Next Article in Journal
Current Possibilities of Gynecologic Cancer Treatment with the Use of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
Previous Article in Journal
Genome-Wide Analysis and Identification of the Aux/IAA Gene Family in Peach
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genetic Factors of Cerebral Small Vessel Disease and Their Potential Clinical Outcome
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 20
Issue 19
10.3390/ijms20194704
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Microbiome Influence in the Pathogenesis of Prion and Alzheimer’s Diseases

by
Valeria D’Argenio
1,2,3 and
Daniela Sarnataro
1,2,*
1
Department of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnologies, University of Naples Federico II, via Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
2
CEINGE-Biotecnologie Avanzate, via G. Salvatore 486, 80145 Naples, Italy
3
Task Force on Microbiome Studies, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20(19), 4704; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20194704
Submission received: 4 September 2019 / Revised: 20 September 2019 / Accepted: 21 September 2019 / Published: 23 September 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetics of Neurodegenerative Diseases: Focus on Progression and Response to Treatment)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Misfolded and abnormal β-sheets forms of wild-type proteins, such as cellular prion protein (PrPC) and amyloid beta (Aβ), are believed to be the vectors of neurodegenerative diseases, prion and Alzheimer’s disease (AD), respectively. Increasing evidence highlights the “prion-like” seeding of protein aggregates as a mechanism for pathological spread in AD, tauopathy, as well as in other neurodegenerative diseases, such as Parkinson’s. Mutations in both PrPC and Aβ precursor protein (APP), have been associated with the pathogenesis of these fatal disorders with clear evidence for their pathogenic significance. In addition, a critical role for the gut microbiota is emerging; indeed, as a consequence of gut–brain axis alterations, the gut microbiota has been involved in the regulation of Aβ production in AD and, through the microglial inflammation, in the amyloid fibril formation, in prion diseases. Here, we aim to review the role of microbiome (“the other human genome”) alterations in AD and prion disease pathogenesis.

1. Introduction

Prion diseases, similar to Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases, are based on the aggregation of abnormal protein assemblies which could result in a cascade of neurodegenerative pathways. Prion diseases, whose origin can be sporadic, genetic, or infectious, are characterized by misfolding of a normal prion protein (PrPC) into a pathological form, called PrPSc. Several germline, predisposing mutations have been associated with prion diseases pathogenesis; these mutations can affect the entire PRNP sequence length, including the signal sequence of the glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchor attachment [1]. It has been hypothesized that PRNP mutations are able to lower the energy barrier for the conversion of the normal cellular PrP into the scrapie, pathological PrPSc isoform [2]. The latter, according to the recently proposed concept of “propagating misfolding”, can modulate the misfolding of the normal protein into the misfolded amyloidogenic isoform [3].
Similar to the misfolded and aggregated PrP, other protein particles, deriving from the misfolding and aggregation of the Aβ or tau proteins, are able to propagate from affected cells to neighboring cells by a well-documented intercellular transfer of protein inclusions [4]. As well as PrP, mutations in the APP (amyloid precursor protein) cleavage sites and in the Aβ sequence can affect the processing of the protein with consequences in the trafficking, folding, and aggregation/amyloidogenic abilities [5,6].
The infective prion disease pathogenesis is based on protein misfolding triggered by prions entering the gut [7] where microbiomal factors (e.g., Curli proteins) can act as a template for amyloid fibril formation though a cross-seeding event [8]. This suggests that the gut microbiota may play a role in the pathogenesis of prion disease; similarly, it has been hypothesized that gut microbiota may influence both Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathogenesis and the risk for AD [9].
Indeed, the human microbiota, i.e., the communities of microorganisms that live inside and on the surface of our body, has emerged as an important player for human’s health acquisition and maintenance, even before birth [10,11,12]. Consequently, a microbial dysbiosis has been associated with several diseases, suggesting new clues to clarify their pathogenesis [13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. Since microbiota composition is an actionable target, there is an increasing interest in understanding its functions and its possible use as a disease biomarker, or as a target for the development of novel therapeutic approaches [20,21,22,23]. Since it has been reported that there is a 1:1 ratio between human host and microbial cells, and that the microbial genes outnumber the host genes by about 150:1 [24,25], it is feasible to suppose that microbial genes features may contribute to AD and prion disease development, as well as human genome alterations.
Here, we analyze the latest findings on the role of the gut microbiota in the regulation of protein folding related to both prion and AD pathogenesis.

2. The Role of Microbiome in Prion and Alzheimer’s Disease

The gut microbiota has been proven to be crucial for several metabolic and immunological functions; in particular, influencing the gut–brain axis, the gut microbiota has been involved in brain development [26], neurogenesis [27], and specific interactions with the enteric and central nervous systems [28] (Figure 1A).
Despite a great interest, it is important to underline that most of the studies on human microbiota are observational and report just an association between a specific disease of interest and a microbial alteration. Currently, the challenge is to move to a more mechanistic view. In this context, different mechanisms are being investigated to clarify how the gut microbiota may influence the nervous system, including short-chain fatty acid secretion, blood–brain barrier permeability modifications, vagus nerve stimulation, or neurotransmitter modulation [29,30,31].
To date, gut microbiome alterations have been reported in different neurological disorders, including prion disease and AD [32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43].
Here, we will review the current knowledge regarding the role of the gut microbiome in these two neurodegenerative disorders.

2.1. Human Microbiota and Prion Disease Development

The pathological PrPSc, a glycolipid-anchored sialoglycoprotein rich in β-sheets, is the causative agent of prion diseases, which can be of sporadic, genetic, or acquired origin [44]. Prion disorders are also referred to as TSEs (transmissible spongiform encephalopathies) and include the bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) in cattle, scrapie in sheep, Creutzfeldt–Jacob diseases (CJD), Gerstman–Sträussler–Scheinker (GSS), fatal familial insomnia (FFI), and kuru in humans [45], which are characterized by a mechanism of protein misfolding adopted also by other neurodegenerative-related proteins, such as Aβ or tau [46].
Although 90% of prion diseases are sporadic, ~10% of all cases are due to dominantly inherited mutations in the prion protein gene PRNP [46]. In particular, mutations in PRNP, have been described to be present in the N-terminal region, in the central hydrophobic domain (HD), and in the C-terminal region including the GPI-attachment signal sequence (Figure 2).
These pathological mutations have been reported to have a key role in both the intracellular transport of secretory proteins and in the tendency to form β-sheet-enriched structures [47,48].
PrP intracellular localization and transport are of fundamental importance for the generation of the pathological PrPSc [49,50,51,52].
For some PrP mutants, it has been hypothesized that the mutations are able to lower the energy barrier for the conversion of the normal cellular PrP into the scrapie, pathological PrPSc isoform [2], and/or to induce an aberrant trafficking and accumulation inside the cells, triggering abnormal interaction with other unknown cofactors [52].
The gathering of the PrPSc in the brain of the affected subjects causes a reactive microglial and astroglial inflammation, and a consequent neurodegeneration. As for other diseases, it has been suggested that quantitative and/or qualitative alterations of the gut microbiota may play a role in prion-disease pathogenesis and susceptibility. In particular, it has been hypothesized that the prion agents ingested with food may cause a microbial dysbiosis at gut level. This dysbiosis in turn, through the production of a microbial form of amyloid, is able to activate the immune system, thus enhancing microglia and astrocyte activation and improving the production and accumulation of the neuronal amyloid at the brain level (Figure 1B) [43]. Items of evidence supporting this hypothesis are summarized below.
The interplay between the microbiota and the host immune system is crucial for immune system development. It has been reported that the gut microbiota is able to exert effects on the development of isolated lymphoid follicles [53,54]. Donaldson et al. showed that isolated lymphoid follicles were reduced in the small intestine of germ-free mice, and that their abundance increases after microbial colonization [55]. Since it has been reported that isolated lymphoid follicles are important sites of prion accumulation in the small intestine [55,56], this suggests that, acting on the microbiota, it is possible to: (1) reduce isolated lymphoid follicles density and, as a consequence, reduce the sites of prion uptake, replication, and neuroinvasion; and (2) reduce the development of prion disease pathogenesis [43]. The current opinion on BSE and kuru pathogenesis is based on the protein misfolding which is triggered by prion agents’ entry via the gut [7]. As the gut hosts the majority of microbiota, the major question is whether there are specific factors triggering the disease. Interestingly, it has been proposed that neuronal amyloid formation may be enhanced by exposure to microbiomal amyloids through cross-seeding (e.g., Curli proteins from different bacterial species that may serve as a template for fibril formation), which leads to misfolding of neuronal proteins in the brain in an analogous manner to kuru and BSE [8].
At the brain level, PrPSc accumulation causes an inflammatory reaction featured by microglia and astrocyte activation. It is well known that microglia are involved in neuronal homeostasis, synaptic remodeling, and defense against pathogens [57,58,59,60]. Microglia activation is one of the first sign of prion disease and is characterized by increased expression of the anti-inflammatory cytokines, such as transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), and signaling receptors, such as triggering receptor myeloid 2 cells (TREM2), sialic acid binding Ig-like lectin F (SiglecF), cell surface transmembrane glycoprotein CD200 receptor 1(CD200R), and fragment crystallizable gamma receptor (Fcg) [61,62]. This suggests that microglia activation should have a protective role with respect to the development of prion-related damage [57]. Accordingly, studies on MFGE-8 (milk fat globule—epidermal growth factor—factor VIII)- or cluster of differentiation 14 (CD14)-deficient mice showed an accelerated progression of prion disease with respect to the controls [58,63].
As a consequence, the sensing of bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) may change this microglial protective status to a pro-inflammatory one. Indeed, Erny et al. have assessed that microglial development depends on gut microbiota [29]. They were able to demonstrate that in the brain of germ-free mice, there was an impaired microglial maturation due to reduced early exposure to LPS of the commensal microbiota, and a similar behavior was observed also in SPF (specific pathogen free) mice treated with broad-range antibiotics [29]. Thus, it is conceivable that prolonged use of antibiotics during prion diseases, by impairing the gut microbiota, may hamper the anti-inflammatory activity of the microglia and negatively impact on disease development.
Moreover, diet has been reported as a factor able to affect microglial development and functions through gut microbiota alterations. Indeed, it has been established that Bacteroidetes and Clostridia are able to metabolize the polysaccharides in dietary fibers into short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs). Among the SCFAs, butyrate not only regulates gut mucosal permeability and thus is involved in inflammatory response, but also seems to be related to microglial homeostasis [29,64]. Consequently, a high-fat diet (including the Western diet), being able to increase the Firmicutes level and reduce the quantity of Bacteroidetes, could reduce the availability of SCFAs important for microglial activity and promote prion diseases. However, this association has not been confirmed to date.

2.2. Human Microbiota and Alzheimer’s Disease Development

Similarly to prion diseases, a minority of Alzheimer’s disease cases is due to dominantly inherited mutations affecting mainly the APP gene. For APP, the critical sequences involved in aminoacidic mutations, affecting folding, dynamic protein stability, and proteins aggregation, are in the Aβ and transmembrane regions (Figure 2).
It has been estimated that about 40 million people worldwide are affected by AD (WHO, World Health Organization), being the most common kind of dementia. AD is a neurodegenerative disorder featured by a chronic neuroinflammation (increased levels of IL-1β, TNF-α, COX-1, COX-2, 12-LOX, and 15-LOX) due to an anomalous activation of the microglia, especially in the area of the brain (usually, the frontal cortex and hippocampus) that shows a higher concentration of extracellular Aβ plaques and intracellular neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) [65].
Aging is associated with an increasing risk for developing inflammatory-based diseases, such as generalized cognitive impairments and neurological conditions, including AD. Indeed, aging not only is characterized by molecular and cellular modification of the human host, but also by modifications of the gut microbiome composition [66]. The role of bacteria in lifespan development, aging, and dementia is still largely unknown. However, it has been assessed that elderly individuals with low bacterial diversity had lower cognitive functions [67]. Even if cause–effect relationships are yet to be proven, this observation opens the way for future investigations [66].
An emerging hypothesis is that the gut microbiota may influence AD neuroinflammation. In particular, it has been proposed that in AD, similarly to prion diseases, a microbial dysbiosis at the gut level may impair gut permeability, thus inducing a systemic activation of the immune system. The latter, together with the production of bacterial Aβ fibrils, is able to enhance the neuroinflammatory status and the deposition of the Aβ fibrils at the brain level (Figure 1C).
Accordingly, Harach et al. highlighted the presence of a microbial dysbiosis at gut level in APP transgenic mice with respect to the wild type [68]. Next, they assessed that the colonization of germ-free APP transgenic mice with the gut microbiota of APP transgenic mice was able to enhance Aβ-related cerebral damage, while the colonization with the gut microbiota from wild-type mice had a poor effect on Aβ levels in brain [68]. Thus, these data strongly support the idea that the gut microbiota may contribute to AD development.
Furthermore, it has been assessed that some high-fat diets increase the risk for AD, and this seems to be related to alterations of gut permeability, at least in mice [9,69]. Thus, it is possible to hypothesize that such diets increase the risk for AD by inducing specific modifications of the gut microbiota composition [65].
According to this hypothesis, Cani et al. found that the gut microbiome of mice fed with a diet enriched in unsaturated fatty acids, had a reduction of Lactobacillus, Bacteroides, and Prevotella species and an increase of Bifidobacterium species with respect to that of the control group [70]. They also found that the treated group had an increase of gut permeability, probably due to the reduced expression of both zonulin and occludin proteins, corresponding to higher circulating level of the bacterial LPS and also of inflammatory markers, such as IL-1 and TNF-α. Interestingly, oral antibiotic administration was able to restore a gut microbiota similar to that of the control group and, by increasing the expression of both zonulin and occludin proteins, to restore also the gut permeability [70]. Subsequently, Zhang et al. showed that AD patients had increased levels of serum LPS and monocyte activation with respect to the controls [71]. Since it is known that in AD the blood–brain barrier is damaged and this can lead to the anomalous microglia activation and to the typical AD neuroinflammation, the combination of an altered permeability also at intestinal level may allow a pathogenetic signaling between the gut microbiota and the central nervous system. In particular, the microbial dysbiosis altering gut permeability is able to trigger a systemic inflammatory status that may potentiate the neuroinflammatory reactions typical of AD development [65,72]. In this context, Zhao et al. reported an increased concentration of the bacterial LPS in the hippocampus and neocortex of AD patients’ postmortem brains [73]. It is noteworthy that patients affected by inflammatory bowel diseases, showing an altered gut permeability due to gut microbiota alterations, are at high risk for AD [74,75].
Furthermore, Cattaneo et al. highlighted a relationship between cognitive impairment, brain amyloidosis, and the presence of circulating inflammatory markers [76]. They found that cognitively impaired AD patients had higher circulating levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, CXCL2, NLRP3 and IL-1β) and lower levels of anti-inflammatory cytokine (IL-10), and that the Escherichia/Shigella amount correlated positively with this behavior; consequently, they hypothesized that alterations of the gut microbiota, i.e., increased levels of pro-inflammatory (Escherichia/Shigella) and reduced levels of anti-inflammatory (Eubacterium rectale) species, may have a role in AD cognitive impairment [76].
A recent study by Haran et al. carried out a five-month prospective study collecting longitudinal stool samples for metagenomic analysis and intestinal cell functional evaluations in AD patients compared to elderly without dementia or with other kinds of dementia [77]. This study showed that the microbiota of the AD patients had a higher abundance of pro-inflammatory taxa and a lower abundance of butyrate-producer taxa compared with the other two study groups. In addition, they were able to verify that the AD-related microbiota alters the P-glycoprotein (a mediator of gut homeostasis) pathway, supporting the hypothesis that an altered epithelial homeostasis is a mechanism by which the microbiome impacts AD pathogenesis [77].
An intriguing pathogenetic hypothesis, recently published by Block, suggests a cooperative model in which some pathogenic microbes may enhance the virulence of others, usually less invasive, enabling them to cross the blood–brain barrier and exert pathogenic affects at the brain level [78]. The authors, in particular, hypothesize that a microbial dysbiosis at the gut level together with involving Chlamydia species and Human papillomavirus infections, altering the mucosal barrier integrity, allows colonization from yeast. In particular, Chlamydia and other gut microbiota commensals induce insulin resistance, thus providing the glucose required for yeast growth, and also predispose to amyloid beta protein accumulation. In addition, immunological alterations due to both the papilloma virus infection and the Chlamydia-induced hyperglycemia enable the invasion of the brain by yeast. At the brain level, inflammatory cytokines produced in response to yeast increase amyloid beta protein accumulation [78].
In addition to the effect on gut permeability, it has been proposed that the gut microbiota may also have a direct effect on some specific AD biomarkers [65]. Indeed, through a metabolomics screening, Xu and Wang (2016) highlighted a positive correlation between a pattern of about 50 microbial metabolites and AD early age of onset and cognitive decline [79]. Interestingly, among the increased metabolites, there was also TMAO (trimethylamine N-oxide), a microbial metabolite associated with the assumption of animal fats, thus supporting the hypothesis that high-fat diets may be a risk factor for AD development also by inducing a gut microbial dysbiosis, which in turn exerts a series of pro-inflammatory, pathogenetic functions.
It is also noticeable that different studies have reported the ability of different bacteria, such as Salmonella enterica and typhimurium, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus subtilis, and E. coli, to produce the amyloid protein [80,81,82]. In this context, Asti and Gioglio (2014) assessed that E. coli LPS increases Aβ fibril production [83]. Since it is known that Aβ fibrils pass through both gut and brain barriers [84,85,86], an intriguing hypothesis is that different bacteria in the gut may produce amyloid fibers that are able to activate the immune system and, thus, trigger the typical AD brain neuroinflammation [87]. Holmqvist et al. also hypothesized that the Aβ fibrils produced by gut bacteria may be directly deposited into the brain promoting AD [88]. In particular, Porphyromonas gingivalis, the etiologic factor of chronic periodontitis, has caught the attention since not only was it identified in the brain of AD patients, but its toxic proteases, namely gingipains, were also found in AD patients’ brain [89]. Interestingly, P. gingivalis infection in AD mice models has been proven to cause brain colonization and an increased production of the Aβ1–42 [90]. In addition, gingipains have showed neurotoxic effects both in vivo and in vitro, impairing tau and consequently the normal neuronal function [91]. Based on the hypothesis that P. gingivalis infection, through gingipains production, is able to promote AD-typical neuronal damage, a recent work by Dominy et al. tested the use of a gingipains inhibitor in positively modulating AD progression [92]. Interestingly, they found that gingipain inhibition was able to reduce P. gingivalis brain infection, inhibit Aβ1–42 production, ameliorate the neuroinflammatory status, and protect neurons in the hippocampus. These results suggest that the use of gingipain inhibitors could be useful to treat P. gingivalis brain colonization and ameliorate neurodegeneration in AD patients [92].
Bacteria seem to have a role also in the expression of the triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-2 (TREM2). This receptor is expressed on the surface of microglial cells and has been involved in several functions, including cytokines and ROS production, phagocytosis, and Aβ clearance [93,94]. It has been reported that TREM2 is down-expressed in AD and that the bacterial LPS can hamper the expression of this receptor reducing, in turn, the phagocytosis of the Aβ fibrils [95,96,97].
The latter data support the idea that gut microbiota alterations may influence AD development, and that a combination of different mechanisms is involved in this process. Bacteria not only seem to be able to produce and/or induce the production of Aβ fibrils, but also to contribute to their accumulation at brain level.
A recent study reported for the first time an association between the gut microbiota, bile acid profile, and genetic variants in AD pathogenesis [98]. They found that the serum bile acid profile is altered in AD patients with a significant decrease of liver-derived primary bile acids and an increase of bacterially produced secondary bile acids and their conjugated forms compared to control subjects. The higher levels of secondary conjugated bile acids were significantly associated with worse cognitive function. In addition, several genetic variants in immune-response-related genes, previously associated with AD, seem to be associated with bile acid profiles [98].
Interestingly, it has been highlighted that some bacteria may exert a positive effect reducing AD-related signs. Wang et al. showed that in rats fed with grape seed polyphenol extracts there is an accumulation in the brain of polyphenol metabolites that are able to interfere with Aβ oligomerization [99]. Other studies have assessed that Lactobacillus and Bacillus species produce acetylcholine, a neurotransmitter, usually reduced in the brain of AD patients and, thus, may have a beneficial effect [100,101].
In addition to the effects on Aβ fibrils, it is important to underline that gut microbiota has also been implicated in some cognitive functions and in memory [102]. Pyndt Jorgensen et al. showed that mice fed with a high-fat (especially saturated) diet had specific microbial modifications (increased levels of the Firmicutes phylum and Rumunococcus genus, and reduced level of the Bacteroidetes phylum) that correlated with a reduction of memory [103].
An intriguing study showed in a mouse model of AD (APPSWE/PS1ΔE9) that alterations of the gut microbiota induced by antibiotics administration affect both inflammation and amyloid production [104]. In particular, the mice treated with antibiotics had increased levels of Lachnospiraceae and decreased levels of Bacteroides with respect to the untreated, and these microbial alterations correspond to a lower plaque burden [104].
Recently, Abraham et al. studied the effects of regular physical exercise and nutritional intervention on the development of AD in APP/PS1 transgenic mice [105]. Interestingly, they showed that exercise, probiotics, and their combined effects reduced the number and area of amyloid plaques in the hippocampus of mice, and that these beneficial effects were partly due to alterations of the gut microbiome [105]. In this context, Akbari et al., conducting a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial, showed that AD patients treated with 200 mL/day of probiotic (three strains of lactobacilli and Bifidobacterium bifidum) for twelve weeks experienced benefits in cognitive function and metabolic state [106]. Indeed, several recent studies have been carried out to prove the hypothesis that pro- and prebiotics may have beneficial effects in ameliorating AD-typical alterations [107,108,109,110,111]. In this context, Leblhuber et al. showed that the supplementation of AD patients with a multispecies probiotic modifies the gut bacteria composition and also tryptophan metabolism in serum, suggesting a role in immune system activation [107]. Similarly, Athari Nik Azm et al. found that multispecies probiotic administration is able to improve insulin resistance in an experimental model of AD [108].
On the contrary, Agahi et al. conduced a double-blind clinical trial to evaluate the effects of 12 weeks of probiotic treatment on inflammatory and oxidative biomarkers, and they did not find any significant difference [109]. This result suggests that, in addition to the kind and dosage of probiotic bacteria, AD severity and time of administration affect treatment outcomes.
In an attempt also to standardize the methodologies for probiotic administration, Sanborn et al. are carrying out a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the potential effects of three months of LGG (Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG) probiotic supplementation on psychological status and cognitive performance in middle-aged and older adults; their results will provide further insights on these aspects [110].
Finally, Asl et al. have recently assessed the effects of probiotic administration in an animal model of AD on behavioral and electrophysiological aspects [111]. They were able to demonstrate that, while the control group experienced a weak spatial performance, the probiotic-treated group improved the maze navigation. In addition, probiotic administration significantly restored the long-term potentiation and exerted a positive effect on the antioxidant/oxidant biomarker balance, thus suggesting that probiotics have a positive effect on synaptic plasticity [111].
In addition to probiotic administration, also other nutritional interventions and/or dietary supplementations are being investigated to assess their role in AD pathogenesis and, consequently, their possible use for therapeutic purposes [112]. In this context, the role of tryptophan has been recently reviewed, since it has been suggested that the gut microbiota may play an important role in tryptophan availability regulation [113]. Indeed, tryptophan is an essential amino acid involved in emotional states, cellular aging, and serotonin pathway, and it has been shown that some bacteria in the gut may consume the food-derived tryptophan, therefore, gut microbiota manipulation may be used as a strategy for regulating the tryptophan availability and/or to reduce the concentration of some neurotoxic derivates, lowering the severity of neurodegenerative disorders, such as AD [113].
Nagpal et al. have evaluated, in subjects with mild cognitive impairment with respect to controls, the effects of a modified Mediterranean ketogenic diet on the gut microbiota composition in association with other AD biomarkers [114]. They not only found specific microbial alterations positively correlated with mild cognitive impairment, but also highlighted that the proposed ketogenic diet is able to modulate the gut microbiota and induce improved AD-related biomarkers in the cerebrospinal fluid [114].
In a recently published study, McCann et al. explored the association between gut microbiota-derived vitamin K and cognitive function [115]. Indeed, vitamin K has protective effects on myelin integrity and has been found to be reduced in AD patients. Since some commensal bacteria are able to produce vitamin K, this may be a mechanism though which microbial dysbiosis may exert pathogenic effects. Interestingly, by correlating the gut metagenomes of the elderly with their different cognitive levels, some vitamin K isoforms were identified as positively correlated with cognition [115].
Taken together, all these data highlight the role of the gut microbiota in AD pathogenesis through different mechanisms, synergistically contributing to the development of the disease-specific signature.

3. Conclusions

The vicious circle of spread, seed, and accumulation of misfolded protein aggregates within the central nervous system is not only restricted to prion protein PrP, but has also been reported for other proteins, such as Aβ, α-synuclein, and tau, that are able to form amyloidogenic aggregates which spread through the brain and cause distinct neurodegenerative diseases [3,45]. Mutations in the genes codifying for these proteins have been associated with the pathogenesis of prion diseases and AD, and have been described to alter protein trafficking, processing, dynamic stability, folding, and ability to aggregate inside the cells [5,6].
Indeed, defects in APP intracellular trafficking and processing leading to Aβ production in neurons, as well as defects in PrP metabolism, are likely the most common cause of AD and prion diseases, respectively; thus, understanding how APP and PrP are targeted to a selected destination inside the cells and identifying the molecular mechanisms controlling the Aβ /prions generation is a key for new therapies.
Interestingly, regulation of Aβ production and neuroinflammation has been described to be enhanced by gut microbiota in AD. Increasing evidences are also suggesting a role of the microbiome in microglia activation typical of prion diseases and beside the critical role of the interplays between the host and its gut microbiota in the availability of micronutrients, trophic factors, and neurotransmitters, it has been reported to also have a key role in the development of cognitive and behavioral functions (known to be compromised in disease conditions). Accordingly, alterations of the gut microbiota have been associated with AD and prion diseases [9] and seem to be able to contribute to functional impairment, neuroinflammation, and exacerbation of disease-specific pathogenic reactions.
Although the data obtained up to date are still preliminary and need to be further confirmed in controlled clinical trials, they draw attention to an emerging field of neuroscience that may acquire an increasing relevance in a near future.

Author Contributions

D.S. conceived the paper; V.D. and D.S. wrote, revised and approved the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

PrPCCellular prion protein
AβAmyloid beta
ADAlzheimer’s disease
APPAβ precursor protein
PRNPPrP gene
PrPScPrion protein infectious isoform
BSEBovine encephalopathies
CJDCreutzfeldt–Jacob diseases
GSSGerstman–Sträussler–Scheinker
FFIFatal familial insomnia
GPIGlycosylphosphatidylinositol
HDHydrophobic domain
FTDFrontotemporal dementia
HplHuman platelet lysate
ctmC-terminus transmembrane
EREndoplasmic reticulum
HRdupHydrophobic region duplication
PS1Presenilin 1
PS2Presenilin 2
BACE1Beta secretase 1
MAMsMitochondrial-ER associated membranes
NMRNuclear magnetic resonance
TMTransmembrane
CLUClusterin
CR1Complement component 3b/4b receptor 1
TREM2Triggering receptor myeloid 2 cells
APOEApolipoprotein E
SORL-1Sortilin related receptor 1
TGF-βTransforming growth factor-beta
PGE2Prostaglandin E2
SiglecFSialic acid binding Ig-like lectin F
CD200RCell surface transmembrane glycoprotein CD200 receptor 1
FcgFragment crystallizable gamma receptor
MFGE-8Milk fat globule—epidermal growth factor—factor VIII
CD14Cluster of differentiation 14
SCFAsShort-chain fatty acids
LPSLipopolysaccharide
SPFSpecific pathogen free
WHOWorld Health Organization
NFTsNeurofibrillary tangles
TMAOTrimethylamine N-oxide

References

  1. Puig, B.; Altmeppen, H.; Glatzel, M. The GPI-anchoring of PrP: Implications in sorting and pathogenesis. Prion 2014, 8, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Swietnicki, W.; Petersen, R.B.; Gambetti, P.; Surewicz, W.K. Familial mutations and the thermodynamic stability of the recombinant human prion protein. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 31048–31052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Sarnataro, D. Attempt to untangle the prion-like misfolding mechanism for neurodegenerative diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Goedert, M.; Clavaguera, F.; Tolnay, M. The propagation of prion-like protein inclusions in neurodegenerative diseases. Trends Neurosc. 2010, 33, 317–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Jucker, M.; Walker, L.C. Self-propagation of pathogenic protein aggregates in neurodegenerative diseases. Nature 2013, 501, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Sarnataro, D.; Pepe, A.; Zurzolo, C. Cell biology of prion protein. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. 2017, 150, 57–82. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  7. Kujala, P.; Raymond, C.R.; Romeijn, M.; Godsave, S.F.; van Kasteren, S.I.; Wille, H.; Prusiner, S.B.; Mabbott, N.A.; Peters, P.J. Prion uptake in the gut: Identification of the first uptake and replication sites. PLoS Pathog. 2011, 7, e1002449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Friedland, R.P.; Chapman, M.R. The role of microbial amyloid in neurodegeneration. PLos Pathog. 2017, 13, e1006654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Theriault, P.; ElAli, A.; Rivest, S. High fat diet exacerbates Alzheimer’s disease related pathology in APPswe/PS1 mice. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 67808–67827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. D’Argenio, V.; Salvatore, F. The role of the gut microbiome in the healthy adult status. Clin. Chim. Acta 2015, 451, 97–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. D’Argenio, V. Human microbiome acquisition and bioinformatic challenges in metagenomic studies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. D’Argenio, V. The Prenatal Microbiome: A New Player for Human Health. High Throughput 2018, 7, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Imhann, F.; Vich Vila, A.; Bonder, M.J.; Fu, J.; Gevers, D.; Visschedijk, M.C.; Spekhorst, L.M.; Alberts, R.; Franke, L.; van Dullemen, H.M.; et al. Interplay of host genetics and gut microbiota underlying the onset and clinical presentation of inflammatory bowel disease. Gut 2018, 67, 108–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. D’Argenio, V.; Casaburi, G.; Precone, V.; Pagliuca, C.; Colicchio, R.; Sarnataro, D.; Discepolo, V.; Kim, S.M.; Russo, I.; Del Vecchio Blanco, G.; et al. Metagenomics reveals dysbiosis and a potentially pathogenic n. flavescens strain in duodenum of adult celiac patients. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2016, 111, 879–890. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  15. D’Argenio, V.; Casaburi, G.; Precone, V.; Pagliuca, C.; Colicchio, R.; Sarnataro, D.; Discepolo, V.; Kim, S.M.; Russo, I.; Del Vecchio Blanco, G.; et al. No change in the mucosal gut microbiome is associated with celiac disease-specific microbiome alteration in adult patients. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2016, 111, 1659–1661. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. D’Argenio, V.; Torino, M.; Precone, V.; Casaburi, G.; Esposito, M.V.; Iaffaldano, L.; Malapelle, U.; Troncone, G.; Coto, I.; Cavalcanti, P.; et al. The cause of death of a child in the 18th century solved by bone microbiome typing using laser microdissection and next generation sequencing. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Iaffaldano, L.; Granata, I.; Pagliuca, C.; Esposito, M.V.; Casaburi, G.; Salerno, G.; Colicchio, R.; Piccirillo, M.; Ciacci, C.; Del Vecchio Blanco, G.; et al. Oropharyngeal microbiome evaluation highlights Neisseria abundance in active celiac patients. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 11047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. D’Argenio, V.; Casaburi, G.; Precone, V.; Moccia, L.G.; Postiglione, I.; Bocchino, M.; Sanduzzi, A. A common microbial signature is present in the lower airways of interstitial lung diseases including sarcoidosis. Sarcoidosis Vasc. Diffuse Lung Dis. 2018, 35, 354–362. [Google Scholar]
  19. Labruna, G.; Nanayakkara, M.; Pagliuca, C.; Nunziato, M.; Iaffaldano, L.; D’Argenio, V.; Colicchio, R.; Budelli, A.L.; Nigro, R.; Salvatore, P.; et al. Celiac disease-associated Neisseria flavescens decreases mitochondrial respiration in CaCo-2 epithelial cells: Impact of Lactobacillus paracasei CBA L74 on bacterial-induced cellular imbalance. Cell Microbiol. 2019, 21, e13035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Strzępa, A.; Lobo, F.M.; Majewska-Szczepani, K.M.; Szczepanik, M. Antibiotics and autoimmune and allergy diseases: Causative factor or treatment? Int. Immunopharmacol. 2018, 65, 328–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. D’Argenio, V.; Precone, V.; Casaburi, G.; Miele, E.; Martinelli, M.; Staiano, A.; Salvatore, F.; Sacchetti, L. An altered gut microbiome profile in a child affected by Crohn’s disease normalized after nutritional therapy. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2013, 108, 851–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ni, Y.; Li, J.; Panagiotou, G. A molecular-level landscape of diet-gut microbiome interactions: Toward dietary interventions targeting bacterial genes. MBio 2015, 6, e01263-15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lee, P.; Yacyshyn, B.R.; Yacyshyn, M.B. Gut microbiota and obesity: An opportunity to alter obesity through Fecal Microbiota Transplant (FMT). Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2018, 21, 479–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Sender, R.; Fuchs, S.; Milo, R. Are we really vastly outnumbered? Revisiting the ratio of bacterial to host cells in humans. Cell 2016, 164, 337–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Hill, J.M.; Clement, C.; Pogue, A.I.; Bhattacharjee, S.; Zhao, Y.; Lukiw, W.J. Pathogenic microbes, the microbiome, and Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Front. Aging Neurosci. 2014, 6, 127. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  26. Heijtz, R.D.; Wang, S.; Anuar, F.; Qian, Y.; Björkholm, B.; Samuelsson, A.; Hibberd, M.L.; Forssberg, H.; Pettersson, S. Normal gut microbiota modulates brain development and behavior. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 3047–3052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Ogbonnaya, E.S.; Clarke, G.; Shanahan, F.; Dinan, T.G.; Cryan, J.F.; O’Leary, O.F. Adult hippocampal neurogenesis is regulated by the microbiome. Biol. Psychiatry 2015, 78, e7–e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fung, T.C.; Olson, C.A.; Hsiao, E.Y. Interactions between the microbiota, immune and nervous systems in health and disease. Nat. Neurosci. 2017, 20, 145–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Erny, D.; Hrabě de Angelis, A.L.; Jaitin, D.; Wieghofer, P.; Staszewski, O.; David, E.; Keren-Shaul, H.; Mahlakoiv, T.; Jakobshagen, K.; Buch, T.; et al. Host microbiota constantly control maturation and function of microglia in the CNS. Nat. Neurosci. 2015, 18, 965–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Braniste, V.; Al-Asmakh, M.; Kowal, C.; Anuar, F.; Abbaspour, A.; Tóth, M.; Korecka, A.; Bakocevic, N.; Ng, L.G.; Kundu, P.; et al. The gut microbiota influences blood-brain barrier permeability in mice. Sci. Transl. Med. 2014, 6, 263ra158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Strandwitz, P. Neurotransmitter modulation by the gut microbiota. Brain Res. 2018, 1693 Pt B, 128–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ge, X.; Zhao, W.; Ding, C.; Tian, H.; Xu, L.; Wang, H.; Ni, L.; Jiang, J.; Gong, J.; Zhu, W.; et al. Potential role of fecal microbiota from patients with slow transit constipation in the regulation of gastrointestinal motility. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Luczynski, P.; Tramullas, M.; Viola, M.; Shanahan, F.; Clarke, G.; O’Mahony, S.; Dinan, T.G.; Cryan, J.F. Microbiota regulates visceral pain in the mouse. Elife 2017, 6, e25887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kelly, J.R.; Borre, Y.; O’ Brien, C.; Patterson, E.; El Aidy, S.; Deane, J.; Kennedy, P.J.; Beers, S.; Scott, K.; Moloney, G.; et al. Transferring the blues: Depression-associated gut microbiota induces neurobehavioural changes in the rat. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2016, 82, 109–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Zheng, P.; Zeng, B.; Zhou, C.; Liu, M.; Fang, Z.; Xu, X.; Zeng, L.; Chen, J.; Fan, S.; Du, X.; et al. Gut microbiome remodeling induces depressive-like behaviors through a pathway mediated by the host’s metabolism. Mol. Psychiatry 2016, 21, 786–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. De Palma, G.; Lynch, M.D.; Lu, J.; Dang, V.T.; Deng, Y.; Jury, J.; Umeh, G.; Miranda, P.M.; Pigrau Pastor, M.; Sidani, S.; et al. Transplantation of fecal microbiota from patients with irritable bowel syndrome alters gut function and behavior in recipient mice. Sci. Transl. Med. 2017, 9, eaaf6397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Sampson, T.R.; Debelius, J.W.; Thron, T.; Janssen, S.; Shastri, G.G.; Ilhan, Z.E.; Challis, C.; Schretter, C.E.; Rocha, S.; Gradinaru, V.; et al. Gut microbiota regulate motor deficits and neuroinflammation in a model of parkinson’s disease. Cell 2016, 167, 1469–1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Minter, M.R.; Zhang, C.; Leone, V.; Ringus, D.L.; Zhang, X.; Oyler-Castrillo, P.; Musch, M.W.; Liao, F.; Ward, J.F.; Holtzman, D.M.; et al. Antibiotic-induced perturbations in gut microbial diversity influences neuro-inflammation and amyloidosis in a murine model of Alzheimer’s disease. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 30028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Berer, K.; Gerdes, L.A.; Cekanaviciute, E.; Jia, X.; Xiao, L.; Xia, Z.; Liu, C.; Klotz, L.; Stauffer, U.; Baranzini, S.E.; et al. Gut microbiota from multiple sclerosis patients enables spontaneous autoimmune encephalomyelitis in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 10719–10724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Cekanaviciute, E.; Yoo, B.B.; Runia, T.F.; Debelius, J.W.; Singh, S.; Nelson, C.A.; Kanner, R.; Bencosme, Y.; Lee, Y.K.; Hauser, S.L.; et al. Gut bacteria from multiple sclerosis patients modulate human T cells and exacerbate symptoms in mouse models. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 10713–10718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Benakis, C.; Brea, D.; Caballero, S.; Faraco, G.; Moore, J.; Murphy, M.; Sita, G.; Racchumi, G.; Ling, L.; Pamer, E.G.; et al. Commensal microbiota affects ischemic stroke outcome by regulating intestinal gammadelta T cells. Nat. Med. 2016, 22, 516–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Hsiao, E.Y.; McBride, S.W.; Hsien, S.; Sharon, G.; Hyde, E.R.; McCue, T.; Codelli, J.A.; Chow, J.; Reisman, S.E.; Petrosino, J.F.; et al. Microbiota modulate behavioral and physiological abnormalities associated with neurodevelopmental disorders. Cell 2013, 155, 1451–1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Donaldson, D.S.; Mabbott, N.A. The influence of the commensal and pathogenic gut microbiota on prion disease pathogenesis. J. Gen. Virol. 2016, 97, 1725–3178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Collinge, J. Prion diseases of humans and animals: Their causes and molecular basis. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2001, 24, 519–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Kim, M.O.; Takada, L.T.; Wong, K.; Forner, S.A.; Geschwind, M.D. Genetic PrP prion diseases. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2018, 10, a033134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Frost, B.; Diamond, M.I. Prion-like mechanism in neurodegenerative diseases. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2010, 11, 155–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Campana, V.; Caputo, A.; Sarnataro, D.; Paladino, S.; Tivodar, S.; Zurzolo, C. Characterization of the properties and trafficking of an anchorless form of the prion protein. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 22747–22756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Pepe, A.; Avolio, R.; Matassa, D.S.; Esposito, F.; Nitsch, L.; Zurzolo, C.; Paladino, S.; Sarnataro, D. Regulation of subcompartmental targeting and folding properties of the prion-like protein Shadoo. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 3731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Caputo, A.; Sarnataro, D.; Campana, V.; Costanzo, M.; Negro, A.; Sorgato, M.C.; Zurzolo, C. Doppel and PrPC co-immunoprecipitate in detergent-resistant membrane domains of epithelial cells. Biochem. J. 2009, 425, 341–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sarnataro, D.; Caputo, A.; Casanova, P.; Puri, C.; Paladino, S.; Tivodar, S.S.; Campana, V.; Tacchetti, C.; Zurzolo, C. Lipid rafts and clathrin cooperate in the internalization of PrP in epithelial FRT cells. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e5829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sarnataro, D.; Campana, V.; Zurzolo, C. Lipid rafts in trafficking and processing of prion protein and amyloid precursor protein. In Lipid Rafts and Caveolae: From Membrane Biophysics to Cell Biology; Fielding, C.J., Ed.; Cardiovascular Research Institute, Department of Medicine, University of California: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2006; pp. 205–231. ISBN 978-352731261-0. [Google Scholar]
  52. Campana, V.; Sarnataro, D.; Fasano, C.; Casanova, P.; Paladino, S.; Zurzolo, C. Detergent-resistant membrane domains but not the proteasome are involved in the misfolding of a PrP mutant retained in the endoplasmic reticulum. J. Cell Sci. 2006, 119, 433–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Donaldson, D.S.; Bradford, B.M.; Artis, D.; Mabbott, N.A. Reciprocal regulation of lymphoid tissue development in the large intestine by IL-25 and IL-23. Mucosal Immunol. 2015, 8, 582–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Hamada, H.; Hiroi, T.; Nishiyama, Y.; Takahashi, H.; Masunaga, Y.; Hachimura, S.; Kaminogawa, S.; Takahashi-Iwanaga, H.; Iwanaga, T.; Kiyono, H.; et al. Identification of multiple isolated lymphoid follicles on the antimesenteric wall of the mouse small intestine. J. Immunol. 2002, 168, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Donaldson, D.S.; Else, K.J.; Mabbott, N.A. The gut-associated lymphoid tissues in the small intestine, not the large intestine, play a major role in oral prion disease pathogenesis. J. Virol. 2015, 15, 9532–9547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Glaysher, B.R.; Mabbott, N.A. Role of the GALT in scrapie agent neuroinvasion from the intestine. J. Immunol. 2007, 178, 3757–3766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. De Lucia, C.; Rinchon, A.; Olmos-Alonso, A.; Riecken, K.; Fehse, B.; Boche, D.; Perry, V.H.; Gomez-Nicola, D. Microglia regulate hippocampal neurogenesis during chronic neurodegeneration. Brain Behav. Immun. 2015, 55, 179–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Kranich, J.; Krautler, N.J.; Falsig, J.; Ballmer, B.; Li, S.; Hutter, G.; Schwarz, P.; Moos, R.; Julius, C.; Miele, G.; et al. Engulfment of cerebral apoptotic bodies controls the course of prion disease in a mouse strain-dependent manner. J. Exp. Med. 2010, 207, 2271–2281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Prinz, M.; Priller, J. Microglia and brain macrophages in the molecular age. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2014, 15, 300–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zhan, Y.; Paolicelli, R.C.; Sforazzini, F.; Weinhard, L.; Bolasco, G.; Pagani, F.; Vyssotski, A.L.; Bifone, A.; Gozzi, A.; Ragozzino, D.; et al. Deficient neuron-microglia signaling results in impaired functional brain connectivity and social behaviour. Nat. Neurosci. 2014, 17, 400–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lunnon, K.; Teeling, J.L.; Tutt, A.L.; Cragg, M.S.; Glennie, M.J.; Perry, V.H. Systemic inflammation modulates Fc receptor expression on microglia during chronic neurodegeneration. J. Immunol. 2011, 186, 7215–7224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Vincenti, J.E.; Murphy, L.; Grabert, K.; McColl, B.W.; Cancellotti, E.; Freeman, T.C.; Manson, J.C. Defining the microglial response during the time course of chronic neurodegeneration. J. Virol. 2016, 90, 3003–3017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Sakai, K.; Hasebe, R.; Takahashi, Y.; Song, C.H.; Suzuki, A.; Yamasaki, T.; Horiuchi, M. Absence of CD14 delays progression of prion diseases accompanied by increased microglial activation. J. Virol. 2013, 87, 13433–13445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Furusawa, Y.; Obata, Y.; Fukuda, S.; Endo, T.A.; Nakato, G.; Takahashi, D.; Nakanishi, Y.; Uetake, C.; Kato, K.; Kato, T.; et al. Commensal microbe-derived butyrate induces the differentiation of colonic regulatory T cells. Nature 2013, 504, 446–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Spielman, L.J.; Gibson, D.L.; Klegeris, A. Unhealthy gut, unhealthy brain: The role of the intestinal microbiota in neurodegenerative diseases. Neurochem. Int. 2018, 120, 149–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Sarkar, A.; Harty, S.; Lehto, S.M.; Moeller, A.H.; Dinan, T.G.; Dunbar, R.I.M.; Cryan, J.F.; Burnet, P.W.J. The Microbiome in Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2018, 22, 611–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Claesson, M.J.; Jeffery, I.B.; Conde, S.; Power, S.E.; O’Connor, E.M.; Cusack, S.; Harris, H.M.; Coakley, M.; Lakshminarayanan, B.; O’Sullivan, O.; et al. Gut microbiota composition correlates with diet and health in the elderly. Nature 2012, 488, 178–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Harach, T.; Marungruang, N.; Duthilleul, N.; Cheatham, V.; Mc Coy, K.D.; Frisoni, G.; Neher, J.J.; Fåk, F.; Jucker, M.; Lasser, T.; et al. Reduction of Abeta amyloid pathology in APPPS1 transgenic mice in the absence of gut microbiota. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 41802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kawano, M.; Miyoshi, M.; Ogawa, A.; Sakai, F.; Kadooka, Y. Lactobacillus gasseri SBT2055 inhibits adipose tissue inflammation and intestinal permeability in mice fed a high-fat diet. J. Nutr. Sci. 2016, 5, e23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Cani, P.D.; Bibiloni, R.; Knauf, C.; Waget, A.; Neyrinck, A.M.; Delzenne, N.M.; Burcelin, R. Changes in gut microbiota control metabolic endotoxemia-induced inflammation in high-fat diet-induced obesity and diabetes in mice. Diabetes 2008, 57, 1470–1481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Zhang, R.; Miller, R.G.; Gascon, R.; Champion, S.; Katz, J.; Lancero, M.; Narvaez, A.; Honrada, R.; Ruvalcaba, D.; McGrath, M.S. Circulating endotoxin and systemic immune activation in sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (sALS). J. Neuroimmunol. 2009, 206, 121–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Calsolaro, V.; Edison, P. Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease: Current evidence and future directions. Alzheimers Dement. 2016, 12, 719–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Zhao, Y.; Cong, L.; Jaber, V.; Lukiw, W.J. Microbiome-derived lipopolysaccharide enriched in the perinuclear region of Alzheimer’s disease brain. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Chen, C.H.; Lin, C.L.; Kao, C.H. Irritable bowel syndrome is associated with an increased risk of dementia: A nationwide population-based study. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0144589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Caini, S.; Bagnoli, S.; Palli, D.; Saieva, C.; Ceroti, M.; Bendinelli, B.; Assedi, M.; Masala, G. Total and cancer mortality in a cohort of ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease patients: The Florence inflammatory bowel disease study, 1978-2010. Dig. Liver Dis. 2016, 48, 1162–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Cattaneo, A.; Cattane, N.; Galluzzi, S.; Provasi, S.; Lopizzo, N.; Festari, C.; Ferrari, C.; Guerra, U.P.; Paghera, B.; Muscio, C.; et al. Association of brain amyloidosis with pro-inflammatory gut bacterial taxa and peripheral inflammation markers in cognitively impaired elderly. Neurobiol. Aging 2017, 49, 60–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Haran, J.P.; Bhattarai, S.K.; Foley, S.E.; Dutta, P.; Ward, D.V.; Bucci, V.; McCormick, B.A. Alzheimer’s Disease Microbiome Is Associated with Dysregulation of the Anti-Inflammatory P-Glycoprotein Pathway. MBio 2019, 10, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Block, J. Alzheimer’s disease might depend on enabling pathogens which do not necessarily cross the blood-brain barrier. Med. Hypotheses 2019, 125, 129–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Xu, R.; Wang, Q. Towards understanding brain-gut-microbiome connections in Alzheimer’s disease. BMC Syst. Biol. 2016, 10 (Suppl. 3), 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Larsen, P.; Nielsen, J.L.; Otzen, D.; Nielsen, P.H. Amyloid-like adhesins produced by floc-forming and filamentous bacteria in activated sludge. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 1517–1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Oli, M.W.; Otoo, H.N.; Crowley, P.J.; Heim, K.P.; Nascimento, M.M.; Ramsook, C.B.; Lipke, P.N.; Brady, L.J. Functional amyloid formation by Streptococcus mutans. Microbiology 2012, 158, 2903–2916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Pistollato, F.; Sumalla Cano, S.; Elio, I.; Masias Vergara, M.; Giampieri, F.; Battino, M. Role of gut microbiota and nutrients in amyloid formation and pathogenesis of Alzheimer disease. Nutr. Rev. 2016, 74, 624–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Asti, A.; Gioglio, L. Can a bacterial endotoxin be a key factor in the kinetics of amyloid fibril formation? J. Alzheimers Dis. 2014, 39, 169–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Galloway, S.; Takechi, R.; Pallebage-Gamarallage, M.M.; Dhaliwal, S.S.; Mamo, J.C. Amyloid-beta colocalizes with apolipoprotein B in absorptive cells of the small intestine. Lipids Health Dis. 2009, 8, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Takechi, R.; Galloway, S.; Pallebage-Gamarallage, M.; Wellington, C.; Johnsen, R.; Mamo, J.C. Three-dimensional colocalization analysis of plasma-derived apolipoprotein B with amyloid plaques in APP/PS1 transgenic mice. Histochem. Cell Biol. 2009, 131, 661–666. [Google Scholar]
  86. Zlokovic, B.V. Cerebrovascular transport of Alzheimer’s amyloid beta and apolipoproteins J and E: Possible anti-amyloidogenic role of the blood-brain barrier. Life Sci. 1996, 59, 1483–1497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Friedland, R.P. Mechanisms of molecular mimicry involving the microbiota in neurodegeneration. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2015, 45, 349–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Holmqvist, S.; Chutna, O.; Bousset, L.; Aldrin-Kirk, P.; Li, W.; Bjorklund, T.; Wang, Z.Y.; Roybon, L.; Melki, R.; Li, J.Y. Direct evidence of Parkinson pathology spread from the gastrointestinal tract to the brain in rats. Acta Neuropathol. 2014, 128, 805–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Singhrao, S.K.; Harding, A.; Poole, S.; Kesavalu, L.; Crean, S. Porphyromonas gingivalis periodontal infection and its putative links with Alzheimer’s disease. Mediators Inflamm. 2015, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Ishida, N.; Ishihara, Y.; Ishida, K.; Tada, H.; Funaki-Kato, Y.; Hagiwara, M.; Ferdous, T.; Abdullah, M.; Mitani, A.; Michikawa, M.; et al. Periodontitis induced by bacterial infection exacerbates features of Alzheimer’s disease in transgenic mice. NPJ Aging Mech. Dis. 2017, 3, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Chu, J.; Lauretti, E.; Pratic, D. Caspase-3-dependent cleavage of Akt modulates tau phosphorylation via GSK3ß kinase: Implications for Alzheimer’s disease. Mol. Psychiatry 2017, 22, 1002–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Dominy, S.S.; Lynch, C.; Ermini, F.; Benedyk, M.; Marczyk, A.; Konradi, A.; Nguyen, M.; Haditsch, U.; Raha, D.; Griffin, C.; et al. Porphyromonas gingivalis in Alzheimer’s disease brains: Evidence for disease causation and treatment with small-molecule inhibitors. Sci. Adv. 2019, 5, eaau3333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Rivest, S. TREM2 enables amyloid beta clearance by microglia. Cell Res. 2015, 25, 535–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Zhao, Y.; Lukiw, W.J. Microbiome-generated amyloid and potential impact on amyloidogenesis in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). J. Nat. Sci. 2015, 1, e138. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  95. Melchior, B.; Garcia, A.E.; Hsiung, B.K.; Lo, K.M.; Doose, J.M.; Thrash, J.C.; Stalder, A.K.; Staufenbiel, M.; Neumann, H.; Carson, M.J. Dual induction of TREM2 and tolerance-related transcript, Tmem176b, in amyloid transgenic mice: Implications for vaccine-based therapies for Alzheimer’s disease. ASN Neuro 2010, 2, e00037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Gawish, R.; Martins, R.; Bohm, B.; Wimberger, T.; Sharif, O.; Lakovits, K.; Schmidt, M.; Knapp, S. Triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-2 fine-tunes inflammatory responses in murine Gram-negative sepsis. Faseb J. 2015, 29, 1247–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Zhao, Y.; Jaber, V.; Lukiw, W.J. Over-expressed pathogenic miRNAs in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and prion disease (PrD) drive deficits in TREM2-mediated Abeta42 peptide clearance. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2016, 8, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Mahmoudian Dehkordi, S.; Arnold, M.; Nho, K.; Ahmad, S.; Jia, W.; Xie, G.; Louie, G.; Kueider-Paisley, A.; Moseley, M.A.; Thompson, J.W.; et al. Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative and the Alzheimer Disease Metabolomics Consortium. Altered bile acid profile associates with cognitive impairment in Alzheimer’s disease-An emerging role for gut microbiome. Alzheimers Dement. 2019, 15, 76–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Wang, D.; Ho, L.; Faith, J.; Ono, K.; Janle, E.M.; Lachcik, P.J.; Cooper, B.R.; Jannasch, A.H.; D’Arcy, B.R.; Williams, B.A.; et al. Role of intestinal microbiota in the generation of polyphenolderived phenolic acid mediated attenuation of Alzheimer’s disease beta-amyloid oligomerization. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2015, 59, 1025–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Kawashima, K.; Misawa, H.; Moriwaki, Y.; Fujii, Y.X.; Fujii, T.; Horiuchi, Y.; Yamada, T.; Imanaka, T.; Kamekura, M. Ubiquitous expression of acetylcholine and its biological functions in life forms without nervous systems. Life Sci. 2007, 80, 2206–2209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Wall, R.; Cryan, J.F.; Ross, R.P.; Fitzgerald, G.F.; Dinan, T.G.; Stanton, C. Bacterial neuroactive compounds produced by psychobiotics. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2014, 817, 221–239. [Google Scholar]
  102. Hu, X.; Wang, T.; Jin, F. Alzheimer’s disease and gut microbiota. Sci. China Life Sci. 2016, 59, 1006–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Pyndt Jorgensen, B.; Hansen, J.T.; Krych, L.; Larsen, C.; Klein, A.B.; Nielsen, D.S.; Josefsen, K.; Hansen, A.K.; Sorensen, D.B. A possible link between food and mood: Dietary impact on gut microbiota and behavior in BALB/c mice. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e103398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Minter, M.R.; Hinterleitner, R.; Meisel, M.; Zhang, C.; Leone, V.; Zhang, X.; Oyler-Castrillo, P.; Zhang, X.; Musch, M.W.; Shen, X.; et al. Antibiotic-induced perturbations in microbial diversity during post-natal development alters amyloid pathology in an aged APPSWE/PS1DeltaE9 murine model of Alzheimer’s disease. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 10411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Abraham, D.; Feher, J.; Scuderi, G.L.; Szabo, D.; Dobolyi, A.; Cservenak, M.; Juhasz, J.; Ligeti, B.; Pongor, S.; Gomez-Cabrera, M.C.; et al. Exercise and probiotics attenuate the development of Alzheimer’s disease in transgenic mice: Role of microbiome. Exp. Gerontol. 2019, 115, 122–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Akbari, E.; Asemi, Z.; Daneshvar Kakhaki, R.; Bahmani, F.; Kouchaki, E.; Tamtaji, O.R.; Hamidi, G.A.; Salami, M. Effect of probiotic supplementation on cognitive function and metabolic status in Alzheimer’s disease: A randomized, double-blind and controlled trial. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2016, 8, 256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Leblhuber, F.; Steiner, K.; Schuetz, B.; Fuchs, D.; Gostner, J.M. Probiotic Supplementation in Patients with Alzheimer’s Dementia-An Explorative Intervention Study. Med. J. Islam Repub. Iran 2017, 31, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Athari Nik Azm, S.; Djazayeri, A.; Safa, M.; Azami, K.; Djalali, M.; Sharifzadeh, M.; Vafa, M. Probiotics improve insulin resistance status in an experimental model of Alzheimer’s disease. Curr. Alzheimer Res. 2018, 15, 1106–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Agahi, A.; Hamidi, G.A.; Daneshvar, R.; Hamdieh, M.; Soheili, M.; Alinaghipour, A.; Esmaeili Taba, S.M.; Salami, M. Does Severity of Alzheimer’s Disease Contribute to Its Responsiveness to Modifying Gut Microbiota? A Double Blind Clinical Trial. Front. Neurol. 2018, 9, 662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Sanborn, V.; Azcarate-Peril, M.A.; Updegraff, J.; Manderino, L.M.; Gunstad, J. A randomized clinical trial examining the impact of LGG probiotic supplementation on psychological status in middle-aged and older adults. Contemp. Clin. Trials Commun. 2018, 12, 192–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Asl, Z.R.; Sepehri, G.; Salami, M. Probiotic treatment improves the impaired spatial cognitive performance and restores synaptic plasticity in an animal model of Alzheimer’s disease. Behav. Brain Res. 2019, 112183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Fernández-Sanz, P.; Ruiz-Gabarre, D.; García-Escudero, V. Modulating Effect of Diet on Alzheimer’s Disease. Diseases 2019, 7, 12. [Google Scholar]
  113. Dehhaghi, M.; Kazemi Shariat Panahi, H.; Guillemin, G.J. Microorganisms, Tryptophan Metabolism, and Kynurenine Pathway: A Complex Interconnected Loop Influencing Human Health Status. Int. J. Tryptophan Res. 2019, 12, 1178646919852996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Nagpal, R.; Neth, B.J.; Wang, S.; Craft, S.; Yadav, H. Modified Mediterranean-ketogenic diet modulates gut microbiome and short-chain fatty acids in association with Alzheimer’s disease markers in subjects with mild cognitive impairment. EBioMedicine 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. McCann, A.; Jeffery, I.B.; Ouliass, B.; Ferland, G.; Fu, X.; Booth, S.L.; Tran, T.T.; O’Toole, P.W.; O’Connor, E.M. Exploratory analysis of covariation of microbiota-derived vitamin K and cognition in older adults. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 20 04704 g001 550
Figure 1. Relationship between the gut microbiota and the brain. (A) In physiological conditions, gut microbiota exerts its effects on the central nervous system using several mechanisms, including the production of short-chain fatty acids, modification of blood–brain barrier permeability, modulation of specific neurotransmitters, and vagus nerve stimulation. (B) In prion disease, prion agents introduced with diet give a microbial dysbiosis that, through microbial amyloid production, is able to activate the immune system, enhance microglia and astrocyte activation, and improve neuronal amyloid production and accumulation in the brain. (C) In Alzheimer’s disease, the microbial dysbiosis impairs gut permeability, inducing a systemic activation of the immune system; this, together with bacterial amyloid beta (Aβ) fibrils, increases the neuroinflammatory status and the deposition of Aβ fibrils at the brain level.
Figure 1. Relationship between the gut microbiota and the brain. (A) In physiological conditions, gut microbiota exerts its effects on the central nervous system using several mechanisms, including the production of short-chain fatty acids, modification of blood–brain barrier permeability, modulation of specific neurotransmitters, and vagus nerve stimulation. (B) In prion disease, prion agents introduced with diet give a microbial dysbiosis that, through microbial amyloid production, is able to activate the immune system, enhance microglia and astrocyte activation, and improve neuronal amyloid production and accumulation in the brain. (C) In Alzheimer’s disease, the microbial dysbiosis impairs gut permeability, inducing a systemic activation of the immune system; this, together with bacterial amyloid beta (Aβ) fibrils, increases the neuroinflammatory status and the deposition of Aβ fibrils at the brain level.
Ijms 20 04704 g001
Ijms 20 04704 g002 550
Figure 2. Schematic illustration of Aβ precursor protein (APP) and prion protein (PrP) pathogenic mutations. Sites of α -, β-, and γ-secretase cleavage are indicated by arrows on both proteins. Asterisks near braces point to currently known mutations in APP and PrP: from aa670/671 to aa723 in APP; from aa60 to aa231 in glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored PrP and to aa238 (present in the GPI-attachment signal) in unprocessed PrP (carrying the GPI-signal peptide). To note: APP can be principally mutated into or nearby the Aβ sequence, while PrP can be mutated all along the sequence length. Effects of protein mutations are listed in the column. HD: hydrophobic domain.
Figure 2. Schematic illustration of Aβ precursor protein (APP) and prion protein (PrP) pathogenic mutations. Sites of α -, β-, and γ-secretase cleavage are indicated by arrows on both proteins. Asterisks near braces point to currently known mutations in APP and PrP: from aa670/671 to aa723 in APP; from aa60 to aa231 in glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored PrP and to aa238 (present in the GPI-attachment signal) in unprocessed PrP (carrying the GPI-signal peptide). To note: APP can be principally mutated into or nearby the Aβ sequence, while PrP can be mutated all along the sequence length. Effects of protein mutations are listed in the column. HD: hydrophobic domain.
Ijms 20 04704 g002

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

D’Argenio, V.; Sarnataro, D. Microbiome Influence in the Pathogenesis of Prion and Alzheimer’s Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4704. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20194704

AMA Style

D’Argenio V, Sarnataro D. Microbiome Influence in the Pathogenesis of Prion and Alzheimer’s Diseases. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019; 20(19):4704. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20194704

Chicago/Turabian Style

D’Argenio, Valeria, and Daniela Sarnataro. 2019. "Microbiome Influence in the Pathogenesis of Prion and Alzheimer’s Diseases" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20, no. 19: 4704. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20194704

APA Style

D’Argenio, V., & Sarnataro, D. (2019). Microbiome Influence in the Pathogenesis of Prion and Alzheimer’s Diseases. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 20(19), 4704. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20194704

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop