Next Article in Journal
Well-Known and Novel Serum Biomarkers for Risk Stratification of Patients with Non-ischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Previous Article in Journal
Next-Generation Sequencing Applications for Inherited Retinal Diseases
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 22
Issue 11
10.3390/ijms22115687
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Multifaceted Nature of Nucleobindin-2 in Carcinogenesis

by
Anna Skorupska
†,
Rafał Lenda
†,
Andrzej Ożyhar
and
Dominika Bystranowska
*
Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Chemistry, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego 27, 50-370 Wrocław, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Both authors contributed equally to the work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(11), 5687; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22115687
Submission received: 17 April 2021 / Revised: 19 May 2021 / Accepted: 24 May 2021 / Published: 26 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Biochemistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Nucb2 is a multifunctional protein associated with a variety of biological processes. Multiple studies have revealed that Nucb2, and its derivative nesfatin-1, are involved in carcinogenesis. Interestingly, the role of Nucb2/nesfatin-1 in tumorigenesis seems to be dual—both pro-metastatic and anti-metastatic. The implication of Nucb2/nesfatin-1 in carcinogenesis seems to be tissue dependent. Herein, we review the role of Nucb2/nesfatin-1 in both carcinogenesis and the apoptosis process, and we also highlight the multifaceted nature of Nucb2/nesfatin-1.

1. Introduction

Nucleobindin-2 (Nucb2) is a DNA/Ca2+-binding protein, the characteristic structure of which consists of several functional domains: a signal peptide, a Leu/Ile-rich region, a DNA-binding domain, two EF-hand domains, an acidic-rich region, and a leucine zipper motif [1]. Oh-I et al. [2] showed that Nucb2 can be proteolytically converted into three peptide segments: nesfatin-1, -2, and -3. Additionally, nesfatin-1 turned out to be involved in food intake inhibition [2], whereas the function of the two other parts of Nucb2 still remains an open question. The high expression levels of Nucb2 and/or nesfatin-1 (Nucb2/nesfatin-1) were originally found in the hypothalamus [2]. However, Nucb2/nesfatin-1 is also widely expressed in a variety of peripheral tissues—e.g., adipose tissue [3], the pancreas [4], and the reproductive system [5]—which suggests the implication of Nucb2/nesfatin-1 in controlling energy homeostasis processes. Interestingly, Nucb2/nesfatin-1 has an insulin-dependent anti-hyperglycemic effect in mice [6]. Nucb2 was also found to be involved in multiple interactions, e.g., with the tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 [7] and the growth suppressor necdin protein [8]. Recently, Nucb2s from Homo sapiens and Gallus gallus were characterized as proteins that exhibit the properties of inherently disordered proteins (IDPs) [9]. The altered expression of IDPs is involved in the pathogenesis of several diseases, such as Alzheimer’s disease [10] and cancer [11]. In addition to its physiological role, Nucb2/nesfatin-1 is also associated with pathological states, such as carcinoma development [12,13]. In recent years, an increasing number of research studies have focused on this relationship [13,14,15]. The purpose of this review is to discuss the multifaceted nature of Nucb2/nesfatin-1 in tumorigenesis.

2. Nucb2 Involvement in Cancer Progression

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), cancer is the second leading cause of death, and was responsible for 9.6 million deaths globally in 2018. The major reason for mortality (about 90%) is cancer metastasis, and not the primary tumor itself [16]. Cancer is usually considered to be a dynamic system, and malignant tumors, with their ability to invade and metastasize, also develop. This results in the formation of tumors that are heterogeneous in nature [17], which is what makes cancers so dangerous. Nowadays, biomarkers can be used at each stage of cancer progression and for monitoring the efficacy of therapy [18]. Therefore, the necessity of searching for cancer biomarkers is urgent.
Proteins with multiple domains have been shown to be essential to numerous signaling pathways. A number of studies show that Nucb2 might be associated with diverse cellular functions. Despite the fact that its broad physiological function has been extensively investigated, there is also growing evidence that Nucb2 may play an important role in the multistep processes of tumorigenesis. A high expression of Nucb2, in comparison to adjacent non-cancerous cells, was found in breast [13], prostate [12], colon [19], endometrial [14], papillary thyroid [20], and renal cell carcinomas [21]. The immunoreactivity of Nucb2 was mainly detected in the cytoplasm of cancer cells [13,22,23]. However, in glioblastoma cancer cells [24], the localization of Nucb2 was nuclear. In most cases, Nucb2 expression was correlated with the key clinicopathological characteristics of cancer. In clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), the high level of Nucb2 expression was linked to a progressed tumor stage and metastasis [22]. A similar pattern was observed for prostate [12] and colon [25] cancer cells. The high level of Nucb2 mRNA expression was related to a higher Gleason score, a higher level of preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA), positive lymph node metastasis, and angiolymphatic invasion [12]. Additionally, patients with colon carcinomas with TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors of stages III-IV have an increased expression of Nucb2 when compared with patients with stages I-II [25]. Interestingly, Nucb2 overexpression was also associated with a poor prognosis. Patients with strong Nucb2 tumor expression had a shorter overall survival rate [22,26] and increased incidence of recurrence [13]. The prostate cancer patients with Nucb2 overexpression had a shorter biochemical recurrence-free period [23]. These data indicate that a high level of Nucb2 expression may become a new prognostic factor in cancer. The analysis of the expression level of Nucb2 might be utilized in cancer therapy monitoring, as well as provide independent information alongside known biomarkers, such as PSA.
Upregulation of Nucb2 expression was also significantly associated with lymph node metastasis in breast carcinoma cells [13]. Breast cancer progression is associated with the steroid hormone estrogen [27]. Estrogen mediates its effects by binding to estrogen receptors (ERs) [28]. The expression of ERs was found in 75% of all breast cancer cases [29,30]. ERs, in response to estrogens, activate the expression of the autocrine, paracrine, and intracrine protein growth factors by binding to estrogen response elements (EREs) located in the promoted region of their genes [31]. Interestingly, analysis of microarray experiments of gene expression profiling showed that the Nucb2 gene is among the genes involved in the recurrence in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast carcinoma patients after surgery [13]. Additionally, high-affinity EREs were identified in the promoter region (at a range a of –10 kb to +5 kb from mRNA 5’-ends) of human Nucb2 [32]. Further research showed that estradiol treatment of the MCF-7 breast cancer cell line for 3 days significantly increased the Nucb2 expression level [13]. However, the estradiol and ICI 182780 (a potent antagonist of ERs) treatment lessened the Nucb2 mRNA expression to a level lower than the basal level. The expression of Nucb2 in MCF-7 cells is probably ER-regulated [13]. All in all, the above discussed results suggest that Nucb2 is considered to be an oncogene in ER-induced breast carcinoma [13].
Further studies also revealed that Nucb2 is involved in cancer progression and metastasis. Bladder cancer cell lines [26], transfected with Nucb2-targeted shRNA to knockdown Nucb2 expression, were characterized in order to verify the effects of Nucb2 on cell proliferation and invasion. The results of the assays revealed that the knockdown of Nucb2 with special shRNA inhibits invasion and proliferation in bladder cancer cells. Downregulation of Nucb2 expression also induces the decreased expression of two other proliferation markers: Ki67, and the proliferating cell nuclear antigen [33]. The results of an additional wound-healing assay revealed that Nucb2 also had a stimulatory effect on cell migration [26]. Additionally, the same research group analyzed whether there was a correlation between Nucb2-regulated cell migration and the significance of Nucb2 in the migration of cancer cells facilitated by the action of matrix metalloproteases MMP-2 and MMP-9. Overexpression of MMP-2 [34] and MMP-9 [34,35] is highly correlated with tumor dissemination and invasiveness. The expression levels of MMP-2 and MMP-9 in bladder cancer cells transfected with Nucb2 shRNA was lowered, indicating that Nucb2 may affect cancer migration and invasion through the MMP-2 and MMP-9 signaling pathways [26]. Analogous correlation was also recently found in papillary thyroid tumor cells [20], as well as previously for breast [13], renal [21], and colon [19] cancer cells. Similarly, in endometrial carcinoma cells [14], Nucb2 and its derivative nesfatin-1 significantly induced cell proliferation and migration. Moreover, in vivo studies also showed that the knockdown of Nucb2 might decrease tumor growth, at least in the case of thyroid and bladder cancer cells [20,26]. In addition, lung metastases were not observed in cells with Nucb2 suppression [24,26]. All of the above-mentioned analyses indicate that Nucb2 is linked in a tissue-specific manner to tumor development and metastasis, both in vitro and in vivo.

2.1. The Action of Transcription Factors on the Migration and Invasion of Nucb2-Mediated Cancer Cells

Epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a cellular program that converts the apical–basal polarity of epithelial cells with a cell–cell junction to mesenchymal cells with higher migrating and invasive properties [36]. The accelerated motility of these mesenchymal cells indicates that EMT may in turn contribute to the metastasis process [37]. The exact mechanism of the pathogenesis of Nucb2 has not yet been explained in detail; there are, however, some clues. As the knockdown of Nucb2 in the lymph node metastases of SW620 colon cancer cells leads to the modulation of their shape, this might suggest the involvement of Nucb2 in the EMT [19]. Moreover, further studies based on the microarray assays of various human tumor samples demonstrated that the suppression of Nucb2 expression in the SW620 cells resulted in a low level of zinc finger E-box-binding homeobox transcription factor 1 (ZEB1), twist family bHLH transcription factor 1 (Twist), and snail family zinc finger 2 (Slug)—three transcription factors engaged in the EMT [19]. The upregulation of markers characteristic of epithelial cells—such as E-cadherin, β-catenin, and claudin-3—has also been observed in Nucb2-knockdowned SW620 cells. Additionally, ZEB1 overexpression counteracted the migration ability inhibition caused by the knockdown of Nucb2 expression in SW620 cells, and also led to the enhanced expression of the metastatic promotor N-cadherin and a decreased level of the migration suppressor E-cadherin [19]. Thus, Nucb2 mediates the EMT in colon cancer cells through the ZEB1, Twist, and Slug pathways (Figure 1A) [19].
Generally, deregulation of the activity of signaling pathways is implicated in cancer progression. The studies presented by Kan et al. [19] revealed the association of Nucb2-induced colon cancer metastasis with the liver kinase B1 (LKB1), 5’AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), and mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) pathways [19]. It has been found that enhanced phosphorylation of LKB1, AMPK, and acetyl-CoA carboxylase, and diminished phosphorylation of S6 kinase and eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E)-binding protein 1, are caused by Nucb2 depletion in the SW620 cells [19]. Interestingly, the phosphorylation pattern was inverted upon the addition of the AMPK inhibitor. Moreover, utilization of the AMPK inhibitor results in the upregulation of ZEB1 expression, the reduction of the E-cadherin level, and the escalation of the migration and invasiveness of SW620 cells with the suppression of Nucb2 expression [19]. These results indicate that Nucb2 might play an oncogene role in colon cancer cells (Figure 2). Nucb2 promotes migration, invasion, and EMT through the LKB1/AMPK/mTORC1/ZEB1 pathways (see Figure 1). Nucb2 inhibits the LKB1/AMPK route with simultaneous enhancement of the mTOR pathway. The mTOR pathway probably participates in the activation of ZEB1 [19]. Interestingly, the association of EMT promotion by Nucb2 with the AMPK/mTORC1/ZEB1 pathways has also been reported for renal cell carcinoma cells [38]. In addition, in endometrial cancer cells, nesfatin-1 activates the mTOR pathway through phosphorylation [14].
Furthermore, a high level of Nucb2 expression was found in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), which is the predominant type of non-small-cell lung carcinoma [39]. Nucb2 has been presented as the oncogene implicated in the LUAD progression pathways [39]. The deciphered mechanism was based on the upregulation of FTX, which is a long non-coding RNA [39]. FTX inhibited the activity of microRNA-335-5p, while the depletion of microRNA-335-5p resulted in increased expression of Nucb2 [39]. Both Nucb2 and FTX induced the processes implicated in LUAD progression. FTX and Nucb2 increased the expression of N-cadherin and vimentin and promoted the deficiency of the E-cadherin level, which also indicates their function in inducing the EMT process (Figure 2). It was also shown that FTX/Nucb2 accelerated the metastasis of cancer through mediation in the phosphorylation of protein kinase B and mTOR [39]. Remarkably, the involvement of mTOR in the regulation of Nucb2 expression has previously been reported in the stomach [40,41].
Hence, Nucb2 participates in colon cancer cell and LUAD metastasis through EMT induction. Interestingly, in both presented cases, Nucb2 impacts cancer progression via the mTOR pathway.

2.2. The Potential Role of Nucb2 in Melanoma Metastasis under Endoplasmic Reticulum (ERm) Stress

Recently, Nucb2 was also reported to involve metastasis in the melanoma cells by adapting to endoplasmic reticulum (ERm) stress [42]. One study showed that ERm stress induces the expression of Krüppel-like factor 4 (KLF4) [42], which is a zinc-finger-type transcription factor with an oncogenic role. KLF4 was further found to bind to the promoter of Nucb2, facilitating its transcription, and through the regulation of the expression of Nucb2 in vivo and in vitro it was shown to be involved in the promotion of cell metastasis and the inhibition of apoptosis processes under ERm stress [42]. The increased expression of KLF4 was therefore associated with a high level of Nucb2 [42]. Although an elevated level of Nucb2 was shown to be linked to the inhibition of ERm-stress-induced apoptosis and the promotion of cell metastasis in melanoma, the detailed regulations governing the downstream pathway of Nucb2 still need to be investigated. Interestingly, a possible link between nucleobindins and ERm stress responses has previously been suggested for Nucb1, a paralog of Nucb2 [43]. Findings that the Nucb1 gene was identified as being ERm stress inducible were reported in research on the activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6), the activation of which during ERm stress turned out to be suppressed by overexpression of Nucb1. As illustrated in Figure 1, an ERm-membrane-anchored ATF6 is transported to the Golgi apparatus and cleaved by site-1 protease (S1P) in order to activate the unfolded protein response (UPR). The researchers identified Nucb1 as a repressor of this S1P-mediated ATF6 activation, and showed that the knockdown of Nucb1 by siRNA accelerates ATF6 cleavage during ERm stress. Moreover, it was shown that the Nucb1 promoter region possesses two ATF6 response elements, which might be utilized for transcriptional activation of ATF6 or other factors [43]. The function of ATF6 in cancer progression seems contradictory. Various studies have shown that ATF6 is implicated in cancer cell survival [44,45,46]. However, it was also presented that ATF6 mediates the apoptosis processes in myoblast cells [47]. The 62% sequence identity of amino acids Nucb1 and Nucb2 [48], and also the Golgi location of both paralogs [49,50,51], may suggest—but does not need to—that Nucb1 and Nucb2 have at least partially similar roles.
The findings presented above indicate that Nucb2 might be involved in melanoma cell metastasis through ERm stress induction. However, the downstream pathways of these actions require further research.

2.3. Nucb2 Expression during Cancer-Associated Anorexia-Cachexia

Cancer anorexia–cachexia syndrome (CACS) is a disorder characterized by decreased food nutritional intake, tissue wasting, anorexia, and the loss of muscle, adipose tissue, and body mass [52]. This state occurs in 15–40% of cancer patients, and in 80% of advanced cancer stage patients, in turn impacting the quality of their lives, decreasing their chances of survival, and frequently causing death [53]. The origin of CACS is multifactorial, involving mediators like cytokines (interleukin 1, interleukin 6, and tumor necrosis factor α), neuropeptides (leptin, neuropeptide Y (NPY), and ghrelin), and neurotransmitters [54,55,56]. Nesfatin-1 was described as an anorexigenic peptide [2]. Intracerebroventricular injection of nesfatin-1 results in food intake inhibition in rodents [2]. Interestingly, the implication of Nucb2/nesfatin-1 in CACS was shown by Burgos et al. [57]; their studies were conducted on a tumor-bearing murine model with implanted methylcholanthrene-induced sarcoma (MCG101), which is a low or undifferentiated epithelial-like solid tumor with high expression of prostaglandin E2 [58]. This model corresponds to cancer patients with CACS [59]. The tumor-bearing group of mice had an increased level of Nucb2 mRNA in the paraventricular nucleus (PVN) compared with the control group, whereas in the arcuate nucleus and brainstem, the expression level of Nucb2 mRNA was similar to that of the control group. The authors suggest that the induction of Nucb2 in the PVN could play a primary role in promoting the tumor-induced anorexia response of the host [57]. Additionally, anorexia in CACS might be enhanced by other factors, e.g., anxiety, pain, or depression [55,60]. It is important to acknowledge that multiple studies have shown the involvement of Nucb2/nesfatin-1 in anxiety- [61,62] and depression-like behavior [63,64] induction, and therefore Nucb2/nesfatin-1 may play a role in tumor-induced anorexia associated with CACS through variable pathways.
Taken together, the above results reveal that Nucb2/nesfatin-1 plays a complex role in cancer metastasis. It involves multiple signaling pathways, which makes Nucb2/nesfatin-1 a significant therapeutic target. It is worth noting that Nucb2/nesfatin-1 not only stimulates cancer progression, but also influences the life quality of patients, in turn leading to decreased treatment success. Still, the control of Nucb2/nesfatin-1 activity in cancer progression requires further investigation.

3. Apoptotic Potential of Nucb2

Cell apoptosis is a form of programmed cell death that naturally occurs during embryogenesis, or as a result of pathological conditions, e.g., neurodegenerative diseases, autoimmune diseases, or cancer [65]. Malignant cells are insensitive to apoptotic stimuli, which results in uncontrolled proliferation and tumor growth. Many anticancer drugs are thus designed to target and activate specific components of apoptotic machinery in order to facilitate the eradication of cancer cells. Although Nucb2/nesfatin-1 seems to play a role in the progression and invasiveness of breast [13], colon [19], prostate [23], renal [21], and endometrial cancer [14], there is also evidence that increased levels of Nucb2/nesfatin-1 trigger apoptosis in other malignancies, which as a result might render this unique peptide useful in the treatment of cancer.

3.1. Nucb2/nesfatin-1-Induced Apoptosis in Ovarian Cancer

Ovarian cancer is the 5th most common cause of cancer death among women [66], and has a poor survival rate of 5 years in 93% of cases due to its late diagnosis [67]. In 2013, Xu et al. showed that Nucb2/nesfatin-1 inhibit ovarian epithelial cell carcinoma in vitro in HO-8910 cells [15]. Stimulation of HO-8910 cells for 48 h with Nucb2/nesfatin-1 results in a concentration-dependent G1/S phase arrest of the cell cycle and enhanced apoptosis, which is shown by increased levels of caspase-3/7. This effect is evoked by downregulation of the mTOR pathway (Figure 3), leading to decreased levels of the phosphorylated mTOR and S6 ribosomal proteins [15]. Unexpectedly, upregulation of the Ras homologue gene family member A/Rho-associated coiled-coil-containing kinases (RhoA/ROCK) pathway was also observed under Nucb2/nesfatin-1 treatment. Conversely, inhibition of the RhoA/ROCK pathway by the Y27632 inhibitor revoked pro-apoptotic action of Nucb-2/nesfatin-1 in HO-8910 cells [15]. These findings show that Nucb2/nesfatin-1 induce apoptosis in ovarian epithelial cell carcinoma through the mTOR/RhoA/ROCK pathway (Figure 1). Surprisingly, this pro-apoptotic effect of Nucb2/nesfatin-1 is contradictory to the effect previously observed for colon and renal cell cancers, where Nucb2/nesfatin-1, through the AMPK/mTOR signaling pathways, contributed to the enhanced aggressiveness and invasiveness of these tumors [19,38]. It is also worth noting that a similar pro-apoptotic effect of Nucb2/nesfatin-1 was reported by Feijóo-Bandín et al. [68] in murine cardiomyocytes. Long stimulation (24 h) of cardiomyocytes with Nucb2/nesfatin-1 brings about apoptosis, which is shown by increased levels of cleaved caspase-3 and decreased levels of phosphorylated Akt—an upstream protein in the mTOR signaling pathway [68].

3.2. Nucb2/Nesfatin-1-Induced Cell Death in Adrenocortical Carcinoma

Adrenal cortex tumors (ACTs) are usually benign tumors with an incidence of 3–10% in the population [69]. In contrast, adrenocortical cell carcinomas (ACCs) are a rare type of cancer with a poor prognosis due to their late diagnosis and resistance to chemotherapy [70]. This stems from the fact that ACCs exhibit a downregulated apoptosis pathway with underexpression of genes such as those encoding executioner caspases-3, -6, and -7, as well as the Bcl2-associated X protein (Bax) [71].
Stimulation of H295R cells with Nucb2/nesfatin-1 for 24h induced apoptosis in this cell line in a concentration-dependent manner [72]. Interestingly, Nucb2/nesfatin-1 was shown to induce overexpression of pro-apoptotic genes, such as Bax, in H295R cells (Figure 3). This overexpression was accompanied by a simultaneous decrease in the expression of mRNAs of anti-apoptotic proteins, such as Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL (see Figure 1), but with no significant changes to the expression pattern of the p53 gene or to cellular Ca2+ levels [72]. Furthermore, Nucb2/nesfatin-1 alter the phosphorylation pattern of kinases belonging to the family of serine/threonine mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs), resulting in elevated levels of phosphorylated (p-) c-Jun N-terminal kinases 1 and 2 (p-JNK-1/2), and p38MAPK (p-p38MAPK), and decreased levels of phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2 (p-ERK1/2) [72]. MAPKs are involved in the cellular response to extracellular stimuli and their transduction to intracellular effectors. This family of protein kinases is engaged in the control of proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, and cellular responses to stress [73]. Ras is an upstream protein in the ERK/MAPK pathways, and belongs to the family of small GTPases. A gain-of-function mutations in the ras proto-oncogene, which result in an indefinitely active Ras protein along with upregulation of the ERK/MAPK pathways, is often a hallmark of carcinogenesis [73,74]. On the other hand, the JNK-1/2 and p38MAPK pathways are involved in the control of a cell’s response to stress stimuli, and also the regulation of immune responses [75]. Additionally, the JNK-1/2 pathway plays an important role in stress-induced apoptosis [75]. The above findings suggest that Nucb2/nesfatin-1, through upregulation of the JNK-1/2/p38MAPK pathways and downregulation of the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK pathways, induces apoptosis (Figure 1) in H295R cells in a Ca2+-independent manner. Ramanjaneya et al. [72] also reported localization of Nucb2/nesfatin-1 in human adrenocortical cells. Interestingly, Nucb1 and Nucb2 can be proteolytically cleaved by caspase-3, -6, and -8, in vitro and in vivo (Figure 1B) [48]. This fact further underlines the importance of Nucb2 in the control of apoptosis. The putative cleavage site is localized in the region of the first EF-hand motif between residues 235–255 [48]. The effect of the cleavage of Nucb2/nesfatin-1 by caspases on the apoptotic program remains unknown. Nonetheless, Nucb2/nesfatin-1 seems to have an auto-, paracrine and tissue-specific mode of action that could be exploited in the treatment, diagnosis, and monitoring of different types of cancer. Since the Nucb2/nesfatin-1 receptor has not yet been discovered, determination of the exact effectors through which this unique polypeptide exerts this vast array of functions is still hindered.

4. Nucb2-Protein Interactions in the Regulation of the Tumorigenesis Process

Nucb2 interactions with other proteins deserve special attention [7,8]. Nucb2 has been identified via yeast hybrid assay as a necdin-binding protein (Figure 4A) [8]. The post-mitotic neuron protein necdin is a tumor growth suppressor [76] that interacts with the p53 [77] and E2F1 transcription factors [78]. Taniguchi et al. [8] showed that Nucb2 binds to necdin through the regions of two EF-hand domains and the acidic region [8]. The expression of the necdin protein in cells disrupted the secretion of Nucb2, and led to the accumulation of Nucb2 in the cytoplasm [8]. Remarkably, the Nucb2–necdin interaction increased the level of Ca2+ in the cytoplasm [8]. Nucb2 is a Ca2+-binding protein, which probably plays a Ca2+-sensor protein role [9]. Additionally, Nucb2 is localized in the Golgi apparatus [51], which is a storage compartment of Ca2+ [79]. Thus, it appears that Nucb2–necdin interaction, probably through regulation of the Ca2+ level, influences Ca2+-dependent biological processes, e.g., apoptosis [8].
The tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and tumor necrosis factor receptors (TNFRs) belong to the superfamilies of trimeric cytokines and receptors, respectively [80]. TNFRs that contain characteristic cysteine-rich domains include TNFR1, Fas, nerve growth factor receptor, CD40 and CD27, receptor activator of NF-κB, and many more [81]. TNFRs play a key role in the regulation and responses of the immune system, in proliferation, and also in the execution of the apoptotic program. The aminopeptidase regulator of TNFR1 shedding (ARTS-1) has been shown to take part in the release mechanism of TNFR1. ARTS-1 interacts with TNFR1 through their extracellular domains, and facilitates TNFR-1 release [82]. Interestingly, Nucb2 was shown to interact via its EF domains with ARTS-1 in human vascular endothelial cells through two-yeast hybrid screening and co-immunoprecipitation [7], as described earlier. This interaction (Figure 4B) is Ca2+-dependent, and Nucb2 is required for the release of both the full-length and truncated forms of TNFR1 [7]. These findings suggest that Nucb2 participates in the turnover of TNFR1 in cells, as well as indirectly in the modulation of TNF activity, thereby affecting the TNF-induced apoptosis pathway.
A separate group of proteins interacting with Nucb2 are G proteins. It has been presented that Nucb2 and its paralog Nucb1, which possess a GBA motif (short for G-binding and -activating motif), belong to the family of non-receptor proteins with GEF activity [83]. These seven conserved amino acid residues are located at the C-terminal region of the second EF-hand domain in the Nucb2 and Nucb1 sequences [83]. This motif has also been discovered in the Gα-interacting vesicle-associated protein (GIV/Girdin), Daple, and synthetic peptides such as KB-752, which also have GEF activity [83,84,85]. Remarkably, Nucb2 and Nucb1 bind preferentially to the GDP-bound form of Gαi3 through the GEF motif [83]. Additionally, Nucb1 and Nucb2 enhance the GTPase activity of Gαi3. Due to the overlapping sites for binding Ca2+ and Gαi3 in the Nucb2 and Nucb1 sequences, the presence of Ca2+ through conformational rearrangement suppresses interaction of Nucb2 with Gαi3 in vitro and in vivo [83]. These data indicate that both Nucb1 and Nucb2 belong to the family of proteins that are implicated in G protein regulation (Figure 4C). The dysfunction and upregulation of both G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and G proteins play a role in various pathological conditions, e.g., cancer progression and metastasis [86,87,88]. Curiously, the GIV/Girdin proteins were characterized as “rheostats” [85]. “Rheostats” are defined as proteins that enhance the signal transduction initiated by the G protein and GPCRs. Dysregulation of these pathways might be implicated in phenotypic changes that result in cancer metastasis [85,89]. Additionally, it has also been suggested that GIV/Girdin might be utilized as potential biomarkers in various cancers [90,91]. The high expression of GIV/Girdin was positively associated with poorer prognosis in cancer cases [92,93]. Barbazan et al. [94] showed that a high expression of proteins with the GBA motif (i.e., GIV/Girdin, Daple, Nucb1 and Nucb2, etc.) in circulating tumor cells (CTCs) from metastatic colon cancer was correlated with poorer outcomes. Combined expression of GBA motif proteins has an improved prognostic value [94]. It was suggested that other GBA motif proteins—e.g., Nucb2—might also participate in tumorigenesis as “rheostats”, in turn dysregulating the G protein activity [94].

5. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

The number of studies exploring the participation of Nucb2 in tumorigenesis processes is growing. Despite its role in the control of energy homeostasis, Nucb2 seems to be deeply involved in the widely understood pathogenesis of cancer. Numerous studies have revealed that Nucb2, and its derivative, nesfatin-1, are implicated in cancer progression. The high expression of Nucb2 is associated with key traits of cancer and poor prognoses and outcomes, which suggests that Nucb2 might be utilized as a biomarker and prognostic factor of cancer in the future. It has been shown that Nucb2 is connected, through the regulation of the LKB1/AMPK/TORC1/ZEB1 and Akt/mTOR pathways, to cancer metastasis and various accompanying processes, such as EMT [19,38], ERm stress [42], and CACS [57]. Conversely, Nucb2 and nesfatin-1 have also been presented as apoptosis stimulators in ovarian epithelial carcinoma cells and adrenocortical cancer cells through the mTOR/RhoA/ROCK [15], JNK-1/2/p38MAPK, and Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK pathways [72]. These results suggest that the role of Nucb2/nesfatin-1 might be tissue dependent (see Table 1). Interestingly, the mTOR pathway seems to be a downstream pathway for both anti- and pro-apoptotic roles of Nucb2. The complete control mechanisms of these processes have, unfortunately, still not been fully identified. The similar dual nature in cancer development has, however, also been observed for other proteins, e.g., for lysine-specific demethylase 6B (KDM6B) [95]. The oncogenic role of KDM6B in EMT regulation was observed to be mediated via Slug activation [96]. Additionally, high expression of KDM6B was found in prostate cancer cells, and was also correlated with poor prognoses in prostate cancer patients [97]. Both Nucb2 and KDM6B are able to regulate the expression levels of different proteins. Nucb2 is a multidomain protein, containing, among others, a region of basic amino acids, a helix–loop–helix motif, and a leucine zipper. All of these motifs are often present in known transcription factors [1], which suggests that Nucb2 might play the role of a transcription factor in the tumorigenesis process. The interactions of Nucb2 with the necdin protein, TNFR1, and G proteins also seem to confirm its dual role in carcinogenesis. Interestingly, all of these interactions are Ca2+-dependent, and associated with the structural rearrangements of the carboxy-terminal part of Nucb2—nesfatin-3. We recently showed that nesfatin-3 possesses IDP properties [9]. The significant flexibility of IDPs facilitates a variety of interactions with molecular partners [98]. Nesfatin-3 might provide the binding surface for other proteins. However, the exact function of nesfatin-3 has not yet been characterized. Thus, Nucb2/nesfatin-1 might be utilized as diagnostic tools, and also used in cancer therapy in the future. The suppression of Nucb2 and/or nesfatin-1 could not only contribute to a patient’s survival, but also improve their quality of life. However, further studies are needed in order to clarify the exact mechanism of Nucb2/nesfatin-1 in tumorigenesis, and to elucidate how to regulate their actions.

Author Contributions

A.S. and R.L. wrote the original draft with support from D.B. and A.O., R.L. prepared the figures. All authors reviewed and edited the final version of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Science Centre Grant (A.O.) number 2018/29/B/NZ1/02574.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

4EBIP1eukaryotic initiation factor 4E-binding protein
ACCacetyl-CoA carboxylase
ACCsadrenocortical cell carcinomas
ACTsadrenal cortex tumors
AMPK5’AMP-activated protein kinase
ARTS-1aminopeptidase regulator of TNFR1 shedding
ATF6activating transcription factor 6
BaxBcl2 associated X protein
CACScancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome
ccRCCclear-cell renal cell carcinoma
CTCscirculating tumor cells
EMTepithelial–mesenchymal transition
ERestrogen receptor
ERmendoplasmic reticulum
EREestrogen response element
GAPsGTPase-activating proteins
GDIsguanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitors
GEFsguanine nucleotide-exchange factors
GIV/GirdinGα-interacting vesicle-associated protein
GPCRG-protein-coupled receptors
IDPsinherently disordered proteins
KLF4Krüppel-like factor 4
LKB1liver kinase B1
LUADlung adenocarcinoma
MAPKsserine/threonine mitogen activated protein kinases
MMPsmatrix metalloproteinase
mTORmammalian target of rapamycin
mTORC1mTOR complex 1
Nucb2Nucleobindin-2
ERK1/2extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2
JNK-1/2c-Jun N-terminal kinases-1 and -2
PSAprostate specific antigen
PVNparaventricular nucleus
RhoARas homologue gene family member A
ROCKsRho-associated coiled-coil-containing kinases
Slugsnail family zinc finger 2
S6KS6 kinase
S1Psite-1 protease
TNFtumor necrosis factor
TNFRstumor necrosis factor receptors
TSC2tuberos sclerosis complex 2
Twisttwist family bHLH transcription factor 1
UPRunfolded protein response
ZEB1zinc finger E-box-binding homeobox transcription factor 1

References

  1. Barnikol-Watanabe, S.; Groß, N.A.; Götz, H.; Henkel, T.; Karabinos, A.; Kratzin, H.; Barnikol, H.U.; Hilschmann, N. Human Protein NEFA, a Novel DNA Binding/EF-Hand/Leucine Zipper Protein. Molecular Cloning and Sequence Analysis of the cDNA, Isolation and Characterization of the Protein. Biol. Chem. Hoppe Seyler. 1994, 375, 497–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Oh-I, S.; Shimizu, H.; Satoh, T.; Okada, S.; Adachi, S.; Inoue, K.; Eguchi, H.; Yamamoto, M.; Imaki, T.; Hashimoto, K.; et al. Identification of nesfatin-1 as a satiety molecule in the hypothalamus. Nat. Cell Biol. 2006, 443, 709–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ramanjaneya, M.; Chen, J.; Brown, J.E.; Tripathi, G.; Hallschmid, M.; Patel, S.; Kern, W.; Hillhouse, E.W.; Lehnert, H.; Tan, B.K.; et al. Identification of Nesfatin-1 in Human and Murine Adipose Tissue: A Novel Depot-Specific Adipokine with Increased Levels in Obesity. Endocrinology 2010, 151, 3169–3180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Gonzalez, R.; Tiwari, A.; Unniappan, S. Pancreatic beta cells colocalize insulin and pronesfatin immunoreactivity in rodents. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2009, 381, 643–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. García-Galiano, D.; Pineda, R.; Ilhan, T.; Castellano, J.M.; Ruiz-Pino, F.; Sánchez-Garrido, M.A.; Vazquez, M.J.; Sangiao-Alvarellos, S.; Romero-Ruiz, A.; Pinilla, L.; et al. Cellular Distribution, Regulated Expression, and Functional Role of the Anorexigenic Peptide, NUCB2/Nesfatin-1, in the Testis. Endocrinology 2012, 153, 1959–1971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Su, Y.; Zhang, J.; Tang, Y.; Bi, F.; Liu, J.-N. The novel function of nesfatin-1: Anti-hyperglycemia. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2010, 391, 1039–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Islam, A.; Adamik, B.; Hawari, F.I.; Ma, G.; Rouhani, F.N.; Zhang, J.; Levine, S.J. Extracellular TNFR1 Release Requires the Calcium-dependent Formation of a Nucleobindin 2-ARTS-1 Complex. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 6860–6873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Taniguchi, N.; Taniura, H.; Niinobe, M.; Takayama, C.; Tominaga-Yoshino, K.; Ogura, A.; Yoshikawa, K. The Postmitotic Growth Suppressor Necdin Interacts with a Calcium-binding Protein (NEFA) in Neuronal Cytoplasm. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 31674–31681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Skorupska, A.; Bystranowska, D.; Dąbrowska, K.; Ożyhar, A. Calcium ions modulate the structure of the intrinsically disordered Nucleobindin-2 protein. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 154, 1091–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Martinelli, A.H.S.; Lopes, F.C.; John, E.B.O.; Carlini, C.R.; Ligabue-Braun, R. Modulation of Disordered Proteins with a Focus on Neurodegenerative Diseases and Other Pathologies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Santofimia-Castaño, P.; Rizzuti, B.; Xia, Y.; Abian, O.; Peng, L.; Velázquez-Campoy, A.; Neira, J.L.; Iovanna, J. Targeting intrinsically disordered proteins involved in cancer. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2020, 77, 1695–1707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Zhang, H.; Qi, C.; Li, L.; Luo, F.; Xu, Y. Clinical significance of NUCB2 mRNA expression in prostate cancer. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2013, 32, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Suzuki, S.; Takagi, K.; Miki, Y.; Onodera, Y.; Akahira, J.-I.; Ebata, A.; Ishida, T.; Watanabe, M.; Sasano, H.; Suzuki, T. Nucleobindin 2 in human breast carcinoma as a potent prognostic factor. Cancer Sci. 2011, 103, 136–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Takagi, K.; Miki, Y.; Tanaka, S.; Hashimoto, C.; Watanabe, M.; Sasano, H.; Ito, K.; Suzuki, T. Nucleobindin 2 (NUCB2) in human endometrial carcinoma: A potent prognostic factor associated with cell proliferation and migration. Endocr. J. 2016, 63, 287–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Xu, Y.; Pang, X.; Dong, M.; Wen, F.; Zhang, Y. Nesfatin-1 inhibits ovarian epithelial carcinoma cell proliferation in vitro. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2013, 440, 467–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Seyfried, T.N.; Huysentruyt, L.C. On the Origin of Cancer Metastasis. Crit. Rev. Oncog. 2013, 18, 43–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Dagogo-Jack, I.; Shaw, A.T. Tumour heterogeneity and resistance to cancer therapies. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2018, 15, 81–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Henry, N.L.; Hayes, D.F. Cancer biomarkers. Mol. Oncol. 2012, 6, 140–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Kan, J.-Y.; Yen, M.-C.; Wang, J.-Y.; Wu, D.-C.; Chiu, Y.-J.; Ho, Y.-W.; Kuo, P.-L. Nesfatin-1/Nucleobindin-2 enhances cell migration, invasion, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition via LKB1/AMPK/TORC1/ZEB1 pathways in colon cancer. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 31336–31349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Zhao, J.; Yun, X.; Ruan, X.; Chi, J.; Yu, Y.; Yigong, L.; Zheng, X.; Gao, M. High expression of NUCB2 promotes papillary thyroid cancer cells proliferation and invasion. OncoTargets Ther. 2019, 12, 1309–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Xu, H.; Li, W.; Qi, K.; Zhou, J.; Gu, M.; Wang, Z. A novel function of NUCB2 in promoting the development and invasion of renal cell carcinoma. Oncol. Lett. 2017, 15, 2425–2430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Qi, C.; Ma, H.; Zhang, H.-T.; Gao, J.-D.; Xu, Y. Nucleobindin 2 expression is an independent prognostic factor for clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Histopathology 2014, 66, 650–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zhang, H.; Qi, C.; Wang, A.; Yao, B.; Li, L.; Wang, Y.; Xu, Y. Prognostication of prostate cancer based on NUCB2 protein assessment: NUCB2 in prostate cancer. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2013, 32, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Liu, Q.-J.; Lv, J.-X.; Liu, J.; Zhang, X.-B.; Wang, L.-B. Nucleobindin-2 Promotes the Growth and Invasion of Glioblastoma. Cancer Biotherapy Radiopharm. 2019, 34, 581–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Xie, J.; Chen, L.; Chen, W. High NUCB2 expression level is associated with metastasis and may promote tumor progression in colorectal cancer. Oncol. Lett. 2018, 15, 9188–9194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Liu, G.-M.; Xu, Z.-Q.; Ma, H.-S. Nesfatin-1/Nucleobindin-2 Is a Potent Prognostic Marker and Enhances Cell Proliferation, Migration, and Invasion in Bladder Cancer. Dis. Markers 2018, 2018, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Belachew, E.B.; Sewasew, D.T. Molecular Mechanisms of Endocrine Resistance in Estrogen-Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer. Front. Endocrinol. 2021, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Thomas, C.; Gustafsson, J.-Å. The different roles of ER subtypes in cancer biology and therapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2011, 11, 597–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lim, E.; Tarulli, G.; Portman, N.; Hickey, T.E.; Tilley, W.D.; Palmieri, C. Pushing estrogen receptor around in breast cancer. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 2016, 23, T227–T241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ellis, M.J.; Ding, L.; Shen, D.; Luo, J.; Suman, V.J.; Wallis, J.W.; Van Tine, B.A.; Hoog, J.; Goiffon, R.; Goldstein, T.C.; et al. Whole-genome analysis informs breast cancer response to aromatase inhibition. Nat. Cell Biol. 2012, 486, 353–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kahlert, S.; Nuedling, S.; van Eickels, M.; Vetter, H.; Meyer, R.; Grohé, C. Estrogen Receptor α Rapidly Activates the IGF-1 Receptor Pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 18447–18453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Bourdeau, V.; Deschênes, J.; Métivier, R.; Nagai, Y.; Nguyen, D.; Bretschneider, N.; Gannon, F.; White, J.H.; Mader, S. Genome-Wide Identification of High-Affinity Estrogen Response Elements in Human and Mouse. Mol. Endocrinol. 2004, 18, 1411–1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Tsujihashi, H.; Nakanishi, A.; Matsuda, H.; Uejima, S.; Kurita, T. Cell Proliferation of Human Bladder Tumors Determined by Brdurd and Ki-67 Immunostaining. J. Urol. 1991, 145, 846–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Webb, A.H.; Gao, B.T.; Goldsmith, Z.K.; Irvine, A.S.; Saleh, N.; Lee, R.P.; Lendermon, J.B.; Bheemreddy, R.; Zhang, Q.; Brennan, R.C.; et al. Inhibition of MMP-2 and MMP-9 decreases cellular migration, and angiogenesis in in vitro models of retinoblastoma. BMC Cancer 2017, 17, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Brehmer, B.; Biesterfeld, S.; Jakse, G. Expression of matrix metalloproteinases (MMP-2 and -9) and their inhibitors (TIMP-1 and -2) in prostate cancer tissue. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2003, 6, 217–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Dongre, A.; Weinberg, R.A. New insights into the mechanisms of epithelial–mesenchymal transition and implications for cancer. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2019, 20, 69–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lai, X.; Li, Q.; Wu, F.; Lin, J.; Chen, J.; Zheng, H.; Guo, L. Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition and Metabolic Switching in Cancer: Lessons From Somatic Cell Reprogramming. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tao, R.; Niu, W.; Dou, P.; Ni, S.; Yu, Y.; Cai, L.; Wang, X.; Li, S.; Zhang, C.; Luo, Z. Nucleobindin-2 enhances the epithelial-mesenchymal transition in renal cell carcinoma. Oncol. Lett. 2020, 19, 3653–3664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Huo, X.; Wang, H.; Huo, B.; Wang, L.; Yang, K.; Wang, J.; Wang, L.; Wang, H. FTX contributes to cell proliferation and migration in lung adenocarcinoma via targeting miR-335-5p/NUCB2 axis. Cancer Cell Int. 2020, 20, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Folgueira, C.; Barja-Fernandez, S.; Prado, L.; Al-Massadi, O.; Castelao, C.; Pena-Leon, V.; González-Sáenz, P.; Baltar, J.; Baamonde, I.; Leis, R.; et al. Pharmacological inhibition of cannabinoid receptor 1 stimulates gastric release of nesfatin-1 via the mTOR pathway. World J. Gastroenterol. 2017, 23, 6403–6411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Li, Z.; Xu, G.; Li, Y.; Zhao, J.; Mulholland, M.W.; Zhang, W. mTOR-dependent Modulation of Gastric Nesfatin-1/NUCB2. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2012, 29, 493–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Zhang, D.; Lin, J.; Chao, Y.; Zhang, L.; Jin, L.; Li, N.; He, R.; Ma, B.; Zhao, W.; Han, C. Regulation of the adaptation to ER stress by KLF4 facilitates melanoma cell metastasis via upregulating NUCB2 expression. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2018, 37, 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Tsukumo, Y.; Tomida, A.; Kitahara, O.; Nakamura, Y.; Asada, S.; Mori, K.; Tsuruo, T. Nucleobindin 1 Controls the Unfolded Protein Response by Inhibiting ATF6 Activation. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 29264–29272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Sicari, D.; Fantuz, M.; Bellazzo, A.; Valentino, E.; Apollonio, M.; Pontisso, I.; Di Cristino, F.; Ferro, M.D.; Bicciato, S.; Del Sal, G.; et al. Mutant p53 improves cancer cells’ resistance to endoplasmic reticulum stress by sustaining activation of the UPR regulator ATF6. Oncogene 2019, 38, 6184–6195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Dadey, D.Y.; Kapoor, V.; Khudanyan, A.; Urano, F.; Kim, A.H.; Thotala, D.; Hallahan, D.E. The ATF6 pathway of the ER stress response contributes to enhanced viability in glioblastoma. Oncotarget 2015, 7, 2080–2092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Tay, K.H.; Luan, Q.; Croft, A.; Jiang, C.C.; Jin, L.; Zhang, X.D.; Tseng, H.-Y. Sustained IRE1 and ATF6 signaling is important for survival of melanoma cells undergoing ER stress. Cell. Signal. 2014, 26, 287–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Morishima, N.; Nakanishi, K.; Nakano, A. Activating Transcription Factor-6 (ATF6) Mediates Apoptosis with Reduction of Myeloid Cell Leukemia Sequence 1 (Mcl-1) Protein via Induction of WW Domain Binding Protein 1*. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 35227–35235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Valencia, C.A.; Cotten, S.W.; Duan, J.; Liu, R.; Cotten, S.W. Modulation of nucleobindin-1 and nucleobindin-2 by caspases. FEBS Lett. 2007, 582, 286–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Lin, P.; Yao, Y.; Hofmeister, R.; Tsien, R.Y.; Farquhar, M.G. Overexpression of CALNUC (Nucleobindin) Increases Agonist and Thapsigargin Releasable Ca2+ Storage in the Golgi. J. Cell Biol. 1999, 145, 279–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Miura, K.; Hirai, M.; Kanai, Y.; Kurosawa, Y. Organization of the Human Gene for Nucleobindin (NUC) and Its Chromosomal Assignment to 19q13.2–q13.4. Genomics 1996, 34, 181–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Nesselhut, J.; Jurgan, U.; Onken, E.; Gotz, H.; Barnikol, H.U.; Hirschfeld, G.; Barnikol-Watanabe, S.; Hilschmann, N. Gol-gi retention of human protein NEFA is mediated by its N-terminal Leu/Ile-rich region. FEBS Lett. 2001, 509, 469–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Evans, W.J.; Morley, J.E.; Argilés, J.; Bales, C.; Baracos, V.; Guttridge, D.; Jatoi, A.; Kalantar-Zadeh, K.; Lochs, H.; Mantovani, G.; et al. Cachexia: A new definition. Clin. Nutr. 2008, 27, 793–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. McClement, S. Cancer Anorexia-Cachexia Syndrome. J. Wound Ostomy Cont. Nurs. 2005, 32, 264–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Inui, A. Cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome: Are neuropeptides the key? Cancer Res. 1999, 59, 4493–4501. [Google Scholar]
  55. Plata-Salamán, C.R. Central nervous system mechanisms contributing to the cachexia–anorexia syndrome. Nutrition 2000, 16, 1009–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Mantovani, G.; Macciò, A.; Massa, E.; Madeddu, C. Managing Cancer-Related Anorexia/Cachexia. Drugs 2001, 61, 499–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Burgos, J.R.; Iresjö, B.-M.; Smedh, U. MCG101-induced cancer anorexia-cachexia features altered expression of hypothalamic Nucb2 and Cartpt and increased plasma levels of cocaine- and amphetamine-regulated transcript peptides. Oncol. Rep. 2016, 35, 2425–2430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Lonnroth, C.; Svaninger, G.; Gelin, J.; Cahlin, C.; Iresjö, B.-M.; Cvetkovska, E.; Edstrom, S.; Andersson, M.; Svanberg, E.; Lundholm, K. Effects related to indomethacin prolonged survival and decreased tumor growth in a mouse tumor model with cytokine dependent cancer cachexia. Int. J. Oncol. 1995, 7, 1405–1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Gelin, J.; Andersson, C.; Lundholm, K. Effects of indomethacin, cytokines, and cyclosporin A on tumor growth and the subsequent development of cancer cachexia. Cancer Res. 1991, 51, 880–885. [Google Scholar]
  60. Ezeoke, C.C.; Morley, J.E. Pathophysiology of anorexia in the cancer cachexia syndrome. J. Cachex Sarcopenia Muscle 2015, 6, 287–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Hofmann, T.; Elbelt, U.; Ahnis, A.; Rose, M.; Klapp, B.F.; Stengel, A. Sex-specific regulation of NUCB2/nesfatin-1: Differential implication in anxiety in obese men and women. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2015, 60, 130–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ge, J.-F.; Xu, Y.-Y.; Qin, G.; Pan, X.-Y.; Cheng, J.-Q.; Chen, F.-H. Nesfatin-1, a potent anorexic agent, decreases exploration and induces anxiety-like behavior in rats without altering learning or memory. Brain Res. 2015, 1629, 171–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Xiao, M.-M.; Li, J.-B.; Jiang, L.-L.; Shao, H.; Wang, B.-L. Plasma nesfatin-1 level is associated with severity of depression in Chinese depressive patients. BMC Psychiatry 2018, 18, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Xia, Q.-R.; Liang, J.; Cao, Y.; Shan, F.; Liu, Y.; Xu, Y.-Y. Increased plasma nesfatin-1 levels may be associated with corticosterone, IL-6, and CRP levels in patients with major depressive disorder. Clin. Chim. Acta 2018, 480, 107–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Favaloro, B.; Allocati, N.; Graziano, V.; Di Ilio, C.; De Laurenzi, V. Role of Apoptosis in disease. Aging 2012, 4, 330–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Siegel, R.L.; Miller, K.D.M.; Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA A Cancer J. Clin. 2018, 68, 7–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Torre, L.A.; Trabert, B.; DeSantis, C.E.; Mph, K.D.M.; Samimi, G.; Runowicz, C.D.; Gaudet, M.M.; Jemal, A.; Siegel, R.L. Ovarian cancer statistics, 2018. CA A Cancer J. Clin. 2018, 68, 284–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Feijóo-Bandín, S.; Rodríguez-Penas, D.; García-Rúa, V.; Mosquera-Leal, A.; Abu-Assi, E.; Portoles, M.; Roselló-Lletí, E.; Rivera, M.; Diéguez, C.; González-Juanatey, J.R.; et al. 24 h nesfatin-1 treatment promotes apoptosis in cardiomyocytes. Endocrine 2015, 51, 551–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Else, T.; Kim, A.C.; Sabolch, A.; Raymond, V.M.; Kandathil, A.; Caoili, E.M.; Jolly, S.; Miller, B.S.; Giordano, T.J.; Hammer, G.D. Adrenocortical Carcinoma. Endocr. Rev. 2014, 35, 282–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Thampi, A.; Shah, E.; Elshimy, G.; Correa, R. Adrenocortical carcinoma: A literature review. Transl. Cancer Res. 2020, 9, 1253–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Pereira, S.S.; Monteiro, M.P.; Antonini, S.R.; Pignatelli, D. Apoptosis regulation in adrenocortical carcinoma. Endocr. Connect. 2019, 8, R91–R104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Ramanjaneya, M.; Tan, B.K.; Rucinski, M.; Kawan, M.; Hu, J.; Kaur, J.; Patel, V.H.; Malendowicz, L.K.; Komarowska, H.; Lehnert, H.; et al. Nesfatin-1 inhibits proliferation and enhances apoptosis of human adrenocortical H295R cells. J. Endocrinol. 2015, 226, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Guo, Y.; Pan, W.; Liu, S.; Shen, Z.; Xu, Y.; Hu, L. ERK/MAPK signalling pathway and tumorigenesis (Review). Exp. Ther. Med. 2020, 19, 1997–2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Hobbs, G.A.; Der, C.J.; Rossman, K.L. RAS isoforms and mutations in cancer at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 2016, 129, 1287–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Dhanasekaran, D.N.; Reddy, E.P. JNK-signaling: A multiplexing hub in programmed cell death. Genes Cancer 2017, 8, 682–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Chapman, E.J.; Knowles, M.A. Necdin: A multi functional protein with potential tumor suppressor role? Mol. Carcinog. 2009, 48, 975–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Taniura, H.; Matsumoto, K.; Yoshikawa, K. Physical and Functional Interactions of Neuronal Growth Suppressor Necdin with p53. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 16242–16248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Kuwako, K.-I.; Taniura, H.; Yoshikawa, K. Necdin-related MAGE Proteins Differentially Interact with the E2F1 Transcription Factor and the p75 Neurotrophin Receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 1703–1712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Yang, Z.; Kirton, H.M.; MacDougall, D.A.; Boyle, J.P.; Deuchars, J.; Frater, B.; Ponnambalam, S.; Hardy, M.E.; White, E.; Calaghan, S.C.; et al. The Golgi apparatus is a functionally distinct Ca2+store regulated by the PKA and Epac branches of the β1-adrenergic signaling pathway. Sci. Signal. 2015, 8, ra101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Aggarwal, B.B. Signalling pathways of the TNF superfamily: A double-edged sword. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2003, 3, 745–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Locksley, R.M.; Killeen, N.; Lenardo, M.J. The TNF and TNF Receptor Superfamilies. Cell 2001, 104, 487–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Cui, X.; Hawari, F.; Alsaaty, S.; Lawrence, M.; Combs, C.A.; Geng, W.; Rouhani, F.N.; Miskinis, D.; Levine, S.J. Identification of ARTS-1 as a novel TNFR1-binding protein that promotes TNFR1 ectodomain shedding. J. Clin. Investig. 2002, 110, 515–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Garcia-Marcos, M.; Kietrsunthorn, P.S.; Wang, H.; Ghosh, P.; Farquhar, M.G. G Protein Binding Sites on Calnuc (Nucleobindin 1) and NUCB2 (Nucleobindin 2) Define a New Class of Gαi-regulatory Motifs. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 28138–28149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Maziarz, M.; Broselid, S.; DiGiacomo, V.; Park, J.-C.; Luebbers, A.; Garcia-Navarrete, L.; Blanco-Canosa, J.B.; Baillie, G.S.; Garcia-Marcos, M. A biochemical and genetic discovery pipeline identifies PLCδ4b as a nonreceptor activator of heterotrimeric G-proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 2018, 293, 16964–16983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Ghosh, P.; Garcia-Marcos, M.; Farquhar, M.G. GIV/Girdin is a rheostat that fine-tunes growth factor signals during tumor progression. Cell Adhes. Migr. 2011, 5, 237–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. O’Hayre, M.; Vázquez-Prado, J.; Kufareva, I.; Stawiski, E.W.; Handel, T.M.; Seshagiri, S.; Gutkind, J.S. The emerging mutational landscape of G proteins and G-protein-coupled receptors in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2013, 13, 412–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Lappano, R.; Maggiolini, M. GPCRs and cancer. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2012, 33, 351–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Bar-Shavit, R.; Maoz, M.; Kancharla, A.; Nag, J.K.; Agranovich, D.; Grisaru-Granovsky, S.; Uziely, B. G Protein-Coupled Receptors in Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Garcia-Marcos, M.; Ghosh, P.; Farquhar, M.G.; Zhao, H.; Chiaro, C.R.; Zhang, L.; Smith, P.B.; Chan, C.Y.; Pedley, A.M.; Pugh, R.J.; et al. GIV/Girdin Transmits Signals from Multiple Receptors by Triggering Trimeric G Protein Activation. J. Biol. Chem. 2015, 290, 6697–6704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Ling, Y.; Jiang, P.; Cui, S.-P.; Ren, Y.-L.; Zhu, S.-N.; Yang, J.-P.; Du, J.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, J.-Y.; Zhang, B. Clinical Implications for Girdin Protein Expression in Breast Cancer. Cancer Investig. 2011, 29, 405–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Liu, C.; Xue, H.; Lu, Y.; Chi, B. Stem cell gene Girdin: A potential early liver metastasis predictor of colorectal cancer. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2012, 39, 8717–8722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Wang, S.; Lei, Y.; Cai, Z.; Ye, X.; Li, L.; Luo, X.; Yu, C. Girdin regulates the proliferation and apoptosis of pancreatic cancer cells via the PI3K/Akt signalling pathway. Oncol. Rep. 2018, 40, 599–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Wang, W.; Chen, H.; Gao, W.; Wang, S.; Wu, K.; Lu, C.; Luo, X.; Li, L.; Yu, C. Girdin interaction with vimentin induces EMT and promotes the growth and metastasis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Oncol. Rep. 2020, 44, 637–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Barbazan, J.; Dunkel, Y.; Li, H.; Nitsche, U.; Janssen, K.-P.; Messer, K.; Ghosh, P. Prognostic Impact of Modulators of G proteins in Circulating Tumor Cells from Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 22112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Lagunas-Rangel, F.A. KDM6B (JMJD3) and its dual role in cancer. Biochimie 2021, 184, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Tang, B.; Qi, G.; Tang, F.; Yuan, S.; Wang, Z.; Liang, X.; Li, B.; Yu, S.; Liu, J.; Huang, Q.; et al. Aberrant JMJD3 Expression Upregulates Slug to Promote Migration, Invasion, and Stem Cell–Like Behaviors in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2016, 76, 6520–6532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Cao, Z.; Shi, X.; Tian, F.; Fang, Y.; Wu, J.B.; Mrdenovic, S.; Nian, X.; Ji, J.; Xu, H.; Kong, C.; et al. KDM6B is an androgen regulated gene and plays oncogenic roles by demethylating H3K27me3 at cyclin D1 promoter in prostate cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2021, 12, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Bhattarai, A.; Emerson, I.A. Dynamic conformational flexibility and molecular interactions of intrinsically disordered proteins. J. Biosci. 2020, 45, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 22 05687 g001 550
Figure 1. The dual role of Nucb2/nesfatin-1 in carcinogenesis. (A) The pro-metastatic function of Nucb2/nesfatin-1. (B) The involvement of Nucb2/nesfatin-1 in apoptosis processes. Nucb2 mediates metastasis through the LKB1/AMPK/mTORC1/ZEB1 pathways. Nucb2 is thought to participate in the adaptation of cancer cells to ERm stress, which also promotes cell metastasis. On the other hand, Nucb2/nesfatin-1 is implicated in the apoptosis process through such pathways as the mTOR/RhoA/ROCK and JNK-1/2/p38MAPK pathways. Apoptosis induction by Nucb2/nesfatin-1 is also exerted by the regulation of apoptotic gene expression, e.g., Bax and Bcl-2. Additionally, Nucb2 is a substrate of caspase cleavage, which also indicates the participation of Nucb2 in apoptosis.
Figure 1. The dual role of Nucb2/nesfatin-1 in carcinogenesis. (A) The pro-metastatic function of Nucb2/nesfatin-1. (B) The involvement of Nucb2/nesfatin-1 in apoptosis processes. Nucb2 mediates metastasis through the LKB1/AMPK/mTORC1/ZEB1 pathways. Nucb2 is thought to participate in the adaptation of cancer cells to ERm stress, which also promotes cell metastasis. On the other hand, Nucb2/nesfatin-1 is implicated in the apoptosis process through such pathways as the mTOR/RhoA/ROCK and JNK-1/2/p38MAPK pathways. Apoptosis induction by Nucb2/nesfatin-1 is also exerted by the regulation of apoptotic gene expression, e.g., Bax and Bcl-2. Additionally, Nucb2 is a substrate of caspase cleavage, which also indicates the participation of Nucb2 in apoptosis.
Ijms 22 05687 g001
Ijms 22 05687 g002 550
Figure 2. Scheme of proposed Nucb2 mediated signaling pathways in colon cancer and LUAD. Nucb2 enhances migration, invasion, and mesenchymal phenotype in colon cancer through the LKB1/AMPK/TORC1/ZEB1 pathways. Nucb2 also plays an oncogenic role in LUAD by increasing the expression of N-cadherin and vimentin and promoting the deficiency of the E-cadherin level. See the text for more details.
Figure 2. Scheme of proposed Nucb2 mediated signaling pathways in colon cancer and LUAD. Nucb2 enhances migration, invasion, and mesenchymal phenotype in colon cancer through the LKB1/AMPK/TORC1/ZEB1 pathways. Nucb2 also plays an oncogenic role in LUAD by increasing the expression of N-cadherin and vimentin and promoting the deficiency of the E-cadherin level. See the text for more details.
Ijms 22 05687 g002
Ijms 22 05687 g003 550
Figure 3. Scheme of proposed Nucb2-induced apoptosis in ovarian cancer and in adrenocortical carcinoma. Nucb2 exerts apoptosis in ovarian epithelial cell carcinoma through the mTOR/RhoA/ROCK pathways. Nucb2 also alters the phosphorylation pattern of kinases belonging to the family of serine/threonine mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs), resulting in elevated levels of phosphorylated p-JNK-1/2, and p-p38MAPK, and decreased levels of phosphorylated p-ERK1/2. See the text for more details.
Figure 3. Scheme of proposed Nucb2-induced apoptosis in ovarian cancer and in adrenocortical carcinoma. Nucb2 exerts apoptosis in ovarian epithelial cell carcinoma through the mTOR/RhoA/ROCK pathways. Nucb2 also alters the phosphorylation pattern of kinases belonging to the family of serine/threonine mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs), resulting in elevated levels of phosphorylated p-JNK-1/2, and p-p38MAPK, and decreased levels of phosphorylated p-ERK1/2. See the text for more details.
Ijms 22 05687 g003
Ijms 22 05687 g004 550
Figure 4. Schematic representation of major Nucb2-protein interactions important in the regulation of the tumorigenesis process. (A) Nucb2–necdin interaction disrupts the secretion of Nucb2 and leads to the accumulation of Nucb2 in the cytoplasm. (B) Ca2+-dependent Nucb2–ARTS-1 interaction leads to the release of both the full-length and truncated forms of TNFR1. (C) Suppression of the Nucb2–Gαi3 interaction occurs due to the Ca2+-dependent conformational change of Nucb2’s structure. See the text for more details.
Figure 4. Schematic representation of major Nucb2-protein interactions important in the regulation of the tumorigenesis process. (A) Nucb2–necdin interaction disrupts the secretion of Nucb2 and leads to the accumulation of Nucb2 in the cytoplasm. (B) Ca2+-dependent Nucb2–ARTS-1 interaction leads to the release of both the full-length and truncated forms of TNFR1. (C) Suppression of the Nucb2–Gαi3 interaction occurs due to the Ca2+-dependent conformational change of Nucb2’s structure. See the text for more details.
Ijms 22 05687 g004
Table
Table 1. Summary of Nucb2/nesfatin-1 involvement in tumorigenesis processes.
Table 1. Summary of Nucb2/nesfatin-1 involvement in tumorigenesis processes.
Cancer TypeSignaling PathwayRole of Nucb2Types of StudiesReferences
Adrenocortical carcinomaJNK-1/2/p38MAPK
Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK		Apoptosis inductionin vitro[72]
Bladder cancer cellsMMPsCancer migration and invasiveness promotionin vitro[26]
Colon cancerLKB1/AMPK/mTORC1/ZEB1
G protein signaling		EMT promotion and
cancer metastasis		in vitro and in vivo[19,94]
Melanoma cells Adaptation to ER stressin vitro and in vivo[42]
Non-small cell lung carcinomaFTX/ miR-335-5p/
Akt/mTOR		EMT induction and
cancer metastasis		in vitro and in vivo[39]
Ovarian epithelial cell carcinomamTOR/RhoA/ROCKApoptosis
enhancement		in vitro[15]
Renal cell carcinomaAMPK/mTORC1/ZEB1EMT inductionin vitro and in vivo[38]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Skorupska, A.; Lenda, R.; Ożyhar, A.; Bystranowska, D. The Multifaceted Nature of Nucleobindin-2 in Carcinogenesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5687. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22115687

AMA Style

Skorupska A, Lenda R, Ożyhar A, Bystranowska D. The Multifaceted Nature of Nucleobindin-2 in Carcinogenesis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(11):5687. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22115687

Chicago/Turabian Style

Skorupska, Anna, Rafał Lenda, Andrzej Ożyhar, and Dominika Bystranowska. 2021. "The Multifaceted Nature of Nucleobindin-2 in Carcinogenesis" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 11: 5687. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22115687

APA Style

Skorupska, A., Lenda, R., Ożyhar, A., & Bystranowska, D. (2021). The Multifaceted Nature of Nucleobindin-2 in Carcinogenesis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(11), 5687. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22115687

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop