Next Article in Journal
miR-199a: A Tumor Suppressor with Noncoding RNA Network and Therapeutic Candidate in Lung Cancer
Next Article in Special Issue
Salicylic Acid Protects Sweet Potato Seedlings from Drought Stress by Mediating Abscisic Acid-Related Gene Expression and Enhancing the Antioxidant Defense System
Previous Article in Journal
Validated Growth Rate-Dependent Regulation of Lipid Metabolism in Yarrowia lipolytica
Previous Article in Special Issue
Receptor for Activated C Kinase1B (OsRACK1B) Impairs Fertility in Rice through NADPH-Dependent H2O2 Signaling Pathway
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Plant Nutrition: An Effective Way to Alleviate Abiotic Stress in Agricultural Crops

by
Venugopalan Visha Kumari
1,
Purabi Banerjee
2,
Vivek Chandra Verma
3,
Suvana Sukumaran
1,
Malamal Alickal Sarath Chandran
1,
Kodigal A. Gopinath
1,*,
Govindarajan Venkatesh
1,
Sushil Kumar Yadav
1,
Vinod Kumar Singh
1,* and
Neeraj Kumar Awasthi
4
1
ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad 500059, India
2
Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Vishwavidyala, Mohanpur 741251, India
3
Department of Biochemistry, College of Basic Science and Humanities, G. B. Pant University of Agriculture & Technology, Pantnagar 263145, India
4
Sirius Mineral India Private Limited, New Delhi 110092, India
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(15), 8519; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23158519
Submission received: 24 June 2022 / Revised: 20 July 2022 / Accepted: 25 July 2022 / Published: 31 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue ROS Regulation during Plant Abiotic Stress Responses)

Abstract

:
By the year 2050, the world’s population is predicted to have grown to around 9–10 billion people. The food demand in many countries continues to increase with population growth. Various abiotic stresses such as temperature, soil salinity and moisture all have an impact on plant growth and development at all levels of plant growth, including the overall plant, tissue cell, and even sub-cellular level. These abiotic stresses directly harm plants by causing protein denaturation and aggregation as well as increased fluidity of membrane lipids. In addition to direct effects, indirect damage also includes protein synthesis inhibition, protein breakdown, and membranous loss in chloroplasts and mitochondria. Abiotic stress during the reproductive stage results in flower drop, pollen sterility, pollen tube deformation, ovule abortion, and reduced yield. Plant nutrition is one of the most effective ways of reducing abiotic stress in agricultural crops. In this paper, we have discussed the effectiveness of different nutrients for alleviating abiotic stress. The roles of primary nutrients (nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium), secondary nutrients (calcium, magnesium and sulphur), micronutrients (zinc, boron, iron and copper), and beneficial nutrients (cobalt, selenium and silicon) in alleviating abiotic stress in crop plants are discussed.

1. Introduction

In this modern era of civilization, the changing climatic scenario has altered the natural balance of the global environment [1]. The food demand over the world is increasing due to the rapid increase in the population. At the same time, the direct and indirect effects of climate change are causing several abiotic stresses to crop growth and the environment. Abiotic stresses, for instance, drought, temperature variations, soil salinity, soil alkalinity and heavy metal stresses can have overwhelming impacts on the growth and productivity of crops under different agricultural ecosystems, which may develop constraints to food security worldwide [2,3,4].
Developing solutions to deal with the increasing frequency of extreme weather events is a challenge for agricultural researchers. In its latest report (2021), the intergovernmental panel on climate change has mentioned that human activity has warmed the atmosphere, ocean and land without a doubt. They have also warned that unless efforts are in place to reduce emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases (GHGs), global warming of 1.5 °C and 2 °C will be exceeded during the 21st century [5]. The world’s leaders committed to a number of agreed-upon aspects when they signed the historic “Glasgow Climate Pact” in November 2021. Some of these decisions include greater efforts to strengthen climate change resilience, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and provide the necessary funding for both [6]. We should practically double crop production to meet the growing food and nutritional demands of the growing population. Though these abiotic stresses have an impact on crop growth and productivity, the nature of the crop and the stage at which the crop experiences the stress determines the amount of crop loss it will incur. Researchers around the world have been pushed to develop a long-term solution and strategy to these challenges, which are likely to increase in the future.
Poor crop yield is very common under a wide range of environmental constraints and lack of mineral nutrient availability, Nutrient imbalances in plants have a significant impact on their performance, such as growth pattern, antioxidant defence mechanisms, and tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses [7].
Abiotic stresses share some characteristics in terms of their effects on plants and how they are perceived by the plants (Table 1). All of these abiotic factors, for example, cause osmotic stress in plant cells. Extreme temperature variations (10–15 °C) above or below an ideal environment can cause heat or chilling/freezing stress. Stress has a substantial impact on plant functions such as seed germination, growth, development, photosynthesis, and reproduction, with serious consequences for plant growth and yield. Heat/temperature stress impacts the plant’s source–sink relationship, hormones produced in the roots, and the concentration of nutrients in the plant [8]. Heat stress in plants reduces enzymatic activity, chlorophyll content, photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, antioxidants and membrane stability index while increasing reactive oxygen species (ROS) production [9] (Figure 1). Chilling stress in plants affects tissue water content, membrane fluidity and chlorophyll [10]. Many plant nutrients are reported to alleviate heat stress. For example, boron is reported as an important micro-nutrient that substantially improves the activity of the antioxidant system and alleviates the toxic effects of ROS produced by heat stress [11]. Likewise, selenium (Se) is known for its structural role in glutathione peroxidase (GPX) synthesis and, therefore, protects plants from the negative effects of ROS [12]. Being an important micronutrient, Zn substantially maintains membrane permeability, and optimum Zn supply protects plants from the devastating impacts of heat stress [13].
Drought is one of the major detrimental abiotic stresses in agricultural systems. Drought imposes a water deficit, leading to scarcity in moisture availability and restricted growth and yield in crops. Water deficit stress restricts stomatal opening, accelerates the photoreduction of oxygen (O2) in the chloroplast and increases photorespiration, eventually leading to oxidative damage due to the accumulation of ROS in plants [21]. In response to drought stress, plants alter gene expression, produce the phytohormone abscisic acid (ABA), close their stomata, and maintain their osmotic balance [25]. On the other hand, excessive accumulation of water in soil due to heavy precipitation over a period of time, poor drainage, etc., causes soil flooding or waterlogging. Waterlogging covers plant roots, characteristically bringing about low light, hypoxia, anoxia, impaired gaseous exchange, a rise in lipid peroxidation and ROS accumulation. It also leaches out substantial amounts of essential nutrients from the soil, accumulates salts and increases the availability of heavy metals owing to the change in soil pH, creating an adverse growing situation for the plants [26].
Salt stress affects plants by restricting water uptake, disrupting biological membranes, ionic imbalance, oxidative damage and nutritional imbalance, reducing cell division and expansion, rate of photosynthesis, lipid metabolism and impairing yield traits. Apart from that, soil salinity has also hampered agricultural production. Drought-like circumstances occur when salt-stressed plants stop absorbing water. As a result, salinity lowers stomatal conductance and disturbs photosystem (PS) and photosynthetic enzymes in plants, resulting in the generation of ROS [27]. Salinity affects approximately one-fifth of irrigated lands [28]. The favourable role of some nutrients, such as silicon (Si), in improving crop salt tolerance was documented by Tahir et al. [29].
In stressful conditions, nutrient management options can be used to provide a good crop yield. Plant nutrients help to activate various plant mechanisms to alleviate abiotic stress, including activation of stress-related genes, biosynthesis of antioxidant enzymes, osmoprotectants, heat shock proteins (HSPs), detoxification of ROS, functional or structural protection of proteins, DNA repair, membrane stability, increased photosynthetic activity, decreased uptake of heavy metals, etc. Nutrient management is a viable technique for reducing stress in the environment and increasing agricultural productivity.

2. Nutrient Management Approaches to Alleviate the Abiotic Stresses

2.1. Primary Nutrients

The notable roles of primary nutrients, i.e., nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) in activations of several plant mechanisms to alleviate abiotic stress are picturized in Figure 2. Whereas crop-wise detailed impacts of these three macronutrients under stress situations are elucidated in Table 2.

2.1.1. Nitrogen

In terms of structural integrity, growth, physiology, and stress reduction, nitrogen (N) is one of the most important plant nutrients [43,44]. In almost all types of crop plants, it is linked to higher chlorophyll biosynthesis, greater photosynthetic activity, and efficient solar radiation utilisation [11,45]. The amount of stress relief was shown to be controlled by the type of nitrogen supplied, either ammonium (NH4+) or nitrate (NO3) [46,47]. Plants fertilised with NO3 showed a stronger tolerance to heat stress than those fertilised with NH4+, according to Zhu et al. [48] and Bendixen et al. [49]. Unused solar energy can occasionally increase photooxidative damage and lipid peroxidation in high-temperature conditions when there is an N deficiency in the plant [50,51]. Furthermore, in terms of agricultural output under moisture stress, N absorption and subsequent usage by plants are critical [31,52]. In reality, nitrogen fertiliser application in crops at a lower water potential facilitates carbon partitioning, carbohydrate build-up, cellular membrane stability, osmoregulation, and antioxidative defence mechanisms, resulting in the improved overall development and reduced leaf senescence [53,54].
The presence of N is linked to the plasticity and water extraction ability of plant roots from soil, which aids in maintaining optimum relative leaf water content and improving water use efficiency in moisture-scarce environments [30,55]. Apart from this, N helps in lowering the ROS concentrations in terms of malondialdehyde (MDA) concentration and lipid peroxidation by triggering proline accumulation and enzymatic antioxidant activities with respect to superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT) and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) activities [33,56,57].
The cell division and expansion mechanisms are hampered by N deficiency, especially under drought conditions, which contribute to the suppression of leaf production and development [58,59]. Furthermore, restricted N supply under stress causes faster degeneration of photosynthetic pigments (chlorophyll) and enzymes (Rubisco) concentrations, resulting in a visible slowing of plant photosynthetic activity [60]. On the other hand, a number of researchers have reported accelerated cell synthesis and expansion of plant cells and xylem tissues through increased leaf area [61,62], as well as increased photosynthetic capacity with N application in moisture deficit situations [55,63]. Aside from cellular growth roles, N has been found to play a role in protein metabolism, particularly under moisture stress [64,65]. Increased N uptake and the enzyme nitrate reductase, which is involved in nitrogen absorption, have both been linked to increased N availability in plants under water stress [66,67]. Furthermore, foliar application of N fertilisers at the reproductive stage, particularly in leguminous crops under drought conditions, significantly slows abscisic acid synthesis while accelerating cytokinin production, which promotes nodulation, cell elongation, apical dominance, shoot development, photosynthetic activity, and assimilates translocation to the sink organs [68,69]. Stress alleviation helps to improve the yield or helps in yield reduction. The yield reduction due to stress varied with the crop and its stages. In wheat, the yield penalties were 5.8% compared to 16% in control [31], whereas in rice and maize, it varied from 13 to 15% yield reduction compared to 33% with no N application [33,55].

2.1.2. Phosphorous

Phosphatic fertiliser application has a strong positive correlation with plant growth and development under stress. Phosphorous enhances root architecture and proliferation in soil, even in the presence of low soil moisture, which stimulates root volume and hydraulic conductance [70,71,72,73]. This improvement in root growth facilitates efficient access to moisture and nutrients by strengthening the sensing and signalling of their availability [74,75], as well as subsequent uptake mechanisms from rhizospheric soil under abiotic stress conditions [76,77,78]. It helps in the modulation of various morphological, physiological, and biochemical processes inside the plant system, leading to stress tolerance [79,80,81,82,83]. It was found that application of P in the initial stage of the wheat crop increased root growth and establishment under water stress conditions [35]. Due to uptake of P in an adequate amount, maximum numbers of fertile tillers were produced and the spike length, number of spikelets per spike and grains per spike also increased due to better photosynthesis, energy storage, transfer, cell division as well as cell elongation, resulting in a 28% yield increase [35].
Phosphorous also helps in maintaining the cell turgidity and cell membrane stability through the acceleration of stomatal conductance and rate of net photosynthesis that helps to sustain optimum leaf water potential ensuring stress tolerance [84,85,86,87]. Apart from this, incorporation of P under various abiotic stresses has a profound impact on tissue formation, carbohydrate and lipid metabolisms, chlorophyll biosynthesis, photosynthesis, production of assimilatory compounds such as adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH), enzymatic functions including ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate (RuBisCo) and ATPase activities, phytohormonal functions such as ABA and indole acetic acid (IAA), energy transfer and storage, reproductive development, ROS (e.g., hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), MDA, singlet oxygen (1O2), superoxide anions (O2) and hydroxyl radicals (OH) scavenging activity, osmolytes accumulation (proline, soluble sugars and proteins) etc. [88,89]. Drought-induced ROS accumulation has been reported to be alleviated through P application by stimulating enzymatic antioxidants such as CAT, SOD, POD, APX and monodehydroascorbate reductase (MDHAR), which inevitably elevated the capacity to withstand stressful situations [90,91]. Likewise, P application has also been reported to be involved with the upregulation of nitrogenous compounds in terms of accumulation and assimilation of NH4+ and NO3 in water-stressed crop plants [92]. P deficiency can exacerbate the intensity of abiotic stresses [90,92]. On the other hand, abiotic stresses have also been observed to end up with P deficiency and hindered activities of ATPase and phosphatase enzymes in plants apparently under drought stress [93,94], heat stress [87,95], salinity stress [79,96], acid stress [97,98].

2.1.3. Potassium

Potassium (K) is a vital macronutrient for the better growth and physiological development of crop plants under abiotic stress situations [99,100]. It is essential for many basic physiological and metabolic functions of a plant system, such as photosynthesis, stomatal regulation, photosynthates translocation, carbohydrate metabolism, maintenance of cell turgidity, enzymatic activations, etc. [93,101]. The pivotal role of K in upgrading the resilience of crops in response to the adversities of several abiotic stresses has been explored in a number of the earlier literature [102,103]. This involves multiple arrays of mechanisms, including improved root physiology, leaf surface area, stomatal control, reduced transpiration, efficient osmotic adjustment, maintenance of leaf turgor, aquaporin (channel protein) function, improved enzymatic upregulations, improved nutrient uptake and utilisation, enhanced water use efficiency, prevention of drought-induced accumulation of ROS and maintaining optimal energy status of plants [38,104,105].
Potassium prevents oxidative damage to cells by preventing ROS accumulation in terms of O2, 1O2, H2O2, OH, peroxy radicals (ROO), alkoxy radicals (RO), organic hydroperoxides (ROOH) and MDA [106,107] by virtue of activating a series of antioxidant enzymes such as SOD, POD, APX and CAT [108,109]. In fact, under moisture stress, K has been shown to have a favourable impact on relative leaf water content and water use efficiency [41,105,110]. Root proliferation is aided by K application in stress situations, resulting in increased water intake by plants [111]. Thus, suitable K supplementation improves the ability of the plants to cope with drought stress through the efficient use of water [112]. Proline accumulation is one of the major mechanisms of drought tolerance in plants [113,114]. Stress tolerance through the accumulation of proline has been reported to be intensified through the foliar spray of K [115,116]. Potassium deficiency has also been linked to a significant reduction in the rate of photosynthetic CO2 fixation, partitioning and use of photosynthates in moisture-deprived conditions [117,118].
Researchers have also documented the ameliorating effect of exogenous K application in field crops under waterlogging by enhancing plant height, photosynthetic ability, chlorophyll content, nutrient uptake and antioxidative activity while reducing lipid peroxidation [119,120]. Additional K fertiliser application of 160 kg ha−1 was found to mitigate the water stress effect in rice by improving yield harvest index and other physiological parameters [38]. Application of K has been found to regulate osmotic adjustment, cytoplasmic homeostasis, membrane potential and enzyme activation under salinity stress [121,122]. Application of K helps in escalating potassium-sodium ionic ratio (K+/Na+), which in turn facilitates higher affinity K+ transporter-mediated specific transport of Na+ as well as co-transport of Na+–K+, inducing Na+ tolerance [123]. The deficiency of K has been reported to exert several negative impacts, such as chlorotic and necrotic disorders in plants exposed to higher intensities of light [2]. On the other hand, with a lack of K fertilisers, freezing or chilling temperature-induced enzymatic dysfunction, disrupted fluid transport, carbon absorption, and photooxidative injury increase, impairing the normal growth and productivity of crop plants [124,125]. Sufficient K supply helps in eliminating freezing-induced dehydration by adjustment of osmotic potential and better ROS defence mechanisms [126].

2.2. Secondary Nutrients

The functional aspects of secondary nutrients, i.e., calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg) and sulphur (S) in the activation of different plant mechanisms to ameliorate abiotic stress are depicted in Figure 3. Some prominent crop-based examples regarding the impacts of these three elements under stress situations are presented in Table 3.

2.2.1. Calcium

Calcium (Ca) is an essential secondary nutrient, mediating the cell and plant development processes. It also improves plant response to different stress conditions by regulating many physiological aspects [144]. It is also a secondary messenger element for intracellular processes, as it acts as a signalling molecule in different physiological and biochemical pathways in the plant to develop stress resistance [145]. Calcium is also important for nutrient uptake, hormonal and enzymatic upregulations and stabilisation of cellular membranes to mitigate abiotic stress in plants [146]. There are reports that Ca reduces yield loss in different crops under diverse abiotic stress conditions, including salt, drought, flooding, heat, chilling, and heavy metal stress [147]. The reactive oxygen species (ROS) act as signalling molecules for moderating stress tolerance by driving the Ca2+-governed stress-responsive genes [148]. Cytolic Ca2+ increases quickly under stressful conditions and is dependent on Ca2+ binding proteins, such as calmodulin [149]. The Ca2+ binding protein, through the enhanced cystolic Ca2+ signal, subsequently adjusts and protects the responses in plants under adverse conditions [147]. The Ca-dependent protein kinases (CDPK) stimulate the stress-responsive genes and regulate abiotic stress physiological responses such as stomatal movement, K+ uptake and gene expression [150,151], thereby playing a significant role in antioxidative stress response [152].
Under salt stress, Ca ions can ameliorate its effect by competing with Na+ ions for the membrane binding sites [153]. The study by Tuna et al. [154] showed that the application of calcium sulphate (CaSO4) enhanced the concentration of Ca2+, N, and K+ and reduced the concentration of Na+ in the leaves when grown in pots under salt stress. The adverse effects of salt stress on seed germination can be reduced under saline conditions as Ca restricts the entry of Na+ ions [155,156]. The effect of salinity stress on germination was alleviated by the application of Ca in Pisum sativum, T. aestivum, H. annuus, L. esculentum [157,158] and Chenopodium album [159]. Patel et al. [160] confirmed that supplementing Ca in Caesalpinia crista L. in salinized soils restored the levels of reduced N, P, K, and Ca content in tissues. Rice is reported to be highly sensitive to salt stress. The early seedling stage is the most salinity-sensitive growth stage that directly affects the yield. In total, 10 mM CaCl2 supplementation on salt-stressed rice seedlings in the early vegetative stage increased the chlorophyll and proline content and oppressed the accretion of ROS, thus protecting them from oxidative damage in salt-susceptible varieties [127]. With the increase in external Ca concentration, the concentration and uptake of Na decrease and Ca concentration and uptake increase, as Ca2+ restricts Na+ uptake and it interferes with the non-selective cation channel [153].
Seed pelleting with calcium oxide (CaO) increased the percentage of seed germination as well as the seedling growth under waterlogging conditions [161] due to increased oxygen availability [147]. Calcium also plays a significant role in plant drought resistance. Ca enhances the ability to conserve water when applied to leaves [162]. Ca2+ changes the degree of hydration of the plasma membrane, thereby improving the cohesion of the cell walls, which thereby increases the resistance of cells to dehydration by increasing the viscosity of protoplasm [163]. Xu et al. [164] observed that Ca increased root and shoot biomass along with dry weight in Zoysia japonica with the application of 10 mM Ca under drought conditions. Berkowitz et al. [165] showed that during water stress, Ca2+ hinders the influx of K+ ions to the guard cells by affecting inward K+ channels [153]. Calcium regulates plasma membrane ATPase, which is required to pump nutrients back that were lost in the case of cell damage and thereby plays a significant role in recovery from drought-induced damage [166]. Under the dark condition, the inhibiting effect on germination of P. karka [155], and U. setulose [167] was reduced by the addition of Ca2+. Nayyar and Kaushal [168] demonstrated that the chilling-induced oxidative stress in the seeds of wheat (T. aestivum) can be partially mitigated by Ca [147] by reducing lipid peroxidation and membrane damage.

2.2.2. Magnesium

Magnesium (Mg) serves as a structural component of the ribosome and is fundamental for the conformational stabilisation of macromolecules such as nucleic acids, proteins, cell membranes and walls [169,170]. As Mg is an essential component in the chloroplast that regulates photosynthetic activity, its deficiency can affect photosynthesis. It is essential for the maintenance of enzyme activities such as ATPase, kinases and polymerases [171]. Magnesium plays a significant role in the activity of every phosphorylating enzyme in carbohydrate metabolism [172,173]. This nutrient is also a cofactor of enzymes involved in metabolism and photosynthetic carbon fixation [174]. The cation-anion balance in the cells is regulated by Mg, which, along with K, acts as an osmotically active ion-regulating cell turgor [175,176].
The bioavailability of Mg is reported to be decreased by heat [134] and drought stress [177]. It is observed in general that plants when exposed to salt stress exhibit decreased levels of Ca2+, Mg2+ and K+ [178]. Ferreira et al. [179] reported that in the stems and roots of Psidium guajava L., salinity did not affect the Mg2+ content, but it decreased in the leaves. Barhoumi et al. [180] reported that in Aeluropus littoralis, salinity stress did not affect Mg content. A high level of Mg in leaves can help in maintaining better water content during drought. Under drought stress, Musa acuminate plants showed an accumulation of around 28% higher Mg content than the control [181].

2.2.3. Sulphur

Sulphur (S) is the fourth most important plant nutrient after N, P and K, and is an essential macronutrient in plants that serves various functions. Many S-containing chemicals play protective functions in abiotic stress response, cellular acclimatization, and adaptability in adverse conditions [182]. An exogenous supply of S has been shown to benefit plants’ survival in stressful conditions by maintaining their normal metabolic processes and also improving crop yield [107]. Sulphur is integrated into cysteine (Cys) after being taken up by the roots in the form of sulfate (SO42−). Cysteine acts as a precursor or donor of key S compounds such as methionine (Met), S-adenosylmethionine, glutathione (GSH), homo-GSH (h-GSH), phytochelatins (PCs), sulfolipids, iron-sulfur clusters, allyl Cys, and glucosinolates, which play a role in plant developmental processes and/or stress adaptation processes [183,184]. GSH, hydrogen sulfide (H2S), Met, Cys, PC, ATP-S, protein thiols, and other sulfur-containing compounds play a significant role in the normal functioning of the plant cell. Stress signal transmission is aided by GSH, which is one of the most effective antioxidants and stress protectors [185,186].
Min et al. [187] reported that S helps to mitigate heat stress by increasing activities of SOD, CAT and APX; higher H2S and soluble sugar contents but reducing H2O2 and MDA contents. In Arabidopsis thaliana, the application of 1500 μM S as SO42− helped alleviate the adverse effect of soil salinity by upregulating some antioxidant enzymes and maintaining ABA level [182]. Sulfate nutrition regulates arsenic (As) translocation from roots to shoots, potentially through the complexation of As III-PCs [188]. Sulphur also protects against Mn toxicity by increasing antioxidant defence and improving Mn transport and distribution from roots to shoots [189]. Stress signalling is enabled via interactions of S with other biological molecules, which provides resistance against external pressures. However, S absorption, transport, and mechanisms of action in stressed plants are still being investigated and need to be validated.

2.3. Micronutrients

A jest mechanism by which the micronutrients, namely, boron, zinc, iron and copper, mitigate abiotic stress is given in Figure 4. While some specific crop-based instances regarding the effects of these four elements under stress situations are given in Table 4.

2.3.1. Boron

Boron (B) application has a significant impact on reducing the negative effects of abiotic stress, improving yield, and nutrient uptake. Boron plays a vital role in the overall metabolism and transport system of carbohydrates as well as synthesis and functional aspects of cellular integuments [116,210]. Application on B mitigates the negative effects of saline environments by maintaining internal K+ balance through retaining cell wall elasticity and recovery of proper levels of K+ [211]. Moreover, B supplementation is a well-established remedy to recover nutrient balance, while improving salt tolerance of nitrogen-fixing leguminous plants [212]. It also promotes the resistance of crop plants against drought stress by improving photosynthetic efficiency, hormone synthesis, sugar transport, lipid metabolism, flower retention, pollen formation, seed germination and seed yield [191].
Plants with sufficient B nutrition have shown an elevated resistance to drought stress due to improved nutritional status and enhanced water uptake from the rhizospheric soil by growing more root hairs and mycorrhizae. Boron can affect the drought sensitivity of crop plants in two different ways. Firstly, it is involved in the ROS detoxification process in chloroplasts and thereby takes a protective role in the prevention of photooxidative damage catalysed by ROS. Secondly, B may contribute to drought tolerance by protecting against oxidative damage to cell membranes [212]. In particular, the tolerance mechanism to moisture deficit is attributed to a rise in total glutathione and ascorbate pools, which control the accumulation of hydrogen peroxide and prevention of electrolyte leakage in the plasma membrane along with the impairment of gaseous exchange.
The role of B in cell wall structure formation, sugar translocation, membrane integrity and plant reproductive growth is critical for reducing the damage caused by abiotic stress, particularly high-temperature stress [118]. In a study by Shahid et al. [211], it was found that application of 1 and 2 kg B ha−1 at vegetative and reproductive stages reduced the negative impacts of a high temperature up to 37.6 °C. They reported that exogenous application of B stabilised the cellular membranes, mobilised carbohydrates and improved pollen grain, thus alleviating temperature stress.
Alike high-temperature stress, chilling stress also leads to oxidative stress that increases ROS, negatively affects membrane lipids and ultimately causes plant cell death. Chilling stress reduces leaf expansion and growth, wilting and chlorosis, which may lead to a lower photosynthetic surface. Boron application mitigates chilling stress [213]. During chilling stress, application of B can enhance photosynthetic activity and enhance the activities of plant antioxidants. This helps to reduce ROS injury caused by temperature. Boron nutrition also improves sugar transport in the plant body, which acts as an osmolyte and anti-freezing agent [214].
Foliar application of B was found more effective to alleviate the deleterious effect of waterlogging [215]. The application of boron increased the stability of leaf membranes, chlorophyll, soluble sugars, soluble proteins, amino acid contents, LRWC and dry mass accumulation [216].

2.3.2. Zinc

Zinc (Zn) nutrition facilitates better defence against heat stress by maintaining the membrane integrity inside the plant system [217]. Zn is an integral constituent of plant enzymes such as carbonic anhydrase, alkaline phosphatase, alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH), RNA polymerase, Cu-Zn SOD and phospholipase. It has been identified as a major component of different proteins associated with DNA and RNA synthesis [217]. Peck and McDonald [13] observed that lower Zn supply significantly hampered the plant growth process, while an adequate supply of Zn minimised the negative effects of heat stress. Antioxidant properties such as SOD activity in the wheat plant were found to be more stable in the presence of Zn under heat stress. The plants’ deficit of Zn showed higher sensitivity towards heat stress as compared to adequate Zn application. Basically, zinc application resulted in enhanced activity of SOD, APX, glutathione reductase and glutathione peroxidase in the Varuna cultivar of mustard and resulted in 145% more yield [183].
Zinc has also proved its role in alleviating chilling stress [218,219]. Zinc plays a key role in upholding the structural integrity of proteins, membrane lipids, various cell components and DNA, along with facilitating ion transport in plants [220]. Foliar application of zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles (NPs) can efficiently mitigate the toxicity of chilling stress. The toxicity of the chilling effect in rice was mitigated through the regulation of the genetic expression of the transcription factors related to chilling stress response by foliar application of ZnO [221]. Evidences are also found regarding the influential and multiple effects of ZnO NPs on plant growth and chlorophyll biosynthesis, eventually enhancing the antioxidant potential and ROS scavenging abilities under chilling stress [222].
Harris et al. [223] reported improved germination and yield of maize, wheat and chickpea under a wide range of environmental conditions through seed priming with Zn. Drought stress reduces plumule length and shoot dry weight owing to restricted remobilisation of nutrients from photosynthates reserves to the embryo. The intervention of Zn priming has been observed to improve the synthesis of plant hormones including IAA and gibberellic acid (GA3) under moisture stress conditions and thereby augmenting plumule characteristics under drought stress [174]. Adequate Zn supply under drought stress regulates membrane permeability, activity of antioxidant substances and enhances photosynthetic efficiency and water use efficiency. In addition, Zn application helps in a significant expansion in leaf area, improvement in photosynthetic pigments such as chlorophyll and others, stomatal conductance, relative leaf water content and osmolyte accumulation, thus resulting in improved growth, yield and prevention of leaf tissues from the destructive impacts of moisture deficiencies [224].
Zn application improves plant tolerance to salt stress by stabilising root-cell membranes while preventing ion leakage from roots by limiting root permeability [225,226]. For instance, the application of Zn resulted in better yield in salinity-stressed chickpea through management of osmotic stress, ionic balance and prevention of solute leakage [227]. In maize (corn), foliar application of 1% ZnSO4 at tassel initiation and grain filling increased the thousand kernels’ weight from 27.3 to 31.3 g and induced an increase in the number of seeds per year from 710 to 770, apart from providing resistance against drought stress [196].
During waterlogging conditions, plants suffer from severe hypoxia and subsequent inhibition in ATP formation because the rate of O2 diffusion is much slower in water compared to that in air. Thus, flooded plants are required to shift their carbohydrate metabolism towards fermentation and up-regulation of genes for ADH and pyruvate decarboxylase to sustain cellular energy levels at optimum [228]. Application of Zn fertilisers improves plant tolerance toward waterlogged conditions under Zn deficiency by reenergizing the diminished ADH activity [229].

2.3.3. Iron

Iron (Fe) is one of the chief components of the cell redox systems and also functions as a cofactor regarding various antioxidant enzymes such as CAT, POD and APX [230,231]. In plants, Fe assists in chlorophyll synthesis and is essential for the maintenance of structural integrity as well as functional aspects of the chloroplast. The Fe-S cluster serves as a prosthetic group for several Fe-S proteins and plays regulatory roles during oxidative stress situations [232]. Therefore, Fe application has a crucial role in the life cycle of plants under stressed conditions.
The application of Fe as a plant nutrient exhibited a significant ameliorative effect against salt stress by producing antioxidative enzymes. These antioxidative enzymes include CAT, POD and SOD that act as major scavengers of ROS, thereby strengthening cell defence mechanisms against salinity [233]. Ghasemia et al. [234] suggested the protective role of Fe2+ in tomato plants against salinity through the formation of chelates with amino acids.
The provision of Fe nutrition to plants under drought conditions can increase stress tolerance as it leads to assimilate synthesis [235,236,237]. In this context, legumes have also been reported to develop positive responses to Fe nutrition [238]. Baghizadeh and Shahbazi [239] reported that foliar Fe nutrition with Zn reduces oxidative stress by depleting H2O2 content along with bringing down lipid peroxidation by accelerating antioxidant enzyme mechanisms (CAT, GPX and SOD) under drought situations. Spraying with Fe also plays a significant role in improving the quality and resistance of protein under drought stress [240]. Foliar spraying of B @ 0.2% + Fe @ 0.5% produced 58.3% and 27.0% higher seed and stover yields than the control treatment apart from alleviating combined heat and moisture stress [239].
Iron oxide nanoparticles have the ability to alleviate the negative effects of cold stress by lowering electrolyte leakage and membrane damage. Iron oxide nanoparticles increase chlorophyll and Rubisco-binding protein genes, thus increasing cold stress tolerance [241]. Atar et al. [242] also pointed out the role of iron oxide nanoparticles in mitigating cold stress in plants by stimulating certain enzymes such as catalase, cytochrome oxidase and peroxidase. The application of iron nanoparticles as a chilling treatment improves the biochemical, physiological, and growth attributes of plants under cold-stressed conditions.
Iron toxicity is a principal constraint, commonly encountered under waterlogged conditions. Under anaerobic environments, reduced Fe is massively absorbed by plant roots, inducing the generation of ROS. This oxidative stress is responsible for substantial growth reductions, physiological perturbations and drastic yield losses [243]. The hampered efficiency of PS II is attributed to the deficiencies of N, P, K, Mg and Ca owing to deficit Fe [244].

2.3.4. Copper

Copper (Cu) is essential for plant growth and the activation of a number of enzymes. The deficiency of Cu interferes with protein synthesis and leads to a subsequent build-up of soluble nitrogenous compounds. Copper is a redox-active transition element that plays a significant role in photosynthesis, C and N metabolism, respiration and protection against oxidative stress [245]. Plastocyanin, which is related to the photosynthetic electron transport pathway in PS I and occurs in the thylakoid lumen of leaf chloroplasts, includes the most Cu [246]. Cu/Zn SOD, a significant Cu protein, contributes to the ROS scavenging mechanisms [247]. Copper chlorophyllin (Cu-chl), an important modified bio-stimulant which is a water-soluble and semi-synthetic derivative of chlorophyll, has been found to reduce oxidative stress by means of its presumed strong antioxidative capacity [248]. Cu-chl has been shown to be protective against the effects of drought stress in tomatoes, where the frequent application of Cu-chl-containing materials improved the activity of leaf antioxidant enzymes as well as GSH concentration [249]. Islam et al. [250] reported other functions of Cu-chl with respect to the development of tolerance against high salinity stress in A. thaliana. Soil salinity significantly decreases RWC with a concomitant increase in lipid peroxidation, total phenolics and cell membrane permeability. The application of Cu successfully mitigates the adversities of salinity stress through the protection of cellular membrane damage and reduction of lipid peroxidation while increasing RWC [251]. The colloidal suspension of Zn-Cu nanoparticles was found to have a beneficial impact under moisture deficit conditions. Copper nanoparticles applied under drought declined reactive substances and increased antioxidative enzyme activity [252]. The colloidal suspension of Zn-Cu nanoparticles increases the chlorophyll content and carotenoid content in the leaves, which is an adaptive mechanism of the plant to drought conditions [253].

2.4. Beneficial Nutrients

The functional aspects of beneficial nutrients, i.e., cobalt (Co), selenium (Se) and silicon (Si) in the regulation of plant physiological processes to relieve various abiotic stresses are illustrated in Figure 5. Moreover, the detailed effects of these three beneficial nutrients on different crops under stress situations are delineated in Table 5.

2.4.1. Cobalt

Cobalt (Co) exemplifies an impressive example of a beneficial element to regulate vital physiological and metabolic functions in plants, with special reference to leguminous crops [264,265]. It synthesises leghaemoglobin protein for the purpose of rhizobial activity as well as biological nitrogen fixation in legumes, thereby exerting a significant impact on enzyme systems [266,267]. Cobalt also imparts drought tolerance in plants by virtue of efficient utilisation of water in addition to reducing the rate of transpiration [268,269]. The substantial effect of Co has been reported to curb moisture stress by activating the antioxidant defence mechanisms in plants [270,271] under heat and drought-stressed conditions [116]. In fact, it stimulates the activities of amino acids and enzymatic antioxidants such as SOD, CAT, POD and polyphenol oxidase (PPO) while delaying leaf senescence by obstructing ethylene biosynthesis [272,273]. A number of literatures have documented the ameliorative role of Co on the adversities of heat, moisture and heavy metal stresses on field crops through leaf area expansion, chlorophyll synthesis, osmotic adjustments, maintaining membrane integrity, efficient use of thermal energy and activation of antioxidant defence mechanisms [113,274]. Alongside this, the adversities related to soil salinity stress in plants can be moderated by means of Co application by promoting normal physiological, biochemical and metabolic activities [266,275]. Some authors have also reported the ameliorative effects of Co in relation to cadmium toxicity-induced retardation of photosynthesis and transpiration rates by suppressing oxidative stress [276,277].

2.4.2. Selenium

Selenium (Se) has been recognised as an essential trace element at a relatively lower concentration with multifarious beneficial impacts on plants [278,279]. It has been established as a strong phytoprotectant when the plant is exposed to different environmental adversities [280,281,282]. Application of Se can induce tolerance to abiotic stresses alone or in combination with several other plant nutrients [283] by retarding senescence and regulating water economy [284], photosynthesis [285] and Na+ homeostasis [286], thereby promoting growth [287]. Del Pino et al. [288] documented the persistent impact of Se fertilisation on the augmentation of qualitative aspects of crop plants under abiotic stress, especially under Se-deficient zones. Specifically, it rejuvenates ROS scavenging mechanisms through activation of antioxidant defence [289] such as GPX, APX, DHAR, MDHAR, CAT, POD and SOD activities, while curtailing the H2O2 and MDA contents under different kinds of abiotic stresses [290,291]. Conjoint activities of these antioxidants reduce lipid peroxidation as well as retain cell membrane integrity and photosynthetic pigment concentrations [292,293]. Selenium is reported to protect crops against drought and heat stress [294], chilling stress [295], salt stress [296], acid stress [297], UV ray-induced oxidative stress [298] etc. Interestingly, nanoparticles of Se have been registered to improve the growth attributes, photosynthetic ability and antioxidant defence of crops for scavenging ROS under heat and chilling stress, with special reference to sorghum [299] and tomato [300]. There are also some other reports where the significant role of Se has been elucidated through modulations in metabolites transport, photosynthetic activity, membrane integrity and cellular turgor in ameliorating drought, salinity and heavy metal stress in the cases of rice [301], wheat [302], maize [258], onion [303], carrot [304], cucumber [305] etc. However, the beneficial effects of Se in terms of plant growth have been attributed to the antioxidative property of the element itself [285,306] by virtue of higher accumulation of soluble sugars and proline in the shoots [307,308] along with higher LRWC, biosynthesis of photosynthetic pigments and enzymatic upregulations to strengthen the metabolic balance inside moisture-stressed plants [309].

2.4.3. Silicon

Silicon (Si) is another important beneficial trace element for plant growth as well as abiotic stress alleviation [310,311,312]. The application of Si nutrition boosts the antioxidant enzyme production, including SOD, CAT and POD, while reducing ROS generation [313]. In fact, Si alleviates oxidative stresses by the accumulation of protective proteins as well as decreasing the metal-ion toxicity, thereby amplifying the efficiencies of oxidative enzymes, while eliminating O2 and H2O2 from the cells and reducing lipid peroxidation [314,315]. Abdel Latef and Tran [262] reported that seed priming with a silicon-enhanced LRWC and levels of photosynthetic pigments, soluble sugars, soluble proteins, total free amino acids and K+, as well as activities of SOD, CAT, and POD enzymes, finally resulted in a higher yield in the stressed crop. Together, these factors reduce the severity of photooxidative damage and protect the integrity of cellular membranes, which enhances plants’ drought tolerance mechanisms [314,316]. Silicon plays a significant detoxifying role under aluminium stress [317] and cadmium stress [318] by stimulating the biosynthesis of proline and phenolic compounds. Although the mechanistic understandings of the functional role of Si in abiotic stress tolerances in plants are relatively limited [319,320], various scientific reports are emerging where it has been reported that Si application encourages growth, photosynthesis, economic yield and also withstands soil salinity and drought [321,322]. Studies have claimed that the primary impact of Si is more distinct on stressed plants rather than on plants growing under normal conditions [323,324]. Several long-term experiments have executed the positive effects of Si in terms of lowering the rate of transpiration while accelerating photosynthetic activity and photoassimilateing mobilisation by modulating mesophyll conductance and thereby improving crop yield under moisture stress [325,326,327]. Moreover, the presence of Si has also been established to maintain LRWC [328], root hydraulic conductance [329], production of photosynthetic pigments [330] and levels of different osmoprotectants [331] when exposed to stress.

3. Combined Effects of Plant Nutrients

Despite the fact that all plant nutrients contribute in some way to plant growth and the reduction of stress, we must pay close attention to the proper nutritional composition. For optimum nutrient utilisation efficiency, antagonistic (negative) nutrient interactions should be minimised and synergistic (positive) nutrient interactions should be increased. Understanding the potential for both positive and negative interactions between nutrients is necessary for these actions. There are reports where it has been mentioned that some nutrients together can combat stress effectively, whereas some may cause negative impacts. Some of the nutrient interactions are discussed in the below Table 6 as follows:

4. Conclusions and Future Needs

One of the biggest challenges in agricultural production is to secure future food security. However, environmental stresses are a significant hurdle in this endeavour. Abiotic stresses affect the morphoanatomical and physiological growth of plants. In general, these stresses affect chlorophyll synthesis, leaf growth, enzyme activity, transpiration, stomatal conductance, membrane stability and finally crop productivity. A changing climate further increases the detrimental effect of abiotic stress on plants. Though developing variety is an essential step for adapting, using the correct plant nutrients can help plants develop abiotic stress tolerance. We have tried to explain the various mechanisms by which plant nutrition alleviates various abiotic stress in this review. In general, nutrients such as nitrogen, potassium, calcium and magnesium increase the concentration of antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD) and catalase (CAT) reducing reactive oxygen species (ROS). Nutrients such as potassium and calcium help in improving stomatal regulation and osmotic adjustments by improving water uptake. Under temperature stress, these nutrients aid in maintaining a high tissue water potential. Micronutrients such as iron, boron and zinc help in activating various physiological changes in plants, activate defence mechanisms and improve the metabolic process by which the plants adapt to various adverse stresses. There are some combinations of nutrients which together can more effectively ameliorate the stress and vice versa. Though plant nutrients are a low-cost and sustainable way of managing abiotic stresses, there is still much that needs to be further explored. A detailed research needs to be performed on the role of these nutrients under stress. In the wake of climate change, a better understanding of nutrient interaction, their optimum concentration and phenological stage of application will help for better management of abiotic stresses.

Author Contributions

All authors significantly contributed to this article. V.V.K., P.B., V.C.V., S.S. and M.A.S.C. prepared the original draft. K.A.G., G.V., S.K.Y. and V.K.S. edited and complied the manuscript. N.K.A. provided the financial support. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by Sirius Mineral India Private Limited, New Delhi in the form of a project (Grant number: 67000-ICAR-67031-22).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Malhi, Y.; Franklin, J.; Seddon, N.; Solan, M.; Turner, M.G.; Field, C.B.; Knowlton, N. Climate change and ecosystems: Threats, opportunities and solutions. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 2020, 375, 20190104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Cakmak, I. The role of potassium in alleviating detrimental effects of abiotic stresses in plants. J. Plant Nutr. Soil. Sci. 2005, 168, 521–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Liang, T.B.; Wang, Z.L.; Wang, R.J.; Liu, L.L.; Shi, C.Y. Effects of potassium humate on ginger root growth and its active oxygen metabolism. J. Appl. Ecol. 2007, 18, 813–817. [Google Scholar]
  4. Seleiman, M.F.; Kheir, A.S. Maize productivity, heavy metals uptake and their availability in contaminated clay and sandy alkaline soils as affected by inorganic and organic amendments. Chemosphere 2018, 204, 514–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. IPCC. Summary for Policymakers. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. In Contribution of Working Group, I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Masson Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pirani, A., Connors, S.L., Péan, C., Berger, S., Caud, N., Chen, Y., Goldfarb, L., Gomis, M.I., et al., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  6. UNFCC. The Glasgow Climate Pact–Key Outcomes from COP26. 2022. Available online: https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/the-glasgow-climate-pact-key-outcomes-fromcop26#:~:text=The%20package%20of%20decisions%20consists,the%20necessary%20finance%20for%20both (accessed on 18 February 2022).
  7. Hajiboland, R. Effect of Micronutrient Deficiencies on Plants Stress Responses. In Abiotic Stress Responses in Plants; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2012; pp. 283–329. [Google Scholar]
  8. Hassan, M.U.; Chattha, M.U.; Khan, I.; Chattha, M.B.; Barbanti, L.; Aamer, M.; Aslam, M.T. Heat stress in cultivated plants: Nature, impact, mechanisms, and mitigation strategies—A review. Plant Biosyst.-Int. J. Deal. All Asp. Plant Biol. 2021, 155, 211–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hussain, H.A.; Hussain, S.; Khaliq, A.; Ashraf, U.; Anjum, S.A.; Men, S.; Wang, L. Chilling and drought stresses in crop plants: Implications, cross talk, and potential management opportunities. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, Y.; Jiang, W.; Yu, H.; Yang, X. Exogenous abscisic acid alleviates low temperature-induced oxidative damage in seedlings of Cucumis sativus L. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2012, 28, 221–228. [Google Scholar]
  11. Waraich, E.A.; Ahmad, R.; Ashraf, M.Y.; Saifullah Ahmad, M. Improving agricultural water use efficiency by nutrient management in crop plants. Acta Agric. Scand. B Soil. Plant Sci. 2011, 61, 291–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lobanov, A.V.; Hatfield, D.L.; Gladyshev, V.N. Reduced reliance on the trace element selenium during evolution of mammals. Genome Biol. 2008, 9, R62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Peck, A.W.; McDonald, G.K. Adequate zinc nutrition alleviates the adverse effects of heat stress in bread wheat. Plant Soil. 2010, 337, 355–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Nievola, C.C.; Carvalho, C.P.; Carvalho, V.; Rodrigues, E. Rapid responses of plants to temperature changes. Temperature 2017, 4, 371–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Sarkar, J.; Chakraborty, B.; Chakraborty, U. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria protect wheat plants against temperature stress through antioxidant signalling and reducing chloroplast and membrane injury. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2018, 37, 1396–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Demirel, U.; Morris, W.L.; Ducreux, L.J.; Yavuz, C.; Asim, A.; Tindas, I.; Hancock, R.D. Physiological, biochemical, and transcriptional responses to single and combined abiotic stress in stress-tolerant and stress-sensitive potato genotypes. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Esim, N.; Atici, O. Nitric oxide improves chilling tolerance of maize by affecting apoplastic antioxidative enzymes in leaves. Plant Growth Regul. 2014, 72, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Megha, S.; Basu, U.; Kav, N.N. Regulation of low temperature stress in plants by microRNAs. Plant Cell Environ. 2018, 41, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Kumar, V.; Khare, T.; Sharma, M.; Wani, S.H. ROS-Induced Signaling and Gene Expression in Crops under Salinity Stress. In Reactive Oxygen Species and Antioxidant Systems in Plants: Role and Regulation under Abiotic Stress; Khan, M.I., Khan, N.A., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2017; pp. 159–184. [Google Scholar]
  20. Jalil, S.U.; Ansari, M.I. Physiological Role of Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid in Salt Stress Tolerance. In Salt and Drought Stress Tolerance in Plants; Hasanuzzaman, M., Tanveer, M., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 337–350. [Google Scholar]
  21. Iqbal, M.S.; Singh, A.K.; Ansari, M.I. Effect of Drought Stress on Crop Production. In New Frontiers in Stress Management for Durable Agriculture; Rakshit, A., Singh, H.B., Singh, A.K., Singh, U.S., Fraceto, L., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp. 35–47. [Google Scholar]
  22. Bailey-Serres, J.; Voesenek, L.A.C.J. Flooding stress: Acclimations and genetic diversity. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008, 59, 313–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Ashraf, M.A. Waterlogging stress in plants: A Review. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2012, 7, 1976–1981. [Google Scholar]
  24. Noshi, M.; Hatanaka, R.; Tanabe, N.; Terai, Y.; Maruta, T.; Shigeoka, S. Redox regulation of ascorbate and glutathione by a chloroplastic dehydroascorbate reductase is required for high-light stress tolerance in Arabidopsis. Biosci. Biotechnol. 2016, 80, 870–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Gong, Z.; Xiong, L.; Shi, H.; Yang, S.; Herrera-Estrella, L.R.; Xu, G.; Zhu, J.K. Plant abiotic stress response and nutrient use efficiency. Sci. China Life 2020, 63, 635–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Fukao, T.; Barrera-Figueroa, B.E.; Juntawong, P.; Peña-Castro, J.M. Submergence and waterlogging stress in plants: A review highlighting research opportunities and understudied aspects. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hasanuzzaman, M.; Oku, H.; Nahar, K.; Bhuyan, M.H.M.; Mahmud, J.A.; Baluska, F.; Fujita, M. Nitric oxide-induced salt stress tolerance in plants: ROS metabolism, signaling, and molecular interactions. Plant Biotechnol. Rep. 2018, 12, 77–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Morton, M.J.L.; Awlia, M.; Al-Tamimi, N.; Saade, S.; Pailles, Y.; Negrão, S.; Tester, M. Salt stress under the scalpel—Dissecting the genetics of salt tolerance. Plant J. 2019, 97, 148–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Tahir, M.A.; Aziz, T.; Rahmatullah. Silicon-induced growth and yield enhancement in two wheat genotypes differing in salinity tolerance. Commun. Soil. Sci. Plant Anal. 2011, 42, 395–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tran, T.T.; Kano-Nakata, M.; Takeda, M.; Menge, D.; Mitsuya, S.; Inukai, Y.; Yamauchi, A. Nitrogen application enhanced the expression of developmental plasticity of root systems triggered by mild drought stress in rice. Plant Soil. 2014, 378, 139–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Abid, M.; Tian, Z.; Ata-Ul-Karim, S.T.; Cui, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zahoor, R.; Jiang, D.; Dai, T. Nitrogen Nutrition Improves the Potential of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to Alleviate the Effects of Drought Stress during Vegetative Growth Periods. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Zhang, Y.Y.; Wang, L.L.; Liu, Y.L.; Zhang, Q.; Wei, Q.P.; Zhang, W.H. Nitric oxide enhances salt tolerance in maize seedlings through increasing activities of proton-pump and Na1/H1 antiport in the tonoplast. Planta 2006, 224, 545–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Albert, B.; Le Cahérec, F.; Niogret, M.F.; Avice, J.C.; Faes, P.; Leport, L.; Bouchereau, A. Nitrogen availability impacts oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) plant water status and proline production efficiency under water-limited conditions. Planta 2012, 236, 659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Rostamza, M.; Chaichi, M.R.; Jahansooz, M.R.; Rahimian Mashhadi, H.; Sharifi, H.R. Effects of water stress and nitrogen fertilizer on multi-cut pearl millet forage yield, nitrogen, and water use efficiency. Commun Soil. Sci. Plant Anal. 2011, 42, 2427–2440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ahmed, M.; Khan, S.; Irfan, M.; Aslam, M.A.; Shabbir, G.; Ahmad, S.; Fahad, S.; Basir, A.; Adnan, M. Effect of Phosphorus on Root Signaling of Wheat under Different Water Regimes. In Global Wheat Production; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2018; pp. 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Singh, V.; Pallaghy, C.K.; Singh, D. Phosphorus nutrition and tolerance of cotton to water stress: I. Seed cotton yield and leaf morphology. Field Crop. Res. 2006, 96, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Garg, B.K.; Burman, U.; Kathju, S. The influence of phosphorus nutrition on the physiological response of moth bean genotypes to drought. J. Plant Nutr. Soil. Sci. 2004, 167, 503–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zain, N.A.M.; Ismail, M.R.; Puteh, A.; Mahmood, M.; Islam, M.R. Drought tolerance and ion accumulation of rice following application of additional potassium fertilizer. Commun Soil. Sci. Plant Anal. 2014, 45, 2502–2514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ahanger, M.A.; Agarwal, R. Potassium up-regulates antioxidant metabolism and alleviates growth inhibition under water and osmotic stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L). Protoplasma 2017, 254, 1471–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ahanger, M.A.; Agarwal, R.; Tomar, N.S.; Shrivastava, M. Potassium induces positive changes in nitrogen metabolism and antioxidant system of oat (Avena sativa L. cultivar Kent). J. Plant Interact. 2015, 10, 211–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Barranco, I.; Tvarijonaviciute, A.; Perez-Patiño, C.; Vicente-Carrillo, A.; Parrilla, I.; Ceron, J.J.; Martinez, E.A.; Rodriguez-Martinez, H.; Roca, J. Effect of potassium fertilizer on the growth, physiological parameters, and water status of Brassica juncea cultivars under different irrigation regimes. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0257023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zahoor, R.; Dong, H.; Abid, M.; Zhao, W.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, Z. Potassium fertilizer improves drought stress alleviation potential in cotton by enhancing photosynthesis and carbohydrate metabolism. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2017, 137, 73–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Song, C.-J.; Ma, K.-M.; Qu, L.-Y.; Liu, Y.; Xu, X.-L.; Fu, B.-J.; Zhong, J.-F. Interactive effects of water, nitrogen and phosphorus on the growth, biomass partitioning and water-use efficiency of Bauhinia faberi seedlings. J. Arid Environ. 2010, 74, 1003–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ata-Ul-Karim, S.T.; Liu, X.; Lu, Z.; Yuan, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Cao, W. In-season estimation of rice grain yield using critical nitrogen dilution curve. Field Crop. Res. 2016, 195, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hassan, M.J.; Wang, F.; Ali, S.; Zhang, G. Toxic effects of cadmium on rice as affected by nitrogen fertilizer form. Plant Soil. 2005, 277, 359–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jalloh, M.A.; Chen, J.; Zhen, F.; Zhang, G. Effect of different N fertilizer forms on antioxidant capacity and grain yield of rice growing under Cd stress. J. Hazard Mater. 2009, 162, 1081–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Li, S.; Zhou, L.; Addo-Danso, S.D.; Ding, G.; Sun, M.; Wu, S.; Lin, S. Nitrogen supply enhances the physiological resistance of Chinese fr plantlets under polyethylene glycol (PEG)-induced drought stress. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 7509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhu, Z.; Gerendas, J.; Bendixen, R.; Schinner, K.; Tabrizi, H.; Sattelmacher, B.; Hansen, U.P. Different tolerance to light stress in N03--and NH4+-grown Phaseolus vulgaris L. Plant Biol. 2000, 2, 558–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Bendixen, R.; Gerendas, J.; Schirmer, K.; Sattelmacher, B.; Hansen, U.P. Difference in zeaxanthin formation in nitrate-and ammonium-grown Phaseolus vulgaris. Physiol. Plant 2001, 111, 255–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kato, M.C.; Hikosaka, K.; Hirotsu, N.; Makin, A.; Hirose, T. The excess light energy that is neither utilized in photosynthesis nor dissipated by photoprotective mechanisms determines the rate of photoinactivation in photosystem II. Plant Cell Physiol. 2003, 44, 318–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Huang, Z.A.; Jiang, D.A.; Yang, Y.; Sun, J.W.; Jin, S.H. Effects of nitrogen deficiency on gas exchange, chlorophyll fluorescence, and antioxidant enzymes in leaves of rice plants. Photosynthetica 2004, 42, 357–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Binghua, L.; Liang, C.; Mingjun, L.; Dong, L.; Yangjun, Z.; Fengwang, M. Interactive effects of water and nitrogen supply on growth, biomass partitioning, and water-use efficiency of young apple trees. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2012, 7, 978–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Saneoka, H.; Moghaieb, R.E.A.; Premachandra, G.S.; Fujita, K. Nitrogen nutrition and water stress effects on cell membrane stability and leaf water relations in Agrostis palustris Huds. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2004, 52, 131–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Saud, S.; Fahad, S.; Yajun, C.; Ihsan, M.Z.; Hammad, H.M.; Nasim, W.; Amanullah, J.; Arif, M.; Alharby, H. Effects of Nitrogen Supply on Water Stress and Recovery Mechanisms in Kentucky Bluegrass Plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Yang, Y.; Guo, J.Y.; Wang, G.X.; Yang, L.D.; Yang, Y. Effects of drought and nitrogen addition on photosynthetic characteristics and resource allocation of Abies fabri seedlings in eastern Tibetan plateau. New For. 2012, 43, 505–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhang, L.X.; Li, S.X.; Zhang, H.; Liang, Z.S. Nitrogen rates and drought stress effects on production, lipid peroxidation and antioxidative enzyme activities in two maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes. J. Agron. Crop. Sci. 2007, 193, 387–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Tarvainen, L.; Näsholm, T. Can adjustments in foliar nitrogen-use efficiency reduce drought stress impacts on boreal trees? Tree Physiol. 2017, 37, 415–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Arun, T.; Upadhyaya, S.D.; Upadhyay, A.; Preeti Sagar, N. Responses of moisture stress on growth, yield and quality of isabgol (Plantago ovata Forsk). J. Agric. Technol. 2012, 8, 563–570. [Google Scholar]
  59. Song, J.; Wang, Y.; Pan, Y.; Pang, J.; Zhang, X.; Fan, J.; Zhang, Y. The influence of nitrogen availability on anatomical and physiological responses of Populus alba × P. glandulosa to drought stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Gonzalez-Real, M.M.; Baille, A. Changes in leaf photosynthetic parameters with leaf position and nitrogen content within a rose plant canopy (Rosa hybrida). Plant Cell Environ. 2000, 23, 351–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Li, H.; Li, M.; Luo, J.; Cao, X.Q.L.; Gai, Y.; Jiang, X.N.; Liu, T.X.; Bai, H.; Janz, D.; Polle, A.; et al. N-fertilization has different effects on the growth, carbon and nitrogen physiology, and wood properties of slow- and fast-growing Populus species. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 695–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Euring, D.; Bai, H.; Janz, D.; Polle, A. Nitrogen-driven stem elongation in poplar is linked with wood modification and gene clusters for stress, photosynthesis and cell wall formation. BMC Plant Biol. 2014, 14, 391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Gessler, A.; Schaub, M.; McDowell, N.G. The role of nutrients in drought induced tree mortality and recovery. New Phytol. 2017, 214, 513–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Silveira, J.A.G.; Costa, R.C.L.; Oliveira, J.T.A. Drought-induced effects and recovery of nitrate assimilation and nodule activity in cowpea plants inoculated with Bradyrhizobium spp. under moderate nitrate level. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2001, 32, 187–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Luo, J.; Li, H.; Liu, T.X.; Polle, A.; Peng, C.H.; Luo, Z.B. Nitrogen metabolism of two contrasting poplar species during acclimation to limiting nitrogen availability. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 4207–4224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Correia, M.J.; Filomena, F.; Azedo-Silva, J.; Dias, C.; David, M.M.; Barrote, I.; Osorio, M.L.; Osorio, J. Effects of water deficit on the activity of nitrate reductase and contents of sugars, nitrate and free amino acids in the leaves and roots of sunflower and white lupin plants growing under two nutrient supply regimes. Physiol. Plant 2005, 124, 61–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Meng, S.; Zhang, C.X.; Su, L.; Li, Y.M.; Zhao, Z. Nitrogen uptake and metabolism of Populus simonii in response to PEG-induced drought stress. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2016, 123, 78–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Vries, F.T.; Brown, C.; Stevens, C.J. Grassland species root response to drought: Consequences for soil carbon and nitrogen availability. Plant Soil. 2016, 409, 297–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Banerjee, P.; Visha Kumari, V.; Nath, R.; Bandyopadhyay, P. Seed priming and foliar nutrition studies on relay grass pea after winter rice in lower Gangetic plain. J. Crop. Weed 2019, 15, 72–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Jin, J.; Lauricella, D.; Armstrong, R.; Sale, P.; Tang, C. Phosphorus application and elevated CO2 enhance drought tolerance in field pea grown in a phosphorus-deficient vertisol. Ann. Bot. 2015, 116, 975–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Tariq, A.; Pan, K.; Olatunji, O.A.; Graciano, C.; Li, Z.; Sun, F.; Sun, X.; Song, D.; Chen, W.; Zhang, A.; et al. Phosphorous Application Improves Drought Tolerance of Phoebe zhennan. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Béné, C.; Barange, M.; Subasinghe, R.; Pinstrup-Andersen, P.; Merino, G.; Hemre, G.-I.; Williams, M. Feeding 2015, 9 billion by 2050—Putting fish back on the menu. Food Sec. 2015, 7, 261–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Sun, L.; Song, L.; Zhang, Y.; Zheng, Z.; Liu, D. Arabidopsis PHL2 and PHR1 act redundantly as the key components of the central regulatory system controlling transcriptional responses to phosphate starvation. Plant Physiol. 2016, 170, 499–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Bechtaoui, N.; Rabiu, M.K.; Raklami, A.; Oufdou, K.; Hafidi, M.; Jemo, M. Phosphate-dependent regulation of growth and stresses management in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 679916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Faustino, L.I.; Bulfe, N.M.L.; Pinazo, M.A.; Monteoliva, S.E.; Graciano, C. Dry weight partitioning and hydraulic traits in young Pinus taeda trees fertilized with nitrogen and phosphorus in a subtropical area. Tree Physiol. 2013, 33, 241–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Hansel, F.D.; Amado, T.J.C.; Ruiz Diaz, D.A.; Rosso, L.H.M.; Nicoloso, F.T.; Schorr, M. Phosphorus fertilizer placement and tillage affect soybean root growth and drought tolerance. Agron. J. 2017, 109, 2936–2944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Gorny, A.G.; Garczynski, S. Genotypic and nutrition dependent variation in water use efficiency and photosynthetic activity of leaves in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J. Appl. Genet. 2002, 43, 145–160. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  78. Sardans, J.; Roda, F.; Penuelas, J. Effects of water and a nutrient pulse supply on Rosmarinus of ficinalis growth, nutrient content and flowering in the field. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2005, 53, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Dey, G.; Banerjee, P.; Sharma, R.K.; Maity, J.P.; Etesami, H.; Shaw, A.K.; Huang, Y.H.; Huang, H.B.; Chen, C.Y. Management of phosphorus in salinity-stressed agriculture for sustainable crop production by salt-tolerant phosphate-solubilizing bacteria—A Review. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Jones, C.A.; Jacobsen, J.S.; Wraithl, J.M. Response of malt barley to phosphorus fertilization under drought conditions. J. Plant Nutr. 2005, 28, 1605–1617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Campbell, C.D.; Sage, R.F. Interactions between the effects of atmospheric CO2 content and P nutrition on photosynthesis in white lupin (Lupinus albus L.). Plant Cell Environ. 2006, 29, 844–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Singh, S.K.; Badgujar, G.; Reddy, V.R.; Fleisher, D.H.; Bunce, J.A. Carbon dioxide diffusion across stomata and mesophyll and photo-biochemical processes as affected by growth CO2 and phosphorus nutrition in cotton. J. Plant Physiol. 2013, 170, 801–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Ajouri, A.H.; Asgedom Becker, M. Seed priming enhances germination and seedling growth of barley under conditions of P and Zn deficiency. J. Plant Nutr. Soil. Sci. 2004, 167, 630–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Sato, A.M.; Catuchi, T.A.; Ribeiro, R.V.; Souza, G.M. The use of network analysis to uncover homeostatic responses of a drought-tolerant sugarcane cultivar under severe water deficit and phosphorus supply. Acta Physiol. Plant 2010, 32, 1145–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. López-Arredondo, D.L.; Leyva-González, M.A.; González-Morales, S.I.; López-Bucio, J.; Herrera-Estrella, L. Phosphate nutrition: Improving low-phosphate tolerance in crops. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2014, 65, 95–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Tariq, A.; Pan, K.; Olatunji, O.A.; Graciano, C.; Li, Z.; Sun, F.; Zhang, L.; Wu, X.; Chen, W.; Song, D.; et al. Phosphorous fertilization alleviates drought effects on Alnus cremastogyne by regulating its antioxidant and osmotic potential. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 5644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Fahad, S.; Hussain, S.; Matloob, A.; Khan, F.A.; Khaliq, A.; Saud, S.; Hassan, S.; Shan, D.; Khan, F.; Ullah, N.; et al. Phytohormones and plant responses to salinity stress: A Review. Plant Growth Regul. 2015, 75, 391–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Begum, N.; Ahanger, M.A.; Zhang, L. AMF inoculation and phosphorus supplementation alleviates drought induced growth and photosynthetic decline in Nicotiana tabacum by up-regulating antioxidant metabolism and osmolyte accumulation. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2020, 176, 104088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Yang, J.; Fan, W.; Zheng, S. Mechanisms and regulation of Aluminium induced secretion of organic acid anions from plant roots. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 2019, 20, 513–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Meng, X.; Chen, W.W.; Wang, Y.Y.; Huang, Z.R.; Ye, X.; Chen, L.S.; Yang, L.T. Effects of phosphorus deficiency on the absorption of mineral nutrients, photosynthetic system performance and antioxidant metabolism in Citrus grandis. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0246944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Burman, U.; Garg, B.K.; Kathju, S. Effect of phosphorus application on cluster bean under different intensities of water stress. J. Plant Nutr. 2009, 32, 668–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Sardans, J.; Penuelas, J. The role of plants in the effects of global change on nutrient availability and stoichiometry in the plant-soil system. Plant Physiol. 2012, 160, 1741–1761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Ge, T.D.; Sun, N.B.; Bai, L.P.; Tong, C.L.; Sui, F.G. Effects of drought stress on phosphorus and potassium uptake dynamics in summer maize (Zea mays) throughout the growth cycle. Act. Physiol. Plant. 2012, 34, 2179–2186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Razaq, M.; Zhang, P.; Shen, H.; Salahuddin, S. Influence of nitrogen and phosphorous on the growth and root morphology of Acer mono. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0171321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Lamaoui, M.; Jemo, M.; Datla, R.; Bekkaoui, F. Heat and drought stresses in crops and approaches for their mitigation. Front. Chem. 2018, 6, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Nasri, N.; Maatallah, S.; Kaddour, R.; Lachâal, M. Effect of salinity on Arabidopsis thaliana seed germination and acid phosphatase activity. Arch. Biol. Sci. 2016, 68, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Chen, Z.C.; Liao, H. Organic acid anions: An effective defensive weapon for plants against aluminum toxicity and phosphorus deficiency in acidic soils. J. Genet. Genom. 2016, 43, 631–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Bhuyan, M.H.M.B.; Hasanuzzaman, M.; Mahmud, J.; Hossain, M.S.; Alam, M.U.; Fujita, M. Explicating physiological and biochemical responses of wheat cultivars under acidity stress: Insight into the antioxidant defence and glyoxalase systems. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plant 2019, 25, 865–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Goud, V.V.; Konde, N.M.; Mohod, P.V.; Kharche, V.K. Response of chickpea to potassium fertilization on yield, quality, soil fertility and economic in vertisols. Legum. Res. 2012, 37, 311–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Wang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Huang, X. Effect of potassium supply on plant potassium distribution and growth and leaf photosynthetic capacity of Pyrus pyrifolia. J. Nanjing Agric. Univ. 2017, 40, 60–67. [Google Scholar]
  101. Jiang, M.Y.; Zhang, J.H. Involvement of plasma membrane NADPH oxidase in abscisic acid- and water stress-induced antioxidant defence in leaves of maize seedlings. Planta 2002, 215, 1022–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Danial, H.F.; Ewees, M.S.; Moussa, S.A. Significance of influence potassium on the tolerance to induce moisture stress and biological activity of some legume crops grown on a sandy soil Egypt. Egypt J. Soil. Sci. 2010, 43, 180–204. [Google Scholar]
  103. Jan, A.U.; Hadi, F.; Nawaz, M.A.; Rahman, K. Potassium and zinc increase tolerance to salt stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 116, 139–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Banerjee, P.; Ghosh, A.; Visha Kumari, V.; Nath, R. Effect of canopy temperature on physiological processes of grass pea as influenced by seed priming and foliar fertilization. J. Agrometeorol. 2021, 23, 340–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Fooladivanda, Z.; Zadehdelouei, M.H.; Zarifinia, N. Effects of water stress and potassium on quantity traits of two varieties of mungbean (Vigna radiata L.). Cercet. Agron. Mold. 2014, 47, 107–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Soleimanzadeh, H.; Habibi, D.; Ardakani, M.; Paknejad, F.; Rejali, F. Effect of potassium levels on antioxidant enzymes and malondialdehyde content under drought stress in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Am. J. Agric. Biol. Sci. 2010, 5, 56–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Hasanuzzaman, M.; Hossain, M.A.; da Silva, J.A.T.; Fujita, M. Plant responses and tolerance to abiotic oxidative stress: Antioxidant defence is a key factor. In Crop Stress and Its Management: Perspectives and Strategies; Bandi, V., Shanker, A.K., Shanker, C., Mandapaka, Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; pp. 261–316. [Google Scholar]
  108. Cha-um, S.; Siringam, K.; Juntawong, N.; Kirdmanee, C. Water relations, pigment stabilization, photosynthetic abilities and growth improvement in salt stressed rice plants treated with exogenous potassium nitrate application. Int. J. Plant Prod. 2010, 4, 187–198. [Google Scholar]
  109. Subbaramamma, P.; Sangamitra, M.; Manjusha, D. Mitigation of drought stress in production of pulses. Int. J. Multidiscip. Adv. Res. Trends 2017, 4, 41–62. [Google Scholar]
  110. Majeed, S.; Akram, M.; Latif, M.; Ijaz, M.; Hussain, M. Mitigation of drought stress by foliar application of salicylic acid and potassium in mungbean (Vigna radiata L.). Legum. Res. 2016, 39, 208–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Römheld, V.; Kirkby, E.A. Research on potassium in agriculture: Needs and prospects. Plant Soil. 2010, 335, 155–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Hasanuzzaman, M.; Bhuyan, M.H.M.B.; Nahar, K.; Hossain, M.S.; Mahmud, J.A.; Hossen, M.S.; Masud, A.A.C.; Moumita Fujita, M. Potassium: A vital regulator of plant responses and tolerance to abiotic stresses. Agronomy 2018, 8, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Rao, D.S.N.; Naidu, T.C.M.; Rani, Y.A. Effect of foliar nutrition on antioxidant enzymes, photosynthetic rate, dry matter production and yield of mung bean under receding soil moisture condition. Int. J. Pure Appl. Biosci. 2015, 3, 115–123. [Google Scholar]
  114. Yadav, G.S.; Devi, A.G.; Das, A.; Kandpal, B.; Babu, S.; Das, R.C.; Nath, M. Foliar application of urea and potassium chloride minimizes terminal moisture stress in lentil (Lens culinaris L.) crop. Legume Res. 2019, 44, 627–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. El–Mageed, T.A.A.; El-Sherif, A.M.; Ali, M.M.; El-Wahed, M.H.A. Combined effect of deficit irrigation and potassium fertilizer on physiological response, plant water status and yield of soybean in calcareous soil. Arch. Agron. Soil. Sci. 2016, 63, 827–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Banerjee, P.; Venugopalan, V.K.; Nath, R.; Althobaiti, Y.S.; Gaber, A.; Al-Yasi, H.; Hossain, A. Physiology, Growth and Productivity of Spring–Summer Black Gram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper) as Influenced by Heat and Moisture Stresses in Different Dates of Sowing and Nutrient Management Conditions. Agronomy 2021, 11, 2329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Halford, N.G. New insights on the effects of heat stress on crops. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60, 4215–4216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Waraich, E.A.; Ahmad, R.; Halim, A.; Aziz, T. Alleviation of temperature stress by nutrient management in crop plants: A review. J. Soil. Sci. Plant Nutr. 2012, 12, 221–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Ashraf, M.A.; Ahmad, M.S.A.; Ashraf, M.; Al-Qurainy, F.; Ashraf, M.Y. Alleviation of waterlogging stress in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) by exogenous application of potassium in soil and as a foliar spray. Crop. Past. Sci. 2011, 26, 25–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Dwivedi, S.K.; Kumar, S.; Bhakta, N.; Singh, S.K.; Rao, K.K.; Mishra, J.S.; Singh, A.K. Improvement of submergence tolerance in rice through efficient application of potassium under submergence-prone rainfed ecology of Indo-Gangetic Plain. Funct. Plant Biol. 2017, 4, 907–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Shabala, S.; Cuin, T.A. Potassium transport and plant salt tolerance. Physiol. Plant 2008, 133, 651–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Almeida, D.M.; Oliveira, M.M.; Saibo, N.J.M. Regulation of Na+ and K+ homeostasis in plants: Towards improved salt stress tolerance in crop plants. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2017, 40, 326–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  123. Su, Y.; Luo, W.; Lin, W.; Ma, L.; Kabir, M.H. Model of cation transportation mediated by high-affinity potassium transporters (HKTs) in higher plants. Biol. Proced. Online 2015, 17, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  124. Foyer, C.H.; Vanacker, H.; Gornez, L.D.; Harbinson, J. Regulation of photosynthesis and antioxidant metabolism in maize leaves at optimal and chilling temperatures: Review. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2002, 40, 659–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Oosterhuis, D.M.; Loka, D.A.; Raper, T.B. Potassium and stress alleviation: Physiological functions and management of cotton. J. Plant Nutr. Soil. Sci. 2013, 176, 331–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Wang, M.; Zheng, Q.; Shen, Q.; Guo, S. The critical role of potassium in plant stress response. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 7370–7390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Roy, P.R.; Tahjib-Ul-Arif, M.; Polash, M.A.S.; Hossen, M.Z.; Hossain, M.A. Physiological mechanisms of exogenous calcium on alleviating salinity-induced stress in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2019, 25, 611–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Wu, Y.; Liu, X.; Wang, W.; Zhang, S.; Xu, B. Calcium regulates the cell-to-cell water flow pathway in maize roots during variable water conditions. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2012, 58, 212–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Naeem, M.; Naeem, M.S.; Ahmad, R.; Ihsan, M.Z.; Ashraf, M.Y.; Hussain, Y.; Fahad, S. Foliar calcium spray confers drought stress tolerance in maize via modulation of plant growth, water relations, proline content and hydrogen peroxide activity. Arch. Agron. Soil. Sci. 2018, 64, 116–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Guo, T.R.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, Y.H.; Jin, Y.F. Alleviation of Al toxicity in Barley by addition of calcium. Agric. Sci. China 2006, 5, 828–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Hosseini, S.A.; Réthoré, E.; Pluchon, S.; Ali, N.; Billiot, B.; Yvin, J.C. Calcium Application Enhances Drought Stress Tolerance in Sugar Beet and Promotes Plant Biomass and Beetroot Sucrose Concentration. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  132. Tan, W.; Meng, Q.W.; Brestic, M.; Olsovska, K.; Yang, X. Photosynthesis is improved by exogenous calcium in heat-stressed tobacco plants. J. Plant Physiol. 2011, 168, 2063–2071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Ding, Y.; Xu, G. Low magnesium with high potassium supply changes sugar partitioning and root growth pattern prior to visible magnesium deficiency in leaves of Rice (Oryza sativa L.). Am. J. Plant Sci. 2011, 2, 601–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  134. Mengutay, M.; Ceylan, Y.; Kutman, U.B.; Cakmak, I. Adequate magnesium nutrition mitigates adverse effects of heat stress on maize and wheat. Plant Soil. 2013, 368, 57–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Shabala, S.; Hari, Y. Effects of magnesium availability on the activity of plasma membrane ion transporters and light-induced responses from broad bean leaf mesophyll. Planta 2005, 221, 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Thalooth, A.T.; Tawfik Mohamed, H.M. A comparative study on the effect of foliar application of zinc, potassium and magnesium on growth, yield and some chemical constituents of mungbean plants grown under water stress conditions. World J. Agric. Sci. 2006, 2, 37–46. [Google Scholar]
  137. Dixit, G.; Singh, A.P.; Kumar, A.; Dwivedi, S.; Deeba, F.; Kumar, S.; Pandey, V. Sulfur alleviates arsenic toxicity by reducing its accumulation and modulating proteome, amino acids and thiol metabolism in rice leaves. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 16205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  138. Cao, Z.Z.; Qin, M.L.; Lin, X.Y.; Zhu, Z.W.; Chen, M.X. Sulfur supply reduces cadmium uptake and translocation in rice grains (Oryza sativa L.) by enhancing iron plaque formation, cadmium chelation and vacuolar sequestration. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 238, 76–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Chen, J.; Wang, W.H.; Wu, F.H.; He, E.M.; Liu, X.; Shangguan, Z.P.; Zheng, H.L. Hydrogen sulfide enhances salt tolerance through nitric oxide-mediated maintenance of ion homeostasis in barley seedling roots. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 12516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  140. Dawood, M.; Cao, F.; Jahangir, M.M.; Zhang, G.; Wu, F. Alleviation of aluminum toxicity by hydrogen sulfide is related to elevated ATPase, and suppressed aluminum uptake and oxidative stress in barley. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 209, 121–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Lee, B.R.; Zaman, R.; Avice, J.C.; Ourry, A.; Kim, T.H. Sulfur use efficiency is a significant determinant of drought stress tolerance in relation to photosynthetic activity in Brassica napus cultivars. Front Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  142. Anjum, N.A.; Umar, S.; Ahmad, A.; Iqbal, M.; Khan, N.A. Sulphur protects mustard (Brassica campestris L.) from cadmium toxicity by improving leaf ascorbate and glutathione Sulphur protects mustard from cadmium toxicity. Plant Growth Regu. 2008, 54, 271–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Fatma, M.; Masood, A.; Per, T.S.; Rasheed, F.; Khan, N.A. Interplay between nitric oxide and sulfur assimilation in salt tolerance in plants. Crop. J. 2016, 4, 153–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  144. Rahman, A.; Mostofa, M.G.; Nahar, K.; Hasanuzzaman, M.; Fujita, M. Exogenous calcium alleviates cadmium-induced oxidative stress in rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings by regulating the antioxidant defence and glyoxalase systems. Braz. J. Bot. 2015, 39, 393–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Ahmad, P.; Sarwat, M.; Bhat, N.A.; Wani, M.R.; Kazi, A.G.; Tran, L.P. Alleviation of cadmium toxicity in Brassica juncea L. (Czern. & Coss.) by calcium application involves various physiological and biochemical strategies. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0114571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  146. Rahman, A.; Mostofa, M.G.; Alam, M.M.; Nahar, K.; Hasanuzzaman, M.; Fujita, M. Calcium mitigates arsenic toxicity in rice seedlings by reducing arsenic uptake and modulating the antioxidant defence and glyoxalase systems and stress markers. BioMed Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 340812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  147. Parvin, K.; Nahar, K.; Hasanuzzaman, M.; Bhuyan, M.H.M.; Fujita, M. Calcium-Mediated Growth Regulation and Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Plants. In Plant Abiotic Stress to Lerance; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 291–331. [Google Scholar]
  148. Mittler, R.; Vanderauwera, S.; Gollery, M.; Van Breusegem, F. Reactive oxygen gene network of plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2004, 9, 490–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Sanders, D.; Pelloux, J.; Brownlee, C.; Harper, J.F. Calcium at the crossroads of signaling. Plant Cell 2002, 14, 401–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  150. Choi, H.I.; Park, H.J.; Park, J.H.; Kim, S.; Im, M.Y.; Seo, H.H.; Kim, Y.W.; Hwang, I.; Kim, S.Y. Arabidopsis calcium dependent protein kinase AtCPK32 interacts with ABF4, a transcriptional regulator of abscisic acid-responsive gene expression, and modulates its activity. Plant Physiol. 2005, 139, 1750–1761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  151. Yu, X.C.; Zhu, S.Y.; Gao, G.F.; Wang, X.J.; Zhao, R.; Zou, K.Q.; Wang, X.F.; Zhang, X.Y.; Wu, F.Q.; Peng, C.C.; et al. Expression of a grape calcium-dependent protein kinase ACPK1 in Arabidopsis thaliana promotes plant growth and confers abscisic acid-hypersensitivity in germination, post-germination growth, and stomatal movement. Plant Mol. Biol. 2007, 64, 531–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Liu, F.; Yoo, B.C.; Lee, J.Y.; Pan, W.; Harmon, A.C. Calcium-regulated phosphorylation of soybean serine acetyl transferase in response to oxidative stress. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 27405–27415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  153. Duman, F. Uptake of Mineral Elements during Abiotic Stress. In Abiotic Stress Responses in Plants; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2012; pp. 267–281. [Google Scholar]
  154. Tuna, A.L.; Kaya, C.; Ashraf, M.; Altunlu, H.; Yokas, I.; Yagmur, B. The effects of calcium sulphate on growth, membrane stability and nutrient uptake of tomato plants grown under salt stress. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2007, 59, 173–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Bonilla, I.; El-Hamdaoui, A.; Bolanos, L. Boron and calcium increase Pisum sativum seed germination and seedling development under salt stress. Plant Soil. 2004, 267, 97–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Zehra, A.; Gul, B.; Ansari, R.; Khan, M.A. Role of calcium in alleviating effect of salinity on germination of Phragmites karka seeds. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2012, 78, 122–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  157. Turkmen, O.; Dursun, A.; Turan, M.; Erdinc, C. Calcium and humic acid affect seed germination, growth and nutrient content of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) seedlings under saline soil conditions. Acta Agric. Scand. B 2004, 54, 168–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Liu, L.-Y.; Wang, M.-Y. Effect of CaCl2 on germination of wheat seeds under salt stress. J. Henan Agric. Sci. 2010, 1, 5–7. [Google Scholar]
  159. Yao, S.; Chen, S.; Zhao, J.; Xu, D.; Lan, H.; Zhang, F. Effect of three salts on germination and seedling survival of dimorphic seeds of Chenopodium album. Botany 2010, 88, 821–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Patel, N.T.; Vaghela, P.M.; Patel, A.D.; Pandey, A.M. Implications of calcium nutrition on the response of Caesalpinia crista (Fabaceae) to soil salinity. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2011, 31, 24–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Mei, J.; Wang, W.; Peng, S.; Nie, L. Seed pelleting with calcium peroxide improves crop establishment of direct-seeded rice under waterlogging conditions. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 4878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  162. Shao, H.B.; Chu, L.Y.; Jaleel, C.A.; Zhao, C.X. Water deficit stress-induced anatomical changes in higher plants. CR Biol. 2008, 331, 215–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Ma, Y.; Song, W.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, H.; Guo, H.; Shao, H.; Ni, F. The dynamic changing of Ca2+ cellular localization in maize leaflets under drought stress. Comptes Rendus Biol. 2009, 332, 351–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Xu, C.; Li, X.; Zhang, L. The effect of calcium chloride on growth, photosynthesis, and antioxidant responses of Zoysia japonica under drought conditions. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e68214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Berkowitz, G.; Zhang, X.; Mercier, R.; Leng, Q.; Lawton, M. Co-expression of calcium-dependent protein kinase with the inward rectified guard cell K + channel KAT1 alters current parameters in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Plant Cell Physiol. 2000, 41, 785–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Palta, J.P. Stress interactions at the cellular and membrane levels. Hort. Sci. 2000, 25, 1377–1381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Shaikh, F.; Gul, B.; Li, W.Q.; Jing, L.X.; Khan, M.A. Effect of calcium and light on the germination of Urochondra setulosa under different salts. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci.B 2007, 8, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Nayyar, H.; Kaushal, S.K. Chilling induced oxidative stress in germinating wheat grains as affected by water stress and calcium. Biol. Plant 2002, 45, 601–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Sreedhara, A.; Cowan, J.A. Structural and catalytic roles for divalent magnesium in nucleic acid biochemistry. Biometals 2002, 15, 211–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Marschner, H. Marschner’s Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants, 3rd ed.; Academic Press: London, UK, 2012; pp. 178–189. [Google Scholar]
  171. Hermans, C.N. Verbruggen Physiological characterization of Mg deficiency in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Exp. Bot. 2005, 56, 2153–2161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  172. Hermans, C.; Conn, S.J.; Chen, J.; Xiao, Q.; Verbruggen, N. An update on magnesium homeostasis mechanisms in plants. Metallomics 2013, 5, 1170–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Cakmak, I.; Kirkby, E.A. Role of magnesium in carbon partitioning and alleviating photooxidative damage. Physiol. Plant 2008, 133, 692–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Cakmak, I. Enrichment of cereal grains with zinc: Agronomic or genetic biofortification? Plant Soil. 2008, 302, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Gerendás, J.; Führs, H. The significance of magnesium for crop quality. Plant Soil. 2013, 368, 101–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  176. Guo, W.; Chen, S.; Hussain, N.; Cong, Y.; Liang, Z.; Chen, K. Magnesium stress signaling in plant: Just a beginning. Plant Signal. Behav. 2015, 10, e992287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  177. Guo, W.; Hussain, N.; Liang, Z.; Yang, D. Magnesium deficiency in plants: An urgent problem. Crop J. 2016, 4, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  178. Khan, M.A. Experimental assessment of salinity tolerance of Ceriops tagal seedlings and saplings from the Indus delta. Pak. Aquat. Bot 2001, 70, 259–268. [Google Scholar]
  179. Ferreira, R.G.; Tavora, F.J.A.F.; Hernandez, F.F.F. Dry matter partitioning and mineral composition of roots, stems and leaves of guava grown under salt stress conditions. Pesqui. Agropecu. Bras. 2001, 36, 79–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  180. Barhoumi, Z.; Djebali, W.; Smaoui, A.; Chaïbi, W.; Abdelly, C. Contribution of NaCl excretion to salt resistance of Aeluropus littoralis (Willd) Parl. J. Plant Physiol. 2007, 164, 842–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Mahouachi, J. Changes in nutrient concentrations and leaf gas exchange parameters in banana plantlets under gradual soil moisture depletion. Sci. Hort. 2009, 120, 460–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Cao, M.J.; Wang, Z.; Zhao, Q.; Mao, J.L.; Speiser, A.; Wirtz, M.; Xiang, C.B. Sulfate availability affects ABA levels and germination response to ABA and salt stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2014, 77, 604–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Khan, N.A.; Khan, M.I.R.; Asgher, M.; Fatma, M.; Masood, A.; Syeed, S. Salinity tolerance in plants: Revisiting the role of sulfur metabolites. J. Plant Biochem. Physiol. 2014, 2, 120. [Google Scholar]
  184. Anjum, N.A.; Gill, R.; Kaushik, M.; Hasanuzzaman, M.; Pereira, E.; Ahmad, I.; Tuteja, N.; Gill, S.S. ATP-sulfurylase, sulfur-compounds, and plant stress tolerance. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  185. Talukdar, D. Functional interplay between glutathione and hydrogen sulfide in regulation of thiol cascade during arsenate tolerance of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes. 3 Biotech. 2015, 5, 819–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  186. Liu, H.; Wang, J.; Liu, J.; Liu, T.; Xue, S. Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) signaling in plant development and stress responses. Abiotech 2021, 2, 32–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Min, Y.; Qin, B.-P.; Ma, X.-L.; Wang, P.; Li, M.-L.; Chen, L.L.; Chen, L.-T.; Sun, A.; Wang, Z.; Yin, Y. Foliar application of sodium hydrosulfide (NaHS), a hydrogen sulfide (H2S) donor, can protect seedlings against heat stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J. Integr. Agric. 2016, 15, 2745–2758. [Google Scholar]
  188. Zhang, J.; Zhao, Q.Z.; Duan, G.L.; Huang, Y.C. Influence of sulphur on arsenic accumulation and metabolism in rice seedlings. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2011, 72, 34–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Sheng, H.; Zeng, J.; Liu, Y.; Wang, X.; Wang, Y.; Kang, H.; Fan, X.; Sha, L.; Zhang, H.; Zhou, Y. Sulfur mediated alleviation of Mn toxicity in polish wheat relates to regulating Mn allocation and improving antioxidant system. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  190. Ardıc, M.; Sekmen, A.H.; Tokur, S.; Ozdemir, F.; Turkan, I. Antioxidant responses of chickpea plants subjected to boron toxicity. Plant Biol. 2009, 11, 328–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Michael, P.I.; Krishnaswamy, M. Oxidative stress and antioxidants in cowpea plants subjected to boron and high irradiance stresses. J. Plant Nutr. 2012, 35, 2180–2197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Keleş, Y.; Ergün, N.; Öncel, I. Antioxidant enzyme activity affected by high boron concentration in sunflower and tomato seedlings. Commun. Soil. Sci. Plant Anal. 2011, 42, 173–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Zhu, C.Q.; Cao, X.C.; Zhu, L.F.; Hu, W.J.; Hu, A.Y.; Abliz, B.; Zhang, J.H. Boron reduces cell wall aluminum content in rice (Oryza sativa) roots by decreasing H2O2 accumulation. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 13, 80–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Mahmoud, A.W.M.; Abdeldaym, E.A.; Abdelaziz, S.M.; El-Sawy, M.B.; Mottaleb, S.A. Synergetic effects of zinc, boron, silicon, and zeolite nanoparticles on confer tolerance in potato plants subjected to salinity. Agronomy 2020, 10, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  195. Wang, H.; Liu, R.L.; Jin, J.Y. Effects of zinc and soil moisture on photosynthetic rate and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of maize. Biol. Plant 2009, 53, 191–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Vazin, F. Effect of zinc sulfate on quantitative and qualitative characteristics of corn (Zea mays) in drought stress. Cercet. Agron. Mold. 2012, 45, 15–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Kheirizadeh Arough, Y.; Seyed Sharifi, R.; Seyed Sharifi, R. Bio fertilizers and zinc effects on some physiological parameters of triticale under water-limitation condition. J. Plant Interact. 2016, 11, 167–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Pavia, I.; Roque, J.; Rocha, L.; Ferreira, H.; Castro, C.; Carvalho, A.; Correia, C. Zinc priming and foliar application enhances photoprotection mechanisms in drought-stressed wheat plants during anthesis. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 140, 27–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Ullah, A.; Romdhane, L.; Rehman, A.; Farooq, M. Adequate zinc nutrition improves the tolerance against drought and heat stresses in chickpea. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 143, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Mahmood, A.; Kanwal, H.; Kausar, A.; Ilyas, A.; Akhter, N.; Ilyas, M.; Khalid, H. Seed priming with zinc modulate growth, pigments and yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under water deficit conditions. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 2019, 17, 147–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Ibrahim, S.A.; Desoky, E.; Elrys, A.S. Influencing of water stress and micronutrients on physio-chemical attributes, yield and anatomical features of Common Bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Egypt. J. Agron. 2017, 39, 251–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  202. Sakya, A.T.; Sulistyaningsih, E.; Indradewa, D.; Purwanto, B.H. Stomata character and chlorophyll content of tomato in response to Zn application under drought condition. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2018, 142, 012033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  203. Zafar, S.; Nasri, M.; Moghadam, H.R.T.; Zahedi, H. Effect of zinc and sulfur foliar applications on physiological characteristics of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) under water deficit stress. Int. J. Biosci. 2014, 5, 87–96. [Google Scholar]
  204. Guha, T.; Ravikumar, K.V.G.; Mukherjee, A.; Mukherjee, A.; Kundu, R. Nanopriming with zero valent iron (nZVI) enhances germination and growth in aromatic rice cultivar (Oryza sativa cv. Gobindabhog L.). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 127, 403–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  205. Al-Amri, N.; Tombuloglu, H.; Slimani, Y.; Akhtar, S.; Barghouthi, M.; Almessiere, M.; Ozcelik, S. Size effect of iron (III) oxide nanomaterials on the growth, and their uptake and translocation in common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 194, 110377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  206. Mohammadi, H.; Amani-Ghadim, A.R.; Matin, A.A.; Ghorbanpour, M. FeO nanoparticles improve physiological and antioxidative attributes of sunflower (Helianthus annuus) plants grown in soil spiked with hexavalent chromium. 3 Biotech 2020, 10, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  207. Alidoust, D.; Isoda, A. Effect of γFe2O3 nanoparticles on photosynthetic characteristic of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.): Foliar spray versus soil amendment. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2013, 35, 3365–3375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Pérez-Labrada, F.; López-Vargas, E.R.; Ortega-Ortiz, H.; Cadenas-Pliego, G.; Benavides-Mendoza, A.; Juárez-Maldonado, A. Responses of tomato plants under saline stress to foliar application of copper nanoparticles. Plants 2019, 8, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  209. Iqbal, M.N.; Rasheed, R.; Ashraf, M.Y.; Ashraf, M.A.; Hussain, I. Exogenously applied zinc and copper mitigate salinity effect in maize (Zea mays L.) by improving key physiological and biochemical attributes. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 23883–23896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. O’Neill, M.A.; Ishii, T.; Albershim, P.; Darvill, A.G. Rhamnogalacturonan II: Structure and function of a borate cross-linked cell wall pectic polysaccharite. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2004, 55, 109–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  211. Shahid, M.; Nayak, A.K.; Tripathi, R.; Katara, J.L.; Bihari, P.; Lal, B.; Gautam, P. Boron application improves yield of rice cultivars under high temperature stress during vegetative and reproductive stages. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2018, 62, 1375–1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  212. Venugopalan, V.K.; Nath, R.; Sengupta, K.; Nalia, A.; Banerjee, S.; Sarath Chandran, M.A.; İbrahimova, U.; Dessoky, E.S.; Attia, A.O.; Hassan, M.; et al. The response of lentil (Lens culinaris medik.) to soil moisture and heat stress under different dates of sowing and foliar application of micronutrients. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 10, 679469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  213. Molassiotis, A.; Sotiropoulos, T.; Tanou, G.; Diamantidis, G.; Therios, I. Boron-induced oxidative damage and antioxidant and nucleolytic responses in shoot tips culture of the apple rootstock EM 2006, 9 (Malus domestica Borkh). Environ. Exp. Bot. 2006, 56, 54–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Ilyas, M.; Ayub, G.; Imran Ali Awan, A.; Ahmad, M. Calcium and Boron effect on production and quality of autumn potato crop under chilling temperature. Commun. Soil. Sci. Plant Anal. 2021, 52, 375–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Sayed, S.A. Impacts of boron application on maize plants growing under flooded and unflooded conditions. Biol. Plant 1998, 41, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. García-Sánchez, F.; Simón-Grao, S.; Martínez-Nicolás, J.J.; Alfosea-Simón, M.; Liu, C.; Chatzissavvidis, C.; Cámara-Zapata, J.M. Multiple stresses occurring with boron toxicity and deficiency in plants. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 397, 122713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  217. Bashir, K.; Rasheed, S.; Kobayashi, T.; Seki, M.; Nishizawa, N.K. Regulating subcellular metal homeostasis: The key to crop improvement. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 2004, 1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  218. Yadav, S.K. Cold stress tolerance mechanisms in plants. A Review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2010, 30, 515–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  219. Xie, Y.; Chen, P.; Yan, Y.; Bao, C.; Li, X.; Wang, L.; Shen, X.; Li, H.; Liu, X.; Niu, C.; et al. An atypical R2R3 MYB transcription factor increases cold hardiness by CBF-dependent and CBF-independent pathways in apple. New Phytol. 2018, 218, 201–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Nadeem, F.; Farooq, M. Application of micronutrients in rice-wheat cropping system of South Asia. Rice Sci. 2019, 26, 356–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Liu, C.; Wu, Y.; Wang, X. bZIP transcription factor OsbZIP52/RISBZ5: A potential negative regulator of cold and drought stress response in rice. Planta 2012, 235, 1157–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  222. Song, Y.; Jiang, M.; Zhang, H.; Li, R. Zinc oxide nanoparticles alleviate chilling stress in rice (Oryza sativa L.) by regulating antioxidative system and chilling response transcription factors. Molecules 2021, 26, 2196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  223. Harris, D.; Rashid, A.; Arif, M.; Yunas, M. Alleviating Micronutrient Deficiencies in Alkaline Soils of the North-West Frontier Province of Pakistan: On-Farm Seed Priming with Zinc in Wheat and Chickpea. In Micronutrients in South and South East Asia, International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development; Andersen, P., Tuladhar, J.K., Karki, K.B., Maskey, S.L., Eds.; International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD): Kathmundu, Nepal, 2005; pp. 143–151. [Google Scholar]
  224. Umair Hassan, M.; Aamer, M.; Umer Chattha, M.; Haiying, T.; Shahzad, B.; Barbanti, L.; Guoqin, H. The critical role of zinc in plants facing the drought stress. Agriculture 2020, 10, 396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Daneshbakhsh, B.; Khoshgoftarmanesh, A.H.; Shariatmadari, H.; Cakmak, I. Effect of zinc nutrition on salinity-induced oxidative damages in wheat genotypes differing in zinc deficiency tolerance. Acta Physiol. Plant 2013, 35, 881–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Sohrabi, Y.; Heidari, G.; Esmailpoor, B. Effect of salinity on growth and yield of Desi and Kabuli chickpea cultivars. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 2008, 11, 664–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  227. Ullah, A.; Farooq, M.; Rehman, A.; Hussain, M.; Siddique, K.H. Zinc nutrition in chickpea (Cicer arietinum): A review. Crop. Pasture Sci. 2020, 71, 199–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Banti, V.; Giuntoli, B.; Gonzali, S.; Loreti, E.; Magneschi, L.; Novi, G.; Paparelli, E.; Parlanti, S.; Pucciariello, C.; Santaniello, A.; et al. Low oxygen response mechanisms in green organisms. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 4734–4761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  229. Porwal, P.; Sonkar, S.; Singh, A.K. Plant Stress Enzymes Nanobiotechnology. In Nanobiotechnology; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 327–348. [Google Scholar]
  230. Kumar, P.; Tewari, R.K.; Sharma, P.N. Sodium nitroprusside-mediated alleviation of iron deficiency and modulation of antioxidant responses in maize plants. AoB Plants 2010, 2010, plq002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  231. Venugopalan, V.K.; Roy, A.; Vijayan, R.; Banerjee, P.; Verma, V.C.; Nalia, A.; Pramanik, M.; Mukherjee, B.; Ghosh, A.; Reja, M.; et al. Drought and heat stress in cool-season food legumes in sub-tropical regions: Consequences, adaptation, and mitigation strategies. Plants 2021, 10, 1038. [Google Scholar]
  232. Balk, J.; Pilon, M. Ancient and essential: The assembly of iron–sulfur clusters in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2011, 16, 218–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Khan, M.A.; Ansari, R.; Ali, H.; Gul, B.; Nielsen, B.L. Panicum turgidum, a potentially sustainable cattle feed alternative to maize for saline areas. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2009, 129, 542–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. Ghasemi, S.; Khoshgoftarmanesh, A.H.; Afyuni, M.; Hadadzadeh, H. Iron (II)–amino acid chelates alleviate salt-stress induced oxidative damages on tomato grown in nutrient solution culture. Sci. Hortic. 2014, 165, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Pourgholam, M.O.; Nemati, N.A.; Oveysi, M.E. Effect of zinc and iron under the influence of drought on yield and yield components of rapeseed (Brassica napus). Ann. Biol. Res. 2013, 4, 186–189. [Google Scholar]
  236. Kumari, V.V.; Banerjee, P.; Nath, R.; Sengupta, K.; Chandran, M.A.S.; Kumar, R. Effect of foliar spray on phenology and yield of Lentil sown on different dates. J. Crop. Weed 2019, 15, 54–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Kumari, V.V.; Nath, R.; Sengupta, K.; Banerjee, S.; Dutta, D.; Karmakar, S. Effect of date of sowing and foliar spray of micronutrients on growth, phenology, yield and seed quality of Lentil (Lens culinaris) in New Alluvial Zone of West Bengal. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 2021, 91, 573–576. [Google Scholar]
  238. Rotaru, V. The effect of phosphorus and iron on plant growth and nutrient status of two soybean (Glycine max L.) cultivars under suboptimal water regime of soil. Lucr. Stiintifice Supl. Agron. 2011, 54, 11–16. [Google Scholar]
  239. Baghizadeh, A.; Shahbazi, M. Effect of Zn and Fe foliar application on yield, yield components and some physiological traits of cumin (Cuminum cyminum) in dry farming. Int. J. Agron. Plant Prod. 2013, 4, 3231–3237. [Google Scholar]
  240. Afshar, R.M.; Hadi, H.; Pirzad, A. Effect of nano-iron on the yield and yield component of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) under end season water deficit. Int. J. Agric. Sci. 2013, 3, 27. [Google Scholar]
  241. Hasanpour, H.; Maali-Amir, R.; Zeinali, H. Effect of TiO2 nanoparticles on metabolic limitations to photosynthesis under cold in chickpea. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2015, 62, 779–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Atar, N.; Eren, T.; Yola, M.L.; Karimi-Maleh, H.; Demirdögen, B. Magnetic iron oxide and iron oxide@ gold nanoparticle anchored nitrogen and sulfur-functionalized reduced graphene oxide electrocatalyst for methanol oxidation. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 26402–26409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  243. Dufey, I.; Gheysens, S.; Ingabire, A.; Lutts, S.; Bertin, P. Silicon application in cultivated rices (Oryza sativa L and Oryza glaberrima Steud) alleviates iron toxicity symptoms through the reduction in iron concentration in the leaf tissue. J. Agron. Crop. Sci. 2014, 200, 132–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  244. Smethurst, C.F.; Garnett, T.; Shabala, S. Nutritional and chlorophyll fluorescence responses of lucerne (Medicago sativa) to waterlogging and subsequent recovery. Plant Soil. 2005, 270, 31–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  245. Syuhada, N.; Jahan, M.S.; Khandaker, M.M.; Nashriyah, M.; Khairi, M.; Nozulaidi, M.; Razali, M.B. Application of copper increased corn yield through enhancing physiological functions. Aust. J. Basic. Appl. Sci. 2014, 8, 282–286. [Google Scholar]
  246. Yamasaki, H.; Pilon, M.; Shikanai, T. How do plants respond to copper deficiency? Plant Signal. Behav. 2008, 3, 231–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  247. Pilon, M.; Abdel-Ghany, S.E.; Cohu, C.M.; Gogolin, K.A.; Ye, H. Copper cofactor delivery in plant cells. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2006, 9, 256–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  248. Kamat, J.P.; Boloor, K.K.; Devasagayam, T.P. Chlorophyllin as an effective antioxidant against membrane damage in vitro and ex vivo. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids. 2000, 1487, 113–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  249. Zhang, X.; Goatley, M.; Conner, J.; Wilkins, M.; Teshler, I.; Liu, J.; Fefer, M.; Ckurshumova, W. Copper chlorophyllin impacts on growth and drought stress tolerance of tomato plants. Hort. Sci. 2019, 54, 2195–2201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  250. Islam, M.T.; Ckurshumova, W.; Fefer, M.; Liu, J.; Uddin, W.; Rosa, C. A plant based modified biostimulant (copper chlorophyllin), mediates defence response in Arabidopsis thaliana under salinity stress. Plants 2021, 10, 625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  251. Hejazi, M.M.; Shariatmadari, H.; Khoshgoftarmanesh, A.H.; Dehghani, F. Copper effects on growth, lipid peroxidation, and total phenolic content of rosemary leaves under salinity stress. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2019, 54, 2195–2201. [Google Scholar]
  252. Jacobson, A.; Doxey, S.; Potter, M.; Adams, J.; Britt, D.; McManus, P.; McLean, J.; Anderson, A. Interactions between a plant probiotic and nanoparticles on plant responses related to drought tolerance. Ind. Biotechnol. 2018, 14, 148–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  253. Iqbal, S.; Waheed, Z.; Naseem, A. Nanotechnology and Abiotic Stresses. In Nanoagronomy; Javad, S., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 37–52. [Google Scholar]
  254. Sarma, B.; Devi, P.; Gogoi, N.; Devi, Y.M. Effects of cobalt induced stress on Triticum aestivum L. crop. Asian J. Agric. Biol. 2014, 2, 137–147. [Google Scholar]
  255. Gad, N.; El–Metwally, I.M. Chemical and physiological response of maize to salinity using cobalt supplement. Int. J. Chem. Tech. Res. 2015, 8, 45–52. [Google Scholar]
  256. Jayakumar, K.; Vijayarengan, P.; Chang-Xing, Z.; Jaleel, C.A. Soil applied cobalt alters the nodulation, leg-haemoglobin content and antioxidant status of Glycine max (L.) Merr. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2008, 67, 272–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  257. Jiang, C.; Zu, C.; Lu, D.; Zheng, Q.; Shen, J.; Wang, H.; Li, D. Effect of exogenous selenium supply on photosynthesis, Na+ accumulation and antioxidative capacity of maize (Zea mays L.) under salinity stress. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 42039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  258. Hasanuzzaman, M.; Hossain, M.A.; Fujita, M. Selenium-induced up-regulation of the antioxidant defence and methylglyoxal detoxification system reduces salinity-induced damage in rapeseed seedlings. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2011, 143, 1704–1721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  259. Marxen, A.; Klotzbücher, T.; Jahn, R. Interaction between silicon cycling and straw decomposition in a silicon deficient rice production system. Plant Soil. 2016, 398, 153–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  260. Gong, H.; Zhu, X.; Chen, K.; Wang, S.; Zhang, C. Silicon alleviates oxidative damage of wheat plants in pots under drought. Plant Sci. 2005, 169, 313–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  261. Gao, X.; Zou, C.; Wang, L.; Zhang, F. Silicon improves water use efficiency in maize plants. J. Plant Nutr. 2004, 27, 1457–1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  262. Abdel Latef, A.A.; Tran, L.S.P. Impacts of priming with silicon on the growth and tolerance of maize plants to alkaline stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  263. Hattori, T.; Inanaga, S.; Araki, H.; An, P.; Morita, S.; Luxova´, M.; Lux, A. Application of silicon enhanced drought tolerance in Sorghum bicolour. Physiol. Plant 2005, 123, 459–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  264. Iram, A.; Awan, T.H.; Tanveer, A.; Akbar, N.; Saleem, M.F.; Safdar, M.E. Optimization of cobalt and nitrogen for improving seed yield, protein content and nitrogen use efficiency in mungbean. J. Environ. Agric. 2017, 2, 173–179. [Google Scholar]
  265. Lwalaba, J.W.; Louisa, L.T.; Zvobgoa, G.; Richmonda, M.E.A.; Fua, L.; Naza, S.; Mwambaa, M.; Mundendeb, R.P.M.; Zhang, G. Physiological and molecular mechanisms of cobalt and copper interaction in causing phyto-toxicity to two barley genotypes difering in Co tolerance. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 187, 109866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  266. Awomi, T.A.; Singh, A.K.; Kumar, M.; Bordoloi, L.J. Effect of phosphorus, molybdenum and cobalt nutrition on yield and quality of mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) in acidic soil of Northeast India. Indian J. Hill Farm. 2012, 25, 22–26. [Google Scholar]
  267. Minz, A.; Sinha, A.K.; Kumar, R.; Kumar, B.; Deep, K.P.; Kumar, S.B. A Review on Importance of Cobalt in Crop Growth and Production. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2018, 7, 2978–2984. [Google Scholar]
  268. DalCorso, G.; Manara, A.; Piasentin, S.; Furini, A. Nutrient metal elements in plants. Metallomics 2014, 6, 1770–1788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  269. Arif, N.; Yadav, V.; Singh, S.; Singh, S.; Ahmad, P.; Mishra, R.K.; Sharma, S.; Tripathi, D.K.; Dubey, N.K.; Chauhan, D.K. Influence of High and Low Levels of Plant-Beneficial Heavy Metal Ions on Plant Growth and Development. Front. Environ. Sci. 2016, 4, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  270. Srivastava, S.; Shukla, A.K. Differential response of blackgram towards heavy metal stress. Environ. Pollut. Prot. 2016, 1, 89–96. [Google Scholar]
  271. Banerjee, P.B.; Hattacharya, P. Investigating cobalt in soil-plant-animal-human system: Dynamics, Impact and Management. J. Soil. Sci. Plant Nutr. 2021, 21, 2339–2354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  272. Jaleel, A.; Jayakumar, K.; Chang-Xing, Z.; Azooz, M.M. Antioxidant potentials protect Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek plants from soil cobalt stress and improve growth and pigment composition. Plant Omics 2009, 2, 120–126. [Google Scholar]
  273. El-Baz, E.E.T.; Lo’ay, A.A.; Ibrahium, E.G.; El-Deeb, M.R.I. Effect of cobalt and some vitamins as foliar application treatments on productivity and quality of williams banana cultivar. J. Plant Prod. 2016, 7, 777–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  274. Banerjee, P.; Mukherjee, B.; Venugopalan, V.K.; Nath, R.; Chandran, M.A.S.; Dessoky, E.S.; Ismail, I.A.; El-Hallous, E.I.; Hossain, A. Thermal response of spring–summer-grown blackgram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper) in Indian subtropics. Atmosphere 2021, 12, 1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  275. Gad, N.; Kandil, H. Influence of cobalt on phosphorus uptake, growth and yield of tomato. Agric. Biol. J. N. Am. 2010, 1, 1069–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  276. Kalavrouziotis, I.K.; Koukoulakis, P.H.; Manouris, G.; Papadopoulos, A.H. Interactions between cadmium, lead, cobalt, and nickel in broccoli, irrigated with treated municipal wastewater. Eur. Water 2009, 25, 13–23. [Google Scholar]
  277. Chmielowska-Bąk, J.; Lefèvre, I.; Lutts, S.; Kulik, A.; Deckert, J. Effect of cobalt chloride on soybean seedlings subjected to cadmium stress. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 2014, 83, 201–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  278. Mozafariyan, M.; Kamelmanesh, M.M.; Hawrylak-Nowak, B. Ameliorative effect of selenium on tomato plants grown under salinity stress. Arch. Agron. Soil. Sci. 2016, 62, 1368–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  279. Hasanuzzaman, M.; Fujita, M. Plant Oxidative Stress: Biology, Physiology and Mitigation. Plants 2022, 11, 1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  280. Hasanuzzaman, M.; Hossain, M.A.; Fujita, M. Selenium in higher plants: Physiological role, antioxidant metabolizm and abiotic stress tolerance. J. Plant Sci. 2010, 5, 354–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  281. Sieprawska, A.; Kornaś, A.; Filek, M. Involvement of selenium in protective mechanisms of plants under environmental stress conditions—Review. Acta Biol. Crac. Ser. Bot. 2015, 57, 9–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  282. Singhal, R.K.; Fahad, S.; Kumar, P.; Choyal, P.; Javed, T.; Jinger, D.; Prabha, S.; Debanjana, S.; Prathibha, M.D.; Bandana, B.; et al. Beneficial elements: New Players in improving nutrient use efficiency and abiotic stress tolerance. Plant Growth Regul. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  283. Hasanuzzaman, M.; Bhuyan, M.B.; Raza, A.; Hawrylak-Nowak, B.; Matraszek-Gawron, R.; Al Mahmud, J.; Nahar, K.; Fujita, M. Selenium in plants: Boon or bane? Environ. Exp. Bot. 2020, 178, 104170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  284. Feng, R.; Wei, C.; Tu, S. The roles of selenium in protecting plants against abiotic stresses. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2013, 87, 58–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  285. Kaur, N.; Sharma, S.; Kaur, S.; Nayyar, H. Selenium in agriculture: A nutrient or contaminant for crops? Arch. Agron. Soil. Sci. 2014, 60, 1593–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  286. Hartikainen, H.; Xue, T.; Piironen, V. Selenium as an anti-oxidant and pro-oxidant in ryegrass. Plant Soil. 2000, 225, 193–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  287. Djanaguiraman, M.; Shanker, A.K.; Sheeba, J.A.; Devi, D.D.; Bangarusamy, U. Selenium-An antioxidative protectant in soybean during senescence. Plant Soil. 2005, 272, 77–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  288. Del Pino, A.M.; Regni, L.; D’Amato, R.; Di Michele, A.; Proietti, P.; Palmerini, C.A. Persistence of the effects of Se-fertilization in olive trees over time, monitored with the cytosolic Ca2+ and with the germination of pollen. Plants 2021, 10, 2290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  289. Sarraf, M.; Vishwakarma, K.; Kumar, V.; Arif, N.; Das, S.; Johnson, R.; Janeeshma, E.; Puthur, J.T.; Aliniaeifard, S.; Chauhan, D.K.; et al. Metal/Metalloid-Based Nanomaterials for Plant Abiotic Stress Tolerance: An Overview of the Mechanisms. Plants 2022, 11, 316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  290. Shekari, F.; Abbasi, A.; Mustafavi, S.H. Effect of silicon and selenium on enzymatic changes and productivity of dill in saline condition. J. Saudi. Soc. Agric. Sci. 2017, 27, R713–R715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  291. Rahman, M.; Rahman, K.; Sathi, K.S.; Alam, M.M.; Nahar, K.; Fujita, M.; Hasanuzzaman, M. Supplemental selenium and boron mitigate salt-induced oxidative damages in Glycine max L. Plants 2021, 10, 2224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  292. Valadabadi, S.A.; Shiranirad, A.H.; Farahani, H.A. Ecophysiological influences of zeolite and selenium on water deficit stress tolerance in different rapeseed cultivars. J. Ecol. Nat. Environ. 2010, 2, 154–159. [Google Scholar]
  293. Habibi, G. Selenium ameliorates salinity stress in Petroselinum crispum by modulation of photosynthesis and by reducing shoot Na accumulation. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2015, 64, 368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  294. Germ, M.; Stibilj, V.; Kreft, I. Metabolic importance of selenium for plants. Eur. J. Plant Sci. Biotech. 2007, 1, 91–97. [Google Scholar]
  295. Hawrylak-Nowak, B.; Matraszek, R.; Szymanska, M. Selenium modifies the effect of short-term chilling stress on cucumber plants. Biol. Trace. Elem. Res. 2010, 138, 307–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  296. Hu, K.; Zhang, L.; Wang, J.; You, Y. Influence of selenium on growth, lipid peroxidation and antioxidative enzyme activity in melon (Cucumis melo L.) seedlings under salt stress. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 2013, 82, 193–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  297. Ribeiro, M.D.; Mapeli, A.M.; Antunes, W.C.; Barros, R.S. A dual role of selenium in the growth control of seedlings of Stylosanthes humilis. Agric. Sci. 2011, 2, 78–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  298. Xue, T.; Hartikainen, H.; Piironen, V. Antioxidative and growth-promoting effect of selenium on senescing lettuce. Plant Soil. 2001, 237, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  299. Djanaguiraman, M.; Nair, R.; Giraldo, J.P.; Prasad, P.V.V. Cerium oxide nanoparticles decrease drought-induced oxidative damage in sorghum leading to higher photosynthesis and grain yield. ACS Omega 2018, 3, 14406–14416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  300. Haghighi, M.; Abolghasemi, R.; da Silva, J.A.T. Low and high temperature stress affect the growth characteristics of tomato in hydroponic culture with Se and nano-Se amendment. Sci. Hortic. 2014, 178, 231–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  301. Yin, H.; Qi, Z.; Li, M.; Jalal, G.; Chu, X.; Zhou, J. Selenium forms and methods of application differentially modulate plant growth, photosynthesis, stress tolerance, selenium content and speciation in Oryza sativa L. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 169, 911–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  302. Nawaz, F.; Ahmad, R.; Ashraf, M.Y.; Waraich, E.A.; Khan, S.Z. Effect of selenium foliar spray on physiological and biochemical processes and chemical constituents of wheat under drought stress. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2015, 113, 191–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  303. Semida, W.M.; Abd El-Mageed, T.A.; Abdelkhalik, A.; Hemida, K.A.; Abdurrahman, H.A.; Howladar, S.M.; Leilah, A.A.A.; Rady, M.O.A. Selenium Modulates Antioxidant Activity, Osmoprotectants, and Photosynthetic Efficiency of Onion under Saline Soil Conditions. Agronomy 2021, 11, 855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  304. Kápolna, E.; Laursen, K.H.; Husted, S.; Larsen, E.H. Bio-fortification and isotopic labelling of Se metabolites in onions and carrots following foliar application of Se and 77 Se. Food Chem. 2012, 133, 650–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  305. Jó'zwiak, W.; Politycka, B. Effect of selenium on alleviating oxidative stress caused by a water deficit in cucumber roots. Plants 2019, 8, 217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  306. Ashraf, M.A.; Akbar, A.; Parveen, A.; Rasheed, R.; Hussain, I. Plant physiology and biochemistry phenological application of selenium differentially improves growth, oxidative defense and ion homeostasis in maize under salinity stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 123, 268–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  307. Banerjee, A.; Roychoudhury, A. Role of Beneficial Trace Elements in Salt Stress Tolerance of Plants. In Plant Nutrients and Abiotic Stress Tolerance; Hasanuzzaman, M., Fujita, M., Oku, H., Nahar, K., Hawrylak-Nowak, B., Eds.; Springer Nature Ltd.: Singapore, 2018; pp. 377–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  308. Desoky, E.M.; Abdel-Rahman, M.; Mohamed, F.; Abo, E.M.; Esayed, M.; Safaa, M.A.A.I.A.; Mohamed, F.A.; Mohamed, F.R.; Seham, A.I. Physiological and Biochemical Mechanisms of Exogenously Applied Selenium for Alleviating Destructive Impacts Induced by Salinity Stress in Bread Wheat. Agronomy 2021, 11, 926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  309. Hawrylak-Nowak, B. Beneficial effects of exogenous selenium in cucumber seedlings subjected to salt stress. Biol. Trace. Elem. Res. 2009, 132, 259–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  310. Liang, Y.; Sun, W.; Zhu, Y.G.; Christie, P. Mechanisms of silicon mediated alleviation of abiotic stresses in higher plants: A review. Environ. Pollut. 2007, 147, 422–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  311. Ali, N.; Réthoré, E.; Yvin, J.C.; Hosseini, S.A. The Regulatory Role of Silicon in Mitigating Plant Nutritional Stresses. Plants 2020, 9, 1779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  312. Mir, R.A.; Bhat, B.A.; Yousuf, H.; Islam, S.T.; Raza, A.; Rizvi, M.A.; Charagh, S.; Albaqami, M.; Sofi, P.A.; Zargar, S.M. Multidimensional Role of Silicon to Activate Resilient Plant Growth and to Mitigate Abiotic Stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 819658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  313. Balakhnina, T.; Borkowska, A. Effects of silicon on plant resistance to environmental stresses: A Review. Int. Agrophys 2013, 27, 225–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  314. Coskun, D.; Britto, D.T.; Huynh, W.Q.; Kronzucker, H.J. The role of silicon in higher plants under salinity and drought stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  315. Abdelaal, K.A.A.; Mazrou, Y.S.A.; Hafez, Y.M. Silicon foliar application mitigates salt stress in sweet pepper plants by enhancing water status, photosynthesis, antioxidant enzyme activity and fruit yield. Plants 2020, 9, 733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  316. Ahmed, M.; Fayyaz Ul, H.; Qadeer, U.; Aslam, M.A. Silicon application and drought tolerance mechanism of sorghum. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2011, 6, 594–607. [Google Scholar]
  317. Gagoonani, S.; Enteshari, S.; Delavar, K.; Behyar, M. Interactive effects of silicon and aluminum on the malondialdehyde (MDA), proline, protein and phenolic compounds in Borago officinalis L. J. Med. Plant Res. 2011, 5, 5818–5827. [Google Scholar]
  318. Ma, J.; Cai, H.; He, C.; Zhang, W.; Wang, L. A hemicellulose-bound form of silicon inhibits cadmium ion uptake in rice (Oryza sativa) cells. New Phytol. 2015, 206, 1063–1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  319. Guntzer, F.; Keller, C.; Meunier, J.D. Benefits of plant silicon for crops: A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2012, 32, 201–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  320. Liang, Y.; Nikolic, M.; Bélanger, R.; Gong, H.; Song, A. Silicon in Agriculture; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  321. Ma, J.F. Role of silicon in enhancing the resistance of plants to biotic and abiotic stresses. Soil. Sci. Plant Nutr. 2015, 50, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  322. Zhu, Y.; Gong, H. Beneficial effects of silicon on salt and drought tolerance in plants. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2014, 34, 455–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  323. Chen, W.; Yao, X.; Cai, K.; Chen, J. Silicon alleviates drought stress of rice plants by improving plant water status, photosynthesis and mineral nutrient absorption. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2011, 142, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  324. Wang, S.; Liu, P.; Chen, D.; Yin, L.; Li, H.; Deng, X. Silicon enhanced salt tolerance by improving the root water uptake and decreasing the ion toxicity in cucumber. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  325. Detmann, K.C.; Araújo, W.L.; Martins, S.C.V.; Sanglard, L.M.V.P.; Reis, J.V.; Detmann, E.; Rodrigues, F.Á.; Nunes-Nesi, A.; Fernie, A.R.; DaMatta, F.M. Silicon nutrition increases grain yield, which, in turn, exerts a feed-forward stimulation of photosynthetic rates via enhanced mesophyll conductance and alters primary metabolism in rice. New Phytol. 2012, 196, 752–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  326. Detmann, K.; Araújo, W.; Martins, S.; Fernie, A.R.; DaMatta, F. Metabolic alterations triggered by silicon nutrition: Is there a signaling role for silicon? Plant Signal. Behav. 2013, 8, e22523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  327. Zhu, Y.X.; Xu, X.B.; Hu, Y.H.; Han, W.H.; Yin, J.L.; Li, H.L.; Gong, H.J. Silicon improves salt tolerance by increasing root water uptake in Cucumis sativus L. Plant Cell Rep. 2015, 34, 1629–1646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  328. Sonobe, K.; Hattori, T.; An, P.; Tsuji, W.; Eneji, A.E.; Kobayashi, S.; Kawamura, Y.; Tanaka, K.; Inanaga, S. Effect of silicon application on sorghum root responses to water stress. J. Plant Nutr. 2010, 34, 71–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  329. Eshi, Y.; Ezhang, Y.; Ehan, W.; Efeng, R.; Ehu, Y.; Eguo, J.; Egong, H. Silicon enhances water stress tolerance by improving root hydraulic conductance in Solanum lycopersicum L. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  330. Al-Aghabary, K.; Zhu, Z.; Shi, Q.H. Influence of silicon supply on chlorophyll content, chlorophyll fluorescence, and antioxidative enzyme activities in tomato plants under salt stress. J. Plant Nutr. 2004, 27, 2101–2115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  331. Ahmed, M.; Qadeer, U.; Ahmed, Z.I.; Fayyaz-Ul, H. Improvement of wheat (Triticum aestivum) drought tolerance by seed priming with silicon. Arch. Acker Pflanzenbau Bodenkd. 2016, 62, 299–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  332. Banerjee, P.; Venugopalan, V.K.; Nath, R.; Chakraborty, P.K.; Gaber, A.; Alsanie, W.F.; Raafat, B.M.; Hossain, A. Seed priming and foliar application of nutrients influence the productivity of relay grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) through accelerating the photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) use efficiency. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  333. Pathak, J.; Ahmed, H.; Kumari, N.; Pandey, A.; Rajneesh Sinha, R. Role of Calcium and Potassium in Amelioration of Environmental Stress in Plants; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2020; pp. 535–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  334. Venugopalan, V.K.; Nath, R.; Sengupta, K.; Pal, A.K.; Banerjee, S.; Banerjee, P.; Chandran, M.A.S.; Roy, S.; Sharma, L.; Hossain, A.; et al. Foliar spray of micronutrients alleviates heat and moisture stress in lentil (Lens culinaris Medik) grown under rainfed field conditions. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 47743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  335. Dias, A.S.; Lido, F.C.; Ramalho, J.C. Heat stress in Triticum: Kinetics of Fe and Mn accumulation. Braz. J. Plant Physiol. 2009, 21, 153–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  336. Akeel, A.; Jahan, A. Role of cobalt in plants: Its stress and alleviation. In Contaminants in Agriculture; Naeem, M., Ansari, A., Gill, S., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Different abiotic stresses and their effects on plants.
Figure 1. Different abiotic stresses and their effects on plants.
Ijms 23 08519 g001
Figure 2. Activation of various plant mechanisms by application of primary nutrients to alleviate plant stress.
Figure 2. Activation of various plant mechanisms by application of primary nutrients to alleviate plant stress.
Ijms 23 08519 g002
Figure 3. Activation of various plant mechanisms by application of secondary nutrients to alleviate plant stress.
Figure 3. Activation of various plant mechanisms by application of secondary nutrients to alleviate plant stress.
Ijms 23 08519 g003
Figure 4. Activation of various plant mechanisms by application of micronutrients to alleviate plant stress.
Figure 4. Activation of various plant mechanisms by application of micronutrients to alleviate plant stress.
Ijms 23 08519 g004
Figure 5. Activation of various plant mechanisms by application of beneficial nutrients to alleviate plant stress.
Figure 5. Activation of various plant mechanisms by application of beneficial nutrients to alleviate plant stress.
Ijms 23 08519 g005
Table 1. Abiotic stresses and their effects on plant growth and activity.
Table 1. Abiotic stresses and their effects on plant growth and activity.
Abiotic StressEffects on PlantReferences
HeatCauses water scarcity, osmotic and oxidative stress that enhances ROS production, protein misfolding and denaturation. Foliar senescence and leaf discoloration, reduced CO2 fixation and disturbed ion transport.[14,15,16]
ChillingLeads to osmotic and oxidative stress, nutritional imbalance. Accumulation of ROS, inhibition of enzyme activities, and reduced photosynthetic activity.[17,18]
SalinityResponsible for water scarcity and ionic imbalance. Osmotic and oxidative stress that enhanced ROS production, restricted uptake and translocation of water and mineral nutrients, decreased stomata opening and reduced photosynthesis.[19,20]
Drought (Water deficit)Causes osmotic and oxidative stress. Increased ROS production and ion leakage. Decrease in absorption and translocation of mineral nutrients. Protein denaturation, loss of enzyme activities[21]
Flooding/water-loggingLeads to oxidative stress and increased ROS production. Reduced gaseous exchange and photosynthetic activity due to lower chlorophyll content.[22,23]
Light/radiationOxidative stress, increased ROS production and oxidative damage, reduced photosynthetic activity, and chlorophyll degradation.[24]
Table 2. Crop-wise effects of macronutrients applied under stress situations.
Table 2. Crop-wise effects of macronutrients applied under stress situations.
MacronutrientTested CropMechanisms Related to Stress AlleviationReferences
NRiceStrengthening root system, improved xylem transport,[30]
Wheatupregulated photosynthesis, chloroplast fluorescence, enzymatic functions, relative leaf water content, nutrients uptake, lower lipid peroxidation, improved antioxidant defence mechanism in terms of SOD and POX[31]
MaizeHigher leaf expansion, reduced Na uptake, delayed cell senescence, stomatal regulation[32]
RapeseedImproved plant water status, greater proline accumulation[33]
Forage pearl milletEscalated water use efficiency, profuse branching[34]
PWheatBetter root and shoot extension, carbohydrate transport, increased nutrients and water use efficiencies [35]
CottonImproved relative leaf water status[36]
Moth beanEnhanced nutrients uptake, root hydraulic conductance, modified root development, leaf moisture content[37]
KRiceBetter shoot development, greater synthesis of osmolytes[38]
WheatImproved antioxidant enzymatic functions[39]
OatAugmented nitrogen metabolism and antioxidant defence system[40]
Indian mustardHigher leaf area expansion, membrane stability, leaf water status, modified antioxidants activity regarding CAT, POX, APX, SOD[41]
CottonEnhanced photosynthetic mechanism, improved carbohydrate metabolism[42]
Table 3. Crop-wise effects of secondary nutrients applied under stress situations.
Table 3. Crop-wise effects of secondary nutrients applied under stress situations.
Secondary NutrientTested CropMechanisms Related to Stress AlleviationReferences
CaRiceImproved germination characters, shoot and root development, enhanced leaf chlorophyll and proline contents, oppression of ROS by stimulation of CAT and POX[127]
MaizeWater regulation at cellular level and root development[128]
Improved growth, osmotic relation and proline content, reduced H2O2 activity[129]
BarleyAlleviation of Al toxicity, ROS suppression and antioxidative enzymes[130]
SugarbeetExtensive leaf coverage, chlorophyll content, carbohydrate accumulation, reduced oxidative stress by escalating glutathione and free polyamine putrescine pools while reducing amino acid gamma-aminobutyric acid levels [131]
TobaccoAccelerated photosynthetic activity, stomatal conductance, improved thermostability of different oxygen-evolving complex and less accumulation of ROS [132]
MgRiceEfficient sugar partitioning, better root proliferation[133]
Wheat,Restricted ROS production, reduced peroxidative damage in leaf chloroplasts, improved antioxidative defence enzymes[134]
Maize
Broad beanIncreased activity of plasma membrane ion transporters, improved light-induced responses of leaf mesophyll[135]
MungbeanGreater synthesis of photosynthetic pigments, higher proline accumulation[136]
SRiceAlleviation of As toxicity through improved amino acids, proteome and thiol metabolisms [137]
Alleviation of Cd toxicity by means of increasing Fe plaque formation, Cd chelation and vacuolar sequestration[138]
BarleyReduction of salt accumulation, regulation of NO signalling and ion homeostasis [139]
Alleviation of Al toxicity through stimulation of ATPase activity and reducing oxidative stress[140]
Oilseed rapeImproved photosynthesis, nutrient uptake[141]
MustardEnhancing leaf ascorbate and glutathione levels, amelioration of Cd toxicity, [142]
Improved photosynthesis, salt tolerance through greater glutathione production[143]
Table 4. Crop-wise effects of micronutrients applied under stress situations.
Table 4. Crop-wise effects of micronutrients applied under stress situations.
MicronutrientsTested CropMechanism to Mitigate Abiotic StressReferences
BChickpeaIncreased antioxidative enzymes, such as SOD, CAT and APX[190]
CowpeaIncrease in SOD activity, photosynthesis, leaf chlorophyll content[191]
SunflowerIncrease in SOD activity, increases photosynthetic activity[192]
TomatoIncrease in SOD activity[192]
RiceIncrease in the enzymatic activity of APX, POD and CAT.[193]
PotatoIncrease in leaf proline, protein, carbohydrates and antioxidant enzymes such as polyphenol oxidase and peroxidase in tubers[194]
ZnMaizeHigher plant biomass, stomatal conductance and quantum yield of photosystem II. Improved grain yield, RWC and chlorophyll content under drought stress.[195,196]
WheatHigher chlorophyll content and activities of SOD, POD and CAT at grain filling stage, quantum yield of PS-II, chlorophyll content, stomatal conductance,[197,198]
ChickpeaCO2 assimilation rate, proline content and activities of SOD, APX. Increases chlorophyll and carotenoid contents, seedling vigor and seed yield. Reduces MDA contents[199,200]
Common beanHigher shoot biomass, chlorophyll and carotenoid contents, leaf NPK content Reduces MDA contents[201]
TomatoImproved stomatal aperture and chlorophyll content[202]
SunflowerHigher chlorophyll, proline contents and SOD activities[203]
FeRiceHigher water content, higher activity of hydrolytic enzymes amylase and protease, increased activity of SOD, CAT and glutathione peroxidase, increased cell membrane integrity, cell viability, chlorophyll and iron content, increased activity of NADPH dehydrogenase[204]
WheatIncreased root length, biomass growth and chlorophyll content, increased activity of peroxidases and SOD, decreased level of MDA[205]
SunflowerIncreased activity of antioxidant enzymes, superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, catalase and ascorbate peroxidase[206]
SoybeanEnhanced net photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, intercellular CO2 concentration, transpiration rate, increased shoot weight[207]
CuTomatoIncreased antioxidant activity, phenols, vitamin C, glutathione, and improved Na+/K+ ratio[208]
MaizeIncreased photosynthesis, water relation, osmotic adjustment, decreased membrane damage and lipid peroxidation, increase in RWC[209]
Table 5. Crop-wise effect of different beneficial nutrients applied under stress situations.
Table 5. Crop-wise effect of different beneficial nutrients applied under stress situations.
Beneficial Nutrients Tested CropMechanisms Related to Stress AlleviationReferences
CoWheatIncreased chlorophyll content, chlorophyll stability index and proline content[254]
MaizeEnhanced physiological efficiency[255]
Black gramImproved chlorophyll and carotenoid contents, proline and nitrate reductase contents, better cell membrane stability [116]
SoybeanEnhanced antioxidant activities[256]
SeMaizeAccelerated net photosynthetic rate, greater integrity in chloroplast ultrastructure [257]
RapeseedRejuvenation of entire antioxidant system in terms of APX, MDHAR, DHAR, GR, GST, GPX, CAT, and glyoxalase I and II, higher ROS scavenging, reduced membrane peroxidation and subsequent lower production of MDA[258]
SiRiceIncreased nutrients uptake, improved plant growth, yield, and quality [259]
WheatBetter regulation of antioxidant enzymes [260]
Maizeincreased water use efficiency, reduced leaf transpiration [261]
Enhanced leaf relative water content, concentrations of photosynthetic pigments, soluble sugars, soluble proteins, free amino acids, improved K/Na ratio by reducing, Na uptake[262]
Sorghum Higher water uptake, greater rate of assimilates transport [263]
Table 6. Nutrient interactions under abiotic stress.
Table 6. Nutrient interactions under abiotic stress.
Interacting NutrientsSynergistic EffectAntagonistic EffectReferences
N, P, K, B, CoIncreased growth rates, accelerated enzymatic activity, proline content and cell membrane stability-[116]
N, P, K, MoImproved growth, physiological efficiency, nutrients uptake and yield ameliorate heat and moisture stress-[332]
K and CaImproved physiological, biochemical and molecular mechanisms ameliorating drought, salinity and cold stress-[333]
Zn, B and SiIncreased plant height, shoot dry weight, number of stems per plant, leaf relative water content, leaf photosynthetic rate, leaf stomatal conductance, chlorophyll content, and tuber yield [194]
B, Fe, ZnImproved chlorophyll biosynthesis, photosynthetic rate, gaseous exchange regulation and osmoregulation to mitigate the abiotic stress in late sown lentil.Scavenge ROS, enhance antioxidant enzyme activity in chloroplast, maintain membrane integrity and decrease lipid peroxidation-[334]
Fe and MnImproved photosynthetic activity in plants ameliorating heat stress-[335]
Co with N/P/K/S/Zn/B/Mo/Ni/SnGreater uptake and utilisation of reserved and applied Co alleviating salinity, heat and moisture-[336]
Co with Ca/Mn/Fe/Cu/Cr/Cd-Immobilisation of available soil Co and thereby reduction in uptake of Co preventing heavy metal stress[271]
B, SeThe combined application was more effective enhancing the activity of MDHAR and GR under salt stress, combined spray enhanced the enzymatic activities (APX, MDHAR, DHAR, GR, CAT, GPX, GST, POD) under salt stress [291]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kumari, V.V.; Banerjee, P.; Verma, V.C.; Sukumaran, S.; Chandran, M.A.S.; Gopinath, K.A.; Venkatesh, G.; Yadav, S.K.; Singh, V.K.; Awasthi, N.K. Plant Nutrition: An Effective Way to Alleviate Abiotic Stress in Agricultural Crops. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 8519. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23158519

AMA Style

Kumari VV, Banerjee P, Verma VC, Sukumaran S, Chandran MAS, Gopinath KA, Venkatesh G, Yadav SK, Singh VK, Awasthi NK. Plant Nutrition: An Effective Way to Alleviate Abiotic Stress in Agricultural Crops. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(15):8519. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23158519

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kumari, Venugopalan Visha, Purabi Banerjee, Vivek Chandra Verma, Suvana Sukumaran, Malamal Alickal Sarath Chandran, Kodigal A. Gopinath, Govindarajan Venkatesh, Sushil Kumar Yadav, Vinod Kumar Singh, and Neeraj Kumar Awasthi. 2022. "Plant Nutrition: An Effective Way to Alleviate Abiotic Stress in Agricultural Crops" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 15: 8519. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23158519

APA Style

Kumari, V. V., Banerjee, P., Verma, V. C., Sukumaran, S., Chandran, M. A. S., Gopinath, K. A., Venkatesh, G., Yadav, S. K., Singh, V. K., & Awasthi, N. K. (2022). Plant Nutrition: An Effective Way to Alleviate Abiotic Stress in Agricultural Crops. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(15), 8519. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23158519

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop