Next Article in Journal
PDE2A Is Indispensable for Mouse Liver Development and Hematopoiesis
Next Article in Special Issue
microRNAs as Promising Biomarkers of Platelet Activity in Antiplatelet Therapy Monitoring
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Cholesterol in Stress-Related Neuronal Death—A Statistical Analysis Perspective
Previous Article in Special Issue
Role of microRNAs in Venous Thromboembolism
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 21
Issue 8
10.3390/ijms21082897
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Circulating MicroRNA Levels Indicate Platelet and Leukocyte Activation in Endotoxemia Despite Platelet P2Y12 Inhibition

by
Aitana Braza-Boïls
1,2,†,
Temo Barwari
1,†,
Clemens Gutmann
1,†,
Mark R. Thomas
3,
Heather M. Judge
4,
Abhishek Joshi
1,
Raimund Pechlaner
5,
Manu Shankar-Hari
6,
Ramzi A. Ajjan
7,
Ian Sabroe
4,
Robert F. Storey
4 and
Manuel Mayr
1,*
1
King’s British Heart Foundation Centre, King’s College London, London SE5 9NU, UK
2
Health Research Institute La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain
3
Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
4
Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2RX, UK
5
Department of Neurology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck 6020, Austria
6
Critical Care Medicine, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London SE1 7EH, UK
7
Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These three authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(8), 2897; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21082897
Submission received: 29 March 2020 / Revised: 15 April 2020 / Accepted: 17 April 2020 / Published: 21 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue MicroRNAs as Biomarkers and Effector Molecules of Thrombosis)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
There is evidence for the effects of platelet inhibition on innate immune activation. Circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) have been implicated as markers of platelet and leukocyte activation. In the present study, we assessed the effects of P2Y12 inhibitors on platelet and leukocyte miRNAs during endotoxemia. Healthy volunteers were randomly assigned to receive oral ticagrelor (n = 10), clopidogrel (n = 8) or no drug (n = 8) for one week, followed by an intravenous bolus of 2 ng/kg endotoxin. Serum was collected at baseline, after one week of antiplatelet treatment and 6 and 24 h after endotoxin administration. MiRNAs were screened using LNA-based qPCR, followed by TaqMan-qPCR validation of candidates. Clinical validation was performed in 41 sepsis patients. Platelet-enriched miR-197, miR-223 and miR-223* were decreased in volunteers following antiplatelet therapy. Endotoxin increased platelet miRNAs, whilst the opposite effect was seen for leukocyte-enriched miR-150. Neither of these endotoxin-mediated effects were altered by P2Y12 inhibitors. Sepsis patients with fatal outcomes (n = 12) had reduced miR-150 levels compared with survivors (n = 29). In conclusion, we show that miR-150 is downregulated in experimental endotoxemia and can predict survival in sepsis but is unaffected by P2Y12 inhibition. While P2Y12 inhibition reduces platelet-associated miRNAs in healthy volunteers, it fails to attenuate the response of platelet miRNAs to endotoxemia.

1. Introduction

Sepsis affects around 31.5 million people per year globally, of which approximately 5.3 million die [1]. With a median of the mean hospital-wide cost of sepsis per patient of $32,421, as systematically reviewed in 2017, it also represents the most expensive condition in US hospitals [2]. Sepsis is characterized by an excessive immune response to infection that leads to organ dysfunction [3]. As a consequence of the systemic presence of inflammatory stimuli, platelets are activated on a large scale. This further aggravates septic coagulation and inflammatory reactions, potentially leading to disseminated intravascular coagulation [4]. Although the mechanisms are not fully understood, increased platelet reactivity might also contribute to the 18-fold risk increase of myocardial infarction or stroke within 30 days of bacteremia [5]. The question whether (and which) platelet inhibitors are able to attenuate this detrimental process is therefore highly relevant. This has been addressed in pre-clinical sepsis models as well as a few, mostly retrospective clinical studies. Some of these studies point to the direction that sepsis patients on antiplatelet therapy have survival benefits [6,7,8], which are attributed to the drug’s anti-inflammatory properties in addition to their antiaggregatory effects, as determined by experimental studies [9,10,11]. Other studies did not confirm benefits on severity and outcome, however, and the hypercoagulable state in sepsis remains difficult to manage [12,13,14].
One reason for limited success of antiplatelet drugs is high on-treatment platelet reactivity during sepsis. In fact, recent data suggests that sepsis promotes platelet activation despite treatment with P2Y12 inhibitors, which are common antiplatelet drugs used in the secondary prevention of arterial thrombotic diseases [15,16,17]. Currently, there are no diagnostic tests that are able to inform treatment decisions and predict outcomes based on measurements of platelet reactivity in sepsis patients. Indeed, early identification of the best individualized treatment strategy remains challenging in sepsis because clinical signs and laboratory parameters are nonspecific [18]. It is therefore important to find novel markers that can be used in combination with established clinical scores and laboratory parameters. MiRNAs are attracting interest as potential biomarkers. The main biological function of these small RNAs (~22 nucleotides in length) is to repress protein synthesis. Most miRNAs are ubiquitously expressed, but a small subset is cell-specific and can be dysregulated in disease [19]. Their stable detectability in cell-free serum or plasma led to their investigation as biomarkers for various conditions, including immune cell activation in sepsis [20] and response of platelets to antiplatelet therapy [21]. However, the identification of a suitable miRNA biomarker in sepsis has been complicated by the numerous confounders present in such critically ill patients. Comorbidity, comedication, source and type of infection can affect the extracellular miRNome and lead to high interindividual variations in the immune response. This contributes to the conflicting evidence in the literature with regards to changes of sepsis-related miRNAs [20].
To minimize the impact of clinical confounders and preanalytical variation, we performed serum miRNA profiling in an experimental endotoxemia model, with volunteers receiving the P2Y12 inhibitors ticagrelor, clopidogrel or no drug [22]. Findings were then validated in a cohort of sepsis patients.

2. Results

2.1. Effect of Antiplatelet Therapy on Circulating MiRNAs

To identify circulating miRNAs that are responsive to antiplatelet therapy and can serve as markers of platelet activation, miRNA levels were profiled by TaqMan-based qPCR analysis in serum of healthy volunteers, who were randomly assigned to receive oral ticagrelor (180 mg loading dose, followed by 90 mg maintenance dose twice daily), oral clopidogrel (300 mg loading dose, followed by 75 mg twice daily) or no treatment for one week. Platelet-enriched miR-197, miR-223 and miR-223* were significantly downregulated after treatment with clopidogrel or ticagrelor (Figure 1, Table S1) [23]. In contrast, antiplatelet therapy had no effect on leukocyte-enriched miR-150 [24].

2.2. Effect of Endotoxemia on Circulating MiRNAs

Next, miRNA profiling was performed in an experimental human model of low-dose endotoxemia [22]. Healthy volunteers from the control group without antiplatelet therapy (n = 6) received an intravenous bolus of 2 ng/kg endotoxin. With this standardized approach, common clinical confounders and preanalytical variation in sepsis patients can be avoided. When miRNA levels were compared before and 6 h after endotoxin administration, leukocyte-enriched miR-150 was found to have the strongest decrease (Figure 2, Table S2) [24]. In contrast, miRNAs previously implicated as markers of platelet activation (miR-197, miR-223, miR-26b, miR-191, miR-24; [23,25,26]) showed higher levels after endotoxin treatment.

2.3. Effect of Antiplatelet Therapy on Circulating MiRNAs in Endotoxemia

Healthy volunteers were randomly assigned to receive oral ticagrelor (n = 10), clopidogrel (n = 8) or no treatment (n = 8) for one week, followed by an intravenous bolus of 2ng/kg endotoxin. Twenty-one candidate miRNAs that were differentially regulated in endotoxemia (Figure 2) and had evidence for enrichment in platelets or leukocytes were selected. These miRNAs were then analyzed by TaqMan-based qPCR in the entire cohort. At 6 h after endotoxin administration, levels of leukocyte-enriched miR-150 were markedly reduced, confirming findings from the previous screen (Figure 3, Table S3). For platelet-enriched miRNAs, an increase at 6 h after endotoxin administration was observed. After 24 h, all miRNAs returned to baseline. Neither of these effects of endotoxin were altered by pretreatment with clopidogrel or ticagrelor, suggesting that antiplatelet therapy does not attenuate platelet activation or the innate immunity response in this model of low-dose endotoxemia.

2.4. Circulating MiR-150 Levels Are Lower in Sepsis Patients with Fatal Outcome Than in Survivors

To validate the findings of our endotoxemia model in a clinical context, selected platelet- and leukocyte-enriched serum miRNAs were measured in 41 sepsis patients at day 1, 3 and 7 after admission to the intensive care unit (Table S4). As previously reported [27,28], miR-150 levels were lower in non-survivors compared with survivors (Figure 4, Table S5). In contrast, levels of platelet-related miRNAs miR-197 and miR-223 did not differ between sepsis survivors and non-survivors (Table S5).

3. Discussion

This study aimed to identify miRNA biomarkers for platelet and immune cell activation in endotoxemia. To define the circulating miRNA response to endotoxemia without common confounders such as medication and co-morbidities in critically-ill sepsis patients, we employed an experimental low-dose endotoxemia model in combination with P2Y12 inhibitor treatment in healthy volunteers. Findings were subsequently applied to a cohort of sepsis patients [22].
The three miRNAs responsive to P2Y12 inhibition (miR-197, miR-223 and miR-223*) have previously been described as being enriched in platelets [23]. Also, a crossover study including 56 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus found plasma levels of miR-197 and miR-223 alongside miR-191 and miR-24 to be lower in diabetic patients on the P2Y12 inhibitor prasugrel, compared with aspirin [26]. We have previously reported a decrease of these platelet-related miRNAs in plasma of healthy volunteers upon treatment with P2Y12 inhibitors [23]. In 121 patients with a history of acute coronary syndrome, plasma levels of miR-223, miR-197, miR-191 and miR-24 showed significant positive correlations with the vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation assay but not light transmittance aggregometry tests after 30 days of dual antiplatelet therapy [29]. In contrast to our results, studies using platelet-rich or platelet-poor plasma from patients with acute coronary syndrome found miR-223 levels to be decreased in patients with a very low response to P2Y12 inhibitors, compared with normal responders [30,31,32]. Differences in sample preparation and normalization, as well as potential interference of heparin [33], can all substantially affect measurements of circulating miRNAs [21]. Alternatively, low miR-223 levels in acute coronary syndrome patients with a low response to P2Y12 inhibitors might be the consequence of reduced expression in platelets of this patient subgroup. MiR-223 is known to target P2Y12 mRNA and lower levels may therefore convey increased resistance to P2Y12 inhibition. Reduced expression of miR-223 in platelets has also been shown in diabetes; which is a strong risk factor for coronary artery disease and can be associated with high on-treatment platelet reactivity [34,35].
In contrast to platelet-derived miR-197, miR-223 and miR-223*, levels of leukocyte-enriched miR-150 were unaffected by antiplatelet therapy [24]. Experimental endotoxemia led to a rise of platelet-associated miRNAs in the circulation, indicating endotoxin-mediated platelet activation. The latter is mediated by platelet toll-like receptor 4 [36,37,38,39]. Facilitated by sCD14 derived from plasma [39], endotoxin binds to this receptor and initiates a signaling cascade that involves the adaptor protein MyD88, resulting in activation of the nitric oxide and cyclic guanosine monophosphate-dependent protein kinase pathway. This is sufficient to induce secretion of dense and α-granules but does not induce platelet aggregation, as determined by ex vivo experiments [36,37,38]. Instead, endotoxin sensitizes and potentiates the aggregation response to subthreshold concentrations of common platelet agonists such as adenosine diphosphate, collagen, glycoprotein VI collagen receptor agonists, thrombin and thromboxane [36,37,38]. There is also evidence that platelet mRNA levels of interleukin-1β, tissue factor and αIIb protein are increased and translated under septic conditions, further contributing to the prothrombotic state [40,41,42].
The rise of platelet-associated miR-197, miR-223 and miR-223* levels observed after low-dose endotoxemia was unaffected by treatment with clopidogrel or ticagrelor, suggesting release of platelet-associated miRNAs despite pharmacological P2Y12 inhibition. One explanation for high on-treatment platelet reactivity during sepsis is the dysregulation of hepatic cytochrome P450 enzymes upon endotoxemia [43], which are responsible for activation of the prodrug clopidogrel. Another possibility is that high on-treatment platelet reactivity is mediated by platelets that escape pharmacological therapy when they are formed at the nadir of drug bioavailability [44]. However, both mechanisms are unlikely since clopidogrel and ticagrelor showed indistinguishable effects on circulating miRNAs; despite ticagrelor being an allosteric antagonist that does not require enzymatic activation and is present continuously in the plasma at therapeutic concentrations during treatment [45]. Instead, there is evidence that P2Y12 inhibitors insufficiently reduce platelet reactivity during sepsis [15,16,17]. Patients on clopidogrel upon sepsis onset showed high on-treatment platelet reactivity in a prospective observational study, as determined by the VerifyNow point-of-care P2Y12 assay [15]. Similarly, healthy volunteers on prasugrel showed reduced antiplatelet effects due to the increased release of von Willebrand factor during experimental endotoxemia [16]. A beneficial role of P2Y12 inhibitors beyond their intended effects on platelets appears to be the reduction of systemic inflammation. This has been shown in sepsis models conducted in animals [46,47] as well as humans [48]. In a human experimental endotoxemia model conducted by Thomas et al. [48], clopidogrel and ticagrelor were able to reduce peak levels of D-dimer and major proinflammatory cytokines, including interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-α and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1. In contrast to clopidogrel, ticagrelor also reduced interleukin-8 and growth colony-stimulating factor levels, increased interleukin-10 levels and reduced platelet-monocyte-, but not platelet-neutrophil aggregation. In line with this observation, another study confirmed decreased release of pro-inflammatory cytokines in blood from ticagrelor-treated volunteers when exposed to endotoxin ex vivo [49]. Platelet-monocyte aggregates are known to amplify monocyte release of proinflammatory cytokines that are responsible for the excessive immune response in sepsis, and their prevention could therefore be beneficial [50,51]. Consistent with the absent response of platelet-neutrophil aggregation upon P2Y12 inhibition in the study by Thomas et al. [48], another human experimental endotoxemia study by Schoergenhofer et al. [17] found no influence of prasugrel on circulating levels of histone-DNA complexes. The latter serve as surrogates of extracellular traps derived from neutrophils (NETs), which can be formed following platelet toll-like receptor 4-mediated platelet-neutrophil aggregation [52]. These structures were initially described for their importance in host defense and are now being increasingly recognized for their prothrombotic role [53].
In contrast to the increase of platelet-associated miRNAs, leukocyte-enriched miR-150 was markedly reduced in experimental endotoxemia and lower in sepsis patients with fatal outcomes, compared with survivors. Clopidogrel and ticagrelor had no influence on miR-150 levels in our model, suggesting that P2Y12 inhibition does not attenuate its reduction during low-dose endotoxemia. In a previous study, intracellular miR-150 levels were found to be decreased in leukocytes upon human experimental endotoxemia [24]. Its downregulation in the circulation and negative correlation with survival in sepsis patients has also been reported before [27,28,54]. In a pilot study with 17 sepsis patients and 32 healthy controls, miR-150 levels were reduced and correlated with disease severity assessed by the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score [28]. Here, miR-150 also negatively correlated with levels pro-inflammatory cytokines interleukin-18, tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-6, but not leukocyte numbers [28]. This was reproduced in a larger study, which included a training cohort and independent validation cohort [54]. In the latter, miR-150 levels were downregulated in patients with sepsis compared with individuals affected by systemic inflammatory response syndrome and healthy volunteers. In another study, miR-150 levels predicted survival in a cohort of 223 critically ill patients, of which 138 fulfilled sepsis criteria [27]. Reduced miR-150 levels were also shown in a murine sepsis model [55]. Functionally, miR-150 controls the transcription factor transcriptional activator Myb, which affects the development and immune response of lymphocytes [56]. In monocytes, miR-150 regulates the generation of non-classical monocyte subsets, with miR-150 being upregulated in non-classical monocytes and downregulated in classical monocytes [57]. Increased differentiation of monocytes towards the non-classical phenotype has been associated with survival in sepsis [58]. In light of our finding that miR-150 is decreased in serum upon experimental human endotoxemia, it appears that miR-150 is a robust sepsis marker.
Our study has quantified miRNAs in cell-free serum, which is characterized by high RNase activity [59]. The stable detectability of circulating miRNAs has been attributed to their protection by small and large extracellular vesicles [60,61,62] and/or protein complexes [62,63,64]. Recently, it was reported by Linhares-Lacerda et al. [53] that miRNAs can also be carried by NETs. In fact, NET formation could be a relevant mechanism by which miR-150 is released from neutrophils. In sepsis patients, platelet toll-like receptor 4 has been shown to induce platelet-neutrophil aggregation and subsequent NET-formation [52]. According to the findings by Schoergenhofer et al. [17] and Thomas et al. [48], P2Y12 inhibition reduced systemic inflammation but not platelet-neutrophil aggregation and NET markers in humans given a single bolus of endotoxin; a possible NET-dependent miR-150 release could explain why this miRNA is such a robust marker of endotoxemia but is not affected by the anti-inflammatory effects of P2Y12 inhibitors. The response to antiplatelet treatment during endotoxemia, however, might differ for other antiplatelet drugs. There is limited evidence for aspirin to inhibit endotoxin-mediated platelet activation ex vivo [37]. A recent meta-analysis by Ouyang et al. [65] has shown that for all but one study [6], the positive effect of different antiplatelet drugs on sepsis mortality is lost when patients on aspirin are excluded. Most studies, however, are retrospective rather than interventional, and there is currently no consensus on the benefit of antiplatelet therapy in sepsis.
In summary, our findings indicate that miR-150 is a robust marker of sepsis mortality, which is in line with previous studies [27,28,54]. Reduced miR-150 levels were observed in sepsis patients and in experimental endotoxemia, confirming that endotoxin is sufficient to induce this response, at least in healthy volunteers. The P2Y12 inhibitors clopidogrel and ticagrelor do not alter the miR-150 response, nor do they attenuate the endotoxin-induced release of platelet-associated miRNAs (miR-197, miR-223 and miR-223*). While these platelet-associated miRNAs are responsive to P2Y12 inhibition in the absence of endotoxemia, their response during sepsis does not allow discrimination between survivors and non-survivors. Further studies are needed to clarify whether certain miRNAs have the potential to improve diagnosis, prognosis assessment and inform treatment decisions in sepsis.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Study Design and Participant Characteristics

Two independent cohorts were included in the study (Figure 5). The first cohort consisted of 30 healthy volunteers (median age 22 years, all male). A detailed description of the study population can be found here [48]. All participants were randomly assigned to three experimental groups according to the antiplatelet therapy they received. In brief, group A received oral ticagrelor (180 mg loading dose, followed by a maintenance dose of 90 mg twice daily for 7 days). Group B received oral clopidogrel (300 mg loading dose, followed by a maintenance dose of 75 mg once daily for 7 days). Group C did not receive any treatment and served as a control group. All participants then received an intravenous bolus of 2 ng/kg endotoxin. Serum was collected by venipuncture into serum separator tubes at baseline (before starting antiplatelet therapy); after one week of antiplatelet therapy (before endotoxin bolus); and 6 and 24 h after endotoxin infusion. Samples of 2 volunteers from group B and samples of 2 volunteers from group C were excluded from miRNA analysis due to hemolysis. The study was approved by the Sheffield Research Ethics Committee (UK) on 7th of February 2013 (REC reference 13/YH/0005). Participants provided written informed consent [48].
The second cohort consisted of 41 sepsis patients (median age 64 years, 61% male) recruited in an intensive care unit. Clinical management of all patients in the sepsis cohort was at the discretion of the attending physicians. A detailed description of the study population can be found in Supplementary Table S4. Serum was collected by venipuncture into serum separator tubes at days 1, 3 and 7 after enrolment. The study was approved by an institutional review board (REC reference 12/LO/0326). Written informed consent was obtained directly from patients (if mentally competent), or from the next of kin. The consent procedure was then completed with retrospective consent [66].

4.2. RNA Isolation

Total RNA was extracted from 100 μL serum using the miRNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany, #217004) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations, with minor modifications as described previously [67]. At the first step of the isolation, 1.25 μL RNA from MS2 bacteriophage (Roche, Basel, Switzerland, #10165948001) and 1:2000 diluted Cel-miR-39-3p mimic (Qiagen, #219610) were spiked-in as carrier and exogenous control, respectively. Total RNA was eluted in 35 μL of nuclease-free water.

4.3. Reverse Transcription and Real Time Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR)

For the screening experiment that was conducted in healthy volunteers before and 6h after endotoxin administration, Locked Nucleic Acid (LNA)-based qPCR was used (92 miRNAs; Supplementary Table S2). Reverse transcription was performed with the miRCURY LNA™ Universal RT microRNA PCR panel (Exiqon, Vedbaek, Denmark, #203301) following the manufacturer’s instructions, using a Veriti Thermal Cycler (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, USA). qPCR was then performed with the miRCURY Ready-to-Use PCR, Human panel I + II V1.M platform (Exiqon, Vedbaek, Denmark, #339322) following the manufacturer’s instructions, using an Applied Biosystems Viia 7 thermocycler. Screening data was normalized based on the 2−ΔΔCq method [68], using the average Cq of all measured transcripts for ΔCq and an interplate calibrator consisting of an RNA pool of all samples for ΔΔCq.
For the validation experiment in the whole cohort of healthy volunteers (21 miRNAs; Supplementary Tables S1 and S3) and the miRNA measurements in sepsis patients (18 miRNAs; Supplementary Table S5), TaqMan-based qPCR was used. Reverse transcription was performed using Megaplex RT primers (Human Pool A v2.; Life Technologies, Darmstadt, Germany, #4399966) and the TaqMan MicroRNA RT kit (Life Technologies, Darmstadt, Germany, #4366596) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. cDNA was then pre-amplified using Megaplex PreAmp Primers (Human Pool A v2.1, Life Technologies, Darmstadt, Germany, #4399233) and TaqMan PreAmp Mastermix (Life Technologies, Darmstadt, Germany, #4488593). Pre-amplification product was diluted 1:18 and TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix No AmpErase UNG (Life Technologies, Darmstadt, Germany, #4324018) was used for qRT-PCR in an Applied Biosystems Viia 7 thermocycler. Validation data and data of sepsis patients was normalized based on the 2−ΔΔCq method [68], using exogenous Cel-miR-39-3p for ΔCq and an interplate calibrator consisting of an RNA pool of all samples for ΔΔCq.

4.4. Data Analysis

Statistical analysis and design of graphs was performed with R programming environment and GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software Inc, San Diego, USA, Version 8). Statistical tests, measures of central tendency and variation are indicated in the respective result figures. A p-value of <0.05 was considered to denote statistical significance in all cases.

5. Patents

M.M. has filed and licensed patent applications on miRNAs as platelet biomarkers.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/21/8/2897/s1. Table S1: List of 21 miRNAs measured by TaqMan-based qPCR in volunteers treated with ticagrelor (n = 8), clopidogrel (n = 10) or no drug (n = 8). Table S2: Experimental endotoxemia screening experiment. Table S3: List of 21 miRNAs measured by TaqMan-based qPCR in volunteers treated with ticagrelor (n = 10), clopidogrel (n = 8) or no drug (n = 8) before (0 h) and after (6 h, 24 h) endotoxin administration. Table S4: Clinical characteristics of the cohort of sepsis patients. Table S5: List of 18 miRNAs measured by TaqMan-based qPCR in sepsis patients at day 1 (d1), day 3 (d3) and day 7 (d7) after admission to the intensive care unit.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization of research, R.F.S. and M.M.; methodology, T.B.; validation, T.B.; formal analysis, A.B.-B.; resources, M.R.T., H.M.J., M.S.-H., R.A.A., I.S.; data curation, T.B., R.P., C.G.; writing—original draft preparation, T.B., C.G.; writing—review and editing, A.B.-B., A.J., R.F.S., M.M.; supervision, M.M.; project administration, M.R.T.; funding acquisition, R.F.S, and M.M.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was conducted with support from AstraZeneca UK Limited. T.B. was funded by a British Heart Foundation (BHF) Interdisciplinary PhD studentship. C.G. is funded by a BHF PhD studentship (FS/18/60/34181). M.R.T was funded by a Medical Research Council clinical research training fellowship. A.J. was a BHF Clinical Research Training Fellow (FS/16/32/32184). M.M. is a BHF Chair Holder (CH/16/3/32406) with BHF program grant support (RG/16/14/32397). This study is supported by VASCage—Research Centre on Vascular Ageing and Stroke. As a COMET centre, VASCage is funded within the COMET program—Competence Centers for Excellent Technologies by the Austrian Ministry for Climate Action, Environment, Energy, Mobility, Innovation and Technology, the Austrian Ministry for Digital and Economic Affairs and the federal states Tyrol, Salzburg and Vienna.

Conflicts of Interest

A.B.-B., T.B., C.G., A.J., R.A.A. declare no conflict of interest. M.M. has filed and licensed patent applications on miRNAs as platelet biomarkers. R.F.S. reports institutional research grants/support from AstraZeneca, GlyCardial Diagnostics and Thromboserin; consultancy fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb/Pfizer, GlyCardial Diagnostics, Haemonetics, Portola and Thromboserin; and honoraria from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb/Pfizer and Medscape. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Fleischmann, C.; Scherag, A.; Adhikari, N.K.J.; Hartog, C.S.; Tsaganos, T.; Schlattmann, P.; Angus, D.C.; Reinhart, K.; International Forum of Acute Care Trialists Assessment of Global Incidence and Mortality of Hospital-treated Sepsis. Current Estimates and Limitations. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2016, 193, 259–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Arefian, H.; Heublein, S.; Scherag, A.; Brunkhorst, F.M.; Younis, M.Z.; Moerer, O.; Fischer, D.; Hartmann, M. Hospital-related cost of sepsis: A systematic review. J. Infect. 2017, 74, 107–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Singer, M.; Deutschman, C.S.; Seymour, C.W.; Shankar-Hari, M.; Annane, D.; Bauer, M.; Bellomo, R.; Bernard, G.R.; Chiche, J.-D.; Coopersmith, C.M.; et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 2016, 315, 801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Vardon-Bounes, F.; Ruiz, S.; Gratacap, M.-P.; Garcia, C.; Payrastre, B.; Minville, V. Platelets Are Critical Key Players in Sepsis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Dalager-Pedersen, M.; Søgaard, M.; Schønheyder, H.C.; Nielsen, H.; Thomsen, R.W. Risk for Myocardial Infarction and Stroke After Community-Acquired Bacteremia. Circulation 2014, 129, 1387–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Tsai, M.-J.; Ou, S.-M.; Shih, C.-J.; Chao, P.; Wang, L.-F.; Shih, Y.-N.; Li, S.-Y.; Kuo, S.-C.; Hsu, Y.-T.; Chen, Y.-T. Association of prior antiplatelet agents with mortality in sepsis patients: A nationwide population-based cohort study. Intensive Care Med. 2015, 41, 806–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Eisen, D.P.; Reid, D.; McBryde, E.S. Acetyl salicylic acid usage and mortality in critically ill patients with the systemic inflammatory response syndrome and sepsis. Crit. Care Med. 2012, 40, 1761–1767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Otto, G.P.; Sossdorf, M.; Boettel, J.; Kabisch, B.; Breuel, H.; Winning, J.; Lösche, W. Effects of low-dose acetylsalicylic acid and atherosclerotic vascular diseases on the outcome in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. Platelets 2013, 24, 480–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liverani, E.; Rico, M.C.; Tsygankov, A.Y.; Kilpatrick, L.E.; Kunapuli, S.P. P2Y 12 Receptor Modulates Sepsis-Induced Inflammation. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2016, 36, 961–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Rahman, M.; Gustafsson, D.; Wang, Y.; Thorlacius, H.; Braun, O.Ö. Ticagrelor reduces neutrophil recruitment and lung damage in abdominal sepsis. Platelets 2014, 25, 257–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sharron, M.; Hoptay, C.E.; Wiles, A.A.; Garvin, L.M.; Geha, M.; Benton, A.S.; Nagaraju, K.; Freishtat, R.J. Platelets Induce Apoptosis during Sepsis in a Contact-Dependent Manner That Is Inhibited by GPIIb/IIIa Blockade. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e41549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wiewel, M.A.; de Stoppelaar, S.F.; van Vught, L.A.; Frencken, J.F.; Hoogendijk, A.J.; Klein Klouwenberg, P.M.C.; Horn, J.; Bonten, M.J.; Zwinderman, A.H.; Cremer, O.L.; et al. Chronic antiplatelet therapy is not associated with alterations in the presentation, outcome, or host response biomarkers during sepsis: A propensity-matched analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2016, 42, 352–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Valerio-Rojas, J.C.; Jaffer, I.J.; Kor, D.J.; Gajic, O.; Cartin-Ceba, R. Outcomes of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Patients on Chronic Antiplatelet Treatment: A Historical Cohort Study. Crit. Care Res. Pract. 2013, 2013, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Campbell, R.; McGuire, A.; Young, L.; Mackay, A. Aspirin and statin therapy in sepsis, a red herring? Intensive Care Med. Exp. 2015, 3, A227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Akinosoglou, K.; Perperis, A.; Theodoraki, S.; Alexopoulos, D.; Gogos, C. Sepsis favors high-on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity. Platelets 2018, 29, 76–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Spiel, A.O.; Derhaschnig, U.; Schwameis, M.; Bartko, J.; Siller-Matula, J.M.; Jilma, B. Effects of prasugrel on platelet inhibition during systemic endotoxaemia: A randomized controlled trial. Clin. Sci. (Lond.) 2012, 123, 591–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Schoergenhofer, C.; Schwameis, M.; Hobl, E.-L.; Ay, C.; Key, N.S.; Derhaschnig, U.; Jilma, B.; Spiel, A.O. Potent irreversible P2Y12 inhibition does not reduce LPS-induced coagulation activation in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Clin. Sci. 2016, 130, 433–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Opal, S.M.; Wittebole, X. Biomarkers of Infection and Sepsis. Crit. Care Clin. 2020, 36, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mendell, J.T.; Olson, E.N. MicroRNAs in Stress Signaling and Human Disease. Cell 2012, 148, 1172–1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Benz, F.; Roy, S.; Trautwein, C.; Roderburg, C.; Luedde, T. Circulating MicroRNAs as Biomarkers for Sepsis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Sunderland, N.; Skroblin, P.; Barwari, T.; Huntley, R.P.; Lu, R.; Joshi, A.; Lovering, R.C.; Mayr, M. MicroRNA Biomarkers and Platelet Reactivity. Circ. Res. 2017, 120, 418–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Van Lier, D.; Geven, C.; Leijte, G.P.; Pickkers, P. Experimental human endotoxemia as a model of systemic inflammation. Biochimie 2019, 159, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Willeit, P.; Zampetaki, A.; Dudek, K.; Kaudewitz, D.; King, A.; Kirkby, N.S.; Crosby-Nwaobi, R.; Prokopi, M.; Drozdov, I.; Langley, S.R.; et al. Circulating MicroRNAs as Novel Biomarkers for Platelet Activation. Circ. Res. 2013, 112, 595–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Schmidt, W.M.; Spiel, A.O.; Jilma, B.; Wolzt, M.; Müller, M. In vivo profile of the human leukocyte microRNA response to endotoxemia. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2009, 380, 437–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Szilágyi, B.; Fejes, Z.; Póliska, S.; Pócsi, M.; Czimmerer, Z.; Patsalos, A.; Fenyvesi, F.; Rusznyák, Á.; Nagy, G.; Kerekes, G.; et al. Reduced miR-26b Expression in Megakaryocytes and Platelets Contributes to Elevated Level of Platelet Activation Status in Sepsis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Parker, W.A.E.; Schulte, C.; Barwari, T.; Phoenix, F.; Pearson, S.M.; Mayr, M.; Grant, P.J.; Storey, R.F.; Ajjan, R.A. Aspirin, clopidogrel and prasugrel monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A double-blind randomised controlled trial of the effects on thrombotic markers and microRNA levels. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2020, 19, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Roderburg, C.; Luedde, M.; Vargas Cardenas, D.; Vucur, M.; Scholten, D.; Frey, N.; Koch, A.; Trautwein, C.; Tacke, F.; Luedde, T. Circulating MicroRNA-150 Serum Levels Predict Survival in Patients with Critical Illness and Sepsis. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e54612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Vasilescu, C.; Rossi, S.; Shimizu, M.; Tudor, S.; Veronese, A.; Ferracin, M.; Nicoloso, M.S.; Barbarotto, E.; Popa, M.; Stanciulea, O.; et al. MicroRNA Fingerprints Identify miR-150 as a Plasma Prognostic Marker in Patients with Sepsis. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e7405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kaudewitz, D.; Skroblin, P.; Bender, L.H.; Barwari, T.; Willeit, P.; Pechlaner, R.; Sunderland, N.P.; Willeit, K.; Morton, A.C.; Armstrong, P.C.; et al. Association of MicroRNAs and YRNAs With Platelet Function. Circ. Res. 2016, 118, 420–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chyrchel, B.; Totoń-Żurańska, J.; Kruszelnicka, O.; Chyrchel, M.; Mielecki, W.; Kołton-Wróż, M.; Wołkow, P.; Surdacki, A. Association of plasma miR-223 and platelet reactivity in patients with coronary artery disease on dual antiplatelet therapy: A preliminary report. Platelets 2015, 26, 593–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Shi, R.; Ge, L.; Zhou, X.; Ji, W.-J.; Lu, R.-Y.; Zhang, Y.-Y.; Zeng, S.; Liu, X.; Zhao, J.-H.; Zhang, W.-C.; et al. Decreased platelet miR-223 expression is associated with high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity. Thromb. Res. 2013, 131, 508–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Peng, L.; Liu, J.; Qin, L.; Liu, J.; Xi, S.; Lu, C.; Yin, T. Interaction between platelet-derived microRNAs and CYP2C19*2 genotype on clopidogrel antiplatelet responsiveness in patients with ACS. Thromb. Res. 2017, 157, 97–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kaudewitz, D.; Lee, R.; Willeit, P.; McGregor, R.; Markus, H.S.; Kiechl, S.; Zampetaki, A.; Storey, R.F.; Channon, K.M.; Mayr, M. Impact of intravenous heparin on quantification of circulating microRNAs in patients with coronary artery disease. Thromb. Haemost. 2013, 110, 609–615. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Zeng, Z.; Xia, L.; Fan, X.; Ostriker, A.C.; Yarovinsky, T.; Su, M.; Zhang, Y.; Peng, X.; Xie, Y.; Pi, L.; et al. Platelet-derived miR-223 promotes a phenotypic switch in arterial injury repair. J. Clin. Invest. 2019, 129, 1372–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Fejes, Z.; Póliska, S.; Czimmerer, Z.; Káplár, M.; Penyige, A.; Gál Szabó, G.; Debreceni, I.B.; Kunapuli, S.P.; Kappelmayer, J.; Nagy, B. Hyperglycaemia suppresses microRNA expression in platelets to increase P2RY12 and SELP levels in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Thromb. Haemost. 2017, 117, 529–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Zhang, G.; Han, J.; Welch, E.J.; Ye, R.D.; Voyno-Yasenetskaya, T.A.; Malik, A.B.; Du, X.; Li, Z. Lipopolysaccharide Stimulates Platelet Secretion and Potentiates Platelet Aggregation via TLR4/MyD88 and the cGMP-Dependent Protein Kinase Pathway. J. Immunol. 2009, 182, 7997–8004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Nocella, C.; Carnevale, R.; Bartimoccia, S.; Novo, M.; Cangemi, R.; Pastori, D.; Calvieri, C.; Pignatelli, P.; Violi, F. Lipopolysaccharide as trigger of platelet aggregation via eicosanoid over-production. Thromb. Haemost. 2017, 117, 1558–1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Lopes Pires, M.E.; Clarke, S.R.; Marcondes, S.; Gibbins, J.M. Lipopolysaccharide potentiates platelet responses via toll-like receptor 4-stimulated Akt-Erk-PLA2 signalling. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0186981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Damien, P.; Cognasse, F.; Eyraud, M.-A.; Arthaud, C.-A.; Pozzetto, B.; Garraud, O.; Hamzeh-Cognasse, H. LPS stimulation of purified human platelets is partly dependent on plasma soluble CD14 to secrete their main secreted product, soluble-CD40-Ligand. BMC Immunol. 2015, 16, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Shashkin, P.N.; Brown, G.T.; Ghosh, A.; Marathe, G.K.; McIntyre, T.M. Lipopolysaccharide Is a Direct Agonist for Platelet RNA Splicing. J. Immunol. 2008, 181, 3495–3502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Rondina, M.T.; Schwertz, H.; Harris, E.S.; Kraemer, B.F.; Campbell, R.A.; Mackman, N.; Grissom, C.K.; Weyrich, A.S.; Zimmerman, G.A. The septic milieu triggers expression of spliced tissue factor mRNA in human platelets. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2011, 9, 748–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Middleton, E.A.; Rowley, J.W.; Campbell, R.A.; Grissom, C.K.; Brown, S.M.; Beesley, S.J.; Schwertz, H.O.R.; Kosaka, Y.; Manne, B.K.; Krauel, K.; et al. Sepsis Alters the Transcriptional and Translational Landscape of Human and Murine Platelets. Blood 2019, 134, 911–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Shedlofsky, S.I.; Israel, B.C.; McClain, C.J.; Hill, D.B.; Blouin, R.A. Endotoxin administration to humans inhibits hepatic cytochrome P450-mediated drug metabolism. J. Clin. Invest. 1994, 94, 2209–2214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Armstrong, P.C.; Hoefer, T.; Knowles, R.B.; Tucker, A.T.; Hayman, M.A.; Ferreira, P.M.; Chan, M.V.; Warner, T.D. Newly Formed Reticulated Platelets Undermine Pharmacokinetically Short-Lived Antiplatelet Therapies. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2017, 37, 949–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Orme, R.C.; Parker, W.A.E.; Thomas, M.R.; Judge, H.M.; Baster, K.; Sumaya, W.; Morgan, K.P.; McMellon, H.C.; Richardson, J.D.; Grech, E.D.; et al. Study of Two Dose Regimens of Ticagrelor Compared With Clopidogrel in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Stable Coronary Artery Disease. Circulation 2018, 138, 1290–1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hagiwara, S.; Iwasaka, H.; Hasegawa, A.; Oyama, M.; Imatomi, R.; Uchida, T.; Noguchi, T. Adenosine Diphosphate Receptor Antagonist Clopidogrel Sulfate Attenuates LPS-Induced Systemic Inflammation in a Rat Model. Shock 2011, 35, 289–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Liverani, E.; Rico, M.C.; Yaratha, L.; Tsygankov, A.Y.; Kilpatrick, L.E.; Kunapuli, S.P. LPS-induced systemic inflammation is more severe in P2Y 12 null mice. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2014, 95, 313–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Thomas, M.R.; Outteridge, S.N.; Ajjan, R.A.; Phoenix, F.; Sangha, G.K.; Faulkner, R.E.; Ecob, R.; Judge, H.M.; Khan, H.; West, L.E.; et al. Platelet P2Y12 Inhibitors Reduce Systemic Inflammation and Its Prothrombotic Effects in an Experimental Human Model. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2015, 35, 2562–2570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Tunjungputri, R.N.; van der Ven, A.J.; Riksen, N.; Rongen, G.; Tacke, S.; van den Berg, T.N.A.; Fijnheer, R.; Gomes, M.E.; Dinarello, C.A.; van de Veerdonk, F.L.; et al. Differential effects of platelets and platelet inhibition by ticagrelor on TLR2- and TLR4-mediated inflammatory responses. Thromb. Haemost. 2015, 113, 1035–1045. [Google Scholar]
  50. Neumann, F.J.; Marx, N.; Gawaz, M.; Brand, K.; Ott, I.; Rokitta, C.; Sticherling, C.; Meinl, C.; May, A.; Schömig, A. Induction of cytokine expression in leukocytes by binding of thrombin-stimulated platelets. Circulation 1997, 95, 2387–2394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Bournazos, S.; Rennie, J.; Hart, S.P.; Fox, K.A.A.; Dransfield, I. Monocyte Functional Responsiveness After PSGL-1–Mediated Platelet Adhesion Is Dependent on Platelet Activation Status. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2008, 28, 1491–1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Clark, S.R.; Ma, A.C.; Tavener, S.A.; McDonald, B.; Goodarzi, Z.; Kelly, M.M.; Patel, K.D.; Chakrabarti, S.; McAvoy, E.; Sinclair, G.D.; et al. Platelet TLR4 activates neutrophil extracellular traps to ensnare bacteria in septic blood. Nat. Med. 2007, 13, 463–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Kimball, A.S.; Obi, A.T.; Diaz, J.A.; Henke, P.K. The Emerging Role of NETs in Venous Thrombosis and Immunothrombosis. Front. Immunol. 2016, 7, 236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Ma, Y.; Vilanova, D.; Atalar, K.; Delfour, O.; Edgeworth, J.; Ostermann, M.; Hernandez-Fuentes, M.; Razafimahatratra, S.; Michot, B.; Persing, D.H.; et al. Genome-Wide Sequencing of Cellular microRNAs Identifies a Combinatorial Expression Signature Diagnostic of Sepsis. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e75918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Tacke, F.; Roderburg, C.; Benz, F.; Cardenas, D.V.; Luedde, M.; Hippe, H.-J.; Frey, N.; Vucur, M.; Gautheron, J.; Koch, A.; et al. Levels of Circulating miR-133a Are Elevated in Sepsis and Predict Mortality in Critically Ill Patients. Crit. Care Med. 2014, 42, 1096–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Xiao, C.; Calado, D.P.; Galler, G.; Thai, T.-H.; Patterson, H.C.; Wang, J.; Rajewsky, N.; Bender, T.P.; Rajewsky, K. MiR-150 Controls B Cell Differentiation by Targeting the Transcription Factor c-Myb. Cell 2007, 131, 146–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Selimoglu-Buet, D.; Rivière, J.; Ghamlouch, H.; Bencheikh, L.; Lacout, C.; Morabito, M.; Diop, M.; Meurice, G.; Breckler, M.; Chauveau, A.; et al. A miR-150/TET3 pathway regulates the generation of mouse and human non-classical monocyte subset. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 5455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Gainaru, G.; Papadopoulos, A.; Tsangaris, I.; Lada, M.; Giamarellos-Bourboulis, E.J.; Pistiki, A. Increases in inflammatory and CD14dim/CD16pos/CD45pos patrolling monocytes in sepsis: Correlation with final outcome. Crit. Care 2018, 22, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Tsui, N.B.Y.; Ng, E.K.O.; Lo, Y.M.D. Stability of endogenous and added RNA in blood specimens, serum, and plasma. Clin. Chem. 2002, 48, 1647–1653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Valadi, H.; Ekström, K.; Bossios, A.; Sjöstrand, M.; Lee, J.J.; Lötvall, J.O. Exosome-mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007, 9, 654–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Jansen, F.; Yang, X.; Proebsting, S.; Hoelscher, M.; Przybilla, D.; Baumann, K.; Schmitz, T.; Dolf, A.; Endl, E.; Franklin, B.S.; et al. MicroRNA Expression in Circulating Microvesicles Predicts Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2014, 3, e001249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Jeppesen, D.K.; Fenix, A.M.; Franklin, J.L.; Higginbotham, J.N.; Zhang, Q.; Zimmerman, L.J.; Liebler, D.C.; Ping, J.; Liu, Q.; Evans, R.; et al. Reassessment of Exosome Composition. Cell 2019, 177, 428–445.e18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Arroyo, J.D.; Chevillet, J.R.; Kroh, E.M.; Ruf, I.K.; Pritchard, C.C.; Gibson, D.F.; Mitchell, P.S.; Bennett, C.F.; Pogosova-Agadjanyan, E.L.; Stirewalt, D.L.; et al. Argonaute2 complexes carry a population of circulating microRNAs independent of vesicles in human plasma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 5003–5008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Vickers, K.C.; Palmisano, B.T.; Shoucri, B.M.; Shamburek, R.D.; Remaley, A.T. MicroRNAs are transported in plasma and delivered to recipient cells by high-density lipoproteins. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011, 13, 423–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Ouyang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Liu, B.; Ma, X.; Ding, R. Effects of antiplatelet therapy on the mortality rate of patients with sepsis: A meta-analysis. J. Crit. Care 2019, 50, 162–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Cuello, F.; Shankar-Hari, M.; Mayr, U.; Yin, X.; Marshall, M.; Suna, G.; Willeit, P.; Langley, S.R.; Jayawardhana, T.; Zeller, T.; et al. Redox state of pentraxin 3 as a novel biomarker for resolution of inflammation and survival in sepsis. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2014, 13, 2545–2557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Barwari, T.; Eminaga, S.; Mayr, U.; Lu, R.; Armstrong, P.C.; Chan, M.V.; Sahraei, M.; Fernández-Fuertes, M.; Moreau, T.; Barallobre-Barreiro, J.; et al. Inhibition of profibrotic microRNA-21 affects platelets and their releasate. JCI Insight 2018, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 21 02897 g001 550
Figure 1. Circulating miRNA levels after antiplatelet therapy. Levels of platelet-enriched miR-197, miR-223 and miR-223* were significantly lower after one week of treatment with either ticagrelor or clopidogrel, compared with the untreated control group. Leukocyte-enriched miR-150 was not affected. Bars and lines represent range and median. Wilcoxon’s signed-rank test was used for statistical comparison. * denotes p-value < 0.05.
Figure 1. Circulating miRNA levels after antiplatelet therapy. Levels of platelet-enriched miR-197, miR-223 and miR-223* were significantly lower after one week of treatment with either ticagrelor or clopidogrel, compared with the untreated control group. Leukocyte-enriched miR-150 was not affected. Bars and lines represent range and median. Wilcoxon’s signed-rank test was used for statistical comparison. * denotes p-value < 0.05.
Ijms 21 02897 g001
Ijms 21 02897 g002 550
Figure 2. Circulating miRNA levels after endotoxemia. Volcano plot representing log2 fold change of miRNA levels 6 h after endotoxin infusion in healthy volunteers without antiplatelet therapy (n = 6). Leukocyte-enriched miR-150 showed strongest fall in abundance, while platelet-enriched miR-197 and miR-223 showed the strongest rise. MiRNAs highlighted in red were selected for qPCR analysis in the entire cohort. Student’s t-tests were used to calculate p-values.
Figure 2. Circulating miRNA levels after endotoxemia. Volcano plot representing log2 fold change of miRNA levels 6 h after endotoxin infusion in healthy volunteers without antiplatelet therapy (n = 6). Leukocyte-enriched miR-150 showed strongest fall in abundance, while platelet-enriched miR-197 and miR-223 showed the strongest rise. MiRNAs highlighted in red were selected for qPCR analysis in the entire cohort. Student’s t-tests were used to calculate p-values.
Ijms 21 02897 g002
Ijms 21 02897 g003 550
Figure 3. Effect of antiplatelet therapy on miRNA levels in endotoxemia. Endotoxin administration in volunteers markedly reduced levels of leukocyte-enriched miR-150 at 6 h after endotoxin administration (6 h), while platelet-enriched miR-197, miR-223 and miR-223* showed an increase. Neither of these effects of endotoxin were altered by treatment with clopidogrel (red) or ticagrelor (blue), compared to the untreated group (green). After 24 h, miRNAs returned to baseline levels (0 h). Data is represented as the geometrical mean with the 95% confidence interval. Statistical testing was performed using Wilcoxon’s signed rank test for consecutive timepoints within each treatment group. p-values were adjusted for multiple testing by the Benjamini–Hochberg method. * denotes False Discovery Rate-adjusted p-value <0.05.
Figure 3. Effect of antiplatelet therapy on miRNA levels in endotoxemia. Endotoxin administration in volunteers markedly reduced levels of leukocyte-enriched miR-150 at 6 h after endotoxin administration (6 h), while platelet-enriched miR-197, miR-223 and miR-223* showed an increase. Neither of these effects of endotoxin were altered by treatment with clopidogrel (red) or ticagrelor (blue), compared to the untreated group (green). After 24 h, miRNAs returned to baseline levels (0 h). Data is represented as the geometrical mean with the 95% confidence interval. Statistical testing was performed using Wilcoxon’s signed rank test for consecutive timepoints within each treatment group. p-values were adjusted for multiple testing by the Benjamini–Hochberg method. * denotes False Discovery Rate-adjusted p-value <0.05.
Ijms 21 02897 g003
Ijms 21 02897 g004 550
Figure 4. Levels of miR-150 in sepsis patients. Sepsis patients with fatal outcome (n = 12) had significantly lower miR-150 levels in serum at day 3 and day 7 compared with sepsis survivors (n = 29). Graph depicts mean ± standard error of the mean. Two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test was used for statistical comparison. * denotes p-value <0.05.
Figure 4. Levels of miR-150 in sepsis patients. Sepsis patients with fatal outcome (n = 12) had significantly lower miR-150 levels in serum at day 3 and day 7 compared with sepsis survivors (n = 29). Graph depicts mean ± standard error of the mean. Two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test was used for statistical comparison. * denotes p-value <0.05.
Ijms 21 02897 g004
Ijms 21 02897 g005 550
Figure 5. Schematic of experimental design. * Samples of 2 volunteers from the clopidogrel group and from the untreated group had to be excluded due to hemolysis.
Figure 5. Schematic of experimental design. * Samples of 2 volunteers from the clopidogrel group and from the untreated group had to be excluded due to hemolysis.
Ijms 21 02897 g005

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Braza-Boïls, A.; Barwari, T.; Gutmann, C.; Thomas, M.R.; Judge, H.M.; Joshi, A.; Pechlaner, R.; Shankar-Hari, M.; Ajjan, R.A.; Sabroe, I.; et al. Circulating MicroRNA Levels Indicate Platelet and Leukocyte Activation in Endotoxemia Despite Platelet P2Y12 Inhibition. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2897. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21082897

AMA Style

Braza-Boïls A, Barwari T, Gutmann C, Thomas MR, Judge HM, Joshi A, Pechlaner R, Shankar-Hari M, Ajjan RA, Sabroe I, et al. Circulating MicroRNA Levels Indicate Platelet and Leukocyte Activation in Endotoxemia Despite Platelet P2Y12 Inhibition. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21(8):2897. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21082897

Chicago/Turabian Style

Braza-Boïls, Aitana, Temo Barwari, Clemens Gutmann, Mark R. Thomas, Heather M. Judge, Abhishek Joshi, Raimund Pechlaner, Manu Shankar-Hari, Ramzi A. Ajjan, Ian Sabroe, and et al. 2020. "Circulating MicroRNA Levels Indicate Platelet and Leukocyte Activation in Endotoxemia Despite Platelet P2Y12 Inhibition" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 8: 2897. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21082897

APA Style

Braza-Boïls, A., Barwari, T., Gutmann, C., Thomas, M. R., Judge, H. M., Joshi, A., Pechlaner, R., Shankar-Hari, M., Ajjan, R. A., Sabroe, I., Storey, R. F., & Mayr, M. (2020). Circulating MicroRNA Levels Indicate Platelet and Leukocyte Activation in Endotoxemia Despite Platelet P2Y12 Inhibition. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21(8), 2897. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21082897

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop