Next Article in Journal
From Dukes-MAC Staging System to Molecular Classification: Evolving Concepts in Colorectal Cancer
Next Article in Special Issue
Study of the Electrochemical Behavior of N-Substituted-4-Piperidones Curcumin Analogs: A Combined Experimental and Theoretical Approach
Previous Article in Journal
Differential Ganglioside and Cholesterol Depletion by Various Cyclodextrin Derivatives and Their Effect on Synaptosomal Glutamate Release
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 16
10.3390/ijms23169461
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Novel Synthesis Methods of New Imidazole-Containing Coordination Compounds Tc(IV, V, VII)—Reaction Mechanism, Xrd and Hirshfeld Surface Analysis

by
Mikhail Alexandrovich Volkov
*,
Anton Petrovich Novikov
,
Mikhail Semenovich Grigoriev
,
Alexander Mikhailovich Fedoseev
and
Konstantin Eduardovich German
Frumkin Institute of Physical Chemistry and Electrochemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninskii Prospect 31-4, 119071 Moscow, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(16), 9461; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23169461
Submission received: 31 July 2022 / Revised: 19 August 2022 / Accepted: 20 August 2022 / Published: 21 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Chemical Bond and Bonding 2.0)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In this work, we have proposed two new methods for the synthesis of [TcO2L4]+ (where L = imidazole (Im), methylimidazole (MeIm)) complexes using thiourea (Tu) and Sn(II) as the reducing agents. The main and by-products of the reactions were determined, and possible reaction mechanisms were proposed. We have shown that the reduction of Tc(VII) with thiourea is accompanied by the formation of the Tc(III) intermediate and further oxidation to Tc(V). The reaction conditions’ changing can lead to the formation of Tc(VII) and Tc(IV) salts. Seven new crystal structures are described in this work: Tc(V) complexes, salts with Tc(VII) and Tc(IV) anions. For the halide salts of Tu the cell parameters were determined. In all of the obtained compounds, except for [TcO2(MeIm)4]TcO4, there are π–stacking interactions between the aromatic rings. An increase in the anion size lead to weakening of the intermolecular interactions. The halogen bonds and anion-π interactions were also found in the hexahalide-containing compounds. The Hirshfeld surface analysis showed that the main contribution to the crystal packing is created by the van der Waals interactions of the H···H type (42.5–55.1%), H···C/C···H (17.7–21.3%) and hydrogen bonds, which contribute 15.7–25.3% in total.

1. Introduction

Technetium is mostly chemically and environmentally available as Tc(VII)O4–, and therefore in most reactions possesses oxidative properties. Depending on the reducing conditions and the chemical nature of the ligand available, Tc(VII)O4– may convert to stable/unstable final/intermediate species of Tc(V), Tc(VI) or Tc(III). Under very special conditions, the products could be either of a cluster nature [1], or carbonyl derivatives [2,3] of Tc[2+, 2.5+ and 0] oxidation states. Very high attention is focused on the Tc(V) and Tc(III) complexes that play important roles in the preparative [4,5,6], radiopharmaceutical [7,8] and industrial reprocessing chemistry of Tc [9].
Weak, intermolecular interactions are of particular interest from a theoretical point of view, the study of which in pertechnetates and perrhenates of purines led to the discovery of a new type of chemical bond [10]. New methods of separating perrhenates and pertechnetates are based on non-valent interactions [11,12,13,14]. The study of the non-valent interactions’ contribution for various technetium compounds will allow a deeper understanding of the impact of radiopharmaceuticals on living organisms [7], and of the formation of non-trivial technetium complex compounds, similar to those described in [4,5,15]. The information about weak interactions can also be useful for predicting the behavior of the Tc-containing intermediates in catalytic and sorption processes on complex organic sorbents, such as those described [16].
Halide systems have now received a new meaning for high-temperature pyrometallurgical reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel. One approach to this is the use of low-temperature melts and ionic liquids, based on imidazole derivatives. It is known that concentrated hydrohalogen acids form the stable compounds TcO(Hal)42–, but during its long-term storage, Tc(V) transforms into the hexahalide compounds of Tc(IV). However, with the presence of ligands in the Tc(V) solutions, it becomes possible to obtain useful functional complexes, which was shown in the work [17]. There is no description in the literature of Tc(IV) hexahalide complexes with imidazolium cations. In the course of the operation of molten-salt reactors, the TcHal62– compounds will inevitably accumulate. The study of the crystal structure, intermolecular interactions and conditions for the formation of technetium hexahalides can be used to develop methods for reprocessing fuel for new types of reactors [18,19]. It should be taken into account that TcHal62– compounds can be used to purify and obtain metallic technetium, which is considered to be the most acceptable form for the long-term storage or transmutation of technetium.
The reduction of the pertechnetate ions with organosulfur compounds (inorganic Na2S2O3 or organic thiourea (Tu)) leads to the formation of Tc(V) [20,21] depending on the present ligands, which the authors of the following work pay attention to [22].
In the work of Fackler and co-workers in 1985 [1], the structure of [TcO2(Im)4]Cl·2H2O (Im = imidazole) was analyzed. The Tc=O distances were used in some of the databases as a reference for TcO2+, giving an idea of the large variation of Tc=O in technetyl cation—the observation being in fact erroneous, due to the initial misinterpretation of the space group in the compound structure. Meanwhile, the great interest in the technetyl(V) derivatives arose due to the fact that its application in nuclear medicine as biologically active 99mTc radiopharmaceuticals is based on the Tc(V) formation with [O=Tc=O]+ as a complex-forming center [23,24,25,26]. The Tc complexes of such a type with amine and imine ligands are the principal models for the Tc bonding to amino acids, proteins, antibodies etc. In general, Tc (V) usually forms trans -[O2L4Tc]+, where L is the N-bearing organic ligand [17]. Imidazole rings are often found in biochemical systems applicable to metal coordination.
The R-factor obtained in [17] for [TcO2(Im)4]Cl·2H2O, was equal to 0.091 with the abnormally short distances Tc–O, that are characteristic more of Tc(VII) than of Tc(V). The analyses of local symmetry and the hkl set support the erroneous interpretation of the space group to a centrosymmetric one by the authors of [17] for the structure [TcO2(Im)4]Cl·2H2O. Nowadays, a great database for metalloyl cations complexes is available, and the typical tendencies indicate that the structure of [TcO2(Im)4]Cl·2H2O in [17] was confusing; therefore, we considered it reasonable to undertake new research of its analogues with the principal idea of enlarging (and possibly correcting) the database for the technetyl complex compounds and the structural understanding of them.
The paper considers a new method for the preparation of [TcO2(Im)4]Cl·2H2O (I), [TcO2(Im)4]Br·2H2O (II), [TcO2(2-MeIm)4]Cl·2H2O (III), and [TcO2(2-MeIm)4]TcO4 (IV) compounds, their crystal structures are studied and the noncovalent interactions are analyzed by the Hirshfeld surfaces method and IR spectroscopy of [TcO2(Im)4]Br·2H2O. A detailed analysis of the reactional by-products ((MeIm)(HMeIm)(Tu)TcO4 (V), HIm2TcCl6 (VI), Him2TcBr6 (VII), (HMeIm)4Tc/SnCl6Cl2 (VIII), Tu2Cl2 (IX) and Tu2Br2 (X)) was carried out and new imidazole complexes Tc(VII) and Tc(IV) were identified. The optimal conditions for the formation of the complex-forming nucleus TcO2+ by the proposed method were also determined.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Structural Description of Tc(V) Complexes

Compounds I–IV contain [TcO2L4]+ cationic complexes, in which the Im (MeIm) molecules are coordinated to the Tc atom by the N atom (Figure 1). The crystal structure data for compound I were obtained from [17]. The [TcO2Im4]Cl·2H2O structure described earlier in the centrosymmetric space group C2/c, with the disordering of the chloride ion and water molecules is, probably, not centrosymmetric and similar to II. Furthermore, in [17] the authors also reported the structure of [TcO2(MeIm)4]Cl2H2O. The space group of the compound is C2/c, while the compound III of the same composition in our work is P-1. The oxygen atoms are in the trans-position (the angles O-Tc-O are close to 180°) The N-Tc-N angles are close to 90° in all of the complexes (Tables S2, S6 and S10, Supplementary Materials). In II, three imidazole rings are turned in one direction (C1, C7 and C10 atoms on one side of the equatorial plane of the TcO2 group), and only one ring is turned in the other direction (C4 on the other side of the plane) (Figure 1). In the structures III and IV, the opposite imidazole rings are turned in different directions. Although in all of the structures the imidazole rings are planar, they are not parallel to the O···O direction. In structure II, the two opposite rings are rotated further away from this direction (torsion angles O1-Tc1-N1-C3 and O1-Tc1-N3-C4 are 159.1° and 164.2°, respectively), than the other two (the torsion angles O1-Tc1-N7-C12 and O1-Tc1-N5-C8 are 170.1° and 175.4°). In III, the imidazole rings deviate more strongly from the O···O direction (torsion angles change from 150° to 155°), while in IV, on the contrary, they are close to this direction (torsion angles change from 168.1° to 175.0°).
The Tc–N distances in all of the complexes are approximately equal and change from 2.122 to 2.140 Å. The Tc=O distances in the complexes vary from 1.743 to 1.763 Å, which is longer than the distances described in previous works for the chlorides of these complexes [17], and used in the calculations [27].
In all of the structures, the cations are bonded to each other through crystallization water molecules or counterions. In II, the cations are linked through bromide-ions by the H-bonds of the N–H···Br type and through the water molecules by the hydrogen bonds of the N–H···O and O–H···O types. In III, the cations are linked to the water molecules by the hydrogen bonds of the O–H···O type, which in turn form a water···Cl···water···water bridge to another cation. In IV, the cations are linked to each other through the pertechnetate anions by the weak hydrogen bonds of the C–H···O type. The crystal packing in all of the complexes can be represented as layered, where the molecules of the complexes form layers, between which there are molecules of anions and water (Figure 2). Additionally, the molecules of the complexes in structure II are connected by two π–stacking interactions, and in III by only one (Figure 3a,b). The strongest π–stacking interaction is observed in structure III (Table 1). In structure IV, there are short distances between the atoms of the imidazole rings, but these contacts cannot be called π–stacking [28,29], because of the large distance between the centers (4.127 Å) and the large displacement (1.944 Å) of the rings. However, in IV, the methyl hydrogen of methylimidazole and one of the hydrogens of the imidazole ring participate in the CH-π interactions (the distances between the hydrogen atoms and the centers of the aromatic rings are shorter than 3 Å(Figure 3c)) [30,31,32,33]. In this case, the distance between the hydrogen atom and the center of the aromatic ring is the shortest in the case of the hydrogen of the imidazole ring. Although the CH-π interactions are often considered weaker than the hydrogen bonds, they are one of the factors that determine the molecular structure within a crystal and can be used for recognition [34,35].
The analysis of the supramolecular interactions in the obtained structures showed that an increase in the size of the anion leads to a deterioration in the binding of the molecules in the crystal but does not lead to crystal-packing disturbances (solvent molecules and counterions are located between the layer of cations) and suggests an increase in solubility upon passing from compound II to IV.

2.2. Structural Description of By-Products

Compound V was obtained as a by-product of the preparation of compound IV. The structure contains two MeIm molecules, one of which is protonated at the nitrogen atom, but the proton in the compound is disordered between the two nitrogen atoms of different molecules (N3 and N13). The structure contains a neutral thiourea molecule and a pertechnetate-anion (Figure 4a). The MeIm fragments are in the same plane (the angle between the planes is 4.67°). The crystal packing can be represented as layered, the MeIm fragments are linked to each other by a hydrogen bond of the N–H···H type into dimers and by π–stacking interaction (Table 2) into layers, as in II–IV, and the pertechnetate-ions and thiourea molecules are located between the layers (Figure 4b). The thiourea molecules are linked to each other by the hydrogen bonds of the N–H···S type, to the pertechnetate-ions by H-bonds of the N–H···O type and to the imidazole fragments by the bonds of the C–H···S type.
Compounds VI, VII and VIII are by-products of the second method. Compounds VI and VII contain protonated imidazole cations and hexahalide Tc(IV) anions (Figure 5). Compound VIII is a mixed salt containing 30% technetium and 70% tin in the hexahalide anion. In VIII, the asymmetric fragment contains four MeIm cations, the hexahalide anion and two chloride anions. The environment of the technetium or tin atoms in the hexahalide anions is close to an ideal octahedral (Tables S18, S23 and S27, Supplementary Materials).
In structures VI–VIII, there are π–stacking interactions between cations (Table 2) (Figure 6). The crystal packing can be represented as layered. The cations in VI–VIII are linked into layers by the π–stacking interactions, the cations and anions are linked between layers by hydrogen bonds (Figure 7). In VI and VII, the anions are additionally linked by the halogen bonds, and the Hal···Hal. The packing of VI and VII is very close (Figure 7), the main difference is in the small rotations of anions and cations: in VI (sp. gr. C2/m), the anions occupy a special position with symmetry 2/m, and cations occupy a special position with symmetry m; in VII (sp. gr. P21/c), the anions occupy a special position with symmetry -1, and the cations are in a general position.
In addition, in VI–VIII there are anion–π interactions (the distance between the center of the ring and the anion is less than 5 Å, and the angle α is greater than 50°) between the hexahalide anions and imidazole rings (Figure 6) [36,37].
For compound IX, a crystal structure containing a dithiourea cation and chloride anions was previously described [38]. The doubly charged dithiourea cation is formed by S–S bonding of the thiourea molecules. The halide anions are attached to the cations by the hydrogen bonds. Compound X is isostructural to compound IX (a = 8.836(1), b = 10.506(1), c = 19.695(1), sp. gr. Pbca); in this paper, we determined only the crystal cell of compound IX: a = 9.36, b = 10.70, c = 20.17 Å, orthorhombic P.

2.3. Hirshfeld Surface Analysis

The Hirshfeld surface (HS) analysis is based on the division of the electron density in a crystal. The Hirshfeld surface covers the molecule and determines the volume of space in which the electron density of the pro-molecule exceeds the density of all of the neighboring molecules [39]. The fingerprint plots (2D scans of 3D surfaces) are a convenient way to analyze the intermolecular interactions present in crystals. This method can be used to analyze the π–stacking interactions [40], the halogen and hydrogen bonds [41,42], anion–π [28] and other weak non-covalent interactions [43,44].
The Crystal Explorer 21 [45] program was used to analyze the non-valent interactions in crystals using the HS analysis. The donor–acceptor groups are visualized using a standard (high) surface resolution and dnorm surfaces (Figure 8a–c). The red spots on the surface of the dnorm plot indicate intermolecular contacts involving the hydrogen bonds. The brightest red spots correspond to the strongest hydrogen bond N—H···Hal in II–III and O–H···O in II. The weaker red spots correspond to C—H···Hal bonds in II–III, C—H···O in II–IV and the π–stacking interactions in II–III. For an additional analysis of the π–stacking interactions, the shape-index surfaces were described. There are π–stacking interactions in II and III, as seen from the characteristic red and blue triangles on the surface, and absent in IV (Figure 8d–f).
The nonvalent interactions analysis of the obtained complexes showed that the main contribution to the crystal packing is made by van der Waals interactions of the H···H type (42.5–55.1%) and H···C/C···H (17.7–21.3%). The contacts of the H···H type make the greatest contribution to III, which may be due to the appearance of a methyl group and the absence of a large number of H-bonds. A significant contribution to the intermolecular interactions is made by the hydrogen bonds, for which the following types are responsible: O···H/H···O and Hal···H/H···Hal, which contribute 15.7–25.3% in total. Contacts of the C···N/N···C type responsible for the π–stacking interactions contribute 3.3% in II, 1.5% in III and are practically absent in IV (0.1%). The contacts that contribute less than 2% are not considered in Figure 9.

2.4. Ir-Spectroscopy

The electronic absorption spectroscopy of the bright pink solutions of compounds I and II showed a broad wave with a peak of 480 ± 10 nm (Figure 10, inset), which is typical for Tc(V) compounds. Otherwise, the UV-Vis spectroscopy was uninformative.
As no sulfur atoms are present in our case, compound II, the group [O=Tc=O]+ is completely characterized with the fluctuation bands at 790–880 cm−1 in the infrared region [46,47,48]. In the IR spectrum of II (Figure 10) the Tc=O group is pronounced by the bands at 809.79 cm−1 and 847.68 cm−1 (Table 2). A wide wave in the range of 2800–3700 cm−1 corresponds to the vibrations of water atoms [49] and 1500 ± 50 cm−1 scissor vibrations HOH. The remaining peaks displayed on the spectrum, including those that appear in the region of 2800–3700 cm−1, correspond to the vibrations of the carbon and nitrogen atoms in the imidazole fragment of the compound molecule II [50,51]. The spectra show the peaks splitting typical for compressed tablets KBr.

2.5. Proposed Mechanism for the Formation of Complexes [Tco2(Im)4]+

The reduction reaction of the pertechnetate ions with thiourea in the presence of the HHal acids has a relatively low yield, but it also has advantages. The method turned out to be selective for the synthesis of the [TcO2(R-Im)4]+ complexes, and the target Tc-containing products were the only colored compounds. Changing the concentrations of thiourea and hydrohalic acid did not lead to a noticeable change in the yield of the target reaction products. Nevertheless, it should be noted that, in the absence of the acids (HHal or HTcO4), the reaction proceeds very slowly, which can be explained as in the described compound V, where the thiourea interacts with oxygen Tc=O with unprotonated nitrogen atoms of nitrogen. The experiments have shown that an excess of thiourea and an equimolar concentration of HHal acid will be optimal for the preparation of the [TcO2(R-Im)4]+ compounds. The UV-VIS spectroscopy of the intensely colored solutions formed during the synthesis showed the presence of several broad wavelengths of 370 nm, 415 nm and 495 nm (Figure 11). A similar spectrum is described by the authors of [21] (peaks at 423 nm and 493 nm), which suggests the formation of Tc(III) intermediates in the form of coordination cations [TcTu4L2]3+ (L = Tu or R-Im). The authors of this work find it difficult to interpret the peak at 370 nm. The synthesis in an oxygen-free atmosphere hindered the formation of the target complexes; the Tc(III) compounds could not be isolated in the presence of imidazoles. The combination of the above factors helped to suggest the mechanism for the formation of Tc(V) complexes, which is schematically presented in Figure 12.
The reduction of the pertechnetate ion and the formation of the complexes apparently occur during the successive reduction of Tc(VII) to Tc(III) and the subsequent oxidation with atmospheric oxygen to Tc(V). The reaction takes place in the presence of catalytic anions in an acidic medium, in which the thiol tautomeric form of thiourea is stable. The reaction begins with the SH-group reaction with the Tc-O– bond; in this case, the Tc-S bond is formed with the formation of particle I and the water molecule elimination. The redistribution of the charges in an acid medium leads to an elongation of the Tc=O bond and the formation of particle II. Repeating this process three times results in the formation of particle III. The resulting fragment is reactive and coordinates with the two additional ligands, which can be assumed to contain thiourea, in the case of thiourea excess. The resulting particle IV presumably has an octahedral environment of the technetium atom [TcS6]. In the presence of the imidazolium fragment, it is possible for a slow stage of fragment IV oxidation. The oxidation, most likely with dissolved oxygen, leads to the sequential elimination of two thiourea molecules, which leave as a Tu22+ dimer, and the formation of a V particle. The repeated course of the reaction of oxidation and the substitution of two molecules of the Tu leads to the formation of particle VI. The resulting particle VI coordinates with the two imidazole molecules and completes the coordination sphere, forming a stable reaction product [TcO2(Im)4]+.
The mechanism of the Tc(V) complex formation reaction, according to the second proposed method, is based on the assumption of the formation of an intermediate TcO(Hal)52– particle. The ongoing hydrolysis processes lead to the formation of the [O=Tc=O]+ nucleus, and in the presence of an imidazolium ligand, the final product [TcO2(Im)4]+ is formed. A large excess of HHal acid provokes a competitive exchange of ligands; at a sufficiently high concentration, HHal reduces Tc(VII) via Tc(V) to Tc(IV) with the formation of a stable hexahalide complex.

3. Materials and Methods

Caution! 99Tc is a β-emitter (A = 635 Bq/μg [52], Emax = 290 keV), the appropriate shielding and manipulation techniques were employed during the synthesis and all of the manipulations.
All of the reagents used in the work were qualified chemically pure and were not subjected to further purification. The technetic acid used in the work was prepared by dissolving Tc2O7 in bi-distilled water (R ≥ 18 MΩ).

3.1. Synthesis [TcO2(Im)4]Cl·2H2O (I), [TcO2(Im)4]Br·2H2O (II), [TcO2(2-MeIm)4]Cl·2H2O (III)

3.1.1. Method 1

A total of 10 mg thiourea (Tu) (Merck) and 10 mg imidazole (Im) (Merck) (5 µL 2-methylimidazole (MeIm) (Merck) for compound III) were placed in a 1.5 mL vial and dissolved in 350 µL methanol (Sigma-Aldrich). Then, 10 µL of 12M HCl (5M HBr for compound II) and 2 µL of 3.5 M HTcO4 were added to the resulting solution. The vial with an intensely colored red solution was closed and left until the color changed to bright pink, then the solution was evaporated to dryness at room temperature (about 10 h). The resulting crystalline mixtures were washed once with cold methanol (3 °C), the washing solutions were colored light pink. The resulting crystals I, II and III were suitable for SCXRD. The compounds are infinitely soluble in alcohol, acetone, water and organic acids. The recrystallization is conveniently carried out from methanol. The approximate reaction yield of each substance by technetium: I, II ~20%, III ~40%. UV-Vis spectroscopy of the methanol solutions of compounds I, II and III: 233 nm, 340 nm, 480 nm. A total of 50 mg of each of the products was given for elemental analysis. The elemental analysis calculated/found (%). I: Tc–20.36/19.54; O–13.48/16.17; C–30.34/32.37; N–23.6/24.25; Cl–7.48/7.33; H–4.21; II: Tc–19.07/18.7; O–12.33/13.3; C–27.7/29.47; N–21.6/21.76; Br–15.41/14.48; H– 3.9. III: Tc–18.66/17.28; O–12.06/13.2; C–36.19/37.63; N–21.11/21.9; Cl–6.7/6.29; H–4.52.

3.1.2. Method 2

The compounds I, II and III were prepared by reduction of 100 mg KTcO4 («Isotope JSC») with SnCl2 (Merck) (or SnBr2 for substance II) in 1M HCl (HBr) in presence of excess Im (MeIm for substance III). A pink solution was formed on refluxing the reaction mixture at 80 oC for 3 h. The pink crystals were grown on cooling and separated by filtration and recrystallized for ethanol. The mother liquors were an intense red-brown color. The obtained compounds I, II and III turned out to be contaminated with other technetium-containing products and were subjected to recrystallization from methanol. The approximate reaction yield by technetium: I, II = 50 %, III = 63%.

3.2. Synthesis [TcO2(2-MeIm)4]TcO4 (IV)

A total of 9.5 mg of thiourea (Tu) and 5 µL of 2-methylimidazole (MeIm) were placed in a 1.5 mL vial and dissolved in 350 µL of methanol. Then, 5 µL of 12M HCl and 10 µL of 3.5M HTcO4 were added to the resulting solution. The intensely colored red solution was allowed to evaporate to dryness at room temperature (10 h). The pink transparent crystals of IV were separated from the mother liquor and washed with methanol (20 °C), until the washings were colorless. The resulting compound IV was less soluble in the alcohols and acetone than those obtained for I, II and III. Compound IV can be conveniently recrystallized from ethanol with the addition of 10% water. Approximate reaction yield by technetium was 40%. A total of 50 mg of the product IV was given for elemental analysis. The elemental analysis calculated/found (%): Tc-33.11/31.12; O–6.06/17.5; C–32.1/32.37; N–18.72/19.66; H–4.01.

3.3. Selection and Synthesis (MeIm)(HMeIm)(Tu)TcO4 (V)

The alcohol solutions formed by washing the dry crystalline mixture of compound IV were evaporated by half at room temperature. The transparent colorless crystals that formed along the meniscus of the liquid were selected for X-ray diffraction. An increase in the concentration of MeIm and a decrease in the acidity of the reaction mass led to an increase in the content of compound V in the products (approx. 40–50% by Tc).

3.4. Selection and Synthesis HIm2TcCl6 (VI), Him2TcBr6 (VII) (HMeIm)4Tc/SnCl6Cl2 (VIII)

The methanolic solutions obtained after washing the mother crystalline mixtures of compounds I, II and III were mixed with the solutions obtained after recrystallization of the compounds obtained by method 2. After the slow evaporation of methanol, the crystalline mixtures were obtained containing a small amount of compounds I, II and III (approx. 5%), compounds VI, VII and VIII (approx. 30%). In a mixture containing compound II, the previously described [53] HImBr crystals were found.
Compounds VI and VII can be obtained analogously to the second synthesis method I, II and III by adding more HHal acid. The recrystallization of the products I, II and III from the concentrated HHal acids also led to the formation of hexahalotechnetates.

3.5. Selection Tu2Cl2 (IX) and Tu2Br2 (X)

In the dried crystalline mixture containing crystals of compounds IV and V, as well as in the mixtures of the compounds I, II and III, obtained by method 1, long transparent crystals of IX and X were found. They were readily soluble in methanol and could be purified from other impurities, including technetium compounds by recrystallization.

3.6. FTIR-Analysis

The IR spectrum of the compound II was registered at Nicolet IR200 FT-IR from the 2 mg sample pressed as a finely grounded mixture with 100 mg KBr and pressed at 50 kg/sm2.

3.7. Single-Crystal XRD Analysis

The crystal structure of all of the synthesized substances was determined by X-ray structural analysis, using an automatic four-circle area-detector diffractometer Bruker KAPPA APEX II with MoKα radiation. The cell parameters were refined over the entire dataset together with the data reduction by using SAINT-Plus software [54]. The absorption corrections were introduced using the SADABS program [55]. The structures were solved by using the SHELXT-2018/2 program [56] and refined by full-matrix least squares on F2 in the anisotropic approximation for all of the non-hydrogen atoms (SHELXL-2018/3 [57]). Atoms H, bounded to CH- and NH-groups, were placed in geometrically calculated positions with the isotropic temperature factors equal to 1.2 Ueq(C, N) and 1.5 Ueq(C) for CH3-groups. The H atoms in the water molecules in I were objectively located from the difference Fourier synthesis and refined with isotropic temperature factors equal 1.5 Ueq(O). The structure I was refined as an inversion twin. The tables and figures for the structures were generated using Olex2 [58].
The crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 3. All of the other crystallographic parameters of the structures are indicated in Tables S1−S29 (Supplementary Materials). The atomic coordinates were deposited at the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre [59], CCDC № 1022420, 2193592–2193597 for II–VIII. The supplementary crystallographic data can be obtained free of charge from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif (accessed on 30 July 2022).

3.8. Elemental Analysis

For compounds I–IV, the chemical composition was determined on a sample of 50 mg each. The technetium in the compounds was determined by liquid scintillation on a Tri-Carb 3180 TR/SL instrument (PerkinElmer, Chiba, Japan), using a HiSafe 3 scintillator; the measurement error did not exceed 5%. C, N, O were determined using the EA 3000 EuroVector analyzer, the measurement error was not more than 10%. The halogens were determined by Mohr titration in the presence of potassium dichromate.

4. Conclusions

In this work, we proposed two new methods for the preparation of [TcO2L4]+ complexes (where L = imidazole (Im), methylimidazole (MeIm)). The reduction of Tc(VII) in an acidic alcoholic solution with thiourea leads to the selective formation of Tc(V). In the absence of a reducing agent, a complex salt Tc(VII) is formed. The reduction of Tc(VII) in an acidic aqueous solution by Sn(II) leads to the formation of a mixture of Tc(V) and Tc(IV) complexes. In a large excess of the reducing agent, the Tc(IV) hexahalides are formed and the formation of double, mixed salt (HMeIm)4[Tc/SnCl6]Cl2 is possible. The main by-products of the reactions are determined and the possible reaction mechanisms are considered. We have shown that the Tc(VII) reduction by thiourea occurs via Tc(III) intermediates, followed by oxidation to Tc(V).
The definition of the [TcO2Im4]Br·2H2O crystal structure in the non-centrosymmetric space group suggests that the literature description of the [TcO2Im4]Cl·2H2O structure in the C2/c space group with disordered Cl and water positions may be erroneous. The lengths of the Tc-N and Tc=O bonds in complexes of the [TcO2L4]+ type were refined. A comparative analysis of the non-valent interactions in the obtained crystals showed that with an increase in the size of the anion or the change of Im for MeIm, the intermolecular interactions become weaker. In all of the compounds obtained, except for [TcO2(MeIm)4]TcO4, there are π–stacking interactions between the aromatic rings. The halogen bonds and anion–π interactions were also found in the hexahalide-containing compounds. An analysis of the Hirshfeld surface showed that the main contribution to the crystal packing is made by van der Waals interactions of the type H···H (42.5–55.1%), H···C/C···H (17.7–21.3%) and hydrogen bonds, which contribute 15.7–25.3% in total.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms23169461/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.P.N. and M.A.V.; methodology, A.M.F. and M.A.V.; software, A.P.N.; validation, A.P.N., M.A.V. and K.E.G.; formal analysis, A.P.N.; investigation, A.P.N. and M.A.V.; resources, M.S.G.; data curation, M.S.G.; writing—original draft preparation, M.A.V.; writing—review and editing, M.A.V. and A.P.N.; visualization, M.A.V. and A.P.N.; supervision, K.E.G.; project administration, K.E.G.; funding acquisition, K.E.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The study was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (program no. 122011300061-3).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The work does not contain information classified as a state secret and can be published in the public domain.

Acknowledgments

X-ray diffraction experiments were performed at the Center for Shared Use of Physical Methods of Investigation at the Frumkin Institute of Physical Chemistry and Electrochemistry, RAS. The study was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (program no. 122011300061-3).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Volkov, M.A.; Fedoseev, A.M.; Krivoborodov, E.G.; Toropygin, I.Y.; German, K.E.; Grigoriev, M.S.; Kuznetsov, V.V.; Budantseva, N.A.; Novikov, A.P.; Mezhuev, Y.O. A new method for the synthesis of polynuclear carboxylate complexes of technetium (II, III). J. Organomet. Chem. 2022, 957, 122146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Alberto, R. From oxo to carbonyl and arene complexes; A journey through technetium chemistry. J. Organomet. Chem. 2018, 869, 264–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sidorenko, G.V.; Miroslavov, A.E. Higher Technetium(I) Carbonyls and Possibility of Using Them in Nuclear Medicine: Problems and Prospects. Radiochemistry 2021, 63, 253–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zegke, M.; Grödler, D.; Roca Jungfer, M.; Haseloer, A.; Kreuter, M.; Neudörfl, J.M.; Sittel, T.; James, C.M.; Rothe, J.; Altmaier, M.; et al. Ammonium Pertechnetate in Mixtures of Trifluoromethanesulfonic Acid and Trifluoromethanesulfonic Anhydride. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202113777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. German, K.E.; Fedoseev, A.M.; Grigoriev, M.S.; Kirakosyan, G.A.; Dumas, T.; Den Auwer, C.; Moisy, P.; Lawler, K.V.; Forster, P.M.; Poineau, F. A 70-Year-Old Mystery in Technetium Chemistry Explained by the New Technetium Polyoxometalate [H7O3]4[Tc20O68] ⋅ 4H2O. Chem. Eur. J. 2021, 27, 13624–13631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Abram, U.; Beyer, R.; Münze, R.; Stach, J.; Kaden, L.; Lorenz, B.; Findeisen, M. Mixed-ligand complexes of technetium-III. Synthesis and characterization of [bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane]tetrakis(trimethylphosphite)technetium(I) hexafluorophosphate, [Tc(DPPE)(TMP)4]PF6. Polyhedron 1989, 8, 1201–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Duatti, A. Review on 99mTc radiopharmaceuticals with emphasis on new advancements. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2021, 92, 202–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jürgens, S.; Herrmann, W.A.; Kühn, F.E. Rhenium and technetium based radiopharmaceuticals: Development and recent advances. J. Organomet. Chem. 2014, 751, 83–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Melent’ev, A.B.; Mashkin, A.N.; German, K.E. The influence of deviations in process parameters on the purification of uranium from different radionuclides. Theor. Found. Chem. Eng. 2016, 50, 554–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Daolio, A.; Pizzi, A.; Terraneo, G.; Frontera, A.; Resnati, G. Anion⋅⋅⋅Anion Interactions Involving σ-Holes of Perrhenate, Pertechnetate and Permanganate Anions. ChemPhysChem 2021, 22, 2281–2285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Xie, R.; Shen, N.; Chen, X.; Li, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, C.; Xiao, C.; Chai, Z.; Wang, S. 99TcO4−Separation through Selective Crystallization Assisted by Polydentate Benzene-Aminoguanidinium Ligands. Inorg. Chem. 2021, 60, 6463–6471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zhu, L.; Sheng, D.; Xu, C.; Dai, X.; Silver, M.A.; Li, J.; Li, P.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Chen, L.; et al. Identifying the Recognition Site for Selective Trapping of 99TcO4− in a Hydrolytically Stable and Radiation Resistant Cationic Metal-Organic Framework. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 14873–14876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zhu, L.; Xiao, C.; Dai, X.; Li, J.; Gui, D.; Sheng, D.; Chen, L.; Zhou, R.; Chai, Z.; Albrecht-Schmitt, T.E.; et al. Exceptional perrhenate/pertechnetate uptake and subsequent immobilization by a low-dimensional cationic coordination polymer: Overcoming the hofmeister bias selectivity. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2017, 4, 316–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sheng, D.; Zhu, L.; Dai, X.; Xu, C.; Li, P.; Pearce, C.I.; Xiao, C.; Chen, J.; Zhou, R.; Duan, T.; et al. Successful Decontamination of 99TcO4− in Groundwater at Legacy Nuclear Sites by a Cationic Metal-Organic Framework with Hydrophobic Pockets. Angew. Chem. 2019, 131, 5022–5026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chotkowski, M.; Wrzosek, B.; Grdeń, M. Intermediate oxidation states of technetium in concentrated sulfuric acid solutions. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2018, 814, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, J.; Li, B.; Shen, N.; Chen, L.; Guo, Q.; Chen, L.; He, L.; Dai, X.; Chai, Z.; Wang, S. Task-Specific Tailored Cationic Polymeric Network with High Base-Resistance for Unprecedented 99TcO4−Cleanup from Alkaline Nuclear Waste. ACS Cent. Sci. 2021, 7, 1441–1450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fackler, P.H.; Lindsay, M.J.; Clarke, M.J.; Kastner, M.E. Synthesis and structure of trans-[O2(Im)4Tc]Cl·2H2O, trans-[O2(1-meIm)4Tc]Cl·3H2O and related compounds. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1985, 109, 39–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Louis-Jean, J.; George, J.; Poineau, F. From ammonium Hexahalorhenates(IV) to nanocrystalline rhenium metal: A combined thermal, diffraction and microscopic analysis. Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 2022, 105, 105840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Louis-Jean, J.; Swift, A.J.; Hatchett, D.W.; Poineau, F. Conversion of (NH4)2[ReF6] into ReO2 mixed phases: A thermal analysis study. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2022, 140, 109482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Baldas, J.; Colmanet, S.F.; Ivanov, Z.; Williams, G.A. Preparation and structure of [{Tc(V)N(thiourea)}4(edta)2]·6H2O: The first example of a cyclic nitrido-bridged tetrameric technetium complex. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1994, 2153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Abrams, M.J.; Davison, A.; Faggiani, R.; Jones, A.G.; Lock, C.J.L. Chemistry and Structure of Hexakis (thiourea-S) technetium (III) Trichloride Tetrahydrate, [Tc(SC(NH2)2)6]Cl3 * 4H2O. Inorg. Chem. 1984, 23, 3284–3288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Omori, T. Substitution reactions of technetium compounds. In Technetium and Rhenium Their Chemistry and Its Applications; Yoshihara, K., Omori, T., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1996; pp. 253–273. ISBN 978-3-540-49273-3. [Google Scholar]
  23. Welch, M.J.; Redvanly, C.S. Handbook of Radiopharmaceuticals: Radiochemistry and Applications; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2003; ISBN 978-0-470-84638-4. [Google Scholar]
  24. Abram, U.; Alberto, R. Technetium and rhenium: Coordination chemistry and nuclear medical applications. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2006, 17, 1486–1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liu, S. The role of coordination chemistry in the development of target-specific radiopharmaceuticals. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2004, 33, 445–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Maruk, A.Y.; Bruskin, A.B.; Kodina, G.E. Novel 99mTc radiopharmaceuticals with bifunctional chelating agents. Radiochemistry 2011, 53, 341–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sergienko, V.S.; Churakov, A.V. Specific features of technetium mononuclear octahedral oxo complexes: A review. Crystallogr. Reports 2013, 58, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Novikov, A.P.; Volkov, M.A.; Safonov, A.V.; Grigoriev, M.S. Synthesis, Crystal Structure, and Hirshfeld Surface Analysis of Hexachloroplatinate and Tetraclorouranylate of 3-Carboxypyridinium—Halogen Bonds and π-Interactions vs. Hydrogen Bonds. Crystals 2022, 12, 271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Alvarez, S. A cartography of the van der Waals territories. Dalton Trans. 2013, 42, 8617–8636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Spiwok, V. CH/π Interactions in Carbohydrate Recognition. Molecules 2017, 22, 1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Wang, L.; Hao, J.; Zhai, L.X.; Zhang, Y.; Dong, W.K. Synthesis, Crystal Structure, Luminescence, Electrochemical and Antimicrobial Properties of Bis(salamo)-Based Co(II) Complex. Crystals 2017, 7, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Nishio, M. The CH/π hydrogen bond in chemistry. Conformation, supramolecules, optical resolution and interactions involving carbohydrates. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011, 13, 13873–13900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Nishio, M. CH/π hydrogen bonds in organic reactions. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 6923–6950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kiessling, L.L.; Diehl, R.C. CH-π Interactions in Glycan Recognition. ACS Chem. Biol. 2021, 16, 1884–1893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Houser, J.; Kozmon, S.; Mishra, D.; Hammerová, Z.; Wimmerová, M.; Koča, J. The CH–π Interaction in Protein–Carbohydrate Binding: Bioinformatics and In Vitro Quantification. Chem. A Eur. J. 2020, 26, 10769–10780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Novikov, A.P.; Volkov, M.A.; Safonov, A.V.; Grigoriev, M.S.; Abkhalimov, E.V. Synthesis and Characterization of New Guanine Complexes of Pt(IV) and Pd(II) by X-Ray Diffraction and Hirshfeld Surface Analysis. Crystals 2021, 11, 1417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Savastano, M.; García, C.; López de la Torre, M.D.; Pichierri, F.; Bazzicalupi, C.; Bianchi, A.; Melguizo, M. Interplay between salt bridge, hydrogen bond and anion-π interactions in thiocyanate binding. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2018, 470, 133–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bombicz, P.; Mutikainen, I.; Krunks, M.; Leskelä, T.; Madarász, J.; Niinistö, L. Synthesis, vibrational spectra and X-ray structures of copper(I) thiourea complexes. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2004, 357, 513–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Spackman, M.A.; Jayatilaka, D. Hirshfeld surface analysis. CrystEngComm 2009, 11, 19–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Piña, J.J.; Gil, D.M.; Pérez, H. Revealing new non-covalent interactions in polymorphs and hydrates of Acyclovir: Hirshfeld surface analysis, NCI plots and energetic calculations. Comput. Theor. Chem. 2021, 1197, 113133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Marek, P.H.; Urban, M.; Madura, I.D. The study of interactions with a halogen atom: Influence of NH2 group insertion on the crystal structures of meta-bromonitrobenzene derivatives. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. C Struct. Chem. 2018, 74, 1509–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Novikov, A.P.; Bezdomnikov, A.A.; Grigoriev, M.S.; German, K.E. Synthesis, crystal structure and Hirshfeld surface analysis of 2-(perfluorophenyl)acetamide in comparison with some related compounds. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. E Crystallogr. Commun. 2022, 78, 80–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Psycharis, V.; Dermitzaki, D.; Raptopoulou, C.P. The Use of Hirshfeld Surface Analysis Tools to Study the Intermolecular Interactions in Single Molecule Magnets. Crystals 2021, 11, 1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Tan, S.L.; Jotani, M.M.; Tiekink, E.R.T. Utilizing Hirshfeld surface calculations, non-covalent inter action (NCI) plots and the calculation of inter action energies in the analysis of mol ecular packing. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. E Crystallogr. Commun. 2019, 75, 308–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Spackman, P.R.; Turner, M.J.; McKinnon, J.J.; Wolff, S.K.; Grimwood, D.J.; Jayatilaka, D.; Spackman, M.A. CrystalExplorer: A program for Hirshfeld surface analysis, visualization and quantitative analysis of molecular crystals. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2021, 54, 1006–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Du Preez, J.G.H.; Gerber, T.I.A.; Fourie, P.J.; Van Wyk, A.J. The Chemistry of rhenium and technetium. Part 1. Syntheses and characterisation of new dioxo technetium(V) complexes with schiff base type ligands. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1984, 82, 201–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kastner, M.E.; Lindsay, M.J.; Clarke, M.J. Synthesis and Structure of trans-[O2(en)2Tc(V)]+. Inorg. Chem. 1982, 21, 2037–2040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zuckman, S.A.; Freeman, G.M.; Troutner, D.E.; Volkert, W.A.; Holmes, R.A.; Van Derveer, D.G.; Barefield, E.K. Preparation and X-ray Structure of trans-Dioxo(1,4,8,11-tetraazacyclotetradecane)technetium(V) Perchlorate Hydrate. Inorg. Chem. 1981, 20, 2386–2389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Bykov, A.V.; Starokurov, Y.V.; Saletsky, A.M. IR Spectroscopy of Bidistilled and Deuterium Water under Conditions of Geometric Limitation in Glass Nanopores. Opt. Spectrosc. 2020, 128, 114–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wang, X.; Wang, D.; Guo, Y.; Yang, C.; Iqbal, A.; Liu, W.; Qin, W.; Yan, D.; Guo, H. Imidazole derivative-functionalized carbon dots: Using as a fluorescent probe for detecting water and imaging of live cells. Dalton Trans. 2015, 44, 5547–5554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. 1H-Imidazole. Available online: https://webbook.nist.gov/cgi/cbook.cgi?ID=C288324&Mask=80 (accessed on 30 July 2022).
  52. Handbook of Radioactivity Analysis: Volume 2. Radioanalytical Applications; L’Annunziata, M.F., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020; ISBN 978-0-12-814395-7. [Google Scholar]
  53. Ggor, A.; Piecha, A.; Jakubas, R.; Miniewicz, A. Crystal structure and characterization of a novel acentric imidazolium analog [C3N2H5+][Br−]. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2011, 503, 134–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. SAINT V8. 40B; Bruker AXS Inc.: Madison, WI, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  55. Krause, L.; Herbst-Irmer, R.; Sheldrick, G.M.; Stalke, D. Comparison of silver and molybdenum microfocus X-ray sources for single-crystal structure determination. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2015, 48, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Sheldrick, G.M. SHELXT—Integrated space-group and crystal-structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A Found. Crystallogr. 2015, 71, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Sheldrick, G.M. Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. C Struct. Chem. 2015, 71, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Dolomanov, O.V.; Bourhis, L.J.; Gildea, R.J.; Howard, J.A.K.; Puschmann, H. OLEX2: A complete structure solution, refinement and analysis program. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2009, 42, 339–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Groom, C.R.; Bruno, I.J.; Lightfoot, M.P.; Ward, S.C. The Cambridge Structural Database. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. B Struct. Sci. Cryst. Eng. Mater. 2016, 72, 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 23 09461 g001 550
Figure 1. Molecular structure of II (a), III (b) and IV (c) showing the coordination of the technetium atom with some bond lengths and labeling. Solvent molecules, counterions and H-atoms are omitted for clarity.
Figure 1. Molecular structure of II (a), III (b) and IV (c) showing the coordination of the technetium atom with some bond lengths and labeling. Solvent molecules, counterions and H-atoms are omitted for clarity.
Ijms 23 09461 g001
Ijms 23 09461 g002 550
Figure 2. Crystal packing of II (a), III (b) and IV (c) showing layers of complexes with solvent molecules and counterions between them. View along b axis.
Figure 2. Crystal packing of II (a), III (b) and IV (c) showing layers of complexes with solvent molecules and counterions between them. View along b axis.
Ijms 23 09461 g002
Ijms 23 09461 g003 550
Figure 3. View showing π–stacking interactions in the structures II (a), III (b) and CH-π interactions in IV(c). Only the hydrogen atoms involved in the CH-π interactions are shown.
Figure 3. View showing π–stacking interactions in the structures II (a), III (b) and CH-π interactions in IV(c). Only the hydrogen atoms involved in the CH-π interactions are shown.
Ijms 23 09461 g003
Ijms 23 09461 g004 550
Figure 4. Molecular structure of V (a) including atom labeling and crystal packing (b). Only one disordered H-atom of the imidazole ring is shown.
Figure 4. Molecular structure of V (a) including atom labeling and crystal packing (b). Only one disordered H-atom of the imidazole ring is shown.
Ijms 23 09461 g004
Ijms 23 09461 g005 550
Figure 5. Molecular structure of VI (a), VII (b) and VIII (c).
Figure 5. Molecular structure of VI (a), VII (b) and VIII (c).
Ijms 23 09461 g005
Ijms 23 09461 g006 550
Figure 6. View showing halogen bonds, anion–π and π–stacking interactions in the structures VI (a), VII (b) and VIII (c).
Figure 6. View showing halogen bonds, anion–π and π–stacking interactions in the structures VI (a), VII (b) and VIII (c).
Ijms 23 09461 g006
Ijms 23 09461 g007 550
Figure 7. Crystal packing of VI (a), VII (b) and VIII (c), showing cation.
Figure 7. Crystal packing of VI (a), VII (b) and VIII (c), showing cation.
Ijms 23 09461 g007
Ijms 23 09461 g008 550
Figure 8. HS mapper over dnorm for I (a), II (b), III (c) and HS mapper shape-index of I (d), II (e), III (f) to visualize intermolecular interactions in crystals.
Figure 8. HS mapper over dnorm for I (a), II (b), III (c) and HS mapper shape-index of I (d), II (e), III (f) to visualize intermolecular interactions in crystals.
Ijms 23 09461 g008
Ijms 23 09461 g009 550
Figure 9. Percentage contributions to the Hirshfeld surface area for the various close intermolecular contacts for II–IV.
Figure 9. Percentage contributions to the Hirshfeld surface area for the various close intermolecular contacts for II–IV.
Ijms 23 09461 g009
Ijms 23 09461 g010 550
Figure 10. IR spectrum of compound II, inset: UV-vis spectroscopy of a methanolic solution of compound II.
Figure 10. IR spectrum of compound II, inset: UV-vis spectroscopy of a methanolic solution of compound II.
Ijms 23 09461 g010
Ijms 23 09461 g011 550
Figure 11. UV-Vis spectroscopy of the stock solution of compound III a few minutes after the addition of HTcO4.
Figure 11. UV-Vis spectroscopy of the stock solution of compound III a few minutes after the addition of HTcO4.
Ijms 23 09461 g011
Ijms 23 09461 g012 550
Figure 12. Proposed mechanism of Tc(VII) reduction in the presence of competitive ligands by thiourea with the formation of intermediate products.
Figure 12. Proposed mechanism of Tc(VII) reduction in the presence of competitive ligands by thiourea with the formation of intermediate products.
Ijms 23 09461 g012
Table
Table 1. Parameters of π–stacking interactions.
Table 1. Parameters of π–stacking interactions.
StructureRingsAngleCentroid–Centroid DistanceShift Distance
IIN1C3C2N2C1N3C5C6N4C4 (symmetry code: −1/2+x, 1/2+y, z)6.5033.7491.175
N3C5C6N4C4 (symmetry code: −1/2+x, 1/2−y, −1/2+z)5.3513.9791.718
IIIC10N7C12C11N8C7N5C8C9N6 (symmetry code: 1+x, y, z)1.3253.5691.269
VC5N1C2N3C4C15N11C12N13C14 (symmetry code: 1−x, 1−y, 1−z)4.6673.4371.153
C15N11C12N13C14C15N11C12N13C14 (symmetry code: 1−x, 2−y,1−z)0.0003.3420.572
VIC1N5C4C3N2C1N5C4C3N2 (symmetry code: 2−x, 1−y, 2−z)0.0003.4610.937
VIIC1N5C4C3N2C1N5C4C3N2 (symmetry code: −x, 1−y, −z)0.0003.5360.960
VIIIC6N2C7C11N1C17N9C21C19N4 (symmetry code: x, 5/2−y, −1/2+z)3.0453.4461.102
C13N8C23C20N3C14N12C18C15N5 (symmetry code: x, 1+y, z)7.5553.5320.892
C14N12C18C15N5 (symmetry code: x, 3/2−y, 1/2+z)6.5563.4811.136
Table
Table 2. Absorption peaks of compound II in the IR spectrum.
Table 2. Absorption peaks of compound II in the IR spectrum.
Peak PositionIntensityPeak PositionIntensity
661.820.9151264.790.689
659.951.0701330.650.883
739.931.0451434.100.834
775.831.1041500.610.934
809.791.1341537.211.012
847.680.9791655.870.867
1065.581.2212856.371.192
1094.150.9122961.851.282
1137.110.8643151.491.605
Table
Table 3. Crystal data and structure refinement for structures II–VIII.
Table 3. Crystal data and structure refinement for structures II–VIII.
Identification CodeIIIIIIVVVIVIIVIII
Empirical formulaC12H20BrN8O4TcC16H28ClN8O4TcC16H24N8O6Tc2C9H17N6O4STcC6H10Cl6N4TcC6H10Br6N4TcC16H28Cl8N8Sn0.73Tc0.27
Formula weight518.27529.91620.43403.34448.88715.64729.22
Temperature/K100 (2)296 (2)100 (2)
Crystal systemmonoclinictriclinicmonoclinicmonoclinicmonoclinicmonoclinicmonoclinic
Space groupCcP-1C2/cP21/nC2/mP21/cP21/c
a/Å13.0113(11)8.2324(7)14.8088(9)10.5966(3)12.4407(5)7.6991(9)14.7536(5)
b/Å11.3064(9)9.4890(8)13.1343(8)8.6220(3)7.9932(4)8.3979(9)15.0790(5)
c/Å14.2554(16)15.2946(13)12.9484(8)17.2476(6)7.4078(3)12.8406(16)13.4854(5)
α/°90107.160(3)9090909090
β/°114.312(4)95.947(3)115.911(2)94.804(1)97.352(3)98.166(7)102.729(1)
γ/°9096.731(3)9090909090
Volume/Å31911.1(3)1121.63(17)2265.3(2)1570.27(9)730.58(6)821.81(17)2926.36(18)
Z4244224
ρcalcg/cm31.8011.5691.8191.7062.0412.8921.655
μ/mm−12.8790.8001.2701.0732.06515.4471.524
F(000)1032.0544.01240.0816.0438.0654.01457.0
Crystal size/mm30.4 × 0.12 × 0.10.3 × 0.27 × 0.250.18 × 0.1 × 0.060.36 × 0.22 × 0.180.4 × 0.23 × 0.190.22 × 0.12 × 0.10.18 × 0.12 × 0.1
RadiationMoKα (λ = 0.71073)
2Θ range for data collection/°9.316 to 59.9968.264 to 59.9928.336 to 59.9988.374 to 708.508 to 49.918.204 to 64.9748.224 to 70
Index ranges−15 ≤ h ≤ 18, −15 ≤ k ≤ 15, −20 ≤ l ≤ 20−11 ≤ h ≤ 11, −13 ≤ k ≤ 11, −21 ≤ l ≤ 21−20 ≤ h ≤ 20, −18 ≤ k ≤ 18, −18 ≤ l ≤ 18−17 ≤ h ≤ 17, −13 ≤ k ≤ 13, −27 ≤ l ≤ 27−14 ≤ h ≤ 14, −9 ≤ k ≤ 9, −8 ≤ l ≤ 8−11 ≤ h ≤ 10, −12 ≤ k ≤ 12, −19 ≤ l ≤ 19−23 ≤ h ≤ 21, −23 ≤ k ≤ 22, −21 ≤ l ≤ 21
Reflections collected1337519898239797274729271841844345
Independent reflections4644 [Rint = 0.0376, Rsigma = 0.0435]6537 [Rint = 0.0425, Rsigma = 0.0557]3283 [Rint = 0.0547, Rsigma = 0.0371]6875 [Rint = 0.0488, Rsigma = 0.0254]685 [Rint = 0.0336, Rsigma = 0.0279]2960 [Rint = 0.0400, Rsigma = 0.0293]12760 [Rint = 0.0370, Rsigma = 0.0389]
Data/restraints/parameters4644/8/2486537/0/2813283/0/1496875/0/192685/30/582960/0/7912760/0/315
Goodness-of-fit on F21.0301.0391.0491.0511.0651.0521.020
Final R indexes [I ≥ 2σ (I)]R1 = 0.0223, wR2 = 0.0470R1 = 0.0487, wR2 = 0.1090R1 = 0.0320, wR2 = 0.0676R1 = 0.0238, wR2 = 0.0510R1 = 0.0259, wR2 = 0.0591R1 = 0.0415, wR2 = 0.0877R1 = 0.0296, wR2 = 0.0557
Final R
indexes (all data)		R1 = 0.0235, wR2 = 0.0474R1 = 0.0665, wR2 = 0.1204R1 = 0.0444, wR2 = 0.0729R1 = 0.0310, wR2 = 0.0539R1 = 0.0306, wR2 = 0.0612R1 = 0.0665, wR2 = 0.0966R1 = 0.0477, wR2 = 0.0605
Largest diff. peak/hole/e Å−30.34/−0.373.81/−1.880.65/−0.900.59/−0.510.47/−0.461.76/−1.031.50/−0.51
Flack parameter0.588(7)
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Volkov, M.A.; Novikov, A.P.; Grigoriev, M.S.; Fedoseev, A.M.; German, K.E. Novel Synthesis Methods of New Imidazole-Containing Coordination Compounds Tc(IV, V, VII)—Reaction Mechanism, Xrd and Hirshfeld Surface Analysis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 9461. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23169461

AMA Style

Volkov MA, Novikov AP, Grigoriev MS, Fedoseev AM, German KE. Novel Synthesis Methods of New Imidazole-Containing Coordination Compounds Tc(IV, V, VII)—Reaction Mechanism, Xrd and Hirshfeld Surface Analysis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(16):9461. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23169461

Chicago/Turabian Style

Volkov, Mikhail Alexandrovich, Anton Petrovich Novikov, Mikhail Semenovich Grigoriev, Alexander Mikhailovich Fedoseev, and Konstantin Eduardovich German. 2022. "Novel Synthesis Methods of New Imidazole-Containing Coordination Compounds Tc(IV, V, VII)—Reaction Mechanism, Xrd and Hirshfeld Surface Analysis" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 16: 9461. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23169461

APA Style

Volkov, M. A., Novikov, A. P., Grigoriev, M. S., Fedoseev, A. M., & German, K. E. (2022). Novel Synthesis Methods of New Imidazole-Containing Coordination Compounds Tc(IV, V, VII)—Reaction Mechanism, Xrd and Hirshfeld Surface Analysis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(16), 9461. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23169461

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop