Next Article in Journal
Natural Catalytic IgGs Hydrolyzing Histones in Schizophrenia: Are They the Link between Humoral Immunity and Inflammation?
Previous Article in Journal
Overexpression of UGT74E2, an Arabidopsis IBA Glycosyltransferase, Enhances Seed Germination and Modulates Stress Tolerance via ABA Signaling in Rice
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 21
Issue 19
10.3390/ijms21197240
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Biological Functions of Prokaryotic Amyloids in Interspecies Interactions: Facts and Assumptions

by
Anastasiia O. Kosolapova
1,2,*,
Kirill S. Antonets
1,2,
Mikhail V. Belousov
1,2 and
Anton A. Nizhnikov
1,2,*
1
Laboratory for Proteomics of Supra-Organismal Systems, All-Russia Research Institute for Agricultural Microbiology (ARRIAM), 196608 St. Petersburg, Russia
2
Faculty of Biology, St. Petersburg State University (SPbSU), 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(19), 7240; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21197240
Submission received: 2 September 2020 / Revised: 25 September 2020 / Accepted: 28 September 2020 / Published: 30 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Microbiology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Amyloids are fibrillar protein aggregates with an ordered spatial structure called “cross-β”. While some amyloids are associated with development of approximately 50 incurable diseases of humans and animals, the others perform various crucial physiological functions. The greatest diversity of amyloids functions is identified within prokaryotic species where they, being the components of the biofilm matrix, function as adhesins, regulate the activity of toxins and virulence factors, and compose extracellular protein layers. Amyloid state is widely used by different pathogenic bacterial species in their interactions with eukaryotic organisms. These amyloids, being functional for bacteria that produce them, are associated with various bacterial infections in humans and animals. Thus, the repertoire of the disease-associated amyloids includes not only dozens of pathological amyloids of mammalian origin but also numerous microbial amyloids. Although the ability of symbiotic microorganisms to produce amyloids has recently been demonstrated, functional roles of prokaryotic amyloids in host–symbiont interactions as well as in the interspecies interactions within the prokaryotic communities remain poorly studied. Here, we summarize the current findings in the field of prokaryotic amyloids, classify different interspecies interactions where these amyloids are involved, and hypothesize about their real occurrence in nature as well as their roles in pathogenesis and symbiosis.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The term “amyloid” dates back to the previous century. In 1838, Matthias Schleiden introduced “amyloid” (from Latin “amylum”—starch) to describe a starch material in plant cells [1]. In 1854, Rudolf Virchow first used “amyloid” to characterize cerebral inclusions that colored blue in a reaction with iodine [2]. Based on the iodine test reaction, Virchow hypothesized about polysaccharide nature of pathological inclusions in so-called “waxy” human organs that underwent irreversible changes called amyloidosis [1]. Five years later, in 1859, August Kekulé and Carl Friedreich showed that the inclusions in “waxy” spleen were enriched in nitrogen and were rather proteinaceous than starchy [3].
Currently, the term “amyloid” refers to the highly ordered protein aggregates formed by unbranched fibrils the protein monomers of which are stacked by intermolecular β-sheets [4] composed of β-strands running perpendicular to the fibril axis and connected via hydrogen bonds [5]. The spatial organization of amyloid fibrils determines “cross-β” diffraction pattern characterized by two scattering diffraction signals: ~4.7 Å, corresponding to the interstrand distance, and ~10 Å, corresponding to the distance between β-sheets [6,7]. This structure is typical of amyloids, yet there is no rule without exception: phenol-soluble modulin α3 (PSMα3), a secreted protein of Staphylococcus aureus, forms fibrils possessing physicochemical properties of amyloids but shows “cross-α” diffraction pattern that corresponds to perpendicularly stacked α-helices rather than to β-sheets in “cross-β” structure [8].
Unique physicochemical properties of amyloid fibrils allow discriminating amyloids from the non-amyloid protein aggregates. Two defining features of amyloids are: (i) their ability to form mainly unbranched fibrils that can be shown with electron or atomic force microscopy [9,10]; and (ii) their “cross-β” structure, which can be directly demonstrated by X-ray diffraction (XRD) [6] or solid state nuclear magnetic resonance (SS-NMR) [11]. Circular dichroism spectroscopy (CD), often used to evaluate the enrichment of protein aggregates in β-sheets, cannot prove their “cross-β” structure [12]. Amyloids are resistant to treatment with ionic detergents such as sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) [13] and proteases [14], although these properties vary significantly depending on the amyloids themselves and the proteins from which they are formed [15,16]. Amyloids also bind specific dyes [17], which was demonstrated for the first time in 1922 with Congo red (CR) dye [18]. Further, amyloids have been shown to exhibit “apple-green” birefringence in polarized light upon CR binding [19] and demonstrate specific fluorescence emission spectra [20]. Another widely used dye for the analysis of amyloids is Thioflavin T (ThT), which binding to amyloids leads to an increased fluorescence intensity [21].
For more than 150 years, amyloid studies were mainly focused on their roles in the development of incurable diseases in humans and animals, such as Alzheimer’s disease and various localized and systemic amyloidoses. Despite extensive study, the molecular mechanisms of amyloid toxicity remain unclear. To date, two dominant hypotheses have been proposed [22]. Amyloid hypothesis suggests that deposition of amyloid fibrils themselves causes toxicity leading to cell death [23]. The second hypothesis postulates that soluble oligomers rather than fibrillar polymers cause the main cytotoxic effect [24]. Both hypotheses are unable to fully explain observed data. Thus, there are new currently emerging hypotheses. In particular, lipid-chaperone hypothesis is based on the observation that toxicity of amyloidogenic proteins is associated with their ability to damage cell membranes and suggests that phospholipids can act as molecular chaperones promoting interaction of amyloidogenic proteins with cell membranes [22,25].
The paradigm describing amyloid as harmful agents shifted with the discovery of functional amyloids that can perform various physiological roles [26,27]. To date, functional amyloids have been identified within all three domains of life, Archaea, Bacteria, and Eukarya, and their current number is approximately equal or even exceeds the number of pathogenic ones [27,28]. The greatest diversity of functional amyloids is identified within prokaryotic organisms. Since the discovery of amyloid properties of the curli fimbriae of Escherichia coli [29], more than 30 amyloidogenic proteins of Bacteria and Archaea have been identified. Part of them form amyloid fibrils under the native conditions and act as functional amyloids involved in the interspecies interactions with their hosts or within microbial communities. The variety of the prokaryotic amyloid-forming proteins, the methods that have been used to analyze their amyloid properties in vitro and in vivo, and their functions in the amyloid and soluble states are summarized in Table 1. In this paper, we review the published scientific data on the diversity of prokaryotic amyloids and discuss their biological functions with regard to their role in different types of interspecies interactions in both pathogenic and symbiotic aspects.

2. Amyloids of Biofilms and Their Involvement in Host–Pathogen Interactions and Interspecies Interactions within Prokaryotic Communities

The highest number of the identified functional amyloids of prokaryotes is represented by the biofilm components. Biofilm is a community of microorganisms encapsulated in hydrated extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) [73]. EPS account for almost 90% of the dry weight of a biofilm and include polysaccharides, eDNA, lipids, and proteins [73]. The biofilm proteins include the extracellular enzymes, carrying out degradation and remodulation of EPS, and structural proteins, providing stability and integrity to biofilm [74]. The stability of amyloid fibrils, originating from their spatial structure, makes them perfect structural proteins of the biofilm EPS. Thus, amyloids, making the biofilms stable, serve as scaffolding proteins, as well as play a role in surface and intercellular adhesion [75]. At the same time, a biofilm formation is linked with the development of 65% of all bacterial infections and 80% of chronic bacterial infections [76] such as periodontitis, chronic rhinosinusitis, chronic otitis media, chronic urinary tract infections, and cystic fibrosis pneumonia [77]. Biofilm formation creates a local microenvironment (such as anaerobic conditions or zones with lowered pH), to protect the microbial community from the antibiotic treatment, host defense, and environmental stresses [78] and contributes to formation of so-called “persister” microbial sub-population formed by dormant, multi-drug resistant cells [79]. Thus, amyloids that have been identified within the pathogenic bacteria and being part and parcel of the biofilm matrix can act as virulence and pathogenesis factors [80].
The curli are the main structural proteins of EPS of Escherichia coli biofilms [29,31,81], adhering to both biotic and abiotic surfaces [82,83,84]. In 2002, amyloid properties were demonstrated for E. coli curlin CsgA [29] and in 2007 for Salmonella enterica curlin AgfA [31]. Curli amyloid formation involves secretion system Type VIII and is controlled by the expression of two operons—csgABC and csgDEFG (curli-specific genes)—in E. coli [29]. CsgA is the main structural protein while CsgB nucleates CsgA polymerization on the cell surface [85]. CsgC, the third gene from csgABC operon, is a periplasmic chaperone that prevents a premature CsgA polymerization [86]. Lipoprotein CsgG forms a pore in the outer membrane of bacterial cells and mediates the transport of the curli subunits to the cell surface [87]. CsgE and CsgF proteins facilitate CsgA and CsgB transport through CsgG pore [88]. CsgE interacts directly with the pore and secreted proteins and acts as a secretion adaptor [88]. The precise function of CsgF remains unclear, but it is required for the normal functioning of the CsgB nucleator [88,89].
Despite curli fimbriae were initially characterized within clinical isolates, the precise role of amyloid formation of those proteins in infection remained unclear [90,91]. Indeed, curli operons are not only present in the genomes of pathogenic strains of Proteobacteria but are also widespread within the non-pathogenic strains [92]; and curli homologs have also been found within Firmicutes, Thermodesulfobacteria, and Bacteroidetes phyla [92], including Porphyromonas gingivalis [93].
The curli fimbriae apparently take part in bacteria’s adhesion to host cells [94], interact with the host proteins [95,96], and trigger the host immune response [97] during an infection. The curli-producing E. coli and Salmonella spp. strains are highly adhesive to a variety of cell lines. Thus, curli-producing K-12 E. coli has demonstrated a higher level of adherence to human uroepithelial cells in comparison to curli deficient strains [94]. Similarly, higher levels of curli production in S. typhimurium SR-11 are linked to adherence to a murine small intestinal epithelial [98]. Nevertheless, ΔcsgA strain of enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC) has not shown any decrease in adherence to mammalian cells, suggesting that the E. coli system of adhesion to host cells includes not only the curli fimbriae but a broad repertoire of molecular factors [99]. Moreover, curli expression levels have been significantly lowered within the enterohemorrhagic E. coli [100,101] and invasive Salmonella spp. strains [102].
The curli interact with the host proteins including fibronectin, laminin, and plasminogen [90,103,104]. They also interact with Toll-like receptors, which leads to an innate immune system activation [105,106]. On the contrary, the curli can protect bacterial cells from the immune reactions via antimicrobial peptides sequestering [107] and inhibition of the classical pathway of the complement cascade activation [108].
The Gram-negative bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a cause of nosocomial and chronic infections associated with the biofilm formation, for example during cystic fibrosis pneumonia [109]. The biofilm matrix of Pseudomonas species includes amyloid fibrils formed by Fap proteins [33]. Amyloid fibril formation in Pseudomonas is controlled by a fapABCDEF operon, evolutionally distant from the curli system of E. coli [33]. Unlike the curli system, fap genes are unique for Proteobacteria species [110]. FapC is the main structural component of amyloid fibrils, whereas FapB, similar to CsgB from curlin system, acts as a nucleator of fibril polymerization [34]. Transport of FapB and FapC subunits to the cell surface is facilitated by FapF protein which forms trimer pores in the outer membrane of bacteria [111].
Fap amyloid fibrils increase the biofilm hydrophobicity, facilitate mechanical stiffness [112], and reversibly bind quorum sensing molecules, supporting their role as a reservoir for signal molecules that can modulate the reaction of the microbial community to turbulent environmental conditions [35]. Similar to curli, Fap proteins contribute to bacterial adhesion to a substrate. Thus, Pseudomonas strains overexpressing fap operon have a highly adhesive phenotype and an enhanced ability to form biofilms [33,34]. However, overexpression of fap operon notably changes the complete proteomic landscape, thus it is impossible to assume the direct connection between Fap amyloidogenesis and the altered phenotype [113]. The role of Fap proteins in Pseudomonas virulence has been demonstrated using P. aureginosa mutant strain with fapC deletion. Strains with fapC deletion had lowered virulence to Caenorhabditis elegans [114]. In murine models of acute and chronic infections, fap operon transcription in P. aureginosa was also significantly elevated [115].
Gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis forms biofilms on the surface of solid agar plates and floating biofilms, or pellicles, at the air–liquid interface [116]. TasA protein, the main component of Bacillus biofilm EPS [117], can form amyloids both in vitro and in vivo [45,46,47]. While B. subtilis is a soil-dwelling non-pathogenic bacterium, Bacillus cereus is a soil bacterium responsible for the development of food-borne disease. However, the role of biofilm formation and TasA amyloid formation in a particular disease development is unclear. At the same time, TasA amyloids of Bacillus apparently contribute to the interspecies interaction in complex biofilm communities as TasA amyloid fibrils adhere to Streptococcus mutans exopolysaccharides during the initial steps of multispecies biofilm formation [118].
Biofilms are the main form for Streptococcus mutans—a Gram-positive bacterium involved in the dental plaques and cavities formation [119,120]. Within the proteins of S. mutans amyloid formation in biofilm, EPS has been demonstrated for adhesin P1, WapA, and Smu_63c proteins [56,57]. Adhesin P1 and WapA protein represent substrates of sortase—an enzyme cleaving the C-terminal signal motif of proteins and attaching them to the cell wall through transpeptidase reaction [121]. As a result of adhesin P1 and WapA protein cleavage amyloid-forming fragments, C123 and AgA, respectively, are generated [57]. Smu_63c is a secreted protein that forms amyloids under acid conditions. These amyloids act as negative regulators of genetic competence and biofilm cell density [57]. The deletion of one of the genes encoding amyloid-forming proteins was shown not to affect the ability of S. mutans to form biofilms. At the same time, double (lacking in adhesin P1 and WapA) or triple deletions lead to decreased biofilm formation [57]. Mutants lacking in the adhesin P1 gene have a lowered virulence in the murine cavity models, but the precise role of adhesin P1 amyloidogenesis in virulence is still unclear [122].
Similar to P. aeruginosa, Staphylococcus species, S. aureus and S. epidermidis, are the leading causes of nosocomial infections [123]. At the same time, S. aureus as well as S. epidermidis can act not only as pathogens but as a part of the normal skin microbiome. Staphylococcus biofilm formation promotes adhesion and substrate colonization, including multicellular host tissues, as well as contributes to protection against antibiotic agents and immune system elements [124]. Thus, the biochemical content of Staphylococcus biofilms is a target of extensive research. The extracellular polymeric substances of staphylococcal biofilms include a variety of amyloid proteins, but their role in host–pathogen interactions have not yet been elucidated.
Sbp and Aap are amyloid-forming proteins of Staphylococcus epidermidis [54,55]. Sbp is a small (18 kDa) extracellular protein that forms the biofilm scaffolds [125]. The amyloid properties of Sbp have been demonstrated in vitro and in E. coli cells [55]. Aap is a multidomain protein associated with the bacterial cell wall. Aap includes the N-terminal region of tandem A-repeats, L-type lectin domain, the region of tandem B-repeats, the proline/glycine-enriched domain, and the C-terminal sortase recognition motif [126]. The ability to form amyloids was demonstrated in vitro for the B-repeats domain. Amyloid formation by B-repeats domain of Aap has a Zn2+-dependent manner and requires metal ions for assembly. The peptides identified as B-repeats and lectin domains of Aap protein were also present in detergent-resistant aggregates from S. epidermidis biofilms [54]. These data are consistent with the research suggesting that Aap protein takes part in biofilm formation in a processed form, lacking the N-terminal domain [127,128]. Sbp and Aap colocalization in biofilms was demonstrated [125] unlike physical interaction in vitro [55].
There is a variety of the identified amyloid-forming proteins composing the extracellular biofilm matrix of Staphylococcus aureus. In 2012, phenol-soluble modulins (PSMs) were identified as a part of fibrils in the biofilm matrix of S. aureus. PSMs also form amyloid fibrils in vitro [48]. In the amyloid state, PSMs stabilize biofilms [48], whereas monomeric PSMs facilitate biofilm detachment [129]. Extracellular DNA (eDNA) is required for PSMs polymerization, so eDNA can act as a nucleator in the amyloid formation [130]. The amyloid properties have been demonstrated for the N-terminal leader peptide of ArgD propeptide (N-ArgD) as well. N-ArgD is a naturally occurring cleavage product of ArgD, appearing due to the AIP (autoinducing peptide) maturation [50] and identified as a part of fibrils, composing the biofilm matrix of S. aureus. The SuhB protein of S. aureus forms amyloids under overexpression in E. coli cells [49]. The precise function of SuhB remains unknown, but the suhB mutant strain is impaired (in terms) of biofilm formation [131]. Another S. aureus protein that can form amyloids extracellularly is called Bap (biofilm-associated protein) [132]. Bap is a multidomain protein anchored to the bacterial cell wall. The N-terminal domain of Bap is cleaved as a result of the Bap processing [133]. The cleaved fragment forms amyloid fibrils in the extracellular space at acidic conditions and low Ca2+ concentration. The Ca2+ concentration increase leads to acquiring a stable globular conformation of the N-terminal domain of Bap [51]. Thus, the N-terminal domain can act not only as a scaffold protein of biofilm but also as a sensor [75]. Local acidosis, the pH decrease, appears in vivo during staphylococcal infection due to glucose utilization by these microorganisms and are accompanied by the host’s inflammatory response [132]. Within S. aureus strains, bap gene has been identified within bovine mastitis isolates [133] but not within human clinical isolates. Deletion in the bap gene leads to a lowered capacity to adhere to the bovine epithelial cells. S. aureus Δbap strain cell titer is also significantly lower at 10 days post-infection [51]. Notably, Esp—the Bap ortholog of Enterococcus faecalis, a commensal bacterium capable of inducing nosocomial infection—forms amyloids, supporting the idea of the prevalence of amyloid formation by Bap-like proteins in biofilm matrix [53].
Pathogenic bacteria can also adhere to the host tissues in a biofilm-independent way. In particular, Mycobacterium tuberculosis possesses adhesive structures called pili. MTP (Mycobacterium tuberculosis pili) are structurally similar to E. coli curli and able to form amyloid fibrils [69]. The mtp gene has been identified only within the pathogenic strains of M. tuberculosis, supporting the key role of MTP in mycobacterial virulence [134]. MTPs bind laminin in vitro while Δmtp strain is unable to bind it [69]. Moreover, mutants show a lowered ability to adhere and invade macrophages and alveolar epithelial cells [135].
Overall, amyloids are widespread structural components of prokaryotic biofilms. Interestingly, not only bacteria but also archaea can contain amyloids in their EPS. For instance, in 2014, the Haloferax volcanii biofilm extracellular matrix was demonstrated to bind ThT and CR dyes with the specific fluorescence [70]. In bacterial biofilms, the amyloids form a scaffold and facilitate their stiffness and integrity. Amyloids may also contribute to intercellular and surface adhesion, which makes them one of the key virulence factors of pathogenic bacteria. Thus, the crucial role of amyloids of biofilms in adhesion is apparently widespread across various prokaryotes, thus allowing us to suppose that there are numerous still unknown biofilm-associated amyloids underlying the pathogenesis and development of infectious diseases. Considering that the number of only human pathogenic bacteria species is about 1500 [136] and 65% of them form biofilms in disease-associated processes [55], the real number of such prokaryotic amyloids involved in pathogenesis in humans and animals could exceed hundreds and even thousands. The interactions between bacteria in microbial communities represent another type of interspecies interactions where the bacterial biofilm amyloids are involved by providing the cell adhesion to heterogeneous exopolysaccharides and where the number of yet unidentified prokaryotic amyloids could be remarkably high.

3. Amyloids of the Outer Membrane Proteins and Their Probable Roles in Host–Pathogen and Host–Symbiont Interactions

Fibril formation exhibiting several properties of amyloids has been demonstrated for the outer membrane proteins of Proteobacteria and associated with their virulence. In particular, the full-length OmpA of E. coli and its N-terminal domain form ThT-binding fibrils in vitro [37]. The role of OmpA protein in the pathogenicity of E. coli and other bacteria is thoroughly studied so far. OmpA is believed to contribute to bacterial adhesion and invasion, as well as to the antimicrobial peptide resistance [137]. Meningitic E. coli strains deficient in ompA are less virulent and invasive in the chick embryo and rat models [138]. In uropathogenic E. coli OmpA contributes to the infection persistence. As ΔompA strain adheres and invades the bladder epithelium, the number of formed E. coli colonies is lower in comparison to the wild-type strain. Moreover, ompA expression is increased between 16 and 20 h after infection [139]. OmpA is notably overexpressed during the biofilm formation [140]. The facts listed above allow use to suggest that OmpA amyloids could be involved in the biofilm formation and associated with virulence of E. coli.
OmpC, another amyloid-forming outer membrane protein of E. coli [38], forms fibrillar aggregates in vitro that are resistant to proteinase K treatment. OmpC fibrils stained with ThT demonstrate a specific peak of fluorescence emission as well as OmpC fibrils stained with Congo red show green birefringence under polarized light [38]. OmpC has been detected in the brain of murine models pointing to its possible role in the neurodegeneration and formation of a spongiform encephalopathy [38]. Similar to the OmpA protein, OmpC takes part in adhesion and invasion of pathogenic strains of E. coli. In the avian pathogenic E. coli strains, deletion of ompC has led to a drop in adherence and ability to invade the murine brain microvascular endothelial cells. The ompC deletion also led to a decreased colonization and invasion capacity in ducklings and murine models [141].
OmpP2-like protein of Mannheimia haemolytica, an outer membrane porin of Pasteurellaceae [142], forms extracellular fibrils in vivo [39]. After incubation, a purified OmpP2-like protein forms polymeric aggregates binding CR. OmpP2-like protein apparently is a part of the biofilm matrix. Its role in adherence of M. haemolytica to host cells was demonstrated using the adenocarcinomic human alveolar basal epithelial cells [39].
Outer membrane proteins of symbiotic bacteria can also form amyloid fibrils. RopA and RopB are outer membrane proteins of plant symbiotic bacterium Rhizobium leguminosarum, which are predicted to form pores in bacterial outer membrane [143,144]. The levels of production of RopA and RopB proteins rises at the initial steps of nodulation [145]. These data suggest that RopA and RopB proteins are required for the early stages of the plant-bacteria symbiosis. In vitro, RopA and RopB form fibrillar aggregates exhibiting typical physicochemical properties of amyloids including green birefringence in polarized light upon CR staining, binding of ThT, resistance to proteases and ionic detergents treatment. In vivo, RopA and RopB form extracellular amyloid fibrils after the prolonged incubation of R. leguminosarum cells on the cultural media [40]. Moreover, the amount and size of the aggregates formed by RopA protein after induction of the nodulation process in free-living culture is increased after flavonoid treatment [40]. Based on these observations, RopA and RopB hypothetically act as adhesins and represent a part of the EPS of biofilms formed by R. leguminosarum on different surfaces including the plant roots, thus participating in colonization of plant by bacteria cells. Considering the increasing number of the RopA amyloids after flavonoid stimulation, a more specific role of amyloids of this protein at the initial stages of plant–microbe symbiosis can also be proposed.
The proteins discussed in this section can potentially act as the outer membrane porins possessing a β-barrel channel, thus facilitating molecular transport through the outer membrane and perform additional functions such as membrane stabilization and intercellular adhesion [146]. In vivo amyloid formation mechanisms by these proteins are not fully understood and could be realized either through β-barrel to the amyloid transition or via the alternative folding ways of β-barrels and ordered amyloid aggregates [147]. The amyloids formed by outer membrane porins of Proteobacteria apparently contribute to both host–pathogen and host–symbiont interactions, thus drawing a line of similarity between the mechanisms of virulence of both symbiotic and pathogenic bacteria.

4. Amyloids of Bacterial Toxins and Their Contribution to Pathogenesis

The amyloid state is used by prokaryotes to regulate the activity of several toxins via inactivating or storing them. Microcin E492 (Mcc) is a bacteriocin of Klebsiella pneumoniae. In its soluble form, microcin E492 forms pores in membranes of Enterobacter species. The pore formation leads to membrane potential drop and, as a result, a cell death [148]. K. pneumoniae produces an active soluble form of microcin E492 during the exponential growth phase. At the stationary growth phase, the toxin becomes inactivated in the amyloid form [41,149]. Listeriolysin O (LLO) of Listeria monocytogenes is another bacterial toxin that is inactivated in the amyloid state [64]. L. monocytogenes is the intracellular human pathogen. Invading a cell, L. monocytogenes gets inside of phagolysosome. The release of the bacteria into the cytoplasm is driven by listeriolysin O activity. LLO is active in acidic conditions of the phagolysosomes and forms pores in their membrane, which leads to the release of L. monocytogenes [150]. The increase of pH in cytoplasm promotes the polymerization of LLO with amyloid fibrils formation and toxin inactivation [64,151].
The amyloid formation can result not only in inhibiting but also in activating of a toxin function. The harpins are Gram-negative plant pathogenic bacteria proteins. Harpins are transported via secretion system Type III to extracellular space, where these proteins of Xanthomonas axonopodis, Pseudomonas syringae, and Erwinia amylovora form amyloid fibrils [43]. The precise function of harpins and their amyloid fibrils remains unclear. The harpins’ secretion triggers a hypersensitive response in plants [152,153]. The hypersensitive response is a protective mechanism preventing the spread of pathogens across plant tissues due to a rapid cell death in the localized region [154]. The way harpins cause hypersensitive response is unknown, but there are pieces of evidence, proving the ability of harpins to form pores in the cell membranes [155] and promote their depolarization [156].
Thus, amyloid formation may orchestrate the prokaryotic toxins’ activity in two ways, i.e., activating them as in the case of amyloid harpins or inactivating similar to microcin E492 and listeriolysin O, which contributes to the host–pathogen interactions of bacteria with multicellular hosts and antagonistic interactions within prokaryotic communities.

5. Amyloids of Extracellular Protein Layers

The amyloid formation within the protein layer surrounding the cell is widespread across prokaryotes. In particular, the amyloids can form additional extracellular layers changing cell surface properties. Actinobacteria species have a complex life cycle that includes hyphae and spores formation. Growth of hyphae and transition to the next stage of the life cycle requires the formation of additional protein layers modulating cell surface properties including an increase in hydrophobicity [157]. Chaplins are proteins of Streptomyces coelicolor that form amyloids on the surface of spores and aerial hyphae [158]. Chaplins secretion on the surface of the developing hyphae increases their hydrophobicity and lowers the water surface tension [65,158]. Rodlin RdlA, another amyloid-forming protein of S. coelicolor, is secreted at the later stages of hyphae development [67]. Together with chaplins, rodlins form a protein coat of spores, increasing their stiffness and hydrophobicity [157].
As opposed to rodlins and chaplins amyloid-forming bioemulsifier BE-AM1 from a Gram-positive bacterium, Solibacillus silvestris, lowers the hydrophobic properties of the cell surface. Bioemulsifier BE-AM1 production also facilitates an intercellular adhesion and biofilm formation [63].
Amyloids are a part of protein sheaths of archaea. Thus, the main component of sheaths of methanogenic thermophilic archaeon Methanosaeta thermophila is amyloidogenic protein MspA [71]. Archaeal sheaths are protein envelopes that encapsulate several cells. The cell division leads to the formation of long chains of cells under the sheath [159]. The sheaths protect archaea against protists and regulate cell turgor pressure [159]. Amyloid properties of MspA of M. thermophila increase the stability of sheaths in an extreme environment [71].

6. Amyloid Formation by Cytoplasmic Prokaryotic Proteins

The proteins listed above are secreted and form the amyloids extracellularly. However, over the last few years, the list of prokaryotic amyloids was expanded with the bacterial cytoplasmic proteins. CarD is an RNA polymerase-binding transcription factor of Mycobacterium tuberculosis stabilizing the transcription initiation complex [160]. CarD forms fibrils that can bind ThT with fluorescence enhancement in vitro. CarD overexpression in E. coli cells also leads to ThS binding aggregates [68]. HelD is a helicase of Bacillus subtilis that also interacts with RNA polymerase. HelD forms amyloid fibrils in vitro and forms ThS binding aggregates when expressed in E. coli cells [59]. The ability of HelD and CarD to form amyloids in vivo, under native conditions, and a potential physiological role of that processes require further investigations. Amyloid formation by HelD and CarD can represent the mechanisms of the functional protein inactivation via amyloid formation. As both proteins interact with RNA-polymerase, their polymerization can occur due to environmental changes and alter transcriptome and phenotype of cells.
A transcriptional regulator Rho of Clostridium botulinum (Cb-Rho) stands out as exceptional as its prion-like domain is able to form not only amyloids but also a prion, a self-propagating protein aggregate [60]. The prion-like domain of Cb-Rho was demonstrated to switch conformation to the amyloid state in E. coli cells without overexpression and to be able to propagate in more than 100 generations. Cb-Rho Amyloid formation leads to its decreased activity and changes in genome expression. There are also data on the ability of several amyloid-forming archaeal domains to act as prions, which propose that prion formation is spread within prokaryotic organisms [161].
Thus, the role of amyloids of the extracellular protein levels and cytoplasm of prokaryotes in the interspecies interactions cannot be excluded especially given the position of interactions between different species of prokaryotes with microbial communities.

7. Amyloids of Prokaryotes and Interspecies Interactions: A Tip of the Iceberg

The data discussed in the previous sections and summarized in Table 1 indicate that more than 30 amyloid-forming proteins of prokaryotes have been identified to date and most of them contribute in some way to interspecies interactions. Such interactions, mediated by prokaryotic amyloids, can be divided into three types: Type I, host–pathogen interactions in which most of the identified prokaryotic amyloids are involved; Type II, antagonistic and synergistic interspecies interactions within microbial communities; and Type III, host–symbiont interactions (Figure 1 and Table 1). While the involvement of prokaryotic amyloids in the host–pathogen interactions has been scrutinized, the range of biological roles of amyloids in two latter types of interactions remains poorly studied and represents an intriguing question to be addressed in the future.
The involvement of the prokaryotic amyloids in the Type I (host–pathogen) interactions is related to the function of these amyloids or their structural proteins as the virulence factors or toxins. Most functional amyloids produced by bacterial pathogens of animals can act as virulence factors [80], predominantly as adhesins and structural proteins of the biofilm matrix, as biofilm formation is required for the multicellular host’s tissues colonization during infection. Moreover, bacterial amyloids can trigger the immune response in the host–pathogen interactions and protect the microorganisms from the host immune response [80]. Toxins represent the second subtype of functional prokaryotic amyloids involved in host–pathogen interactions. In this case, the amyloid state of a toxin can be either active (harpins) [43] or inactive (listeriolysin O [151] and microcin E492 [41]). Accumulation of bacterial toxins in the inactive amyloid state represents the storage function of amyloids (formation of dormant aggregates for further use). This function has been described not only in prokaryotes but also in eukaryotes, particularly, in animals (hormones and amyloid bodies) and plants (seed storage proteins) [162,163,164]. The existence of other functional virulence-associated amyloids mediating the host–pathogen interactions cannot be excluded. For example, evolutionary conservative domain of the mucin degrading metalloprotease YghJ involved in the virulence of enterotoxigenic E. coli [165] forms amyloids in vitro and being secreted to the cell surface of E. coli in the C-DAG system [166]. At the same time, the full-length YghJ forms detergent resistant aggregates in vivo [167].
Amyloid-forming bacterial toxins participate not only in the Type I pathogen–host interactions but also in the Type II antagonistic interspecies interactions within prokaryotic communities such as microcin E492 (see Section 4). Even though these communities seem to represent a promising source to search for novel amyloids due to the formation of biofilms, little is known about biological roles of prokaryotic amyloids in such interspecies systems because the amyloid formation of secreted proteins is mostly studied in the model single-species biofilms. Nevertheless, other examples of the amyloids involved in the interspecies interactions within prokaryotic communities have recently been revealed. In particular, amyloid fibrils of TasA of Bacillus subtilis bind exopolysaccharides of Streptococcus mutans at the initial steps of biofilm formation, thus representing an example of the amyloid involvement in the synergistic Type II interactions [118]. Several indirect pieces of evidence also suggest the involvement of the amyloid formation in the Type II interactions. Cross-seeding, the process, in which amyloids of one protein cause polymerization of another [168], between bacterial amyloid-forming proteins can contribute to the development of the multicellular biofilms. It has been shown that curli from Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium LT2, and Citrobacter koseri are able to cross-seed each other in vitro [169]. Cross-seeding of curli has also occurred in vivo in two-species biofilms of E. coli and S. typhimurium [169]. The ability of non-homologs bacterial amyloid-forming proteins to cross-seed requires further investigation and may highlight some probable interactions between amyloids of different prokaryotic species in the future.
Microbial communities may also trigger the amyloid-associated neurodegenerative diseases development such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases, in their multicellular hosts (humans and animals). Thus, they demonstrate an unusual mix of Type I and II interactions though molecular mechanisms underlying these effects remain poorly understood [170]. The influence of the gut microbiota amyloid formation on the neurodegeneration development was first proposed in 2016. Chen et al. demonstrated that exposing aged rats to curli-producing bacteria leads to the increase of α-synuclein deposition in neurons in both brain and gut, which is a feature of neurodegenerative disorders [171]. Cross-seeding is a potential mechanism, by which gut microbiota can trigger the amyloidogenesis of human proteins. The cross-seeding between bacterial and human amyloids has been demonstrated in vitro: curli fibrils cross-seed fibrillation of amyloid-β [172] and Fap amyloids cross-seed α-synuclein aggregation [173]. The occurrence of human amyloids cross-seeding by prokaryotic amyloids in physiological conditions in vivo represents an important subject for investigation. Nevertheless, the indirect mechanisms of metabolic triggering of human amyloid-associated diseases by gut microbiota without any involvement of cross-seeding cannot be excluded [174,175,176].
The role of amyloids in non-pathogen–host interactions has been less investigated for a while. Some recent demonstration of amyloid properties of RopA and RopB proteins of symbiotic root nodule bacterium Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae [40] suggests that the bacterial amyloids can be involved not only in the interactions between pathogenic bacteria and multicellular hosts but also in the symbiotic (Type III) interactions with them. Notably, the virulence mechanisms—the ability of a microorganism to successfully infect and colonize host—share similarities between symbiotic bacteria belonging to the order Rhizobiales and pathogenic microorganisms [177]. In both cases, adhesion and host tissue surface colonization by bacteria are the key steps in the establishment of the interspecies interaction. In the interaction between pathogenic bacteria and mammalian tissues, bacterial amyloids act as the virulence factors promoting adhesion [178]. The role of amyloids in adhesion of Escherichia and Bacillus species to plant leaves and roots has also been shown [179,180]. Rhizobia attachment to plant roots is mediated by glucomannans that bind plant lectins in acidic conditions and the synthesis of lipopolysaccharides and cellulose is necessary. Notably, these molecules are a part of extracellular polymeric substances of biofilms [181,182] among them prokaryotic amyloids are widely spread at least in pathogenic species.
Quorum sensing is another mechanism that controls virulence of both pathogenic and symbiotic bacteria [177]. The quorum sensing is a process of gene expression regulation in response to changes in microorganism’s population density. It is mediated by small signal molecules called autoinducers [183] and regulates the transition from free-living form to associated with the multicellular host, modulated adhesion to substrates, and biofilm formation in both pathogenic and symbiotic bacteria [177]. The Fap protein of species from Pseudomonas genus, which includes pathogens of plants and animals, forms amyloid fibrils, which transiently bind autoinducers [177]. Thus, prokaryotic amyloids can act as a reservoir of signal molecules and modulate the response of the microbial community to fluctuations in conditions [35].
At the latter stages of chronic infection, both rhizobia and plant pathogens need to avoid or take under control plant defense response. Rhizobia have both specific [184,185] and general, found in rhizobia and phytopathogens, systems to overcome plant immune response such as Type IV and III secretion systems, producing effector molecules to a plant cell [186]. The Type III secretion system of Rhizobium is associated with host specificity regulation [187]. In phytopathogens, protein secretion via Type III secretion system promotes resistance to plant immunity and modulates the physiological condition of plant cells for the chronic infection persistence [188]. Type III secretion system effector molecules not only inhibit the plant defense response but can also trigger the hypersensitive response. This group of effector molecules includes harpins, which are secreted proteins of Xantomonas, form amyloid fibrils, and elicit the hypersensitive response [43]. Thus, the molecular systems providing virulence of symbiotic and pathogenic bacteria exhibit significant similarity and though amyloids of symbiotic prokaryotes identified to date could probably function as adhesins. Therefore, the real number of amyloids of symbiotic prokaryotes is likely to be significantly higher and may include biofilm scaffold proteins, adhesins, and host immune response modulators. In particular, it has been predicted that proteins bearing potentially amyloidogenic regions are widespread within order Rhizobiales that includes both pathogenic and symbiotic species. These proteins are involved in the transport of siderophores and lipopolysaccharides or act as adhesins or flagellum assembly components and contain domains typical for virulence factors [189].

8. Conclusions

Prokaryotic amyloids identified to date contribute to various interspecies interactions, including Type I interactions between pathogenic bacteria and multicellular hosts, Type II interactions between different microbial species in the communities, and Type III host–symbiont interactions (the data are summarized in Table 1 and Figure 1). The impact of microbial amyloids in the pathogenesis seems to be significantly underestimated both from the point of view of amyloid biodiversity (numerous novel bacterial amyloids may potentially be found among biofilm-forming pathogenic bacteria species) and the unusual mechanisms of their actions (as in the recently described case of triggering human amyloid diseases by gut microbiota). Even though very few amyloids of symbiotic bacteria have been identified to date, they most likely represent only “the tip of the iceberg” considering the similarity between the molecular systems underlying host–pathogen and host–symbiont interactions including virulence factors to which most prokaryotic amyloids belong. Finally, microbial communities may also be considered as the reservoirs of prokaryotic amyloids involved in both pathogenic and symbiotic interspecies interactions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.A.N. and A.O.K.; writing—original draft preparation A.O.K. and A.A.N.; writing—review and editing, A.O.K., K.S.A., M.V.B. and A.A.N.; visualization, K.S.A.; supervision, A.A.N.; and funding acquisition, A.A.N. and M.V.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Russian Science Foundation, grant 17-16-01100 (review of the involvement of amyloids in host–symbiont interactions) and grant 19-76-00026 (review of prokaryotic amyloids associated with pathogenesis in mammals). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors are very grateful to A. Kureneva for drawing Figure 1.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

AIPAutoinducing peptide
CDCircular dichroism
C-DAGCurli-dependent amyloid generator
CRCongo red
EAECEnteroaggregative Escherichia coli
eDNAExtracellular DNA
EPSExtracellular polymeric substances
FTIRFourier-transform infrared spectroscopy
LLOListeriolysin O
NMRNuclear magnetic resonance
NMRNuclear magnetic resonance
PSMα3Phenol-soluble modulin α3
SDSSodium dodecyl sulfate
SEMScanning electron microscopy
TEMTransmission electron microscopy
ThSThioflavin S
ThTThioflavin T
XRDX-ray diffraction

References

  1. Kyle, R.A. Amyloidosis: A convoluted story. Br. J. Haematol. 2001, 114, 529–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Virchow, R. Ueber eine im Gehirn und Rückenmark des Menschen aufgefundene Substanz mit der chemischen Reaction der Cellulose. Virchows. Arch. Pathol. Anat. Physiol. Klin. Med. 1854, 6, 135–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sipe, J.D.; Cohen, A.S. Review: History of the amyloid fibril. J. Struct. Biol. 2000, 130, 88–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Sipe, J.D.; Benson, M.D.; Buxbaum, J.N.; Ikeda, S.; Merlini, G.; Saraiva, M.J.M.; Westermark, P. Amyloid fibril proteins and amyloidosis: Chemical identification and clinical classification International Society of Amyloidosis 2016 Nomenclature Guidelines. Amyloid 2016, 23, 209–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Riek, R.; Eisenberg, D.S. The activities of amyloids from a structural perspective. Nature 2016, 539, 227–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Eanes, E.D.; Glenner, G.G. X-ray diffraction studies on amyloid filaments. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 1968, 16, 673–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Sunde, M.; Serpell, L.C.; Bartlam, M.; Fraser, P.E.; Pepys, M.B.; Blake, C.C. Common core structure of amyloid fibrils by synchrotron X-ray diffraction. J. Mol. Biol. 1997, 273, 729–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Tayeb-Fligelman, E.; Tabachnikov, O.; Moshe, A.; Goldshmidt-Tran, O.; Sawaya, M.R.; Coquelle, N.; Colletier, J.P.; Landau, M. The cytotoxic Staphylococcus aureus PSMα3 reveals a cross-α amyloid-like fibril. Science 2017, 355, 831–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shirahama, T.; Cohen, A.S. High-resolution electron microscopic analysis of the amyloid fibril. J. Cell Biol. 1967, 33, 679–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Adamcik, J.; Mezzenga, R. Study of amyloid fibrils via atomic force microscopy. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2012, 17, 369–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tycko, R.; Ishii, Y. Constraints on supramolecular structure in amyloid fibrils from two-dimensional solid-state NMR spectroscopy with uniform isotopic labeling. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 6606–6607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Greenfield, N.J. Using circular dichroism spectra to estimate protein secondary structure. Nat. Protoc. 2006, 1, 2876–2890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Selkoe, D.J.; Ihara, Y.; Salazar, F.J. Alzheimer’s disease: Insolubility of partially purified paired helical filaments in sodium dodecyl sulfate and urea. Science 1982, 215, 1243–1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bolton, D.C.; McKinley, M.P.; Prusiner, S.B. Identification of a protein that purifies with the scrapie prion. Science 1982, 218, 1309–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zurdo, J.; Guijarro, J.I.; Dobson, C.M. Preparation and characterization of purified amyloid fibrils. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 8141–8142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Nizhnikov, A.A.; Alexandrov, A.I.; Ryzhova, T.A.; Mitkevich, O.V.; Dergalev, A.A.; Ter-Avanesyan, M.D.; Galkin, A.P. Proteomic screening for amyloid proteins. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e116003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Sipe, J.D.; Benson, M.D.; Buxbaum, J.N.; Ikeda, S.; Merlini, G.; Saraiva, M.J.M.; Westermark, P. Nomenclature 2014: Amyloid fibril proteins and clinical classification of the amyloidosis. Amyloid 2014, 21, 221–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bennhold, H. Specific staining of amyloid by Congo red (in German). Muenchen. Med. Wochenschr. 1922, 69, 1537–1538. Available online: https://archive.org/details/munchenermedizin6921unse/page/1536/mode/2up (accessed on 30 September 2020).
  19. Divry, P.; Florkin, M. Sur les propriétés optiques de l’amyloïde, C.R. Soc. Biol. 1927, 97, 1808–1810. [Google Scholar]
  20. Kan, A.; Birnbaum, D.P.; Praveschotinunt, P.; Joshi, N.S. Congo red fluorescence for rapid in situ characterization of synthetic curli systems. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2019, 85, e00434-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Naiki, H.; Higuchi, K.; Hosokawa, M.; Takeda, T. Fluorometric determination of amyloid fibrils in vitro using the fluorescent dye, thioflavine T. Anal. Biochem. 1989, 177, 244–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Scollo, F.; La Rosa, C. Amyloidogenic Intrinsically Disordered Proteins: New Insights into Their Self-Assembly and Their Interaction with Membranes. Life 2020, 10, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Chiti, F.; Dobson, C.M. Protein misfolding, functional amyloid, and human disease. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2006, 75, 333–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Hebda, J.A.; Miranker, A.D. The interplay of catalysis and toxicity by amyloid intermediates on lipid bilayers: Insights from type II diabetes. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 2009, 38, 125–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sciacca, M.F.M.; Lolicato, F.; Tempra, C.; Scollo, F.; Sahoo, B.R.; Watson, M.D.; García-Viñuales, S.; Milardi, D.; Raudino, A.; Lee, J.C.; et al. The Lipid-Chaperon Hypothesis: A Common Molecular Mechanism of Membrane Disruption by Intrinsically Disordered Proteins. ChemRxiv 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Fowler, D.M.; Koulov, A.V.; Balch, W.E.; Kelly, J.W. Functional amyloid—from bacteria to humans. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2007, 32, 217–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Nizhnikov, A.A.; Antonets, K.S.; Inge-Vechtomov, S.G. Amyloids: From pathogenesis to function. Biochemistry (Moscow) 2015, 80, 1127–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Otzen, D.; Riek, R. Functional amyloids. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2019, 11, a033860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chapman, M.R.; Robinson, L.S.; Pinkner, J.S.; Roth, R.; Heuser, J.; Hammar, M.; Normark, S.; Hultgren, S.J. Role of Escherichia coli curli operons in directing amyloid fiber formation. Science 2002, 295, 851–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Shewmaker, F.; McGlinchey, R.P.; Thurber, K.R.; McPhie, P.; Dyda, F.; Tycko, R.; Wickner, R.B. The functional curli amyloid is not based on in-register parallel β-sheet structure. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 25065–25076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Gibson, D.L.; White, A.P.; Rajotte, C.M.; Kay, W.W. AgfC and AgfE facilitate extracellular thin aggregative fimbriae synthesis in Salmonella Enteritidis. Microbiology 2007, 153, 1131–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Dueholm, M.S.; Nielsen, S.B.; Hein, K.L.; Nissen, P.; Chapman, M.; Christiansen, G.; Nielsen, P.H.; Otzen, D.E. Fibrillation of the major curli subunit CsgA under a wide range of conditions implies a robust design of aggregation. Biochemistry 2011, 50, 8281–8290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Dueholm, M.S.; Petersen, S.V.; Sønderkær, M.; Larsen, P.; Christiansen, G.; Hein, K.L.; Enghild, J.J.; Nielsen, J.L.; Nielsen, K.L.; Nielsen, P.H.; et al. Functional amyloid in Pseudomonas. Mol. Microbiol. 2010, 77, 1009–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Dueholm, M.S.; Søndergaard, M.T.; Nilsson, M.; Christiansen, G.; Stensballe, A.; Overgaard, M.T.; Givskov, M.; Tolker-Nielsen, T.; Otzen, D.E.; Nielsen, P.H. Expression of Fap amyloids in Pseudomonas aeruginosa, P. fluorescens, and P. putida results in aggregation and increased biofilm formation. Microbiologyopen 2013, 2, 365–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Seviour, T.; Hansen, S.H.; Yang, L.; Yau, Y.H.; Wang, V.B.; Stenvang, M.R.; Christiansen, G.; Marsili, E.; Givskov, M.; Chen, Y.; et al. Functional amyloids keep quorum-sensing molecules in check. J. Biol. Chem. 2015, 290, 6457–6469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Peterson, C.P.; Sauer, C.; Chatfield, C.H. The Extracellular Polymeric Substances of Legionella pneumophila Biofilms Contain Amyloid Structures. Curr. Microbiol. 2018, 75, 736–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Danoff, E.J.; Fleming, K.G. Aqueous, Unfolded OmpA forms amyloid-like fibrils upon self-association. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0132301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Rajan, J.J.S.; Santiago, T.C.; Singaravel, R.; Ignacimuthu, S. Outer membrane protein C (OmpC) of Escherichia coli induces neurodegeneration in mice by acting as an amyloid. Biotechnol. Lett. 2016, 38, 689–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. García, J.F.M.; Vaca, S.; Delgado, N.L.; Uribe-García, A.; Vázquez, C.; Alonso, P.S.; Cortes, J.X.; Cordoba, A.C.; Abascal, E.N. Mannheimia haemolytica OmpP2-like is an amyloid-like protein, forms filaments, takes part in cell adhesion and is part of biofilms. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2018, 111, 2311–2321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kosolapova, A.O.; Belousov, M.V.; Sulatskaya, A.I.; Belousova, M.E.; Sulatsky, M.I.; Antonets, K.S.; Volkov, K.V.; Lykholay, A.N.; Shtark, O.Y.; Vasileva, E.N.; et al. Two novel amyloid proteins, RopA and RopB, from the root nodule bacterium Rhizobium leguminosarum. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Bieler, S.; Estrada, L.; Lagos, R.; Baeza, M.; Castilla, J.; Soto, C. Amyloid formation modulates the biological activity of a bacterial protein. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 26880–26885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Arranz, R.; Mercado, G.; Martín-Benito, J.; Giraldo, R.; Monasterio, O.; Lagos, R.; Valpuesta, J.M. Structural characterization of microcin E492 amyloid formation: Identification of the precursors. J. Struct. Biol. 2012, 178, 54–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Oh, J.; Kim, J.-G.; Jeon, E.; Yoo, C.-H.; Moon, J.S.; Rhee, S.; Hwang, I. Amyloidogenesis of type III-dependent harpins from plant pathogenic bacteria. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 13601–13609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. López-Ochoa, J.; Montes-García, J.F.; Vázquez, C.; Sánchez-Alonso, P.; Pérez-Márquez, V.M.; Blackall, P.J.; Vaca, S.; Negrete-Abascal, E. Gallibacterium elongation factor-Tu possesses amyloid-like protein characteristics, participates in cell adhesion, and is present in biofilms. J. Microbiol. 2017, 55, 745–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Romero, D.; Aguilar, C.; Losick, R.; Kolter, R. Amyloid fibers provide structural integrity to Bacillus subtilis biofilms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 2230–2234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. El Mammeri, N.; Hierrezuelo, J.; Tolchard, J.; Cámara-Almirón, J.; Caro-Astorga, J.; Álvarez-Mena, A.; Dutour, A.; Berbon, M.; Shenoy, J.; Morvan, E.; et al. Molecular architecture of bacterial amyloids in Bacillus biofilms. FASEB J. 2019, 33, 12146–12163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Sarang, M.C.; Nerurkar, A.S. Amyloid protein produced by B. cereus CR4 possesses bioflocculant activity and has potential application in microalgae harvest. Biotechnol. Lett. 2020, 42, 79–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Schwartz, K.; Syed, A.K.; Stephenson, R.E.; Rickard, A.H.; Boles, B.R. Functional amyloids composed of phenol soluble modulins stabilize Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. PLoS Pathog. 2012, 8, e1002744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Dutta, A.; Bhattacharyya, S.; Kundu, A.; Dutta, D.; Das, A.K. Macroscopic amyloid fiber formation by staphylococcal biofilm associated SuhB protein. Biophys. Chem. 2016, 217, 32–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Schwartz, K.; Sekedat, M.D.; Syed, A.K.; O’Hara, B.; Payne, D.E.; Lamb, A.; Boles, B.R. The AgrD N-terminal leader peptide of Staphylococcus aureus has cytolytic and amyloidogenic properties. Infect. Immun. 2014, 82, 3837–3844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Taglialegna, A.; Navarro, S.; Ventura, S.; Garnett, J.A.; Matthews, S.; Penades, J.R.; Lasa, I.; Valle, J. Staphylococcal Bap Proteins Build Amyloid Scaffold Biofilm Matrices in Response to Environmental Signals. PLoS Pathog. 2016, 12, e1005711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Gour, S.; Kumar, V.; Rana, M.; Yadav, J.K. Pheromone peptide cOB1 from native Enterococcus faecalis forms amyloid-like structures: A new paradigm for peptide pheromones. J. Pept. Sci. 2019, 25, e3178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Taglialegna, A.; Matilla-Cuenca, L.; Dorado-Morales, P.; Navarro, S.; Ventura, S.; Garnett, J.A.; Lasa, I.; Valle, J. The biofilm-associated surface protein Esp of Enterococcus faecalis forms amyloid-like fibers. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 2020, 6, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Yarawsky, A.E.; Johns, S.L.; Schuck, P.; Herr, A.B. The biofilm adhesion protein Aap from Staphylococcus epidermidis forms zinc-dependent amyloid fibers. J. Biol. Chem. 2020, 295, 4411–4427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wang, Y.; Jiang, J.; Gao, Y.; Sun, Y.; Dai, J.; Wu, Y.; Qu, D.; Ma, G.; Fang, X. Staphylococcus epidermidis small basic protein (Sbp) forms amyloid fibrils, consistent with its function as a scaffolding protein in biofilms. J. Biol. Chem. 2018, 293, 14296–14311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Oli, M.W.; Otoo, H.N.; Crowley, P.J.; Heim, K.P.; Nascimento, M.M.; Ramsook, C.B.; Lipke, P.N.; Brady, L.J. Functional amyloid formation by Streptococcus mutans. Microbiology 2012, 158, 2903–2916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Besingi, R.N.; Wenderska, I.B.; Senadheera, D.B.; Cvitkovitch, D.G.; Long, J.R.; Wen, Z.T.; Brady, L.J. Functional amyloids in streptococcus mutans, their use as targets of biofilm inhibition and initial characterization of SMU_63c. Microbiology 2017, 163, 488–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Barran-Berdon, A.L.; Ocampo, S.; Haider, M.; Morales-Aparicio, J.; Ottenberg, G.; Kendall, A.; Yarmola, E.; Mishra, S.; Long, J.R.; Hagen, S.J.; et al. Enhanced purification coupled with biophysical analyses shows cross-β structure as a core building block for Streptococcus mutans functional amyloids. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 5138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Kaur, G.; Kapoor, S.; Thakur, K.G. Bacillus subtilis HelD, an RNA Polymerase Interacting Helicase, Forms Amyloid-Like Fibrils. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Yuan, A.H.; Hochschild, A. A bacterial global regulator forms a prion. Science 2017, 355, 198–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Pallarès, I.; Iglesias, V.; Ventura, S. The rho termination factor of Clostridium botulinum contains a prion-like domain with a highly amyloidogenic core. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 6, 1516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Markande, A.R.; Acharya, S.R.; Nerurkar, A.S. Physicochemical characterization of a thermostable glycoprotein bioemulsifier from Solibacillus silvestris AM1. Process Biochem. 2013, 48, 1800–1808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Markande, A.R.; Nerurkar, A.S. Bioemulsifier (BE-AM1) produced by Solibacillus silvestris AM1 is a functional amyloid that modulates bacterial cell-surface properties. Biofouling 2016, 32, 1153–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Bavdek, A.; Kostanjšek, R.; Antonini, V.; Lakey, J.H.; Dalla Serra, M.; Gilbert, R.J.C.; Anderluh, G. PH dependence of listeriolysin O aggregation and pore-forming ability. FEBS J. 2012, 279, 126–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Claessen, D.; Rink, R.; de Jong, W.; Siebring, J.; de Vreugd, P.; Boersma, F.G.H.; Dijkhuizen, L.; Wösten, H.A.B. A novel class of secreted hydrophobic proteins is involved in aerial hyphae formation in Streptomyces coelicolor by forming amyloid-like fibrils. Genes Dev. 2003, 17, 1714–1726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Sawyer, E.B.; Claessen, D.; Haas, M.; Hurgobin, B.; Gras, S.L. The assembly of individual chaplin peptides from Streptomyces coelicolor into functional amyloid fibrils. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e18839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Yang, W.; Willemse, J.; Sawyer, E.B.; Lou, F.; Gong, W.; Zhang, H.; Gras, S.L.; Claessen, D.; Perrett, S. The propensity of the bacterial rodlin protein RdlB to form amyloid fibrils determines its function in Streptomyces coelicolor. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 42867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Kaur, G.; Kaundal, S.; Kapoor, S.; Grimes, J.M.; Huiskonen, J.T.; Thakur, K.G. Mycobacterium tuberculosis CarD, an essential global transcriptional regulator forms amyloid-like fibrils. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 10124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Alteri, C.J.; Xicohtencatl-Cortes, J.; Hess, S.; Caballero-Olin, G.; Giron, J.A.; Friedman, R.L.; Xicohténcatl-Cortes, J.; Hess, S.; Caballero-Olin, G.; Girón, J.A.; et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis produces pili during human infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 5145–5150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Chimileski, S.; Franklin, M.J.; Papke, R.T. Biofilms formed by the archaeon Haloferax volcanii exhibit cellular differentiation and social motility, and facilitate horizontal gene transfer. BMC Biol. 2014, 12, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Dueholm, M.S.; Larsen, P.; Finster, K.; Stenvang, M.R.; Christiansen, G.; Vad, B.S.; Bøggild, A.; Otzen, D.E.; Nielsen, P.H. The tubular sheaths encasing Methanosaeta thermophila filaments are functional amyloids. J. Biol. Chem. 2015, 290, 20590–20600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Christensen, L.F.B.; Hansen, L.M.; Finster, K.; Christiansen, G.; Nielsen, P.H.; Otzen, D.E.; Dueholm, M.S. The sheaths of Methanospirillum are made of a new type of amyloid protein. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Flemming, H.C.; Wingender, J. The biofilm matrix. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2010, 8, 623–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Flemming, H.C.; Neu, T.R.; Wozniak, D.J. The EPS matrix: The “House of Biofilm Cells”. J. Bacteriol. 2007, 189, 7945–7947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Taglialegna, A.; Lasa, I.; Valle, J. Amyloid structures as biofilm matrix scaffolds. J. Bacteriol. 2016, 198, 2579–2588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Jamal, M.; Ahmad, W.; Andleeb, S.; Jalil, F.; Imran, M.; Nawaz, M.A.; Hussain, T.; Ali, M.; Rafiq, M.; Kamil, M.A. Bacterial biofilm and associated infections. J. Chin. Med. Assoc. 2018, 81, 7–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Hall-Stoodley, L.; Stoodley, P. Evolving concepts in biofilm infections. Cell. Microbiol. 2009, 11, 1034–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Ciofu, O.; Rojo-Molinero, E.; Macià, M.D.; Oliver, A. Antibiotic treatment of biofilm infections. APMIS 2017, 125, 304–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Fisher, R.A.; Gollan, B.; Helaine, S. Persistent bacterial infections and persister cells. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2017, 15, 453–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Van Gerven, N.; Van der Verren, S.E.; Reiter, D.M.; Remaut, H. The role of functional amyloids in bacterial virulence. J. Mol. Biol. 2018, 430, 3657–3684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Hung, C.; Zhou, Y.; Pinkner, J.S.; Dodson, K.W.; Crowley, J.R.; Heuser, J.; Chapman, M.R.; Hadjifrangiskou, M.; Henderson, J.P.; Hultgren, S.J. Escherichia coli biofilms have an organized and complex extracellular matrix structure. MBio 2013, 4, e00645-13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Barak, J.D.; Gorski, L.; Naraghi-Arani, P.; Charkowski, A.O. Salmonella enterica virulence genes are required for bacterial attachment to plant tissue. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 5685–5691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Jeter, C.; Matthysse, A.G. Characterization of the binding of diarrheagenic strains of E. coli to plant surfaces and the role of curli in the interaction of the bacteria with alfalfa sprouts. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2005, 18, 1235–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Ryu, J.H.; Beuchat, L.R. Biofilm formation by Escherichia coli O157:H7 on stainless steel: Effect of exopolysaccharide and curli production on its resistance to chlorine. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 247–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Hammer, N.D.; Schmidt, J.C.; Chapman, M.R. The curli nucleator protein, CsgB, contains an amyloidogenic domain that directs CsgA polymerization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 12494–12499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Evans, M.L.; Chorell, E.; Taylor, J.D.; Åden, J.; Götheson, A.; Li, F.; Koch, M.; Sefer, L.; Matthews, S.J.; Wittung-Stafshede, P.; et al. The bacterial curli system possesses a potent and selective inhibitor of amyloid formation. Mol. Cell 2015, 57, 445–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Robinson, L.S.; Ashman, E.M.; Hultgren, S.J.; Chapman, M.R. Secretion of curli fibre subunits is mediated by the outer membrane-localized CsgG protein. Mol. Microbiol. 2006, 59, 870–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Van Gerven, N.; Klein, R.D.; Hultgren, S.J.; Remaut, H. Bacterial amyloid formation: Structural insights into curli biogensis. Trends Microbiol. 2015, 23, 693–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Nenninger, A.A.; Robinson, L.S.; Hultgren, S.J. Localized and efficient curli nucleation requires the chaperone-like amyloid assembly protein CsgF. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 900–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Olsén, A.; Jonsson, A.; Normark, S. Fibronectin binding mediated by a novel class of surface organelles on Escherichia coli. Nature 1989, 338, 652–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Collinson, S.K.; Clouthier, S.C.; Doran, J.L.; Banser, P.A.; Kay, W.W. Characterization of the agfBA fimbrial operon encoding thin aggregative fimbriae of Salmonella enteritidis. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1997, 412, 247–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Dueholm, M.S.; Albertsen, M.; Otzen, D.; Nielsen, P.H. Curli functional amyloid systems are phylogenetically widespread and display large diversity in operon and protein structure. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e51274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Shoji, M.; Naito, M.; Yukitake, H.; Sato, K.; Sakai, E.; Ohara, N.; Nakayama, K. The major structural components of two cell surface filaments of Porphyromonas gingivalis are matured through lipoprotein precursors. Mol. Microbiol. 2004, 52, 1513–1525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Kikuchi, T.; Mizunoe, Y.; Takade, A.; Naito, S.; Yoshida, S.I. Curli fibers are required for development of biofilm architecture in Escherichia coli K-12 and enhance bacterial adherence to human uroepithelial cells. Microbiol. Immunol. 2005, 49, 875–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Olsén, A.; Arnqvist, A.; Hammar, M.; Sukupolvi, S.; Normark, S. The RpoS Sigma factor relieves H-NS-mediated transcriptional repression of csgA, the subunit gene of fibronectin-binding curli in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 1993, 7, 523–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Olsén, A.; Wick, M.J.; Mörgelin, M.; Björck, L. Curli, fibrous surface proteins of Escherichia coli, interact with major histocompatibility complex class I molecules. Infect. Immun. 1998, 66, 944–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Tükel, Ç.; Raffatellu, M.; Humphries, A.D.; Wilson, R.P.; Andrews-Polymenis, H.L.; Gull, T.; Figueiredo, J.F.; Wong, M.H.; Michelsen, K.S.; Akçelik, M.; et al. CsgA is a pathogen-associated molecular pattern of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium that is recognized by Toll-like receptor 2. Mol. Microbiol. 2005, 58, 289–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Sukupolvi, S.; Lorenz, R.G.; Gordon, J.I.; Bian, Z.; Pfeifer, J.D.; Normark, S.J.; Rhen, M. Expression of thin aggregative fimbriae promotes interaction of Salmonella typhimurium SR-11 with mouse small intestinal epithelial. Infect. Immun. 1997, 65, 5320–5325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Saldaña, Z.; Xicohtencatl-Cortes, J.; Avelino, F.; Phillips, A.D.; Kaper, J.B.; Puente, J.L.; Girón, J.A. Synergistic role of curli and cellulose in cell adherence and biofilm formation of attaching and effacing Escherichia coli and identification of Fis as a negative regulator of curli. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 11, 992–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Uhlich, G.A.; Keen, J.E.; Elder, R.O. Mutations in the csgD promoter associated with variations in curli expression in certain strains of Escherichia coli O157:H7. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2001, 67, 2367–2370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Uhlich, G.A.; Chen, C.Y.; Cottrell, B.J.; Hofmann, C.S.; Dudley, E.G.; Strobaugh, T.P.; Nguyen, L.H. Phage insertion in mlrA and variations in rpoS limit curli expression and biofilm formation in Escherichia coli serotype O157: H7. Microbiology 2013, 159, 1586–1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  102. Gerstel, U.; Römling, U. The csgD promoter, a control unit for biofilm formation in Salmonella typhimurium. Res. Microbiol. 2003, 154, 659–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Olsen, A.; Arnqvist, A.; Hammar, M.; Normark, S. Environmental regulation of curli production in Escherichia coli. Infect. Agents Dis. 1993, 2, 272–274. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  104. Sjöbring, U.; Pohl, G.; Olsén, A. Plasminogen, absorbed by Escherichia coli expressing curli or by Salmonella enteritidis expressing thin aggregative fimbriae, can be activated by simultaneously captured tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA). Mol. Microbiol. 1994, 14, 443–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Rapsinski, G.J.; Wynosky-Dolfi, M.A.; Oppong, G.O.; Tursi, S.A.; Wilson, R.P.; Brodsky, I.E.; Tükel, Ç. Toll-like receptor 2 and NLRP3 cooperate to recognize a functional bacterial amyloid, curli. Infect. Immun. 2015, 83, 693–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Tükel, C.; Wilson, R.P.; Nishimori, J.H.; Pezeshki, M.; Chromy, B.A.; Bäumler, A.J. Responses to amyloids of microbial and host origin are mediated through toll-like receptor 2. Cell Host Microbe 2009, 6, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Kai-Larsen, Y.; Lüthje, P.; Chromek, M.; Peters, V.; Wang, X.; Holm, Å.; Kádas, L.; Hedlund, K.O.; Johansson, J.; Chapman, M.R.; et al. Uropathogenic Escherichia coli modulates immune responses and its curli fimbriae interact with the antimicrobial peptide LL-37. PLoS Pathog. 2010, 6, e1001010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Biesecker, S.G.; Nicastro, L.K.; Paul Wilson, R.; Tükel, Ç. The functional amyloid curli protects escherichia coli against complement-mediated bactericidal activity. Biomolecules 2018, 8, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Moradali, M.F.; Ghods, S.; Rehm, B.H.A. Pseudomonas aeruginosa lifestyle: A paradigm for adaptation, survival, and persistence. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2017, 7, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Dueholm, M.S.; Otzen, D.; Nielsen, P.H. Evolutionary insight into the functional amyloids of the pseudomonads. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e76630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Rouse, S.L.; Hawthorne, W.J.; Berry, J.L.; Chorev, D.S.; Ionescu, S.A.; Lambert, S.; Stylianou, F.; Ewert, W.; Mackie, U.; Morgan, R.M.L.; et al. A new class of hybrid secretion system is employed in Pseudomonas amyloid biogenesis. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Zeng, G.; Vad, B.S.; Dueholm, M.S.; Christiansen, G.; Nilsson, M.; Tolker-Nielsen, T.; Nielsen, P.H.; Meyer, R.L.; Otzen, D.E. Functional bacterial amyloid increases Pseudomonas biofilm hydrophobicity and stiffness. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  113. Herbst, F.A.; Søndergaard, M.T.; Kjeldal, H.; Stensballe, A.; Nielsen, P.H.; Dueholm, M.S. Major proteomic changes associated with amyloid-induced biofilm formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. J. Proteome Res. 2015, 14, 72–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Wiehlmann, L.; Munder, A.; Adams, T.; Juhas, M.; Kolmar, H.; Salunkhe, P.; Tümmler, B. Functional genomics of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to identify habitat-specific determinants of pathogenicity. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2007, 297, 615–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Turner, K.H.; Everett, J.; Trivedi, U.; Rumbaugh, K.P.; Whiteley, M. Requirements for Pseudomonas aeruginosa Acute Burn and Chronic Surgical Wound Infection. PLoS Genet. 2014, 10, e1004518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  116. Branda, S.S.; González-Pastor, J.E.; Ben-Yehuda, S.; Losick, R.; Kolter, R. Fruiting body formation by Bacillus subtilis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 11621–11626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  117. Branda, S.S.; Chu, F.; Kearns, D.B.; Losick, R.; Kolter, R. A major protein component of the Bacillus subtilis biofilm matrix. Mol. Microbiol. 2006, 59, 1229–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Duanis-Assaf, D.; Duanis-Assaf, T.; Zeng, G.; Meyer, R.L.; Reches, M.; Steinberg, D.; Shemesh, M. Cell wall associated protein TasA provides an initial binding component to extracellular polysaccharides in dual-species biofilm. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 9350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Hamada, S.; Slade, H.D. Biology, immunology, and cariogenicity of Streptococcus mutans. Microbiol. Rev. 1980, 44, 331–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Matsumoto-Nakano, M. Role of Streptococcus mutans surface proteins for biofilm formation. Jpn. Dent. Sci. Rev. 2018, 54, 22–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Siegel, S.D.; Reardon, M.E.; Ton-That, H. Anchoring of LPXTG-like proteins to the gram-positive cell wall envelope. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2017, 404, 159–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Crowley, P.J.; Brady, L.J.; Michalek, S.M.; Bleiweis, A.S. Virulence of a spaP mutant of Streptococcus mutans in a gnotobiotic rat model. Infect. Immun. 1999, 67, 1201–1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  123. Ziebuhr, W. Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis: Emerging pathogens in nosocomial infections. Contrib. Microbiol. 2001, 8, 102–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Otto, M. Staphylococcal biofilms. Curr. Top Microbiol. Immunol. 2008, 322, 207–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Decker, R.; Burdelski, C.; Zobiak, M.; Büttner, H.; Franke, G.; Christner, M.; Saß, K.; Zobiak, B.; Henke, H.A.; Horswill, A.R.; et al. An 18 kDa Scaffold protein is critical for Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation. PLoS Pathog. 2015, 11, e1004735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Schaeffer, C.R.; Woods, K.M.; Longo, G.M.; Kiedrowski, M.R.; Paharik, A.E.; Büttner, H.; Christner, M.; Boissy, R.J.; Horswill, A.R.; Rohde, H.; et al. Accumulation-associated protein enhances Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation under dynamic conditions and is required for infection in a rat catheter model. Infect. Immun. 2015, 83, 214–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Rohde, H.; Burdelski, C.; Bartscht, K.; Hussain, M.; Buck, F.; Horstkotte, M.A.; Knobloch, J.K.M.; Heilmann, C.; Herrmann, M.; Mack, D. Induction of Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation via proteolytic processing of the accumulation-associated protein by staphylococcal and host proteases. Mol. Microbiol. 2005, 55, 1883–1895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Paharik, A.E.; Kotasinska, M.; Both, A.; Hoang, T.M.N.; Büttner, H.; Roy, P.; Fey, P.D.; Horswill, A.R.; Rohde, H. The metalloprotease SepA governs processing of accumulation-associated protein and shapes intercellular adhesive surface properties in Staphylococcus epidermidis. Mol. Microbiol. 2017, 103, 860–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Periasamy, S.; Joo, H.-S.; Duong, A.C.; Bach, T.-H.L.; Tan, V.Y.; Chatterjee, S.S.; Cheung, G.Y.C.; Otto, M. How Staphylococcus aureus biofilms develop their characteristic structure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 1281–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. Schwartz, K.; Ganesan, M.; Payne, D.E.; Solomon, M.J.; Boles, B.R. Extracellular DNA facilitates the formation of functional amyloids in Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. Mol. Microbiol. 2015, 99, 123–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Boles, B.R.; Thoendel, M.; Roth, A.J.; Horswill, A.R. Identification of genes involved in polysaccharide-independent Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e10146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Di Martino, P. Bap: A new type of functional amyloid. Trends Microbiol. 2016, 24, 682–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Cucarella, C.; Solano, C.; Valle, J.; Amorena, B.; Lasa, Í.; Penadés, J.R. Bap, a Staphylococcus aureus surface protein involved in biofilm formation. J. Bacteriol. 2001, 183, 2888–2896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  134. Naidoo, N.; Ramsugit, S.; Pillay, M. Mycobacterium tuberculosis pili (MTP), a putative biomarker for a tuberculosis diagnostic test. Tuberculosis 2014, 94, 338–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Ramsugit, S.; Pillay, B.; Pillay, M. Evaluation of the role of Mycobacterium tuberculosis pili (MTP) as an adhesin, invasin, and cytokine inducer of epithelial cells. Braz. J. Infect. Dis. 2016, 20, 160–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  136. Shaw, L.P.; Wang, A.D.; Dylus, D.; Meier, M.; Pogacnik, G.; Dessimoz, C.; Balloux, F. The phylogenetic range of bacterial and viral pathogens of vertebrates. Mol. Ecol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Confer, A.W.; Ayalew, S. The OmpA family of proteins: Roles in bacterial pathogenesis and immunity. Vet. Microbiol. 2013, 163, 207–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Weiser, J.N.; Gotschlich, E.C. Outer membrane protein A (OmpA) contributes to serum resistance and pathogenicity of Escherichia coli K-1. Infect. Immun. 1991, 59, 2252–2258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Nicholson, T.F.; Watts, K.M.; Hunstad, D.A. OmpA of uropathogenic Escherichia coli promotes postinvasion pathogenesis of cystitis. Infect. Immun. 2009, 77, 5245–5251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  140. Orme, R.; Douglas, C.W.I.; Rimmer, S.; Webb, M. Proteomic analysis of Escherichia coli biofilms reveals the overexpression of the outer membrane protein OmpA. Proteomics 2006, 6, 4269–4277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Hejair, H.M.A.; Zhu, Y.; Ma, J.; Zhang, Y.; Pan, Z.; Zhang, W.; Yao, H. Functional role of ompF and ompC porins in pathogenesis of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli. Microb. Pathog. 2017, 107, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Bujold, A.R.; MacInnes, J.I. Identification of putative adhesins of Actinobacillus suis and their homologues in other members of the family Pasteurellaceae. BMC Res. Notes 2015, 8, 675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Roest, H.P.; Bloemendaal, C.J.P.; Wijffelman, C.A.; Lugtenberg, B.J.J. Isolation and characterization of ropA homologous genes from Rhizobium leguminosarum biovars viciae and trifolii. J. Bacteriol. 1995, 177, 4985–4991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  144. Roest, H.P.; Mulders, I.H.; Wijffelman, C.A.; Lugtenberg, B.J.J. Isolation of ropB, a gene encoding a 22-kDa Rhizobium leguminosarum outer membrane protein. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 1995, 8, 576–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Tolin, S.; Arrigoni, G.; Moscatiello, R.; Masi, A.; Navazio, L.; Sablok, G.; Squartini, A. Quantitative analysis of the naringenin-inducible proteome in Rhizobium leguminosarum by isobaric tagging and mass spectrometry. Proteomics 2013, 13, 1961–1972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Vergalli, J.; Bodrenko, I.V.; Masi, M.; Moynié, L.; Acosta-Gutiérrez, S.; Naismith, J.H.; Davin-Regli, A.; Ceccarelli, M.; van den Berg, B.; Winterhalter, M.; et al. Porins and small-molecule translocation across the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2020, 18, 164–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Schiffrin, B.; Brockwell, D.J.; Radford, S.E. Outer membrane protein folding from an energy landscape perspective. BMC Biol. 2017, 15, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  148. Destoumieux-Garzón, D.; Thomas, X.; Santamaria, M.; Goulard, C.; Barthélémy, M.; Boscher, B.; Bessin, Y.; Molle, G.; Pons, A.M.; Letellier, L.; et al. Microcin E492 antibacterial activity: Evidence for a TonB-dependent inner membrane permeabilization on Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 2003, 49, 1031–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Shahnawaz, M.; Park, K.W.; Mukherjee, A.; Diaz-Espinoza, R.; Soto, C. Prion-like characteristics of the bacterial protein Microcin E492. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 45720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  150. Portnoy, D.A.; Auerbuch, V.; Glomski, I.J. The cell biology of Listeria monocytogenes infection: The intersection of bacterial pathogenesis and cell-mediated immunity. J. Cell Biol. 2002, 158, 409–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  151. Schuerch, D.W.; Wilson-Kubalek, E.M.; Tweten, R.K. Molecular basis of listeriolysin O pH dependence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 12537–12542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  152. Kim, J.G.; Jeon, E.; Oh, J.; Moon, J.S.; Hwang, I. Mutational analysis of Xanthomonas harpin HpaG identifies a key functional region that elicits the hypersensitive response in nonhost plants. J. Bacteriol. 2004, 186, 6239–6247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  153. Lindgren, P.D. The role of hrp gene during Plant-Bacterial interaction. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1997, 35, 129–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Balint-Kurti, P. The plant hypersensitive response: Concepts, control and consequences. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2019, 20, 1163–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  155. Racapé, J.; Belbahri, L.; Engelhardt, S.; Lacombe, B.; Lee, J.; Lochman, J.; Marais, A.; Nicole, M.; Nürnberger, T.; Parlange, F.; et al. Ca2+-dependent lipid binding and membrane integration of PopA, a harpin-like elicitor of the hypersensitive response in tobacco. Mol. Microbiol. 2005, 58, 1406–1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Ahmad, M.; Majerczak, D.R.; Pike, S.; Hoyos, M.E.; Novacky, A.; Coplin, D.L. Biological activity of harpin produced by Pantoea stewartii subsp. stewartii. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2001, 14, 1223–1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Claessen, D.; de Jong, W.; Dijkhuizen, L.; Wösten, H.A.B. Regulation of Streptomyces development: Reach for the sky! Trends Microbiol. 2006, 14, 313–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  158. Elliot, M.A.; Karoonuthaisiri, N.; Huang, J.; Bibb, M.J.; Cohen, S.N.; Kao, C.M.; Buttner, M.J. The chaplins: A family of hydrophobic cell-surface proteins involved in aerial mycelium formation in Streptomyces coelicolor. Genes Dev. 2003, 17, 1727–1740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  159. Shaw, P.J.; Hills, G.J.; Henwood, J.A.; Harris, J.E.; Archer, D.B. Three-dimensional architecture of the cell sheath and septa of Methanospirillum hungatei. J. Bacteriol. 1985, 161, 750–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  160. Davis, E.; Chen, J.; Leon, K.; Darst, S.A.; Campbell, E.A. Mycobacterial RNA polymerase forms unstable open promoter complexes that are stabilized by CarD. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, 433–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  161. Zajkowski, T.; Lee, M.D.; Mondal, S.S.; Carbajal, A.; Dec, R.; Brennock, P.D.; Piast, R.W.; Snyder, J.E.; Bense, N.B.; Dzwolak, W.; et al. The hunt for ancient prions: Archaeal prion-like domains form amyloids and substitute for yeast prion domains. bioRxiv 2020. Available online: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.07.20.212902v1 (accessed on 27 September 2020). [CrossRef]
  162. Antonets, K.S.; Belousov, M.V.; Sulatskaya, A.I.; Belousova, M.E.; Kosolapova, A.O.; Sulatsky, M.I.; Andreeva, E.A.; Zykin, P.A.; Malovichko, Y.V.; Shtark, O.Y.; et al. Accumulation of storage proteins in plant seeds is mediated by amyloid formation. PLoS Biol. 2020, 18, e3000564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Maji, S.K.; Perrin, M.H.; Sawaya, M.R.; Jessberger, S.; Vadodaria, K.; Rissman, R.A.; Singru, P.S.; Nilsson, K.P.R.; Simon, R.; Schubert, D.; et al. Functional amyloids as natural storage of peptide hormones in pituitary secretory granules. Science 2009, 325, 328–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  164. Audas, T.E.; Audas, D.E.; Jacob, M.D.; Ho, J.J.D.; Khacho, M.; Wang, M.; Perera, J.K.; Gardiner, C.; Bennett, C.A.; Head, T.; et al. Adaptation to stressors by systemic protein amyloidogenesis. Dev. Cell 2016, 39, 155–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  165. Luo, Q.; Kumar, P.; Vickers, T.J.; Sheikh, A.; Lewis, W.G.; Rasko, D.A.; Sistrunk, J.; Fleckenstein, J.M. Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli secretes a highly conserved mucin-degrading metalloprotease to effectively engage intestinal epithelial cells. Infect. Immun. 2014, 82, 509–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  166. Belousov, M.V.; Bondarev, S.A.; Kosolapova, A.O.; Antonets, K.S.; Sulatskaya, A.I.; Sulatsky, M.I.; Zhouravleva, G.A.; Kuznetsova, I.M.; Turoverov, K.K.; Nizhnikov, A.A. M60-like metalloprotease domain of the Escherichia coli YghJ protein forms amyloid fibrils. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0191317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  167. Antonets, K.S.; Volkov, K.V.; Maltseva, A.L.; Arshakian, L.M.; Galkin, A.P.; Nizhnikov, A.A. Proteomic analysis of Escherichia coli protein fractions resistant to solubilization by ionic detergents. Biochemistry (Moscow) 2016, 81, 34–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Morales, R.; Green, K.; Soto, C. Cross Currents in protein misfolding disorders: Interactions and therapy. CNS Neurol. Disord. Drug Targets 2009, 8, 363–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  169. Zhou, Y.; Smith, D.; Leong, B.J.; Brannstrom, K.; Almqvist, F.; Chapman, M.R.; Brännström, K.; Almqvist, F.; Chapman, M.R. Promiscuous cross-seeding between bacterial amyloids promotes interspecies biofilms. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 35092–35103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  170. Friedland, R.P.; Chapman, M.R. The role of microbial amyloid in neurodegeneration. PLoS Pathog. 2017, 13, e1006654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Chen, S.G.; Stribinskis, V.; Rane, M.J.; Demuth, D.R.; Gozal, E.; Roberts, A.M.; Jagadapillai, R.; Liu, R.; Choe, K.; Shivakumar, B.; et al. Exposure to the functional bacterial amyloid protein curli enhances alpha-synuclein aggregation in aged Fischer 344 rats and Caenorhabditis elegans. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 34477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Perov, S.; Lidor, O.; Salinas, N.; Golan, N.; Tayeb-Fligelman, E.; Deshmukh, M.; Willbold, D.; Landau, M. Structural insights into curli CsgA cross-β fibril architecture inspire repurposing of anti-amyloid compounds as anti-biofilm agents. PLoS Pathog. 2019, 15, e1007978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  173. Christensen, L.F.B.; Jensen, K.F.; Nielsen, J.; Vad, B.S.; Christiansen, G.; Otzen, D.E. Reducing the Amyloidogenicity of functional amyloid protein FapC increases its ability to inhibit α-synuclein fibrillation. ACS Omega 2019, 4, 4029–4039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  174. Raimondi, I.; Izzo, L.; Tunesi, M.; Comar, M.; Albani, D.; Giordano, C. Organ-on-a-chip in vitro models of the brain and the blood-brain barrier and their value to study the microbiota-gut-brain axis in neurodegeneration. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 7, 435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Matsumoto, M.; Kibe, R.; Ooga, T.; Aiba, Y.; Sawaki, E.; Koga, Y.; Benno, Y. Cerebral low-molecular metabolites influenced by intestinal microbiota: A pilot study. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 2013, 7, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  176. Brenner, S.R. Blue-green algae or cyanobacteria in the intestinal micro-flora may produce neurotoxins such as Beta-N-Methylamino-l-Alanine (BMAA) which may be related to development of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson-Dementia-Complex in. Med. Hypotheses 2013, 80, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Soto, M.J.; Sanjuán, J.; Olivares, J. Rhizobia and plant-pathogenic bacteria: Common infection weapons. Microbiology 2006, 152, 3167–3174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  178. Shanmugam, N.; Baker, M.O.D.G.; Ball, S.R.; Steain, M.; Pham, C.L.L.; Sunde, M. Microbial functional amyloids serve diverse purposes for structure, adhesion and defence. Biophys. Rev. 2019, 11, 287–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Chauret, C. Survival and control of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in foods, beverages, soil and water. Virulence 2011, 2, 593–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  180. Cámara-Almirón, J.; Navarro, Y.; Díaz-Martínez, L.; Magno-Pérez-Bryan, M.C.; Molina-Santiago, C.; Pearson, J.R.; de Vicente, A.; Pérez-García, A.; Romero, D. Dual functionality of the amyloid protein TasA in Bacillus physiology and fitness on the phylloplane. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  181. Robledo, M.; Rivera, L.; Jiménez-Zurdo, J.I.; Rivas, R.; Dazzo, F.; Velázquez, E.; Martínez-Molina, E.; Hirsch, A.M.; Mateos, P.F. Role of Rhizobium endoglucanase CelC2 in cellulose biosynthesis and biofilm formation on plant roots and abiotic surfaces. Microb. Cell Fact. 2012, 11, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  182. Russo, D.M.; Abdian, P.L.; Posadas, D.M.; Williams, A.; Vozza, N.; Giordano, W.; Kannenberg, E.; Downie, J.A.; Zorreguietaa, A. Lipopolysaccharide O-chain core region required for cellular cohesion and compaction of In Vitro and root biofilms developed by Rhizobium leguminosarum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 81, 1013–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  183. Miller, M.B.; Bassler, B.L. Quorum sensing in bacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2001, 55, 165–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  184. Bueno, P.; Soto, M.J.; Rodríguez-Rosales, M.P.; Sanjuan, J.; Olivares, J.; Donaire, J.P. Time-course of lipoxygenase, antioxidant enzyme activities and H2O2 accumulation during the early stages of Rhizobium-legume symbiosis. New Phytol. 2001, 152, 91–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Martínez-Abarca, F.; Herrera-Cervera, J.A.; Bueno, P.; Sanjuan, J.; Bisseling, T.; Olivares, J. Involvement of salicylic acid in the establishment of the Rhizobium meliloti-Alfalfa symbiosis. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 1998, 11, 153–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  186. Deakin, W.J.; Broughton, W.J. Symbiotic use of pathogenic strategies: Rhizobial protein secretion systems. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2009, 7, 312–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Fauvart, M.; Michiels, J. Rhizobial secreted proteins as determinants of host specificity in the rhizobium-legume symbiosis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2008, 285, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  188. Tampakaki, A.P. Commonalities and differences of T3SSs in rhizobia and plant pathogenic bacteria. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Antonets, K.S.; Kliver, S.F.; Nizhnikov, A.A. Exploring proteins containing amyloidogenic regions in the proteomes of bacteria of the order Rhizobiales. Evol. Bioinform. 2018, 14, 1176934318768781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Ijms 21 07240 g001 550
Figure 1. Functions of prokaryotic amyloids in the interspecies interactions. Dots denote monomeric proteins, striated lines denote amyloid fibrils, and monomer-to-amyloid conversion is shown as a thin arrow. Thick arrows represent different types of interspecies interactions: red for Type I (host–pathogen), blue for Type II (interactions within microbial community), and green for Type III (host–symbiont). MTP—Mycobacterium tuberculosis pili; LLO—listeriolysin O; OMPs—outer membrane proteins; PSMs—phenol-soluble modulins.
Figure 1. Functions of prokaryotic amyloids in the interspecies interactions. Dots denote monomeric proteins, striated lines denote amyloid fibrils, and monomer-to-amyloid conversion is shown as a thin arrow. Thick arrows represent different types of interspecies interactions: red for Type I (host–pathogen), blue for Type II (interactions within microbial community), and green for Type III (host–symbiont). MTP—Mycobacterium tuberculosis pili; LLO—listeriolysin O; OMPs—outer membrane proteins; PSMs—phenol-soluble modulins.
Ijms 21 07240 g001
Table
Table 1. Amyloidogenic proteins of prokaryotes, their properties, functions, and involvement in the interspecies interactions.
Table 1. Amyloidogenic proteins of prokaryotes, their properties, functions, and involvement in the interspecies interactions.
SpeciesProteinFunction of Soluble ProteinFunction of AmyloidAmyloid Properties *Type of Inter-Species Interactions Mediated by Amyloid **References
In VitroIn Vivo
Domain: Bacteria
Phylum: Proteobacteria
Escherichia coli,
Salmonella enterica		CsgA (curli),
AgfA (tafi)		No dataBiofilm matrix protein; surface adhesion; intercellular adhesionCR ( Congo red) absorbance, ThT (Thioflavin T) fluorescence, CD (Circular dichroism), FTIR (Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy), XDR (X-ray diffraction)Extracellular fibrils formationI[29,30,31,32]
Pseudomonas aeruginosa,
P. fluorescens,
P. putida		FapCNo dataBiofilm matrix protein; facilitates mechanical stiffness; enhances hydrophobic properties; binds quorum-sensing signal moleculesTEM (Transmission electron microscopy), FTIR, XDRExtracellular fibrils formation; purified native fibrils: CD, FTIR, ThT fluorescenceI[33,34,35]
Legionella pneumophilaNot identifiedNo dataBiofilm matrix proteinNo dataThT fluorescence, CR staining and WO1 antibodies binding of extracellular polymer matrix of biofilmI[36]
Escherichia coliOmpAOuter membrane porinVirulence factor; amyloid function is unknownThT fluorescence, TEM, CD (for N-terminal domain)No dataI ***[37]
Escherichia coliOmpCOuter membrane porinVirulence factor; amyloid function is unknownProteinase K resistance, TEM, ThT fluorescence, CR absorbance and birefringenceNo dataI ***[38]
Mannheimia haemolyticaOmpP2-like proteinOuter membrane porinBiofilm matrix protein; adhesion to host’s tissuesCR bindingFibrils on the cell surface, binding anti-OmpP2-like protein antibodiesI[39]
Rhizobium leguminosarumRopAOuter membrane porinComponent of extracellular capsuleCD, CR birefringence, ThT fluorescence, TEM, detergent-resistance, trypsin resistanceSDS (Sodium dodecyl sulfate)-resistant polymer formation, fibrils on the cell surface, binding anti-RopA antibodiesIII ***[40]
Rhizobium leguminosarumRopBNo dataComponent of extracellular capsuleCD, CR birefringence, ThT fluorescence, TEM, detergent-resistance, trypsin and pepsin resistanceSDS-resistant polymer formation, fibrils on the cell surface, binding anti-RopB antibodiesIII ***[40]
Klebsiella pneumoniaeMicrocin E492Pore-forming toxinToxin inactivationTEM, CD, ThT fluorescence, CR absorbance, proteinase K resistance, XDRFibril formation on the surface of Microcin E492 secreting strain (TEM)II[41,42]
Xanthomonas axonopodisHpaG (harpin)No dataVirulence factor; induces plant hypersensitive responseTEM, CD, CR absorbance and birefringence, proteinase K resistanceNo dataI ***[43]
Pseudomonas syringaeHrpZ (harpin)No dataVirulence factor; induces plant hypersensitive responseTEMNo dataI ***[43]
Erwinia amylovoraHrpN (harpin)No dataVirulence factor; induces plant hypersensitive responseTEMNo dataI ***[43]
Gallibacterium anatisEF-TuElongation factorBiofilm matrix protein; surface adhesionTEMTEM, CR binding, antibodies against curliN/a[44]
Phylum: Firmicutes
Bacillus subtilis,
Bacillus cereus		TasANo dataBiofilm matrix protein; facilitates biofilm integrity; binds exopolysaccharides on the initial steps of multispecies biofilm formationTEM, CD, NMR (Nuclear magnetic resonance), FTIRAnti-TasA antibodies binding extracellular fibrils in biofilm matrix; native fibrils: TEM, CR absorbance, ThT fluorescenceI, II[45,46,47]
Staphylococcus aureusPSMsNo dataBiofilm matrix proteinTEM, ThT fluorescence, NMR (cross-α structure)Extracellular fibrils in biofilm matrix while Δabpsm mutant were unable to form fibrilsI[8,48]
Staphylococcus aureusSuhBNo dataBiofilm matrix protein; intercellular adhesionCR absorbance, ThT fluorescence, FTIR, SEM, XDRNo dataI ***[49]
Staphylococcus aureusAgrDPropeptide; autoinducing peptide pheromone (AIP) precursorN-terminal peptide, cleaved during AIP maturation, forms amyloid; biofilm matrix componentN-terminal domain: ThT fluorescence, TEM, CR absorbance, CDFibrils formed by N-terminal domain of AgrD in biofilm matrixI[50]
Staphylococcus aureusBapNo dataSurface adhesion; intercellular adhesion; promotes biofilm formation in acidic conditionsBap B-domain: ThT fluorescence, CR absorbance, TEM, FTIR, CDAnti-Bap antibodies binding fibrils formation on the cell surfaceI[51]
Enterococcus faecaliscOB1Pheromone; part of the pheromone-based conjugation systemPrevention of conjugation; initiate the aggregation of biofilm matrix proteins (such as Esp)ThT fluorescence, CR absorbance, CD, TEMNo dataII ***[52]
Enterococcus faecalisEspNo dataBiofilm matrix proteinC-DAG assay: CR binding, TEM;
N-terminal domain: SEM (Scanning electron microscopy), FTIR, CD, CR absorbance, ThT fluorescence;
Fibril formation on the surface of Δbap S. aureus expressing Esp_N		No dataI ***[53]
Staphylococcus epidermidisAapIntercellular adhesionBiofilm matrix proteinThT fluorescence, CR absorbance, TEM, CDSDS-resistant aggregates, binding anti-Aap antibodies, were extracted from biofilm-forming bacteriaI[54]
Staphylococcus epidermidisSbpNo dataScaffolding protein in biofilmsTEM, AFM, FTIR, CR absorbance, ThT fluoerescenceThS-binding inclusions, expressing SbpI[55]
Streptococcus mutansAdhesin P1No dataBiofilm matrix protein; adhesion to tooth surfaceCR birefringence, ThT fluorescence, TEM, XDRNo dataI ***[56]
Streptococcus mutansWapANo dataBiofilm matrix proteinCR birefringence, ThT fluorescence, TEM, XDRNo dataI ***[57,58]
Streptococcus mutansSmu_63cNo dataBiofilm matrix proteinCR birefringence, ThT fluorescence, TEM, XDRNo dataI ***[57,58]
Bacillus subtilisHelDHelicaseAmyloid function is unknownCD, ThT fluorescence, CR absorbance, XDRThS-binding inclusions in strain, overexpressing HelDN/a[59]
Clostridium botulinumRho ****Transcription terminatorModulates transcription; causes genome-wide changes in transcriptomeAnalysis of prion-like domain:
ThT, ThS and CR fluorescence,
FTIR, TEM; C-DAG (Curli-dependent amyloid generator) assay: CR birefringence, SDS-resistance		SDS-stable aggregate formation in E. coliN/a[60,61]
Solibacillus silvestrisBioemulsifier BE-AM1No dataCell surface properties modulation; biofilm matrix proteinCR birefringence, FTIR, CD, TEMNo dataN/a[62,63]
Listeria monocytogenesListeriolysin OToxin, that forms pores in phagolysosome’s membraneToxin inactivationCD, TEM, CR fluorescence and absorbance, ThT fluorescence, trypsin resistanceNo dataI[64]
Phylum: Actinobacteria
Streptomyces coelicolorChpA-H (chaplin)No dataLowering of the surface tension; assists aerial hyphae formationCD, TEM, XDR, FTIRNative extracts: ThT fluorescence, TEM, CDN/a[65,66]
Streptomyces coelicolorRdlB (rodlin)No dataRodlet layer formation; assists aerial hyphae formationThT fluorescence, TEM, CD, XDRNo dataN/a[67]
Mycobacterium tuberculosisCarDTranscription factorAmyloid function is unknownThT fluorescence, TEM, SDS-resistance, CD (increase in β-sheet content during heating)ThS-binding (Thioflavin S) inclusions in strain, overexpressing CarDN/a[68]
Mycobacterium tuberculosisMTPNo dataAdhesion to host’s tissuesTEM, CR bindingTEM, SDS resistance of fibrilsI ***[69]
Domain: Archaea
Phylum: Euryarchaeota
Haloferax volcaniiNot identifiedNo dataBiofilm matrix proteinNo dataFluorescence of biofilms stained with CR and ThTN/a[70]
Methanosaeta thermophilaMspANo dataTubular sheaths component; facilitates its stiffnessTEM, ThT, CD, FTIR, XDRIntact sheaths: TEM, WO1 antibodies;
purified sheaths: TEM, WO1 antibodies, ThT, FTIR, XDR		N/a[71]
Methanospirillum hungateiMspANo dataTubular sheaths component; facilitates its stiffnessNo dataIntact sheaths: WO1 antibodies;
purified sheaths: TEM, FTIR		N/a[72]
* CR, Congo red; ThT, Thioflavin T; ThS, Thioflavin S; C-DAG, Curli-dependent amyloid generator; CD, Circular dichroism; FTIR, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy; XDR, X-ray diffraction; NMR, Nuclear magnetic resonance; SDS, Sodium dodecyl sulfate; SEM, Scanning electron microscopy; TEM, Transmission electron microscopy. ** Type of proven or hypothetical inter-species interactions: Type I, host–pathogen interactions; Type II, interactions between different microbial species in the communities; Type III, host–symbiont interactions; N/a, not applicable. *** Hypothetical interaction based on the structural protein function. **** This protein also possesses infectious prion properties [60].

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kosolapova, A.O.; Antonets, K.S.; Belousov, M.V.; Nizhnikov, A.A. Biological Functions of Prokaryotic Amyloids in Interspecies Interactions: Facts and Assumptions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7240. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21197240

AMA Style

Kosolapova AO, Antonets KS, Belousov MV, Nizhnikov AA. Biological Functions of Prokaryotic Amyloids in Interspecies Interactions: Facts and Assumptions. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21(19):7240. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21197240

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kosolapova, Anastasiia O., Kirill S. Antonets, Mikhail V. Belousov, and Anton A. Nizhnikov. 2020. "Biological Functions of Prokaryotic Amyloids in Interspecies Interactions: Facts and Assumptions" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 19: 7240. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21197240

APA Style

Kosolapova, A. O., Antonets, K. S., Belousov, M. V., & Nizhnikov, A. A. (2020). Biological Functions of Prokaryotic Amyloids in Interspecies Interactions: Facts and Assumptions. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21(19), 7240. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21197240

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop