Next Article in Journal
Friction in Myocardial Anoxia Leads to Negative Excess Entropy Production, Self-Organization, and Dissipative Structures
Next Article in Special Issue
miRNA in Ischemic Heart Disease and Its Potential as Biomarkers: A Comprehensive Review
Previous Article in Journal
Inflammatory Bowel Disease Treatments and Predictive Biomarkers of Therapeutic Response
Previous Article in Special Issue
Role of miR-133/Dio3 Axis in the T3-Dependent Modulation of Cardiac mitoK-ATP Expression
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 13
10.3390/ijms23136962
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

miR-1183 Is a Key Marker of Remodeling upon Stretch and Tachycardia in Human Myocardium

by
Natasa Djalinac
1,2,
Ewald Kolesnik
1,
Heinrich Maechler
3,
Susanne Scheruebel-Posch
4,
Brigitte Pelzmann
4,
Peter P. Rainer
1,5,
Ines Foessl
6,
Markus Wallner
1,7,*,†,
Daniel Scherr
1,
Akos Heinemann
8,
Simon Sedej
1,5,9,
Senka Ljubojevic-Holzer
1,5,
Dirk von Lewinski
1,*,† and
Egbert Bisping
1,†
1
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria
2
Unit of Human Molecular Genetics and Functional Genomics, Department of Biology, University of Padua, 35121 Padua, Italy
3
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Medical University of Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria
4
Gottfried Schatz Research Center, Institute of Biophysics, Medical University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria
5
BioTechMed Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria
6
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Medical University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria
7
Cardiovascular Research Center, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA
8
Institute of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria
9
Institute of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(13), 6962; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23136962
Submission received: 31 May 2022 / Revised: 20 June 2022 / Accepted: 21 June 2022 / Published: 23 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue MicroRNA in Cardiac Health and Disease)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Many cardiac insults causing atrial remodeling are linked to either stretch or tachycardia, but a comparative characterization of their effects on early remodeling events in human myocardium is lacking. Here, we applied isometric stretch or sustained tachycardia at 2.5 Hz in human atrial trabeculae for 6 h followed by microarray gene expression profiling. Among largely independent expression patterns, we found a small common fraction with the microRNA miR-1183 as the highest up-regulated transcript (up to 4-fold). Both, acute stretch and tachycardia induced down-regulation of the predicted miR-1183 target genes ADAM20 and PLA2G7. Furthermore, miR-1183 was also significantly up-regulated in chronically remodeled atrial samples from patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (3-fold up-regulation versus sinus rhythm samples), and in ventricular myocardium from dilative cardiomyopathy hearts (2-fold up-regulation) as compared to non-failing controls. In sum, although stretch and tachycardia show distinct transcriptomic signatures in human atrial myocardium, both cardiac insults consistently regulate the expression of miR-1183 and its downstream targets in acute and chronic remodeling. Thus, elevated expression of miR-1183 might serve as a tissue biomarker for atrial remodeling and might be of potential functional significance in cardiac disease.

1. Introduction

Atrial remodeling is the response of the atria to a variety of acute insults or chronic load. Its consequences have major clinical impact associated with decline in hemodynamic and valvular function, the generation of thromboembolism and stroke, and the development of atrial fibrillation with significant individual morbidity and also enormous socioeconomic burden [1].
The remodeling process starts with excitation transcription coupling and altered gene expression as first steps followed by functional and structural changes, including atrial enlargement, altered geometry and sphericity, and altered extracellular matrix and atrial fibrosis [2]. In human heart disease this is, typically, a result of several combined triggering mechanisms which can potentiate each other and result in remodeling progression, e.g., atrial fibrosis will increase the probability of atrial fibrillation, and atrial fibrillation triggers progression of atrial fibrosis [3].
Though different in origin, most of the triggering mechanisms can be categorized to one of these two categories: 1. Stretch, and 2. Tachycardia. Stretch is the cellular correlate to volume overload, and, if combined with pure isometric contraction, it also corresponds to pressure overload. Those load conditions may be found as a result of valvular stenosis or regurgitation, diastolic dysfunction with or without cardiac hypertrophy, heart failure with either preserved (HFpEF) or reduced ejection fraction (HfrEF), arterial or pulmonary hypertension, and others [4]. In contrast, tachycardia corresponds to either paroxysmal episodes of atrial runs, atrial tachycardias, atrial flutter, or atrial fibrillation or persistent to permanent forms of tachycardias [5].
In chronic human atrial remodeling, the contribution of each of these mechanisms is unknown, which makes it difficult to therapeutically target the specific mechanisms. Data on trigger-specific remodeling and their acute initiating phase in human myocardium is lacking. Thus, we performed experiments under controlled conditions in isolated human atrial myocardium. We show that stretch and tachycardia induce very different early remodeling patterns but share up-regulation of the microRNA, miR-1183. We also present putative downstream targets of miR-1183 which are involved in the response to both triggers. And we show that this microRNA is not only regulated in an acute setting but also in chronic remodeling, and we discuss its potential causative role in cardiac remodeling.

2. Results

2.1. Stretch and Tachycardia Induced Differential and Common Patterns of Gene Expression

Muscle strips (trabeculae) isolated from the right atrial appendage of heart surgery patients (Table 1) were subjected to two triggers of early remodeling: sustained stretch with increased pre- and afterload for 6 h or sustained tachycardia stimulation (2.5 Hz) for 6 h. Microarray screening was performed with five patient samples for each of these four groups: 1. Stretch, 2. Control for stretch, 3. Tachycardia, and 4. Control for tachycardia. Original data files are uploaded to the GEO repository under the series record GSE135166.
The microarray transcripts could be classified in four groups with a similar distribution for the stretch- and the tachycardia-regulated genes: protein-coding (approx. 60% in both), predicted protein-coding (2–3%), non-coding including small RNAs (18–22%), and transcripts without a functional annotation (approx. 20%). The analysis for protein coding and non-coding genes with p < 0.05 showed a largely independent regulation by stretch versus tachycardia as demonstrated by 1305 transcripts regulated solely after stretch and 1837 solely after tachycardia (Figure 1A), which also revealed that tachycardia resulted in a 40% higher number of significantly regulated genes than stretch. Out of the 1305 stretch regulated genes, 683 were found to be up-regulated and 622 down-regulated. Similarly, tachycardia resulted in an equal ratio of 922 up-regulated and 915 down-regulated transcripts. The list containing all significantly regulated transcripts for either trigger conditions sorted by gene symbol can be found in Supplemental Table S1. Among the protein coding genes ACTA1 was the highest up-regulated gene after 6h of pathological stretch (Figure 1C), while TRAJ22 and SNRPN were the highest up-regulated genes after sustained tachycardia (Figure 1B). qPCR assessment of a selection of best up-/down-regulated genes and genes with a known cardiovascular role (CNN1, PLA2G7) on the microarrays confirmed a similar extend of array and qPCR expression in the same samples (Figure 1D).
Despite the predominantly independent gene regulation between stretch and tachycardia, there were 65 transcripts that were commonly regulated by both triggers (Figure 2A): The larger fraction (39 genes) displayed unidirectional regulation (Figure 2B) while the smaller fraction (26 genes) was regulated in opposite direction (Figure 2C) between both triggers. The majority of the common genes with identical direction were up-regulated in their expression. Among characterized transcripts with a known biological function a microRNA encoding transcript, MIR1183, had the highest expression level. In contrast, MIR4501, ADAM20, and PLA2G7 were the most down-regulated common transcripts. A complete list of all significantly regulated transcripts and all 65 commonly regulated transcripts is provided in the Supplementary Table S1.
Bioinformatic estimations via ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA) provided information on molecules and associated networks, canonical pathways, disease and functions, upstream regulators, and causal networks which are summarized in Supplementary Table S2. By these means we also determined potential upstream regulators of the affected target molecules on our arrays: for stretch this included inhibition of PARP1 and BRD4 and activation of MAP2K1/2. In contrast, tachycardia pointed to a larger spectrum of potential upstream regulators with several activated factors (TP53, RBM5, JAG2, PDGF BB, NR3C2, SPP1, and IL1RN) and even more inhibited factors (TNF, JUN, IKBKB, IL4, TLR4, IL1A, CD40, IL18, PRKCD, P38 MAPK, Lymphotoxin, PTGS2, CD14, C5, Gm-csf, MBD2, Fcer1, IL17A, Jnk, ERK1/2, SAA, TP63, ECSIT, NDRG1, ESR1, and Mek).

2.2. MicroRNA Expression Profile and Detection of miR-1183 Encoding Gene as the Strongest and Commonly Regulated Transcript

After evaluation of all protein coding genes, we generated a list of all significantly regulated miRNA genes (Figure 3A). Small RNAs, including miRNAs, were present in a close to equal relative expression of 13% and 14% from total regulated stretch and tachycardia regulated transcripts, respectively. Interestingly, stretch showed an almost exclusive up-regulation of affected miRNAs. Conversely, tachycardia stimulation induced a balanced response concerning miRNA expression (Figure 3A). Among the hits, MIR1183 was the top regulated transcript not only among miRNAs but also when considering overall array gene expression. More importantly, MIR1183 was the highest regulated transcript that involved both stretch and tachycardia (Figure 3A). Accordingly, qPCR evaluation confirmed the up-regulation to be significant with stretch and a strong trend with tachycardia (Figure 3B).

2.3. miR-1183 as a Biomarker in Human Cardiac Tissue

Considering the novelty of microarray findings, we further investigated whether miR-1183 is also regulated in chronic remodeling and might serve as a tissue biomarker. Therefore, we evaluated chronic gene expression levels in samples of both atrial and ventricular source. Samples from patients suffering from documented long-term atrial fibrillation were compared to those with stable sinus rhythm (Table 2).
Additionally, ventricular samples from patients suffering from end-stage dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) were compared to samples from non-failing donor hearts (NF) (Table 3).
Atrial myocardial samples from patients with chronic atrial fibrillation showed a significant increase in pri-miR-1183 levels compared to patients with normal sinus rhythm (Figure 4A). Samples from patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) also showed a significant up-regulation compared to samples from non-failing donor hearts (Figure 4B).

2.4. Bioinformatics Prediction of miR-1183 Downstream Targets

For investigation of miR-1183 mechanism of action we used the tool TargetScan7.2 to assess miR-1183 target genes. Out of the complete list of possible target genes (3539) with a different cumulative weighted context ++ score which predicts efficacy of miRNA binding to complementary mRNA sites [6] 1337 were expressed on the microarray and are summarized in Supplemental Table S3. We looked solely at down-regulated genes, since down-regulation reflects direct miRNA effects on mRNA. Out of these target genes, 24 down-regulated genes emerged under tachycardia (Figure 5A) whereas 13 showed significant down-regulation under stretch (Figure 5B). The most interesting candidate mRNA targets include the stretch and tachycardia commonly expressed genes ADAM20 and PLA2G7 (Figure 5C). Additionally, both ADAM20 and PLA2G7 are the protein coding genes with the highest common down-regulation detected on the microarray and confirmed via qPCR.

3. Discussion

Our results show that the pathological triggers, stretch and tachycardia, induced largely independent early remodeling responses in human atrial myocardium. Both triggers shared only a small common fraction, but, within this fraction, the pri-microRNA encoding transcript, MIR1183, was the strongest up-regulated for both on genome-wide level. Furthermore, we demonstrated that miR-1183 is not only up-regulated acutely but also in chronic cardiac remodeling in both human atrial and ventricular tissue. As downstream targets of miR-1183 we identified ADAM20 and PLA2G7. Our data characterized miR-1183 as novel tissue biomarker in human cardiac remodeling with a potential functional cardiac role.

3.1. Microarray Gene Expression Uncovers Independent Stretch and Tachycardia Gene Regulation

With our experimental settings we were able to uncover trigger-specific remodeling mechanisms which are otherwise masked by each other in vivo. This is the first study to allow those insights in human myocardium. We found that stretch and tachycardia induced very independent genome-wide expression profiles, and that tachycardia had a 40% higher impact on the number of transcripts at the very early time point. A recent study focused on the chronic response in human atrial appendage samples from patients with right atrial dilatation but no history of atrial fibrillation suggesting stretch without tachycardia as a remodeling trigger in these hearts [7]. The authors found a rather small number of stretch regulated genes by genome-wide profiling, which fits to our findings in comparison to more regulated genes with tachycardia. Also, there was an overlap between their and our microarray datasets for several stretch regulated genes (DEFB109P1B, LOC102723337, LOC101927029, RHPN2, CD177, and LYPD6), but also for tachycardia regulated genes.
Some of the highest stretch up-regulated genes in our dataset are well known in cardiac disease: skeletal alpha (α)-actin, ACTA1, is involved in regulation of muscle contraction [8] as well as cytoskeleton organization [9]. ACTA1 expression in the cardiovascular systems can serve as a marker of pathological hypertrophy [10,11,12,13,14], associated cardiac diseases [15,16], and, ultimately, heart failure. The CNN1 gene encodes Calponin 1, which expression was previously shown to have a stretch-mediated up-regulation pattern [17,18]. The gene TP1 encodes an enzyme participating in processes of glycolysis and gluconeogenesis and has a role in skeletal muscle myopathy [19] and metabolic regulation in type 2 diabetes hearts [20].
We also found tachycardia up-regulated genes with cardiac relevance: SNRPN is a human gene that encodes the small nuclear ribonucleoprotein polypeptide N with a role in development [21,22] and detected single nucleotide polymorphism in COPD patients and participants of the Framingham study [23]. RCAN1 is linked to the calcineurin/NFAT signaling pathway [24,25,26]. It inhibits Calcineurin by binding to its catalytic domain and therefore represses pathological hypertrophy [27]. High expression of RCAN1 is part of a coping mechanism against sudden insult in the brain [28] and lung [29] and is highly involved in regulating pathological cardiac remodeling either directly as mentioned previously or through interaction with other signaling mediators [30].
Our analysis by IPA was not able to predict any highly relevant signaling pathways tied to either stretch or tachycardia. However, it became obvious that tachycardia resulted in down-regulation of a number of genes involved in the process of inflammation, such as IL1A, IL1B, VCAM1, KIR3DL3, and CCL4. As determined by the GO molecular function, interleukin 1 alpha and beta belong to a major pro-inflammatory cytokine family. VCAM1 is an adhesion molecule whose expression is additionally modulated by IL1B [31], KIR3DL3 is involved in antigen processing, and CCL4 is a chemokine for a number of inflammatory cells.
Following the observation that stretch and tachycardia show these distinctive patterns of gene regulation, we next concentrated on the common gene fraction with unidirectional regulation and identified a non-coding miR-1183 precursor gene—MIR1183, which stands out as the top up-regulated array transcript with a predefined function. Consequently, we analyzed the expression changes of MIR1183 and all other microRNA coding transcripts which were represented on our microarrays.

3.2. MicroRNA Regulation in Stretch Versus Tachycardia Induced Remodeling

Stretch-mediated miRNAs up-regulation was more prominent than down-regulation on our microarrays, and several of the up-regulated miRNAs had an established role in cardiac remodeling:
miR-378 acts as an antihypertrophic factor, is specific to cardiomyocytes, and targets components of the MAPK pathway in vitro. In vivo it prevents pressure overload induced hypertrophy in mice and improves cardiac function [32].
miR-216A is up-regulated in CAD patients and is involved in inflammation via the Smad3/IƙBα axis [33]. The expression of miR-216 also promotes cardiac fibroblast proliferation and biogenesis through the SMAD signaling pathway and autophagy inhibition [34]. Finally, it is up-regulated in plasma samples in heart-failure patients [35,36].
miIR-641 is involved in vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation and metastasis [37] and miR-16-1 in cytostatic cardiac injury [38].
The detailed cardiac function of several array expressed miRNAs is yet to be determined. However, in previous reports their up-regulation has been associated with different types of cardiac disease: miR-376C with females with gestational hypertension [39], miR-4268 with aortic stenosis [40], miR-330 with post-MI heart failure [41], and miR-4487 with CVD patients with “blood stasis syndrome” [42].
A few tachycardia-regulated miRNAs could also be assigned to a cardiovascular role: miR-221 is increased after intense sport activity and associated with PW and CK biomarkers [43] which is consistent with increased workload after tachycardia. miR-519b is found to be up-regulated in AFIB patients [44] while miR-518e in non-ischemic heart-failure [45].
In contrast to stretch, tachycardia-mediated down-regulation appears more prominent and in positive correlation with cardiac remodeling: down-regulation of miR-599 is in relation with cardiomyocyte sensitivity to oxidative stress and, eventually, pyroptosis [46] and is also consistent with the direction of regulation in our array. Apoptotic cell death is linked to low expression of miR-498 in MI patients [47] and is in agreement with the down-regulation in our array. MiRNAs with a negative correlation between cardiac remodeling and the direction of regulation in our array, such as miR-28 [48,49], miR-374c [50], and miR-125a [51] are likely part of an early coping mechanism.
The common fraction of stretch and tachycardia regulated genes contained MIR1183 as the strongest up-regulated and MIR4501 as the strongest down-regulated microRNA transcripts. Whereas miR-4501 has no assigned cardiac function, the relevance of increased miR-1183 expression levels in cardiovascular disease has been previously established in a cohort of patients with rheumatic heart disease [52]. The authors observed high levels of plasma miR-1183 and a positive trend regarding tissue expression in the papillary muscle. Another study found that miR-1183 is among the top up-regulated microRNAs in plasma of patients diagnosed with essential hypertension [53]. However, direct assessment of miR-1183 levels in the human myocardium have not been reported yet, nor was the behavior upon an acute insult such as in our settings. MiR-1183 has no known orthologues in lower species, which might provide explanation for the lack of previous studies. The microarray gene chip can detect a gene encoding the precursor of the mature form of miR-1183 and, so, we aimed to verify this finding via qPCR and found a strong correlation between the array and qPCR expression levels.

3.3. miR-1183 as a Novel Marker in Atrial and Ventricular Remodeling

The atrial tissue samples from patients undergoing mitral valve replacement surgery showed atrial dilatation and persistent atrial fibrillation compared to the control group with only moderate dilatation and permanent sinus rhythm. Thus, this reflects increased atrial wall stress (i.e., cellular stretch) and tachycardic atrial rate as a remodeling trigger in the atrial fibrillation samples. We observed a significantly increased miR-1183 in these samples, which coincides with a previous study that found some other differentially expressed miRNAs in left and right tissue samples of atrial fibrillation patients [54].
We were also interested in seeing if the chronic miR-1183 expression changes in atrial myocardium were reflected in ventricular myocardium as well and found significant up-regulation of miR-1183 in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) compared to non-failing hearts. This finding confirms the value of miR-1183 as a tissue biomarker from the early onset of acute myocardial stress, towards chronic disease in the atrium and, finally, end-stage heart failure in the ventricle.

3.4. Upstream Regulators of miR-1183

IPA bioinformatics screening did not offer hints about possible miR-1183 upstream regulators. Thus, it remains open by what signaling cascade miR-1183 might be part of in human myocardium.

3.5. Downstream Targets of miR-1183 and Cardiac Functional Effects

We also performed a TargetScan search for all potential miR-1183 downstream targets and looked up those with suppressed gene expression on the array. Thus, an association has been established between several stretch-specific miR-1183 targets and cardiac remodeling, such as: KCNA3 with diabetic cardiomyopathy [55], MED23 with CHD [56], SAMSN1 with atherosclerosis [57], CCND1 with myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury [58,59], and MCOLN3 with atrial fibrillation [60].
Also the following tachycardia-specific miR-1183-regulated targets showed a cardiovascular association: the gene NEU3 with cardiac fibrosis and CHD [61,62], ZNRD1 with CHD [63], TRIM16 [64] with cardiac hypertrophy, BIRC3 with ischemic preconditioning [65], ARRDC3 with cardiac hypertrophy [66], and MTAP with ischemic stroke [67].
Furthermore, we found two downstream targets in the common fraction of stretch and tachycardia regulated genes: ADAM20 and PLA2G7:
ADAM20 is a member of the dysintegrin and matrix metalloprotease domain family which is involved in processes of adhesion and proteolysis and is important for cell-to-cell and cell-to-matrix communication [68]. So far, ADAM20 was found to have a role in managing cell fusion during reproduction [69] but a possible relationship with cardiovascular disease is not defined.
PLA2G7 encodes a component of the protein LP-phospholipase 2 (LPA2) which mediates cardiac effects through an inflammatory response [70]. It is commonly down-regulated in foam cells in arteriosclerosis [71]. Also, down-regulation of PLA2G7 has been shown to delay cardiac aging after caloric restriction [72]. LPA2 inhibition has been attributed to anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic benefits seen in a model of hypertensive cardiac disease [73]. By down-regulating PLA2G7 and, consequently, reducing LPA2 expression miR-1183 might display a protective role against inflammatory cardiac remodeling, cardiac aging, and fibrosis. Since 1. additional inflammation mediators are down-regulated on our microarrays, and 2. IPA indicates involvement of the LXR/RXR nuclear pathway, we can speculate that cardiomyocytes might display a coping mechanism mediated through this pathway.
In addition to our microarray findings, it was recently published that Bcl2 is a direct molecular target of miR-1183 in rheumatic heart disease [74]. In our dataset BCL2 and associated anti-apoptotic pathways were not significantly regulated, but its interaction partner BNIP3 was down-regulated. BNIP3 is a pro-apoptotic gene and correlated with progression towards heart failure [75,76], so that its down-regulation might point to a potential early coping mechanism upon stretch.

4. Material and Methods

4.1. Preparation, Processing, and Stretch and Tachycardia Induction in Human Myocardium

Human atrial muscle strips were isolated from right atrial appendages obtained from patients undergoing cardiac surgery after written consent was obtained. Ventricular muscle strips and tissue samples were obtained as biopsies from non-failing or failing hearts from multiorgan donors denied for transplantation due to medical reasons, such as advanced age, systolic or diastolic dysfunction, valvular disease, or multivessel coronary disease.
The isolated muscle strips (trabeculae) were mounted on hooks and kept in an oxygenized (95% O2; 5% CO2) organ bath setup (Scientific Instruments, Gilching, Germany) at 37 °C in Tyrode solution similar to what has been described previously [77]. For stretch induction, muscle strips were stimulated at 1 Hz frequency and stretched to the length of maximal isometric force (Lmax) while the control muscle strips were kept without preload on slack length. For tachycardia induction, the stimulation was set to 2.5 Hz frequency in duration of 6h and compared to a control at 1 Hz frequency. In addition, both groups were kept on slack length. Myocardial tissue samples were homogenized and used for RNA isolation. The patient’s medical history was assessed to determine a possible correlation between confounding factors with experimental outcome and gene expression dataset (Table 1 and Table 2).

4.2. RNA Isolation

Total RNA purification of all human specimens was performed using the miRNeasy on column isolation kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) with DNase treatment. RNA yield was measured using the NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wilmington, NC, USA). RNA quality was validated by the 2100 Bioanalyzer using the Eukaryote total RNA 6000 Pico assay (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and the QiaXpert (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) setup The samples were further processed for microarray hybridization or used for qPCR analysis.

4.3. Microarray Hybridization

Microarray screening was performed on a total of 20 arrays with five patient samples for each of these four groups: 1. Stretch, 2. Control for stretch, 3. Tachycardia, and 4. Control for tachycardia. Control samples and the respective intervention samples were matched and originated from the same patient. Due to a lower RNA yield than required for microarray hybridization it was first necessary to perform a single primer isothermal amplification (SPIA) using an Ovation Pico WTA System v2 kit (NuGen Technologies, Chesapeake Dr, Redwood City, CA, USA). A total amount of 20 ng RNA used for amplification which yielded 10 µg of SPIA cDNA in 20 µL volume. Microarray hybridization was conducted using GeneChip™ Human Gene 2.0 ST Arrays (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wilmington, NC, USA). Data preprocessing and filtering was carried out with the Partek® Genomics Suite® software (v.6.6). Validation was performed by qPCR for selected genes. Bioinformatical assessment was done with Ingenuity® Pathway Analysis software (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany).

4.4. Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qPCR)

Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed on a LightCycler® 480 Instrument (Roche Applied Sciences, Penzberg, Germany). Validation of human microarray gene candidates from the same SPIA cDNA was performed using the TaqMan expression gene assay (Thermo Fischer Scientific) for the following genes: CNN1 (Cat.#Hs00959434_m1), SNRPN (Cat.#Hs01374551_m1), PLA2G7 (Cat.#Hs00965837_m1), ADAM20 (Cat.#Hs01083178_s1), MIR1183 (Cat.#Hs04273420_s1), and GAPDH (Cat.#Hs03929097_g1) along with TaqMan™ Fast Universal PCR Master Mix (2X), no AmpErase™ UNG (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Verification of MIR1183 gene expression in AFIB and DCM tissue was conducted after cDNA synthesis using the QuantiTect Reverse transcription kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) with the TaqMan® Fast Advanced Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). GenEx 5.4.4. Software (MultiD, Gothenburg, Sweden) had been used to correct primer efficiency followed by 2−ΔΔct relative quantification. The results are presented as fold change in gene expression normalized to control.

4.5. Statistical Analyses

Results are shown as bar charts representing mean ± SEM. Statistical significance between two groups with normal distribution, assessed via the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, was determined by a paired-sample t-test. One-sample t-test was used when comparing qPCR fold-change to a control group with a pre-set value of 1. The microarray dataset was statistically evaluated by one-way ANOVA followed by Benjamini and Hochberg false discovery rate correction. p-values of <0.05 were considered as statistically significant.

5. Conclusions

Though stretch and tachycardia show distinct transcriptomic signatures in human atrial myocardium we identified a miR-1183 precursor gene with the highest up-regulation shared by both triggers. We verified its up-regulation status in acute and chronic remodeling, and end-stage heart failure and established a profile with consistent down-regulation of two putative downstream targets of miR-1183. Expression levels of miR-1183 might serve as a tissue biomarker for atrial remodeling and might have potential functional significance in cardiac disease. Future studies regarding its biomarker and functional role in cardiac disease will be of high interest and clinical relevance.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms23136962/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.D. and E.B.; data curation, N.D. and E.B.; formal analysis, N.D. and E.K.; funding acquisition, M.W., D.S., A.H., S.L.-H., D.v.L. and E.B.; investigation, N.D., I.F. and D.v.L.; methodology, N.D., E.K. and I.F.; project administration, N.D.; resources, E.K., H.M., B.P., S.S.-P., P.P.R., M.W., D.S., A.H., S.S., S.L.-H., D.v.L. and E.B.; software, E.K.; supervision, A.H., S.L.-H., D.v.L. and E.B.; validation, N.D., P.P.R., M.W., S.S. and S.L.-H.; visualization, D.S.; writing—original draft, N.D.; writing–review and editing, N.D., S.S., S.L.-H., M.W., D.v.L. and E.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

N.D. was trained within the frame of the Ph.D. Program Molecular Medicine of the Medical University of Graz. This project was additionally supported by the Austrian Science Fund FWF (V 530 to SLH).

Institutional Review Board Statement

All procedures involving human myocardium were approved by the Ethical Committee of the Medical University of Graz with the approved codes given below and were conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Human atrial muscle strips and other atrial samples derived from patients undergoing cardiac surgery after written consent (approved code ethic vote 19-109ex07/08). Ventricular muscle strips and tissue samples were obtained as biopsies from non-failing or failing hearts from multiorgan donors denied for transplantation due to medical reasons (approved code ethic vote 28-508 ex 15/16).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Microarray data files are uploaded to the GEO repository under the series record GSE135166 and are publicly available. The data supporting findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the cardiothoracic surgery team and Florian Kaufman and Christian Mayer for their support in obtaining patient samples. We thank Karin Wagner for her excellent technical support, discussion, and advice on microarray experiments. Open Access Funding by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Corradi, D.; Callegari, S.; Maestri, R.; Benussi, S.; Alfieri, O. Structural remodeling in atrial fibrillation. Nat. Clin. Pract. Cardiovasc. Med. 2008, 5, 782–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Greiser, M.; Lederer, W.J.; Schotten, U. Alterations of atrial Ca2+ handling as cause and consequence of atrial fibrillation. Cardiovasc. Res. 2011, 89, 722–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Ma, J.; Chen, Q.; Ma, S. Left atrial fibrosis in atrial fibrillation: Mechanisms, clinical evaluation and management. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2021, 25, 2764–2775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Al Ghamdi, B.; Hassan, W. Atrial Remodeling And Atrial Fibrillation: Mechanistic Interactions And Clinical Implications. J. Atr. Fibrillation 2009, 2, 125. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Nattel, S.; Shiroshita-Takeshita, A.; Cardin, S.; Pelletier, P. Mechanisms of atrial remodeling and clinical relevance. Curr. Opin. Cardiol. 2005, 20, 21–25. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  6. Agarwal, V.; Bell, G.W.; Nam, J.W.; Bartel, D.P. Predicting effective microRNA target sites in mammalian mRNAs. eLife 2015, 4, e05005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Suzuki, R.; Morishima, M.; Nakada, C.; Miyamoto, S.; Ono, K. Manifestations of gene expression profiles in human right atrial myocardium caused by mechanical stretch. Heart Vessel. 2021, 36, 577–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Joureau, B.; de Winter, J.M.; Conijn, S.; Bogaards, S.J.P.; Kovacevic, I.; Kalganov, A.; Persson, M.; Lindqvist, J.; Stienen, G.J.M.; Irving, T.C.; et al. Dysfunctional sarcomere contractility contributes to muscle weakness in ACTA1-related nemaline myopathy (NEM3). Ann. Neurol. 2018, 83, 269–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Clarkson, E.; Costa, C.F.; Machesky, L.M. Congenital myopathies: Diseases of the actin cytoskeleton. J. Pathol. 2004, 204, 407–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gerçek, M.; Gerçek, M.; Kant, S.; Simsekyilmaz, S.; Kassner, A.; Milting, H.; Liehn, E.A.; Leube, R.E.; Krusche, C.A. Cardiomyocyte Hypertrophy in Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy. Am. J. Pathol. 2017, 187, 752–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Karakikes, I.; Chaanine, A.H.; Kang, S.; Mukete, B.N.; Jeong, D.; Zhang, S.; Hajjar, R.J.; Lebeche, D. Therapeutic cardiac-targeted delivery of miR-1 reverses pressure overload-induced cardiac hypertrophy and attenuates pathological remodeling. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2013, 2, e000078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Kee, H.J.; Bae, E.H.; Park, S.; Lee, K.E.; Suh, S.H.; Kim, S.W.; Jeong, M.H. HDAC Inhibition Suppresses Cardiac Hypertrophy and Fibrosis in DOCA-Salt Hypertensive Rats via Regulation of HDAC6/HDAC8 Enzyme Activity. Kidney Blood Press. Res. 2013, 37, 229–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Schaefer, A.; Schneeberger, Y.; Schulz, S.; Krasemann, S.; Werner, T.; Piasecki, A.; Höppner, G.; Müller, C.; Morhenn, K.; Lorenz, K.; et al. Analysis of fibrosis in control or pressure overloaded rat hearts after mechanical unloading by heterotopic heart transplantation. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 5710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wu, C.; Dong, S.; Li, Y. Effects of miRNA-455 on cardiac hypertrophy induced by pressure overload. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2015, 35, 893–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Kant, S.; Freytag, B.; Herzog, A.; Reich, A.; Merkel, R.; Hoffmann, B.; Krusche, C.A.; Leube, R.E. Desmoglein 2 mutation provokes skeletal muscle actin expression and accumulation at intercalated discs in murine hearts. J. Cell Sci. 2019, 132, jcs199612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Olson, T.M.; Michels, V.V.; Thibodeau, S.N.; Tai, Y.S.; Keating, M.T. Actin mutations in dilated cardiomyopathy, a heritable form of heart failure. Science 1998, 280, 750–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Kluge, A.; Rangrez, A.Y.; Kilian, L.S.; Pott, J.; Bernt, A.; Frauen, R.; Rohrbeck, A.; Frey, N.; Frank, D. Rho-family GTPase 1 (Rnd1) is a biomechanical stress-sensitive activator of cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2019, 129, 130–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Rysä, J.; Tokola, H.; Ruskoaho, H. Mechanical stretch induced transcriptomic profiles in cardiac myocytes. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 4733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bardosi, A.; Eber, S.W.; Hendrys, M.; Pekrun, A. Myopathy with altered mitochondria due to a triosephosphate isomerase (TPI) deficiency. Acta Neuropathol. 1990, 79, 387–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Smith, L.E.; Hambly, B.; Cordwell, S.; White, M. Abstract 20301: Reversible Oxidation Of Metabolic Protein Triosephosphate Isomerase in the Type 2 Diabetic Heart. Circulation 2016, 134, A20301. [Google Scholar]
  21. Ramsden, S.C.; Clayton-Smith, J.; Birch, R.; Buiting, K. Practice guidelines for the molecular analysis of Prader-Willi and Angelman syndromes. BMC Med. Genet. 2010, 11, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Kim, S.J.; Brune, C.W.; Kistner, E.O.; Christian, S.L.; Courchesne, E.H.; Cox, N.J.; Cook, E.H. Transmission disequilibrium testing of the chromosome 15q11-q13 region in autism. Am. J. Med. Genet. B Neuropsychiatr. Genet. 2008, 147, 1116–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Wilk, J.B.; Walter, R.E.; Laramie, J.M.; Gottlieb, D.J.; O’Connor, G.T. Framingham Heart Study genome-wide association: Results for pulmonary function measures. BMC Med. Genet. 2007, 8, S8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Davies, K.J.A.; Ermak, G.; Rothermel, B.A.; Pritchard, M.; Heitman, J.; Ahnn, J.; Henrique-Silva, F.; Crawford, D.; Canaider, S.; Strippoli, P.; et al. Renaming the DSCR1/Adapt78 gene family as RCAN: Regulators of calcineurin. FASEB J. 2007, 21, 3023–3028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Shin, S.-Y.; Yang, J.M.; Choo, S.-M.; Kwon, K.-S.; Cho, K.-H. System-level investigation into the regulatory mechanism of the calcineurin/NFAT signaling pathway. Cell. Signal. 2008, 20, 1117–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Vega, R.B.; Rothermel, B.A.; Weinheimer, C.J.; Kovacs, A.; Naseem, R.H.; Bassel-Duby, R.; Williams, R.S.; Olson, E.N. Dual roles of modulatory calcineurin-interacting protein 1 in cardiac hypertrophy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 669–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Turpin, C.; Waikel, R. The role of myocyte-enriched calcineurin-inhibiting protein (MCIP1) in estrogen mediated repression of cardiac hypertrophy (795.5). FASEB J. 2014, 28, 795.5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sobrado, M.; Ramirez, B.G.; Neria, F.; Lizasoain, I.; Arbones, M.L.; Minami, T.; Redondo, J.M.; Moro, M.A.; Cano, E. Regulator of calcineurin 1 (Rcan1) has a protective role in brain ischemia/reperfusion injury. J. Neuroinflamm. 2012, 9, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Bartoszewski, R.; Gebert, M.; Janaszak-Jasiecka, A.; Cabaj, A.; Króliczewski, J.; Bartoszewska, S.; Sobolewska, A.; Crossman, D.K.; Ochocka, R.; Kamysz, W.; et al. Genome-wide mRNA profiling identifies RCAN1 and GADD45A as regulators of the transitional switch from survival to apoptosis during ER stress. FEBS J. 2020, 287, 2923–2947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kuwahara, K.; Wang, Y.; McAnally, J.; Richardson, J.A.; Bassel-Duby, R.; Hill, J.A.; Olson, E.N. TRPC6 fulfills a calcineurin signaling circuit during pathologic cardiac remodeling. J. Clin. Investig. 2006, 116, 3114–3126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, X.; Feuerstein, G.Z.; Gu, J.-L.; Lysko, P.G.; Yue, T.-L. Interleukin-1β induces expression of adhesion molecules in human vascular smooth muscle cells and enhances adhesion of leukocytes to smooth muscle cells. Atherosclerosis 1995, 115, 89–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ganesan, J.; Ramanujam, D.; Sassi, Y.; Ahles, A.; Jentzsch, C.; Werfel, S.; Leierseder, S.; Loyer, X.; Giacca, M.; Zentilin, L.; et al. MiR-378 controls cardiac hypertrophy by combined repression of mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway factors. Circulation 2013, 127, 2097–2106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Yang, S.; Mi, X.; Chen, Y.; Feng, C.; Hou, Z.; Hui, R.; Zhang, W. MicroRNA-216a induces endothelial senescence and inflammation via Smad3/IkappaBalpha pathway. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2018, 22, 2739–2749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Tao, J.; Wang, J.; Li, C.; Wang, W.; Yu, H.; Liu, J.; Kong, X.; Chen, Y. MiR-216a accelerates proliferation and fibrogenesis via targeting PTEN and SMAD7 in human cardiac fibroblasts. Cardiovasc. Diagn. Ther. 2019, 9, 535–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ding, H.; Wang, Y.; Hu, L.; Xue, S.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Qi, H.; Yu, H.; Aung, L.H.H.; et al. Combined detection of miR-21-5p, miR-30a-3p, miR-30a-5p, miR-155-5p, miR-216a and miR-217 for screening of early heart failure diseases. Biosci. Rep. 2020, 40, BSR20191653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Greco, S.; Fasanaro, P.; Castelvecchio, S.; D’Alessandra, Y.; Arcelli, D.; Di Donato, M.; Malavazos, A.; Capogrossi, M.C.; Menicanti, L.; Martelli, F. MicroRNA dysregulation in diabetic ischemic heart failure patients. Diabetes 2012, 61, 1633–1641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Ma, G.; Bi, S.; Zhang, P. Long non-coding RNA MIAT regulates ox-LDL-induced cell proliferation, migration and invasion by miR-641/STIM1 axis in human vascular smooth muscle cells. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord. 2021, 21, 248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sandhu, H.; Cooper, S.; Hussain, A.; Mee, C.; Maddock, H. Attenuation of Sunitinib-induced cardiotoxicity through the A3 adenosine receptor activation. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2017, 814, 95–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yang, H.L.; Zhang, H.Z.; Meng, F.R.; Han, S.Y.; Zhang, M. Differential expression of microRNA-411 and 376c is associated with hypertension in pregnancy. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 2019, 52, e7546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Santos-Faria, J.; Gavina, C.; Rodrigues, P.; Coelho, J.; da Costa Martins, P.; Leite-Moreira, A.; Falcao-Pires, I. MicroRNAs and ventricular remodeling in aortic stenosis. Rev. Port. Cardiol. 2020, 39, 377–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Li, F.; Sun, J.Y.; Wu, L.D.; Qu, Q.; Zhang, Z.Y.; Chen, X.F.; Kan, J.Y.; Wang, C.; Wang, R.X. Predictive Biomarkers for Postmyocardial Infarction Heart Failure Using Machine Learning: A Secondary Analysis of a Cohort Study. Evid. Based Complementary Altern. Med. 2021, 2021, 2903543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Hou, J.; Wang, J.; Lin, C.; Fu, J.; Ren, J.; Li, L.; Guo, H.; Han, X.; Liu, J. Circulating MicroRNA Profiles Differ between Qi-Stagnation and Qi-Deficiency in Coronary Heart Disease Patients with Blood Stasis Syndrome. Evid Based Complementary Altern. Med. 2014, 2014, 926962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Sanna, G.D.; Gabrielli, E.; De Vito, E.; Nusdeo, G.; Prisco, D.; Parodi, G. Atrial fibrillation in athletes: From epidemiology to treatment in the novel oral anticoagulants era. J. Cardiol. 2018, 72, 269–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Wang, J.G.; Meng, X.; Han, J.; Li, Y.; Luo, T.G.; Wang, J.; Xin, M.; Xi, J.Z. [Differential expressions of miRNAs in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 2012, 92, 1816–1819. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  45. Qiang, L.; Hong, L.; Ningfu, W.; Huaihong, C.; Jing, W. Expression of miR-126 and miR-508-5p in endothelial progenitor cells is associated with the prognosis of chronic heart failure patients. Int. J. Cardiol. 2013, 168, 2082–2088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Fan, X.; Zhan, E.; Yao, Y.; Zhang, R.; Sun, Y.; Tian, X. MiR-599 Protects Cardiomyocytes against Oxidative Stress-Induced Pyroptosis. BioMed Res. Int. 2021, 2021, 3287053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Chai, Q.; Zheng, M.; Wang, L.; Wei, M.; Yin, Y.; Ma, F.; Li, X.; Zhang, H.; Liu, G. Circ_0068655 Promotes Cardiomyocyte Apoptosis via miR-498/PAWR Axis. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2020, 17, 659–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhu, R.Y.; Zhang, D.; Zou, H.D.; Zuo, X.S.; Zhou, Q.S.; Huang, H. MiR-28 inhibits cardiomyocyte survival through suppressing PDK1/Akt/mTOR signaling. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. Anim. 2016, 52, 1020–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Li, S.P.; Liu, B.; Song, B.; Wang, C.X.; Zhou, Y.C. miR-28 promotes cardiac ischemia by targeting mitochondrial aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (ALDH2) in mus musculus cardiac myocytes. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2015, 19, 752–758. [Google Scholar]
  50. Yang, L.; Liang, H.; Shen, L.; Guan, Z.; Meng, X. LncRNA Tug1 involves in the pulmonary vascular remodeling in mice with hypoxic pulmonary hypertension via the microRNA-374c-mediated Foxc1. Life Sci. 2019, 237, 116769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wang, Y.; Tan, J.; Wang, L.; Pei, G.; Cheng, H.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, S.; He, C.; Fu, C.; Wei, Q. MiR-125 Family in Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Diseases. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 9, 799049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Li, N.; Lian, J.; Zhao, S.; Zheng, D.; Yang, X.; Huang, X.; Shi, X.; Sun, L.; Zhou, Q.; Shi, H.; et al. Detection of Differentially Expressed MicroRNAs in Rheumatic Heart Disease: MiR-1183 and miR-1299 as Potential Diagnostic Biomarkers. BioMed Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 524519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Ye, Y.; Yang, J.; Lv, W.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Musha, Z.; Fan, P.; Yang, B.; Zhou, X.; et al. Screening of differentially expressed microRNAs of essential hypertension in Uyghur population. Lipids Health Dis. 2019, 18, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Slagsvold, K.H.; Johnsen, A.B.; Rognmo, O.; Hoydal, M.; Wisloff, U.; Wahba, A. Comparison of left versus right atrial myocardium in patients with sinus rhythm or atrial fibrillation-an assessment of mitochondrial function and microRNA expression. Physiol. Rep. 2014, 2, e12124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zayas-Arrabal, J.; Alquiza, A.; Rodriguez-de-Yurre, A.; Echeazarra, L.; Fernandez-Lopez, V.; Gallego, M.; Casis, O. Kv1.3 Channel Blockade Improves Inflammatory Profile, Reduces Cardiac Electrical Remodeling, and Prevents Arrhythmia in Type 2 Diabetic Rats. Cardiovasc. Drugs Ther. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Napoli, C.; Schiano, C.; Soricelli, A. Increasing evidence of pathogenic role of the Mediator (MED) complex in the development of cardiovascular diseases. Biochimie 2019, 165, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ward-Caviness, C.K.; Neas, L.M.; Blach, C.; Haynes, C.S.; LaRocque-Abramson, K.; Grass, E.; Dowdy, Z.E.; Devlin, R.B.; Diaz-Sanchez, D.; Cascio, W.E.; et al. A genome-wide trans-ethnic interaction study links the PIGR-FCAMR locus to coronary atherosclerosis via interactions between genetic variants and residential exposure to traffic. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0173880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Kang, H.; Yu, H.; Zeng, L.; Ma, H.; Cao, G. LncRNA Rian reduces cardiomyocyte pyroptosis and alleviates myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury by regulating by the miR-17-5p/CCND1 axis. Hypertens. Res. 2022, 45, 976–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Bai, Q.; Li, Y.; Song, K.; Huang, J.; Qin, L. Knockdown of XIST up-regulates 263294miR-340-5p to relieve myocardial ischaemia-reperfusion injury via inhibiting cyclin D1. ESC Heart Fail. 2022, 9, 1050–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Cubukcuoglu Deniz, G.; Durdu, S.; Dogan, Y.; Erdemli, E.; Ozdag, H.; Akar, A.R. Molecular Signatures of Human Chronic Atrial Fibrillation in Primary Mitral Regurgitation. Cardiovasc. Ther. 2021, 2021, 5516185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ghiroldi, A.; Piccoli, M.; Creo, P.; Cirillo, F.; Rota, P.; D’Imperio, S.; Ciconte, G.; Monasky, M.M.; Micaglio, E.; Garatti, A.; et al. Role of sialidase Neu3 and ganglioside GM3 in cardiac fibroblasts activation. Biochem. J. 2020, 477, 3401–3415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Piccoli, M.; Conforti, E.; Varrica, A.; Ghiroldi, A.; Cirillo, F.; Resmini, G.; Pluchinotta, F.; Tettamanti, G.; Giamberti, A.; Frigiola, A.; et al. NEU3 sialidase role in activating HIF-1alpha in response to chronic hypoxia in cyanotic congenital heart patients. Int. J. Cardiol. 2017, 230, 6–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Wang, F.; Wang, H.; Wang, L.; Zhou, S.; Chang, M.; Zhou, J.; Dou, Y.; Wang, Y.; Shi, X. Association Between Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in NFATC1 Signaling Pathway Genes and Susceptibility to Congenital Heart Disease in the Chinese Population. Pediatr. Cardiol. 2016, 37, 1548–1561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Liu, J.; Li, W.; Deng, K.Q.; Tian, S.; Liu, H.; Shi, H.; Fang, Q.; Liu, Z.; Chen, Z.; Tian, T.; et al. The E3 Ligase TRIM16 Is a Key Suppressor of Pathological Cardiac Hypertrophy. Circ. Res. 2022, 130, 1586–1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Liu, L.; Zhu, J.; Glass, P.S.; Brink, P.R.; Rampil, I.J.; Rebecchi, M.J. Age-associated changes in cardiac gene expression after preconditioning. Anesthesiology 2009, 111, 1052–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Alikunju, S.; Niranjan, N.; Mohsin, M.; Sayed, N.; Sayed, D. G3bp1-microRNA-1 axis regulates cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. Cell Signal. 2022, 91, 110245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Li, S.J.; Hu, W.L.; Liu, D.T.; Sun, F.H.; Zhang, Q.; Yang, X.C.; Yu, S.Z.; Jin, L.; Wang, X.F. MTAP gene is associated with ischemic stroke in Chinese Hans. J. Neurol. Sci. 2009, 284, 103–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Wolfsberg, T.G.; Straight, P.D.; Gerena, R.L.; Huovila, A.P.; Primakoff, P.; Myles, D.G.; White, J.M. ADAM, a widely distributed and developmentally regulated gene family encoding membrane proteins with a disintegrin and metalloprotease domain. Dev. Biol. 1995, 169, 378–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Hooft van Huijsduijnen, R. ADAM 20 and 21; two novel human testis-specific membrane metalloproteases with similarity to fertilin-alpha. Gene 1998, 206, 273–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Sudhir, K. Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A 2, vascular inflammation and cardiovascular risk prediction. Vasc. Health Risk Manag. 2006, 2, 153–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Feldmann, R.; Fischer, C.; Kodelja, V.; Behrens, S.; Haas, S.; Vingron, M.; Timmermann, B.; Geikowski, A.; Sauer, S. Genome-wide analysis of LXRα activation reveals new transcriptional networks in human atherosclerotic foam cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41, 3518–3531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Spadaro, O.; Youm, Y.; Shchukina, I.; Ryu, S.; Sidorov, S.; Ravussin, A.; Nguyen, K.; Aladyeva, E.; Predeus, A.N.; Smith, S.R.; et al. Caloric restriction in humans reveals immunometabolic regulators of health span. Science 2022, 375, 671–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Lv, S.L.; Zeng, Z.F.; Gan, W.Q.; Wang, W.Q.; Li, T.G.; Hou, Y.F.; Yan, Z.; Zhang, R.X.; Yang, M. Lp-PLA2 inhibition prevents Ang II-induced cardiac inflammation and fibrosis by blocking macrophage NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2021, 42, 2016–2032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Li, N.; Zhu, L.; Zhou, H.; Zheng, D.; Xu, G.; Sun, L.; Gao, J.; Shao, G. miRNA-1183-targeted regulation of Bcl-2 contributes to the pathogenesis of rheumatic heart disease. Biosci. Rep. 2020, 40, BSR20201573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Chaanine, A.H.; Higgins, L.; Lauterboeck, L.; Markowski, T.; Yang, Q.; Delafontaine, P. Multiomics Approach Reveals an Important Role of BNIP3 in Myocardial Remodeling and the Pathogenesis of Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction. Cells 2022, 11, 1572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Chaanine, A.H.; Joyce, L.D.; Stulak, J.M.; Maltais, S.; Joyce, D.L.; Dearani, J.A.; Klaus, K.; Nair, K.S.; Hajjar, R.J.; Redfield, M.M. Mitochondrial Morphology, Dynamics, and Function in Human Pressure Overload or Ischemic Heart Disease With Preserved or Reduced Ejection Fraction. Circ Heart Fail. 2019, 12, e005131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Lammerich, A.; Bohm, J.; Schimke, I.; Wagner, K.D.; Storch, E.; Günther, J. Effects of hypoxia, simulated ischemia and reoxygenation on the contractile function of human atrial trabeculae. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 1996, 160, 143–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 23 06962 g001 550
Figure 1. Genome wide expression characterization of stretch (ST) and tachycardia (TC) in human atrial trabeculae. (A) Microarray Venn diagram showing all genes regulated by ST or TC with p < 0.05 and fold-change cut-off of at least 1.2-fold up- or −1.2 down-regulated, n = 5 hearts per group. (B,C) A zoom-in of the top 10 genes (only protein coding ones) up-regulated (red) or down-regulated (green) after 6h of either stretch or tachycardia stimulation. (D) qPCR validation of some of the strongest regulated protein coding microarray genes with a determined function. Statistical difference determined by one-sample t-test. * p < 0.05, n = 4–5 hearts per group.
Figure 1. Genome wide expression characterization of stretch (ST) and tachycardia (TC) in human atrial trabeculae. (A) Microarray Venn diagram showing all genes regulated by ST or TC with p < 0.05 and fold-change cut-off of at least 1.2-fold up- or −1.2 down-regulated, n = 5 hearts per group. (B,C) A zoom-in of the top 10 genes (only protein coding ones) up-regulated (red) or down-regulated (green) after 6h of either stretch or tachycardia stimulation. (D) qPCR validation of some of the strongest regulated protein coding microarray genes with a determined function. Statistical difference determined by one-sample t-test. * p < 0.05, n = 4–5 hearts per group.
Ijms 23 06962 g001
Ijms 23 06962 g002 550
Figure 2. Commonly regulated genes by stretch (ST) and tachycardia (TC). (A) Microarray Venn diagram with cutoff values as specified in Figure 1. There are 65 regulated genes by both, ST and TC. (B) Out of this group there are 39 transcripts with the same direction and similar pattern of regulation. (C) 26 transcripts with opposing directed regulation. Statistical difference determined by one-sample t-test. n = 4–5 hearts per group.
Figure 2. Commonly regulated genes by stretch (ST) and tachycardia (TC). (A) Microarray Venn diagram with cutoff values as specified in Figure 1. There are 65 regulated genes by both, ST and TC. (B) Out of this group there are 39 transcripts with the same direction and similar pattern of regulation. (C) 26 transcripts with opposing directed regulation. Statistical difference determined by one-sample t-test. n = 4–5 hearts per group.
Ijms 23 06962 g002
Ijms 23 06962 g003 550
Figure 3. MicroRNA expression profile of ST and TC in human atrial trabeculae. (A) Microarray expression profile for precursors of miRNA in human atrial muscle strips regulated by ST or TC with p < 0.05 and fold-change cut-off of at least 1.2-fold up- or −1.2 down-regulated, n = 4–5 hearts per group. (B) pri-miR-1183 expression showed the highest fold change and was validated by qPCR in human atrial muscle strips. One-way ANOVA for microarrays and paired-sample t-test for qPCR, * p < 0.05, n-number of hearts per group is indicated within bar charts.
Figure 3. MicroRNA expression profile of ST and TC in human atrial trabeculae. (A) Microarray expression profile for precursors of miRNA in human atrial muscle strips regulated by ST or TC with p < 0.05 and fold-change cut-off of at least 1.2-fold up- or −1.2 down-regulated, n = 4–5 hearts per group. (B) pri-miR-1183 expression showed the highest fold change and was validated by qPCR in human atrial muscle strips. One-way ANOVA for microarrays and paired-sample t-test for qPCR, * p < 0.05, n-number of hearts per group is indicated within bar charts.
Ijms 23 06962 g003
Ijms 23 06962 g004 550
Figure 4. Chronic expression of pri-miR-1183 in healthy versus diseased atrial and ventricular human myocardium. (A) Increase in relative mRNA expression of pri-miR-1183 in right atrial appendage tissue from patients with normal sinus rhythm versus patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. (B) Increase in mRNA levels of pri-miR-1183 in right ventricular myocardial samples from the following heart groups: non-failing donor hearts (NF) and hearts with dilative cardiomyopathy (DCM). The dashed line represents the baseline expression. Statistical difference determined by one-sample t-test. * p < 0.05, n—number of hearts per group is indicated within bar charts.
Figure 4. Chronic expression of pri-miR-1183 in healthy versus diseased atrial and ventricular human myocardium. (A) Increase in relative mRNA expression of pri-miR-1183 in right atrial appendage tissue from patients with normal sinus rhythm versus patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. (B) Increase in mRNA levels of pri-miR-1183 in right ventricular myocardial samples from the following heart groups: non-failing donor hearts (NF) and hearts with dilative cardiomyopathy (DCM). The dashed line represents the baseline expression. Statistical difference determined by one-sample t-test. * p < 0.05, n—number of hearts per group is indicated within bar charts.
Ijms 23 06962 g004
Ijms 23 06962 g005 550
Figure 5. MicroRNA–mRNA network displaying the direct regulation of target genes by miR-1183. Up-regulation of miR-1183 and down-regulation of target genes following (A) tachycardia and (B) stretch. (C) Commonly regulated miR-1183 and target genes ADAM20 and PLA2G7. Ingenuity® Pathway Analysis, n = 4–5 hearts per group.
Figure 5. MicroRNA–mRNA network displaying the direct regulation of target genes by miR-1183. Up-regulation of miR-1183 and down-regulation of target genes following (A) tachycardia and (B) stretch. (C) Commonly regulated miR-1183 and target genes ADAM20 and PLA2G7. Ingenuity® Pathway Analysis, n = 4–5 hearts per group.
Ijms 23 06962 g005
Table
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of patients that underwent surgical interventions providing atrial muscle strip specimens.
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of patients that underwent surgical interventions providing atrial muscle strip specimens.
Demographic Parameters/Medical HistoryMedication (%)
Gender m/f (%)56.6/44.4ß-blockers44.4
Age (y ± SD)66.8 ± 9.4ACE Inhibitors44.4
BMI (% ± SD)29 ± 6.4AT1 Antagonist22.2
SR (%)100MRA0
AFIB0Statins77.7
Paroxysmal AFIB0Ca2+ Antagonist44.4
EF (% ± SD)54.9 ± 9.4
CABG (%)77.8
AVR (%)11.1
MVR (%)11.1
Abbreviations: BMI—Body mass index, SR—sinus rhythm, AFIB—atrial fibrillation, EF—ejection fraction, CABG—coronary artery bypass grafting, AVR—aortic valve replacement, MVR—mitral valve replacement, ACE—angiotensin-converting-enzyme, AT1—angiotensin 1, and MRA—mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist. n = 9.
Table
Table 2. Baseline characteristics of sinus rhythm (SR) and atrial fibrillation (AFIB) groups of patients that underwent surgical interventions and provided atrial muscle strip specimens.
Table 2. Baseline characteristics of sinus rhythm (SR) and atrial fibrillation (AFIB) groups of patients that underwent surgical interventions and provided atrial muscle strip specimens.
GroupsSRAFIB
Demographic parameters
Gender m/f1/54/2
Age (y ± SD)66 ± 1073.7 ± 9.8
BMI (% ± SD)29.2 ± 3.524.8 ± 2.9
Cardiac function
EF (%± SD)60.8 ± 9.256.2 ± 1.5
LVEDD49.2 ± 2.457.2 ± 3.1
RVEDD33.8 ± 1.333.3 ± 0.9
IVS11.8 ± 0.912.8 ± 0.4
LA major axis62.8 ± 3.670.4 ± 2.3
Comorbidities (%)
Hypertension83100
Diabetes170
CABG1767
AVR1717
MVR100100
Medication (%)
ß-blockers6783
ACE Inhibitors5033
AT1 Antagonist1733
MRA1717
Statins5033
Ca2+ Antagonist170
Main groups: SR—sinus rhythm, AFIB—atrial fibrillation, Parameters: BMI—body mass index, EF —ejection, LVEDD—left ventricular dilation diameter, RVEDD—right ventricular dilation diameter, IVS—interventricular septum, LA—left atria, CABG—coronary artery bypass grafting, AVR—aortic valve replacement, MVR—mitral valve replacement, ACE—angiotensin-converting-enzyme, AT1—angiotensin 1, and MRA—mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist. n = 12.
Table
Table 3. Baseline characteristics of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and non-failing (NF) ventricle donors.
Table 3. Baseline characteristics of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and non-failing (NF) ventricle donors.
GroupsNFDCM
Gender m/f (%)50/50100/0
Age (y ± SD)63 ± 16.359 ± 14
BMI (% ± SD)25.4 ± 5.125.8 ± 2
SR (%)7533.3
AFIB (%)2566.7
EF (%± SD)58 ± 0.1322.5 ± 6.12
CHD016.7
Hypertension2583.3
Diabetes033.3
Hyperlipidemia050
Paroxysmal AFIB2533.3
CABG00
AVR00
MVR00
ß-blockers2533.3
ACE Inhibitors2550
AT1 Antagonist00
MRA050
Statins016.7
Ca2+ Antagonist00
Main groups: NF—non failing ventricles, DCM—dilated cardiomyopathy ventricles. Parameters: BMI—Body mass index, SR—sinus rhythm, AFIB—atrial fibrillation, EF—ejection fraction, CABG—coronary artery bypass grafting, AVR—aortic valve replacement, MVR—mitral valve replacement, CHD—coronary heart disease, ACE—angiotensin-converting-enzyme, AT1—angiotensin 1, and MRA—mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist. n = 24.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Djalinac, N.; Kolesnik, E.; Maechler, H.; Scheruebel-Posch, S.; Pelzmann, B.; Rainer, P.P.; Foessl, I.; Wallner, M.; Scherr, D.; Heinemann, A.; et al. miR-1183 Is a Key Marker of Remodeling upon Stretch and Tachycardia in Human Myocardium. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 6962. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23136962

AMA Style

Djalinac N, Kolesnik E, Maechler H, Scheruebel-Posch S, Pelzmann B, Rainer PP, Foessl I, Wallner M, Scherr D, Heinemann A, et al. miR-1183 Is a Key Marker of Remodeling upon Stretch and Tachycardia in Human Myocardium. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(13):6962. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23136962

Chicago/Turabian Style

Djalinac, Natasa, Ewald Kolesnik, Heinrich Maechler, Susanne Scheruebel-Posch, Brigitte Pelzmann, Peter P. Rainer, Ines Foessl, Markus Wallner, Daniel Scherr, Akos Heinemann, and et al. 2022. "miR-1183 Is a Key Marker of Remodeling upon Stretch and Tachycardia in Human Myocardium" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 13: 6962. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23136962

APA Style

Djalinac, N., Kolesnik, E., Maechler, H., Scheruebel-Posch, S., Pelzmann, B., Rainer, P. P., Foessl, I., Wallner, M., Scherr, D., Heinemann, A., Sedej, S., Ljubojevic-Holzer, S., von Lewinski, D., & Bisping, E. (2022). miR-1183 Is a Key Marker of Remodeling upon Stretch and Tachycardia in Human Myocardium. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(13), 6962. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23136962

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop