Next Article in Journal
Elevated Oxytocin Receptor Blood Concentrations Predict Higher Risk for, More, and Earlier 24-Month Hospital Readmissions after In-Patient Detoxification in Males with Alcohol Use Disorder
Next Article in Special Issue
Different Requirements of CBFB and RUNX2 in Skeletal Development among Calvaria, Limbs, Vertebrae and Ribs
Previous Article in Journal
Oxidation of DJ-1 Cysteines in Retinal Pigment Epithelium Function
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fibroblast Growth Factors and Cellular Communication Network Factors: Intimate Interplay by the Founding Members in Cartilage
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Matrix Vesicle-Mediated Mineralization and Osteocytic Regulation of Bone Mineralization

1
Developmental Biology of Hard Tissue, Graduate School of Dental Medicine, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8586, Japan
2
Northern Army Medical Unit, Camp Makomanai, Japan Ground Self-Defense Forces, Sapporo 005-8543, Japan
3
Division of Craniofacial Development and Tissue Biology, Graduate School of Dentistry, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8577, Japan
4
Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(17), 9941; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23179941
Submission received: 20 June 2022 / Revised: 23 August 2022 / Accepted: 29 August 2022 / Published: 1 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bone and Cartilage Biology)

Abstract

:
Bone mineralization entails two mineralization phases: primary and secondary mineralization. Primary mineralization is achieved when matrix vesicles are secreted by osteoblasts, and thereafter, bone mineral density gradually increases during secondary mineralization. Nearby extracellular phosphate ions (PO43−) flow into the vesicles via membrane transporters and enzymes located on the vesicles’ membranes, while calcium ions (Ca2+), abundant in the tissue fluid, are also transported into the vesicles. The accumulation of Ca2+ and PO43− in the matrix vesicles induces crystal nucleation and growth. The calcium phosphate crystals grow radially within the vesicle, penetrate the vesicle’s membrane, and continue to grow outside the vesicle, ultimately forming mineralized nodules. The mineralized nodules then attach to collagen fibrils, mineralizing them from the contact sites (i.e., collagen mineralization). Afterward, the bone mineral density gradually increases during the secondary mineralization process. The mechanisms of this phenomenon remain unclear, but osteocytes may play a key role; it is assumed that osteocytes enable the transport of Ca2+ and PO43− through the canaliculi of the osteocyte network, as well as regulate the mineralization of the surrounding bone matrix via the Phex/SIBLINGs axis. Thus, bone mineralization is biologically regulated by osteoblasts and osteocytes.

1. Introduction

Bone is mineralized tissue composed of crystalline calcium phosphates and collagen fibrils onto which the calcium phosphate crystals are deposited [1,2,3,4]. The hardness and flexibility of bone, which can provide strength against mechanical force, are derived from calcium phosphates and collagen fibrils, respectively. Osteoblasts secrete a large amount of collagen fibrils, non-collagenous proteins, and proteoglycans, as well as matrix vesicles, into the incompletely mineralized superficial layer of the bone matrix known as the osteoid. A matrix vesicle is a small extracellular vesicle equipped with membrane transporters and enzymes involved in mineralization, such as tissue nonspecific alkaline phosphatase (TNAP) [5,6], ectonucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase (ENPP) [7], sodium-dependent phosphate cotransporter type III (Slc20a1/Pit1 and Slc20a2/Pit2) [8,9,10,11,12], phosphoethanolamine phosphohydrolase 1 (PHOSPHO1) [13,14,15], and ankylosis (ANK) [16,17]. The supply and inflow of calcium ions (Ca2+) and inorganic phosphate ions (PO43−) in the initial process of matrix vesicle-mediated mineralization is achieved by the finely-tuned activities of these enzymes and transporters. Hence, matrix vesicle-mediated mineralization is categorized as the primary mineralization that takes place in the osteoid, which then forms a mineralized nodule, also called a calcifying nodule, allowing the collagen mineralization to eventually spread throughout the bone [18,19]. Moreover, non-collagenous proteins and proteoglycans in the osteoid regulate mineralization by modulating the aggregation of collagen fibrils and mineral deposition during primary mineralization [20,21,22,23].
After primary mineralization, the bone mineral density becomes slowly and chronologically elevated in a phenomenon called secondary mineralization, which is independent of osteoblastic bone formation [2]. It is hypothesized that secondary mineralization is achieved by the physicochemical processes of mineral transport in the osteocytic network extended throughout the bone [24]. Therefore, the osteocytes and the meshwork of their cytoplasmic processes appear essential for secondary mineralization involving bone mineral transportation [25,26,27,28]. Osteocytes with well-organized osteocytic lacunar canalicular system (OLCS) sense mechanical stress [29], transport bone minerals, and secrete bone metabolism-regulating molecules [30,31,32,33,34]. It is important that the cytoplasmic processes of osteocytes connect with those of the bone-forming osteoblasts and the narrow channels through which osteocytic processes are opened to the osteoid where the matrix vesicle-mediated mineralization takes place. Therefore, it is postulated that bone minerals, such as Ca2+ and PO43−, are derived from the activities of TNAP/ectonucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase 1 (ENPP1) and PHOSPHO1 inside the matrix vesicles and also from the osteocytic canaliculi that are opened to the osteoid, implicating the interplay of osteoblasts and osteocytes for adequate maintenance of mineralized bone.
In this review, we will discuss matrix vesicle-mediated mineralization, osteocytic regulation of bone mineralization, and the possible interplay of osteoblasts and osteocytes on bone mineralization.

2. Matrix Vesicle-Meditated Mineralization

2.1. Nucleation of Calcium Phosphates in Matrix Vesicles

Bone mineralization initiates inside matrix vesicles, which are small extracellular vesicles secreted by osteoblasts [18,19,35,36,37]. Matrix vesicles contain several membrane transporters and enzymes related to mineralization on their plasma membranes and in their interior, thus providing an adequate microenvironment for calcium phosphate nucleation and subsequent growth to eventually form hydroxyapatite crystals [Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2]. Regarding calcium phosphate crystal nucleation, it is generally known that Ca2+ strongly binds to the negatively charged inner leaflet of the plasma membrane [38]. Plasma membranes consisting of phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylserine have a substantial capacity for Ca2+ binding, with several types of binding sites proposed [39]. Many researchers have previously postulated that phosphatidylserine, which is rich in matrix vesicles, has a particularly high affinity for Ca2+ to produce a stable calcium phosphate-phospholipid complex with the vesicle’s membrane [40,41,42]. When observed by transmission electron microscope (TEM) during the early phases of calcium phosphate nucleation, amorphous non-crystalline calcium phosphates are found to incipiently form in association with the inner leaflet of the matrix vesicle membranes [43]. Thereafter, the original amorphous calcium phosphate structures are converted into mature crystalline structures, i.e., hydroxyapatite, allowing the large, assembled mineral crystals inside the matrix vesicles. The resultant hydroxyapatite crystals grow in all directions inside the vesicle, then penetrate the plasma membrane, and eventually form mineralized nodules in the later stage (Figure 1).

2.2. Distribution of Ca and P in the Vicinity of Matrix Vesicles in the Osteoid

Electron energy loss spectroscopy, or EELS, enables elemental mapping and can detect calcium (Ca) and phosphorus (P) at an ultra-structural level [45]. A previous report revealed that Ca and P were highly accumulated inside matrix vesicles; however, Ca was evenly and abundantly distributed in the vicinity of the matrix vesicles, while P was detected predominantly in organic materials, such as collagen fibrils and cells, but not in the matrix vesicle vicinity [45]. Nucleation and growth of calcium phosphate crystals require the influx of Ca2+ and PO43− inside the matrix vesicles from the extracellular fluid. Taking Ca2+ and PO43− distribution into consideration, a biological mechanism governing the local synthesis and supplementation of PO43−, as well as its subsequent influx into matrix vesicles, must be necessary. In contrast to PO43− synthesis and supplementation, Ca2+ is abundantly present in the tissue fluid, and annexins, which are acidic phospholipid-dependent Ca2+-binding proteins, are assumed to serve as the Ca2+ channels of the matrix vesicles. Annexin A5 is the most abundant protein among annexins [46,47,48], and it appears to display Ca2+ channel activity in matrix vesicles. Kirsch et al. have previously reported that annexin A5 mediates Ca2+ influx into matrix vesicles secreted from hypertrophic chondrocytes in the growth plate, thereby initiating cartilage mineralization [49]. Thus, Ca2+ that is abundantly present near the matrix vesicles may enter the vesicles via annexin A5. Alternatively, to enable the influx and accumulation of PO43− in the vesicles, the interplay among membrane transporters and enzymes on the plasma membranes appears to be necessary.

2.3. Local Synthesis of PO43− by the Activities of TNAP and ENPP1

One of the most important enzymes enabling mineralization is TNAP, a glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor enzyme associated with the cell membranes of matrix vesicles and osteoblastic cells. TNAP can hydrolyze various phosphate esters, especially pyrophosphates (PPi), and is broadly recognized as a hallmark of osteoblastic cells. However, the method of PPi supplementation is important. Currently, it is believed that ENPP1 mainly supplies PPi. ENPP1 is composed of two N-terminal somatomedin B-like domains, a catalytic domain, and a nuclease-like domain. Crystalline structure analysis of ENPP1 demonstrated that the nucleotides are accommodated in a pocket formed by an insertion loop in the catalytic domain of ENPP1, implying a preference for an ATP substrate [7]. Therefore, in bone mineralization, the catalytic activity of ENPP1 may generate PPi, presumably using ATPs in the extracellular fluid. The resultant PPi is then hydrolyzed by TNAP into PO43−. However, PPi is also known to inhibit mineralization by binding to nascent hydroxyapatite crystals, thereby preventing crystal overgrowth [50,51,52]. Hence, a balance between PPi and PO43− is important for normal bone mineralization. TNAP is not uniformly distributed on the cell membranes of osteoblasts; it was distinctly observed on the basolateral sides rather than the secretory (osteoidal) domains [37,53]. We recently demonstrated that ENPP1 was mainly localized in mature osteoblasts and osteocytes, while TNAP was seen on preosteoblasts and mature osteoblasts [54] (Figure 2). It is interesting that ENPP1, which produces PPi, a mineralization inhibitor, is localized near matrix vesicles, whereas TNAP is located on preosteoblasts and the basolateral membranes of mature osteoblasts, which are relatively distant from matrix vesicles (Figure 2). It may be important that the biological PO43− influx is balanced with the nucleation and growth of crystalline calcium phosphates inside the matrix vesicles, as well as the inhibition of ectopic mineralization of calcium phosphates deposited in areas other than the matrix vesicles, e.g., collagen fibrils without mediating matrix vesicles.

2.4. Transport of PPi and PO43− via ANK and Pit1/Pit2

ANK, encoded by the progressive ankylosis gene (Ank), can serve as a non-enzymatic PPi channel, allowing PPi to pass through the plasma membrane to the outside of the cell [16,17]. As shown in our recent reports, the immunoreactivity of ENPP1 was detected not only in the cell membranes but also in the cytoplasmic region of osteoblasts and osteocytes, indicating the presence of both extracellular and intracellular PPi in these cells [54]. It is therefore likely that the ANK-mediated outflow of intracellular PPi may be involved in the dynamic equilibrium between intra- and extracellular levels of PPi. After the outflow of PPi to the extracellular region, TNAP hydrolyzes PPi into PO43−.
Extracellular PO43− may pass through the plasma membrane of the matrix vesicles by Pit1 and Pit2 mediation. Pit1 and Pit2 are type III sodium-inorganic phosphate (Pi) co-transporters encoded by Slc20a1 and Slc20a2 [8,9,10,11,12]. Recently, it has been reported that Pit1 and Pit2 form heterodimers, sense extracellular PO43− concentrations, and increase the expression of matrix Gla protein (MGP) and osteopontin via the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) pathway [55,56,57]. These reports suggest that Pit1 and Pit2 function not only as PO43− transporters (the influx of Pi from extracellular to intra-vesicular) but also as Pi sensors and transmit signals of the rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma (Raf)/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MEK)/ERK pathway to synthesize bone matrix proteins [58,59]. Regarding the matrix vesicles, Pit1 and Pit2 seem to serve as transporters of PO43− from the extracellular fluid to intra-vesicular regions of the matrix vesicles.

2.5. PHOSPHO1 for PO43− Production inside Matrix Vesicles

Alternative to the biological function of ENPP1/TNAP, PHOSPHO1 is an enzyme highly expressed in mineralizing osteoblasts and hypertrophic chondrocytes [60] (Figure 2). This enzyme has been implicated in bone and cartilage formation and is thought to function inside cells and matrix vesicles to generate PO43− using phosphocholine and phosphoethanolamine, which are components of the lipid bilayers of matrix vesicles [13,14,15]. Roberts et al. documented that PHOSPHO1 is restricted to mineralizing regions of the bone and growth plate and plays a role in the initiation of matrix vesicle-mediated mineralization [14]. Consistently, Phospho1−/− mice displayed hypo-mineralization of the bone at birth, biomechanical incompetency, scoliosis, and spontaneous greenstick fractures [61,62]. More recently, Dillon et al. demonstrated ectonucleotide phosphodiesterase/pyrophosphatase member 6 (Enpp6)−/− mice also revealed hypo-mineralization [63]. ENPP6 is a member of the nucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase family with lysophospholipase C activity, generating phosphocholine with a monoacylglycerol byproduct [64,65,66]. Therefore, ENPP6 may functionally lie upstream of PHOSPHO1 to generate intra-vesicular phosphocholine. As proposed by Stewart et al. (2018), ENPP6, as well as phospholipase A2 (PLA2), may act in sequence in the matrix vesicle membranes to produce phosphocholine, which PHOSPHO1 subsequently hydrolyzes into PO43− [67]. Taken together, both PLA2/ENPP6/PHOSPHO1 and TNAP/ENPP1/Pit1/Pit2 are important cascades for liberating and increasing the PO43− concentration in matrix vesicles. Both PLA2/ENPP6/PHOSPHO1 and TNAP/ENPP1/Pit1/Pit2 pathways may be necessary for normal mineralization in the bone.

3. Development of Mineralized Nodules and Collagen Mineralization

3.1. Growth of Mineralized Nodules

The calcium phosphate crystals that are nucleated inside the matrix vesicles grow in all directions and then penetrate the plasma membrane to exit the vesicles, eventually forming mineralized nodules, which are also referred to as calcifying globules [1,3,4]. Under TEM observation, mineralized nodules appear as globular structures composed of radially assembled hydroxyapatite crystals [44,68]. It seems likely that the growth of mineralized nodules is regulated by non-collagenous proteins in the osteoid. Among these materials, osteopontin is especially suited to regulating mineralization because it is a negatively charged and highly phosphorylated molecule that can effectively inhibit hydroxyapatite formation and growth [6,69]. Osteocalcin is another important bone matrix protein subjected to vitamin K-dependent carboxylation at its glutamate residues. Using crystal structural analysis, Hoang et al. demonstrated a negatively charged protein surface in γ-carboxylated osteocalcin, which could bind to Ca2+ in a hydroxyapatite crystal lattice [70]. In our experiments, the administration of warfarin, an inhibitor for the γ-carboxylation of glutamine residues, resulted in the failure of mineralized nodule formation and the dispersal of numerous needle-shaped crystal mineral fragments throughout the osteoid [71] (Figure 3). Recently, γ-carboxylase-deficient mice revealed the same abnormality with disassembled, scattered crystal minerals in the bone, which is consistent with our observation of the warfarin-treated rats [72]. When used clinically, warfarin administration to women in the first trimester of pregnancy is associated with embryopathy characterized by stippled epiphyses and distal extremity hypoplasia [73]. Therefore, osteocalcin may play an important role in the formation of the globular assembly of needle-shaped mineral crystals, i.e., mineralized nodules, which can make focal contact with collagen fibrils to enable normal mineralization in bone.

3.2. Collagen Mineralization

Collagen mineralization begins at the point of contact with mineralized nodules. TEM observations demonstrated that mineralization spreads from the contact point of the mineralized nodules toward the periphery of the collagen fibrils [2]. This finding suggests that collagen mineralization orderly progresses from the contact points with mineralized nodules, presumably allowing the regular deposition of calcium phosphate crystals onto the collagen fibrils. At a higher magnification, the spicules of calcium phosphate crystals can be seen on the fibrillar structures identical to the superhelix (tropocollagen) of collagen fibrils, thus indicating that mineral crystals are deposited on the superhelix, which serves as a scaffold for collagen mineralization. After contact with the mineralized nodules, the collagen fibrils eventually become completely mineralized.
Proteoglycans such as decorin and biglycan, which directly bind the collagen surface through GAG chains, inhibit the growth of mineral crystals [74,75,76]. Collagen mineralization in the osteoid increases proportionally based on the distance from the osteoblasts, whereas the amount of decorin in the osteoid decreases further away from the bone surface [77]. In the osteoid close to the osteoblasts, proteoglycans combined with the surface of newly formed collagen fibrils are localized to the large space between collagen fibrils. By contrast, in the areas close to the mineralization front of the osteoid, proteoglycans are almost exclusively bound to mature collagen fibrils and are rarely found between the narrowed spaces of collagen fibrils. Moreover, the levels of decorin mRNA and protein expression are significantly decreased before and at the beginning of matrix mineralization [78]. Therefore, collagen mineralization may also be regulated by proteoglycans. Proteoglycans not only contribute to the inhibition of bone mineralization but also modulate the aggregation of collagen fibrils [23,79,80]. Biglycan-knockout mice and biglycan/decorin double-knockout mice exhibit reduced bone mineral density as well as abnormal morphology of collagen fibrils in the bone matrix [21]. Taken together, the growth of mineral crystals and the maturation of collagen fibrils through the modulation of proteoglycans substantially affect the progression of collagen mineralization.

4. Osteocyte Network and the Biological Function of Regulating Bone Mineralization

4.1. Distribution of the Osteocyte Network

Osteoblasts secrete bone matrix proteins and can become embedded in the bone matrix, where they differentiate into osteocytes. Immediately before becoming embedded into the bone matrix, osteoblasts rearrange the actin filament assembly along the cell membranes and the cytoplasmic processes, which resemble that of embedded osteocytes [24]. This implies that the osteoblasts approaching osteocytic differentiation and the newly-differentiated osteocytes decide the geometrical structure of the cellular network of their cytoplasmic processes. In addition, the collagen fibril orientation seems to be associated with the direction of the cytoplasmic processes of the osteoblasts and newly-differentiated osteocytes [81]. Repp et al. have documented that the intimate link between the OLCS and the collagen molecules implies an interplay between osteocyte processes and the arrangement of the surrounding collagen fibers [82]. Regularly distributed osteocytes and their cytoplasmic processes appear to control the rearrangement of mineral crystals parallel to the long axis of the collagen fibrils [83].
Recent review articles have shown variations in the osteocyte distribution within differently organized bone matrices during bone development and morphogenesis [84,85]. There are different types of osteogenesis (i.e., static osteogenesis (SO) and dynamic osteogenesis (DO)), which decide the fate of the osteocytes and the geometrical arrangement of the canalicular network. Although SO and subsequent DO occur in the process of intramembranous ossification, only DO occurs directly close to the remnants of the calcifying cartilage during endochondral ossification [84,85]. We thus postulated that the slowly-embedded osteocytes in the bone matrix, especially in the cortical bone that induces SO and subsequent DO, show the geometrically regulated distribution of cell bodies and cytoplasmic processes.
Osteocytes are housed in osteocytic lacunae in the bone, while their thin cytoplasmic processes pass through narrow channels, referred to as osteocytic canaliculi, interconnected through gap junctions [86,87]. Thereby, osteocytes build two passageways: one is a cytosolic track through the cytoplasmic processes of osteocytes and osteoblasts, and the other is a narrow space between the canalicular walls and the cytoplasmic processes. It is believed that osteocytes and their meshwork of cytoplasmic processes establish a functional group for intercellular communication, molecular transport, mechanical stress-sensing, and mineralization regulation [25,26,27,28]. However, it is likely that osteocytes featuring two passageways in the OLCS communicate with other bone cells, such as osteoblasts/bone lining cells and preosteoblasts, by mediating the processes of wiring and volume transmission, as reported by Marotti [88]. This indicates that osteoblasts and osteocytes may reciprocally modulate their functions not only through volume transmission (paracrine and autocrine stimulation) but also through wiring transmission (that is, in a neuronal-like manner). In addition, recent reports have demonstrated new insights into osteocytic function, such as the piezo1 ion channel for mechanical signaling [89], the Cas–NF-κB interplay in osteocytes upon shear stress induction [90], and EphrinB2-RhoA-limited autophagy in osteocytes during secondary mineralization [91], all of which may be breakthroughs for better understanding the physiological function of osteocytes and their network.

4.2. Osteocyte-Derived Molecules Involved in Peripheral Mineralization

Osteocytes physiologically synthesize several important molecules, e.g., dentin matrix protein (DMP) 1, matrix extracellular phosphoglycoprotein (MEPE), osteopontin, and Phex, for regulating surrounding bone mineralization. DMP1 has a high Ca2+-binding capacity and, therefore, is postulated to play a role in bone mineralization in the vicinity of osteocytes [33]. Recently, Oya et al. demonstrated that C-terminal DMP1 is phosphorylated within osteocytes and then secreted into the peri-canalicular matrix of mineralized bone, suggesting that negatively-charged phosphorylated C-terminal DMP1 plays an important role in recruiting Ca2+ in the peri-canalicular matrix [34]. DMP1 belongs to the small integrin-binding ligand N-linked glycoprotein (SIBLING) family, which also includes MEPE, osteopontin, bone sialoprotein, and dentin sialo-phosphoprotein, and is encoded by a gene located on human chromosome 4q21 and mouse chromosome 5q21 [92,93]. Regarding MEPE, Rowe et al. identified the novel functional domain acidic serine-rich and aspirate-rich motif (ASARM) peptide, which is highly conserved across species. MEPE can be cleaved by cathepsin B to release the carboxy-terminal ASARM peptide [31,94], which is then phosphorylated to inhibit bone mineralization [31]. However, MEPE reversibly binds to Phex, which protects MEPE from proteolysis by cathepsin B, indicating that the MEPE-Phex complex blocks the inhibition of mineralization [32]. As with osteopontin, Addison et al. demonstrated that the ASARM peptide of osteopontin inhibited mineralization by binding to hydroxyapatite in a phosphorylation-dependent manner and that Phex blocked this mineralization inhibition [95]. Since osteocytes express abundant MEPE [96], DMP1 [33], and osteopontin, especially in Hyp mice fed a high-phosphate diet [97], it can be easily assumed that osteocyte-derived SIBLINGs would regulate peripheral bone mineralization by the osteocytes. This postulation is evidenced by the report that a DMP1 absence results in rickets or osteomalacia in mice [98] and by autosomal recessive hypophosphatemic rickets/osteomalacia (ARHR) in human patients [99]. Hence, osteocytes seem to be involved in the regulation of the surrounding mineralization. However, Phex/SIBLINGs are usually associated with the congenital deformities rickets and osteomalacia. Therefore, it is necessary to elucidate whether SIBLINGs play an important role in the physiological regulation of bone mineralization in a normal state (Figure 4).

5. Cellular Interplay between Osteoblasts and Osteocytes in Bone Mineralization

Osteoblasts secrete matrix vesicles, which provide initiation sites for mineralization during primary mineralization, while osteocytes appear to regulate bone mineralization through Phex/SIBLINGs. Taking these findings into account, the interplay between osteoblasts and osteocytes in the regulation of bone mineralization seems likely. Matrix vesicles secreted by osteoblasts grow into globular assemblies of needle-like calcium phosphate crystals, called mineralized nodules, which then induce collagen mineralization. During nucleation and subsequent growth inside the vesicles, the influx of Ca2+ and PO43− is promoted by many enzymes and membrane transporters located on the matrix vesicles and mineralized nodules (particularly, they are located on the ruptured membranes of the vesicles).
However, the growth of large, terminal mineralized nodules that are distant from osteoblasts, as well as collagen mineralization, may be regulated by a mechanism other than enzymes associated with matrix vesicles secreted by the osteoblasts. In the osteoid, there seem to be two possible pathways that supply Ca2+ and PO43− to terminal mineralized nodules and collagen mineralization: one is from the osteoblast-covered bone surface, and the other is from osteocytic canaliculi, which are opened to the osteoid. We have observed abundant ENPP1 on the secretory membranes of osteoblasts, while TNAP activity was evident on the basolateral membranes rather than the secretory side [81]. This may imply that ENPP1 provides abundant PPi beneath the osteoblasts to inhibit excessive nucleation and Ca2+ and PO43− deposition outside the matrix vesicles. In other words, matrix vesicle-mediated mineralization is initiated by the finely-tuned nucleation of Ca2+ and PO43− only inside the vesicles.
In our study, the bones of the kl/kl mice displayed broad unmineralized areas despite highly concentrated serum Ca2+ and PO43− [33]. However, under higher magnification by TEM, the osteoblasts of the kl/kl mice produced many matrix vesicles which did not grow into large, terminal mineralized nodules [100]. Hence, supplementation with Ca2+ and PO43− from osteocytic canaliculi may be predominant compared with that from osteoblast-covered bone surfaces, or Ca2+ and PO43− supplementation from both pathways may be necessary for normal mineralization. Whichever the reason, the interplay between osteoblasts and osteocytes appears to be necessary for the sequential, finely-tuned processes of normal bone mineralization, i.e., nucleation in the matrix vesicles, formation of mineralized nodules, and collagen mineralization.
Wingless/int1 (Wnt)/β-catenin signaling may be involved in the interplay of osteoblasts and osteocytes on mineralization. Zhou et al. have demonstrated the downregulation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway during the terminal mineralization process. They also revealed that aberrant activation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling in osteocytes resulted in the deposition of extra-large mineralized nodules on collagen fibrils [101]. Wang et al. have proposed the paradigm shift that bone mineralization is directly linked to osteocytes but not osteoblasts [76]. The authors also documented that osteocyte defects lead to the onset of osteomalacia via a sharp increase in β-catenin mechanisms.

6. Conclusions

Primary mineralization in bone is achieved by matrix vesicle-mediated mineralization; matrix vesicles contain a variety of membrane transporters and enzymes involved in the nucleation and subsequent growth of crystalline calcium phosphates inside the vesicles. For proper mineralization, the biological accumulation of Ca2+ and PO43− in the vesicles is necessary. Of particular importance is the influx of PO43− into matrix vesicles, which involves a complex interplay among ENPP1, ANK, TNAP, and Pit1. Crystalline calcium phosphates grow radially, penetrate the vesicle membranes, and then exit the vesicles to form mineralized nodules, which are globular assemblies of needle-shaped mineral crystals. In contrast to primary mineralization, secondary mineralization increases bone mineral density, presumably due to osteocytic functions. Osteocytes appear to regulate bone mineralization, which is mediated by Phex/SIBLINGs. Thus, bone mineralization is biologically regulated by osteoblasts and osteocytes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, writing—original draft preparation, T.H.; investigation; T.H., H.H., T.Y., M.A., H.Y. and M.H.-K.; writing—review and editing; H.I., T.S. and N.I.; supervision and funding acquisition, T.H. and N.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was partially supported by grants from the Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS, 22K09911 to T.H., 21K16928 to H.H., and 21H03103 to N.A.) and a grant-in-aid for young scientists provided by the Uehara Memorial Foundation (202110102 to T.H.).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Paulo Henrique Luiz de Freitas and Minqi Li for their helpful discussions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ozawa, H.; Yamada, M.; Yamamoto, T. Ultrastructural Observations on the Location of Lead and Calcium in the Mineralizing Dentine of Rat Incisor. In Matrix Vesicles; Ascenzi, A., Bonucci, E., de Bernard, B., Eds.; Wiching Editore Srl: Milano, Italy, 1981; pp. 179–187. [Google Scholar]
  2. Hasegawa, T.; Li, M.; Hara, K.; Sasaki, M.; Tabata, C.; de Freitas, P.H.L.; Hongo, H.; Suzuki, R.; Kobayashi, M.; Inoue, K.; et al. Morphological Assessment of Bone Mineralization in Tibial Metaphyses of Ascorbic Acid-Deficient ODS rats. Biomed. Res. 2011, 32, 259–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Boonrungsiman, S.; Gentleman, E.; Carzaniga, R.; Evans, N.D.; McComb, D.W.; Porter, A.E.; Stevens, M.M. The role of intra-cellular calcium phosphate in osteoblast-mediated bone apatite formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 14170–14175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ansari, S.; de Wildt, B.W.; Vis, M.A.; de Korte, C.E.; Ito, K.; Hofmann, S.; Yuana, Y. Matrix Vesicles: Role in Bone Mineral-ization and Potential Use as Therapeutics. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Matsuzawa, T.; Anderson, H.C. Phosphatases of epiphyseal carti-lage studied by electron microscopic cytochemical methods. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 1971, 19, 801–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. De Bruyn, J.R.; Goiko, M.; Mozaffari, M.; Bator, D.; Dauphinee, R.L.; Liao, Y.; Flemming, R.L.; Bramble, M.S.; Hunter, G.K.; Goldberg, H.A. Dynamic light scattering study of inhibition of nucleation and growth of hydroxyapatite crystals by osteopon-tin. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e56764. [Google Scholar]
  7. Kato, K.; Nishimasu, H.; Okudaira, S.; Mihara, E.; Ishitani, R.; Takagi, J.; Aoki, J.; Nureki, O. Crystal structure of Enpp1, an extracellular glycoprotein involved in bone mineralization and insulin signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 16876–168781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Bai, L.; Collins, J.F.; Ghishan, F.K. Cloning and characterization of a type III Na-dependent phosphate cotransporter from mouse intestine. Am. J. Physiol. Cell. Physiol. 2000, 279, C1135–C1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bai, L.; Collins, J.F.; Xu, H.; Xu, L.; Ghishan, F.K. Molecular cloning of a murine type III sodium-dependent phosphate co-transporter (Pit-2) gene promoter. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2001, 1522, 42–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Collins, J.F.; Bai, L.; Ghishan, F.K. The SLC20 family of proteins: Dual functions as sodium-phosphate cotransporters and viral receptors. Pflügers Arch. 2004, 447, 647–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zoidis, E.; Ghirlanda-Keller, C.; Gosteli-Peter, M.; Zapf, J.; Schmid, C. Regulation of phosphate (Pi) transport and NaPi-III transporter (Pit-1) mRNA in rat osteoblasts. J. Endocrinol. 2004, 181, 531–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Forster, I.C.; Hernando, N.; Biber, J.; Murer, H. Phosphate transporters of the SLC20 and SLC34 families. Mol. Asp. Med. 2013, 34, 386–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Roberts, S.J.; Stewart, A.J.; Sadler, P.J.; Farquharson, C. Human PHOSPHO1 exhibits high specific phosphoethanolamine and phosphocholine phosphatase activities. Biochem. J. 2004, 382, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Roberts, S.; Narisawa, S.; Harmey, D.; Millán, J.L.; Farquharson, C. Functional Involvement of PHOSPHO1 in Matrix Vesicle-Mediated Skeletal Mineralization. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2007, 22, 617–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ciancaglini, P.; Yadav, M.C.; Simão, A.M.S.; Narisawa, S.; Pizauro, J.M.; Farquharson, C.; Hoylaerts, M.F.; Millán, J.L. Kinetic Analysis of Substrate Utilization by Native and TNAP-, NPP1- or PHOSPHO1-Deficient Matrix Vesicles. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2010, 25, 716–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ho, A.M.; Johnson, M.D.; Kingsley, D.M. Role of the mouse ank gene in tissue calcification and arthritis. Science 2000, 15, 265–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Gurley, K.A.; Reimer, R.J.; Kingsley, D.M. Biochemical and Genetic Analysis of ANK in Arthritis and Bone Disease. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2006, 79, 1017–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hasegawa, T.; Yamamoto, T.; Tsuchiya, E.; Hongo, H.; Tsuboi, K.; Kudo, A.; Abe, M.; Yoshida, T.; Nagai, T.; Khadiza, N.; et al. Ultrastructural and biochemical aspects of matrix vesicle-mediated mineralization. Jpn. Dent. Sci. Rev. 2016, 53, 34–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Hasegawa, T. Ultrastructure and biological function of matrix vesicles in bone mineralization. Histochem. Cell Biol. 2018, 149, 289–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Xu, T.; Bianco, P.; Fisher, L.W.; Longenecker, G.; Smith, E.; Goldstein, S.; Bonadio, J.; Boskey, A.; Heegaard, A.-M.; Sommer, B.; et al. Targeted disruption of the biglycan gene leads to an osteoporosis-like phenotype in mice. Nat. Genet. 1998, 20, 78–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Corsi, A.; Xu, T.; Chen, X.; Boyde, A.; Liang, J.; Mankani, M.; Sommer, B.; Iozzo, R.V.; Eichstetter, I.; Robey, P.G.; et al. Phenotypic Effects of Biglycan Deficiency Are Linked to Collagen Fibril Abnormalities, Are Synergized by Decorin Deficiency, and Mimic Ehlers-Danlos-Like Changes in Bone and Other Connective Tissues. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2002, 17, 1180–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kemp, L.P.; Morris, J.A.; Medina-Gomez, C.; Forgetta, V.; Warrington, N.M.; Youlten, S.E.; Zheng, J.; Gregson, C.L.; Grundberg, E.; Trajanoska, K.; et al. Identification of 153 new loci associated with heel bone mineral density and functional in-volvement of GPC6 in osteoporosis. Nat. Genetics. 2017, 49, 1468–1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Hao, J.-X.; Shen, M.-J.; Wang, C.-Y.; Wei, J.-H.; Wan, Q.-Q.; Zhu, Y.-F.; Ye, T.; Luo, M.-L.; Qin, W.-P.; Li, Y.-T.; et al. Regulation of biomineralization by proteoglycans: From mechanisms to application. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 294, 119773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Nagai, T.; Hasegawa, T.; Yimin; Yamamoto, T.; Hongo, H.; Abe, M.; Yoshida, T.; Yokoyama, A.; de Freitas, P.H.L.; Li, M.; et al. Immunocytochemical assessment of cell differentiation of podoplanin-positive osteoblasts into os-teocytes in murine bone. Histochem. Cell. Biol. 2021, 155, 369–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Plotkin, L.I.; Bellido, T. Osteocytic signalling pathways as therapeutic targets for bone fragility. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2016, 12, 593–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gould, N.R.; Torre, O.M.; Leser, J.M.; Stains, J.P. The cytoskeleton and connected elements in bone cell mechano-transduction. Bone 2021, 149, 115971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Moriishi, T.; Komori, T. Osteocytes: Their Lacunocanalicular Structure and Mechanoresponses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 4373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, H.; Du, T.; Li, R.; Main, R.P.; Yang, H. Interactive effects of various loading parameters on the fluid dynamics within the lacunar-canalicular system for a single osteocyte. Bone 2022, 158, 116367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Sato, T.; Verma, S.; Andrade, C.D.C.; Omeara, M.; Campbell, N.; Wang, J.S.; Cetinbas, M.; Lang, A.; Ausk, B.J.; Brooks, D.J.; et al. A FAK/HDAC5 signaling axis controls osteocyte mechanotransduction. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 3282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Ubaidus, S.; Li, M.; Sultana, S.; de Freitas, P.H.L.; Oda, K.; Maeda, T.; Takagi, R.; Amizuka, N. FGF23 ismainly synthesized by osteocytes in the regularly distributed osteocytic lacunar canalicular system established after physiological bone remodeling. J. Electron. Microsc. 2009, 58, 381–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Rowe, P.S.; Kumagai, Y.; Gutierrez, G.; Garrett, I.R.; Blacher, R.; Rosen, D.; Cundy, J.; Navvab, S.; Chen, D.; Drezner, M.K.; et al. MEPE has the properties of an osteoblastic phosphatonin and minhibin. Bone 2004, 34, 303–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Rowe, P.S.; Garrett, I.R.; Schwarz, P.M.; Carnes, D.L.; Lafer, E.; Mundy, G.R.; Gutierrez, G.E. Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) confirms that MEPE binds to PHEX via the MEPE–ASARM motif: A model for impaired mineralization in X-linked rickets (HYP). Bone 2005, 36, 33–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Sasaki, M.; Hasegawa, T.; Yamada, T.; Hongo, H.; de Freitas, P.H.; Suzuki, R.; Yamamoto, T.; Tabata, C.; Toyosawa, S.; Yamamoto, T.; et al. Altered distribution of bone matrix proteins and defective bone min-eralization in klotho-deficient mice. Bone 2013, 57, 206–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Oya, K.; Ishida, K.; Nishida, T.; Sato, S.; Kishino, M.; Hirose, K.; Ogawa, Y.; Ikebe, K.; Takeshige, F.; Yasuda, H.; et al. Immunohistochemical analysis of dentin matrix protein 1 (Dmp1) phosphorylation by Fam20C in bone: Impli-cations for the induction of biomineralization. Histochem. Cell. Biol. 2017, 147, 341–351. [Google Scholar]
  35. Anderson, H.C. Vesicles Associated with Calcification in the Matrix of Epiphyseal Cartilage. J. Cell Biol. 1969, 41, 59–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bonucci, E. Fine Structure and Histochemistry of "Calcifying Globules" in Epiphyseal Cartilage. Cell Tissue Res. 1970, 103, 192–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Amizuka, N.; Hasegawa, T.; Oda, K.; Luiz de Freitas, P.H.; Hoshi, K.; Li, M.; Ozawa, H. Histology of Epiphyseal Cartilage Cal-cification and Endochondral Ossification. Front. Biosci. 2012, 4, 2085–2100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tadross, M.R.; Tsien, R.W.; Yue, D.T. Ca2+ channel nanodomains boost local Ca2+ amplitude. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 15794–15799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Melcrova, A.; Pokorna, S.; Pullanchery, S.; Kohagen, M.; Jurkiewicz, P.; Hof, M.; Jungwirth, P.; Cremer, P.S.; Cwiklik, L. The complex nature of calcium cation interactions with phospholipid bilayers. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 38035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wuthier, R.E. Lipid composition of isolated epiphyseal cartilage cells, membranes and matrix vesicles. Biochim. Et Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Lipids Lipid Metab. 1975, 409, 128–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Boskey, A.L.; Posner, A.S. The role of synthetic and bone extracted Ca-phospholipid-PO4 complexes in hydroxyapatite for-mation. Calcif. Tissue. Res. 1977, 23, 251–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Boyan, B.D.; Schwartz, Z.; Swain, L.D.; Khare, A. Role of lipids in calcification of cartilage. Anat. Rec. 1989, 224, 211–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ozawa, H. Current concepts of the morphophysiology of matrix vesicle calcification. Connective Tissue 1983, 15, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  44. Ozawa, H. Ultrastructural concepts on biological calcification; Focused on matrix vesicles. Jpn. J. Oral Biol. 1985, 27, 751–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hoshi, K.; Ejiri, S.; Ozawa, H. Localizational Alterations of Calcium, Phosphorus, and Calcification-Related Organics Such as Proteoglycans and Alkaline Phosphatase During Bone Calcification. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2001, 16, 289–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Genge, B.R.; Wu, L.N.; Wuthier, R.E. Identification of phospholipid-dependent calcium-binding proteins as constituents of ma-trix vesicles. J. Biol. Chem. 1989, 264, 10917–10921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Genge, B.R.; Cao, X.; Wu, L.N.; Buzzi, W.R.; Showman, R.W.; Arsenault, A.L.; Ishikawa, Y.; Wuthier, R.E. Establishment of the primary structure of the major lipid dependent Ca2+ binding proteins of chicken growth plate cartilage matrix vesicles: Iden-tity with anchorin CII (annexin V) and annexin II. J. Bone. Miner. Res. 1992, 7, 807–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Balcerzak, M.; Malinowska, A.; Thouverey, C.; Sekrecka, A.; Dadlez, M.; Buchet, R.; Pikula, S. Proteome analysis of matrix vesicles isolated from femurs of chicken embryo. Proteomics 2007, 8, 192–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kirsch, T.; Harrison, G.; Golub, E.E.; Nah, H.-D. The Roles of Annexins and Types II and X Collagen in Matrix Vesicle-mediated Mineralization of Growth Plate Cartilage. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 35577–35583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Terkeltaub, R.; Rosenbach, M.; Fong, F.; Goding, J. Causal link between nucleotide pyrophosphohydrolase overactivity and increased intracellular inorganic pyrophosphate generation demonstrated by transfection of cultured fibroblasts and osteo-blasts with plasma cell membrane glycoprotein-1. Arthritis. Rheum. 1994, 37, 934–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Johnson, K.; Vaingankar, S.; Chen, Y.; Moffa, A.; Goldring, M.; Sano, K.; Jin-Hua, P.; Sali, A.; Goding, J.; Terkeltaub, R. Dif-ferential mechanisms of inorganic pyrophosphate production by plasma cell membrane glycoprotein-1 and B10 in chondro-cytes. Arthritis. Rheum. 1999, 42, 1986–1997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Johnson, K.; Moffa, A.; Chen, Y.; Pritzker, K.; Goding, J.; Terkeltaub, R. Matrix vesicle plasma membrane glycoprotein-1 reg-ulates mineralization by murine osteoblastic MC3T3 cells. J. Bone. Miner. Res. 1999, 14, 883–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Nakano, Y.; Beertsen, W.; van den Bos, T.; Kawamoto, T.; Oda, K.; Takano, Y. Site-specific localization of two distinct phos-phatasesalong the osteoblast plasma membrane: Tissue non-specificalkaline phosphatase and plasma membrane calcium ATPase. Bone 2004, 35, 1077–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yamamoto, T.; Hasegawa, T.; Mae, T.; Hongo, H.; Yamamoto, T.; Abe, M.; Nasoori, A.; Morimoto, Y.; Maruoka, H.; Kubota, K.; et al. Comparative immunolocalization of tissue nonspecific alkaline phosphatase and ectonucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase 1 in murine bone. J. Oral Biosci. 2021, 63, 259–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Beck, L.; Leroy, C.; Salaün, C.; Margall-Ducos, G.; Desdouets, C.; Friedlander, G. Identification of a Novel Function of PiT1 Critical for Cell Proliferation and Independent of Its Phosphate Transport Activity. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 31363–31374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Salaün, C.; Leroy, C.; Rousseau, A.; Boitez, V.; Beck, L.; Friedlander, G. Identification of a novel transport-independent function of PiT1/SLC20A1 in the regulation of TNF-induced apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 34408–34418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Forand, A.; Koumakis, E.; Rousseau, A.; Sassier, Y.; Journe, C.; Merlin, J.F.; Leroy, C.; Boitez, V.; Codogno, P.; Friedlander, G.; et al. Disruption of the Phosphate Transporter Pit1 in Hepatocytes Improves Glucose Metabolism and Insulin Signaling by Modulating the USP7/IRS1 Interaction. Cell. Rep. 2016, 16, 2736–2748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Michigami, T.; Kawai, M.; Yamazaki, M.; Ozono, K. Phosphate as a Signaling Molecule and Its Sensing Mechanism. Physiol. Rev. 2018, 98, 2317–2348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Kritmetapak, K.; Kumar, R. Phosphate as a Signaling Molecule. Calcif. Tissue Res. 2021, 108, 16–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Houston, B.; Stewart, A.J.; Farquharson, C. PHOSPHO1—A novel phosphatase specifically expressed at sites of mineralisation in bone and cartilage. Bone 2004, 34, 629–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Huesa, C.; Yadav, M.C.; Finnilä, M.A.; Goodyear, S.R.; Robins, S.P.; Tanner, K.E.; Aspden, R.M.; Millán, J.L.; Farquharson, C. PHOSPHO1 is essential for mechanically competent mineralization and the avoidance of spontaneous fractures. Bone 2011, 48, 1066–1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Boyde, A.; Staines, K.A.; Javaheri, B.; Millan, J.L.; Pitsillides, A.A.; Farquharson, C. A distinctive patchy osteomalacia charac-terizes PHOSPHO1-deficient mice. J. Anat. 2017, 231, 298–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Dillon, S.; Suchacki, K.; Hsu, S.N.; Stephen, L.A.; Wang, R.; Cawthorn, W.P.; Stewart, A.J.; Nudelman, F.; Morton, N.M.; Farquharson, C. Ablation of Enpp6 Results in Transient Bone Hypomineralization. JBMR Plus 2021, 5, e10439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Sakagami, H.; Aoki, J.; Natori, Y.; Nishikawa, K.; Kakehi, Y.; Natori, Y.; Arai, H. Biochemical and molecular characterization of a novel choline-specific glycerophosphodiester phosphodiesterase belonging to the nucleotide pyrophospha-tase/phosphodiesterase family. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 23084–23093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Morita, J.; Kato, K.; Mihara, E.; Ishitani, R.; Takagi, J.; Nishimasu, H.; Aoki, J.; Nureki, O. Expression, purification, crystalliza-tion and preliminary X-ray crystallographic analysis of Enpp6. Acta. Crystallogr. Sect. F 2014, 70, 794–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Morita, J.; Kano, K.; Kato, K.; Takita, H.; Sakagami, H.; Yamamoto, Y.; Mihara, E.; Ueda, H.; Sato, T.; Tokuyama, H.; et al. Structure and biological function of ENPP6, a cho-line-specific glycerophosphodiester-phosphodiesterase. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Stewart, A.J.; Leong, D.T.K.; Farquharson, C. PLA2 and ENPP6 may act in concert to generate phosphocholine from the matrix vesicle membrane during skeletal mineralization. FASEB J. 2018, 32, 20–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Weiner, S. Organization of extracellularly mineralized tissues: A comparative study of biological crystal growth. CRC Crit. Rev. Biochem. 1986, 20, 365–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Boskey, A.L.; Christensen, B.; Taleb, H.; Sørensen, E.S. Post-translational modification of osteopontin: Effects on in vitro hy-droxyapatite formation and growth. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2012, 419, 333–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Hoang, Q.Q.; Sicheri, F.; Howard, A.J.; Yang, D.S.C. Bone recognition mechanism of porcine osteocalcin from crystal structure. Nature 2003, 425, 977–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Amizuka, N.; Li, M.; Hara, K.; Kobayashi, M.; de Freitas, P.H.L.; Ubaidus, S.; Oda, K.; Akiyama, Y. Warfarin administration disrupts the assembly of mineralized nodules in the osteoid. J. Electron Microsc. 2009, 58, 55–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Azuma, K.; Shiba, S.; Hasegawa, T.; Ikeda, K.; Urano, T.; Horie-Inoue, K.; Ouchi, Y.; Amizuka, N.; Inoue, S. Osteo-blast-specific γ-glutamyl carboxylase-deficient mice display enhanced bone formation with aberrant mineralization. J. Bone. Miner. Res. 2015, 30, 1245–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Pauli, R.M.; Lian, J.B.; Mosher, D.F.; Suttie, J.W. Association of congenital deficiency of multiple vitamin K-dependent coagula-tion factors and the phenotype of the warfarin embryopathy: Cues to the mechanism of teratogenicity of coumarin deriva-tives. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1987, 41, 566–583. [Google Scholar]
  74. Boskey, A.L.; Spevak, L.; Doty, S.B.; Rosenberg, L. Effects of bone CS-proteoglycans, DS-decorin, and DS-biglycan on hydrox-yapatite formation in a gelatin gel. Calcif. Tissue. Int. 1997, 61, 298–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Tavafoghi, M.; Cerruti, M. The role of amino acids in hydroxyapatite mineralization. J. R. Soc. Interface 2016, 13, 20160462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Wang, K.; Ren, Y.; Lin, S.; Jing, Y.; Ma, C.; Wang, J.; Yuan, X.B.; Han, X.; Zhao, H.; Wang, Z.; et al. Osteocytes but not osteoblasts directly build mineralized bone structures. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2021, 17, 2430–2448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Hoshi, K.; Kemmotsu, S.; Takeuchi, Y.; Amizuka, N.; Ozawa, H. The Primary Calcification in Bones Follows Removal of Decorin and Fusion of Collagen Fibrils. J. Bone Miner. Res. 1999, 14, 273–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Mochida, Y.; Parisuthiman, D.; Pornprasertsuk-Damrongsri, S.; Atsawasuwan, P.; Sricholpech, M.; Boskey, A.L.; Yamauchi, M. Decorin modulates collagen matrix assembly and mineralization. Matrix Biol. 2009, 28, 44–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Raspanti, M.; Viola, M.; Forlino, A.; Tenni, R.; Gruppi, C.; Tira, M.E. Glycosaminoglycans show a specific periodic interaction with type I collagen fibrils. J. Struct. Biol. 2008, 164, 134–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Orgel, J.P.; Eid, A.; Antipova, O.; Bella, J.; Scott, J.E. Decorin Core Protein (Decoron) Shape Complements Collagen Fibril Surface Structure and Mediates Its Binding. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e7028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Yamamoto, T.; Hasegawa, T.; Hongo, H.; Amizuka, N. Alternating lamellar structure in human cellular cementum and rat compact bone: Its structure and formation. J. Oral Biosci. 2019, 61, 105–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Repp, F.; Kollmannsberger, P.; Roschger, A.; Berzlanovich, A.; Gruber, G.M.; Roschger, P.; Wagermaier, W.; Weinkamer, R. Coalignment of osteocyte canaliculi and collagen fibers in human osteonal bone. J. Struct. Biol. 2017, 199, 177–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Ishimoto, T.; Kawahara, K.; Matsugaki, A.; Kamioka, H.; Nakano, T. Quantitative Evaluation of Osteocyte Morphology and Bone Anisotropic Extracellular Matrix in Rat Femur. Calcif. Tissue Int. 2021, 109, 434–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Ferretti, M.; Palumbo, C. Static Osteogenesis versus Dynamic Osteogenesis: A Comparison between Two Different Types of Bone Formation. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Palumbo, C.; Ferretti, M. The osteocyte: From “Prisoner” to “Orchestrator”. J. Funct. Morphol. Kinesiol. 2021, 17, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Donahue, H.J. Gap junctions and biophysical regulation of bone cell differentiation. Bone 2000, 26, 417–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Civitelli, R. Cell–cell communication in the osteoblast/osteocyte lineage. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2008, 473, 188–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Marotti, G. The osteocyte as a wiring transmission system. J. Musculoskelet. Neuronal Interact. 2000, 1, 133–136. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  89. Li, X.; Han, L.; Nookaew, I.; Mannen, E.; Silva, M.J.; Almeida, M.; Xiong, J. Stimulation of Piezo1 by mechanical signals promotes bone anabolism. eLife 2019, 8, e49631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Miyazaki, T.; Zhao, Z.; Ichihara, Y.; Yoshino, D.; Imamura, T.; Sawada, K.; Hayano, S.; Kamioka, H.; Mori, S.; Hirata, H.; et al. Mechanical regulation of bone homeostasis through p130Cas-mediated alleviation of NF-кB activity. Sci. Adv. 2019, 5, eaau7802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Vrahnas, C.; Blank, M.; Dite, T.A.; Tatarczuch, L.; Ansari, N.; Crimeen-Irwin, B.; Nguyen, H.; Forwood, M.R.; Hu, Y.; Ikegame, M.; et al. Increased autophagy in EphrinB2-deficient osteocytes is associated with elevated secondary mineralization and brittle bone. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 3436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Liu, S.; Rowe, P.S.N.; Vierthaler, L.; Zhou, J.; Quarles, L.D. Phosphorylated acidic serine–aspartate-rich MEPE-associated motif peptide from matrix extracellular phosphoglycoprotein inhibits phosphate regulating gene with homologies to endopeptidases on the X-chromosome enzyme activity. J. Endocrinol. 2007, 192, 261–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Staines, K.A.; MacRae, V.E.; Farquharson, C. The importance of the SIBLING family of proteins on skeletal mineralisation and bone remodelling. J. Endocrinol. 2012, 214, 241–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Rowe, P.S.; de Zoysa, P.A.; Dong, R.; Wang, H.R.; White, K.E.; Econs, M.J.; Oudet, C.L. MEPE, a New Gene Expressed in Bone Marrow and Tumors Causing Osteomalacia. Genomics 2000, 67, 54–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Addison, W.N.; Masica, D.L.; Gray, J.J.; McKee, M.D. Phosphorylation-Dependent Inhibition of Mineralization by Osteopontin ASARM Peptides is Regulated by PHEX Cleavage. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2009, 25, 695–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Yamada, T.; Matsukawa, N.; Matsumoto, M.; Morimoto, S.; Ogihara, T.; Ochi, T.; Yoshikawa, H.; Nampei, A.; Hashimoto, J.; Hayashida, K.; et al. Matrix extracellular phosphoglycoprotein (MEPE) is highly expressed in osteocytes in human bone. J. Bone Miner. Metab. 2004, 22, 176–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Hoac, B.; Østergaard, M.; Wittig, N.K.; Boukpessi, T.; Buss, D.J.; Chaussain, C.; Birkedal, H.; Murshed, M.; McKee, M.D. Genetic Ablation of Osteopontin in Osteomalacic Hyp Mice Partially Rescues the Deficient Mineralization Without Correcting Hypo-phosphatemia. J. Bone. Miner. Res. 2020, 35, 2032–2048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Feng, J.Q.; Ward, L.M.; Liu, S.; Lu, Y.; Xie, Y.; Yuan, B.; Yu, X.; Rauch, F.; Davis, S.I.; Zhang, S.; et al. Loss of DMP1 causes rickets and osteomalacia and identifies a role for osteocytes in mineral metabolism. Nat. Genet. 2006, 38, 1310–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Mäkitie, O.; Pereira, R.C.; Kaitila, I.; Turan, S.; Bastepe, M.; Laine, T.; Kröger, H.; Cole, W.G.; Jüppner, H. Long-term clinical outcome and carrier phenotype in autosomal recessive hypophosphatemia caused by a novel DMP1 mutation. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2010, 25, 2165–2174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Hasegawa, T.; Yamamoto, T.; Miyamoto, Y.; Qiu, Z.; Hongo, H.; Amizuka, N. Histochemical assessment of abnormal miner-alization in bone and aorta induced by disrupted FGF23/αklotho. In Proceedings of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) 2019 Annual Meeting, Orlando, FL, USA, 20–23 September 2019; p. 120. [Google Scholar]
  101. Zhou, Y.; Lin, J.; Shao, J.; Zuo, Q.; Wang, S.; Wolff, A.; Nguyen, D.T.; Rintoul, L.; Du, Z.; Gu, Y.; et al. Aberrant activation of Wnt signaling pathway altered osteocyte mineralization. Bone 2019, 127, 324–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. TEM observation of matrix vesicles and mineralized nodules. (a) Ultrastructure of osteoid underlying mature osteoblasts (Ob). (b) When observed at a higher magnification, there seem to be many matrix vesicles (white arrowheads), mineralized nodules (CN), and collagen fibrils (Co, arrows). (c) Amorphous non-crystalline phosphates (arrowheads) are observed along the inner membrane of matrix vesicles (MV) at the early stage of matrix vesicle-mediated mineralization. (d) The grown calcium phosphate crystals are seen inside the matrix vesicles. (e) The needle-like mineral crystals get out of the matrix vesicles. Panel (a,b) are cited from Ref. [19], and (ce) are from Ref. [44]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [19]. 2018, Springer Nature. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [44]. 1985, Japanese Association for Oral Biology. Bar, 2 mm (a), 1 mm (b), 30 nm (ce).
Figure 1. TEM observation of matrix vesicles and mineralized nodules. (a) Ultrastructure of osteoid underlying mature osteoblasts (Ob). (b) When observed at a higher magnification, there seem to be many matrix vesicles (white arrowheads), mineralized nodules (CN), and collagen fibrils (Co, arrows). (c) Amorphous non-crystalline phosphates (arrowheads) are observed along the inner membrane of matrix vesicles (MV) at the early stage of matrix vesicle-mediated mineralization. (d) The grown calcium phosphate crystals are seen inside the matrix vesicles. (e) The needle-like mineral crystals get out of the matrix vesicles. Panel (a,b) are cited from Ref. [19], and (ce) are from Ref. [44]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [19]. 2018, Springer Nature. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [44]. 1985, Japanese Association for Oral Biology. Bar, 2 mm (a), 1 mm (b), 30 nm (ce).
Ijms 23 09941 g001
Figure 2. Immunolocalization of TNAP and ENPP1. (a) Double detection of TNAP (brown) and ENPP1 (red). Note preosteoblasts (pre-ob) and the baso-lateral sides of osteoblasts (ob) show an intense reactivity of TNAP (brown), while the cytoplasm of osteoblasts and osteocytes (ocy) reveals ENPP1 reactivity (red). (b) A schematic design of the distribution of TNAP (red lines), ENPP1 (green color), and PHOSPHO1 (yellow lines). Panel a and b are modified from Ref. [54]. Adapted with permission from Ref. [54]. 2021, Elsevier. Bar, 15 mm (a).
Figure 2. Immunolocalization of TNAP and ENPP1. (a) Double detection of TNAP (brown) and ENPP1 (red). Note preosteoblasts (pre-ob) and the baso-lateral sides of osteoblasts (ob) show an intense reactivity of TNAP (brown), while the cytoplasm of osteoblasts and osteocytes (ocy) reveals ENPP1 reactivity (red). (b) A schematic design of the distribution of TNAP (red lines), ENPP1 (green color), and PHOSPHO1 (yellow lines). Panel a and b are modified from Ref. [54]. Adapted with permission from Ref. [54]. 2021, Elsevier. Bar, 15 mm (a).
Ijms 23 09941 g002
Figure 3. TEM observation on normal mineralized nodules and dispersed mineral crystals in osteoid. (a) Normal rats demonstrate globular assembly of mineral crystals in osteoid. (b) When administered with warfarin, an inhibitor of g-carboxylation, however, many dispersed mineral crystals (arrows) are seen in the osteoid. The images are cited from Ref. [71]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [71]. 2009, Oxford University Press. Bar, 2 mm.
Figure 3. TEM observation on normal mineralized nodules and dispersed mineral crystals in osteoid. (a) Normal rats demonstrate globular assembly of mineral crystals in osteoid. (b) When administered with warfarin, an inhibitor of g-carboxylation, however, many dispersed mineral crystals (arrows) are seen in the osteoid. The images are cited from Ref. [71]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [71]. 2009, Oxford University Press. Bar, 2 mm.
Ijms 23 09941 g003
Figure 4. A schematic design of matrix vesicle-mediated mineralization and subsequent osteocytic maturation of mineralization.
Figure 4. A schematic design of matrix vesicle-mediated mineralization and subsequent osteocytic maturation of mineralization.
Ijms 23 09941 g004
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hasegawa, T.; Hongo, H.; Yamamoto, T.; Abe, M.; Yoshino, H.; Haraguchi-Kitakamae, M.; Ishizu, H.; Shimizu, T.; Iwasaki, N.; Amizuka, N. Matrix Vesicle-Mediated Mineralization and Osteocytic Regulation of Bone Mineralization. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 9941. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23179941

AMA Style

Hasegawa T, Hongo H, Yamamoto T, Abe M, Yoshino H, Haraguchi-Kitakamae M, Ishizu H, Shimizu T, Iwasaki N, Amizuka N. Matrix Vesicle-Mediated Mineralization and Osteocytic Regulation of Bone Mineralization. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(17):9941. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23179941

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hasegawa, Tomoka, Hiromi Hongo, Tomomaya Yamamoto, Miki Abe, Hirona Yoshino, Mai Haraguchi-Kitakamae, Hotaka Ishizu, Tomohiro Shimizu, Norimasa Iwasaki, and Norio Amizuka. 2022. "Matrix Vesicle-Mediated Mineralization and Osteocytic Regulation of Bone Mineralization" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 17: 9941. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23179941

APA Style

Hasegawa, T., Hongo, H., Yamamoto, T., Abe, M., Yoshino, H., Haraguchi-Kitakamae, M., Ishizu, H., Shimizu, T., Iwasaki, N., & Amizuka, N. (2022). Matrix Vesicle-Mediated Mineralization and Osteocytic Regulation of Bone Mineralization. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(17), 9941. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23179941

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop