Next Article in Journal
Sclerostin Depletion Induces Inflammation in the Bone Marrow of Mice
Next Article in Special Issue
Differential Physio-Biochemical and Metabolic Responses of Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) under Multiple Abiotic Stress Conditions
Previous Article in Journal
Nerve Growth Factor: A Potential Therapeutic Target for Lung Diseases
Previous Article in Special Issue
Plant Secondary Metabolites with an Overview of Populus
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Metabolomics and Molecular Approaches Reveal Drought Stress Tolerance in Plants

1
Institute of Plant Sciences, Agricultural Research Organization, Volcani Center, Rishon LeZion 7505101, Israel
2
Department of Postharvest Science of Fresh Produce, Agricultural Research Organization, Volcani Center, Rishon LeZion 7505101, Israel
3
Department of Life Sciences, Ben-Gurion University, Be’er Sheva 84105, Israel
4
Department of Botany, D.B.S. (PG) College, Dehradun 248001, Uttarakhand, India
5
The UWA Institute of Agriculture, and UWA School of Agriculture and Environment, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6001, Australia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(17), 9108; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22179108
Submission received: 30 June 2021 / Revised: 17 August 2021 / Accepted: 20 August 2021 / Published: 24 August 2021

Abstract

:
Metabolic regulation is the key mechanism implicated in plants maintaining cell osmotic potential under drought stress. Understanding drought stress tolerance in plants will have a significant impact on food security in the face of increasingly harsh climatic conditions. Plant primary and secondary metabolites and metabolic genes are key factors in drought tolerance through their involvement in diverse metabolic pathways. Physio-biochemical and molecular strategies involved in plant tolerance mechanisms could be exploited to increase plant survival under drought stress. This review summarizes the most updated findings on primary and secondary metabolites involved in drought stress. We also examine the application of useful metabolic genes and their molecular responses to drought tolerance in plants and discuss possible strategies to help plants to counteract unfavorable drought periods.

1. Introduction

Drought stress (DS) negatively affects plant morphological, physiological, and biochemical processes, which decrease photosynthesis [1], impair cell elongation and division [2], and reduce cell turgor pressure [3]. Drought stress also inhibits nutrient uptake and affects gene expression, yield, and quality of crop plants [4,5]. Metabolites play an essential role in plant growth and development. Under stress conditions, metabolites are involved in cell signaling, energy storage, membrane formation and scaffolding, and whole-plant resource allocation [6]. Various abiotic stresses, including drought, disturb plant metabolism through metabolic enzyme inhibition, substrate shortage, excess demand for specific compounds, or a combination of these and many other factors. Thus, the metabolic network must be reconfigured to maintain essential metabolism, and acclimate by adopting a new steady-state in light of the prevailing stress conditions [7]. The induction of primary or secondary metabolites under drought stress can regulate the turgidity and stiffness of cells and tissues, redox homoeostasis, ion transport, and enzyme activity [8,9]. These metabolites play an important role in connecting plant genotypes and phenotypes [10,11].
Metabolomics is an effective tool for garnering comprehensive information on metabolite profiling and metabolic network analysis. It also imparts knowledge about identified and unidentified metabolites. Several reports have contributed to the recent understanding of metabolite regulation in many plant species in response to different environmental stresses, including drought, salt, heat, cold, and light stress [7,12,13]. Metabolite profiling approaches have been widely used to characterize the molecular responses to DS in plants and evaluate metabolite levels in a particular metabolite class or pathway [14,15]. It includes various analytical approaches for identifying different classes of metabolites through gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry (CE-MS) in various plant species under DS [16,17,18] (Table 1).
The detection of molecular traits that differ in response to stress events is challenging. Metabolic profiling could be used to characterize molecular traits implicated in the stress response, providing valuable information for breeding programs [19]. Certainly, metabolomics is a powerful technique for identifying biological or physiological responses to environmental changes, particularly when combined with other omics approaches, such as transcriptomics and proteomics [20,21,22]. Metabolomics is used to identifying and/or quantifying primary and secondary stress-responsive metabolites in plants under abiotic stress, including DS [23]. This review summarizes the most updated findings on metabolomics and molecular approaches to reveal drought stress tolerance in plants.

2. Metabolomics and Its Application in Drought Tolerance of Plants

Environmental stresses, such as drought, salinity, and high temperatures, can trigger hyper-accumulation of a vast array of metabolites in plants [24,25]. Plant secondary metabolites (SMs) are derivatives of primary metabolites (PMs) produced by plants to fight a variety of unfavorable physiological changes induced due to stressors [26,27]. Drought is one of the most significant environmental stresses on agricultural production worldwide [28]. In plants, DS adaptation is a complicated biological process that involves dynamic trends in metabolite composition and gene expression [29]. Plant tolerance to DS is typically determined by their ability to maintain an appropriate level of primary and secondary metabolic processes and defense responses [25]. Metabolomic analysis can investigate and recognize key differences between DS-tolerant and DS-sensitive plant species/genotypes and connect links between genotypic and phenotypic changes in plants during DS [30]. Two main methods (non-targeted and targeted) are used to understand metabolic reprogramming in plants under abiotic stress [31,32,33]. Non-targeted metabolomics provides an overview of the most abundant metabolites in plants under various environmental stresses. Targeted metabolomics detects, estimates, and analyzes known metabolites in plants under various environmental stresses [34,35]. Therefore, metabolomics studies can reveal the important role for metabolic reprogramming, including regulation and accumulation of PM and SM levels in plants under DS and biotechnological applications for DS management of agricultural crop plants [36,37].

2.1. Drought-Induced Adjustment of Primary Metabolites

Drought stress directly affects plant metabolism, resulting in profound changes in biosynthesis and transport of PMs and SMs [38,39]. Primary metabolites are important for the proper development of plant cells and directly implicated in plant growth processes, photosynthesis, and respiration [25,40]. They include sugars, polyols, amino acids (AAs), and lipids that allow plants to acclimatize and recover from DS [41] (Figure 1; Table 1).

2.1.1. Carbohydrates

Sugars play an important role in carbon resource allocation and plant growth [42]. Sugars (glucose, sucrose, fructose, ribose, raffinose, erythronate, and xylonate) and pyruvate, a glycolysis intermediate, increased in roots under DS [43]. Myoinositol content decreased under dehydration stress in Arabidopsis [29]. Similarly, trehalose levels declined in Zea mays [44] and Oryza sativa [45]. Sugars (glucose, galactose, fructose, and maltose) and sugar alcohols (arabitol and galactitol) accumulated in Lotus japonicus during DS [46]. Ogbaga et al. [47] studied two drought-contrasting sorghum (Sorghumbicolor) cultivars (Samsorg 17 and 40) under DS and reported significant upregulation of sugars (fructose, cellobiose, galactose, lactose, and sedoheptulose) and sugar alcohols (myoinositol, ribitol, and xylitol) in Samsorg 17, relative to Samsorg 40, in response to DS. Nicotiana tabacum leaves and roots showed different metabolic responses under DS. In leaves, glucose-6-phosphate and fructose-6-phosphate decreased and mannitol increased [48]. In roots, galactinol and myoinositol increased initially but decreased later, and mannitol and trehalose increased [48]. In N. tabacum, 4-hydroxy-2-oxoglutaric acid was undetectable in leaves but increased 20-fold in roots during the initial hours (between 1 and 2 h) of drought stress and 70-fold after four hours. This indicates that N. tabacum under DS accumulates 4-hydroxy-2-oxoglutaric acid, which is subsequently broken down into pyruvate and glyoxylate when water becomes available [48]. Yang et al. [49] analyzed drought-tolerant (Lo964) and drought-sensitive (B73) inbred lines of Z. mays at 7 and 14 days after drought imposition (DAI). Under DS, carbohydrates such as sucrose, fructose, galactinol, raffinose, and ketose increased in B73 and decreased in Lo964. Components of the TCA cycle, such as citrate, succinate, α-ketoglutarate, and fumarate, decreased in Lo964 at 7 or 14 DAI, while isocitrate and citrate increased in B73 at 7 DAI [49]. In Z. mays, glutathione and urea cycles as well as carbohydrate and lipid metabolism play a key role in osmoprotection, membrane maintenance, and antioxidant protection during DS [49]. Four metabolites (ornithine, arginosuccinate, arginine, and citrulline) were downregulated in B73 under DS at 7 DAI, but exhibited different patterns in Lo964 [49]. Obata et al. [44] analyzed myoinositol and glycine using GC-MS in leaf blade tissue of Z. mays under DS and found significant correlations between myoinositol and glycine levels and grain yield.

2.1.2. Amino Acids

Amino acids are essential metabolites in plants for protein synthesis and cellular function [50]; they also function as osmolytes to balance cellular osmotic potential and as scavengers of reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated in plants under DS. The aromatic AAs (phenylalanine, tryptophan and tyrosine) are important components of protein synthesis in plants and serve as precursors for several secondary metabolites that are essential for plant growth [51]. Differential accumulation of metabolites occurred in two drought-contrasting chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes using the UPLC-HRMS-based untargeted metabolic profiling approach [52]. Under DS, other PMs (e.g., proline, arginine, histidine, isoleucine, and tryptophan) accumulated in the leaves of the tolerant chickpea variety, while alanine, α-ketoglutaric acid, GABA, choline, tyrosine, glucosamine, adenosine, guanine, and aspartic acid decreased in both genotypes [52]. Active aromatic AAs may function as a secondary source of energy and have been implicated in stress tolerance in chickpea. Aromatic AAs (phenaylalanine and tyrosine) are precursors of several SMs, including indole acetate, and lignin in the shikimate pathway, which play an important role in stress tolerance [53,54]. Many essential metabolites, such as sugars, AAs, and GABA, increased in wheat (Triticum aestivum) exposed to DS compared to control plants [55]. Similarly, increased levels of proline, methionine, lysine, and arginine contents occurred in drought-tolerant and drought-sensitive wheat genotypes in response to DS [56] (Table 1). Sanchez et al. [46] reported that aspartic acid, glutamic acid, and phosphoric acid decreased during DS in L. japonicus. Alanine and glutamine contents decreased in drought-tolerant and drought-sensitive soybean (Glycine max L.) genotypes under DS, whereas GABA decreased in the tolerant genotype and aspartic acid content increased in the sensitive genotype [57].
Significant metabolite accumulation was detected in one or more organs of Hordeum vulgare under DS [58]. Valine was significantly upregulated in the fifth leaf, awn, and lemma, and proline accumulated in all organs (fifth leaf, awn, lemma, and palea) during DS [58]. Phenylalanine was significantly upregulated in the lemma and fifth leaf, and glycine, isoleucine, and threonine accumulated in the fifth leaf and awn during DS. Moreover, sugars accumulated in the spike organs (awn, lemma, and palea) during DS [58]. Amino acids and osmolytes maintain turgor pressure and protect cellular processes through ROS scavenging [58]. De Miguel et al. [43] reported that the concentrations of sugars and AAs increased significantly in aerial organs and roots of Pinus pinaster under DS. The relative increase in AAs is related to a process of protein degradation under stress [59], as measured by the increase in asparagine levels in roots and stems of P. pinaster but not needles under DS [43]. Amino acids from the aspartate and glutamate families increased in aerial organs and roots, whereas aromatic AAs (phenylalanine) were increased in roots of P. pinaster during DS [43]. Plants under DS accumulate various osmolytes, such as carbohydrates, AAs, and glycine betaine, which play a key role in regulating osmotic potential, controlling ion transport and cell turgor pressure, and stabilizing cell membranes [60,61]. Thus, changes in metabolite contents under DS indicate that regulation of primary metabolism is crucial for DS tolerance in crop plants (Figure 1).

2.1.3. Lipids and Fatty Acid

Lipids are cellular macromolecules with structural, energy storage, and signalling roles in plant biological systems [62]. Lipids act as signaling mediators [63,64] to mitigate the negative impacts of environmental stressors [65,66]. Plant lipids principally include glycerolipids (e.g., phospholipids, galactolipids, sphingolipids, triacylglycerols) and extracellular lipids (e.g., suberin, cutin, and waxes). Sanchez-Martin et al. [67] profiled different classes of lipids, including polar lipids (PLs), monoacylglycerols (MAGs), diacylglycerols (DAGs), and triacylglycerols (TAGs) and free fatty acids (FFAs) in drought-tolerant (cv. Patones) and drought-sensitive (cv. Flega) oat cultivars differing in their response to drought stress. Saturated FAs, particularly palmitic acid in the DAG and TAG fractions, increased in drought-sensitive cv. Flega. In contrast, drought-tolerant cv. Patones was characterized by the early induction of signaling-related fatty acids and lipids, such as linolenic acid and DAGs [67]. Moradi et al. [68] examined lipid profiling in drought-tolerant and drought-sensitive thyme plants under prolonged drought stress and found that lipid components decreased in sensitive plants but increased in tolerant plants. They proposed that combining lipid profiling with physiological parameters represented a promising tool for investigating the mechanisms of plant response to DS at the non-polar metabolome level [68]. The composition of lipid components changes under DS. The lipid contents in A. thaliana leaves decreased progressively in response to DS. However, the lipid content of highly dehydrated leaves quickly increased after rehydration [69].
Drought elevated the levels of major lipid components, indicating enhanced lipid biosynthesis and/or reduced lipid degradation [68]. Stress-induced changes in the lipid profile cause membrane lipid remodeling and activation of plant defense mechanisms against biotic and abiotic stresses, including drought [70,71]. Zhang et al. [72] used lipidomic analyses to investigate the responses of cutin monomers and cuticular waxes to drought stress in drought-tolerant (cv. Kangsi) and drought-sensitive (cv. Hongyingzi) cultivars of Sorghum bicolor. In drought-tolerant cv. Kangsi, drought increased cutin content by 41.3%, alkanoic acid level by 72.6%, and 2-hydroxyacid content by 117.8%, but had no effect on drought-sensitive cv. Hongyingzi. Drought increased total wax coverage in cv. Hongyingzi but decreased it in cv. Kangsi [72]. Gundaraniya et al. [73] reported that drought stress increased the accumulation of saturated FAs (stearic acid) in leaves of a drought-tolerant peanut genotype, whereas 8, 11-octadecadienoic acid accumulated in roots of a drought-sensitive peanut genotype. Several FAs were detected in purslane leaves under DS, including palmitic acid, linolenic acid, linoleic acid, oleic acid, stearic acid, arachidic acid and behenic acid [74]. Drought treatments significantly increased palmitic acid content, but decreased stearic acid and oleic acid contents compared to the control [74]. FAs and lipids are involved in growth, development and responses to biotic and abiotic stresses for acclimation [75].

2.2. Drought-Induced Adjustment of Secondary Metabolites

In response to various environmental stresses, including drought, plants produce SMs [60,76]. The biosynthesis of SMs is regulated by environmental factors and has a chief role in protecting plants against environmental stresses [25,77]. Secondary metabolites are categorized into three main groups, including nitrogen-containing metabolites such as alkaloids (e.g., cyanogenic glycosides, glucosinolates, etc), phenolic compounds (e.g., tannins, flavonoids, lignins), and terpenes (e.g., terpenoids or isoprenoids) [25,78] (Figure 1; Table 1). Secondary metabolite pathways include mevalonic acid, shikimic acid, phenylpropanoic acid, and methylerythritol phosphate [79,80]. Drought induces oxidative stress in plants, which produces reactive oxygen species (ROS). Secondary metabolites mainly scavenge ROS to protect plant cells from lipid peroxidation and play an important role in other defense-related activities [81]. Key enzymes of the phenylpropanoid pathway, including phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL), 4-coumaroyl CoA ligase (4CL), and coumarate-4-hydroxylase (C4H), were implicated under stress conditions [82] (Figure 1). Additionally, drought-induced volatile compounds can warn tissues to activate DS-mitigating functions in plants [83] (Figure 1). The production of SMs may alter in response to DS in plants. Secondary metabolite accumulation enhances stress tolerance by modulating physiological and biochemical parameters in plants [84].

2.2.1. Phenolics

Plant phenolics, such as flavonoids, tannins, coumarins, and lignins, are a significant family of SMs [85]. Flavonoids are a class of naturally occurring phenolic compounds that include flavones, isoflavones, flavanones, flavonols, chalcones, proanthocyanidins, and anthocyanidins [86]. The phenolics contents in Hypericum brasiliense increased under water-deficit conditions [87]. Quercetin was upregulated under water-deficit conditions, while rutin was upregulated in response to hypoxia and DS [87]. Increased flavonol content in plants has a role in the protection against ROS [88]. Under DS, flavonoids and phenolics contents increased in Achillea species [89]. In Achillea pachycephala, DS increased luteolin-7-O-glucoside and decreased apigenin-7-O-glucoside content [90]. Similarly, DS significantly elevated phenolic compounds such as salicylic acid, ferulic acid, and 4-hydroxycinnamic acid drought-tolerant G. max compared to the common wild-type [91]. Salicylic acid can stimulate the plant antioxidant system, improving cell metabolic activity [58]. Ferulic acid is a strong antioxidant that can improve cell membrane integrity under various abiotic stresses [92,93]. During drought, luteolin levels increased in leaves of chrysanthemum cultivars, while apigenin levels decreased or remained unchanged [94]. Drought stress decreased flavonoid and phenolic compound contents, specifically p-coumaric acid, chlorogenic acid, and rutin, in the flower extract of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) but increased caffeic acid, ellagic acid, vanillic acid, and quercetin contents [95]. In the same study, DS decreased ferulic acid, vanillic acid, p-coumaric acid, apigenin, quercetin, rutin, and luteolin contents in the seed extracts of C. tinctorius but increased caffeic acid, ellagic acid, chlorogenic acid, and gallic acid contents [95]. Changes in the amount of flavonoid compounds during abiotic stress could be linked to ROS generation due to the role of flavonols in plant defense [88].
Long-term progressive DS significantly reduced total isoflavone content in G. max seeds [96]. Drought stress increased endogenous SM contents in various medicinal plants. For example, quercetin, rutin, and betulinic acid increased in Hypericum brasiliense and Artemisinin artemisia under DS [97]. In another study, the level of phenolic compounds increased in Trachyspermum ammi under DS [98]. Flavonoids increased in Glechoma longituba under DS [99]. In Sesamum indicum L, DS increased flavonoid, phenolic, and polyphenolic contents, while sesamin, oil, and quercetin contents decreased [100]. Plant polyphenols, such as phenolics and flavonoids, are biosynthesized in plants via different pathways [89]. Phenolic acids increase under DS due to the lignification of cell walls and production of AAs, mainly phenylalanine and tyrosine, to maintain cell osmotic equilibrium [101]. Under DS, factor OsC1-MYB upregulated transcripts of flavonoid biosynthesis-related genes OsDFR and OsANS in O. sativa [102]. Drought stress enhanced the levels of total phenolics, flavonoids, and anthocyanins in T. aestivum [103]. Quantitative real-time PCR analysis revealed that TaCHS, TaCHI, TaFLS, TaF3H, TaFNS, TaANS, and TaDFR expression levels increased under DS in two T. aestivum cultivars, Aikang 58 (AK) and Chinese Spring (CS) [103].
Lignins are a high-molecular-weight natural phenolic polymer that play an important role in cell wall formation of plants [104]. Lignin accumulation plays a key role in plant biotic and abiotic stress tolerance [105,106]. Drought stress significantly enhanced the expression of lignin biosynthetic gene cinnamoyl CoA reductase (CCR) in Leucaenal eucocephala seedlings. The accumulation of CCR protein is associated with drought tolerance [107]. Overexpression of the SiMYB56 gene from Setaria italica enhanced drought tolerance in transgenic rice plants by lowering MDA content and increasing lignin content under drought [108]. Similarly, overexpression of the VlbZIP30 gene from Vitis labrusca enhanced DS tolerance in transgenic grapevine plants by maintaining photosynthesis rate and increasing leaf lignin content under drought conditions [109].

2.2.2. Trepenes and Polyamines

Terpene synthases are the main gatekeepers engaged in terpene biosynthesis. Drought stress upregulates terpenes (e.g., monoterpene, diterpenes, and sesquiterpene) and their biosynthesis [110,111]. Diterpenes provided drought tolerance in Salvia officinalis plants by inducing the ROS system [112]. Vallat et al. [113] studied the effects of relative humidity on apple (Malus domestica), revealing that low humidity stimulates the production of terpenes such as camphene, α-pinene, β-pinene, β-caryophyllene, limonene, and α-farnesene. Exogenous application of salicylic acid increased the level of terpenes in lemongrass (Cymbopogon flexuosus Steud. Wats.) under DS [114]. Naturally occurring SMs (triterpenoid, oleanolic acid, and betulin) increased in Betula platyphylla under mild and mild/severe DS [115]. Craterostigma plantagineum plants exposed to DS for 4 days gradually increased the level of polyamines spermine (Spm) and spermidine (Spd) up to 8-fold and 3-fold, respectively, relative to control plants, and the amount of putrescine (Put) decreased [116]. Put and Spd levels were significantly reduced under drought stress, whereas Spm levels were either maintained or slightly increased in O. sativa cultivars [117]. While Put was the main polyamine under control conditions, Spm became the dominating polyamine during drought stress, however there were no significant associations between polyamine concentration and drought tolerance cultivar [117]. The findings discussed above and additional studies in Table 1 show that reprogramming PMs and SMs in plants is an adaptive response to DS tolerance (Figure 1).
Table 1. Key metabolites involved in various plant species under drought stress.
Table 1. Key metabolites involved in various plant species under drought stress.
Plant SpeciesMethods of AnalysisTissueKey Metabolites Involved in Drought ToleranceReferences
Monocots
Avena sativaGCLeavesLipids: Monoacylglycerols (MAGs), diacylglycerols (DAGs), and triacylglycerols (TAGs) and free fatty acids (FFAs)[67]
FA: Palmitic acid, linolenic acid
Brachypodium distachyonGC/MSLeavesCH: Glucose, glycerol, mannobiose, maltose, sucrose, galactose[118]
AA: Norvaline
Hordeum vulgareHPLC-DAD-MSnLeavesSM: Flavone glycosides, chlorogenic acids, caffeoyl-hexose, sinapoyl-hexoses, feruloyl-hexose, hydroxycinnamic acids[93]
H. vulgareGC-MSAwns, kernelsCH: Galactinol, mannitol[119]
OM: Isocitric acid, α-ketoglutaric acid
H. vulgareGC-MSGrainCH: Raffinose, mannitol, myoinositol, putrescine, [120]
AA: Pyroglutamic acid
H. vulgareGC-MS-EIFifth leaf, paleaAA: Proline, glutamine, threonine, glycine, aspartate, serine, aromatic amino acids[58]
Oryza sativaGC/EI-TOF-MSLeavesAA: Glutamate, arginine, proline[117]
PA: Spermidine, putrescine, spermine
OM: GABA
O. sativaGC/MSLeaf bladesAA: Serine, asparagine, threonine[121]
Triticum aestivumGC-TOF-MSShootsCH: Sucrose, mannose, fructose[13]
AA: Proline
OM: Malic acid
T. aestivumGC/MSFlag leavesAA: Glutamine, methionine, lysine, asparagines, serine[122]
T. aestivumGC-MSRoots, leavesAA: Valine, tryptophan [123]
OM: Malic acid, fumaric acid, citric acid,
Seven Triticeae speciesGC-MSRoots, leavesCH: Sucrose, trehalose, mannitol, maltose [124]
AA: Proline, glutamate, alanine, glycine, asparagines, methionine, threonine, phenylalanine, homocysteine, serine, valine, tyrosine
OM: Succinate, citrate, aspartate, gluconate, glutathione
Zea maysGC/MSLeaf bladesAA: Glycine, myoinositol[44]
Z. mays1H-NMRLeavesAA: Alanine [125]
Lipids: Triacylglyceride
OM: Malate, glutamate, formate
Dicots
African eggplantGC-MSLeavesCH: Fructose, sucrose[126]
AA: Proline, glutamate
OM: Tricarboxylic cycle metabolite
Arachis hypogaeaGC-MSNodulesCH: Trehalose[127]
AA: Proline
OM: GABA
A. hypogaeaGC-MSLeaves, rootsCH: Glucose D-ribose, D-mannitol, D-xylopyranose, xylonic acid, α-D-glucopyranose, 2-deoxyribose, L-manopyranose, myo-inositol, galactosoxime, D-fructose, D-turanose, malic acid, succinic acid, 2 butenedoic acids, 2-deoxyribose, myo-inositol [73]
FA: Stearic acid, pentadecanoic acid, 8,11-octadecadienoic acid, palmitic acid, pentadecanoic acid
Craterostigma
plantagineum
HPLCLeavesPAs: Putrescine, spermine, spermidine[116]
Cicer arietinumUPLC-HRMSLeavesAA: l-proline, l-arginine, l-histidine, l-isoleucine, tryptophan[52]
OM: Allantoin
Glycine max1H-NMR, 1H-1H TOCSYLeaves, nodulesCH: Myoinositol, pinitol[57]
AA: Glutamine
OM: GABA, allantoin
G. maxNMRLeaves, rootsCH: Sucrose[128]
AA: Alanine
OM: Succinate, citrate, acetate
G. maxGC-MSLeavesSM: 5-methoxytryptamine, 4-hydroxycinnamic acid, ferulic acid, salicylic acid[91]
OM: Fluorine
LentilsGC/EI-TOF-MSCotyledons, radicles, shootsPAs: Putrescine, cadaverine [129]
CH: Erythronic acid
OM: Isocitric acid, nicotinic acid
Nicotiana tabacumGC/MS, LC/MSLeaves, rootsCH: Mannitol, trehalose, myoinositol, galactinol[129]
OM: GABA
Nigella sativaGCSeeds(10 black cumin genotypes)FA: Stearic acid, palmitic acid, oleic acid, linoleic acid, linolenic acid, myristic acid, arachidic acid[130]
Portulaca oleraceaGCLeavesFA: Palmitic acid, linolenic acid, linoleic acid, oleic acid, stearic acid, arachidic acid, behenic acid[74]
Vigna unguiculataGC-TOFSeedsCH: Galactinol[131]
AA: Proline
SM: Quercetin
V. unguiculataGC-TOFLeavesCH: Rhamnose, raffinose[132]
Vitis viniferaSPME-GC-MSLeavesSM: Quercetin-3-O-glucoside, kaempferol-3-O-glucoside [133]
OM: Citric acid, 2-methyl-butanal phenylacetaldehyde
AA, amino acid; CH: carbohydrate; EI, electrospray ionization; FA, fatty acid; GABA, γ-aminobutyric acid; GC-MS, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry; HPLC-DAD-MS, high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with diode-array detection and multiple-stage mass spectrometry; LC-MS, liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry; 1H-NMR, nuclear magnetic resonance; OM, other metabolites; PAs, Polyamines; SM, secondary metabolites; SPME-GC-MS, solid phase micro extraction-gas chromatography mass spectrometry; TOCSY, total correlation spectroscopy; TOF, time-of-flight; UPLC-HRMS, ultra-performance liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry.

3. Metabolomic and Molecular Responses to Drought

Metabolic regulation is the key mechanism implicated in the safeguarding of cell osmotic potential during abiotic stress. The metabolite profiling approach has been widely used to characterize molecular responses of plants under abiotic stress [134]. Apart from its importance for cell function, water is an important component of plants due to its undeviating involvement in metabolite transportation and essential nutrients to various plant parts. Inaccessibility of sufficient water or higher transpiration rates enhances DS and changes metabolite production [83]. Drought tolerance strategies of plants comprise numerous biological mechanisms at the cell, organ, and whole-plant levels when stimulated at different phases of plant growth. Drought stress affects plants at several levels, including the molecular level [135], increasing the accumulation of drought-related proteins and metabolites [136]. Several molecular pathway cascades, including perception of water deficiency, activation of signaling network, and transcriptional, metabolic, and regulatory element responses improve plant resistance to DS [137]. Molecular mechanisms of the drought response are strongly governed by regulatory elements, such as transcription factors (TFs) and protein kinases. Transcription factor families, such as MYB, NAC, bZIP, AP2/ERF, and AREB/ABF, regulate stomatal movement and the expression of drought-responsive genes upstream or downstream of a metabolic pathway [138,139].
The molecular response to drought stress is a multi-genic trait controlled by many genes. Several genes related to DS at the transcriptional level have been investigated in microarray and real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) studies [134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142]. Functional validation revealed that these genes protect against dehydration stress through stress perception, signal transduction, and transcriptional regulatory networks responses to drought tolerance [143,144]. Therefore, understanding molecular responses to drought tolerance can provide insights for enhancing drought tolerance in sensitive plant species. Significant efforts have been made to explore the molecular mechanisms used by plants to cope with DS. Plants respond to DS by reprogramming their transcriptional, proteomic, and metabolic pathways to protect cells from stress-mediated damage [144,145,146]. Primary metabolites, such as glucose, sucrose, and trehalose, function as signal molecules to regulate gene expression involved in plant growth and the stress response [147]. Drought stress elevates ROS production in diverse cellular compartments, particularly chloroplasts and mitochondria, which is controlled by an adaptable and cooperative antioxidant system that balances intracellular ROS levels and sets the redox status of plant cells [148].

4. Genetic Engineering of Metabolic Genes to Improve Drought Tolerance in Plants

The genetic engineering approach is widely used to enhance plant tolerance to various environmental stresses, including drought, by engineering candidate genes for crop improvement [39,149,150,151]. Drought stress can seriously impact plant growth, photosynthesis, water relations, yield, pigment content, and membrane integrity [152]. Plants have evolved various interconnected signaling networks to regulate drought-responsive genes to produce various classes of proteins, including transcription factors, enzymes, molecular chaperones, and other functional proteins, for drought tolerance [153]. Developing drought-tolerant plants using the genetic engineering approach requires identifying key genetic determinants underlying DS tolerance in plants and introducing metabolic genes into crops for expression. Drought-responsive genes are involved in signaling cascades, transcriptional regulation (e.g., transcription factors and protein kinase/phosphatase), and functional proteins that protect cell membranes [154]. Other proteins, such as antioxidants, osmotin, late embryogenesis abundant proteins, and proteins associated with the uptake and transport of water and ions, such as aquaporins and sugar transporters, also respond to DS. Drought tolerance is a complex trait involving the activation of signaling mechanisms and differentially expressed molecular responses [155].
Numerous drought-responsive genes have been isolated from various sources, including plants; their characterization for enhancing drought tolerance by developing transgenic plants with increased level of metabolites shown in Table 2. The schematic representation of the proposed model for the application of metabolic genes involved in drought tolerance in plants is shown in Figure 2. It shows the specific responses of metabolic genes under DS in transgenic plants. It also depicts the accumulation of various key metabolites such as glycine betaine, proline, polyamines, trehalose, mannitol, lipids, flavonoids, and other important metabolites in transgenic plants under DS. The accumulation of these metabolites leads to various cellular responses, such as ROS detoxification, modulation of antioxidant activities, increased relative water contents (RWC), decreased electrolytic leakage (EL) and malondialdehyde (MDA) contents, and structural adaptation of membranes, resulting in morphological changes that improve growth and drought tolerance in plants (Figure 2). Targeted metabolites can be enhanced by overexpression of single or multiple genes that produce either direct desired molecule/metabolites or enzymes implicated in the production of the targeted metabolites. The upregulation of these genes resulted in biosynthesis of the metabolite responsible for osmolyte synthesis [156]. The C1A cysteine protease (CysProt) family is one the most abundant proteins, also known as papain-like CysProt). The upregulation of C1A CysProt genes is important for protein breakdown during stress responses by reorganizing metabolism, remodeling cell protein compounds, degrading damaged or unnecessary proteins, and remobilizing nutrients [34,157,158]. Gomez-Sanchez et al. [159] reported that drought stimulated the entire C1A CysProt family and upregulates HvPap-1 and HvPap-19 genes in H. vulgare leaves. Transgenic Arabidopsis overexpressing the T. aestivum cysteine protease (TaCP) gene showed enhanced drought tolerance and cysteine protease (CP) activity under water-stressed conditions compared to wild-type (WT) plants [160].
Overexpression of the Wax synthase/acyl-CoA:diacylglycerol acyltransferase (WSD1) gene from Arabidopsis enhanced tolerance to ABA, mannitol, drought and salinity in transgenic A. thaliana and Camelina sativa plants through increased accumulation of epicuticular wax crystals and higher leaf and stem wax loading [161]. These transgenic plants also had an enhanced recovery rate from drought and salinity stress compared to WT plants. The main symptoms of DS during the vegetative phase include reduced plant height, leaf wilting, and decreased leaf number and area. Reduced plant height under DS is strongly associated with cell enlargement and leaf senescence [162]. Drought stress decreases turgor pressure and photosynthetic rate, decreasing leaf area [163]. Drought stress significantly reduced leaf width and length in Prunus sargentii and Larix kaempferi [164] and leaf area in Maclura pomifera [165], Triticum aestivum [166], Lens culinaris [167], and Dracocephalum moldavica [168]. Plant roots are directly associated with water absorption and play the most significant role in DS [169]. Root system architecture, including root density, root branching, and root hairs, can be affected by DS. For example, maize absorbs more water from dry soil by decreasing lateral root branch density and increasing axial root elongation and rooting depth [170].
Dehydrins belong to group II late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) proteins, which are considered stress-responsive proteins involved in forming protective reactions against dehydration in plants [171]. A dehydrin gene isolated from Olea europaea named OesDHN was overexpressed in Arabidopsis thaliana, induced by DS, and conferred osmotic stress tolerance [172]. Ectopic expression of TdDhn-5 gene isolated from T. durum showed drought, salt, and osmotic stress tolerance in transgenic A. thaliana [173]. Transgenic chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) overexpressing dehydration responsive element binding protein gene from A. thaliana (AtDREB1a) showed increased tolerance to DS [174]. The leaves of these transgenic lines maintained higher relative water content under soil water deficit which resulted in higher seed yield compared tonon transformed-control. Arginine decarboxylase (ADC) is an essential enzyme responsible for polyamine synthesis under stress conditions. Transgenic O. sativa expressing the ADC gene from Datura stramonium had enhanced drought tolerance, relative to WT plants [175]. The PtADC gene from Poncirus trifoliata conferred resistance to long-term drought, high osmoticum, dehydration, and cold stress in transgenic A. thaliana compared to WT and the mutant, and induced primary root growth [176]. Choline monooxygenase (CMO) catalyzed glycine betaine biosynthesis, a plant osmoprotectant accumulated in response to drought and salinity stress. A plastid-expressed CMO gene, namely BvCMO isolated from Beta vulgaris, showed improved salt and drought tolerance in transgenic N. tabacum by accumulating glycine betaine [176]. The betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase (BADH) gene confers tolerance to abiotic stresses including drought in plants [177]. The AnBADH gene from Ammopiptanthus nanus conferred drought and high salinity stress tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis [178]. The spermidine synthase (SPDH) enzyme catalyzed spermidine (Spd) synthesis, an important polyamine with low-molecular-weight aliphatic amines that occur ubiquitously in animals, plants, and microorganisms. Overexpression of Cucurbita ficifolia CfSPDH gene improved tolerance to drought, chilling, freezing, salinity, hyperosmosis, and paraquat toxicity and modulated expression of various stress-regulated genes in transgenic A. thaliana [179].
Proline is a compatible osmolyte commonly found in drought-stressed plants. Its accumulation is a typical physiological response to DS in several species [180]. Biosynthesis of proline generally occurs through the glutamate pathway with the help of Δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthase (P5CS) and Δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase (P5CR) in cytoplasm or chloroplasts [181]. Pyrroline-5-carboxylate (P5C) is an intermediate product of both proline biosynthetic and catabolic processes, synthesized from glutamate by the P5CS enzyme. It is converted to proline by the enzyme P5CR in cytosol and plastids [182]. The P5CS gene from various plant sources has been characterized for drought tolerance in different crops, including the Vigna aconitifolia VaP5CS gene in transgenic tobacco [183] and A. thaliana AtP5CS or O. sativa OsP5CS gene in Petunia hybrida [184]. Petunia plants transformed with P5CS genes, namely AtP5CS from A. thaliana or OsP5CS from O. sativa, accumulated proline and exhibited drought tolerance [184].
Trehalose is an osmolyte with a vital role in osmotic adjustment [185]. Various genes are involved in the metabolism of trehalose, including the yeast trehalose-phosphate synthase1 (TPS1) gene that has been used to enhance drought tolerance in numerous plant species [186]. The bacterial trehalose-6-phosphate synthase1 (ScTPS1) and trehalose-6-phosphate synthase2 (ScTPS2) genes in N. tabacum confer drought tolerance [187] and the EcTPS gene in rice enhanced tolerance to drought, salt, and cold stress in transgenic O. sativa [188]. Similarly, overexpression of the O. sativa OsTPS1 gene conferred drought, cold, and salt tolerance in transgenic O. sativa [189]. Glucosinolates (GLS) are SMs found in plants of the Brassicaceae family, protecting them from herbivory and pathogen attack. The Aux/IAA proteins belong to auxin co-receptors and transcriptional repressors family which have a key role in auxin signaling in plants. The levels of GLS were regulated by the auxin-sensitive Aux/IAA repressors IAA5, IAA6, and IAA19 proteins. These proteins function in a transcriptional cascade that maintains the expression of GLS levels in plants under DS [190]. These Aux/IAA proteins encoded by Aux/IAAgenes IAA5, IAA6, and IAA19 genes which are directly regulated by DREB2A and DREB2B, transcription factors that are well known for their DS response [191].
Table 2. Application of metabolic genes for generating transgenic crops with improved drought tolerance.
Table 2. Application of metabolic genes for generating transgenic crops with improved drought tolerance.
GeneLocus IDSourceTransgenic PlantsMetabolite Accumulation Stress ToleranceReferences
Arginine decarboxylase (AtADC)BT000682Arabidopsis thalianaA. thalianaIncreased putrescine Drought[192]
Arginine decarboxylase (DsADC)AJ251819Datura stramoniumOryza sativaIncreased putrescine and spermidine Drought[193]
Arginine decarboxylase (PtADC)HQ008237Poncirus trifoliataA. thalianaEnhanced putrescine High osmoticum, dehydration, long-term drought, cold[175]
Betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase (AnBADH)KJ841914Ammopiptanthus nanusA. thalianaIncreased glycine betaineDrought, salt[178]
Chalcone synthase (NtCHS)LOC107801774Nicotiana tabacumN. tabacumIncreased flavanoids (rutin, quercetin, naringenin)Drought[194]
Choline monooxygenase (BvCMO)AB221007Beta vulgarisN. tabacumIncreased glycine betaine Drought, salt[176]
Choline oxidase (AgcodA)AY589052Arthrobacter globiformisSolanum tuberosumIncreased glycine betaine Water stress[195]
Choline oxidase (codA)AY304485A. globiformisS. tuberosumIncreased glycine betaine Drought, salt, oxidative[196]
Cysteine protease (TaCP)AY841792Triticum aestivumA. thalianaIncreased Cysteine protease activityDrought[160]
Dehydrin (OesDHN)KR349290Olea europaeaA. thalianaIncreased proline Drought[172]
Dehydrin (TdDhn-5)AY619566T. durumA. thalianaIncreased proline Drought, salt[173]
Dehydrin (ShDHN)AK319970Solanum habrochaitesSolanum lycopersicumIncreased proline Drought, salt, osmotic stress[197]
Dehydrin (PmLEAs)XM_016796383Prunus mumeN. tabacumIncreased proline Drought, cold[198]
Flavanone 3-hydroxylase(RsF3H)JQ043380Reaumuria soongoricaR. soongoricaIncreased flavonoids and anthocyaninDrought, UV-B radiation[199]
Mannitol dehydrogenase (CaMTD)LOC101510334Cicer arietinumC. arietinumIncreased flavonoids Drought[200]
Mannitol-1-phosphate dehydrogenase (EcmtlD)EFF7369098Escherichia coliT. aestivumIncreased mannitolDrought[201]
Ornithine δ-aminotransferase (Atδ-OAT)NM_123987A. thalianaO. sativaIncreased proline Drought[202]
Ornithine δ-aminotransferase (OsOAT)LOC Os03g44150O. sativaO. sativaIncreased proline Drought[203]
Spermidine synthase (CfSPDS)BD142348Cucurbita ficifoliaA. thalianaIncreased spermidine synthase activity and spermidine contentDrought, chilling, freezing, salinity, hyperosmosis[179]
Trehalose-6-phosphate synthase (EcTPS; otsA) and Trehalose-6-phosphate
phosphatase (EcTPP; otsB)
NC_000913E. coliO. sativaIncreased trehalose Drought, salt, cold[188]
Trehalose-6-phosphate synthase1 (OsTPS1)HM050424O. sativaO. sativaIncreased trehalose and proline Drought, salt, and cold[189]
Trehalose-6-phosphatesynthase1 (ScTPS1) and trehalose-6-phosphate synthase2 (ScTPS2)NC_001134Saccharomyces cerevisiaeN. tabacumEnhanced trehalose Drought[187]
Wax synthase/acyl-CoA:diacylglycerol acyltransferase (AtWSD1)AT5G37300A. thalianaA. thaliana and Camelina sativaIncreased deposition of epicuticular wax crystals and leaf and stem wax loadingDrought[161]
WRI4-like gene (CeWRI4)MW039149Cyperus esculentusA. thalianaIncreased cuticular wax biosynthesis and depositionDrought[204]
Δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase (VaP5CS)VIRPYRRVigna aconitifoliaN. tabacumIncreased proline Drought[183]
Δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase genes (OsP5CS)D49714O. sativaP. hybridaIncreased proline Drought[184]
Flavonoids are important SMs that play significant roles in maintaining the cellular redox balance of plant cells. Chalcone synthase (CHS) is the key enzyme in the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway and is modulated under DS. Transgenic N. tabacum plants overexpressing the NtCHS gene showed enhanced drought tolerance and oxidative stress responses under DS, relative to control plants [194]. Transgenic Brassica napus overexpressing the BR biosynthesis gene AtDWARF4 from Arabidopsis had improved drought tolerance [205]. Overexpressing Gossypium hirsutum Gh4CL7 gene enhanced drought stress tolerance in Arabidopsis [206]. Drought tolerance is conferred in N. tabacum plants through the overexpression of sweet potato cinnamate 4-hydroxylase (IbC4H), promoting phenolic compound accumulation and increasing the expression of stress-responsive genes [106]. The role of metabolic gene expression for providing drought tolerance in plants is summarized in Table 2. Overall, we conclude that induction of metabolite biosynthesis provides a defensive level of drought protection and enhances growth tolerance in drought-stressed plants.

5. Conclusions and Future Research Perspectives

Plants have developed a multifaceted network of defense mechanisms to endure stress environments. Drought is a prevalent unfavorable limiting factor that alters plant growth, development, physiology, metabolism, yield, and production. Plant strategies for drought tolerance include morphological, physiological, and biochemical changes at different phases of plant growth. In the last decade, several metabolic genes have been used to improve drought tolerance in crops using genetic engineering approaches. Metabolic profiling could be useful for characterizing the molecular traits implicated in drought tolerance to provide valuable information for plant breeding programs. Several studies on PMs, SMs, and metabolic genes under DS (e.g., Table 1 and Table 2) revealed valuable information for regulating DS responses. Fulfilling the demand for staple food supply for the increasing human population in coming decades requires awareness of genetically engineered plants and appraisal of their agronomic needs. A possible strategy for enhancing DS tolerance in plants is maintaining the structure and function of cellular components by modulating the expression levels of metabolic genes using genetic engineering. Hence, engineering metabolic genes is one approach for enhancing drought tolerance in crop plants and increasing productivity under DS. Reprogramming PMs or SMs and genetic engineering of metabolic genes will play a key role in plant adaptation and response to DS. Such novel genetic engineering technologies and proposed potential targets of metabolic engineering for drought tolerance will have an enormous impact on sustainable crop yields and productivity to feed the world’s ever-growing population.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.K.; writing—original draft preparation, M.K. and M.K.P.; review and editing, M.K., M.K.P., N.K., A.B.B. and K.H.M.S.; supervision, K.H.M.S.; project administration, M.K.; funding acquisition, K.H.M.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The publication charges were provided by The UWA Institute of Agriculture.

Data Availability Statement

Data presented in this study are available in the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

AAsAmino acids
DAIDays after drought imposition
DSDrought stress
GABAγ-amino butyric acid
GC-MSGas chromatography-mass spectrometry
IAAIndole-3-acetic acid
NMRNuclear magnetic resonance
PMsPrimary metabolites
P5CSΔ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthase
ROSReactive oxygen species
SMsSecondary metabolites

References

  1. McKay, J.K.; Richards, J.H.; Mitchell-Olds, T. Genetics of drought adaptation in Arabidopsis thaliana: I. Pleiotropy contributes to genetic correlations among ecological traits. Mol. Ecol. 2003, 12, 1137–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Bal, W.; Kozlowski, H.; Robbins, R.; Pettit, L.D. Improving drought tolerance by exogenous application of glycine betaine and salicylic acid in sunflower. J. Agron. Crop. Sci. 2010, 194, 193–199. [Google Scholar]
  3. Taiz, L.; Zeiger, E. Plant Physiology, 4th ed.; Sinauer Associates Inc. Publishers: Sunderland, MA, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  4. Cattivelli, L.; Rizza, F.; Badeck, F.W.; Mazzucotelli, E.; Mastrangelo, A.M.; Francia, E.; Marè, C.; Tondelli, A.; Stanca, A.M. Drought tolerance improvement in crop plants: An integrated view from breeding to genomics. Field Crop. Res. 2008, 105, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Prasad, P.V.V.; Staggenborg, S.; Ristic, Z. Impacts of drought and/or heat stress on physiological, developmental, growth, and yield processes of crop plants. Adv. Agric. Syst. Model. Ser. 2008, 1, 301–355. [Google Scholar]
  6. Wen, W.; Li, K.; Alseekh, S.; Omranian, N.; Zhao, L.; Zhou, Y.; Xiao, Y.; Jin, M.; Yang, N.; Liu, H.; et al. Genetic determinants of the network of primary metabolism and their relationships to plant performance in a maize recombinant inbred line population. Plant Cell 2015, 27, 1839–1856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Obata, T.; Fernie, A.R. The use of metabolomics to dissect plant responses to abiotic stresses. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2012, 69, 3225–3243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Seki, M.; Umezawa, T.; Urano, K.; Shinozaki, K. Regulatory metabolic networks in drought stress responses. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2007, 10, 296–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rodziewicz, P.; Swarcewicz, B.; Chmielewska, K.; Wojakowska, A.; Stobiechi, M. Influence of abiotic stresses on plant hormone and metabolome changes. Acta Physiol. Plant 2014, 36, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Fiehn, O.; Kopka, J.; Dormann, P.; Altmann, T.; Trethewey, R.N.; Willmitzer, L. Metabolite profiling for plant functional genomics. Nat. Biotechnol. 2000, 18, 1157–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Suhre, K.; Gieger, C. Genetic variation in metabolic phenotypes: Study designs and applications. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2012, 13, 759–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wu, X.; Cai, K.; Zhang, G.; Zeng, F. Metabolite profiling of barley grains subjected to water stress: To explain the genotypic difference in drought induced impacts on malting quality. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Guo, R.; Shi, L.; Jiao, Y.; Li, M.; Zhong, X.; Gu, F.; Liu, Q.; Xia, X.; Li, H. Metabolic responses to drought stress in the tissues of drought-tolerant and drought-sensitive wheat genotype seedlings. AoB Plants 2018, 10, ply016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Weckwerth, W.; Loureiro, M.E.; Wenzel, K.; Fiehn, O. Differential metabolic networks unravel the effects of silent plant phenotypes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 7809–7814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Kusano, M.; Fukushima, A.; Arita, M.; Jonsson, P.; Moritz, T.; Kobayashi, M.; Hayashi, N.; Tohge, T.; Saito, K. Unbiased characterization of genotype-dependent metabolic regulations by metabolomic approach in Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Syst. Biol. 2007, 1, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Ruan, C.J.; Ja, T.D.S. Metabolomics: Creating new potentials for unraveling the mechanisms in response to salt and drought stress and for the biotechnological improvement of xero-halophytes. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2011, 31, 153–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Meng, J.; Zhang, X.; Wu, H.; Bu, J.; Shi, C.; Deng, C.; Mao, Y. Morphine-induced conditioned place preference in mice: Metabolomic profiling of brain tissue to find “molecular switch” of drug abuse by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Anal. Chim. Acta 2012, 710, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Barding, G.A.; Béni, S.; Fukao, T.; Bailey-Serres, J.; Larive, C.K. Comparison of GC-MS and NMR for metabolite profiling of Rice subjected to submergence stress. J. Proteome Res. 2013, 12, 898–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Bueno, P.; Lopes, N.P. Metabolomics to characterize adaptive and signaling responses in legume crops under abiotic stresses. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 1752–1763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Barros, E.; Lezar, S.; Anttoene, M.J.; van Dik, J.P.; Rölhing, R.M.; Kok, E.J.; Engel, K.H. Comparison of two GM maize varieties with near-isogenic non-GM variety using transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics. Plant Biotech. J. 2010, 8, 436–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Amiour, N.; Imbaud, S.; Clément, G.; Agier, N.; Zivy, M.; Valot, B.; Balliau, T.; Armengaud, P.; Quilleré, I.; Cañas, R.; et al. The use of metabolomics integrated with transcriptomic and proteomic studies for identifying key steps involved in the control of nitrogen metabolism in crops such as maize. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 5017–5033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Carrera, F.P.; Noceda, C.; Maridueña-Zavala, M.G.; Cevallos-Cevallos, J.M. Metabolomics, a powerful tool for understanding plant abiotic stress. Agronomy 2021, 11, 824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Isah, T. Stress and defense responses in plant secondary metabolites production. Biol. Res. 2019, 52, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Krasensky, J.; Jonak, C. Drought, salt, and temperature stress-induced metabolic rearrangements and regulatory networks. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 1593–1608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Patel, M.K.; Kumar, M.; Li, W.; Luo, Y.; Burritt, D.J.; Alkan, N.; Tran, L.-S.P. Enhancing salt tolerance of plants: From metabolic reprogramming to exogenous chemical treatments and molecular approaches. Cells 2020, 9, 2492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kinghorn, A.D. The discovery of drugs from higher plants. Biotechnic 1994, 26, 81–108. [Google Scholar]
  27. Ramakrishna, A.; Ravishankar, G.A. Influences of abiotic stress signals on secondary metabolites in plants. Plant Signal. Behav. 2011, 6, 1720–1731. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  28. Kumar, M.; Yusuf, M.A.; Nigam, M.; Kumar, M. An update on genetic modification of chickpea for increased yield and stress tolerance. Mol. Biotechnol. 2018, 60, 651–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Urano, K.; Maruyama, K.; Ogata, Y.; Morishita, Y.; Takeda, M.; Sakurai, N.; Suzuki, H.; Saito, K.; Shibata, D.; Kobayashi, M.; et al. Characterization of the ABA-regulated global responses to dehydration in Arabidopsis by metabolomics. Plant J. 2009, 57, 1065–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Llanes, A.; Andrade, A.; Alemano, S.; Luna, V. Metabolomic approach to understand plant adaptations to water and salt stress. In Plant Metabolites and Regulation under Environmental Stress; Ahmad, P., Ahanger, M.A., Singh, V.P., Tripathi, D.K., Alam, P., Alyemeni, M.N., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2018; pp. 133–144. [Google Scholar]
  31. Mishra, A.; Patel, M.K.; Jha, B. Non-targeted metabolomics and scavenging activity of reactive oxygen species reveal the potential of Salicornia brachiata as a functional food. J. Funct. Foods 2015, 13, 21–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Patel, M.K.; Mishra, A.; Jha, B. Untargeted metabolomics of halophytes. In Marine Omics: Principles and Applications; Kim, S., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2016; pp. 309–325. [Google Scholar]
  33. Pandey, S.; Patel, M.K.; Mishra, A.; Jha, B. Physio-biochemical composition and untargeted metabolomics of cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.) make it promising functional food and help in mitigating salinity stress. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0144469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Roberts, L.D.; Souza, A.L.; Gerszten, R.E.; Clish, C.B. Targeted metabolomics. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. 2012, 98, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Van Meulebroek, L.; Hanssens, J.; Steppe, K.; Vanhaecke, L. Metabolic fingerprinting to assess the impact of salinity on carotenoid content in developing tomato fruits. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Zagorchev, L.; Seal, C.E.; Kranner, I.; Odjakova, M. A central role for thiols in plant tolerance to abiotic stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 7405–7432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Cusido, R.M.; Onrubia, M.; Sabater-Jara, A.B.; Moyano, E.; Bonfill, M.; Goossens, A.; Palazon, J. A rational approach to improving the biotechnological production of taxanes in plant cell cultures of Taxus spp. Biotechnol. Adv. 2014, 32, 1157–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Di Ferdinando, M.; Brunetti, C.; Agati, G.; Tattini, M. Multiple functions of polyphenols in plants inhabiting unfavourable Mediterranean areas. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2014, 103, 107–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ma, X.J.; Yu, T.F.; Li, X.H.; Cao, X.Y.; Ma, J.; Chen, J.; Zhou, Y.B.; Chen, M.; Ma, Y.Z.; Zhang, J.H.; et al. Overexpression of GmNFYA5 confers drought tolerance to transgenic Arabidopsis and soybean plants. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Kumar, R.; Bohra, A.; Pandey, A.K.; Pandey, M.K.; Kumar, A. Metabolomics for plant improvement: Status and prospects. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Fraire-Velázquez, S.L.; Balderas-Hernández, V.E. Abiotic stress in plants and metabolic responses. In Abiotic Stress—Plant Responses and Applications in Agriculture; Vahdati, K., Leslie, C., Eds.; Intech: Rijeka, Croatia, 2013; pp. 25–46. [Google Scholar]
  42. Koch, K. Sucrose metabolism: Regulatory mechanisms and pivotal roles in sugar sensing and plant development. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2004, 7, 235–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. De Miguel, M.; Guevara, M.Á.; Sánchez-Gómez, D.; de María, N.; Díaz, L.M.; Mancha, J.A.; de Simón, B.F.; Cadahía, E.; Desai, N.; Aranda, I.; et al. Organ-specific metabolic responses to drought in Pinus pinaster Ait. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2016, 102, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Obata, T.; Witt, S.; Lisec, J.; Palacios-Rojas, N.; Florez-Sarasa, I.; Yousfi, S.; Araus, J.L.; Cairns, J.E.; Fernie, A.R. Metabolite profiles of maize leaves in drought, heat, and combined stress field trials reveal the relationship between metabolism and grain yield. Plant Physiol. 2015, 169, 2665–2683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Todaka, D.; Zhao, Y.; Yoshida, T.; Kudo, M.; Kidokoro, S.; Mizoi, J.; Kodaira, K.S.; Takebayashi, Y.; Kojima, M.; Sakakibara, H.; et al. Temporal and spatial changes in gene expression, metabolite accumulation and phytohormone content in rice seedlings grown under drought stress conditions. Plant J. 2017, 90, 61–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Sanchez, D.H.; Schwabe, F.; Erban, A.; Udvardi, M.K.; Kopka, J. Comparative metabolomics of drought acclimation in model and forage legumes. Plant Cell Environ. 2012, 35, 136–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ogbaga, C.C.; Stepien, P.; Dyson, B.C.; Rattray, N.J.; Ellis, D.I.; Goodacre, R.; Johnson, G.N. Biochemical analyses of sorghum varieties reveal differential responses to drought. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0154423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Rabara, R.C.; Tripathi, P.; Reese, R.N.; Rushton, D.L.; Alexander, D.; Timko, M.P.; Shen, Q.J.; Rushton, P.J. Tobacco drought stress responses reveal new targets for Solanaceae crop improvement. BMC Genom. 2015, 16, 484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Yang, L.; Fountain, J.C.; Ji, P.; Ni, X.; Chen, S.; Lee, R.D.; Kemerait, R.C.; Guo, B. Deciphering drought-inducedmetabolic responses and regulation in developing maize kernels. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2018, 16, 1616–1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Ahanger, M.A.; Gul, F.; Ahmad, P.; Akram, N.A. Environmental stresses and metabolomics-deciphering the role of stress responsive metabolites. In Plant Metabolites and Regulation under Environmental Stress; Ahmad, P., Ahanger, M.A., Singh, V.P., Tripathi, D.K., Alam, P., Alyemeni, M.N., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2018; pp. 53–67. [Google Scholar]
  51. Tzin, V.; Galili, G. The biosynthetic pathways for shikimate and aromatic amino acids in Arabidopsis thaliana. Arab. Book/Am. Soc. Plant Biol. 2010, 8, e0132. [Google Scholar]
  52. Khan, N.; Bano, A.; Rahman, M.A.; Rathinasabapathi, B. UPLC-HRMS-based untargeted metabolic profiling reveals changes in chickpea (Cicer arietinum) metabolome following long-term drought stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2019, 42, 115–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Maeda, H.; Dudareva, N. The shikimate pathway and aromatic amino acid biosynthesis in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2012, 63, 73–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Suguiyama, V.F.; Silva, E.A.; Meirelles, S.T.; Centeno, D.C.; Braga, M.R. Leaf metabolite profile of the Brazilian resurrection plant Barbacenia purpurea Hook. (Velloziaceae) shows two time-dependent responses during desiccation and recovering. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Marcek, T.; Hamow, K.Á.; Végh, B.; Janda, T.; Darko, E. Metabolic response to drought in six winter wheat genotypes. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0212411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Michaletti, A.; Naghavi, M.R.; Toorchi, M.; Zolla, L.; Rinalducci, S. Metabolomics and proteomics reveal drought-stress responses of leaf tissues from spring-wheat. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 5710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Silvente, S.; Sobolev, A.P.; Lara, M. Metabolite adjustments in drought tolerant and sensitive soybean genotypes in response to water stress. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e38554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Hein, J.A.; Sherrard, M.E.; Manfredi, K.P.; Abebe, T. The fifth leaf and spike organs of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) display different physiological and metabolic responses to drought stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2016, 16, 248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Araujo, W.L.; Tohge, T.; Ishizaki, K.; Leaver, C.J.; Fernie, A.R. Protein degradation: An alternative respiratory substrate for stressed plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2011, 16, 489–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Slama, I.; Abdelly, C.; Bouchereau, A.; Flower, T.; Savouré, A. Diversity, distribution and roles of osmoprotective compounds accumulated in halophytes under abiotic stress. Ann. Bot. 2015, 115, 433–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Sharma, A.; Shahzad, B.; Rehman, A.; Bhardwaj, R.; Landi, M.; Zheng, B. Response of phenylpropanoid pathway and the role of polyphenols in plants under abiotic stress. Molecules 2019, 24, 2452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Svenningsson, H.; Liljenberg, C. Membrane lipid changes in root cells of rape (brassica napus) as a function of water-deficit stress. Physiol. Plant 1986, 68, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Quartacci, M.F.; Pinzino, C.; Sgherri, C.L.; Navari-Izzo, F. Lipid composition and protein dynamics in thylakoids of two wheat cultivars differently sensitive to drought. Plant Physiol. 1995, 108, 191–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Hubac, C.; Guerrier, D.; Ferran, J.; Tremolieres, A. Change of leaf lipid composition during water stress in two genotypes of Lupines albus resistant or susceptible to drought. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 1989, 27, 737–744. [Google Scholar]
  65. Bahl, J.; Francke, B.; Monéger, R. Lipid composition of envelopes, prolamellar bodies and other plastid membranes in etiolated, green and greening wheat leaves. Planta 1976, 129, 193–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Eastman, P.; Rashid, A.; Camm, E. Changes of the photosystem 2 activity and thylakoid proteins in spruce seedlings during water stress. Photosynthetica 1998, 34, 201–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Sanchez-Martin, J.; Canales, F.J.; Tweed, J.K.S.; Lee, M.R.F.; Rubiales, D.; Gómez-Cadenas, A.; Arbona, V.; Mur, L.A.J.; Prats, E. Fatty acid profile changes during gradual soil water depletion in oats suggests a role for jasmonates in coping with drought. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Moradi, P.; Mahdavi, A.; Khoshkam, M.; Iriti, M. Lipidomics unravels the role of leaf lipids in thyme plant response to drought stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Gigon, A.; Matos, A.; Laffray, D.; Zully-Fodil, Y.; Phan-Thi, A.T. Effect of drought stress on lipid metabolism in the leaves of Arabidopsis thaliana (Ecotype Columbia). Ann. Bot. 2004, 94, 345–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Okazaki, Y.; Saito, K. Roles of lipids as signaling molecules and mitigators during stress response in plants. Plant J. 2014, 79, 584–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Moellering, E.R.; Muthan, B.; Benning, C. Freezing tolerance in plants requires lipid remodeling at the outer chloroplast membrane. Science 2010, 330, 226–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Zhang, X.; Ni, Y.; Xu, D.; Busta, L.; Xiao, Y.; Jetter, R.; Guo, Y. Integrative analysis of the cuticular lipidome and transcriptome of Sorghum bicolor reveals cultivar differences in drought tolerance. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 163, 285–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Gundaraniya, S.A.; Ambalam, P.S.; Tomar, R.S. Metabolomic profiling of drought-tolerant and susceptible peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) genotypes in response to drought Stress. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 31209–31219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Saheri, F.; Barzin, G.; Pishkar, L.; Boojar, M.M.A.; Babaeekhou, L. Foliar spray of salicylic acid induces physiological and biochemical changes in purslane (Portulaca oleracea L.) under drought stress. Biologia 2020, 75, 2189–2200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Hartmann, T. From waste products to ecochemicals: Fifty years research of plant secondary metabolism. Phytochemistry 2007, 68, 2831–2846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Kleinwächter, M.; Selmar, D. New insights explain that drought stress enhances the quality of spice and medicinal plants: Potential applications. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2015, 35, 121–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Ballhorn, D.J.; Kautz, S.; Jensen, M.; Schmitt, I.; Heil, M.; Hegeman, A.D. Genetic and environmental interactions determine plant defences against herbivores. J. Ecol. 2011, 99, 313–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Wink, M. Modes of action of herbal medicines and plant secondary metabolites. Medicines 2015, 2, 251–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Banerjee, A.; Sharkey, T.D. Methylerythritol 4-phosphate (MEP) pathway metabolic regulation. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2014, 31, 1043–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  80. Akhi, M.Z.; Haque, M.M.; Biswas, M.S. Role of secondary metabolites to attenuate stress damages in plants. In Antioxidants; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  81. Treml, J.; Smejkal, K. Flavonoids as potent scavengers of hydroxyl radicals. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2016, 15, 720–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Bartwal, A.; Mall, R.; Lohani, P.; Guru, S.K.; Arora, S. Role of secondary metabolites and brassinosteroids in plant defense against environmental stresses. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2013, 32, 216–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Jogawat, A.; Yadav, B.; Lakra, N.; Singh, A.K.; Narayan, O.P. Crosstalk between phytohormones and secondary metabolites in the drought stress tolerance of crop plants: A review. Physiol. Plant 2021, 172, 1106–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Kabera, J.N.; Semana, E.; Mussa, A.R.; He, X. Plant secondary metabolites: Biosynthesis, classification, function and pharmacological properties. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2014, 2, 377–392. [Google Scholar]
  85. Cheynier, V.; Comte, G.; Davies, K.M.; Lattanzio, V.; Martens, S. Plant phenolics: Recent advances on their biosynthesis, genetics, and ecophysiology. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2013, 72, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Mierziak, J.; Kostyn, K.; Kulma, A. Flavonoids as important molecules of plant interactions with the environment. Molecules 2014, 19, 16240–16265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. de Abreu, I.N.; Mazzafera, P. Effect of water and temperature stress on the content of active constituents of Hypericum brasiliense Choisy. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2005, 43, 241–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Havaux, M.; Kloppstech, K. The protective functions of carotenoid and flavonoid pigments against excess visible radiation at chilling temperature investigated in Arabidopsis npq and tt mutants. Planta 2001, 213, 953–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Gharibi, S.; Tabatabaei, B.E.S.; Saeidi, G.; Goli, S.A.H. Effect of drought stress on total phenolic, lipid peroxidation, and antioxidant activity of Achillea species. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2016, 178, 796–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Gharibi, S.; Sayed Tabatabaei, B.E.; Saeidi, G.; Talebi, M.; Matkowski, A. The efect of drought stress on polyphenolic compounds and expression of flavonoid biosynthesis related genes in Achillea pachycephala Rech.f. Phytochemistry 2019, 162, 90–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Wang, X.; Guo, R.; Li, M.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, M.; Fu, H.; Liu, X.; Wang, S.; Shi, L. Metabolomics reveals the drought-tolerance mechanism in wild soybean (Glycine soja). Acta Physiol. Plant 2019, 41, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Hura, T.; Hura, K.; Dziurka, K.; Ostrowska, A.; Baczek-Kwinta, R.; Grzesiak, M. An increase in the content of cell wall-bound phenolics correlates with the productivity of triticale under soil drought. J. Plant Physiol. 2012, 169, 1728–1736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Piasecka, A.; Sawikowska, A.; Kuczyńska, A.; Ogrodowicz, P.; Mikołajczak, K.; Krystkowiak, K.; Gudys, K.; Guzy-Wróbelska, J.; Krajewski, P.; Kachlicki, P. Drought-related secondary metabolites of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) leaves and their metabolomic quantitative trait loci. Plant J. 2017, 89, 898–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Hodaei, A.; Talebi, M. The effect of water stress on phytochemical accumulation, bioactive compounds and expression of key genes involved in flavonoid biosynthesis in Chrysanthemum morifolium L. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2018, 120, 295–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Yeloojeh, K.A.; Saeidi, G.; Sabzalian, M.R. Drought stress improves the composition of secondary metabolites in safflower flower at the expense of reduction in seed yield and oil content. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2020, 154, 112496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Gutierrez-Gonzalez, J.J.; Guttikonda, S.K.; Tran, L.-S.P.; Aldrich, D.L.; Zhong, R.; Yu, O.; Nguyen, H.T.; Sleper, D.A. Differential expression of isoflavone biosynthetic genes in soybean during water deficits. Plant Cell Physiol. 2010, 51, 936–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Verma, N.; Shukla, S. Impact of various factors responsible for fluctuation in plant secondary metabolites. J. Appl. Res. Med. Aroma 2015, 2, 105–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Azhar, N.; Hussain, B.; Ashraf, M.Y.; Abbasi, K.Y. Water stress mediated changes in growth, physiology and secondary metabolites of desi ajwain (Trachyspermum ammi L.). Pak. J. Bot. 2011, 43, 15–19. [Google Scholar]
  99. Zhang, L.; Wang, Q.; Guo, Q.; Chang, Q.; Zhu, Z.; Liu, L.; Xu, H. Growth, physiological characteristics and total flavonoid content of Glechoma longituba in response to water stress. J. Med. Plant Res. 2012, 6, 1015–1024. [Google Scholar]
  100. Kermani, S.G.; Saeidi, G.; Sabzalian, M.R.; Gianinetti, A. Drought stress influenced sesamin and sesamolin content and polyphenolic components in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) populations with contrasting seed coat colors. Food Chem. 2019, 289, 360–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Ayaz, F.; Kadioglu, A.; Turgut, R. Water stress effects on the content of low molecular weight carbohydrates and phenolic acids in Ctenanthe setosa (Rosc.) Eichler. Can. J. Plant Sci. 2000, 80, 373–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Ithal, N.; Reddy, A.R. Rice flavonoid pathway genes, OsDfr and OsAns, are induced by dehydration, high salt and ABA, and contain stress responsive promoter elements that interact with the transcription activator, OsC1-MYB. Plant Sci. 2004, 166, 1505–1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Ma, D.; Sun, D.; Wang, C.; Li, Y.; Guo, T. Expression of flavonoid biosynthesis genes and accumulation of flavonoid in wheat leaves in response to drought stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2014, 80, 60–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Liu, Q.; Luo, L.; Zheng, L. Lignins: Biosynthesis and biological functions in plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Li, W.; Wang, K.; Chern, M.; Liu, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Liu, J.; Zhu, X.; Yin, J.; Ran, L.; Xiong, J.; et al. Sclerenchyma cell thickening through enhanced lignification induced by OsMYB30 prevents fungal penetration of rice leaves. New Phytol. 2020, 226, 1850–1863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Wang, A.; Zhu, M.; Luo, Y.; Liu, Y.; Li, R.; Kou, M.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Meng, X.; Zheng, Y. A sweet potato cinnamate 4-hydroxylase gene, IbC4H, increases phenolics content and enhances drought tolerance in tobacco. Acta Physiol. Plant 2017, 39, 276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Srivastava, S.; Vishwakarma, R.K.; Arafat, Y.A.; Gupta, S.K.; Khan, B.M. Abiotic stress induces change in Cinnamoyl CoA Reductase (CCR) protein abundance and lignin deposition in developing seedlings of Leucaena leucocephala. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2015, 21, 197–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Xu, W.; Tang, W.; Wang, C.; Ge, L.; Sun, J.; Qi, X.; He, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, J.; Xu, Z.; et al. SiMYB56 confers drought stress tolerance in transgenic rice by regulating lignin biosynthesis and ABA signaling pathway. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Tu, M.; Wang, X.; Yin, W.; Wang, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhang, G.; Li, Z.; Song, J.; Wang, X. Grapevine VlbZIP30 improves drought resistance by directly activating VvNAC17 and promoting lignin biosynthesis through the regulation of three peroxidase genes. Horti. Res. 2020, 7, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Turtola, S.; Manninen, A.M.; Rikala, R.; Kainulainen, P. Drought stress alters the concentration of wood terpenoids in scots pine and Norway spruce seedlings. J. Chem. Ecol. 2003, 29, 1981–1995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Ormeno, E.; Mevy, J.; Vila, B.; Bousquet-Mélou, A.; Greff, S.; Bonin, G.; Fernandez, C. Water deficit stress induces different monoterpene and sesquiterpene emission changes in Mediterranean species. Relationship between terpene emissions and plant water potential. Chemosphere 2007, 67, 276–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Munne-Bosch, S.; Mueller, M.; Schwarz, K.; Alegre, L. Diterpenes and antioxidative protection in drought-stressed Salvia officinalis plants. J. Plant Physiol. 2001, 158, 1431–1437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Vallat, A.; Gu, H.; Dorn, S. How rainfall, relative humidity and temperature influence volatile emissions from apple trees in situ. Phytochemistry 2005, 66, 1540–1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Idrees, M.; Khan, M.M.A.; Aftab, T.; Naeem, M.; Hashmi, N. Salicylic acid-induced physiological and biochemical changes in lemongrass varieties under water stress. J. Plant Interact. 2010, 5, 293–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Yin, J.; Liang, T.; Wang, S.; Zhang, M.; Xiao, J.; Zhan, Y.; Li, C. Effect of drought and nitrogen on betulin and oleanolic acid accumulation and osc gene expression in white birch saplings. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 2015, 33, 705–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Alcazar, R.; Bitrián, M.; Bartels, D.; Koncz, C.; Altabella, T.; Tiburcio, A.F. Polyamine metabolic canalization in response to drought stress in Arabidopsis and the resurrection plant Craterostigma plantagineum. Plant Signal. Behav. 2011, 6, 243–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  117. Do, P.T.; Degenkolbe, T.; Erban, A.; Heyer, A.G.; Kopka, J.; Köhl, K.I.; Hincha, D.K.; Zuther, E. Dissecting rice polyamine metabolism under controlled long-term drought stress. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e60325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  118. Shi, H.; Ye, T.; Song, B.; Qi, X.; Chan, Z. Comparative physiological and metabolomic responses of four Brachypodium distachyon varieties contrasting in drought stress resistance. Acta Physiol. Plant 2015, 37, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Wenzel, A.; Frank, T.; Reichenberger, G.; Herz, M.; Engel, K.H. Impact of induced drought stress on the metabolite profiles of barely grain. Metabolomics 2015, 11, 454–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Lanzinger, A.; Frank, T.; Reichenberger, G.; Herz, M.; Engel, K.H. Metabolite profiling of barley grain subjected to induced drought stress: Responses of free amino acids in differently adapted cultivars. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 4252–4261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Degenkolbe, T.; Do, P.T.; Kopka, J.; Zuther, E.; Hincha, D.K.; Kohl, K.I. Identification of drought tolerance markers in a diverse population of rice cultivars by expression and metabolite profiling. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e63637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Yadav, A.K.; Carroll, A.J.; Estavillo, G.M.; Rebetzke, G.J.; Pogson, B.J. Wheat drought tolerance in the field is predicted by amino acid responses to glasshouse-imposed drought. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 70, 4931–4948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Kang, Z.; Babar, M.A.; Khan, N.; Guo, J.; Khan, J.; Islam, S.; Shrestha, S.; Shahi, D. Comparative metabolomic profiling in the roots and leaves in contrasting genotypes reveals complex mechanisms involved in post-anthesis drought tolerance in wheat. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0213502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Ullah, N.; Yüce, M.; NeslihanÖztürkGökçe, Z.; Budak, H. Comparative metabolite profiling of drought stress in roots and leaves of seven Triticeae species. BMC Genom. 2017, 18, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Sun, C.; Gao, X.; Fu, J.; Zhou, J.; Wu, X. Metabolic response of maize (Zea mays L.) plants to combined drought and salt stress. Plant Soil. 2015, 388, 99–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Mibei, E.; Owino, W.; Ambuko, J.; Giovannoni, J.; Onyango, A. Metabolomic analyses to evaluate the effect of drought stress on selected African eggplant accessions. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2018, 98, 205–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Furlan, A.L.; Bianucci, E.; Castro, S.; Dietz, K.J. Metabolic features involved in drought stress tolerance mechanisms in peanut nodules and their contribution to biological nitrogen fixation. Plant Sci. 2017, 263, 12–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Coutinho, I.; Henning, L.; Döpp, S.; Nepomuceno, A.; Moraes, L.; Marcolino-Gomes, J.; Richter, C.; Schwalbe, H.; Colnago, L. Flooded soybean metabolomic analysis reveals important primary and secondary metabolites involved in the hypoxia stress response and tolerance. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2018, 153, 176–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Muscolo, A.; Junker, A.; Klukas, C.; Weigelt-Fischer, K.; Riewe, D.; Altmann, T. Phenotypic and metabolic responses to drought and salinity of four contrasting lentil accessions. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 5467–5480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  130. Bayati, P.; Karimmojeni, H.; Razmjoo, J. Changes in essential oil yield and fatty acid contents in black cumin (Nigella sativa L.) genotypes in response to drought stress. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 155, 112764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Goufo, P.; Moutinho-Pereira, J.M.; Jorge, T.F.; Correia, C.M.; Oliveira, M.R.; Rosa, E.A.S.; António, C.; Trindade, H. Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) Metabolomics: Osmoprotection as a physiological strategy for drought stress resistance and improved yield. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Gomes, A.M.; Rodrigues, A.P.; António, C.; Rodrigues, A.M.; Leitão, A.E.; Batista-Santos, P.; Nhantumbo, N.; Massinga, R.; Ribeiro-Barros, A.I.; Ramalho, J.C. Drought response of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) landraces at leaf physiological and metabolite profile levels. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2020, 175, 104060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Griesser, M.; Weingart, G.; Schoedl-Hummel, K.; Neumann, N.; Becker, M.; Varmuza, K.; Liebner, F.; Schuhmacher, R.; Forneck, A. Severe drought stress is affecting selected primary metabolites, polyphenols, and volatile metabolites in grapevine leaves (Vitis vinifera cv. Pinot noir). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2015, 88, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Fabregas, N.; Fernie, A.R. The metabolic response to drought. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 70, 1077–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  135. Anjum, S.A.; Xie, X.; Wang, L. Morphological, physiological and biochemical responses of plants to drought stress. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2011, 6, 2026–2032. [Google Scholar]
  136. Ramachandra-Reddy, A.; Chaitanya, K.V.; Vivekanandan, M. Drought-induced responses of photosynthesis and antioxidant metabolism in higher plants. J. Plant Physiol. 2004, 161, 1189–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Liu, J.; Chen, N.; Chen, F.; Cai, B.; Dal Santo, S.; Tornielli, G.B.; Pezzotti, M.; Cheng, Z.M. Genome-wide analysis and expression profile of the bZIP transcription factor gene family in grapevine (Vitis vinifera). BMC Genom. 2014, 15, 281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  138. Kim, T.H.; Bohmer, M.; Hu, H.; Nishimura, N.; Schroeder, J.I. Guard cell signal transduction network: Advances in understanding abscisic acid, CO2, and Ca2+ signaling. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2010, 61, 561–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  139. Joshi, R.; Wani, S.H.; Singh, B.; Bohra, A.; Dar, Z.A.; Lone, A.A.; Pareek, A.; Singla-Pareek, S.L. Transcription factors and plants response to drought stress: Current understanding and future directions. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  140. Shinozaki, K.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. Gene networks involved in drought stress response and tolerance. J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 58, 221–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  141. Talame, V.; Ozturk, N.Z.; Bohnert, H.J.; Tuberosa, R. Barley transcript profiles under dehydration shock and drought stress treatments: A comparative analysis. J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 58, 229–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  142. Guo, P.; Baum, M.; Grando, S.; Ceccarelli, S.; Bai, G.; Li, R.; Korff, M.V.; Varshney, R.K.; Graner, A.; Valkoun, J. Differentially expressed genes between drought-tolerant and drought-sensitive barley genotypes in response to drought stress during the reproductive stage. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60, 3531–3544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Wang, F.Z.; Wang, Q.B.; Kwon, S.Y.; Kwak, S.S.; Su, W.A. Enhanced drought tolerance of transgenic rice plants expressing a pea manganese superoxide dismutase. J. Plant Physiol. 2005, 162, 465–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Umezawa, T.; Fujita, M.; Fujita, Y.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K.; Shinozaki, K. Engineering drought tolerance in plants: Discovering and tailoring genes to unlock the future. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2006, 17, 113–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Skirycz, A.; Vandenbroucke, K.; Clauw, P.; Maleux, K.; De Meyer, B.; Dhondt, S.; Pucci, A.; Gonzalez, N.; Hoeberichts, F.; Tognetti, V.B.; et al. Survival and growth of Arabidopsis plants given limited water are not equal. Nat. Biotechnol. 2011, 29, 212–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Claeys, H.; Inzé, D. The agony of choice: How plants balance growth and survival under water-limiting conditions. Plant Physiol. 2013, 162, 1768–1779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Maruyama, K.; Urano, K.; Yoshiwara, K.; Morishita, Y.; Sakurai, N.; Suzuki, H.; Kojima, M.; Sakakibara, H.; Shibata, D.; Saito, K.; et al. Integrated analysis of the effects of cold and dehydration on rice metabolites, phytohormones, and gene transcripts. Plant Physiol. 2014, 164, 1759–1771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  148. Kaur, G.; Asthir, B. Molecular responses to drought stress in plants. Biol. Plant 2017, 61, 201–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Yang, S.; Vanderbeld, B.; Wan, J.; Huang, Y. Narrowing down the targets: Towards successful genetic engineering of drought-tolerant crops. Mol. Plant 2010, 3, 469–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. He, C.; Zhang, W.; Gao, Q.; Yang, A.; Hu, X.; Zhang, J. Enhancement of drought resistance and biomass by increasing the amount of glycine betaine in wheat seedlings. Euphytica 2011, 177, 151–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Kumar, M.; Yusuf, M.A.; Yadav, P.; Narayan, S.; Kumar, M. Overexpression of chickpea defensin gene confers tolerance to water-deficit stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Praba, M.L.; Cairns, J.E.; Babu, R.C.; Lafitte, H.R. Identification of physiological traits underlying cultivar differences in drought tolerance in rice and wheat. J. Agron. Crop. Sci. 2009, 195, 30–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Hu, H.; Xiong, L. Genetic engineering and breeding of drought-resistant crops. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2014, 65, 715–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Nakashima, K.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K.; Shinozaki, K. The transcriptional regulatory network in the drought response and its crosstalk in abiotic stress responses including drought, cold, and heat. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  155. Mahmood, T.; Khalid, S.; Abdullah, M.; Ahmed, Z.; Shah, M.; Ghafoor, A.; Du, X. Insights into drought stress signaling in plants and the molecular genetic basis of cotton drought tolerance. Cells 2019, 9, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  156. Sinha, R.; Bala, M.; Kumar, M.; Sharma, T.R.; Singh, A.K. Methods for screening legume crops for abiotic stress tolerance through physiological and biochemical approaches. In Legume Genomics: Methods and Protocols, Methods in Molecular Biology; Jain, M., Garg, R., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2020; pp. 277–303. [Google Scholar]
  157. Diaz-Mendoza, M.; Velasco-Arroyo, B.; González-Melendi, P.; Martínez, M.; Díaz, I. C1A cysteine protease–cystatin interactions in leaf senescence. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 3825–3833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  158. Wang, W.; Zhou, X.M.; Xiong, H.X.; Mao, W.Y.; Zhao, P.; Sun, M.X. Papain-like and legumain-like proteases in rice: Genome-wide identification, comprehensive gene feature characterization and expression analysis. BMC Plant Biol. 2018, 18, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  159. Gomez-Sanchez, A.; González-Melendi, P.; Santamaria, M.E.; Arbona, V.; Lopez-Gonzalvez, A.; Garcia, A.; Hensel, G.; Kumlehn, J.; Martínez, M.; Díaz, I. Repression of drought-induced cysteine-protease genes alters barley leaf structure and responses to abiotic and biotic stresses. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 70, 2143–2155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Zhang, Q.W.; Wang, C.X.; Li, X.Y.; Guo, Z.A.; Jing, R.L.; Zhao, J.; Chang, X.P. Isolation and characterization of a gene encoding a polyethylene glycol-induced cysteine protease in common wheat. J. Biosci. 2010, 35, 379–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Abdullah, H.M.; Rodriguez, J.; Salacup, J.M.; Castañeda, I.S.; Schnell, D.J.; Pareek, A.; Dhankher, O.P. Increased cuticle waxes by overexpression of WSD1 improves osmotic stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana and Camelina sativa. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Yang, X.; Lu, M.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Chen, S. Response mechanism of plants to drought stress. Horticulturae 2021, 7, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Rucker, K.S.; Kvien, C.K.; Holbrook, C.C.; Hook, J.E. Identification of peanut genotypes with improved drought avoidance traits. Peanut Sci. 1995, 22, 14–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  164. Bhusal, N.; Lee, M.; Han, R.; Han, A.; Kim, H. Responses to drought stress in Prunussargentii and Larix kaempferi seedlings using morphological and physiological parameters. For. Ecol. Manag. 2020, 465, 118099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Khaleghi, A.; Naderi, R.; Brunetti, C.; Maserti, B.E.; Babalar, M. Morphological, physiochemical and antioxidant responses of Maclura pomifera to drought stress. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 19250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Hosseini, F.; Mosaddeghi, M.R.; Dexter, A.R. Effect of the fungus Piriformospora indica on physiological characteristics and root morphology of wheat under combined drought and mechanical stresses. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 118, 107–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Mishra, B.K.; Srivastava, J.P.; Lal, J.P. Drought resistance in lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) in relation to morphological, physiological parameters and phenological developments. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2018, 7, 2288–2304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Asl, K.K.; Ghorbanpour, M.; Khameneh, M.M.; Hatami, M. Influence of drought stress, biofertilizers and zeolite on morphological traits and essential oil constituents in Dracocephalum moldavica L. J. Med. Plants 2018, 17, 91–112. [Google Scholar]
  169. Lobet, G.; Draye, X. Novel scanning procedure enabling the vectorization of entire rhizotron-grown root systems. Plant Methods 2013, 9, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  170. Zhan, A.; Schneider, H.; Lynch, J.P. Reduced lateral root branching density improves drought tolerance in maize. Plant Physiol. 2015, 168, 1603–1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  171. Liu, Y.; Song, Q.; Li, D.; Yang, X.; Li, D. Multifunctional Roles of Plant Dehydrins in Response to Environmental Stresses. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  172. Chiappetta, A.; Muto, A.; Bruno, L.; Woloszynska, M.; Van Lijsebettens, M.; Bitonti, M.B. A dehydrin gene isolated from feral olive enhances drought tolerance in Arabidopsis transgenic plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  173. Brini, F.; Hanin, M.; Lumbreras, V.; Amara, I.; Khoudi, H.; Hassairi, A.; Pagès, M.; Masmoudi, K. Overexpression of wheat dehydrin DHN-5 enhances tolerance to salt and osmotic stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Rep. 2007, 26, 2017–2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Das, A.; Basu, P.S.; Kumar, M.; Ansari, J.; Shukla, A.; Thakur, S.; Singh, P.; Datta, S.; Chaturvedi, S.K.; Sheshshayee, M.S.; et al. Transgenic chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) harbouring AtDREB1a are physiologically better adapted to water deficit. BMC Plant Biol. 2021, 21, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Wang, J.; Sun, P.P.; Chen, C.L.; Wang, Y.; Fu, X.Z.; Liu, J.H. An arginine decarboxylase gene PtADC from Poncirus trifoliata confers abiotic stress tolerance and promotes primary root growth in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62, 2899–2914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Zhang, J.; Tan, W.; Yang, X.H.; Zhang, H.X. Plastid-expressed choline monooxygenase gene improves salt and drought tolerance through accumulation of glycine betaine in tobacco. Plant Cell Rep. 2008, 27, 1113–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Golestan Hashemi, F.S.; Ismail, M.R.; Rafii, M.Y.; Aslani, F.; Miah, G.; Muharam, F.M. Critical multifunctional role of the betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase gene in plants. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 2018, 32, 815–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  178. Yu, H.Q.; Zhou, X.Y.; Wang, Y.G.; Zhou, S.F.; Fu, F.L.; Li, W.C. A betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase gene from Ammopiptanthus nanus enhances tolerance of Arabidopsis to high salt and drought stresses. Plant Growth Regul. 2017, 83, 265–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Kasukabe, Y.; He, L.; Nada, K.; Misawa, S.; Ihara, I.; Tachibana, S. Overexpression of spermidine synthase enhances tolerance to multiple environmental stresses and up-regulates the expression of various stress-regulated genes in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 2004, 45, 712–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  180. Mafakheri, A.; Siosemardeh, A.F.; Bahramnejad, B.; Struik, P.C.; Sohrabi, Y. Effect of drought stress on yield, proline and chlorophyll contents in three chickpea cultivars. Aust. J. Crop. Sci. 2010, 4, 580–585. [Google Scholar]
  181. Szekely, G.; Ábrahám, E.; Cséplo, Á.; Rigó, G.; Zsigmond, L.; Csiszár, J.; Ayaydin, F.; Strizhov, N.; Jásik, J.; Schmelzer, E.; et al. Duplicated P5CS genes of Arabidopsis play distinct roles in stress regulation and developmental control of proline biosynthesis. Plant J. 2008, 53, 11–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  182. Qamar, A.; Mysore, K.S.; Senthil-Kumar, M. Role of proline and pyrroline-5-carboxylate metabolism in plant defense against invading pathogens. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  183. Borgo, L.; Marur, C.J.; Vieira, L.G.E. Effects of high proline accumulation on chloroplast and mitochondrial ultrastructure and on osmotic adjustment in tobacco plants. Acta Sci. Agron. 2015, 37, 191–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  184. Yamada, M.; Morishita, H.; Urano, K.; Shiozaki, N.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K.; Shinozaki, K.; Yoshiba, Y. Effects of free proline accumulation in petunias under drought stress. J. Exp. Bot. 2005, 56, 1975–1981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  185. Jain, N.K.; Roy, I. Effect of trehalose on protein structure. Protein Sci. 2009, 18, 24–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Iturriaga, G.; Suárez, R.; Nova-Franco, B. Trehalose metabolism: From osmoprotection to signaling. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2009, 10, 3793–3810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  187. Karim, S.; Aronsson, H.; Ericson, H.; Pirhonen, M.; Leyman, B.; Welin, B.; Mäntylä, E.; Palva, E.T.; Van Dijck, P.; Holmström, K.O. Improved drought tolerance without undesired side effects in transgenic plants producing trehalose. Plant Mol. Biol. 2007, 64, 371–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Garg, A.K.; Kim, J.K.; Owens, T.G.; Ranwala, A.P.; Do Choi, Y.; Kochian, L.V.; Wu, R.J. Trehalose accumulation in rice plants confers high tolerance levels to different abiotic stresses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 15898–15903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  189. Li, H.W.; Zang, B.S.; Deng, X.W.; Wang, X.P. Overexpression of the trehalose-6-phosphate synthase gene OsTPS1 enhances abiotic stress tolerance in rice. Planta 2011, 234, 1007–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  190. Salehin, M.; Li, B.; Tang, M.; Katz, E.; Song, L.; Ecker, J.R.; Kliebenstein, D.J.; Estelle, M. Auxin-sensitive Aux/IAA proteins mediate drought tolerance in Arabidopsis by regulating glucosinolate levels. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 4021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  191. Shani, E.; Salehin, M.; Zhang, Y.; Sanchez, S.E.; Doherty, C.; Wang, R.; Mangado, C.C.; Song, L.; Tal, I.; Pisanty, O.; et al. Plant stress tolerance requires auxin-sensitive Aux/IAA transcriptional repressors. Curr. Biol. 2017, 27, 437–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  192. Alcazar, R.; Planas, J.; Saxena, T.; Zarza, X.; Bortolotti, C.; Cuevas, J.; Bitrián, M.; Tiburcio, A.F.; Altabella, T. Putrescine accumulation confers drought tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis plants over-expressing the homologous Arginine decarboxylase 2 gene. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2010, 48, 547–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Capell, T.; Bassie, L.; Christou, P. Modulation of the polyamine biosynthetic pathway in transgenic rice confers tolerance to drought stress. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 9909–9914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  194. Zhao, M.; Jin, L.; Hu, B.; Yao, H.; Gao, Y.; Wang, R.; Li, F.; Guo, J.; Li, K.; Zhao, M.; et al. Overexpression of chalcone synthase gene improves flavonoid accumulation and drought tolerance in tobacco. Durh. NC Res. Sq. 2019, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  195. Cheng, Y.J.; Deng, X.P.; Kwak, S.S.; Chen, W.; Eneji, A.E. Enhanced tolerance of transgenic potato plants expressing choline oxidase in chloroplasts against water stress. Bot Stud. 2013, 54, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  196. Ahmad, R.; Kim, M.D.; Back, K.H.; Kim, H.S.; Lee, H.S.; Kwon, S.Y.; Murata, N.; Chung, W.I.; Kwak, S.S. Stress-induced expression of choline oxidase in potato plant chloroplasts confers enhanced tolerance to oxidative, salt, and drought stresses. Plant Cell Rep. 2008, 27, 687–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Liu, H.; Yu, C.; Li, H.; Ouyang, B.; Wang, T.; Zhang, J.; Wang, X.; Ye, Z. Overexpression of ShDHN, a dehydrin gene from Solanum habrochaites enhances tolerance to multiple abiotic stresses in tomato. Plant Sci. 2015, 231, 198–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  198. Bao, F.; Du, D.; An, Y.; Yang, W.; Wang, J.; Cheng, T.; Zhang, Q. Overexpression of Prunus mume dehydrin genes in tobacco enhances tolerance to cold and drought. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  199. Liu, M.; Li, X.; Liu, Y.; Cao, B. Regulation of flavanone 3-hydroxylase gene involved in the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway in response to UV-B radiation and drought stress in the desert plant, Reaumuria soongorica. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2013, 73, 161–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Kumar, M. Gene Mining and Application for Development of Drought Tolerant Transgenic Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L) lines. Ph.D. Thesis, Integral University, Lucknow, India, 2019. Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/10603/272521 (accessed on 24 August 2021).
  201. Abebe, T.; Guenzi, A.C.; Martin, B.; Cushman, J.C. Tolerance of mannitol-accumulating transgenic wheat to water stress and salinity. Plant Physiol. 2003, 131, 1748–1755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  202. Wu, L.; Fan, Z.; Guo, L.; Li, Y.; Zhang, W.; Qu, L.J.; Chen, Z. Overexpression of an Arabidopsis δ-OAT gene enhances salt and drought tolerance in transgenic rice. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2003, 48, 2594–2600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. You, J.; Hu, H.; Xiong, L. An ornithine δ-aminotransferase gene OsOAT confers drought and oxidative stress tolerance in rice. Plant Sci. 2012, 197, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  204. Cheng, C.; Hu, S.; Han, Y.; Xia, D.; Huang, B.L.; Wu, W.; Hussain, J.; Zhang, X.; Huang, B. Yellow nutsedge WRI4-like gene improves drought tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana by promoting cuticular wax biosynthesis. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  205. Sahni, S.; Prasad, B.D.; Liu, Q.; Grbic, V.; Sharpe, A.; Singh, S.P.; Krishna, P. Overexpression of the brassinosteroid biosynthetic gene DWF4 in Brassica napus simultaneously increases seed yield and stress tolerance. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 28298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  206. Sun, S.C.; Xiong, X.P.; Zhang, X.L.; Feng, H.J.; Zhu, Q.H.; Sun, J.; Li, Y.J. Characterization of the Gh4CL gene family reveals a role of Gh4CL7 in drought tolerance. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. A schematic representation of metabolic response to drought stress. Primary metabolites (PMs) and secondary metabolites (SMs) are reprogrammed in plant cells to maintain osmotic balance and activate various primary and secondary metabolic pathways (green and orange circles, respectively) to survive under DS. Metabolites with an important role in DS are highlighted in bold, and their responses are depicted with green arrow (increased level), red arrow (decreased level), and green and red arrows (increased/decreased levels). ACP, acyl carrier protein; 4 CL, 4-coumarate-CoA ligase; AcCoA, acetyl-CoA; CAD, cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase; CCoAR, cinnamoyl-CoA reductase; CHI, chalcone isomerase; CHS, chalcone synthase; DMAPP, dimethylallyl diphosphate; DTs, diterpene synthase; DXP, 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate; DXS, 1-deoxy-D-xylulose 5-phosphate synthase; FAT A/B, fatty acyl-ACP thioesterase A/B; F3H, flavanone 3-hydroxylase, F3’H, flavonoid 3‘-hydroxylase; F6P, fructose 6-phosphate; FDP, farnesyl diphosphate; FDPS, farnesyl diphosphate synthase; FLS, flavonol synthase; G3P, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate; G6P, glucose 6-phosphate; GDP, geranyl diphosphate; GDPS, geranyl diphosphate synthase; GGDP, geranyl geranyl diphosphate; GGDPS, geranyl geranyl diphosphate synthase; HDR, 1-hydroxy-2-methyl-2-(E)-butenyl 4-diphosphate reductase; HMBPP, 1-hydroxy-2-methyl-2-(E)-butenyl 4-diphosphate; IDI, isopentenyl diphosphate isomerase; IPP, isopentenyl diphosphate; MtID, mannitol-1-phosphate dehydrogenase; MEP, 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol-4-phosphate; MTs, monoterpene synthase; PAE, palmitoyl-ACP elongase; PA, pyruvic acid; PAL, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase; PEP, phosphoenolpyruvate; PER, peroxidase; SAD, stearoyl-ACP desaturase; SQTs, sesquiterpene synthase; TCA, tricarboxylic acid; TCMO, trans-cinnamate 4-monooxygenase. Figure adapted from images created with BioRender.comto draw the proposed model (https://app.biorender.com/biorender-templates (accessed on 18 June 2021)).
Figure 1. A schematic representation of metabolic response to drought stress. Primary metabolites (PMs) and secondary metabolites (SMs) are reprogrammed in plant cells to maintain osmotic balance and activate various primary and secondary metabolic pathways (green and orange circles, respectively) to survive under DS. Metabolites with an important role in DS are highlighted in bold, and their responses are depicted with green arrow (increased level), red arrow (decreased level), and green and red arrows (increased/decreased levels). ACP, acyl carrier protein; 4 CL, 4-coumarate-CoA ligase; AcCoA, acetyl-CoA; CAD, cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase; CCoAR, cinnamoyl-CoA reductase; CHI, chalcone isomerase; CHS, chalcone synthase; DMAPP, dimethylallyl diphosphate; DTs, diterpene synthase; DXP, 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate; DXS, 1-deoxy-D-xylulose 5-phosphate synthase; FAT A/B, fatty acyl-ACP thioesterase A/B; F3H, flavanone 3-hydroxylase, F3’H, flavonoid 3‘-hydroxylase; F6P, fructose 6-phosphate; FDP, farnesyl diphosphate; FDPS, farnesyl diphosphate synthase; FLS, flavonol synthase; G3P, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate; G6P, glucose 6-phosphate; GDP, geranyl diphosphate; GDPS, geranyl diphosphate synthase; GGDP, geranyl geranyl diphosphate; GGDPS, geranyl geranyl diphosphate synthase; HDR, 1-hydroxy-2-methyl-2-(E)-butenyl 4-diphosphate reductase; HMBPP, 1-hydroxy-2-methyl-2-(E)-butenyl 4-diphosphate; IDI, isopentenyl diphosphate isomerase; IPP, isopentenyl diphosphate; MtID, mannitol-1-phosphate dehydrogenase; MEP, 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol-4-phosphate; MTs, monoterpene synthase; PAE, palmitoyl-ACP elongase; PA, pyruvic acid; PAL, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase; PEP, phosphoenolpyruvate; PER, peroxidase; SAD, stearoyl-ACP desaturase; SQTs, sesquiterpene synthase; TCA, tricarboxylic acid; TCMO, trans-cinnamate 4-monooxygenase. Figure adapted from images created with BioRender.comto draw the proposed model (https://app.biorender.com/biorender-templates (accessed on 18 June 2021)).
Ijms 22 09108 g001
Figure 2. Schematic model displaying drought-induced expression of metabolic genes in transgenic plants. The proposed model depicts drought stress (DS)-mediated (yellow circle) reduction in root and shoot biomass, decrease chlorophyll content, increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) and flower and pod abortion, reducing yield and production (shown in purple oval). Plant DS response and adaptation involve various pathways for signal perception, transduction, transcriptional regulation depicted in olive green ovals, and expression of various metabolic genes shown in aqua color rectangle. Drought-induced expression of metabolic genes, such as Δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase (P5CS), trehalose-6-phosphate synthase1 (TPS1), dehydrin (DHN), cysteine protease (CP), flavanone 3-hydroxylase (F3H), arginine decarboxylase gene (ADC), choline monooxygenase (CMO), betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase (BADH), and spermidine synthase (SPDS), mannitol dehydrogenase (MTD), wax synthase/acyl-CoA:diacylglycerol acyltransferase (WSD) resulted in the accumulation of primary and secondary metabolites. This leads to the accumulation of several osmoprotectants and defensive compounds and ROS detoxification inside cells. Modulation of antioxidants prevents cell damage and maintains homeostasis. SOD, superoxide dismutase; CAT, catalase; APX, ascorbate peroxidase; GPX, guaiacol peroxidase; PAL, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase; GRX, glutaredoxins; MeJA, methyl jasmonate; GB, glycine betain; SA, salicylic acid depicted in orange color rectangles. Morphological changes occurs in plants are shown in light green color rectangles. Plant growth and tolerance are shown in light green color in rectangle. Figure adapted from images created with BioRender.com to draw the proposed model (https://app.biorender.com/biorender-templates (accessed on 18 June 2021)).
Figure 2. Schematic model displaying drought-induced expression of metabolic genes in transgenic plants. The proposed model depicts drought stress (DS)-mediated (yellow circle) reduction in root and shoot biomass, decrease chlorophyll content, increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) and flower and pod abortion, reducing yield and production (shown in purple oval). Plant DS response and adaptation involve various pathways for signal perception, transduction, transcriptional regulation depicted in olive green ovals, and expression of various metabolic genes shown in aqua color rectangle. Drought-induced expression of metabolic genes, such as Δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase (P5CS), trehalose-6-phosphate synthase1 (TPS1), dehydrin (DHN), cysteine protease (CP), flavanone 3-hydroxylase (F3H), arginine decarboxylase gene (ADC), choline monooxygenase (CMO), betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase (BADH), and spermidine synthase (SPDS), mannitol dehydrogenase (MTD), wax synthase/acyl-CoA:diacylglycerol acyltransferase (WSD) resulted in the accumulation of primary and secondary metabolites. This leads to the accumulation of several osmoprotectants and defensive compounds and ROS detoxification inside cells. Modulation of antioxidants prevents cell damage and maintains homeostasis. SOD, superoxide dismutase; CAT, catalase; APX, ascorbate peroxidase; GPX, guaiacol peroxidase; PAL, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase; GRX, glutaredoxins; MeJA, methyl jasmonate; GB, glycine betain; SA, salicylic acid depicted in orange color rectangles. Morphological changes occurs in plants are shown in light green color rectangles. Plant growth and tolerance are shown in light green color in rectangle. Figure adapted from images created with BioRender.com to draw the proposed model (https://app.biorender.com/biorender-templates (accessed on 18 June 2021)).
Ijms 22 09108 g002
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kumar, M.; Kumar Patel, M.; Kumar, N.; Bajpai, A.B.; Siddique, K.H.M. Metabolomics and Molecular Approaches Reveal Drought Stress Tolerance in Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 9108. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22179108

AMA Style

Kumar M, Kumar Patel M, Kumar N, Bajpai AB, Siddique KHM. Metabolomics and Molecular Approaches Reveal Drought Stress Tolerance in Plants. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(17):9108. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22179108

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kumar, Manoj, Manish Kumar Patel, Navin Kumar, Atal Bihari Bajpai, and Kadambot H. M. Siddique. 2021. "Metabolomics and Molecular Approaches Reveal Drought Stress Tolerance in Plants" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 17: 9108. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22179108

APA Style

Kumar, M., Kumar Patel, M., Kumar, N., Bajpai, A. B., & Siddique, K. H. M. (2021). Metabolomics and Molecular Approaches Reveal Drought Stress Tolerance in Plants. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(17), 9108. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22179108

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop