Next Article in Journal
Correction: Prado, L.G.; Barbosa, A.S. Understanding the Renal Fibrotic Process in Leptospirosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 10779
Next Article in Special Issue
Cell-Based and Selected Cell-Free Therapies for Myocardial Infarction: How Do They Compare to the Current Treatment Options?
Previous Article in Journal
Knockdown of the Halloween Genes spook, shadow and shade Influences Oocyte Development, Egg Shape, Oviposition and Hatching in the Desert Locust
Previous Article in Special Issue
Missense Mutations in Desmoplakin Plakin Repeat Domains Have Dramatic Effects on Domain Structure and Function
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 16
10.3390/ijms23169230
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Recombinant Adeno-Associated Viral Vector-Mediated Gene Transfer of hTBX18 Generates Pacemaker Cells from Ventricular Cardiomyocytes

by
Melad Farraha
1,2,
Renuka Rao
2,
Sindhu Igoor
2,
Thi Y. L. Le
2,
Michael A. Barry
3,
Christopher Davey
2,4,
Cindy Kok
2,
James J.H. Chong
1,2,3 and
Eddy Kizana
1,2,3,*
1
Sydney Medical School, the University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia
2
Centre for Heart Research, the Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney 2145, Australia
3
Department of Cardiology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney 2145, Australia
4
School of Physics, the University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(16), 9230; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23169230
Submission received: 28 July 2022 / Revised: 12 August 2022 / Accepted: 16 August 2022 / Published: 17 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cell Programming for Cardiovascular Disease Modeling and Therapy 2.0)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Sinoatrial node dysfunction can manifest as bradycardia, leading to symptoms of syncope and sudden cardiac death. Electronic pacemakers are the current standard of care but are limited due to a lack of biological chronotropic control, cost of revision surgeries, and risk of lead- and device-related complications. We therefore aimed to develop a biological alternative to electronic devices by using a clinically relevant gene therapy vector to demonstrate conversion of cardiomyocytes into sinoatrial node-like cells in an in vitro context. Neonatal rat ventricular myocytes were transduced with recombinant adeno-associated virus vector 6 encoding either hTBX18 or green fluorescent protein and maintained for 3 weeks. At the endpoint, qPCR, Western blot analysis and immunocytochemistry were used to assess for reprogramming into pacemaker cells. Cell morphology and Arclight action potentials were imaged via confocal microscopy. Compared to GFP, hTBX18-transduced cells showed that hTBX18, HCN4 and Cx45 were upregulated. Cx43 was significantly downregulated, while sarcomeric α-actinin remained unchanged. Cardiomyocytes transduced with hTBX18 acquired the tapering morphology of native pacemaker cells, as compared to the block-like, striated appearance of ventricular cardiomyocytes. Analysis of the action potentials showed phase 4 depolarization and a significant decrease in the APD50 of the hTBX18-transduced cells. We have demonstrated that rAAV-hTBX18 gene transfer to ventricular myocytes results in morphological, molecular, physiological, and functional changes, recapitulating the pacemaker phenotype in an in vitro setting. The generation of these induced pacemaker-like cells using a clinically relevant vector opens new prospects for biological pacemaker development.

1. Introduction

The sinoatrial node (SAN) is a group of highly specialized cells, containing less than 10,000 genuine pacemaker cells that maintain the regular beating of the mammalian heart [1,2]. The SAN, however, can become defective via several means, including myocardial infarction, cardiomyopathy, and genetic defects but most prevalently because of ageing [3,4]. This condition affects approximately 1 in 600 cardiac patients older than 65 years and accounts for 50 percent or more of permanent pacemaker insertions in the United States alone [4,5,6], with the incidence rising due to the world’s ageing population [7]. Dysfunction of the SAN leads to cardiac rate control issues including bradycardia, with severe cases resulting in sudden cardiac death [8,9]. To date, there are no known cures for SAN dysfunction, with the only viable management option being the implantation of an electronic pacemaker. Implantable electronic pacemaker technology has continued to evolve since its development six decades ago [10,11]. Although effective, these devices and their subsequent surgeries present their own issues ranging from insertion complications [11,12,13], follow-up surgeries required to replace batteries and to correct device problems, but most seriously, infections that require the removal of the device for effective antibiosis to be administered [11,14]. The complications associated with electronic pacemakers and the existence of a need for better treatment of SAN dysfunction have motivated research into discovering more effective and innovative treatment options, including gene transfer of ion channels and developmental transcription factors necessary for SAN formation [14].
Over the past two decades, complex studies have been carried out to gain a greater understanding of the pathways that drive the formation, migration, and assembly of cardiac tissue, the pacemaker and the conduction system [15]. Early morphological studies of the SAN described 3 cell types: nodal, intermediate, and elongated cells, which are thought to drive the pacemaker [16]. The developmental biology of these cells is now known to arise from the sinus venosus, which is heavily regulated by numerous transcription factors as it develops [17]. The transcription-regulating candidates for embryonic SAN development include Shox2, TBX3, TBX5 and TBX18 [17]. Shox2 is a negative regulator of Nkx2.5 (an early precardiac marker essential for the development of the cardiac conduction system [18,19,20,21]) in the sinus venosus, and Shox2-deficient mouse and zebrafish embryos displayed bradycardia [18,22]. TBX3 is a potent regulator of SAN specialization, with developmental errors resulting from either deficiency or ectopic expression [23]. TBX5, which shows an inverse correlation between its dosage and abnormal cardiac morphogenesis, is a positive regulator of Shox2 and TBX3 [24]. However, upstream of all these factors is TBX18. Mesenchymal progenitor cells expressing TBX18 define the sinus venosus and differentiate de novo into SAN cells. TBX18 is required for the differentiation of ventricular cardiomyocytes, triggering the genetic pathways related to SAN development, becoming undetectable by birth [25,26]. Therefore, understanding the importance of TBX18 in this context has informed the direction in which biological pacemaker research has evolved.
The first attempt at using recombinant human T-box 18 (hTBX18) gene therapy to develop a biological pacemaker involved its overexpression via an adenoviral vector in ventricular cardiomyocytes of adult guinea pigs using a bradycardic disease model [1]. Transduction of hTBX18 induced conversion of ventricular cardiomyocytes into SAN-like cells, which resembled the endogenous SAN. As opposed to previous approaches, no single determinant of excitability was selectively overexpressed. Rather, the entire gene expression profile was altered, resulting in fundamental phenotypic changes to the cells. Furthermore, the in vivo reprogramming by hTBX18 created a pacemaker rhythm in the guinea pig hearts that corrected the disease model.
Following on from the small animal model, hTBX18 was again delivered using an adenoviral vector via a minimally invasive technique in a pig model of complete heart block [27]. The vector encoding hTBX18 was delivered to the His-bundle region by an endocardial needle catheter. The results showed that animals transduced with hTBX18 had stable pacemaker activity originating from the injection site while also having a higher heart rate, more diurnal heart rate variation, decreased reliance on the backup electronic pacemaker and an increased physiologic autonomic response. Moreover, there were no signs of pro-arrhythmia or systemic adverse effects. While these results were the most promising to date, biological pacing in this model peaked at day 7–8 and waned by day 14. The decline in pacing was due to the predictable host immune response to the adenoviral vector employed [1,28,29,30,31].
Newer attempts at using hTBX18 have attempted to use both gene- and gene-cell hybrid-based approaches to generate SAN-like pacemaker cells, both in vivo or in vitro, before implantation [32,33,34,35,36,37]. Further studies are required to assess the engraftment potential, pacing efficacy and any proarrhythmic effects of these strategies [32].
There are still many inherent limitations associated with the development of gene therapy. The use of viral vectors to deliver the necessary genes presents its own problems. It is appreciated that adenoviral vectors can only provide transient expression for pacemaker function largely due to the strong and rapid inflammatory and immune responses triggered by the vector, resulting in vector clearance [1,28,29,30,31]. Other vectors, such as lentivirus vectors, are not cardiotropic and carry an attendant risk of insertional mutagenesis [38,39]. Therefore, the choice of viral vector will predictably impact the duration of expression and subsequent functional effects of the transgene. Recombinant adeno-associated viral vectors (rAAV) present a promising alternative for several reasons. A subset of natural capsid subtypes are highly cardiotropic, minimally immunogenic compared to other vectors, allow for longer-term gene expression, and have been used in several human clinical trials highlighting their efficacy as a gene therapy vector, and further research is being conducted via capsid engineering to create rAAVs with enhanced cardiotropism and the ability to evade the immune response [40,41,42,43].
Therefore, the aim of this study was to design and develop an rAAV construct containing hTBX18 and to validate its functionality in reprogramming ventricular myocytes into SAN-like pacemaker cells in an in vitro context.

2. Results

2.1. rAAV Vectors Expressing GFP or hTBX18 Showed Highly Efficient Transduction in NRVMs

Neonatal rat ventricular myocytes (NRVM) transduced for 3 weeks with rAAV6-GFP (Figure 1A) and rAAV6-hTBX18 (Figure 1B) at an MOI of 30,000 showed transduction efficiencies greater than 90%, as compared to the non-transduced controls, when visualized via microscopy and analyzed via flow cytometry (Figure 1C).

2.2. NRVMs Transduced with rAAV6-hTBX18 Faithfully Reproduced the Distinctive Molecular and Physiological Characteristics of Pacemaker Cells

Three weeks following transduction with rAAV6-GFP (control) or rAAV6-hTBX18, the following 5 genes associated with pacemaker cells were examined at a mRNA, protein and immunocytochemical level: hTBX18, hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated channel 4 (HCN4), gap junction connexin 43 (Cx43), gap junction connexin 45 (Cx45) and sarcomeric α-actinin (SαA).

2.2.1. Analysis of mRNA Expression Showed Changes Characteristic of Pacemaker Cells

Following transduction with rAAV6-GFP or rAAV6-hTBX18 (n = 8), expression levels of the different genes were analyzed by qPCR, normalized to GAPDH expression and the two groups were compared. The following results were observed: hTBX18 expression in the rAAV6-hTBX18-transduced cells was 1145 times higher as compared to the rAAV6-GFP-transduced cells (Figure 2A). HCN4 in the rAAV6-hTBX18-transduced cells was 3 times higher as compared to the rAAV6-GFP-transduced cells (Figure 2B). Cx43 expression in the rAAV6-hTBX18-transduced cells was 3.5 times lower as compared to the rAAV6-GFP-transduced cells (Figure 2C). Cx45 expression in the rAAV6-hTBX18-transduced cells was 1.6 times higher as compared to the rAAV6-GFP-transduced cells but did not achieve statistical significance (Figure 2D). SαA expression in the rAAV6-hTBX18-transduced cells was equal to that of the rAAV6-GFP-transduced cells (Figure 2E).

2.2.2. Analysis of Protein Expression Showed Changes Characteristic of Pacemaker Cells

Following transduction with rAAV6-GFP or rAAV6-hTBX18 (n = 7), the changes in expression levels of the following proteins relative to β-actin were observed (Figure 3A): hTBX18 in the rAAV6-hTBX18-transduced cells was higher as compared to the rAAV6-GFP-transduced cells (Figure 3B). HCN4 in the rAAV6-hTBX18-transduced cells was also higher as compared to the rAAV6-GFP-transduced cells (Figure 3C). Cx43 in the rAAV6-hTBX18-transduced cells was lower as compared to the rAAV6-GFP-transduced cells (Figure 3D). Cx45 in the rAAV6-hTBX18-transduced cells was higher as compared to the rAAV6-GFP-transduced cells but did not achieve statistical significance (Figure 3E). SαA in the rAAV6-hTBX18-transduced cells was higher as compared to that of the rAAV6-GFP-transduced cells but did not achieve statistical significance (Figure 3F).

2.2.3. Immunocytochemical Analysis of Cells Transduced with rAAV6-hTBX18 Displayed Distinctive Characteristics of Pacemaker Cells

Following transduction with rAAV6-GFP or rAAV6-hTBX18, the changes in expression levels of the following markers were observed: hTBX18 was evident in the nuclei of rAAV6-hTBX18-transduced cells only (Figure 4A). HCN4 showed strong expression in rAAV6-hTBX18-transduced cells, which was much more evident as compared to the rAAV6-GFP-transduced cells (Figure 4B). Cx43 showed strong expression with junctional localization in the rAAV6-GFP-transduced cells, which was not evident in the rAAV6-hTBX18-transduced cells (Figure 4C). Cx45 showed similar expression patterns in the rAAV6-hTBX18 and rAAV6-GFP-transduced cells (Figure 4D). Additionally, SαA expression in the rAAV6-hTBX18 transduced cells showed disorganized myofibril structures as compared to that of the rAAV6-GFP-transduced cells, which showed well-organized and striated myofibril structures (Figure 4E).

2.3. NRVMs Transduced with rAAV6-hTBX18 Faithfully Recapitulate the Morphological Features of Pacemaker Cells

In addition to the molecular and physiological changes, rAAV6-hTBX18-transduced cells underwent distinct morphological changes. hTBX18 cells were co-transduced with rAAV6-GFP to visualize under fluorescent microscopy. NRVMs originally showed large, thick, block-like structures, shown in Figure 5A. Following transduction with rAAV6-hTBX18, NRVMs underwent a morphological change and became thin, spindle-like and tapering in structure, similar to native pacemaker cells, as shown in Figure 5B. The mean diameter of the NRVMs (29.38 ± 1.439 µm) was 3 times larger than the rAAV6-hTBX18-transduced cells (10.62 ± 0.8472 µm) (Figure 5C). The total area of the NRVMs (5253 ± 453.1 µm) was 5 times larger than the rAAV6-hTBX18-transduced cells (1452 ± 132.3 µm) (Figure 5D).

2.4. NRVMs Co-Transduced with rAAV6-hTBX18 and LV.Arclight Generated Pacemaker-like Action Potentials

Co-transduction of NRVMs with LV.Arclight allowed for electrophysiological characterization of the cells based on a potentiometric fluorescent GFP signal (Figure 6), assessed three weeks after transduction. The recordings were made from beating areas of cells in the rAAV6-GFP and rAAV6-hTBX18 cultures. Based on the parameters of the morphology of the action potential (AP) and AP duration at 50% repolarization (APD50), we could distinctly identify three types of AP morphologies. Ventricular myocytes (Figure 6A) and atrial myocytes (Figure 6B) displayed their corresponding action potentials, while hTBX18-transduced cells (Figure 6C) displayed a distinctive phase 4 depolarization. Additionally, NRVMs (0.925 ± 0.022 s) had a significantly longer APD50 as compared to rAAV6-hTBX18-transduced cells (0.170 ± 0.011 s) (Figure 6D).

3. Discussion

In this study, we successfully validated the rAAV vector-mediated gene transfer of hTBX18 to demonstrate the conversion of NRVMs into SAN-like cells, which recapitulated the biological pacemaker phenotype in vitro.
Previous work had identified that SAN development is tightly regulated by the transcription factors Shox2, TBX3, TBX5 and TBX18 [17]. Using these transcription factors, studies focused on overexpression to either increase the efficiency of the differentiation process of stem cells—either embryonic or induced-pluripotent-derived—into the pacemaker-like phenotype [33,34,35,36,37,44,45,46] or used a viral vector-mediated approach to demonstrate the conversion of cardiomyocytes into pacemaker-like cells [1,27,32,33]. Although all were successful to some degree, TBX18 was shown to be upstream of all these factors [25,26] and demonstrated the greatest potential in achieving functional pacemaker cells in either a stem cell or gene therapy context. However, to address the issues raised with the use of stem cell therapies [47] or gene therapy-mediated approaches using lentiviral or adenoviral vectors [27,32,48,49], we designed and validated the use of an rAAV vector expressing hTBX18 to reprogram ventricular cardiomyocytes into SAN-like pacemaker cells, which has not been demonstrated previously. Complementing previous findings, our results recognized that the single hTBX18 transcription factor sufficed for direct conversion of NRVMs into pacemaker-like cells, with the focus on establishing the reliability of conversion using molecular, physiological, morphological, and functional characterization.
rAAV has become the most promising vector for gene therapy clinical trials, including those targeting the heart [50,51,52]. It is derived from a non-pathogenic parental virus, and packaging with capsid subtypes 6, 8 and 9 generate vectors that are cardiotropic and capable of efficient cardiac transduction. This vector generates minimal immunogenicity and can therefore confer long-term gene expression in non-replicating cells such as cardiomyocytes [40,42,43]. It has been successfully used in several human clinical trials, and efforts are continuing to improve its efficiency at transducing target cells and enhancing its ability to evade pre-existing neutralizing antibodies via directed evolution [53,54]. All these characteristics allow for the advancement of biological pacemaker development, addressing the translational issues which have arisen in previous studies.
Since rAAV vectors had not been utilized in this context, we designed a rAAV6 vector expressing hTBX18. This vector was confirmed to be functional and highly efficient (>90% transduction efficiency) at expressing hTBX18 in NRVMs. We chose to use the rAAV6 capsid as it showed the greatest transduction efficiency when compared to capsids considered to be most cardiotropic in rodent models [40,42,55]. This vector was then used to transduce NRVMs for three weeks, and we subsequently analyzed the modification they underwent as they became pacemaker-like cells. Molecular analysis was used to observe changes in five distinct markers: hTBX18, HCN4, Cx43, Cx45 and SαA. These markers were chosen because they allowed us to differentiate between ventricular cardiomyocytes and pacemaker cells.
Adult mammalian ventricular cardiomyocytes do not inherently express the transcription factor TBX18, with silencing occurring upon cardiac maturation around the time of birth [1,26]. hTBX18 expression was significantly upregulated at an mRNA and protein level because of transduction with rAAV6-hTBX18. Immunocytochemistry confirmed the presence of hTBX18 in rAAV6-hTBX18-transduced cells only and was shown to be localized to the nucleus. With the knowledge that hTBX18 was being overexpressed, the other markers were similarly examined to confirm they changed in a manner reflective of pacemaker cells.
Hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated channels (HCN) produce the If current, which is responsible for diastolic depolarization in the SAN cells [56]. HCN1, HCN2 and HCN4 are the main subtypes of the HCN channels in the heart [57], with the SAN cells containing the highest proportion of HCN4, which is important in phase 4 automatic depolarization of pacemaker cells [58,59,60]. HCN4 expression was significantly upregulated in the rAAV6-hTBX18 transduced cells. The underlying mechanism responsible for this upregulation is due to the HCN4 promoter being activated by hTBX18 [1], which directly increases the expression of HCN4 and enhances the conversion of the cardiomyocytes into a pacemaker-like phenotype.
The gap junction proteins (connexins) in cardiomyocytes permit intercellular coupling and conduction of electrical signals to allow for synchronized contraction of the heart. They also specifically shield the SAN from the hyperpolarizing environment of the atrial tissue [61,62]. There are three main connexins that are expressed in the heart: Cx40, Cx43 and Cx45 [62,63,64]. Cx45 predominates in the SAN to slow conduction, while Cx43 is found in all other chambers except the conduction system to maintain conduction integrity [64,65]. To distinguish the difference between ventricular cardiomyocytes and pacemaker-like cells, Cx43 and Cx45 expression levels were analyzed as they differed the most with changes in expression levels [65,66]. As predicted, Cx43 expression was significantly downregulated in the rAAV6-hTBX18-transduced cells. Cx45 expression was upregulated in the rAAV6-hTBX18-transduced cells, although this did not achieve statistical significance. These findings in connexin expression concur with previous literature that summarizes Cx43 to be significantly downregulated in pacemaker cells, while Cx45 either remains the same or increases as compared to ventricular myocytes [1,64,66]. Once again, the underlying mechanism responsible for this significant downregulation of Cx43 involves hTBX18 selectively repressing the Cx43 promoter over other connexins, facilitating the slow and safe propagation of action potentials within the SAN before disseminating to the working myocardium [66].
Cardiac SαA functions to anchor myofibrillar actin thin filaments to Z-discs within the muscle fibers of cardiac cells, giving rise to their structure and organized striations [67]. Its expression has been previously described to be lower and disorganized in the SAN as compared to the adjacent right atrium [1]. SαA expression was relatively unchanged in rAAV6-hTBX18-transduced cells. However, when analyzed via immunocytochemistry, it was evident that there was myofibrillar disorganization and a breakdown in the structure of SαA (Figure 4E). This is most likely attributed to the change in morphology the cells undergo as they convert into pacemaker cells, requiring the myofibrillar structures to break down and re-arrange as the cells move from thick, block like structures into thin, spindle shaped ones.
In addition to the molecular and physiological changes which occurred, changes in the morphology of the cellular structure were also observed, further validating the conversion of the ventricular cardiomyocytes into pacemaker-like cells. Native SAN pacemaker cells present a distinct morphology: they are smaller [68] and exhibit less-organized myofibrils [2,69] than ventricular cardiomyocytes. rAAV6-hTBX18-transduced cells underwent distinct morphological changes, starting as thick, block-like structures before becoming thin, spindle-like and tapering in morphology, indicative of pacemaker cells (Figure 5). The converted cells were, on average, 5 times smaller and 3 times thinner, resembling SAN cells [64,69].
The final measure of successful conversion to pacemaker-like cells involved analysis of the action potentials generated by rAAV6-hTBX18 cells. Action potentials were recorded using the Arclight construct—a variant of the Ciona intestinalis voltage-sensitive-based fluorescent protein voltage sensor [70,71,72,73]. This approach was able to successfully differentiate between atrial, ventricular and pacemaker-like action potentials based on the action potential morphology. Atrial and ventricular myocytes displayed their distinct action potentials, while rAAV6-hTBX18-transduced cells displayed abbreviated, atrial-like potentials with spontaneous phase 4 depolarization, the hallmark of pacemaker cells. There was a significant decrease in the APD50 of rAAV6-hTBX18-transduced cells. Taken together, these changes in the action potential of rAAV6-hTBX18-transduced cells are consistent with an electrophysiological phenotypic change from ventricular to pacemaker cells. Our findings are consistent with others found in literature [1,33,71,73,74].
There are two main limitations to this approach for creating pacemaker cells using rAAV. As previously outlined, hTBX18 is an embryonic transcription factor that ceases to be expressed following complete SAN development and birth. As such, the effects of persistent expression of hTBX18 using rAAV are unknown beyond the study period of 3 weeks. Further investigations need to be undertaken to determine if there are any detrimental effects following long-term expression of hTBX18 both in vitro and in vivo. This limitation could be addressed by the use of a tissue-specific promotor with an inherent capacity for regulation or expression cassette regulatory elements designed to reduce transgene expression following somatic reprogramming. The other main limitation is that the in vivo potential of an AAV-based vector to induce reprogramming is unknown. The vector copy numbers of functional rAAV particles injected in vivo will be lower as compared to adenovirus-based vectors due to the much higher titers achieved with the latter. Therefore, the threshold for somatic reprogramming and phenotypic conversion may be more challenging to achieve with rAAV compared to established protocols with adenoviral vectors. This limitation could be addressed by employing rAAV with capsids engineered to be more cardiotropic.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Molecular Cloning of hTBX18 Gene into a rAAV Expression Vector

The human TBX18 gene without the C-terminal Flag–ZsGreen tag was PCR amplified from pLV-TBX18-Flag–ZsGreen [66] using custom-designed hTBX18 forward and reverse primers. The forward primer added a BamHI restriction site and Kozak consensus sequence (5′-ATGGATCCACCACCATGGCCGAGAAG-3′). The reverse primer added a stop codon followed by a SpeI restriction site (5′-CGACTAGTTCAGACCATATGTGCAG-3′). Digestion using BamHI and SpeI sites allowed hTBX18 to be subcloned into an AAV_CBA_WPRE_Empty expression vector containing the desired chicken beta actin (CBA) promoter and woodchuck post-transcriptional regulatory element (WPRE) (Figure 7). This generated our desired construct: AAV_CBA_hTBX18_WPRE (7.2 kB). The control construct, AAV_CBA_GFP_WPRE (6.2 kB), encoded for GFP. Generated constructs were verified to encode the correct target gene by Sanger DNA sequencing (AGRF, Sydney, Australia).

4.2. rAAV6 Production and Purification

rAAV6 vectors were prepared with a two-plasmid system as previously described with modification [43,75,76,77]. Briefly, HEK293T cells were seeded in Falcon 150 mm tissue culture dishes (Corning Life Sciences, Teterboro, NJ, USA) in DMEM (Lonza, Basel, Switzerland) and 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) media. Cells were transfected with plasmid DNA 24 h later using 22.5 µg of the rAAV expression vector (GFP or hTBX18) and 45µg of the packaging/helper plasmid pDGM6 [77] per plate by calcium phosphate precipitation. Sixteen hours later, the media was changed to fresh DMEM and 10% FBS. Forty-eight hours following transfection, clarified media from rAAV 2/6-transfected cells were collected and stored at 4 °C until purification.
Vector was purified from the AAV 2/6 supernatant as previously described [43,75,76,78]. In brief, the supernatant was incubated with 40% polyethylene glycol (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for >3 h on ice. The precipitate was spun down and gently resuspended in 10 mM Tris, 10 mM Bis Tris Propane (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) before benzonase (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) treatment for 30 min at 37 °C. The supernatant was then layered on a 12.5 mL cesium chloride (CsCl) (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA) density gradient (7 mL of 1.37 g/mL CsCl layered on 1 mL of 1.5 g/mL CsCl) and ultracentrifuged at 36,000 rpm for 40 h at 16 °C in an Optima XPN-100 ultracentrifuge (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA).
Following ultracentrifugation, 1 mL fractions were collected, and real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) was performed directly on aliquots from the fractions. Fractions with the highest concentration of vector particles were pooled and dialyzed for three rounds against 1 × phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) containing 5% glycerol (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), before concentration using vivaspin 300,000 MWCO ultrafiltration tubes (Sartorius, Göttingen, Germany). A final qPCR was performed to determine the titer of the concentrated vector stocks. The final qPCR titer was ~2 × 1012 vector genomes (vg)/mL.

4.3. Neonatal Rat Ventricular Myocyte Isolation, Culture and rAAV Transduction

Primary cultures of neonatal rat ventricular myocytes (NRVM) were prepared by enzymatic digestion of ventricles obtained from neonatal (2–3 day old) Sprague-Dawley rats, as previously described [79,80,81]. Briefly, atria and major vessels were trimmed from the ventricles before being incubated overnight at 4 °C in Hank’s balanced salt solution (HBSS, Lonza, Basel, Switzerland) containing 0.1% trypsin (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The following morning, the hearts were dissociated in 4 to 5 rounds of incubation with 0.1% collagenase solution (Worthington Biochemical Corporation, Lakewood, NJ, USA). Isolated cells were enriched for myocytes by pre-plating cell suspensions in T150 flasks (Corning Life Sciences, New York, NY, USA) for 1–2 h. Fibroblasts attach much more rapidly than myocytes, with pre-plating removing most of the fibroblasts from the cardiac cell suspension. A cell count was performed on the enriched suspension, after which cells were plated in gelatin-coated 6- or 24-well tissue culture plates (Corning Life Sciences, New York, NY, USA) or glass-bottom confocal dishes (Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark) at a density of 1.1 × 105 cells/cm2. The cells were plated in culture media (M199 media Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) supplemented with 0.35 µg/mL glucose (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), 2 mM L-glutamine (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), 1 × HEPES buffer (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), 1 × MEM non-essential amino acids (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), 0.2 ng/mL vitamin B12 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), 5 U/mL penicillin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA)). The following morning, the cells were washed with two rounds of PBS involving vigorous shaking to dislodge the dead cells, then replenished with fresh media. Every second day, the media was changed to maintenance media (M199 + 2% FBS (including supplements)) for maintenance of the cells.
Following the switch to maintenance media, cells were either left non-transduced or transduced with rAAV6-GFP or rAAV6-hTBX18 at a pre-determined (data not shown) MOI of 30,000 to initiate viral vector transduction.

4.4. Messenger RNA Extraction and Complementary DNA Synthesis

Three weeks post-transduction with rAAV, NRVMs were trypsinized (0.1% trypsin and 0.04% EDTA (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA)), washed once with PBS and pelleted before messenger RNA (mRNA) was extracted using an mRNA isolation kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Qiagen, Venlo, The Netherlands). Once eluted, mRNA was stored in aliquots at −80 °C.
The mRNA samples were converted to first strand cDNA using the M-MLV RT DNA polymerase kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). The appropriate no-RNA and no-enzyme controls were used to confirm cDNA integrity. cDNA was diluted to 5 ng/µL for use with real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis.

4.5. Real-Time PCR Analysis

RT-PCR was used to evaluate the changes in gene expression between the different NRVM treatment groups. In brief, primers (Table 1) were designed and validated for the different genes to be examined. Reactions were prepared in a 384-well plate (Biorad, Hercules, CA, USA) and performed in 10 µL volumes using the following mix: 1 × Sensifast SYBR RT-PCR master mix (Bioline, Memphis, TN, USA), 0.4 µM primers, 1 µL of template cDNA and molecular biology grade sterile water (Lonza, Basel, Switzerland). The plates were run in a Biorad CFX384 PCR thermocycler (Biorad, Hercules, CA, USA) using the following conditions: denaturation at 95 °C for 2 min, followed by 40 cycles of denaturing for 5 s at 95 °C, annealing for 10 s at 60 °C and extension for 15 s at 72 °C, ending with a melt cycle. Melt curves and CT values for GAPDH across all samples were confirmed to be consistent before analysis. The cycle threshold values obtained from duplicate samples were analyzed for relative expression changes.

4.6. Protein Extraction and Immunoblotting

Three weeks following transduction with rAAV6, NRVMs in 6-well plates were incubated for 5 min with 200 µL of ice-cold lysis solution containing RIPA buffer (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and 1% (v/v) protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Lysed samples were pelleted, and protein supernatant was collected. Protein estimation was performed using the Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and the absorbance at ~562 nm was measured using a Victor Plate Reader (PerkinElmer Life Sciences, Waltham, MA, USA) alongside a standard curve, to infer the concentration of the protein samples.
Once quantified, equal amounts of protein were diluted in 4× Laemmli sample buffer (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), denatured at 95 °C for 5 min and loaded onto 10% sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-page) gels. Gels were electrophoresed in 1 × Tris Base SDS-page running buffer under reducing conditions at 150 V. Following electrophoretic separation, proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes using the mini trans-blot electrophoretic transfer cell (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) at 100 V for 90 min. Membranes were then blocked in 5% skim milk in PBST (0.05% Tween 20, phosphate-buffered saline) for 1 h and subsequently incubated with primary antibody overnight at 4 °C (Table 2). The membranes were then incubated with secondary antibody (HRP-conjugated) for 1 h (Table 2). SuperSignal Pico Chemiluminescent substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) blotting detection reagents were used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. To detect faint signals, SuperSignal West Femto (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Membranes were imaged in a Chemidoc touch detection unit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).
The membrane was then stripped with 0.5 M NaOH for 10 min and stained for β-Actin as a loading control for 1 h. The membrane was incubated with an HRP-conjugated secondary antibody for 1 h and imaged as previously described.
Quantitative densitometry of immunoblots was used to calculate changes in expression levels of the proteins of interest relative to the β-actin control. ImageJ (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA) was used to calculate the intensity of individual bands, after which they were normalized to the loading control.

4.7. Immunocytochemistry and Microscopy

NRVMs plated on glass coverslips and transduced with rAAV for 3 weeks were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 15 min, permeabilized with 0.3% Triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) in PBS for 10 min and blocked with serum-free protein block (Dako, Copenhagen, Denmark) for 1 h. Samples were then incubated with primary antibody (Table 3) for 1 h at room temperature with mild shaking. Following 3 washes, the appropriate secondary antibody (Table 3) was applied for 1 h at room temperature in the dark. Samples were stained with DAPI (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) before being mounted with glycerol-based mounting media onto glass slides. The slides were sealed and stored at 4 °C. Z-stack imaging was performed on an Olympus FV1000 confocal laser scanning microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) using a 60 × objective (Olympus 60 ×/1.35 NA Oil UPLFLN). All images were deconvolved with Huygens Professional software version 18.04 (Scientific Volume Imaging, Hilversum, The Netherlands, https://svi.nl/HomePage (accessed 27 July 2017)) using the CMLE algorithm, with SNR:30 and 40 iterations. Before being processed with ImageJ (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA).

4.8. Flow Cytometry Analysis

NRVM cells for GFP analysis were harvested by trypsinization before being washed twice in PBS, pelleted and resuspended in PBS containing 1% FBS. Cells for hTBX18 analysis were harvested by trypsinization before being washed, fixed in 1% PFA for 1 min and permeabilized in 0.05% Triton X-100 in PBS for 5 min. The cells were then blocked in PBS + 3% BSA for 30 min at room temperature before being subject to primary and secondary antibody incubations for 1 h each in the dark. The cells were then pelleted and resuspended in PBS containing 1% FBS. GFP and hTBX18 fluorescence were assessed using a BD FACS Canto II (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) flow cytometer. Cell-size and singlet gates were set based on forward and side scatters, and the frequency of GFP+ and hTBX18+ cells was analyzed using FlowJo v10.4 (FlowJo LLC, Ashland, OR, USA).

4.9. Lentiviral Arclight Production, Titration and Transduction

Arclight, a voltage-sensitive-based fluorescent protein, was used to analyze action potentials generated by NRVMs [71,73]. Lentiviral Arclight was packaged in HEK293T cells by transfection using calcium phosphate precipitation with ppt.Arclight (Addgene, Watertown, MA, USA), pMDLgpRRE, pRSVREV, pMD2VSVG plasmids as previously described [82]. Lentivirus-containing supernatants were harvested at 48 and 72 h post-transfection, filtered through 0.45 µM syringe filters (Merck Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA), and concentrated using vivaspin 300,000 MWCO ultrafiltration tubes (Sartorius, Göttingen, Germany). Titer was assigned via functional transduction experiments in which dilutions of lentivirus stocks were used to transduce HEK293T cells, genomic DNA was extracted (Bioline, Memphis, TN, USA), and qPCR was performed to calculate the functional titer. The final titer of LV.Arclight was ~3 × 108 transducing units/mL.

4.10. Arclight Confocal Line Scanning

NRVMs plated in glass bottom confocal dishes and co-transduced with rAAV6 and LV.Arclight for 3 weeks were analyzed for functional changes using a live cell imaging chamber on an Olympus FV1000 confocal laser scanning microscope. This involved repetitively scanning the same line 20,000 times on individual cells at a frequency of 850 Hz (~25 s) to measure changes in fluorescence intensity of Arclight over time [71,73]. To ensure consistency across treatment groups, cells were paced at a rate of 0.5 Hz using a custom-built cell culture pacing device.
Captured line scans were analyzed using a custom-written MATLAB program (MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA). This program corrected for baseline signal bleaching, filtered the signal to allow for better signal visualization and normalized, and inverted and zero-corrected it to allow signal parameters to be measured and compared across scans. APD50 was measured as the interval between the timing of 50% maximal upstroke amplitude and the time point of 50% of repolarization. Additionally, the peak-to-peak interval was used to confirm consistent beating frequencies.

4.11. Statistical Analysis

All data are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean. Differences between group means were compared using an unpaired t-test with Welch’s correction. Differences between several groups were compared using an ordinary one-way ANOVA. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

5. Conclusions

This study demonstrated the faithful recapitulation of the sophisticated pacemaker cell phenotype using an rAAV construct expressing hTBX18 to reprogram ventricular myocytes, thus building on the previously employed stem cell and adenoviral-based approaches to biological pacing. This approach produced cells that not only converted on a molecular and physiological level but also underwent distinctive morphological and functional changes to become genuine SAN-like pacemaker cells. This novel method utilized a vector system that addresses some of the limitations of previous approaches and allows for new prospects for biological pacemakers to be developed in a clinically relevant gene transfer vector. Although limited by use in primary cells only, this method serves as a proof of principle in that NRVMs can be converted into genuine pacemaker cells using an rAAV vector. However, longer-term experiments in small and large animal models will be required to assess the efficacy, reliability and safety of this system before translation to patients who exhibit bradycardia.

Author Contributions

M.F.—conception and design, performing experiments, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of results, drafting and submission of the manuscript. R.R.—preparation of reagents and animal cells for experiments. S.I.—preparation of reagents and animal cells for experiments. T.Y.L.L.—performing experiments and acquisition of data. M.A.B.—development of equipment and tools for performing experiments and analysis of data. C.D.—creation of software for analysis and interpretation of data. C.K.—acquisition of data on flow cytometry. J.J.H.C.—conception, design and proofreading of the manuscript. E.K.—conception and design, analysis and interpretation of results, drafting of manuscript, proofreading and submission of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by a National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia Project Grant (APP1128864) to E.K., Future Leader Fellowship (ID 100463) from the National Heart Foundation of Australia (JJHC) and a Sydney Medical School Foundation Fellowship (JJHC). M.F. was supported by the MyWestmead Early Career Research Scholarship and Arab Bank Postgraduate Research Scholarship from the Westmead Medical Research Foundation.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Western Sydney Local Health District Animal Ethics Committee (protocol number: 4232, approved: June 2018). The gene therapy work was approved by the Western Sydney Local Health District Institutional Biosafety Committee (protocol number: WIMR-17-08, approved: October 2017).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that supports the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the facilities and services provided by the Westmead Institute for Medical Research and Westmead Research Hub Core facilities, including microscopy, flow cytometry and genomics.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kapoor, N.; Liang, W.; Marbán, E.; Cho, H.C. Transcription factor-driven conversion of quiescent cardiomyocytes to pacemaker cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 2013, 31, 54–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Bleeker, W.K.; Mackaay, A.J.; Masson-Pévet, M.; Bouman, L.N.; Becker, A.E. Functional and morphological organization of the rabbit sinus node. Circ. Res. 1980, 46, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jensen, P.N.; Gronroos, N.N.; Chen, L.Y.; Folsom, A.R.; de Filippi, C.; Heckbert, S.R.; Alonso, A. Incidence of and risk factors for sick sinus syndrome in the general population. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2014, 64, 531–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Dakkak, W.; Doukky, R. Sick Sinus Syndrome. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing LLC: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  5. Adan, V.; Crown, L.A. Diagnosis and treatment of sick sinus syndrome. Am. Fam. Physician 2003, 67, 1725–1732. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  6. Semelka, M.; Gera, J.; Usman, S. Sick sinus syndrome: A review. Am. Fam. Physician 2013, 87, 691–696. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  7. Bradshaw, P.J.; Stobie, P.; Knuiman, M.W.; Briffa, T.G.; Hobbs, M.S. Trends in the incidence and prevalence of cardiac pacemaker insertions in an ageing population. Open Heart 2014, 1, e000177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. John, R.M.; Kumar, S. Sinus Node and Atrial Arrhythmias. Circulation 2016, 133, 1892–1900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Keller, K.B.; Lemberg, L. The Sick Sinus Syndrome. Am. J. Crit. Care 2006, 15, 226–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cronin, B.; Essandoh, M.K. Update on Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices for Anesthesiologists. J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 2017, 4, 1871–1884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Madhavan, M.; Mulpuru, S.K.; McLeod, C.J.; Cha, Y.-M.; Friedman, P.A. Advances and Future Directions in Cardiac Pacemakers: Part 2 of a 2-Part Series. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2017, 69, 211–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Banaszewski, M.; Stępińska, J. Right heart perforation by pacemaker leads. Arch. Med. Sci. 2012, 8, 11–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Khan, M.N.; Joseph, G.; Khaykin, Y.; Ziada, K.M.; Wilkoff, B.L. Delayed Lead Perforation: A Disturbing Trend. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. 2005, 28, 251–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Cingolani, E.; Goldhaber, J.I.; Marban, E. Next-generation pacemakers: From small devices to biological pacemakers. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2018, 15, 139–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chien, K.R.; Domian, I.J.; Parker, K.K. Cardiogenesis and the Complex Biology of Regenerative Cardiovascular Medicine. Science 2008, 322, 1494–1497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Irisawa, H. Comparative physiology of the cardiac pacemaker mechanism. Physiol. Rev. 1978, 58, 461–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Christoffels, V.M.; Smits, G.J.; Kispert, A.; Moorman, A.F.M. Development of the Pacemaker Tissues of the Heart. Circ. Res. 2010, 106, 240–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Blaschke, R.J.; Hahurij, N.D.; Kuijper, S.; Just, S.; Wisse, L.J.; Deissler, K.; Maxelon, T.; Anastassiadis, K.; Spitzer, J.; Hardt, S.E.; et al. Targeted mutation reveals essential functions of the homeodomain transcription factor Shox2 in sinoatrial and pacemaking development. Circulation 2007, 115, 1830–1838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jay, P.Y.; Berul, C.I.; Tanaka, M.; Ishii, M.; Kurachi, Y.; Izumo, S. Cardiac conduction and arrhythmia: Insights from Nkx2.5 mutations in mouse and humans. Novartis Found. Symp. 2003, 250, 227–238. [Google Scholar]
  20. Jay, P.Y.; Harris, B.S.; Maguire, C.T.; Buerger, A.; Wakimoto, H.; Tanaka, M.; Kupershmidt, S.; Roden, D.M.; Schultheiss, T.M.; O’Brien, T.X.; et al. Nkx2-5 mutation causes anatomic hypoplasia of the cardiac conduction system. J. Clin. Investig. 2004, 113, 1130–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, H.; Espinoza-Lewis, R.A.; Chen, C.; Hu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, Y. The role of Shox2 in SAN development and function. Pediatric Cardiol. 2012, 33, 882–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Espinoza-Lewis, R.A.; Yu, L.; He, F.; Liu, H.; Tang, R.; Shi, J.; Sun, X.; Martin, J.F.; Wang, D.; Yang, J.; et al. Shox2 is essential for the differentiation of cardiac pacemaker cells by repressing Nkx2-5. Dev. Biol. 2009, 327, 376–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Hoogaars, W.M.; Engel, A.; Brons, J.F.; Verkerk, A.O.; de Lange, F.J.; Wong, L.Y.; Bakker, M.L.; Clout, D.E.; Wakker, V.; Barnett, P.; et al. Tbx3 controls the sinoatrial node gene program and imposes pacemaker function on the atria. Genes Dev. 2007, 21, 1098–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Mori, A.D.; Zhu, Y.; Vahora, I.; Nieman, B.; Koshiba-Takeuchi, K.; Davidson, L.; Pizard, A.; Seidman, J.G.; Seidman, C.E.; Chen, X.J.; et al. Tbx5-dependent rheostatic control of cardiac gene expression and morphogenesis. Dev. Biol. 2006, 297, 566–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. McNally, E.M.; Svensson, E.C. Setting the pace: Tbx3 and Tbx18 in cardiac conduction system development. Circ. Res. 2009, 104, 285–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Wiese, C.; Grieskamp, T.; Airik, R.; Mommersteeg, M.T.; Gardiwal, A.; de Gier-de Vries, C.; Schuster-Gossler, K.; Moorman, A.F.; Kispert, A.; Christoffels, V.M. Formation of the sinus node head and differentiation of sinus node myocardium are independently regulated by Tbx18 and Tbx3. Circ. Res. 2009, 104, 388–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Hu, Y.F.; Dawkins, J.F.; Cho, H.C.; Marban, E.; Cingolani, E. Biological pacemaker created by minimally invasive somatic reprogramming in pigs with complete heart block. Sci. Transl. Med. 2014, 6, 245–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Liu, Q.; Zaiss, A.K.; Colarusso, P.; Patel, K.; Haljan, G.; Wickham, T.J.; Muruve, D.A. The role of capsid-endothelial interactions in the innate immune response to adenovirus vectors. Hum. Gene Ther. 2003, 14, 627–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Muruve, D.A. The innate immune response to adenovirus vectors. Hum. Gene Ther. 2004, 15, 1157–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lusky, M.; Christ, M.; Rittner, K.; Dieterle, A.; Dreyer, D.; Mourot, B.; Schultz, H.; Stoeckel, F.; Pavirani, A.; Mehtali, M. In vitro and in vivo biology of recombinant adenovirus vectors with E1, E1/E2A, or E1/E4 deleted. J. Virol. 1998, 72, 2022–2032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gorziglia, M.I.; Kadan, M.J.; Yei, S.; Lim, J.; Lee, G.M.; Luthra, R.; Trapnell, B.C. Elimination of both E1 and E2 from adenovirus vectors further improves prospects for in vivo human gene therapy. J. Virol. 1996, 70, 4173–4178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gorabi, A.M.; Hajighasemi, S.; Khori, V.; Soleimani, M.; Rajaei, M.; Rabbani, S.; Atashi, A.; Ghiaseddin, A.; Saeid, A.K.; Ahmadi Tafti, H.; et al. Functional biological pacemaker generation by T-Box18 protein expression via stem cell and viral delivery approaches in a murine model of complete heart block. Pharm. Res. 2019, 141, 443–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Gorabi, A.M.; Hajighasemi, S.; Tafti, H.A.; Atashi, A.; Soleimani, M.; Aghdami, N.; Saeid, A.K.; Khori, V.; Panahi, Y.; Sahebkar, A. TBX18 transcription factor overexpression in human-induced pluripotent stem cells increases their differentiation into pacemaker-like cells. J. Cell. Physiol. 2019, 234, 1534–1546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Hu, Y.; Li, N.; Liu, L.; Zhang, H.; Xue, X.; Shao, X.; Zhang, Y.; Lang, X. Genetically Modified Porcine Mesenchymal Stem Cells by Lentiviral Tbx18 Create a Biological Pacemaker. Stem Cells Int. 2019, 2019, 3621314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Schweizer, P.A.; Darche, F.F.; Ullrich, N.D.; Geschwill, P.; Greber, B.; Rivinius, R.; Seyler, C.; Müller-Decker, K.; Draguhn, A.; Utikal, J.; et al. Subtype-specific differentiation of cardiac pacemaker cell clusters from human induced pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cell Res. 2017, 8, 229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Yang, M.; Zhang, G.G.; Wang, T.; Wang, X.; Tang, Y.H.; Huang, H.; Barajas-Martinez, H.; Hu, D.; Huang, C.X. TBX18 gene induces adipose-derived stem cells to differentiate into pacemaker-like cells in the myocardial microenvironment. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2016, 38, 1403–1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Zhang, W.; Zhao, H.; Quan, D.; Tang, Y.; Wang, X.; Huang, C. Tbx18 promoted the conversion of human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes into sinoatrial node-like pacemaker cells. Cell Biol. Int. 2022, 46, 403–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ranzani, M.; Cesana, D.; Bartholomae, C.C.; Sanvito, F.; Pala, M.; Benedicenti, F.; Gallina, P.; Sergi, L.S.; Merella, S.; Bulfone, A.; et al. Lentiviral vector-based insertional mutagenesis identifies genes associated with liver cancer. Nat. Methods 2013, 10, 155–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bokhoven, M.; Stephen, S.L.; Knight, S.; Gevers, E.F.; Robinson, I.C.; Takeuchi, Y.; Collins, M.K. Insertional Gene Activation by Lentiviral and Gammaretroviral Vectors. J. Virol. 2009, 83, 283–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chamberlain, K.; Riyad, J.M.; Weber, T. Cardiac gene therapy with adeno-associated virus-based vectors. Curr. Opin. Cardiol. 2017, 32, 275–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zacchigna, S.; Zentilin, L.; Giacca, M. Adeno-associated virus vectors as therapeutic and investigational tools in the cardiovascular system. Circ. Res. 2014, 114, 1827–1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Pacak, C.A.; Byrne, B.J. AAV vectors for cardiac gene transfer: Experimental tools and clinical opportunities. Mol. Ther. J. Am. Soc. Gene Ther. 2011, 19, 1582–1590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Wu, Z.; Asokan, A.; Samulski, R.J. Adeno-associated virus serotypes: Vector toolkit for human gene therapy. Mol. Ther. J. Am. Soc. Gene Ther. 2006, 14, 316–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Chauveau, S.; Anyukhovsky, E.P.; Ben-Ari, M.; Naor, S.; Jiang, Y.P.; Danilo, P., Jr.; Rahim, T.; Burke, S.; Qiu, X.; Potapova, I.A.; et al. Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes Provide In Vivo Biological Pacemaker Function. Circ. Arrhythmia Electrophysiol. 2017, 10, e004508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Jung, J.J.; Husse, B.; Rimmbach, C.; Krebs, S.; Stieber, J.; Steinhoff, G.; Dendorfer, A.; Franz, W.M.; David, R. Programming and isolation of highly pure physiologically and pharmacologically functional sinus-nodal bodies from pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cell Rep. 2014, 2, 592–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Protze, S.I.; Liu, J.; Nussinovitch, U.; Ohana, L.; Backx, P.H.; Gepstein, L.; Keller, G.M. Sinoatrial node cardiomyocytes derived from human pluripotent cells function as a biological pacemaker. Nat. Biotechnol. 2017, 35, 56–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Saito, Y.; Nakamura, K.; Ito, H. Cell-based Biological Pacemakers: Progress and Problems. Acta Med. Okayama 2018, 72, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Cai, J.; Yi, F.F.; Li, Y.H.; Yang, X.C.; Song, J.; Jiang, X.J.; Jiang, H.; Lin, G.S.; Wang, W. Adenoviral gene transfer of HCN4 creates a genetic pacemaker in pigs with complete atrioventricular block. Life Sci. 2007, 80, 1746–1753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Cingolani, E.; Yee, K.; Shehata, M.; Chugh, S.S.; Marban, E.; Cho, H.C. Biological pacemaker created by percutaneous gene delivery via venous catheters in a porcine model of complete heart block. Heart Rhythm 2012, 9, 1310–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Manno, C.S.; Chew, A.J.; Hutchison, S.; Larson, P.J.; Herzog, R.W.; Arruda, V.R.; Tai, S.J.; Ragni, M.V.; Thompson, A.; Ozelo, M.; et al. AAV-mediated factor IX gene transfer to skeletal muscle in patients with severe hemophilia B. Blood 2003, 101, 2963–2972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ginn, S.L.; Alexander, I.E.; Edelstein, M.L.; Abedi, M.R.; Wixon, J. Gene therapy clinical trials worldwide to 2012—An update. J. Gene Med. 2013, 15, 65–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Aitken, M.L.; Moss, R.B.; Waltz, D.A.; Dovey, M.E.; Tonelli, M.R.; McNamara, S.C.; Gibson, R.L.; Ramsey, B.W.; Carter, B.J.; Reynolds, T.C. A phase I study of aerosolized administration of tgAAVCF to cystic fibrosis subjects with mild lung disease. Hum. Gene Ther. 2001, 12, 1907–1916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Li, W.; Zhang, L.; Johnson, J.S.; Zhijian, W.; Grieger, J.C.; Ping-Jie, X.; Drouin, L.M.; Agbandje-McKenna, M.; Pickles, R.J.; Samulski, R.J. Generation of novel AAV variants by directed evolution for improved CFTR delivery to human ciliated airway epithelium. Mol. Ther. J. Am. Soc. Gene Ther. 2009, 17, 2067–2077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Yang, L.; Li, J.; Xiao, X. Directed evolution of adeno-associated virus (AAV) as vector for muscle gene therapy. Methods Mol. Biol. (Clifton N.J.) 2011, 709, 127–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zincarelli, C.; Soltys, S.; Rengo, G.; Rabinowitz, J.E. Analysis of AAV serotypes 1-9 mediated gene expression and tropism in mice after systemic injection. Mol. Ther. J. Am. Soc. Gene Ther. 2008, 16, 1073–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Larsson, H.P. How is the heart rate regulated in the sinoatrial node? Another piece to the puzzle. J. Gen. Physiol. 2010, 136, 237–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Stieber, J.; Hofmann, F.; Ludwig, A. Pacemaker channels and sinus node arrhythmia. Trends Cardiovasc. Med. 2004, 14, 23–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. DiFrancesco, D. The role of the funny current in pacemaker activity. Circ. Res. 2010, 106, 434–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ueda, K.; Nakamura, K.; Hayashi, T.; Inagaki, N.; Takahashi, M.; Arimura, T.; Morita, H.; Higashiuesato, Y.; Hirano, Y.; Yasunami, M.; et al. Functional characterization of a trafficking-defective HCN4 mutation, D553N, associated with cardiac arrhythmia. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 27194–27198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Shi, W.; Wymore, R.; Yu, H.; Wu, J.; Wymore, R.T.; Pan, Z.; Robinson, R.B.; Dixon, J.E.; McKinnon, D.; Cohen, I.S. Distribution and prevalence of hyperpolarization-activated cation channel (HCN) mRNA expression in cardiac tissues. Circ. Res. 1999, 85, e1–e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Chandler, N.J.; Greener, I.D.; Tellez, J.O.; Inada, S.; Musa, H.; Molenaar, P.; Difrancesco, D.; Baruscotti, M.; Longhi, R.; Anderson, R.H.; et al. Molecular architecture of the human sinus node: Insights into the function of the cardiac pacemaker. Circulation 2009, 119, 1562–1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Vozzi, C.; Dupont, E.; Coppen, S.R.; Yeh, H.I.; Severs, N.J. Chamber-related differences in connexin expression in the human heart. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 1999, 31, 991–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Davis, L.M.; Rodefeld, M.E.; Green, K.; Beyer, E.C.; Saffitz, J.E. Gap junction protein phenotypes of the human heart and conduction system. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 1995, 6, 813–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Kodama, I.; Takagishi, Y.; Honjo, H.; Boyett, M.R.; Severs, N.J.; Coppen, S.R.; Opthof, T. Heterogeneous expression of connexins in rabbit sinoatrial node cells: Correlation between connexin isotype and cell size. Cardiovasc. Res. 2002, 53, 89–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Desplantez, T. Cardiac Cx43, Cx40 and Cx45 co-assembling: Involvement of connexins epitopes in formation of hemichannels and Gap junction channels. BMC Cell Biol. 2017, 18, 3–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Kapoor, N.; Galang, G.; Marban, E.; Cho, H.C. Transcriptional suppression of connexin43 by TBX18 undermines cell-cell electrical coupling in postnatal cardiomyocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 14073–14079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Henderson, C.A.; Gomez, C.G.; Novak, S.M.; Mi-Mi, L.; Gregorio, C.C. Overview of the Muscle Cytoskeleton. Compr. Physiol. 2017, 7, 891–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Honjo, H.; Boyett, M.R.; Kodama, I.; Toyama, J. Correlation between electrical activity and the size of rabbit sino-atrial node cells. J. Physiol. 1996, 496, 795–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Trautwein, W.; Uchizono, K. Electron Microscopic and Electrophysiologic Study of the Pacemaker in the Sino-atrial Node of the Rabbit Heart. Z. Fur Zellforsch. Und Mikrosk. Anatomie (Vienna Austria 1948) 1963, 61, 96–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Barnett, L.; Platisa, J.; Popovic, M.; Pieribone, V.A.; Hughes, T. A Fluorescent, Genetically-Encoded Voltage Probe Capable of Resolving Action Potentials. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e43454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Shinnawi, R.; Huber, I.; Maizels, L.; Shaheen, N.; Gepstein, A.; Arbel, G.; Tijsen, A.J.; Gepstein, L. Monitoring Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes with Genetically Encoded Calcium and Voltage Fluorescent Reporters. Stem Cell Rep. 2015, 5, 582–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Murata, Y.; Iwasaki, H.; Sasaki, M.; Inaba, K.; Okamura, Y. Phosphoinositide phosphatase activity coupled to an intrinsic voltage sensor. Nature 2005, 435, 1239–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Leyton-Mange, J.S.; Mills, R.W.; Macri, V.S.; Jang, M.Y.; Butte, F.N.; Ellinor, P.T.; Milan, D.J. Rapid cellular phenotyping of human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes using a genetically encoded fluorescent voltage sensor. Stem Cell Rep. 2014, 2, 163–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Ma, J.; Guo, L.; Fiene, S.J.; Anson, B.D.; Thomson, J.A.; Kamp, T.J.; Kolaja, K.L.; Swanson, B.J.; January, C.T. High purity human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes: Electrophysiological properties of action potentials and ionic currents. Am. J. Physiol.-Heart Circ. Physiol. 2011, 301, 2006–2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Snyder, R.O. Adeno-associated virus-mediated gene delivery. J. Gene Med. 1999, 1, 166–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Choi, V.W.; Asokan, A.; Haberman, R.A.; Samulski, R.J. Production of Recombinant Adeno-Associated Viral Vectors. In Current Protocols in Human Genetics; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  77. Gregorevic, P.; Blankinship, M.J.; Allen, J.M.; Crawford, R.W.; Meuse, L.; Miller, D.G.; Russell, D.W.; Chamberlain, J.S. Systemic delivery of genes to striated muscles using adeno-associated viral vectors. Nat. Med. 2004, 10, 828–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Strobel, B.; Miller, F.D.; Rist, W.; Lamla, T. Comparative Analysis of Cesium Chloride- and Iodixanol-Based Purification of Recombinant Adeno-Associated Viral Vectors for Preclinical Applications. Hum. Gene Ther. Methods 2015, 26, 147–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Iravanian, S.; Nabutovsky, Y.; Kong, C.R.; Saha, S.; Bursac, N.; Tung, L. Functional reentry in cultured monolayers of neonatal rat cardiac cells. Am. J. Physiol.-Heart Circ. Physiol. 2003, 285, 449–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Bursac, N.; Papadaki, M.; Cohen, R.J.; Schoen, F.J.; Eisenberg, S.R.; Carrier, R.; Vunjak-Novakovic, G.; Freed, L.E. Cardiac muscle tissue engineering: Toward an in vitro model for electrophysiological studies. Am. J. Physiol.-Heart Circ. Physiol. 1999, 277, 433–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Toraason, M.; Luken, M.E.; Breitenstein, M.; Krueger, J.A.; Biagini, R.E. Comparative toxicity of allylamine and acrolein in cultured myocytes and fibroblasts from neonatal rat heart. Toxicology 1989, 56, 107–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Kizana, E.; Ginn, S.L.; Allen, D.G.; Ross, D.L.; Alexander, I.E. Fibroblasts can be genetically modified to produce excitable cells capable of electrical coupling. Circulation 2005, 111, 394–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 23 09230 g001 550
Figure 1. Efficient transduction of NRVMs using rAAV6 vectors. rAAV6-GFP and rAAV6-hTBX18 transduction efficiency in NRVMs as visualized via microscopy and quantified via flow cytometry. (A) GFP fluorescence in NRVMs transduced with rAAV6-GFP. (B) NRVMs transduced with rAAV6-hTBX18, then co-stained with hTBX18 antibody and DAPI. (C) Transduction efficiencies of NRVMs transduced with rAAV6-GFP and rAAV6-hTBX18, as quantified via flow cytometry. Data presented as mean ± SEM. n = 2 replicates.
Figure 1. Efficient transduction of NRVMs using rAAV6 vectors. rAAV6-GFP and rAAV6-hTBX18 transduction efficiency in NRVMs as visualized via microscopy and quantified via flow cytometry. (A) GFP fluorescence in NRVMs transduced with rAAV6-GFP. (B) NRVMs transduced with rAAV6-hTBX18, then co-stained with hTBX18 antibody and DAPI. (C) Transduction efficiencies of NRVMs transduced with rAAV6-GFP and rAAV6-hTBX18, as quantified via flow cytometry. Data presented as mean ± SEM. n = 2 replicates.
Ijms 23 09230 g001
Ijms 23 09230 g002 550
Figure 2. mRNA expression profile of NRVMs converted to pacemaker cells following overexpression of hTBX18. Quantitative analysis of changes in mRNA expression levels between rAAV6-GFP and rAAV6-hTBX18-transduced cells for the following genes. (A) hTBX18, (B) HCN4, (C) Cx43, (D) Cx45, (E) SαA. Data presented as mean ± SEM. *** p-value ≤ 0.001, ** p-value ≤ 0.01, * p-value ≤ 0.05.
Figure 2. mRNA expression profile of NRVMs converted to pacemaker cells following overexpression of hTBX18. Quantitative analysis of changes in mRNA expression levels between rAAV6-GFP and rAAV6-hTBX18-transduced cells for the following genes. (A) hTBX18, (B) HCN4, (C) Cx43, (D) Cx45, (E) SαA. Data presented as mean ± SEM. *** p-value ≤ 0.001, ** p-value ≤ 0.01, * p-value ≤ 0.05.
Ijms 23 09230 g002
Ijms 23 09230 g003 550
Figure 3. Protein expression profile of NRVMs converted to pacemaker cells following induced overexpression of hTBX18. Quantitative analysis of changes in protein expression levels between rAAV6-GFP- and rAAV6-hTBX18-transduced cells. (A) Representative figure showing protein bands generated by Western blot, their corresponding band sizes and the β-actin loading control (B) Quantification of hTBX18 protein levels in cells transduced with rAAV6-hTBX18 and rAAV6-GFP-transduced cells. (C) Quantification of HCN4 protein levels in cells transduced with rAAV6-hTBX18 and rAAV6-GFP-transduced cells. (D) Quantification of Cx43 protein levels in cells transduced with rAAV6-hTBX18 and rAAV6-GFP-transduced cells. (E) Quantification of Cx45 protein levels in cells transduced with rAAV6-hTBX18 and rAAV6-GFP-transduced cells. (F) Quantification of SαA protein levels in cells transduced with rAAV6-hTBX18 and rAAV6-GFP-transduced cells. Data presented as mean ± SEM. * p-value ≤ 0.05.
Figure 3. Protein expression profile of NRVMs converted to pacemaker cells following induced overexpression of hTBX18. Quantitative analysis of changes in protein expression levels between rAAV6-GFP- and rAAV6-hTBX18-transduced cells. (A) Representative figure showing protein bands generated by Western blot, their corresponding band sizes and the β-actin loading control (B) Quantification of hTBX18 protein levels in cells transduced with rAAV6-hTBX18 and rAAV6-GFP-transduced cells. (C) Quantification of HCN4 protein levels in cells transduced with rAAV6-hTBX18 and rAAV6-GFP-transduced cells. (D) Quantification of Cx43 protein levels in cells transduced with rAAV6-hTBX18 and rAAV6-GFP-transduced cells. (E) Quantification of Cx45 protein levels in cells transduced with rAAV6-hTBX18 and rAAV6-GFP-transduced cells. (F) Quantification of SαA protein levels in cells transduced with rAAV6-hTBX18 and rAAV6-GFP-transduced cells. Data presented as mean ± SEM. * p-value ≤ 0.05.
Ijms 23 09230 g003
Ijms 23 09230 g004 550
Figure 4. Characterization of expression levels of pacemaker markers in rAAV6-GFP and rAAV6-hTBX18-transduced cells by immunocytochemistry. (A) hTBX18 (green) expression and (B) HCN4 (red) and hTBX18 (green) expression. (C) Cx43 (red) and hTBX18 (green) expression. (D) Cx45 (red) and hTBX18 (green) expression. (E) SαA (red) and hTBX18 (green) expression. All samples were also co-stained with DAPI to mark the nuclei (blue).
Figure 4. Characterization of expression levels of pacemaker markers in rAAV6-GFP and rAAV6-hTBX18-transduced cells by immunocytochemistry. (A) hTBX18 (green) expression and (B) HCN4 (red) and hTBX18 (green) expression. (C) Cx43 (red) and hTBX18 (green) expression. (D) Cx45 (red) and hTBX18 (green) expression. (E) SαA (red) and hTBX18 (green) expression. All samples were also co-stained with DAPI to mark the nuclei (blue).
Ijms 23 09230 g004
Ijms 23 09230 g005 550
Figure 5. Morphological characterization of NRVMs converted to a pacemaker cell phenotype following induced overexpression of hTBX18. (A) Representative figures showing original NRVMs with their characteristic large, thick, block-like structure. (B) Representative figures showing rAAV6-hTBX18-transduced NRVMs which have become thin, spindle-like and tapering in structure after 3 weeks. (C) Quantification of the mean diameter of the transduced cells. (D) Quantification of the mean area of the transduced cells. Data presented as mean ± SEM. **** p-value ≤ 0.0001, *** p-value ≤ 0.001.
Figure 5. Morphological characterization of NRVMs converted to a pacemaker cell phenotype following induced overexpression of hTBX18. (A) Representative figures showing original NRVMs with their characteristic large, thick, block-like structure. (B) Representative figures showing rAAV6-hTBX18-transduced NRVMs which have become thin, spindle-like and tapering in structure after 3 weeks. (C) Quantification of the mean diameter of the transduced cells. (D) Quantification of the mean area of the transduced cells. Data presented as mean ± SEM. **** p-value ≤ 0.0001, *** p-value ≤ 0.001.
Ijms 23 09230 g005
Ijms 23 09230 g006 550
Figure 6. Pacemaker-like cell function was observed in hTBX18-transduced NRVMs. Action potentials recorded and analyzed from NRVMs and hTBX18-transduced cells using LV. Arclight co-transduction. Representative images of Arclight expression as generated by the confocal line scan protocol and the action potentials generated after analysis via MATLAB for (A) NRVM cells, (B) atrial myocyte cells (C) and rAAV6-hTBX18-transduced cells. (D) Quantification of the AP morphology using the APD50 measure. Data presented as mean ± SEM. **** p-value ≤ 0.0001.
Figure 6. Pacemaker-like cell function was observed in hTBX18-transduced NRVMs. Action potentials recorded and analyzed from NRVMs and hTBX18-transduced cells using LV. Arclight co-transduction. Representative images of Arclight expression as generated by the confocal line scan protocol and the action potentials generated after analysis via MATLAB for (A) NRVM cells, (B) atrial myocyte cells (C) and rAAV6-hTBX18-transduced cells. (D) Quantification of the AP morphology using the APD50 measure. Data presented as mean ± SEM. **** p-value ≤ 0.0001.
Ijms 23 09230 g006
Ijms 23 09230 g007 550
Figure 7. The cloning strategy followed to create the AAV_CBA_hTBX18_WPRE rAAV construct. This involved PCR amplifying the hTBX18 gene fragment from a lentiviral backbone and sub-cloning it into the rAAV construct.
Figure 7. The cloning strategy followed to create the AAV_CBA_hTBX18_WPRE rAAV construct. This involved PCR amplifying the hTBX18 gene fragment from a lentiviral backbone and sub-cloning it into the rAAV construct.
Ijms 23 09230 g007
Table
Table 1. Primers used for RT-PCR protocol to measure fold changes in synthesized cDNA.
Table 1. Primers used for RT-PCR protocol to measure fold changes in synthesized cDNA.
PrimerDirectionSequence
Human TBX18Forward (5′-3′)TTCTGGCGACCATCACTACG
Human TBX18Reverse (5′-3′)ACGCCATTCCCAGTACCTTG
Rat HCN4Forward (5′-3′)CGCATCCACGACTACTACGAAC
Rat HCN4Reverse (5′-3′)GGTCTGCATTGGCGAACAG
Rat Cx43Forward (5′-3′)AGCCTGAACTCTCATTTTTCCTT
Rat Cx43Reverse (5′-3′)CCATGTCTGGGCACCTCT
Rat Cx45Forward (5′-3′)TGCCTACAAGCAGAACAAAGC
Rat Cx45Reverse (5′-3′)TCCTCGTGGCTGCCATAC
Rat Actn2Forward (5′-3′)CTATTGGGGCTGAAGAAATCGTC
Rat Actn2Reverse (5′-3′)CTGAGATGTCCTGAATGGCG
Rat GAPDHForward (5′-3′)GCATCACCCCATTTGATGTT
Rat GAPDHReverse (5′-3′)TGGGAAGCTGGTCATCAAC
Table
Table 2. Primary and secondary antibodies used in the immunoblotting protocol.
Table 2. Primary and secondary antibodies used in the immunoblotting protocol.
Primary AntibodySourceCatalogue NumberDilution
Goat anti-TBX18Santa Cruzsc-178691:200
Mouse anti-HCN4Abcamab85023 (S114-10)1:250
Rabbit anti-Cx43Merck MilliporeAb17271:500
Rabbit anti-Cx45KovalDonation1:500
Mouse anti-SαASigmaA78111:3000
Rabbit anti-β-ActinAbcamAb82271:5000
Secondary AntibodySourceCatalogue NumberDilution
Anti-rabbit HRPThermofisher314601:10,000
Anti-mouse HRPDakoP04471:10,000
Anti-goat HRPDakoP04491:10,000
Table
Table 3. Primary and secondary antibodies used in the immunocytochemistry protocol.
Table 3. Primary and secondary antibodies used in the immunocytochemistry protocol.
Primary AntibodySourceCatalogue NumberDilution
Goat anti-TBX18Santa Cruzsc-178691:150
Mouse anti-HCN4Abcamab85023 (S114-10)1:150
Rabbit anti-Cx43Merck MilliporeMAB30681:250
Rabbit anti-Cx45Merck MilliporeMAB31001:150
Mouse anti-SαASigmaA78111:1000
Secondary AntibodySourceCatalogue NumberDilution
Donkey anti-Goat Alexa fluor 594Life TechnologiesA-110581:1000
Donkey anti-Goat Alexa fluor 647InvitrogenA-214471:1000
Rabbit anti-Mouse Alexa fluor 594Molecular ProbesA-110671:1000
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Farraha, M.; Rao, R.; Igoor, S.; Le, T.Y.L.; Barry, M.A.; Davey, C.; Kok, C.; Chong, J.J.H.; Kizana, E. Recombinant Adeno-Associated Viral Vector-Mediated Gene Transfer of hTBX18 Generates Pacemaker Cells from Ventricular Cardiomyocytes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 9230. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23169230

AMA Style

Farraha M, Rao R, Igoor S, Le TYL, Barry MA, Davey C, Kok C, Chong JJH, Kizana E. Recombinant Adeno-Associated Viral Vector-Mediated Gene Transfer of hTBX18 Generates Pacemaker Cells from Ventricular Cardiomyocytes. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(16):9230. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23169230

Chicago/Turabian Style

Farraha, Melad, Renuka Rao, Sindhu Igoor, Thi Y. L. Le, Michael A. Barry, Christopher Davey, Cindy Kok, James J.H. Chong, and Eddy Kizana. 2022. "Recombinant Adeno-Associated Viral Vector-Mediated Gene Transfer of hTBX18 Generates Pacemaker Cells from Ventricular Cardiomyocytes" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 16: 9230. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23169230

APA Style

Farraha, M., Rao, R., Igoor, S., Le, T. Y. L., Barry, M. A., Davey, C., Kok, C., Chong, J. J. H., & Kizana, E. (2022). Recombinant Adeno-Associated Viral Vector-Mediated Gene Transfer of hTBX18 Generates Pacemaker Cells from Ventricular Cardiomyocytes. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(16), 9230. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23169230

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop