Next Article in Journal
Chondroprotective Effects of a Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor, Panobinostat, on Pain Behavior and Cartilage Degradation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Transection-Induced Experimental Osteoarthritic Rats
Next Article in Special Issue
Potent Activity of Hybrid Arthropod Antimicrobial Peptides Linked by Glycine Spacers
Previous Article in Journal
Hybrid QM/MM Simulations Confirm Zn(II) Coordination Sphere That Includes Four Cysteines from the P2 × 4R Head Domain
Previous Article in Special Issue
Thanatin: An Emerging Host Defense Antimicrobial Peptide with Multiple Modes of Action
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 22
Issue 14
10.3390/ijms22147291
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Identification of Amyloidogenic Regions in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Ribosomal S1 Protein

by
Sergei Y. Grishin
1,
Ulyana F. Dzhus
1,
Anatoly S. Glukhov
1,
Olga M. Selivanova
1,
Alexey K. Surin
1,2,3 and
Oxana V. Galzitskaya
1,4,*
1
Institute of Protein Research, Russian Academy of Sciences, 142290 Pushchino, Russia
2
The Branch of the Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, 142290 Pushchino, Russia
3
State Research Center for Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 142279 Obolensk, Russia
4
Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Biophysics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 142290 Pushchino, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(14), 7291; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22147291
Submission received: 11 June 2021 / Revised: 24 June 2021 / Accepted: 1 July 2021 / Published: 7 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Creation of New Antimicrobial Peptides 2.0)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Bacterial S1 protein is a functionally important ribosomal protein. It is a part of the 30S ribosomal subunit and is also able to interact with mRNA and tmRNA. An important feature of the S1 protein family is a strong tendency towards aggregation. To study the amyloidogenic properties of S1, we isolated and purified the recombinant ribosomal S1 protein of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Using the FoldAmyloid, Waltz, Pasta 2.0, and AGGRESCAN programs, amyloidogenic regions of the protein were predicted, which play a key role in its aggregation. The method of limited proteolysis in combination with high performance liquid chromatography and mass spectrometric analysis of the products, made it possible to identify regions of the S1 protein from P. aeruginosa that are protected from the action of proteinase K, trypsin, and chymotrypsin. Sequences of theoretically predicted and experimentally identified amyloidogenic regions were used to synthesize four peptides, three of which demonstrated the ability to form amyloid-like fibrils, as shown by electron microscopy and fluorescence spectroscopy. The identified amyloidogenic sites can further serve as a basis for the development of new antibacterial peptides against the pathogenic microorganism P. aeruginosa.

1. Introduction

The study of amyloids as ordered fibrillar protein aggregates is of great importance for elucidating their role in human pathologies, especially in neurodegenerative diseases [1,2,3]. It is known that, under certain conditions, most proteins and peptides tend not only to aggregation, but also to form amyloid-like fibrils [4,5,6]; in a particular case, the formation of amyloids of some proteins can be induced by other amyloidogenic proteins and peptides [7,8]. Currently, interest in the study of amyloids is also associated with the fact that they can be used in various nano- and bio-technological developments, including as antimicrobial agents against pathogenic microorganisms [9,10,11]. In recent reviews of scientific articles, the prospects of using antimicrobial peptides in medicine are discussed [12,13], including those acting by the mechanism of directed coaggregation with the target protein due to the interaction of amyloidogenic sites that constitute the spine of amyloid fibrils [14]. Disruption of the native structure of the most important bacterial proteins, in particular ribosomal ones, caused by directed aggregation, can be accompanied by a loss of the functional activity of the protein, which, in turn, can lead to a change in normal cellular metabolism and the death of bacteria.
The ribosomal S1 protein is the largest bacterial protein of the 30S ribosomal subunit and can perform, in addition to structural, many other functions, interacting with both RNA and other proteins [15,16,17,18]. It was shown that amber mutation and knockout of the gene encoding the bS1 protein lead to the death of bacterial cells [19,20]. The bS1 protein, which is present only in bacterial cells, contains, depending on the taxonomic affiliation of the microorganism, from one to six domains of the S1 protein (D1–D6), separated by flexible regions [21,22]. It is important that the S1 domain is a structural variant of the oligosaccharide/oligonucleotide-binding fold (OB-fold) [23,24] and can exhibit amyloidogenic properties, like another analog of the OB-fold, the cold shock domain [25]. Previously, peptides with amyloidogenic properties and antimicrobial activity against Thermus thermophilus were synthesized and studied based on the sequences of the S1 domains of the ribosomal S1 protein of the model organism T. thermophilus [26].
P. aeruginosa is a pathogenic bacterium that can cause nosocomial infections [27,28], and for which cases of multiple antibiotic resistance are increasingly being reported [29,30]. Recently, antimicrobial peptides have been considered as an alternative to classical antibiotics for the treatment of diseases caused by multidrug-resistant strains of P. aeruginosa [31,32,33]. Information about the amyloidogenic regions in the structure of the ribosomal S1 protein from P. aeruginosa (bPaS1) will allow the development of new antimicrobial peptides that specifically interact with this target protein and cause its aggregation, which will ultimately lead to disruption of the functioning of the ribosomal S1 protein and suppress the vital activity of this pathogenic bacteria.
The main contribution to the formation of amyloids is made by amino acid residues, which contribute to a denser packing of the protein structure [34,35]. Consequently, protein regions included in the spine of amyloid fibrils are characterized by high resistance to protease treatment, which is used to determine amyloidogenic regions in products of limited proteolysis of aggregates [36,37].
In the present work, amyloidogenic fragments were identified in the amino acid sequence of bPaS1, using the programs for searching and predicting amyloidogenic regions FoldAmyloid [38], Waltz [39], Pasta 2.0 [40] and AGGRESCAN [41], and experimentally by analyzing the products of limited proteolysis of bPaS1 aggregates using high performance liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry (LC-MS). The tendency to amyloid formation of peptides synthesized on the basis of amyloidogenic regions of bPaS1 was studied by electron microscopy (EM) and fluorescence spectroscopy (using thioflavin T (ThT)), which are widely used to detect amyloids [42,43,44].

2. Results

2.1. Isolation and Purification of bPaS1

The E. coli strain was obtained, the genetic construct allows us to obtain the recombinant bPaS1 with additional inserts: an N-terminal sequence with 6 His, which allows the use of affinity chromatography purification; a specific TEV protease recognition site for cleaving intact bPaS1. Nucleic acids were precipitated with streptomycin sulfate and the precipitates were removed from protein samples. The degree of purification of bPaS1 preparations was assessed by electrophoresis of samples under denaturing conditions. The resulting final preparation had a purity of at least 90%.

2.2. Prediction and Experimental Determination of bPaS1 Regions Prone to Aggregation

The ability of a protein to aggregate and form amyloid-like fibrils is primarily determined by the presence of amyloidogenic regions in its structure, which can be predicted using special programs developed for this purpose. Prediction of amyloidogenic sites for bPaS1 was performed using four programs: FoldAmyloid, Waltz, AGGRESCAN, and Pasta 2.0 (Figure 1B).
Each program predicts at least one region prone to amyloid formation in the bPaS1 sequence. However, the prediction results differ between different programs as they use different algorithms to find amyloidogenic regions. Subsequently, an experimental search for protein regions resistant to the action of proteases was carried out in the course of limited proteolysis and analysis of hydrolysates by LC-MS. In total, 146 significant peptides were found in the products of limited proteolysis of bPaS1 aggregates. At the same time, only 96 significant peptides were detected in the control sample without incubation for aggregation. Subsequently, significant peptides identified in the hydrolysates of control and experimental bPaS1 samples were ranked by length, the longest of them was compared with the bPaS1 sequence in order to determine the regions most protected from the action of proteases in aggregates and control preparations (Figure 1).
As shown in Figure 1B, the overall peptide coverage for protein aggregate hydrolysates and controls is similar. At the same time, additional amino acid sequences for aggregates have been identified that may play a role in the formation of associates. LC-MS data were analyzed, and peptides with a length of at least five amino acid residues were selected (similar to the selection criterion in programs predicting amyloidogenic sequences of at least five amino acid residues), which are present only in hydrolysates of aggregates and are not observed in control samples (Table 1).
As follows from Table 1, the results of bioinformatic analysis and experimental determination of amyloidogenic regions in the bPaS1 sequence do not coincide for all protease-resistant peptides found in protein aggregates. At the same time, for the identified peptides FEESLK, AIITGIVVDI, DVNGIR, LHITDMAWKR, ITDFGIFIGL, ASLHEK, KQEVESA, the accuracy of molecular weight measurement was no worse than 1.8 ppm, and the T function value was at least two times higher than the threshold value, which on the whole indicates a high reliability of the experimental determination. Thus, the bPaS1 regions that overlap with the results of predicting amyloidogenicity by at least two programs, or are identified only in the products of limited proteolysis of bPaS1 aggregates, were used as prototypes for the synthesis of peptides: AIITGIVVDI, SWIVLEAAFA, ITDFGIFIGL and LHITDMAWKR (Figure 1B). Interestingly, the local distribution of non-polar amino acid residues, especially V, I, F, C, can be used to assess the propensity of a peptide to form amyloid structures [45]. The AIITGIVVDI, SWIVLEAAFA, ITDFGIFIGL fragments are characterized by a high percentage of nonpolar amino acid residues (70%, 70%, and 60%, respectively), in contrast to the LHITDMAWKR peptide (40%).
The bPaS1 regions, which are theoretically predicted to be amyloidogenic and experimentally resistant to the action of proteases, are of interest for further study and discussion of the prospects for using antimicrobial peptides acting on the basis of directed coaggregation in the development of antimicrobial peptides.

2.3. Electron Microscopic Images of Aggregates

Recombinant bPaS1 was isolated, purified and analyzed using the EM method. According to EM data (Figure 2), bPaS1 under conditions of 50 mM TrisHCl, pH 8.0; 100 mM NaCl; 10 mM MgCl2; 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol forms disordered aggregates. That is, as in the case of the recombinant protein bS1 from T. thermophilus [47], bPaS1 does not form fibrils. However, it should be noted that bPaS1, in contrast to the previously studied bS1 from T. thermophilus, is less prone to aggregation and forms small and less dense aggregates of various sizes [47]. The images of amyloids/aggregates of peptide synthesized based on the predicted amyloidogenic regions in the bPaS1 amino acid sequence are shown in Figure 3.
According to EM data, it was shown that the AIITGIVVDI, SWIVLEAAFA, and ITDFGIFIGL peptides under conditions of 50 mM TrisHCl, pH 7.5; 150 mM NaCl, incubation for 5 h at 37 °C are able to form amyloid-like fibrils of various morphologies. Under the same conditions, the LHITDMAWKR peptide did not form fibrils, but only disordered aggregates.

2.4. Thioflavin T Fluorescence Assay for Aggregation of bPaS1 and Peptides

The property of thioflavin T to bind to amyloid fibrils with a simultaneous multiple increase in fluorescence at a wavelength of ~485 nm [48] was used by us to analyze the tendency towards the formation of amyloids in bPaS1 preparations and AIITGIVVDI, SWIVLEAAFA, ITDFGIFIGL, LHITDMAWKR peptides (Figure 4). In Figure 4 (Part 1), the ThT fluorescence intensity at a wavelength of ~485 nm, exceeding the control values for free ThT by a factor of ten or more, was obtained for preparations of the AIITGIVVDI, SWIVLEAAFA, ITDFGIFIGL peptides (Figure 4C–E,K, Part 1), as well as in a mixture of these peptides with bPaS1 (Figure 4G–I,L, Part 1). At the same time, for bPaS1 preparations and the LHITDMAWKR peptide (Figure 4B,F, Part 1), as well as for their mixture in solution (Figure 4J, Part 1), a multiple increase in the ThT fluorescence intensity was not observed.
Thus, the presence of the effect of a multiple increase in the ThT fluorescence intensity upon incubation with preparations of the AIITGIVVDI, SWIVLEAAFA, ITDFGIFIGL peptides and the absence of such an effect for preparations with the LHITDMAWKR peptide is consistent with the data of electron microscopy that the AIITGIVVDI, SWIVLEAAFA, ITDFGIFIGL peptides form amyloid fibrils, while only disordered aggregates of the peptide are found in the LHITDMAWKR preparations.
It should be noted that when testing the propensity for coaggregation of individual peptides with bPaS1, the greatest increase in the ThT fluorescence intensity was observed in a mixture of the ITDFGIFIGL peptide with bPaS1 after 24 h of incubation (Figure 4i, Part 2).
Thus, although bPaS1 preparations do not form amyloid-like fibrils, they affect the change in the relative intensity and wavelength of the maximum intensity of ThT fluorescence in mixtures with amyloidogenic peptides. No such effects were observed in mixtures of bPaS1 with the non-amyloidogenic LHITDMAWKR peptide.

3. Discussion

The tendency of bS1 proteins to form associates is determined by the structural features of the protein, as well as by the functions it performs [49,50,51]. High amyloidogenicity and, first of all, the mobility of S1 domains relative to each other creates problems in crystallization of ribosomal protein bS1 and determination of its tertiary structure [47,52]. At the moment, there is no data on the complete spatial structure of any ribosomal S1 protein. In the present work, for the isolated recombinant S1 protein from the pathogenic organism P. aeruginosa, regions of the amino acid sequence prone to aggregation and formation of amyloid were determined. The results obtained will be important in crystallization of bPaS1, and can also be used in the development of antimicrobial peptides acting on the basis of the mechanism of directed coaggregation with the whole protein [26].
The results of a theoretical search for amyloidogenic regions in the bPaS1 sequence using the algorithms of the FoldAmyloid, Waltz, Pasta 2.0, and AGGRESCAN programs showed that all six protein domains contain sequences prone to aggregation. Several programs predicted the same amyloidogenic regions: AIITGIVVDIDG (21–35 a.a., D1), RAESWIVLEAAFA (92–103 a.a., between D1 and D2), LHITDM (218–223 a.a., D3), ITDFGIFI (374–381 a.a., D5). At the same time, no amyloidogenic regions were identified in amino acid sequences at the N- and C-terminal fragments of the protein outside the domains. Earlier, other researchers noted that not for all proteins the prediction results of the FoldAmyloid, Waltz, Pasta 2.0, and AGGRESCAN programs coincide with the experimental data [53]. In this regard, it is of interest to discuss the data of bioinformatic analysis of amyloidogenicity in the context of the experimental determination of areas inaccessible for the action of a mixture of proteases.
The bPaS1 regions corresponding to significant unique peptides identified by limited proteolysis and LC-MS for protein aggregates only appear to be responsible for the propensity of bPaS1 to aggregate at 37 °C. Thus, the following peptides from Table 1 are common between the predicted presumably amyloidogenic and experimentally identified as resistant to proteases: AIITGIVVDI, VHAGLK, DVNGIR, LHITDMAWKR, ITDFGIFIGL. From our point of view, the AIITGIVVDI, SWIVLEAAFA, ITDFGIFIGL, LHITDMAWKR peptides were of interest for the synthesis and experimental verification of amyloidogenic properties. One should take into account both the differences in the algorithms for predicting amyloidogenic regions by the FoldAmyloid [38], Waltz [39], Pasta 2.0 [40], and AGGRESCAN [41] programs, and the possible effects of nonspecific hydrolysis of protein sequence regions by proteases, in particular, Proteinase K [54,55]. In this regard, the synthesized peptides AIITGIVVDI, SWIVLEAAFA, ITDFGIFIGL, LHITDMAWKR were also tested by other methods for detecting amyloids, namely EM and fluorescence spectroscopy with ThT.
EM studies have shown that the morphological features of the bPaS1 protein aggregates (six domains) are similar to those obtained for the T. thermophilus S1 protein (five domains) [47]. Despite the fact that the buffer conditions for aggregation experiments in these studies were somewhat different, it can be concluded that in both cases proteins did not form fibrils similar to amyloidogenic proteins and peptides [56,57,58], but only disordered aggregates with a tendency to form larger associates. Possibly, this morphology can be associated with the presence of several mobile domains containing amyloidogenic regions, which, when domains move relative to each other, prevents the formation of ordered fibrils [59]. In addition, as shown by us and other authors, individual protein domains exhibit different amyloidogenicity in proteins that are able to functionally interact with both nucleic acids and other proteins and peptides [52,60]. In particular, it was found that the amyloidogenicity of S1 proteins decreases with increasing protein size, while short amyloidogenic peptides synthesized based on the sequence of S1 proteins from E. coli and T. thermophilus are able to form amyloid-like fibrils [52]. In this work, using EM, it was demonstrated that three of the four selected and synthesized peptides (AIITGIVVDI, SWIVLEAAFA, and ITDFGIFIGL) were able to form amyloid-like fibrils at a temperature 37 °C and pH value 7.5, similar to the conditions for the development of the pathogenic bacteria P. aeruginosa.
In accordance with EM data, the amyloid-like properties of the AIITGIVVDI, SWIVLEAAFA, and ITDFGIFIGL peptides, associated with a multiple increase in the ThT fluorescence intensity, were also demonstrated using fluorescence spectroscopy. In the future, it is planned to conduct additional studies to identify the morphology of aggregates and the mechanism of formation of amyloid-like fibrils in mixtures of amyloidogenic peptides with bPaS1.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Isolation and Purification of bPaS1

The DNA fragment encoding bPaS1 was amplified using KOD Hot Start DNA Polymerase (Novagen, Darmstadt, Germany), two S1P_Nde oligonucleotides (5′-CACCATATGAGCGAAAGCTTCGCAGAAC-3′) and S1P_Bam (5′-CATAGGATCCTTAGCCCTGATTCTCCATCTG-3′) and genomic DNA from P. aeruginosa as a DNA template. DNA fragments were digested with restriction endonucleases NdeI and BamHI (Thermo Scientific, Dreieich, Germany) and ligated with DNA of the pET19mod vector (Novagen, Madison, WI, USA), which had been previously digested with the corresponding enzymes. DNA sequencing of the pET19mod-bS1 vector was performed at ZAO Evrogen (Evrogen, Moscow, Russia). E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells were transformed with the pET19mod-bS1 plasmid. The cell culture was grown in LB medium in the presence of ampicillin (100 μg/mL) at 37 °C to an optical density of A590 = 0.6. Expression was induced by the addition of isopropyl-β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside at a concentration of 0.3 mM. After induction, the cells were grown under the same conditions for 3 h. To purify the protein, the biomass of E. coli was suspended in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.5; 10 mM MgCl2, 200 mM NaCl (Buffer A) containing 0.3 mM PMSF. The cells were disrupted using an ultrasonic disintegrator (Qsonica, Newtown, CT, USA). Debris was sedimented by centrifugation at 10,000× g for 30 min. The supernatant was loaded onto a Ni-Sepharose column (GE Healthcare, Danderyd, Sweden) equilibrated with starting buffer A. The protein was eluted with 250 mM imidazole in starting Buffer A.
LiCl and streptomycin sulfate were added to the preparation to final concentrations of 3 M and 3% (weight/weight), respectively. The mixture was incubated at +4 °C overnight. The precipitate was removed by centrifugation at 10,000× g for 30 min. Then the drug was transferred by dialysis into a buffer solution of 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5; 10 mM MgCl2, 50 mM NaCl and clarified by centrifugation. Then the preparation was purified by gel filtration on Superdex 75 in Buffer A. The protein preparation was stored at −20 °C. Protein concentration was determined by the Bradford method [61], as well as spectrophotometrically taking into account the extinction coefficient at 278 nm, ε278 = 0.75 (mL mg−1 cm−1) (determined by the method [62]). Before the experiments, aliquots of the drug (1 mg of protein) were transferred by dialysis into a buffer solution of 50 mM TrisHCl, pH 7.5; 150 mM NaCl. Protein preparations were centrifuged for 30 min (+4 °C) at 65,000× g in a Z 36 HK centrifuge (HERMLE Labortechnik GmbH, Wehingen, Germany). The obtained samples at a concentration of 13–16 μM (0.8–1 mg/mL) were used for experiments on electron microscopy and limited proteolysis.

4.2. Prediction of bPaS1 Amyloidogenic Sites

To search for amyloidogenic sites in bPaS1, we analyzed the amino acid sequence available in the open UniProt database in FASTA format under the number Q9HZ71 (RS1_PSEAE) (UniProt. Available online: https://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/Q9HZ71 (accessed on 20 January 2021)). To predict amyloidogenic sequences, we used four programs—FoldAmyloid [38], Waltz [39], Pasta 2.0 [40], and AGGRESCAN [41], designed to search for amyloidogenic regions in the protein chain.

4.3. Limited Proteolysis and Analysis of Hydrolysates of bPaS1 Aggregates

For experiments on the proteolysis of bPaS1 aggregates, protein preparations in a buffer solution (50 mM TrisHCl, pH 7.5; 150 mM NaCl) were divided into control and experimental samples. The former was stored at –20 °C, and the latter were incubated to obtain aggregates at 37 °C with shaking for a day at 450 rpm in a thermostatically controlled Thermomixer comfort mixer (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). After that, the control and experimental samples were separately incubated with an equimolar mixture of three proteases—Proteinase K (AppliChem, Darmstadt, Germany), trypsin and chymotrypsin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 8 h at 37 °C with a shaking speed of 450 vol./min in a thermostatic mixer Thermomixer comfort (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). The final concentration of bPaS1 in the preparations was 16 μM (1 mg/mL), the concentration of each protease was 0.2 μM (0.0058 mg/mL for proteinase K, 0.0048 mg/mL for trypsin; 0.005 mg/mL for chymotrypsin). After incubation, the proteolysis reaction was stopped by adding concentrated trifluoroacetic acid (1% (volume/volume)). Control and experimental samples were centrifuged for 20 min at 12,000× g in an Eppendorf 5418R centrifuge (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). The precipitate was washed with 100 mM NH4HCO3 (pH 7.5), then all preparations were dried and dissolved in 20 μL of a solution of 0.5% (volume/volume) trifluoroacetic acid and 3% (volume/volume) acetonitrile for subsequent LC-MS analysis. To purify the samples treated with proteases, filtration was performed through ZipTips (MilliporeSigma, Burlington, MA, USA). Protein hydrolysates were concentrated on an Acclaim PepMap 100 guard column (C18, particle size 3 μm, pore size 100 Å, inner diameter 300 μm × length 5 mm) and separated on an Acclaim PepMap RSLC analytical column (particle size 2 μm, pore size 100 Å, internal diameter 75 μm × length 150 mm) (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) using a nano-flow liquid chromatograph EASY nLC 1000 (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). An Orbitrap Elite high-resolution mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Dreieich, Germany) was used as a detector. Mass-to-charge (m/z) ratio ions was determined in the course of mass spectrometric analysis. The obtained m/z values, in turn, were analyzed with the PEAKS Studio 7.5 software (Bioinformatics Solution Inc., Waterloo, ON N2L 6J2, Canada) to identify peptides. A preliminary selection of identified peptides with a molecular weight > 600 Da was carried out.

4.4. Synthesis and Peptide Preparations for Aggregation Experiments

The sequences of the amyloidogenic regions of bPaS1, which coincide according to the predictions of at least two of the four algorithms (FoldAmyloid, Waltz, AGGRESCAN, and Pasta 2.0), were used to select four peptides (10 amino acid residues) for synthesis. Solid phase synthesis was carried out according to the Fmoc method [63]. Peptides AIITGIVVDI (1013 Da), SWIVLEAAFA (1106 Da), LHITDMAWKR (1271 Da), and ITDFGIFIGL (1095 Da) were synthesized at IQ Chemical LLC (S. Petersburg, Russia). The purified peptide was tested using an Orbitrap Elite mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Dreieich, Germany). The estimated peptide molecular weight coincided with the calculated one, the purity of peptides was >95%. Immediately before the study of peptide aggregation, a stock solution was prepared with a peptide concentration of 50 mg/mL in 100% dimethyl sulfoxide (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). To the resulting stock, solution was added a buffer solution of 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5; 150 mM NaCl to a final peptide concentration of 0.5 mg/mL. Each thus prepared peptide preparation was incubated for 5 h at 37 °C with shaking at 450 rpm in a thermostatically controlled Thermomixer comfort mixer (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) and then used for electron microscopic analysis. Thus, the incubation time (5 h) and buffer solutions (with pH 7.5) for the peptides were chosen similarly to those used in [52].

4.5. Transmission Electron Microscopy

BPaS1 preparations (0.8 mg/mL) in buffered conditions with 50 mM TrisHCl, pH 8.0; 100 mM NaCl; 10 mM MgCl2; 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol, as well as peptides (0.5 mg/mL) in buffer conditions, 50 mM TrisHCl, pH 7.5; 150 mM NaCl was analyzed using a JEM-1200EX electron microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) according to the method used previously [46]. Before analysis, the concentration of drugs was adjusted with the appropriate buffer to 0.2 mg/mL. Samples were prepared for negative contrast analysis. A copper mesh (400 Mesh, Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA, USA) coated with a formvar film (0.2% (weight/volume) formvar solution in chloroform) was placed on a drop of the preparation (~10 μL). After adsorption (5 min), the meshes with the preparation were transferred to a 1% (weight/volume) aqueous solution of uranyl acetate (1 min). The analysis of the preparations was carried out at an accelerating voltage of 80 kV. The shooting was carried out on Kodak film (SO-163) for EM at a magnification of 40,000.

4.6. Study of bPaS1 Aggregates and Peptides Using the Fluorescent Dye Thioflavin T

Preparations of bPaS1 (1 mg/mL) and peptides (0.5 mg/mL) in buffer conditions 50 mM TrisHCl, pH 7.5; 150 mM NaCl was incubated with thioflavin T (ThT) (0.06 mg/mL) for 24 h at 37 °C with shaking for 24 h at 450 rpm in a thermostatic mixer Thermomixer comfort (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). Fluorescence spectra were measured at 37 °C using an RF-6000 spectrofluorometer (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) in quartz cuvettes with an optical path length of 0.3 × 0.3 cm and a volume of 100 μL of a protein and/or peptide preparation. The excitation wavelength of ThT was 450 nm, the emission spectra were recorded in the range 455–600 nm. Measurements for the same preparation were performed three times. Standard deviations were calculated for the average (based on the results of three measurements) relative fluorescence intensity of ThT at a wavelength of 485 nm, close to the maximum fluorescence intensity of amyloid-bound ThT [48,64].

5. Conclusions

It is known that the ribosomal S1 protein can be used as a target for the development of antibiotics against the bacterium Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the causative agent of tuberculosis [65,66]. In turn, the present study identified amyloidogenic sequences of the S1 protein from P. aeruginosa that can be used to create antimicrobial peptides capable of targeting antibiotic-resistant strains of this pathogen. Such antimicrobial peptides containing amyloidogenic regions and acting by the mechanism of directed coaggregation with the ribosomal S1 protein may be a promising variant of a new type of antibiotics directed against microorganisms that cause nosocomial and other types of infections [67,68,69].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and designed the experiments: S.Y.G., A.K.S., O.V.G.; software: S.Y.G.; formal analysis: S.Y.G., A.K.S., O.M.S., U.F.D., A.S.G. and O.V.G.; visualization: S.Y.G., O.M.S.; investigation: S.Y.G., A.K.S., O.M.S., A.S.G., U.F.D. and O.V.G.; methodology: S.Y.G., A.K.S., U.F.D., O.M.S., A.S.G. and O.V.G.; resources: A.K.S., O.M.S., U.F.D., A.S.G. and O.V.G.; writing original draft preparation: S.Y.G. and O.V.G.; writing—review and editing, O.V.G.; supervision, O.V.G.; funding acquisition: O.V.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Russian science foundation, Grant Number 18-14-00321.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Mass spectrometry measurements were carried out by facilities of the Center for Collective Employment for Mass Spectrometry of IPR RAS (584307). We are grateful to V.V. Rogachevsky for help in working with EM.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

a.a.amino acid
AMPantimicrobial peptide
TEMtransmission electron microscopy
ThTthioflavin T

References

  1. Nizhnikov, A.A.; Antonets, K.S.; Inge-Vechtomov, S.G. Amyloids: From pathogenesis to function. Biochemistry 2015, 80, 1127–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Stroylova, Y.Y.; Kiselev, G.G.; Schmalhausen, E.V.; Muronetz, V.I. Prions and chaperones: Friends or foes? Biochemistry 2014, 79, 761–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Fantini, J.; Chahinian, H.; Yahi, N. Progress toward Alzheimer’s disease treatment: Leveraging the Achilles’ heel of Aβ oligomers? Protein Sci. 2020, 29, 1748–1759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Matiiv, A.B.; Trubitsina, N.P.; Matveenko, A.G.; Barbitoff, Y.A.; Zhouravleva, G.A.; Bondarev, S.A. Amyloid and Amyloid-Like Aggregates: Diversity and the Term Crisis. Biochemistry 2020, 85, 1011–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Suvorina, M.Y.; Selivanova, O.M.; Grigorashvili, E.I.; Nikulin, A.D.; Marchenkov, V.V.; Surin, A.K.; Galzitskaya, O.V. Studies of Polymorphism of Amyloid-β 42 Peptide from Different Suppliers. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2015, 47, 583–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Zabrodskaya, Y.A.; Lebedev, D.V.; Egorova, M.A.; Shaldzhyan, A.A.; Shvetsov, A.V.; Kuklin, A.I.; Vinogradova, D.S.; Klopov, N.V.; Matusevich, O.V.; Cheremnykh, T.A.; et al. The amyloidogenicity of the influenza virus PB1-derived peptide sheds light on its antiviral activity. Biophys. Chem. 2018, 234, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hu, R.; Ren, B.; Zhang, M.; Chen, H.; Liu, Y.; Liu, L.; Gong, X.; Jiang, B.; Ma, J.; Zheng, J. Seed-Induced Heterogeneous Cross-Seeding Self-Assembly of Human and Rat Islet Polypeptides. ACS Omega 2017, 2, 784–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Javed, I.; Zhang, Z.; Adamcik, J.; Andrikopoulos, N.; Li, Y.; Otzen, D.E.; Lin, S.; Mezzenga, R.; Davis, T.P.; Ding, F.; et al. Accelerated Amyloid Beta Pathogenesis by Bacterial Amyloid FapC. Adv. Sci. 2020, 7, 2001299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ke, P.C.; Zhou, R.; Serpell, L.C.; Riek, R.; Knowles, T.P.J.; Lashuel, H.A.; Gazit, E.; Hamley, I.W.; Davis, T.P.; Fändrich, M.; et al. Half a century of amyloids: Past, present and future. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 5473–5509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pastore, A.; Raimondi, F.; Rajendran, L.; Temussi, P.A. Why does the Aβ peptide of Alzheimer share structural similarity with antimicrobial peptides? Commun. Biol. 2020, 3, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Salinas, N.; Tayeb-Fligelman, E.; Sammito, M.D.; Bloch, D.; Jelinek, R.; Noy, D.; Usón, I.; Landau, M. The amphibian antimicrobial peptide uperin 3.5 is a cross-α/cross-β chameleon functional amyloid. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2014442118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Batoni, G.; Maisetta, G.; Esin, S. Therapeutic Potential of Antimicrobial Peptides in Polymicrobial Biofilm-Associated Infections. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Divyashree, M.; Mani, M.K.; Reddy, D.; Kumavath, R.; Ghosh, P.; Azevedo, V.; Barh, D. Clinical Applications of Antimicrobial Peptides (AMPs): Where do we Stand Now? Protein Pept. Lett. 2020, 27, 120–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kurpe, S.R.; Grishin, S.Y.; Surin, A.K.; Panfilov, A.V.; Slizen, M.V.; Chowdhury, S.D.; Galzitskaya, O.V. Antimicrobial and Amyloidogenic Activity of Peptides. Can Antimicrobial Peptides Be Used Against SARS-CoV-2? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 9552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Qureshi, N.S.; Bains, J.K.; Sreeramulu, S.; Schwalbe, H.; Fürtig, B. Conformational switch in the ribosomal protein S1 guides unfolding of structured RNAs for translation initiation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, 10917–10929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lund, P.E.; Chatterjee, S.; Daher, M.; Walter, N.G. Protein unties the pseudoknot: S1-mediated unfolding of RNA higher order structure. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020, 48, 2107–2125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Azam, M.S.; Vanderpool, C.K. Translation inhibition from a distance: The small RNA SgrS silences a ribosomal protein S1-dependent enhancer. Mol. Microbiol. 2020, 114, 391–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Kutlubaeva, Z.S.; Chetverina, H.V.; Chetverin, A.B. The Contribution of Ribosomal Protein S1 to the Structure and Function of Qβ Replicase. Acta Nat. 2017, 9, 24–30. [Google Scholar]
  19. Kitakawa, M.; Isono, K. An amber mutation in the gene rpsA for ribosomal protein S1 in Escherichia coli. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1982, 185, 445–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sørensen, M.A.; Fricke, J.; Pedersen, S. Ribosomal protein S1 is required for translation of most, if not all, natural mRNAs in Escherichia coli in vivo. J. Mol. Biol. 1998, 280, 561–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Deryusheva, E.I.; Machulin, A.V.; Matyunin, M.A.; Galzitskaya, O.V. Investigation of the Relationship between the S1 Domain and Its Molecular Functions Derived from Studies of the Tertiary Structure. Molecules 2019, 24, 3681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Machulin, A.; Deryusheva, E.; Lobanov, M.; Galzitskaya, O. Repeats in S1 Proteins: Flexibility and Tendency for Intrinsic Disorder. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Amir, M.; Kumar, V.; Dohare, R.; Islam, A.; Ahmad, F.; Hassan, M.I. Sequence, structure and evolutionary analysis of cold shock domain proteins, a member of OB-fold family. J. Evol. Biol. 2018, 31, 1903–1917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Deryusheva, E.I.; Machulin, A.V.; Selivanova, O.M.; Galzitskaya, O.V. Taxonomic distribution, repeats, and functions of the S1 domain-containing proteins as members of the OB-fold family. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Bioinform. 2017, 85, 602–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Guryanov, S.G.; Selivanova, O.M.; Nikulin, A.D.; Enin, G.A.; Melnik, B.S.; Kretov, D.A.; Serdyuk, I.N.; Ovchinnikov, L.P. Formation of Amyloid-Like Fibrils by Y-Box Binding Protein 1 (YB-1) Is Mediated by Its Cold Shock Domain and Modulated by Disordered Terminal Domains. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e36969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Kurpe, S.R.; Grishin, S.Y.; Surin, A.K.; Selivanova, O.M.; Fadeev, R.S.; Dzhus, Y.F.; Gorbunova, E.Y.; Mustaeva, L.G.; Azev, V.N.; Galzitskaya, O.V. Antimicrobial and Amyloidogenic Activity of Peptides Synthesized on the Basis of the Ribosomal S1 Protein from Thermus Thermophilus. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 6382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Juan, C.; Peña, C.; Oliver, A. Host and Pathogen Biomarkers for Severe Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections. J. Infect. Dis. 2017, 215, S44–S51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ma, Y.; Wang, C.; Li, Y.; Li, J.; Wan, Q.; Chen, J.; Tay, F.R.; Niu, L. Considerations and Caveats in Combating ESKAPE Pathogens against Nosocomial Infections. Adv. Sci. 2020, 7, 1901872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Hwang, W.; Yoon, S.S. Virulence Characteristics and an Action Mode of Antibiotic Resistance in Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Azam, M.W.; Khan, A.U. Updates on the pathogenicity status of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Drug Discov. Today 2019, 24, 350–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Kim, H.; Jang, J.H.; Kim, S.C.; Cho, J.H. Development of a novel hybrid antimicrobial peptide for targeted killing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 185, 111814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yasir, M.; Dutta, D.; Willcox, M.D.P. Comparative mode of action of the antimicrobial peptide melimine and its derivative Mel4 against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 7063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Mukhopadhyay, S.; Bharath Prasad, A.S.; Mehta, C.H.; Nayak, U.Y. Antimicrobial peptide polymers: No escape to ESKAPE pathogens—A review. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 36, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Dec, R.; Dzwolak, W. Extremely Amyloidogenic Single-Chain Analogues of Insulin’s H-Fragment: Structural Adaptability of an Amyloid Stretch. Langmuir 2020, 36, 12150–12159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Bouziane, H.; Chouarfia, A. Sequence- and structure-based prediction of amyloidogenic regions in proteins. Soft Comput. 2020, 24, 3285–3308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kushnirov, V.V.; Dergalev, A.A.; Alexandrov, A.I. Proteinase K resistant cores of prions and amyloids. Prion 2020, 14, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Surin, A.K.; Grishin, S.Y.; Galzitskaya, O.V. Determination of amyloid core regions of insulin analogues fibrils. Prion 2020, 14, 149–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Garbuzynskiy, S.O.; Lobanov, M.Y.; Galzitskaya, O.V. FoldAmyloid: A method of prediction of amyloidogenic regions from protein sequence. Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 326–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Oliveberg, M. Waltz, an exciting new move in amyloid prediction. Nat. Methods 2010, 7, 187–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Walsh, I.; Seno, F.; Tosatto, S.C.E.; Trovato, A. PASTA 2.0: An improved server for protein aggregation prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, W301–W307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Conchillo-Solé, O.; De Groot, N.S.; Avilés, F.X.; Vendrell, J.; Daura, X.; Ventura, S. AGGRESCAN: A server for the prediction and evaluation of “hot spots” of aggregation in polypeptides. BMC Bioinform. 2007, 8, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Selivanova, O.M.; Grigorashvili, E.I.; Suvorina, M.Y.; Dzhus, U.F.; Nikulin, A.D.; Marchenkov, V.V.; Surin, A.K.; Galzitskaya, O.V. X-ray diffraction and electron microscopy data for amyloid formation of Aβ40 and Aβ42. Data Brief 2016, 8, 108–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Ziaunys, M.; Smirnovas, V. Additional Thioflavin-T Binding Mode in Insulin Fibril Inner Core Region. J. Phys. Chem. B 2019, 123, 8727–8732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ma, X.-J.; Zhang, Y.-J.; Zeng, C.-M. Inhibition of amyloid aggregation of bovine serum albumin by sodium dodecyl sulfate at submicellar concentrations. Biochemistry 2018, 83, 60–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Johansson, J.; Nerelius, C.; Willander, H.; Presto, J. Conformational preferences of non-polar amino acid residues: An additional factor in amyloid formation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2010, 402, 515–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhang, J.; Xin, L.; Shan, B.; Chen, W.; Xie, M.; Yuen, D.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, Z.; Lajoie, G.A.; Ma, B. PEAKS DB: De Novo Sequencing Assisted Database Search for Sensitive and Accurate Peptide Identification. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2012, 11, M111.010587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Grishin, S.Y.; Dzhus, U.F.; Selivanova, O.M.; Balobanov, V.A.; Surin, A.K.; Galzitskaya, O.V. Comparative Analysis of Aggregation of Thermus thermophilus Ribosomal Protein bS1 and Its Stable Fragment. Biochemistry 2020, 85, 344–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Biancalana, M.; Koide, S. Molecular mechanism of Thioflavin-T binding to amyloid fibrils. Biochim. Biophys. Acta—Proteins Proteom. 2010, 1804, 1405–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Timchenko, A.A.; Shiriaev, V.M.; Fedorova, I.I.; Kihara, K.; Kimura, K.; Willumeit, R.; Garamus, V.M.; Selivanova, O.M. Conformation of the ribosomal protein S1 of Thermus thermophilus in solution under different ionic conditions. Biofizika 2007, 52, 216–222. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  50. Beckert, B.; Turk, M.; Czech, A.; Berninghausen, O.; Beckmann, R.; Ignatova, Z.; Plitzko, J.M.; Wilson, D.N. Structure of a hibernating 100S ribosome reveals an inactive conformation of the ribosomal protein S1. Nat. Microbiol. 2018, 3, 1115–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Loveland, A.B.; Korostelev, A.A. Structural dynamics of protein S1 on the 70S ribosome visualized by ensemble cryo-EM. Methods 2018, 137, 55–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Grishin, S.Y.; Deryusheva, E.I.; Machulin, A.V.; Selivanova, O.M.; Glyakina, A.V.; Gorbunova, E.Y.; Mustaeva, L.G.; Azev, V.N.; Rekstina, V.V.; Kalebina, T.S.; et al. Amyloidogenic Propensities of Ribosomal S1 Proteins: Bioinformatics Screening and Experimental Checking. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Kolesinska, B.; Rozniakowski, K.; Fraczyk, A.; Galecki, K.; Wietrzyk, J.; Filip-Psurska, B.; Fraczyk, J.; Kaminski, Z. New human Islet Amyloid Polypeptide fragments susceptible to aggregation. Chem. Biodivers. 2020, 17, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Fontana, A.; De Laureto, P.P.; Spolaore, B.; Frare, E.; Picotti, P.; Zambonin, M. Probing protein structure by limited proteolysis. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2004, 51, 299–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Katina, N.S.; Suvorina, M.Y.; Grigorashvili, E.I.; Marchenkov, V.V.; Ryabova, N.A.; Nikulin, A.D.; Surin, A.K. Identification of Regions in Apomyoglobin that Form Intermolecular Interactions in Amyloid Aggregates Using High-Performance Mass Spectrometry. J. Anal. Chem. 2017, 72, 1271–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Balobanov, V.; Chertkova, R.; Egorova, A.; Dolgikh, D.; Bychkova, V.; Kirpichnikov, M. The Kinetics of Amyloid Fibril Formation by de Novo Protein Albebetin and Its Mutant Variants. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Grigorashvili, E.I.; Selivanova, O.M.; Dovidchenko, N.V.; Dzhus, U.F.; Mikhailina, A.O.; Suvorina, M.Y.; Marchenkov, V.V.; Surin, A.K.; Galzitskaya, O.V. Determination of size of folding nuclei of fibrils formed from recombinant Aβ(1-40) peptide. Biochemistry 2016, 81, 538–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Selivanova, O.M.; Galzitskaya, O.V. Structural polymorphism and possible pathways of amyloid fibril formation on the example of insulin protein. Biochemistry 2012, 77, 1237–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Borgia, A.; Kemplen, K.R.; Borgia, M.B.; Soranno, A.; Shammas, S.; Wunderlich, B.; Nettels, D.; Best, R.B.; Clarke, J.; Schuler, B. Transient misfolding dominates multidomain protein folding. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Kumar, V.; Wahiduzzaman; Prakash, A.; Tomar, A.K.; Srivastava, A.; Kundu, B.; Lynn, A.M.; Imtaiyaz Hassan, I. Exploring the aggregation-prone regions from structural domains of human TDP-43. Biochim. Biophys. Acta—Proteins Proteom. 2019, 1867, 286–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Bradford, M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-Dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Gill, S.C.; Von Hippel, P.H. Calculation of protein extinction coefficients from amino acid sequence data. Anal. Biochem. 1989, 182, 319–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Beyermann, M.; Henklein, P.; Klose, A.; Sohr, R.; Bienert, M. Effect of tertiary amine on the carbodiimide-mediated peptide synthesis. Int. J. Pept. Protein Res. 2009, 37, 252–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Selivanova, O.M.; Suvorina, M.Y.; Dovidchenko, N.V.; Eliseeva, I.A.; Surin, A.K.; Finkelstein, A.V.; Schmatchenko, V.V.; Galzitskaya, O.V. How to Determine the Size of Folding Nuclei of Protofibrils from the Concentration Dependence of the Rate and Lag-Time of Aggregation. II. Experimental Application for Insulin and LysPro Insulin: Aggregation Morphology, Kinetics, and Sizes of Nuclei. J. Phys. Chem. B 2014, 118, 1198–1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Zhi, Y.; Dai, Y.; Yang, J.; Tan, S.; Lin, D.; Lin, K. Lead compounds and key residues of ribosomal protein S1 in drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Bioorganic Chem. 2019, 82, 58–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Shi, W.; Zhang, X.; Jiang, X.; Yuan, H.; Lee, J.S.; Barry, C.E.; Wang, H.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, Y. Pyrazinamide Inhibits Trans-Translation in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Science 2011, 333, 1630–1632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Browne, K.; Chakraborty, S.; Chen, R.; Willcox, M.D.; Black, D.S.; Walsh, W.R.; Kumar, N. A New Era of Antibiotics: The Clinical Potential of Antimicrobial Peptides. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Slizen, M.V.; Galzitskaya, O.V. Comparative Analysis of Proteomes of a Number of Nosocomial Pathogens by KEGG Modules and KEGG Pathways. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Voth, S.; Gwin, M.; Francis, C.M.; Balczon, R.; Frank, D.W.; Pittet, J.; Wagener, B.M.; Moser, S.A.; Alexeyev, M.; Housley, N.; et al. Virulent Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection converts antimicrobial amyloids into cytotoxic prions. FASEB J. 2020, 34, 9156–9179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 22 07291 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the domain organization of bPaS1 (A) and comparison of predicting amyloidogenic regions using programs with the results of peptide coverage after LC-MS analysis of hydrolysates of control and experimental (aggregate) protein preparations (B). The peptides identified in the control and experimental samples, respectively, are underlined in gray and black. The bPaS1 sequence is taken from the UniProt database (UniProt. Available online: https://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/Q9HZ71 (accessed on 20 January 2021)). The regions of bPaS1, prototype peptide synthesis, are shown black–green color.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the domain organization of bPaS1 (A) and comparison of predicting amyloidogenic regions using programs with the results of peptide coverage after LC-MS analysis of hydrolysates of control and experimental (aggregate) protein preparations (B). The peptides identified in the control and experimental samples, respectively, are underlined in gray and black. The bPaS1 sequence is taken from the UniProt database (UniProt. Available online: https://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/Q9HZ71 (accessed on 20 January 2021)). The regions of bPaS1, prototype peptide synthesis, are shown black–green color.
Ijms 22 07291 g001
Ijms 22 07291 g002 550
Figure 2. Electron microscopic image of the bPaS1 protein under conditions of 50 mM TrisHCl, pH 8.0; 100 mM NaCl; 10 mM MgCl2; 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol.
Figure 2. Electron microscopic image of the bPaS1 protein under conditions of 50 mM TrisHCl, pH 8.0; 100 mM NaCl; 10 mM MgCl2; 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol.
Ijms 22 07291 g002
Ijms 22 07291 g003 550
Figure 3. Electron microscopic images of aggregates formed from peptide preparations synthesized based on the bPaS1 sequence: AIITGIVVDI (A), SWIVLEAAFA (B), ITDFGIFIGL (C), and disordered aggregates of the LHITDMAWKR peptide (D).
Figure 3. Electron microscopic images of aggregates formed from peptide preparations synthesized based on the bPaS1 sequence: AIITGIVVDI (A), SWIVLEAAFA (B), ITDFGIFIGL (C), and disordered aggregates of the LHITDMAWKR peptide (D).
Ijms 22 07291 g003
Ijms 22 07291 g004 550
Figure 4. Histograms (1) and spectra (2) of fluorescence intensity of free thioflavin T (A,a) and in solution with bPaS1 (B,b), individual peptides AIITGIVVDI (C,c), SWIVLEAAFA (D,d), ITDFGIFIGL (E,e), LHITDMAWKR (F,f), a mixture of peptides (K,k), as well as in mixtures of bPaS1 with peptides (G,g), (H,h), (I,i), (J,j), (L,l). Error bars with standard deviations for the mean values of the measured fluorescence intensity after 1, 3, 5, 8, and 24 h of incubation are shown.
Figure 4. Histograms (1) and spectra (2) of fluorescence intensity of free thioflavin T (A,a) and in solution with bPaS1 (B,b), individual peptides AIITGIVVDI (C,c), SWIVLEAAFA (D,d), ITDFGIFIGL (E,e), LHITDMAWKR (F,f), a mixture of peptides (K,k), as well as in mixtures of bPaS1 with peptides (G,g), (H,h), (I,i), (J,j), (L,l). Error bars with standard deviations for the mean values of the measured fluorescence intensity after 1, 3, 5, 8, and 24 h of incubation are shown.
Ijms 22 07291 g004
Table
Table 1. Unique peptides identified as a result of comparing data from LC-MS analysis of hydrolysates of bPaS1 aggregates.
Table 1. Unique peptides identified as a result of comparing data from LC-MS analysis of hydrolysates of bPaS1 aggregates.
PeptidePrediction of AmyloidogenicityPercentage of Most Non-Polar a.a. [45] (V,I,F,C,L,A,M), %Observed Mass, DaTheoretical Mass, DaMeasurement Error, ppm *Molecular Ion, m/zCharge (z)Value of the Function T **
FEESLK
(9–14 a.a.)		No0751.376751.37520.5376.6951+235.71
AIITGIVVDI (22–31 a.a.)AGGRESCAN, Pasta 2.0, partially FoldAmyloid
(23–30 a.a.)		701012.6181012.61680.9507.3162+241.51
VHAGLK
(38–43 a.a.)		Pasta 2.050623.374623.3755–1.8312.6945+217.19
DVNGIR
(123–128 a.a.)		AGGRESCAN33672.356672.35550.7337.1852+232
E (+27.99) GQQVK *** (191–196 a.a.)No17715.35715.35–0.3358.6822+216.8
LHITDMAWKR (218–227 a.a.)FoldAmyloid, partially AGGRESCAN
(218–223 a.a.)		401269.6661269.66520.4635.8401+2114.36
ISGTIK
(367–372 a.a.)		partially AGGRESCAN
(370–372 a.a.)		33617.375617.37480.7309.6949+227.5
ITDFGIFIGL (374–383 a.a.)AGGRESCAN, partially FoldAmyloid
(375–382 a.a.)		601094.6011094.6012–0.1548.3078+276.43
ASLHEK
(445–450 a.a.)		No33683.361683.36021342.6877+230.93
KQEVESA
(536–542 a.a.)		No29789.388789.38681.1395.7011+241.89
*—The accuracy of molecular weight measurement of 1 ppm (parts per million) corresponds to 0.001 Da for an ion with a molecular weight of 1000 Da. **—For the PEAKS Studio 7.5 software we used (Bioinformatics Solution Inc., Waterloo, ON N2L 6J2, Canada) the value of the function T = –10 lgP, where P is the probability that a false identification of a peptide in the current search will achieve the same or better conformity score. For peptide mapping, only peptides for which a T value > 15 were used, which corresponds to the p-criterion < 0.03 [46]. ***—Mass shift (+27.99) means amino acid post-isolation modification (formylation) at the N-termini for peptide EGQQVK.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Grishin, S.Y.; Dzhus, U.F.; Glukhov, A.S.; Selivanova, O.M.; Surin, A.K.; Galzitskaya, O.V. Identification of Amyloidogenic Regions in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Ribosomal S1 Protein. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7291. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22147291

AMA Style

Grishin SY, Dzhus UF, Glukhov AS, Selivanova OM, Surin AK, Galzitskaya OV. Identification of Amyloidogenic Regions in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Ribosomal S1 Protein. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(14):7291. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22147291

Chicago/Turabian Style

Grishin, Sergei Y., Ulyana F. Dzhus, Anatoly S. Glukhov, Olga M. Selivanova, Alexey K. Surin, and Oxana V. Galzitskaya. 2021. "Identification of Amyloidogenic Regions in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Ribosomal S1 Protein" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 14: 7291. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22147291

APA Style

Grishin, S. Y., Dzhus, U. F., Glukhov, A. S., Selivanova, O. M., Surin, A. K., & Galzitskaya, O. V. (2021). Identification of Amyloidogenic Regions in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Ribosomal S1 Protein. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(14), 7291. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22147291

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop