Next Article in Journal
Ubiquitin Specific Protease USP48 Destabilizes NF-κB/p65 in Retinal Pigment Epithelium Cells
Next Article in Special Issue
Physiological and Transcriptome Analyses Revealed the Mechanism by Which Deferoxamine Promotes Iron Absorption in Cinnamomum camphora
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Transcriptome Dynamics Underlying Magnesium Deficiency Stress in Three Founding Saccharum Species
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 17
10.3390/ijms23179680
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A C2-Domain Abscisic Acid-Related Gene, IbCAR1, Positively Enhances Salt Tolerance in Sweet Potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.)

by
Chang You
,
Chen Li
,
Meng Ma
,
Wei Tang
,
Meng Kou
,
Hui Yan
,
Weihan Song
,
Runfei Gao
,
Xin Wang
,
Yungang Zhang
and
Qiang Li
*
Xuzhou Institute of Agricultural Sciences in Jiangsu Xuhuai District/Sweetpotato Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Breeding of Sweetpotato, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Xuzhou 221131, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(17), 9680; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23179680
Submission received: 19 July 2022 / Revised: 18 August 2022 / Accepted: 23 August 2022 / Published: 26 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Abiotic Stress in Plant: From Gene to the Fields)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Plant C2-domain abscisic acid-related (CAR) protein family plays an important role in plant growth, abiotic stress responses, and defense regulation. In this study, we cloned the IbCAR1 by homologous cloning method from the transcriptomic data of Xuzishu8, which is a sweet potato cultivar with dark-purple flesh. This gene was expressed in all tissues of sweet potato, with the highest expression level in leaf tissue, and it could be induced by NaCl and ABA. Subcellular localization analyses indicated that IbCAR1 was localized in the nucleus and plasma membrane. The PI staining experiment revealed the distinctive root cell membrane integrity of overexpressed transgenic lines upon salt stress. Salt stress significantly increased the contents of proline, ABA, and the activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD), whereas the content of malondialdehyde (MDA) was decreased in overexpressed lines. On the contrary, RNA interference plants showed sensitivity to salt stress. Overexpression of IbCAR1 in sweet potatoes could improve the salt tolerance of plants, while the RNAi of IbCAR1 significantly increased sensitivity to salt stress in sweet potatoes. Meanwhile, the genes involved in ABA biosynthesis, stress response, and reactive oxygen species (ROS)-scavenging system were upregulated in overexpressed lines under salt stress. Taken together, these results demonstrated that IbCAR1 plays a positive role in salt tolerance by relying on the ABA signal transduction pathway, activating the ROS-scavenging system in sweet potatoes.

1. Introduction

The growth of plants is constantly affected by various environmental factors, such as low temperature, drought, salinity, heavy metal, and other abiotic stresses [1,2]. Salt stress will lead to a decrease in the yield and quality of sweet potatoes [3,4,5]. Therefore, one of the important objectives of sweet potato breeding in China is to find salt tolerance genes and select sweet potato varieties with strong resistance to stresses [6,7,8,9,10]. The development of genetic engineering technology provides a new idea and way for breeding sweet potato varieties with high yield, high quality, and strong resistance to stresses [11,12].
The C2 domain is a relatively conserved domain with 130 residues located between the C1 domain and the catalytic domain of protein kinase C (PKC) [13,14]. Compared with C2 domain proteins in animals, plant C2 domain proteins contain only one C2 domain and no other conserved domains. Therefore, plant C2 domain proteins are also known as small C2 domain proteins. Proteins containing C2 domains play important roles in many biological processes [15]. To date, extensive evidence has shown that genes encoding plant C2 domain proteins are involved in the regulation of plant abiotic stress resistance, such as high salt and drought stress [16]. In Arabidopsis, CAR (C2-domain abscisic acid-related) proteins respond to salt stress by mediating ABA signaling [17]. Pepper soybean genes regulated by cold 2 (SRC2) protein are involved in the resistance of bacteria, pathogens, and abiotic stress [18]. Triticum aestivum elicitor responsive gene (TaERG3) encoding wheat C2 domain protein can be induced by low temperature, high salt, and stripe rust [19]. Glycine max C2 domain gene (GMC2-148) could increase proline content, decrease malondialdehyde (MDA) content, and upregulate the expression of NAM-ATAF1/2-CUC2 (NAC11) gene, cold-responsive (COR47) gene, cold-inducible (KIN1) gene and other abiotic transcription factors in soybean leaves, thus improving the tolerance of salt and drought stress [20]. Therefore, an in-depth analysis of C2 domain proteins in plants and their regulatory mechanisms in flower morphogenesis, biological stress, and abiotic stress is of great significance for genetic improvement in crop yield, quality, and resistance [21,22].
Sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.) is an important crop, feed, and industrial raw material crop [23,24,25]. Its productivity is often restricted by salt stress. Cultivated sweet potato is an autohexaploid crop with a large number of chromosomes (2n = 6x = 90), complex genetic background, and incompatibility between intraspecific and interspecific crosses, resulting in a lack of available germplasm resources. It is difficult to cultivate sweet potato varieties with excellent comprehensive traits by using traditional crossbreeding methods [1,26]. Genetic engineering is an effective way to improve the salt tolerance of sweet potatoes [27,28,29,30,31,32]. However, there are few reports about CAR conferring tolerance to salt in sweet potatoes [33,34,35]. In this study, we cloned the stress-resistant gene IbCAR1 by homologous cloning method from the transcriptomic data of Xuzishu8, which is a sweet potato cultivar with dark-purple flesh. Its overexpression enhanced salt tolerance in transgenic sweet potatoes.

2. Results

2.1. Cloning and Sequence Analysis of IbCAR1 and Its Promoter

The open reading frame (ORF) of the IbCAR1 gene is 531bp, and 176 amino acids are encoded (Figure S1). The molecular weight (MW) of IbCAR1 protein is 19.95 kDa, and the isoelectric point (pI) is 7.76. This protein has a highly conserved C2 domain (Figure 1A). It has a high sequence identity with CAR in Ipomoea trifida (100%), Ipomoea triloba (XP_031110439.1, 100%), Ipomoea nil (XP_019173082.1, 94.32%), Capsicum annuum (XP_016560847.1, 74.40%), Hevea brasiliensis (XP_021664250.1, 74.40%), Sesamum indicum (XP_011073630.1, 73.81%), Ipomoea nil (XP_019182458.1, 73.30%), Coffea eugenioide (XP_027161458.1, 73.21%), Datura stramonium (MCD9559783.1, 71.43%), Solanum pennellii (XP_015065130.1, 70.83%), Camellia sinensis (XP_028068988.1, 70.83%), Solanum lycopersicum (XP_004231984.1, 70.24%), Impatiens glandulifera (XP_047317802.1, 69.64%), Tripterygium wilfordii (XP_038689876.1, 69.64%), Mangifera indica (XP_044467456.1, 69.05%), and Eucalyptus grandis (XP_010032690.1, 67.86%) (Figure 1B). Phylogenetic analysis showed that IbCAR1 has a close relationship with that of Ipomoea trifida (Figure 1C). The 2018-bp genomic DNA of IbCAR1 contained three exons and two introns (Figure 1D). A 1440bp fragment corresponding to the promoter of IbCAR1 was isolated from Xuzishu8 genomic DNA and analyzed by using the online analysis software PlantCARE. The results showed that the promoter possessed not only basic cis-acting elements but also photoresponsive elements and cis-acting elements related to ABA, salicylic acid, and protein binding (Supplementary Table S1).

2.2. Expression Patterns of IbCAR1 Genes

To investigate the expression level of IbCAR1 in different tissues of Xuzishu8, including the storage root, pencil root, fibrous root, leaf, stem, and petiole. The IbCAR1 gene was expressed in different tissues of sweet potato, but the highest expression was in leaves and the lowest in petioles (Figure 2A). To further analyze its potential function, the expression of IbCAR1 was checked using the whole plants of Xuzishu8, which were treated with 200 mM NaCl and 100 mM ABA for 0, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h. These results showed that the expression of IbCAR1 was significantly induced by NaCl and ABA. Under 200 mM NaCl stress, the expression of IbCAR1 peaked at 12 h with 2.93-fold, respectively. Under ABA stress, the expression of the IbCAR1 gene increased sharply after 24 h (Figure 2B).

2.3. Subcellular Localization of IbCAR1

The subcellular localization of IbCAR1 was studied by detecting IbCAR1-GFP fusion protein. The ORF of IbCAR1 controlled by the 35S promoter was fused with GFP to construct the subcellular localization vector pCAMBIA1300-IbCAR1-GFP. The pCAMBIA1300-IbCAR1-GFP was expressed in Nicotiana benthamiana leaf epidermal cells using Agrobacterium tumefaciens (A. tumefaciens)-meditated transformation. Confocal scanning microscopic images from Nicotiana benthamiana leaf epidermal cells showed that the IbCAR1-GFP fusion expression protein was located in the nucleus and plasma membrane (Figure 3).

2.4. Determination of Plasma Membrane Integrity of Transgenic Sweet Potato under Salt Stress

To further investigate whether IbCAR1 contributes to salt resistance, we generated three overexpressed transgenic lines (OE-1, OE-5, and OE-16) (Figure S2) and two IbCAR1 RNAi transgenic lines (RNAi-10 and RNAi-11) (Figure S3) of sweet potato. The expression level of IbCAR1 in overexpressed transgenic plants was significantly higher than that of WT, while the expression levels of RNAi plants were lower than that of WT. The transgenic and wild-type Xuzishu8 seedlings were hydroponic for 3 days and treated with 150 mmol·L−1 NaCl, while the control group was treated with water. After 24 h, PI staining was performed on the sweet potato root tip to observe the integrity of the plasma membrane of the sweet potato root cell. The results indicated that the cytoplasmic membranes in the meristem area of the root tip of sweet potato in the control group showed weak red fluorescence, indicating that the cytoplasmic membranes were intact. After being treated with salt, the root elongation zone (2–3 mm from the tip) of the WT showed strong red fluorescence in the nucleus of most cells, indicating that the plasma membrane integrity in this root region was damaged. However, the PI-stained nucleus in the same position of the overexpressed transgenic lines was substantially smaller than that of the WT under saline conditions. These results showed that WT is more sensitive to salinity stress than the overexpressed transgenic lines. In order to further verify the integrity of the root cell plasma membrane after salt stress treatment, PI staining results of wild-type Xuzishu8 and RNAi transgenic sweet potato under the same conditions were observed. After being treated with salt, the root elongation zone of the RNAi transgenic lines showed stronger red fluorescence in the nucleus of most cells, indicating that the plasma membrane integrity in this root region was completely destroyed (Figure 4). The PI staining experiment revealed the distinctive root cell membrane integrity of overexpressed transgenic lines upon salt stress. These results suggest that the IbCAR1 gene can better maintain the integrity of the root cell plasma membrane under salt stress.

2.5. Overexpression of IbCAR1 Enhances Salt Tolerance in Sweet Potato

The overexpressed transgenic lines, RNAi transgenic lines, and wild-type Xuzishu8 were treated with 150 mmol·L−1 NaCl, and the control group was cultured with water for 3 days. Phenotypic identification showed that there was no significant difference among the overexpressed transgenic lines, RNAi lines, or WT under normal growth conditions. After the salt treatment, the growth of all sweet potato plants was inhibited to some extent. The leaves of the RNAi plants turned yellow and were more wilted than the WT plants. In the overexpressed transgenic lines, only a few bottom leaves showed yellowing and wilting, which indicated significantly increased salt tolerance (Figure 5A). It indicated that overexpression of IbCAR1 improved the salt stress tolerance in sweet potatoes.
Salt stress can reduce the scavenging function of intracellular ROS. Accumulation of ROS will lead to membrane lipid peroxidation, MDA formation, and activation of the ROS-scavenging system. At the same time, plant cells will accumulate a large amount of proline under salt stress to maintain the normal swelling pressure of cells and improve the tolerance of plants to salt stress. The content of MDA, proline, ABA, and SOD in the leaves of overexpressed transgenic lines and WT were determined under normal and salt treatment conditions. The results indicated that the overexpressed lines increased the content of ABA and proline, increased activities of SOD, and decreased the content of MDA than that in WT plants under salt stress (Figure 5B–E). To further verify whether there is a necessary functional link between salt tolerance and IbCAR1 gene expression, we also measured the content of MDA, proline, ABA, and SOD of RNAi lines and WT lines under normal and salt treatment conditions. The results indicated that the RNAi lines decreased the content of ABA and proline, decreased activities of SOD, and increased the content of MDA than that in WT plants under salt stress (Figure 5F–I). This is the opposite of overexpressed transgenic lines. These results all indicated that IbCAR1 plays a role in improving the tolerance of salt stress.

2.6. Overexpression of IbCAR1 Upregulates the Expression of the Stress-Responsive Genes

To investigate the reason that IbCAR1 affected salt tolerance in transgenic plants, we analyzed the expression of several genes involved in different pathways. Our data indicated that after 12 h of the salt treatment, the expression levels of the ROS scavenging-related genes IbAPX, IbPOD, IbCAT (encoding an ascorbate peroxidase, a peroxidase, a catalase, respectively), the late embryogenesis abundant gene IbLEA (encoding a late embryogenesis abundant protein), the ABA biosynthesis-related genes IbAAO and IbABA2 (encoding an ascorbic acid oxidase, a zeaxanthin epoxidase, respectively) were significantly upregulated in the overexpressed transgenic plants compared with WT under salt stress (Figure 6A).
To further verify whether there is a necessary functional link between salt tolerance and IbCAR1 gene expression, qRT-PCR was used to detect the resistance-related gene expression levels of IbCAR1 RNAi transgenic lines and WT lines. Under normal growth conditions, the expression levels of IbAPX and IbABA2 were higher in RNAi lines compared to WT, while IbPOD and IbLEA were lower in RNAi lines. For salt stress, the expression levels of IbAPX, IbPOD, and IbCAT were significantly downregulated in RNAi plants, which suggests that IbCAR1 can regulate ROS-scavenging pathways. Meanwhile, the expression levels of IbAAO and IbABA2 were significantly downregulated in RNAi plants (Figure 6B). This is the opposite of the overexpressed transgenic lines. These results indicated that IbCAR1 may regulate stress tolerance by regulating the expression of salt stress-related genes.

3. Discussion

3.1. Overexpression of IbCAR1 Upregulates Related Genes in ABA Signaling Pathway

The plant CAR protein family plays an important role in regulating abiotic and biological stress [16]. However, so far, there are few reports about the plant CAR protein family involved in salt stress. Studies on the plant CAR protein family have focused on Arabidopsis thaliana. In Arabidopsis thaliana, CAR proteins respond to salt stress by mediating ABA signaling. Overexpression of rice CAR homolog OsSMCP1 can improve salt tolerance and drought tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. In previous studies, CAR proteins were found to positively regulate ABA signaling by affecting the subcellular localization of PYR/PYL. CAR proteins have a molecular mechanism that integrates Ca2+ signal recognition, plasma membrane interaction, and PYR/PYL receptor recognition and interaction. LOT1 affects ABA signaling by regulating the stability and dynamic localization of CAR9, thereby enhancing plant tolerance to drought stress [32].
ABA is an important plant hormone that regulates plant growth and development [36,37]. The ABA signaling pathway can regulate ABA-dependent stress response genes, and increasing ABA content can upregulate the expression of related stress response genes, thus enhancing the adaptability of plants to abiotic stress [38,39,40]. ABA biosynthesis can be induced by drought and salt stress [41,42,43]. It has been reported that ABA2 and AAO are responsible for ABA accumulation [44,45]. Under abiotic stress, genes related to the ABA signaling pathway AAO and ABA2 were induced to express and promote the rapid accumulation of ABA in plants [46]. ABA has been reported to regulate the expression levels of stress-tolerance-related genes, including APX, POD, LEA, and CAT, in several plant species [47,48,49].
In previous studies, CAR proteins have been found to participate in ABA-dependent signaling pathways by recruiting ABA signaling receptor PYR/PYL. In this experiment, genes related to the ABA signal transduction pathway AAO and ABA2 and the content of ABA significantly increased in the overexpressed transgenic plants compared with WT under salt stress (Figure 5 and Figure 6). The expression levels of POD, LEA, and CAT were significantly upregulated in the overexpressed transgenic plants. At the same time, the expression of genes related to stress tolerance in RNAi transgenic lines was opposite to that in overexpressed transgenic lines (Figure 6). These results indicated that IbCAR1 might play an important role in the regulation of the stress-responsive gene via the ABA signaling pathway (Figure 7).

3.2. Overexpression of IbCAR1 Improve Salt Tolerance in Sweet potato

Sweet potato is an important food, feed, and new energy crop, but due to the large number of chromosomes (2n = 6x = 90), complex genetic background, and incompatibility between intraspecific and interspecific hybridization, it is difficult to breed sweet potato varieties with excellent comprehensive traits by traditional crossbreeding methods, so genetic engineering is used to improve sweet potato [26]. At present, there is no related study on this protein in sweet potatoes. In this study, the gene IbCAR1 related to acquiring stress resistance was cloned according to the transcriptome data of Xuzishu8 obtained earlier. IbCAR1 was expressed in all tissues of sweet potato, with the highest expression level in leaves. Its expression was induced by NaCl and ABA (Figure 2A,B).
The cell membrane is a barrier separating cells from the external environment, an important structure to ensure normal internal physiological functions, and an important target for damage caused by environmental stress [50]. PI staining can show the integrity of the plasma membrane in the root elongation zone (2–3 mm from the tip). After salt treatment, the PI-stained nucleus in the root elongation zone of the overexpressed transgenic lines was substantially smaller than that of the WT, while the PI-stained nucleus in the same position of the RNAi transgenic lines showed more intense red fluorescence (Figure 4). These results suggest that the IbCAR1 gene can better maintain the integrity of the root cell plasma membrane under salt stress.

3.3. Overexpression of IbCAR1 Enhances the ROS-Scavenging System

Under salt stress, a large number of ROS were produced in sweet potatoes, which caused oxidative damage to cell structure and function [51,52]. To avoid ROS damage, plants have evolved a sophisticated ROS clearance system to protect them from ROS [53]. SOD is closely related to the clearance of reactive oxygen species and catalyzes the conversion of superoxide to oxygen and hydrogen peroxide, which can be removed by POD, CAT, and APX [54,55]. The upregulated expression of related stress response genes POD, CAT, and APX enhanced their ability of ROS scavenging so as to resist the damage of ROS to plants.
In this study, the activity of SOD, the content of proline, and ABA were significantly increased, while the content of MDA significantly decreased in overexpressed plants compared with WT under salt stress (Figure 5B–E). In contrast, the physiological indicators in RNAi transgenic lines were opposite to that in overexpressed transgenic lines under salt stress (Figure 5F–I). The expression levels of IbAPX, IbPOD, IbLEA, IbCAT, IbAAO, and IbABA2 in overexpressed plants were significantly upregulated, while the expression levels of IbAPX, IbPOD, IbLEA, IbCAT, IbAAO, and IbABA2 in RNAi plants were significantly downregulated (Figure 6). These results indicated that the IbCAR1 gene can improve the salt tolerance of transgenic sweet potato plants by upregulating the expression of stress-responsive genes and enhancing the activity of ROS-scavenging enzymes.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials and Growth Conditions

The function of IbCAR1 was studied by using Xuzishu8 (purple skin and purple flesh, table use type) as materials. Sweet potato seedlings were planted in Xuzhou’s modern agricultural experiment and demonstration base in Jiangsu province for conventional management.

4.2. Cloning and Sequence Analysis of IbCAR1

Total RNA was extracted from the leaves of Xuzishu8 using the RNAprep Pure Plant Kit (Tiangen Biotech, Beijing, China), and the first strand cDNA synthesis was synthesized using ReverTra Ace® qPCR RT Master Mix with gDNA Remover Synthesis Kit (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan). According to the EST obtained in a previous study and referring to the genomic data of Ipomoea trifida (http://sweetpotato.uga.edu/, accessed on 10 November 2020), the cDNA sequence of the IbCAR1 gene was obtained with a primer pair (IbCAR1-clon-F/R) and homology-based cloning method. All special primers are listed in Supplementary Table S2. The MW and pI of IbCAR1 protein were predicted using Expasy (https://web.expasy.org/protparam/ accessed on 25 November 2020). IbCAR1 was analyzed with online BLAST (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi accessed on 3 December 2020). COBALT was used for homology analysis, and MEGA 7.0 was used to construct an evolutionary tree (https://www.megasoftware.net/ accessed on 12 December 2020). The structure of the IbCAR1 gene was constructed using GSDS 2.0 (http://gsds.gao-lab.org/ accessed on 5 January 2021). The promoter sequence of the IbCAR1 gene was analyzed using the PlantCARE database (https://www.dna.affrc.go.jp/PLACE/?action=newplace accessed on 8 March 2021).

4.3. Expression Analysis of IbCAR1

The expression levels of the IbCAR1 gene in six tissues (the storage root, pencil root, fibrous root, leaf, stem, and petiole) of the Xuzishu8 field seedling were determined. Xuzishu8 seedlings with the same growth pattern of 25–30 cm were cut and treated with 200 mM NaCl and 100 mM ABA, respectively. The whole plants were sampled at 0 h, 3 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h after treatment. qRT-PCR was used to analyze the expression of the IbCAR1 gene at different time points under different stress treatments.

4.4. Subcellular Localization

The ORF of the terminating codon IbCAR1 gene was removed, and the restriction endonuclease StuⅠ and XbaⅠ were used to cut the fragment into pCAMBIA1300-GFP to construct the subcellular localization vector pCAMBIA1300-IbCAR1-GFP. The recombinant vectors pCAMBIA1300-IbCAR1-GFP and pCAMBIA1300-GFP (as control) were transformed into A. tumefaciens strain EHA105 by heat shock method, respectively, and transiently expressed in Nicotiana benthamiana leaf epidermal cells using Agrobacterium infiltration [56]. After 2–3 days of low light culture, the fluorescence of the lower epidermis of injected tobacco was observed by laser confocal microscope (Nikon C2).

4.5. Production of Transgenic Sweet Potato Plants

The coding region of IbCAR1 was inserted into the pCAMBIA1301S expression vector. A pair of forward and reverse nonconserved fragments of IbCAR1 were inserted into the plant RNA interference (RNAi) vector pFGC5941. Vectors were individually introduced into Xuzishu8 via A. tumefaciens-mediated transformation as previously described. The resistant calli in suitable condition on the screening medium were transferred to an MS medium containing 1 mg/L ABA and 200 mg/L Cef, and the light intensity (2500 Lux) induced the formation of somatic embryos. Mature somatic embryos were cultured for 1–2 months to obtain transgenic plants [57]. The putative transgenic sweet potato plants were identified by PCR analysis with qRT-PCR primers (Supplementary Table S2).

4.6. Determination of Plasma Membrane Integrity

The transgenic and wild-type Xuzishu8 seedlings were treated with 150 mmol·L−1 NaCl, while the control group was treated with water. After 24 h, the plasma membrane integrity in root cells was checked by using propidium iodide (PI) staining [58]. Root tips (3 cm) were collected from non-treated or NaCl-treated WT overexpressed transgenic lines and RNAi transgenic lines and were incubated in a staining buffer containing 5 mM KCl/MES and 3 μg mL−1 PI (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for 20 min. The samples were then washed in KCl/MES buffer for 5 min before imaging (elongation root zone) with an Olympus BX 63 epifluorescence microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).

4.7. Assay for Salt Tolerance

The overexpressed transgenic lines, RNAi transgenic lines, and wild-type xuzishu8 were treated with 150 mmol·L−1 NaCl, and the control group was cultured in water for 3 days for phenotypic identification. Meanwhile, proline and MDA contents and SOD activity in the leaves of transgenic and WT plants were analyzed using Assay Kits [59] (Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd. Beijing, China). The ABA content in the leaves of transgenic and WT plants was analyzed using Assay Kits (Enzyme-linked Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China).

4.8. Expression of Salt Stress-Responsive Genes

The overexpressed transgenic lines, RNAi transgenic lines, and WT were treated with 150 mmol·L−1 NaCl, and the control group was cultured in water for 12 h. qRT-PCR was used to detect the expression levels of related resistance genes in the leaves of wild-type and transgenic plants under salt stress with gene-specific primers [60] (Supplementary Table S2).

4.9. Statistical Analysis

SPSS 22.0 software (IBM, New York, NY, USA) was used for statistical analysis of data, and t-test analysis of variance was used between different samples. All experiments were performed with three biological replicates. The two-tailed t-test was used for significant difference analysis.

5. Conclusions

The stress-resistant gene IbCAR1 was obtained by homologous cloning. This is the first report that IbCAR1 endows sweet potatoes with salt tolerance. The overexpression of the IbCAR1 gene relies on the ABA signal transduction pathway, regulating the expression of stress-related genes and activating the ROS-scavenging system; thus, the salt tolerance of transgenic sweet potato plants was significantly improved. This study provides a new candidate gene for improving the salt tolerance of sweet potatoes.

Supplementary Materials

The supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms23179680/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Q.L.; methodology, X.W. and M.K.; software, C.Y.; validation, C.Y., C.L. and M.M.; formal analysis, C.Y.; investigation, C.Y., C.L. and W.T.; resources, W.T., H.Y., W.S. and R.G.; data curation, C.Y.; writing-original draft preparation, C.Y.; writing-review and editing, Q.L., C.Y., W.T. and C.L.; visualization, C.Y.; supervision, Q.L.; project administration, Y.Z.; funding acquisition, Q.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the earmarked fund for CARS-10-Sweetpotato, National Key R&D Program of China (2019YFD1001300, 2019YFD1001304).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yang, Y.L.; Zhang, X.J.; Zou, H.D.; Chen, J.Y.; Wang, Z.Y.; Luo, Z.X.; Yao, Z.F.; Fang, B.P.; Huang, L.F. Exploration of molecular mechanism of intraspecific cross-incompatibility in sweetpotato by transcriptome and metabolome analysis. Plant Mol. Biol. 2022, 109, 115–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wang, F.X.; Xu, Y.G.; Wang, S.; Shi, W.W.; Liu, R.R.; Feng, G.; Song, J. Salinity affects production and salt tolerance of dimorphic seeds of Suaeda salsa. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2015, 95, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hasegawa, P.M.; Bressan, R.A.; Zhu, J.K.; Bohnert, H.J. Plant cellular and molecular responses to high salinity. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 2000, 51, 463–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Liu, X.Y.; Liu, S.F.; Zhang, J.; Wu, Y.H.; Wu, W.Y.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, B.L.; Tang, R.M.; He, L.H.; Li, R.Z.; et al. Optimization of reference genes for qRT-PCR analysis of microRNA expression under abiotic stress conditions in sweetpotato. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 154, 379–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kim, S.E.; Lee, C.J.; Ji, C.Y.; Kim, H.S.; Park, S.U.; Lim, Y.H.; Park, W.S.; Ahn, M.J.; Bian, X.; Xie, Y.; et al. Transgenic sweetpotato plants overexpressing tocopherol cyclase display enhanced alpha-tocopherol content and abiotic stress tolerance. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 144, 436–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Morton, M.; Awlia, M.; Al-Tamimi, N.; Saade, S.; Pailles, Y.; Negrao, S.; Tester, M. Salt stress under the scalpel—dissecting the genetics of salt tolerance. Plant J. 2019, 97, 148–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yang, Y.Q.; Guo, Y. Elucidating the molecular mechanisms mediating plant salt-stress responses. New Phytol. 2018, 217, 523–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Munns, R.; Tester, M. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008, 59, 651–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Qadir, M.; Quillérou, E.; Nangia, V.; Murtaza, G.; Singh, M.; Thomas, R.J.; Drechsel, P.; Noble, A.D. Economics of salt-induced land degradation and restoration. Nat. Resour. Forum 2014, 38, 282–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tang, W.; Yan, H.; Su, Z.X.; Park, S.C.; Liu, Y.J.; Zhang, Y.G.; Wang, X.; Kou, M.; Ma, D.F.; Kwak, S.S.; et al. Cloning and characterization of a novel GIGANTEA gene in sweet potato. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 116, 27–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, J.L.; Shi, H.Z. Physiological and molecular mechanisms of plant salt tolerance. Photosynth. Res. 2013, 115, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zhu, H.; Zhou, Y.Y.; Zhai, H.; He, S.Z.; Zhao, N.; Liu, Q.C. A Novel Sweetpotato WRKY Transcription Factor, IbWRKY2, Positively Regulates Drought and Salt Tolerance in Transgenic Arab. Biomol. 2020, 10, 506. [Google Scholar]
  13. Nishizuka, Y. The molecular heterogeneity of protein kinase C and its implications for cellular regulation. Nature 1988, 334, 661–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Corbalan-Garcia, S.; Guerrero-Valero, M.; Marin-Vicente, C.; Gomez-Fernandez, J.C. The C2 domains of classical/conventional PKCs are specific PtdIns(4,5) P(2)-sensing domains. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2007, 35, 1046–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zhang, D.; Aravind, L. Identification of novel families and classification of the C2 domain superfamily elucidate the origin and evolution of membrane targeting activities in eukaryotes. Gene 2010, 469, 18–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. de Silva, K.; Laska, B.; Brown, C.; Sederoff, H.W.; Khodakovskaya, M. Arabidopsis thaliana calcium-dependent lipid-binding protein (AtCLB): A novel repressor of abiotic stress response. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62, 2679–2689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rodriguez, L.; Gonzalez-Guzman, M.; Diaz, M.; Rodrigues, A.; Izquierdo-Garcia, A.C.; Peirats-Llobet, M.; Fernandez, M.A.; Antoni, R.; Fernandez, D.; Marquez, J.A. C2-domain abscisic acid-related proteins mediate the interaction of PYR/PYL/RCAR abscisic acid receptors with the plasma membrane and regulate abscisic acid sensitivity in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2014, 26, 4802–4820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kim, Y.C.; Kim, S.Y.; Choi, D.; Ryu, C.M.; Park, J.M. Molecular characterization of a pepper C2 domain-containing SRC2 protein implicated in resistance against host and non-host pathogens and abiotic stresses. Planta 2008, 227, 1169–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, G.; Sun, Y.; Li, F.; Dong, Y.M.; Huang, Y.L.; Yu, X.L.; Wang, Y.T.; Wang, J.M.; Wang, X.M.; Kang, X.J.; et al. Characterization of a wheat C2 domain protein encoding gene regulated by stripe rust and abiotic stresses. Biol. Plant. 2013, 57, 701–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sun, Y.; Zhao, J.Y.; Li, Y.T.; Zhang, P.G.; Wang, S.P.; Guo, J.; Chen, J.; Zhou, Y.B.; Chen, M.; Ma, Y.Z. Genome-Wide Analysis of the C2 Domain Family in Soybean and Identification of a Putative Abiotic Stress Response Gene GmC2-148. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kim, C.Y.; Koo, Y.D.; Jin, J.B.; Moon, B.C.; Kang, C.H.; Kim, S.T.; Park, B.O.; Lee, S.Y.; Kim, M.L.; Hwang, I. Rice C2-domain proteins are induced and translocated to the plasma membrane in response to a fungal elicitor. Biochemistry 2003, 42, 11625–11633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Hua, J.; Grisafi, P.; Cheng, S.H.; Fink, G.R. Plant growth homeostasis is controlled by the Arabidopsis BON1 and BAP1 genes. Genes Dev. 2001, 15, 2263–2272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Feng, C.H.; Yin, Z.F.; Ma, Y.L.; Zhang, Z.B.; Chen, L.; Wang, B.; Li, B.Q.; Huang, Y.S.; Wang, Q.C. Cryopreservation of sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas) and its pathogen eradication by cryotherapy. Biotechnol. Adv. 2011, 29, 84–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kenji, K.; Kanefumi, K.; Tetsufumi, S.; Yumi, K.; Masaru, Y. Resistant and Digestible Starch Contents in Sweet Potato Cultivars and Lines. J. Appl. Glycosci. 2011, 58, 19–21. [Google Scholar]
  25. Yan, H.; Zhang, Y.G.; Ahmad, M.Q.; Liu, Y.J.; Kou, M.; Ma, M.; Li, C.; Arisha, M.H.; Tang, W.; Wang, X.; et al. Comparative Analysis of Anthocyanin Compositions and Starch Physiochemical Properties of Purple-Fleshed Sweetpotato “Xuzishu8” in Desert Regions of China. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 841969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Dhir, S.K.; Oglesby, J.; Bhagsari, A.S. Plant regeneration via somatic embryogenesis, and transient gene expression in sweet potato protoplasts. Plant Cell Rep. 1998, 17, 665–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Park, S.C.; Kim, Y.H.; Jeong, J.C.; Kim, C.Y.; Lee, H.S.; Bang, J.W.; Kwak, S.S. Sweetpotato late embryogenesis abundant 14 (IbLEA14) gene influences lignification and increases osmotic- and salt stress-tolerance of transgenic calli. Planta 2011, 233, 621–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kim, S.H.; Ahn, Y.O.; Ahn, M.J.; Lee, H.S.; Kwak, S.S. Down-regulation of beta-carotene hydroxylase increases beta-carotene and total carotenoids enhancing salt stress tolerance in transgenic cultured cells of sweetpotato. Phytochemistry 2012, 74, 69–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kim, S.H.; Kim, Y.H.; Ahn, Y.O.; Ahn, M.J.; Jeong, J.C.; Lee, H.S.; Kwak, S.S. Downregulation of the lycopene epsilon-cyclase gene increases carotenoid synthesis via the beta-branch-specific pathway and enhances salt-stress tolerance in sweetpotato transgenic calli. Physiol. Plant 2013, 147, 432–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kim, S.H.; Jeong, J.C.; Park, S.; Bae, J.Y.; Ahn, M.J.; Lee, H.S.; Kwak, S.S. Down-regulation of sweetpotato lycopene beta-cyclase gene enhances tolerance to abiotic stress in transgenic calli. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2014, 41, 8137–8148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, D.G.; Wang, L.J.; Liu, C.L.; Song, X.J.; He, S.Z.; Zhai, H.; Liu, Q.C. An Ipomoea batatas iron-sulfur cluster scaffold protein gene, IbNFU1, is involved in salt tolerance. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e93935. [Google Scholar]
  32. Liu, D.G.; Wang, L.J.; Zhai, H.; Song, X.J.; He, S.Z.; Liu, Q.C. A novel alpha/beta-hydrolase gene IbMas enhances salt tolerance in transgenic sweetpotato. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e115128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Qin, T.; Tian, Q.Z.; Wang, G.F.; Xiong, L.M. LOWER TEMPERATURE 1 Enhances ABA Responses and Plant Drought Tolerance by Modulating the Stability and Localization of C2-Domain ABA-Related Proteins in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 2019, 12, 1243–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yokotani, N.; Ichikawa, T.; Kondou, Y.; Maeda, S.; Iwabuchi, M.; Mori, M.; Hirochika, H.; Matsui, M.; Oda, K. Overexpression of a rice gene encoding a small C2 domain protein OsSMCP1 increases tolerance to abiotic and biotic stresses in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Mol. Biol. 2009, 71, 391–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Diaz, M.; Sanchez-Barrena, M.J.; Gonzalez-Rubio, J.M.; Rodriguez, L.; Fernandez, D.; Antoni, R.; Yunta, C.; Belda-Palazon, B.; Gonzalez-Guzman, M.; Peirats-Llobet, M. Calcium-dependent oligomerization of CAR proteins at cell membrane modulates ABA signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 396–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sharma, G.; Giri, J.; Tyagi, A.K. Rice OsiSAP7 negatively regulates ABA stress signalling and imparts sensitivity to water-deficit stress in Arabidopsis. Plant Sci. 2015, 237, 80–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Takuya, Y.; Junro, M.; Kazuko, Y.S. ABA-dependent and ABA-independent signaling in response to osmotic stress in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2014, 21, 133–139. [Google Scholar]
  38. Carrio-Segui, A.; Romero, P.; Sanz, A.; Penarrubia, L. Interaction Between ABA Signaling and Copper Homeostasis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 2016, 57, 1568–1582. [Google Scholar]
  39. Li, Y.X.; Zhou, J.H.; Li, Z.; Qiao, J.Z.; Quan, R.D.; Wang, J.; Huang, R.F.; Qin, H. SALT AND ABA RESPONSE ERF1 improves seed germination and salt tolerance by repressing ABA signaling in rice. Plant Physiol. 2022, 16, 15–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Xu, X.H.; Ye, X.L.; Xing, A.Q.; Wu, Z.C.; Li, X.Y.; Shu, Z.F.; Wang, Y.H. Camellia sinensis small GTPase gene (CsRAC1) involves in response to salt stress, drought stress and ABA signaling pathway. Gene 2022, 821, 146318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Audran, C.; Borel, C.; Frey, A.; Sotta, B.; Meyer, C.; Simonneau, T.; Marion-Poll, A. Expression studies of the zeaxanthin epoxidase gene in Nicotiana plumbaginifolia. Plant Physiol. 1998, 118, 1021–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Xie, Y.H.; Zhang, F.J.; Sun, P.; Li, Z.Y.; Zheng, P.F.; Gu, K.D.; Hao, Y.J.; Zhang, Z.; You, C.X. Apple receptor-like kinase FERONIA regulates salt tolerance and ABA sensitivity in Malus domestica. J. Plant Physiol. 2022, 270, 153616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Huang, Y.Y.; Zhou, J.H.; Li, Y.X.; Quan, R.D.; Wang, J.; Huang, R.F.; Qin, H. Salt Stress Promotes Abscisic Acid Accumulation to Affect Cell Proliferation and Expansion of Primary Roots in Rice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 10892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Seo, M.; Koiwai, H.; Akaba, S.; Komano, T.; Oritani, T.; Kamiya, Y.; Koshiba, T. Abscisic aldehyde oxidase in leaves of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 2000, 23, 481–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Xiong, L.M.; Zhu, J.K. Abiotic stress signal transduction in plants: Molecular and genetic perspectives. Physiol. Plantarum 2001, 112, 152–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Zhang, X.; Long, Y.; Chen, X.X.; Zhang, B.L.; Xin, Y.F.; Li, L.Y.; Cao, S.L.; Liu, F.H.; Wang, Z.G.; Huang, H.; et al. A NAC transcription factor OsNAC3 positively regulates ABA response and salt tolerance in rice. BMC Plant Biol. 2021, 21, 546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Chen, G.J.; Zheng, D.F.; Feng, N.J.; Zhou, H.; Mu, D.W.; Zhao, L.M.; Shen, X.F.; Rao, G.S.; Meng, F.Y.; Huang, A.Q. Physiological mechanisms of ABA-induced salinity tolerance in leaves and roots of rice. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 627–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yuan, X.; Wang, H.; Cai, J.T.; Bi, Y.; Li, D.Y.; Song, F.M. Rice NAC transcription factor ONAC066 functions as a positive regulator of drought and oxidative stress response. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Joo, J.; Lee, Y.H.; Song, S.I. OsbZIP42 is a positive regulator of ABA signaling and confers drought tolerance to rice. Planta 2019, 249, 1521–1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhang, Y.; Rock, C.O. Membrane lipid homeostasis in bacteria. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2008, 6, 222–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Graham, N.; Jean-Philippe, R.; Christine, H.F. ROS-related redox regulation and signaling in plants. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2018, 80, 3–12. [Google Scholar]
  52. Katarzyna, P.S.; Lidia, P.; Ma, G.L.; Justyna, M.; Gra, Y.D. SNF1-Related Protein Kinases SnRK2.4 and SnRK2.10 Modulate ROS Homeostasis in Plant Response to Salt Stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 59–64. [Google Scholar]
  53. Dietz, K. Peroxiredoxins in plants and cyanobacteria. Antioxid. Redox Sign. 2011, 15, 1129–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Zhang, F.L.; Wang, Y.H.; Liu, C.; Chen, F.J.; Ge, H.L.; Tian, F.S.; Yang, T.W.; Ma, K.S.; Zhang, Y. Trichoderma harzianum mitigates salt stress in cucumber via multiple responses. Ecotox. Environ. Safe 2019, 170, 436–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Yan, H.; Li, Q.; Park, S.C.; Wang, X.; Liu, Y.J.; Zhang, Y.G.; Tang, W.; Kou, M.; Ma, D.F. Overexpression of CuZnSOD and APX enhance salt stress tolerance in sweet potato. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2016, 109, 20–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Batoko, H.; Zheng, H.Q.; Hawes, C.; Moore, I. A rab1 GTPase is required for transport between the endoplasmic reticulum and golgi apparatus and for normal golgi movement in plants. Plant Cell 2000, 12, 2201–2217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Liu, Q.C.; Zhai, H.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, D.P. Efficient Plant Regeneration from Embryogenic Suspension Cultures of Sweetpotato. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2001, 37, 564–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Liu, Y.; Yu, Y.C.; Sun, J.Y.; Cao, Q.H.; Tang, Z.H.; Liu, M.Y.; Xu, T.; Ma, D.F.; Li, Z.Y.; Sun, J. Root-zone-specific sensitivity of K+-and Ca2+-permeable channels to H2O2 determines ion homeostasis in salinized diploid and hexaploid Ipomoea trifida. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 70, 1389–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Liu, Y.L.; Zheng, L.; Jin, L.G.; Liu, Y.X.; Kong, Y.N.; Wang, Y.X.; Yu, T.F.; Chen, J.; Zhou, Y.B.; Chen, M. Genome-Wide Analysis of the Soybean TIFY Family and Identification of GmTIFY10e and GmTIFY10g Response to Salt Stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 845314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Sun, S.; Li, X.; Gao, S.P.; Nie, N.; Zhang, H.; Yang, Y.F.; He, S.Z.; Liu, Q.C.; Zhai, H. A Novel WRKY Transcription Factor from Ipomoea trifida, ItfWRKY70, Confers Drought Tolerance in Sweet Potato. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 23 09680 g001 550
Figure 1. Sequence analysis of IbCAR1. (A) Features of IbCAR1 protein. (B) Sequences alignment of IbCAR1 with its closest homologs from other species. The C2 domain is represented with red lines. (C) Analysis of IbCAR1 protein homology tree in different species. (D) The structure diagrams of IbCAR1. Exons are represented by ellipses, and introns are represented by lines. The blue boxes represent the 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions (UTR).
Figure 1. Sequence analysis of IbCAR1. (A) Features of IbCAR1 protein. (B) Sequences alignment of IbCAR1 with its closest homologs from other species. The C2 domain is represented with red lines. (C) Analysis of IbCAR1 protein homology tree in different species. (D) The structure diagrams of IbCAR1. Exons are represented by ellipses, and introns are represented by lines. The blue boxes represent the 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions (UTR).
Ijms 23 09680 g001
Ijms 23 09680 g002 550
Figure 2. Expression analysis of IbCAR1. (A) Expression analysis of IbCAR1 in storage root, pencil root, fibrous root, leaf, stem, and petiole tissues of Xuzishu8. Data are presented as means ± SE (n = 3). Different lowercase letters indicate a significant difference at p < 0.05 based on Student’s t-test. (B) Expression analysis of IbCAR1 in whole plants of Xuzishu8 after different times (h) in response to 200 mM NaCl and 100 mM ABA, respectively. The sweet potato b-actin gene was used as an internal control. Data are presented as means ± SE (n = 3). ** indicates a significant difference compared with 0 h (p < 0.01) based on Student’s t-test. * indicates a significant difference compared with 0 h (p < 0.05) based on Student’s t-test.
Figure 2. Expression analysis of IbCAR1. (A) Expression analysis of IbCAR1 in storage root, pencil root, fibrous root, leaf, stem, and petiole tissues of Xuzishu8. Data are presented as means ± SE (n = 3). Different lowercase letters indicate a significant difference at p < 0.05 based on Student’s t-test. (B) Expression analysis of IbCAR1 in whole plants of Xuzishu8 after different times (h) in response to 200 mM NaCl and 100 mM ABA, respectively. The sweet potato b-actin gene was used as an internal control. Data are presented as means ± SE (n = 3). ** indicates a significant difference compared with 0 h (p < 0.01) based on Student’s t-test. * indicates a significant difference compared with 0 h (p < 0.05) based on Student’s t-test.
Ijms 23 09680 g002
Ijms 23 09680 g003 550
Figure 3. Subcellular localization of IbCAR1. OsMADS53 and AtSYP122 were used as nuclear and membrane markers, respectively. The n stands for nucleus. The cm stands for cytoplasmic membrane. Confocal scanning microscopic images showed that the IbCAR1-GFP fusion expression protein localized on the nucleus and membrane. GFP as the control. Bars = 25 μm.
Figure 3. Subcellular localization of IbCAR1. OsMADS53 and AtSYP122 were used as nuclear and membrane markers, respectively. The n stands for nucleus. The cm stands for cytoplasmic membrane. Confocal scanning microscopic images showed that the IbCAR1-GFP fusion expression protein localized on the nucleus and membrane. GFP as the control. Bars = 25 μm.
Ijms 23 09680 g003
Ijms 23 09680 g004 550
Figure 4. Effects of NaCl stress on the root cell membrane integrity. The plasma membrane integrity in root cells was checked by using propidium iodide (PI) staining. The PI staining experiment revealed the distinctive root cell membrane integrity of overexpressed transgenic lines upon salt stress. The PI staining image of the root elongation zone (three independent experiments) for each treatment. Bars = 200 μm.
Figure 4. Effects of NaCl stress on the root cell membrane integrity. The plasma membrane integrity in root cells was checked by using propidium iodide (PI) staining. The PI staining experiment revealed the distinctive root cell membrane integrity of overexpressed transgenic lines upon salt stress. The PI staining image of the root elongation zone (three independent experiments) for each treatment. Bars = 200 μm.
Ijms 23 09680 g004
Ijms 23 09680 g005 550
Figure 5. Analysis of the function of sweet potato IbCAR1 under normal and salt stress. (A) Phenotypic analysis of WT and transgenic sweet potato under salt stress. (B–E) The SOD (B), Proline (C), MDA (D), and ABA (E) contents of WT and overexpressed plant leaves under normal and salt stress. (F–I) The SOD (F), proline (G), MDA (H), and ABA (I) contents of WT and RNAi plant leaves under normal and salt stress. Data are presented as means ± SE (n = 3). ** and * indicate significant differences between the transgenic lines and WT at p < 0.01 and p < 0.05 levels, respectively.
Figure 5. Analysis of the function of sweet potato IbCAR1 under normal and salt stress. (A) Phenotypic analysis of WT and transgenic sweet potato under salt stress. (B–E) The SOD (B), Proline (C), MDA (D), and ABA (E) contents of WT and overexpressed plant leaves under normal and salt stress. (F–I) The SOD (F), proline (G), MDA (H), and ABA (I) contents of WT and RNAi plant leaves under normal and salt stress. Data are presented as means ± SE (n = 3). ** and * indicate significant differences between the transgenic lines and WT at p < 0.01 and p < 0.05 levels, respectively.
Ijms 23 09680 g005
Ijms 23 09680 g006 550
Figure 6. Expression levels of stress-responsive genes in transgenic and WT sweet potato plants. (A) Expression patterns of stress-related genes in the WT and the overexpressed transgenic lines L1, L5, and L16. (B) Expression patterns of stress-related genes in the WT and the RNAi transgenic lines #10, #11. Plants grown in the transplanting boxes were sampled for analysis after treating with no stress (normal) for 12 h and salt stress for 12 h. Data are presented as means ± SE (n = 3). ** and * indicate significant differences between the transgenic lines and WT at p < 0.01 and p < 0.05 levels, respectively.
Figure 6. Expression levels of stress-responsive genes in transgenic and WT sweet potato plants. (A) Expression patterns of stress-related genes in the WT and the overexpressed transgenic lines L1, L5, and L16. (B) Expression patterns of stress-related genes in the WT and the RNAi transgenic lines #10, #11. Plants grown in the transplanting boxes were sampled for analysis after treating with no stress (normal) for 12 h and salt stress for 12 h. Data are presented as means ± SE (n = 3). ** and * indicate significant differences between the transgenic lines and WT at p < 0.01 and p < 0.05 levels, respectively.
Ijms 23 09680 g006
Ijms 23 09680 g007 550
Figure 7. A proposed model for regulation of IbCAR1 in salt stress tolerance in transgenic sweet potato. Red arrows indicate up-regulation of gene coding these enzymes.
Figure 7. A proposed model for regulation of IbCAR1 in salt stress tolerance in transgenic sweet potato. Red arrows indicate up-regulation of gene coding these enzymes.
Ijms 23 09680 g007
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

You, C.; Li, C.; Ma, M.; Tang, W.; Kou, M.; Yan, H.; Song, W.; Gao, R.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Y.; et al. A C2-Domain Abscisic Acid-Related Gene, IbCAR1, Positively Enhances Salt Tolerance in Sweet Potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 9680. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23179680

AMA Style

You C, Li C, Ma M, Tang W, Kou M, Yan H, Song W, Gao R, Wang X, Zhang Y, et al. A C2-Domain Abscisic Acid-Related Gene, IbCAR1, Positively Enhances Salt Tolerance in Sweet Potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.). International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(17):9680. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23179680

Chicago/Turabian Style

You, Chang, Chen Li, Meng Ma, Wei Tang, Meng Kou, Hui Yan, Weihan Song, Runfei Gao, Xin Wang, Yungang Zhang, and et al. 2022. "A C2-Domain Abscisic Acid-Related Gene, IbCAR1, Positively Enhances Salt Tolerance in Sweet Potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.)" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 17: 9680. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23179680

APA Style

You, C., Li, C., Ma, M., Tang, W., Kou, M., Yan, H., Song, W., Gao, R., Wang, X., Zhang, Y., & Li, Q. (2022). A C2-Domain Abscisic Acid-Related Gene, IbCAR1, Positively Enhances Salt Tolerance in Sweet Potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.). International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(17), 9680. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23179680

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop