Next Article in Journal
Immunomodulatory Effects of Hydroxychloroquine and Chloroquine in Viral Infections and Their Potential Application in Retinal Gene Therapy
Next Article in Special Issue
Linking Brassinosteroid and ABA Signaling in the Context of Stress Acclimation
Previous Article in Journal
Melatonin Induces Melanogenesis in Human SK-MEL-1 Melanoma Cells Involving Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3 and Reactive Oxygen Species
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cytological and Gene Profile Expression Analysis Reveals Modification in Metabolic Pathways and Catalytic Activities Induce Resistance in Botrytis cinerea Against Iprodione Isolated From Tomato
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 21
Issue 14
10.3390/ijms21144968
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Cloning and Functional Analysis of Dwarf Gene Mini Plant 1 (MNP1) in Medicago truncatula

by
Shiqi Guo
1,2,†,
Xiaojia Zhang
1,2,†,
Quanzi Bai
1,2,
Weiyue Zhao
1,2,
Yuegenwang Fang
1,2,
Shaoli Zhou
1,2,
Baolin Zhao
1,
Liangliang He
1,2,* and
Jianghua Chen
1,*
1
CAS Key Laboratory of Tropical Plant Resources and Sustainable Use, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 88 Xuefu Road, Kunming 650223, China
2
College of Life Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(14), 4968; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21144968
Submission received: 31 May 2020 / Revised: 3 July 2020 / Accepted: 3 July 2020 / Published: 14 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cell Signaling in Model Plants)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Plant height is a vital agronomic trait that greatly determines crop yields because of the close relationship between plant height and lodging resistance. Legumes play a unique role in the worldwide agriculture; however, little attention has been given to the molecular basis of their height. Here, we characterized the first dwarf mutant mini plant 1 (mnp1) of the model legume plant Medicago truncatula. Our study found that both cell length and the cell number of internodes were reduced in a mnp1 mutant. Using the forward genetic screening and subsequent whole-genome resequencing approach, we cloned the MNP1 gene and found that it encodes a putative copalyl diphosphate synthase (CPS) implicated in the first step of gibberellin (GA) biosynthesis. MNP1 was highly homologous to Pisum sativum LS. The subcellular localization showed that MNP1 was located in the chloroplast. Further analysis indicated that GA3 could significantly restore the plant height of mnp1-1, and expression of MNP1 in a cps1 mutant of Arabidopsis partially rescued its mini-plant phenotype, indicating the conservation function of MNP1 in GA biosynthesis. Our results provide valuable information for understanding the genetic regulation of plant height in M. truncatula.

1. Introduction

Dwarf phenotypes have been widely used to improve lodging resistance and enhance harvest index in crops. For this reason, the proper modulation of plant height has always been a priority for breeders. Although many factors regulate plant height, gibberellin (GA) plays a leading role and is also known as the “green revolution phytohormone” because of its great contribution to the cultivation of high yields and lodging resistant crop varieties. The “green revolution” gene semi-dwarf 1 (sd1) encoding GA biosynthesis enzyme GA 20-oxidase (GA20ox) is always important in rice breeding from the 1960s [1]. The reduced height 1 (rht-B1b and rht-D1b) mutants showed a semi-dwarfing phenotype due to insensitivity to GA and were also used to breed for lodging resistance and yield increase in wheat [2].
GA is involved in various processes of plant growth and development, including leaf expansion, seed germination, induction of flowering and stem elongation [3,4,5,6,7]. With the extensive characterization of dwarf mutants related to GA, numerous genes encoding GA biosynthetic enzymes have been identified [8,9]. Bioactive GA biosynthesis is divided into three stages. In the first stage, geranylgeranyl diphosphate (GGDP), the precursor of GA, is catalyzed by the copalyl diphosphate synthase (CPS) and ent-kaurene synthase (KS) to form ent-kaurene, and this process takes place in the plastid [10,11]. Then, in the second stage, ent-kaurene is converted to GA12 by ent-kaurene oxidase (KO) and ent-kaurenoic acid oxidase (KAO), both of which are cytochrome P450 enzymes [11,12,13]. In the final stage, GA12 is catalyzed by GA20ox and converted to GA9 via GA15 and GA24, and then GA9 is converted to GA4 by GA 3β-hydroxylase (GA3ox) [14,15,16,17]. GA12 is also converted to GA1 through the 13-hydroxylation pathway [9]. The biosynthesis of bioactive GA1 and GA4 occurs in the cytoplasm. Because the early-step genes of GA biosynthesis, CPS1/GA1, KS and KO, are single copy in Arabidopsis, mutations of these genes usually induce severely dwarf phenotype with greatly impaired fertility [12,18]. In contrast, the loss-of-function mutants of GA20ox and GA3ox (the late-step genes of GA biosynthesis) show a semi-dwarf phenotype due to the functional redundancy of multiple copies of genes [19,20]. In addition, the mutants altered in GA degradation and signal transduction pathway also show various degrees of dwarf phenotype and are valuable in molecular breeding [21,22,23,24,25].
Previous studies have suggested that, in addition to GAs, other plant hormones, such as brassinosteroids (BRs) [26,27] and strigolactones (SLs) [28,29], also play important roles in plant height development. The dwarf mutants related to these hormones can be divided into two types, hormone-sensitive and hormone-insensitive. The plant height of those hormone-sensitive mutants could be restored by exogenous hormones because their hormone content is reduced due to the disorder of hormone metabolic pathways [26,29,30,31,32]. The hormone-insensitive mutants are not sensitive to the hormone due to the abnormal signaling pathway [27,33,34,35,36]. So far, the molecular genetic pathways underlying the plant height regulation are well-characterized in Arabidopsis and rice, but only a few studies have been conducted on other species.
Legumes are the second most important economic crops after cereals and provide the major sources of plant proteins and oils for humans and animals [37]. Investigations on dwarf mutants in peas and soybeans have strongly suggested that the GA pathway plays a conserved role in determining the plant height of legumes [38,39,40]. Medicago truncatula, a diploid model legume plant, has been sequenced [41,42], but little attention was given to the basis of its height and the involved regulatory mechanisms of the GA pathway.
In this study, we characterized the severely dwarf mutant mnp1 with two alleles isolated from the Tnt1 retrotransposon-tagged mutant population of M. truncatula. Through forward genetic screening and the subsequent whole-genome resequencing approach, we cloned the MNP1/Medtr7g011663 gene and found that it was well-clustered with the homologous genes encoding Pisum sativum LS, Solanum lycopersicum GIB-1, Arabidopsis thaliana CPS1/GA1, Oryza sativa OsCPS1 and Zea mays An1, all of which are the enzymes involved in the first step of GA biosynthesis. Because the dwarf phenotype of mnp1 was significantly restored by exogenous application of GA3, and the mini-plant phenotype of the Arabidopsis cps1 mutant was partially rescued by the expression of MNP1, we proposed a conserved function of MNP1 in GA biosynthesis. Given the evidence that both the mnp1 and the pea ls mutants are fertile and there are multiple possible copies of MNP1/LS in M. truncatula, peas and soybeans, it is reasonable to hypothesize that the duplication of CPS genes and the subsequent functional divergence may have occurred in legumes during evolution [43]. The result has significant implications for the legume breeding programs and provides a good model to further study the regulatory mechanism of height regulation in M. truncatula.

2. Results

2.1. Mini Plant 1 Mutants Were Severely Dwarfed Due to Shorter and Fewer Cells

Legumes are the third largest family of angiosperms, including many important crops, such as soybeans and peanuts [44]. To gain a better understanding of the molecular basis of plant height regulation in legumes, we screened the Tnt1 retrotransposon insertion mutant collection of the model plant M. truncatula [45] to isolate mutants with significant changes in plant height. Two allelic mutants with similar severely dwarf phenotypes were identified and designated as mini plant 1-1 (mnp1-1) and mini plant 1-2 (mnp1-2), respectively, because all F1 progenies derived from a cross between mnp1-1 and mnp1-2 were dwarf plants. Compared with the wild type, the mutants are severely dwarf, with increased branches and dark green leaves (Figure 1A–C and Figure 2C).
During the growth and development from seedlings to adult plants, the height gap between the wild type and mnp1-1 mutant was becoming bigger (Figure 1A–C). By measuring the length of the third internode beneath the shoot apex, we confirmed that the mnp1-1 mutants have reduced internode length compared with the wild type (Figure 1D). Then, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis was used to determine the reasons for the shorter internode of mnp1-1 mutants. The epidermal cells of the mnp1-1 internode were considerably shorter than those of the wild type (Figure 1E,F). In addition, the number of internode cells was also greatly reduced in mnp1-1 mutants (Figure 1G), indicating that cell division was significantly suppressed. This speculation would be in agreement with the quantitative analysis of the reduced cell cycle activity of the mnp1-1 internode. The expression of the G2/M phase cell cycle marker MtCYCB1;1 and the cytokinesis marker MtKNOLLE [46] were both dramatically lower in mnp1-1 than that of wild type (Figure 1H,I). Therefore, both decreased length and number of internode cells contributed to the shortened stem of mnp1-1. In addition to the decrease of stem length, the petiole of mnp1-1 was shortened as well (Figure S1). In conclusion, these results demonstrated that MNP1 plays an important role in the length determination of stem and petiole in M. truncatula.

2.2. Molecular Cloning of MNP1 Gene

Analysis of the F2 generation resulting from a cross between mnp1-2 and wild type showed a segregation ratio of 3:1 between wild-type-like and dwarf phenotypes (36:13, χ2 = 0.0068 < χ20.05 = 3.84) (Figure S2A), indicating that the mnp1-2 phenotype was controlled by a single recessive gene. To clone the target gene corresponding for the mutant phenotype, mnp1-1 and mnp1-2 were backcrossed with the wild type, respectively, and mutant plants were isolated from both F2 populations, followed by whole-genome resequencing at 20× coverage. Then, the resequencing data were analyzed using the bioinformatics tool Identification of Transposon Insertion Sites (ITIS) as previously described (Table S1) [47]. ITIS identified nine and seventy-one Tnt1 insertions in the genomes of the mnp1-1 and mnp1-2 mutants, respectively. There were two Tnt1 insertion sites on chromosome 7 that appeared to be nearby from the genomic sequence data of mnp1-1 and mnp1-2; one was inserted into an intergenic region, and another was inserted into a genic region corresponding to the Medtr7g011663 gene (annotated in A17 genome v4.0) (Figure 2A; Table S1). Then, PCR-based genotyping and sequencing analysis confirmed that the mnp1-1 and mnp1-2 mutants harbored Tnt1 insertions in the fourth exon and the seventh exon of the candidate gene/Medtr7g011663, respectively (Figure 2B–D and Figure S2B). To determine whether the mutation of Medtr7g011663 is responsible for the mnp1 mutants’ phenotype, an additional mutant line with a predicted Tnt1 insertion in Medtr7g011663 locus was identified via BLAST searching of the public mutant database [45], and thus was designated as mnp1-3. The mnp1-3 plants displayed a severely dwarfed phenotype similar to mnp1 alleles when growing in the greenhouse (Figure 2C). PCR-based sequencing confirmed that there is indeed a Tnt1 insertion in the sixth exon of Medtr7g011663 in mnp1-3 (Figure 2D and Figure S2B). Thus, we considered Medtr7g011663 as the putative MNP1 gene.

2.3. MNP1 Encodes a Putative CPS Protein in M. truncatula

To figure out the type of protein encoded by MNP1, phylogenetic analysis of MNP1 and its homologous proteins from M. truncatula and related legume plants (pea and soybean), dicotyledonous model plants (Arabidopsis and tomato) and grasses (rice and maize) was performed. MNP1 protein was closely grouped with numerous homologs from legumes, and each selected legume species has at least two homologous copies. When compared to the reported homologous proteins, MNP1 showed the most homology to the pea LS and significant homology to the GIB-1 in tomatoes, CPS1/GA1 in Arabidopsis, OsCPS1 in rice and An1 in maize (Figure 3A), all of which are in the CPS family belonging to type-B cyclase and take part in the first step of GA biosynthesis [48,49,50,51,52]. The loss-of-function mutants of ls, gib-1, cps1/ga1, Oscps1 and an1 all show dwarfed phenotypes. In addition, the alignment of multiple amino acid sequences shows that MNP1 exhibits a high degree of amino acid sequence identities with these CPS proteins (Figure S3). Furthermore, there is an aspartate-rich motif DXDD near the N-terminal region of MNP1 (Figure 3B), which is conserved among type-B cyclase and important for the catalysis of the type-B cyclization reactions [52,53]. Taken together, we believe that MNP1 would be a conserved CPS protein involved in the GA biosynthesis pathway in M. truncatula.

2.4. Subcellular Localization of MNP1

The CPS1/GA1 has been reported to be localized on plastids in Arabidopsis with a chloroplast transit peptide (cTP) at its N-terminus [50]. Then, we carried out cTP prediction using the ChloroP program (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/ChloroP) and found that the MNP1 is also highly predicted to have a cTP at its N-terminus, with a score of 0.591 (strong).
Based on the ChloroP prediction results, the sequence encoding the N-terminal truncation of 1–100 amino acids of MNP1 (TPMNP1) was used to generate p35S::TPMNP1-GFP constructs, which was then transiently expressed in epidermal cells of tobacco (Nicotiana benthamia). The green fluorescence signal of the fusion protein was observed in a chloroplast (Figure 4). This result was further confirmed by the subcellular localization analysis of the GFP fusion protein with full-length MNP1 (Figure S4). Thus, these data suggest that MNP1 may play the same role as Arabidopsis CPS1 in chloroplasts and participate in GA biosynthesis.

2.5. Genes of GA Biosynthesis Pathway Are Significantly Up-Regulated in mnp1-1

Based on the above evidence, we conclude that MNP1 is the putative gene encoding a CPS protein that participates in GA biosynthesis in M. truncatula. Therefore, exogenous GA3 was used to investigate whether mnp1 is a GA-sensitive mutant. As expected, the plant height of mnp1-1 sprayed with GA3 was significantly higher than that of the control group without GA treatment (Figure 5A). Besides, the blade size and petiole length of mnp1-1 mutants were also significantly restored after GA treatment (Figure S5). Thus, it could be stated that the lack of GA leads to the dwarf phenotype of mnp1. The GA biosynthesis pathway involves many genes besides CPS (Figure 5B). According to the reference [54], we tested the expression level of the putative genes (Table S2) in the GA biosynthesis pathway of M. truncatula stem tissue. The results showed that most GA biosynthesis genes were highly upregulated in the mnp1-1 mutant, while a small proportion of the genes (MtKS, MtKAO1, MtCYP714_A1, MtCYP714_C2) showed a low level of upregulation, with no significant difference. Among these upregulated genes, MtGA20ox7 was most significant and was thousands of times higher than that of the wild type (Figure 5C), which is coincident with the earlier statement that GA20ox has an important role in GA homeostasis regulation in plants [20]. The upregulation of the genes that lie downstream of the GA biosynthesis pathway in mnp1-1 implied a negative feedback response to the low GA content, and MtGA20ox7 may play a key role in GA feedback regulation in mnp1-1.

2.6. MNP1 Could Partially Rescue the Phenotype of Arabidopsis cps1 Mutant

The cps1/ga1 mutant of Arabidopsis shows a severely dwarfed and sterile phenotype due to the loss of CPS function [55]. To examine the extent of the functional conservation between M. truncatula and A. thaliana CPS proteins, we obtained a homozygous T-DNA insertion mutant of At4g02780 (SALK_109115) from the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center (ABRC), namely the cps1 mutant. The cps1 mutant showed extremely dwarf as expected, and was able to produce inflorescences, but no fertile seeds (Figure 6A). Next, we introduced p35S::MNP1-GFP constructs into cps1 heterozygotes by the floral dip method. Through resistance screening and PCR genotyping, we isolated the p35S::MNP1-GFP transgenic plants in the cps1 homozygous background, and found that the size of transgenic plants was partially restored (Figure 6B,C). RT-PCR analysis confirmed the expression of MNP1 gene in the transgenic plants (Figure 6D). These results indicated that MNP1 could partially recover the mini-plant phenotype of the cps1 mutant, suggesting that CPS has functional conservation between M. truncatula and A. thaliana.

3. Discussion

Although the genes encoding CPS have been identified in many species [48,49,50,51,52], the pea LS is the only CPS protein characterized from legumes in general before the present study, and mnp1 appears to be the first dwarf mutant related to GA biosynthesis in M. truncatula. We found that the mnp1 dwarf phenotype is caused by the decrease of the cell elongation and cell division in the stem. This result is consistent with the previously reported function of GA in promoting cell elongation and division. Cell elongation is regulated by cell wall-loosening protein expansin (EXP) and xyloglucan endo-transglycosylases (XET) which play a role in cell wall reconstruction. Some XET and EXP genes have been shown to be specifically upregulated by GA, which is believed to cause cell elongation in Arabidopsis and rice [56,57,58,59]. GA also promotes plant growth via upregulating the transcription levels of cell division-related genes including cell cycle genes CYCA1;1 and CDC2Os-3 in deepwater rice [60]. However, the underlying mechanism by which GA regulates the expression of these genes remains to be studied. The identification of mnp1 provides a very good model to further study this mechanism in M. truncatula.
Focusing on the phylogenetic analysis of MNP1 and its homologous proteins, we found that CPS proteins belonging to legumes were grouped into two clades (clade I and II), and each clade was identified in all selected legumes, suggesting that a lineage-specific duplication of CPS genes may have occurred in legumes during the evolution process. There are just single copies from Arabidopsis and the tomato outgroup of the legume CPS proteins, while the CPS proteins of grasses gather together and are significantly separated from those of eudicots (Figure 3A). Consistent with this result, the conserved DXDD motif of CPS shows some degree of sequence divergence between monocots and eudicots (Figure 3B). In M. truncatula, MNP2/Medtr7g011770 appears to be a very close paralogue of MNP1/Medtr7g011663, because MNP1 and MNP2 are tightly clustered on chromosome 7 and shared high sequence identity. MNP1 and MNP2 belong to the legume CPS clade I, while in the legume CPS clade II, two members were found in the M. truncatula genome, namely MNP3/Medtr7g094970 and MNP4/Medtr5g030050. Since a highly conserved DXDD motif existed in all these four CPS proteins of M. truncatula (Figure S6), it will be interesting to explore the possibilities of functional redundancy and diversification between MNP1 and the rest members.
GA homeostasis is important for the regulation of many developmental processes and has been found to be maintained by feedback regulation of GA metabolism genes in a variety of plant species [61]. GA20ox and GA3ox are the main participants in the negative feedback regulation of GA. The expression of these two kinds of genes was upregulated in the GA biosynthesis deletion mutant [20]. In our study, we found that the expression of MtGA20ox7 was significantly upregulated, up to thousands of times in mnp1-1 compared with the wild type. Therefore, it seems that MtGA20ox7 may be a key member in the regulation of GA homeostasis in M. truncatula.
The Arabidopsis cps1 mutants are male sterility caused by defective pollen development [55]. In M. truncatula, the expression of MNP1 gene was also detected in stamens (Figure S7), suggesting that MNP1 may play a potentially important role in stamen development. However, mnp1 is fully fertile in M. truncatula, with its flower organ, pods and seeds being relatively smaller when compared with the wild type (Figure S8A–E). Pollen viability, tested by Alexander’s staining, indicated no significant difference between the wild type and mnp1-1 as well (Figure S8C). It is a common phenomenon that GA deficiency leads to dwarfing and male sterility in various species, such as Arabidopsis, maize and tomato, but this scenario does not appear to be the case in legumes. Fertile pollens can be produced in all the reported dwarf mutants with GA deficiency in peas [43,51], and mnp1 is similar to pea ls mutants, unlike cps mutants of other species. Given that a legume species usually contain multiple CPS genes, it can be argued that the mechanism of GA biosynthesis for plant height and pollen development in legumes may be conserved and distinct from that of other species. In terms of the dwarfed but fertile phenotypes of mnp1 and ls mutants, the identification of MNP1/LS and other key genes involved in GA metabolism would be of great potential utility in legume breeding.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials and Growth Conditions

M. truncatula ecotype R108 and A. thaliana ecotype Col-0 were used for this study. The mnp1-1 (NF0500), mnp1-2 (NF13564) and mnp1-3 (NF10616) mutants (all in ecotype R108 background) were isolated from the Tnt1 retrotransposon-tagged mutant collection of M. truncatula as previously reported [45]. Among them, the mnp1-3 mutants were screened from the Tnt1 population by a reverse genetic approach. Seeds of Arabidopsis cps1 mutant (SALK_109115) were purchased from the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center (ABRC). The p35S::MNP1-GFP transgenic plants were generated in cps1 background.
Arabidopsis GA-deficient mutant cps1 cannot germinate in the soil. For this reason, Arabidopsis plants need to be grown on solid 1/2 MS medium for approximately 2 weeks and then be transplanted into the soil. All plants (M. truncatula and A. thaliana) were grown under the following greenhouse conditions: 16 h day/8 h night cycle, 150 uE/m2/s light intensity, 22 °C day/18 °C night temperature and 70% humidity.

4.2. Statistical Analysis of Cell Length and Number

For the measurement of the internode length, twenty individual plants of both the wild type and mnp1-1 genotypes were grown simultaneously in the same greenhouse, and the third internode beneath the shoot apex of each plant (2-month-old) was collected and considered as an independent biological sample. Thus, a total of twenty internodes were processed to calculate the average length. Then, three internodes of each genotype were randomly selected from the above twenty samples, and were submerged in fixative solution (5% formaldehyde, 5% acetic acid and 50% ethanol) for over 12 h at room temperature. Subsequently, the samples were dehydrated in a graded ethanol series (50%, 70%, 90%, 95%, 100%), critical-point dried in liquid CO2 and sputter-coated with gold. The three dried internodes for each genotype were individually examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) by an EVO LS10 (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) at an accelerating voltage of 5 kV. Therefore, three SEM images of the third internode were obtained for each genotype (wild type and mnp1-1).
For the measurement of epidermal cell length of the internode, 20 cells were randomly selected from the SEM images (6–7 cells per image) for both the wild type and mnp1-1 genotypes, and the lengths were measured by ImageJ.
The cell number was calculated from the ratio of the average internode length (that was evaluated from a total of 20 internodes) to the average cell length (that was evaluated from 20 cells of three biological replicates).
All above experiments were repeated twice independently with similar results.

4.3. Molecular Cloning of MNP1

The molecular cloning of the MNP1 gene referred to the method reported previously [62]. We screened the Tnt1 retrotransposon insertion mutant collection of M. truncatula (ecotype R108) and isolated two mnp1 alleles (mnp1-1, NF0500 and mnp1-2, NF13564) with severely dwarfed phenotypes. Then, these two mnp1 alleles were backcrossed with the wild type to purify the genetic background for reducing incoherent Tnt1 insertions, and mnp1-1 and mnp1-2 F2 segregation populations were generated, respectively. Equal amounts of leaf material were harvested from 12 independent mutant individuals of each population to make two mixed samples. The genomic DNA of the mixed samples was extracted using the Plant Genomic DNA Kit (Tiangen, Beijing, China). Whole-genome resequencing was carried out at 20× coverage. Then, the data of whole-genome resequencing were analyzed by a novel bioinformatics tool, Identification of Transposon Insertion Sites (ITIS) to identify all Tnt1 insertion sites in the genome [47]. The common Tnt1 insertion sites in mnp1-1 and mnp1-2 genomes were found in Medtr7g011663 locus (annotated in A17 genome v4.0). Subsequently, PCR experiments using mnp1-1 and mnp1-2 genomic DNA as templates were performed to verify the insertion of Tnt1 in Medtr7g011663. An additional allele mnp1-3 (NF10616) was screened from the Tnt1 population by a reverse genetics approach, which also displayed a mini-plant phenotype. Genomic PCR analysis confirmed that the mnp1-3 mutant does carry a Tnt1 insertion in Medtr7g011663. Thus, Medtr7g011663 was regarded as the putative MNP1 gene. The analysis data of ITIS and the primers used for PCR are shown in Tables S1 and S3, respectively.

4.4. Phylogenetic Analysis and Sequences Alignment

The sequences of MNP1 homologs were identified through BLAST from Phytozome (https://phytozome.jgi.doe.gov/pz/portal.html), URGI (https://urgi.versailles.inra.fr/Species/Pisum) and maizeGDB (https://maizegdb.org/) in the protein databases of Medicago truncatula, Glycine max, Solanum lycopersicum, Arabidopsis thaliana, Oryza sativa, Pisum sativum and Zea mays. Multiple amino acid sequences were aligned by ClustalX2 (v2.1) at default parameters and beautified by DNAMAN V6. The phylogenetic tree was performed by the maximum likelihood method with IQTREE v1.6.10 as previously reported [63]. The JTT + F + G4 model was selected as suggested by the IQTREE model test tool (BIC criterion) with 1000 ultrafast bootstrap replicates and 5000 iterations.

4.5. Exogenous GA3 Application Method

Bioactive GA3 (Genview, Lot: 5209010140) was dissolved in ethanol (0.1 M) and diluted with water before being applied [64]. About 600 mL of 70 uM bioactive GA3 working solution was sprayed to a total of twelve mnp1-1 mutant plant one time. The first spray was applied at 10-day-old seedlings after sowing, and the later sprays performed once a week for two months in total. An equivalent group (n = 12) of mnp1-1 mutant plants was treated similarly with a solution without GA3 at each same time. All mnp1-1 mutants with the treatments (+GA3 and −GA3) were grown simultaneously in the same greenhouse. Experiments were repeated twice independently with similar results.

4.6. RNA Extraction, RT-PCR and Quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR)

Medicago stem tissues and Arabidopsis rosette leaves for RNA extraction were harvested from 7-week-old and 6-week-old plants, respectively. Total RNA was isolated using TransZol (TransGen, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s protocol and then was reverse transcribed into cDNA by HiScript® II 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Vazyme, Nanjing, China). The resulting cDNAs were used as templates for RT-PCR and qRT-PCR. AtACTIN (Actin2/At3g18780) was used as an internal control for Arabidopsis RT-PCR. qRT-PCR was performed using 2 × T5 Fast qPCR mix (SYBR Green I) (TsingKe, Beijing, China) on the Roche Light Cycler 480II real-time PCR machine (95 °C, 1 min; 95 °C, 10 s, 60 °C, 10 s, 72 °C, 15 s, 40 cycles). MtACTIN (Medtr3g095530) was used as an internal control for Medicago qPCR. Three independent biological replicates were used for RNA extraction and subsequent cDNA synthesis. All samples were selected randomly under the same greenhouse conditions. Three technical replicates for each biological replicate were used in qRT-PCR analysis. The genes involved in this study and the primers used for qPCR are listed in Tables S2 and S3, respectively.

4.7. Plasmid Construction

Coding sequences of target genes were isolated by RT-PCR from wild type root tissue of seedlings (3 weeks old). For subcellular localization experiments, the coding sequences of the N-terminus of MNP1 (100-amino acid, TPMNP1) and the full-length coding sequence of MNP1 were inserted into the pCAMBIA3301MP vector between NcoI and AvrII site via the ClonExpress II One Step Cloning Kit (Vazyme) to generate p35S::TPMNP1-GFP and p35S::MNP1-GFP constructs, respectively. The p35S:: MNP1-GFP constructs were also used for plant transformation. The primers used for plasmid construction are listed in Table S3.

4.8. Subcellular Localization

The constructs, p35S::TPMNP1-GFP and p35S::GFP, were introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens EHA105 strain, and then they were transiently expressed in tobacco (Nicotiana benthamia) leaves by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation [65]. The p35S::GFP constructs were served as a positive control. The TPMNP1-GFP fusion protein was examined using a confocal laser scanning microscope (FV1000; Olympus, Japan). This experiment was repeated three times independently with similar results.

4.9. Plant Transformation

The p35S::MNP1-GFP constructs were introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens EHA105 strain, which was subsequently used to transform cps1 heterozygotes by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation using the floral dip method [66]. Through resistance screening with 20 mg/L Basta (BBI Life Sciences, Lot: C707BA0017) and the subsequent PCR genotyping, the p35S::MNP1-GFP transgenic lines in the cps1 homozygous background were isolated. The primers used for PCR are shown in Table S3.

4.10. Alexander’s Staining

Mature pollens were stained with Alexander’s staining solution as previously described [67]. Mature anthers of WT and mnp1-1 from the same developmental stage were immersed directly in a drop of staining solution, covered with a coverslip respectively, and then kept them in an oven at 50 °C for 1 h. Next, a microscopic examination was conducted via a fluorescence microscope (Olympus BX63) using the bright field channel. The fertile pollen would be stained red to deep red, while aborted pollen would be green. Experiments were repeated more than three times independently.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/21/14/4968/s1.

Author Contributions

S.G., X.Z. and J.C. designed the research. Q.B. and S.Z. supported constructive comments on the research. S.G. and X.Z. performed most of the experiments. W.Z. and Y.F. assisted the experiments. S.G., X.Z., L.H. and B.Z. analyzed the data. S.G. wrote the original manuscript. J.C. and L.H. revised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 31700244, U1702234 and 31471171. L.H. and J.C. were also supported by the STS of CAS (KFJ-STS-ZDTP-076).

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Zhijia Gu and Yanxia Jia (Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences) for their technical help in SEM and laser confocal experiments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Spielmeyer, W.; Ellis, M.H.; Chandler, P.M. Semidwarf (sd-1), “green revolution” rice, contains a defective gibberellin 20-oxidase gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 9043–9048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Peng, J.; Richards, D.E.; Hartley, N.M.; Murphy, G.P.; Devos, K.M.; Flintham, J.E.; Beales, J.; Fish, L.J.; Worland, A.J.; Pelica, F.; et al. ‘Green revolution’ genes encode mutant gibberellin response modulators. Nature 1999, 400, 256–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Nelissen, H.; Rymen, B.; Jikumaru, Y.; Demuynck, K.; Van Lijsebettens, M.; Kamiya, Y.; Inze, D.; Beemster, G.T. A local maximum in gibberellin levels regulates maize leaf growth by spatial control of cell division. Curr. Biol. 2012, 22, 1183–1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Cao, D.; Cheng, H.; Wu, W.; Soo, H.M.; Peng, J. Gibberellin mobilizes distinct DELLA-dependent transcriptomes to regulate seed germination and floral development in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2006, 142, 509–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. King, R.W.; Moritz, T.; Evans, L.T.; Junttila, O.; Herlt, A.J. Long-day induction of flowering in Lolium temulentum involves sequential increases in specific gibberellins at the shoot apex. Plant Physiol. 2001, 127, 624–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Lo, S.F.; Yang, S.Y.; Chen, K.T.; Hsing, Y.I.; Zeevaart, J.A.; Chen, L.J.; Yu, S.M. A novel class of gibberellin 2-oxidases control semidwarfism, tillering, and root development in rice. Plant Cell 2008, 20, 2603–2618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Davidson, S.E.; Elliott, R.C.; Helliwell, C.A.; Poole, A.T.; Reid, J.B. The pea gene NA encodes ent-kaurenoic acid oxidase. Plant Physiol. 2003, 131, 335–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Yamaguchi, S. Gibberellin metabolism and its regulation. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008, 59, 225–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Magome, H.; Nomura, T.; Hanada, A.; Takeda-Kamiya, N.; Ohnishi, T.; Shinma, Y.; Katsumata, T.; Kawaide, H.; Kamiya, Y.; Yamaguchi, S. CYP714B1 and CYP714B2 encode gibberellin 13-oxidases that reduce gibberellin activity in rice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 1947–1952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Duncan, J.D.; West, C.A. Properties of Kaurene Synthetase from Marah macrocarpus Endosperm: Evidence for the Participation of Separate but Interacting Enzymes. Plant Physiol. 1981, 68, 1128–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Helliwell, C.A.; Sullivan, J.A.; Mould, R.M.; Gray, J.C.; Peacock, W.J.; Dennis, E.S. A plastid envelope location of Arabidopsis ent-kaurene oxidase links the plastid and endoplasmic reticulum steps of the gibberellin biosynthesis pathway. Plant J. 2001, 28, 201–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Helliwell, C.A.; Sheldon, C.C.; Olive, M.R.; Walker, A.R.; Zeevaart, J.A.; Peacock, W.J.; Dennis, E.S. Cloning of the Arabidopsis ent-kaurene oxidase gene GA3. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 9019–9024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Helliwell, C.A.; Chandler, P.M.; Poole, A.; Dennis, E.S.; Peacock, W.J. The CYP88A cytochrome P450, ent-kaurenoic acid oxidase, catalyzes three steps of the gibberellin biosynthesis pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 2065–2070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Xu, Y.L.; Li, L.; Wu, K.; Peeters, A.J.; Gage, D.A.; Zeevaart, J.A. The GA5 locus of Arabidopsis thaliana encodes a multifunctional gibberellin 20-oxidase: Molecular cloning and functional expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92, 6640–6644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Lange, T.; Hedden, P.; Graebe, J.E. Expression cloning of a gibberellin 20-oxidase, a multifunctional enzyme involved in gibberellin biosynthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1994, 91, 8552–8556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Chiang, H.H.; Hwang, I.; Goodman, H.M. Isolation of the Arabidopsis GA4 locus. Plant Cell 1995, 7, 195–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Israelsson, M.; Mellerowicz, E.; Chono, M.; Gullberg, J.; Moritz, T. Cloning and overproduction of gibberellin 3-oxidase in hybrid aspen trees. Effects on gibberellin homeostasis and development. Plant Physiol. 2004, 135, 221–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Regnault, T.; Daviere, J.M.; Heintz, D.; Lange, T.; Achard, P. The gibberellin biosynthetic genes AtKAO1 and AtKAO2 have overlapping roles throughout Arabidopsis development. Plant J. 2014, 80, 462–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rieu, I.; Ruiz-Rivero, O.; Fernandez-Garcia, N.; Griffiths, J.; Powers, S.J.; Gong, F.; Linhartova, T.; Eriksson, S.; Nilsson, O.; Thomas, S.G.; et al. The gibberellin biosynthetic genes AtGA20ox1 and AtGA20ox2 act, partially redundantly, to promote growth and development throughout the Arabidopsis life cycle. Plant J. 2008, 53, 488–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hedden, P.; Phillips, A.L. Gibberellin metabolism: New insights revealed by the genes. Trends Plant Sci. 2000, 5, 523–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Griffiths, J.; Murase, K.; Rieu, I.; Zentella, R.; Zhang, Z.L.; Powers, S.J.; Gong, F.; Phillips, A.L.; Hedden, P.; Sun, T.P.; et al. Genetic characterization and functional analysis of the GID1 gibberellin receptors in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2006, 18, 3399–3414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Willige, B.C.; Ghosh, S.; Nill, C.; Zourelidou, M.; Dohmann, E.M.; Maier, A.; Schwechheimer, C. The DELLA domain of GA INSENSITIVE mediates the interaction with the GA INSENSITIVE DWARF1A gibberellin receptor of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2007, 19, 1209–1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Varbanova, M.; Yamaguchi, S.; Yang, Y.; McKelvey, K.; Hanada, A.; Borochov, R.; Yu, F.; Jikumaru, Y.; Ross, J.; Cortes, D.; et al. Methylation of gibberellins by Arabidopsis GAMT1 and GAMT2. Plant Cell 2007, 19, 32–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Zhu, Y.; Nomura, T.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Peng, Y.; Mao, B.; Hanada, A.; Zhou, H.; Wang, R.; Li, P.; et al. ELONGATED UPPERMOST INTERNODE encodes a cytochrome P450 monooxygenase that epoxidizes gibberellins in a novel deactivation reaction in rice. Plant Cell 2006, 18, 442–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Wuddineh, W.A.; Mazarei, M.; Zhang, J.; Poovaiah, C.R.; Mann, D.G.; Ziebell, A.; Sykes, R.W.; Davis, M.F.; Udvardi, M.K.; Stewart, C.N., Jr. Identification and overexpression of gibberellin 2-oxidase (GA2ox) in switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) for improved plant architecture and reduced biomass recalcitrance. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2015, 13, 636–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Szekeres, M.; Nemeth, K.; Koncz-Kalman, Z.; Mathur, J.; Kauschmann, A.; Altmann, T.; Redei, G.P.; Nagy, F.; Schell, J.; Koncz, C. Brassinosteroids rescue the deficiency of CYP90, a cytochrome P450, controlling cell elongation and de-etiolation in Arabidopsis. Cell 1996, 85, 171–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Li, J.; Wen, J.; Lease, K.A.; Doke, J.T.; Tax, F.E.; Walker, J.C. BAK1, an Arabidopsis LRR receptor-like protein kinase, interacts with BRI1 and modulates brassinosteroid signaling. Cell 2002, 110, 213–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Zhou, F.; Lin, Q.; Zhu, L.; Ren, Y.; Zhou, K.; Shabek, N.; Wu, F.; Mao, H.; Dong, W.; Gan, L.; et al. D14-SCF(D3)-dependent degradation of D53 regulates strigolactone signalling. Nature 2013, 504, 406–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Lin, H.; Wang, R.; Qian, Q.; Yan, M.; Meng, X.; Fu, Z.; Yan, C.; Jiang, B.; Su, Z.; Li, J.; et al. DWARF27, an iron-containing protein required for the biosynthesis of strigolactones, regulates rice tiller bud outgrowth. Plant Cell 2009, 21, 1512–1525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Yokota, T. The structure, biosynthesis and function of brassinosteroids. Trend Plant Sci. 1997, 2, 137–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Choe, S.; Dilkes, B.P.; Gregory, B.D.; Ross, A.S.; Yuan, H.; Noguchi, T.; Fujioka, S.; Takatsuto, S.; Tanaka, A.; Yoshida, S.; et al. The Arabidopsis dwarf1 mutant is defective in the conversion of 24-methylenecholesterol to campesterol in brassinosteroid biosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 1999, 119, 897–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Arite, T.; Iwata, H.; Ohshima, K.; Maekawa, M.; Nakajima, M.; Kojima, M.; Sakakibara, H.; Kyozuka, J. DWARF10, an RMS1/MAX4/DAD1 ortholog, controls lateral bud outgrowth in rice. Plant J. 2007, 51, 1019–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Clouse, S.D. Brassinosteroid signal transduction: From receptor kinase activation to transcriptional networks regulating plant development. Plant Cell 2011, 23, 1219–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Li, J.; Nam, K.H.; Vafeados, D.; Chory, J. BIN2, a new brassinosteroid-insensitive locus in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2001, 127, 14–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Jiang, L.; Liu, X.; Xiong, G.; Liu, H.; Chen, F.; Wang, L.; Meng, X.; Liu, G.; Yu, H.; Yuan, Y.; et al. DWARF 53 acts as a repressor of strigolactone signalling in rice. Nature 2013, 504, 401–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Ishikawa, S.; Maekawa, M.; Arite, T.; Onishi, K.; Takamure, I.; Kyozuka, J. Suppression of tiller bud activity in tillering dwarf mutants of rice. Plant Cell Physiol. 2005, 46, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Maphosa, Y.; Jideani, V.A. The Role of Legumes in Human Nutrition. In Functional Food; Chavarri, M., Ed.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2017; pp. 103–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Li, Z.F.; Guo, Y.; Ou, L.; Hong, H.; Wang, J.; Liu, Z.X.; Guo, B.; Zhang, L.; Qiu, L. Identification of the dwarf gene GmDW1 in soybean (Glycine max L.) by combining mapping-by-sequencing and linkage analysis. TAG Theor. Appl. Genet. 2018, 131, 1001–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Reid, J.B.; Ross, J.J. A Mutant-Based Approach, Using Pisum sativum, to Understanding Plant Growth. Int. J. Plant Sci. 1993, 154, 22–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yaxley, J.R.; Ross, J.J.; Sherriff, L.J.; Reid, J.B. Gibberellin biosynthesis mutations and root development in pea. Plant Physiol. 2001, 125, 627–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Tang, H.; Krishnakumar, V.; Bidwell, S.; Rosen, B.; Chan, A.; Zhou, S.; Gentzbittel, L.; Childs, K.L.; Yandell, M.; Gundlach, H.; et al. An improved genome release (version Mt4.0) for the model legume Medicago truncatula. BMC Genom. 2014, 15, 312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Pecrix, Y.; Staton, S.E.; Sallet, E.; Lelandais-Brière, C.; Moreau, S.; Carrère, S.; Blein, T.; Jardinaud, M.F.; Latrasse, D.; Zouine, M.; et al. Whole-genome landscape of Medicago truncatula symbiotic genes. Nat. Plants 2018, 4, 1017–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Swain, S.M.; Ross, J.J.; Reid, J.B.; Kamiya, Y. Gibberellins and pea seed development: Expression of the lh^i, ls and le^5839 mutations. Planta 1995, 195, 426–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Burks, D.; Azad, R.; Wen, J.; Dickstein, R. The Medicago truncatula Genome: Genomic Data Availability. Methods Mol. Biol. 2018, 1822, 39–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Tadege, M.; Wen, J.; He, J.; Tu, H.; Kwak, Y.; Eschstruth, A.; Cayrel, A.; Endre, G.; Zhao, P.X.; Chabaud, M.; et al. Large-scale insertional mutagenesis using the Tnt1 retrotransposon in the model legume Medicago truncatula. Plant J. 2008, 54, 335–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Hacham, Y.; Holland, N.; Butterfield, C.; Ubeda-Tomas, S.; Bennett, M.J.; Chory, J.; Savaldi-Goldstein, S. Brassinosteroid perception in the epidermis controls root meristem size. Development 2011, 138, 839–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Jiang, C.; Chen, C.; Huang, Z.; Liu, R.; Verdier, J. ITIS, a bioinformatics tool for accurate identification of transposon insertion sites using next-generation sequencing data. BMC Bioinform. 2015, 16, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Bensen, R.J.; Johal, G.S.; Crane, V.C.; Tossberg, J.T.; Schnable, P.S.; Meeley, R.B.; Briggs, S.P. Cloning and characterization of the maize An1 gene. Plant Cell 1995, 7, 75–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Jacobsen, S.E.; Olszewski, N.E. Characterization of the Arrest in Anther Development Associated with Gibberellin Deficiency of the gib-1 Mutant of Tomato. Plant Physiol. 1991, 97, 409–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Sun, T.P.; Kamiya, Y. The Arabidopsis GA1 locus encodes the cyclase ent-kaurene synthetase A of gibberellin biosynthesis. Plant Cell 1994, 6, 1509–1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Ait-Ali, T.; Swain, S.M.; Reid, J.B.; Sun, T.; Kamiya, Y. The LS locus of pea encodes the gibberellin biosynthesis enzyme ent-kaurene synthase A. Plant J. 1997, 11, 443–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Otomo, K.; Kenmoku, H.; Oikawa, H.; Konig, W.A.; Toshima, H.; Mitsuhashi, W.; Yamane, H.; Sassa, T.; Toyomasu, T. Biological functions of ent- and syn-copalyl diphosphate synthases in rice: Key enzymes for the branch point of gibberellin and phytoalexin biosynthesis. Plant J. 2004, 39, 886–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Prisic, S.; Xu, J.; Coates, R.M.; Peters, R.J. Probing the Role of the DXDD Motif in Class II Diterpene Cyclases. ChemBioChem 2007, 8, 869–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Igielski, R.; Kepczynska, E. Gene expression and metabolite profiling of gibberellin biosynthesis during induction of somatic embryogenesis in Medicago truncatula Gaertn. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0182055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Cheng, H.; Qin, L.; Lee, S.; Fu, X.; Richards, D.E.; Cao, D.; Luo, D.; Harberd, N.P.; Peng, J. Gibberellin regulates Arabidopsis floral development via suppression of DELLA protein function. Development 2004, 131, 1055–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Xu, W.; Purugganan, M.M.; Polisensky, D.H.; Antosiewicz, D.M.; Fry, S.C.; Braam, J. Arabidopsis TCH4, regulated by hormones and the environment, encodes a xyloglucan endotransglycosylase. Plant Cell 1995, 7, 1555–1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Uozu, S.; Tanaka-Ueguchi, M.; Kitano, H.; Hattori, K.; Matsuoka, M. Characterization of XET-related genes of rice. Plant Physiol. 2000, 122, 853–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Lee, Y.; Kende, H. Expression of beta-expansins is correlated with internodal elongation in deepwater rice. Plant Physiol. 2001, 127, 645–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Lee, Y.; Kende, H. Expression of alpha-expansin and expansin-like genes in deepwater rice. Plant Physiol. 2002, 130, 1396–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Fabian, T.; Lorbiecke, R.; Umeda, M.; Sauter, M. The cell cycle genes cycA1;1 and cdc2Os-3 are coordinately regulated by gibberellin in planta. Planta 2000, 211, 376–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Gallego-Giraldo, L.; Ubeda-Tomas, S.; Gisbert, C.; Garcia-Martinez, J.L.; Moritz, T.; Lopez-Diaz, I. Gibberellin homeostasis in tobacco is regulated by gibberellin metabolism genes with different gibberellin sensitivity. Plant Cell Physiol. 2008, 49, 679–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Zhao, B.; He, L.; Jiang, C.; Liu, Y.; He, H.; Bai, Q.; Zhou, S.; Zheng, X.; Wen, J.; Mysore, K.S.; et al. Lateral Leaflet Suppression 1 (LLS1), encoding the MtYUCCA1 protein, regulates lateral leaflet development in Medicago truncatula. New Phytol. 2020, 227, 613–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. He, L.; Liu, Y.; He, H.; Liu, Y.; Qi, J.; Zhang, X.; Li, Y.; Mao, Y.; Zhou, S.; Zheng, X.; et al. A molecular framework underlying the compound leaf pattern of Medicago truncatula. Nat. Plants 2020, 6, 511–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Dalmadi, A.; Kalo, P.; Jakab, J.; Saskoi, A.; Petrovics, T.; Deak, G.; Kiss, G.B. Dwarf plants of diploid Medicago sativa carry a mutation in the gibberellin 3-beta-hydroxylase gene. Plant Cell Rep. 2008, 27, 1271–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Kapila, J.; Rycke, R.D.; Montagu, M.V.; Angenon, G. An Agrobacterium-mediated transient gene expression system for intact leaves. Plant Sci. 1997, 122, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Clough, S.J.; Bent, A.F. Floral dip: A simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1998, 16, 735–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Alexander, M.P. Differential staining of aborted and nonaborted pollen. Stain Technol. 1969, 44, 117–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 21 04968 g001 550
Figure 1. Phenotypic characterization of mnp1-1 mutant. (A–C) Morphologies of wild type (WT) and mnp1-1 mutant at different developmental stages. (A) Ten days after sowing. Scale bar = 0.75 cm. (B) Six weeks after sowing. Scale bar = 2 cm. (C) The reproductive stage of plants. Scale bar = 6.5 cm. (D) The length of the third internode beneath the shoot apex. Values are means ± SD (n = 20 internodes). Two-sample t-test, *** p < 0.001. (E) The length of epidermal cells of the third internode beneath the shoot apex. Values are means ± SD (n = 20 cells from three biological replicates). Two-sample t-test, *** p < 0.001. (F) Scanning electron microscope images and cell outlines of a representative third internode beneath the shoot apex. Scale bar = 50 um. (G) Number of epidermal cells in the third internode beneath the shoot apex. The cell number was calculated from the ratio of the average internode length (D) to the average cell length (E). Error bars represent the standard deviation of the cell number of 20 independent internodes. Two-sample t-test, *** p < 0.001. (H) Expression analysis of cell division marker gene MtCYCB1;1. Values are means ± SD. Two-sample t-test, ** p < 0.01. (I) Expression analysis of cell division marker gene MtKNOLLE. Values are means ± SD. Two-sample t-test, *** p < 0.001.
Figure 1. Phenotypic characterization of mnp1-1 mutant. (A–C) Morphologies of wild type (WT) and mnp1-1 mutant at different developmental stages. (A) Ten days after sowing. Scale bar = 0.75 cm. (B) Six weeks after sowing. Scale bar = 2 cm. (C) The reproductive stage of plants. Scale bar = 6.5 cm. (D) The length of the third internode beneath the shoot apex. Values are means ± SD (n = 20 internodes). Two-sample t-test, *** p < 0.001. (E) The length of epidermal cells of the third internode beneath the shoot apex. Values are means ± SD (n = 20 cells from three biological replicates). Two-sample t-test, *** p < 0.001. (F) Scanning electron microscope images and cell outlines of a representative third internode beneath the shoot apex. Scale bar = 50 um. (G) Number of epidermal cells in the third internode beneath the shoot apex. The cell number was calculated from the ratio of the average internode length (D) to the average cell length (E). Error bars represent the standard deviation of the cell number of 20 independent internodes. Two-sample t-test, *** p < 0.001. (H) Expression analysis of cell division marker gene MtCYCB1;1. Values are means ± SD. Two-sample t-test, ** p < 0.01. (I) Expression analysis of cell division marker gene MtKNOLLE. Values are means ± SD. Two-sample t-test, *** p < 0.001.
Ijms 21 04968 g001
Ijms 21 04968 g002 550
Figure 2. Molecular cloning of the MNP1 gene. (A) Adjacent Tnt1 insertion sites were found on chromosome 7 of mnp1-1 and mnp1-2. The x-axis represents chromosome 7. Rhombus and squares represent Tnt1 insertions in mnp1-1 and mnp1-2, respectively. The rhombus and square on a black line show nearby Tnt1 insertions in an intergenic region. The rhombus and square on a red line show nearby Tnt1 insertions in Medtr7g011663 and the right image is an enlarged view in the same region. (B) Schematic illustration of MNP1 gene structure and Tnt1 insertion sites in mnp1 alleles. The mnp1-3 (blue color) mutants were screened from the Tnt1 population using a reverse genetics approach. Filled black boxes represent exons and lines between them denote introns. Arrows indicate Tnt1 orientation. (C) The phenotype of mnp1 alleles. Scale bar = 6.5 cm. (D) Genotyping of mnp1 alleles. The primers (MNP1-GT-F/R) were designed for detecting MNP1 genomic fragments, and the primer pair TntF2/R2 were Tnt1-specific primers.
Figure 2. Molecular cloning of the MNP1 gene. (A) Adjacent Tnt1 insertion sites were found on chromosome 7 of mnp1-1 and mnp1-2. The x-axis represents chromosome 7. Rhombus and squares represent Tnt1 insertions in mnp1-1 and mnp1-2, respectively. The rhombus and square on a black line show nearby Tnt1 insertions in an intergenic region. The rhombus and square on a red line show nearby Tnt1 insertions in Medtr7g011663 and the right image is an enlarged view in the same region. (B) Schematic illustration of MNP1 gene structure and Tnt1 insertion sites in mnp1 alleles. The mnp1-3 (blue color) mutants were screened from the Tnt1 population using a reverse genetics approach. Filled black boxes represent exons and lines between them denote introns. Arrows indicate Tnt1 orientation. (C) The phenotype of mnp1 alleles. Scale bar = 6.5 cm. (D) Genotyping of mnp1 alleles. The primers (MNP1-GT-F/R) were designed for detecting MNP1 genomic fragments, and the primer pair TntF2/R2 were Tnt1-specific primers.
Ijms 21 04968 g002
Ijms 21 04968 g003 550
Figure 3. Phylogenetic analysis and sequences alignment of MNP1 and its closely related homologs. (A) Phylogenetic analysis of MNP1 and its homologs. Proteins from the species Medicago truncatula (Medtr), Pisum sativum (Psat), Glycine max (Gm), Solanum lycopersicum (Solyc), Arabidopsis thaliana (At), Oryza sativa (Os) and Zea mays (Zm). Bootstrap values are indicated upon the branches. Red rhombus indicates MNP1 protein and red circles indicate the reported CPS proteins. (B) The sequences alignment of MNP1 and the reported CPS proteins. The amino acid color indicates the homology of sequences between these species: black = 100%, pink ≥ 75% and blue ≥ 50%. The DXDD motifs in the sequences are indicated by the black line.
Figure 3. Phylogenetic analysis and sequences alignment of MNP1 and its closely related homologs. (A) Phylogenetic analysis of MNP1 and its homologs. Proteins from the species Medicago truncatula (Medtr), Pisum sativum (Psat), Glycine max (Gm), Solanum lycopersicum (Solyc), Arabidopsis thaliana (At), Oryza sativa (Os) and Zea mays (Zm). Bootstrap values are indicated upon the branches. Red rhombus indicates MNP1 protein and red circles indicate the reported CPS proteins. (B) The sequences alignment of MNP1 and the reported CPS proteins. The amino acid color indicates the homology of sequences between these species: black = 100%, pink ≥ 75% and blue ≥ 50%. The DXDD motifs in the sequences are indicated by the black line.
Ijms 21 04968 g003
Ijms 21 04968 g004 550
Figure 4. Subcellular localization of MNP1. According to ChloroP prediction, there is a chloroplast transit peptide (cTP) at the N-terminus of MNP1 protein, so a sequence encoding 100 amino acids containing cTP was used to generate p35S::TPMNP1-GFP constructs. Then, the constructs were transformed into tobacco (Nicotiana benthamia) leaf epidermal cells by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. p35S::GFP was used as a positive control. Images were taken 36 h after transformation with dual GFP (green) and chlorophyll (red) channels. Scale bar = 40 um.
Figure 4. Subcellular localization of MNP1. According to ChloroP prediction, there is a chloroplast transit peptide (cTP) at the N-terminus of MNP1 protein, so a sequence encoding 100 amino acids containing cTP was used to generate p35S::TPMNP1-GFP constructs. Then, the constructs were transformed into tobacco (Nicotiana benthamia) leaf epidermal cells by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. p35S::GFP was used as a positive control. Images were taken 36 h after transformation with dual GFP (green) and chlorophyll (red) channels. Scale bar = 40 um.
Ijms 21 04968 g004
Ijms 21 04968 g005 550
Figure 5. Expression analysis of GA biosynthesis genes in GA-sensitive mutant mnp1-1. (A) From left to right are mnp1-1 without GA3 treatment and mnp1-1 with 70 uM GA3 treatment. Scale bar = 4 cm. (B) GA biosynthesis pathway schematic diagram. The red, green and blue arrows represent the three stages of GA biosynthesis pathway. Gray ovals represent enzymes. (C) Relative expression levels of GA biosynthesis genes in the stem of WT and mnp1-1. The red, green and blue boxes represent the three stages of GA biosynthesis pathway as in (B). The significant difference was determined by unpaired two-sample t-test (** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001).
Figure 5. Expression analysis of GA biosynthesis genes in GA-sensitive mutant mnp1-1. (A) From left to right are mnp1-1 without GA3 treatment and mnp1-1 with 70 uM GA3 treatment. Scale bar = 4 cm. (B) GA biosynthesis pathway schematic diagram. The red, green and blue arrows represent the three stages of GA biosynthesis pathway. Gray ovals represent enzymes. (C) Relative expression levels of GA biosynthesis genes in the stem of WT and mnp1-1. The red, green and blue boxes represent the three stages of GA biosynthesis pathway as in (B). The significant difference was determined by unpaired two-sample t-test (** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001).
Ijms 21 04968 g005
Ijms 21 04968 g006 550
Figure 6. MNP1 partially rescued the mini-plant phenotype of Arabidopsis cps1 mutant. (A) The phenotype of Arabidopsis wild type (Col-0) and cps1 mutant. The Col-0 and cps1 mutant were 7 and 12 weeks old, respectively. Scale bar = 2 cm. (B) The p35S::MNP1-GFP transgenic plant of the cps1 homozygous background partially restored the mini-plant phenotype of cps1 mutant. The plants were 6 weeks old. Scale bar = 2 cm. (C) Genotyping of the transgenic plant. The homozygous T-DNA insertion in CPS1/At4g02780 locus and MNP1 coding sequence were detected in the transgenic plant. (D) RT-PCR amplification of MNP1 from Col-0, the transgenic plant and cps1 mutant. AtACTIN was used as an internal control.
Figure 6. MNP1 partially rescued the mini-plant phenotype of Arabidopsis cps1 mutant. (A) The phenotype of Arabidopsis wild type (Col-0) and cps1 mutant. The Col-0 and cps1 mutant were 7 and 12 weeks old, respectively. Scale bar = 2 cm. (B) The p35S::MNP1-GFP transgenic plant of the cps1 homozygous background partially restored the mini-plant phenotype of cps1 mutant. The plants were 6 weeks old. Scale bar = 2 cm. (C) Genotyping of the transgenic plant. The homozygous T-DNA insertion in CPS1/At4g02780 locus and MNP1 coding sequence were detected in the transgenic plant. (D) RT-PCR amplification of MNP1 from Col-0, the transgenic plant and cps1 mutant. AtACTIN was used as an internal control.
Ijms 21 04968 g006

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Guo, S.; Zhang, X.; Bai, Q.; Zhao, W.; Fang, Y.; Zhou, S.; Zhao, B.; He, L.; Chen, J. Cloning and Functional Analysis of Dwarf Gene Mini Plant 1 (MNP1) in Medicago truncatula. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4968. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21144968

AMA Style

Guo S, Zhang X, Bai Q, Zhao W, Fang Y, Zhou S, Zhao B, He L, Chen J. Cloning and Functional Analysis of Dwarf Gene Mini Plant 1 (MNP1) in Medicago truncatula. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21(14):4968. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21144968

Chicago/Turabian Style

Guo, Shiqi, Xiaojia Zhang, Quanzi Bai, Weiyue Zhao, Yuegenwang Fang, Shaoli Zhou, Baolin Zhao, Liangliang He, and Jianghua Chen. 2020. "Cloning and Functional Analysis of Dwarf Gene Mini Plant 1 (MNP1) in Medicago truncatula" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 14: 4968. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21144968

APA Style

Guo, S., Zhang, X., Bai, Q., Zhao, W., Fang, Y., Zhou, S., Zhao, B., He, L., & Chen, J. (2020). Cloning and Functional Analysis of Dwarf Gene Mini Plant 1 (MNP1) in Medicago truncatula. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21(14), 4968. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21144968

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop