Next Article in Journal
Roles of PRR-Mediated Signaling Pathways in the Regulation of Oxidative Stress and Inflammatory Diseases
Next Article in Special Issue
Knockdown of PEX16 Induces Autophagic Degradation of Peroxisomes
Previous Article in Journal
Antibacterial Poly(ε-CL)/Hydroxyapatite Electrospun Fibers Reinforced by Poly(ε-CL)-b-poly(ethylene phosphoric acid)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Revising Endosomal Trafficking under Insulin Receptor Activation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 22
Issue 14
10.3390/ijms22147691
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Large Rab GTPases: Novel Membrane Trafficking Regulators with a Calcium Sensor and Functional Domains

by
Takayuki Tsukuba
1,*,
Yu Yamaguchi
1 and
Tomoko Kadowaki
2
1
Department of Dental Pharmacology, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University, Sakamoto 1-7-1, Nagasaki 852-8588, Japan
2
Department of Frontier Oral Science, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University, Sakamoto 1-7-1, Nagasaki 852-8588, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(14), 7691; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22147691
Submission received: 23 June 2021 / Revised: 13 July 2021 / Accepted: 14 July 2021 / Published: 19 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Regulatory Mechanisms of Membrane Trafficking)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Rab GTPases are major coordinators of intracellular membrane trafficking, including vesicle transport, membrane fission, tethering, docking, and fusion events. Rab GTPases are roughly divided into two groups: conventional “small” Rab GTPases and atypical “large” Rab GTPases that have been recently reported. Some members of large Rab GTPases in mammals include Rab44, Rab45/RASEF, and Rab46. The genes of these large Rab GTPases commonly encode an amino-terminal EF-hand domain, coiled-coil domain, and the carboxyl-terminal Rab GTPase domain. A common feature of large Rab GTPases is that they express several isoforms in cells. For instance, Rab44’s two isoforms have similar functions, but exhibit differential localization. The long form of Rab45 (Rab45-L) is abundantly distributed in epithelial cells. The short form of Rab45 (Rab45-S) is predominantly present in the testes. Both Rab46 (CRACR2A-L) and the short isoform lacking the Rab domain (CRACR2A-S) are expressed in T cells, whereas Rab46 is only distributed in endothelial cells. Although evidence regarding the function of large Rab GTPases has been accumulating recently, there are only a limited number of studies. Here, we report the recent findings on the large Rab GTPase family concerning their function in membrane trafficking, cell differentiation, related diseases, and knockout mouse phenotypes.

1. Introduction

Intracellular membrane trafficking involves complicated network systems that precisely regulate various membrane-bound organelles in cells [1,2]. Dynamic membrane movements, including vesicle transport, membrane fission, tethering, docking, and fusion events are controlled by Rab GTPases, which act as central regulators [3,4]. Rab GTPases are strictly controlled by two important regulators: the guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) and GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) that undergo conformational changes by translocation between the cytosol and membranes [5,6]. GEFs change the inactive GDP-bound Rab protein to the active GTP-bound form on the membranes, whereas GAPs convert active GTP-bound Rab protein to the inactive GDP-bound form [7,8,9]. Posttranslational isoprenylation of one or two cysteine residues at the carboxy terminus is required for the membrane association of Rab GTPases [10,11].
To date, approximately 70 members of Rab GTPases have been discovered in mammalian cells [12,13,14]. Rab GTPases are roughly divided into two groups: conventional “small” Rab GTPases and atypical “large” Rab GTPases. The former group includes Rab 1–43 with low molecular weights of approximately 20–30 kDa, which are well-characterized [15,16,17]. Among these, some are known as “housekeeping Rabs”, since they are conserved in eukaryotes [4,12]. Some examples are Rabs1, 2, and 6 that act in the Golgi; Rab8 is involved in Golgi-to-plasma membrane trafficking; and Rabs 4, 5, 7, 11, 14, and 21 are implicated in the endosomal system [18]. Furthermore, some Rab proteins play a specific role in animal cells: Rabs 3, 26, 27, 33, 37, and 39, are mainly involved in regulating secretion; Rabs 10 and 43 are involved in membrane trafficking between the Golgi and ER; Rabs 30, 33, 34, and 43 play a role in Golgi localization; and Rabs9 and 22 are involved in late endocytic trafficking [12,18].
In contrast, large Rab GTPases comprise Rab44, Rab45 (alias RASEF (RAS and EFD-containing protein)), and Rab46. These large Rab GTPases are atypical Rab GTPases with molecular weights of approximately 70–150 kDa, which have been reported recently. However, studies are limited regarding these GTPases thus far.
In this review, we report the recent findings on the large Rab GTPase family, including their function in membrane trafficking, cell differentiation, related diseases, and knockout mouse phenotypes.

2. Common Features of Large Rab GTPases

One of the important features of large Rab GTPases is that these proteins share a common structural domain organization that includes an amino-terminal EF-hand domain (EFD), coiled-coil domain (CCD), and a carboxy-terminal Rab domain (Figure 1). EFDs are Ca2+ binding sites with a helix-loop-helix topology [19,20,21]. For example, the EFD of Rab44 was suggested to be required for its translocation from the lysosomes to the plasma membrane and/or cytosol following transient Ca2+ influx [22]. Rab45 and Rab46 contain two EFDs (Figure 1). The second EFD of Rab46 reportedly binds to Ca2+ [23,24]. The EFDs of Rab45 have not been investigated. In the case of Rab46, a mutant lacking the EFD of Rab46 loses its interaction with dynein–dynactin, although this interaction is independent of Ca2+ concentration [25].
Generally, CCD-containing proteins have been proposed to act as tethering factors to target organelles before fusion, or as scaffolds for the assembly of other factors important for fusion [26,27]. The CCD of Rab44 appears to be important for localization and organelle formation [22]. In particular, Rab44 mutants lacking the CCD are efficiently colocalized with the lysosomes; however, they show reduced colocalization with the ER [22]. Moreover, expression of Rab44 mutants lacking the CCD affects the lysosomal size compared to that of the wild type [22]. Furthermore, the CCD of Rab45/RASEF is important for self-interaction and oligomer formation [28,29]. Interaction analyses using the yeast two-hybrid system indicated that the CCD of Rab45/RASEF specifically associates with the full-length or the CCD of Rab45/RASEF, but not with the Rab domain or the EFD [28].
Proline-rich domains (PRDs) include specific proline-containing sequences of three to six residues [30] that are important for protein–protein interactions with low affinities and moderate specificities [31,32]. Although a previous report suggested that all members of large Rab GTPases contain PRDs [33], we propose that Rab44 and Rab46 contain the PRD, but Rab45 lacks it. The amino acid sequence between the CCD and Rab domain of large Rab GTPases is shown in Figure 2. Some consensus sequences containing proline have been identified in these regions of Rab44 and Rab46, but not in Rab45 (Figure 2). Since these domains that recognize target core motifs contain phosphorylated residues [30,34], this domain in large Rab GTPases is thought to function as a switch between binding partners to control association and dissociation in the phosphorylated state. The PRD of Rab46 interacts with the GEF protein Vav1, which is converted into a tyrosine-phosphorylated protein upon T cell receptor (TCR) stimulation [33,35]. Vav1 binding mediated by its PRD is due to the SH3–SH2–SH3 domain in the carboxy-terminus of Vav1 [35]. Therefore, the Rab46-mediated interaction with Vav1 is thought to be required for the recruitment of Rab46-containing vesicles to the immunological synapse in T cells [33,35].
Another common feature of large Rab GTPases is the existence of isoforms generated by splicing variants. Mouse Rab44 is expressed as two isoforms: Rab44 long form (Rab44-L) that encodes 924 amino acids, and Rab44 short form (Rab44-S) that comprises 725 amino acids [36,37] (Figure 1). Mouse Rab44-L consists of EFD, CCD, PRD, and the Rab domain, although 47 amino acids in the CCD and 38 amino acids in the region between CCD and Rab domain are absent compared to the human Rab44 (Figure 1). Furthermore, mouse Rab44-S lacks the EFD and N-terminal half of the CCD (Figure 1). In humans, only the long form of Rab44 (Rab44-L) was reported, and Rab44-S has not yet been discovered [22] (Figure 1). Similar to Rab44, mouse Rab45/RASEF is expressed as two isoforms: the long form (Rab45-L) that encodes 627 amino acids [28], and the short form (Rab45-S) that encodes 530 amino acids and is predominantly present in the testes [29] (Figure 1). The mouse Rab45-L consists of EFD, CCD, and the Rab domain, whereas Rab45-S contains CCD and the Rab domain but lacks the N-terminal EFD. CRACR2A/Rab46 comprises two isoforms: the short form CRACR2A-S (alias: CRACR2A-c) consisting of 395 amino acids, containing only the EF-hand and CCDs, and without the Rab domain [23,33] (Figure 1); and the long form (CRACR2A-L, alias: CRACR2A-a), which was identified as a protein composed of 732 amino acids in human umbilical vein endothelial cells [38] and subsequently found in T cells [35]. The Rab46 long form has a Rab domain and an isoprenylation site at the carboxy terminus.
A previous study identified large Rab GTPase orthologs for the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans Rab proteins 4R79.2 and rsef-1, indicating the evolutionarily conserved nature of Rab proteins (Figure 1). The predicted Rab44 ortholog 4R79.2 (alias: CeRabY2) expresses two isoforms, 4R79.2a, with 395 amino acids, and 4R79.2b, with 311 amino acids [39,40] (Figure 1). The former contains an EFD and a Rab domain, whereas the latter lacks EFD but possesses the Rab domain. The rsef-1 (alias: C33D12.6/TAG-312/CeRabY1) gene encodes an EFD, CCD, and Rab domain (Figure 1). However, the existence of isoforms of Rab45/RASEF ortholog rsef-1 in C. elegans has not yet been reported [41] (Figure 1).

3. Rab44

Rab44 was originally identified as an upregulated gene during osteoclast differentiation [42]. Subsequent tissue distribution analysis of mouse Rab44 indicated that Rab44 is highly expressed in the bone marrow and marginally expressed in the epididymis, lungs, skin, spleen, thymus, ovary, uterus, and liver [37]. In the bone marrow, Rab44 is extensively expressed in hematopoietic CD117+ Sca-1− cells, which are granulocyte- or mast cell-lineage cells. Therefore, Rab44 is highly expressed in immune-related cells, including mast cells, bone marrow cells, and osteoclasts [37].

3.1. Intracellular Localization

Endogenous mouse Rab44 localizes mainly to the lysosomes and the ER and partially to early endosomes in bone marrow mast cells [36]. In particular, Rab44 isoforms exhibit differential localization. The expression of the human Rab44-L and the two mouse isoforms was examined in rat basophilic leukemia (RBL)-2H3 cells. The results indicated that both human and mouse Rab44-L localize mainly in the lysosomes, whereas the mouse Rab44-S localizes mainly in the ER [36]. In mouse macrophages, overexpressed Rab44-S was localized in the lysosomes and the Golgi complex [42], suggesting that the localization of Rab44 is cell-specific. When human Rab44-L was expressed in HeLa cells, Rab44 formed ring-like structures, and partially surrounded the lysosomes in the cells [22].
Rab44 localization in the lysosomes is partially altered to the plasma membrane and cytosol upon transient Ca2+ influx. The partial translocation of Rab44 is required for the EFD, since mutants lacking EFD fail to translocate [22]. Moreover, the CCD appears to be important for localization and organelle formation.

3.2. Cell Function

Rab44 negatively regulates osteoclast differentiation. Rab44 knockdown promotes osteoclast differentiation of macrophages, and conversely, Rab44 overexpression prevents osteoclast differentiation [42]. Mechanistically, Rab44 specifically regulates lysosomal Ca2+ influx and then affects the nuclear factor of activated T cells c1 (NFATc1) signaling in RANKL-stimulated macrophages [42].
Rab44 regulates degranulation of mast cells. Mast cells derived from Rab44-deficient mice show reduced FcεRI-mediated β-hexosaminidase secretion compared to mast cells from wild-type mice [36,43]. Specifically, Rab44-deficient mice show reduced anaphylactic responses in vivo [43]. Moreover, although Rab44 isoforms exhibit differential localization in mast cells, they promote lysosomal exocytosis in a similar manner [36]. Expression of the human Rab44-L and both mouse isoforms causes an increase in β-hexosaminidase secretion in rat RBL-2H3 cells [36].

3.3. Binding Molecules and/or Effectors

Both human and mouse Rab44 proteins interact with vesicle-associated membrane protein 8 (VAMP8), a v-SNARE protein [36].

3.4. Knockout Phenotypes or Diseases

Rab44 deficiency is likely to be associated with allergies and autoimmune diseases. Rab44 knockout mice grow normally, and exhibit reduced systemic anaphylaxis as well as lower histamine levels in the serum than wild-type mice [36,43].
Whole-genome sequencing of samples from patients with T-cell-mediated autoimmune lymphoproliferative disease revealed that Rab44 is one of the missense genes [44]. A transcriptome-wide association study indicated that Rab44 was upregulated in white blood cells from patients with atopy [45].
The distribution, localization, functions, and binding proteins of Rab44 and the phenotypes or diseases associated with Rab44 deficiency are summarized in Table 1.

4. Rab45/RASEF

Rab45/RASEF was initially discovered as a downregulated gene in human cutaneous malignant melanoma by genome-wide screening analysis [46]. Subsequent gene expression analyses have shown that human Rab45/RASEF is detected in many cancer cells, such as myeloid leukemia [47], uveal malignant melanoma [48], colorectal cancer [49], lung cancer [50], and breast cancer [51,52,53]. Moreover, Rab45/RASEF has been found in normal cells, including airway epithelial cells, columnar epithelial cells, bronchial epithelial cells [50], and non-cancerous breast epithelial cell lines [51]. Therefore, Rab45/RASEF is likely to be expressed predominantly in various epithelial cells, either normal or malignant. Immunohistochemical analysis using normal human tissues indicated that Rab45/RASEF is detectable in the liver, heart, kidney, lungs, prostate, and testes [50].
Rab45/RASEF is likely to be induced by certain stimuli. Rab45/RASEF expression is regulated by promoter methylation of the Rab45/RASEF gene. Cigarette smoking induces DNA methylation in the promoter region of the Rab45/RASEF gene in arterial smooth muscle cells [54]. A mutation in the Rab45/RASEF promoter region causes methylation and low RASEF expression in uveal melanoma, suggesting that Rab45/RASEF acts as a tumor suppressor gene [48]. Interestingly, the short form of Rab45/RASEF (Rab45/RASEF-S) is an androgen-induced protein in the testes [29]. Rab45/RASEF-S is also distributed in germ cells, particularly in elongated spermatids [29].

4.1. Intracellular Localization

Rab45/RASEF was reported to have differential localization in different cell types. Human Rab45/RASEF-L expressed in HeLa cells predominantly localizes in the Golgi apparatus and/or recycling endosomes [28]. For localization, both the CCD and Rab domain are required, but not the EFD. In particular, oligomer formation by the CCD of Rab45/RASEF appears to be important for localization, since a CCD deletion mutant showed dispersed localization patterns near the perinuclear region [28]. In human lung cancer cells, endogenous Rab45/RASEF localizes mainly in the cytoplasm [50]; however, the localization mechanism is still unknown. Testis-specific mouse Rab45/RASEF-S was reported to contain a nuclear targeting sequence in the middle of the CCD, despite the presence of a prenylation site at the carboxy-terminus [29]. When mouse Rab45/RASEF-S was exogenously expressed in HeLa cells, it was localized in the nuclei [29]. However, a deletion mutant lacking the nuclear targeting sequence of Rab45/RASEF-S showed cytoplasmic localization [29]. Thus, a more detailed analysis is required for the nuclear or cytosolic targeting of Rab45/RASEF.

4.2. Cell Function

The function of Rab45/RASEF in cancer cells, either as a tumor suppressor or oncogene, is controversial. Rab45/RASEF was thought to act as a tumor suppressor, since it was initially discovered as a downregulated gene in human cutaneous malignant melanoma [46]. Overexpression of RAB45/RASEF caused apoptosis by activation of caspase-3 and -9 and increased phosphorylation of p38 in chronic myelogenous leukemia cells [55]. Moreover, a clinical study showed that cancer patients with low Rab45/RASEF expression levels had significantly lower survival rates than patients with high Rab45/RASEF expression levels, suggesting that Rab45/RASEF may be a tumor suppressor gene [49].
In contrast, Rab45/RASEF was reported to act as an oncogene in some cancer cells. RASEF overexpression promoted cell growth, whereas Rab45/RASEF knockdown reduced the growth of cancer cells [50]. Mechanistically, Rab45/RASEF-L interacts with extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) 1/2 and enhances ERK1/2 signaling [50]. Importantly, inhibiting the interaction between Rab45/RASEF-L and ERK1/2 using a cell-permeable peptide that corresponded to the ERK1/2-interacting site of RASEF suppressed the growth of lung cancer cells.

4.3. Binding Molecules and/or Effectors

Co-transfection with FLAG-Rab45 and Myc-Rab45, and subsequent immunoprecipitation with anti-Myc antibody followed by Western blotting with anti-FLAG antibody revealed that both Rab45/RASEF-L or -S (a truncation mutant) interact with each other, indicating oligomer formation [28,29]. Rab45/RASEF interacted with ERK1/2 [50]. An immunoprecipitation assay using anti-RASEF antibody revealed the interaction between endogenous RASEF and endogenous ERK1/2 proteins in lung cancer cells [50]. Recently, using an in vitro pull-down assay, recombinant Rab45/RASEF was reported to be associated with the motor protein dynein–dynactin complex [25], suggesting microtubule minus end-directed transport.

4.4. Knockout Phenotypes or Diseases

The Rab45/RASEF gene is encoded on the long arm of chromosome 9, where the region is frequently deleted in candidate tumor suppressor genes in patients with acute myeloid leukemia [47]. To date, Rab45/RASEF knockout mice or transgenic mice have not been reported.
The nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, a model animal, expresses the Rab45/Rasef ortholog rsef-1 gene in uterine seam cells (Figure 1). The rsef-1-GFP protein is expressed in both the spermathecal and spermathecal-uterine junction at an earlier stage, and in the uterine toroids at young adult [41]. Knockdown of the rsef-1 gene with siRNA in C. elegans causes defects in nuclear translocation and cell proliferation in endometrial epithelial cells [41].
The distribution, localization, cell function, and binding proteins of Rab45/RASEF are summarized in Table 1.

5. Rab46 (CRACR2A-L or CRACR2A-a)

The gene encoding Rab46 was originally designated CRACR2A (Ca2+ release-activated Ca2+ channel regulator 2A) or EFCAB4B (EF-hand calcium binding domain 4B). The CRACR2A protein, which contains 395 amino acids, was first identified as a regulator of store-operated calcium entry in T cells [23]. The isoform was described as CRACR2A-S (alias CRACR2A-c), since this protein is a short form lacking a Rab domain. A subsequent study revealed a longer variant CRACR2A-L (also known as CRACR2A-a), which contains 731 amino acids in endothelial cells [38]. The long isoform was renamed Rab46 since it contains a Rab domain [56]. Therefore, the short isoform CRACR2A-S is not discussed in this review.
Rab46 is reportedly expressed in endothelial cells [38] as well as immune cells including T cells [35]. The mouse database of the tissue distribution of the CRACR2A gene indicates that it is distributed in lymphoid tissues, such as the thymus, spleen, and other tissues, including the lungs and large and small intestines (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/381812/?report=expression, accessed on 13 July 2021). However, whether the data are derived from CRACR2A-S or Rab46 is unknown.

5.1. Intracellular Localization

Localization of Rab46 is likely to alter in resting and stimulated cells. Rab46 predominantly localizes in the Golgi in resting T cells. GTP binding is necessary for the correct localization of Rab46. After TCR stimulation, Rab46 is immediately translocated to specialized vesicles formed by Vav1, which leads to the activation of the downstream JNK pathway [35]. The PRD is important for the recruitment of Rab46-containing vesicles into the immunological synapse.
In endothelial cells, Rab46 is initially localized to Weibel-Palade bodies (WPBs), which are small storage granules containing von Willebrand factor and P-selectin [56]. Upon histamine stimulation, but not thrombin stimulation, Rab46 is directly translocated from WPBs to the perinuclear region, possibly the Golgi [56].

5.2. Cell Function

In CD4+ T cells, Rab46 controls the Orai1-dependent Ca2+ influx during TCR signaling, which induces Ca2+/NFAT-and JNK/AP1-dependent pathways [57]. Although both CRACR2A-S and Rab46 share a conserved function in the Ca2+-NFAT signaling pathway, only Rab46 is involved in the activation of the JNK pathway, suggesting the importance of the PRD and Rab domains in this functional difference [35]. Moreover, Rab46-mediated signaling selectively affects Th1 differentiation, which is directly involved in autoimmune diseases [57]. Rab46 functions as a dynein adaptor and engages in Ca2+-regulated endocytic trafficking in T cells as observed in an in vitro assay [25]. However, Rab46 in endothelial cells fails to function in the store-operated Ca2+ mechanism [38].
In endothelial cells, Rab46 is likely to be involved in tube formation. Rab46 knockdown suppresses endothelial tube formation, especially by reducing lumen length and the number of branch points in endothelial cells [38]. Moreover, in endothelial cells, Rab46 diverts WPBs that contain cargo superfluous to histamine stimulation away from the plasma membrane to the microtubule organizing center (MTOC), thus preventing secretion [56]. This trafficking is independent of Ca2+. However, Ca2+ binding to Rab46 is necessary at the MTOC for re-dispersal of WPBs after stimulation [56].

5.3. Binding Molecules and/or Effectors

The PRD of Rab46 associates with the SH3–SH2–SH3 domains of Vav1, wherein Vav1 is tyrosine-phosphorylated after TCR stimulation [35]. Recently, it has been found that Rab46 directly binds to the motor protein dynein–dynactin complex [24,25,58], and the Na2+/K+ ATPase subunit alpha 1 in endothelial cells [24].

5.4. Knockout Phenotypes or Diseases

When T-cell-specific Rab46 gene (CRACR2A) knockout mice were generated, Rab46 deficiency in primary T cells impaired the activation of the Ca2+-NFAT and JNK signaling pathways [35]. Moreover, Rab46 deficiency impairs Th1 differentiation in vitro [57]. Consistent with these findings, Rab46 depletion in T cells decreased Th1 responses in acute lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus infection and reduced resistance to experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in vivo [57].
A genome-wide association study indicated that four single-nucleotide polymorphisms in CRACR2A/Rab46 (EFCAB4B) caused periodontal diseases [59], and nonalcoholic fatty liver (NAFL) and/or nonalcoholic liver disease (NAFLD) [60,61,62,63]. Genetic analysis of the human genome indicated that Rab46 is an inducible protein, since exercise causes hypomethylation of the promoter region of the CRACR2A gene, resulting in lower risk of metastatic prostate cancer [64] and lung cancer [65].
The distribution, localization, functions, and binding proteins of Rab46 and the phenotypes or diseases associated with CRACR2A/Rab46 deficiency are summarized in Table 1.

6. Concluding Remarks and Perspectives

In this article, we summarized the recent findings on large Rab GTPases, including Rab44, Rab45/RASEF, and Rab46. As large Rab GTPases contain an EFD, it is speculated that regulation of the Ca2+ signaling pathway is important for large Rab GTPases. Although large Rab GTPases contain many phosphorylation sites, the responsible kinase(s) have not yet been identified. However, small Rab GTPases are phosphorylated by many kinases, such as CDK1, LRRKs, PKCs, TAK1, TBK1, and Src [66]. Therefore, the identification of large Rab GTPase-mediated mechanisms involved in regulating signaling pathways and membrane trafficking is critical. Thus, it is crucial to elucidate the link between membrane trafficking and signaling pathways mediated by large Rab GTPases.
The detailed mechanisms of the functional similarities between large and small Rab GTPases are unclear. For example, both Rab44 and Rab27B colocalize in secretory granules and regulate mast cell degranulation. Mast cells from Rab44-deficient mice exhibited decreased release of secretory granules. However, small amounts of secretion from Rab44-deficient mast cells have been detected, and therefore, it is assumed that Rab27B is possibly responsible for the alternative secretion of secretory granules. This is because Rab27B-deficient mast cells also display phenotypes similar to those of Rab44 [67,68]. Thus, Rab44 may regulate the release of secretory granules from mast cells independent of Rab27B. However, mechanisms other than this are still unknown.
Taken together, elucidating the signaling mechanisms mediated by these large Rab GTPases, as well as investigating the functional similarities between large and small Rab GTPases may potentially unravel new aspects of membrane trafficking.

Author Contributions

T.T. conceived the manuscript. Y.Y. and T.K. prepared the figures and T.T. wrote the manuscript with contributions from all the authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI grant numbers 18K09536, 20K18459, and 20H3860.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, T.; Li, L.; Hong, W. SNARE proteins in membrane trafficking. Traffic 2017, 18, 767–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Gillingham, A.K.; Munro, S. Transport carrier tethering—How vesicles are captured by organelles. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2019, 59, 140–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Stenmark, H. Rab GTPases as coordinators of vesicle traffic. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2009, 10, 513–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hutagalung, A.H.; Novick, P.J. Role of Rab GTPases in membrane traffic and cell physiology. Physiol. Rev. 2011, 91, 119–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Zhen, Y.; Stenmark, H. Cellular functions of Rab GTPases at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 2015, 128, 3171–3176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Pfeffer, S.R. Rab GTPases: Master regulators that establish the secretory and endocytic pathways. Mol. Biol. Cell 2017, 28, 712–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Novick, P. Regulation of membrane traffic by Rab GEF and GAP cascades. Small GTPases 2016, 7, 252–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Barr, F.; Lambright, D.G. Rab GEFs and GAPs. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2010, 22, 461–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Lamber, E.P.; Siedenburg, A.C.; Barr, F.A. Rab regulation by GEFs and GAPs during membrane traffic. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2019, 59, 34–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pereira-Leal, J.B.; Hume, A.N.; Seabra, M.C. Prenylation of Rab GTPases: Molecular mechanisms and involvement in genetic disease. FEBS Lett. 2001, 498, 197–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Leung, K.F.; Baron, R.; Seabra, M.C. Thematic review series: Lipid posttranslational modifications. geranylgeranylation of Rab GTPases. J. Lipid Res. 2006, 47, 467–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Diekmann, Y.; Seixas, E.; Gouw, M.; Tavares-Cadete, F.; Seabra, M.C.; Pereira-Leal, J.B. Thousands of rab GTPases for the cell biologist. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2011, 7, e1002217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Surkont, J.; Diekmann, Y.; Pereira-Leal, J.B. Rabifier2: An improved bioinformatic classifier of Rab GTPases. Bioinform. Oxf. Engl. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Fukuda, M. Regulation of secretory vesicle traffic by Rab small GTPases. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2008, 65, 2801–2813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Langemeyer, L.; Fröhlich, F.; Ungermann, C. Rab GTPase Function in Endosome and Lysosome Biogenesis. Trends Cell Biol. 2018, 28, 957–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Guadagno, N.A.; Progida, C. Rab GTPases: Switching to Human Diseases. Cells 2019, 8, 909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Homma, Y.; Hiragi, S.; Fukuda, M. Rab family of small GTPases: An updated view on their regulation and functions. FEBS J. 2021, 288, 36–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Klopper, T.H.; Kienle, N.; Fasshauer, D.; Munro, S. Untangling the evolution of Rab G proteins: Implications of a comprehensive genomic analysis. BMC Biol. 2012, 10, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Nelson, M.R.; Thulin, E.; Fagan, P.A.; Forsén, S.; Chazin, W.J. The EF-hand domain: A globally cooperative structural unit. Protein Sci. Publ. Protein Soc. 2002, 11, 198–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Denessiouk, K.; Permyakov, S.; Denesyuk, A.; Permyakov, E.; Johnson, M.S. Two structural motifs within canonical EF-hand calcium-binding domains identify five different classes of calcium buffers and sensors. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e109287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Kawasaki, H.; Kretsinger, R.H. Structural and functional diversity of EF-hand proteins: Evolutionary perspectives. Protein Sci. Publ. Protein Soc. 2017, 26, 1898–1920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Ogawa, K.; Kadowaki, T.; Tokuhisa, M.; Yamaguchi, Y.; Umeda, M.; Tsukuba, T. Role of the EF-hand and coiled-coil domains of human Rab44 in localisation and organelle formation. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 19149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Srikanth, S.; Jung, H.J.; Kim, K.D.; Souda, P.; Whitelegge, J.; Gwack, Y. A novel EF-hand protein, CRACR2A, is a cytosolic Ca2+ sensor that stabilizes CRAC channels in T cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 2010, 12, 436–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Pedicini, L.; Wiktor, S.D.; Simmons, K.J.; Money, A.; McKeown, L. Affinity-based proteomics reveals novel binding partners for Rab46 in endothelial cells. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 4054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Wang, Y.; Huynh, W.; Skokan, T.D.; Lu, W.; Weiss, A.; Vale, R.D. CRACR2a is a calcium-activated dynein adaptor protein that regulates endocytic traffic. J. Cell Biol. 2019, 218, 1619–1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Gillingham, A.K.; Munro, S. Long coiled-coil proteins and membrane traffic. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2003, 1641, 71–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Gillingham, A.K.; Munro, S. Finding the Golgi: Golgin Coiled-Coil Proteins Show the Way. Trends Cell Biol. 2016, 26, 399–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Shintani, M.; Tada, M.; Kobayashi, T.; Kajiho, H.; Kontani, K.; Katada, T. Characterization of Rab45/RASEF containing EF-hand domain and a coiled-coil motif as a self-associating GTPase. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2007, 357, 661–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Kumar, S.; Lee, H.J.; Park, H.S.; Lee, K. Testis-Specific GTPase (TSG): An oligomeric protein. BMC Genom. 2016, 17, 792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Ball, L.J.; Kühne, R.; Schneider-Mergener, J.; Oschkinat, H. Recognition of proline-rich motifs by protein-protein-interaction domains. Angew. Chem. Int. Engl. 2005, 44, 2852–2869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Zarrinpar, A.; Bhattacharyya, R.P.; Lim, W.A. The structure and function of proline recognition domains. Sci. STKE Signal Transduct. Knowl. Environ. 2003, 2003, Re8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kofler, M.; Schuemann, M.; Merz, C.; Kosslick, D.; Schlundt, A.; Tannert, A.; Schaefer, M.; Lührmann, R.; Krause, E.; Freund, C. Proline-rich sequence recognition: I. Marking GYF and WW domain assembly sites in early spliceosomal complexes. Mol. Cell. Proteom. MCP 2009, 8, 2461–2473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Srikanth, S.; Woo, J.S.; Gwack, Y. A large Rab GTPase family in a small GTPase world. Small GTPases 2017, 8, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Elias, R.D.; Ma, W.; Ghirlando, R.; Schwieters, C.D.; Reddy, V.S.; Deshmukh, L. Proline-rich domain of human ALIX contains multiple TSG101-UEV interaction sites and forms phosphorylation-mediated reversible amyloids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 24274–24284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Srikanth, S.; Kim, K.D.; Gao, Y.; Woo, J.S.; Ghosh, S.; Calmettes, G.; Paz, A.; Abramson, J.; Jiang, M.; Gwack, Y. A large Rab GTPase encoded by CRACR2A is a component of subsynaptic vesicles that transmit T cell activation signals. Sci. Signal. 2016, 9, ra31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Kadowaki, T.; Yamaguchi, Y.; Ogawa, K.; Tokuhisa, M.; Okamoto, K.; Tsukuba, T. Rab44 isoforms similarly promote lysosomal exocytosis, but exhibit differential localization in mast cells. FEBS Open Bio, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tokuhisa, M.; Kadowaki, T.; Ogawa, K.; Yamaguchi, Y.; Kido, M.A.; Gao, W.; Umeda, M.; Tsukuba, T. Expression and localisation of Rab44 in immune-related cells change during cell differentiation and stimulation. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 10728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wilson, L.A.; McKeown, L.; Tumova, S.; Li, J.; Beech, D.J. Expression of a long variant of CRACR2A that belongs to the Rab GTPase protein family in endothelial cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2015, 456, 398–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Pereira-Leal, J.B.; Seabra, M.C. Evolution of the Rab family of small GTP-binding proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 2001, 313, 889–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Gallegos, M.E.; Balakrishnan, S.; Chandramouli, P.; Arora, S.; Azameera, A.; Babushekar, A.; Bargoma, E.; Bokhari, A.; Chava, S.K.; Das, P.; et al. The C. elegans rab family: Identification, classification and toolkit construction. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e49387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Ghosh, S.; Sternberg, P.W. Spatial and molecular cues for cell outgrowth during C. elegans uterine development. Dev. Biol. 2014, 396, 121–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Yamaguchi, Y.; Sakai, E.; Okamoto, K.; Kajiya, H.; Okabe, K.; Naito, M.; Kadowaki, T.; Tsukuba, T. Rab44, a novel large Rab GTPase, negatively regulates osteoclast differentiation by modulating intracellular calcium levels followed by NFATc1 activation. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2018, 75, 33–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Kadowaki, T.; Yamaguchi, Y.; Kido, M.A.; Abe, T.; Ogawa, K.; Tokuhisa, M.; Gao, W.; Okamoto, K.; Kiyonari, H.; Tsukuba, T. The large GTPase Rab44 regulates granule exocytosis in mast cells and IgE-mediated anaphylaxis. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2020, 17, 1287–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Comrie, W.A.; Faruqi, A.J.; Price, S.; Zhang, Y.; Rao, V.K.; Su, H.C.; Lenardo, M.J. RELA haploinsufficiency in CD4 lymphoproliferative disease with autoimmune cytopenias. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2018, 141, 1507–1510.e1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Jiang, Y.; Gruzieva, O.; Wang, T.; Forno, E.; Boutaoui, N.; Sun, T.; Merid, S.K.; Acosta-Pérez, E.; Kull, I.; Canino, G.; et al. Transcriptomics of atopy and atopic asthma in white blood cells from children and adolescents. Eur. Respir. J. 2019, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Jönsson, G.; Bendahl, P.O.; Sandberg, T.; Kurbasic, A.; Staaf, J.; Sunde, L.; Crüger, D.G.; Ingvar, C.; Olsson, H.; Borg, A. Mapping of a novel ocular and cutaneous malignant melanoma susceptibility locus to chromosome 9q21.32. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2005, 97, 1377–1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Sweetser, D.A.; Peniket, A.J.; Haaland, C.; Blomberg, A.A.; Zhang, Y.; Zaidi, S.T.; Dayyani, F.; Zhao, Z.; Heerema, N.A.; Boultwood, J.; et al. Delineation of the minimal commonly deleted segment and identification of candidate tumor-suppressor genes in del(9q) acute myeloid leukemia. Genes Chromosom. Cancer 2005, 44, 279–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Maat, W.; Beiboer, S.H.; Jager, M.J.; Luyten, G.P.; Gruis, N.A.; van der Velden, P.A. Epigenetic regulation identifies RASEF as a tumor-suppressor gene in uveal melanoma. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2008, 49, 1291–1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Yu, X.; Fang, Z.; Li, G.; Zhang, S.; Liu, M.; Wang, Y. High RASEF expression is associated with a significantly better prognosis in colorectal cancer. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2018, 11, 4276–4282. [Google Scholar]
  50. Oshita, H.; Nishino, R.; Takano, A.; Fujitomo, T.; Aragaki, M.; Kato, T.; Akiyama, H.; Tsuchiya, E.; Kohno, N.; Nakamura, Y.; et al. RASEF is a novel diagnostic biomarker and a therapeutic target for lung cancer. Mol. Cancer Res. MCR 2013, 11, 937–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Shibata, M.; Kanda, M.; Shimizu, D.; Tanaka, H.; Umeda, S.; Miwa, T.; Hayashi, M.; Inaishi, T.; Miyajima, N.; Adachi, Y.; et al. RASEF expression correlates with hormone receptor status in breast cancer. Oncol. Lett. 2018, 16, 7223–7230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Xiao, B.; Hang, J.; Lei, T.; He, Y.; Kuang, Z.; Wang, L.; Chen, L.; He, J.; Zhang, W.; Liao, Y.; et al. Identification of key genes relevant to the prognosis of ER-positive and ER-negative breast cancer based on a prognostic prediction system. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2019, 46, 2111–2119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Cai, M.; Liang, X.; Sun, X.; Chen, H.; Dong, Y.; Wu, L.; Gu, S.; Han, S. Nuclear Receptor Coactivator 2 Promotes Human Breast Cancer Cell Growth by Positively Regulating the MAPK/ERK Pathway. Front. Oncol. 2019, 9, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Li, Q.; Wu, J.; Xu, Y.; Liu, L.; Xie, J. Role of RASEF hypermethylation in cigarette smoke-induced pulmonary arterial smooth muscle remodeling. Respir. Res. 2019, 20, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Nakamura, S.; Takemura, T.; Tan, L.; Nagata, Y.; Yokota, D.; Hirano, I.; Shigeno, K.; Shibata, K.; Fujie, M.; Fujisawa, S.; et al. Small GTPase RAB45-mediated p38 activation in apoptosis of chronic myeloid leukemia progenitor cells. Carcinogenesis 2011, 32, 1758–1772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Miteva, K.T.; Pedicini, L.; Wilson, L.A.; Jayasinghe, I.; Slip, R.G.; Marszalek, K.; Gaunt, H.J.; Bartoli, F.; Deivasigamani, S.; Sobradillo, D.; et al. Rab46 integrates Ca2+ and histamine signaling to regulate selective cargo release from Weibel-Palade bodies. J. Cell Biol. 2019, 218, 2232–2246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Woo, J.S.; Srikanth, S.; Kim, K.D.; Elsaesser, H.; Lu, J.; Pellegrini, M.; Brooks, D.G.; Sun, Z.; Gwack, Y. CRACR2A-Mediated TCR Signaling Promotes Local Effector Th1 and Th17 Responses. J. Immunol. 2018, 201, 1174–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Lee, I.G.; Cason, S.E.; Alqassim, S.S.; Holzbaur, E.L.F.; Dominguez, R. A tunable LIC1-adaptor interaction modulates dynein activity in a cargo-specific manner. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 5695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Bevilacqua, L.; Navarra, C.O.; Pirastu, N.; Lenarda, R.D.; Gasparini, P.; Robino, A. A genome-wide association study identifies an association between variants in EFCAB4B gene and periodontal disease in an Italian isolated population. J. Periodontal Res. 2018, 53, 992–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Chalasani, N.; Guo, X.; Loomba, R.; Goodarzi, M.O.; Haritunians, T.; Kwon, S.; Cui, J.; Taylor, K.D.; Wilson, L.; Cummings, O.W.; et al. Genome-wide association study identifies variants associated with histologic features of nonalcoholic Fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology 2010, 139, 1567–1576.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Sharma, M.; Mitnala, S.; Vishnubhotla, R.K.; Mukherjee, R.; Reddy, D.N.; Rao, P.N. The Riddle of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Progression From Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver to Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis. J. Clin. Exp. Hepatol. 2015, 5, 147–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Grove, J.I.; Austin, M.; Tibble, J.; Aithal, G.P.; Verma, S. Monozygotic twins with NASH cirrhosis: Cumulative effect of multiple single nucleotide polymorphisms? Ann. Hepatol. 2016, 15, 277–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Meir, A.Y.; Keller, M.; Müller, L.; Bernhart, S.H.; Tsaban, G.; Zelicha, H.; Rinott, E.; Kaplan, A.; Gepner, Y.; Shelef, I.; et al. Effects of lifestyle interventions on epigenetic signatures of liver fat: CENTRAL randomized controlled trial. Liver Int. Off. J. Int. Assoc. Study Liver 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Dai, J.Y.; Wang, B.; Wang, X.; Cheng, A.; Kolb, S.; Stanford, J.L.; Wright, J.L. Vigorous Physical Activity Is Associated with Lower Risk of Metastatic-Lethal Progression in Prostate Cancer and Hypomethylation in the CRACR2A Gene. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2019, 28, 258–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Kim, J.Y.; Choi, J.K.; Jung, H. Genome-wide methylation patterns predict clinical benefit of immunotherapy in lung cancer. Clin. Epigenet. 2020, 12, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Waschbüsch, D.; Khan, A.R. Phosphorylation of Rab GTPases in the regulation of membrane trafficking. Traffic 2020, 21, 712–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Mizuno, K.; Tolmachova, T.; Ushakov, D.S.; Romao, M.; Abrink, M.; Ferenczi, M.A.; Raposo, G.; Seabra, M.C. Rab27b regulates mast cell granule dynamics and secretion. Traffic 2007, 8, 883–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Singh, R.K.; Mizuno, K.; Wasmeier, C.; Wavre-Shapton, S.T.; Recchi, C.; Catz, S.D.; Futter, C.; Tolmachova, T.; Hume, A.N.; Seabra, M.C. Distinct and opposing roles for Rab27a/Mlph/MyoVa and Rab27b/Munc13-4 in mast cell secretion. FEBS J. 2013, 280, 892–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 22 07691 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic representation of domain structures of large Rab proteins. The EF-hand domain (EFD), coiled-coil domain (CCD), proline-rich (PRD), and the Rab family domain are shown in yellow, blue, green, and red, respectively.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of domain structures of large Rab proteins. The EF-hand domain (EFD), coiled-coil domain (CCD), proline-rich (PRD), and the Rab family domain are shown in yellow, blue, green, and red, respectively.
Ijms 22 07691 g001
Ijms 22 07691 g002 550
Figure 2. Sequence alignment of regions between the coiled-coil domain and the Rab domain in large Rab GTPases. The red letters indicate proline residues. Yellow indicates proline-rich sequences, including PxxPxxP, PPxPPxPP, PxxP, (R/K)xxPxxP, PxxPx(R/K), and xPPx. Accession numbers for the proteins are the following: human Rab44 (NP_001244286.1), human Rab45/RASEF (NP_689786.2), and human Rab46 (NP_001138430.1).
Figure 2. Sequence alignment of regions between the coiled-coil domain and the Rab domain in large Rab GTPases. The red letters indicate proline residues. Yellow indicates proline-rich sequences, including PxxPxxP, PPxPPxPP, PxxP, (R/K)xxPxxP, PxxPx(R/K), and xPPx. Accession numbers for the proteins are the following: human Rab44 (NP_001244286.1), human Rab45/RASEF (NP_689786.2), and human Rab46 (NP_001138430.1).
Ijms 22 07691 g002
Table
Table 1. Summary of distribution, localization, functions, binding proteins, and the phenotypes or diseases associated with large Rab GTPases.
Table 1. Summary of distribution, localization, functions, binding proteins, and the phenotypes or diseases associated with large Rab GTPases.
Protein Name (Localization)DistributionFunctionsBinding MoleculesPhenotypes
Rab44-L
Mast cellsDegranulationVAMP8Reduced anaphylaxis
Bone marrow Autoimmune diseases
Immune cells Atopic diseases
Osteoclasts (ER/L)Osteoclast-differentiation
Rab44-S
OsteoclastsOsteoclast-differentiation
Mast cellsDegranulationVAMP8
Bone marrow
Immune cells (ER/G/L/EE)
Rab45/RASEF-L
Liver, heart, kidney, lung, prostate, testis Rab45/RASEF (oligomer)
Epithelial cells Dynein–dynactin
Cancer cells (G/RE/C)Tumor suppressor or oncogeneERK1/2
Rab45/RASEF-SGerm cells of testis (N) Rab45/RASEF (oligomer)
Rab46
T cells (G/Vav1+-vesicles)Transport of Vav1+-vesiclesVav1 Impaired Th1 differentiation
Endothelial cells (Tube formation) Transport of WPBsDynein–dynactinPeriodontal diseases
Cancer metastasis
Na2+/K+ ATPase subunit α1NAFL, NAFLD
Abbreviations: ER: endoplasmic reticulum, G: Golgi complex, L: lysosomes, EE: early endosomes, RE: recycling endosomes, N: nuclei, PM: plasma membrane, C: cytosol, WPBs: Weibel–Palade bodies.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tsukuba, T.; Yamaguchi, Y.; Kadowaki, T. Large Rab GTPases: Novel Membrane Trafficking Regulators with a Calcium Sensor and Functional Domains. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7691. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22147691

AMA Style

Tsukuba T, Yamaguchi Y, Kadowaki T. Large Rab GTPases: Novel Membrane Trafficking Regulators with a Calcium Sensor and Functional Domains. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(14):7691. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22147691

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tsukuba, Takayuki, Yu Yamaguchi, and Tomoko Kadowaki. 2021. "Large Rab GTPases: Novel Membrane Trafficking Regulators with a Calcium Sensor and Functional Domains" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 14: 7691. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22147691

APA Style

Tsukuba, T., Yamaguchi, Y., & Kadowaki, T. (2021). Large Rab GTPases: Novel Membrane Trafficking Regulators with a Calcium Sensor and Functional Domains. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(14), 7691. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22147691

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop