Next Article in Journal
A2B Adenosine Receptor Enhances Chemoresistance of Glioblastoma Stem-Like Cells under Hypoxia: New Insights into MRP3 Transporter Function
Next Article in Special Issue
Comprehensive Steroid Assay with Non-Targeted Analysis Using Liquid Chromatography Ion Mobility Mass Spectrometry
Previous Article in Journal
The Chemerin/CMKLR1 Axis Is Involved in the Recruitment of Microglia to Aβ Deposition through p38 MAPK Pathway
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Association of Cholesterol Uptake and Synthesis with Histology and Genotype in Cortisol-Producing Adenoma (CPA)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Clinical Translationality of KCNJ5 Mutation in Aldosterone Producing Adenoma

by
Takumi Kitamoto
1,2,* and
Tetsuo Nishikawa
1,3
1
Endocrinology and Diabetes Center, Yokohama Rosai Hospital, Yokohama 2220036, Japan
2
Department of Endocrinology, Hematology and Gerontology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba 2608670, Japan
3
Nishikawa Clinic, Yokohama 2220033, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(16), 9042; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23169042
Submission received: 27 July 2022 / Revised: 9 August 2022 / Accepted: 10 August 2022 / Published: 12 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Advances in Aldosterone and Aldosterone Related Disorders)

Abstract

:
Hypertension due to primary aldosteronism poses a risk of severe cardiovascular complications compared to essential hypertension. The discovery of the KCNJ5 somatic mutation in aldosteroene producing adenoma (APA) in 2011 and the development of specific CYP11B2 antibodies in 2012 have greatly advanced our understanding of the pathophysiology of primary aldosteronism. In particular, the presence of CYP11B2-positive aldosterone-producing micronodules (APMs) in the adrenal glands of normotensive individuals and the presence of renin-independent aldosterone excess in normotensive subjects demonstrated the continuum of the pathogenesis of PA. Furthermore, among the aldosterone driver mutations which incur excessive aldosterone secretion, KCNJ5 was a major somatic mutation in APA, while CACNA1D is a leading somatic mutation in APMs and idiopathic hyperaldosteronism (IHA), suggesting a distinctive pathogenesis between APA and IHA. Although the functional detail of APMs has not been still uncovered, its impact on the pathogenesis of PA is gradually being revealed. In this review, we summarize the integrated findings regarding APA, APM or diffuse hyperplasia defined by novel CYP11B2, and aldosterone driver mutations. Following this, we discuss the clinical implications of KCNJ5 mutations to support better cardiovascular outcomes of primary aldosteronism.

1. Introduction

Hypertension is the leading risk factor for death and disability in the global population [1,2,3,4]. The treatment goal of hypertensive patients is to maintain a healthy life expectancy comparable to that of healthy individuals. To achieve it, we need to cure the disease and reduce the risk of cardiovascular complications as much as possible. In this regard, an appropriate classification of hypertension is necessary. Secondary hypertension should be screened for the patients showing following characteristics [5,6,7]: (1) onset of hypertension (<30 years), (2) abrupt onset of hypertension, (3) drug-resistant hypertension, (4) exacerbation of previously controlled hypertension, (5) suspicion of endocrine causes of hypertension or CKD, (6) clinical features suggestive of obstructive sleep apnoea, (7) unprovoked or excessive hypokalemia, (8) disproportionate targeted organ damage for degree of hypertension, (9) onset of diastolic hypertension in older adults (≥65 years). Primary aldosteronism (PA) is found in 5–7% of all hypertensive patients [8,9,10,11,12,13] and even explains 20% of patients with third-degree hypertension [14]. Despite its frequency, less than 1% of patients with PA undergo screening and progress to treatment throughout their lifetime [15,16,17,18,19,20]. One reason for the underdiagnosis may be that health care providers are not fully aware of the high frequency of PA in hypertensive patients. In addition, there is not sufficient consensus on the targets and methods of screening tests. In most of the institutions, patients to be screened are those with severe hypertension [21,22,23], i.e., in addition to the characteristics indicating secondary hypertension, (1) hypertension and spontaneous or diuretic-induced hypokalemia, (2) hypertension and adrenal incidentaloma, (3) atrial fibrillation in the absence of structural heart disease, (4) a family history of early onset hypertension or stroke at a young age (<40 years), (5) all hypertensive first-degree relatives of patients with PA. Others recommend screening for all hypertensive patients [24] from a cost-effectiveness perspective based on its high frequency [25,26] and the need for lifelong antihypertensive medication. With suspicions of PA at the first screening test evaluating plasma aldosterone levels and plasma renin activity, we should move to definitive diagnosis of PA, performing confirmatory tests (Figure 1). If the patient desires surgical treatment, subtype diagnosis should be considered, which requires adrenal venous sampling (AVS). However, AVS is available at limited institutions, therefore, efforts have been made to identify cases in which AVS can be bypassed and to determine the indications for surgery by CT scan [27,28,29,30]. It should be noted, however, that the results of CT imaging and AVS differ in 28–38% of cases [31,32]. Thus, AVS has been recommended for precise subtype diagnosis to date. In this review, we summarize integrated findings regarding new insight of pathophysiology of PA and discuss clinical transferability of the findings, particularly focusing on somatic KCNJ5 mutation. We searched MEDLINE for articles published 1 January 1955 to 1 June 2022, using the search terms “primary aldosteronism”, “Conn’s syndrome”, “hyperaldosteronism”, “adrenal vein sampling”, and “genetics”. We mainly focused on the publications in the past 5 years (1 June 2017, to 1 June 2022) in the English language, and selected relevant and highly referenced publications before this time.

2. Cardiovascular Outcome of Primary Aldosteronism

PA leads to abnormalities in the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and is known to increase the incidence of atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and stroke by 3.52, 2.05, and 2.58 times compared to hypertension due to essential hypertension [36,37,38,39]. Appropriate treatment for PA can greatly improve the prognosis of cardiovascular complications [38], and thus early diagnosis of PA and specific treatment for the condition are important. The etiology of PA is caused by two broad categories: aldosterone-producing adenomas (APA) and idiopathic hyper aldosteronism (IHA). In the former, the pathogenetic localization is clear, and surgical resection can be expected to cure the disease [40]. The frequency of APA and IHA has been reported to vary between primary care and referral centers [11,12,41], but it is difficult to determine the exact frequency. APA should be pathologically diagnosed by morphology and staining for CYP11B2 [42], an aldosterone-producing rate-limiting enzyme. However, surgical resection is only performed in cases who want to receive surgery and have been pre-surgically diagnosed with APA by adrenal venous sampling (AVS). IHA, on the other hand, is diagnosed by AVS and is usually treated with medication. We, therefore, cannot rule out the possibility of mixed misdiagnosis of APA in most cases. The frequency of APA and IHA diagnoses depends largely on the availability, procedure (e.g., usage of ACTH stimulation) and diagnostic criteria of AVS. Recently, tributary adrenal vein in addition to central adrenal vein sampling (a.k.a., segment selective AVS) has revealed that more than 10% of patients were elucidated as having APA, which could not be diagnosed by classic AVS evaluation of left-right difference [34]. Therefore, it is important to identify the localization of increased aldosterone synthesis within the adrenal gland to accurately diagnose APA, rather than simply looking at the right or left side of the adrenal gland. However, as a practical matter, the number of facilities where AVS is available is still far less than the expected number of patients with PA, and it is difficult to perform AVS on all patients with PA. Furthermore, publications reporting use of segment selective AVS are mostly from Japan [34,35,43,44]. Standardization and cost reduction of the AVS technique would give us precise etiology of APA and IHA. The data would help us to develop the diagnostic algorithm to predict the cases who require AVS.

3. Great Progress in Our Pathophysiological Understanding of PA

Along with the improvement of diagnostic techniques for PA, there have been remarkable advances in pathophysiological understanding of PA. One is the development of the specific CYP11B2 antibody, and the other is the findings of somatic mutations in APAs.
The corner stone of the specific monoclonal antibody against CYP11B2 was reported in 2014 [45,46]. CYP11B2 is the rate-limiting enzyme for aldosterone synthesis and the antibody was recently used for standardization for the nomenclature and criteria of the pathological diagnosis of surgical specimens of PA patients (HISTALDO) [42]. Classically, the diagnosis of aldosterone-producing adenoma and nodule was made morphologically by HE staining of the resected specimen (classic form). On the other hand, CYP11B2 staining has made it possible to diagnose multiple aldosterone-producing nodules or, less frequently, aldosterone-producing diffuse hyperplasia. In addition, this pathological diagnosis was reproducible among different pathologists (non-classic form). This standardization of the pathological diagnosis was built up by the incorporation of a functional aspect using CYP11B2 into the diagnosis, in parallel with the conventional morphological criteria. A prospective cohort study using these diagnostic concepts showed that non-classical multiple nodules were associated with more postoperative biochemical failures compared to patients diagnosed with a single macro lesion in its classic form represented by APA (33.3 vs. 2.4 (%)) [47]. The possibility that lesions with multiple nodules may be more prone to bilateral disease should be considered, although this is a matter of speculation due to the lack of pathological findings in the residual adrenal gland. Efforts should be made to make the preoperative diagnosis closer to the pathological diagnosis in order to take advantage of the finding that the two forms of classification would have different surgical implications for PA patients. The recently published segment selective AVS (sAVS) allows us to plot the distribution of the aldosterone secretory response within the adrenal gland [34]. In particular, when partial resection was performed for the cases that showed the local distribution of aldosterone in the adrenal gland coincided with the tumor, biochemical remission was achieved in all postoperative patients, and 97% of the cases showed the pathological diagnosis of APA. In the future, these improvements in AVS diagnostic techniques, coupled with standardization of pathology diagnosis, will provide useful insights to build appropriate treatment strategies for individual patients. To this end, prospective cohort studies with uniform diagnostic criteria, pathological evaluation, and posttreatment assessment are needed to establish the frequency of APA and multiple nodules, as well as appropriate diagnostic procedures.
In parallel with these findings, the discovery of the aldosterone driver mutation has greatly advanced our understanding of the pathogenesis of PA patients. The first step in this sequence was the memorable report published in 2011, describing a somatic mutation in the KCNJ5 gene encoding G protein-activated inward rectifier potassium channel 4 (GIRK-4) [48]. KCNJ5 mutation was identified in 36% of APA [48,49,50]. Following this discovery, somatic mutations in ATP2B3, ATP1A1 [51], and CACNA1D [52] were identified in 2013; although the frequency of KCNJ5 mutations in APA is higher in Eastern countries (59.5–76.8%) [53,54,55,56] than in Western countries (34–45%) [49,50,57,58,59], KCNJ5 mutations are similarly the most common mutation across the world. All of these mutations increase intracellular calcium concentrations, followed by activating CYP11B2 enzyme expression and increasing excess aldosterone biosynthesis. However, whether these mutations enhance cell proliferation has not been determined. Particularly, the proliferative effect seen in KCNJ5 was different due to KCNJ5 expression levels in the study using HAC15 [60], while another report using APAs did not show any evidence of proliferative effect of KCNJ5 mutation [61]. However, the evidence from germline KCNJ5 mutations suggested that KCNJ5 mutations promote proliferation to form hyperplasia in vivo [62,63]. A recent study using CYP11B2 immunohistochemistry-guided high-throughput sequencing rather than Sanger sequencing identified 95% of APAs as showing one of these somatic mutations, and more APAs with CACNA1D mutations among KCNJ5 wild-type APAs [64]. These mutations would play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of PA.

4. Pathological Insights into PA

CYP11B1 and CYCP11B2 play pivotal roles in the synthesis of adrenal corticosteroids, the former responsible for the synthesis of cortisol and corticosterone, and the latter for the synthesis of aldosterone [65]. The advent of CYP11B2 novel monoclonal antibodies has clarified the zonation of these synthesis enzymes in the normal adrenal gland [45,46]. Classically, the adrenal cortex is composed of three main zones, i.e., from the outermost layer, zona glomerulosa (ZG), to the zona fasciculata (ZF) and zona reticularis. Aldosterone and cortisol are produced by ZG and ZF cells, which have been shown by HE staining to be morphologically distinct: ZG cells are smaller, more compact, and have a smaller cytoplasm/nucleus ratio; ZF cells have a larger cytoplasm/nucleus ratio, with more fatty material and transparent appearance. Evaluation of the distribution of each synthase in the normal adrenal gland using specific CYP11B2 and B1 antibodies has shown that the distribution is different in young and elderly individuals [66,67,68]. In younger individuals, CYP11B2-positive cells are present throughout the ZG [67]; CYP11B1 was detected in both the ZF and zona reticularis. An unstained region is identified between the CYP11B2- and CYP11B1-positive cells that is not detected by either antibody. It is not clear whether this region comprises undifferentiated progenitor-like cells [69]. On the other hand, in the elderly, CYP11B2-positive cells are adjacent to the membrane and form a pattern of CYP11B2-immunopositive cell clusters with no CYP11B2 staining around them. Approximately half of the adrenals of normotensive individuals contain these regions, which have been designated as Aldosterone Producing Cell Clusters (APCCs) [66,67,68,70,71]. The nomenclature of APCC was changed to Aldosterone Producing Micronodules (APM) in the HISTALDO study [42]. The question of whether APMs have an autonomous aldosterone secretory capacity has been arisen. This is linked to the fact that the incidence of APMs correlates with the frequency of aldosterone-related hypertension [68,72]. Subsequent studies have shown that these APMs when found in adult human adrenal tissue with normal adrenal function also contain somatic mutations of the aldosterne driver mutation; mutations were identified in over 30% of APMs, most frequently in the CACNA1D mutation [64,66,71]. This was followed by ATP2B3, ATP1A1, and few KCNJ5 mutations. Interestingly, in case reports suggesting APM to APA transition, APM and micro APA were adjacent, with ATP1A1 and ATP2B3 mutations from the former and KCNJ5 mutations from the latter [73,74]. The research efforts have also extended to IHA cases. The study showed somatic mutations in CACNA1D are the cause of most IHA [75]. This is consistent with previous reports of image-negative PAs [76]. Interpretation is limited due to the small sample of surgically resected IHAs. However, their findings were much appreciated as supporting the concept of a continuum of pathophysiology from normotensive to hypertensive patients [77]. The different distribution of somatic mutations, with KCNJ5 mutations found specifically in APA and CACNA1D mutations in IHA, may contribute to the difference in clinical features between APA and IHA [41].
What is the pathological characteristics of APA harboring KCNJ5, and are they defined by the expression profile of steroidogenic enzymes? (See Figure 2a.) KCNJ5 mutated APAs are larger than other APAs; 60% are composed of lipid-laden clear ZF like cells and 40% are composed of compact ZG like cells [78]. Immunohistological studies on steroid synthase have shown that KCNJ5 mutated APAs are positive for CYP11B2 alone, co-expressing CYP11B2 and CYP17, and in a few cases, cells co-expressing CYP11B2, CYP11B1 and CYP17 [46,78,79]. On the other hand, APA with ATPA2B3 mutations tended to be dominated by compact ZG like cells, while APA with ATP1A1 and CACNA1D mutations showed heterogeneity from tumor to tumor with no clear advantage [55,78]. Very interestingly, the expression of CYP11B2 and CYP17A1, which are involved in aldosterone and cortisol synthesis, correlated positively in KCNJ5 mutant APAs, but negatively in ATP2B3 mutants [78]. The correlation between the two is not clear for ATP1A1 or CACNA1D. Inconsistent with this profile of steroidogenic enzymes, the normally negligible hybrid steroid, 18 oxocortisol (see the section “Development of prediction model for somatic KCNJ5 mutation in PA patinets”), is markedly increased in patients with APAs harboring KCNJ5 mutations. This increase has not been observed in patients with APAs harboring ATPase and CACNA1D mutations [64,80] (Figure 2a). This series of results has suggested that KCNJ5 mutations are associated with the formation of APA and that the pathogenetic process differs from that of ATPase and CACNA1D mutations. APAs harboring KCNJ5 mutations may have a more disorganized process of tumor cell differentiation and formation than APAs with ATPase or CACNA1D mutations. It has not been clear how the KCNJ5 mutation occurred in APAs. Considering the high prevalence of the KCNJ5 mutation in Asian populations, variant SNPs specific to Asian races or epigenetic changes might be derived from environmental situations, such as high salt intake, which might affect mutation frequency. An aldosterone synthesis pathway of the latter deviates from the zonation-based steroid synthesis. This may be reflected in the specific clinical features.

5. Clinical Implication of KCNJ5 Somatic Mutation in APA

The intriguing question regarding the discovery of the KCNJ5 mutation is whether it could change our treatment strategy. To begin with, when a definite diagnosis of APA is made, more than 95% of these patients are in biological remission [40]. Thus, resection of APA with or without mutation has been shown to improve patient prognosis. However, the clinical prognosis of patients with resection of unilateral lesions has been shown to vary widely, with 33–77% of hypertensive cases in remission [83,84,85,86]. Therefore, research is underway to determine which patients will achieve remission. Common predictors of hypertensive remission after surgery for unilateral PA patients [83,84,85,86] have included gender, body mass index (BMI), duration of hypertension, and number of antihypertensive drugs. When PA patients are treated appropriately with MRA, i.e., to a PRA > 1.0, their risk can be improved to that of patients with essential hypertension [38]. Thus, when PA is biochemically in remission after surgery without remission of hypertension, most patients are considered to have essential hypertension; the risk of cardiovascular events may only be reduced to the same level as that of PA cases whose plasma renin suppression is appropriately treated. Therefore, surgery should be performed as early as possible in patients who are difficult to manage with MRA, as well as in those who are supposed to be in remission (Figure 3). Clinical features of patients with KCNJ5 mutated APA have included younger age, higher plasma aldosterone levels, lower potassium, and having larger tumors than those with KCNJ5 wild APAs [48,49,50,57,59,87,88] (Figure 2a). In a retrospective cohort study scrutinizing more than 100 patients, cardiac hypertrophy, frequently seen in PA cases, was shown to improve significantly in those who harbored KCNJ5 mutated APAs after unilateral adrenalectomy compared to those with KCNJ5 wild APAs [89,90]. In addition, the KCNJ5 mutation was found as an independent remission factor. A subsequent large prospective cohort study using propensity score matching showed that surgery in the cases with APA harboring KCNJ5 mutation group significantly improved left ventricular hypertrophy compared to the KCNJ5 wild group [91]. Interestingly, in this study, when the outcome was left ventricular diastolic function, measured through a functional assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy, the benefit of adrenalectomy was seen only in the KCNJ5 mutant group and not in the KCNJ5 wild type group. Analysis has also been conducted using a retrospective cohort to evaluate the impact of the KCNJ5 mutation on the remission of hypertension. In each case, possession of the KCNJ5 mutation was found to be an independent factor for remission of postoperative hypertension [90,92]. Recently, however, a prospective cohort study analyzing 45 patients was reported, in which there was no difference in hypertension remission rate according to the presence or absence of KCNJ5 mutation [47]. This point should be tested in future prospective cohorts with sample sizes that allow propensity score matching for age, gender, body mass index, blood pressure, duration of hypertension, and number of hypertension medications. Long-term data that clarify the incidence of cardiovascular complications and risk of mortality are particularly desirable.

6. Development of Prediction Model for Somatic KCNJ5 Mutation in PA Patinets

While the clinical importance of KCNJ5 mutations is being revealed, the findings of aldosterone driver mutations have been still far from clinical application, as they can currently be diagnosed only with surgical specimens. Is it possible to predict KCNJ5 mutations preoperatively? Prediction strategies should include: (1) direct detection of tissue DNA of KCNJ5 mutant APAs that may be leaked into the blood (a.k.a., liquid biopsy), (2) search for new biomarkers characteristic of KCNJ5 mutant APAs, and (3) pattern recognition using known clinical features (e.g., machine learning method). Unfortunately, there have been no reports of successful liquid biopsy to detect KCNJ5 mutation in APA to date. As an example of a new biomarker discovery, steroid profiling has shown very promising potential for preoperative diagnosis [80,93,94,95]. Cortisol is synthesized by conversion of pregnenolone and progesterone to 17-hydroxypregnenolone and 17-hydroxyprogesterone by the CYP11B1 enzyme expressed in ZF. The 11-Deoxycortisol and cortisol produced by this pathway are then synthesized into the hybrid steroid 18-Oxocortisol and 18-hydroxycortisol by CYP11B2, which is normally expressed in ZG. These hybrid steroids are detected only in trace amounts in normal adrenal glands, where zonation is clearly distinguished. However, their blood levels are elevated in APA, especially in the presence of KCNJ5 mutations [80,93]. As mentioned earlier, in APA with KCNJ5 mutation, the expression of CYP11B2 and CYP17A1 is positively correlated, and although rare, cells co-expressing CYP11B1 have also been identified. The results may support these pathological features. Although there was wide variation, APAs with KCNJ5 mutations had up to 18-fold higher levels of aldosterone, 18-oxocortisol, 18-hydroxycortisol, and 11-deoxycorticosterone in the adrenal veins compared to APAs of the other genotypes [93]. In peripheral blood, 18-oxocortisol was elevated up to 18-fold. Using these characteristic results, the predictive model that was built allowed us to fractionate each mutation with 95% accuracy using adrenal venous blood, with KCNJ5 and CACNA1D being 100% accurate. Furthermore, combining this mass spectrometry-based plasma steroid profiling with machine learning enabled the diagnosis of the presence of primary aldosteronism and APA with KCNJ5 mutations with sensitivity of 69% and 85%, and specificity of 85% and 97%, respectively [95]. Steroid profiling may be useful for screening PA and detecting the cases with APA, especially harboring KCNJ5 mutations.
The development of mutant KCNJ5 channel blockers also has potential diagnostic tools as well as therapeutic utility. A reduction in aldosterone secretory responsiveness to therapy may predict KCNJ5 mutations when obtained. Candidate drugs include calcium antagonists and macrolide compounds that specifically inhibit mutant KCNJ5 channels and blockers of Na+-Ca++ transport proteins, such as the calcium blockers verapamil and amiloride [96,97,98,99,100]. Drug screening has also confirmed that macrolide compounds reduced aldosterone secretion from KCNJ5 mutant APA cells in vitro and ex vivo. However, results regarding the diagnostic application of PA in patients are pending [101].
Finally, as for establishing a prediction method based on pattern recognition using a clinical values commonly used in the PA diagnostic steps, although papers using machine learning for APA are beginning to be seen [30,102,103], there have been currently no significant results on the detection of KCNJ5-mutated APAs. However, several other clinical characteristics of APA patients with KCNJ5 mutations have been reported: younger age, female dominant, lower potassium level, higher aldosterone value, and large tumor size compared to KCNJ5 wild APA cases [48,49,50,57,58,59,87,88]. Compared to cases with APA harboring ATPase or CACNA1D mutation, KCNJ5 mutated APA cases showed less responsiveness to ACTH stimulation with higher basal value of plasma aldosterone [81]. This finding is consistent with the result of ex vivo study [55]. Conversely, when ACTH is suppressed by Dexamethazone, aldosterone secretions are found to be more suppressed in KCNJ5 mutated APA cases than in KCNJ5 wild type cases, resulting in no statistical difference in plasma aldosterone value between them [82]. These results suggest that APAs with KCNJ5 mutations have an increased sensitivity to ACTH signaling, which is constantly stimulated and raises basal aldosterone secretion (Figure 2b). On the other hand, responsiveness to the ATII system is not clear. In addition to basic clinical data, the combination of tests that manipulate the ATII system, such as the saline infusion or captopril challenge tests, and tests that stimulate ACTH signaling, such as the ACTH infusion or Dexamethazone suppression tests, may improve the predictive power of KCNJ5 mutations.
If these findings allow us presurgical diagnosis of KCNJ5 mutations in APA by pattern recognition of machine learning using new biomarkers or widely available clinical information, the treatment strategy for PA will change dramatically. Since KCNJ5 mutations are often identified in APA and we need to recognize APA location for surgical treatment, it is important to determine whether CT-recognizable tumors carry KCNJ5 mutations. If a visible tumor is predicted to have KCNJ5 mutation, adrenalectomy is recommended without AVS for the prevention of cardiovascular complications and better prognosis. If the tumor does not carry the KCNJ5 mutation, AVS should be recommended to those who receive surgical benefit. The surgical indication should be considered based on the patient’s current cardiovascular complications, risk of future cardiovascular disease, and response to MRA to manage blood pressure of PA. Otherwise, we can manage PA cases with MRA without further testing (Figure 3).

7. Conclusions

Elucidation of detailed pathophysiology and appropriate classification of PA are the fundamental to achieve individualized medicine for PA patients. In the past decade, the development of specific CYP11B2 antibodies and the discovery of the aldosterone driver mutations have largely progressed our understanding of primary aldosteronism. The pathological significance of KCNJ5 somatic mutation is also of great importance for understanding the origin of APA: the most frequent aldosterone driver mutation in APA is very rare in AMN, while CACNA1D is most common in AMN and diffuse hyperplasia. These results suggest the possibility that they may have different pathogenesis. A further question to be answered clinically is whether APAs with KCNJ5 mutations lead to more severe cardiovascular complications and shorter healthy life expectancy compared to those with KCNJ5 wild type. The answer would determine if it is worthwhile making predictions before surgery to provide individualized treatment. The studies obtained to date have indicated a more effective surgical approach for KCNJ5 mutated APA patients, but the long-term therapeutic benefit is not clear. Prospective cohort or randomized control studies are expected to provide evidence for targeted treatment of APAs harboring KCNJ5 mutations.

Author Contributions

T.K. designed the study, analyzed the results, and wrote the manuscript. T.N. oversaw the research and wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Grant for Research on Intractable Diseases provided by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank all the medical staff in the endocrinology department of Yokohama Rosai hospital.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

AVSAdrenal Venous Sampling
PAPrimary Aldosteronism
sAVSSegmental selective AVS
IHAIdiopathic hyperaldosteronism
cAVSCentral AVS
APAAldosterone-producing adenoma

References

  1. Gilmour, S.; Liao, Y.; Bilano, V.; Shibuya, K. Burden of disease in Japan: Using national and subnational data to inform local health policy. J. Prev. Med. Public Health 2014, 47, 136–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Mills, K.T.; Bundy, J.D.; Kelly, T.N.; Reed, J.E.; Kearney, P.M.; Reynolds, K.; Chen, J.; He, J. Global Disparities of Hypertension Prevalence and Control: A Systematic Analysis of Population-Based Studies From 90 Countries. Circulation 2016, 134, 441–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. GBD 2017 Risk Factor Collaborators. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 2018, 392, 1923–1994. [Google Scholar]
  4. Sakaue, S.; Gen, F.; Kanai, M.; Karjalainen, J.; Akiyama, M.; Kurki, M.; Matoba, N.; Takahashi, A.; Hirata, M.; Kubo, M.; et al. Trans-biobank analysis with 676,000 individuals elucidates the association of polygenic risk scores of complex traits with human lifespan. Nat. Med. 2020, 26, 542–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Whelton, P.K.; Carey, R.M.; Aronow, W.S.; Casey, D.E.; Collins, K.J.; Dennison Himmelfarb, C.; DePalma, S.M.; Gidding, S.; Jamerson, K.A.; Jones, D.W.; et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Hypertension 2018, 71, e13–e115. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  6. Williams, B.; Mancia, G.; Spiering, W.; Agabiti Rosei, E.; Azizi, M.; Burnier, M.; Clement, D.L.; Coca, A.; de Simone, G.; Dominiczak, A.; et al. 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Eur. Heart J. 2018, 39, 3021–3104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Umemura, S.; Arima, H.; Arima, S.; Asayama, K.; Dohi, Y.; Hirooka, Y.; Horio, T.; Hoshide, S.; Ikeda, S.; Ishimitsu, T.; et al. The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension (JSH 2019). Hypertens. Res. 2019, 42, 1235–1481. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Gordon, R.D.; Ziesak, M.D.; Tunny, T.J.; Stowasser, M.; Klemm, S.A. Evidence that primary aldosteronism may not be uncommon: 12% incidence among antihypertensive drug trial volunteers. Clin. Exp. Pharm. Physiol. 1993, 20, 296–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Rossi, G.P.; Sacchetto, A.; Chiesura-Corona, M.; De Toni, R.; Gallina, M.; Feltrin, G.P.; Pessina, A.C. Identification of the etiology of primary aldosteronism with adrenal vein sampling in patients with equivocal computed tomography and magnetic resonance findings: Results in 104 consecutive cases. J. Clin. Endocrinol Metab. 2001, 86, 1083–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Omura, M.; Saito, J.; Yamaguchi, K.; Kakuta, Y.; Nishikawa, T. Prospective study on the prevalence of secondary hypertension among hypertensive patients visiting a general outpatient clinic in Japan. Hypertens. Res. 2004, 27, 193–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Rossi, G.P.; Bernini, G.; Caliumi, C.; Desideri, G.; Fabris, B.; Ferri, C.; Ganzaroli, C.; Giacchetti, G.; Letizia, C.; Maccario, M.; et al. A prospective study of the prevalence of primary aldosteronism in 1,125 hypertensive patients. J. Am. Coll Cardiol. 2006, 48, 2293–2300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Monticone, S.; Burrello, J.; Tizzani, D.; Bertello, C.; Viola, A.; Buffolo, F.; Gabetti, L.; Mengozzi, G.; Williams, T.A.; Rabbia, F.; et al. Prevalence and Clinical Manifestations of Primary Aldosteronism Encountered in Primary Care Practice. J. Am. Coll Cardiol. 2017, 69, 1811–1820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Karashima, S.; Kometani, M.; Tsujiguchi, H.; Asakura, H.; Nakano, S.; Usukura, M.; Mori, S.; Ohe, M.; Sawamura, T.; Okuda, R.; et al. Prevalence of primary aldosteronism without hypertension in the general population: Results in Shika study. Clin. Exp. Hypertens. 2018, 40, 118–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Brown, J.M.; Siddiqui, M.; Calhoun, D.A.; Carey, R.M.; Hopkins, P.N.; Williams, G.H.; Vaidya, A. The Unrecognized Prevalence of Primary Aldosteronism: A Cross-sectional Study. Ann. Intern. Med. 2020, 173, 10–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Funder, J.W. Primary aldosteronism as a public health issue. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016, 4, 972–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mulatero, P.; Monticone, S.; Burrello, J.; Veglio, F.; Williams, T.A.; Funder, J. Guidelines for primary aldosteronism: Uptake by primary care physicians in Europe. J. Hypertens. 2016, 34, 2253–2257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jaffe, G.; Gray, Z.; Krishnan, G.; Stedman, M.; Zheng, Y.; Han, J.; Chertow, G.M.; Leppert, J.T.; Bhalla, V. Screening Rates for Primary Aldosteronism in Resistant Hypertension. Hypertension 2020, 75, 650–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cohen, J.B.; Cohen, D.L.; Herman, D.S.; Leppert, J.T.; Byrd, J.B.; Bhalla, V. Testing for primary aldosteronism and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist use among US veterans: A retrospective cohort study. Ann. Intern. Med. 2021, 174, 289–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gkaniatsa, E.; Ekerstad, E.; Gavric, M.; Muth, A.; Trimpou, P.; Olsson, D.S.; Johannsson, G.; Ragnarsson, O. Increasing Incidence of Primary Aldosteronism in Western Sweden During 3 Decades-Yet An Underdiagnosed Disorder. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2021, 106, e3603–e3610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, Y.-Y.; King, J.; Kline, G.A.; Padwal, R.S.; Pasieka, J.L.; Chen, G.; So, B.; Harvey, A.; Chin, A.; Leung, A.A. Outcomes of a Specialized Clinic on Rates of Investigation and Treatment of Primary Aldosteronism. JAMA Surg. 2021, 156, 541–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Funder, J.W.; Carey, R.M.; Mantero, F.; Murad, M.H.; Reincke, M.; Shibata, H.; Stowasser, M.; Young, W.F. The Management of Primary Aldosteronism: Case Detection, Diagnosis, and Treatment: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2016, 101, 1889–1916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Mulatero, P.; Monticone, S.; Deinum, J.; Amar, L.; Prejbisz, A.; Zennaro, M.C.; Beuschlein, F.; Rossi, G.P.; Nishikawa, T.; Morganti, A.; et al. Genetics, prevalence, screening and confirmation of primary aldosteronism: A position statement and consensus of the Working Group on Endocrine Hypertension of The European Society of Hypertension. J. Hypertens. 2020, 38, 1919–1928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Rossi, G.P.; Bisogni, V.; Bacca, A.V.; Belfiore, A.; Cesari, M.; Concistrè, A.; Del Pinto, R.; Fabris, B.; Fallo, F.; Fava, C.; et al. The 2020 Italian Society of Arterial Hypertension (SIIA) practical guidelines for the management of primary aldosteronism. Int. J. Cardiol. Hypertens. 2020, 5, 100029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Naruse, M.; Katabami, T.; Shibata, H.; Sone, M.; Takahashi, K.; Tanabe, A.; Izawa, S.; Ichijo, T.; Otsuki, M.; Omura, M.; et al. Japan Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and management of primary aldosteronism 2021. Endocr. J. 2022, 69, 327–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lubitz, C.C.; Economopoulos, K.P.; Sy, S.; Johanson, C.; Kunzel, H.E.; Reincke, M.; Gazelle, G.S.; Weinstein, M.C.; Gaziano, T.A. Cost-Effectiveness of Screening for Primary Aldosteronism and Subtype Diagnosis in the Resistant Hypertensive Patients. Circ. Cardiovasc. Qual. Outcomes 2015, 8, 621–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sato, M.; Morimoto, R.; Seiji, K.; Iwakura, Y.; Ono, Y.; Kudo, M.; Satoh, F.; Ito, S.; Ishibashi, T.; Takase, K. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Diagnosis and Treatment of Primary Aldosteronism in Japan. Horm. Metab. Res. 2015, 47, 826–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Nanba, K.; Tsuiki, M.; Nakao, K.; Nanba, A.; Usui, T.; Tagami, T.; Hirokawa, Y.; Okuno, H.; Suzuki, T.; Shimbo, T.; et al. A subtype prediction score for primary aldosteronism. J. Hum. Hypertens. 2014, 28, 716–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kocjan, T.; Janez, A.; Stankovic, M.; Vidmar, G.; Jensterle, M. A New Clinical Prediction Criterion Accurately Determines A Subset of Patients with Bilateral Primary Aldosteronism Before Adrenal Venous Sampling. Endocr. Pract. 2016, 22, 587–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kamemura, K.; Wada, N.; Ichijo, T.; Matsuda, Y.; Fujii, Y.; Kai, T.; Fukuoka, T.; Sakamoto, R.; Ogo, A.; Suzuki, T.; et al. Significance of adrenal computed tomography in predicting laterality and indicating adrenal vein sampling in primary aldosteronism. J. Hum. Hypertens. 2017, 31, 195–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Burrello, J.; Burrello, A.; Pieroni, J.; Sconfienza, E.; Forestiero, V.; Rabbia, P.; Adolf, C.; Reincke, M.; Veglio, F.; Williams, T.A.; et al. Development and Validation of Prediction Models for Subtype Diagnosis of Patients With Primary Aldosteronism. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2020, 105, e3706–e3717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kempers, M.J.; Lenders, J.W.; Van Outheusden, L.; van der Wilt, G.J.; Kool, L.J.S.; Hermus, A.R.; Deinum, J. Systematic review: Diagnostic procedures to differentiate unilateral from bilateral adrenal abnormality in primary aldosteronism. Ann. Intern. Med. 2009, 151, 329–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Rossi, G.P.; Crimì, F.; Rossitto, G.; Amar, L.; Azizi, M.; Riester, A.; Reincke, M.; Degenhart, C.; Widimsky, J.; Naruse, M.; et al. Identification of Surgically Curable Primary Aldosteronism by Imaging in a Large, Multiethnic International Study. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2021, 106, e4340–e4349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Wu, V.-C.; Hu, Y.-H.; Er, L.K.; Yen, R.-F.; Chang, C.-H.; Chang, Y.-L.; Lu, C.-C.; Chang, C.-C.; Lin, J.-H.; Lin, Y.-H.; et al. Case detection and diagnosis of primary aldosteronism-The consensus of Taiwan Society of Aldosteronism. J. Formos. Med. Assoc. 2017, 116, 993–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kitamoto, T.; Kitamoto, K.K.; Omura, M.; Takiguchi, T.; Tsurutani, Y.; Kubo, H.; Yamazaki, Y.; Sasano, H.; Saito, J.; Nishikawa, T. Precise Mapping of Intra-Adrenal Aldosterone Activities Provides a Novel Surgical Strategy for Primary Aldosteronism. Hypertension 2020, 76, 976–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Satoh, F.; Morimoto, R.; Seiji, K.; Satani, N.; Ota, H.; Iwakura, Y.; Ono, Y.; Kudo, M.; Nezu, M.; Omata, K.; et al. Is there a role for segmental adrenal venous sampling and adrenal sparing surgery in patients with primary aldosteronism? Eur J. Endocrinol. 2015, 173, 465–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Milliez, P.; Girerd, X.; Plouin, P.F.; Blacher, J.; Safar, M.E.; Mourad, J.J. Evidence for an increased rate of cardiovascular events in patients with primary aldosteronism. J. Am. Coll Cardiol. 2005, 45, 1243–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Catena, C.; Colussi, G.; Nadalini, E.; Chiuch, A.; Baroselli, S.; Lapenna, R.; Sechi, L.A. Cardiovascular outcomes in patients with primary aldosteronism after treatment. Arch. Intern. Med. 2008, 168, 80–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hundemer, G.L.; Curhan, G.C.; Yozamp, N.; Wang, M.; Vaidya, A. Cardiometabolic outcomes and mortality in medically treated primary aldosteronism: A retrospective cohort study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018, 6, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Monticone, S.; D’Ascenzo, F.; Moretti, C.; Williams, T.A.; Veglio, F.; Gaita, F.; Mulatero, P. Cardiovascular events and target organ damage in primary aldosteronism compared with essential hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018, 6, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Williams, T.A.; Lenders, J.W.M.; Mulatero, P.; Burrello, J.; Rottenkolber, M.; Adolf, C.; Satoh, F.; Amar, L.; Quinkler, M.; Deinum, J.; et al. Outcomes after adrenalectomy for unilateral primary aldosteronism: An international consensus on outcome measures and analysis of remission rates in an international cohort. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017, 5, 689–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Omura, M.; Sasano, H.; Saito, J.; Yamaguchi, K.; Kakuta, Y.; Nishikawa, T. Clinical characteristics of aldosterone-producing microadenoma, macroadenoma, and idiopathic hyperaldosteronism in 93 patients with primary aldosteronism. Hypertens. Res. 2006, 29, 883–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Williams, T.A.; Gomez-Sanchez, C.E.; Rainey, W.E.; Giordano, T.J.; Lam, A.K.; Marker, A.; Mete, O.; Yamazaki, Y.; Zerbini, M.C.N.; Beuschlein, F.; et al. International Histopathology Consensus for Unilateral Primary Aldosteronism. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2021, 106, 42–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Satani, N.; Ota, H.; Seiji, K.; Morimoto, R.; Kudo, M.; Iwakura, Y.; Ono, Y.; Nezu, M.; Omata, K.; Ito, S.; et al. Intra-adrenal Aldosterone Secretion: Segmental Adrenal Venous Sampling for Localization. Radiology 2016, 278, 265–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Makita, K.; Nishimoto, K.; Kiriyama-Kitamoto, K.; Karashima, S.; Seki, T.; Yasuda, M.; Matsui, S.; Omura, M.; Nishikawa, T. A Novel Method: Super-selective Adrenal Venous Sampling. J. Vis. Exp. 2017, 127, e55716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Gomez-Sanchez, C.E.; Qi, X.; Velarde-Miranda, C.; Plonczynski, M.W.; Parker, C.R.; Rainey, W.; Satoh, F.; Maekawa, T.; Nakamura, Y.; Sasano, H.; et al. Development of monoclonal antibodies against human CYP11B1 and CYP11B2. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2014, 383, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Nakamura, Y.; Maekawa, T.; Felizola, S.J.; Satoh, F.; Qi, X.; Velarde-Miranda, C.; Plonczynski, M.W.; Ise, K.; Kikuchi, K.; Rainey, W.E.; et al. Adrenal CYP11B1/2 expression in primary aldosteronism: Immunohistochemical analysis using novel monoclonal antibodies. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2014, 392, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Meyer, L.S.; Handgriff, L.; Lim, J.S.; Udager, A.M.; Kinker, I.-S.; Ladurner, R.; Wildgruber, M.; Knösel, T.; Bidlingmaier, M.; Rainey, W.E.; et al. Single-Center Prospective Cohort Study on the Histopathology, Genotype, and Postsurgical Outcomes of Patients With Primary Aldosteronism. Hypertension 2021, 78, 738–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Choi, M.; Scholl, U.I.; Yue, P.; Björklund, P.; Zhao, B.; Nelson-Williams, C.; Ji, W.; Cho, Y.; Patel, A.; Men, C.J.; et al. K+ channel mutations in adrenal aldosterone-producing adenomas and hereditary hypertension. Science 2011, 331, 768–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Åkerström, T.; Crona, J.; Verdugo, A.D.; Starker, L.F.; Cupisti, K.; Willenberg, H.S.; Knoefel, W.T.; Saeger, W.; Feller, A.; Ip, J.; et al. Comprehensive re-sequencing of adrenal aldosterone producing lesions reveal three somatic mutations near the KCNJ5 potassium channel selectivity filter. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e41926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Azizan, E.A.; Murthy, M.; Stowasser, M.; Gordon, R.; Kowalski, B.; Xu, S.; Brown, M.J.; O’Shaughnessy, K.M. Somatic mutations affecting the selectivity filter of KCNJ5 are frequent in 2 large unselected collections of adrenal aldosteronomas. Hypertension 2012, 59, 587–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Beuschlein, F.; Boulkroun, S.; Osswald, A.; Wieland, T.; Nielsen, H.N.; Lichtenauer, U.D.; Penton, D.; Schack, V.R.; Amar, L.; Fischer, E.; et al. Somatic mutations in ATP1A1 and ATP2B3 lead to aldosterone-producing adenomas and secondary hypertension. Nat. Genet. 2013, 45, 440–444, 444e1.1–444e.2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Scholl, U.I.; Goh, G.; Stolting, G.; De Oliveira, R.C.; Choi, M.; Overton, J.D.; Fonseca, A.L.; Korah, R.; Starker, L.F.; Kunstman, J.; et al. Somatic and germline CACNA1D calcium channel mutations in aldosterone-producing adenomas and primary aldosteronism. Nat. Genet. 2013, 45, 1050–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wu, V.-C.; Huang, K.-H.; Peng, K.-Y.; Tsai, Y.-C.; Wu, C.-H.; Wang, S.-M.; Yang, S.-Y.; Lin, L.-Y.; Chang, C.-C.; Lin, Y.-H.; et al. Prevalence and clinical correlates of somatic mutation in aldosterone producing adenoma-Taiwanese population. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 11396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Zheng, F.-F.; Zhu, L.-M.; Nie, A.-F.; Li, X.-Y.; Lin, J.-R.; Zhang, K.; Chen, J.; Zhou, W.-L.; Shen, Z.-J.; Zhu, Y.-C.; et al. Clinical characteristics of somatic mutations in Chinese patients with aldosterone-producing adenoma. Hypertension 2015, 65, 622–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kitamoto, T.; Suematsu, S.; Yamazaki, Y.; Nakamura, Y.; Sasano, H.; Matsuzawa, Y.; Saito, J.; Omura, M.; Nishikawa, T. Clinical and Steroidogenic Characteristics of Aldosterone-Producing Adenomas With ATPase or CACNA1D Gene Mutations. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2016, 101, 494–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Nanba, K.; Yamazaki, Y.; Bick, N.; Onodera, K.; Tezuka, Y.; Omata, K.; Ono, Y.; Blinder, A.R.; Tomlins, S.A.; Rainey, W.E.; et al. Prevalence of Somatic Mutations in Aldosterone-Producing Adenomas in Japanese Patients. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2020, 105, e4066–e4073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Boulkroun, S.; Beuschlein, F.; Rossi, G.P.; Golib-Dzib, J.F.; Fischer, E.; Amar, L.; Mulatero, P.; Samson-Couterie, B.; Hahner, S.; Quinkler, M.; et al. Prevalence, clinical, and molecular correlates of KCNJ5 mutations in primary aldosteronism. Hypertension 2012, 59, 592–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Williams, T.A.; Monticone, S.; Schack, V.R.; Stindl, J.; Burrello, J.; Buffolo, F.; Annaratone, L.; Castellano, I.; Beuschlein, F.; Reincke, M.; et al. Somatic ATP1A1, ATP2B3, and KCNJ5 mutations in aldosterone-producing adenomas. Hypertension 2014, 63, 188–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Lenzini, L.; Rossitto, G.; Maiolino, G.; Letizia, C.; Funder, J.W.; Rossi, G.P. A Meta-Analysis of Somatic KCNJ5 K(+) Channel Mutations In 1636 Patients With an Aldosterone-Producing Adenoma. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2015, 100, E1089–E1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Yang, Y.; Gomez-Sanchez, C.E.; Jaquin, D.; Aristizabal Prada, E.T.; Meyer, L.S.; Knösel, T.; Schneider, H.; Beuschlein, F.; Reincke, M.; Williams, T.A. Primary Aldosteronism: KCNJ5 Mutations and Adrenocortical Cell Growth. Hypertension 2019, 74, 809–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Lerario, A.M.; Nanba, K.; Blinder, A.R.; Suematsu, S.; Omura, M.; Nishikawa, T.; Giordano, T.J.; Rainey, W.E.; Else, T. Genetics of aldosterone-producing adenomas with pathogenic KCNJ5 variants. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 2019, 26, 463. [Google Scholar]
  62. Tamura, A.; Nishimoto, K.; Seki, T.; Matsuzawa, Y.; Saito, J.; Omura, M.; Gomez-Sanchez, C.E.; Makita, K.; Matsui, S.; Moriya, N.; et al. Somatic KCNJ5 mutation occurring early in adrenal development may cause a novel form of juvenile primary aldosteronism. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2017, 441, 134–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Maria, A.G.; Suzuki, M.; Berthon, A.; Kamilaris, C.; Demidowich, A.; Lack, J.; Zilbermint, M.; Hannah-Shmouni, F.; Faucz, F.R.; A Stratakis, C. Mosaicism for KCNJ5 Causing Early-Onset Primary Aldosteronism due to Bilateral Adrenocortical Hyperplasia. Am. J. Hypertens. 2020, 33, 124–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. De Sousa, K.; Boulkroun, S.; Baron, S.; Nanba, K.; Wack, M.; Rainey, W.E.; Rocha, A.; Giscos-Douriez, I.; Meatchi, T.; Amar, L.; et al. Genetic, Cellular, and Molecular Heterogeneity in Adrenals with Aldosterone-Producing Adenoma. Hypertension 2020, 75, 1034–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Spat, A.; Hunyady, L. Control of aldosterone secretion: A model for convergence in cellular signaling pathways. Physiol. Rev. 2004, 84, 489–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Nishimoto, K.; Tomlins, S.A.; Kuick, R.; Cani, A.K.; Giordano, T.J.; Hovelson, D.H.; Liu, C.-J.; Sanjanwala, A.R.; Edwards, M.A.; Gomez-Sanchez, C.E.; et al. Aldosterone-stimulating somatic gene mutations are common in normal adrenal glands. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, E4591–E4599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Nishimoto, K.; Seki, T.; Hayashi, Y.; Mikami, S.; Al-Eyd, G.; Nakagawa, K.; Morita, S.; Kosaka, T.; Oya, M.; Mitani, F.; et al. Human Adrenocortical Remodeling Leading to Aldosterone-Producing Cell Cluster Generation. Int. J. Endocrinol. 2016, 2016, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Nanba, K.; Vaidya, A.; Williams, G.H.; Zheng, I.; Else, T.; Rainey, W.E. Age-Related Autonomous Aldosteronism. Circulation 2017, 136, 347–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Gomez-Sanchez, C.E.; Gomez-Sanchez, E.P.; Nishimoto, K. Immunohistochemistry of the Human Adrenal CYP11B2 in Normal Individuals and in Patients with Primary Aldosteronism. Horm. Metab. Res. 2020, 52, 421–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Nishimoto, K.; Nakagawa, K.; Li, D.; Kosaka, T.; Oya, M.; Mikami, S.; Shibata, H.; Itoh, H.; Mitani, F.; Yamazaki, T.; et al. Adrenocortical zonation in humans under normal and pathological conditions. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2010, 95, 2296–2305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Omata, K.; Anand, S.K.; Hovelson, D.H.; Liu, C.-J.; Yamazaki, Y.; Nakamura, Y.; Ito, S.; Satoh, F.; Sasano, H.; Rainey, W.E.; et al. Aldosterone-Producing Cell Clusters Frequently Harbor Somatic Mutations and Accumulate with Age in Normal Adrenals. J. Endocr. Soc. 2017, 1, 787–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Nanba, K.; Vaidya, A.; Rainey, W.E. Aging and Adrenal Aldosterone Production. Hypertension 2018, 71, 218–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Nishimoto, K.; Seki, T.; Kurihara, I.; Yokota, K.; Omura, M.; Nishikawa, T.; Shibata, H.; Kosaka, T.; Oya, M.; Suematsu, M.; et al. Case Report: Nodule Development From Subcapsular Aldosterone-Producing Cell Clusters Causes Hyperaldosteronism. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2016, 101, 6–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Zennaro, M.C.; Boulkroun, S.; Fernandes-Rosa, F. Genetic Causes of Functional Adrenocortical Adenomas. Endocr. Rev. 2017, 38, 516–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Omata, K.; Satoh, F.; Morimoto, R.; Ito, S.; Yamazaki, Y.; Nakamura, Y.; Anand, S.K.; Guo, Z.; Stowasser, M.; Sasano, H.; et al. Cellular and Genetic Causes of Idiopathic Hyperaldosteronism. Hypertension 2018, 72, 874–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Yamazaki, Y.; Nakamura, Y.; Omata, K.; Ise, K.; Tezuka, Y.; Ono, Y.; Morimoto, R.; Nozawa, Y.; Gomez-Sanchez, C.E.; Tomlins, S.A.; et al. Histopathological Classification of Cross-Sectional Image-Negative Hyperaldosteronism. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2017, 102, 1182–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Brown, J.M.; Robinson-Cohen, C.; Luque-Fernandez, M.A.; Allison, M.A.; Baudrand, R.; Ix, J.H.; Kestenbaum, B.; De Boer, I.H.; Vaidya, A. The Spectrum of Subclinical Primary Aldosteronism and Incident Hypertension: A Cohort Study. Ann. Intern. Med. 2017, 167, 630–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Ono, Y.; Yamazaki, Y.; Omata, K.; Else, T.; A Tomlins, S.; Rhayem, Y.; Williams, T.A.; Reincke, M.; Carling, T.; Monticone, S.; et al. Histological Characterization of Aldosterone-producing Adrenocortical Adenomas with Different Somatic Mutations. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2019, 105, e282–e289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Nakamura, Y.; Kitada, M.; Satoh, F.; Maekawa, T.; Morimoto, R.; Yamazaki, Y.; Ise, K.; Gomez-Sanchez, C.E.; Ito, S.; Arai, Y.; et al. Intratumoral heterogeneity of steroidogenesis in aldosterone-producing adenoma revealed by intensive double-and triple-immunostaining for CYP11B2/B1 and CYP17. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2016, 422, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Tezuka, Y.; Yamazaki, Y.; Kitada, M.; Morimoto, R.; Kudo, M.; Seiji, K.; Takase, K.; Kawasaki, Y.; Mitsuzuka, K.; Ito, A.; et al. 18-Oxocortisol Synthesis in Aldosterone-Producing Adrenocortical Adenoma and Significance of KCNJ5 Mutation Status. Hypertension 2019, 73, 1283–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Wannachalee, T.; Zhao, L.; Nanba, K.; Nanba, A.T.; Shields, J.J.; E Rainey, W.; Auchus, R.J.; Turcu, A.F. Three Discrete Patterns of Primary Aldosteronism Lateralization in Response to Cosyntropin During Adrenal Vein Sampling. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2019, 104, 5867–5876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Inoue, K.; Yamazaki, Y.; Kitamoto, T.; Hirose, R.; Saito, J.; Omura, M.; Sasano, H.; Nishikawa, T. Aldosterone Suppression by Dexamethasone in Patients with KCNJ5-Mutated Aldosterone-Producing Adenoma. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2018, 103, 3477–3485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Sawka, A.M.; Young, W.F.; Thompson, G.B.; Grant, C.S.; Farley, D.R.; Leibson, C.; Van Heerden, J.A. Primary aldosteronism: Factors associated with normalization of blood pressure after surgery. Ann. Intern. Med. 2001, 135, 258–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Letavernier, E.; Peyrard, S.; Amar, L.; Zinzindohoue, F.; Fiquet, B.; Plouin, P.F. Blood pressure outcome of adrenalectomy in patients with primary hyperaldosteronism with or without unilateral adenoma. J. Hypertens. 2008, 26, 1816–1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Mourad, J.J.; Girerd, X.; Milliez, P.; Lopez-Sublet, M.; Lejeune, S.; Safar, M.E. Urinary aldosterone-to-active-renin ratio: A useful tool for predicting resolution of hypertension after adrenalectomy in patients with aldosterone-producing adenomas. Am. J. Hypertens. 2008, 21, 742–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Aronova, A.; Gordon, B.L.; Finnerty, B.M.; Zarnegar, R.; Fahey, T.J., 3rd. Aldosteronoma resolution score predicts long-term resolution of hypertension. Surgery 2014, 156, 1387–1392; discussion 1392-1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Taguchi, R.; Yamada, M.; Nakajima, Y.; Satoh, T.; Hashimoto, K.; Shibusawa, N.; Ozawa, A.; Okada, S.; Rokutanda, N.; Takata, D.; et al. Expression and mutations of KCNJ5 mRNA in Japanese patients with aldosterone-producing adenomas. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2012, 97, 1311–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Kitamoto, T.; Suematsu, S.; Matsuzawa, Y.; Saito, J.; Omura, M.; Nishikawa, T. Comparison of Cardiovascular Complications in Patients with and without KCNJ5 Gene Mutations Harboring Aldosterone-producing Adenomas. J. Atheroscler. Thromb. 2015, 22, 191–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Rossi, G.P.; Cesari, M.; Letizia, C.; Seccia, T.M.; Cicala, M.V.; Zinnamosca, L.; Kuppusamy, M.; Mareso, S.; Sciomer, S.; Iacobone, M.; et al. KCNJ5 gene somatic mutations affect cardiac remodelling but do not preclude cure of high blood pressure and regression of left ventricular hypertrophy in primary aldosteronism. J. Hypertens. 2014, 32, 1514–1521; discussion 1522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Kitamoto, T.; Omura, M.; Suematsu, S.; Saito, J.; Nishikawa, T. KCNJ5 mutation as a predictor for resolution of hypertension after surgical treatment of aldosterone-producing adenoma. J. Hypertens. 2018, 36, 619–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Chang, Y.-Y.; Tsai, C.-H.; Peng, S.-Y.; Chen, Z.-W.; Chang, C.-C.; Lee, B.-C.; Liao, C.-W.; Pan, C.-T.; Chen, Y.-L.; Lin, L.-C.; et al. KCNJ5 Somatic Mutations in Aldosterone-Producing Adenoma Are Associated with a Worse Baseline Status and Better Recovery of Left Ventricular Remodeling and Diastolic Function. Hypertension 2021, 77, 114–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Vilela, L.A.P.; Rassi-Cruz, M.; Guimaraes, A.G.; Moises, C.C.S.; Freitas, T.C.; Alencar, N.P.; Petenuci, J.; Goldbaum, T.S.; Maciel, A.A.W.; A Pereira, M.A.; et al. KCNJ5 Somatic Mutation Is a Predictor of Hypertension Remission after Adrenalectomy for Unilateral Primary Aldosteronism. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2019, 104, 4695–4702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Williams, T.A.; Peitzsch, M.; Dietz, A.S.; Dekkers, T.; Bidlingmaier, M.; Riester, A.; Treitl, M.; Rhayem, Y.; Beuschlein, F.; Lenders, J.W.; et al. Genotype-Specific Steroid Profiles Associated with Aldosterone-Producing Adenomas. Hypertension 2016, 67, 139–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Holler, F.; Heinrich, D.A.; Adolf, C.; Lechner, B.; Bidlingmaier, M.; Eisenhofer, G.; Williams, T.A.; Reincke, M. Steroid Profiling and Immunohistochemistry for Subtyping and Outcome Prediction in Primary Aldosteronism-a Review. Curr. Hypertens. Rep. 2019, 21, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Eisenhofer, G.; Durán, C.; Cannistraci, C.V.; Peitzsch, M.; Williams, T.A.; Riester, A.; Burrello, J.; Buffolo, F.; Prejbisz, A.; Beuschlein, F.; et al. Use of Steroid Profiling Combined with Machine Learning for Identification and Subtype Classification in Primary Aldosteronism. JAMA Netw. Open 2020, 3, e2016209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Tauber, P.; Penton, D.; Stindl, J.; Humberg, E.; Tegtmeier, I.; Sterner, C.; Beuschlein, F.; Reincke, M.; Barhanin, J.; Bandulik, S.; et al. Pharmacology and pathophysiology of mutated KCNJ5 found in adrenal aldosterone-producing adenomas. Endocrinology 2014, 155, 1353–1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Xie, C.B.; Shaikh, L.H.; Garg, S.; Tanriver, G.; Teo, A.E.D.; Zhou, J.; Maniero, C.; Zhao, W.; Kang, S.; Silverman, R.B.; et al. Regulation of aldosterone secretion by Cav1.3. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 24697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Caroccia, B.; Prisco, S.; Seccia, T.M.; Piazza, M.; Maiolino, G.; Rossi, G.P. Macrolides Blunt Aldosterone Biosynthesis: A Proof-of-Concept Study in KCNJ5 Mutated Adenoma Cells Ex Vivo. Hypertension 2017, 70, 1238–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Scholl, U.I.; Abriola, L.; Zhang, C.; Reimer, E.N.; Plummer, M.; Kazmierczak, B.I.; Zhang, J.; Hoyer, D.; Merkel, J.S.; Wang, W.; et al. Macrolides selectively inhibit mutant KCNJ5 potassium channels that cause aldosterone-producing adenoma. J. Clin. Investig. 2017, 127, 2739–2750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Wang, F.; Ma, X.; Tong, A.; Zhang, Y.; Wen, J.; Li, Y. The Effects of Different Calcium Channel Blockers on Aldosterone-Producing Adenoma Cells. Front. Endocrinol. 2020, 11, 260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Maiolino, G.; Ceolotto, G.; Battistel, M.; Barbiero, G.; Cesari, M.; Amar, L.; Caroccia, B.; Padrini, R.; Azizi, M.; Rossi, G.P. Macrolides for KCNJ5–mutated aldosterone-producing adenoma (MAPA): Design of a study for personalized diagnosis of primary aldosteronism. Blood Press. 2018, 27, 200–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Buffolo, F.; Burrello, J.; Burrello, A.; Heinrich, D.; Adolf, C.; Müller, L.M.; Chen, R.; Forestiero, V.; Sconfienza, E.; Tetti, M.; et al. Clinical Score and Machine Learning-Based Model to Predict Diagnosis of Primary Aldosteronism in Arterial Hypertension. Hypertension 2021, 78, 1595–1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Kaneko, H.; Umakoshi, H.; Ogata, M.; Wada, N.; Iwahashi, N.; Fukumoto, T.; Yokomoto-Umakoshi, M.; Nakano, Y.; Matsuda, Y.; Miyazawa, T.; et al. Machine learning based models for prediction of subtype diagnosis of primary aldosteronism using blood test. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 9140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Overview of case detection and treatment strategy of primary aldosteronism. Most guidelines recommend to use plasma aldosterone-renin ratio (PAC/PRA) for screening test [21,22,23,24,33]. * Confirmatory tests included captopril challenge test, saline infusion test, and oral sodium loading test. ** Bilateral APAs can be diagnosed by segment selective adrenal venous sampling [34,35]. Partial adrenalectomy to spare normal adrenal tissue should be considered for the dominant side of APA if attempting surgical treatment. This would be helpful when the residual APA may cause MRA-resistant PA in the future. PAC, plasma aldosterone concentration; PRA, plasma renin activity; PA, primary aldosteronism; MRA, mineral corticoid receptor antagonist; CT, computed tomography; IHA, idiopathic hyperaldosteronism; APA, aldosterone producing adenoma.
Figure 1. Overview of case detection and treatment strategy of primary aldosteronism. Most guidelines recommend to use plasma aldosterone-renin ratio (PAC/PRA) for screening test [21,22,23,24,33]. * Confirmatory tests included captopril challenge test, saline infusion test, and oral sodium loading test. ** Bilateral APAs can be diagnosed by segment selective adrenal venous sampling [34,35]. Partial adrenalectomy to spare normal adrenal tissue should be considered for the dominant side of APA if attempting surgical treatment. This would be helpful when the residual APA may cause MRA-resistant PA in the future. PAC, plasma aldosterone concentration; PRA, plasma renin activity; PA, primary aldosteronism; MRA, mineral corticoid receptor antagonist; CT, computed tomography; IHA, idiopathic hyperaldosteronism; APA, aldosterone producing adenoma.
Ijms 23 09042 g001
Figure 2. Distinctive characteristics of APA patients harboring KCNJ5 mutations, and CACNA1D or ATPase mutations. Distinctive characteristics of aldosterone producing adenoma (APA) patients harboring KCNJ5 mutation and CACNA1D or ATPase mutations. (a) KCNJ5 mutated APAs showed larger tumor and heterogenous composition of CYP11B2, CYP11B1, and/or CYP17 positive cells, while CACNA1D and ATPase mutated APAs showed smaller tumor and homogeneous composition of CYP11B2 positive cells. 18 oxocortisol is elevated in KCNJ5 mutated APAs, while not in CACNA1D and ATPase mutated APAs. KCNJ5 mutations have been detected mostly in APAs, while CACNA1D and ATPase mutations have been dominantly identified in aldosterone producing micronodules (APMs) and idiopathic hyperaldosteronism (IHA) as well as APAs. We assume distinctive activated pathways of aldosterone synthesis between KCNJ5 mutated and CACNA1D or ATPase mutated APAs, such as the ACTH-cAMP and Ca2+ signaling pathways. (b) Conceptual scheme of responsiveness of aldosterone secretion to ACTH between APAs harboring KCNJ5 and CACNA1D or ATPase mutations is shown. Basal aldosterone secretion is higher and its responsiveness to ACTH stimulation is lower in KCNJ5 mutated APAs than CACNA1D and ATPase mutated APAs. ACTH depletion via dexamethasone (Dex) suppression decreased plasma aldosterone levels from KCNJ5 mutated APAs to that from KCNJ5 wild APAs [55,81,82]. Thus we assume ACTH-cAMP signaling in KCNJ5 mutated APAs is activated to increase basal aldosterone secretion and to lessen response to extra ACTH stimulation. Figure was created with BioRender.com.
Figure 2. Distinctive characteristics of APA patients harboring KCNJ5 mutations, and CACNA1D or ATPase mutations. Distinctive characteristics of aldosterone producing adenoma (APA) patients harboring KCNJ5 mutation and CACNA1D or ATPase mutations. (a) KCNJ5 mutated APAs showed larger tumor and heterogenous composition of CYP11B2, CYP11B1, and/or CYP17 positive cells, while CACNA1D and ATPase mutated APAs showed smaller tumor and homogeneous composition of CYP11B2 positive cells. 18 oxocortisol is elevated in KCNJ5 mutated APAs, while not in CACNA1D and ATPase mutated APAs. KCNJ5 mutations have been detected mostly in APAs, while CACNA1D and ATPase mutations have been dominantly identified in aldosterone producing micronodules (APMs) and idiopathic hyperaldosteronism (IHA) as well as APAs. We assume distinctive activated pathways of aldosterone synthesis between KCNJ5 mutated and CACNA1D or ATPase mutated APAs, such as the ACTH-cAMP and Ca2+ signaling pathways. (b) Conceptual scheme of responsiveness of aldosterone secretion to ACTH between APAs harboring KCNJ5 and CACNA1D or ATPase mutations is shown. Basal aldosterone secretion is higher and its responsiveness to ACTH stimulation is lower in KCNJ5 mutated APAs than CACNA1D and ATPase mutated APAs. ACTH depletion via dexamethasone (Dex) suppression decreased plasma aldosterone levels from KCNJ5 mutated APAs to that from KCNJ5 wild APAs [55,81,82]. Thus we assume ACTH-cAMP signaling in KCNJ5 mutated APAs is activated to increase basal aldosterone secretion and to lessen response to extra ACTH stimulation. Figure was created with BioRender.com.
Ijms 23 09042 g002
Figure 3. Conceptual scheme of treatment strategy based on prediction model for KCNJ5 mutations in CT detectable tumor. Conceptual scheme of utilizing presurgical diagnosis of KCNJ5 mutations in CT detectable tumors. CVD risk indicates (1) current cardiovascular complications and (2) future risk of CVD events. To achieve well controlled blood pressure (BP) and PRA, BP should be controlled to the same level as essential hypertensives, and PRA should be elevated more than 1.0 ng/mL/h with MRA. * Adrenal venous sampling should be performed for the cases with KCNJ5-wild APAs who can receive surgical benefits, such as MRA-resistant primary aldosteronism of uncontrollable blood pressure and plasma renin. Debulking of APA for bilateral APA cases and adrenalectomy for unilateral APA cases should alleviate the hormonal abnormality in this population. Otherwise, the prognosis should be similar with appropriate treatment with MRA to essential hypertensive patients due to a lower outcome of complete clinical success in KCNJ5 wild-type APA cases than in KCNJ5 mutated APA cases. PA, primary aldosteronism; CT, computed tomography; CVD, cardiovascular disease; BP, blood pressure; PRA, plasma renin activity.
Figure 3. Conceptual scheme of treatment strategy based on prediction model for KCNJ5 mutations in CT detectable tumor. Conceptual scheme of utilizing presurgical diagnosis of KCNJ5 mutations in CT detectable tumors. CVD risk indicates (1) current cardiovascular complications and (2) future risk of CVD events. To achieve well controlled blood pressure (BP) and PRA, BP should be controlled to the same level as essential hypertensives, and PRA should be elevated more than 1.0 ng/mL/h with MRA. * Adrenal venous sampling should be performed for the cases with KCNJ5-wild APAs who can receive surgical benefits, such as MRA-resistant primary aldosteronism of uncontrollable blood pressure and plasma renin. Debulking of APA for bilateral APA cases and adrenalectomy for unilateral APA cases should alleviate the hormonal abnormality in this population. Otherwise, the prognosis should be similar with appropriate treatment with MRA to essential hypertensive patients due to a lower outcome of complete clinical success in KCNJ5 wild-type APA cases than in KCNJ5 mutated APA cases. PA, primary aldosteronism; CT, computed tomography; CVD, cardiovascular disease; BP, blood pressure; PRA, plasma renin activity.
Ijms 23 09042 g003
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kitamoto, T.; Nishikawa, T. Clinical Translationality of KCNJ5 Mutation in Aldosterone Producing Adenoma. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 9042. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23169042

AMA Style

Kitamoto T, Nishikawa T. Clinical Translationality of KCNJ5 Mutation in Aldosterone Producing Adenoma. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(16):9042. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23169042

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kitamoto, Takumi, and Tetsuo Nishikawa. 2022. "Clinical Translationality of KCNJ5 Mutation in Aldosterone Producing Adenoma" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 16: 9042. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23169042

APA Style

Kitamoto, T., & Nishikawa, T. (2022). Clinical Translationality of KCNJ5 Mutation in Aldosterone Producing Adenoma. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(16), 9042. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23169042

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop