Next Article in Journal
Using ncRNAs as Tools in Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment—The Way towards Personalized Medicine to Improve Patients’ Health
Next Article in Special Issue
Influence of Foods and Nutrition on the Gut Microbiome and Implications for Intestinal Health
Previous Article in Journal
Combined Treatment of Bronchial Epithelial Calu-3 Cells with Peptide Nucleic Acids Targeting miR-145-5p and miR-101-3p: Synergistic Enhancement of the Expression of the Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR) Gene
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of the Lipid Profile, Type 2 Diabetes and Medication on the Metabolic Syndrome—Associated Gut Microbiome
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Depletion of Gut Microbiota Inhibits Hepatic Lipid Accumulation in High-Fat Diet-Fed Mice

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(16), 9350; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23169350
by Hui Han 1,2, Mengyu Wang 1, Ruqing Zhong 1, Bao Yi 1,*, Martine Schroyen 2 and Hongfu Zhang 1
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(16), 9350; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23169350
Submission received: 27 July 2022 / Revised: 9 August 2022 / Accepted: 14 August 2022 / Published: 19 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gut Microbiota in Gastroenterology and Hepatology)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors performed experiments to determine the effects of antibiotic treatment to mice to kill the intestinal microbiota on the effects of a high fat diet, focusing on the effects on the liver.  The experiments showed that the antibiotic treatment decreased weight gain and fatty liver. Global gene expression analysis of liver identified many changes in lipid metabolism genes that may be involved in the molecular mechanism.  Overall, the experiments appear to be well-performed, and the paper is well-organized and well-written. However, there are a few minor comments.

Comment 1:  As the authors write in the Conclusions, many of the effects of the antibiotic treatment may be independent of the changes in microbiota and just due to host toxicities from the combination of the 4 antibiotics. It would have strengthened the paper to have added a fourth group where the same dose of antibiotics was administered by i.v. or i.p. injection to mice fed the high-fat diet. This may largely block the killing of the intestinal bacteria, but maintain host toxicity. The weight graph and energy intake graph suggest that the antibiotics cause an initial toxicity that the mice then adapt to.  Perhaps toxicity, RNA-Seq, or (Seahorse) respiratory experiments can be performed on isolated hepatocytes or HepG2 cells as a surrogate for in vivo effects on liver. Antibiotics frequently perturb mitochondrial protein synthesis that can lead to mitohormesis and potentially compensatory increases in fatty acid beta-oxidation potentially leading to a prevention of fatty liver such as the result observed. Although evidence for this was not observed at the gene expression level it could possibly occur through translational or post-translational mechanisms.

Minor comments (wording):   

Abstract line 1: the key -> a key pathology

Abstract line 2: Gut -> The gut

Abstract line 2: confirmed to be correlated with -> shown to regulate

Abstract line 3: gut -> the gut

Abstract line 4: mice model -> mouse model

Abstract line 5: mechanism of -> mechanism through which

Abstract line 5: in regulating -> regulates

Introduction line 5: gut -> the gut

Introduction line 8: Gut -> The gut

Page 2 line 2: an high-fat -> a high-fat

Page 2 paragraph 2 line 6: immune -> the immune

Page 2 paragraph 2 line 11: transportation -> transport

Page 2 paragraph 3 line 1: As for the energy metabolism in host, gut -> The gut

Page 2 paragraph 3 second line from bottom: effects and mechanism of -> the effects of the

Page 2 paragraph 3 last line: a Abx-induced-> an Abx-induced

Page 2 paragraph 3 last line: was investigated -> were investigated

Figure 1 legend line 1: Veen -> Venn

Page 3 paragraph 1 line 12 -> Simpson -> the Simpson

Page 4 paragraph 1 line 9: Desulfobacterota, while increased -> and Desulfobacterota, while

it increased

Page 4 paragraph 1 second line from bottom: while increased -> while it increased

Figure 3 legend line 1: SCFAs contents -> SCFA content

Page 5 paragraph 1 line 1: were the microbial -> are microbial synthesized

Page 7 paragraph 2 line 1: Beside -> Besides

Figure 7 legend lines 2 and 3 (occurs twice): Volcan blot -> Volcano plot

Figure 8 legend lines 2 and 3 (occurs twice): Go -> GO

Figure 8 legend line 5: differential -> differentially expressed

Figure 9 legend line 1: validated the -> validation of the

Discussion line 8: have -> has

Discussion line 9: in host -> on the host

Discussion paragraph 2 line 6: effects -> effects on the host

Discussion paragraph 2 line 9: induced -> induces

Page 12 line 15: linolenic and -> linolenic acid

Page 12 line 16: acids -> acid

Page 12 line 29: blood circulating -> the circulation

Page 13 line 2: Besides -> In addition

Discussion 10 lines from bottom: bacterial -> bacteria

Discussion 5 lines from bottom: contains the major resistant bacteria -> is a major antibiotic-resistant genus

Discussion 4 lines from bottom: suggested -> suggest

Discussion second line from bottom: with the differential expressing analysis resulting from the -> differential expression analysis using

Discussion bottom line: RNA sequencing in the liver -> hepatic RNA sequencing

Section 4.2 title: experiment -> experiments

Page 14 line 9: was showed -> is shown

Page 14 line 13: weighted -> weighed

Section 4.4 line 2: tubes -> tube

Section 4.4 lines 3 and 5 (twice): under -> at

Section 4.4 line 7: Agilent 6890 gas chromatography -> an Agilent 6890 gas chromatograph

Section 4.5 line 4: under -> at

Section 4.7 line 2: DNA were -> DNA was

Section 4.7 line 3: 2100 Bioanalyser -> a 2100 Bioanalyzer

Conclusion line 4: to be established -> to establish

Conclusion line 7: 5 weeks’ -> 5-week

Conclusion fourth line from bottom: are necessary to -> should

Conclusion bottom line: confirmed -> more definitive

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript aims to identify the impact of gut microbiota and its depletion by antibiotics on regulating hepatic lipid metabolism in high-fat diet (HFD)-fed mice. The results of the animal study are well documented by charts and figures showing microbiota depletion-related changes in the bacterial composition and their impact on the expression of hepatic genes involved in metabolic pathways.

Overall, the manuscript is very well written. However, several issues might be addressed to improve the scientific quality of the article.

1.  I would suggest placing the Figures with legends after the main text in each sub-section within the Results (2.1., 2.2., 2.3., 2.4., ...). That way it would be more appropriate and especially understandable for the readers. They will read the information first and then study the Figures.

2. I would suggest replacing mice fed a HFD with HFD-fed mice.

3. Description of chow diet within Material and Methods might be added.

4. In the Introduction - I recommend adding more information about the gut microbiome composition in health and disease. Moreover, it would beneficial to add a small paragraph concerning bacterial metabolites - SCFA (propionate, butyrate, acetate), their functions, and their impact on health.

5. Please, define the red rectangle bounding bacterial taxa Enterobacter in the Legend of Figure 2C.

6. Please, check if all abbreviations are explained in the main text, not only in the Figure legends (FFS, TC, TG, iWAT, pWAT, eWAT,...). It will be more clear for the readers if abbreviations will be also explained in the main text.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop