Next Article in Journal
Blast Transformation in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Risk Factors, Biological Findings, and Targeted Therapeutic Options
Next Article in Special Issue
Prevalence of Quinolone Resistance of Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli with ST131-fimH30 in a City Hospital in Hyogo, Japan
Previous Article in Journal
Structural Insights into CB1 Receptor Biased Signaling
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fighting AMR in the Healthcare Environment: Microbiome-Based Sanitation Approaches and Monitoring Tools
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Quorum Sensing as Antivirulence Target in Cystic Fibrosis Pathogens

by
Viola Camilla Scoffone
,
Gabriele Trespidi
,
Laurent R. Chiarelli
,
Giulia Barbieri
and
Silvia Buroni
*
Dipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie, Università degli Studi di Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20(8), 1838; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20081838
Submission received: 19 March 2019 / Revised: 11 April 2019 / Accepted: 11 April 2019 / Published: 13 April 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Drug Resistance: Mechanisms and New Strategies)

Abstract

:
Cystic fibrosis (CF) is an autosomal recessive genetic disorder which leads to the secretion of a viscous mucus layer on the respiratory epithelium that facilitates colonization by various bacterial pathogens. The problem of drug resistance has been reported for all the species able to colonize the lung of CF patients, so alternative treatments are urgently needed. In this context, a valid approach is to investigate new natural and synthetic molecules for their ability to counteract alternative pathways, such as virulence regulating quorum sensing (QS). In this review we describe the pathogens most commonly associated with CF lung infections: Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, species of the Burkholderia cepacia complex and the emerging pathogens Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Haemophilus influenzae and non-tuberculous Mycobacteria. For each bacterium, the QS system(s) and the molecules targeting the different components of this pathway are described. The amount of investigations published in the last five years clearly indicate the interest and the expectations on antivirulence therapy as an alternative to classical antibiotics.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a hereditary, autosomal recessive genetic disease associated with mutations in the gene encoding a membrane-bound chloride channel named cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) [1]. CFTR dysfunction has been correlated to the secretion of a viscous mucus layer on the respiratory epithelium that facilitates colonization by bacterial pathogens. In addition, a major hallmark of CF clinical phenotype is the dysregulation of innate immune functions, leading to chronic bacterial lung infections and inflammation [2]. Pulmonary disease is the primary cause of reduced life expectancy and death in CF patients [3]. The pathogens most commonly associated with CF lung infections include Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, species of the Burkholderia cepacia complex as well as emerging pathogens, like Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Haemophilus influenzae and non-tuberculous Mycobacteria [4].
Antibiotic therapies are implemented in order to eradicate these infections and slow down the deterioration of pulmonary function. However, by targeting essential bacterial physiological processes, antimicrobial compounds exert a strong selective pressure, facilitating the emergence and spread of resistant isolates [5]. New therapeutic strategies aimed at preventing pathogens from producing virulence factors, rather than killing them, represent an attracting alternative to the use of antimicrobial compounds. In particular, regulatory mechanisms controlling the expression of multiple virulence determinants constitute promising targets for antivirulence therapies [6,7].
Quorum sensing (QS) is a cell-to-cell communication process that allows bacteria to collectively modify their pattern of gene expression in response to changes in the cell density and species composition of the microbial community. Processes controlled by QS include the activation of bacterial defense mechanisms, such as the synchronized production of virulence factors (toxins, proteases, immune-evasion factors) and biofilm formation. These responses are activated in response to the extracellular concentration of small soluble autoinducer signal molecules that are produced and secreted by bacteria [8]. Autoinducer molecules comprise a diversity of molecular species such as oligopeptides, furanosyl borate diester (autoinducer-2, AI-2), acylated homoserine lactones (acyl-HSLs), the Pseudomonas quinolone signal molecule (PQS, 2-heptyl-3-hydroxy-4-quinolone) and integrated QS signal (IQS, 2-(2-hydroxyphenyl)-thiazole-4-carbaldehyde) as well as the Burkholderia cepacia complex fatty acid molecule named diffusible signal factor (BDSF) [9,10,11,12,13]. Interestingly, bacteria usually do not rely on a single signal molecule but different QS-systems acting in parallel or in a hierarchical manner can be found within the same organism [8,14]. As autoinducers concentration increases with bacterial population density, changes in the concentration of autoinducers allow bacteria to monitor their cell numbers. Autoinducers are bound by specific receptors that reside either in the inner membrane or in the cytoplasm. Once a certain threshold of signal concentration is reached, a cascade of signaling events is triggered, leading to the modulation of the expression of hundreds of genes underlying various biological processes related to bacterial physiology, virulence, and biofilm formation [8].
QS is one of the most intensively studied targets for antivirulence therapy. As this process allows the concerted regulation of several virulence determinants without being essential for growth, targeting QS allows controlling bacterial pathogenesis while limiting selective survival pressure and emergence of antibiotic resistance [14].
Interference with QS systems therefore represents a promising strategy to address the emergence and spread of antibiotic resistance [7]. A great diversity of QS interfering agents has been described. These compounds can be either of natural or synthetic origin and can target different steps of the QS cell-to-cell communication process, by acting as inhibitors or agonists of signal molecule biosynthesis, signal molecule detection, or signal transduction.
Plant-derived compounds have been known since ancient times as having beneficial properties, including antimicrobial activity. Plant-derived secondary metabolites have been widely explored for their ability to inhibit QS. To test the inhibitory activity of natural compounds, different methods have been developed. The ability of phytochemicals to inhibit violacein production in the sensor strain Chromobacterium violaceum (CV12472) is a common assay used to evaluate anti-QS activity [15,16]. In C. violaceum, synthesis of the violet pigment violacein is regulated by QS in response to the concentrations of the autoinducers C6-AHL and C4-AHL [17]. Since this QS-regulated trait is easily observable by disc diffusion assay, C. violaceum is widely used as biosensor strain for screening anti-QS molecules. More specific and targeted screening methods for anti-QS activity include biofilm formation and eradication assays by crystal violet staining [18,19,20], quantification of QS-regulated virulence traits (e.g., pyocyanin production in P. aeruginosa, alpha-hemolysin secretion by S. aureus, protease production) as well as gene expression analysis of known QS-targets [21,22].
In this review, we will describe the QS systems of the main pathogens associated with CF lung infections and we will provide an overview of the main, so-far developed antivirulence compounds targeting these cell communication and regulatory processes, focusing our attention on papers published in the last five years.

2. Staphylococcus aureus

Staphylococcus aureus is a ubiquitous non-motile Gram-positive coccus, which can be found in the anterior nares and skin of humans. It is an aerobe and a facultative anaerobe bacterium, able to form biofilms, which can cause skin, soft tissue, and respiratory infections, osteomyelitis, endocarditis, and can colonize medical device implants. It can cause bacteraemia in 30–50% of healthy people with chronic nasal carriage [23]. Within two years of the introduction of methicillin in clinical practice, S. aureus strains developed resistance through the acquisition of the mecA gene, thus being defined as Methicillin Resistant (MRSA) [24]. Treatment of Methicillin Sensitive strains (MSSA) includes the use of fusidic acid in combination with oxacillin or dicloxacillin (or rifampicin in case of penicillin allergy) given for 14 days [25]. Among the currently used drugs to treat MRSA we can find fusidic acid, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, tetracyclines, linezolid, clindamycin, levofloxacin, glycopeptides, rifampin, aminoglycosides, and tigecycline [26]. Newer medications for MRSA include quinopristin/dalfopristin, daptomycin (for skin infections and bacteriaemia, but not for pneumonia), and fosfomycin in combination with tobramycin [26].

2.1. S. aureus Infections in cystic fibrosis

In CF patients S. aureus is implicated in early lung damage [27], but it is also associated with lower respiratory tract inflammation [28]. Chronic infections include high bacterial density, frequent exacerbations, and inflammation. Co-infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia appear to be particular risk markers for more severe lung disease [29], while in the absence of other infections the prognosis is more favorable [30]. MRSA represent a great concern leading to an increased rate of decline in lung function and a high risk of death [31,32]. At the same time, the emergence of small colony variants (SCVs) is associated with worse lung function [33].
S. aureus is often the first pathogen isolated in CF children and the most prevalent one during childhood [34]. From adolescence to adulthood the prevalence of S. aureus decreases gradually, but a significant percentage of adults harbor the pathogen [34]. S. aureus infections prevalence seems to vary from country to country and over time: in the USA it changed from 30% in 1990 to 60% in 2016 [34]. On the contrary, the UK CF Registry shows a reducing proportion of children infected by S. aureus, with 16% of 0–3 year-olds and 23.7% of 4–7 year-olds [35], while in 1994 up to 60% of babies included in a randomized trial were positive [36]. Also, the type of strains is different in the USA respect to Europe: in particular, a three-fold greater annual prevalence of MSSA and an eight-fold greater annual prevalence of MRSA was reported in the USA compared to the UK [26].
Although the high prevalence of infections caused by S. aureus no international guidelines for the treatment in CF patients exist [37]. As an example, in UK an anti-staphylococcal prophylactic therapy in younger children is used [38], while in other countries the infection is treated only if symptoms occur or if specimens from airway are cultured positive [39].

2.2. Quorum Sensing Systems of S. aureus

Two main QS systems have been described so far in S. aureus: the Accessory gene regulator (Agr, Figure 1) and the LuxS systems [40].

2.2.1. The Agr System

The agr locus consists of two divergent transcriptional units, RNAII and RNAIII, which are under the control of P2 and P3 promoters, respectively [41]. The RNAII locus contains the genes agrB, agrD, agrC and agrA which are transcribed on the complementary strand [42].
The agrD gene codes for a peptide which is a precursor of the extracellular AutoInducing Peptide (AIP), the QS signal molecule produced by the Agr system. The AIP harbors a thiolactone ring and an exocyclic N-terminus tail [9].
AgrB is a transmembrane endopeptidase that modifies the thiolactone, cleaves the C-terminal, and exports the AIP [43].
The agrC gene encodes a receptor histidine kinase that autophosphorylates and, subsequently, transfers a phosphoryl group to the response regulator AgrA [44]. Then, AgrA activates the P2 promoter region for RNAII, thus leading to an autoinduction, the P3 promoter region for RNAIII [45], but also the transcription of the phenol-soluble modulin psmα and psmβ, a family of staphylococcal peptide toxins [46].
RNAIII contains the gene which encodes the δ-toxin (an exoprotein that lyses eukaryotic host cells), and regulates other genes required for exotoxin secretion, degradative exoenzyme production, and biofilm disassembly [47].
There are four S. aureus Agr allelic variants (I to IV) that produce four AIPs which differ in a few amino acid residues (Figure 1B). AIPs function as QS activator in the S. aureus cells that produce them, while they generally inhibit QS in S. aureus strains that produce different AIPs [47]. Agr groups have been also correlated to specific biotypes: for example, most toxic shock syndrome strains belong to Agr group III, while vancomycin susceptible strains belong to group II and host exfoliation, producing strains belonging to group IV [48].
It has been shown that Agr is inactive during biofilm formation, mainly related to the increased expression of adhesins. In contrast, Agr is active in the detachment process, facilitating bacterial dissemination to other sites [49]. On the other hand, the upregulation of Agr enhances the production of virulence factors important for the progression of many staphylococcal diseases, including pneumonia [50], endocarditis [51], septic arthritis, and osteomyelitis [52,53], and skin and soft tissue infections [54].

2.2.2. The LuxS System

The LuxS system employs the AI-2 autoinducer, a furanosyl borate diester [55]. It regulates the capsule synthesis, biofilm formation (through the icaR locus), antibiotic susceptibility, and virulence [56,57]. However, the role of the LuxS system in S. aureus QS is not completely clear, as it is involved in metabolism, nor have AI-2 receptors been described so far [58].

2.3. Molecules Targeting QS in S. aureus

Molecules targeting QS in S. aureus can be classified into natural and synthetic products. Among natural molecules, Agr, generic QS, biofilm, δ toxin, and PT13 inhibitors have been described. Among synthetic products we can enumerate Agr, generic QS, biofilm and SarA inhibitors (Figure 2).

2.3.1. Natural Molecules

The chemical structure of natural molecules inhibiting QS of S. aureus is reported in Figure 3A.

Generic QS Inhibitors

Since plants are considered the greatest source for obtaining new antimicrobials, Monte and collaborators explored the antimicrobial activity of four phytochemicals, finding that 7-hydroxycoumarin and indole-3-carbinol affected the motility and QS activity of S. aureus [15].
Among generic QS inhibitors of S. aureus, an Agr-like peptide from Clostridium difficile [59] and myricetin [60] were described. The first one was shown to affect the gene and protein expression profiles of different S. aureus strains and inhibited the production of Hla and LukS-PV toxins which are particularly important in S. aureus pathogenesis, suggesting its potential use as ‘antipathogenic’ therapy for S. aureus infections [59]. Myricetin is a flavonoid contained in fruits, vegetables, tea, berries, and red wine with proven beneficial pharmacological properties [61]. It has been shown to affect both surface and secreted proteins, decreasing the production of several S. aureus virulence factors, including adhesion, biofilm formation, hemolysis, and staphyloxanthin production, without interfering with growth, and thus being an alternative multi-target antivirulence candidate [60].
Finally, the alanine rich protein PT13 from Populus trichocarpa has been shown to suppress the expression of various QS dependent virulence factors in S. aureus, including biofilm-related genes, cell adhesion, and bacterial attachment [18].

Biofilm Inhibitors

Mare colostrum, the mare’s first milk, has been shown as a promising source for isolating next-generation antibacterials [16]. It exhibited inhibitory activities against virulence factors produced by S. aureus, such as spreading ability, hemolysis, protease, and lipase activities. Moreover, mare colostrum showed a strong inhibitory activity against biofilm formation and eradication [16].
Brazilin is a principal active component of the herbal medicine Caesalpinia sappan L [62]. Different studies demonstrated its multiple biological properties, including immune system modulatory, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antiplatelet, antihepatotoxicity, and antitumor activities [62], as well as its antimicrobial activity [63]. In 2018, Peng and collaborators used a biofilm model of S. aureus to establish in vitro inhibitory effects of brazilin on biofilm formation [19]. Indeed, this molecule was able to inhibit and destroy S. aureus biofilm, to reduce the production of the extracellular polymeric matrix and to inhibit the QS system, thus supporting its use as a novel drug and treatment strategy for S. aureus biofilm-associated infections [19].
Among natural agents able to inhibit biofilm formation in S. aureus, the action of essential oils has been investigated. Eucalyptus globulus essential oil, and its main component 1,8-cineole, has been reported to be effective against MRSA [64], while Sharifi et al. [65] investigated the effects of Thymus daenensis and Satureja hortensis essential oils on some S. aureus isolates showing a significant inhibitory effect on biofilm formation.
S. aureus expresses several phenol-soluble modulins which are produced in the late growth phase in an agr QS dependent manner. They show persister reducing activity which has been associated with lytic activity against bacterial membranes [66]. This way, it has been proposed that these toxins increase the ability of antibiotics to kill persister cells present in the biofilm [66].

Agr Inhibitors

Solonamide B is a cyclodepsipeptide isolated from the marine bacterium Photobacterium halotolerans that strongly reduces expression of RNAIII, interfering with the binding of S. aureus AIPs to sensor histidine kinase AgrC and is the first described natural compound with these characteristics [67]. In 2018, Hansen and collaborators synthesized an array of 27 analogues identifying an analogue resembling solonamide B in amino acid sequence with more potent AgrC inhibitory activity [68].
Manuka honey is another Agr system inhibitor described between 2014 and 2018 [69]. It has been reported as a broad-spectrum antimicrobial agent [70] which is used to treat topical wounds. In order to better understand its mode of action, Jenkins and collaborators performed proteomic and genomic analysis to investigate its effects on MRSA strains [69]. The agr gene was found among the genes with decreased expression, thus the authors concluded that a decreased expression of virulence genes will impact MRSA pathogenicity.
ω-hydroxyanodin from Penicillium restrictum is a polyhydroxyanthraquinone. It has been shown to prevent agr signaling by all four S. aureus agr alleles [71]. In particular, it inhibited QS by direct binding to AgrA, thus preventing its interaction with the agr P2 promoter. Its efficacy has been demonstrated in a mouse model of S. aureus infection where it decreased dermonecrosis in association with enhanced bacterial clearance and reductions in inflammatory cytokine transcription and expression at the site of infection [71].
Hamigera ingelheimensis, a metabolically prolific Eurotiales, was observed to be producing an unknown congener, designated as avellanin C [72]. Its chemical structure was determined and its ability to inhibit S. aureus QS was reported in 2015 by measuring the decrease in luminescence intensity from a S. aureus transformant that carried a plasmid encoding luciferase gene under agr P3 promoter upon a treatment with 0.5–200 μM of compound [72].
Also, the QS inhibitory activity of chestnut leaf extracts, which are rich in oleanene and ursene derivatives, has been assessed against all S. aureus agr alleles, suggesting a role for non-biocide inhibitors of virulence in future antibiotic therapies [73].
Norlichexanthone is a small non-reduced tricyclic polyketide produced by fungi and lichens. It is able to reduce expression of α-hemolysin and RNAIII thus lowering S. aureus toxicity towards human neutrophils and reducing its ability to form biofilms [74].
In 2016 Chen and collaborators showed that baicalein treatment reduced staphylococcal enterotoxin A and α-hemolysin levels downregulating the QS regulators agrA, RNAIII, and sarA, and gene expression of ica [75]. Moreover, it was able to inhibit S. aureus biofilm formation, to destroy biofilms, and to increase the permeability of vancomycin, supporting its use as a novel drug candidate [75].
Finally, ajoene is a sulfur-rich molecule from garlic which has been shown to reduce expression of key QS regulated virulence factors in S. aureus lowering RNAIII expression and, in turn, of hemolysins and proteases [76].

δ-Toxin Production Inhibitors

Recently, Khan and collaborators selected nine plants from the Sudhnoti district of Pakistan used in the ethnopharmacological tradition for the treatment of infectious and inflammatory diseases to check their activity against S. aureus and other bacteria [77]. Some of the extracts exhibited significant QS inhibition in a reporter strain for S. aureus agr I and one of them also for agr I–III with a significant drop in δ-toxin production.

2.3.2. Synthetic Molecules

The chemical structure of synthetic molecules inhibiting QS of S. aureus is reported in Figure 3B.

Generic QS Inhibitors

Three biaryl hydroxyketone compounds showed efficacy in MRSA-infected animal models and combination therapy with cephalothin or nafcillin revealed survival benefits [78]. These data suggested a possible employment of obsolete antibiotic therapies in combination with these novel quorum-quenching agents.

Biofilm Inhibitors

Sub-inhibitory concentrations of azithromycin have been shown to decrease the biofilm formation in MRSA in a dose-dependent manner [79].
In 2015, Gizdavic and collaborators showed that functionalized polyanilines significantly disrupted and killed bacterial cells present in pre-established forty-eight-hour static biofilms of S. aureus [80].
An acyclic diamine, (2,20-((butane-1,4-diylbis(azanediyl)bis(methylene))diphenol) showed good antimicrobial and antibiofilm activity, being capable of reducing the virulence factors expression. Moreover, confocal laser scanning microscope analysis showed biofilm reduction as well as bacterial killing, suggesting its role as lead compound for further studies in alternative therapeutic approaches [81].
Many studies have been performed also on Hamamelitannin, shown to increase S. aureus biofilm susceptibility towards vancomycin through the TraP receptor by affecting cell wall synthesis and extracellular DNA release [82]. Vermote and collaborators synthesized many derivatives [83,84] which resulted in the identification of an analogue that increases the susceptibility of S. aureus towards antibiotics in vitro, in Caenorhabditis elegans, and in a mouse mammary gland infection model, without showing cytotoxicity [85].
Also, 5-hydroxymethylfurfural has been shown to reduce the ability of S. aureus to form a biofilm up to 82% [86], while silver and ruthenium nanoparticles caused a significant reduction in biofilm formation (46%) of a clinical MRSA isolate. Indeed, RNA sequencing demonstrated down-regulation of many biofilm-associated genes and of genes related to virulence [86].

Agr Inhibitors

Among synthetic inhibitors of the S. aureus Agr system, two kind of small molecules were synthesized: a series of 3-oxo-C12-HSL, tetramic acid, and tetronic acid analogues [87] and Savirin [88]. The former are noncompetitive inhibitors of the AIP activated AgrC receptor and in vivo reduced nasal cell colonization and arthritis [87]. Savirin (S. aureus virulence inhibitor) hits the transcriptional regulator AgrA, preventing virulence gene upregulation. Also, savirin showed efficacy in murine skin infection models, abating tissue injury and promoting clearance [88].
In 2014 O’Rourke and collaborators identified a set of peptides displayed on virus-like-particles that bound with high specificity to AP4-24H11. Immunization with a subset of these particles protected against pathogenicity in a mouse model of S. aureus, paving the way for the development of a mimotope vaccine [89].
Serum lipoproteins are dual purpose molecules that contribute to both cholesterol homeostasis and host innate defense. The apolipoprotein B100 (apoB100) prevents agr activation by binding and sequestering AIP. ApoB48, the N-terminal 2152 amino acids of apoB100, has been shown to antagonize S. aureus QS. Since they are produced by enterocytes in the form of chylomicrons, these data suggested a previously unrecognized role for chylomicrons and enterocytes in the host innate defense against S. aureus QS-mediated pathogenesis [90].
Peptide-conjugated locked nucleic acids targeting agrA mRNA were developed to inhibit agr activity and arrest the pathogenicity of MRSA strains. They were shown to inhibit the expression of virulence genes that are upregulated by Agr and showed high levels of protection in a mouse skin infection model [91].
Analogues of a native AIP-III signal able to inhibit AgrC-type QS receptors and attenuate virulence phenotypes in S. aureus [92], as well as AIP-II peptidomimetics with a conserved hydrophobic motif [93] or linear peptide-like molecules [94] suggested that the AIP scaffold is amenable to structural mimicry for the development of synthetic QS inhibitors.

SarA Inhibitors

The quorum regulator SarA of S. aureus up-regulates the expression of many virulence factors, including biofilm formation. Through an in silico approach, Balamurugan and collaborators synthesized 2-[(Methylamino)methyl]phenol, which showed antibiofilm and antivirulence activity against clinical S. aureus strains [95].

3. Pseudomonas aeruginosa

P. aeruginosa is a social, ubiquitous, opportunistic Gram-negative pathogen able to cause infections in many different niches of the human body, such as respiratory and urinary tracts [96]. It is highly invasive, toxigenic and adaptable to different surfaces and tissues. Infections occur frequently in immunocompromised individuals and in particular in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. In 2017 carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa has been listed in the highest category of “critical” pathogens with urgent need for new treatments by the World Health Organization (WHO) [97]. P. aeruginosa is a member of the large group of the ESKAPE pathogens (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumonia, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter species) and it could be considered a “superbug” due to its pathogenesis and transmission. The extensive use of antibiotics increases the development of multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa strains that leads to the failure of the therapies against this bacterium [98]. In this scenario, the identification of new and alternative strategies for prevention and treatment of infection is essential.

3.1. P. aeruginosa Infections in cystic fibrosis

Chronic P. aeruginosa colonizations in CF patients are recalcitrant to antibiotic treatments and they are associated with loss of lung function, morbidity and mortality [99]. The majority of the CF patients become positive for P. aeruginosa infections during the lifespan and it is still one of the major causes of death associated with this genetic disorder [100]. Initially, patients are infected by the nonmucoid strains of P. aeruginosa, but during the time mutations could occur in mucA, encoding an anti-sigma factor, leading to a switch to the mucoid phenotype characterized by the overproduction of polysaccharide alginate [101].
Nowadays, several treatments have been applied to handle early P. aeruginosa infection, such as inhaled antibiotics like colistin and tobramycin [102,103], oral ciprofloxacin [104], or an intravenous combination of an aminoglycoside with a beta-lactam [105]. Nevertheless, there is insufficient information to determine the antibiotic strategy that should be used for early P. aeruginosa infections eradication in CF patients [106].

3.2. Quorum Sensing Systems of P. aeruginosa

P. aeruginosa is one of the model organisms in QS study and its complex QS systems play a key role in virulence. Four QS systems were described in P. aeruginosa: LasI/LasR, RhlI/RhlR, Pqs and Iqs (Figure 4A). Their specific signal molecules are N-oxododecanoyl-l-homoserine lactone (OdDHL or 3OC12-HSL), N-butanoyl-l-homoserine lactone (BHL or C4-HSL), the Pseudomonas quinolone signal (PQS), and the integrated quorum sensing signal (IQS), respectively (Figure 4B). These systems are deeply intertwined and LasI/LasR is at the top of the hierarchical organization. LasI/LasR and RhlI/RhlR are N–acylhomoserine lactone (AHL) circuits homolog of LuxI/LuxR and are activated by an increased cell density. Both these systems are represented by a Lux-type synthase and a LuxR-type receptor. The LasI synthase produces the signal molecule OdDHL which is detected by the cytoplasmic receptor LasR. In the second system, the signal molecule BHL is produced by the synthase RhlI and sensed by the receptor RhlR. The two receptors LasR and RhlR are the transcriptional regulators that control the expression of nearly 10% of the P. aeruginosa genome (approximately 300 genes) [107]. The third system is the P. aeruginosa quinolone signal (PQS) system in which the signal molecule PQS is produced by PqsABCDE and PqsH and detected by the receptor PqsR [108]. The fourth QS system, activated by phosphate and iron starvation, is still under investigation. Its signal molecule is the IQS synthesized by AmbBCDE [109].
Additionally, P. aeruginosa produces other 50 AHQs, discovered by LC/MS of the culture supernatant, the majority of which is still uncharacterized [110].
The las system is at the top of the signalling hierarchy and, when activated by its molecule OdDHL, induces the transcription of rhlI/rhlR, lasI and of the other virulence genes [111]. On the other hand, when RhlR is activated by the BHL signal it induces the expression of rhlI and of its own regulon. At the same time, the operon pqsABCDE is induced by the las system and repressed by rhl and it is modulated by the ratio between OdDHL and BHL [112]. The PQS system induces the transcription of rhlI and, in turn, of the RhlI/RhlR system [111,113]. The IQS system is controlled by LasI/LasR during growth in rich medium [109]. PQS signal is produced mainly during the late phase of growth, suggesting its prominent role under stressful conditions [113,114].
Among the virulence factors modulated by QS signals there is the LasB elastase controlled by OdDHL and the BHL signals and involved in the degradation of the proteins of the matrix; the pyocyanin, necessary for immune evasion and controlled by all the three QS systems (OdDHL, BHL and PQS); the protease LasA, for the disruption of the epithelial barrier and the alkaline protease, degrading the proteins of the host defence, both controlled by OdDHL. Also, rhamnolipids, inducing necrosis of immune cells, are controlled by BHL and factors that enhance colonization, such as the LecA lectin regulated by PQS system [11]. QS systems control the production of virulence factors necessary to survive during the host invasion in the early and late stages of infection and in P. aeruginosa are required for complete virulence in different hosts: nematodes, fruit flies, zebrafish and mice [115]. P. aeruginosa strains deficient in QS systems are significantly less virulent and cytotoxic and induce lower level of tissue damage during colonization [116]. Notably, P. aeruginosa clinical isolates from chronic infections showed mutations in the gene lasR and some of these mutants still have a functional LasR while others have uncoupled the LasI/LasR system from the RhlI/RhlR [117]. Moreover, stress conditions during infection of the host such as phosphate and iron limitation induce virulence factor production through RhlR and IQS activation [109,118]. It has been demonstrated that there is a correlation between the concentration of some QS signal molecules and the level of pulmonary exacerbation [119]. Hence, some studies were focused on the correlation between the QS and the mucoid phenotype, showing that strains with this phenotype have a reduction of 3-oxo-C12-HSL, C4-HSL and AQ-dependent QS systems during the early stationary phase, while in the late stationary phase expression levels were comparable with the wild type strain [120].
All these results showed how QS systems have a key role during P. aeruginosa adaptation to the host and environmental changes.

3.3. Molecules Targeting QS in P. aeruginosa

Also, in this case, both natural and synthetic molecules targeting QS in P. aeruginosa have been described (Figure 5).

3.3.1. Natural Products

There is a huge amount of literature describing natural compounds active against P. aeruginosa QS (Figure 6A). Among these natural products with anti-biofilm activity there is the cranberry extract rich in proanthocyanidins (cerPAC) that acts by decreasing the concentration of virulence factors and protecting Drosophila melanogaster from P. aeruginosa PA14 fatal infection. lasIR and rhlIR genes were downregulated and molecular docking studies proposed that CerPAC binds to QS transcriptional regulators [121].
A natural plant phenolic compound, Coumarin, has been described as a QS inhibitor with a strong anti-virulence activity. Coumarin is effective against protease and pyocyanin production and blocks biofilm formation. Furthermore, transcriptome analysis highlighted that several genes involved in las, rhl, pqs, and also IQS systems were downregulated in P. aeruginosa PAO1 biofilm treated with Coumarin [21].
The natural compound Baicalin extracted from Scutellaria baicalensis inhibits P. aeruginosa biofilm formation at sub-MICs concentrations and enhances the activity of bactericidal compounds in vitro. Moreover, it decreases the expression levels of QS-regulatory genes (lasI, lasR, rhlI, rhlR, pqsR and pqsA) and the treatment of C. elegans reduces the pathogenesis of P. aeruginosa infection and increases the activation of Th1-induced immune response to induce bacterial clearance [22].

3.3.2. Synthetic Molecules

The chemical structure of synthetic molecules inhibiting QS of P. aeruginosa is reported in Figure 6B.

Inhibitor of LasIR QS System

The LasIR system is an attractive target to interfere with QS and a recent work demonstrates that blocking the LasR receptor prevents the binding of LasR to the target DNA [122]. LasR inhibitors can be classified into three groups: non-AHL-like antagonists, AHL-like antagonists, and covalent binders.
In order to block LasR activity, a possibility is to modify the chemical and enzymatic stability of the molecule. Among the non-AHL-like antagonists there is an indole derivative characterized by low levels of inhibition (65% at 250 µM). More recently, a compound with a glycine ethyl ester branch has been described and tested in the P. aeruginosa reporter strain MH602. It blocks the activation of LasR and slightly decreases the pyocyanin production [123]. The same group identified a glyxoamide-based macrocycle able to inhibit the biofilm formation in the reporter strain P. aeruginosa MH64 at 250 µM [124].
Among 25 nonsymmetrical azines, another study identified two compounds that inhibit the LasR receptor-based QS system in a plasB-gfpASV-based bioassay and decrease biofilm formation in P. aeruginosa [125].
Another hybrid compound was identified using a structure-based scaffold hopping approach combining a triphenyl derivative (already known to agonize LasR) with LasR antagonists producing a more stable molecule. This new compound shows an IC50 of 4.8 µM in the E. coli lasR reporter strain [126]. Two different patents described two molecules, an N-thioacyl-homoserine lactone and a pyrrolidin-2-ol derivative: the first is active against Las, Pqs and Rhl QS system at sub-inhibitory concentration [127], while the second blocks both LasR and RhlR at high concentration (400 µM) [128].
In order to block LasR activity, a family of compounds was designed with an aliphatic tail and a pyrone headgroup; one of these showed the strongest activity at a ligand concentration of 100 µM in the biofilm assay. The interaction between this molecule and LasR was predicted using in silico modeling [129].
In order to interfere with LasR function, many studies developed LasR covalent inhibitors based on the core structure of the ligand. In particular, a previously studied isothiocyanate-based inhibitor, ITC-12, showing covalent non-competitive inhibition at low micromolar concentration, but also able to activate LasR [130], has been modified adding an electronegative halogen. The new compound successfully protects C. elegans from P. aeruginosa infection [131]. Finally, O’Brien and colleagues synthesized a group of irreversible binders of LasR among which the lead inhibitor is able to decrease P. aeruginosa pyocyanine and biofilm production [132].
LasI is another interesting drug target and several studies identified molecules blocking its activity. Unfortunately, there are few examples of LasI inhibitors and the majority described only a putative interaction predicted by docking analysis. Among a group of synthetic and natural compounds, the trans-cinnamaldehyde was identified. This is a strong inhibitor of AHL synthases, decreasing P. aeruginosa PAO1 pyocyanin production [133]. Using molecular docking analysis, it has been demonstrated that trans-cinnamaldehyde binds to LasI, interacting with the substrate binding site [133].
The (z)-5-octylidenethiazolidine-2, 4-dione (TZD-C8) is a potent inhibitor of biofilm, swarming motility and QS signal production, and in silico docking studies predicted the affinity of this compound for LasI pocket [134].
In another study on marine Streptomyces extracts, it has been shown that some fatty acid lead molecules have synergistic or individual anti-biofilm activity and the most active compounds were successfully docked against the protein LasI [135].

3.3.3. Inhibitors of rhl Quorum Sensing System

A group of synthetic molecules was tested for inhibition of the Pseudomonas QS receptor RhlR: among these the most effective compound is an analog of a native autoinducer, the meta-bromo-thiolactone (mBTL), that prevents virulence factor production such as pyocyanin, biofilm formation and protects C. elegans and human lung epithelial cells from P. aeruginosa infections [136]. The in vivo target of this compound is RhlR and mBTL functions as an agonist of RhlR blocking pyocyanin production down-regulating the Pqs circuit [137]. The same group characterized a family of strong agonists of RhlR that repress the Pqs signal cascade, revealing the Rhl-Pqs cross-talk as a new QS target [138].

3.3.4. Inhibition of PqsR

PqsR could be considered an important target in the development of QSIs. One of the PqsR inhibitors described is an HHQ derivative that once in the cell is converted in a strong PqsR agonist by the synthase PqsH. The molecule was further optimized by introducing a CONH2 group which reduced mortality caused by P. aeruginosa in an animal model [139].
Another group of PqsR inhibitors was identified using a whole-cell high throughput screen and structure-activity relationship (SAR) analysis: these new molecules block pro-persistence and pro-acute PqsR-dependent signals [140]. These compounds contain the structural backbone of benzamide and a benzimidazole moiety with a thioether bond: they are highly potent with IC50 values of 200–350 nM for HHQ, PQS and pyocyanin [140]. The optimization of these molecules resulted in a robust inhibitor called M64 with a significant therapeutic efficacy against acute and persistent infections in mice, also in combination with antibiotic therapy [140]. Moreover, M64 interferes with biofilm formation and potentiates the antibiofilm activity of currently used antibiotics [141].

Inhibitors of PQS Biosynthesis

One of the key enzymes of the PQS biosynthesis is the anthranilyl-CoA synthase PqsA, for this reason it is an attractive target for the development of QS inhibitors. Sulfonyladeonsine-based substrate analogs were synthetized: anthranilyl-AMS and anthranilyl-AMSN that decreased HHQ and PQS levels but not pyocyanin production in P. aeruginosa [142].
PqsD is involved in the production of the 2-aminobenzoylacetate-CoA, the second step of HHQ biosynthesis. The first PqsD antagonists derived from FabH inhibitors (a homolog of PqsD) and their optimization produced two molecules that compete better for the substrate binding pocket [143]. In another study, urea-based PqsD inhibitors were described and improved, producing compounds with high inhibitory activity (IC50 of 0.14 and 0.36 µM) [143]. Unfortunately, their intracellular activity was not evaluable, probably because they were subjected to efflux [144].
PqsD shares some features (size of the active site, catalytic residues) with chalcone synthase (CHS2) of Medicago sativa. Starting from these affinities, Allegretta and co-workers evaluated the inhibitory activity of some selected substrates of CHS2 on PqsD. The new inhibitors were characterized by a catechol structure, a saturated linker with at least two carbons and an ester moiety [144]. One of these compounds showed a promising inhibitory activity (IC50 of 7.9 µM) and was able to reduce the HHQ production. Surface Plasmon Resonance revealed that this molecule does not bind to the protein active site, but it is near the entrance of the substrate channel [145].
The 2-sulfonylpyrimidines were reported as dual inhibitors targeting the PQS receptor PqsR and the synthase PqsD. Bioisosteric replacement was used to improve their functionality and allowed to obtain a new dual inhibitor with enhanced efficacy [146]. This molecule reduced biofilm formation, pyocyanin and pyoverdine release and restored ciprofloxacin activity. Moreover, it protected the larvae of Galleria mellonella from P. aeruginosa infections [146].
Two groups of benzamidobenzoic acids were described as RNAP and PqsD inhibitors. Studying the structural modification needed to increase their selectivity against PqsD, Hinsberger and co-workers identified a new molecule which strongly blocks PqsD activity (IC50 of 6.2 µM), but without activity against RNAP [147].
Recently, a new strategy to screen PqsD inhibitors in a E. coli cellular model system has been described [148]. Through this technique, a covalent inhibitor derived from the anthranilic acid core of the native substrates was identified, which caused a global inhibition of quinolone biosynthesis in P. aeruginosa [148].
Another enzyme that plays a central role in the HHQ biosynthesis is the thioesterase PqsE: its functions are not completely elucidated, but it is involved in the regulation of numerous genes coding for biofilm production and virulence determinants [149]. PqsE contributes to the regulation of bacterial virulence producing an alternative ligand that activates RhlR QS receptor in the absence of the 4-HSL. During the elucidation of PqsE function, molecules that bind at the PqsE catalytic site and that inhibit its thioesterase activity were identified [149]. Further investigations are needed because these ligands failed to alter the levels of the PqsE-regulated virulence factor pyocyanin and to influence the interaction with RhlR [150].
The final step of HH biosynthesis involves the heterodimer PqsBC. Taking advantage of a benzamide-benzamidazole (BB) core structure (described as PqsR inhibitor) the first class of inhibitors targeting simultaneously MvfR and PqsBC has been identified [151]. The authors showed that PqsBC inhibition blocks acute virulence behaviours, interfering with the conversion of 2-ABA into the signal molecule HHQ [151]. The dual inhibition allows to decrease acute and chronic virulence factors. Moreover, these molecules have a more potent efficacy against antibiotic tolerance [151].
In another study, the effect of already described Pqs inhibitors was evaluated on PqsBC activity, underlining that these compounds are less effective in the reduction of HHQ levels. Indeed, these compounds affect the distribution of QS molecules and not their production [152].
There are also other compounds described as Pqs inhibitors with unspecific targets. The 4-aminoquinoline derivatives are effective QS and biofilm inhibitors in P. aeruginosa, characterized also by a weak bactericidal activity. Among these molecules, compounds interfering with PQS signalling, able to decrease pyocyanin production and biofilm formation were identified [153].
In order to characterize new PqsR antagonists, in silico docking analysis, together with screening with P. aeruginosa mCTX::PpqsA-lux chromosomal promoter fusion were performed. The resulting hits blocked alkylquinolone and pyocyanin production in both P. aeruginosa PAO1-L and PA14. Among these, one compound, stable in the plasma, reduced biofilm formation and increased the efficacy of tobramycin [154].

3.3.5. “PAN-INHIBITORS” of QS

Previous studies highlighted the efficacy of ajoene against QS in P. aeruginosa, hence a screening of in-house compound library identified a sulfuric compound (resembling ajoene) able to block QS. The optimization of this molecule was carried out using SAR and a benzothiazole derivative was the most potent [155]. These derivatives reduced the production of virulence factors (elastase, rhamnolipids and pyocyanin) and decreased P. aeruginosa infection in the animal model [155].
Another group identified benzothiazole-based HK inhibitors that alter multiple virulence factors, in particular the compounds called Rilu-4 and Rilu-12 decreased significantly the production of PQS signal molecule, toxins and altered the motility of the bacteria, acting on the functionality of the two-component system GacS/GacA [156].
The products of Petiveria alliacea, S-phenyl-l-cysteine sulfoxide, antagonized QS pathways and biofilm formation and P. aeruginosa showed a down-regulation of many QS-dependent virulence operons and a misregulation of genes involved in metabolic pathways such as the one of PQS biosynthesis. Indeed, S-phenyl-l-cysteine sulfoxide is able to inhibit the KynU enzyme (kynureninase), reducing the PQS production in vivo [157].

4. Burkholderia cepacia

4.1. B. cepacia Infections in cystic fibrosis

Burkholderia cepacia complex (Bcc) is a group of 22 closely related Gram-negative bacterial species isolated from soil, water, plants, industrial settings, hospitals and from infected patients [158,159,160,161]. These bacteria have peculiar characteristics, as the ability to degrade toxic xenobiotics and the capacity of promoting the growth of crops, that make them interesting for biotechnological applications in agriculture and industry [162].
Unfortunately, Bcc bacteria are better known from the early 1980s as opportunistic human pathogens which cause persistent and severe infections in CF patient airways, as well as in chronic granulomatous disease or in immunocompromised individuals. The acquisition of these infections, which can occur both from the environment and from other patients, is very dangerous, because they are inherently highly resistant to the majority of the antibiotics used in current clinical treatments [163,164], making the eradication extremely challenging. This wide antibiotic resistance is shared by clinical and environmental Burkholderia strains, because of the conservation of the genes coding for the resistance mechanisms [165]. Moreover, in up to 20% of the cases the infection leads to the cepacia syndrome, a lethal necrotizing pneumonia associated with bacteremia [166]. Although all the Bcc species are able to cause an infection in CF patients, Burkholderia cenocepacia and Burkholderia multivorans are the most common isolates from these patients [4]. B. cenocepacia includes the epidemic strains ET-12 and Czeck strain, which spread in the 1990s within people with CF in Canada and Europe, besides the PHDC and the Midwest clone, dominant in United States [167]. These strains are particularly virulent and transmissible and is demonstrated that they possess several genes coding for virulence factors [168]. The expression of these genes is mainly regulated by QS.

4.2. Quorum Sensing Systems of B. cepacia

Bcc uses multiple QS systems for the cell-to-cell communication, and while some are common to each species, others are species or strain-specific (Figure 7A). QS in Gram-negative bacteria usually involves the production and sensing of N-acyl-homoserine lactone (AHL) molecules synthesized by a LuxI homolog and bound by a transcriptional regulator of the LuxR family (Figure 7B) [169]. This system is represented in all Bcc species by CepIR, which is composed of the synthase CepI that synthesizes N-octanoyl-homoserine-lactone (C8-HSL) and, to a minor extent, N-hexanoyl-homoserine-lactone (C6-HSL), and CepR that can act both as positive and negative transcriptional regulator [170].
Some epidemic strains of B. cenocepacia possess also a pathogenicity island named cenocepacia island (cci) which contains the genes coding for a second AHL-based QS system known as CciIR. Conversely to CepI, CciI produces mainly C6-HSL and a lower amount of C8-HSL, activating the cognate receptor CciR [171].
B. cenocepacia has also an orphan LuxR homolog, CepR2, not coupled with any synthase in the genome, indeed its activation is independent from AHLs, even though recently, it has been discovered that its activity is antagonized by C8-HSL [172,173].
Among the Bcc, another AHL-mediated QS system has been characterized only in other two species, Burkholderia vietnamiensis, which has the BviIR system that synthesizes C10-HSL [174], and Burkholderia ambifaria, which has the CepI2R2 system that mainly produces the hydroxylated AHLs, 3OHC10-HSL and 3OHC12-HSL [175].
The other leading signal molecule used by all Bcc species for cellular communication, is the Burkholderia diffusible signal factor (BDSF), a fatty acid molecule similar to the diffusible signal factor originally described in Xanthomonas [12,176]. In B. cenocepacia BDSF or cis-2-dodecenoic acid is synthesized by the bifunctional crotonase DfsA or RpfFbc, the counterpart of RpfF of Xanthomonas, [177] and sensed by the soluble receptor RpfR [13,178]. This protein, activated in the presence of BDSF, degrades the c-di-GMP through its phosphodiesterase activity and allows the activation of the global transcriptional regulator GtrR which works in complex with RpfR itself [179].
Furthermore, another sensor protein has been identified, BCAM0227, which controls only a subgroup of genes regulated by BDSF (Figure 7B) [180]. B. cenocepacia is able to produce also a 2-heptyl-4(1H)-quinolone (HHQ) molecule, a known signaling factor in Burkholderia pseudomallei, but not yet characterized in this species [181]. Besides a modified HHQ, the 4-hydroxy-3-methyl-2-heptenylquinoline (HMAQ-C7:2′) is produced by the other Bcc species B. ambifaria [182].
Finally, the last signal molecule discovered in the Bcc has been a diazeniumdiolate compound named valdiazen, which controls the expression of more than 100 genes in B. cenocepacia H111 [183]. This molecule is probably the first member of a new wider class of signal compounds in Burkholderia. These QS systems communicate with each other through a very complex and regulated network of interactions that is just partially characterized so far, considering that new regulators are discovered periodically and some interactions are not fully understood as yet.
The AHL based QS systems directly interact, and indeed CepR positively regulates the expression of cepI by a positive feedback regulation, but also the cciIR operon and, at least in B. cenocepacia H111, the gene cepR2. However, it is also a repressor of its own expression. The B. cenocepacia QS regulator, CciR, is instead a transcriptional repressor, negatively regulating the expression of cepI by a negative feedback regulation, cepR2 and its own expression [184]. The orphan regulator CepR2 does not need the presence of AHL to be active and to repress its own expression, as it inhibits the activator CepS, an AraC-type transcription factor, and blocks the transcription in an unusual way [173]. Unlike the other two regulators, CepR2 does not interfere with CepIR and CciIR systems [172].
Until a few years ago, there was no evidence about cross interactions between the two main QS systems of Burkholderia, CepIR and BDSF, but today it is assessed that they are part of a bigger regulon. Indeed, it has been demonstrated that BDSF controls the AHL production, activating the RpfR-GtrR complex and directly promoting the expression of the AHL synthase gene cepI [185,186]. Moreover, in the ET-12 strain of B. cenocepacia the synthase gene cciI is regulated in the same manner [185].
Several other regulators are known to take part in the QS regulation, such as CepS, ShvR, YciR, SuhB, YciL, BCAM1871, AtsR, BCAM1869, BCAM0258, BceR, RqpR, contributing to the complexity of the network [173,187,188,189,190,191,192,193].
QS systems are known to control the expression of next to hundred genes in Burkholderia, and several of these are regulated together by more than one system [184,194,195]. In human infections, it has been proved that the bacterium needs active QS systems to infect the lungs of CF patients successfully, because they control also the expression of the genes coding for virulence factors [196]. The virulence factors directly associated with QS are the extracellular zinc metalloprotease ZmpA and ZmpB [12,194], the siderophores ornibactin and pyochelin [184,197], the flagellar motility [180,184], the type III and type VI secretion systems [180,184], the biofilm formation [13,198], the LysR regulator ShvR [199], the protein BCAM1871 not characterized as yet [187], and the nematocidal protein AidA [172,184]. Therefore, in order to decrease the virulence of these infections and to overcome antibiotic resistance, molecules able to hit the QS regulation have been screened and characterized.

4.3. Molecules Targeting QS in B. cenocepacia

The combination of quorum sensing inhibitors (QSI) with antibiotics is a useful strategy to control the infections caused by Bcc bacteria. Although promising results have been obtained in the last years, only few active molecules in Bcc have been studied, principally because of the low number of studies performed on these bacteria. The molecules characterized as active QSI are both natural compounds and synthetic molecules [20,200,201,202] which are able to interfere with the biofilm formation and in turn to increase the efficacy of the antibiotic treatment (Figure 8A). Moreover, it has been proved that some of these QSI can decrease the virulence in infection models [200,202]. Within them, there are both AHL analogues, that act as agonist or antagonist of the natural AHL [201], and molecules with completely different structures and so different mechanisms of action [202,203]. Recently, a new set of synthetic diketopiperazines has been tested in our laboratory for their ability to inhibit QS, and among them we discovered two molecules with a very interesting activity against CepI of B. cenocepacia J2315 [202]. Besides these, the only other molecule further studied in the last years has been the baicalin hydrate [204], a flavonoid initially characterized as QSI for Pseudomonas aeruginosa in 2008 by Zeng et al. [205].

4.3.1. Natural Molecules

Baicalin hydrate (BH, Figure 8B) is a polyphenolic molecule belonging to the class of the flavonoids, isolated from the roots of Scutellaria baicalensis, and firstly characterized as QSI in a work consisting in the screening of compounds with antibacterial activity of the Traditional Chinese Medicine [205]. Polyphenols are already known to be biofilm and swarming motility inhibitors in B. cenocepacia H111 [206]. BH has been tested as QSI on some microorganisms including Bcc bacteria, obtaining very promising results. These studies uncovered its ability to impair the biofilm formation in B. cenocepacia and B. multivorans [20], and the ability to increase the effect of tobramycin against sessile cells both in vitro and in vivo [200]. The combination of BH and tobramycin results in a significantly reduced mortality after Burkholderia infections in C. elegans and G. mellonella models and in a strongly reduced pulmonary bacterial load in infected mice, compared to the antibiotic treatment alone [200]. Although the potential of this molecule is fully recognized, the mechanism of action of BH remains unclear. BH enhances the bactericidal activity of tobramycin and other aminoglycosides, even though the effect is strain-specific, increasing the formation of reactive oxygen species, by acting on several pathways such as cellular respiration, glucarate metabolism and biosynthesis of putrescine [204]. On the contrary, the QSI action of BH in this case may not be the main mechanism that leads to this synergistic effect as hypothesized by Slachmuylders et al. [204], leaving a question open for further studies.

4.3.2. Synthetic Molecules

2,5-Diketopiperazines (DKPs, Figure 8B) are a class of cyclic dipeptides, isolated mainly from Gram-negative bacteria, but also from Gram-positive bacteria, Archaea and Fungi, which were characterized as agonists of LuxR-type proteins and accordingly a new class of QS molecules and interspecies signals [207,208]. However, this theory is still debated, because of a study which proved that DKPs did not interact directly with TraR, LasR and LuxR [209]. However, being DKPs an established QSI, in order to find CepI inhibitors of B. cenocepacia J2315, we have tested ten newly synthesized molecules, designed adding a redox moiety to the DKPs scaffold, against the enzymatic activity of the recombinant purified synthase CepI. We have found two active compounds, named 6a and 8b, classified as non-competitive inhibitor of the synthase. Even though the two molecules did not show any synergistic activity in combination with the currently most used antibiotics against planktonic cells, they were able to significantly reduce the production of siderophores and proteases, and besides to interfere with the biofilm formation [202]. These results have been confirmed also in a C. elegans infection model, showing that the two DKPs could protect the nematodes from the infection of B. cenocepacia J2315. Moreover, it has been verified that 6a and 8b have a very low toxicity on HeLa cells, making the compounds good candidates for future experimentations in humans [202]. A further study has been performed on the molecule 8b, showing that the effect of the compound on B. cenocepacia J2315 is comparable to the deletion of cepI, and also that its binding pocket is likely localized close to the predicted S-adenosylmethionine binding site of CepI [203], adding information that may be considered in the future to improve its biological activity by chemical modifications.

5. Emerging CF Pathogens

5.1. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia

5.1.1. S. maltophilia Infections in cystic fibrosis

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is a Gram-negative rod which represents an important emerging nosocomial pathogen, responsible for infectious diseases and death, particularly in immunosuppressed or immunocompromised patients or in subjects carrying medical implants [210]. Among the emerging CF pathogens, S. maltophilia infection is considerably variable from center to center, ranging from 3–30%, with an increasing in prevalence in this population [211]. In CF patients, infection with S. maltophilia has been associated to poor outcomes, decreased lung function, and increased risk of transplantation or death [212].
Nevertheless, the effect of S. maltophilia on lung function decline is not clear, and there is no consensus about the management of patients with this infection. For instance, in some cases it is considered a colonizer, and thus no specific treatments are carried out, while in other cases it is treated with specific antibiotics, but with no consensus on the optimal regimen [213].
Anyway, the treatment is very difficult, as S. maltophilia is intrinsically resistant to several antimicrobials, and able to acquire new resistances by horizontal gene transfer [214]. Indeed, S. maltophilia is usually present in environmental water reservoirs, a highly competitive niche that favors not only the acquisition of resistance genes, but also the establishment of communication networks with the neighboring microorganisms [215].

5.1.2. Quorum Sensing Systems of S. maltophilia

The principal QS system of S. maltophilia relies on the Diffusible Signal Factor (DSF) cis-11-methyl-2-dodecenoic acid, which regulates bacterial motility, biofilm formation, antibiotic resistance, and virulence [216,217]. Differing from other DSF producing bacteria, such as B. cenocepacia and P. aeruginosa, in S. maltophilia, the genes encoding the QS proteins co-localize in the regulation of pathogenicity factors (Rpf) cluster, and are organized in two adjacent operons convergently transcribed [217]. The first operon encodes the fatty acid ligase RpfB and the synthase RpfF, whereas the second operon contains the genes coding for the sensor kinase RpfC and the cytoplasmic regulator RpfG [216]. The peculiarity of the S. maltophilia DSF system is the presence of two variants of the rpf cluster, rpf-1 and rpf-2, which are associated with two RpfC-1 and RpfC-2 variants. Interestingly, the association of these variants is fixed, whereby the strains harboring RpfF-1 necessarily carry the RpfC-1 variants and vice versa. The RpfF variants differ in first 108 amino acids, while the RpfC variants display a different number of trans-membrane regions at the N-terminal portion, 10 for RpfC-1 and 5 for RpfC2. To date, the rpf-1 variant has been detected in the 55.5% of the isolates, while the rpf-2 in the 44.5% [216]. These two variant strains show differences in DSF synthesis, perception, and in regulation of biological processes. Differently from the rpf-1 strains, which under standard growth conditions produce DSF, the rpf-2 needs extra copies of the rpfF-2 gene or the absence of RpfC-2 to produce DSF [216]. Nonetheless, RpfF-1 and RpfF-2 enzymes have both acyl-ACP dehydratase and thioesterase activity, and catalyze the conversion of (R)-3-hydroxy-11-methyl-dodecanoyl-ACP into DSF [217]. This thioesterase activity is not specific, and the enzymes are able to cleave different medium and long chain acyl-ACP, producing free fatty acids that are released in extracellular environment [217]. Among these fatty acids, the mostly produced in S. maltophilia is the 13-methyltetradecanoic acid (iso-15:0). This molecule is synthetized by the biosynthetic pathway of the DSF, suggesting a connection between DSF and membrane synthesis. Indeed, iso-15:0 modulates the DSF in rpf-1 strains, being sensed by RpfC-1, which thus releases RpfF-1 that can start DSF synthesis [217]. By contrast, in rpf-2 strains the 5-transmembrane sensor RpfC-2 does not have promiscuous perception, which leads to the repression of RpfF-2 also in the presence of iso-15:0 or other fatty acids. Indeed, the RpfF-2 RpfC-2 complex can dissociate only upon sensing the DSF itself. Thus, in rpf-2 strains the DSF production is triggered by the presence of exogenous DSF [217].
Interspecies communication through DSF signal molecules is a quite common phenomenon also for S. maltophilia. For instance, DSF produced by S. maltophilia was found to influence P. aeruginosa, particularly regarding biofilm formation, antibiotic resistance, virulence and persistence in lungs of CF patients [218]. Moreover, although S. maltophilia has been shown not to produce AHLs, it has been found that it responds to AHL signal molecules produced by P. aeruginosa [219]. Indeed, in the S. maltophilia genome there are 15 putative LuxR that lack the cognate LuxI, and are widely spread throughout bacteria [220]. Among them, the SmoR, containing the typical N-terminal AHL-binding domain and the C-terminal helix-turn-helix DNA-binding domain, was demonstrated to bind in vitro oxo-C8- homoserine lactone. Moreover, S. maltophilia swarming motility was found to be strongly stimulated in the presence of a P. aeruginosa supernatant containing high levels of AHLs, indicating that SmoR senses the AHL signals of neighboring bacteria [219]. By contrast, the strain of S. maltophilia BJ01 was found to produce a compound (cis-9-octadecenoic acid) which possesses quorum quenching activity and which is able to inhibit biofilm formation of P. aeruginosa [221].

5.1.3. Molecules Targeting QS in S. maltophilia

Despite the increasing incidence of multi-resistant S. maltophilia clinical isolates, and the potential of quenching DSF communication as a promising therapeutic approach, no active compounds, nor QS molecules degrading enzymes, have been reported until now.

5.2. Haemophilus Influenzae

5.2.1. H. influenzae Infections in cystic fibrosis

Nontypeable H. influenzae (NTHi) is a common commensal of the upper airways, which can cause different infections, such as otitis media, bronchitis, sinusitis, and pneumonia. Moreover, chronic infection can occur in patients with diseases of lower respiratory tracts, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, bronchiectasis and CF [222]. In particular, NTHi is the most common colonizer of the airways in infants with CF [4]. NTHi is indeed recovered from about 20% of children under the age of 2 years and has a peak of prevalence at 30% in children 2 to 5 years old, decreasing to less than 10% in adults [34]. Furthermore, about 80% of children with P. aeruginosa had previous infections with S. aureus or NTHi. NTHi has been found involved in chronic infections and exacerbations of CF lung disease, and associated with lower lung function impairment in infants [223].
NTHi is able to produce biofilm, also in the lower airway of CF patients [224]. Similarly, to several pathogens, within biofilm it is intrinsically resistant to antibiotics, and has been demonstrated to be able to persist during infection in multicellular biofilm communities [225]. Moreover, it has been found that low concentrations of different antibiotics stimulate biofilm formation [226].

5.2.2. Quorum Sensing Systems of H. influenzae

Biofilm regulation in NTHi is mainly mediated by the autoinducer-2 (AI-2) QS signal that relies on the LuxS/RbsB system [227] and is widely distributed among different bacteria [169]. Interestingly, AI-2 signaling can have different roles among different species, promoting the formation and maturation of the biofilm, or the biofilm dispersal and cells release [228].
In NTHi, AI-2 promotes biofilm formation and prevents its dispersal during the maturation process. Indeed, it has been shown that if the expression of luxS is interrupted, thus decreasing the production of AI-2, biofilm dispersal occurs, suggesting a role of AI-2 also in the regulation of the lipooligosaccharides that are known to mediate adherence [229]. In this context, the recent discovery that the levels of AI-2 regulate the expression of the glycosyltransferase GstA [229] paves the way to new investigations to better define how the bacteria form and persist into biofilms, and to find novel possible antivirulence targets. For instance, the AI-2 receptor RbsB has been suggested as a promising target, since mutations in its gene are associated with alterations of biofilm formation and maturation in an in vivo model of otitis media [227,229]. In addition to the LuxS/RbsB system, biofilm in NTHi is regulated by the two-component histidine kinase QseB/QseC system [230]. To date, little is still known about this system in NTHi that, differently from the well characterized QseBC of E. coli and Salmonella enterica, does not respond to epinephrine or norepinephrine, but is activated only by ferrous iron or zinc and has been designated as a ferrous-iron-responsive system (FirS) [231].

5.2.3. Molecules Targeting QS in H. influenzae

A novel approach against NTHi, based on vaccine targeting bacterial adhesive proteins and biofilm mediators, was recently demonstrated to prevent otitis media on a polymicrobial infection model [232]. In particular, it was demonstrated that antisera against the NTHi type IV pili PilA were able to in vitro disrupt and prevent the dual species biofilm formed by NTHi and Moraxella catarrhalis. Moreover, the bacteria released from biofilm were significantly more sensitive to different antibiotics [233]. Since NTHi and M. catarrhalis have been found together also in the lungs of children with CF [234], this strategy of immunization in combination with antibiotics can provide a novel approach for the treatment of these biofilm-associated infections [233] (Figure 9A).

5.3. Non-Tuberculous Mycobacteria (NTM)

5.3.1. NTM Infections in cystic fibrosis

Non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are microorganisms usually isolated from environmental sources, such as soil and water. NTM can be divided in rapid growers (i.e., Mycobacterium abscessus complex, Mycobacterium fortuitum), that take less than 7 days to grow, or slow growers (i.e., Mycobacterium avium complex, Mycobacterium kansasii). Among NTM, some species are associated with human disease, particularly the M. avium complex (MAB: including Mycobacterium avium, Mycobacterium intracellulare, and Mycobacterium chimaera) and the Mycobacterium abscessus complex (MABSC: that comprises Mycobacterium abscessus, Mycobacterium massiliense, and Mycobacterium bolletii). NTM are considered opportunistic pathogens organisms, particularly prevalent in patients with CF, non-CF bronchiectasis, and in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [235]. The incidence and prevalence of NTM in CF patients is increasing and highly variable, with a prevalence ranging between 2% and 28% [236]. NTM infections in CF patients, particularly of M. abscessus, are associated with an increased morbidity and mortality, and a rapid lung function decline [237]. Moreover, the treatment is particularly challenging due to an intrinsic resistance to several antibiotics, including those commonly used in CF infections [238].

5.3.2. Quorum Sensing Systems of NTM

Most mycobacteria, including NTM such as M. abscessus and M. avium, are known to form biofilm, suggesting the possibility that these organisms may have QS systems, but experimental validation is still lacking [239]. Nevertheless, bioinformatics analysis demonstrated the presence of homologs of LuxR in Mycobacterium tuberculosis, which have been found also in different other mycobacteria [240]. Moreover, the existence of QS in mycobacteria is also indirectly suggested by the fact that their signal transduction phospho-relay cascade uses different di-cyclic or modified nucleotides as second messenger, including c-di-GMP. Indeed, c-di-GMP is ubiquitous in several bacteria, and known to be involved in virulence and biofilm formation [241].

5.3.3. Molecules Targeting QS in NTM

Due to the increasing incidence of NTM infections, together with their intrinsic resistance to several antibiotics, particularly when in biofilms, the research of new compounds with biofilm dispersal activity is fundamental (Figure 9B).
Among the natural products, essential oils, which are secondary plant metabolites, have been suggested as potential antimicrobial and antivirulence compounds [242]. For instance, the essential oil of Cymbopogon flexuosus (a plant generally known as lemongrass) was recently demonstrated to have antimicrobial activity against rapidly growing NTM, being also able to efficiently disperse biofilm, as well as to inhibit its formation [243].
On the other hand, Flores and co-workers evaluated the antibiofilm activity of different antibiotics used in the treatment of mycobacterial infections (amikacin, ciprofloxacin, clarithromycin, doxycycline, imipenem and sulfamethoxazole), but none of them was able to significantly prevent biofilm formation or to promote biofilm dispersal [244]. Nevertheless, it was recently found that sulfamethoxazole when in complex with metal ions, particularly in complex with Au, showed a markedly enhanced antibiofilm activity [245]. Moreover, showing these compounds a good safety profile and antibacterial activity, they have been suggested as potential therapeutic agents [245].
Thus, although NTM QS is still very poorly known, these effective antibiofilm compounds demonstrate the potential of this target to develop novel therapeutic molecules.

6. Conclusions

In this review we enumerated the principal CF pathogens which cause lung infections: S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, B. cepacia complex bacteria, and the emerging pathogens S. maltophilia, H. influenzae and non-tuberculous Mycobacteria. As their common peculiarity is the high degree of drug resistance, in the last years a lot of work has been done to find an alternative therapeutic solution: the research on QS inhibitors, able to attenuate the virulence of these strains, has merged as a promising strategy. In this way, both synthetic and natural products were evaluated for their ability to interfere with various components of the QS machinery, although sometimes their target has not been found yet.
In particular, for S. aureus we described generic QS inhibitors, both of natural and synthetic origin (Figure 2 and Figure 3). Moreover, among natural molecules, some are able to inhibit biofilm formation, the Agr system at different levels, and the δ toxin; while synthetic compounds hit biofilm formation, the Agr system as well as the QS regulator SarA (Figure 2).
Among P. aeruginosa QS inhibitors, we described natural generic and transcriptional factors inhibitors (Figure 5 and Figure 6A). The synthetic molecules reported target all the QS systems of this bacterium: LasIR, RhlIL, and Pqs. Also, Pan-inhibitors have been described (Figure 5 and Figure 6B).
As regarding B. cepacia complex, natural generic QS inhibitors have been characterized, while among the synthetic molecules, only CepI inhibitors have been described so far (Figure 8).
Conversely, despite the incidence of multi-resistant S. maltophilia clinical isolates, and the potential of quenching DSF communication, no active compounds have been reported until now. The unique report about H. influenzae biofilm disruption regards synthetic antisera against the PilA, which render the cells released from biofilm significantly more sensitive to different antibiotics (Figure 9A). Finally, natural essential oils and synthetic sulfamethoxazole in complex with metal ions showed good activity against Non-tuberculous Mycobacteria biofilm (Figure 9B).
The huge amount of literature published in the last five years clearly demonstrates that QS is a good candidate to find alternative therapeutic approaches to face the increasing problem of antibiotic resistance. The compounds described have a great potential as antivirulence molecules, but can also be proposed for combined therapies to improve the activity of existing drugs, paving the way for alternative treatments.
On the other hand, potential challenges for the use of these compounds have been described. These include the possible incurrence of drug resistance [246,247,248], and the limitations of the current animal infection models for QS [246]. Moreover, it seems that, in order to develop truly effective QSI, a better understanding of the virulence and of the behavior of pathogens during infections is needed [249]. Finally, despite QSI having been published in the literature since the 1990’s, none of them is in clinical trial yet, leading to the conclusion that further efforts are needed in order to exploit these new approaches for the treatment of bacterial infections; yet a lot of alternatives are being explored.

Funding

This research was supported by the Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research (MIUR): Dipartimenti di Eccellenza Program (2018–2022)—Dept. of Biology and Biotechnology “L. Spallanzani”, University of Pavia (to S.B. and L.R.C.) and by a BlueSky research grant of the University of Pavia to S.B.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results

Abbreviations

AHLAcyl Homoserine Lactone
CFCystic Fibrosis
DSFDiffusible Signal Factor
NTMNon-tuberculous Mycobacteria
QSQuorum sensing
QSIQuorum sensing inhibitor

References

  1. Riordan, J.R.; Rommens, J.M.; Kerem, B.; Alon, N.; Rozmahel, R.; Grzelczak, Z.; Zielenski, J.; Lok, S.; Plavsic, N.; Chou, J.L. Identification of the cystic fibrosis gene: Cloning and characterization of complementary DNA. Science 1989, 245, 1066–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Döring, G.; Gulbins, E. Cystic fibrosis and innate immunity: How chloride channel mutations provoke lung disease. Cell Microbiol. 2009, 11, 208–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Gibson, R.L.; Burns, J.L.; Ramsey, B.W. Pathophysiology and management of pulmonary infections in cystic fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2003, 168, 918–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Lipuma, J.J. The changing microbial epidemiology in cystic fibrosis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2010, 23, 299–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Munguia, J.; Nizet, V. Pharmacological Targeting of the Host-Pathogen Interaction: Alternatives to Classical Antibiotics to Combat Drug-Resistant Superbugs. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2017, 38, 473–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Dickey, S.W.; Cheung, G.Y.C.; Otto, M. Different drugs for bad bugs: Antivirulence strategies in the age of antibiotic resistance. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2017, 16, 457–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Defoirdt, T. Quorum-Sensing Systems as Targets for Antivirulence Therapy. Trends Microbiol. 2018, 26, 313–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Papenfort, K.; Bassler, B.L. Quorum sensing signal-response systems in Gram-negative bacteria. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2016, 14, 576–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ji, G.; Pei, W.; Zhang, L.; Qiu, R.; Lin, J.; Benito, Y.; Lina, G.; Novick, R.P. Staphylococcus intermedius produces a functional agr autoinducing peptide containing a cyclic lactone. J. Bacteriol. 2005, 187, 3139–3150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Guo, M.; Gamby, S.; Zheng, Y.; Sintim, H.O. Small molecule inhibitors of AI-2 signaling in bacteria: State-of-the-art and future perspectives for anti-quorum sensing agents. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 17694–17728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Lee, J.; Zhang, L. The hierarchy quorum sensing network in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Protein Cell 2015, 6, 26–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Deng, Y.; Boon, C.; Eberl, L.; Zhang, L.H. Differential modulation of Burkholderia cenocepacia virulence and energy metabolism by the quorum-sensing signal BDSF and its synthase. J. Bacteriol. 2009, 191, 7270–7278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Deng, Y.; Wu, J.; Eberl, L.; Zhang, L.H. Structural and functional characterization of diffusible signal factor family quorum-sensing signals produced by members of the Burkholderia cepacia complex. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 4675–4683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. LaSarre, B.; Federle, M.J. Exploiting quorum sensing to confuse bacterial pathogens. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2013, 77, 73–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Monte, J.; Abreu, A.C.; Borges, A.; Simões, L.C.; Simões, M. Antimicrobial Activity of Selected Phytochemicals against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus and Their Biofilms. Pathogens 2014, 3, 473–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Srivastava, A.; Singh, B.N.; Deepak, D.; Rawat, A.K.; Singh, B.R. Colostrum hexasaccharide, a novel Staphylococcus aureus quorum-sensing inhibitor. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015, 59, 2169–2178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Steindler, L.; Venturi, V. Detection of quorum-sensing N-acyl homoserine lactone signal molecules by bacterial biosensors. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2007, 266, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Al Akeel, R.; Mateen, A.; Syed, R. An alanine-rich peptide attenuates quorum sensing-regulated virulence and biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus. J. AOAC Int. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Peng, D.; Chen, A.; Shi, B.; Min, X.; Zhang, T.; Dong, Z.; Yang, H.; Chen, X.; Tian, Y.; Chen, Z. Preliminary study on the effect of brazilin on biofilms of Staphylococcus aureus. Exp. Ther. Med. 2018, 16, 2108–2118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Brackman, G.; Hillaert, U.; Van Calenbergh, S.; Nelis, H.J.; Coenye, T. Use of quorum sensing inhibitors to interfere with biofilm formation and development in Burkholderia multivorans and Burkholderia cenocepacia. Res. Microbiol. 2009, 160, 144–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, Y.; Sass, A.; Van Acker, H.; Wille, J.; Verhasselt, B.; Van Nieuwerburgh, F.; Kaever, V.; Crabbé, A.; Coenye, T. Coumarin Reduces Virulence and Biofilm Formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa by Affecting Quorum Sensing, Type III Secretion and C-di-GMP Levels. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Luo, J.; Dong, B.; Wang, K.; Cai, S.; Liu, T.; Cheng, X.; Lei, D.; Chen, Y.; Li, Y.; Kong, J.; et al. Baicalin inhibits biofilm formation, attenuates the quorum sensing-controlled virulence and enhances Pseudomonas aeruginosa clearance in a mouse peritoneal implant infection model. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0176883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Wertheim, H.F.; Vos, M.C.; Ott, A.; van Belkum, A.; Voss, A.; Kluytmans, J.A.; van Keulen, P.H.; Vandenbroucke-Grauls, C.M.; Meester, M.H.; Verbrugh, H.A. Risk and outcome of nosocomial Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia in nasal carriers versus non-carriers. Lancet 2004, 364, 703–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Seybold, U.; Kourbatova, E.V.; Johnson, J.G.; Halvosa, S.J.; Wang, Y.F.; King, M.D.; Ray, S.M.; Blumberg, H.M. Emergence of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus USA 300 genotype as a major cause of health care-associated blood stream infections. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2006, 42, 647–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Szaff, M.; Høiby, N. Antibiotic treatment of Staphylococcus aureus infection in cystic fibrosis. Acta Paediatr. 1982, 71, 821–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Goss, C.H.; Muhlebach, M.S. Review: Staphylococcus aureus and MRSA in cystic fibrosis. J. Cyst. Fibros. 2011, 10, 298–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Cigana, C.; Bianconi, I.; Baldan, R.; De Simone, M.; Riva, C.; Sipione, B.; Rossi, G.; Cirillo, D.M.; Bragonzi, A. Staphylococcus aureus impacts Pseudomonas aeruginosa chronic respiratory disease in murine models. J. Infect. Dis. 2017, 217, 933–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Sagel, S.; Gibson, R.; Emerson, J.; McNamara, S.; Burns, J.L.; Wagener, J.S.; Ramsey, B.W. Impact of Pseudomonas and Staphylococcus infection on inflammation and clinical status in young children with cystic fibrosis. J. Pediatr. 2009, 154, 183–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Junge, S.; Gorlich, D.; den Reijer, M.; Wiedemann, B.; Tümmler, B.; Ellemunter, H.; Dübbers, A.; Küster, P.; Ballmann, M.; Koerner-Rettberg, C.; et al. Factors associated with worse lung function in cystic fibrosis patients with persistent Staphylococcus aureus. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0166220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Ahlgren, H.G.; Benedetti, A.; Landry, J.S.; Bernier, J.; Matouk, E.; Radzioch, D.; Lands, L.C.; Rousseau, S.; Nguyen, D. Clinical outcomes associated with Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa airway infections in adult cystic fibrosis patients. BMC Pulm. Med. 2015, 15, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dasenbrook, E.C.; Merlo, C.A.; Diener-West, M.; Lechtzin, N.; Boyle, M.-P. Persistent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and rate of FEV1 decline in cystic fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2008, 178, 814–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Dasenbrook, E.C.; Checkley, W.; Merlo, C.A.; Konstan, M.W.; Lechtzin, N.; Boyle, M.P. Association between respiratory tract methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and survival in cystic fibrosis. JAMA 2010, 303, 2386–2392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wolter, D.J.; Emerson, J.C.; McNamara, S.; Buccat, A.M.; Qin, X.; Cochrane, E.; Houston, L.S.; Rogers, G.B.; Marsh, P.; Prehar, K.; et al. Staphylococcus aureus small-colony variants are independently associated with worse lung disease in children with cystic fibrosis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2013, 57, 384–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. Patient Registry: 2017 Annual Data Report; Cystic Fibrosis Foundation: Bethesda, MD, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  35. UK Cystic Fibrosis Trust. UK CF Registry. In Annual Data Report 2016; Cystic Fibrosis Trust: London, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  36. Weaver, L.T.; Green, M.R.; Nicholson, K.; Mills, J.; Heeley, M.E.; Kuzemko, J.A.; Austin, S.; Gregory, G.A.; Dux, A.E.; Davis, J.A. Prognosis in cystic fibrosis treated with continuous flucloxacillin from the neonatal period. Arch. Dis. Child. 1994, 70, 84–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Smyth, A.R.; Walters, S. Prophylactic anti-staphylococcal antibiotics for cystic fibrosis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2012, 12, CD001912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Cystic Fibrosis Trust. Standard for the Clinical Care of Children and Adults with Cystic Fibrosis in the UK; Cystic Fibrosis Trust: London, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  39. Andersen, C.; Kahl, B.C.; Olesen, H.V.; Jensen-Fangel, S.; Norskov-Lauritsen, N. Intravenous antibiotics given for 2 weeks do not eradicate persistent Staphylococcus aureus clones in cystic fibrosis patients. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2014, 20, O285–O291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Kleerebezem, M.; Quadri, L.E.; Kuipers, O.P.; deVos, W.M. Quorum sensing by peptide pheromones and two-component signal-transduction systems in Gram-positive bacteria. Mol. Microbiol. 1997, 24, 895–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Peng, H.L.; Novick, R.P.; Kreiswirth, B.; Kornblum, J.; Schlievert, P. Cloning, characterization, and sequencing of an accessory gene regulator (agr) in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol. 1988, 170, 4365–4372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Kornblum, J.; Kreiswirth, B.; Projan, S.J.; Ross, H.; Novick, R.P. Agr: A polycistronic locus regulating exoprotein synthesis in Staphylococcus aureus. In Molecular Biology of the Staphylococci; Novick, R.P., Ed.; VCH Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 1990; pp. 373–401. ISBN1 3527280820. ISBN2 9783527280827. [Google Scholar]
  43. Zhang, L.; Ji, G. Identification of a staphylococcal AgrB segment(s) responsible for group-specific processing of AgrD by gene swapping. J. Bacteriol. 2004, 186, 6706–6713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lina, G.; Jarraud, S.; Ji, G.; Greenland, T.; Pedraza, A.; Etienne, J.; Novick, R.P.; Vandenesch, F. Transmembrane topology and histidine protein kinase activity of AgrC, the agr signal receptor in Staphylococcus aureus. Mol. Microbiol. 1998, 28, 655–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Koenig, R.L.; Ray, J.L.; Maleki, S.J.; Smeltzer, M.S.; Hurlburt, B.K. Staphylococcus aureus AgrA binding to the RNAIII-agr regulatory region. J. Bacteriol. 2004, 186, 7549–7555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Queck, S.Y.; Jameson-Lee, M.; Villaruz, A.E.; Bach, T.H.; Khan, B.A.; Sturdevant, D.E.; Ricklefs, S.M.; Li, M.; Otto, M. RNAIII-independent target gene control by the agr quorum-sensing system: Insight into the evolution of virulence regulation in Staphylococcus aureus. Mol. Cell 2008, 32, 150–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Fechter, P.; Caldelari, I.; Lioliou, E.; Romby, P. Novel aspects of RNA regulation in Staphylococcus aureus. FEBS Lett. 2014, 588, 2523–2529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Pace, J.L.; Rupp, M.E.; Finch, R.G. Biofilms, Infection, and Antimicrobial Therapy; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  49. Periasamy, S.; Joo, H.S.; Duong, A.C.; Bach, T.H.; Tan, V.Y.; Chatterjee, S.S.; Cheung, G.Y.; Otto, M. How Staphylococcus aureus biofilms develop their characteristic structure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 1281–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Bubeck Wardenburg, J.; Bae, T.; Otto, M.; Deleo, F.R.; Schneewind, O. Poring over pores: Alpha-hemolysin and Panton-Valentine leukocidin in Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia. Nat. Med. 2007, 13, 1405–1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Cheung, A.L.; Eberhardt, K.J.; Chung, E.; Yeaman, M.R.; Sullam, P.M.; Ramos, M.; Bayer, A.S. Diminished virulence of a sar-/agr-mutant of Staphylococcus aureus in the rabbit model of endocarditis. J. Clin. Investig. 1994, 94, 1815–1822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Abdelnour, A.; Arvidson, S.; Bremell, T.; Ryden, C.; Tarkowski, A. The accessory gene regulator (agr) controls Staphylococcus aureus virulence in a murine arthritis model. Infect. Immun. 1993, 61, 3879–3885. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  53. Gillaspy, A.F.; Hickmon, S.G.; Skinner, R.A.; Thomas, J.R.; Nelson, C.L.; Smeltzer, M.S. Role of the accessory gene regulator (agr) in pathogenesis of staphylococcal osteomyelitis. Infect. Immun. 1995, 63, 3373–3380. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  54. Wright, J.S., III; Jin, R.; Novick, R.P. Transient interference with staphylococcal quorum sensing blocks abscess formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 1691–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Chen, X.; Schauder, S.; Potier, N.; Van Dorsselaer, A.; Pelczer, I.; Bassler, B.L.; Hughson, F.M. Structural identification of a bacterial quorum-sensing signal containing boron. Nature 2002, 415, 545–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhao, L.; Xue, T.; Shang, F.; Sun, H.; Sun, B. Staphylococcus aureus AI-2 quorum sensing associates with the KdpDE two-component system to regulate capsular polysaccharide synthesis and virulence. Infect. Immun. 2010, 78, 3506–3515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Yu, D.; Zhao, L.; Xue, T.; Sun, B. Staphylococcus aureus autoinducer-2 quorum sensing decreases biofilm formation in an icaR-dependent manner. BMC Microbiol. 2012, 12, 288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Doherty, N.; Holden, M.T.; Qazi, S.N.; Williams, P.; Winzer, K. Functional analysis of luxS in Staphylococcus aureus reveals a role in metabolism but not quorum sensing. J. Bacteriol. 2006, 188, 2885–2897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Essigmann, H.T.; Darkoh, C.; McHugh, E.E.; Brown, E.L. The Clostridium difficile quorum-sensing molecule alters the Staphylococcus aureus toxin expression profile. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2017, 49, 391–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Silva, L.N.; Da Hora, G.C.A.; Soares, T.A.; Bojer, M.S.; Ingmer, H.; Macedo, A.J.; Trentin, D.S. Myricetin protects Galleria mellonella against Staphylococcus aureus infection and inhibits multiple virulence factors. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 2823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Ong, K.C.; Khoo, H.E. Biological effects of myricetin. Gen. Pharmacol. 1997, 29, 121–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Gao, X.J.; Wang, T.C.; Zhang, Z.C.; Cao, Y.G.; Zhang, N.S.; Guo, M.Y. Brazilin plays an anti-inflammatory role with regulating Toll-like receptor 2 and TLR 2 downstream pathways in Staphylococcus aureus-induced mastitis in mice. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2015, 27, 130–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Nirmal, N.P.; Panichayupakaranant, P. Antioxidant, antibacterial, and anti-inflammatory activities of standardized brazilin-rich Caesalpinia sappan extract. Pharm. Biol. 2015, 53, 1339–1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Merghni, A.; Noumi, E.; Hadded, O.; Dridi, N.; Panwar, H.; Ceylan, O.; Mastouri, M.; Snoussi, M. Assessment of the antibiofilm and antiquorum sensing activities of Eucalyptus globulus essential oil and its main component 1,8-cineole against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains. Microb. Pathog. 2018, 118, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Sharifi, A.; Mohammadzadeh, A.; Zahraei Salehi, T.; Mahmoodi, P. Antibacterial, antibiofilm and antiquorum sensing effects of Thymus daenensis and Satureja hortensis essential oils against Staphylococcus aureus isolates. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2018, 124, 379–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Bojer, M.S.; Lindemose, S.; Vestergaard, M.; Ingmer, H. Quorum sensing-regulated phenol-soluble modulins limit persister cell populations in Staphylococcus aureus. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Nielsen, A.; Månsson, M.; Bojer, M.S.; Gram, L.; Larsen, T.O.; Novick, R.P.; Frees, D.; Frøkiær, H.; Ingmer, H. Solonamide B inhibits quorum sensing and reduces Staphylococcus aureus mediated killing of human neutrophils. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e84992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Hansen, A.M.; Peng, P.; Baldry, M.; Perez-Gassol, I.; Christensen, S.B.; Vinther, J.M.O.; Ingmer, H.; Franzyk, H. Lactam hybrid analogues of solonamide B and autoinducing peptides as potent S. aureus AgrC antagonists. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 152, 370–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Jenkins, R.; Burton, N.; Cooper, R. Proteomic and genomic analysis of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) exposed to manuka honey in vitro demonstrated down-regulation of virulence markers. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2014, 69, 603–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Blair, S.E.; Cockcetin, N.N.; Harry, E.J.; Carter, D.A. The unusual antibacterial activity of medical-grade Leptospermum honey: Antibacterial spectrum, resistance and transcriptome analysis. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2009, 10, 1199–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Daly, S.M.; Elmore, B.O.; Kavanaugh, J.S.; Triplett, K.D.; Figueroa, M.; Raja, H.A.; El-Elimat, T.; Crosby, H.A.; Femling, J.K.; Cech, N.B.; et al. ω-Hydroxyemodin limits Staphylococcus aureus quorum sensing-mediated pathogenesis and inflammation. Antimicrob. Agents. Chemother. 2015, 59, 2223–2235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Igarashi, Y.; Gohda, F.; Kadoshima, T.; Fukuda, T.; Hanafusa, T.; Shojima, A.; Nakayama, J.; Bills, G.F.; Peterson, S. Avellanin C, an inhibitor of quorum-sensing signaling in Staphylococcus aureus, from Hamigera ingelheimensis. J. Antibiot. (Tokyo) 2015, 68, 707–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Quave, C.L.; Lyles, J.T.; Kavanaugh, J.S.; Nelson, K.; Parlet, C.P.; Crosby, H.A.; Heilmann, K.P.; Horswill, A.R. Castanea sativa (European Chestnut) Leaf Extracts Rich in Ursene and Oleanene Derivatives Block Staphylococcus aureus Virulence and Pathogenesis without Detectable Resistance. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0136486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Baldry, M.; Nielsen, A.; Bojer, M.S.; Zhao, Y.; Friberg, C.; Ifrah, D.; Glasser Heede, N.; Larsen, T.O.; Frøkiær, H.; Frees, D.; et al. Norlichexanthone reduces virulence gene expression and biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0168305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Chen, Y.; Liu, T.; Wang, K.; Hou, C.; Cai, S.; Huang, Y.; Du, Z.; Huang, H.; Kong, J.; Chen, Y. Baicalein inhibits Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation and the quorum sensing system in vitro. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0153468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Jakobsen, T.H.; Warming, A.N.; Vejborg, R.M.; Moscoso, J.A.; Stegger, M.; Lorenzen, F.; Rybtke, M.; Andersen, J.B.; Petersen, R.; Andersen, P.S.; et al. A broad range quorum sensing inhibitor working through sRNA inhibition. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 9857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Khan, M.F.; Tang, H.; Lyles, J.T.; Pineau, R.; Mashwani, Z.U.; Quave, C.L. Antibacterial properties of medicinal plants from Pakistan against multidrug-resistant ESKAPE pathogens. Front. Pharmacol. 2018, 9, 815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Kuo, D.; Yu, G.; Hoch, W.; Gabay, D.; Long, L.; Ghannoum, M.; Nagy, N.; Harding, C.V.; Viswanathan, R.; Shoham, M. Novel quorum-quenching agents promote methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) wound healing and sensitize MRSA to β-lactam antibiotics. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015, 59, 1512–1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Gui, Z.; Wang, H.; Ding, T.; Zhu, W.; Zhuang, X.; Chu, W. Azithromycin Reduces the Production of α-hemolysin and Biofilm Formation in Staphylococcus aureus. Indian J. Microbiol. 2014, 54, 114–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Gizdavic-Nikolaidis, M.R.; Pagnon, J.C.; Ali, N.; Sum, R.; Davies, N.; Roddam, L.F.; Ambrose, M. Functionalized polyanilines disrupt Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2015, 136, 666–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Kaur, G.; Balamurugan, P.; Vasudevan, S.; Jadav, S.; Princy, S.A. Antimicrobial and antibiofilm potential of acyclic amines and diamines against multi-drug resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Brackman, G.; Breyne, K.; De Rycke, R.; Vermote, A.; Van Nieuwerburgh, F.; Meyer, E.; Van Calenbergh, S.; Coenye, T. The quorum sensing inhibitor hamamelitannin increases antibiotic susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms by affecting peptidoglycan biosynthesis and eDNA eRelease. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 20321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Vermote, A.; Brackman, G.; Risseeuw, M.D.; Vanhoutte, B.; Cos, P.; Van Hecke, K.; Breyne, K.; Meyer, E.; Coenye, T.; Van Calenbergh, S. Hamamelitannin Analogues that Modulate Quorum Sensing as Potentiators of Antibiotics against Staphylococcus aureus. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2016, 55, 6551–6555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Vermote, A.; Brackman, G.; Risseeuw, M.D.P.; Coenye, T.; Van Calenbergh, S. Novel hamamelitannin analogues for the treatment of biofilm related MRSA infections-A scaffold hopping approach. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 127, 757–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Vermote, A.; Brackman, G.; Risseeuw, M.D.; Cappoen, D.; Cos, P.; Coenye, T.; Van Calenbergh, S. Novel Potentiators for Vancomycin in the Treatment of Biofilm-Related MRSA Infections via a Mix and Match Approach. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2016, 8, 38–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Vijayakumar, K.; Ramanathan, T. Antiquorum sensing and biofilm potential of 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural against Gram positive pathogens. Microb. Pathog. 2018, 125, 48–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Murray, E.J.; Crowley, R.C.; Truman, A.; Clarke, S.R.; Cottam, J.A.; Jadhav, G.P.; Steele, V.R.; O’Shea, P.; Lindholm, C.; Cockayne, A.; et al. Targeting Staphylococcus aureus quorum sensing with nonpeptidic small molecule inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 57, 2813–2819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Sully, E.K.; Malachowa, N.; Elmore, B.O.; Alexander, S.M.; Femling, J.K.; Gray, B.M.; DeLeo, F.R.; Otto, M.; Cheung, A.L.; Edwards, B.S.; et al. Selective chemical inhibition of agr quorum sensing in Staphylococcus aureus promotes host defense with minimal impact on resistance. PLoS Pathog. 2014, 10, e1004174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. O’Rourke, J.P.; Daly, S.M.; Triplett, K.D.; Peabody, D.; Chackerian, B.; Hall, P.R. Development of a mimotope vaccine targeting the Staphylococcus aureus quorum sensing pathway. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e111198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Elmore, B.O.; Triplett, K.D.; Hall, P.R. Apolipoprotein B48, the Structural Component of Chylomicrons, Is Sufficient to Antagonize Staphylococcus aureus Quorum-Sensing. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0125027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Da, F.; Yao, L.; Su, Z.; Hou, Z.; Li, Z.; Xue, X.; Meng, J.; Luo, X. Antisense locked nucleic acids targeting agrA inhibit quorum sensing and pathogenesis of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2017, 122, 257–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Tal-Gan, Y.; Ivancic, M.; Cornilescu, G.; Yang, T.; Blackwell, H.E. Highly Stable, Amide-Bridged Autoinducing Peptide Analogues that Strongly Inhibit the AgrC Quorum Sensing Receptor in Staphylococcus aureus. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2016, 55, 8913–8917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Vasquez, J.K.; Tal-Gan, Y.; Cornilescu, G.; Tyler, K.A.; Blackwell, H.E. Simplified AIP-II Peptidomimetics Are Potent Inhibitors of Staphylococcus aureus AgrC Quorum Sensing Receptors. ChemBioChem 2017, 18, 413–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Karathanasi, G.; Bojer, M.S.; Baldry, M.; Johannessen, B.A.; Wolff, S.; Greco, I.; Kilstrup, M.; Hansen, P.R.; Ingmer, H. Linear peptidomimetics as potent antagonists of Staphylococcus aureus agr quorum sensing. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 3562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Balamurugan, P.; Praveen Krishna, V.; Bharath, D.; Lavanya, R.; Vairaprakash, P.; Princy, S.A. Staphylococcus aureus quorum regulator SarA targeted compound, 2-[(Methylamino)methyl]phenol inhibits biofilm and down-regulates virulence genes. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Bodey, G.P.; Bolivar, R.; Fainstein, V.; Jadeja, L. Infections Caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Rev. Infect. Dis. 1983, 5, 279–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. WHO. Global Priority List of Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria to Guide Research, Discovery, and Development of New Antibiotics. Available online: http://www.who.int/medicines/publications/global-priority-list-antibiotic-resistant-bacteria/en/ (accessed on 5 March 2019).
  98. Pang, B.; Armbruster, C.E.; Foster, G.; Learman, B.S.; Gandhi, U.; Swords, W.E. Autoinducer 2 (AI-2) Production by nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae 86-028NP promotes expression of a predicted glycosyltransferase that is a determinant of biofilm maturation, prevention of dispersal, and persistence in vivo. Infect. Immun. 2018, 86, e00506-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Da Silva Filho, L.V.R.F.; de Agujar Ferreira, F.; Reis, F.J.C.; de Britto, M.C.A.; Levy, C.E.; Clark, O.; Ribeiro, J.D.J. Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in patients with cystic fibrosis: Scientific evidence regarding clinical impact, diagnosis, and treatment. Bras. Pneumol. 2013, 39, 495–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Sordé, R.; Pahissa, A.; Rello, J. Management of refractory Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in cystic fibrosis. Infect. Drug Resist. 2011, 4, 31–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Martin, D.W.; Schurr, M.J.; Mudd, M.H.; Govan, J.R.; Holloway, B.W.; Deretic, V. Mechanism of conversion to mucoidy in Pseudomonas aeruginosa infecting cystic fibrosis patients. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1993, 90, 8377–8381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Littlewood, J.M.; Miller, M.G.; Ghoneim, A.T.; Ramsden, C.H. Nebulised colomycin for early pseudomonal colonisation in cystic fibrosis. Lancet 1985, 1, 865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Ratjen, F.; Döring, G.; Nikolaizik, W.H. Effect of inhaled tobramycin on early Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonisation in patients with cystic fibrosis. Lancet 2001, 358, 983–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Taccetti, G.; Campana, S.; Festini, F.; Mascherini, M.; Doring, G. Early eradication therapy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis patients. Eur. Respir. J. 2005, 26, 458–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Döring, G.; Conway, S.; Heijerman, H.; Hodson, M.; Høiby, N.; Smyth, A.; Touw, D.J. Antibiotic therapy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa: A European consensus. Eur. Respir. J. 2000, 16, 749–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Langton Hewer, S.C.; Smyth, A.R. Antibiotic strategies for eradicating Pseudomonas aeruginosa in people with cystic fibrosis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2017, 4, CD004197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Schuster, M.; Greenberg, E.P. A network of networks: Quorum-sensing gene regulation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2006, 296, 73–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Heeb, S.; Fletcher, M.P.; Chhabra, S.R.; Diggle, S.P.; Williams, P.; Camara, M. Quinolones: From antibiotics to autoinducers. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2011, 35, 247–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Lee, J.; Wu, J.; Deng, Y.; Wang, J.; Wang, C.; Wang, J.; Chang, C.; Dong, Y.; Williams, P.; Zhang, L.H. A cell-cell communication signal integrates quorum sensing and stress response. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2013, 9, 339–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Lépine, F.; Milot, S.; Déziel, E.; He, J.; Rahme, L.G. Electrospray/mass spectrometric identification and analysis of 4-hydroxy-2-alkylquinolines (HAQs) produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2004, 15, 862–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Pesci, E.C.; Milbank, J.B.J.; Pearson, J.P.; McKnight, S.; Kende, A.S.; Greenberg, E.P.; Iglewski, B.H. Quinolone signaling in the cell-to-cell communication system of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 11229–11234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. McGrath, S.; Wade, D.S.; Pesci, E.C. Dueling quorum sensing systems in Pseudomonas aeruginosa control the production of the Pseudomonas quinolone signal (PQS). FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2004, 230, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. McKnight, S.L.; Iglewski, B.H.; Pesci, E.C. The Pseudomonas quinolone signal regulates rhl quorum sensing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 2000, 182, 2702–2708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Collier, D.N.; Anderson, L.S.; McKnight, L.; Noah, T.L.; Knowles, M.; Boucher, R.; Schwab, U.; Gilligan, P.; Pesci, E.C. A bacterial cell to cell signal in the lungs of cystic fibrosis patients. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2002, 215, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Smith, R.S.; Iglewski, B.H. P. aeruginosa quorum-sensing systems and virulence. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2003, 6, 56–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Feng, L.; Xiang, Q.; Ai, Q.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Lu, Q. Effects of quorum sensing systems on regulatory T cells in catheter-related Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm infection rat models. Mediat. Inflamm. 2016, 2016, 4012912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Feltner, J.B.; Wolter, D.J.; Pope, C.E.; Groleau, M.C.; Smalley, N.E.; Greenberg, E.P.; Mayer-Hamblett, N.; Burns, J.; Déziel, E.; Hoffman, L.R.; et al. LasR variant cystic fibrosis isolates Reveal an adaptable quorum-sensing hierarchy in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. mBio 2016, 7, e01513-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Welsh, M.A.; Blackwell, H.E. Chemical genetics reveals environment-specific roles for quorum sensing circuits in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Cell Chem. Biol. 2016, 23, 361–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Barr, H.L.; Halliday, N.; Cámara, M.; Barrett, D.A.; Williams, P.; Forrester, D.L.; Simms, R.; Smyth, A.R.; Honeybourne, D.; Whitehouse, J.L.; et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum sensing molecules correlate with clinical status in cystic fibrosis. Eur. Respir. J. 2015, 46, 1046–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Ryall, B.; Carrara, M.; Zlosnik, J.E.; Behrends, V.; Lee, X.; Wong, Z.; Lougheed, K.E.; Williams, H.D. The mucoid switch in Pseudomonas aeruginosa represses quorum sensing systems and leads to complex changes to stationary phase virulence factor regulation. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e96166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Maisuria, V.B.; Los Santos, Y.L.; Tufenkji, N.; Déziel, E. Cranberry-derived proanthocyanidins impair virulence and inhibit quorum sensing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 30169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Suneby, E.G.; Herndon, L.R.; Schneider, T.L. Pseudomonas aeruginosa LasR·DNA binding is directly inhibited by quorum sensing antagonists. ACS Infect. Dis. 2017, 3, 183–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Nizalapur, S.; Kimyon, O.; Biswas, N.N.; Gardner, C.R.; Griffith, R.; Rice, S.A.; Manefield, M.; Willcox, M.; Black, D.S.; Kumar, N. Design, synthesis and evaluation of N-aryl-glyoxamide derivatives as structurally novel bacterial quorum sensing inhibitors. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2016, 14, 680–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Nizalapur, S.; Kimyon, O.; Yee, E.; Bhadbhade, M.M.; Manefield, M.; Willcox, M.; Black, D.S.; Kumar, N. Synthesis and biological evaluation of novel acyclic and cyclic glyoxamide based derivatives as bacterial quorum sensing and biofilm inhibitors. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2017, 15, 5743–5755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Chourasiya, S.S.; Kathuria, D.; Singh, S.; Sonawane, V.C.; Chakraborti, A.K.; Bharatam, P.V. Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel unsymmetrical azines as quorum sensing inhibitors. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 80027–80038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. O’Reilly, M.C.; Blackwell, H.E. Structure-based design and biological evaluation of triphenyl scaffold-based hybrid compounds as hydrolytically stable modulators of a LuxR-type quorum sensing receptor. ACS Infect. Dis. 2016, 2, 32–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Wu, C.L.Y.; Kong, X.; Feng, P. Benzene ring substituted n-acyl homoserine lactone compounds as well as preparation method and application thereof. CN106749119A, 31 May 2017. [Google Scholar]
  128. Malladi, V.L.; Schneper, L.; Sobczak, A.J.; Mathee, K.; Wnuk, S.F. 2-methylthiopyrrolidines and their use for modulating bacterial quorum sensing. U.S. Patent No. 9,249,095; WO2012174511A1, 19 January 2016. [Google Scholar]
  129. Park, S.; Kim, H.S.; Ok, K.; Kim, Y.; Park, H.D.; Byun, Y. Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of 4-(alkyloxy)-6-methyl-2H-pyran-2-one derivatives as quorum sensing inhibitors. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2015, 25, 2913–2917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Amara, N.; Mashiach, R.; Amar, D.; Krief, P.; Spieser, S.A.; Bottomley, M.J.; Aharoni, A.; Meijler, M.M. Covalent inhibition of bacterial quorum sensing. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 10610–10619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Amara, N.; Gregor, R.; Rayo, J.; Dandela, R.; Daniel, E.; Liubin, N.; Willems, H.M.; Ben-Zvi, A.; Krom, B.P.; Meijler, M.M. Fine-tuning covalent inhibition of bacterial quorum sensing. ChemBioChem 2016, 17, 825–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. O’Brien, K.T.; Noto, J.G.; Nichols-O’Neill, L.; Perez, L.J. Potent irreversible inhibitors of LasR quorum sensing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2015, 6, 162–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Chang, C.Y.; Krishnan, T.; Wang, H.; Chen, Y.; Yin, W.F.; Chong, Y.M.; Tan, L.Y.; Chong, T.M.; Chan, K.G. Non-antibiotic quorum sensing inhibitors acting against N-acyl homoserine lactone synthase as druggable target. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 7245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Lidor, O.; Al-Quntar, A.; Pesci, E.C.; Steinberg, D. Mechanistic analysis of a synthetic inhibitor of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa LasI quorum-sensing signal synthase. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 16569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Kamarudheen, N.; Rao, K.V.B. Fatty acyl compounds from marine Streptomyces griseoincarnatus strain HK12 against two major bio-film forming nosocomial pathogens; an in vitro and in silico approach. Microb. Pathog. 2019, 127, 121–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Bassler, B.L.; Semmelhack, M.F.; Drescher, K.; Siryaporn, A.; Miller, L.C.; O’Loughlin, C.T. Molecules and Compositions that Inhibit Gram Negative Bacteria and Their Uses. U.S. Patent No. 9,751,851, 5 September 2017. [Google Scholar]
  137. Eibergen, N.R.; Moore, J.D.; Mattmann, M.E.; Blackwell, H.E. Potent and selective modulation of the RhlR quorum sensing receptor by using non-native ligands: An emerging target for virulence control in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. ChemBioChem 2015, 16, 2348–2356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Welsh, M.A.; Eibergen, N.R.; Moore, J.D.; Blackwell, H.E. Small molecule disruption of quorum sensing cross-regulation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa causes major and unexpected alterations to virulence phenotypes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 1510–1519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Lu, C.; Maurer, C.K.; Kirsch, B.; Steinbach, A.; Hartmann, R.W. Overcoming the unexpected functional inversion of a PqsR antagonist in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: An in vivo potent antivirulence agent targeting pqs quorum sensing. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 1109–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Starkey, M.; Lepine, F.; Maura, D.; Bandyopadhaya, A.; Lesic, B.; He, J.; Kitao, T.; Righi, V.; Milot, S.; Tzika, A.; et al. Identification of anti-virulence compounds that disrupt quorum-sensing regulated acute and persistent pathogenicity. PLoS Pathog. 2014, 10, e1004321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Maura, D.; Rahme, L.G. Pharmacological Inhibition of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa MvfR Quorum-Sensing System interferes with biofilm formation and potentiates antibiotic-mediated biofilm disruption. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 61, e01362-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Ji, C.; Sharma, I.; Pratihar, D.; Hudson, L.L.; Maura, D.; Guney, T.; Rahme, L.G.; Pesci, E.C.; Coleman, J.P.; Tan, D.S. Designed Small-Molecule Inhibitors of the Anthranilyl-CoA Synthetase PqsA Block Quinolone Biosynthesis in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. ACS Chem. Biol. 2016, 11, 3061–3067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Weidel, E.; Negri, M.; Empting, M.; Hinsberger, S.; Hartmann, R.W. Composing compound libraries for hit discovery--rationality-driven preselection or random choice by structural diversity? Future Med. Chem. 2014, 6, 2057–2072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Sahner, J.H.; Empting, M.; Kamal, A.; Weidel, E.; Groh, M.; Borger, C.; Hartmann, R.W. Exploring the chemical space of ureidothiophene-2-carboxylic acids as inhibitors of the quorum sensing enzyme PqsD from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 96, 14–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Allegretta, G.; Weidel, E.; Empting, M.; Hartmann, R.W. Catechol-based substrates of chalcone synthase as a scaffold for novel inhibitors of PqsD. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 90, 351–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Thomann, A.; de Mello Martins, A.G.; Brengel, C.; Empting, M.; Hartmann, R.W. Application of dual inhibition concept within looped autoregulatory systems toward antivirulence agents against Pseudomonas aeruginosa I infections. ACS Chem. Biol. 2016, 11, 1279–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Hinsberger, S.; de Jong, J.C.; Groh, M.; Haupenthal, J.; Hartmann, R.W. Benzamidobenzoic acids as potent PqsD inhibitors for the treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 76, 343–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Prothiwa, M.; Englmaier, F.; Böttcher, T. Competitive Live-Cell Profiling Strategy for discovering inhibitors of the quinolone biosynthesis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 14019–14023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Rampioni, G.; Falcone, M.; Heeb, S.; Frangipani, E.; Fletcher, M.P.; Dubern, J.F.; Visca, P.; Leoni, L.; Cámara, M.; Williams, P. Unravelling the Genome-Wide contributions of specific 2-Alkyl-4-Quinolones and PqsE to Quorum Sensing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. PLoS Pathog. 2016, 12, e1006029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Zender, M.; Witzgall, F.; Drees, S.L.; Weidel, E.; Maurer, C.K.; Fetzner, S.; Blankenfeldt, W.; Empting, M.; Hartmann, R.W. Dissecting the multiple roles of PqsE in Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence by discovery of small tool compounds. ACS Chem. Biol. 2016, 11, 1755–1763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Maura, D.; Drees, S.L.; Bandyopadhaya, A.; Kitao, T.; Negri, M.; Starkey, M.; Lesic, B.; Milot, S.; Déziel, E.; Zahler, R.; et al. Polypharmacology approaches against the Pseudomonas aeruginosa MvfR regulon and their application in blocking virulence and antibiotic tolerance. ACS Chem. Biol. 2017, 12, 1435–1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Allegretta, G.; Maurer, C.K.; Eberhard, J.; Maura, D.; Hartmann, R.W.; Rahme, L.; Empting, M. In-depth profiling of MvfR-regulated small molecules in Pseudomonas aeruginosa after Quorum Sensing Inhibitor treatment. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Aleksić, I.; Šegan, S.; Andrić, F.; Zlatović, M.; Moric, I.; Opsenica, D.M.; Senerovic, L. long-chain 4-aminoquinolines as quorum sensing inhibitors in Serratia marcescens and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. ACS Chem. Biol. 2017, 12, 1425–1434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Soukarieh, F.; Vico Oton, E.; Dubern, J.F.; Gomes, J.; Halliday, N.; de Pilar Crespo, M.; Ramírez-Prada, J.; Insuasty, B.; Abonia, R.; Quiroga, J.; et al. In silico and in vitro-guided identification of inhibitors of alkylquinolone-dependent quorum sensing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Molecules 2018, 23, 257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Fong, J.; Yuan, M.; Jakobsen, T.H.; Mortensen, K.T.; Delos Santos, M.M.S.; Chua, S.L.; Yang, L.; Tan, C.H.; Nielsen, T.E.; Givskov, M. Disulfide bond-containing ajoene analogues as novel quorum sensing inhibitors of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 60, 215–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Goswami, M.; Espinasse, A.; Carlson, E.E. Disarming the virulence arsenal of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by blocking two-component system signaling. Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 7332–7337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Kasper, S.H.; Bonocora, R.P.; Wade, J.T.; Musah, R.A.; Cady, N.C. Chemical inhibition of kynureninase reduces Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum sensing and virulence factor expression. ACS Chem. Biol. 2016, 11, 1106–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Vanlaere, E.; Lipuma, J.J.; Baldwin, A.; Henry, D.; De Brandt, E.; Mahenthiralingam, E.; Speert, D.; Dowson, C.; Vandamme, P. Burkholderia latens sp. nov., Burkholderia diffusa sp. nov., Burkholderia arboris sp. nov., Burkholderia seminalis sp. nov. and Burkholderia metallica sp. nov., novel species within the Burkholderia cepacia complex. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2008, 58, 1580–1590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. De Smet, B.; Mayo, M.; Peeters, C.; Zlosnik, J.E.; Spilker, T.; Hird, T.J.; LiPuma, J.J.; Kidd, T.J.; Kaestli, M.; Ginther, J.L.; et al. Burkholderia stagnalis sp. nov. and Burkholderia territorii sp. nov., two novel Burkholderia cepacia complex species from environmental and human sources. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2015, 65, 2265–2271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Ong, K.S.; Aw, Y.K.; Lee, L.H.; Yule, C.M.; Cheow, Y.L.; Lee, S.M. Burkholderia paludis sp. nov., an antibiotic-siderophore producing novel Burkholderia cepacia complex species, isolated from Malaysian tropical peat swamp soil. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 2046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Weber, C.F.; King, G.M. Volcanic soils as sources of novel CO-oxidizing Paraburkholderia and Burkholderia: Paraburkholderia hiiakae sp. nov., Paraburkholderia metrosideri sp. nov., Paraburkholderia paradisi sp. nov., Paraburkholderia peleae sp. nov., and Burkholderia alpina sp. nov. a member of the Burkholderia cepacia complex. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Mahenthiralingam, E.; Urban, T.A.; Goldberg, J.B. The multifarious, multireplicon Burkholderia cepacia complex. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2005, 3, 144–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Burns, J.L. Antibiotic resistance of Burkholderia spp. In Burkholderia: Molecular Microbiology and Genomics; Coenye, T., Vandamme, P., Eds.; Horizon Bioscience: Norfolk, VA, USA, 2007; ISBN 978-1-904933-41-0. [Google Scholar]
  164. Scoffone, V.C.; Chiarelli, L.R.; Trespidi, G.; Mentasti, M.; Riccardi, G.; Buroni, S. Burkholderia cenocepacia Infections in Cystic Fibrosis Patients: Drug Resistance and Therapeutic Approaches. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Bodilis, J.; Denet, E.; Brothier, E.; Graindorge, A.; Favre-Bonté, S.; Nazaret, S. Comparative Genomics of Environmental and Clinical Burkholderia cenocepacia Strains Closely Related to the Highly Transmissible Epidemic ET12 Lineage. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Jones, A.M.; Dodd, M.E.; Webb, A.K. Burkholderia cepacia: Current clinical issues, environmental controversies and ethical dilemmas. Eur. Respir. J. 2001, 17, 295–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Drevinek, P.; Mahenthiralingam, E. Burkholderia cenocepacia in cystic fibrosis: Epidemiology and molecular mechanisms of virulence. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2010, 16, 821–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Loutet, S.A.; Valvano, M.A. A decade of Burkholderia cenocepacia virulence determinant research. Infect. Immun. 2010, 78, 4088–4100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Waters, C.M.; Bassler, B.L. Quorum sensing: Cell-to-cell communication in bacteria. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2005, 21, 319–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. Lutter, E.; Lewenza, S.; Dennis, J.J.; Visser, M.B.; Sokol, P.A. Distribution of quorum-sensing genes in the Burkholderia cepacia complex. Infect. Immun. 2001, 69, 4661–4666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Malott, R.J.; Baldwin, A.; Mahenthiralingam, E.; Sokol, P.A. Characterization of the CciIR quorum-sensing system in Burkholderia cenocepacia. Infect. Immun. 2005, 73, 4982–4992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Malott, R.J.; O’Grady, E.P.; Toller, J.; Inhulsen, S.; Eberl, L.; Sokol, P.A. A Burkholderia cenocepacia orphan LuxR homolog is involved in quorum-sensing regulation. J. Bacteriol. 2009, 191, 2447–2460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Ryan, G.T.; Wei, Y.; Winans, S.C. A LuxR-type repressor of Burkholderia cenocepacia inhibits transcription via antiactivation and is inactivated by its cognate acylhomoserine lactone. Mol. Microbiol. 2013, 87, 94–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Malott, R.J.; Sokol, P.A. Expression of the BviIR and CepIR quorum-sensing systems of Burkholderia vietnamiensis. J. Bacteriol. 2007, 189, 3006–3016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Chapalain, A.; Groleau, M.C.; Le Guillouzer, S.; Miomandre, A.; Vial, L.; Milot, S.; Déziel, E. Interplay between 4-Hydroxy-3-Methyl-2-Alkylquinoline and N-Acyl-Homoserine Lactone Signaling in a Burkholderia cepacia Complex Clinical Strain. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Boon, C.; Deng, Y.; Wang, L.H.; He, Y.; Xu, J.L.; Fan, Y.; Pan, S.Q.; Zhang, L.H. A novel DSF-like signal from Burkholderia cenocepacia interferes with Candida albicans morphological transition. ISME J. 2008, 2, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Spadaro, F.; Scoffone, V.C.; Chiarelli, L.R.; Fumagalli, M.; Buroni, S.; Riccardi, G.; Forneris, F. The Crystal Structure of Burkholderia cenocepacia DfsA Provides Insights into Substrate Recognition and Quorum Sensing Fatty Acid Biosynthesis. Biochemistry 2016, 55, 3241–3250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Waldron, E.J.; Snyder, D.; Fernandez, N.L.; Sileo, E.; Inoyama, D.; Freundlich, J.S.; Waters, C.M.; Cooper, V.S.; Neiditch, M.B. Structural basis of DSF recognition by its receptor RpfR and its regulatory interaction with the DSF synthase RpfF. PLoS Biol. 2019, 17, e3000123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Yang, C.; Cui, C.; Ye, Q.; Kan, J.; Fu, S.; Song, S.; Huang, Y.; He, F.; Zhang, L.H.; Jia, Y.; et al. Burkholderia cenocepacia integrates cis-2-dodecenoic acid and cyclic dimeric guanosine monophosphate signals to control virulence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 13006–13011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. McCarthy, Y.; Yang, L.; Twomey, K.B.; Sass, A.; Tolker-Nielsen, T.; Mahenthiralingam, E.; Dow, J.M.; Ryan, R.P. A sensor kinase recognizing the cell–cell signal BDSF (cis-2-dodecenoic acid) regulates virulence in Burkholderia cenocepacia. Mol. Microbiol. 2010, 77, 1220–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Diggle, S.P.; Lumjiaktase, P.; Dipilato, F.; Winzer, K.; Kunakorn, M.; Barrett, D.A.; Chhabra, S.R.; Cámara, M.; Williams, P. Functional genetic analysis reveals a 2-alkyl-4-quinolone signaling system in the human pathogen Burkholderia pseudomallei and related bacteria. Chem. Biol. 2006, 13, 701–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Vial, L.; Lepine, F.; Milot, S.; Groleau, M.C.; Dekimpe, V.; Woods, D.E.; Déziel, E. Burkholderia pseudomallei, B. thailandensis, and B. ambifaria produce 4-hydroxy-2-alkylquinoline analogues with a methyl group at the 3 position that is required for quorum-sensing regulation. J. Bacteriol. 2008, 190, 5339–5352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Jenul, C.; Sieber, S.; Daeppen, C.; Mathew, A.; Lardi, M.; Pessi, G.; Hoepfner, D.; Neuburger, M.; Linden, A.; Gademann, K.; et al. Biosynthesis of fragin is controlled by a novel quorum sensing signal. Nat Commun 2018, 9, 1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. O’Grady, E.P.; Viteri, D.F.; Malott, R.J.; Sokol, P.A. Reciprocal regulation by the CepIR and CciIR quorum sensing systems in Burkholderia cenocepacia. BMC Genom. 2009, 10, 441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Udine, C.; Brackman, G.; Bazzini, S.; Buroni, S.; Van Acker, H.; Pasca, M.R.; Riccardi, G.; Coenye, T. Phenotypic and genotypic characterisation of Burkholderia cenocepacia J2315 mutants affected in homoserine lactone and diffusible signal factor-based quorum sensing systems suggests interplay between both types of systems. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e55112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Schmid, N.; Suppiger, A.; Steiner, E.; Pessi, G.; Kaever, V.; Fazli, M.; Tolker-Nielsen, T.; Jenal, U.; Eberl, L. High intracellular c-di-GMP levels antagonize quorum sensing and virulence gene expression in Burkholderia cenocepacia H111. Microbiology 2017, 163, 754–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. O’Grady, E.P.; Viteri, D.F.; Sokol, P.A. A unique regulator contributes to quorum sensing and virulence in Burkholderia cenocepacia. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e37611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Huber, B.; Riedel, K.; Kothe, M.; Givskov, M.; Molin, S.; Eberl, L. Genetic analysis of functions involved in the late stages of biofilm development in Burkholderia cepacia H111. Mol. Microbiol. 2002, 46, 411–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Aubert, D.F.; O’grady, E.P.; Hamad, M.A.; Sokol, P.A.; Valvano, M.A. The Burkholderia cenocepacia sensor kinase hybrid AtsR is a global regulator modulating quorum-sensing signalling. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 15, 372–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Michalska, K.; Chhor, G.; Clancy, S.; Jedrzejczak, R.; Babnigg, G.; Winans, S.C.; Joachimiak, A. RsaM: A transcriptional regulator of Burkholderia spp. with novel fold. FEBS J. 2014, 281, 4293–4306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  191. Van Acker, H.; De Canck, E.; Van Nieuwerburgh, F.; Sass, A.; Deforce, D.; Nelis, H.J.; Coenye, T. The BCESM genomic region contains a regulator involved in quorum sensing and persistence in Burkholderia cenocepacia J2315. Future Microbiol. 2014, 9, 845–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  192. Merry, C.R.; Perkins, M.; Mu, L.; Peterson, B.K.; Knackstedt, R.W.; Weingart, C.L. Characterization of a novel two-component system in Burkholderia cenocepacia. Curr. Microbiol. 2015, 70, 556–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Cui, C.; Yang, C.; Song, S.; Fu, S.; Sun, X.; Yang, L.; He, F.; Zhang, L.H.; Zhang, Y.; Deng, Y. A novel two-component system modulates quorum sensing and pathogenicity in Burkholderia cenocepacia. Mol. Microbiol. 2018, 108, 32–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. Subsin, B.; Chambers, C.E.; Visser, M.B.; Sokol, P.A. Identification of genes regulated by the cepIR quorum-sensing system in Burkholderia cenocepacia by high-throughput screening of a random promoter library. J. Bacteriol. 2007, 189, 968–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Schmid, N.; Pessi, G.; Deng, Y.; Aguilar, C.; Carlier, A.L.; Grunau, A.; Omasits, U.; Zhang, L.H.; Ahrens, C.H.; Eberl, L. The AHL-and BDSF-dependent quorum sensing systems control specific and overlapping sets of genes in Burkholderia cenocepacia H111. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e49966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. McKeon, S.A.; Nguyen, D.T.; Viteri, D.F.; Zlosnik, J.E.; Sokol, P.A. Functional quorum sensing systems are maintained during chronic Burkholderia cepacia complex infections in patients with cystic fibrosis. J. Infect. Dis. 2011, 203, 383–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  197. Visser, M.B.; Majumdar, S.; Hani, E.; Sokol, P.A. Importance of the ornibactin and pyochelin siderophore transport systems in Burkholderia cenocepacia lung infections. Infect. Immun. 2004, 72, 2850–2857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  198. Inhülsen, S.; Aguilar, C.; Schmid, N.; Suppiger, A.; Riedel, K.; Eberl, L. Identification of functions linking quorum sensing with biofilm formation in Burkholderia cenocepacia H111. Microbiologyopen 2012, 1, 225–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Uehlinger, S.; Schwager, S.; Bernier, S.P.; Riedel, K.; Nguyen, D.T.; Sokol, P.A.; Eberl, L. Identification of specific and universal virulence factors in Burkholderia cenocepacia strains by using multiple infection hosts. Infect. Immun. 2009, 77, 4102–4110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Brackman, G.; Cos, P.; Maes, L.; Nelis, H.J.; Coenye, T. Quorum sensing inhibitors increase the susceptibility of bacterial biofilms to antibiotics in vitro and in vivo. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011, 55, 2655–2661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  201. Brackman, G.; Risseeuw, M.; Celen, S.; Cos, P.; Maes, L.; Nelis, H.J.; Van Calenbergh, S.; Coenye, T. Synthesis and evaluation of the quorum sensing inhibitory effect of substituted triazolyldihydrofuranones. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2012, 20, 4737–4743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  202. Scoffone, V.C.; Chiarelli, L.R.; Makarov, V.; Brackman, G.; Israyilova, A.; Azzalin, A.; Forneris, F.; Riabova, O.; Savina, S.; Coenye, T.; et al. Discovery of new diketopiperazines inhibiting Burkholderia cenocepacia quorum sensing in vitro and in vivo. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 32487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  203. Buroni, S.; Scoffone, V.C.; Fumagalli, M.; Makarov, V.; Cagnone, M.; Trespidi, G.; De Rossi, E.; Forneris, F.; Riccardi, G.; Chiarelli, L.R. Investigating the Mechanism of Action of Diketopiperazines Inhibitors of the Burkholderia cenocepacia Quorum Sensing Synthase CepI: A Site-Directed Mutagenesis Study. Front. Pharmacol. 2018, 9, 836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  204. Slachmuylders, L.; Van Acker, H.; Brackman, G.; Sass, A.; Van Nieuwerburgh, F.; Coenye, T. Elucidation of the mechanism behind the potentiating activity of baicalin against Burkholderia cenocepacia biofilms. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0190533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  205. Zeng, Z.; Qian, L.; Cao, L.; Tan, H.; Huang, Y.; Xue, X.; Shen, Y.; Zhou, S. Virtual screening for novel quorum sensing inhibitors to eradicate biofilm formation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 79, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  206. Huber, B.; Eberl, L.; Feucht, W.; Polster, J. Influence of polyphenols on bacterial biofilm formation and quorum-sensing. Z. Nat. C 2003, 58, 879–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Bugni, T.S.; Ireland, C.M. Marine-derived fungi: A chemically and biologically diverse group of microorganisms. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2004, 21, 143–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  208. Tommonaro, G.; Abbamondi, G.R.; Iodice, C.; Tait, K.; De Rosa, S. Diketopiperazines produced by the halophilic archaeon, Haloterrigena hispanica, activate AHL bioreporters. Microb. Ecol. 2012, 63, 490–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  209. Campbell, J.; Lin, Q.; Geske, G.D.; Blackwell, H.E. New and unexpected insights into the modulation of LuxR-type quorum sensing by cyclic dipeptides. ACS Chem. Biol. 2009, 4, 1051–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Adegoke, A.A.; Stenström, T.A.; Okoh, A.I. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia as an emerging ubiquitous pathogen: Looking beyond contemporary antibiotic therapy. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 2276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  211. Salsgiver, E.L.; Fink, A.K.; Knapp, E.A.; LiPuma, J.J.; Olivier, K.N.; Marshall, B.C.; Saiman, L. Changing epidemiology of the respiratory bacteriology of patients with cystic fibrosis. Chest 2016, 149, 390–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  212. Barsky, E.E.; Williams, K.A.; Priebe, G.P.; Sawicki, G.S. Incident Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infection and lung function decline in cystic fibrosis. Pediatric Pulmonol. 2017, 52, 1276–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  213. Amin, R.; Waters, V. Antibiotic treatment for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in people with cystic fibrosis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2016, 7, CD009249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  214. Sánchez, M.B. Antibiotic resistance in the opportunistic pathogen Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  215. Berg, G.; Eberl, L.; Hartmann, A. The rhizosphere as a reservoir for opportunistic human pathogenic bacteria. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 7, 1673–1685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  216. Huedo, P.; Yero, D.; Martínez-Servat, S.; Estibariz, I.; Planell, R.; Martínez, P.; Ruyra, A.; Roher, N.; Roca, I.; Vila, J.; Daura, X.; et al. Two different rpf clusters distributed among a population of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia clinical strains display differential diffusible signal factor production and virulence regulation. J. Bacteriol. 2014, 196, 2431–2442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Huedo, P.; Yero, D.; Martinez-Servat, S.; Ruyra, À.; Roher, N.; Daura, X.; Gibert, I. Decoding the genetic and functional diversity of the DSF quorum-sensing system in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Pompilio, A.; Crocetta, V.; DeNicola, S.; Verginelli, F.; Fiscarelli, E.; Di Bonaventura, G. Cooperative pathogenicity in cystic fibrosis: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia modulates Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence in mixed biofilm. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Martínez, P.; Huedo, P.; Martinez-Servat, S.; Planell, R.; Ferrer-Navarro, M.; Daura, X.; Yero, D.; Gilbert, I. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia responds to exogenous AHL signals through the LuxR solo SmoR (Smlt1839). Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2015, 5, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Hudaiberdiev, S.; Choudhary, K.S.; Vera Alvarez, R.; Gelencsér, Z.; Ligeti, B.; Lamba, D.; Pongor, S. Census of solo LuxR genes in prokaryotic genomes. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2015, 5, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  221. Singh, V.K.; Kavita, K.; Prabhakaran, R.; Jha, B. Cis-9-octadecenoic acid from the rhizospheric bacterium Stenotrophomonas maltophilia BJ01 shows quorum quenching and anti-biofilm activities. Biofouling 2013, 29, 855–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  222. Sriram, K.B.; Cox, A.J.; Clancy, R.L.; Slack, M.P.E.; Cripps, A.W. Nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A review for clinicians. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2018, 44, 125–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  223. Rajan, S.; Saiman, L. Pulmonary infections in patients with cystic fibrosis. Semin. Respir. Infect. 2002, 17, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  224. Starner, T.D.; Zhang, N.; Kim, G.; Apicella, M.A.; McCray, P.B., Jr. Haemophilus influenzae forms biofilms on airway epithelia: Implications in cystic fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2006, 174, 213–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  225. Swords, W.E. Nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae biofilms: Role in chronic airway infections. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2012, 2, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  226. Starner, T.D.; Shrout, J.D.; Parsek, M.R.; Appelbaum, P.C.; Kim, G. Subinhibitory concentrations of azithromycin decrease nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae biofilm formation and diminish established biofilms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2008, 52, 137–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  227. Armbruster, C.E.; Pang, B.; Murrah, K.; Juneau, R.A.; Perez, A.C.; Weimer, K.E.; Swords, W.E. RbsB (NTHI_0632) mediates quorum signal uptake in nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae strain 86-028NP. Mol. Microbiol. 2011, 82, 836–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Rickard, A.H.; Palmer, R.J., Jr.; Blehert, D.S.; Campagna, S.R.; Semmelhack, M.F.; Egland, P.G.; Bassler, B.L.; Kolenbrander, P.E. Autoinducer 2: A concentration-dependent signal for mutualistic bacterial biofilm growth. Mol. Microbiol. 2006, 60, 1446–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Pang, Z.; Raudonis, R.; Glick, B.R.; Lin, T.J.; Cheng, Z. Antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Mechanisms and alternative therapeutic strategies. Biotechnol. Adv. 2019, 37, 177–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  230. Unal, C.M.; Singh, B.; Fleury, C.; Singh, K.; Chávez de Paz, L.; Svensäter, G.; Riesbeck, K. QseC controls biofilm formation of non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae in addition to an AI-2-dependent mechanism. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2012, 302, 261–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  231. Steele, K.H.; O’Connor, L.H.; Burpo, N.; Kohler, K.; Johnston, J.-W. Characterization of a ferrous iron-responsive two-component system in nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae. J. Bacteriol. 2012, 194, 6162–6173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  232. Novotny, L.A.; Clements, J.D.; Goodman, S.D.; Bakaletz, L.O. Transcutaneous immunization with a band-aid prevents experimental otitis media in a polymicrobial model. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 2017, 24, e00563-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  233. Mokrzan, E.M.; Novotny, L.A.; Brockman, K.L.; Bakaletz, L.O. Antibodies against the majority subunit (PilA) of the type IV pilus of nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae disperse Moraxella catarrhalis from a dual-species biofilm. mBio 2018, 9, e02423-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  234. Muhlebach, M.S.; Zorn, B.T.; Esther, C.R.; Hatch, J.E.; Murray, C.P.; Turkovic, L.; Ranganathan, S.C.; Boucher, R.C.; Stick, S.M.; Wolfgang, M.C. Initial acquisition and succession of the cystic fibrosis lung microbiome is associated with disease progression in infants and preschool children. PLoS Pathog. 2018, 14, e1006798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  235. Fleshner, M.; Olivier, K.N.; Shaw, P.A.; Adjemian, J.; Strollo, S.; Claypool, R.J.; Folio, L.; Zelazny, A.; Holland, S.M.; Prevots, D.R. Mortality among patients with pulmonary non-tuberculous mycobacteria disease. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 2016, 20, 582–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  236. Skolnik, K.; Kirkpatrick, G.; Quon, B.S. Nontuberculous mycobacteria in cystic fibrosis. Curr. Treat. Options Infect. Dis. 2016, 8, 259–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  237. Qvist, T.; Taylor-Robinson, D.; Waldmann, E.; Olesen, H.V.; Hansen, C.R.; Mathiesen, I.H.; Høiby, N.; Katzenstein, T.L.; Smyth, R.L.; Diggle, P.J.; et al. Comparing the harmful effects of nontuberculous mycobacteria and Gram negative bacteria on lung function in patients with cystic fibrosis. J. Cyst. Fibros. 2016, 15, 380–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Waters, V.; Ratjen, F. Antibiotic treatment for nontuberculous mycobacteria lung infection in people with cystic fibrosis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2016, 12, CD010004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  239. Polkade, A.V.; Mantri, S.S.; Patwekar, U.J.; Jangid, K. Quorum sensing: An under-explored phenomenon in the phylum Actinobacteria. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Santos, C.L.; Correia-Neves, M.; Moradas-Ferreira, P.; Mendes, M.V. A walk into the LuxR regulators of Actinobacteria: Phylogenomic distribution and functional diversity. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e46758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  241. Sharma, I.M.; Petchiappan, A.; Chatterji, D. Quorum sensing and biofilm formation in Mycobacteria: Role of c-di-GMP and methods to study this second messenger. IUBMB Life 2014, 66, 823–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  242. Simões, M. Antimicrobial strategies effective against infectious bacterial biofilms. Curr. Med. Chem. 2011, 18, 2129–2145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  243. Rossi, G.G.; Guterres, K.B.; Bonez, P.C.; da Silva Gundel, S.; Aggertt, V.A.; Siqueira, F.S.; Ourique, A.F.; Wagnerd, R.; Klein, B.; Santos, R.C.V.; et al. Antibiofilm activity of nanoemulsions of Cymbopogon flexuosus against rapidly growing mycobacteria. Microb. Pathog. 2017, 113, 335–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  244. Flores, V.D.; Siqueira, F.D.; Mizdal, C.R.; Bonez, P.C.; Agertt, V.A.; Stefanello, S.T.; Rossi, G.G.; Campos, M.M. Antibiofilm effect of antimicrobials used in the therapy of mycobacteriosis. Microb. Pathog. 2016, 99, 229–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  245. Siqueira, F.D.S.; Rossi, G.G.; Machado, A.K.; Alves, C.F.S.; Flores, V.C.; Somavilla, V.D.; Agertt, V.A.; Siqueira, J.D.; Dias, R.S.; Copetti, P.M.; et al. Sulfamethoxazole derivatives complexed with metals: A new alternative against biofilms of rapidly growing mycobacteria. Biofouling 2018, 34, 893–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  246. García-Contreras, R.; Maeda, T.; Wood, T.K. Resistance to quorum-quenching compounds. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79, 6840–6846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  247. Kalia, V.C.; Wood, T.K.; Kumar, P. Evolution of resistance to quorum-sensing inhibitors. Microb. Ecol. 2014, 68, 13–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  248. Sass, A.; Slachmuylders, L.; Van Acker, H.; Vandenbussche, I.; Ostyn, L.; Bové, M.; Crabbé, A.; Chiarelli, L.R.; Buroni, S.; Van Nieuwerburgh, F.; et al. Various Evolutionary Trajectories Lead to Loss of the Tobramycin-Potentiating Activity of the Quorum-Sensing Inhibitor Baicalin Hydrate in Burkholderia cenocepacia Biofilms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2019, 63, e02092-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  249. García-Contreras, R. Is Quorum Sensing Interference a Viable Alternative to Treat Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections? Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The Agr QS system of S. aureus. (A) The autoinducing peptide (AIP) is produced by AgrD and exported by AgrB. The two component system AgrC/AgrA is activated by AIP. AgrA binds the P2 and P3 promoter regions activating the agr quorum sensing feedback mechanism and RNAIII expression. (B) Chemical structures of autoinducing peptides I–IV and autoinducer-2 (AI-2).
Figure 1. The Agr QS system of S. aureus. (A) The autoinducing peptide (AIP) is produced by AgrD and exported by AgrB. The two component system AgrC/AgrA is activated by AIP. AgrA binds the P2 and P3 promoter regions activating the agr quorum sensing feedback mechanism and RNAIII expression. (B) Chemical structures of autoinducing peptides I–IV and autoinducer-2 (AI-2).
Ijms 20 01838 g001
Figure 2. Targets of natural and synthetic molecules active against S. aureus quorum sensing.
Figure 2. Targets of natural and synthetic molecules active against S. aureus quorum sensing.
Ijms 20 01838 g002
Figure 3. Chemical structures of natural (A) and synthetic (B) molecules active against S. aureus QS systems.
Figure 3. Chemical structures of natural (A) and synthetic (B) molecules active against S. aureus QS systems.
Ijms 20 01838 g003
Figure 4. The QS systems of P. aeruginosa, Las, Iqs, Rhl and Pqs and their interactions. (A) OdDHL, N-(3-oxododecanoyl) homoserine lactone; IQS, integrating quorum sensing signal; BHL, N-butyryl-l-homoserine lactone; PQS, Pseudomonas quinolone signal. Arrows indicate positive regulation, T-bars negative regulation. (B) Chemical structures of QS signal molecules.
Figure 4. The QS systems of P. aeruginosa, Las, Iqs, Rhl and Pqs and their interactions. (A) OdDHL, N-(3-oxododecanoyl) homoserine lactone; IQS, integrating quorum sensing signal; BHL, N-butyryl-l-homoserine lactone; PQS, Pseudomonas quinolone signal. Arrows indicate positive regulation, T-bars negative regulation. (B) Chemical structures of QS signal molecules.
Ijms 20 01838 g004
Figure 5. Targets of natural and synthetic molecules active against P. aeruginosa quorum sensing.
Figure 5. Targets of natural and synthetic molecules active against P. aeruginosa quorum sensing.
Ijms 20 01838 g005
Figure 6. Chemical structures of natural (A) and synthetic (B) molecules active against P. aeruginosa QS systems.
Figure 6. Chemical structures of natural (A) and synthetic (B) molecules active against P. aeruginosa QS systems.
Ijms 20 01838 g006
Figure 7. The QS systems of B. cenocepacia, Cep, Cci, Rpf and Ham and their interactions. (A) The interactions of the Ham system are not completely elucidated. C8-HSL, N-octanoyl-homoserine-lactone; C6-HSL, N-hexanoyl-homoserine-lactone; BDSF, Burkholderia diffusible signal factor and valdiazen. Arrows indicate positive regulation, T-bars negative regulation. (B) Chemical structures of QS signal molecules.
Figure 7. The QS systems of B. cenocepacia, Cep, Cci, Rpf and Ham and their interactions. (A) The interactions of the Ham system are not completely elucidated. C8-HSL, N-octanoyl-homoserine-lactone; C6-HSL, N-hexanoyl-homoserine-lactone; BDSF, Burkholderia diffusible signal factor and valdiazen. Arrows indicate positive regulation, T-bars negative regulation. (B) Chemical structures of QS signal molecules.
Ijms 20 01838 g007
Figure 8. (A) Targets of natural and synthetic molecules active against B. cenocepacia quorum sensing. (B) Chemical structures of natural and synthetic molecules active against B. cenocepacia QS systems.
Figure 8. (A) Targets of natural and synthetic molecules active against B. cenocepacia quorum sensing. (B) Chemical structures of natural and synthetic molecules active against B. cenocepacia QS systems.
Ijms 20 01838 g008
Figure 9. Targets of natural and synthetic molecules active against Haemophilus influenzae (A) and Non-tuberculous Mycobacteria (B) quorum sensing.
Figure 9. Targets of natural and synthetic molecules active against Haemophilus influenzae (A) and Non-tuberculous Mycobacteria (B) quorum sensing.
Ijms 20 01838 g009

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Scoffone, V.C.; Trespidi, G.; Chiarelli, L.R.; Barbieri, G.; Buroni, S. Quorum Sensing as Antivirulence Target in Cystic Fibrosis Pathogens. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1838. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20081838

AMA Style

Scoffone VC, Trespidi G, Chiarelli LR, Barbieri G, Buroni S. Quorum Sensing as Antivirulence Target in Cystic Fibrosis Pathogens. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019; 20(8):1838. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20081838

Chicago/Turabian Style

Scoffone, Viola Camilla, Gabriele Trespidi, Laurent R. Chiarelli, Giulia Barbieri, and Silvia Buroni. 2019. "Quorum Sensing as Antivirulence Target in Cystic Fibrosis Pathogens" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20, no. 8: 1838. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20081838

APA Style

Scoffone, V. C., Trespidi, G., Chiarelli, L. R., Barbieri, G., & Buroni, S. (2019). Quorum Sensing as Antivirulence Target in Cystic Fibrosis Pathogens. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 20(8), 1838. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20081838

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop