Acid Oxidation-Dependent Metabolic Shift Regulates Adult Neural Stem Cell Activity. Cell Rep. 2017, 20, 2144–2155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Stoll, E.A.; Makin, R.; Sweet, I.R.; Trevelyan, A.J.; Miwa, S.; Horner, P.J.; Turnbull, D.M. Neural stem cells in the adult subventricular zone oxidize fatty acids to produce energy and support neurogenic activity. Stem Cells 2015, 33, 2306–2319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Ramachandra, C.J.A.; Mehta, A.; Wong, P.; Ja, K.P.M.M.; Fritsche-Danielson, R.; Bhat, R.V.; Hausenloy, D.J.; Kovalik, J.P.; Shim, W. Fatty acid metabolism driven mitochondrial bioenergetics promotes advanced developmental phenotypes in human induced pluripotent stem cell derived cardiomyocytes. Int. J. Cardiol. 2018, 272, 288–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Cornacchia, D.; Zhang, C.; Zimmer, B.; Chung, S.Y.; Fan, Y.; Soliman, M.A.; Tchieu, J.; Chambers, S.M.; Shah, H.; Paull, D.; et al. Lipid Deprivation Induces a Stable, Naive-to-Primed Intermediate State of Pluripotency in Human PSCs. Cell Stem Cell 2019, 25, 120–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Knobloch, M.; Jessberger, S. Metabolism and neurogenesis. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2017, 42, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Bourre, J.-M. Roles of unsaturated fatty acids (especially omega-3 fatty acids) in the brain at various ages and during ageing. J. Nutr. Health Aging 2004, 8, 163–174. [Google Scholar]
  88. Luchtman, D.W.; Song, C. Cognitive enhancement by omega-3 fatty acids from child-hood to old age: Findings from animal and clinical studies. Neuropharmacology 2013, 64, 550–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Sakayori, N.; Kimura, R.; Osumi, N. Impact of lipid nutrition on neural stem/progenitor cells. Stem Cells Int. 2013, 2013, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Hashimoto, M.; Hossain, S.; Al Mamun, A.; Matsuzaki, K.; Arai, H. Docosahexaenoic acid: one molecule diverse functions. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2016, 8551, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Surette, M.E. The science behind dietary omega-3 fatty acids. Cmaj 2008, 178, 177–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Domenichiello, A.F.; Kitson, A.P.; Bazinet, R.P. Is docosahexaenoic acid synthesis from alpha-linolenic acid sufficient to supply the adult brain? Prog. Lipid Res. 2015, 59, 54–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Metz, K.R.; Dunphy, L.K. Absolute quantitation of tissue phospholipids using 31P NMR spectroscopy. J. Lipid Res. 1996, 37, 2251–2265. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  94. André, A.; Juanéda, P.; Sébédio, J.L.; Chardigny, J.M. Effects of aging and dietary n−3 fatty acids on rat brain phospholipids: Focus on plasmalogens. Lipids 2005, 40, 799–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Xiao, Y.; Huang, Y.; Chen, Z.-Y. Distribution, depletion and recovery of docosahexaenoic acid are region-specific in rat brain. Br. J. Nutr. 2005, 94, 544–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  96. Joffre, C.; Grégoire, S.; De Smedt, V.; Acar, N.; Bretillon, L.; Nadjar, A.; Layé, S. Modulation of brain PUFA content in different experimental models of mice. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fat. Acids 2016, 114, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Smink, W.; Gerrits, W.J.J.; Gloaguen, M.; Ruiter, A.; van Baal, J. Linoleic and α-linolenic acid as precursor and inhibitor for the synthesis of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids in liver and brain of growing pigs. Animal 2012, 6, 262–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Bannenberg, G.; Serhan, C.N. Specialized pro-resolving lipid mediators in the inflammatory response: An update. Biochim. Biophys. Acta - Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 2010, 1801, 1260–1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Spite, M.; Clària, J.; Serhan, C.N. Resolvins, specialized proresolving lipid mediators, and their potential roles in metabolic diseases. Cell Metab. 2014, 19, 21–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Chen, P.; Véricel, E.; Lagarde, M.; Guichardant, M. Poxytrins, a class of oxygenated products from polyunsaturated fatty acids, potently inhibit blood platelet aggregation. FASEB J. 2011, 25, 382–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Jouvène, C.; Fourmaux, B.; Géloën, A.; Balas, L.; Durand, T.; Lagarde, M.; Létisse, M.; Guichardant, M. Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Free and Esterified Oxygenated Derivatives from Docosahexaenoic Acid in Rat Brain. Lipids 2018, 53, 103–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Das, U.N. Influence of polyunsaturated fatty acids and their metabolites on stem cell biology. Nutrition 2011, 27, 21–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Weylandt, K.H.; Chiu, C.-Y.; Gomolka, B.; Waechter, S.F.; Wiedenmann, B. Omega-3 fatty acids and their lipid mediators: Towards an understanding of resolvin and protectin formation. Prostaglandins Lipid Mediat. 2012, 97, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Weylandt, K.H. Docosapentaenoic acid derived metabolites and mediators – The new world of lipid mediator medicine in a nutshell. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2016, 785, 108–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Lo Van, A.; Sakayori, N.; Hachem, M.; Belkouch, M.; Picq, M.; Lagarde, M.; Osumi, N.; Bernoud-Hubac, N. Mechanisms of DHA transport to the brain and potential therapy to neurodegenerative diseases. Biochimie 2016, 130, 163–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Lagarde, M.; Bernoud, N.; Brossard, N.; Lemaitre-Delaunay, D.; Thiès, F.; Croset, M.; Lecerf, J. Lysophosphatidylcholine as a preferred carrier form of docosahexaenoic acid to the brain. J. Mol. Neurosci. 2001, 16, 201–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Brossard, N.; Croset, M.; Lecerf, J.; Pachiaudi, C.; Normand, S.; Chirouze, V.; Macovschi, O.; Riou, J.P.; Tayot, J.L.; Lagarde, M. Metabolic fate of an oral tracer dose of [13C]docosahexaenoic acid triglycerides in the rat. Am. J. Physiol. - Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 1996, 270, R846–R854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Ouellet, M.; Emond, V.; Chen, C.T.; Julien, C.; Bourasset, F.; Oddo, S.; LaFerla, F.; Bazinet, R.P.; Calon, F. Diffusion of docosahexaenoic and eicosapentaenoic acids through the blood–brain barrier: An in situ cerebral perfusion study. Neurochem. Int. 2009, 55, 476–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Nguyen, L.N.; Ma, D.; Shui, G.; Wong, P.; Cazenave-Gassiot, A.; Zhang, X.; Wenk, M.R.; Goh, E.L.K.; Silver, D.L. Mfsd2a is a transporter for the essential omega-3 fatty acid docosahexaenoic acid. Nature 2014, 509, 503–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Quek, D.Q.Y.; Nguyen, L.N.; Fan, H.; Silver, D.L. Structural Insights into the Transport Mechanism of the Human Sodium-dependent Lysophosphatidylcholine Transporter MFSD2A. J. Biol. Chem. 2016, 291, 9383–9394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Teng, P.; Bateman, N.W.; Darcy, K.M.; Hamilton, C.A.; Maxwell, G.L.; Bakkenist, C.J.; Conrads, T.P. Pharmacologic inhibition of ATR and ATM offers clinically important distinctions to enhancing platinum or radiation response in ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancer cells. Gynecol. Oncol. 2015, 136, 554–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  112. Chan, J.P.; Wong, B.H.; Chin, C.F.; Galam, D.L.A.; Foo, J.C.; Wong, L.C.; Ghosh, S.; Wenk, M.R.; Cazenave-Gassiot, A.; Silver, D.L. The lysolipid transporter Mfsd2a regulates lipogenesis in the developing brain. PLoS Biol. 2018, 16, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Thies, F.; Pillon, C.; Moliere, P.; Lagarde, M.; Lecerf, J. Preferential incorporation of sn-2 lysoPC DHA over unesterified DHA in the young rat brain. Am. J. Physiol. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 1994, 267, R1273–R1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Bazinet, R.P.; Bernoud-Hubac, N.; Lagarde, M. How the plasma lysophospholipid and unesterified fatty acid pools supply the brain with docosahexaenoic acid. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fat. Acids 2019, 142, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Sugasini, D.; Thomas, R.; Yalagala, P.C.R.; Tai, L.M.; Subbaiah, P.V. Dietary docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) as lysophosphatidylcholine, but not as free acid, enriches brain DHA and improves memory in adult mice. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 11263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Chouinard-Watkins, R.; Lacombe, R.J.S.; Metherel, A.H.; Masoodi, M.; Bazinet, R.P. DHA Esterified to Phosphatidylserine or Phosphatidylcholine is More Efficient at Targeting the Brain than DHA Esterified to Triacylglycerol. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2019, 63, 1801224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Destaillats, F.; Oliveira, M.; Schmid, V.B.; Masserey-Elmelegy, I.; Giuffrida, F.; Thakkar, S.K.; Dupuis, L.; Gosoniu, M.L.; Cruz-Hernandez, C. Comparison of the incorporation of DHA in circulatory and neural tissue when provided as triacylglycerol (TAG), monoacylglycerol (MAG) or phospholipids (PL) provides new insight into fatty acid bioavailability. Nutrients 2018, 10, 620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Polette, A.; Deshayes, C.; Chantegrel, B.; Croset, M.; Armstrong, J.M.; Lagarde, M. Synthesis of acetyl,docosahexaenoyl-glycerophosphocholine and its characterization using nuclear magnetic resonance. Lipids 1999, 34, 1333–1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Lagarde, M.; Guichardant, M.; Picq, M.; Michaud, S.; Doutheau, A. Method for preparing acetyl,docosahexaenoyl-glycerophosphocholine and use thereof for the delivery of polyunsaturated fatty acids. International Application No.: PCT/FR2007/001868; Publication No.: WO 2008/068413, 12 June 2008. [Google Scholar]
  120. Lagarde, M.; Hachem, M.; Bernoud-Hubac, N.; Picq, M.; Véricel, E.; Guichardant, M. Biological properties of a DHA-containing structured phospholipid (AceDoPC) to target the brain. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fat. Acids 2015, 92, 63–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Hachem, M.; Géloën, A.; Van, A.L.; Foumaux, B.; Fenart, L.; Gosselet, F.; Da Silva, P.; Breton, G.; Lagarde, M.; Picq, M.; et al. Efficient Docosahexaenoic Acid Uptake by the Brain from a Structured Phospholipid. Mol. Neurobiol. 2016, 53, 3205–3215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Lo Van, A.; Sakayori, N.; Hachem, M.; Belkouch, M.; Picq, M.; Fourmaux, B.; Lagarde, M.; Osumi, N.; Bernoud-Hubac, N. Targeting the Brain with a Neuroprotective Omega-3 Fatty Acid to Enhance Neurogenesis in Hypoxic Condition in Culture. Mol. Neurobiol. 2019, 56, 986–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Owada, Y.; Yoshimoto, T.; Kondo, H. Spatio-temporally differential expression of genes for three members of fatty acid binding proteins in developing and mature rat brains. J. Chem. Neuroanat. 1996, 12, 113–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Storch, J.; McDermott, L. Structural and functional analysis of fatty acid-binding proteins. J. Lipid Res. 2009, 50, S126–S131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  125. Arai, Y. Role of Fabp7, a Downstream Gene of Pax6, in the Maintenance of Neuroepithelial Cells during Early Embryonic Development of the Rat Cortex. J. Neurosci. 2005, 25, 9752–9761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  126. Li, H.; Yang, Q.; Han, X.; Tan, X.; Qin, J.; Jin, G. Low-dose DHA-induced astrocyte proliferation can be attenuated by insufficient expression of BLBP in vitro. Prostaglandins Lipid Mediat. 2018, 134, 114–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Langelier, B.; Linard, A.; Bordat, C.; Lavialle, M.; Heberden, C. Long chain-polyunsaturated fatty acids modulate membrane phospholipid composition and protein localization in lipid rafts of neural stem cell cultures. J. Cell. Biochem. 2010, 110, 1356–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Valenzuela, A.; Nieto, S.; Sanhueza, J.; Morgado, N.; Rojas, I.; Zañartu, P. Supplementing female rats with DHA-lysophosphatidylcholine increases docosahexaenoic acid and acetylcholine contents in the brain and improves the memory and learning capabilities of the pups. Grasas y Aceites 2010, 61, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Lacombe, R.J.S.; Chouinard-Watkins, R.; Bazinet, R.P. Brain docosahexaenoic acid uptake and metabolism. Mol. Aspects Med. 2018, 64, 109–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Sakayori, N.; Maekawa, M.; Numayama-Tsuruta, K.; Katura, T.; Moriya, T.; Osumi, N. Distinctive effects of arachidonic acid and docosahexaenoic acid on neural stem/progenitor cells. Genes to Cells 2011, 16, 778–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Song, E.A.; Kim, H. Docosahexaenoic acid induces oxidative DNA damage and apoptosis, and enhances the chemosensitivity of cancer cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Kim, S.; Jing, K.; Shin, S.; Jeong, S.; Han, S.H.; Oh, H.; Yoo, Y.S.; Han, J.; Jeon, Y.J.; Heo, J.Y.; et al. ω3-polyunsaturated fatty acids induce cell death through apoptosis and autophagy in glioblastoma cells: In vitro and in vivo. Oncol. Rep. 2018, 39, 239–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. So, W.; Liu, W.; Leung, K. Omega-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids Trigger Cell Cycle Arrest and Induce Apoptosis in Human Neuroblastoma LA-N-1 Cells. Nutrients 2015, 7, 6956–6973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Newell, M.; Baker, K.; Postovit, L.M.; Field, C.J. A critical review on the effect of docosahexaenoic acid (Dha) on cancer cell cycle progression. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 1784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. He, C.; Qu, X.; Cui, L.; Wang, J.; Kang, J.X. Improved spatial learning performance of fat-1 mice is associated with enhanced neurogenesis and neuritogenesis by docosahexaenoic acid. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 11370–11375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  136. Bieberich, E. It’s a lipid’s world: Bioactive lipid metabolism and signaling in neural stem cell differentiation. Neurochem. Res. 2012, 37, 1208–1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Faigle, R.; Song, H. Signaling mechanisms regulating adult neural stem cells and neurogenesis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta - Gen. Subj. 2013, 1830, 2435–2448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Kang, J.X.; Wan, J.-B.; He, C. Concise Review: Regulation of Stem Cell Proliferation and Differentiation by Essential Fatty Acids and Their Metabolites. Stem Cells 2014, 32, 1092–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Knobloch, M. The Role of Lipid Metabolism for Neural Stem Cell Regulation. Brain Plast. 2017, 3, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Ma, D.; Zhang, M.; Larsen, C.P.; Xu, F.; Hua, W.; Yamashima, T.; Mao, Y.; Zhou, L. DHA promotes the neuronal differentiation of rat neural stem cells transfected with GPR40 gene. Brain Res. 2010, 1330, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Katakura, M.; Hashimoto, M.; Okui, T.; Shahdat, H.M.; Matsuzaki, K.; Shido, O. Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids enhance neuronal differentiation in cultured rat neural stem cells. Stem Cells Int. 2013, 2013, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Dyall, S.C.; Mandhair, H.K.; Fincham, R.E.A.; Kerr, D.M.; Roche, M.; Molina-Holgado, F. Distinctive effects of eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic acids in regulating neural stem cell fate are mediated via endocannabinoid signalling pathways. Neuropharmacology 2016, 107, 387–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Katakura, M.; Hashimoto, M.; Shahdat, H.M.; Gamoh, S.; Okui, T.; Matsuzaki, K.; Shido, O. Docosahexaenoic acid promotes neuronal differentiation by regulating basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors and cell cycle in neural stem cells. Neuroscience 2009, 160, 651–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Dyer, M.A.; Cepko, C.L. p27 Kip1 and p57 Kip2 Regulate Proliferation in Distinct Retinal Progenitor Cell Populations. J. Neurosci. 2018, 21, 4259–4271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Legrier, M.-E.; Ducray, A.; Propper, A.; Chao, M.; Kastner, A. Cell cycle regulation during mouse olfactory neurogenesis. Cell Growth Differ. 2001, 12, 591–601. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  146. Kawauchi, T.; Shikanai, M.; Kosodo, Y. Extra-cell cycle regulatory functions of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK) and CDK inhibitor proteins contribute to brain development and neurological disorders. Genes to Cells 2013, 18, 176–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Kim, H.-Y.; Akbar, M.; Kim, K.-Y. Inhibition of Neuronal Apoptosis by Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids. J. Mol. Neurosci. 2001, 16, 223–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Boneva, N.B.; Kikuchi, M.; Minabe, Y.; Yamashima, T. Neuroprotective and Ameliorative Actions of Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids Against Neuronal Diseases: Implication of Fatty Acid–Binding Proteins (FABP) and G Protein–Coupled Receptor 40 (GPR40) in Adult Neurogenesis. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2011, 116, 163–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Wu, F.J.; Xue, Y.; Liu, X.F.; Xue, C.H.; Wang, J.F.; Du, L.; Takahashi, K.; Wang, Y.M. The protective effect of eicosapentaenoic acid-enriched phospholipids from sea cucumber Cucumaria frondosa on oxidative stress in PC12 cells and SAMP8 mice. Neurochem. Int. 2014, 64, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  150. Liu, Q.; Wu, D.; Ni, N.; Ren, H.; Luo, C.; He, C.; Kang, J.X.; Wan, J.B.; Su, H. Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids protect neural progenitor cells against oxidative injury. Mar. Drugs 2014, 12, 2341–2356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Wang, D.; Zhang, L.; Wen, M.; Du, L.; Gao, X.; Xue, C.; Xu, J.; Wang, Y. Enhanced neuroprotective effect of DHA and EPA-enriched phospholipids against 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) induced oxidative stress in mice brain. J. Funct. Foods 2016, 25, 385–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Tatsumi, Y.; Kato, A.; Sango, K.; Himeno, T.; Kondo, M.; Kato, Y.; Kamiya, H.; Nakamura, J.; Kato, K. Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids exert anti-oxidant effects through the nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-related factor 2 pathway in immortalized mouse Schwann cells. J. Diabetes Investig. 2019, 10, 602–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Zendedel, A.; Habib, P.; Dang, J.; Lammerding, L.; Hoffmann, S.; Beyer, C.; Slowik, A. Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids ameliorate neuroinflammation and mitigate ischemic stroke damage through interactions with astrocytes and microglia. J. Neuroimmunol. 2015, 278, 200–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Borsini, A.; Alboni, S.; Horowitz, M.A.; Tojo, L.M.; Cannazza, G.; Su, K.P.; Pariante, C.M.; Zunszain, P.A. Rescue of IL-1β-induced reduction of human neurogenesis by omega-3 fatty acids and antidepressants. Brain. Behav. Immun. 2017, 65, 230–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Labrousse, V.F.; Nadjar, A.; Joffre, C.; Costes, L.; Aubert, A.; Grégoire, S.; Bretillon, L.; Layé, S. Short-Term Long Chain Omega3 Diet Protects from Neuroinflammatory Processes and Memory Impairment in Aged Mice. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e36861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Cutuli, D. Functional and Structural Benefits Induced by Omega-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids During Aging. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2016, 15, 534–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Belkouch, M.; Hachem, M.; Elgot, A.; Lo Van, A.; Picq, M.; Guichardant, M.; Lagarde, M.; Bernoud-Hubac, N. The pleiotropic effects of omega-3 docosahexaenoic acid on the hallmarks of Alzheimer’s disease. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2016, 38, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Lazarov, O.; Mattson, M.P.; Peterson, D.A.; Pimplikar, S.W.; van Praag, H. When neurogenesis encounters aging and disease. Trends Neurosci. 2010, 33, 569–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  159. Hashimoto, M.; Shahdat, H.M.; Katakura, M.; Tanabe, Y.; Gamoh, S.; Miwa, K.; Shimada, T.; Shido, O. Effects of docosahexaenoic acid on in vitro amyloid beta peptide 25-35 fibrillation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta - Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 2009, 1791, 289–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Grimm, M.O.W.; Kuchenbecker, J.; Grosgen, S.; Burg, V.K.; Hundsdorfer, B.; Rothhaar, T.L.; Friess, P.; De Wilde, M.C.; Broersen, L.M.; Penke, B.; et al. Docosahexaenoic acid reduces amyloid β production via multiple pleiotropic mechanisms. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 14028–14039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Fiol-Deroque, M.A.; Gutierrez-Lanza, R.; Terés, S.; Torres, M.; Barceló, P.; Rial, R.V.; Verkhratsky, A.; Escribá, P.V.; Busquets, X.; Rodríguez, J.J. Cognitive recovery and restoration of cell proliferation in the dentate gyrus in the 5XFAD transgenic mice model of Alzheimer’s disease following 2-hydroxy-DHA treatment. Biogerontology 2013, 14, 763–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Hamilton, L.K.; Fernandes, K.J.L. Neural stem cells and adult brain fatty acid metabolism: Lessons from the 3xTg model of Alzheimer’s disease. Biol. Cell 2018, 110, 6–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Ozsoy, O.; Seval-Celik, Y.; Hacioglu, G.; Yargicoglu, P.; Demir, R.; Agar, A.; Aslan, M. The influence and the mechanism of docosahexaenoic acid on a mouse model of Parkinson’s disease. Neurochem. Int. 2011, 59, 664–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Gómez-Soler, M.; Cordobilla, B.; Morató, X.; Fernández-Dueñas, V.; Domingo, J.C.; Ciruela, F. Triglyceride form of docosahexaenoic acid mediates neuroprotection in experimental parkinsonism. Front. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Wang, C.; Wang, D.; Xu, J.; Yanagita, T.; Xue, C.; Zhang, T.; Wang, Y. DHA enriched phospholipids with different polar groups (PC and PS) had different improvements on MPTP-induced mice with Parkinson’s disease. J. Funct. Foods 2018, 45, 417–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Hernando, S.; Requejo, C.; Herran, E.; Ruiz-Ortega, J.A.; Morera-Herreras, T.; Lafuente, J.V.; Gainza, E.; Pedraz, J.L.; Igartua, M.; Hernandez, R.M. Beneficial effects of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids administration in a partial lesion model of Parkinson’s disease: The role of glia and NRf2 regulation. Neurobiol. Dis. 2019, 121, 252–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Ghazale, H.; Ramadan, N.; Mantash, S.; Zibara, K.; El-Sitt, S.; Darwish, H.; Chamaa, F.; Boustany, R.M.; Mondello, S.; Abou-Kheir, W.; et al. Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) enhances the therapeutic potential of neonatal neural stem cell transplantation post—Traumatic brain injury. Behav. Brain Res. 2018, 340, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Tang, R.; Lin, Y.M.; Liu, H.X.; Wang, E.S. Neuroprotective effect of docosahexaenoic acid in rat traumatic brain injury model via regulation of TLR4/NF-Kappa B signaling pathway. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2018, 99, 64–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Eady, T.N.; Belayev, L.; Khoutorova, L.; Atkins, K.D.; Zhang, C.; Bazan, N.G. Docosahexaenoic Acid Signaling Modulates Cell Survival in Experimental Ischemic Stroke Penumbra and Initiates Long-Term Repair in Young and Aged Rats. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e46151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Zhang, W.; Wang, H.; Zhang, H.; Leak, R.K.; Shi, Y.; Hu, X.; Gao, Y.; Chen, J. Dietary supplementation with omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids robustly promotes neurovascular restorative dynamics and improves neurological functions after stroke. Exp. Neurol. 2015, 272, 170–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Representation of the major metabolic pathway changes of glycolysis, oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS), fatty acid oxidation (FAO), lipogenesis, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation and defense in neural stem/progenitor cells (NSPCs) during cell-fate decision. Illustrated for NSPC metabolism from quiescent cells to immature neuron differentiation in the adult subgranular zone (SGZ) and the developing forebrain. From Knobloch et al. [86].
Figure 1. Representation of the major metabolic pathway changes of glycolysis, oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS), fatty acid oxidation (FAO), lipogenesis, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation and defense in neural stem/progenitor cells (NSPCs) during cell-fate decision. Illustrated for NSPC metabolism from quiescent cells to immature neuron differentiation in the adult subgranular zone (SGZ) and the developing forebrain. From Knobloch et al. [86].
Ijms 20 04240 g001
Figure 2. Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) uptake through the blood–brain barrier (BBB) and metabolism in brain cells. Transfer from plasma to endothelial cells is possible through passive diffusion and active transport of non-esterified DHA (NE-DHA) or lysophospholipid containing DHA (LysoPL), including LysoPC–DHA. Active transport involves lipoproteins and Mfsd2a. Inside endothelial cells, NE-DHA and DHA cleaved from LysoPL–DHA are bound to fatty acid binding proteins (FABP) to cross the intercellular space to reach brain cells. DHA then participates in cell metabolism for energy production of CoA and production of signaling mediators, specialized pro-resolving mediators (SPM), producing beta-oxidation. For further details, refer to original figure from Lacombe et al. [129].
Figure 2. Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) uptake through the blood–brain barrier (BBB) and metabolism in brain cells. Transfer from plasma to endothelial cells is possible through passive diffusion and active transport of non-esterified DHA (NE-DHA) or lysophospholipid containing DHA (LysoPL), including LysoPC–DHA. Active transport involves lipoproteins and Mfsd2a. Inside endothelial cells, NE-DHA and DHA cleaved from LysoPL–DHA are bound to fatty acid binding proteins (FABP) to cross the intercellular space to reach brain cells. DHA then participates in cell metabolism for energy production of CoA and production of signaling mediators, specialized pro-resolving mediators (SPM), producing beta-oxidation. For further details, refer to original figure from Lacombe et al. [129].
Ijms 20 04240 g002

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lo Van, A.; Hachem, M.; Lagarde, M.; Bernoud-Hubac, N. Omega-3 Docosahexaenoic Acid Is a Mediator of Fate-Decision of Adult Neural Stem Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4240. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20174240

AMA Style

Lo Van A, Hachem M, Lagarde M, Bernoud-Hubac N. Omega-3 Docosahexaenoic Acid Is a Mediator of Fate-Decision of Adult Neural Stem Cells. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019; 20(17):4240. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20174240

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lo Van, Amanda, Mayssa Hachem, Michel Lagarde, and Nathalie Bernoud-Hubac. 2019. "Omega-3 Docosahexaenoic Acid Is a Mediator of Fate-Decision of Adult Neural Stem Cells" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20, no. 17: 4240. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20174240

APA Style

Lo Van, A., Hachem, M., Lagarde, M., & Bernoud-Hubac, N. (2019). Omega-3 Docosahexaenoic Acid Is a Mediator of Fate-Decision of Adult Neural Stem Cells. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 20(17), 4240. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20174240

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop