Next Article in Journal
In Vitro and In Vivo Characterization of PLLA-316L Stainless Steel Electromechanical Devices for Bone Tissue Engineering—A Preliminary Study
Previous Article in Journal
Breast Cancer and Anaesthesia: Genetic Influence
Previous Article in Special Issue
Regulation of T-cell Receptor Gene Expression by Three-Dimensional Locus Conformation and Enhancer Function
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Cytokine Release Syndrome Associated with T-Cell-Based Therapies for Hematological Malignancies: Pathophysiology, Clinical Presentation, and Treatment

Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124 Modena, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(14), 7652; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22147652
Submission received: 9 July 2021 / Revised: 15 July 2021 / Accepted: 15 July 2021 / Published: 17 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue T Lymphocytes Biology, Pathogenesis and Therapeutic Applications)

Abstract

:
Cytokines are a broad group of small regulatory proteins with many biological functions involved in regulating the hematopoietic and immune systems. However, in pathological conditions, hyperactivation of the cytokine network constitutes the fundamental event in cytokine release syndrome (CRS). During the last few decades, the development of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies and T-cell therapies has rapidly evolved, and CRS can be a serious adverse event related to these treatments. CRS is a set of toxic adverse events that can be observed during infection or following the administration of antibodies for therapeutic purposes and, more recently, during T-cell-engaging therapies. CRS is triggered by on-target effects induced by binding of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells or bispecific antibody to its antigen and by subsequent activation of bystander immune and non-immune cells. CRS is associated with high circulating concentrations of several pro-inflammatory cytokines, including interleukins, interferons, tumor necrosis factors, colony-stimulating factors, and transforming growth factors. Recently, considerable developments have been achieved with regard to preventing and controlling CRS, but it remains an unmet clinical need. This review comprehensively summarizes the pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and treatment of CRS caused by T-cell-engaging therapies utilized in the treatment of hematological malignancies.

1. Introduction

Cytokines are small molecular messengers produced by a wide variety of immune and non-immune cells [1,2,3,4] that act as mediators and modulators within microenvironments. Cytokines regulate immunological responses, hematopoietic development, and cell to cell communication, as well as host responses to infectious agents, inflammatory stimuli, and drugs, modulating their effects [4,5,6]. Cytokines with important roles in the hematopoietic and immune systems may be classified based on their structure or function as interleukins (ILs), interferons (IFNs), tumor necrosis factors (TNFs), colony-stimulating factors (CSFs), and transforming growth factors (TGFs) [7]. Under physiological conditions, the secretion of cytokines is highly regulated, and the excess production of one cytokine is antagonized by the production of others with opposing functions through a counter-regulatory homeostatic mechanism. Cytokines can be pleiotropic, with different effects on diverse cell types, and can act synergistically. They form complex interactive networks with potential autocrine, paracrine, and endocrine functions [4,8,9]. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) is a systemic inflammatory response that can be triggered by a variety of factors, such as infection and certain medications, including monoclonal antibodies. CRS has been described after the infusion of several antibody-based therapies, including rituximab [10,11], obinutuzumab [12], alemtuzumab [13], brentuximab [14], dacetuzumab [15], and nivolumab [16]. Severe viral infections, such as influenza and SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) [17], can also trigger CRS through massive immune and non-immune cell stimulation.
Several efforts have been made to identify new therapeutic strategies for treating hematological malignancies, and some immunotherapy approaches have been tested to fortify the immune system of the patient against tumors. In the last few years, immune checkpoint inhibition and T-cell-engaging therapies, such as bispecific T-cell-engaging (BiTE) single-chain antibody constructs and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells, have opened up a new frontier in cancer immunotherapy [18,19,20]. However, one of the most important serious adverse effects of these therapies is CRS.
CRS is characterized by hypersecretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including IL-6, IL-1, IL-5, IL-10, IFN-γ, TNF, and TGFs by B and T lymphocytes and natural killer (NK) cells. The CRS may be further enhanced by numerous cellular interactions with bystander cells, such as endothelial cells, monocyte/macrophages, and dendritic cells, further increasing cytokine hypersecretion, aggravating symptoms, and inducing various grades of organ damage [21]. CRS symptoms may occur immediately after the administration of T-cell-engaging therapies or may be delayed until days or weeks after treatment. CRS can manifest as mild, with flu-like symptoms, including fever, nausea, and chills, or may be life-threatening and severe with shock and respiratory compromise, leading to multi-system organ failure and even death [10,22].
This review comprehensively summarizes the biological and clinical aspects of the CRS triggered by T-cell-engaging therapies used in the treatment of hematological malignancies.

2. Pathophysiology

The pathophysiology of CRS has been associated with invasive pathogens and therapeutic infusions of several monoclonal antibodies [10,12,13,14,15,23] (Table 1). CRS can also develop in association with severe viral infections, including COVID-19, which is caused by SARS-CoV-2 [24,25]. Recently, with the success of the newer T-cell-engaging immunotherapeutic agents, such as BiTE constructs and CAR T cells, in hematological malignancies [26], the interest in CRS has grown, as this is a major serious adverse event of these treatments. The immunotherapeutic strategies have been carried forward into clinical applications and shown impressive therapeutic activity in several hematological malignancies, including acute lymphoblastic B cell leukemia (B-ALL), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), and diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) [27]. CRS describes an exaggerated systemic immune response involving the release of more than 150 inflammatory mediators, cytokines, chemokines, oxygen radicals, and complement factors (Table 2) [28]. CRS is due to on-target effects induced by the binding of CAR T cells or BiTE antibody to its antigen on the surface of target cells and subsequent activation of bystander immune and non-immune cells, such as monocytes/macrophages, dendritic cells, and endothelial cells. Activation of these cells results in the massive release of several cytokines, initiating a cascade of events that overwhelms counter-regulatory homeostatic mechanisms, leading to CRS [29,30]. As clearly illustrated in Figure 1, T-cell engaging therapies target tumor cells and induce the release of cytokines as IFN-γ or TNF-α, which lead to the activation of bystander immune and non-immune cells as monocytes/macrophages, dendritic cells, NK and T-cell, and endothelial cells. These cells further release proinflammatory cytokines triggering a cascade reaction. Macrophages and endothelial cells produce large amounts of IL-6 which in turn activates T cells and other immune cells leading to a cytokine storm (Figure 1). However, the pathophysiology of CRS is still poorly understood.

2.1. The Key Role of IL-6

Physiologically, cytokines play a key role in coordinating effector cells of the immune system and providing regulatory signals that direct, amplify, and resolve the immune response. Cytokines have short half-lives, which normally prevents them from having effects outside the lymphoid tissue and sites of inflammation. In CRS, immune over-activation occurs as a result of perceived danger, resulting in excessive activation of effector immune cells and prolonged immune activation.
The overabundance of cytokines causes clinically significant collateral damage. The cytokines involved in the pathophysiology of CRS include IFN-γ, TNF, IL-6, and IL-10, which are consistently found to be elevated in the serum of patients with CRS [22,48] (Figure 1). IL-6 seems to play a key role in CRS pathophysiology, as highly elevated IL-6 levels are found in almost all patients with CRS [10,35]. IL-6 is a pleiotropic cytokine that exhibits both anti-inflammatory and pro-inflammatory characteristics. IL-6 can play diverse roles in different phases of inflammation, promoting damaging reactions within the tissue, and then contributing to resolving the inflammation, and finally helping to repair tissue in the late stages [49]. IL-6 is secreted by T lymphocytes, monocytes/macrophages, dendritic cells, mesenchymal cells, and osteoblasts and is present in processes, such as neutrophil migration, the acute phase response, angiogenesis, B-cell differentiation, and antibody generation [50] (Figure 2A). IL-6 exerts its biological functions via two major pathways: “classical signaling” and “trans-signaling pathways.” In “classical signaling” pathways, IL-6 activates cells by binding to the IL-6 receptor (IL6R), which leads to dimerization of the membrane protein gp130 [50] and intracellular tyrosine kinases, especially Janus kinase (JAK) 1 and JAK2, which then activate transcription factors signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) 1 and STAT3 [51,52]. Other cascades that can be activated by IL-6 include the SHP-2/ERK MAPK, PI3K-AKT-mTORC1, and SRC-YAP-NOTCH pathways [53,54,55] (Figure 2B). IL-6 can bind cells that express IL6R and signal transducer membrane protein gp130 on their surfaces. IL6R is also found in its soluble form in body fluids (sIL6R). When IL6 attaches to sIL6R and starts the signaling cascade by binding to cells that express gp130 alone (without IL6R on their surface), it is known as “trans-signaling” [56]. The mode of signaling influences the result: “classical IL-6 signaling” reduces inflammation, whereas “IL-6 trans-signaling” promotes T-cell migration, decreases apoptosis, enhances cytotoxicity, and suppresses regulatory T-cell differentiation [57,58,59]. “Classical IL-6 signaling” does not seem to affect CAR T cell efficacy [60], but the impact of IL-6 trans-signaling on CAR T cells has not been described.

2.2. The Roles of Other Cytokines

IL-6 determines the release of other cytokines, such as IFN-γ and TNF-α, by lymphocytes, monocytes, and neutrophils (Figure 1 and Figure 2A). The release of TNF-α and IFN-γ within 1–2 h is followed by an increase in IL-6 and IL-10, and in some cases, of IL-8 and IL-2. IFN-γ generated by T cells and NK cells, or by the tumor cells themselves, is a pro-inflammatory cytokine that activates other immune cells, such as macrophages [61], which produce excessive quantities of additional cytokines [62]. Moreover, IFN-γ triggers macrophage activation, leading to the secretion of host cytokines, including IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-10 [22], which could further intensify the CRS. IL-10 fails to control this process, though it suppresses cellular immunity. Other cytokines have also been found to be elevated during the course of CRS, including IL-1, IL-2, IL-8, IL-5, monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1), and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), driving some of its manifestations (Figure 1 and Table 2) [22,48,63,64,65,66,67,68]. IL-1 has one of the simplest signaling mechanisms in the innate immune system. It is capable of sensing an infection and triggering an inflammatory response [69]. IL-1 is released from activated macrophages and monocytes, further stimulating the release of IL-6 and inducing nitric oxide synthetase [48]. Endothelial cell activation also plays a role in CRS. Ang-2, a typical marker of endothelial cell activation, is a hallmark of severe CRS, showing that the endothelium plays a key role in the pathophysiology of CRS by amplifying the inflammatory response [67].

2.3. Biomarkers

Various studies indicate a correlation between the severity of the CRS and tumor burden, C-reactive protein (CRP) and ferritin levels, and cytokine levels [29,63,70,71] (Table 2). However, whether the cytokines can act as prognostic factors, especially in patients with CRS, in whom cytokine concentrations may already be high, and in patients with malignancies, is not clear. Comparing the increased cytokine level to the baseline value while simultaneously considering some specific markers and following a series of measurements rather than the amount of a single cytokine has been suggested [72]. Furthermore, the serum cytokine measurement is usually not quickly available in most hospitals. In response to IL-6, the liver produces CRP, and this concentration is easily measured by a rapid and inexpensive assay available in the majority of hospitals. Thus, CRP measurements are widely utilized as a surrogate marker of IL-6 bioactivity [73,74]. However, CRP is not specific to CRS and cannot be used to distinguish inflammation due to infectious or non-infectious disease [75]. An excessive increase in ferritin has also been reported in several patients after CAR T-cell infusion, supporting a relationship between CRS and macrophage activation syndrome (MAS)/hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH). However, in the same experience, ferritin did not show utility in predicting the severity of CRS [29].

3. Clinical Manifestations

The incidence of CRS varies with the type of immunotherapy, and it is more frequently observed during CAR T-cell therapy than with bispecific antibody blinatumomab infusion. During T-cell therapies, CRS occurs early during the course of treatment [76]. CRS related to blinatumomab therapy usually occurs during the first cycle of therapy, and typically upon starting the infusion. CRS manifests with a wide variety of signs and symptoms of varying severity. The most important and frequent symptoms are summarized in Figure 3. Fever is usually present, and several other symptoms can mimic infection. The patient’s body temperature quite commonly exceeds 40.0 °C. For this reason, the possibility of infection must be ruled out after appropriate cultures, particularly if the patient is neutropenic. Other constitutional symptoms, such as myalgia and arthralgia, may be present. Any organ can be affected during CRS, and the patient can develop nausea, vomiting, skin rash, hemodynamic instability, and capillary leak syndrome with hypotension and tachycardia, disseminated intravascular coagulation, and neurological toxicity [67]. Neurological toxicity may occur together with other symptoms of CRS or when the other symptoms are disappearing. Neurological toxicity includes headache, confusion, delirium, aphasia, tremor, and seizures. Patients with severe neurotoxicity show signs of endothelial activation, including disseminated intravascular coagulation and increased blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability, which may allow the entry of high concentrations of systemic cytokines, particularly IFN-γ, inducing brain vascular pericyte stress and the consequent secretion of endothelium-activating cytokines. Adverse neurological events can be fatal in rare cases [77]. Although usually reversible, severe cardiac dysfunction is of particular concern. The pathophysiology of acute cardiac toxicity is not clear but it appears similar to that cardiomyopathy is associated with sepsis [78].
Disseminated intravascular coagulation can occur in patients with CRS, especially in those who develop a CRS of grade ≥4. Consumptive coagulopathy manifests with thrombocytopenia, the elevation of D-dimer, prolongation of prothrombin time (PT) and partial thromboplastin time (PTT), hyperfibrinogenemia, and elevation of endothelial activation markers [67]. CRS symptoms may also mimic MAS/HLH [79,80], and the pathophysiology of the syndromes may overlap [81].

4. Management of CRS

The optimal clinical management of CRS is still not well-defined since T-cell-engaging therapies were recently introduced into clinical practice; thus, several questions are still unanswered. A reduced incidence of severe CRS has been obtained with cytoreduction, dose adjustment, and premedication with corticosteroids [82].
In patients receiving T-cell-engaging therapies, the approaches to prevention and treatment of CRS may differ substantially. Blinatumomab has a short half-life (~2 h), and CRS symptoms may resolve quickly by interrupting therapy and starting supportive care with or without additional interventions. However, BiTE constructs can be given repeatedly, whereas CAR T cells are usually administered once, but the side effects after CAR T infusion are difficult to reverse because the infused cells can persist for prolonged periods. Therefore, the management of CRS can be diverse between the two therapeutic modalities. Current treatments are based on the severity of the side effects [29,83] using the grading scheme developed by Lee et al. [29] (Table 3 and Figure 3).
Efficient management of patients requires very strict collaboration between several specialties, such as hematology, neurology, and radiology. Sometimes intensive care unit (ICU) referral should be considered so that mechanical ventilation can be offered when necessary. Patients with grade 1 and 2 toxicity experiencing fever, constitutional symptoms, and moderate hypotension are treated symptomatically with antipyretics and antibiotics for fever, with fluids and low dose vasopressors for hypotension and oxygen supplementation when saturation drops.
After CAR T-cell therapy, fever usually precedes CRS. Therefore, patients who develop persistent fever should be frequently evaluated for signs and symptoms of CRS. If an infection cannot be ruled out, empiric antibiotic therapy should be started.
For severe cases of CRS, the patient should be admitted to the ICU for close monitoring. In addition to aggressive supportive care, steroids and repeated doses of Il-6 inhibitor need to be administered when no improvement is observed. In some resistant cases, other anti-inflammatory agents need to be administered, but clinical experience in this setting is undeveloped [29,80,84,85].

5. Treatment of CRS

The therapy for CRS is not yet well defined but is based on the use of steroids and inhibitors of IL-6 activity, as well as IL-1, IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-2 inhibitors for unresponsive patients.

5.1. Steroids

Clinical experience shows that steroids are an effective treatment for suppressing the excessive inflammatory response and CRS [86]. Opinions differ on the timing and dosing of corticosteroids. Some choose to use corticosteroids as a first-line agent, whereas others do not [29]. However, corticosteroids have generalized effects on the immune system and may also inhibit the anti-tumor efficacy and affect the amplification and persistence of CAR T cells in vivo [71]. Thus, steroids should generally be avoided as first-line treatment but used in resistant patients with severe CRS and given at high doses when it is necessary to ablate CAR T cells. Furthermore, steroids are recommended in patients with adverse neurological effects.

5.2. IL-6 Activity Inhibitors

Tocilizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody against both the soluble IL-6 and membrane-bound IL-6 receptors, inhibiting both classical and trans-IL-6 signaling. After multiple trials demonstrated its efficacy [76,87], it was approved by the FDA in 2017 as the first approach for the treatment of CRS-related toxicities following CAR T-cell infusion. Tocilizumab controls CRS without significant loss of CAR T-cell activity. Improvements occur within a few hours after drug infusion, reducing adjuvant therapy. Advantageous effects of a single injection in patients with CRS induced by CAR T-cell therapy strongly suggest that IL-6 blockade may constitute a new therapeutic approach for an acute, severe, systemic inflammatory response such as CRS. Its most used dosage for CRS is 12 mg/kg for patients weighing <30 kg and 8 mg/kg for patients weighing ≥30 kg. Fever and hypotension are ameliorated within a few hours in responsive patients, whereas it is necessary to continue supportive treatment for several days in some patients. Responsive patients recover from CRS without significant loss of CAR T-cell function. However, a significant number of patients present with resistance to tocilizumab [83].
The effect of tocilizumab against severe CRS-associated neurotoxicity is extremely low, probably due to its limited ability to penetrate the BBB [88]. Some researchers have seen that prophylactic use of tocilizumab does not prevent the development of neurotoxicity [89], whereas others wonder if it is possible to use this drug prophylactically in order to avoid or reduce the symptoms of CRS [22].
Another monoclonal antibody that blocks IL-6 signaling is siltuximab, which prevents the activation of immune effector cells through either the trans or classical mechanisms [50]. Siltuximab has a higher affinity for IL-6 than tocilizumab has for IL6R, making it an attractive tool in managing CRS. The use of siltuximab is encouraged in patients that do not respond to tocilizumab and corticosteroids.

5.3. IL-1, IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-2 Inhibitors

IL-6/IL6R blockade alone cannot alleviate CRS symptoms completely and would be insufficient in treating severe CRS in patients undergoing CAR T-cell therapy. For patients who become critically ill and do not respond to IL-6, directed therapy targeting IL-1, IFN-γ, TNF-α, or sIL-2 could ameliorate their symptoms. This has led to the use of other cytokine inhibitors, including TNF-α and IL1R inhibitors [29,56,70,80]. Etanercept and infliximab both target TNF-α, which is known to be elevated in CRS, and have been used to treat severe CRS, with varying results [29,80]. Anakinra, a recombinant and slightly altered form of the IL1R antagonist, may be helpful in a subset of patients with increased IL-1α, but this cytokine is also not consistently elevated in patients with severe CRS [70]. Although IFN-γ is consistently elevated very early in severe CRS, it is not thought to be an ideal target due to its role in T-cell proliferation [90].
Finally, other research groups have thought of inserting a “suicidal” gene into the genetic construct used to arm T lymphocytes, a “command” that, when activated from the outside, drives the lymphocytes to commit suicide, self-limiting activity when the CRS becomes life-threatening [76].

6. Conclusions

The introduction of CAR T-cell therapy into clinical practice is revolutionizing the treatment of numerous hematological malignancies. This treatment is able to induce prolonged remission in patients in a very advanced stage of the disease and for whom the most common therapeutic options have been exhausted. However, it is essential that life-threatening toxicities, such as CRS, can be managed in an optimal and effective way. Therefore, the goal is to prevent or effectively treat CRS without diminishing the antitumor efficacy. The BiTE construct blinatumomab, a prophylactic procedure including cytoreduction, premedication with corticosteroids, and dose adjustment, appears to be able to reduce the incidence of severe CRS [82]. Considering the type of CAR T cells currently available, the most used sequence of agents to control severe CRS include tocilizumab and high-dose corticosteroids. When these treatments fail, other cytokine inhibitors, such as TNF-α or IL1R inhibitors, are often used. Isolated and severe neurotoxicity is usually, at least initially, treated with corticosteroids rather than tocilizumab.
In this review, we have summarized the pathophysiology, symptoms, and management of CRS associated with T-cell-based therapies utilized in the treatment of hematological malignancies. Although several grading scales and very effective treatment algorithms have been proposed, we would like to emphasize that optimal management of patients is based on the close collaboration of a multidisciplinary team that includes hematologists, neurologists, radiologists, and intensive care specialists, so that mechanical ventilation can be offered if necessary. Until new knowledge on the pathophysiology of CRS allows the use of new and more effective treatments, we think that early intervention by a multidisciplinary team and the use of tocilizumab and corticosteroids remains the best management strategy.

7. Future Prospect

In the near future, every effort will be made to balance treatment toxicity and efficacy and to prevent or reduce the symptoms of CRS after infusion of T-cell-based therapies in hematological patients. It will be necessary to act both on the aspects of patient care and in the field of research on that intricate network of different cell types, which constitutes the immune system. These goals can be achieved:
(a)
Developing even greater cooperation between experts from various fields such as onco-hematology, neuroscience, immunology virology, and ICU: the multidisciplinary approach is an essential requirement for an adequate treatment of patients with CRS.
(b)
Improving specificity and further unlocking the potential of immunotherapy.
A typical example is the recently developed split, universal, and programmable (SUPRA) CAR system which is composed of an antigen-binding portion, and a universal signal transduction receptor. The system seems able to improve the specificity and controllability [91] of the immune cell engineering strategy. Thus, the SUPRA CAR system has the potential to reduce CRS without reducing the antitumor response [92].

Author Contributions

M.C. and S.S. performed the literature search and wrote the manuscript. S.P. critically reviewed the manuscript for intellectual content. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank the “Associazione Mantovana per la Ricerca sul Cancro”, Italy for technical support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

(T-PLL)T-cell prolymphocytic leukemia
AKTserine/threonine-specific protein kinase
ALLacute lymphoblastic leukemia
AMLacute myeloid leukemia
BiTEbispecific T-cell engaging
B-NHLB-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma
CARchimeric antigen receptor
CLLchronic lymphocytic leukemia
COVID 19coronavirus disease 2019
CRESCAR T-cell-related encephalopathy syndrome
CRPC-reactive protein
CRScytokine release syndrome
CSFcolony-stimulating factor
DLBCLdiffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma
FDAFood and Drug Administration
GCSFgranulocyte colony-stimulating factor
HGFhepatocyte growth factor
HLHhaemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis
HSCThematopoietic stem cell transplantation
ICUintensive care unit
IFNinterferon
ILinterleukin
IL6RIL6 Receptor
IP-10interferon–inducible protein 10
JAKJanus associated kinase
mAbsmonoclonal antibodies
MAPKmitogen-activated protein kinase
MASmacrophage activation syndrome
MCPmonocyte chemoattractant protein
MIPmacrophage inflammatory protein 1α
MSCmesenchymal stem cells
NHLnon-Hodgkin lymphoma
NKnatural killer
PTprothrombin time
PTTpartial thromboplastin time
SARS-CoV-2severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
sIL6Rsoluble IL6 receptor
SSSézary syndrome
STATsignal transducer and activator of transcription
TGFtransforming growth factors
TNFtumor necrosis factors

References

  1. Holtmann, H.; Resch, K. Cytokines. Naturwissenschaften 1995, 82, 178–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Borish, L.C.; Steinke, J.W. 2. Cytokines and chemokines. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2003, 111, S460–S475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Dinarello, C.A. Historical insights into cytokines. Eur. J. Immunol. 2007, 37 (Suppl. 1), S34–S45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Ramani, T.; Auletta, C.S.; Weinstock, D.; Mounho-Zamora, B.; Ryan, P.C.; Salcedo, T.W.; Bannish, G. Cytokines: The Good, the Bad, and the Deadly. Int. J. Toxicol. 2015, 34, 355–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lefkowitz, D.L.; Lefkowitz, S.S. Macrophage-neutrophil interaction: A paradigm for chronic inflammation revisited. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2001, 79, 502–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Stenken, J.A.; Poschenrieder, A.J. Bioanalytical chemistry of cytokines—A review. Anal. Chim. Acta 2015, 853, 95–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kato, H.; Kinoshita, T.; Suzuki, S.; Nagasaka, T.; Hatano, S.; Murate, T.; Saito, H.; Hotta, T. Production and effects of interleukin-6 and other cytokines in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Leuk. Lymphoma 1998, 29, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Balkwill, F.R.; Burke, F. The cytokine network. Immunol. Today 1989, 10, 299–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Schmitz, M.L.; Weber, A.; Roxlau, T.; Gaestel, M.; Kracht, M. Signal integration, crosstalk mechanisms and networks in the function of inflammatory cytokines. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2011, 1813, 2165–2175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Winkler, U.; Jensen, M.; Manzke, O.; Schulz, H.; Diehl, V.; Engert, A. Cytokine-release syndrome in patients with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia and high lymphocyte counts after treatment with an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (rituximab, IDEC-C2B8). Blood 1999, 94, 2217–2224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Agarwal, A.; Vieira, C.A.; Book, B.K.; Sidner, R.A.; Fineberg, N.S.; Pescovitz, M.D. Rituximab, anti-CD20, induces in vivo cytokine release but does not impair ex vivo T-cell responses. Am. J. Transplant. 2004, 4, 1357–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Freeman, C.L.; Morschhauser, F.; Sehn, L.; Dixon, M.; Houghton, R.; Lamy, T.; Fingerle-Rowson, G.; Wassner-Fritsch, E.; Gribben, J.G.; Hallek, M.; et al. Cytokine release in patients with CLL treated with obinutuzumab and possible relationship with infusion-related reactions. Blood 2015, 126, 2646–2649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Wing, M.G.; Moreau, T.; Greenwood, J.; Smith, R.M.; Hale, G.; Isaacs, J.; Waldmann, H.; Lachmann, P.J.; Compston, A. Mechanism of first-dose cytokine-release syndrome by CAMPATH 1-H: Involvement of CD16 (FcgammaRIII) and CD11a/CD18 (LFA-1) on NK cells. J. Clin. Investig. 1996, 98, 2819–2826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Alig, S.K.; Dreyling, M.; Seppi, B.; Aulinger, B.; Witkowski, L.; Rieger, C.T. Severe cytokine release syndrome after the first dose of Brentuximab Vedotin in a patient with relapsed systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma (sALCL): A case report and review of literature. Eur. J. Haematol. 2015, 94, 554–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. De Vos, S.; Forero-Torres, A.; Ansell, S.M.; Kahl, B.; Cheson, B.D.; Bartlett, N.L.; Furman, R.R.; Winter, J.N.; Kaplan, H.; Timmerman, J.; et al. A phase II study of dacetuzumab (SGN-40) in patients with relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and correlative analyses of patient-specific factors. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2014, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Rotz, S.J.; Leino, D.; Szabo, S.; Mangino, J.L.; Turpin, B.K.; Pressey, J.G. Severe cytokine release syndrome in a patient receiving PD-1-directed therapy. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 2017, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Moore, J.B.; June, C.H. Cytokine release syndrome in severe COVID-19. Science 2020, 368, 473–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. June, C.H.; O’Connor, R.S.; Kawalekar, O.U.; Ghassemi, S.; Milone, M.C. CAR T cell immunotherapy for human cancer. Science 2018, 359, 1361–1365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Sadelain, M.; Rivière, I.; Riddell, S. Therapeutic T cell engineering. Nature 2017, 545, 423–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Lim, W.A.; June, C.H. The Principles of Engineering Immune Cells to Treat Cancer. Cell 2017, 168, 724–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE); National Cancer Institute: Bethesda, MD, USA, 2017; p. 155.
  22. Wang, Z.; Han, W. Biomarkers of cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity related to CAR-T cell therapy. Biomark. Res. 2018, 6, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Vessillier, S.; Eastwood, D.; Fox, B.; Sathish, J.; Sethu, S.; Dougall, T.; Thorpe, S.J.; Thorpe, R.; Stebbings, R. Cytokine release assays for the prediction of therapeutic mAb safety in first-in man trials—Whole blood cytokine release assays are poorly predictive for TGN1412 cytokine storm. J. Immunol. Methods 2015, 424, 43–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Pedersen, S.F.; Ho, Y.-C. SARS-CoV-2: A storm is raging. J. Clin. Investig. 2020, 130, 2202–2205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mehta, P.; McAuley, D.F.; Brown, M.; Sanchez, E.; Tattersall, R.S.; Manson, J.J.; HLH Across Speciality Collaboration UK. COVID-19: Consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression. Lancet 2020, 395, 1033–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Frey, N.; Porter, D. Cytokine Release Syndrome with Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019, 25, e123–e127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Shimabukuro-Vornhagen, A.; Gödel, P.; Subklewe, M.; Stemmler, H.J.; Schlößer, H.A.; Schlaak, M.; Kochanek, M.; Böll, B.; von Bergwelt-Baildon, M.S. Cytokine release syndrome. J. Immunother. Cancer 2018, 6, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Panelli, M.C.; White, R.; Foster, M.; Martin, B.; Wang, E.; Smith, K.; Marincola, F.M. Forecasting the cytokine storm following systemic interleukin (IL)-2 administration. J. Transl. Med. 2004, 2, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Lee, D.W.; Gardner, R.; Porter, D.L.; Louis, C.U.; Ahmed, N.; Jensen, M.; Grupp, S.A.; Mackall, C.L. Current concepts in the diagnosis and management of cytokine release syndrome. Blood 2014, 124, 188–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Liu, Q.; Zhou, Y.; Yang, Z. The cytokine storm of severe influenza and development of immunomodulatory therapy. Cell Mol. Immunol. 2016, 13, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Farzaneh, L.; Kasahara, N.; Farzaneh, F. The strange case of TGN1412. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2007, 56, 129–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kaneko, N.; Kurata, M.; Yamamoto, T.; Morikawa, S.; Masumoto, J. The role of interleukin-1 in general pathology. Inflamm. Regen. 2019, 39, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Justiz Vaillant, A.A.; Qurie, A. Interleukin. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  34. Ross, S.H.; Cantrell, D.A. Signaling and Function of Interleukin-2 in T Lymphocytes. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2018, 36, 411–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Tanaka, T.; Narazaki, M.; Kishimoto, T. Interleukin (IL-6) Immunotherapy. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2018, 10, a028456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Iyer, S.S.; Cheng, G. Role of Interleukin 10 Transcriptional Regulation in Inflammation and Autoimmune Disease. Crit. Rev. Immunol 2012, 32, 23–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Bickel, M. The role of interleukin-8 in inflammation and mechanisms of regulation. J. Periodontol. 1993, 64, 456–460. [Google Scholar]
  38. Liu, M.; Guo, S.; Hibbert, J.M.; Jain, V.; Singh, N.; Wilson, N.O.; Stiles, J.K. CXCL10/IP-10 in infectious diseases pathogenesis and potential therapeutic implications. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2011, 22, 121–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Deshmane, S.L.; Kremlev, S.; Amini, S.; Sawaya, B.E. Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 (MCP-1): An Overview. J. Interferon Cytokine Res. 2009, 29, 313–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Bhavsar, I.; Miller, C.S.; Al-Sabbagh, M. Macrophage Inflammatory Protein-1 Alpha (MIP-1 alpha)/CCL3: As a Biomarker. In General Methods in Biomarker Research and Their Applications; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 223–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Fahey, T.J.; Tracey, K.J.; Tekamp-Olson, P.; Cousens, L.S.; Jones, W.G.; Shires, G.T.; Cerami, A.; Sherry, B. Macrophage inflammatory protein 1 modulates macrophage function. J. Immunol. 1992, 148, 2764–2769. [Google Scholar]
  42. Tau, G.; Rothman, P. Biologic functions of the IFN-γ receptors. Allergy 1999, 54, 1233–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Parameswaran, N.; Patial, S. Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Signaling in Macrophages. Crit. Rev. Eukaryot. Gene Expr. 2010, 20, 87–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Ushach, I.; Zlotnik, A. Biological role of granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) on cells of the myeloid lineage. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2016, 100, 481–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Shi, Y.; Liu, C.H.; Roberts, A.I.; Das, J.; Xu, G.; Ren, G.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Yuan, Z.R.; Tan, H.S.W.; et al. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and T-cell responses: What we do and don’t know. Cell Res. 2006, 16, 126–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Sproston, N.R.; Ashworth, J.J. Role of C-Reactive Protein at Sites of Inflammation and Infection. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Knovich, M.A.; Storey, J.A.; Coffman, L.G.; Torti, S.V. Ferritin for the Clinician. Blood Rev. 2009, 23, 95–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Norelli, M.; Camisa, B.; Barbiera, G.; Falcone, L.; Purevdorj, A.; Genua, M.; Sanvito, F.; Ponzoni, M.; Doglioni, C.; Cristofori, P.; et al. Monocyte-derived IL-1 and IL-6 are differentially required for cytokine-release syndrome and neurotoxicity due to CAR T cells. Nat. Med. 2018, 24, 739–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Del Giudice, M.; Gangestad, S.W. Rethinking IL-6 and CRP: Why they are more than inflammatory biomarkers, and why it matters. Brain Behav. Immun. 2018, 70, 61–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Rose-John, S.; Scheller, J.; Elson, G.; Jones, S.A. Interleukin-6 biology is coordinated by membrane-bound and soluble receptors: Role in inflammation and cancer. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2006, 80, 227–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Johnson, D.E.; O’Keefe, R.A.; Grandis, J.R. Targeting the IL-6/JAK/STAT3 signalling axis in cancer. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2018, 15, 234–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Villarino, A.V.; Kanno, Y.; O’Shea, J.J. Mechanisms and consequences of Jak-STAT signaling in the immune system. Nat. Immunol. 2017, 18, 374–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Heinrich, P.C.; Behrmann, I.; Haan, S.; Hermanns, H.M.; Müller-Newen, G.; Schaper, F. Principles of interleukin (IL)-6-type cytokine signalling and its regulation. Biochem. J. 2003, 374, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Taniguchi, K.; Wu, L.-W.; Grivennikov, S.I.; de Jong, P.R.; Lian, I.; Yu, F.-X.; Wang, K.; Ho, S.B.; Boland, B.S.; Chang, J.T.; et al. A gp130-Src-YAP module links inflammation to epithelial regeneration. Nature 2015, 519, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Yamada, O.; Ozaki, K.; Akiyama, M.; Kawauchi, K. JAK-STAT and JAK-PI3K-mTORC1 pathways regulate telomerase transcriptionally and posttranslationally in ATL cells. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2012, 11, 1112–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Jones, S.A.; Scheller, J.; Rose-John, S. Therapeutic strategies for the clinical blockade of IL-6/gp130 signaling. J. Clin. Investig. 2011, 121, 3375–3383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Böttcher, J.P.; Schanz, O.; Garbers, C.; Zaremba, A.; Hegenbarth, S.; Kurts, C.; Beyer, M.; Schultze, J.L.; Kastenmüller, W.; Rose-John, S.; et al. IL-6 trans-signaling-dependent rapid development of cytotoxic CD8+ T cell function. Cell Rep. 2014, 8, 1318–1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. McLoughlin, R.M.; Jenkins, B.J.; Grail, D.; Williams, A.S.; Fielding, C.A.; Parker, C.R.; Ernst, M.; Topley, N.; Jones, S.A. IL-6 trans-signaling via STAT3 directs T cell infiltration in acute inflammation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 9589–9594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Atreya, R.; Mudter, J.; Finotto, S.; Müllberg, J.; Jostock, T.; Wirtz, S.; Schütz, M.; Bartsch, B.; Holtmann, M.; Becker, C.; et al. Blockade of interleukin 6 trans signaling suppresses T-cell resistance against apoptosis in chronic intestinal inflammation: Evidence in crohn disease and experimental colitis in vivo. Nat. Med. 2000, 6, 583–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Singh, N.; Hofmann, T.J.; Gershenson, Z.; Levine, B.L.; Grupp, S.A.; Teachey, D.T.; Barrett, D.M. Monocyte lineage-derived IL-6 does not affect chimeric antigen receptor T-cell function. Cytotherapy 2017, 19, 867–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Matthys, P.; Dillen, C.; Proost, P.; Heremans, H.; Van Damme, J.; Billiau, A. Modification of the anti-CD3-induced cytokine release syndrome by anti-interferon-gamma or anti-interleukin-6 antibody treatment: Protective effects and biphasic changes in blood cytokine levels. Eur. J. Immunol. 1993, 23, 2209–2216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Saha, B.; Jyothi Prasanna, S.; Chandrasekar, B.; Nandi, D. Gene modulation and immunoregulatory roles of interferon gamma. Cytokine 2010, 50, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Maude, S.L.; Frey, N.; Shaw, P.A.; Aplenc, R.; Barrett, D.M.; Bunin, N.J.; Chew, A.; Gonzalez, V.E.; Zheng, Z.; Lacey, S.F.; et al. Chimeric antigen receptor T cells for sustained remissions in leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014, 371, 1507–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Klinger, M.; Brandl, C.; Zugmaier, G.; Hijazi, Y.; Bargou, R.C.; Topp, M.S.; Gökbuget, N.; Neumann, S.; Goebeler, M.; Viardot, A.; et al. Immunopharmacologic response of patients with B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia to continuous infusion of T cell-engaging CD19/CD3-bispecific BiTE antibody blinatumomab. Blood 2012, 119, 6226–6233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Hao, Z.; Li, R.; Meng, L.; Han, Z.; Hong, Z. Macrophage, the potential key mediator in CAR-T related CRS. Exp. Hematol. Oncol 2020, 9, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Bastian, D.; Tamburstuen, M.V.; Lyngstadaas, S.P.; Reikerås, O. Systemic and local cytokine kinetics after total hip replacement surgery. Eur. Surg. Res. 2008, 41, 334–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Hay, K.A.; Hanafi, L.-A.; Li, D.; Gust, J.; Liles, W.C.; Wurfel, M.M.; López, J.A.; Chen, J.; Chung, D.; Harju-Baker, S.; et al. Kinetics and biomarkers of severe cytokine release syndrome after CD19 chimeric antigen receptor-modified T-cell therapy. Blood 2017, 130, 2295–2306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Nägele, V.; Kratzer, A.; Zugmaier, G.; Holland, C.; Hijazi, Y.; Topp, M.S.; Gökbuget, N.; Baeuerle, P.A.; Kufer, P.; Wolf, A.; et al. Changes in clinical laboratory parameters and pharmacodynamic markers in response to blinatumomab treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory ALL. Exp. Hematol. Oncol. 2017, 6, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Orzalli, M.H.; Kagan, J.C. A one-protein signaling pathway in the innate immune system. Sci. Immunol. 2016, 1, eaah6184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Teachey, D.T.; Lacey, S.F.; Shaw, P.A.; Melenhorst, J.J.; Maude, S.L.; Frey, N.; Pequignot, E.; Gonzalez, V.E.; Chen, F.; Finklestein, J.; et al. Identification of Predictive Biomarkers for Cytokine Release Syndrome after Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Therapy for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Cancer Discov. 2016, 6, 664–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Davila, M.L.; Riviere, I.; Wang, X.; Bartido, S.; Park, J.; Curran, K.; Chung, S.S.; Stefanski, J.; Borquez-Ojeda, O.; Olszewska, M.; et al. Efficacy and toxicity management of 19-28z CAR T cell therapy in B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Sci. Transl. Med. 2014, 6, 224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Yildizhan, E.; Kaynar, L. Cytokine release syndrome. J. Oncol. Sci. 2018, 4, 134–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Schultz, D.R.; Arnold, P.I. Properties of four acute phase proteins: C-reactive protein, serum amyloid A protein, alpha 1-acid glycoprotein, and fibrinogen. Semin. Arthritis Rheum. 1990, 20, 129–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Pepys, M.B.; Hirschfield, G.M. C-reactive protein: A critical update. J. Clin. Investig. 2003, 111, 1805–1812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Arkader, R.; Troster, E.J.; Abellan, D.M.; Lopes, M.R.; Júnior, R.R.; Carcillo, J.A.; Okay, T.S. Procalcitonin and C-reactive protein kinetics in postoperative pediatric cardiac surgical patients. J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 2004, 18, 160–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Maude, S.L.; Laetsch, T.W.; Buechner, J.; Rives, S.; Boyer, M.; Bittencourt, H.; Bader, P.; Verneris, M.R.; Stefanski, H.E.; Myers, G.D.; et al. Tisagenlecleucel in Children and Young Adults with B-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 378, 439–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Gust, J.; Hay, K.A.; Hanafi, L.-A.; Li, D.; Myerson, D.; Gonzalez-Cuyar, L.F.; Yeung, C.; Liles, W.C.; Wurfel, M.; Lopez, J.A.; et al. Endothelial Activation and Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption in Neurotoxicity after Adoptive Immunotherapy with CD19 CAR-T Cells. Cancer Discov. 2017, 7, 1404–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Romero-Bermejo, F.J.; Ruiz-Bailen, M.; Gil-Cebrian, J.; Huertos-Ranchal, M.J. Sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy. Curr. Cardiol. Rev. 2011, 7, 163–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Teachey, D.T.; Rheingold, S.R.; Maude, S.L.; Zugmaier, G.; Barrett, D.M.; Seif, A.E.; Nichols, K.E.; Suppa, E.K.; Kalos, M.; Berg, R.A.; et al. Cytokine release syndrome after blinatumomab treatment related to abnormal macrophage activation and ameliorated with cytokine-directed therapy. Blood 2013, 121, 5154–5157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Grupp, S.A.; Kalos, M.; Barrett, D.; Aplenc, R.; Porter, D.L.; Rheingold, S.R.; Teachey, D.T.; Chew, A.; Hauck, B.; Wright, J.F.; et al. Chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells for acute lymphoid leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 368, 1509–1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  81. Billiau, A.D.; Roskams, T.; Van Damme-Lombaerts, R.; Matthys, P.; Wouters, C. Macrophage activation syndrome: Characteristic findings on liver biopsy illustrating the key role of activated, IFN-gamma-producing lymphocytes and IL-6- and TNF-alpha-producing macrophages. Blood 2005, 105, 1648–1651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Topp, M.S.; Gökbuget, N.; Stein, A.S.; Zugmaier, G.; O’Brien, S.; Bargou, R.C.; Dombret, H.; Fielding, A.K.; Heffner, L.; Larson, R.A.; et al. Safety and activity of blinatumomab for adult patients with relapsed or refractory B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: A multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2015, 16, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Neelapu, S.S.; Tummala, S.; Kebriaei, P.; Wierda, W.; Gutierrez, C.; Locke, F.L.; Komanduri, K.V.; Lin, Y.; Jain, N.; Daver, N.; et al. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy—Assessment and management of toxicities. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2018, 15, 47–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Turtle, C.J.; Hanafi, L.-A.; Berger, C.; Gooley, T.A.; Cherian, S.; Hudecek, M.; Sommermeyer, D.; Melville, K.; Pender, B.; Budiarto, T.M.; et al. CD19 CAR-T cells of defined CD4+:CD8+ composition in adult B cell ALL patients. J. Clin. Investig. 2016, 126, 2123–2138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Chen, F.; Teachey, D.T.; Pequignot, E.; Frey, N.; Porter, D.; Maude, S.L.; Grupp, S.A.; June, C.H.; Melenhorst, J.J.; Lacey, S.F. Measuring IL-6 and sIL-6R in serum from patients treated with tocilizumab and/or siltuximab following CAR T cell therapy. J. Immunol. Methods 2016, 434, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Maus, M.V.; Levine, B.L. Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy for the Community Oncologist. Oncologist 2016, 21, 608–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Fitzgerald, J.C.; Weiss, S.L.; Maude, S.L.; Barrett, D.M.; Lacey, S.F.; Melenhorst, J.J.; Shaw, P.; Berg, R.A.; June, C.H.; Porter, D.L.; et al. Cytokine Release Syndrome After Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Crit. Care Med. 2017, 45, e124–e131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Santomasso, B.D.; Park, J.H.; Salloum, D.; Riviere, I.; Flynn, J.; Mead, E.; Halton, E.; Wang, X.; Senechal, B.; Purdon, T.; et al. Clinical and Biological Correlates of Neurotoxicity Associated with CAR T-cell Therapy in Patients with B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Cancer Discov. 2018, 8, 958–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Acharya, U.H.; Dhawale, T.; Yun, S.; Jacobson, C.A.; Chavez, J.C.; Ramos, J.D.; Appelbaum, J.; Maloney, D.G. Management of cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity in chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy. Expert Rev. Hematol. 2019, 12, 195–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Maude, S.L.; Barrett, D.; Teachey, D.T.; Grupp, S.A. Managing cytokine release syndrome associated with novel T cell-engaging therapies. Cancer J. 2014, 20, 119–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Cho, J.H.; Collins, J.J.; Wong, W.W. Universal Chimeric Antigen Receptors for Multiplexed and Logical Control of T Cell Responses. Cell 2018, 173, 1426–1438e11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Cho, J.H.; Okuma, A.; Sofjan, K.; Lee, S.; Collins, J.J.; Wong, W.W. Engineering advanced logic and distributed computing in human CAR immune cells. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. CAR T cells target tumor cells and induce the release of cytokines as IFN-γ or TNF-α, which lead to the activation of bystander immune and non-immune cells as monocytes/macrophages, dendritic cells, NK and T-cell, and endothelial cells. These cells further release proinflammatory cytokines triggering a cascade reaction. Macrophages and endothelial cells produce large amounts of IL-6 which in turn activates T cells and other immune cells leading to a cytokine storm. BiTe: bispecific T-cell engager; CAR: chimeric antigen receptor; IFN-γ: interferon-gamma; TNF-α: tumor necrosis factor-alpha; IL: interleukin; GM-CSF: granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; MCP-1: monocyte chemoattractant protein; NK cell: natural killer cell; DC: dendritic cell.
Figure 1. CAR T cells target tumor cells and induce the release of cytokines as IFN-γ or TNF-α, which lead to the activation of bystander immune and non-immune cells as monocytes/macrophages, dendritic cells, NK and T-cell, and endothelial cells. These cells further release proinflammatory cytokines triggering a cascade reaction. Macrophages and endothelial cells produce large amounts of IL-6 which in turn activates T cells and other immune cells leading to a cytokine storm. BiTe: bispecific T-cell engager; CAR: chimeric antigen receptor; IFN-γ: interferon-gamma; TNF-α: tumor necrosis factor-alpha; IL: interleukin; GM-CSF: granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; MCP-1: monocyte chemoattractant protein; NK cell: natural killer cell; DC: dendritic cell.
Ijms 22 07652 g001
Figure 2. (A) Source and biological functions of IL-6. (B) Genetic interaction network (String: https://string-db.org) that evaluates pathways and visualizes the connection among target genes according to the literature search. IL6R: interleukin-6 receptor subunit alpha; STAT3: signal transducer and activator of transcription 3; IL6ST: interleukin-6 receptor subunit beta; IL10: interleukin-10; IL4: interleukin-4; SOCS3: suppressor of cytokine signaling 3; IL13: interleukin-13; CXCL8: interleukin-8; IL1B: interleukin-1 beta; JUN: transcription factor AP-1.
Figure 2. (A) Source and biological functions of IL-6. (B) Genetic interaction network (String: https://string-db.org) that evaluates pathways and visualizes the connection among target genes according to the literature search. IL6R: interleukin-6 receptor subunit alpha; STAT3: signal transducer and activator of transcription 3; IL6ST: interleukin-6 receptor subunit beta; IL10: interleukin-10; IL4: interleukin-4; SOCS3: suppressor of cytokine signaling 3; IL13: interleukin-13; CXCL8: interleukin-8; IL1B: interleukin-1 beta; JUN: transcription factor AP-1.
Ijms 22 07652 g002
Figure 3. Pathophysiology of signs and symptoms of CRS. IFN-γ: interferon-gamma; TNF-α: tumor necrosis factor-alpha; IL: interleukin; CSF: colony-stimulating factor; MCP: monocyte chemoattractant protein.
Figure 3. Pathophysiology of signs and symptoms of CRS. IFN-γ: interferon-gamma; TNF-α: tumor necrosis factor-alpha; IL: interleukin; CSF: colony-stimulating factor; MCP: monocyte chemoattractant protein.
Ijms 22 07652 g003
Table 1. Monoclonal antibodies associated with cytokine release syndrome (CRS) in hematological malignancies.
Table 1. Monoclonal antibodies associated with cytokine release syndrome (CRS) in hematological malignancies.
AntibodyAntigenClassReference
TGN1412CD28Human IgG4[31]
AlemtuzumabCD52Human IgG2[13]
RituximabCD20Murine-human chimeric IgG1[10,11]
ObinutuzumabCD20Human IgG1[12]
BrentuximabCD30Human IgG1[14]
DacetuzumabCD40Human IgG1[15]
Table 2. Soluble mediators over-expressed in cytokine release syndrome.
Table 2. Soluble mediators over-expressed in cytokine release syndrome.
Main Cell SourceCytokinesType and FunctionReference
Macrophages, epithelial cellsIL-1Proinflammatory alarming cytokine; pyrogenic function, macrophage, and Th17 cell activation[32,33]
T cellsIL-2Effector T-cell and regulatory T-cell growth factor [33,34]
Monocyte/macrophages, T cells, endothelial cells, mesenchymal cells, osteoblastsIL-6Proinflammatory cytokine; pyrogenic function, increased antibody production, growth and differentiation of hematopoietic stem cells, induction of acute-phase reactants[33,35]
Regulatory T cells, T cellsIL-10Anti-inflammatory cytokine, inhibition of Th1 cells, and cytokine release[33,36]
Chemokines
Macrophages, epithelial cellsIL-8 (CXCL8)Recruitment of neutrophils[33,37]
Monocyte, endothelial cells, keratinocytes IP-10 (CXCL10)Interferon-inducible chemokine: recruitment of Th1 cells, NK cells, plasmacytoid dendritic cells[38]
Macrophages, dendritic cells, cardiac myocytesMCP-1 (CCL2)Recruitment of Th2 cells, monocyte, dendritic cells, basophils[39]
Monocyte, neutrophils, dendritic cells, NK cells, mast cellsMIP-1α (CCL3)Recruitment of macrophages, Th1 cells, NK cells, eosinophils, dendritic cells, pyrogenic function[40,41]
Macrophages, neutrophils, endotheliumMIP-1β (CCL4)Recruitment of macrophages, Th1 cells, NK cells, dendritic cells[40,41]
Growth Factors
Th1 cells, CTLs, group 1 innate lymphoid cells, and NK cellsIFN-γProinflammatory cytokine, activation of macrophages[42]
Macrophages, T cells, NK cells, mast cellsTNF-αIncreasing vascular permeability, pyrogenic function[43]
Th17 cellsGM-CSFProinflammatory cytokine[44,45]
Endothelium and macrophagesCSFGrowth and differentiation of neutrophils[44]
Plasma Protein
HepatocytesCRPMonomeric CRP increases IL-8 and MCP-1 secretion, IL-6 increases CRP expression[46]
UbiquitousFerritinPrimary site of iron storage in cells[47]
IL: interleukin; IP-10: interferon—inducible protein 10; MCP-1: monocyte chemoattractant protein; MIP: macrophage inflammatory protein 1α; IFN-γ: interferon-gamma; TNF-α: tumor necrosis factor-alpha; GM-CSF: granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; CSF: colony-stimulating factor; CRP: C-reactive protein; Th cell: T helper cell; CTLs: cytotoxic T lymphocytes; NK cell: natural killer cell.
Table 3. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) grading system (Lee et al. [29] partially modify).
Table 3. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) grading system (Lee et al. [29] partially modify).
ToxicityGrade
Symptoms are not life threatening and require symptomatic treatment only, eg, fever, nausea, fatigue, headache, myalgia, malaise Grade 1
Symptoms require and respond to moderate intervention. Oxygen requirement < 40 % or hypotension responsive to fluids or low dose of one vasopressor or grade 2 organ toxicityGrade 2
Symptoms require and respond to aggressive intervention. Oxygen requirement ≥ 40 % or hypotension requiring high dose or multiple vasopressor or grade 3 organ toxicity or grade 4 transaminitisGrade 3
Life-threatening symptoms. Requirement for ventilator support or grade 4 organ toxicity (excluding transaminitis)Grade 4
Grades 2–4 refer to CTCAE v4.0 grading [21].
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cosenza, M.; Sacchi, S.; Pozzi, S. Cytokine Release Syndrome Associated with T-Cell-Based Therapies for Hematological Malignancies: Pathophysiology, Clinical Presentation, and Treatment. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7652. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22147652

AMA Style

Cosenza M, Sacchi S, Pozzi S. Cytokine Release Syndrome Associated with T-Cell-Based Therapies for Hematological Malignancies: Pathophysiology, Clinical Presentation, and Treatment. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(14):7652. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22147652

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cosenza, Maria, Stefano Sacchi, and Samantha Pozzi. 2021. "Cytokine Release Syndrome Associated with T-Cell-Based Therapies for Hematological Malignancies: Pathophysiology, Clinical Presentation, and Treatment" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 14: 7652. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22147652

APA Style

Cosenza, M., Sacchi, S., & Pozzi, S. (2021). Cytokine Release Syndrome Associated with T-Cell-Based Therapies for Hematological Malignancies: Pathophysiology, Clinical Presentation, and Treatment. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(14), 7652. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22147652

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop