Next Article in Journal
Resveratrol as Chemosensitizer Agent: State of Art and Future Perspectives
Next Article in Special Issue
Impact of SGLT-2 Inhibition on Cardiometabolic Abnormalities in a Rat Model of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
Previous Article in Journal
Dysregulated Provision of Oxidisable Substrates to the Mitochondria in ME/CFS Lymphoblasts
Previous Article in Special Issue
Chronic Inflammation in PCOS: The Potential Benefits of Specialized Pro-Resolving Lipid Mediators (SPMs) in the Improvement of the Resolutive Response
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 22
Issue 4
10.3390/ijms22042048
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Microbiome and PCOS: State-of-Art and Future Aspects

by
Pierluigi Giampaolino
1,
Virginia Foreste
2,
Claudia Di Filippo
2,
Alessandra Gallo
1,
Antonio Mercorio
2,
Paolo Serafino
2,
Francesco Paolo Improda
1,
Paolo Verrazzo
1,
Giuseppe Zara
2,
Cira Buonfantino
1,
Maria Borgo
1,
Gaetano Riemma
3,
Chiara De Angelis
1,
Brunella Zizolfi
1,
Giuseppe Bifulco
2 and
Luigi Della Corte
2,*
1
Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy
2
Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy
3
Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80131 Naples, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(4), 2048; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22042048
Submission received: 4 January 2021 / Revised: 14 February 2021 / Accepted: 15 February 2021 / Published: 19 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: From Molecular Mechanisms to Therapies)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a complex and heterogeneous endocrine disease. The hypothesis that alterations in the microbiome are involved in the genesis of PCOS has been postulated. Aim of this review is to summarize the available literature data about the relationship between microbiome and PCOS. A search on PubMed and Medline databases was performed from inception to November 20Most of evidence has focused on the connection of intestinal bacteria with sex hormones and insulin-resistance: while in the first case, a relationship with hyperandrogenism has been described, although it is still unclear, in the second one, chronic low-grade inflammation by activating the immune system, with increased production of proinflammatory cytokines which interfere with insulin receptor function, causing IR (Insulin Resistance)/hyperinsulinemia has been described, as well as the role of gastrointestinal hormones like Ghrelin and peptide YY (PYY), bile acids, interleukin-22 and Bacteroides vulgatus have been highlighted. The lower genital tract microbiome would be affected by changes in PCOS patients too. The therapeutic opportunities include probiotic, prebiotics and synbiotics, as well as fecal microbiota transplantation and the use of IL-22, to date only in animal models, as a possible future drug. Current evidence has shown the involvement of the gut microbiome in PCOS, seen how humanized mice receiving a fecal transplant from women with PCOS develop ovarian dysfunction, immune changes and insulin resistance and how it is capable of disrupting the secondary bile acid biosynthesis. A future therapeutic approach for PCOS may involve the human administration of IL-22 and bile acid glycodeoxycholic acid.

1. Introduction

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common cause of female endocrine infertility, with high heterogeneity and complexity, characterized by increased ovarian androgen biosynthesis, anovulation, and, as mentioned, infertility [1,2]; however, several aspects of women’s overall health are affected by PCOS, with long-term effects that transcend well beyond the reproductive age [3,4,5]. The prevalence of PCOS varies according to the population studied and the diagnostic criteria used, ranging from 8% to 13% [6]. Hyperandrogenism (HA) is one of the principal disorders that could characterize PCOS. Its excessive production by the ovaries or the adrenal cortex results in dermatological abnormalities (acne, hirsutism, androgenic alopecia), alteration of the hypothalamus-pituitary-gonadal axis and dysregulation of ovarian folliculogenesis that leads to menstrual disorder and infertility [6]. In 1992 the National Institutes of Health (NIH) defined PCOS by two features: (1) chronic anovulation, with (2) clinical and/or biochemical hyperandrogenism, in absence of other diseases (congenital adrenal hyperplasia, androgen-secreting neoplasms, thyroid dysfunction and hyperprolactinemia [7]. In 2003, the meeting of experts in Rotterdam revised the criterion; according to the European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology/American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ESHRE/ASRM) PCOS is defined by the presence of 2 out of the following 3 features: oligo- and/or anovulation, clinical and/or biochemical signs of hyperandrogenism, and/or polycystic ovarian morphology (PCOM). The presence of 12 or more follicles measuring 2–9 mm throughout the entire ovary or an ovarian volume = 10 cm3 defines the PCOM [8,9].
The etiology of PCOS is still unclear; however, several factors have been identified, involved in generating a hormonal and metabolic imbalance that can lead to the development of this syndrome [9,10,11]. The most accredited theory is that of Frank et al. who considers PCOS a genetically determined disease whose clinical and biochemical heterogeneity depends on the interaction between genetic and environmental factors [12]. In the etiological hypotheses proposed over the years, the fact that, besides gynecological problems, PCOS can also lead to systemic metabolic disorders (such as hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance (IR), obesity, increased risk of type II diabetes, cardiovascular disease) has played a fundamental role [13]. The numerous evidence on the correlation between the intestinal microbiome and the development of metabolic disorders, have led to postulate the hypothesis that alterations in the microbiome are also involved in the genesis of PCOS [14,15,16]. In 2012 the Dysbiosis of gut microbiota (DOGMA) hypothesis suggested that, following imbalance of intestinal flora, an increase of intestinal permeability could cause leakage of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) into the systemic circulation. The result is the activation of the immune system and inflammatory response that leads to IR [17]. Furthermore, recent studies are beginning to consider also the role of vaginal microbiome [18]. In consideration of the growing interest in the literature for the role of the microbiome in the genesis of numerous diseases, we try to summarize the main evidence published in literature regarding the relationship between microbiome and PCOS.

2. Materials and Methods

A literature search on the MEDLINE database (accessed through PubMed) for articles in English and published from inception to November 2020 was performed.
The following Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms were used to screen and identify studies: “PCOS”, “microbiome”, “molecular mechanism”, “therapy”, “insulin-resistance”, “sexual hormones” and “therapeutic strategies”. Non-English articles, published as conference papers or abstract only, and studies including information that overlapped other publications were excluded. In our search, only articles concerning PCOS were included. The selection criteria for the narrative review included original articles (randomized and non-randomized clinical trials, including prospective observational studies, retrospective cohort studies, and case-control studies) and review articles regarding the influence of PCOS on the microbiome. Articles that met the inclusion criteria were carefully read, and, when appropriate, further articles retrieved from their references were also reviewed with the aim to include other critical studies that might have been missed in the initial search. We presented here a narrative synthesis of the available evidence about the topic. Figure 1 reports the flow chart of article selection.

3. Gut Microbiome and PCOS

3.1. Gut Microbiome Changes in Women with PCOS

The human gut microbiome is made up of about 1013 to 1014 microorganisms, greater than 1000 different species and more than 7000 different strains [19,20]. The most represented microorganisms are bacteria, especially anaerobes, but the intestinal microbiome also including viruses, protozoa, archaea, and fungi [19]. The two most represented types of bacterial are Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes with Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Fusobacteria, and Verrucomicrobia phyla present in relatively low abundance. Gut microbiota plays a major role by influencing physiology, metabolism, nutrition, and immune function and, under physiological conditions, the delicate balance between the latter and the host prevents the development of different diseases [21,22]. There are significant differences in the composition of the microbiome between healthy adults, and these differences may underlie the susceptibility to various diseases [23]. The relationship between PCOS and gut microbiota changes has been the subject of numerous studies in recent years, that showed a significant difference in composition of gut microbiome between PCOS patients and healthy controls [24,25,26,27]. α and β diversity defines the microbiome changes: alpha (α) diversity is considered as an index of the health of an ecosystem and indicates the number of species present in a community that occupy a given environment in a specific community, whereas beta (β) diversity represents how similar one community is to another [28,29]. Several studies have reported a change in α and β diversity in patients with PCOS [25,26,30,31]. In addition to an alteration in the general composition of the microbiome, the same studies have shown that in PCOS there is also an alteration in balance of some species of bacteria, like Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes [24,25,26,27]; this modification can lead to altered production of short-chain fatty acids with a negative impact on metabolism, gut barrier integrity, and immunity [28]. Regarding the genera Bacteroides, Liu et al. have observed a specific increase of Escherichia and Shigella in women with PCOS, and a general gut microbiome composition similar respect that of obese control women [24]. Qi et al., instead, reported an increased abundance of Bacteroides vulgatus, accompanied by a reduction in the levels of glycodeoxycholic and tauroursodeoxycholic acid that leads to alteration of IL-22 level [31]. Moreover, Prevotella species abundance can be altered: its increase in PCOS patients arguing that may induce an adverse inflammatory effect to the host has been reported [32,33]. Another study, instead, founded a decrease of Prevotellaceae with a negative effect due to the loss of production of anti-inflammatory metabolites [34]. The beneficial bacteria, as Lactobacilli and Bifidobacteria, who enhancing immunity and nutrient absorption, are instead significantly reduced in PCOS patients [35,36,37]. The modifications of the gut microbiota in PCOS are different, sometimes controversial and not yet fully understood. However, several studies have tried to investigate the relationship between intestinal microbiota and PCOS; most of these have focused on the connection of intestinal bacteria with insulin-resistance and sex hormones. Table 1 summarizes the effect of changes in major microorganisms in PCOS patients.

3.2. Gut Microbiome and Insulin-Resistance

Insulin resistance (IR), together with obesity, is closely related to the gut microbiome as showed in studies conducted on animals and humans [38,39]. After the transplantation of healthy intestinal flora in germ-free mice, an increase in body fat and the development of IR has been observed [40]. Therefore, it can be assumed that, on the contrary, the transplantation of a healthy microbiome in a subject affected by metabolic syndrome determines an improvement in clinical parameters, as was demonstrated by Vrieze et al.: after six weeks from transplantation of gut microbiome of healthy people into patients with metabolic syndrome, an increase in insulin sensitivity and a decrease of body mass index (BMI) of the recipients was observed [40]. The gut microbiome could therefore play a role in the development of IR; the mechanisms that connect IR, gut microbiome and PCOS are manifold and were recently summarized in the review by He et al. [41]. Imbalance of gut microbiota, increasing intestinal permeability, could determine a chronic low-grade inflammation by activating the immune system. Proinflammatory cytokines interfere with insulin receptor function, causing IR/hyperinsulinemia; indeed, it has been founded that with the increased intestinal permeability and the consequent introduction of LPS into the blood circulation of mice and humans, fasting blood glucose and insulin levels increase [13,42,43]. Another possible link between the gut microbiome and IR sees involved gastrointestinal hormones like Ghrelin and peptide YY (PYY), both showing a negative correlation with IR and BMI [25,44,45]. Liu et al. reported a lower level of ghrelin and PYY in women with PCOS compared with those of healthy women, maybe due to an increase in Bacteroides species that are negatively correlated with ghrelin [25]. However, not all studies found differences in ghrelin and PYY levels in women with PCOS compared to healthy women, although gut microbiota may cause altered secretion of these hormones leading to insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia [46,47]. The relationship between gut microbiota, brain-intestinal axis mediators, and PCOS phenotypes is not yet and sufficiently investigated. To date, it is widely recognized that there is a link between IR in PCOS patients and intestinal dysbiosis. Indeed, as aforementioned, the composition of the gut microbiome in patients with PCOS is significantly altered compared with that of women without PCOS. Zeng et al. were the only ones that investigated the profile of gut microbiome in PCOS patients with IR, compared with that of PCOS patients without IR [35]. They showed differences between the gut microbiome of PCOS patients with IR and without IR. Changes in the intestinal microbiota are much more marked in the forms of PCOS with IR that have the highest level of Bacteroidaceae and a greater decrease of Prevotellaceae compared with PCOS women without IR. Moreover, patients with IR displayed a significant difference in the abundance of Ruminococcaceae and Lachnospiraceae when compared to insulin-sensitive patients. Table 2 summarizes the relationship between changes in major microorganisms and the onset of IR.

3.3. Gut Microbiome and Sexual Hormones

There is ample evidence that sex influences the composition of the gut microbiome. Indeed, the microbiome of women, compared to that of men, is characterized by greater α diversity and a relatively smaller representation of Bacteroides [48,49]. Numerous other differences in the microbiota of the two sexes were highlighted. Prevotella has a strong positive correlation with testosterone and negative associations with estradiol concentrations, so were more abundant in men than women [50]. Moreover, men had a lower abundance of Clostridia, Methanobrevibacter, and Desulfovibrio compared with women [48,49,50,51]. These differences could be caused by sex chromosomes or by sex hormones; while the first one has not been described, the latter has been extensively evaluated in rat studies that verified the effect of castration on the gut microbiome [52,53]. Sex hormones can determine alterations of the intestinal microbiome by activating the receptors present in the gastrointestinal tract, by altering beta-glucuronidase activity, or by modulating systemic or intestinal immunity [29]. Therefore, it was postulated a relationship, perhaps causal, between the hyperandrogenism of PCOS and the alterations of the intestinal microbiome. The study of Torres et al. using the 16s ribosomal RNA sequencing, analyzed and compared the gut microbiome of 48 healthy women, 42 women with PCOM and 73 women with PCOS [26]. The results has highlighted a reduction in the number of bacterial species (α diversity) and phylogenetic diversity in women with PCOS. Moreover, women with PCOS have also changes in the composition of the microbial community (beta diversity). This evidence was in agreement with those of previous studies [24,25]. Besides, Torres et al. have reached two important pieces of evidence. First of all, they showed that also in women with PCOM occurs alteration in the gut microbiome, which was intermediate between that of healthy control and women with PCOS. Secondly, using multiple and single linear regression analyses, the study showed the inverse correlation between the biodiversity of the microbiome and the hyperandrogenism, rated as serum total testosterone level and hirsutism. Therefore, as testosterone levels increase, there is a reduction in α diversity (p = 0.006) and a modification in β diversity (p = 0.0009). The study of Insenser el al. has shown a positive correlation between α diversity and testosterone levels and a negative correlation with estradiol concentrations, suggesting that sex hormones might be involved in the modification of gut microbiome, without, however, being able to confirm the causal relationship and the direction of the same (is it the sex hormones that influence the microbiome or, conversely, is it the gut microbiome that influences the hormone levels?) [27]. Moreover, in this study, a difference between men and women also at the genera level was showed [27]. Raoultella genus is prevalent in women than men, while Megasphaera, Paraprevotella, and Butyricimonas genera are less frequent. Instead, women with PCOS have an increased abundance of the Catenibacterium and Kandleria genera compared with men and control women. In conclusion, it might be possible that hyperandrogenemia, characterizing some forms of PCOS, modifies the normal microbiome’s structure leading to an alteration of intestinal permeability which triggers the aforementioned mechanism responsible for IR. Farther, the secretion of androgens and the consequent hyperandrogenemia promoted by IR is able to stimulate decomposition of visceral adipose tissue, leading to an increase in free fatty acids, which further aggravate the levels of IR, creating a vicious cycle that promoting the occurrence and development of PCOS [13,54]. Nevertheless, a clear correlation between hyperandrogenism and the gut microbiome in determining the genesis of PCOS is lacking.

3.4. Pathway Leading to PCOS

Though the relationship between the alteration of gut microbiome and PCOS has been found, only few studies have explored the possible mechanisms through which gut microbes are associated with PCOS. Wang et al. (2021) described how the intestinal microbes influence the progression of PCOS by upregulating or downregulating hormone secretion, gut-brain mediators, cytokines, and metabolite production [54]. One of the first examples is related to the role of bile acids, interleukin-22 and Bacteroides vulgatus (B. vulgatus). As highlighted in the study conducted by Qi et al., it has been reported a significant increase in B. vulgatus in PCOS patients compared with healthy controls [31]. Healthy recipient mice transplanted with faecal microbiota from PCOS women or fed B. vulgatus develop insulin resistance, a disrupted oestrous cycle and hormone abnormalities, all typical features of PCOS disease: based on this observation, Qi et al. described in the species B. vulgatus of individuals with PCOS a significant increase in the abundance of bile salt hydrolase (bsh) genes, which encode bile salt hydrolases. As a consequence, in PCOS groups, the levels of glycodeoxycholic acid (GDCA) and tauroursodeoxycholic acid (TUDCA) decreased due to the action of the encoded protein, bile salt hydrolases: thus, an increased abundance of B.vulgatus reduced the concentrations of the bile acids, which negatively influenced the production of interleukin-Normally, IL-22 administration is very effective in ameliorating insulin resistance, regulating disrupted oestrous cycles, reversing ovary morphological changes and improving infertility, all typical aspect of PCOS phenotypes. Its role may be explain through two mechanisms: first, an upregulated expression of brown fat-related genes and brown adipose tissue, and second, a resolution of inflammation targeting ovarian granulosa cells. Thus, the decrease of IL-22 was not able to well reverse the PCOS phenotypes, leading to insulin resistance and ovary dysfunction [31]. A further element that can help researchers understand the role of gut microbiome is the evidence of lower concentrations of short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) in the faecal samples of PCOS patients [55]. Indeed, the growth of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Bifidobacterium and Akkermansia is promoted by probiotics supplementation, which are SCFA-producing bacteria, and lead to an increase in intestinal SCFAs. These SCFAs bind to their receptors on enteroendocrine cell membranes and directly stimulate the release of gut-brain mediators such as ghrelin and PYY, whose increase is able to influence sex hormone secretion by the hypophysis and hypothalamus through the gut-brain axis, thus exerting an impact on PCOS symptoms [56]. The increased production of SCFAs also contributes to the barrier function of the gut and reduces the translocation of endotoxins across the gut wall, resulting in reduced inflammation and insulin resistance. Finally, there is a potential interaction between sex hormones and gut microbiota, and their interplay may contribute to the pathogenesis of PCOS [36]. The abundance of Prevotella is positively related to androgen levels, especially testosterone and androstenedione [57], whereas the abundance of Kandleria with the circulating androstenedione concentrations [27]. Lactobacilli are also positively correlated with oestradiol and estrone levels as, transplantation of Lactobacillus or faecal microbiota from normal rats improve the PCOS phenotypes reducing androgen biosynthesis [36].

4. Lower Genital Tract Microbiome in PCOS Patients

Menopause, sex hormones (especially estrogen), age and hygienic habits could influence the composition of lower genital tract (LGT) microbiome since prepuberty and postmenopausal women present different kinds of microbes [58]. The main factors leading to the alteration of LGT microbiome PCOS patients are to be found in the irregular menstruation and abnormal hormone levels [59]. We know that during the normal menstrual cycle estrogen and progesterone causes periodic changes in the epidermal cells of the reproductive tract, which may play a critical role in maintaining the microenvironment of the LGT and considered the menstrual cycle irregularity in PCOS patient, this can strongly alter the composition of PCOS patients’ LGT microbiomes. The vagino-uterine microbiome undergoes small changes between the two phases of the menstrual cycle (proliferative and secretory phase): proliferative period seems to be related to the increase of bacterial proliferation in the vagina and endometrium, which may be the reason why the microorganism in the reproductive tract of PCOS patients is easier to alter [60,61,62]. Moreover, also several studies on rats’ models have demonstrated that rats with PCOS do not show the normal cyclical fluctuations of the vaginal microbiota observed in normal rats [54]. The composition of PCOS patients’ LGT microbiome has not yet been characterized: in 2020, Tu et al. evaluated the LGT microbiome composition of PCOS women, sampling microbiota biopsy of both the vagina and cervical canal of 97 reproductive-aged women [63]. A significant difference of taxa abundance between PCOS and healthy women in both vaginal and cervical canal microbiomes was demonstrated by 16S rRNA gene sequencing on a total of 194 microbial samples. In detail, a great heterogeneity of microbiome composition was observed both in the vagina and cervical canal with a significantly reduced proportion of Lactobacillus and, conversely, an increase of several potential pathogenic taxa, such as Gardnerella vaginalis, Chlamydia trachomatis and Prevotella, in PCOS patients. More than one author has found a tight association between the onset of vaginosis, infertility, abortion, stillbirth, preterm labor, recurrent implantation failure, and many other adverse pregnancy outcomes, and reduced levels of Lactobacillus spp. in the female reproductive tract [64,65,66,67]. Gardnerella and Prevotella species have been reported to be closely related to bacterial vaginosis (BV), which is often overlooked and can be difficult to treat because easy relapses and increase woman’s susceptibility to other types of infections, including HIV [65,66,67,68]. Gardnerella vaginalis can also be detected in the endometrium of about half of women with BV, and may have adverse effects on the procedure of embryo implantation and even the growth of the fetus [69]. Considering that PCOS women are often plagued by infertility, abortion, fetal arrest, preterm birth, and several other adverse reproductive outcomes, it is questionable whether the composition of microorganisms in PCOS women’s LGT may lead to these adverse reproductive phenotypes. In a case-control study conducted by Hong X et al. [18], the microbiome structure was studied by 16S rRNA gene sequencing using vaginal swabs of 39 women with newly diagnosed PCOS and 40 healthy controls. A in The vaginal bacterial structures was found to be significantly difference in the PCOS women compared to healthy one. The Simpson index for PCOS group versus (vs) control group showed a median of 0.49 vs. 0.80, p = 0.008, a Shannon index a median of 1.07 vs. 0.44, p = 0.003, while the Chao1 index a median of 85.12 vs. 66.13, p < 0.0 L. crispatus was significantly lower in the PCOS group (p = 0.001), whereas Mycoplasma and Prevotella was higher in this group when compared to controls (p < 0.001, p = 0.002, respectively). The ROC analysis highlighted that the area under the curve (AUC) for the relative abundance of Mycoplasma was 0.958 (95% CI: 0.901–0.999) underling Mycoplasma genus as a potential biomarker for PCOS screening [18]. Whether the vaginal microbiome impacts the PCOS occurrence or development is still unknown. Normally, disruption in ‘normal’ vaginal equilibrium is defined as BV, which is characterized by increasing pH, epithelial cell destruction and local inflammation [70]. The potential impact of the vaginal microbiome on the female LGT is worth investigating.

5. Diet and Medication: How to Change Gut Microbiome

Since the relationship between microbiome and PCOS pathogenesis is getting more and more defined, a link between diet, microbiota, and PCOS could be postulated, revealing the potential impact on prevention and treatment of this condition. To date, the possible relationship with medication is inconsistent. On the other hand, diet could play a therapeutic role for several chronic diseases, especially those related to metabolic syndrome, through the modulation of the microbiome. In their review, Singh RK et al. described the microbiome and its modification through diet, with the influence on inflammatory bowel disease, obesity, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, cancer and its response immunotherapy [71]. They showed the different impact of animal and plant proteins on gut microbiota: animal-based proteins have been noted to increase Bacteroides, Alistipes and Bilophila, and to reduce counts of Bifidobacterium (B.) adolescentis; those changes increased risk of cardiovascular disease. On the opposite, plant proteins have been reported to increase Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus, and to decrease Bacteroides fragilis and Clostridium perfringens, with the positive health outcome of increasing SCFA’s (Short Chain Fatty Acids) levels and consequent decreasing inflammation. The Authors also reported that a high-fat diet increases counts of Bacteroides and correlates with less Lactobacillus intestinalis and more Clostridiales, Bacteroides, and Enterobacteriales, associated with inflammation. Regarding carbohydrates, it has been suggested that high levels of glucose, fructose, and sucrose increase Bifidobacteria and reduce Bacteroides. Non-digestible carbohydrates, such as whole grain and wheat bran, seem linked to an increase in Bifidobacteria and Lactobacilli [71].
Moreover, it has been demonstrated that those dietary patterns can modify the natural history of pathologic conditions, like type 2 diabetes, independently of antidiabetic drugs, with a significant reduction of glucose and improvement of dyslipidemia and inflammation.
This is also confirmed by the evidence that a diet as poor as that of the “fast-food culture” can cause dysbiosis, a condition linked with numerous chronic diseases, as obesity, cardiovascular diseases, and cancer [72,73].
Given this association, there may be significant therapeutic utility for several pathologies in altering microbial composition through diet. Nevertheless, there is only one study investigating if diet could play any protective or therapeutic role in PCOS. Xue et al. demonstrated that a 21-day treatment with inulin and metformin in mice could cause a decrease of ovarian damage and improvement of PCOS, through the increase of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium, the latter with a proven great anti-inflammation capable [74].
Actually, diet and medication contribution to potential therapy or their protective role on disease’s development and progression is currently poor understood and should be further investigated.

6. Therapeutic Opportunities

With a better understanding of the role of the microbiome in PCOS pathogenesis, great efforts have been made to develop new treatment options for the management of PCOS [75,76,77]. Literature focused on probiotics, prebiotics, and symbiotic, and more innovative fecal microbiota transplantation and IL-22 (Table 3).

6.1. Probiotic, Prebiotics and Synbiotics

Probiotics are “live micro-organisms that, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit on the host” according to the World Health Organization (WHO) [78]. Probiotic microorganisms are naturally found in fermented foods: they perform anti-oxygenic, anti-microbial, anti-inflammatory effects, improving metabolic parameters, modulating intestinal microbiota, and regulating the immune system [79]. To administer probiotics as a therapy implies appropriate supplementation with probiotics to treat diseases.
Although the underlying mechanism remains unclear, probiotics therapy has shown a positive effects on the metabolic profile in women with PCOS [79,80,81,82,83,86,87]. Ahmadi et al. reported that probiotic supplementation (L. acidophilus, L. casei, and B. bifidum) for a period of 12 weeks caused a statistically significant decrease in weight and BMI in PCOS patients compared with the placebo, with beneficial effects on glycaemia, triglycerides (TG) and very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol [79]. Similar results with the supplementation of L. casei, L. acidophilus, L. rhamnosus, L. bulgaricus, B. breve, B. longum, and Streptococcus thermophiles was described in women with PCOS for 8 weeks with a significant decrease in plasma glucose and serum insulin levels [80]. Moreover, Rashad et al. found that probiotic supplementation (L. delbruekii and L. fermentum) for 12 weeks significantly reduced Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) levels, with an additional improvement of lipid profile [81]. The probiotic therapy with L. acidophilus, L. plantarum, L. fermentum, and L. gasseri has also evidenced a possible role in modulation of inflammatory processes when administered for 12 weeks in women with PCOS [86].
In a meta-analysis of seven RCTs, Heshmati et al. found no significant effect of probiotic supplementation on anthropometric indices like weight, BMI, and waist circumferences as well as HOMA-IR and LDL, in PCOS patients compared to placebo; they instead found a significant effect on glycemic control, with lower insulin levels, and on lipid metabolism, by lowering TG serum levels and increasing HDL. These data suggest that probiotic supplementation can be applied as an adjunct therapy for PCOS management. The effects of probiotic therapy on the hormonal profile of women with PCOS are not so widespread [82]. In a recent metanalysis, a significant effect of probiotics on the control of hormonal and inflammatory indicators has been reported by Shamasbi et al., with a significant reduction of Free Androgen Index (FAI) and malondialdehyde (MDA), and an increase Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG) and nitric oxide (NO) [83].
Another study showed that probiotic supplementation of PCOS women for 12 weeks had beneficial effects on total testosterone, SHBG, and MDA levels but did not affect other metabolic profiles [82]. Notable, the probiotics, and their dosages, used in studies varied widely, and that is why future studies will face the standardization of these aspects.
Regarding prebiotics, the most known ones are fructooligosaccharides (FOS), inulin, galactooligosaccharides (GOS), and lactulose [78]. They alter the composition of the microbiota, performing positive effects on the health of the host.
Some studies have shown that prebiotics has positive effects on metabolic markers and immunomodulatory properties because they induce the growth of both Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus, which in turn produce an important reduction in fasting plasma glucose, serum TG, total cholesterol, and LDL cholesterol, and a significant increase in HDL cholesterol levels [87]. Fernandes et al., in this sense, indicated that some prebiotics directly controlled hyperglycemia and HOMA-IR [88]. These results may indicate that the presence of prebiotics, along with probiotics, improves their effectiveness in reducing LDL. Moreover, probiotics (or synbiotics) may decrease triglyceride level (mean difference (MD) −17.51 mg/dL, 95% CI −29.65 to −5.36) [82]. The androgen levels, hirsutism, and menstrual cycle irregularities could also improve by the resident dextrin consumption in women with PCOS [84].
However, additional researches are needed to elucidate and compare the efficacy of several probiotic strains and various doses of probiotics, to identify the proper duration of treatment, and to demonstrate the health benefits of probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics on clinical outcomes in PCOS [84].

6.2. Fecal Microbiota Transplantation

Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) consists of the infusion of microorganisms from the feces of healthy donors to a recipient’s small intestine, in order to rapidly change the composition of the new hostʼs gut microbiome and treat diseases [85]. It could represent a potential innovative treatment option for PCOS.
In their study, Guo Y et al. reported how microbiota interventions through FMT and Lactobacillus transplantation in PCOS-induced rats had a beneficial effect; indeed, this kind of treatment results to be associated with a decrease in serum androgen levels and an increase in estrogen levels, leading to a regulated menstrual cycle [36]. Guo Y et al. showed metabolic improvements in FMT-treated PCOS rats vs. the untreated group, with decreased androgen levels, estradiol and estrone increase and normalization of ovarian function [36].
However, to date, there are no clinical reports on the use of FMT to treat PCOS except murine models; prospective data obtained from laboratory researches should encourage further studies on humans [89].

6.3. New Therapeutic Options (IL-22)

The therapeutic role of intestinal immune factor IL-22 has been studied in PCOS-induced mice models, but it is still not so clear. Qi et al. tried to explore the possible mechanism of IL-22 in regulating hyperandrogenism-associated PCOS, and they found that additional IL-22 treatment in PCOS-induced mice improved insulin-resistance, estrous cycle and ovary morphology. They hypothesized that IL-22 upregulated the browning of white adipose tissue, resulting in regulated insulin sensitivity and ovarian functions in women affected by PCOS with a hyperandrogenism phenotype [90].
Moreover, Qi et al. reported low levels of IL-22 in individuals with PCOS, mediated by reduced IL-22 secretion induced by glycodeoxycholic acid; indeed, reduced glycodeoxycholic acid and tauroursodeoxycholic acid levels were found after transplantation of fecal microbiota from women with PCOS to recipient mice, resulting in insulin resistance, altered bile acid metabolism, reduced interleukin-22 secretion, worst ovarian functions and infertility [31].
These results suggest that modifying the gut microbiota and administrating IL-22 exogenous may represent the effective treatment of PCOS [91].

7. Conclusions

Diversity enriches: starting from this simple sentence and moving the concept to PCOS, the dysbiosis of gut microbiota that occurs in PCOS lead to a decrease of diversity and the abundance of some bacteria species causes metabolic disorders.
Current evidence stressed the contribution of the gut microbiome in conditions unrelated to the gut and emerging researches demonstrated its involvement in PCOS, starting from the observation that humanized mice receiving a fecal transplant from women with PCOS develop ovarian dysfunction, along with immune changes and insulin resistance.
To date, the causal contribution of gut microbiota composition and disruption in secondary bile acid biosynthesis in the pathogenesis of PCOS seems to be proven. As discusses in this paper, the proof that the administration of IL-22 and bile acid glycodeoxycholic acid improved insulin resistance, ovarian dysfunction and infertility in mice with PCOS, suggests that gut microbiota may have a causal role in mediating disrupted insulin sensitivity and ovarian function in PCOS. In light of this evidence, it is possible to believe that a future therapeutic approach for PCOS may involve gut microbiota.
The supplementation with prebiotic, probiotic, and synbiotic in women with PCOS seems to improve many biochemical findings and beneficially affect but the mechanism is still unclear. Further studies are needed to establish the role of these agents in PCOS treatment or, maybe, prevention.
Future prospective and, especially, randomized clinical studies are needed to explain mechanisms underlying this association, the causes of dysbiosis of gut microbiota, and the role of the gut microbiota in PCOS.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: L.D.C. and P.G.; methodology, V.F., C.D.F., A.G., A.M., and P.S.; data curation, V.F., F.P.I., P.V., G.Z., C.B., M.B., G.R., C.D.A. and B.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, V.F., C.D.F., A.G. and L.D.C.; writing-review and editing, V.F., L.D.C. and P.G.; project administration, L.D.C. and G.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not Applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not Applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data available on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

PCOSpolycystic vary syndrome
HAhyperandrogenism
NIHNational Institutes of Health
ESHRE/ASRMEuropean Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology/American Society for Reproductive Medicine
PCOMpolycystic ovarian morphology
DOGMAdysbiosis of gut microbiota
LPSlipopolysaccharide
MeSHmedical subject headings
IRinsulin resistance
BMIbody mass index
PYYpeptide YY
GDCAglycodeoxycholic acid
TUDCAtauroursodeoxycholic acid
SCFAshort-chain fatty acids
LGTlower genital tract
BVbacterial vaginosis
AUCarea under the curve
WHOWorld Health Organization
TGtriglycerides
VLDLvery-low-density lipoprotein
HOMA-IRHomeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance
FAIFree Androgen Index
MDAmalondialdehyde
SHBGsex hormone binding globulin
NOnitric oxide
FOSfructooligosaccharides
GOSgalactooligosaccharides
FMTfecal microbiota transplantation

References

  1. Teede, H.J.; Misso, M.L.; Costello, M.F.; Dokras, A.; Laven, J.; Moran, L.; Piltonen, T.; Norman, R.J.; Andersen, M.; Azziz, R.; et al. Recommendations from the international evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum. Reprod. 2018, 33, 1602–1618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Bozdag, G.; Mumusoglu, S.; Zengin, D.; Karabulut, E.; Yildiz, B.O. The prevalence and phenotypic features of polycystic ovary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum. Reprod. 2016, 31, 2841–2855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lambrinoudaki, I.; Armeni, E. Cardiovascular Risk in Postmenopausal Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Curr. Vasc. Pharmacol. 2019, 17, 579–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Puurunen, J.; Piltonen, T.; Morin-Papunen, L.; Perheentupa, A.; Järvelä, I.; Ruokonen, A.; Tapanainen, J.S. Unfavorable Hormonal, Metabolic, and Inflammatory Alterations Persist after Menopause in Women with PCOS. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011, 96, 1827–1834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Della Corte, L.; La Rosa, V.L.; Rapisarda, A.M.C.; Valenti, G.; Morra, I.; Boccellino, A.; Zizolfi, B.; Santangelo, F.; De Rosa, N.; Sapia, F.; et al. Current evidences and future perspectives on patient-oriented treatments for polycystic ovary syn-drome: An overview. Ital. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2018, 30, 2385. [Google Scholar]
  6. Azziz, R.; Carmina, E.; Chen, Z.; Dunaif, A.; Laven, J.S.E.; Legro, R.S.; Lizneva, D.; Horowtiz-Natterson, B.; Teede, H.J.; Yildiz, B.O. Polycystic ovary syndrome. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2016, 2, 16057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zawadzki, J.K.; Dunaif, A. Diagnostic criteria for polycystic ovary syndrome: Toward a rational approach. In Polycystic Ovary Syndrome; Dunaif, A., Givens, J.R., Haseltine, F., Merriam, G.R., Eds.; Blackwell Scientific Publications: Oxford, UK, 1992; pp. 377–384. [Google Scholar]
  8. Chang, J.; Azziz, R.; Legro, R.; Dewailly, D.; Franks, S.; Tarlatzis, R.; Fauser, B.; Balen, A.; Bouchard, P.; Dalgien, E.; et al. Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil. Steril. 2004, 81, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Giampaolino, P.; Della Corte, L.; De Rosa, N.; Mercorio, A.; Bruzzese, D.; Bifulco, G. Ovarian volume and PCOS: A controversial issue. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 2017, 34, 229–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Giampaolino, P.; Morra, I.; Della Corte, L.; Sparice, S.; Di Carlo, C.; Nappi, C.; Bifulco, G. Serum anti-Mullerian hormone levels after ovarian drilling for the second-line treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome: A pilot-randomized study comparing laparoscopy and transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 2017, 33, 26–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Giampaolino, P.; De Rosa, N.; Della Corte, L.; Morra, I.; Mercorio, A.; Nappi, C.; Bifulco, G. Operative transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy improve ovulation rate after clomiphene failure in polycystic ovary syndrome. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 2017, 34, 32–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Franks, S.; I McCarthy, M.; Hardy, K. Development of polycystic ovary syndrome: Involvement of genetic and environmental factors. Int. J. Androl. 2006, 29, 278–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, Y.; Chen, C.; Ma, Y.; Xiao, J.; Luo, G.; Li, Y.; Wu, D. Multi-system reproductive metabolic disorder: Significance for the pathogenesis and therapy of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Life Sci. 2019, 228, 167–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Cani, P.D.; Amar, J.; Iglesias, M.A.; Poggi, M.; Knauf, C.; Bastelica, D.; Neyrinck, A.M.; Fava, F.; Tuohy, K.M.; Chabo, C.; et al. Metabolic Endotoxemia Initiates Obesity and Insulin Resistance. Diabetes 2007, 56, 1761–1772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Turnbaugh, P.J.; Ley, R.E.; Mahowald, M.A.; Magrini, V.; Mardis, E.R.; Gordon, J.I. An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest. Nat. Cell Biol. 2006, 444, 1027–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dabke, K.; Hendrick, G.; Devkota, S. The gut microbiome and metabolic syndrome. J. Clin. Investig. 2019, 129, 4050–4057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tremellen, K.; Pearce, K. Dysbiosis of Gut Microbiota (DOGMA)—A novel theory for the development of Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome. Med. Hypotheses 2012, 79, 104–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Hong, X.; Qin, P.; Huang, K.; Ding, X.; Ma, J.; Xuan, Y.; Zhu, X.; Peng, D.; Wang, B. Association between polycystic ovary syndrome and the vaginal microbiome: A case-control study. Clin. Endocrinol. 2020, 93, 52–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Qin, J.; Li, R.; Raes, J.; Arumugam, M.; Burgdorf, K.S.; Manichanh, C.; Nielsen, T.; Pons, N.; Levenez, F.; Yamada, T.; et al. A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature 2010, 464, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Gill, S.R.; Pop, M.; DeBoy, R.T.; Eckburg, P.B.; Turnbaugh, P.J.; Samuel, B.S.; Gordon, J.I.; Relman, D.A.; Fraser-Liggett, C.M.; Nelson, K.E. Metagenomic Analysis of the Human Distal Gut Microbiome. Science 2006, 312, 1355–1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Clemente, J.C.; Ursell, L.K.; Parfrey, L.W.; Knight, R. The Impact of the Gut Microbiota on Human Health: An Integrative View. Cell 2012, 148, 1258–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Eckburg, P.B.; Bik, E.M.; Bernstein, C.N.; Purdom, E.; Dethlefsen, L.; Sargent, M.; Gill, S.R.; Nelson, K.E.; Relman, D.A. Diversity of the Human Intestinal Microbial Flora. Science 2005, 308, 1635–1638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Lindheim, L.; Bashir, M.; Münzker, J.; Trummer, C.; Zachhuber, V.; Leber, B.; Horvath, A.; Pieber, T.R.; Gorkiewicz, G.; Stadlbauer, V.; et al. Alterations in Gut Microbiome Composition and Barrier Function Are Associated with Reproductive and Metabolic Defects in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS): A Pilot Study. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0168390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, R.; Zhang, C.; Shi, Y.; Zhang, F.; Li, L.; Wang, X.; Ling, Y.; Fu, H.; Dong, W.; Shen, J.; et al. Dysbiosis of Gut Microbiota Associated with Clinical Parameters in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Torres, P.J.; Siakowska, M.; Banaszewska, B.; Pawelczyk, L.; Duleba, A.J.; Kelley, S.T.; Thackray, V.G. Gut Microbial Diversity in Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Correlates With Hyperandrogenism. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2018, 103, 1502–1511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Insenser, M.; Murri, M.; Del Campo, R.; Ángeles Martínez-García, M.; Fernández-Durán, E.; Escobar-Morreale, H.F. Gut Microbiota and the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Influence of Sex, Sex Hormones, and Obesity. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2018, 103, 2552–2562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Thursby, E.; Juge, N. Introduction to the human gut microbiota. Biochem. J. 2017, 474, 1823–1836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Thackray, V.G. Sex, Microbes, and Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2019, 30, 54–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Fangyuan, C.; Zhiwen, L.A.I.; Zusen, X.U. Analysis of the gut microbial composition in polycystic ovary syndrome with acne. Zigong Matern. Child. Health Hosp. 2019, 35, 2246–2251. [Google Scholar]
  30. Zhou, L.; Ni, Z.; Cheng, W.; Yu, J.; Sun, S.; Zhai, D.; Yu, C.; Cai, Z. Characteristic gut microbiota and predicted metabolic functions in women with PCOS. Endocr. Connect. 2020, 9, 63–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Qi, X.; Yun, C.; Sun, L.; Xia, J.; Wu, Q.; Wang, L.; Wang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Liang, X.; Gonzalez, F.J.; et al. Gut microbiota–bile acid–interleukin-22 axis orchestrates polycystic ovary syndrome. Nat. Med. 2019, 25, 1225–1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ley, R.E. Gut microbiota in 2015: Prevotella in the gut: Choose carefully. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lukens, J.R.; Gurung, P.; Vogel, P.; Johnson, G.R.; Carter, R.A.; McGoldrick, D.J.; Bandi, S.R.; Calabrese, C.R.; Vande Walle, L.; Lamkanfi, M.; et al. Dietary modulation of the microbiome affects autoinflammatory disease. Nature 2014, 516, 246e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Zeng, B.; Lai, Z.; Sun, L.; Zhang, Z.; Yang, J.; Li, Z.; Lin, J.; Zhang, Z. Structural and functional profiles of the gut microbial community in polycystic ovary syndrome with insulin resistance (IR-PCOS): A pilot study. Res. Microbiol. 2019, 170, 43–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Sherman, S.; Sarsour, N.; Salehi, M.; Schroering, A.; Mell, B.; Joe, B.; Hill, J.W. Prenatal androgen ex-posure causes hypertension and gut microbiota dysbiosis. Gut Microbes. 2018, 9, 400–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Guo, Y.; Qi, Y.; Yang, X.; Zhao, L.; Wen, S.; Liu, Y.; Tang, L. Association between Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and Gut Microbiota. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0153196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Jiao, N.; Baker, S.S.; Nugent, C.A.; Tsompana, M.; Cai, L.; Wang, Y.; Buck, M.J.; Genco, R.J.; Baker, R.D.; Zhu, R.; et al. Gut microbiome may con-tribute to insulin resistance and systemic inflammation in obese rodents: A meta-analysis. Physiol Genomics. 2018, 50, 54–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Scheithauer, T.P.M.; Dallinga-Thie, G.M.; De Vos, W.M.; Nieuwdorp, M.; Van Raalte, D.H. Causality of small and large intestinal microbiota in weight regulation and insulin resistance. Mol. Metab. 2016, 5, 759–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Bäckhed, F.; Ding, H.; Wang, T.; Hooper, L.V.; Koh, G.Y.; Nagy, A.; Semenkovich, C.F.; Gordon, J.I. The gut microbiota as an environmental factor that regulates fat storage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 15718–15723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Vrieze, A.; Van Nood, E.; Holleman, F.; Salojärvi, J.; Kootte, R.S.; Bartelsman, J.F.W.M.; Dallinga–Thie, G.M.; Ackermans, M.T.; Serlie, M.J.; Oozeer, R.; et al. Transfer of Intestinal Microbiota from Lean Donors Increases Insulin Sensitivity in Individuals With Metabolic Syndrome. Gastroenterology 2012, 143, 913–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. He, F.-F.; Li, Y.-M. Role of gut microbiota in the development of insulin resistance and the mechanism underlying polycystic ovary syndrome: A review. J. Ovarian Res. 2020, 13, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Andreasen, A.S.; Larsen, N.; Pedersen-Skovsgaard, T.; Berg, R.M.G.; Møller, K.; Svendsen, K.D.; Jakobsen, M.; Pedersen, B.K. Effects ofLactobacillus acidophilusNCFM on insulin sensitivity and the systemic inflammatory response in human subjects. Br. J. Nutr. 2010, 104, 1831–1838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Lang, U.E.; Beglinger, C.; Schweinfurth, N.; Walter, M.H.; Borgwardt, S. Nutritional Aspects of Depression. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2015, 37, 1029–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lin, T.; Li, S.; Xu, H.; Zhou, H.; Feng, R.; Liu, W.; Sun, Y.; Ma, J. Gastrointestinal hormone secretion in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: An observational study. Hum. Reprod. 2015, 30, 2639–2644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Houjeghani, S.; Gargari, B.P.; Farzadi, L. Serum Leptin and Ghrelin Levels in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Correlation with Anthropometric, Metabolic, and Endocrine Parameters. Int. J. Fertil Steril 2012, 6, 117–126. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  46. Arusoglu, G.; Koksal, G.; Cinar, N.; Tapan, S.; Aksoy, D.Y.; Yildiz, B.O. Basal and Meal-Stimulated Ghrelin, PYY, CCK Levels and Satiety in Lean Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Effect of Low-Dose Oral Contraceptive. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2013, 98, 4475–4482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Falony, G.; Joossens, M.; Vieira-Silva, S.; Wang, J.; Darzi, Y.; Faust, K.; Kurilshikov, A.; Bonder, M.J.; Valles-Colomer, M.; Vandeputte, D.; et al. Population-level analysis of gut microbiome variation. Science 2016, 352, 560–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Dominianni, C.; Sinha, R.; Goedert, J.J.; Pei, Z.; Yang, L.; Hayes, R.B.; Ahn, J. Sex, Body Mass Index, and Dietary Fiber Intake Influence the Human Gut Microbiome. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0124599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Chen, T.; Long, W.; Zhang, C.; Liu, S.; Zhao, L.; Hamaker, B.R. Fiber-utilizing capacity varies in Prevotella- versus Bacteroides-dominated gut microbiota. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Haro, C.; Rangel-Zúñiga, O.A.; Alcalá-Díaz, J.F.; Gómez-Delgado, F.; Pérez-Martínez, P.; Delgado-Lista, J.; Quintana-Navarro, G.M.; Landa, B.B.; Cortés, J.A.N.; Tena-Sempere, M.; et al. Intestinal Microbiota Is Influenced by Gender and Body Mass Index. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0154090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Harada, N.; Hanaoka, R.; Horiuchi, H.; Kitakaze, T.; Mitani, T.; Inui, H.; Yamaji, R. Castration influences intestinal microflora and induces abdominal obesity in high-fat diet-fed mice. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 23001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Choi, S.; Hwang, Y.-J.; Shin, M.-J.; Yi, H. Difference in the Gut Microbiome between Ovariectomy-Induced Obesity and Diet-Induced Obesity. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 27, 2228–2236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Barrea, L.; Marzullo, P.; Muscogiuri, G.; Di Somma, C.; Scacchi, M.; Orio, F.; Aimaretti, G.; Colao, A.; Savastano, S. Source and amount of carbohydrate in the diet and inflammation in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Nutr. Res. Rev. 2018, 31, 291–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Wang, L.; Zhou, J.; Gober, H.-J.; Leung, W.T.; Huang, Z.; Pan, X.; Li, C.; Zhang, N.; Wang, L. Alterations in the intestinal microbiome associated with PCOS affect the clinical phenotype. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2021, 133, 110958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ratajczak, W.; Rył, A.; Mizerski, A.; Walczakiewicz, K.; Sipak, O.; Laszczyńska, M. Immunomodulatory potential of gut microbiome-derived short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs). Acta Biochim. Pol. 2019, 66, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Zhang, J.; Sun, Z.; Jiang, S.; Bai, X.; Ma, C.; Peng, Q.; Chen, K.; Chang, H.; Fang, T.; Zhang, H. Probiotic Bifidobacterium lactis V9 Regulates the Secretion of Sex Hormones in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Patients through the Gut-Brain Axis. mSystems 2019, 4, e00017-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Kumar, P.S. Sex and the subgingival microbiome: Do female sex steroids affect periodontal bacteria? Periodontol. 2000 2013, 61, 103–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Muhleisen, A.L.; Herbst-Kralovetz, M.M. Menopause and the vaginal microbiome. Maturitas 2016, 91, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Stumpf, R.M.; Wilson, B.A.; Rivera, A.; Yildirim, S.; Yeoman, C.J.; Polk, J.D.; White, B.A.; Leigh, S.R. The primate vaginal microbiome: Comparative context and implications for human health and disease. Am. J. Phys. Anthr. 2013, 152, 119–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Gajer, P.; Brotman, R.M.; Bai, G.; Sakamoto, J.; Schütte, U.M.E.; Zhong, X.; Koenig, S.S.K.; Fu, L.; Ma, Z.S.; Zhou, X.; et al. Temporal Dynamics of the Human Vaginal Microbiota. Sci. Transl. Med. 2012, 4, 132ra52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Chen, C.; Song, X.; Chunwei, Z.; Zhong, H.; Dai, J.; Lan, Z.; Li, F.; Yu, X.; Feng, Q.; Wang, Z.; et al. The microbiota continuum along the female reproductive tract and its relation to uterine-related diseases. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Anahtar, M.N.; Gootenberg, D.B.; Mitchell, C.M.; Kwon, D.S. Cervicovaginal Microbiota and Reproductive Health: The Virtue of Simplicity. Cell Host Microbe 2018, 23, 159–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Tu, Y.; Zheng, G.; Ding, G.; Wu, Y.; Xi, J.; Ge, Y.; Gu, H.; Wang, Y.; Sheng, J.; Liu, X.; et al. Comparative Analysis of Lower Genital Tract Microbiome Between PCOS and Healthy Women. Front. Physiol. 2020, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Gupta, S.; Kakkar, V.; Bhushan, I. Crosstalk between Vaginal Microbiome and Female Health: A review. Microb. Pathog. 2019, 136, 103696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Al-Memar, M.; Bobdiwala, S.; Fourie, H.; Mannino, R.; Lee, Y.S.; Smith, A.; Marchesi, J.R.; Timmerman, D.; Bourne, T.; Bennett, P.R.; et al. The association between vaginal bacterial composition and miscarriage: A nested case–control study. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2020, 127, 264–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Peelen, M.J.; Luef, B.M.; Lamont, R.F.; De Milliano, I.; Jensen, J.S.; Limpens, J.; Hajenius, P.J.; Jørgensen, J.S.; Menon, R. The influence of the vaginal microbiota on preterm birth: A systematic review and recommendations for a minimum dataset for future research. Placenta 2019, 79, 30–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Koedooder, R.; Singer, M.; Schoenmakers, S.; Savelkoul, P.H.M.; A Morré, S.; De Jonge, J.D.; Poort, L.; Cuypers, W.J.S.S.; Beckers, N.G.M.; Broekmans, F.J.M.; et al. The vaginal microbiome as a predictor for outcome of in vitro fertilization with or without intracytoplasmic sperm injection: A prospective study. Hum. Reprod. 2019, 34, 1042–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Coudray, M.S.; Madhivanan, P. Bacterial vaginosis—A brief synopsis of the literature. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2020, 245, 143–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Vestby, L.K.; Grønseth, T.; Simm, R.; Nesse, L.L. Bacterial Biofilm and its Role in the Pathogenesis of Disease. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  70. Onderdonk, A.B.; Delaney, M.L.; Fichorova, R.N. The Human Microbiome during Bacterial Vaginosis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2016, 29, 223–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Singh, R.K.; Chang, H.-W.; Yan, D.; Lee, K.M.; Ucmak, D.; Wong, K.; Abrouk, M.; Farahnik, B.; Nakamura, M.; Zhu, T.H.; et al. Influence of diet on the gut microbiome and implications for human health. J. Transl. Med. 2017, 15, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Gentile, C.L.; Weir, T.L. The gut microbiota at the intersection of diet and human health. Science 2018, 362, 776–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Klement, R.J.; Pazienza, V. Impact of Different Types of Diet on Gut Microbiota Profiles and Cancer Prevention and Treatment. Medicina 2019, 55, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Xue, J.; Li, X.; Liu, P.; Li, K.; Sha, L.; Yang, X.; Zhu, L.; Wang, Z.; Dong, Y.; Zhang, L.; et al. Inulin and metformin ameliorate polycystic ovary syndrome via anti-inflammation and modulating gut microbiota in mice. Endocr. J. 2019, 66, 859–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Karamali, M.; Eghbalpour, S.; Rajabi, S.; Jamilian, M.; Bahmani, F.; Tajabadi-Ebrahimi, M.; Keneshlou, F.; Mirhashemi, S.M.; Chamani, M.; Hashem Gelougerdi, S.; et al. Effects of Probiotic Supplementation on Hormonal Profiles, Biomarkers of Inflammation and Oxida-tive Stress in Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Pla-cebo-Controlled Trial. Arch. Iran Med. 2018, 21, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  76. Zhao, X.; Jiang, Y.; Xi, H.; Chen, L.; Feng, X. Exploration of the Relationship Between Gut Microbiota and Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS): A Review. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2020, 80, 161–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Della Corte, L.; Foreste, V.; Barra, F.; Gustavino, C.; Alessandri, F.; Centurioni, M.G.; Ferrero, S.; Bifulco, G.; Giampaolino, P. Current and experimental drug therapy for the treatment of polycystic ovarian syndrome. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 2020, 29, 819–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Guarner, F.; Khan, A.G.; Garisch, J.; Eliakim, R.; Gangl, A.; Thomson, A.; Krabshuis, J.; Lemair, T.; Kaufmann, P.; De Paula, J.A.; et al. World Gastroenterology Organisation Global Guidelines. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2012, 46, 468–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Ahmadi, S.; Jamilian, M.; Karamali, M.; Tajabadi-Ebrahimi, M.; Jafari, P.; Taghizadeh, M.; Memarzadeh, M.R.; Asemi, Z. Probiotic supplementation and the effects on weight loss, glycaemia and lipid profiles in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Hum. Fertil. 2017, 20, 254–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Askari, G.; Shoaei, T.; Tehrani, H.G.; Heidari-Beni, M.; Feizi, A.; Esmaillzadeh, A. Effects of probiotic supplementation on pancreatic β-cell function and c-reactive protein in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial. Int. J. Prev. Med. 2015, 6, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Rashad, N.M.; El-Shal, A.S.; Amin, A.I.; Soliman, M.H. Effects of probiotics supplementation on macrophage migration inhibitory factor and clinical laboratory feature of polycystic ovary syndrome. J. Funct. Foods 2017, 36, 317–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Heshmati, J.; Farsi, F.; Yosaee, S.; Razavi, M.; Rezaeinejad, M.; Karimie, E.; Sepidarkish, M. The Effects of Probiotics or Synbiotics Supplementation in Women with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2019, 11, 1236–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Shamasbi, S.G.; Ghanbari-Homayi, S.; Mirghafourvand, M. The effect of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics on hormonal and inflammatory indices in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. J. Nutr. 2019, 59, 433–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Shamasbi, S.G.; Dehgan, P.; Charandabi, S.M.-A.; Aliasgarzadeh, A.; Mirghafourvand, M. The effect of resistant dextrin as a prebiotic on metabolic parameters and androgen level in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome: A randomized, triple-blind, controlled, clinical trial. Eur. J. Nutr. 2018, 58, 629–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Yurtdaş, G.; Akdevelioğlu, Y. A New Approach to Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: The Gut Microbiota. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 2019, 39, 371–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Ghanei, N.; Rezaei, N.; Amiri, G.A.; Zayeri, F.; Makki, G.; Nasseri, E. The probiotic supplementation reduced inflammation in polycystic ovary syndrome: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J. Funct. Foods 2018, 42, 306–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Altun, H.K.; Yıldız, E.A. Prebiyotikler ve Probiyotiklerin Diyabet ile Iliskisi. Turk. J. Life Sci. 2017, 11, 63–70. [Google Scholar]
  88. Fernandes, R.; Rosario, V.A.D.; Mocellin, M.C.; Kuntz, M.G.; Trindade, E.B. Effects of inulin-type fructans, galacto-oligosaccharides and related synbiotics on inflammatory markers in adult patients with overweight or obesity: A systematic review. Clin. Nutr. 2017, 36, 1197–1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Moore, T.; Rodriguez, A.; Bakken, J.S. Fecal Microbiota Transplantation: A Practical Update for the Infectious Disease Specialist. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2014, 58, 541–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Qi, X.; Yun, C.; Liao, B.; Qiao, J.; Pang, Y. The therapeutic effect of interleukin-22 in high androgen-induced polycystic ovary syndrome. J. Endocrinol. 2020, 245, 281–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Kriebs, A. IL-22 links gut microbiota to PCOS. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2019, 15, 565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 22 02048 g001 550
Figure 1. Flow diagram of narrative review search.
Figure 1. Flow diagram of narrative review search.
Ijms 22 02048 g001
Table
Table 1. The effect of changes in major microorganisms in PCOS patients.
Table 1. The effect of changes in major microorganisms in PCOS patients.
PCOS
MicroorganismsEffect
Increase of
Escherichia and Shigella 		Altered production of short-chain fatty acids
Increase of
Bacteroides vulgatus		Reduction in the levels of glycodeoxycholic and tauroursodeoxycholic acid
Decrease of
Prevotellaceae		Loss of production of anti-inflammatory metabolites
Decrease of
Lactobacilli and Bifidobacteria		Reduced immunity and nutrient absorption
Table
Table 2. The relationship between changes in major microorganisms and the onset of IR.
Table 2. The relationship between changes in major microorganisms and the onset of IR.
Insuline Resistance (IR)
MicroorganismsEffect
Imbalance of gut microbiota (significant difference in the abundance of Ruminococcaceae and Lachnospiraceae)Increased intestinal permeability → chronic low-grade inflammation by activating the immune system → production of proinflammatory cytokines interfere with insulin receptor function → IR/hyperinsulinemia
Increase of Bacteroides speciesAltered secretion of Ghrelin and peptide YY → IR/hyperinsulinemia.
Table
Table 3. Therapeutic opportunities acting on the gut microbiome (HDL: High-Density Lipoprotein; LDL: Low-Density Lipoprotein; TG: Triglyceride; FMT: Fecal Microbiota Transplantation).
Table 3. Therapeutic opportunities acting on the gut microbiome (HDL: High-Density Lipoprotein; LDL: Low-Density Lipoprotein; TG: Triglyceride; FMT: Fecal Microbiota Transplantation).
TherapyStudied ModelEffectsReference
ProbioticHumanPositive effect on glycemic control, with lower insulin levels, and on lipid metabolism, by increasing HDL and lowering TG serum levels; positive control of hormonal and inflammatory indicators[76,77,78,79,80,81]
Prebiotics HumanPositive effects on metabolic markers and immunomodulatory properties; considerable decrease in fasting plasma glucose, serum TG, total cholesterol, and LDL cholesterol, and significant increase in HDL cholesterol levels.[75,82,83]
FMTMiceMetabolic improvements in FMT-treated PCOS rats vs. the untreated group, with decreased androgen levels, estradiol and estrone increase and normalization of ovarian function.[36]
IL-22MiceImproved insulin-resistance, estrous cycle and ovary morphology.[84,85]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Giampaolino, P.; Foreste, V.; Di Filippo, C.; Gallo, A.; Mercorio, A.; Serafino, P.; Improda, F.P.; Verrazzo, P.; Zara, G.; Buonfantino, C.; et al. Microbiome and PCOS: State-of-Art and Future Aspects. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 2048. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22042048

AMA Style

Giampaolino P, Foreste V, Di Filippo C, Gallo A, Mercorio A, Serafino P, Improda FP, Verrazzo P, Zara G, Buonfantino C, et al. Microbiome and PCOS: State-of-Art and Future Aspects. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(4):2048. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22042048

Chicago/Turabian Style

Giampaolino, Pierluigi, Virginia Foreste, Claudia Di Filippo, Alessandra Gallo, Antonio Mercorio, Paolo Serafino, Francesco Paolo Improda, Paolo Verrazzo, Giuseppe Zara, Cira Buonfantino, and et al. 2021. "Microbiome and PCOS: State-of-Art and Future Aspects" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 4: 2048. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22042048

APA Style

Giampaolino, P., Foreste, V., Di Filippo, C., Gallo, A., Mercorio, A., Serafino, P., Improda, F. P., Verrazzo, P., Zara, G., Buonfantino, C., Borgo, M., Riemma, G., Angelis, C. D., Zizolfi, B., Bifulco, G., & Della Corte, L. (2021). Microbiome and PCOS: State-of-Art and Future Aspects. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(4), 2048. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22042048

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop