Next Article in Journal
On the Origins of Homology Directed Repair in Mammalian Cells
Next Article in Special Issue
Novel (+)-Neoisopulegol-Based O-Benzyl Derivatives as Antimicrobial Agents
Previous Article in Journal
Knockout of Auxin Response Factor SlARF4 Improves Tomato Resistance to Water Deficit
Previous Article in Special Issue
Hyaluronic Acid-Targeted Stimuli-Sensitive Nanomicelles Co-Encapsulating Paclitaxel and Ritonavir to Overcome Multi-Drug Resistance in Metastatic Breast Cancer and Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 22
Issue 7
10.3390/ijms22073349
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Delivery of Orally Administered Digestible Antibodies Using Nanoparticles

by
Toshihiko Tashima
Tashima Laboratories of Arts and Sciences, 1239-5 Toriyama-cho, Kohoku-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 222-0035, Japan
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(7), 3349; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22073349
Submission received: 3 March 2021 / Revised: 23 March 2021 / Accepted: 23 March 2021 / Published: 25 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Drug Design, Synthesis and Delivery)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Oral administration of medications is highly preferred in healthcare owing to its simplicity and convenience; however, problems of drug membrane permeability can arise with any administration method in drug discovery and development. In particular, commonly used monoclonal antibody (mAb) drugs are directly injected through intravenous or subcutaneous routes across physical barriers such as the cell membrane, including the epithelium and endothelium. However, intravenous administration has disadvantages such as pain, discomfort, and stress. Oral administration is an ideal route for mAbs. Nonetheless, proteolysis and denaturation, in addition to membrane impermeability, pose serious challenges in delivering peroral mAbs to the systemic circulation, biologically, through enzymatic and acidic blocks and, physically, through the small intestinal epithelium barrier. A number of clinical trials have been performed using oral mAbs for the local treatment of gastrointestinal diseases, some of which have adopted capsules or tablets as formulations. Surprisingly, no oral mAbs have been approved clinically. An enteric nanodelivery system can protect cargos from proteolysis and denaturation. Moreover, mAb cargos released in the small intestine may be delivered to the systemic circulation across the intestinal epithelium through receptor-mediated transcytosis. Oral Abs in milk are transported by neonatal Fc receptors to the systemic circulation in neonates. Thus, well-designed approaches can establish oral mAb delivery. In this review, I will introduce the implementation and possibility of delivering orally administered mAbs with or without nanoparticles not only to the local gastrointestinal tract but also to the systemic circulation.

1. Introduction

Medicines benefit human health. Oral administration of medications is the most convenient and commonly used route from the standpoint of quality of life. However, barriers due to insolubility in water, gastric juice with low acidity, degradative or metabolic enzymes, and the epithelial cell membrane impede drug delivery. In particular, peptides, proteins, and nucleic acid drugs are associated with almost all these factors. In contrast, low-molecular-weight drugs are pharmacokinetically appropriate for oral administration because of their enzymatic stability and membrane permeability, which result in good absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME). They enter the cells across the membrane not only through passive diffusion but also through carrier-mediated transport by solute carrier transporters. However, at present, drug modalities have become diverse owing to the depletion tendency of drug seeds or drug discovery targets. Generally, compounds are categorized into three groups: low-molecular weight compounds (molecular weight (MW) < approximately 500), high-molecular weight compounds (MW > approximately 3000), and medium-molecular weight compounds (MW approximately 500–3000). While low-molecular weight drugs, as the mainstream pharmaceutical agents, have achieved the best success among these groups, high-molecular weight compounds and medium-molecular weight compounds have further scope for development. Multiple intravenous monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that are high-molecular weight compounds have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA); they are used in clinical practice for the treatment of various diseases. High-molecular weight compounds such as protein and nucleic acid drugs, as well as medium-molecular weight compounds such as peptide drugs, have great potential to satisfy unmet medical needs. Therefore, the oral administration of peptides or proteins with or without nanodelivery systems has been proactively explored in drug development [1,2,3]. However, the methodology for oral mAb delivery has not yet been established [4].
Drug delivery systems are highly important in solving barrier problems, such as transmembrane transportation in drug discovery and development. I have described a transporter-conscious drug design for crossing the cell membrane based on carrier-mediated transport [5], delivery of substances into cells across the membrane using cell-penetrating peptides through endocytosis or direct translocation [6], drug internalization into cancer cells that express specific proteins to avoid off-target side effects in cancer therapy [7], substance delivery into the brain across the blood–brain barrier (BBB) based on transcytosis [8], and intranasal conjugated substance delivery into the brain using insulin as a carrier [9]. Despite these approaches, problems in drug delivery persist. It is true that intravenous mAbs provide significant patient benefit; however, the patients are subject to the inconvenience of injection or drip infusion, compared to peroral administration. In this perspective review, I will introduce the implementation and possibility of the delivery of orally administered mAbs to the target sites.

2. Discussion

2.1. The Small Intestinal Epithelium

Oral administration of drugs is the most convenient and acceptable route because it is simple, economical, and safe. However, almost all mAbs approved by the FDA are intravenously or subcutaneously administered owing to enzymatic instability and difficulty in controlling their pharmacokinetics. When mAbs are administered orally, safety and simplicity are fulfilled. Thus, oral administration of mAbs poses important challenges. The trajectory of peroral drugs and foods based on peristalsis is described here (Figure 1). Drugs pass from the mouth to the stomach (approximately 30 cm in length, pH 1–3.5) through the esophagus (approximately 25 cm), and they are transported to the small intestine (approximately 7 m, pH 6.3–7.5), which is composed of the duodenum (approximately 25 cm), jejunum, and ileum. The jejunum forms the upper 2/5 parts of the jejunoileum, and the ileum forms the lower 3/5 parts of the jejunoileum, without a distinct boundary. The lamina propria in the jejunum is more vascularized than the lamina propria in the ileum. The intestinal villi in the small intestine increase the surface area for absorbing materials effectively. Most orally administered drugs are absorbed in the small intestine across the intestinal epithelium to the portal vein, leading to systemic circulation via enzymatic metabolism in the liver. The remaining drugs are conveyed to the colon (approximately 1.6 m, pH 7.5–8) and eventually expelled into the feces [10]. The mechanisms of substance absorption in the intestinal epithelial cells are classified as the transcellular pathway and paracellular pathway. Furthermore, the transcellular pathway is categorized into passive lipoidal diffusion, carrier-mediated transport based on solute carrier transporters, receptor-mediated transcytosis (RMT), and bystander transportation through pinocytosis. The paracellular pathway involves the passive diffusion of small solute materials such as ions and water through tight junctions between cells. mAb molecules are so large that they cannot pass through tight junctions, internal cavities of transporters, and cell membranes on the basis of passive lipoidal diffusion. Basically, mAbs are transported across the membrane through receptor-mediated endocytosis and spontaneous pinocytosis. Therefore, molecular design for achieving the delivery of oral mAbs or nanoparticles delivery should consider these facts.
The small intestinal epithelium is primarily composed of enterocytes, microfold (M) cells, goblet cells, tuft cells, enteroendocrine cells, and Paneth cells (Figure 2). First, enterocytes, also called intestinal absorptive cells, play a vital role in the uptake of nutrients, vitamins, peptides, water, and ions. Most orally administered drugs are absorbed by enterocytes. Second, the gut-associated lymphoid tissue is composed of Peyer’s patches and isolated lymphoid follicles; it contains immune cells such as T and B lymphocytes, macrophages, antigen-presenting cells, and intraepithelial lymphocytes. M cells of Peyer’s patch transcytose antigens and present them to immune cells [11]. mAbs and nanoparticles are absorbed through endocytosis by M cells covered with a thin mucus layer. However, the population of M cells is considerably smaller than that of enterocytes. Third, goblet cells continually secrete mucin into the lumen. Mucins are negatively charged and composed of highly O-glycosylated glycoproteins; they form a single mucus layer (approximately 30 μm in depth) in the small intestine and two mucus layers in the colon [12]. The mucus layer averts abrasion on the epithelial surface by undigested food and the invasion of microorganisms and toxic materials. In addition to materials essential for life activity, drugs penetrate the mucus layer into the epithelial cells. Thus, orally administered mAbs or nanoparticles must penetrate the mucus layer in order to elicit their activity at target sites, except for the intestinal lumen. Fourth, tuft cells function as chemosensory sentinels to regulate type 2 immune responses to parasites and protozoa by producing biological effector molecules [13]. Fifth, various enteroendocrine cells secrete cell-specific endocrine hormones or hormone-like substances, such as somatostatin, glucagon, and serotonin. Sixth, Paneth cells in the crypts secrete antimicrobial peptides. The gastrointestinal tract, which connects to the external environment, possesses a highly developed system for immune defense against exogenous materials and microorganisms, in addition to digestive and absorptive systems. Eaten foods are digested by digestive enzymes such as pepsin in the stomach and trypsin, chymotrypsin, carboxypeptidase, and elastase in the small intestine. Peroral mAbs are exposed to these digestive enzymes. In fact, mAbs are denatured by pepsin at pH 2, whereas they are denatured to some extent by trypsin or chymotrypsin at pH 8. Drugs are considered to be pharmacokinetically influenced by structural and biological systems. Accordingly, drug design for oral administration should be conducted in consideration of anatomical and biological features in the gastrointestinal tract and stomach, particularly in the enterocytes and M cells of the small intestine.

2.2. Viruses Entering the Intestinal Epithelium

Human norovirus (HuNoV), a non-enveloped, single-stranded RNA virus, enters the body from the mouth through the gut tract and causes diarrheal illness. Its capsid (23–40 nm in diameter) protects RNAs from gastric acid and digestive proteases, as if it functioned as a nanoparticle carrier. VP1, a major capsid protein derived from HuNoVs, was detected in enterocytes, macrophages, T cells, and dendritic cells in intestinal biopsies. In particular, enterocytes were found to be relevant to HuNoV replication [14]. Moreover, enteroendocrine cells are relevant to HuNoV replication [15]. It has been proposed that the mechanism underlying the internalization of HuNoVs into cells is based on receptor-mediated endocytosis [16]. Therefore, it was suggested that unstable materials such as proteins and nucleic acids could be orally delivered using nanoparticles as carriers that protect them from gastric acid and digestive proteases. For rational molecular design and drug development, medicinal chemists and pharmaceutical scientists are utilizing evasion strategies used by viruses.

2.3. Rise of Intravenous Antibody Drugs on the Market

mAb drugs show high specificity to target substances, such as antigens, and are called molecular-targeted agents. Muromonab-CD3 (anti-CD3) was approved by the FDA as the first mAb in 1986. Since then, several mAb drugs have been approved [17]. Currently, pharmaceutical companies have produced revenue from the sale of mAb drugs. The total global sales of mAbs were approximately US$115.2 billion in 2018 and projected to reach US$300 billion by 2025 [17]. The top 10 drugs with the highest worldwide sales in 2019 were: (1) Humira (adalimumab), (2) Keytruda (pembrolizumab), (3) Revlimid (lenalidomide), (4) Opdivo (nivolumab), (5) Eylea (aflibercept), (6) Eliquis (apixaban), (7) Enbrel (etanercept), (8) Avastin (bevacizumab), (9) Stelara (ustekinumab), and (10) Rituxan (rituximab). This list includes several mAb drugs. Thus, mAb drugs have shown promising results in the pharmaceutical market. However, depletion of the targets for mAb drug development and restricted patterns of antigen-binding sites on mAbs are serious problems. All approved mAb drugs are administered via parenteral routes. Peroral administration may be a solution in terms of product life, in addition to simplifying drug administration.

2.4. pH-Dependent Dissolution of Nanoparticles and Subsequent Peptide Cargo Release

Upon oral administration, macrocyclic peptides such as N-alkylated cyclic cyclosporin (1202.61 Da) (Figure 3) are absorbed through passive lipoidal diffusion without proteolysis in the small intestine, owing to their hydrophobicity, compact size, and enzymatic stability [18]. In general, peptides or proteins are digested in the stomach and small intestine. Thus, nanodelivery systems are required to protect orally delivered peptides or proteins from degradation. Fatty acid transport protein 4 (FATP4), a transporter that transports long-chain fatty acids (LCFA), with a carbon chain length of n > 12, was used for peptide delivery across the membrane using a nanodelivery system. The LCFA conjugate covalently linked with peptides such as exendin-4 (Ex4) (4186.57 Da), which is composed of 39 amino acids, was expected to cross the intestinal epithelium. The LCFA-Ex4 conjugate was released from LCFA-Ex4-loaded and chitosan-based nanoparticle-stabilized liposomes (OxaEx4) at pH 7, which is close to the pH in the small intestine, and was transported across the membrane according to an in vitro test using FATP4-positive Caco-2 cells as an epithelial cell model. This release was achieved through the sponge effect of chitosan. Furthermore, the long fatty acid chain protected the conjugated peptide from enzymatic degradation after its release from the carrier [19]. Various pH-sensitive nanoparticles have been developed [20]. Such well-conceived strategies can be adaptable to oral high-molecular mAb delivery; however, mAbs (IgG; approximately 150 kDa) cannot be transported by transporters.

2.5. Orally Administered mAbs for Localized Effect in Gut

Immunoglobulins are categorized into five classes: IgG (Figure 4), IgA, IgM, IgD, and IgE. IgG antibodies are commonly used as mAb drugs. There are four IgG subclasses: IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4. The IgG protein is approximately 14.2 nm in diameter [21]. The HuNoV capsid (23–40 nm in diameter) contains an IgG molecule inside. However, natural immunoglobulins such as milk immunoglobulins are bare and exposed to a severe environment in the living body. Peroral mAbs are believed to be denatured by gastric acid and proteases. It is true that pepsin at pH 2 denatures large mAbs through proteolysis; however, trypsin or chymotrypsin at pH 8 did not completely denature them. A small amount of intact mAbs survived through escaping degradation by gastric acid and digestive enzymes; however, Fc (approximately 50 kDa), Fab (approximately 50 kDa), F(ab′)2 (approximately 110 kDa) (Figure 4), and other small peptide fragments were cut out [10]. F(ab′)2 fragments were obtained through pepsin cleavage. Fab and F(ab′)2 fragments retained their neutralizing activity. Therefore, orally administered mAbs can neutralize their corresponding antigens, which are involved in local infection, local inflammation, and local neoplasms in the gastrointestinal tract. Several clinical trials have been performed for evaluating oral mAbs in the treatment of such localized diseases (Table 1).
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is caused by excess tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α in the lamina propria. V565 is an anti-TNF-α domain antibody developed for oral administration that resists intestinal proteases such as trypsin, chymotrypsin, and pancreatin. Orally administered V565 was detected in the lamina propria because of the colonic mucosal barrier loss caused by TNF-α and in the serum, according to an in vivo assay using colitis mice; however, V565 was not detected in the colonic mucosal tissue and serum of naïve mice [22]. Thus, V565 is effective against ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease, which are classified as IBD. The formulation of coated mini-tablets was engineered for clinical use to prevent V565 from being degraded by gastric acid and pepsin in the stomach and to release it in the lower small intestine. At present, a phase 2 clinical trial of oral V565 (NCT02976129) and a phase 1 clinical trial of oral V565 in capsules (NCT03705117) were conducted for the treatment of Crohn’s disease.
AVX-470, an anti-TNF antibody from the bovine colostrum, in delayed-release enteric-coated capsules that protect the contents from gastric acid were evaluated for UC treatment through oral administration. This phase 1 clinical trial showed an efficacy trend (NCT01759056) [23].
Anti-CD3 antibody elicited an immunological effect on UC. Intravenous muromonab-CD3, a mouse monoclonal antibody against CD3, was originally approved for the clinical treatment of acute rejection after organ transplantation in 1986. The biological mechanism of UC is the induction of regulatory T cells through anti-CD3 antibody uptake in gut-associated lymphoid tissue. Orally delivered muromonab-CD3 improved symptoms in the colon of patients with UC in a phase 2 trial using omeprazole, a proton pump inhibitor (NCT01287195) [24].
Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a chronic progressive hepatic disorder caused by neutral lipid accumulation (steatosis), subsequent oxidative stress, elevated cytokine levels, and insulin resistance. Foralumab is the first fully human anti-CD3 antibody. Peroral anti-CD3 antibody binds to the CD3/T cell receptor complex on T cells in the gut wall and eventually induces regulatory T cells that suppress inflammation in the liver by modulating cytokines [25]. A phase 2 clinical trial was conducted in NASH and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) using oral foralumab. Omeprazole was co-administered to neutralize stomach acidity. However, this trial was withdrawn (NCT03291249) [25]. The trial results implied that a proton pump inhibitor was not sufficient to suppress acidity in the stomach. Accordingly, another tactic should be implemented to guard the mAbs.
In addition, phase 2 clinical trials were conducted for NASH using oral muromonab-CD3 with omeprazole (NCT01205087) [26] and for non-responder genotype-I chronic hepatitis C using oral anti-CD3 mAb with or without omeprazole (NCT01459419). Detailed accounts of these observations are not known.
Food allergies are abnormal immune responses to specific foods, including eggs, milk, and wheat, and are extremely common in children and adults. This immediate allergic reaction is caused by IgE against food antigens. In the most serious cases, it causes life-threatening anaphylaxis. The number of patients with food allergies is increasing. Accidents due to food allergies should be prevented. Omalizumab, a humanized mouse anti-IgE antibody, was studied for milk allergy in a phase 2 trial. It did not demonstrate efficacy with respect to desensitization and sustained unresponsiveness compared to the placebo (NCT01157117) [27]. Moreover, a phase 2 trial for peanut allergy was performed for ascertaining whether impairment of allergen-specific regulatory T cell function caused by food allergy was restored through oral omalizumab administration. According to the results, desensitization was likely acquired by the loss of peanut-reactive regulatory T cells expressing a Th2 cell-like phenotype (NCT01290913) [28]. A phase 3 clinical trial using omalizumab administered by subcutaneous injection is being planned and is recruiting patients with food allergies (NCT03881696). Although, as part of oral immunotherapy, anti-IgE antibody was orally administered in these studies, noticeable efficiency might not be observed, probably because of denaturation in the stomach. As the symptoms of food allergy are displayed throughout the body, such as the skin, gastrointestinal tract, respiratory system, and cardiovascular system, antigens in food are suggested to move in the body through the systemic circulation after intestinal absorption. Children dislike intravenous injections because of pain. Thus, oral anti-IgE antibodies have to be taken in the small intestine and be subsequently transported across the intestinal epithelium to the systemic circulation without losing their neutralizing activity.
Celiac disease (CD) is a chronic autoimmune disorder of the small intestine caused by the presence of gluten in grains as an antigen. Orally administered capsules of anti-gluten egg yolk antibodies, such as IgY (AGY), were evaluated in phase 1 (NCT01765647) and 2 (NCT03707730) clinical trials for CD.
Although the etiology of autism is unknown, it has been suggested that gastrointestinal immunopathology is related to autism. Oral Oralgam, a human immunoglobulin, improved gastrointestinal dysfunction in children with autism in a phase 2 clinical trial (NCT00110708) [29].
Toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3) is involved in the pathogenesis of viral infections, including influenza, and is located in the endosomal membrane as the sentinel against viral infection to induce interferons. Nonetheless, an antibody against the TLR3 FYW peptide exhibited efficiency in a mouse model of influenza [30]. TLR3 antagonization inhibits production of pro-inflammatory cytokines [34]. A phase 2 trial was conducted for common cold using oral homeopathic antibody as a tablet formulation against the TLR3 FYW peptide (TAO1); it showed efficacy against moderate-to-severe upper respiratory tract infection (NCT01651715) [30]. The tested tablets were dissolved in the mouth and were not swallowed.
Tablets of anti-influenza antibodies in the bovine colostrum were orally administered to verify their safety and efficacy against influenza in phase 1 clinical trials (NCT01026350).
Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) expressed colonization factor 17 (CS17), whose fimbriae are composed of a polymerized major subunit (CsbA) forming its stalk and a minor tip subunit (CsbD). Orally administered anti-CS17 bovine milk IgG and anti-CsbD bovine milk IgG were evaluated for diarrhea caused by ETEC in phase 2 clinical trials. Anti-CS17 Abs demonstrated protection against CS17-expressing ETEC (NCT00524004) [31]. Moreover, ETEC expressed colonization factor I (CFA/I) fimbriae, which have a major pilin subunit (CfaB) and minor pilin subunit (CfaE). Anti-CFA/I bovine IgG and anti-CfaE bovine IgG were evaluated in a phase 1 clinical trial for diarrhea. Anti-CfaE Abs demonstrated protection against CfaE-expressing ETEC (NCT00435526) [32].
In a phase 2 trial, orally administered serum-derived bovine immunoglobulin/protein isolate (SBI) was evaluated as a dietary supplement for mucositis (NCT04239261). Oral SBI reduced the levels of intestinal fatty acid binding protein (I-FABP) and zonulin, which suggested an improvement in gut damage induced by chronic human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection (NCT01828593) [33]. Moreover, an oral SBI phase 2 trial was performed to investigate postoperative recovery of female reproductive cancer after surgery (NCT01867606). Oral SBI was evaluated to determine whether it improved the nutritional status of patients with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with cachexia (NCT02067377), diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (NCT02163213), and irritable bowel syndrome (NCT02609529). Thus, these findings imply that SBI is biologically effective against certain diseases.
Although few phase 3 trials have been performed using orally administered mAbs, several phase 2 trials have been conducted. Phase 2/3 trials of oral food additive colostrum-derived antibodies against Clostridium difficile for the treatment of C. difficile-associated diarrhea were withdrawn (NCT00747071). In fact, orally administered mAbs have not been used in clinical practice [4]. The disappointing results of these trials might have been because the antibodies were exposed to gastric acid and pepsin at pH 2 instead of intestinal proteases, resulting in denaturation. Thus, nanoparticles should be employed to avoid denaturation, similar to the utilization of capsids by HuNoVs. A formulation for intestinal protease-resistant V565 has already been developed using coated mini-tablets with an enteric Eudragit® L100 polymer soluble at pH 6.0. Moreover, an oral formulation of foralumab has been developed by encapsulating it in enteric-coated capsules coated with substances such as Eudragit® L30D/L100–55 to shelter from gastric acid and pepsin and to release the cargos at pH > 4–5 [35]; a phase 2 trial of this formulation is planned in progressive multiple sclerosis or Crohn’s disease.

2.6. Proteins Interacting with IgG

Intriguingly, a very small amount of orally administered intact mAbs can reach the systemic circulation without being digested by gastric acid and proteases [10]. Phenomenalistically, antibody drugs can be administered not only through the intravenous route but also the oral route. The proteins described below help mAbs cross the epithelium to the systemic circulation.

2.6.1. FcRn for Salvation and Transcytosis

Neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) [36,37] was recognized as the factor responsible for the absorption of maternal IgG antibodies in milk in the small intestine of babies. However, it was revealed that FcRn is expressed not only in babies but also in adults and possesses multifunctional roles in transporting, saving, and recycling certain materials such as IgG and albumin in the living body. FcRn is expressed in enterocytes of the small intestine, podocytes, renal proximal tubular cells of the kidney, syncytiotrophoblasts of the placenta, hepatocytes of the liver, and vascular endothelial cells [36]. FcRn binds to IgG under weakly acidic conditions (pH < 6.5), while FcRn does not bind to IgG under extracellular physiological pH between 7.0–7.4. Endosomes mature from early endosomes (approximate pH 6.5) to late endosomes (approximate pH 5.5) and, subsequently, lysosomes (approximate pH 4.5) through the effect of vacuolar H+-ATPase proton pumps. Therefore, the FcRn-IgG complex is formed in the early endosomes. Sorting to convey the contents through the lysosomal degradative pathway or the secretory pathway is conducted through division of the endosome into two. Endosomes containing the FcRn-IgG complex are fused to the plasma membrane. Endosomes without the FcRn-IgG complex mature into lysosomes, leading to degradation of its contents. Interestingly, ligands with high affinity to the transferrin receptor are subject to the degradative pathway, whereas those with moderate affinity are subject to the secretory pathway. FcRn plays a role in the salvation or transcytosis of IgG (Figure 5). Cells with FcRn perform their own mission. IgG molecules have a long half-life in the blood circulation because of salvation by endothelial FcRn. Salvation is observed in the vascular endothelial cells and hepatocytes of the liver. Transcytosis phenomena are observed in the enterocytes of the small intestine, podocytes [38], renal proximal tubular cells of the kidney, and syncytiotrophoblasts of the placenta. While dimeric IgA is transported in only one direction from the basolateral side to the apical side by the polymeric Ig receptor (pIgR), IgG is transported in both directions by FcRn. Moreover, even IgG-antigen complexes are transported from the apical side by FcRn and presented to antigen-presenting cells, such as dendritic cells. Thus, FcRn may play an important role in the immune system. An active transportation system for IgG-antigen complexes, different from pinocytosis, might be present in the small intestinal epithelium. Antigen-presenting cells, such as monocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells, also express FcRn. It was suggested that the nascent phagocytic cup was acidified to induce FcRn-IgG binding during phagocytosis to enable internalization of opsonized bacteria by monocytes [39]. A similar system might function on the surface of enterocytes of the intestinal epithelium owing to Na+/H+ exchangers at their apical membrane.

2.6.2. Trafficking of IgG and Albumin by FcRn

Endocytosed IgG binds to FcRn in endosomes through acidification. The IgG-FcRn complex is recycled back to the apical side or endocytosed to the basolateral side through the fusion between the endosomes and plasma membrane. After sorting and endosome maturation, other proteins are degraded in the lysosomes. At physiological pH, IgG is liberated from the FcRn. Similarly, the albumin-FcRn complex in endosomes is recycled or endocytosed. While IgG and albumin do not bind tightly to FcRn under physiological pH conditions, they bind to FcRn under weakly acidic conditions. Human IgG1-human FcRn exhibited a Kd value of 760 ± 60 nM at pH 5.8 [40]. The Kd values for humanized IgG (motavizumab)-human FcRn were 2140 nM at pH 6.0 and > 10,000 nM at pH 7.4 [41]. Human albumin-human FcRn showed a Kd value of 633.0 ± 97.0 nM at pH 5.5 and no detectable binding at pH 7.0 [42]. A homodimeric IgG (150–170 kDa) has two equivalent binding sites, one for each Fc region, with the same affinity for FcRn (40 kDa), consistent with the crystal structure. When the second FcRn binds to another unoccupied binding site on the IgG bound to the first FcRn, both the allosteric effect and steric hindrance do not occur according to the kinetic analysis, while a negative allosteric effect on the interaction between IgG-FcRn and another FcRn has been suggested in other studies. The variable region of IgG does not interact with Fc binding to FcRn [40]. Moreover, IgG and albumin (65–70 kDa) can bind simultaneously and independently to their own different binding sites on FcRn in a non-allosteric manner and without steric hindrance [43]. Accordingly, theoretically, heterodimers such as IgG-FcRn and FcRn-albumin, hetero-trimers such as IgG-(FcRn)2 and IgG-FcRn-albumin, hetero-tetramers such as IgG-(FcRn-albumin)-FcRn, and hetero-pentamer complexes such as IgG-(FcRn-albumin)2 [37] can exist under acidic conditions. However, it is unknown whether the trafficking routes of IgG and albumin differ with respect to such complex formation. In an in vitro assay using FcRn knockout mouse podocytes, IgG accumulated owing to IgG transcytosis impairment, and albumin did not accumulate without albumin transcytosis impairment [38]. It needs to be determined whether IgG∙FcRn and IgG∙(FcRn)2 exhibit different trafficking routes.

2.6.3. IgG Transepithelium through RMT Based on Translational Substance Exchange

Under extracellular physiological pH, IgG antibodies do not bind tightly to FcRn on the apical membrane of endothelial and epithelial cells. Thus, they are believed to be internalized into cells through a fluid-phase endocytosis process, such as pinocytosis. However, fluid-phase endocytosis is not a ligand-specific process; the resultant transfer of bystander IgG into cells is not effective. Moreover, inherently, excess non-specific endocytosis is a disadvantage to the living body, because bystander harmful substances can enter cells to elicit toxicity. Therefore, receptor-mediated endocytosis using receptors other than FcRn is desirable for effective and specific internalization. Subsequently, IgG released from such an intervention receptor may bind to FcRn through acidification of the endosome, following which it can be released to the opposite extracellular space at physiological pH through the fusion between the endosome and basolateral membrane. Intriguingly, in renal tubular epithelial cells, albumin reabsorption occurs through this coordinated trafficking process via RMT. Albumin binding to the megalin-cubilin complex on the tubular lumen triggers clathlin-dependent endocytosis. Albumin transferred from the megalin-cubilin complex to FcRn in weakly acidified endosomes was released from FcRn to the peritubular capillary (Figure 6). Rat cubilin-rat albumin showed a Kd value of 630 nM at pH 7.0 [44]. The megalin-cubilin complex is expressed on the apical membrane of small intestinal epithelial cells in suckling rats [45]. FITC-labeled human IgG binds to the megalin-cubilin complex to induce clathrin-dependent endocytosis in opossum kidney epithelial cells [46]. Thus, IgG endocytosed in the small intestine, utilizing the megalin-cubilin complex as an intervention receptor, could be transferred to FcRn in endosomes through acidification (Figure 6). Megalin, cubilin, and FcRn were expressed in the small intestine [47]. Nonetheless, it has been suggested that megalin might not be expressed in the small intestine (Table 2) [48].
Furthermore, IgG is internalized through receptor-mediated endocytosis based on human FcγRI using INF-γ-treated U937 cells, where FcγRI expression is upregulated 4–5-fold, resulting in up to 60,000 receptors per cell. This IgG-FcγRI complex in endosomes is recycled back to the plasma membrane, while the IgG-FcγRI complex with cross-linking mAb against human IgG Fab is endocytosed and eventually degraded in lysosomes without being recycled [49]. Human FcγRI-human IgG1 has been shown to exhibit a Kd value of 2.9 nM [50]. Thus, IgG might be transcytosed in small intestine epithelial cells through RMT using megalin-cubilin or FcγRI as the first receptor complex and FcRn as the second receptor. Effective transepithelium of IgG in the small intestine can be accomplished using this strategy. However, although FcγRI is not expressed in the small intestine, cubilin, FcRn, and probably megalin are expressed (Table 2) [47,48]. Thus, a well-conceived molecular design is very important for achieving intended substance delivery to the target tissues and cells.

2.7. Possible Methods for Applying Orally Administered mAbs for Systemic Treatment across the Epithelium

Ideally, after internalization of nanoparticles containing mAbs through receptor-mediated endocytosis in the small intestine, mAbs should be released from acid-sensitive nanoparticles through acidification in endosomes, bound to FcRn, and exocytosed to the lamina propria. This strategy is suitable for intravenous nanoparticle delivery across the BBB. However, before they reach the small intestine, such acid-sensitive nanoparticles are activated to release their cargo in the stomach because of the gastric acid. Thus, nanoparticles sensitive to pH (6.3–7.5) in the small intestine, such as enteric Eudragit®, should be used for nanodelivery systems. Released mAbs could be transported across the epithelium to the lamina propria through four pathways: (1) RMT in enterocytes using megalin-cubilin as the first receptor, (2) RMT in enterocytes using FcRn as the first receptor, (3) phagocytosis, and (4) RMT in M cells. These transportations can occur simultaneously. Internalization through phagocytosis is considered a coincidental event. Therefore, nanoparticles with mAbs need to be designed for intelligent and effective internalization of released cargos through RMT. In seven neonates and infants who were exclusively breast-fed, the pH values were 6.4 ± 0.5 in the duodenum, 6.6 ± 0.4 in the jejunum, and 6.9 ± 0.7 in the ileum. Moreover, in eight neonates and infants who were fed solely cow’s milk, the pH values were 6.3 ± 0.9 in the duodenum, 6.0 ± 0.5 in the jejunum, and 6.3 ± 0.8 in the ileum [51]. These values were almost the same as those in adults. Nevertheless, peroral IgG antibodies were absorbed in the small intestine of neonates because of FcRn but not in adults. Milk feeding in neonates neutralizes the gastric pH to 4–5 [10]. Neonates have an immature digestive system. Thus, it is suggested that undigested intact IgG may be transported in the small intestine under such conditions. This can be reproduced using nanoparticles that protect IgG from enzymatic and acid digestion and release it into the small intestine. Eventually, the mechanism for transepithelium is assumed to be, ideally, FcRn-mediated transcytosis or, realistically, megalin-cubilin and FcRn-mediated transcytosis through handoff. However, strategies using pH-sensitive nanoparticles as carriers have not yet been implemented. The possibilities for their implementation are described in more detail below.

2.7.1. Oral mAb Delivery Using Nanoparticle through Endocytosis Based on Megalin-Cubilin

Under extracellular physiological pH in the small intestine, IgG antibodies bind not to FcRn but to the megalin-cubilin complex. Interestingly, IgG was transported across the epithelium based on megalin-cubilin complex-mediated endocytosis followed by FcRn-mediated exocytosis through handoff in suckling rats [45]. Therefore, mAbs released from pH-sensitive nanoparticles at physiological pH in the small intestine can be transcytosed through a handoff. Nevertheless, it is true that FcRn and cubilin are present in the small intestine; however, whether megalin is expressed is controversial. It has been reported that megalin may be absent in the small intestine [48] (Table 2). Megalin is involved in inducing endocytosis rather than cubilin in the megalin-cubilin complex. It is unclear whether cubilin is expressed alone in the absence of megalin. Nevertheless, if it were not for megalin in the small intestine, there would be countermeasures. The light chain of IgG binds to megalin and cubilin [47,52]. Ligand-receptor clustering on the cell surface induces endocytosis [53,54]. Cubilin lacks a transmembrane part and is anchored to the apical membrane through its N-terminal. Amnionless is a transmembrane protein that forms a complex with cubilin. Structurally, an IgG molecule can bind to two cubilin molecules. Thus, clustering IgG-cubilin could induce endocytosis and dissociate in endosomes through acidification. Another approach is to preliminarily use a mixture of IgG and megalin, even though megalin is a single transmembrane protein with a cytoplasmic C-terminal. With or without megalin, IgG can be delivered across the small intestinal epithelium through translational substance exchange from megalin-cublin to FcRn in endosomes.

2.7.2. Oral mAb Delivery Using Nanoparticles through Endocytosis Based on FcRn

The stomach is protected from its own gastric acid through two mucus layers. This suggests that H+ does not penetrate the mucus layer. The small intestinal epithelium is covered with a single mucus layer, which is different from the endothelium. H+ is poured into the lumen by the Na+/H+ exchangers in enterocytes. As a result, H+ accumulates between the mucus layer and cell surface [55]. Thus, mAbs released from the nanoparticles could bind to FcRn owing to locally acidic circumstances, following which they could be internalized through receptor-mediated endocytosis and liberated into the lamina propria after membrane fusion.

2.7.3. Oral mAb Delivery Using Nanoparticles through Pinocytosis Based on FcRn

Pinocytosis is an energy-requiring bulk transport in constitutive processes or strictly controlled processes, and it non-selectively envelops fluids and certain molecules such as nutrients into vesicles. Accordingly, through pinocytosis bystander mAbs, which are released from the nanoparticles, are absorbed into the endosomes. The mAbs bind to FcRn in the endosomes through acidification, and they are released to the lamina propria. The mechanisms of pinocytosis are classified into several pathways, including macropinocytosis, clathrin-dependent endocytosis, caveolin-dependent endocytosis, and clathrin- and caveolin-independent endocytosis. It is difficult to induce systematic pinocytosis. Thus, a strategy that predominantly depends on pinocytosis is not efficient.

2.7.4. Oral mAb Delivery Using Nanoparticles through Transcytosis in M Cells

M cells in Peyer’s patches, where the mucus layer is thin, absorb materials such as antigens through endocytosis. In fact, non-enteric NPs are endocytosed by M cells. However, it is unknown whether human M cells express FcRn. Moreover, the population of M cells is considerably smaller than that of enterocytes in the small intestine. Thus, a strategy based on transportation by M cells is not effective for mAb delivery through endocytosis using enteric pH-sensitive nanoparticles. Nonetheless, M cells would endocytose mAbs through mechanisms other than FcRn transcytosis. Eventually, mAb delivery based on transcytosis by enterocytes is more effective than that by M cells.

2.7.5. Bio-Betters and Bio-Superiors

Repurposing existing mAb drugs approved for intravenous or subcutaneous administration for oral use may have limitations with respect to their effectiveness against the corresponding diseases. At present, bio-betters and bio-superiors based on protein engineering have been developed for use in biomedicines including Ab drugs [56]. Tuning affinity to FcRn might optimize oral mAb distribution. Accordingly, bispecific mAbs against target molecules such as cargos and membrane proteins as ligands on the surface of enterocytes could be transcytosed across the epithelium. Recycling Abs, including satralizumab, are engineered Abs that liberate their binding antigens in endosomes through acidification. Such free Abs are recycled back to the plasma membrane by FcRn, while the liberated antigens are subject to degradation in lysosomes. Recycling Abs exhibit a longer biological half-life than normal Abs. Sweeping Abs are functionalized recycling Abs that can bind reversibly to FcRn even under neutral pH, continue to bind to FcRn in endosomes, and liberate their antigen in endosomes through acidification; eventually, they are released from FcRn after endosomal fusion to the plasma membrane. Sweeping Abs can bind to FcRn at the extracellular physiological pH in the small intestine. Another approach is designing mAbs with mucoadhesive and mucopenetrating functionalities in order to enhance their transepithelial transport, even though enteric nanoparticles release their cargos in the lumen or the mucus layer, particularly at the jejunum, where peristaltic action is dynamically intense. Mucopenetrating functionality of Abs might be created by introducing the feature to avoid excessive electrostatic interaction with negative charge in mucins, although such electrostatic interaction is effective in mucoadhesion and transient adhesion to heparan sulfate proteoglycans on the surface of the epithelial cells. Furthermore, introducing modifications, such as resistance to gastric and intestinal proteases, can also be effective for improving bioavailability. Recently, nanobodies (15–45 kDa) known as single-domain Abs seem potential alternatives to Abs. However, most of them lack Fc domains. Thus, nanobodies are unlikely to be delivered across the intestinal epithelium to the systemic circulation based on FcRn-mediated transcytosis. Even though nanobodies are endocytosed based on pinocytosis, they would be degraded through the lysosomal degradative pathway. Nonetheless, nanobody-Fc domain conjugates could be transcytosed through the secretory pathway. The use of ingenuous strategies can enable the development of mAbs as promising pharmaceutical agents.

3. Conclusions

A wide range of drug modalities is being investigated for drug discovery and development. mAb drugs are used for molecular-targeted therapy, owing to their specific ability to bind to the corresponding antigens and thereby produce effective activity with minimal off-target side effects. However, clinically approved mAb drugs are administered through intravenous or subcutaneous routes, because mAbs are subjected to proteolysis and denaturation by proteases and gastric acid. Intravenous administration has disadvantages, such as pain, discomfort, stress, and potential infection. Thus, if oral mAb administration is established, patients will be free from such disadvantages. Accordingly, clinical trials have been performed for evaluating oral mAb administration in local gastrointestinal diseases. However, orally administered mAbs have not been approved for local use. Intriguingly, oral Abs in milk are transported by FcRn to the systemic circulation in neonates, probably because milk feeding neutralizes the gastric pH to 4–5 [10]. Furthermore, very small amounts (1–5%) of intact Abs have been detected in the systemic circulation, even through the oral administration route in adults [10]. Therefore, preventing mAbs from proteolytic digestion and denaturation by pepsin and gastric acid using an enteric nanodelivery system might enable mAb delivery across the intestinal epithelium to the systemic circulation. Released intact mAbs from enteric nanoparticles can be transferred to the vascularized lamina propria of the small intestine through RMT based on FcRn or megalin-cubilin, and they can subsequently enter the portal vein. IgG antibodies have a high affinity to FcRn under weakly acidic conditions and low or no affinity under physiological pH. Developing enteric nanoparticles is one of the most important factors for success, with regard to pH sensitivity in the small intestine, appropriate mucoadhesion as an anchor, and cargo encapsulation ability. Enteric Eudragit® polymer is a promising candidate. In addition, SMART-Ig®, such as recycling Abs and, particularly, sweeping Abs that are modified to bind FcRn under neutral pH, can be protein engineering technologies that establish oral mAb delivery across the intestinal epithelial cells through FcRn-mediated transcytosis to the systemic circulation. From the standpoint of structuralism by Lévi-Strauss, structures such as social environments and rules unconsciously regulate human activities. Similarly, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics are regulated by structures in living systems, including not only cells and tissues but also organic activity. In contrast, from the standpoint of existentialism by Sartre, existence precedes essence. By taking advantage of the existing machinery system in the living body using well-designed molecules such as functionalized nanoparticles, a new orderly system can be established. Thus, sophisticated medicinal chemists and pharmaceutical scientists must work with a sense of mission. Consequently, the development of innovative drugs will ease patient suffering in intractable diseases.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The human protein atlas can be found at https://www.proteinatlas.org/.

Acknowledgments

This review presents the author’s views based on or inferred from available published articles and public knowledge. Thus, the intellectual property rights are not infringed upon.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hua, S. Advances in Oral Drug Delivery for Regional Targeting in the Gastrointestinal Tract—Influence of Physiological, Pathophysiological and Pharmaceutical Factors. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 11, 524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ibrahim, Y.H.-E.Y.; Regdon, G., Jr.; Hamedelniel, E.I.; Sovány, T. Review of recently used techniques and materials to improve the efficiency of orally administered proteins/peptides. DARU J. Pharm. Sci. 2020, 28, 403–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Cao, S.-J.; Xu, S.; Wang, H.-M.; Ling, Y.; Dong, J.; Xia, R.-D.; Sun, X.-H. Nanoparticles: Oral Delivery for Protein and Peptide Drugs. AAPS PharmSciTech 2019, 20, 190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Cui, Y.; Cui, P.; Chen, B.; Li, S.; Guan, H. Monoclonal antibodies: Formulations of marketed products and recent advances in novel delivery system. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2017, 43, 519–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tashima, T. Intriguing possibilities and beneficial aspects of transporter-conscious drug design. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2015, 23, 4119–4131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tashima, T. Intelligent substance delivery into cells using cell-penetrating peptides. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2017, 27, 121–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tashima, T. Effective cancer therapy based on selective drug delivery into cells across their membrane using receptor-mediated endocytosis. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2018, 28, 3015–3024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tashima, T. Smart Strategies for Therapeutic Agent Delivery into Brain across the Blood-Brain Barrier Using Receptor-Mediated Transcytosis. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2020, 68, 316–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Tashima, T. Shortcut Approaches to Substance Delivery into the Brain Based on Intranasal Administration Using Nanodelivery Strategies for Insulin. Molecules 2020, 25, 5188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Reilly, R.M.; Domingo, R.; Sandhu, J. Oral delivery of antibodies. Future pharmacokinetic trends. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 1997, 32, 313–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nakamura, Y.; Mimuro, H.; Kunisawa, J.; Furusawa, Y.; Takahashi, D.; Fujimura, Y.; Kaisho, T.; Kiyono, H.; Hase, K. Microfold cell-dependent antigen transport alleviates infectious colitis by inducing antigen-specific cellular immunity. Mucosal Immunol. 2020, 13, 679–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Szabóová, R.; Faixová, Z.; Maková, Z.; Piešová, E. The Difference in the Mucus Organization between the Small and Large Intestine and Its Protection of Selected Natural Substances. A Review. Folia Vet. 2018, 62, 48–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Schneider, C.; O’Leary, C.E.; Locksley, R.M. Regulation of immune responses by tuft cells. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2019, 19, 584–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Karandikar, U.C.; Crawford, S.E.; Ajami, N.J.; Murakami, K.; Kou, B.; Ettayebi, K.; Papanicolaou, G.A.; Jongwutiwes, U.; Perales, M.-A.; Shia, J.; et al. Detection of human norovirus in intestinal biopsies from immunocompromised transplant patients. J. Gen. Virol. 2016, 97, 2291–2300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Green, K.Y.; Kaufman, S.S.; Nagata, B.M.; Chaimongkol, N.; Kim, D.Y.; Levenson, E.A.; Tin, C.M.; Yardley, A.B.; Johnson, J.A.; Barletta, A.B.F.; et al. Human Norovirus Targets Enteroendocrine Epithelial Cells in the Small Intestine. Nat. Commu. 2020, 11, 2759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Murakami, K.; Tenge, V.R.; Karandikar, U.C.; Lin, S.-C.; Ramani, S.; Ettayebi, K.; Crawford, S.E.; Zeng, X.-L.; Neill, F.H.; Ayyar, B.V.; et al. Bile acids and ceramide overcome the entry restriction for GII.3 human norovirus replication in human intestinal enteroids. PNAS 2020, 117, 1700–1710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lu, R.-M.; Hwang, Y.-C.; Liu, I.-J.; Lee, C.-C.; Tsai, H.-Z.; Li, H.-J.; Wu, H.-C. Development of therapeutic antibodies for the treatment of diseases. J. Biomed. Sci. 2020, 27, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Nielsen, D.S.; Shepherd, N.E.; Xu, W.; Lucke, A.J.; Stoermer, M.J.; Fairlie, D.P. Orally Absorbed Cyclic Peptides. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 8094–8128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hu, Z.; Nizzero, S.; Goel, S.; Hinkle, L.E.; Wu, X.; Li, C. Ferrari M, Shen H Molecular targeting of FATP4 transporter for oral delivery of therapeutic peptide. Sci. Adv. 2020, 6, eaba0145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Liu, L.; Yao, W.D.; Rao, Y.F.; Lu, X.Y.; Gao, J.Q. pH-Responsive carriers for oral drug delivery: Challenges and opportunities of current platforms. Drug Deliv. 2017, 24, 569–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Chen, Y.; Cai, Y.; Xu, Q.; Chen, Z.W. Atomic force bio-analytics of polymerization and aggregation of phycoerythrin-conjugated immunoglobulin G molecules. Mol. Immunol. 2004, 41, 1247–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Crowe, J.S.; Roberts, K.J.; Carlton, T.M.; Maggiore, L.; Cubitt, M.F.; Clare, S.; Harcourt, K.; Reckless, J.; MacDonald, T.T.; Ray, K.P.; et al. Preclinical Development of a Novel, Orally-Administered Anti-Tumour Necrosis Factor Domain Antibody for the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 4941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Harris, M.S.; Hartman, D.; Lemos, B.R.; Erlich, E.C.; Spence, S.; Kennedy, S.; Ptak, T.; Pruitt, R.; Vermeire, S.; Fox, B.S. AVX-470, an Orally Delivered Anti-Tumour Necrosis Factor Antibody for Treatment of Active Ulcerative Colitis: Results of a First-in-Human Trial. J. Crohn’s Colitis 2016, 10, 631–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Boden, E.K.; Canavan, J.B.; Moran, C.J.; McCann, K.; Dunn, W.A.; Farraye, F.A.; Ananthakrishnan, A.N.; Yajnik, V.; Gandhi, R.; Nguyen, D.D.; et al. Immunologic Alterations Associated with Oral Delivery of Anti-CD3 (OKT3) Monoclonal Antibodies in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis. Crohn’s Colitis 360 2019, 1, otz009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ilan, Y.; Shailubhai, K.; Sanyal, A. Immunotherapy with oral administration of humanized anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody: A novel gut-immune system-based therapy for metaflammation and NASH. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2018, 193, 275–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Lalazar, G.; Mizrahi, M.; Turgeman, I.; Adar, T.; Ya’acov, A.B.; Shabat, Y.; Nimer, A.; Hemed, N.; Zolotarovya, L.; Lichtenstein, Y.; et al. Oral Administration of OKT3 MAb to Patients with NASH, Promotes Regulatory T-cell Induction, and Alleviates Insulin Resistance: Results of a Phase IIa Blinded Placebo-Controlled Trial. J. Clin. Immunol. 2015, 35, 399–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wood, R.A.; Kim, J.S.; Lindblad, R.; Nadeau, K.; Henning, A.K.; Dawson, P.; Plaut, M.; Sampson, H.A. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of omalizumab combined with oral immunotherapy for the treatment of cow’s milk allergy. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2016, 137, 1103–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Abdel-Gadir, A.; Schneider, L.; Casini, A.; Charbonnier, L.-M.; Little, S.V.; Harrington, T.; Umetsu, D.T.; Rachid, R.; Chatila, T.A. Oral immunotherapy with omalizumab reverses the Th2 cell-like programme of regulatory T cells and restores their function. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2018, 48, 825–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Handen, B.L.; Melmed, R.D.; Hansen, R.L.; Aman, M.G.; Burnham, D.L.; Bruss, J.B.; McDougle, C.J. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of oral human immunoglobulin for gastrointestinal dysfunction in children with autistic disorder. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2009, 39, 796–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Martyushev-Poklad, A.; Bruhwyler, J.; Heijmans, S.; Thiry, M. Efficacy of a Novel Antibody TLR3 Modulator in the Self-Treatment of Common Cold: The ESTUAR Trial. Adv. Infect. Dis. 2015, 5, 204–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Savarino, S.J.; McKenzie, R.; Tribble, D.R.; Porter, C.K.; O’Dowd, A.; Sincock, S.A.; Poole, S.T.; DeNearing, B.; Woods, C.M.; Kim, H.; et al. Hyperimmune Bovine Colostral Anti-CS17 Antibodies Protect Against Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli Diarrhea in a Randomized, Doubled-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Human Infection Model. J. Infect. Dis. 2019, 220, 505–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Savarino, S.J.; McKenzie, R.; Tribble, D.R.; Porter, C.K.; O’Dowd, A.; Cantrell, J.A.; Sincock, S.A.; Poole, S.T.; DeNearing, B.; Woods, C.M.; et al. Prophylactic Efficacy of Hyperimmune Bovine Colostral Antiadhesin Antibodies Against Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli Diarrhea: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 1 Trial. J. Infect. Dis. 2017, 216, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Utay, N.S.; Somasunderam, A.; Hinkle, J.E.; Petschow, B.W.; Detzel, C.J.; Somsouk, M.; Fichtenbaum, C.J.; Weaver, E.M.; Shaw, A.L.; Asmuth, D.M. Serum Bovine Immunoglobulins Improve Inflammation and Gut Barrier Function in Persons with HIV and Enteropathy on Suppressive ART. Pathog. Immun. 2019, 4, 124–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Thiry, M.; Martyushev-Poklad, A. Pharmaceutical Compositions of Antibodies for Treatment of Diseases Caused by Influenza Virus. US Patent 9,409,991 B1, 9 August 2016. [Google Scholar]
  35. Shailubhai, K. Anti-CD3 Formulations. U.S. Patent 2018/0,177,880 A1, 28 June 2018. [Google Scholar]
  36. Pyzik, M.; Sand, K.M.K.; Hubbard, J.J.; Andersen, J.T.; Sandlie, I.; Blumberg, R.S. The Neonatal Fc Receptor (FcRn): A Misnomer? Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 1540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Patel, D.D.; Bussel, J.B. Neonatal Fc receptor in human immunity: Function and role in therapeutic intervention. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2020, 146, 467–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Dylewski, J.; Dobrinskikh, E.; Lewis, L.; Tonsawan, P.; Miyazaki, M.; Jat, P.S.; Blaine, J. Differential trafficking of albumin and IgG facilitated by the neonatal Fc receptor in podocytes in vitro and in vivo. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0209732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Vidarsson, G.; Stemerding, A.M.; Stapleton, N.M.; Spliethoff, S.E.; Janssen, H.; Rebers, F.E.; Haas, M. d.; Winkel, J.G. v.d. FcRn: An IgG receptor on phagocytes with a novel role in phagocytosis. Blood 2006, 108, 3573–3579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Abdiche, Y.N.; Yeung, Y.A.; Chaparro-Riggers, J.; Barman, I.; Strop, P.; Chin, S.M.; Pham, A.; Bolton, G.; McDonough, D.; Lindquist, K.; et al. The neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) binds independently to both sites of the IgG homodimer with identical affinity. MAbs 2015, 7, 331–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Borrok, M.J.; Wu, Y.; Beyaz, N.; Yu, X.-Q.; Oganesyan, V.; Dall’Acqua, W.F.; Tsui, P. pH-dependent binding engineering reveals an FcRn affinity threshold that governs IgG recycling. J. Biol. Chem. 2015, 290, 4282–4290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Schmidt, E.G.W.; Hvam, M.L.; Antunes, F.; Cameron, J.; Viuff, D.; Andersen, B.; Kristensen, N.N.; Howard, K.A. Direct demonstration of a neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn)-driven endosomal sorting pathway for cellular recycling of albumin. J. Biol. Chem. 2017, 292, 13312–13322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Pyzik, M.; Rath, T.; Lencer, W.I.; Baker, K.; Blumberg, R.S. FcRn: The Architect Behind the Immune and Nonimmune Functions of IgG and Albumin. J. Immunol. 2015, 194, 4595–4603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Birn, H.; Fyfe, J.C.; Jacobsen, C.; Mounier, F.; Verroust, P.J.; Orskov, H.; Willnow, T.E.; Moestrup, S.K.; Christensen, E.I. Cubilin is an albumin binding protein important for renal tubular albumin reabsorption. J. Clin. Investig. 2000, 105, 1353–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Vázquez-Carretero, M.D.; Palomo, M.; García-Miranda, P.; Sánchez-Aguayo, I.; Peral, M.J.; Calonge, M.L.; Ilundain, A.A. Dab2, megalin, cubilin and amnionless receptor complex might mediate intestinal endocytosis in the suckling rat. J. Cell. Biochem. 2014, 115, 510–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Nagai, J.; Sato, K.; Yumoto, R.; Takano, M. Megalin/cubilin-mediated uptake of FITC-labeled IgG by OK kidney epithelial cells. Drug Metab. Pharmacokinet. 2011, 26, 474–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Christensen, E.I.; Birn, H. Megalin and cubilin: Multifunctional endocytic receptors. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2002, 3, 258–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. The Human Protein Atlas. Available online: https://www.proteinatlas.org/ (accessed on 23 January 2021).
  49. Harrison, P.T.; Davis, W.; Norman, J.C.; Hockaday, A.R.; Allen, J.M. Binding of monomeric immunoglobulin G triggers FcγRI-mediated endocytosis. J. Biol. Chem. 1994, 269, 24396–24402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kiyoshi, M.; Caaveiro, J.M.M.; Kawai, T.; Tashiro, S.; Ide, T.; Asaoka, Y.; Hatayama, K.; Tsumoto, K. Structural basis for binding of human IgG1 to its high-affinity human receptor FcγRI. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Barbero, G.J.; Runge, G.; Fischer, D.; Crawford, M.N.; Torres, F.E.; György, P. Investigations on the bacterial flora, pH, and sugar content in the intestinal tract of infants. J. Pediatr. 1952, 40, 152–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Klassen, R.B.; Allen, P.L.; Batuman, V.; Crenshaw, K.; Hammond, T.G. Light chains are a ligand for megalin. J. Appl. Physiol. 2005, 98, 257–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Gerbal-Chaloin, S.; Gondeau, C.; Aldrian-Herrada, G.; Heitz, F.; Gauthier-Rouvière, C.; Divita, G. First step of the cell-penetrating peptide mechanism involves Rac1 GTPase-dependent actin-network remodeling. Biol. Cell 2007, 99, 223–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Fujii, M.; Kawai, K.; Egami, Y.; Araki, N. Dissecting the roles of Rac1 activation and deactivation in macropinocytosis using microscopic photo-manipulation. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 2385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Ward, E.S.; Ober, R.J. Chapter 4: Multitasking by exploitation of intracellular transport functions the many faces of FcRn. Adv. Immunol. 2009, 103, 77–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Strohl, W.R. Current progress in innovative engineered antibodies. Protein Cell 2018, 9, 86–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Ijms 22 03349 g001 550
Figure 1. The position of digestive organs.
Figure 1. The position of digestive organs.
Ijms 22 03349 g001
Ijms 22 03349 g002 550
Figure 2. Pattern diagram of the small intestinal surface.
Figure 2. Pattern diagram of the small intestinal surface.
Ijms 22 03349 g002
Ijms 22 03349 g003 550
Figure 3. Structure of cyclosporine as N-methylated macropeptide.
Figure 3. Structure of cyclosporine as N-methylated macropeptide.
Ijms 22 03349 g003
Ijms 22 03349 g004 550
Figure 4. Structures of IgG and its fragments such as Fc, Fab, and F(ab′)2.
Figure 4. Structures of IgG and its fragments such as Fc, Fab, and F(ab′)2.
Ijms 22 03349 g004
Ijms 22 03349 g005 550
Figure 5. Schematic overview of transcytosis or salvation pathway of IgG through FcRn binding.
Figure 5. Schematic overview of transcytosis or salvation pathway of IgG through FcRn binding.
Ijms 22 03349 g005
Ijms 22 03349 g006 550
Figure 6. Schematic overview of transcytosis of albumin through megalin–cubilin and FcRn binding.
Figure 6. Schematic overview of transcytosis of albumin through megalin–cubilin and FcRn binding.
Ijms 22 03349 g006
Table
Table 1. Summary of clinical trials focusing on orally administered Ab delivery described in this review.
Table 1. Summary of clinical trials focusing on orally administered Ab delivery described in this review.
#Administrated DrugFormulation/Co-Administrated DrugDiseaseSponsorPhaseStudy Start DateStudy Completion DateClinicalTrials.gov Identifier
(accessed on 23 January 2021)		StatusReferences
(i)Oral V565 Crohn’s diseaseVHsquared Ltd.Phase 2December 2016December 2018NCT02976129Unknown-
(ii)Oral V565CapsuleUlcerative colitisVHsquared Ltd.Phase 1October 2017October 2017NCT03705117Completed-
(iii)Oral AVX-470Enteric-coated capsuleUlcerative colitisAvaxia Biologics, IncorporatedPhase 1February 2013December 2013NCT01759056Completed[23]
(iv)Oral muromonab-CD3OmeprazoleUlcerative colitisBrigham and Women’s HospitalPhase 1
Phase 2		April 2011May 2013NCT01287195Completed[24]
(v)Oral foralumabOmeprazoleNASH, NAFLD,
Type 2 diabetes mellitus		Tiziana Life Sciences, PLCPhase 2December 2017June 2019NCT03291249Withdrawn[25]
(vi)Oral muromonab-CD3 NASHHadassah Medical OrganizationPhase 2September 2010April 2011NCT01205087Completed[26]
(vii)Oral anti-CD3 mAbOmeprazoleChronic hepatitis CInspira Medical ABPhase 2November 2011October 2013NCT01459419Unknown-
(viii)Oral omalizumab Milk allergyHugh A Sampson, MDPhase 2August 2010October 2015NCT01157117Completed[27]
(ix)Oral omalizumab Peanut AllergyLynda SchneiderPhase 1Phase 2February 2011September 2013NCT01290913Completed[28]
(x)Subcutaneous omalizumab Peanut Allergy,
Multi-food Allergy		National Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesPhase 3July 2019December 2023NCT03881696Recruiting-
(xi)Oral AGYCapsuleCeliac diseaseIgy Inc.Phase 1May 2014August 2015NCT01765647Completed-
(xii)Oral AGYCapsuleCeliac diseaseIgy Inc.Phase 2October 2019December 2022NCT03707730Recruiting-
(xiii)Oral Oralgam Autistic Disorder, Gastrointestinal DiseasesPediaMed PharmaceuticalsPhase 2April 2005June 2006NCT00110708Unknown[29]
(xiv)Oral TAO1TabletCommon ColdTheranor s.p.r.lPhase 1Phase 2September 2012August 2013NCT01651715Completed[30]
(xv)Oral anti-influenza antibodyTabletInfluenzaHadassah Medical OrganizationPhase 1January 2010January 2011NCT01026350Unknown-
(xvi)Oral anti-CsbD bovine IgG,
Oral anti-CS17 bovine IgG		 DiarrheaJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthPhase 2January 2007October 2007NCT00524004Completed[31]
(xvii)Oral anti-CFA/I bovine IgG,
Oral anti-CfaE bovine IgG		 DiarrheaJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthPhase 1March 2006October 2006NCT00435526Completed[32]
(xviii)Oral SBI MucositisMercyOne Des Moines Medical CenterPhase 2January 2020December 2021NCT04239261Recruiting-
(xix)Oral SBI HIV-associated enteropathyEntera Health, IncNot applicableApril 2013September 2014NCT01828593Completed[33]
(xx)Oral SBI Female reproductive cancerMayo ClinicPhase 2October 2013October 2021NCT01867606Active, not recruiting-
(xxi)Oral SBI Advanced COPD with cachexiaMedical University of South CarolinaNot ApplicableDecember 2013April 2016NCT02067377Completed-
(xxii)Oral SBI Diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndromeMayo ClinicNot ApplicableJune 2014November 2016NCT02163213Completed-
(xxiii)Oral SBI Irritable bowel syndromeLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center in New OrleansNot ApplicableMarch 2017March 2017NCT02609529Completed-
(xxiv)Oral antibodies in colostrum Clostridium difficile-associated diarrheaHadassah Medical OrganizationPhase 2Phase 3September 2011November 2013NCT00747071Withdrawn-
(xxv)Oral mAbsEnteric nanoparticlesSystemic treatment Under analysis in Tashima lab-
Table
Table 2. Overview of protein and RNA expression of IgG-binding proteins.
Table 2. Overview of protein and RNA expression of IgG-binding proteins.
#Protein (Gene Name)Protein ExpressionLevelRNA ExpressionNX Values
(i)FcRn (FCGRT)CerebellumMediumGranulocytes164.3
Cerebral cortexLowSmall intestine125.2
HippocampusLowColon104.2
CaudateLowMonocytes100.2
LungLowLiver87.4
TestisLowTotal PBMC72.1
Heart muscleLowDendritic cells70.7
(ii)Megalin/LRP2 (LRP2)KidneyHighKidney61.7
Parathyroid glandMediumParathyroid gland61.4
TestisMediumPlacenta10.5
PlacentaLowSmall intestine0.4
Small intestineNot detected
(iii)Cubilin (CUBN)KidneyHighKidney79.7
Small intestineLowSmall intestine28.9
Epididymis11.5
(iv)FcγRI (FCGR1A, CD64A)not shown Monocytes35.6
Epididymis33.2
Granulocytes25.5
Small intestine0.1
(v)FcγRI (FCGR1B, CD64B)not shown Epididymis36.9
Granulocytes21.8
Monocytes19.2
Small intestine0.4
RNA expression was based on consensus normalized expression (NX) data from the three transcriptomics, i.e., internally generated Human Protein Atlas (HPA) RNA-seq data, RNA-seq data from the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project, and CAGE data from FANTOM5 project. PBMC stands for peripheral blood mononuclear cells.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tashima, T. Delivery of Orally Administered Digestible Antibodies Using Nanoparticles. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3349. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22073349

AMA Style

Tashima T. Delivery of Orally Administered Digestible Antibodies Using Nanoparticles. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(7):3349. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22073349

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tashima, Toshihiko. 2021. "Delivery of Orally Administered Digestible Antibodies Using Nanoparticles" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 7: 3349. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22073349

APA Style

Tashima, T. (2021). Delivery of Orally Administered Digestible Antibodies Using Nanoparticles. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(7), 3349. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22073349

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop