Next Article in Journal
Genome-Wide Identification of the Salvia miltiorrhiza SmCIPK Gene Family and Revealing the Salt Resistance Characteristic of SmCIPK13
Next Article in Special Issue
Distribution and Localization of Mahogunin Ring Finger 1 in the Mouse Central Nervous System
Previous Article in Journal
A Dual-Acting Nitric Oxide Donor and Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitor Activates Autophagy in Primary Skin Fibroblasts
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 12
10.3390/ijms23126853
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Nurr1 Is Not an Essential Regulator of BDNF in Mouse Cortical Neurons

by
Mona Abdollahi
1 and
Margaret Fahnestock
2,*
1
Medical Sciences Graduate Program, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada
2
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(12), 6853; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23126853
Submission received: 22 May 2022 / Revised: 10 June 2022 / Accepted: 13 June 2022 / Published: 20 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecules Affecting Brain Development and Nervous System)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Nurr1 and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) play major roles in cognition. Nurr1 regulates BDNF in midbrain dopaminergic neurons and cerebellar granule cells. Nurr1 and BDNF are also highly expressed in the cerebral cortex, a brain area important in cognition. Due to Nurr1 and BDNF tissue specificity, the regulatory effect of Nurr1 on BDNF in different brain areas cannot be generalized. The relationship between Nurr1 and BDNF in the cortex has not been investigated previously. Therefore, we examined Nurr1-mediated BDNF regulation in cortical neurons in activity-dependent and activity-independent states. Mouse primary cortical neurons were treated with the Nurr1 agonist, amodiaquine (AQ). Membrane depolarization was induced by KCl or veratridine and reversed by nimodipine. AQ and membrane depolarization significantly increased Nurr1 (p < 0.001) and BDNF (pAQ < 0.001, pKCl < 0.01) as assessed by real-time qRT-PCR. However, Nurr1 knockdown did not affect BDNF gene expression in resting or depolarized neurons. Accordingly, the positive correlation between Nurr1 and BDNF expression in AQ and membrane depolarization experiments does not imply co-regulation because Nurr1 knockdown did not affect BDNF gene expression in resting or depolarized cortical neurons. Therefore, in contrast to midbrain dopaminergic neurons and cerebellar granule cells, Nurr1 does not regulate BDNF in cortical neurons.

1. Introduction

The nuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 2 (NR4A2, also known as nuclear receptor-related 1 protein or Nurr1, NOT, TINUR, NGFIB, HZF-3, and RNR1) is an orphan receptor and a transcription factor that belongs to the class of steroid nuclear hormone receptors [1]. Nurr1 is well known for playing a fundamental role in the regulation of the development and maintenance of midbrain dopaminergic (mDA) neurons [2]. Nurr1 binds to brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) promoters in mDA neurons and cerebellar granule cells (CGCs) [3,4,5,6]. BDNF plays a pleiotropic role in the central nervous system. BDNF promotes the survival of mDA neurons, and its deprivation leads to cell death [7]. However, neither Nurr1 nor BDNF expression and roles are limited to mDA neurons. BDNF is highly expressed in the hippocampus and cortex [8]. The communication between the hippocampus and the cerebral cortex plays a leading role in complex cognitive functions, including memory [9,10,11,12]. In cortical neurons, BDNF regulates dendrite growth [13], development [14], plasticity [15,16], survival [17,18], differentiation [19], and neural circuit formation [20]. These processes underlie the mechanisms of learning and memory. Cognitive decline, especially memory deficits, is the hallmark of dementia and is tightly associated with reduced expression of cortical BDNF [21,22]. BDNF is differentially regulated in response to internal and external stimuli that impact neuronal activity [23]. As a result, the identification of transcription factors that regulate BDNF in a tissue-and activity-dependent manner provides a better understanding of the underlying molecular mechanisms.
Nurr1 regulates BDNF in mDA and CGCs and may also do so in cerebral cortical neurons. Nurr1 is highly expressed in cortical regions [11,12]. In addition, similar to BDNF, Nurr1 and its transcriptional targets play critical roles in cortical-dependent cognition, especially learning and memory [12,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34]. Nurr1 repression contributes to age-related impairments in memory [35,36,37,38,39,40,41] and Alzheimer’s disease, the most common form of dementia [42]. However, the role of Nurr1 in the regulation of BDNF has not been investigated in this brain region. Furthermore, due to BDNF tissue specificity [43,44], the regulation of BDNF by Nurr1 in one region of the brain cannot be generalized to other areas. As a result, we investigated whether Nurr1 regulates BDNF expression in mouse cortical neurons in vitro.

2. Results

2.1. Pharmacological Stimulation of Nurr1 Increases Nurr1 and BDNF Gene Expression

We investigated the changes in BDNF gene expression in response to the Nurr1 agonist amodiaquine (AQ). A two-way ANOVA for Nurr1 and BDNF (experiment × treatment) showed a main effect of treatment for both targets (p ˂ 0.001). There was no main effect of experiment (pNurr1/GAPDH = 0.11, pBDNF/GAPDH = 0.16) or interaction between experiment and treatment (pNurr1/GAPDH = 0.11, pBDNF/GAPDH = 0.16), so experiments were combined for further analysis. Post hoc independent samples t-test revealed that AQ treatment significantly increased Nurr1 (Figure 1a, p ˂ 0.001) and BDNF (Figure 1b, p ˂ 0.001) mRNA expression compared to untreated cells.

2.2. Membrane Depolarization Induces Nurr1 and BDNF Gene Expression

To understand the effect of Nurr1 on BDNF regulation during neuronal activity, we applied KCl-mediated membrane depolarization to primary cortical cell cultures. Veratridine was used as a positive control for membrane depolarization [43,44,45], and Nimodipine was used as negative control [46]. A two-way ANOVA for Nurr1 and BDNF expression (experiment x treatment) revealed a main effect of treatment (p ˂ 0.001). There was no statistically significant interaction between the effects of experiment and treatment (pNurr1/GAPDH = 0.85, pBDNF/GAPDH = 0.70) and no main effect of experiment (pNurr1/GAPDH = 0.97, pBDNF/GAPDH = 0.30), so experiments were combined for further analysis. Post hoc Gabriel’s test indicated that, compared to either untreated cells or KCl-induced cells pretreated with nimodipine, both KCl and veratridine significantly induced Nurr1 (p < 0.001, Figure 2a). KCl significantly increased BDNF gene expression compared to untreated cells (p = 0.009) and depolarized cells that were pre-treated with nimodipine (p < 0.001). Likewise, veratridine treatment induced BDNF expression compared to both untreated (p = 0.01) and nimodipine (p < 0.001) groups (Figure 2b).

2.3. Basal BDNF Gene Expression Is Not Regulated by Nurr1

We examined the effect of partial loss of Nurr1 on BDNF gene expression in cortical neurons. We knocked down Nurr1 in primary cortical neurons using siRNA and monitored subsequent changes in BDNF gene expression with real-time qRT-PCR. We ruled out the possibility of toxic effects of Nurr1 siRNA under our experimental conditions because (1) microscopic evaluation and LDH assay showed no signs of toxicity and (2) GAPDH gene expression remained unchanged in Lipofectamine control, scrambled siRNA, and Nurr1 siRNA conditions throughout all experiments (data not shown). A two-way ANOVA (experiment × treatment) showed that there was a main effect of treatment on Nurr1 mRNA levels (p < 0.001), no main effect of the experiment (p = 0.19), and no statistically significant interaction between the effects of experiment and treatment (p = 0.63). As a result, experiments were combined for further analysis. A post hoc t-test showed that Nurr1 mRNA was reduced by 27.6% ± 0.023 in the siNurr1 group compared to the siCtrl group (p < 0.001, Figure 3a). In contrast, no statistically significant difference was found in BDNF mRNA levels between siNurr1 and siCtrl groups (two-way ANOVA pexperiment = 0.84, ptreatment = 0.086, pexperiment × treatment = 0.22, Figure 3b).

2.4. Activity-Dependent BDNF Gene Expression Is Not Regulated by Nurr1

To understand the role of Nurr1 in BDNF regulation during neuronal activity, we applied KCl to induce membrane depolarization in primary cortical cell cultures. A two-way ANOVA (experiment × treatment) showed that there was a main effect of treatment (p = 0.001) on Nurr1 mRNA levels. No main effect of the experiment (p = 0.28) and no statistically significant interaction between the effects of the experiment and treatment (p = 0.058) was detected. As a result, results from three separate experiments were combined for further analysis. Our results revealed that Nurr1 gene expression was knocked down by 35.4% ± 0.43 in KCl-induced cortical neurons (post hoc independent samples t-test, p = 0.005, Figure 4a). For BDNF expression, two-way ANOVA showed no main effect of experiment (p = 0.77), no main effect of treatment (p = 0.18), and no interaction between experiment and treatment (p = 0.96, Figure 4b).

3. Discussion

Regulation of BDNF by Nurr1 in cortical neurons is not supported by our Nurr1 knockdown experiments, in which Nurr1 knockdown did not affect BDNF expression. Therefore, the increase observed in BDNF mRNA following KCl and AQ treatment does not indicate a causative relationship, but rather a positive correlation. It is reasonable to speculate that increased BDNF mRNA in response to AQ treatment and membrane depolarization is a consequence of the downstream recruitment of other transcriptional regulators/co-regulators and/or dissociation of repressors rather than an off-target effect. We chose to treat our cells with AQ for two main reasons. First, Nurr1 activation by AQ has been linked to neuroprotection. Activation of Nurr1 by AQ leads to the generation of neurons from cortical [42] and hippocampal [42,47,48] neural precursor cells, enhances short-and long-term memory, and improves cognitive deficits in mouse models of Parkinson’s [49,50] and Alzheimer’s disease [51]. Second, AQ is known to be a selective agonist for Nurr1 with no effect on other members of the NR4A family (Nur77 and NOR1) [49]. However, it has been shown by a recent study that a high concentration of AQ (100 µM) which is above the EC50 (36 ± 4 µM) activates Nur77 and NOR1 in cell-free experiments [52].
We intentionally used 10 µM AQ in our study to avoid off-target effects of AQ. Therefore, it is unlikely that increased BDNF mRNA is a consequence of Nurr1-independent AQ effects. On the other hand, nuclear receptors such as Nurr1, acting either in combination or sequentially, can recruit core transcription factors, RNA polymerase II, and chromatin remodeling factors to specific promoters [53]. Nurr1 AQ-dependent recruitment of such transcriptional coregulators has been shown in SK-N-BE (2)C cells, a human neuroblastoma cell line [49]. Furthermore, increased Nurr1 mRNA levels suggest the presence of a positive feedback loop. The formation of positive feedback loops by Nurr1’s gene targets and downstream signaling has been shown in previous studies [54,55].
One important tissue-specific feature of neuronal activity is its involvement in synaptic plasticity via the regulation of neurotrophins, particularly BDNF [56,57]. Our data are in agreement with previous studies that show Nurr1 and BDNF gene expression are induced in depolarized primary neural cultures [3,4,17,46,58,59,60,61]. However, similar to AQ treatment experiments, the nature of membrane depolarization experiments does not demonstrate a direct regulatory role of Nurr1 on BDNF because Nurr1 and BDNF are both immediate/early genes that can be induced downstream of membrane depolarization as components of unrelated molecular pathways [62,63,64,65].
Cortical Nurr1 and BDNF are reduced in neurological disorders exhibiting impairment [66,67]. To mimic Nurr1 reduction, we used Nurr1 siRNA. When Nurr1 is knocked down by siRNA, BDNF mRNA expression does not change either in basal or activity-induced conditions. Signaling pathways that are triggered by membrane depolarization and lead to Nurr1 induction are cell- and tissue-specific. Nurr1 and BDNF upregulation in induced mDA neurons are PKC/PLC-dependent [3], while NMDA receptors play a key role in the upregulation of Nurr1 and BDNF in CGCs [58]. In contrast, AMPA- and NMDA-type glutamate receptors do not play a role in Nurr1 induction in hippocampal and cortical neurons [46]. It has been shown that in depolarized hippocampal and cortical neurons, upregulation of Nurr1 is mediated by calcineurin [46]. Calcineurin can activate CREB, a well-known regulator of Nurr1 and BDNF [68,69,70]. This suggests that in response to membrane depolarization in cortical neurons, activated CREB might be responsible for the enhancement of its target genes, Nurr1 and BDNF.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Neuronal Cell Culture

Cell culture reagents and media were purchased from ThermoFisher Scientific, Burlington, Ontario, Canada. One day before brain dissection, cell culture plates were coated with 1 mL poly-L-lysine. Wells were washed once with phosphate-buffered saline and preconditioned with 1 mL Neurobasal™ medium for at least one hour before cell culture. Primary cell cultures of cortical neurons were prepared from embryonic day 17–18 (E17-18) C57Bl/6 mice as described previously [69]. For AQ treatment and membrane depolarization experiments isolated cortical neurons were seeded at a density of 106 cells/well in 6-well plates. For transfection experiments, 104 cells/well were seeded in 12-well plates. Prepared cell cultures were incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2. The cell culture medium consisted of 2% B-27 supplement, 1% Penicillin-Streptomycin, 1% GlutaMAX™ supplement, and 1% fetal bovine serum (FBS) in Neurobasal™ medium. After 24 h, the cell culture medium was replaced by a maintenance medium (cell culture medium lacking FBS). Half of the medium in each well was replaced by an equal amount of fresh maintenance medium every 72 h.

4.2. RNA Extraction

Primary cortical neurons were harvested in 1ml TRIzolTM reagent per well. RNA was isolated using PureLink™ RNA Micro with on-column DNAse treatment (ThermoFisher Scientific, Burlington, ON, Canada) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA yield, purity, and integrity were determined by spectrophotometry and agarose gel electrophoresis.

4.3. Amodiaquine (AQ) Treatment

AQ stock solution (Sigma-Aldrich, Burlington, ON, Canada) was prepared in water (10 mM). At 7 days in vitro (DIV7), primary cortical neurons were treated with a maintenance medium containing 10 µM AQ. Cells were harvested for RNA extraction 24 h later.

4.4. Membrane Depolarization

Veratridine (Sigma-Aldrich, Burlington, ON, Canada) stock solution (37 mM) was prepared in DMSO. At DIV7, cortical cell cultures were depolarized in a maintenance medium containing 50 mM KCl or 10 µM veratridine for 2 h and then incubated without KCl or veratridine for another 2.5 h before harvesting for RNA extraction. A Nimodipine (Sigma-Aldrich, Burlington, ON, Canada) stock solution (50 mM) was prepared in DMSO. Neurons were pre-treated with 10 µM nimodipine for 10 min before stimulation with 50 mM KCl. The final concentration of DMSO used as a vehicle was less than 0.01% (v/v).

4.5. Nurr1 Knockdown

Lipofection reagents and media were purchased from ThermoFisher Scientific, Burlington, Ontario, Canada. Cortical neurons were transfected with Silencer™ Select pre-designed murine Nurr1 siRNA (siRNA ID# s70890) at DIV4 in an antibiotic-free maintenance medium. The final concentration of siRNA used per well was 35 pmol and the final volume of Lipofectamine™ RNAiMAX used per well was 1.75 µL. The siRNA-Lipofectamine complex was incubated at room temperature for 5 min before adding to cortical neurons. Cells were harvested 48 h after incubation at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for RNA extraction. For Nurr1 knockdown experiments in KCl-induced cortical neurons, cells were first transfected as above. After 48 h, the transfection medium was replaced with antibiotic-free maintenance medium containing 50 mM KCl for 2 h, followed by 2.5 h in an antibiotic-KCl-free maintenance medium before harvesting for RNA extraction.

4.6. Complementary DNA (cDNA) Synthesis

Reagents used for cDNA synthesis were obtained from ThermoFisher Scientific, Burlington, Ontario, Canada. The reaction mixture for cDNA synthesis (total volume of 13 µL) consisted of 1 µg RNA, 1 µL dNTP mixture (10 mM of each of dATP, dGTP, dCTP, and dTTP), and 1 µL (300 ng/μL) of random primers. After incubation at 65 °C for 5 min, 7 µL of master mix including dithiothreitol (100 mM), RNaseOUT (40 units), and SuperScriptTM III or IV (200 units) in 5× First-Strand Buffer or 5× SuperScript IV buffer was added to each sample to a total volume of 20 µL. A no-reverse-transcriptase negative control lacked SuperScriptTM III or IV and instead, 1µL of ddH2O was added. The reaction was run in a GeneAmp PCR system 2400 thermal cycler (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) at 25 °C for 5 min, followed by 50 °C for 50 min, and heat inactivation at 70 °C for 15 min (SuperScriptTM III) or at 23 °C for 10 min, followed by 53 °C for 10 min, and heat inactivation at 80 °C for 10 min (SuperScriptTM IV).

4.7. Real-Time Quantitative Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR)

Reagents used for gene expression analysis were obtained from ThermoFisher Scientific, Burlington, Ontario, Canada. Primers used were Nurr1 primers [GenBank: NM_013613.2] (sense: 5′-CAA CTA CAG CAC AGG CTA CGA-3′ and antisense: 5′-GCA TCT GAA TGT CTT CTA CCT TAA TG-3′, Mobix, Hamilton, ON, Canada), BDNF primers [GenBank: NM 001048139.1] (sense: 5′-GCG GCA GAT AAA AAG ACT GC-3′, antisense: 5′-CTT ATG AAT CGC CAG CCA AT-3′, Mobix) and GAPDH primers [GenBank: NM 001289726.1] (sense: 5′-GTG GAG TCA TAC TGG AAC ATG TAG-3′, and antisense: 5′-AAT GGT GAA GGT CGG TGT G-3′, Mobix). Standards for absolute quantification were prepared using the above target-specific primers as described previously [71]. Real-time amplifications were carried out in triplicate with QuantStudio™3 Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). Samples lacking reverse transcriptase were used as negative controls to confirm the lack of genomic DNA contamination. The thermal profile for Nurr1 was 2 min at 50 °C, 2 min at 95 °C, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 sec, 60 °C for 1 min. The thermal profile for BDNF and GAPDH was 2 min at 50 °C, 2 min at 95 °C followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 58 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 45 s. A dissociation curve was followed to monitor the formation of any secondary products. Nurr1 and BDNF mRNA quantities are presented as a ratio to copy numbers of GAPDH, which did not change with any treatment. mRNA quantities and PCR efficiencies were calculated using QuantStudio™ Design and Analysis Software (Version 1.5.1, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.).

4.8. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (Version 26, IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA). The homogeneity of variances was assessed by Levene’s test. Shapiro-Wilk test of normality was used to test the normal distribution of data. When data departed from normality, a combination of calculated z scores for skewness and kurtosis and visual inspection was used to decide whether the assumption of normality was acceptable or not. Further, the overall assumption was that parametric tests, including t-test (assuming equal variances) and univariant analysis of variance (ANOVA), were robust to moderate departures from normality and homogeneity. All experiments were conducted on 2–4 samples in each of two separate experiments. A two-way ANOVA between groups and experiments was used to verify that no significant differences occurred between the two experiments. Post hoc comparisons included unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t-tests and Gabriel’s tests (for unequal sample sizes). p ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. GraphPad Prism (Version 9.0.0, GraphPad Software, LCC, San Diego, CA, USA) was used to generate graphs.

5. Conclusions

In summary, we showed that BDNF expression is regulated independently of Nurr1 in cortical neurons. Tissue-specific BDNF regulation by Nurr1 may require molecular components that are absent in cortical neurons but are present in mDA neurons and CGCs. Our findings highlight the importance of studying BDNF transcriptional regulation in different tissues.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.A. and M.F.; methodology, M.A.; writing—original draft preparation, M.A.; writing—review and editing, M.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of McMaster University (protocol code 19-11-27, date of approval 16 December 2019).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are openly available in Scholars Portal Dataverse at https://doi.org/10.5683/SP3/WXDUBJ (accessed on 7 June 2022).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ohkura, N.; Hijikuro, M.; Yamamoto, A.; Miki, K. Molecular Cloning of a Novel Thyroid/Steroid Receptor Superfamily Gene from Cultured Rat Neuronal Cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1994, 205, 1959–1965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Zetterström, R.H.; Solomin, L.; Jansson, L.; Hoffer, B.J.; Olson, L.; Perlmann, T. Dopamine Neuron Agenesis in Nurr1-Deficient Mice. Science 1997, 276, 248–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Volpicelli, F.; Caiazzo, M.; Greco, D.; Consales, C.; Leone, L.; Perrone-Capano, C.; D’Amato, L.C.; di Porzio, U. Bdnf Gene Is a Downstream Target of Nurr1 Transcription Factor in Rat Midbrain Neurons in Vitro. J. Neurochem. 2007, 102, 441–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Volpicelli, F.; Perrone-Capano, C.; Da Pozzo, P.; Colucci-D’Amato, L.; di Porzio, U. Modulation of Nurr1 Gene Expression in Mesencephalic Dopaminergic Neurones. J. Neurochem. 2004, 88, 1283–1294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Volpicelli, F.; De Gregorio, R.; Pulcrano, S.; Perrone-Capano, C.; di Porzio, U.; Bellenchi, G.C. Direct Regulation of Pitx3 Expression by Nurr1 in Culture and in Developing Mouse Midbrain. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e30661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Koo, J.W.; Mazei-Robison, M.S.; LaPlant, Q.; Egervari, G.; Braunscheidel, K.M.; Adank, D.N.; Ferguson, D.; Feng, J.; Sun, H.; Scobie, K.N.; et al. Epigenetic Basis of Opiate Suppression of Bdnf Gene Expression in the Ventral Tegmental Area. Nat. Neurosci. 2015, 18, 415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Yu, L.; Saarma, M.; Arumäe, U. Death Receptors and Caspases but Not Mitochondria are Activated in the GDNF-or BDNF-Deprived Dopaminergic Neurons. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28, 7467–7475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Notaras, M.; van den Buuse, M. Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF): Novel Insights into Regulation and Genetic Variation. Neuroscientist 2019, 25, 434–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fuster, J.M. Cortex and Memory: Emergence of a New Paradigm. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2009, 21, 2047–2072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Preston, A.R.; Eichenbaum, H. Interplay of Hippocampus and Prefrontal Cortex in Memory. Curr. Biol. 2013, 23, R764–R773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Saucedo-Cardenas, O.; Conneely, O.M. Comparative Distribution of NURR1 and NUR77 Nuclear Receptors in the Mouse Central Nervous System. J. Mol. Neurosci. 1996, 7, 51–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Xing, G.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, L.; Heynen, T.; Li, X.-L.; Smith, M.A.; Weiss, S.R.B.; Feldman, A.N.; Detera-Wadleigh, S.; Chuang, D.-M.; et al. Rat Nurr1 Is Prominently Expressed in Perirhinal Cortex, and Differentially Induced in the Hippocampal Dentate Gyrus by Electroconvulsive vs. Kindled Seizures. Mol. Brain Res. 1997, 47, 251–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhou, B.; Cai, Q.; Xie, Y.; Sheng, Z.-H. Snapin Recruits Dynein to BDNF-TrkB Signaling Endosomes for Retrograde Axonal Transport and Is Essential for Dendrite Growth of Cortical Neurons. Cell Rep. 2012, 2, 42–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Ringstedt, T.; Linnarsson, S.; Wagner, J.; Lendahl, U.; Kokaia, Z.; Arenas, E.; Ernfors, P.; Ibáñez, C.F. BDNF Regulates Reelin Expression and Cajal-Retzius Cell Development in the Cerebral Cortex. Neuron 1998, 21, 305–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Huang, Z.J.; Kirkwood, A.; Pizzorusso, T.; Porciatti, V.; Morales, B.; Bear, M.F.; Maffei, L.; Tonegawa, S. BDNF Regulates the Maturation of Inhibition and the Critical Period of Plasticity in Mouse Visual Cortex. Cell 1999, 98, 739–755.16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Antal, A.; Chaieb, L.; Moliadze, V.; Monte-Silva, K.; Poreisz, C.; Thirugnanasambandam, N.; Nitsche, M.A.; Shoukier, M.; Ludwig, H.; Paulus, W. Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) Gene Polymorphisms Shape Cortical Plasticity in Humans. Brain Stimulat. 2010, 3, 230–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ghosh, A.; Carnahan, J.; Greenberg, M.E. Requirement for BDNF in Activity-Dependent Survival of Cortical Neurons. Science 1994, 263, 1618–1623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, L.; Cavanaugh, J.E.; Wang, Y.; Sakagami, H.; Mao, Z.; Xia, Z. ERK5 Activation of MEF2-Mediated Gene Expression Plays a Critical Role in BDNF-Promoted Survival of Developing but Not Mature Cortical Neurons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 8532–8537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Vutskits, L.; Djebbara-Hannas, Z.; Zhang, H.; Paccaud, J.; Durbec, P.; Rougon, G.; Muller, D.; Kiss, J.Z. PSA-NCAM Modulates BDNF-dependent Survival and Differentiation of Cortical Neurons. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2001, 13, 1391–1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wheeler, A.L.; Felsky, D.; Viviano, J.D.; Stojanovski, S.; Ameis, S.H.; Szatmari, P.; Lerch, J.P.; Chakravarty, M.M.; Voineskos, A.N. BDNF-Dependent Effects on Amygdala–Cortical Circuitry and Depression Risk in Children and Youth. Cereb. Cortex 2018, 28, 1760–1770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Holsinger, R.M.D.; Schnarr, J.; Henry, P.; Castelo, V.T.; Fahnestock, M. Quantitation of BDNF mRNA in Human Parietal Cortex by Competitive Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction: Decreased Levels in Alzheimer’s Disease. Mol. Brain Res. 2000, 76, 347–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Christensen, R.; Marcussen, A.B.; Wörtwein, G.; Knudsen, G.M.; Aznar, S. Aβ (1–42) Injection Causes Memory Impairment, Lowered Cortical and Serum BDNF Levels, and Decreased Hippocampal 5-HT2A Levels. Exp. Neurol. 2008, 210, 164–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Keifer, J. Comparative Genomics of the BDNF Gene, Non-Canonical Modes of Transcriptional Regulation, and Neurological Disease. Mol. Neurobiol. 2021, 58, 2851–2861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hawk, J.D.; Bookout, A.L.; Poplawski, S.G.; Bridi, M.; Rao, A.J.; Sulewski, M.E.; Kroener, B.T.; Manglesdorf, D.J.; Abel, T. NR4A Nuclear Receptors Support Memory Enhancement by Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors. J. Clin. Investig. 2012, 122, 3593–3602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Levenson, J.M.; Choi, S.; Lee, S.-Y.; Cao, Y.A.; Ahn, H.J.; Worley, K.C.; Pizzi, M.; Liou, H.-C.; Sweatt, J.D. A Bioinformatics Analysis of Memory Consolidation Reveals Involvement of the Transcription Factor C-Rel. J. Neurosci. 2004, 24, 3933–3943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Baloh, R.H.; Enomoto, H.; Johnson, E.M.; Milbrandt, J. The GDNF Family Ligands and Receptors—Implications for Neural Development. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2000, 10, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pei, L.; Castrillo, A.; Tontonoz, P. Regulation of Macrophage Inflammatory Gene Expression by the Orphan Nuclear Receptor Nur77. Mol. Endocrinol. 2006, 20, 786–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. de Ortiz, S.P.; Maldonado-Vlaar, C.S.; Carrasquillo, Y. Hippocampal Expression of the Orphan Nuclear Receptor Gene Hzf-3/Nurr1 during Spatial Discrimination Learning. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 2000, 74, 161–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Colón-Cesario, W.I.; Martínez-Montemayor, M.M.; Morales, S.; Félix, J.; Cruz, J.; Adorno, M.; Pereira, L.; Colón, N.; Maldonado-Vlaar, C.S.; Peña de Ortiz, S. Knockdown of Nurr1 in the Rat Hippocampus: Implications to Spatial Discrimination Learning and Memory. Learn. Mem. Cold Spring Harb. N 2006, 13, 734–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Hawk, J.D.; Abel, T. The Role of NR4A Transcription Factors in Memory Formation. Brain Res. Bull. 2011, 85, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Ibi, D.; Takuma, K.; Koike, H.; Mizoguchi, H.; Tsuritani, K.; Kuwahara, Y.; Kamei, H.; Nagai, T.; Yoneda, Y.; Nabeshima, T. Social Isolation Rearing-induced Impairment of the Hippocampal Neurogenesis Is Associated with Deficits in Spatial Memory and Emotion-related Behaviors in Juvenile Mice. J. Neurochem. 2008, 105, 921–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. McNulty, S.E.; Barrett, R.M.; Vogel-Ciernia, A.; Malvaez, M.; Hernandez, N.; Davatolhagh, M.F.; Matheos, D.P.; Schiffman, A.; Wood, M.A. Differential Roles for Nr4a1 and Nr4a2 in Object Location vs. Object Recognition Long-Term Memory. Learn. Mem. 2012, 19, 588–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Bridi, M.S.; Abel, T. The NR4A Orphan Nuclear Receptors Mediate Transcription-Dependent Hippocampal Synaptic Plasticity. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 2013, 105, 151–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Aldavert-Vera, L.; Huguet, G.; Costa-Miserachs, D.; de Ortiz, S.P.; Kádár, E.; Morgado-Bernal, I.; Segura-Torres, P. Intracranial Self-Stimulation Facilitates Active-Avoidance Retention and Induces Expression of c-Fos and Nurr1 in Rat Brain Memory Systems. Behav. Brain Res. 2013, 250, 46–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Glaab, E.; Schneider, R. Comparative Pathway and Network Analysis of Brain Transcriptome Changes during Adult Aging and in Parkinson’s Disease. Neurobiol. Dis. 2015, 74, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Parkinson, G.M.; Dayas, C.V.; Smith, D.W. Age-Related Gene Expression Changes in Substantia Nigra Dopamine Neurons of the Rat. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2015, 149, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, L.; Le, W.; Xie, W.; Dani, J.A. Age-Related Changes in Dopamine Signaling in Nurr1 Deficient Mice as a Model of Parkinson’s Disease. Neurobiol. Aging 2012, 33, 1001.e7–1001.e16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Chu, Y.; Kompoliti, K.; Cochran, E.J.; Mufson, E.J.; Kordower, J.H. Age-Related Decreases in Nurr1 Immunoreactivity in the Human Substantia Nigra. J. Comp. Neurol. 2002, 450, 203–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Umegaki, H.; Roth, G.S.; Ingram, D.K. Aging of the Striatum: Mechanisms and Interventions. Age Dordr. Neth. 2008, 30, 251–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Kummari, E.; Guo-Ross, S.; Eells, J.B. Region Specific Effects of Aging and the Nurr1-Null Heterozygous Genotype on Dopamine Neurotransmission. Neurochem. Neuropharmacol. Open Access 2017, 3, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Ahn, J.H.; Lee, J.S.; Cho, J.H.; Park, J.H.; Lee, T.-K.; Song, M.; Kim, H.; Kang, S.H.; Won, M.-H.; Lee, C.H. Age-Dependent Decrease of Nurr1 Protein Expression in the Gerbil Hippocampus. Biomed. Rep. 2018, 8, 517–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Moon, M.; Jeong, I.; Kim, C.; Kim, J.; Lee, P.K.J.; Mook-Jung, I.; Leblanc, P.; Kim, K. Correlation between Orphan Nuclear Receptor Nurr1 Expression and Amyloid Deposition in 5XFAD Mice, an Animal Model of Alzheimer’s Disease. J. Neurochem. 2015, 132, 254–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Cunha, C.; Brambilla, R.; Thomas, K.L. A Simple Role for BDNF in Learning and Memory? Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2010, 3, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Sacchetti, P.; Carpentier, R.; Segard, P.; Olive-Cren, C.; Lefebvre, P. Multiple Signaling Pathways Regulate the Transcriptional Activity of the Orphan Nuclear Receptor NURR1. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34, 5515–5527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Mulder, A.H.; van Amsterdam, R.G.M.; Wilbrink, M.; Schoffelmeer, A.N.M. Depolarization-Induced Release of [3H] Histamine by High Potassium Concentrations, Electrical Stimulation and Veratrine from Rat Brain Slices after Incubation with the Radiolabelled Amine. Neurochem. Int. 1983, 5, 291–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Tokuoka, H.; Hatanaka, T.; Metzger, D.; Ichinose, H. Nurr1 Expression Is Regulated by Voltage-Dependent Calcium Channels and Calcineurin in Cultured Hippocampal Neurons. Neurosci. Lett. 2014, 559, 50–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Moon, H.; Jeon, S.G.; Kim, J.I.; Kim, H.S.; Lee, S.; Kim, D.; Park, S.; Moon, M.; Chung, H. Pharmacological Stimulation of Nurr1 Promotes Cell Cycle Progression in Adult Hippocampal Neural Stem Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 21, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Kim, J.; Jeon, S.G.; Kim, K.A.; Kim, Y.J.; Song, E.J.; Choi, J.; Ahn, K.J.; Kim, C.-J.; Chung, H.Y.; Moon, M.; et al. The Pharmacological Stimulation of Nurr1 Improves Cognitive Functions via Enhancement of Adult Hippocampal Neurogenesis. Stem Cell Res. 2016, 17, 534–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Kim, C.-H.; Han, B.-S.; Moon, J.; Kim, D.-J.; Shin, J.; Rajan, S.; Nguyen, Q.T.; Sohn, M.; Kim, W.-G.; Han, M.; et al. Nuclear Receptor Nurr1 Agonists Enhance Its Dual Functions and Improve Behavioral Deficits in an Animal Model of Parkinson’s Disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 8756–8761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Kambey, P.A.; Chengcheng, M.; Xiaoxiao, G.; Abdulrahman, A.A.; Kanwore, K.; Nadeem, I.; Jiao, W.; Gao, D. The Orphan Nuclear Receptor Nurr1 Agonist Amodiaquine Mediates Neuroprotective Effects in 6-OHDA Parkinson’s Disease Animal Model by Enhancing the Phosphorylation of P38 Mitogen-Activated Kinase but Not PI3K/AKT Signaling Pathway. Metab. Brain Dis. 2020, 36, 609–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Moon, M.; Jung, E.S.; Jeon, S.G.; Cha, M.-Y.; Jang, Y.; Kim, W.; Lopes, C.; Mook-Jung, I.; Kim, K.-S. Nurr1 (NR4A2) Regulates Alzheimer’s Disease-Related Pathogenesis and Cognitive Function in the 5XFAD Mouse Model. Aging Cell 2019, 18, e12866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Willems, S.; Kilu, W.; Ni, X.; Chaikuad, A.; Knapp, S.; Heering, J.; Merk, D. The Orphan Nuclear Receptor Nurr1 Is Responsive to Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs. Commun. Chem. 2020, 3, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Glass, C.K.; Rosenfeld, M.G. The Coregulator Exchange in Transcriptional Functions of Nuclear Receptors. Genes Dev. 2000, 14, 121–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Jing, C.-Y.; Fu, Y.-P.; Zhou, C.; Zhang, M.-X.; Yi, Y.; Huang, J.-L.; Gan, W.; Zhang, J.; Zheng, S.-S.; Zhang, B.H.; et al. Hepatic Stellate Cells Promote Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Progression via NR4A2/Osteopontin/Wnt Signaling Axis. Oncogene 2021, 40, 2910–2922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Davies, M.R.; Harding, C.J.; Raines, S.; Tolley, K.; Parker, A.E.; Downey-Jones, M.; Needham, M.R.C. Nurr1 Dependent Regulation of Pro-Inflammatory Mediators in Immortalised Synovial Fibroblasts. J. Inflamm. 2005, 2, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Lu, B. BDNF and Activity-Dependent Synaptic Modulation. Learn. Mem. 2003, 10, 86–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Narisawa-Saito, M.; Wakabayashi, K.; Tsuji, S.; Takahashi, H.; Nawa, H. Regional Specificity of Alterations in NGF, BDNF and NT-3 Levels in Alzheimer’s Disease. Neuroreport 1996, 7, 2925–2928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Barneda-Zahonero, B.; Servitja, J.-M.; Badiola, N.; Miñano-Molina, A.J.; Fadó, R.; Saura, C.A.; Rodríguez-Alvarez, J. Nurr1 Protein Is Required for N-Methyl-d-Aspartic Acid (NMDA) Receptor-Mediated Neuronal Survival. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 11351–11362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Law, S.W.; Conneely, O.M.; DeMayo, F.J.; O’Malley, B.W. Identification of a New Brain-Specific Transcription Factor, NURR1. Mol. Endocrinol. 1992, 6, 2129–2135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Shieh, P.B.; Hu, S.-C.; Bobb, K.; Timmusk, T.; Ghosh, A. Identification of a Signaling Pathway Involved in Calcium Regulation of BDNF Expression. Neuron 1998, 20, 727–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Tabuchi, A.; Nakaoka, R.; Amano, K.; Yukimine, M.; Andoh, T.; Kuraishi, Y.; Tsuda, M. Differential Activation of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Gene Promoters I and III by Ca2+ Signals Evoked Vial-Type Voltage-Dependent and N-Methyl-d-Aspartate Receptor Ca2+ Channels. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 17269–17275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Lauterborn, J.C.; Rivera, S.; Stinis, C.T.; Hayes, V.Y.; Isackson, P.J.; Gall, C.M. Differential Effects of Protein Synthesis Inhibition on the Activity-Dependent Expression of BDNF Transcripts: Evidence for Immediate-Early Gene Responses from Specific Promoters. J. Neurosci. 1996, 16, 7428–7436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Tullai, J.W.; Schaffer, M.E.; Mullenbrock, S.; Sholder, G.; Kasif, S.; Cooper, G.M. Immediate-Early and Delayed Primary Response Genes are Distinct in Function and Genomic Architecture. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 23981–23995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Zetterström, R.H.; Williams, R.; Perlmann, T.; Olson, L. Cellular Expression of the Immediate Early Transcription Factors Nurr1 and NGFI-B Suggests a Gene Regulatory Role in Several Brain Regions Including the Nigrostriatal Dopamine System. Mol. Brain Res. 1996, 41, 111–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Maxwell, M.A.; Muscat, G.E.O. The NR4A Subgroup: Immediate Early Response Genes with Pleiotropic Physiological Roles. Nucl. Recept. Signal. 2006, 4, nrs-04002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Xing, G.; Zhang, L.; Russell, S.; Post, R. Reduction of Dopamine-Related Transcription Factors Nurr1 and NGFI-B in the Prefrontal Cortex in Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorders. Schizophr. Res. 2006, 84, 36–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Jeon, S.G.; Yoo, A.; Chun, D.W.; Hong, S.B.; Chung, H.; Kim, J.; Moon, M. The Critical Role of Nurr1 as a Mediator and Therapeutic Target in Alzheimer’s Disease-Related Pathogenesis. Aging Dis. 2020, 11, 705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Amidfar, M.; de Oliveira, J.; Kucharska, E.; Budni, J.; Kim, Y.-K. The Role of CREB and BDNF: Neurobiology and Treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease. Life Sci. 2020, 257, 118020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Tao, X.; Finkbeiner, S.; Arnold, D.B.; Shaywitz, A.J.; Greenberg, M.E. Ca2+ Influx Regulates BDNF Transcription by a CREB Family Transcription Factor-Dependent Mechanism. Neuron 1998, 20, 709–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Volakakis, N.; Kadkhodaei, B.; Joodmardi, E.; Wallis, K.; Panman, L.; Silvaggi, J.; Spiegelman, B.M.; Perlmann, T. NR4A Orphan Nuclear Receptors as Mediators of CREB-Dependent Neuroprotection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 12317–12322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  71. Kapadia, M.; Mian, M.F.; Michalski, B.; Azam, A.B.; Ma, D.; Salwierz, P.; Christopher, A.; Rosa, E.; Zovkic, I.B.; Forsythe, P. Sex-Dependent Differences in Spontaneous Autoimmunity in Adult 3xTg-AD Mice. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2018, 63, 1191–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 23 06853 g001 550
Figure 1. AQ treatment increases Nurr1 and BDNF gene expression. Primary cortical neurons were treated with 10 µM AQ for 24 h. Real-time qRT-PCR data shows that compared to untreated cells, AQ-treated cells exhibited significantly increased levels of (a) Nurr1 and (b) BDNF mRNA. Both targets were normalized to the housekeeping gene GAPDH, which did not change upon AQ treatment (p > 0.05). Two-way ANOVA and post hoc independent samples t-test, *** p < 0.001, n = 6 per group. Error bars: ±SE.
Figure 1. AQ treatment increases Nurr1 and BDNF gene expression. Primary cortical neurons were treated with 10 µM AQ for 24 h. Real-time qRT-PCR data shows that compared to untreated cells, AQ-treated cells exhibited significantly increased levels of (a) Nurr1 and (b) BDNF mRNA. Both targets were normalized to the housekeeping gene GAPDH, which did not change upon AQ treatment (p > 0.05). Two-way ANOVA and post hoc independent samples t-test, *** p < 0.001, n = 6 per group. Error bars: ±SE.
Ijms 23 06853 g001
Ijms 23 06853 g002 550
Figure 2. Membrane depolarization increases Nurr1 and BDNF gene expression. Primary cortical neurons were treated with 50 mM KCl with or without 10 µM nimodipine or with 10 µM veratridine as described in Methods. Compared to untreated cells (n = 6), KCl- (n = 7) and veratridine-treated cells (n = 3) exhibited significantly increased levels of (a) Nurr1 and (b) BDNF mRNA. Nimodipine (n = 3) blocked the increase in Nurr1 (p = 0.405) and BDNF mRNA (p = 0.98). Two-way ANOVA and post hoc Gabriel’s test, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001. Error bars: ±SE.
Figure 2. Membrane depolarization increases Nurr1 and BDNF gene expression. Primary cortical neurons were treated with 50 mM KCl with or without 10 µM nimodipine or with 10 µM veratridine as described in Methods. Compared to untreated cells (n = 6), KCl- (n = 7) and veratridine-treated cells (n = 3) exhibited significantly increased levels of (a) Nurr1 and (b) BDNF mRNA. Nimodipine (n = 3) blocked the increase in Nurr1 (p = 0.405) and BDNF mRNA (p = 0.98). Two-way ANOVA and post hoc Gabriel’s test, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001. Error bars: ±SE.
Ijms 23 06853 g002
Ijms 23 06853 g003 550
Figure 3. Nurr1 siRNA knockdown does not alter BDNF gene expression. Primary cortical cell cultures were treated with 35 pmol scrambled siRNA or Nurr1 siRNA and 48 h later were harvested for real-time qRT-PCR. (a) Compared to the control group, Nurr1 mRNA was reduced significantly in the siNurr1 group. (b) BDNF mRNA remained unchanged between groups. Two-way ANOVA and post hoc independent samples t-test, *** p < 0.001, n = 5 per group. Error bars: ±SE.
Figure 3. Nurr1 siRNA knockdown does not alter BDNF gene expression. Primary cortical cell cultures were treated with 35 pmol scrambled siRNA or Nurr1 siRNA and 48 h later were harvested for real-time qRT-PCR. (a) Compared to the control group, Nurr1 mRNA was reduced significantly in the siNurr1 group. (b) BDNF mRNA remained unchanged between groups. Two-way ANOVA and post hoc independent samples t-test, *** p < 0.001, n = 5 per group. Error bars: ±SE.
Ijms 23 06853 g003
Ijms 23 06853 g004 550
Figure 4. Nurr1 knockdown does not affect activity-dependent BDNF gene expression. Primary cortical neurons were treated with 50 mM KCl and 35 pmol of scrambled siRNA or Nurr1 siRNA. Cells were harvested forty-eight hours post-transfection and underwent harvest for real-time qRT-PCR. (a) Nurr1 mRNA was reduced significantly in the siNurr1 group compared to the control group. (b) BDNF mRNA remained unchanged between groups. *** p < 0.0001, two-way ANOVA and post hoc independent samples t-test (n = 5–6 per group). Error bars: ±SE.
Figure 4. Nurr1 knockdown does not affect activity-dependent BDNF gene expression. Primary cortical neurons were treated with 50 mM KCl and 35 pmol of scrambled siRNA or Nurr1 siRNA. Cells were harvested forty-eight hours post-transfection and underwent harvest for real-time qRT-PCR. (a) Nurr1 mRNA was reduced significantly in the siNurr1 group compared to the control group. (b) BDNF mRNA remained unchanged between groups. *** p < 0.0001, two-way ANOVA and post hoc independent samples t-test (n = 5–6 per group). Error bars: ±SE.
Ijms 23 06853 g004
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Abdollahi, M.; Fahnestock, M. Nurr1 Is Not an Essential Regulator of BDNF in Mouse Cortical Neurons. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 6853. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23126853

AMA Style

Abdollahi M, Fahnestock M. Nurr1 Is Not an Essential Regulator of BDNF in Mouse Cortical Neurons. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(12):6853. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23126853

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abdollahi, Mona, and Margaret Fahnestock. 2022. "Nurr1 Is Not an Essential Regulator of BDNF in Mouse Cortical Neurons" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 12: 6853. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23126853

APA Style

Abdollahi, M., & Fahnestock, M. (2022). Nurr1 Is Not an Essential Regulator of BDNF in Mouse Cortical Neurons. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(12), 6853. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23126853

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop