Next Article in Journal
Comparative Transcriptomic and Metabolic Analyses Reveal the Coordinated Mechanisms in Pinus koraiensis under Different Light Stress Conditions
Previous Article in Journal
Pre-Activated Granulocytes from an Autoimmune Uveitis Model Show Divergent Pathway Activation Profiles upon IL8 Stimulation In Vitro
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genetic Variation in the MBL2 Gene Is Associated with Chlamydia trachomatis Infection and Host Humoral Response to Chlamydia trachomatis Infection
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 17
10.3390/ijms23179554
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Cervicovaginal Microbiota Composition in Chlamydia trachomatis Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

by
Marisa Di Pietro
1,†,
Simone Filardo
1,†,
Ilaria Simonelli
2,3,
Patrizio Pasqualetti
1 and
Rosa Sessa
1,*
1
Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, University of Rome Sapienza, 00185 Rome, Italy
2
Service of Medical Statistics and Information Technology, Fatebenefratelli Foundation for Health Research and Education, 00100 Rome, Italy
3
Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(17), 9554; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23179554
Submission received: 27 July 2022 / Revised: 14 August 2022 / Accepted: 16 August 2022 / Published: 23 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chlamydia trachomatis Pathogenicity and Disease)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In healthy women, the cervicovaginal microbiota is characterized by the predominance of Lactobacillus spp., whereas the overgrowth of anaerobic bacteria leads to dysbiosis, known to increase the risk of acquiring genital infections like Chlamydia trachomatis. In the last decade, a growing body of research has investigated the composition of the cervicovaginal microbiota associated with chlamydial infection via 16s rDNA sequencing, with contrasting results. A systematic review and a meta-analysis, performed on the alpha-diversity indices, were conducted to summarize the scientific evidence on the cervicovaginal microbiota composition in C. trachomatis infection. Databases PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science were searched with the following strategy: “Chlamydia trachomatis” AND “micro*”. The diversity indices considered for the meta-analysis were Operational Taxonomic Unit (OTU) number, Chao1, phylogenetic diversity whole tree, Shannon’s, Pielou’s and Simpson’s diversity indexes. The search yielded 425 abstracts for initial review, of which 16 met the inclusion criteria. The results suggested that the cervicovaginal microbiota in C. trachomatis-positive women was characterized by Lactobacillus iners dominance, or by a diverse mix of facultative or strict anaerobes. The meta-analysis, instead, did not show any difference in the microbial biodiversity between Chlamydia-positive and healthy women. Additional research is clearly required to deepen our knowledge on the interplay between the resident microflora and C. trachomatis in the genital microenvironment.

1. Introduction

The cervicovaginal micro-environment harbours a variety of resident microorganisms, named microbiota, whose interplay with the host is involved in either health or disease [1]. The cervicovaginal microbiota is the simplest microbial community in the human organism since, in healthy reproductive-age women, it is characterized by the predominance of one or a few bacterial species, mainly Lactobacillus spp., alongside other bacterial species present in much lower amounts, including Staphylococcus spp., Streptococcus spp., Bifidobacterium spp., Ureaplasma spp., Mycoplasma spp., Veillonella spp., etc. [1,2] Indeed, Lactobacillus spp. is generally regarded as the main host-defence factor within the cervicovaginal ecosystem against potential pathogens via several mechanisms, including competitive exclusion, anti-microbial compound production (e.g., lactic acid), immune system activation as well as the maintenance of a low vaginal pH [3,4,5]. In certain conditions, the depletion of Lactobacilli and the overgrowth of anaerobic bacteria, like Gardnerella spp., Prevotella spp., Atopobium spp., etc., has often been associated with cervicovaginal dysbiosis, known to increase the risk of acquiring genital infections like Chlamydia trachomatis [6,7].
C. trachomatis is an obligate intracellular pathogen and leading cause of bacterial sexually transmitted diseases, with more than 128 million new cases per year according to the most recent World Health Organization (WHO) estimates [8,9]. Chlamydial genital infection in women is responsible for urethritis, cervicitis, and salpingitis, although the majority of infections are asymptomatic (>80%) and, thus, untreated, potentially leading to severe reproductive sequelae, including pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancy, and obstructive infertility [6,10]. In addition, C. trachomatis can be transmitted to infants following the direct contact with infective cervical secretions during delivery, resulting in neonatal conjunctivitis and pneumonia [10]. Lastly, there is evidence that C. trachomatis infection increases the risk for Human Immunodeficiency Virus infection and transmission by 3 to 4 times, and, more recently, it has been associated with Human Papillomavirus (HPV)-related cervical cancer [11,12].
In the last decade, high-throughput culture-independent techniques based on the analysis of 16s rRNA gene sequences have significantly contributed to characterizing the composition of the cervicovaginal microbiota in health and disease, leading to the identification of different bacterial profiles [1,13]. In particular, five Community State Types (CSTs), from I to V, have been described, with the CST-I, -II, -III and -V dominated by Lactobacillus crispatus, Lactobacillus gasseri, L. iners and Lactobacillus jensenii, respectively, and the CST-IV by a diverse mix of anaerobic bacteria, like Gardnerella vaginalis, Atopobium vaginae and Prevotella spp. CST-IV is often associated with the condition of cervicovaginal dysbiosis, frequently observed in bacterial vaginosis [13].
Since the first attempts, an increasing body of research, investigating the composition of cervicovaginal microbiota associated with C. trachomatis genital infection via 16s rRNA gene sequencing, has been published [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29]. The main findings evidenced the association of a microbiota dominated by L. iners (CST-III) or by different anaerobic bacteria (CST-IV) with C. trachomatis infection, although the specific bacterial species identified varied significantly amongst the different studies and, hence, it is very challenging to compare and summarize results, often leading to controversy.
Therefore, the aim of the present systematic review is to provide an update of the scientific evidence on the complex interplay between the cervicovaginal microbiota and C. trachomatis, evaluated by epidemiological studies on humans. Moreover, a meta-analysis was performed on the alpha-diversity indices extracted from the included studies.

2. Methods

This systematic review and metanalysis has been performed in accordance with the latest version of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines [30]. The Review protocol was registered on the International prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO, reference number CRD42022341268). Zotero citation management software (RRID:SCR_013784) was used to identify any duplicates and to manage and screen the selected literature records.

2.1. Literature Research

The Review included articles published up to 30 June 2022, on the databases PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, with the following search strategy and Boolean operator: “Chlamydia trachomatis” AND “micro*”. Truncation filters (*) were used to represent any combination of letters. Three independent reviewers (MDP, SF, and IS) performed the search, reading the titles and abstracts of the articles identified by the search strategy. During the multi-step exclusion process, any disagreement on the studies was discussed until reaching a consensus. The process was supervised by other investigators (PP and RS). Figure 1 shows the PRISMA flow chart diagram summarizing the selection steps for the present Systematic Review.

2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

The review included only studies investigating the composition of the cervicovaginal microbiota via 16s rRNA gene sequencing, comparing reproductive-age women positive to C. trachomatis infections to age-matched healthy controls. We did not consider studies analysing the cervicovaginal microbiota in women positive to other genital pathogens, including Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Trichomonas vaginalis, Mycoplasma spp., Candida spp., HPV, and herpes simplex virus 2 (HSV-2).
Only articles presenting controlled trials published in peer-reviewed journals were considered eligible. Reviews, meta-analysis, editorials, commentaries, case reports, case series, semi-experimental and experimental studies, proceedings, individual contributions (e.g., conference speeches), and purely descriptive studies published in scientific conferences without any quantitative or qualitative findings, were excluded from the review. Finally, articles published in languages other than English were also excluded. The search was performed until 30 June 2022 on the databases.

2.3. Data Extraction Process and Quality Assessment

From each study included in the review, the following data were extracted: bibliographic information, study design, study population size, age, and ethnicity, 16s rRNA gene primers and sequencing platform used, and main conclusions.
Three different reviewers (MDP, SF, and IS) assessed the methodological quality of the selected studies with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) rating tool, adapted for evaluating case-control, cross-sectional and cohort studies [31]. The NOS is divided in eight categories evaluating three different quality aspects: selection, comparability, and outcome; scores range from 0 to 9 and the quality of a study was considered to be high if the NOS score was 7 to 9, intermediate if the NOS score was 4 to 6, and low if it was 0 to 3 [32].

2.4. Meta-Analysis

2.4.1. Data Items

The outcomes of interest were the OTU, Chao1, Phylogenetic Diversity whole tree, Shannon’s index, Pielou’s evenness index, and Simpson’s index mean levels in C. trachomatis positive (POS) as compared to C. trachomatis negative (CTRL) women.

2.4.2. Effect Measure

For each outcome, an effect measure was calculated as the Mean Difference (MD) between the mean values observed in the POS and CTRL groups.

2.4.3. Synthesis Methods

In each synthesis, only the studies that reported the necessary data for MD calculation (mean and SD in each group of interest) were included.
Each parameter of interest showed a high variability; therefore, before the synthesis, difference in means between POS and CTRL groups and the corresponding standard error (SE), calculated on the raw scale, were converted to an approximate difference and standard error on the logarithmic scale following method 3 proposed by Higgins et al. (2008) [33]. To obtain the pooled MD, it was decided to apply the random effects model. MD was reported with the corresponding 95% Confidence Interval (95% CI).
The results were represented by the forest plot that is a graphical representation of the estimated results from each study included in the analysis along with the pooled result. The heterogeneity between the studies was assessed through the visual inspection of the forest plot, by the overlap of the CIs and possible outliers, and quantified through the I2 index. The I2 statistic describes the percentage of variation across studies that is due to heterogeneity rather than chance. We considered that an I2 of 50% indicates moderate heterogeneity and 75% or greater indicates substantial heterogeneity. The p value of the chi-squared (χ2) test, a statistical test for heterogeneity, was included in the forest plots.
Publication bias was assessed with visual inspection of the funnel plot, that is a scatter plot of the effect estimates from individual studies against standard error (SE). Egger’s test was not performed because in each analysis the number of studies was less than 10. We considered a p value < 0.05 to be statistically significant. The data was entered and analysed with the statistical software STATA v16.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Study Selection Process

In total, we recovered 425 studies from all searched databases (n = 162 from Scopus, n = 165 from Web of Science, and n = 98 from PubMed), and after applying filters by automation tools, 317 articles remained. Out of the remaining 317 papers, 183 were excluded after removing duplicates, and 134 were subjected to further screening and evaluated for inclusion in the systematic review after considering inclusion and exclusion criteria. A total of 117 papers was then excluded because they did not fit inclusion criteria. One more article was not considered since it did not included controls. At the end of the process, 16 articles were included in the systematic review. Due to difficulties in extrapolating alpha-diversity data, only 7 of them were considered for the meta-analysis.

3.2. Characteristics of the Included Studies

The characteristics of the studies included in the Systematic Review are summarized in Table 1. The papers were published between 2017 and 2021 and were conducted on almost all continents, with 8 of them performed in Europe [14,19,21,23,24,25,26,29], 2 in North America [17,20], 3 in Asia [16,22,27], 2 in Africa [18,28] and 1 in Australia [15]. 13 case-control [14,16,17,18,19,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29], 2 cohort [15,20] and 1 cross-sectional [21] studies were included, and all of them involved reproductive-age women, who tested positive for C. trachomatis infection via nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs), alongside matched uninfected women as control group. In addition, 3 studies followed C. trachomatis-positive women after standard azithromycin treatment [15,20,22], 3 studies investigated women with a C. trachomatis co-infection with HPV [29], Mycoplasma genitalium [17], or T. vaginalis and/or N. gonorrhoeae [16], and 2 studies compared the vaginal microbiota in C. trachomatis-positive women to that in women with T. vaginalis or C. albicans genital infections [26,28]. 15 studies performed the 16s rDNA sequencing via Illumina platform, whereas one study employed the Ion torrent PGM platform [28]. Amongst them, 13 studies sequenced the hypervariable region V3-4 [14,15,16,17,19,20,21,22,23,24,26,27,29], 2 studies the V4 [18,25] and 1 study the V2-4-8 region [28]. The majority of the included studies (n = 9) collected vaginal swabs [15,16,17,19,20,21,22,26,28], whereas 4 analysed endocervical swabs [24,25,27,29], 2 endocervical and/or vaginal swabs [14,18], and one study compared vaginal swabs to anal swabs from women with a concomitant C. trachomatis anorectal infection [23]. The sample size was very variable, ranging from 7 cases and 7 controls in the smallest case-control study [24], to a cohort of 248 women [20].

3.3. Cervicovaginal Composition in C. trachomatis-Positive Women

The majority of the studies included in our review evidenced an overall decrease in the relative abundance of Lactobacillus spp., specifically L. crispatus, in C. trachomatis-positive women as compared to healthy controls [14,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29]. In particular, a chlamydial genital infection was mostly associated with a cervicovaginal microbiota characterized by either the dominance of L. iners, or a diverse mix of facultative or strict anaerobes, with the most frequently identified being G. vaginalis, A. vaginae, Megasphaera spp., Prevotella spp., Parvimonas spp. [14,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29]. These bacterial species are usually the hallmark of a CST-IV microbiota, a condition often associated with bacterial vaginosis and believed to increase the risk of acquiring genital pathogens [13,34,35].
From the included studies has also emerged the need to restore a protective vaginal microbiota after antibiotic treatment for C. trachomatis, via, for example, the use of probiotics [15,20,22]. In this regard, besides comparing the resident microflora of the genital ecosystem between C. trachomatis-positive and healthy women at baseline, some authors have also investigated the effects of the standard treatment with azithromycin. In particular, Ziklo et al. (2018) have observed an increased prevalence of indole-producing bacteria in the vaginal microbiota post-treatment, suggesting a destructive effect of azithromycin on vaginal health [15]. On a similar note, the study from Tamarelle et al., 2020, has described a robust increase in L. iners’ abundance, suggesting that after antibiotic treatment, the individual risk for C. trachomatis remains high, as evidenced by the increased rate of reinfections observed in their study [22].
Another interesting aspect was the evidence that unique microbial profiles might characterize genital infection with other viral, protozoan, or fungal pathogens, potentially representing distinct markers of infection [16,17,26,28,29]. Indeed, the compositional structure and biodiversity of the cervicovaginal microbiota in C. trachomatis-positive women was also compared to women with different co-infections, or to women with other genital pathogens alone. The main findings showed that mixed infections, with C. trachomatis and HPV, M. genitalium, and N. gonorrhoeae/T. vaginalis, are associated with a CST-IV microbiota, with increased anaerobic bacterial species, or to L. iners-dominated microbiota, and did not present significant differences as compared to women positive to C. trachomatis alone [16,17,29]. By contrast, women with HPV alone showed a cervicovaginal microbiota similar to that observed in healthy controls, whereas women with either T. vaginalis or C. albicans infections presented a microbiota characterized by a lower abundance of Lactobacillus spp. and much higher abundance of anaerobes, such as Prevotella spp., Gardnerella spp., Atopobium spp. and Megasphaera spp., as compared to C. trachomatis-positive women [26,28].

3.4. Meta-Analysis

Meta-analysis was performed using the following indices: Chao1’s diversity index, OTU number, phylogenetic diversity whole tree, Shannon’s diversity index, Pielou’s evenness diversity index, and Simpson’s diversity index.

3.4.1. Chao1’s Diversity Index

Four studies were eligible for the synthesis of Chao1 mean levels for a total of 95 subjects, 43 positive and 52 controls. The results of the meta-analysis indicate a non-significant difference between positives and controls in Chao1 levels; the pooled MD on a logarithmic scale was equal to −0.06 (95% CI −0.33 to 0.20; p = 0.638) corresponding to an approximate relative reduction in the positives group of about −6%. The heterogeneity between the studies was not significant (I2 = 51.1%; p = 0.105) (Figure 2A). All the studies presented a NOS score of 8 and only one of 7 [22] (Table 2). The funnel plot seemed to not show an evidence of publication bias even if there were only 4 studies included in the analysis (Figure S1A, Table S1).

3.4.2. OTU Number

Four studies were included in the meta-analysis of OTU levels. Pooling the studies there was a total of 207 subjects, 72 positive and 135 controls. The results of the meta-analysis showed a non-significant difference between positives and controls in the OTU; the pooled MD on a logarithmic scale was equal to 0.11 (95% CI −0.28 to 0.50; p = 0.582) corresponding to a relative increase in positives of approximately 11% (Figure 2B). The heterogeneity between the studies was high and significant (I2 = 86.4%; p < 0.001). In fact, two studies [22,26] reported a negative difference indicating lower values in positive group, while the other two studies reported a positive difference indicating higher values in the positive group [24,25]. All the studies presented a NOS score of 8 and only one of 7 [22] (Table 2). The funnel plot does not seem to show the presence of publication bias but there were only 4 studies (Figure S1B, Table S1).

3.4.3. Phylogenetic Diversity Whole Tree

Only two studies reported data about this parameter [24,26] so the analysis was performed considering these two studies. The pooled total number of subjects was of 55, 27 positives and 28 controls. The results of the meta-analysis indicate a non-significant difference between positives and controls; the pooled MD on a logarithmic scale was equal to 0.08 (95% CI −0.12 to 0.28; p = 0.412) corresponding to a relative increase in the positive group of about 8% (Figure 2C). The heterogeneity between the studies was not significant (I2 = 26.8%; p = 0.242) (Figure S1C, Table S1).

3.4.4. Shannon’s Diversity Index

Seven studies report data for Shannon’s parameter for a total of 345 subjects, comprising 138 positives and 207 controls. The results of the meta-analysis indicated a non-significant difference between positives and controls; the pooled MD on a logarithmic scale was equal to 0.21 (95% CI −0.08 to 0.51; p = 0.158) corresponding to a relative increase in the positive group of about 21%. The heterogeneity between the studies was significant (I2 = 77.1%; p < 0.001) (Figure 2D). Two studies [24,25] reported a positive and significant difference, while the remaining 5 studies reported non-significant results. The studies included in this meta-analysis were of high quality except for one of intermediate quality [27] (Table 2). The funnel plot did not seem to show the presence of publication bias (Figure S1D, Table S1).

3.4.5. Simpson’s Diversity Index

Four studies were eligible for the meta-analysis of the Simpson parameter [22,24,27,28]; a total number of 140 subjects were considered, comprising 69 positives and 71 controls. The results of the meta-analysis indicate a non-significant difference between positives and controls. The pooled MD on a logarithmic scale was equal to 0.09 (95% CI −0.40 to 0.58; p = 0.719) corresponding to a relative increase in the positives of about 9% (Figure 2E). The heterogeneity between the studies was significant (I2 = 70.4%; p = 0.017). In this meta-analysis, the MD observed in Filardo et al., 2017 [24] study was positive and significant, while in the other three studies the results were not significant. Based on NOS score, all the studies were of high quality with the exception of Cheong et al. (2019) [27] of intermediate quality (Table 2). The funnel plot did not seem to show evidence of publication bias (Figure S1E, Table S1).

3.4.6. Pielou’s Evenness Diversity Index

Three studies report data about the parameter Pielou [23,25,27] for a total of 241 subjects, comprising 91 positives and 150 controls. The results of the meta-analysis showed a non-significant difference between positives and controls. the pooled MD on a logarithmic scale was equal to 0.21 (95% CI −0.15 to 0.58; p = 0.250), corresponding to a relative increase in positives of about 21% (Figure 2F). The heterogeneity between the studies was significantly high (I2 = 80.9%; p = 0.005). All the studies included in the meta-analysis were of high to very high quality, with the exception of one study [27] of intermediate quality (Table 2). It was difficult to exclude the presence of publication bias by the funnel plot since there were only 3 studies included in the analysis (Figure S1F, Table S1).

3.5. Scoring Results

The median NOS score of the included studies was 8 (interquartile range, IQR 1.25), indicating a high average quality level. Specifically, most studies (n = 12) were of high to very high quality (score of 7 to 9), 3 studies were of intermediate quality (score of 4 to 6), and 1 study was of low quality (score of 0 to 3). Table 2 shows the results of the scoring method applied to each study included in the review, with reference to publication year and study design.

4. Conclusions

Overall, based on the findings presented in our review, it emerged that women affected by a C. trachomatis infection possessed an altered cervicovaginal microbiota, with increased abundances of a varied population of strict or facultative anaerobic bacterial species as well as of L. iners.
Concerning the quantitative measures of microbial biodiversity within a bacterial community, namely alpha- diversity indices, a non-significant difference was demonstrated, via a meta-analysis, between C. trachomatis positive and healthy women. Indeed, alpha-diversity indices were scarcely used in the reviewed studies; only about half of them reported alpha-diversity data via a plethora of different indices, including Shannon, Shannon–Weaver’s or Pielou’s evenness, Chao1, Simpson’s, etc., leading to inconsistent results [23,24,25,26,27,28,29]. Specifically, some papers did not find any statistically significant difference in the diversity indices between C. trachomatis-positive women and healthy controls [26,27,28], while others did find increased diversity in the cervicovaginal microbiota of Chlamydia-infected women [23,24,25,29].
There are different limitations that undermine the comparability of results in the studies included in our systematic review and meta-analysis. In particular, there are differences in specimen collection, since either vaginal and/or endocervical swabs have been used; indeed, it is known that significant differences have been demonstrated in the microbiota characterizing the two sites. In addition, different primers and hypervariable regions of 16s rDNA were chosen for sequencing, such as the V3-4, the V4 or the V2-4-8, leading to potentially different results for microbiota composition. In fact, it has been already evidenced that different primers may influence the results of the bioinformatic analysis. At the same time, another relevant issue lies in the statistical analysis since a varied mix of statistical algorithms have been used. In this regard, it is very challenging to compare the biodiversity of the genital microbiota between different studies and patient groups, due to the numerous and diverse statistical measures adopted for the calculation of alpha-diversity indices, as well as to missing or incomplete reporting of data in the papers.
In the future, it will be of great interest to reach a consensus on the several parameters involved in designing metagenomic studies, so that all data are reported and rendered available to the scientific community. Indeed, given the importance of the microbiota not only from a pathophysiological but also clinical point of view, streamlining the presentation of metagenomic data will render their interpretation more accessible to a wider audience. Surely, a standardized procedure will help to significantly push the field forward by providing more complete data for a better understanding of the pathophysiological role of the cervicovaginal microbiota in C. trachomatis infection.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms23179554/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.D.P. and R.S.; methodology, M.D.P., S.F., I.S., P.P. and R.S.; software, I.S., and P.P.; validation, M.D.P., S.F., I.S., P.P. and R.S.; formal analysis, I.S., and P.P.; data curation, M.D.P., S.F. and I.S.; visualization, S.F., and I.S.; writing—original draft preparation, M.D.P., S.F. and R.S.; writing—review and editing, M.D.P., S.F., I.S., P.P. and R.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. France, M.; Alizadeh, M.; Brown, S.; Ma, B.; Ravel, J. Towards a Deeper Understanding of the Vaginal Microbiota. Nat. Microbiol. 2022, 7, 367–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. France, M.T.; Fu, L.; Rutt, L.; Yang, H.; Humphrys, M.S.; Narina, S.; Gajer, P.M.; Ma, B.; Forney, L.J.; Ravel, J. Insight into the Ecology of Vaginal Bacteria through Integrative Analyses of Metagenomic and Metatranscriptomic Data. Genome Biol. 2022, 23, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Petrova, M.I.; Lievens, E.; Malik, S.; Imholz, N.; Lebeer, S. Lactobacillus Species as Biomarkers and Agents That Can Promote Various Aspects of Vaginal Health. Front. Physiol. 2015, 6, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Sessa, R.; Di Pietro, M.; Filardo, S.; Bressan, A.; Mastromarino, P.; Biasucci, A.V.; Rosa, L.; Cutone, A.; Berlutti, F.; Paesano, R.; et al. Lactobacilli-Lactoferrin Interplay in Chlamydia Trachomatis Infection. Pathog. Dis. 2017, 75, ftx054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Sessa, R.; Di Pietro, M.; Filardo, S.; Bressan, A.; Rosa, L.; Cutone, A.; Frioni, A.; Berlutti, F.; Paesano, R.; Valenti, P. Effect of Bovine Lactoferrin on Chlamydia Trachomatis Infection and Inflammation. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2017, 95, 34–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Di Pietro, M.; Filardo, S.; Romano, S.; Sessa, R. Chlamydia Trachomatis and Chlamydia Pneumoniae Interaction with the Host: Latest Advances and Future Prospective. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Pekmezovic, M.; Mogavero, S.; Naglik, J.R.; Hube, B. Host-Pathogen Interactions during Female Genital Tract Infections. Trends Microbiol. 2019, 27, 982–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rowley, J.; vander Hoorn, S.; Korenromp, E.; Low, N.; Unemo, M.; Abu-Raddad, L.J.; Chico, R.M.; Smolak, A.; Newman, L.; Gottlieb, S.; et al. Chlamydia, Gonorrhoea, Trichomoniasis and Syphilis: Global Prevalence and Incidence Estimates, 2016. Bull. World Health Organ. 2019, 97, 548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Newman, L.; Rowley, J.; vander Hoorn, S.; Wijesooriya, N.S.; Unemo, M.; Low, N.; Stevens, G.; Gottlieb, S.; Kiarie, J.; Temmerman, M. Global Estimates of the Prevalence and Incidence of Four Curable Sexually Transmitted Infections in 2012 Based on Systematic Review and Global Reporting. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0143304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. O’Connell, C.M.; Ferone, M.E. Chlamydia Trachomatis Genital Infections. Microb. Cell 2016, 3, 390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Reda, S.; Gonçalves, F.A.; Mazepa, M.M.; de Carvalho, N.S. Women Infected with HIV and the Impact of Associated Sexually Transmitted Infections. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2018, 142, 143–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kumari, S.; Bhor, V.M. A Literature Review on Correlation between HPV Coinfection with C. Trachomatis and Cervical Neoplasia-Coinfection Mediated Cellular Transformation. Microb. Pathog. 2022, 168, 105587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Gajer, P.; Brotman, R.M.; Bai, G.; Sakamoto, J.; Schütte, U.M.E.; Zhong, X.; Koenig, S.S.K.; Fu, L.; Ma, Z.; Zhou, X.; et al. Temporal Dynamics of the Human Vaginal Microbiota. Sci. Transl. Med. 2012, 4, 132ra52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. van der Veer, C.; Bruisten, S.M.; van der Helm, J.J.; de Vries, H.J.C.; van Houdt, R. The Cervicovaginal Microbiota in Women Notified for Chlamydia Trachomatis Infection: A Case-Control Study at the Sexually Transmitted Infection Outpatient Clinic in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2017, 64, 24–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Ziklo, N.; Vidgen, M.E.; Taing, K.; Huston, W.M.; Timms, P. Dysbiosis of the Vaginal Microbiota and Higher Vaginal Kynurenine/Tryptophan Ratio Reveals an Association with Chlamydia Trachomatis Genital Infections. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2018, 8, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Chiu, S.F.; Huang, P.J.; Cheng, W.H.; Huang, C.Y.; Chu, L.J.; Lee, C.C.; Lin, H.C.; Chen, L.C.; Lin, W.N.; Tsao, C.H.; et al. Vaginal Microbiota of the Sexually Transmitted Infections Caused by Chlamydia Trachomatis and Trichomonas Vaginalis in Women with Vaginitis in Taiwan. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Borgogna, J.L.C.; Shardell, M.D.; Yeoman, C.J.; Ghanem, K.G.; Kadriu, H.; Ulanov, A.V.; Gaydos, C.A.; Hardick, J.; Robinson, C.K.; Bavoil, P.M.; et al. The Association of Chlamydia Trachomatis and Mycoplasma Genitalium Infection with the Vaginal Metabolome. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 3420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Balle, C.; Lennard, K.; Dabee, S.; Barnabas, S.L.; Jaumdally, S.Z.; Gasper, M.A.; Maseko, V.; Mbulawa, Z.Z.A.; Williamson, A.L.; Bekker, L.G.; et al. Endocervical and Vaginal Microbiota in South African Adolescents with Asymptomatic Chlamydia Trachomatis Infection. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 11109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. van Houdt, R.; Ma, B.; Bruisten, S.M.; Speksnijder, A.G.C.L.; Ravel, J.; de Vries, H.J.C. Lactobacillus Iners-Dominated Vaginal Microbiota Is Associated with Increased Susceptibility to Chlamydia Trachomatis Infection in Dutch Women: A Case-Control Study. Sex. Transm. Infect. 2018, 94, 117–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tamarelle, J.; Ma, B.; Gajer, P.; Humphrys, M.S.; Terplan, M.; Mark, K.S.; Thiébaut, A.C.M.; Forney, L.J.; Brotman, R.M.; Delarocque-Astagneau, E.; et al. Nonoptimal Vaginal Microbiota after Azithromycin Treatment for Chlamydia Trachomatis Infection. J. Infect. Dis. 2020, 221, 627–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tamarelle, J.; de Barbeyrac, B.; le Hen, I.; Thiébaut, A.; Bébéar, C.; Ravel, J.; Delarocque-Astagneau, E. Vaginal Microbiota Composition and Association with Prevalent Chlamydia Trachomatis Infection: A Cross-Sectional Study of Young Women Attending a STI Clinic in France. Sex. Transm. Infect. 2018, 94, 616–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Chen, H.; Wang, L.; Zhao, L.; Luo, L.; Min, S.; Wen, Y.; Lei, W.; Shu, M.; Li, Z. Alterations of Vaginal Microbiota in Women with Infertility and Chlamydia Trachomatis Infection. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2021, 11, 714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Raimondi, S.; Candeliere, F.; Amaretti, A.; Foschi, C.; Morselli, S.; Gaspari, V.; Rossi, M.; Marangoni, A. Vaginal and Anal Microbiome during Chlamydia Trachomatis Infections. Pathogens 2021, 10, 1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Filardo, S.; Di Pietro, M.; Porpora, M.G.; Recine, N.; Farcomeni, A.; Latino, M.A.; Sessa, R. Diversity of Cervical Microbiota in Asymptomatic Chlamydia Trachomatis Genital Infection: A Pilot Study. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2017, 7, 321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Filardo, S.; Di Pietro, M.; Tranquilli, G.; Latino, M.A.; Recine, N.; Porpora, M.G.; Sessa, R. Selected Immunological Mediators and Cervical Microbial Signatures in Women with Chlamydia Trachomatis Infection. MSystems 2019, 4, e00094-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Ceccarani, C.; Foschi, C.; Parolin, C.; D’Antuono, A.; Gaspari, V.; Consolandi, C.; Laghi, L.; Camboni, T.; Vitali, B.; Severgnini, M.; et al. Diversity of Vaginal Microbiome and Metabolome during Genital Infections. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 14095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Cheong, H.C.; Yap, P.S.X.; Chong, C.W.; Cheok, Y.Y.; Lee, C.Y.Q.; Tan, G.M.Y.; Sulaiman, S.; Hassan, J.; Sabet, N.S.; Looi, C.Y.; et al. Diversity of Endocervical Microbiota Associated with Genital Chlamydia Trachomatis Infection and Infertility among Women Visiting Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics in Malaysia. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0224658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Masha, S.C.; Owuor, C.; Ngoi, J.M.; Cools, P.; Sanders, E.J.; Vaneechoutte, M.; Crucitti, T.; de Villiers, E.P. Comparative Analysis of the Vaginal Microbiome of Pregnant Women with Either Trichomonas Vaginalis or Chlamydia Trachomatis. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0225545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Di Pietro, M.; Filardo, S.; Grazia Porpora, M.; Recine, N.; Agnese Latino, M.; Sessa, R. HPV/Chlamydia Trachomatis Co-Infection: Metagenomic Analysis of Cervical Microbiota in Asymptomatic Women. New Microbiol. 2018, 41, 34–41. [Google Scholar]
  30. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, n71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wells, G.; Shea, B.; O’Connell, D.; Peterson, J.; Welch, V.; Losos, M.; Tugwell, P. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses. Available online: https://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp (accessed on 20 July 2022).
  32. McPheeters, M.L.; Kripalani, S.; Peterson, N.B.; Idowu, R.T.; Jerome, R.N.; Potter, S.A.; Andrews, J.C. Quality Improvement Interventions to Address Health Disparities: Closing the Quality Gap—Revisiting the State of the Science; Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: Rockville, MD, USA, 2012.
  33. Higgins, J.P.T.; White, I.R.; Anzures-Cabrera, J. Meta-Analysis of Skewed Data: Combining Results Reported on Log-Transformed or Raw Scales. Stat. Med. 2008, 27, 6072–6092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Abou Chacra, L.; Fenollar, F.; Diop, K. Bacterial Vaginosis: What Do We Currently Know? Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2021, 11, 672429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Rosca, A.S.; Castro, J.; Sousa, L.G.V.; Cerca, N. Gardnerella and Vaginal Health: The Truth Is Out There. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2020, 44, 73–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 23 09554 g001 550
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram.
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram.
Ijms 23 09554 g001
Ijms 23 09554 g002 550
Figure 2. Forest plot displaying the results of the meta-analyses of studies reporting data about each Alpha-Diversity parameter in the positive group (pos) and healthy controls (ctrl). (A), Chao1; (B), OTU number; (C), Phylogenetic diversity whole tree; (D), Shannon; (E), Simpson; (F), Pielou’s evenness). The point estimated by each study (Mean Difference on logarithmic scale between pos and ctrl, MD) is represented by a square and the horizontal line is the 95% Confidence Interval (95% CI). The area of the square reflects the weight that the study contributes to the meta-analysis. The combined-effect MD and its 95% CI are represented by the diamond. The vertical line represents the line of no difference. CI, confidence interval; MD, Mean Difference; PY, Publication Year. See Refs. [22,23,24,25,26,27,28].
Figure 2. Forest plot displaying the results of the meta-analyses of studies reporting data about each Alpha-Diversity parameter in the positive group (pos) and healthy controls (ctrl). (A), Chao1; (B), OTU number; (C), Phylogenetic diversity whole tree; (D), Shannon; (E), Simpson; (F), Pielou’s evenness). The point estimated by each study (Mean Difference on logarithmic scale between pos and ctrl, MD) is represented by a square and the horizontal line is the 95% Confidence Interval (95% CI). The area of the square reflects the weight that the study contributes to the meta-analysis. The combined-effect MD and its 95% CI are represented by the diamond. The vertical line represents the line of no difference. CI, confidence interval; MD, Mean Difference; PY, Publication Year. See Refs. [22,23,24,25,26,27,28].
Ijms 23 09554 g002
Table
Table 1. Characteristics of the studies (n = 16) included in the systematic review.
Table 1. Characteristics of the studies (n = 16) included in the systematic review.
AuthorsStudy-PeriodStudy PopulationEthnicitySample TypeSequencing PlatformMain Results
Filardo et al. [24]2016Women with C. trachomatis (CT, n = 7), and healthy controls (HC, n = 7)EuropeanEndo-cervical swabsV3-4 IlluminaCT women showed a marked increase in alpha-diversity indices (Shannon’s and Shannon-weaver’s) and an overall decrease in Lactobacillus spp., alongside an increase in anaerobic bacterial species, including G. vaginalis, A. vaginae, P. amnii, P. timonensis, and L. amnionii.
van der Veer et al. [14]2013–2014Women notified for C. trachomatis (CT) infection of sex partner (n = 93), of which n = 52 tested CT positive and n = 41 tested CT negative (controls)EuropeanEndocervical and/or Vaginal swabsV3-4 IlluminaCT women were significantly associated with a cervico-vaginal microbiota characterized by diverse anaerobic bacteria or with a microbiota dominated by L. iners, as compared to a microbiota dominated by L. crispatus.
Balle et al. [18]2013–2014Women with C. trachomatis (CT+, n = 30), and uninfected controls (CT-, n = 42)AfricanEndocervical and vaginal swabsV4 IlluminaThe endocervical microbiota diversity is not grossly altered in CT+ women, although CT+ women had higher relative abundance of G. vaginalis and other anaerobes, like Megasphaera spp., A. vaginae, Dialister spp., and Prevotella spp., all BV-associated bacteria, as compared to CT- women.
Ziklo et al. [15]Not reportedWomen with diagnosed C. trachomatis infection at baseline (CT-P, n = 11), with repeated CT infection in the last year (CT-RP, n = 3) and post antibiotic treatment (PAT, n = 13), as well as CT-negative controls (CT-N, n = 10)AustralianVaginal swabsV3-4 IlluminaCT-P and CT-RP women were associated with elevated vaginal kynurenine/tryptophan ratios. CST-IV (anaerobic bacteria) showed significantly lower vaginal tryptophan levels as compared to CST-I (L. crispatus) and III (L. iners). In PAT women, a higher abundance of indole producing bacterial species were observed, including Porphyromonas asaccharolytica, Propionibacterium acnes, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Enterococcus faecalis, Peptoniphilus harei, and Escherichia coli.
Tamarelle et al. [21]2015Women with C. trachomatis (CT+, n = 21), and uninfected controls (CT-, n = 111)EuropeanVaginal swabsV3-4 IlluminaCSTs were not significantly associated with C. trachomatis status but higher proportions of CT+ women were found in CST-III (L. iners) and CST-IV (anaerobic bacteria), rather than in CST-I (L. crispatus).
van Houdt et al. [19]2008–2012Women screened for C. trachomatis who tested negative at the first visit (n = 115). At subsequent yearly screening, n = 60 women tested CT-positive, and n = 55 women tested CT-negative (controls).EuropeanVaginal swabsV3-4 IlluminaFive CSTs were identified, four CSTs were dominated by Lactobacillus spp., of which L. crispatus (CST-I) and L. iners (CST-III) were the most common, and one CST was characterized by an array of strict and facultative anaerobes (CST-IV). Women with L. iners dominated CST-III had increased risk of CT infection.
Di Pietro et al. [29]2016Women with C. trachomatis infection (CT, n = 10), papilloma virus infection (HPV, n = 10), HPV/CT co-infection (n = 5), and healthy controls (HC, n = 10).EuropeanEndocervical swabsV3-4 IlluminaAlpha diversity indices (Shannon’s and Shannon-weaver’s) were higher in either CT or HPV/CT co-infected women as compared to healthy controls. The cervical microbiota of CT positive and HPV/CT co-infected women was characterized by decreased Lactobacillus spp. and increased anaerobic bacterial species, like G. vaginalis, A. vaginae and A. christensenii. L. iners were also more frequently found in CT positive and HPV/CT co-infected women. By contrast, HPV positive women showed a similar microbiota to those in healthy controls.
Masha et al. [28]2015Pregnant women with Trichomonas Vaginalis (TV, n = 18), compared to pregnant women with C. trachomatis (CT, n = 14), and healthy controls (HC, n = 21)AfricanVaginal swabsV2-4-8 Ion torrent PGMBacterial alpha-diversity indices (Simpson’s and Shannon’s) were significantly higher in women with either TV or CT as compared to healthy controls. Women with TV had increased abundance of Parvimonas and Prevotella spp. as compared to both CT+ women and healthy controls, whereas CT+ women had increased abundance of Anaerococcus, Collinsella, Corynebacterium, and Dialister spp.
Cheong et al. [27]2010–2014Women with C. trachomatis infection (CT, n = 42), and healthy controls (HC, n = 35)AsianEndocervical swabsV3-4 IlluminaWomen with CT infection showed no increased cervical bacterial alpha-diversity indices (Simpson’s, Shannon’s and Pielou’s). CT infection was associated to increased abundances of strict and facultative anaerobes, like Streptococcus, Megasphaera, Prevotella and Veillonella spp.
Ceccarani et al. [26]2016Women with bacterial vaginosis (BV, n = 20), vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC, n = 18), C. trachomatis (CT, n = 20), and healthy controls (HC, n = 21)EuropeanVaginal swabsV3-4 IlluminaAlpha-diversity indices (Shannon’s and Chao1) were higher in BV women as compared to CT and HC women. Lactobacillus spp. were decreaed In BV, VVC and CT groups, while HC group microbiota was dominated by L. crispatus. In BV, VVC and CT, L. crispatus was replaced by L. iners. CT, BV and VVC, were characterized by anaerobes, such as Gardnerella, Prevotella, Megasphaera, Roseburia and Atopobium spp. The decrease of lactate was considered as a common marker of all the pathological conditions.
Filardo et al. [25]2017Women with C. trachomatis infection (CT, n = 42), and healthy controls (HC, n = 103).EuropeanEndocervical swabsV4 IlluminaAlpha-diversity indices (Shannon’s and Shannon–Weaver’s) were significantly higher in CT women as compared to HC. CT microbiota was dominated by anaerobes (CTS-IV), and a specific network of G. vaginalis, P. amnii, P. buccalis, P. timonensis, A. christensenii and V. guangxiensis was identified as potential biomarker of CT infection. CT was also significantly correlated with increased levels of lactoferrin, IL-6, IL-1α, IFN-α, and IFN-β, whereas very low levels of IFN-γ were observed.
Borgogna et al. [17]Not reportedWomen with C. trachomatis infection (CT+, n = 54), CT/Micoplasma genitalium co-infection (CT+/MG+, n = 14), and healthy controls (HC, n = 77)African-AmericanVaginal swabsV3-4 IlluminaWomen with CT infection or coinfection CT/MG were associated with a CST-IV microbiota, characterized by decreased Lactobacillus spp. Significant differences in vaginal metabolites were identified in CT+ or CT+/MG+ women as compared to uninfected women, before and after adjustment for CSTs, with significant overlap between CT+ and CT+/MG+ women.
Tamarelle et al. [20]Not reportedWomen with confirmed C. trachomatis infection at baseline and after azithromycin treatment at 3, 6 and 9 months (n = 149), and CT negative controls (n = 99).African-AmericanVaginal swabsV3-4 IlluminaCT women microbiota was dominated, at the time of diagnosis, by L. iners or a diverse array of BV or CST-IV associated bacteria, such as G. vaginalis, A. vaginae and M. curtisii. L. iners-dominated communities were most common after azithromycin treatment (1 g monodose), consistent to the observed relative resistance of this bacterium to azithromycin.
Chen et al. [22]2019–2020Women with tubal infertility and C. trachomatis infection before (CT-P, n = 6) and after treatment (CT-PT, n = 4), as compared to infertile (CT-N, n = 8) or healthy women (CT-C, n = 7) without chlamydial infection (controls)AsianVaginal swabsV3-4 IlluminaWomen with tubal infertility and CT presented a L. iners dominated microbiota with a decrease in Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Enterobacter, Atopobium, and Streptococcus spp., which could be restored with varying degrees by azythromycin treatment. C. trachomatis-positive women also had increased levels of IFNγ and IL-10.
Raimondi et al. [23]2019Women with contemporary vaginal and ano-rectal C. trachomatis infection (CT-positive, n = 10), and uninfected controls (CT-negative, n = 16).EuropeanVaginal and anal swabsV3-4 IlluminaAlpha-diversity via Pielou’s index was higher in the vaginal microbiota of CT-positive women than CT-negative women. In CT-positive women, the vaginal microbiota was depleted of Lactobacillus spp., with a significant increase in anaerobes, like Sneathia spp., Parvimonas spp., and Megasphaera spp. CT positively correlated with Ezakiella spp. The predicted metabolic functions showed increased chorismate and aromatic amino-acid biosynthesis, as well as mixed acid fermentation, in the vaginal microbiota of CT-positive women.
Chiu et al. [16]2018–2019Women with vaginitis and C. trachomatis (CT, n = 22), Trichomonas vaginalis (TV, n = 7), Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC, n = 2), mixed infections (TV/CT, n = 2; TV/CT/GC, n = 1), as well as uninfected controls (non-STI, n = 36).AsianVaginal swabsV3-4 IlluminaIn CT women, the vaginal microbiota was dominated by L. iners, with increased relative abundance of G. vaginalis as compared to TV and non-STI women. In TV women, Lactobacillus spp. was significantly lower, and S. agalactiae, P. bivia, S. sanguinegens and G. asaccharolytica were significantly enriched, as compared to the other patient groups.
Table
Table 2. Newcastle-Ottawa scoring (NOS) results of the included studies in relation to the study design.
Table 2. Newcastle-Ottawa scoring (NOS) results of the included studies in relation to the study design.
AuthorsYearJournalCountryStudy DesignNOS Score
Filardo et al. [24]2017Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.ItalyCase-control study8
van der Veer et al. [14]2017Clin. Infect. Dis.NetherlandsCase-control study8
Balle et al. [18]2018Sci. Rep.South AfricaCase-control study8
Ziklo et al. [15]2018Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.AustraliaCohort study5
Tamarelle et al. [21]2018Sex. Transm. Infect.FranceCross-sectional study4
van Houdt et al. [19]2018Sex. Transm. Infect.NetherlandsCase-control study8
Di Pietro et al. [29]2018New MicrobiologicaItalyCase-control study8
Masha et al. [28]2019PLoS OneKenyaCase-control study7
Cheong et al. [27]2019PLoS OneChinaCase-control study6
Ceccarani et al. [26]2019Sci. Rep.ItalyCase-control study8
Filardo et al. [25]2019mSystemsItalyCase-control study8
Borgogna et al. [17]2020Sci. Rep.USACase-control study6
Tamarelle et al. [20]2020J. Infect. Dis.USACohort study7
Chen et al. [22]2021Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.ChinaCase-control study7
Raimondi et al. [23]2021PathogensItalyCase-control study8
Chiu et al. [16]2021MicroorganismsChinaCase-control study3
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Di Pietro, M.; Filardo, S.; Simonelli, I.; Pasqualetti, P.; Sessa, R. Cervicovaginal Microbiota Composition in Chlamydia trachomatis Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 9554. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23179554

AMA Style

Di Pietro M, Filardo S, Simonelli I, Pasqualetti P, Sessa R. Cervicovaginal Microbiota Composition in Chlamydia trachomatis Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(17):9554. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23179554

Chicago/Turabian Style

Di Pietro, Marisa, Simone Filardo, Ilaria Simonelli, Patrizio Pasqualetti, and Rosa Sessa. 2022. "Cervicovaginal Microbiota Composition in Chlamydia trachomatis Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 17: 9554. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23179554

APA Style

Di Pietro, M., Filardo, S., Simonelli, I., Pasqualetti, P., & Sessa, R. (2022). Cervicovaginal Microbiota Composition in Chlamydia trachomatis Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(17), 9554. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23179554

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop