1. Introduction
Azulene (
1) is a 10 π-electron non-benzenoid aromatic hydrocarbon with a fused structure of five- and seven-membered rings, showing a deep blue coloration. The resonance structure of azulene contains ionic cyclopentadienide and tropylium substructures, resulting in electrophilic substitution reactions at the 1- and 3-positions [
1] and nucleophilic addition reactions at the 2-, 4-, 6-, and 8-positions [
2,
3,
4], along with the 2-position at the five-membered ring in some cases (
Scheme 1).
Azulene derivatives are a promising class of compounds anticipated to have applications in pharmaceuticals and organic materials (
Figure 1). In 1990, Yanagisawa, Yasunami, and their collaborators reported the preparation of various sodium sulfonates of alkylazulene derivatives and evaluated their pharmacological activities and clarified that the sulfonate of 1-ethyl-5-isopropylazulene
2 exhibited extremely high antiulcer activity [
5]. Compound
2 is now frequently prescribed as a therapeutic agent for gastric ulcers. Nakamura and Yamamoto reported the azulene-substituted carborane derivatives
3a and
3b with high water solubility, which show high accumulation in B-16 melanoma cells
in vitro, despite its low cytotoxicity, and was revealed as a promising boron carrier for neutron capture therapy [
6]. The azuleno[6,5-
b]indole derivatives
4 reported by Hong et al. have been evaluated for their antitumor activity and are revealed to exhibit good antitumor activity against a variety of cancer cells (melanoma, leukemia, lung, colon, kidney, ovary, brain, breast, and prostate) [
7]. Lewis et al. reported the synthesis of AzuFluor® 483-Bpin
5 showing fluorescence upon the reaction with reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS)
in vivo, which are associated with various diseases such as cancer and cardiovascular disease [
8]. AzuFluor® 483-Bpin
5 is used to stain various living cells to show remarkable luminescence upon the reaction with intracellular ROS and RNS. Therefore, this azulene derivative
5 is expected to be applied for the direct detection of ROS and RNS in living cells.
Recently, azulene derivatives have also gained interest in the field of materials chemistry (
Figure 1). Katagiri and co-workers have reported the preparation and characterization of 2-azulenyl group-substituted 2,2’-bithiophene
6, thieno[3,2-
b]thiophene
7, [
9] and terazulene derivatives
8a,
b, [
10,
11] which exhibit the properties of organic field-effect transistors (OFETs) with relatively high carrier mobility. Wakamiya and Scott et al. described the synthesis and properties of azulene derivative
9 possessing four oxygen-bridged triarylamines, and elucidated that this compound is an excellent hole transport material for perovskite solar cells (power conversion efficiency = 16.5%) [
12]. Gao et al. investigated the thermal stability of conjugated polymers
10 and
11 composed of 2,2’-biazulene diimide units by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and found that these polymers are not decomposed until above 400 °C. Conjugated polymers
10 and
11 also represent excellent OFET performance with high electron mobility, and in particular, polymer
11 was found to be one of the best monopolar
n-type polymers reported so far, functioning as a high-performance OFET [
13].
Although many methods for the synthesis of azulene derivatives have been reported, the methods described below are particularly popular because of their high yields and capability for large-scale synthesis. The effective and practical synthetic methods for azulene and its derivatives were developed in the 1950s independently by Ziegler and Hafner, and by Nozoe. The Ziegler–Hafner method, which involves the condensation of Zincke salts derived from either pyridinium [
14,
15] or pyrillium salts [
16] with cyclopentadienide ions, allows the synthesis of parent azulene (
1) and its alkyl and aryl derivatives on a large scale (
Scheme 2). Ziegler–Hafner’s method is quite effective in the preparation of azulene derivatives with substituents at the seven-membered ring, and no better method except for the Ziegler–Hafner’s method has yet been reported for the synthesis of the parent azulene.
In the synthetic method of Nozoe and co-workers, the reaction of tropone derivatives
12 bearing a leaving group (e.g., halogen, methoxy, tosyloxy group) at the 2-position with active methylenes (e.g., cyanoacetate, malonate, and malononitrile) in the presence of a base provides 2-amino- and 2-hydroxyazulene derivatives in excellent yields (
Scheme 3) [
17]. This method is beneficial for the preparation of azulene derivatives having an amino or hydroxy group at the 2-position, which can be converted to the derivatives with other functional groups. In recent years, the synthesis of 2-aminoazulene derivatives with two butoxy esters has also been reported by the reaction of compound
12c with butyl cyanoacetate in the presence of
tert-butylamine (
t-BuNH
2) [
18]. The conversion of the tropone derivatives to the azulene derivatives proceed via 2
H-cyclohepta[
b]furan-2-one and their analogous intermediates, as described in a later section.
2
H-Cyclohepta[
b]furan-2-ones can also be used as useful starting materials for the synthesis of azulene derivatives with a variety of substituents and/or those with complex structures. As mentioned above, a variety of azulene derivatives have been prepared in recent years for the applications to pharmaceuticals and materials science, but for the applications preparation of more complex molecules is required. Although several reviews on the synthesis and reactivity of azulene and its derivatives have been reported, [
19,
20,
21,
22] there is still no comprehensive review that focuses on the synthesis using 2
H-cyclohepta[
b]furan-2-ones as starting materials. Therefore, we believe that a systematic review for the synthesis of azulenes using 2
H-cyclohepta[
b]furan-2-ones and their reactivity will be valuable for the future application of azulene derivatives to pharmaceuticals and organic materials. From these contexts, this review describes the progress in the synthesis of azulene derivatives starting from 2
H-cyclohepta[
b]furan-2-ones along with the reactivity and properties of the azulene derivatives prepared from 2
H-cyclohepta[
b]furan-2-ones.
3. Synthesis of Azulenes by the Reaction of 2H-cyclohepta[b]furan-2-ones with Active Methylenes
The preparation of 2-amino- and 2-hydroxyazulenes by the reaction of 2H-cyclohepta[b]furan-2-ones with active methylenes has been reported, but there are not so many examples about the reports.
In 1971, Takase, Nozoe, and their collaborators reported the synthesis of 2-hydroxy- and 2-aminoazulene derivatives by the reaction of 2
H-cyclohepta[
b]furan-2-ones having a carbonyl group at the 3-position with active methylenes (
Scheme 9) [
23]. At that time, it was known that 2-methoxy- and 2-chlorotropones
12a and
12b react with active methylenes to give azulene derivatives directly, but the fact that the intermediates of this reaction are 2
H-cyclohepta[
b]furan-2-ones had not yet been clarified. Therefore, Takase et al. investigated the reaction of 2
H-cyclohepta[
b]furan-2-ones with active methylenes, such as malononitrile, cyanoacetamide, ethyl cyanoacetate, and diethyl malonate, to clarify the mechanism of azulene formation from the tropone derivatives.
The reaction of 13a and 13b with active methylenes takes place in the presence of EtONa or t-BuNH2 as a base to yield the 1,2,3-tri-substituted azulene derivatives. The outcome of the reaction between tropone derivatives and active methylenes proves that the intermediates for the formation of azulene derivatives are 2H-cyclohepta[b]furan-2-ones.
When 13a and 13b are reacted with malononitrile or cyanoacetamide, the corresponding 2-aminoazulene derivatives 29a,b and 30a,b are formed as the main products. The mixture of 2-amino- and 2-hydroxyazulenes 30a and 31a is formed by the reaction of 13a with ethyl cyanoacetate, while the reaction with diethyl malonate furnishes 2-hydroxyazulene 31b as the main product. The acetyl derivative 13b is treated with ethyl cyanoacetate or diethyl malonate in the presence of EtONa giving a mixture including the 2-methylazulene derivatives.
Nozoe et al. examined whether the products of the diazotization of 2-amino-3-cyano-4-alkoxyazulenes are azulenequinone or diazonium derivatives [
32]. The precursor for the diazotization, 2-amino-3-cyano-4-alkoxyazulenes
32a and
32b, can be obtained in three steps from 8-hydroxy-2
H-cyclohepta[
b]furan-2-one
14a (
Scheme 10). After the conversion of
14a to the silver salt
14b by the treatment with silver nitrate in sodium hydroxide solution, the resulting
14b is subjected to the reaction with MeBr or EtBr to afford the corresponding 8-methoxy and 8-ethoxy derivatives
14c and
14d in 54 and 44% yields, respectively. Similar to the method reported by Takase et al., condensation of
14c and
14d with malononitrile in the presence of EtONa provides the corresponding 2-amino-3-cyano-4-alkoxyazulenes
32a and
32b in good yields. Diazotization of
32a and
32b does not give diazonium salts, but affords azulenequinone
33 in excellent yield. Also, the regeneration of the azulene structure
34 from
33 is accomplished by catalytic hydrogenation in the presence of 10% Pd/C as a catalyst.
As an improvement on the method of Takase and co-workers, a procedure for the synthesis of 2-aminoazulene derivatives has been reported by the reaction of 2
H-cyclohepta[
b]furan-2-ones having various substituents at the 3-position with malononitrile under the milder basic conditions, i.e., in triethylamine [
33]. Using this procedure, 2-aminoazulene derivatives
35a–
35j with various substituents at the 3-position can be obtained in excellent yields (85–93%,
Table 1). Furthermore, this method requires a simple workup process because the products are obtained as pure precipitates and can be readily isolated by filtration. However, this reaction is successful only when the substituent at the 3-position is a relatively strong electron-withdrawing group, whereas 2
H-cyclohepta[
b]furan-2-ones substituted by iodine or methylsulfide results in quantitative recovery of the starting materials. When the substituent at the 3-position on the 2
H-cyclohepta[
b]furan-2-one is a formyl group, the reaction generates
36 in 92% yield, which is formed by the cooperation with the formation of azulene ring and Knoevenagel condensation [
34].
4. Synthesis of Azulenes by the Reaction of 2H-cyclohepta[b]furan-2-ones with Electron-Rich Olefins and Their Analogues
2H-cyclohepta[b]furan-2-ones react with electron-rich olefins and their analogues, such as enol ethers, acetals, and fulvenes, to produce multiply functionalized azulenes.
Nozoe and Wakabayashi et al. reported the synthesis of azulene derivatives with various functional groups by a [8 + 2] cycloaddition of 2
H-cyclohepta[
b]furan-2-ones with enol ethers (
Scheme 11) [
35]. Importantly, this method affords azulene derivatives in moderate to excellent yields, despite the need for high reaction temperatures, i.e., 160–190 °C, in aprotic solvents (tetrahydrofuran, acetonitrile, toluene, or in neat conditions). In the azulene synthesis by this reaction, the products are diversified depending on the enol ethers used. For instance, the reaction of 2
H-cyclohepta[
b]furan-2-ones with vinyl ethers affords 1,2-disubstituted azulenes
37, whereas dihydrofurans react to yield the 1-azulenylethanol derivatives
38. 1-Azulenylpropanols
39 are obtained by the reaction with dihydropyran, while the reaction with 2-methoxydihydropyran results in 1-azulenylpropanals
40.
The formation of azulene rings by the reaction of 2
H-cyclohepta[
b]furan-2-ones with enol ethers proceeds by [8 + 2] cycloaddition. The mechanism is similar to the reaction with enamines described below (see
Scheme 12). The [8 + 2] cycloaddition of 2
H-cyclohepta[
b]furan-2-ones with enol ethers gives the strained intermediate
A. Subsequently,
A is decarboxylated to resolve the strain to form intermediate
B, which is followed by the elimination of the alcohol to produce the azulene derivatives
37 (
Scheme 13).
Azulene derivatives with functional groups at the five-membered ring can also be synthesized by the reaction of 2
H-cyclohepta[
b]furan-2-ones with acetals prepared from aldehydes and ketones in neat or aprotic solvents under the heating conditions at 160–190 °C (
Scheme 14). In this method, acetals prepared from cyclic ketones, such as cyclopentanone and cyclohexanone, are employed to obtain cycloalkane-fused azulenes
42 and
43. This reaction is also applicable to the synthesis of 2-alkoxyazulenes
45 by using orthoesters as a reagent with low to excellent yields (11% to 99%) [
36]. The formation of the azulene derivatives by this reaction can be explained by the same reaction mechanism as the reaction with enol ethers since acetals and orthoesters exist in equilibrium with enol ethers under the high-temperature conditions as shown in
Scheme 15.
Synthesis of azulene derivatives with a carbonyl substituent, such as acylmethyl or methoxycarbonyl methyl groups, at the 2-position has been achieved by the reaction of furan derivatives with 2
H-cyclohepta[
b]furan-2-ones (
Scheme 16) [
37]. In this synthesis, the yield of the products is affected by both the substituents on the 2
H-cyclohepta[
b]furan-2-ones and the furan derivatives, and the yield of the carbonyl derivatives
47 varies from 8 to 79% yields. Furthermore, when the substituent R on the 2
H-cyclohepta[
b]furan-2-ones is CO
2Me, intramolecular cyclization of the presumed intermediate
46 occurs subsequently to afford the azulenes-fused δ-lactones
49 in 10–90% yields. The reaction mechanism for above is also shown in
Scheme 16: furan reagent serves as an olefin and reacts with 2
H-cyclohepta[
b]furan-2-ones by [8 + 2] cycloaddition mode to furnish the adduct
C, followed by the ring-opening of the adducted furan ring of
C to produce the enol intermediate
46, which tautomerizes eventually into carbonyl product
47. In the case of 2
H-cyclohepta[
b]furan-2-ones with a methoxycarbonyl group at the 3-position, condensation of the ester function and the OH group of enol
46 takes place to give δ-lactones
49 by following the elimination of the methanol from the presumed addition intermediate
48.
Yasunami, Takase, and co-workers reported the reaction of
13c with 6,6-dimethylfulvene to give two types of cycloadducts, in which the products and their yields depend on the solvent employed (
Table 2) [
38]. In xylene, the reaction of
13c with 6,6-dimethylfulvene gives the [8 + 2] cycloadduct, i.e., dihydroazulene derivative
50, as a sole product in 35% yield (entry 1). On the other hand, the reaction in refluxing benzene gives
50 (21%) and the [4 + 2] cycloadduct
51 (28%) with almost the same production rate (entry 2). Furthermore,
51 is the major product in the reaction in ethanol at the reflux temperature (entry 3). When treated with 100% H
3PO
4 at 90 °C, the [8 + 2] cycloadduct
50 is converted to cyclopentadiene-fused azulene derivative
52 in 64% yield. These differences in the reactivities are also investigated in terms of theoretical calculations.
Electron-deficient olefins tend to cause the [4 + 2] cycloaddition at the seven-membered ring of 2
H-cyclohepta[
b]furan-2-one (
17). Tomioka and Nitta investigated the reaction of
17 with dimethyl acetylenedicarboxylate (DMAD) to produce the [4 + 2] adduct
52 (71%) and azulene derivative
53 (9%) in a 7:1 ratio [
39]. The reaction mechanism is discussed based on MNDO calculations, suggesting that
53 is formed via a [8 + 2] cycloaddition reaction of
17 to give intermediate
D, followed by the decarboxylation (
Scheme 17).
Wu, Ku, and their collaborators reported the synthesis of azulene derivatives with acylmethyl or methoxycarbonylmethyl groups at the 2-position by mimicking the Nozoe’s method and their conversion to benz[
a]azulene derivatives (
Scheme 18) [
40]. The reaction of
13a and
13f with 2,5-dimethoxy-2,5-dihydrofuran under the sealed tube conditions provides
54a and its 4-ethoxy derivative
54b in 60 and 80% yields, respectively. These derivatives can be carbonylated at the 1-position of the azulene ring with good yields by Vilsmeier formylation or Friedel-Crafts acylation reactions to give
55a,
b and
56a,
b. The formyl derivatives
55a and
55b react with active methylenes in the presence of EtONa yielding multiply functionalized benz[
a]azulenes
57 in moderate to good yields. Whereas
m-cresol-fused benz[
a]azulene
58 can be obtained in 65% yield by EtONa-mediated intramolecular cyclization of acyl derivative
56b.
5. Synthesis of Azulenes by the Reaction of 2H-cyclohepta[b]furan-2-ones with Enamines
Currently, the most frequently used procedure for azulene synthesis using 2
H-cyclohepta[
b]furan-2-ones as starting materials is the Yasunami-Takase’s method by the reaction with enamines. In the 1970s and 1980s, they reported the efficient synthesis of azulene derivatives by the reaction of 2
H-cyclohepta[
b]furan-2-ones with enamines prepared from various aldehydes or ketones.[
41]. In this reaction, the [8 + 2] cycloaddition of 2
H-cyclohepta[
b]furan-2-ones with enamines affords initially the strained intermediate
E, and subsequent decarboxylation from the intermediate
E yields the aminohydroazulene intermediate
59 (
Scheme 12). The aminohydroazulene
59 can be isolated as a stable compound in some cases (see below). Finally, the reaction is completed by the aromatization of
59 by the deamination to give the thermodynamically stable azulenes
60–
62. This synthetic method is one of the effective ways to introduce various substituents to the five-membered ring during the formation of an azulene ring.
In the synthesis of azulenes by the [8 + 2] cycloaddition of 2
H-cyclohepta[
b]furan-2-ones with enamines, the yield and reactivity depend on both the substituent R on 2
H-cyclohepta[
b]furan-2-ones, amines, and the carbonyl compounds used in the preparation of the enamines (
Table 3,
Figure 2). In general, enamines prepared from aldehydes are more reactive toward 2
H-cyclohepta[
b]furan-2-ones than those prepared from ketones. Furthermore, the reaction rate of pyrrolidine-substituted enamines with 2
H-cyclohepta[
b]furan-2-ones is much faster than that of morpholine enamines [
42,
43]. The reaction with the enamines derived from cyclic ketones gives azulene derivatives, in which the cycloalkanes are fused to the five-membered ring. However, the reaction of 2
H-cyclohepta[
b]furan-2-ones with the enamines prepared from cyclopentanones frequently yields aminohydroazulenes
59 as the main products, but
59 can be readily transformed into azulene derivatives by heating under the acidic conditions (
Scheme 12). When pyrrolidine enamines are reacted with 2
H-cyclohepta[
b]furan-2-ones possessing an electron-withdrawing substituent as R, the yield of azulene derivatives
60–
62 is reduced, as the result on the reaction of 2
H-cyclohepta[
b]furan-2-ones with pyrrolidine eliminated from the enamine to give 1-pyrrolidinylheptafulvenes
63 and insoluble resinous products [
44]. In contrast, the reaction with morpholine enamines does not cause such undesired reactions and often results in good yields of 60–62%. Enamines, which are prepared from phenylacetaldehyde and acetophenone, conjugated with an aryl group are resistant to the reaction with 2
H-cyclohepta[
b]furan-2-ones and tend to require longer reaction times. However, the silyl enol ether prepared from acetophenone readily reacts with 2
H-cyclohepta[
b]furan-2-ones, giving the corresponding 2-phenylazulenes in excellent yield, despite requiring a high reaction temperature (see
Section 7).
Enamines prepared from aldehydes produce 1-alkylazulenes, while enamines derived from ketones provide 1,2-dialkylazulenes and 2-alkylazulenes or a mixture thereof. When the enamines prepared from asymmetric dialkyl ketones such as 2-butanone are conducted, the reaction with
17 yields a mixture of
60f and
60g because of the existence of the tautomers of enamines (
Scheme 19;
Table 3, entries 6 and 16).
The reaction of 2
H-cyclohepta[
b]furan-2-ones with enamines can be applied to the synthesis of parent azulene (
1) (
Scheme 20) [
45]. The reaction of
17 with acetaldehyde in the presence of a solvent amount of diethylamine affords parent azulene (
1) in 60% yield. However, when
13c is treated under similar conditions,
63 with methoxycarbonyl substituent is obtained in 85% yield, which hydrolyzes with aqueous potassium hydroxide (KOH), leading to the carboxylic acid
64 in quantitative yield (100%). Eventually,
64 is transformed to
1 in 90% yield by the decarboxylation by the treatment with trichloroacetic acid (CCl
3CO
2H). The three-step synthesis of parent azulene (
1) is more efficient than the direct preparation from
17, since the overall yield is much higher (three-steps, 77% yield).
The [8 + 2] cycloaddition reaction of 2H-cyclohepta[b]furan-2-ones with enamines can be developed for the construction of azulene derivatives with extended conjugation π-electron systems. Therefore, a variety of π-expanded azulene derivatives have been prepared by using such reactions and their properties are elucidated.
Indenoazulenes
65–
67 can be obtained by the reaction of 2
H-cyclohepta[
b]furan-2-ones
17 and
13d with the enamines prepared from the corresponding indanones; however, the reaction time and product yield are highly dependent on the structure of the enamines employed (
Scheme 21) [
46]. The enamine prepared from 1-indanone and pyrrolidine reacts readily (within 1 hour) with
17 in ethanol under the reflux condition to provide indeno[2,1-
a]azulene (
65) in 93% yield. In contrast, the formation of indeno[1,2-
a]azulene (
66) by the reaction of
17 with the enamine prepared from 2-indanone is very slow (140 hours) and the yield is rather low (30%). Under the similar reaction conditions,
13d reacts with the enamine prepared from 1-indene and morpholine affording 5-cyanoindeno[2,1-
a]azulene (
67) and dihydroazulene derivative
68 in 20 and 57% yields, respectively.
Kuroda and Yasunami et al. have synthesized azuleno[1,2-
a]acenaphthylenes
69–
71 from
17 and discussed their aromaticity in terms of the bond-length alternation observed in
1H NMR spectra, as well as their reactivity (
Scheme 22) [
47]. The [8 + 2] cycloaddition reaction of
17 with the enamine prepared from acenaphthen-1-one and pyrrolidine leads to azuleno[1,2-
a]acenaphthylene
69a in 34% yield. A similar procedure can be extended to dimethoxycarbonyl derivative of acenaphthen-1-one to furnish
69b in 58% yield. The
1H NMR chemical shifts of these compounds at the azulene moiety are almost identical to those of the parent azulene, and no significant bond-length alternation is observed from their
1H NMR spectra. Therefore, these results conclude that
69a and
69b are molecules composed of two independent 10 π-electrons, i.e., azulene and naphthalene, rather than acting as an estimated 20 π-electron system. Reactions of
69a with electrophiles are also investigated; the reaction with bromine (Br
2) gives
70 in 87% yield, and formyl derivative
71 is obtained in 60% yield by the reaction with orthoformate in the presence of BF
3∙OEt.
In the reaction of 69a with DMAD, the [2 + 2] cycloaddition proceeds initially to form the four-membered ring intermediate, followed by the retroelectrocyclization reaction yielding acenaphthyleno[1,2-d]heptalene 72 in 13% yield. Contrary to 69a and 69b, the 1H NMR spectrum of heptalene 72 shows a pronounced bond-length alternation in attributed to its non-aromatic nature.
Synthesis of azuleno[1,2-
b]azulene derivatives starting from
17 was established by Kuroda and Yasunami et al. in 1986 (
Scheme 23) [
48]. The reaction of
17 with the enamine in toluene at the reflux temperature yields
73 in 35% yield. Hydrolysis of the acetal moiety of
73 with HCl in acetone leads to ketone
74 in over 90% yield, and the reaction of
74 with morpholine in the presence of titanium tetrachloride (TiCl
4) affords enamine
75, which is unstable to the moisture. Enamine
75 is reacted with DMAD in a [2 + 2] cycloaddition to provide cycloadduct
77 in 26% yield, along with
76 in 19% yield. The cycloadduct
77 is transformed into
76 in refluxing xylene in more than 90% yield. Eventually, dehydrogenative aromatization of
76 with palladium-carbon in diphenyl ether under the reflux condition results in azuleno[1,2-
b]azulene-2,4-dicarboxylate
78, accompanying the rearrangement of an ester group, in 8% yield. The UV-visible absorption (UV/Vis) spectrum of
78 exhibits an absorption maximum in the near-infrared region at around λ
max = 1200 nm, suggesting that the conjugated system is largely extended.
Nitta et al. reported the preparation of azuleno[1,2-
a]azulenes
82a,
b and
83 via [8 + 2] cycloaddition of
17 with an enamine (
Scheme 24) [
49]. The enamine was prepared by the condensation of 7-(2-oxo-propyl)-1,3,5-cycloheptatriene with pyrrolidine in the presence of the catalytic amount of
p-toluenesulfonic acid and molecular sieves, which is subjected to the cycloaddition with
17 under the autoclave condition to give
79 in 64% yield. The azulene
79 reacts with trifluoroacetic anhydride [(CF
3CO)
2O] at 0 °C to give
80 in 90% yield. Treatment of
80 with NaOH in refluxing ethanol results in hydrolysis to afford the carboxylic acid, which is subsequently converted to the ester
81 (two-steps, 79% yield) by the treatment with diazomethane (CH
2N
2). Oxidative intramolecular cyclization of
80 and
81 gives the corresponding azuleno[1,2-
a]azulenes
82a and
82b: treatment of
80 with 4 equivalents of triphenylcarbenium tetrafluoroborate (Ph
3C
+BF
4−) in refluxing acetonitrile gives
82a with a trifluoroacetyl group in 14% yield. Similarly, the reaction with
81 provides the methoxycarbonyl derivative
82b in 67% yield. The methoxycarbonyl derivative
82b was hydrolyzed to carboxylic acid using sodium hydroxide, and the subsequent decarboxylation in CF
3CO
2H furnished the parent derivative
83 in 47% yield.
The spectroscopic properties of these azuleno[1,2-a]azulenes 82a,b and 83 have been characterized in terms of 1H NMR and UV/Vis spectra, and theoretical calculations. These results clearly show that azuleno[1,2-a]azulenes behave not as a 18 π aromatic system, but as a derivative of two independent fused azulene rings.
Yasunami et al. successfully synthesized naphth[2,1-
a]- and naphth[2,3-
a]azulenes
85,
88, and
89 via the corresponding dihydronaphthoazulenes from
17 as the starting material (
Scheme 25) [
50]. 2
H-Cyclohepta[
b]furan-2-one (
17) reacts with the enamine prepared from 1-tetralone and pyrrolidine in refluxing ethanol to afford 5,6-dihydronaphth[2,1-
a]azulene
84a in 50% yield. Under the similar reaction conditions, the reaction of
17 with the enamines prepared from 7-methyl and 7-
tert-butyl derivatives of 1-tetralone furnishes the corresponding 2-methyl and 2-
tert-butyl derivatives
84b and
84c in 45 and 38% yields, respectively. When
84a,
84b, and
84c are treated with 2,3-dichloro-5,6-dicyano-
p-benzoquinone (DDQ), the dehydrogenative aromatization reaction proceeded to provide the corresponding naphth[2,1-
a]azulenes
85a,
85b, and
85c in 68, 65, and 68% yields, respectively. The compound
85a has also been prepared recently by Murai, Takai, and co-workers by the intramolecular cyclization of 2-phenylazulene derivatives [
51].
The reaction of the enamine prepared from 1-tetralone with 17 is completed within four hours, while the reaction with the enamine prepared from 2-tetralone requires a longer time (462 hours) and the yield of dihydronaphthoazulene 86 is also low (20% yield). Dehydrogenative aromatization of 86 with DDQ is difficult, so naphth[2,3-a]azulene 89 should be synthesized in a stepwise manner. The trifluoroacetyl derivative 87 obtained by the reaction of 86 with (CF3CO)2O is aromatized by DDQ to afford 88 in quantitative yield. The carboxylic acid obtained by the hydrolysis of 88 with sodium hydroxide in ethanol is decarboxylated with 100% H3PO4 to produce 89, almost quantitatively.
1,6-Methano[10]annulene is a class of molecules that satisfy Hückel’s rule. Various fused derivatives by aromatic and heterocyclic rings have been prepared and examined from the viewpoint of their characteristic aromaticity [
52,
53,
54]. In 1994, Nitta et al. reported the synthesis and properties of 1,6-methano[10]annulenes fused to an azulene ring, namely, 2,7-methanocyclodec[
a]azulenes
94 and
95, which are prepared in a five- or six-step procedure from
17 as the starting material (
Scheme 26) [
55]. The [8 + 2] cycloaddition of enamine with
17 gives
90 in 42% yield, which is then converted to
91, quantitatively, by the treatment with (CF
3CO)
2O to protect the 1-position of the azulene ring. Bromination of
91 at −78 °C affords
92 in 93% yield, subsequent treatment of
92 with an aqueous KOH takes place with the hydrolysis of the trifluoroacetyl group and the E2-type debromination, simultaneously, to produce a carboxylic acid derivative. The esterification of the carboxylic acid by CH
2N
2 gives
93 in 34% yield. Oxidation of
93 with DDQ in benzene furnishes the dehydrogenated product
94 immediately (within 5 min) in 85% yield. Decarboxylation product
95 is obtained by the hydrolysis of
94 to a carboxylic acid using aqueous KOH, followed by the trifluoroacetic acid-mediated decarboxylation in 95% yield.
In the 1H NMR spectra, the chemical shifts of the bridging methylenes of 94 and 95 are largely shielded by the ring-current and are observed at δ = −0.07 ppm and −0.34 ppm, respectively. This indicates that the methano[10]annulene moiety in these compounds possesses sufficient aromatic character. Furthermore, even though the vicinal coupling constants of the methano[10]annulene moiety of 94 and 95 closely resemble each other, those of the azulene moiety suggest the contribution of a distinct bond-length alternation. These results confirm the quite small contribution of the 18 π electron system in 94 and 95.
In 1989, there were no reports for the 18 π-electron compounds with bridged annulene architectures. To construct such a molecule, Kuroda and co-workers investigated the synthesis of azulenoannulenes
99 and
101 and clarified their electronic properties (
Scheme 27) [
56].
The reaction of 17 with the enamine prepared from 1-acetylcyclohepta-1,3,5-triene and pyrrolidine in refluxing toluene affords 2-(cyclohepta-1,3,5-trienyl)azulene 96 in 35% yield. Acetylation of 96 is achieved by the treatment with acetyl chloride in the presence of zinc chloride in dichloromethane to give 97 in 78% yield. Compound 97 is subjected to Vilsmeier reaction affording 98, which is further converted by intramolecular aldol condensation to the bridged-ring-fused azulene derivative 99.
In CDCl3, the protons of the bridging methylene of 99 appear at δ = 3.58 and 1.03 ppm, which resonate at the lower fields than those of 4,9-methano[11]annulenone. On the other hand, the chemical shifts of the protons of the bridging methylene of the azulenylium ionic species 100+ produced in CF3CO2D are observed at the higher fields (δ = 1.34 and 0.38 ppm) than those of 99. These results imply that the cationic species 100+ serve as bridged annulene derivatives of the 18 π-electron system in the acidic medium, even though the contribution of the 18 π-electron system is small in the neutral media. Reduction of 99 with LiAlH4 in THF in the presence of AlCl3 yields 101 in 68% yield, but the cationic species derived from 101 has not been obtained so far.
In 2002, Nitta and co-workers prepared a series of azulenobenzotropones
105 and
106 to assess their reactivity and properties [
57]. The [8 + 2] cycloaddition reaction of
17 with the enamines prepared from benzocycloheptanones gives the corresponding benzocycloheptazulenes
102–
104 (
Scheme 28). In these reactions,
102 (85%) and
103 (77%) are obtained in good yields, but the yield of
104 was rather low (39%). The reason for this is explained by the theoretical calculations of the enamines used. To introduce a carbonyl group to the fused-cycloheptane moiety,
102–
104 are treated with DDQ in aqueous acetone to afford the corresponding carbonyl compounds in good to excellent yields (74−92%). Further oxidation of the carbonyl compounds by DDQ in refluxing 1,4-dioxane induces the aromatization to give the corresponding azulenobenzotropones
105 (47%) and
106 (21%) in moderate yields. As described later, these derivatives have also been converted into benzocyclohept[
a]azulenylium ions and their aromaticity are evaluated from the viewpoint of the
1H NMR spectra. The
1H NMR spectra of
105 and
106 show the lower magnetic field shift in most of the proton signals in CF
3CO
2D, compared to those in CDCl
3, attributed to the protonation of the carbonyl oxygen and the proton-deuterium exchange at the five-membered ring of the azulene moiety.
Azulene derivatives fused with a heterocycle can also be prepared from 2
H-cyclohepta[
b]furan-2-ones. In 1983, Fujimori, Yasunami, and co-workers reported the synthesis of azuleno[1,2-
b]- and azuleno[1,2-
c]thiophenes
110,
111a,
b, and
112a,
b starting from the reaction of 2
H-cyclohepta[
b]furan-2-ones with a mixture of enamines prepared from 3-oxotetrahydrothiophene (
Scheme 29) [
58,
59]. The reactions of
13c and
26 with the enamines prepared from 3-oxotetrahydrothiophene and morpholine in ethanol under the reflux condition for 90 hours gives dihydroazuleno[1,2-
c]- and dihydroazuleno[1,2-
b]thiophenes
108a,
b and
109a,
b, respectively. In this reaction, employing the enamines prepared with pyrrolidine leads to unsuccessful results. Dehydrogenation of dihydroazulenothiophenes
108a,
b and
109a,
b by the treatment with DDQ in refluxing benzene, followed by the removal of the precipitated hydroquinone, provides the corresponding azulenothiophenes
110 and
111a,
b. When
111a and
111b are heated in 100% H
3PO
4 at 90–95 °C, a decarboxylation reaction occurs to produce azuleno[1,2-
b]thiophenes
112a and
112b in almost quantitative yields. These azuleno[1,2-
b]thiophenes
111a,
b and
112a,
b are very stable at room temperature, while azuleno[1,2-
c]thiophene
110 is extremely unstable under the ambient condition.
A similar pathway to the synthesis of azulenothiophenes has been adapted for the preparation of azulenopyrroles and furans
117–
122 (
Scheme 30) [
60]. The reaction of the enamines, which are obtained by condensation of
N-ethoxycarbonyl-3-oxopyrrolidine or 3-oxotetrahydrofuran with morpholine, with
13c gives dihydroazulenopyrroles or furans
113–
116 after seven days in refluxing ethanol. Azuleno[1,2-
b]pyrrole and furan
118 and
119 can be obtained in 99 and 86% yields, respectively, by the aromatization of the corresponding dihydro derivatives
115 and
116 with DDQ. When
113 is treated with manganese dioxide in benzene, azuleno[1,2-
c]pyrrole
117 is formed in 37% yield, while the corresponding furan derivative
114 does not show the aromatization under the similar reaction conditions. When
118 is treated in 100% H
3PO
4 at 90 °C, decarboxylation occurs only on the azulene ring to afford
120 in 95% yield, whereas by further increasing the reaction temperature (180 °C), the decarboxylation of the ester group on the nitrogen takes place to provide azuleno[1,2-
b]pyrrole
122 in 97% yield. When a similar reaction is applied to
119 at 90–95 °C, azuleno[1,2-
b]furan
121 is obtained in 46% yield. Azuleno[1,2-
b]furan and pyrrole
121 and
122 suggested a slight decrease in the aromaticity of these compounds compared to that of the parent azulene, since the coupling constants of these derivatives in
1H NMR spectra show a distinct bond-length alternation at the seven-membered ring.
6. Reactivity and Properties of Azulene Derivatives Prepared from 2H-cyclohepta[b]furan-2-ones
The cycloalkane-fused azulenes produced by the reaction of 2H-cyclohepta[b]furan-2-ones with the enamines prepared from cyclic ketones can be derivatized by Oxidation, condensation, aromatization reactions, and so on.
The oxidation of alkyl groups on the azulene ring to a carbonyl group has been very difficult because azulene derivatives have less tolerance to commonly used oxidizing reagents, such as chromic acid, nitric acid, and permanganic acid. However, Yasunami et al. developed a facile method to transform the α-methylene group of an alkyl group on an azulene ring into a carbonyl group by the treatment with DDQ [
61]. The treatment of the cycloalkane-fused azulenes and 1-alkylazulenes with 2.2 equivalents of DDQ in acetone containing 10% water provides the corresponding azulenes
124–
126 fused to a cyclic ketone and
127 in high yields (
Scheme 31). In the case of 1-alkylazulenes with an electron-withdrawing trifluoroacetyl or nitro group at the 3-position, the oxidation of the α-methylene group at the 1-position of the azulene ring is rather slow. Furthermore, the alkyl group at the 2-position of the azulene ring is not oxidized by the reaction with DDQ in a similar manner. When 1-alkylazulenes are treated with 1.2 equivalents of DDQ in aqueous acetone give alcohols
123 in low yield, which treated with DDQ furnishes the carbonyl derivative in quantitative yield. These findings indicate that alcohols
123 should be the intermediate in the oxidation of the α-methylene group with DDQ. The treatment of
128 with DDQ in 1,4-dioxane containing methanol results in the generation of
129 and
130 (
Scheme 32), but the yields have not appeared in the literature.
From the above results, the reaction mechanism can be drawn as follows: the hydride ion is abstracted from the α-methylene at the 1-position of the azulene ring by DDQ to form a cationic intermediate F, which is stabilized by the resonance structure where the seven-membered ring of the azulene moiety forms a tropylium ion substructure F’. In acetone or 1,4-dioxane, the nucleophilic addition of water or methanol to the generated cations forms the corresponding intermediates 123, which are further oxidized by DDQ to form 1-carbonylazulenes 124–127.
Azulene-fused aromatic derivatives have attracting theoretical interest from the viewpoint of their aromaticity. Cyclopent[
a]azulene, which consists of cyclopentadiene and azulene fused together is one of the promising precursors for the azulene derivatives with extended π-conjugation. Therefore, Yasunami et al. attempted to prepare cyclopent[
a]azulenes
136 and
137 and elucidated their reactivity (
Scheme 33) [
62]. The reaction of
131a with
N-bromosuccinimide (NBS) in carbon tetrachloride at 0 °C yields monobromide
132. Attempts of the elimination of hydrogen bromide from
132 with amine are failed to obtain the desired elimination product
133. However, treatment of
132 in refluxing chloroform converts to
133 in 87% yield (two-step yield from
131a). Treatment of
133 with 100% H
3PO
4 does not afford the desired products, but forms unidentifiable compounds. Hence, first, Diels–Alder reaction with cyclopentadiene is employed to
133 to produce
134. Following hydrolysis of the ester group and acid-catalyzed decarboxylation result in
135. When
135 is treated under FVP conditions (400 °C, 0.5–0.05 mmHg),
136 and
137 are obtained almost quantitatively (96%) in a 1:1 ratio.
Oxidation of dihydrocyclopent[
a]azulenes
131a and
131b with DDQ in an aqueous acetone solution produces the ketones
138a and
138b in excellent yields, which are subsequently converted to the monobromides
139a and
139b by the bromination with NBS (
Scheme 34) [
63]. The elimination of hydrogen bromide from
139a and
139b by the treatment with triethylamine generates 3
H-cyclopent[
a]azulen-3-ones
140a and
140b as unstable intermediates, which are trapped by cyclopentadiene to give the bridged compounds
141a and
141b. In the absence of cyclopentadiene, the product
140a generated by the elimination reaction from
139a undergoes a Diels–Alder type cyclodimerization reaction to produce
144 (
Scheme 35). The products
142a and
142b can be prepared by trifluoroacetic acid-catalyzed decarboxylation of the carboxylic acids obtained by the hydrolysis of
141a and
141b, although these compounds undergo decomposition when they are treated with 100% H
3PO
4. The compound
142a can be sublimed by the FVP at 550 °C to afford 3
H-cyclopent[
a]azulen-3-one
143.
It is well known that the ring-fused azulene derivatives exhibit a bond-length alternation in the seven-membered ring, which is reflected in the vicinal coupling constants in their
1H NMR spectra [
64,
65,
66]. In the
1H NMR spectrum of
143, the bond-length alternation is smaller than that of the usual ring-fused azulene derivatives, because the contribution of the resonance structure of
143’ is more significant to avoid the unstable anti-aromatic cyclopentadienone substructure in
143.
Bromination of
131a with NBS yields unstable bromide
132, which can be used in subsequent reactions without further purification. HBr is readily eliminated from
132 in chloroform under the reflux condition to give
133 as also described in
Scheme 33. The product
133 is also prepared by the bromination of
131a with NBS in chloroform at room temperature to afford the dibromide
145 in 45% yield, followed by the treatment with zinc powder in ethanol to afford
133 in 86% yield (
Scheme 36). The methylene position of the cyclopentadiene moiety of
133 is readily deprotonated upon the treatment with amines, and subsequent condensation reaction with ketones and aldehydes gives pentafulvene-fused azulene derivatives. For example, the reaction of
133 with acetone in the presence of methylamine furnishes
146 in 47% yield. Condensation reactions of
133 with carbonyl compounds other than acetone are also investigated to produce the desired pentafulvene derivatives with moderate to good yields.
Spectroscopic properties and bond-length alternations of pentafulvene 146 and its derivatives obtained by this procedure are evaluated by UV/Vis spectra, as well as by 1H NMR spectra.
Cyclohept[
a]azulenylium ion is one of the non-benzene aromatic compounds with a tricyclic carbon skeleton. The theoretical calculations suggest that this ion is a stable cation with a contribution of a 14 π-electron system. Yasunami et al. have investigated the synthesis of cyclohept[
a]azulenylium ions
152a+ and
152b+ in order to demonstrate its stability and properties (
Scheme 37) [
67].
The reaction of the ester derivative 147 with 1.2 equivalents of NBS in refluxing CCl4 gives olefinic compound 148b in 85% yield. The decarboxylation of 148b with 100% H3PO4 affords 148a. Treatment of 148a and 148b with 2.2 equivalents of DDQ in aqueous acetone solution resulted in the carbonyl derivatives 149a and 149b in 88 and 91% yields, respectively. Reduction of 149a and 149b with sodium borohydride (NaBH4) leads to unstable alcohols 150a and 150b, which are easily dehydrated by passing through a silica gel column yielding 3H-cyclohept[a]azulenes 151a and 151b. Treatment of 151a and 151b in chloroform with Ph3C+BF4− provides cyclohept[a]azulenylium ions 152a+ (33%) and 52b+ (93%) as tetrafluoroborates.
The 1H NMR spectra of 152a+ and 152b+ show the downfield shift of the ring proton signals attributed to their ionic structures, as well as the observation as equivalent proton signals at the two seven-membered rings. Furthermore, the fact that the 13C NMR spectra of 152a+ and 152b+ exhibit only eight signals corresponding to the ring carbons suggesting the delocalization of the positive charge of 152a+ and 152b+ in both seven-membered rings.
Dicyclohepta[
cd,
gh]pentalenes have been focused as one of the bridging [
14] annulenes and the synthesis was achieved by Vogel and Reel in 1972 [
68]. Inspired by their report, Yasunami and co-workers developed a novel approach for the synthesis of dicyclohepta[
cd,
gh]pentalenes
156a and
156b by the cyclization of 5
H-cyclohept[
a]azulen-5-one
155 with haloketenes (
Scheme 38) [
69]. The synthetic precursor
155 was prepared by a two-step route using
153 as a starting material;
153 is brominated with three equivalents of phenyltrimethylammonium perbromide (PTAB) at 0 °C to give dibromo derivative
154 in 95% yield, followed by debromination with six equivalents of lithium chloride (LiCl) in
N,
N-dimethylformamide (DMF) at 110 °C under a nitrogen atmosphere to form
155 in 91% yield. The reaction of
155 with dichloroketene for 11 hours in benzene under the reflux condition produces dicyclohepta[
cd,
gh]pentalene
156a in 66% yield. On the other hand, the reaction of
155 with chloromethyl ketene under the similar conditions gives the lactone derivative
157 within five minutes. The conversion of lactone
157 to dicyclohepta[
cd,
gh]pentalene
156b can be achieved by heating in triethylamine or in dimethylformamide at 120 °C with lithium bromide and lithium carbonate.
The reaction of
155 with sulfur ylide, i.e., ethyl dimethyl sulfinylidene acetate (EDSA), produces
158 in 98% yield (
Scheme 38) [
70]. Oxidation of
158 with Ph
3C
+BF
4− produces a cationic intermediate, which can be treated with a sodium bicarbonate solution to furnish 5-oxa-5
H-dicyclohept[
cd,
hi]indene
159 in 24% yield. Treatment of
158 with DDQ instead of Ph
3C
+BF
4− provides
159 in a two-step yield of 65%.
Ito et al. reported the first synthesis of tri(1-azulenyl)methylium ions
162a+ and
162b+ from azuleno[1,2-
b]thiophenes
112a and
112b and revealed their bond-length alternations by both of the coupling constants in
1H NMR spectra and single-crystal X-ray structure analysis (
Scheme 39) [
59]. The Vilsmeier reaction of
112a and
112b affords formyl derivatives
160a (93%) and
160b (86%), which are condensed with two equivalents of
112a or
112b in acetic acid at room temperature to give the corresponding tri(1-azulenyl)methanes
161a and
161b in 76 and 42% yields, respectively. Hydride abstraction reaction of
161a and
161b with DDQ and subsequent anion exchange with 60% HPF
6 solution provides tris(azuleno[1,2-
b]thiophene-9-yl)methylium ions
162a+ and
162b+ as hexafluorophosphates in 86 and 75% yields, respectively. In
1H NMR, the vicinal coupling constants in the seven-membered ring of
162a+ show the alternating pattern of
J = 8.8 and 10.5 Hz, indicating a clear contribution of the bond-length alternation. In the 6-isopropyl derivative
162b+, the coupling constant increases slightly compared to those of
162a+. The results of X-ray crystallography show that the azuleno[1,2-
b]thiophene moiety of the carbocation derived from the 6-isopropyl derivative has an almost planar structure and distinct difference in the carbon–carbon bond length of the seven-membered ring, as expected from the
1H NMR spectrum.
Azulene derivatives usually react with NIS to give the corresponding 1-iodoazulene derivatives [
71]. However, in the reaction of
112a with NIS, 1,1’-biazulene derivative
163 is formed in 74% yield instead of the expected iodoazulene derivative (
Scheme 39) [
72]. A similar reaction with NBS and NCS forms neither the corresponding 1-haloazulenes or the 1,1’-biazulene derivative
163, but only the decomposition is observed. Therefore, this homocoupling reaction is a specific reactivity between
112a and NIS, and a slight difference in the oxidation ability of NXS should be attributed to the outcome of the reaction.
1-Phenylazulene and 1,3,5-tri(1-azulenyl)benzenes can be prepared from 5-isopropyl-2
H-cyclohepta[
b]furan-2-one
13g (
Scheme 40). The [8 + 2] cycloaddition reaction of
13g with
in situ generated enamine from phenylacetaldehyde and morpholine gives 1-phenylazulene
164 having a ester function in 89% yield [
73]. Removal of the ester function of
164 is accomplished by heating in 100% H
3PO
4 to produce
165 in 83% yield. The synthesis of 1,3,5-tri(1-azulenyl)benzenes
168a and
168b is also performed in four steps using
13g as a starting material. The 1-acetylazulene derivative
167 is obtained by the reaction of
13g with enamine prepared from 1-butanal and morpholine, followed by the oxidation of the α-position of azulene ring by DDQ in aqueous acetone furnishes
167, quantitatively. Benzannulation of
167 with thionyl chloride (SOCl
2) in ethanol produces 1,3,5-(1-azulenyl)benzene
168a in 56% yield. 1,3,5-Tris(1-azulenyl)benzene
168a is thought to be generated by trimerization-type benzannulation by successive aldol condensation of the acetyl group of
167 [
74]. The ester group of
168a is also decarboxylated by 100% H
3PO
4 to provide
168b in 98% yield. The 3-position of the azulene ring in
165 and
168 can be functionalized by electrophilic substitution reactions.