Next Article in Journal
Diverse Roles for a Conserved DNA-Methyltransferase in the Entomopathogenic Bacterium Xenorhabdus
Next Article in Special Issue
Differential Analysis of Gly211Val and Gly286Val Mutations Affecting Sarco(endo)plasmic Reticulum Ca2+-ATPase (SERCA1) in Congenital Pseudomyotonia Romagnola Cattle
Previous Article in Journal
Bioinformatics and Experimental Analyses Reveal Immune-Related LncRNA–mRNA Pair AC011483.1-CCR7 as a Biomarker and Therapeutic Target for Ischemic Cardiomyopathy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Nemaline Myopathy in Brazilian Patients: Molecular and Clinical Characterization

by
Juliana Gurgel-Giannetti
1,
Lucas Santos Souza
2,
Guilherme L. Yamamoto
2,
Marina Belisario
1,
Monize Lazar
2,
Wilson Campos
3,
Rita de Cassia M. Pavanello
2,
Mayana Zatz
2,
Umbertina Reed
4,
Edmar Zanoteli
4,
Acary Bulle Oliveira
5,
Vilma-Lotta Lehtokari
6,
Erasmo B. Casella
7,
Marcela C. Machado-Costa
8,
Carina Wallgren-Pettersson
6,
Nigel G. Laing
9,
Vincenzo Nigro
10 and
Mariz Vainzof
2,*
1
Department of Pediatrics, Service of Neuropediatrics, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte 31270-901, MG, Brazil
2
Human Genome and Stem Cell Research Center, Department of Genetics and Evolutionary Biology, Biosciences Institute, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-220, SP, Brazil
3
Rede Mater dei de Saúde, Belo Horizonte 30110-062, MG, Brazil
4
Departamento de Neurologia, Hospital das Clinicas da Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo 05403-000, SP, Brazil
5
Departamento de Neurologia, Hospital São Paulo, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo 04024-002, SP, Brazil
6
Folkhälsan Research Center, Department of Medical Genetics, Medicum, University of Helsinki, 00100 Helsinki, Finland
7
Children’s Institute, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMSUP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-220, SP, Brazil
8
Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública (EBMSP), Salvador 40110-909, BA, Brazil
9
Centre for Medical Research, Queen Elizabeth II Medical Centre, Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia
10
Italy and Telethon Institute of Genetics and Medicine (TIGEM), Università della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli Napoli, 80078 Pozzuoli, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(19), 11995; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231911995
Submission received: 24 August 2022 / Revised: 10 September 2022 / Accepted: 27 September 2022 / Published: 9 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Molecular Approaches to Skeletal Muscle Disease and Disuse 2.0)

Abstract

:
Nemaline myopathy (NM), a structural congenital myopathy, presents a significant clinical and genetic heterogeneity. Here, we compiled molecular and clinical data of 30 Brazilian patients from 25 unrelated families. Next-generation sequencing was able to genetically classify all patients: sixteen families (64%) with mutation in NEB, five (20%) in ACTA1, two (8%) in KLHL40, and one in TPM2 (4%) and TPM3 (4%). In the NEB-related families, 25 different variants, 11 of them novel, were identified; splice site (10/25) and frame shift (9/25) mutations were the most common. Mutation c.24579 G>C was recurrent in three unrelated patients from the same region, suggesting a common ancestor. Clinically, the “typical” form was the more frequent and caused by mutations in the different NM genes. Phenotypic heterogeneity was observed among patients with mutations in the same gene. Respiratory involvement was very common and often out of proportion with limb weakness. Muscle MRI patterns showed variability within the forms and genes, which was related to the severity of the weakness. Considering the high frequency of NEB mutations and the complexity of this gene, NGS tools should be combined with CNV identification, especially in patients with a likely non-identified second mutation.

1. Introduction

Nemaline myopathy (NM) is one of the most common structural congenital myopathies, with a significant clinical and genetic heterogeneity. NM estimated incidence is about 1:50,000 [1,2,3]. The histopathological marker is the presence of rod or nemaline bodies inside muscle fibers associated with type I fiber predominance. The spectrum of clinical presentation varies from severe onset in the neonatal period to juvenile/adult onset with mild weakness [2,4]. Patients usually show neonatal hypotonia and proximal, facial and axial weakness, which can be associated with skeletal deformities. Depending on the degree of muscle weakness, severity of the muscle weakness and age at onset, NM was clinically divided into six forms by the ENMC Nemaline Consortium [1]. More recently, a new classification was suggested with the aim to simplify and to give some information about the prognosis of NM patients. This classification includes the following forms: severe (intrauterine onset), typical (perinatal onset), mild (childhood or juvenile onset), distal, childhood onset with slowness, recessive TNNT1 and other forms with unusual presentation [5].
Nowadays, more than 15 genes are related to NM, including TPM3, NEB, ACTA1, TPM2, TNNT1, KBTBD13, CFL2 (COFILIN2), KLHL40, KLHL41, LMOD3, MYO18B, MYPN, RYR3, TTN3, ADSSL1, Filamin C and MYH2. Most of these genes encode structural or regulatory proteins associated with the thin filament in the skeletal muscle fiber [5].
NM can present autosomal dominant (AD) or autosomal recessive (AR) inheritance, with a high proportion of sporadic dominant cases [2,3]. The first genes identified associated with NM were the genes encoding slow α-tropomyosin (TMP3) [6,7], skeletal muscle α-actin 1 (ACTA1) [8] and nebulin (NEB) [9], all proteins of the muscle thin filament. Subsequently, mutations in other genes were described, including beta-tropomyosin (TPM2 [10], slow troponin T (TNNT1) [11], cofilin-2 (CFL2) [12]. More recently, with the advance of large-scale molecular screening, mutations in several other genes were identified, including KBTBD13 [13], KLHL40 [14], KLHL41 [15], LMOD3 [16,17], MYO18B [18], myopalladin (MYPN) [19], RYR3 [20], TTN3 [21], ADSSL1 [22], Filamin C [23] and MYH2 [24] genes.
Among these known genes, mutations in the nebulin gene (NEB) are the most common cause of autosomal recessive NM, corresponding to around 50% of the cases [3]. This gene is huge, with 183 exons spanning 249 kb of the genomic sequence, and encodes the nebulin protein of approximately 600–900 kDa [25,26,27]. Therefore, the molecular study of this gene was a great challenge in previous years. More recently, with the advance of next-generation sequencing (NGS) methodologies, the screening of the NEB gene has been applied in larger cohorts of NM patients, and more mutations have been identified. Additionally, large structural variations have also been observed in this gene, indicating the necessity to associate molecular methods with copy number variation analyses [28,29].
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been considered a powerful method for the study of muscle diseases. Muscle MRI images allow the identification of patterns of muscle involvement according to the form of myopathy and can sometimes be suggestive of a specific gene mutation, mainly in patients with congenital myopathies, including nemaline myopathy [30,31,32,33].
Over the last 20 years, we have been screening for causative mutations in Brazilian patients with nemaline myopathy. We first used Sanger sequencing of genomic DNA for small genes, such as ACTA1, TPM2 and TPM3, and the nebulin gene was screened in collaboration with NM Consortium members. Later, we introduced the use of next-generation sequencing, which allowed us to study all the known NM genes. Now, we were able to compile the molecular and clinical data of this cohort of 30 Brazilian patients and to correlate the molecular forms with clinical severity, findings in muscle biopsy and muscle MRI.

2. Results

2.1. Clinical Data

A total of 30 patients, 15 males and 15 females, from 25 unrelated families were evaluated. Five families presented more than one affected patient, one of them with a clear autosomal dominant inheritance (Family 7) and four with autosomal recessive form (two affected siblings: Families: 10, 16, 20, 23). The remaining 20 families presented with sporadic cases.
Patients were classified based on the severity of the disease: 24 with the typical form, 3 with the mild form and 3 with the severe neonatal form (Table 1) [5].
All patients who underwent muscle biopsy presented rods in muscle fibers. The distribution of rods inside muscle fibers was predominantly a mixed pattern of large subsarcolemmal rods associated with small intermyofibrillar rods (Figure 1).
Among the 30 patients, 20 individuals (P1, P2, P3, P5, P6, P7, P8, P10, P14, P15, P16, P17, P20, P21, P23, P24, P25, P26, P29, P30) were followed over months to years (six months to ten years) in a neuromuscular outpatient clinic by multidisciplinary teams.
Serial cardiac evaluations performed in these 20 patients over a period of up to ten years did not indicate any cardiac abnormalities.
Three patients died with respiratory complications (P10, P20 and P26).

2.2. Molecular Data

We identified pathogenic mutations in NM-related genes in all 25 studied families. NEB variants were present in 20 patients (P9–P28) from 16 families (all patients had two NEB variants). Five families showed heterozygous mutations in the ACTA1 gene (P1–P5). In addition, in four families, mutations in the following genes were found: TPM2 (P6), TPM3 (P7/P8) and KLHL40 (P29, P30) (Table 1).

2.2.1. Patients with Mutations in the Nebulin Gene

Among the 20 patients (16 families) with NEB mutations, 17 individuals were classified as typical (P10–P22, P25, P26) and 3 with the mild form (childhood/juvenile form) (P9, P23, P24).
All families showed two nebulin mutations, including point mutations, small deletions or duplication and CNVs (P9–P28). In two families, there were two affected siblings (P11/P12 and P23/P24) carrying homozygous mutations, and family 10 (P11/P12 was consanguineous. In the other 14 families, the cases were compound heterozygous for two different NEB variations, including family 16 and 23 with two siblings. Parental segregation analysis performed in three cases confirmed the presence of the two mutations in trans (P14, P16, P17).
Initially, in two families (P21 and P22), we found a mutation in only one allele of the NEB gene, but using next-generation piplines for CNV identification, we found the second mutation: duplication of exons 82 to 105 in P21 and deletion of exon 29 in P22. Additional analysis using Motor Chip v3 [41] confirmed the duplication in patient 21, and parental segregation analysis showed that the CNV was de novo.
Among the total of twenty-five different identified variants in the NEB gene, ten were in the splice sites, nine were frameshift, three stop-gain, one non-frameshift duplication and two CNVs. Eleven of these variants were newly described mutations: four frameshift (c.8501delA, c.24304_24305+2T>A; c.23878_23881dup, c.3648delT), three splice site (c.20466+2T>A, c.19102-8_19102-4del; c.25405-1G>C), one stop-gain (c.16423A>T), one non-frameshift duplication (c.6869_6870insTGC) and two CNVs (exons 82–105 duplication, exon 29 deletion).
Four variants were recurrent: c.24579G>C in three families (P14, P16, P17), c.22170G>A; p.Tyr7390* in two families (P14 and P17), c.24189_24192dup; p.Glu8065Serfs*5 in two families (P10, P25); and c.5343+5G>A in two families (P23/P24 in homozygous and P27/P28 in heterozygous).
Although mutation c.24579G>C was detected in three patients from different families, they were from the same state of Brazil. Among these three patients, two (P14, P17) showed the same and previously described mutations in compound heterozygosity (c.22170C>A and c.24579G>C).
The follow-up of patients with NEB mutations could be performed in 11 individuals with the typical form (cases: P10, P14, P15, P16, P17, P20, P21, P23, P24, P25, P26). Among these patients, three died suddenly because of respiratory complications (P10, P20, P26). The age of death for P10, P20 and P26, was, respectively, 25 years, 15 years and 5 years of age.
Although three patients (P10, P21, P25) were classified as the typical form, they showed more intense weakness and needed ventilatory support and gastrotomy in the first two years of life. P10 presented with repetitive pneumonia and, at 18 months of age, he had tracheostomy and needed mechanical ventilation 24 h/day, and he died at 25 years of age due to respiratory complications. P21 had tracheostomy at the age of 8 months, during a respiratory infection. At the age of 5 years, the tracheostomy could be replaced by non-invasive ventilation (NIV). At her last clinical evaluation, she was 12 years old, still using gastrostomy and NIV for more than 16 h/day. P25 started using NIV at 7 months of age and is still using it for more than 16 h/day. He developed a progressive weakness, losing the capacity to control the head and to sit and needed a gastrostomy at 5 years old. These three patients did not achieve the capacity to walk, and all presented severe scoliosis.
Four patients (P14, P15, P16, P17) were using NIV, which was started during puberty. Two patients (P14 and P17) were using it during nighttime, and two patients were using it for more than 16 h each day (P15 and P16). All these patients were able to walk. However, one lost this ability at 17 years old (P16). In the first years of life, P16 showed proximal weakness in the upper and lower limbs, compatible with the typical form. During puberty, she developed an intense and progressive involvement of distal muscles in the lower limbs, which impaired her capacity to walk during adolescence. The weakness progression was accompanied by respiratory failure and severe scoliosis. At the age of 15, she was admitted for spinal surgery but had persistent severe respiratory failure, needing NIV almost 24 h a day.
P23 and P24, with the mild form of NM, are siblings and have shown a mild proximal and facial weakness with a stable course until now and are able to walk. They did not have ventilatory insufficiency or scoliosis at the last evaluation, at the age of 27 and 25 years, respectively.

2.2.2. Patients with Mutations in the ACTA1 Gene

Five patients had mutations in the ACTA1 gene, four with the typical (P1, P2, P4, P5) and one with the severe form (P3).
All five presented heterozygous mutations in the ACTA1 gene, and four of them were previously described missense variants: c.541G>C, p.Asp181His; c.478G>A, p.Gly160Ser; c.593G>A, p.Arg198His; and c.854T>G, p. Met285Arg.
In P2, we found a novel splice site intronic mutation (c.130-5T>A), classified as a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), following the ACMG pathogenicity classification guidelines, but it showed some pathogenic indicatives based on in silico prediction programs, including the Human Splicing Finder and MaxEntScan. This mutation was not present in the father or the mother and was considered a de novo mutation.
The follow-up of patients with ACTA1 mutations was performed in four patients, three with the typical (P1, P2 and P5) and one with the severe form (P3).
Two patients (P2, P5) with the typical form did not need ventilatory support and were able to walk until the last evaluation. They did not present scoliosis; however, P5 was followed until the beginning of her puberty, and P2 had his last evaluation at 13 years old. One patient (P1) walked at 5 years of age but started using a wheelchair before 11 years of age and needed NIV in adult life.
P3 presented severe weakness since birth. He uses ventilatory support 24 h a day with tracheostomy and never acquired the capacity to walk. He presented an asymmetric weakness distribution. He showed a more intense weakness on the left side of the body and on the right side of the face. At the age of 13 years, he needed spinal surgery to correct a severe scoliosis.

2.2.3. Patients with Mutations in Other Genes Associated with NM

One patient, P6, showed the recurrent mutation p.K7del in the TPM2 gene and presented the typical form. He developed mild scoliosis during puberty and had been followed without the necessity for surgical procedure. He does not need ventilatory support. The clinical and genetic data were previously described [36].
Two patients from the same family (P7 and P8) showed a previously described mutation (c.391C>T; p.Arg131Cys) in the TPM3 gene. Both patients presented with the typical form. P7 was 19 years old at the last evaluation; he developed a progressive scoliosis during puberty and needed NIV ventilation during nighttime. At the age of 15 years, he had scoliosis surgery. His father, P8, is 62 years old and started using NIV at the age of 51. Both have stable motor function and are still able to walk.
Two patients (P29, P30) showed two identical heterozygous mutations in the KLHL40 gene. In patient 29, a segregation (c.1405G>A; p.Gly469Ser; c.1498C>T; p.Arg500Cys) study in the parents revealed that the previously described p.Gly469Ser mutation was present in the father [14]. The p.Arg500Cys was observed in the mother and is a novel mutation. Patient 27 was classified with the severe neonatal form because, at birth, she presented severe hypotonia and weakness, multiple bone fractures, scoliosis, arthrogryposis and ventilatory insufficiency. This patient needed NIV after birth and gastrostomy. At one year of age, she had complete head control and was able to sit with support and maintained the use of NIV. She started using pyridostigmine during the first year of life associated with multidisciplinary treatment.
Patient 30 also presented with the severe form and showed severe hypotonia and weakness in the face and limb muscles associated with multiple arthrogryposis since birth. She started using NIV at two years after multiple pneumonias. She was able to sit at two years of age. At the age of 5 years, she is still not able to stand up or walk independently, and she has scoliosis. In this patient, according to the laboratory report (Invitae), the mutations were also present in different alleles.

2.3. Muscle Biopsy

The slides from the muscle biopsy of each patient were reviewed, and the data are provided in Table 2.
In 28 patients, muscle biopsy was performed and showed rods inside the muscle fibers. Type I predominance was present in all patients, and in some, there was total predominance.
In two patients (P24 and P29), muscle biopsy was not performed; P24 had a sibling who had already had a muscle biopsy, and in P29, it was not necessary because the molecular diagnosis was conclusive.

2.4. Muscle Imaging

Muscle imaging of the lower limbs was performed in eight patients (P2, P3, P7, P14, P15, P16, P17, P21) and whole-body MRI in one patient (P6) (Table 2).
Among the patients with nebulin mutations, muscle imaging was performed in five cases (P14, P15, P16, P17, P21). In P16, muscle tomography was performed because she could not tolerate the supine position for a long time. This patient showed a diffuse and moderate involvement of thigh muscles and accentuated fat replacement in the legs (Figure 2).
In case 21 with a severe weakness, we observed moderate involvement of the thigh muscles (the vastus lateralis, recto femoris and hamstring muscles) and leg muscles (anterior tibial, posterior, soleus, gastrocnemius and fibular) (Table 2). In the three patients with the typical form (P14, P15, P17), the predominant involvement was in the anterior tibial and soleus muscles, while the thigh muscles were spared.
Two patients (P2 and P3) with ACTA1 mutations were submitted for muscle MRI. P3, with a severe clinical form, presented accentuated and diffuse involvement in the thigh and the leg. In P2, with the typical form, we observed a mild involvement of the anterior tibialis muscle with no abnormalities in the thigh.
In P6 with the TPM2 mutation, the whole-body MRI showed facial involvement, mainly temporal and lateral pterygoid muscles, and distal involvement in the lower legs, mainly soleus and flexor digitorum muscles (Figure 3).
For P7 with a TPM3 mutation, the muscle MRI showed fat infiltration in the thigh muscles, especially the sartorius and adductor magnus, and a predominant involvement of the anterior compartment of the leg (Figure 3).

3. Discussion

Nemaline myopathies are considered among the most frequent congenital myopathies worldwide [2,44]. In Brazil, a large country with an estimated population of over 203.6 million, which is dispersed in a huge area, we still do not have an estimate of the congenital myopathies prevalence and of the different subgroups’ distribution.
Over the last 20 years, we have been evaluating Brazilian NM patients, characterizing their clinical phenotype and morphological and molecular aspects [45,46,47]. In the present study, we included data of NM patients from different states of Brazil, including Minas Gerais, São Paulo and Bahia. The molecular techniques changed over the years, varying from Sanger sequencing, next-generation sequencing through customized panels for neuromuscular disorders or whole-exome analysis associated with tools for identifying CNVs [27,28,29]. This has also significantly modified the capacity to identify mutations in so many genes, including a substantial one (NEB) involved in NM.
According to several studies still using the old clinical classification, the predominant NM forms are the typical, followed by the intermediate form, and the severe and childhood/juvenile forms [2,3,27]. In the present study, we used the new classification and found twenty-four patients with the typical form, three with the severe form and three with the mild form [5]. Additionally, concordant with the literature, we observed phenotype variability considering the same gene, especially with the nebulin and ACTA1 genes [27,35,44,48].
During the follow-up of 20 NM patients, we observed the importance of monitoring the respiratory function, since all patients with severe forms, as well as a proportion of patients with the typical form, needed ventilatory support. Among the twenty patients with the typical form, three died because of respiratory complications, and six needed NIV despite preserving appendicular muscle strength and the ability to walk. This pattern of respiratory involvement out of proportion with the appendicular skeletal muscles is common in NM, which can mask the risk of respiratory complications in the follow-up of these patients [27,49,50]. This finding can be explained by histopathological studies, which showed the presence of nemaline bodies in the intercostal and diaphragmatic muscles, sometimes in higher quantity than in the appendicular skeletal muscles [51].
The histologic hallmark of NM is the presence of nemaline bodies or rods inside the muscle fiber [4]. The predominance of type 1 fibers, defined as more than 55% of type 1 fibers, is a common finding in NM, and in some patients, it can be seen as a complete type 1 uniformity [39,47]. In the present study, we observed the presence of rods and type 1 predominance in all patients who underwent muscle biopsy.
Genetically, NM is very heterogeneous, including more than 12 genes to date [5]. The most common causes of NM are recessive mutations in NEB and de novo dominant mutations in ACTA1 [2,27,35]. Considering the families included in this study, we found sixteen families with nebulin mutations (64%), five with ACTA1 mutations (20%), two families with KLHL40 mutations (8%) and one family with mutations in TPM2 (4%) and TPM3 (4%). Therefore, we were able to genetically classify all 25 families, which is a great advance, achieved mainly because of the possibility to use more powerful molecular tools.

3.1. Nebulin Gene Mutations

Considering the clinical manifestations, our findings are in accordance with the literature, since the most common clinical form related to nebulin mutations in our patients was the typical form, observed in 17/20 of our patients, followed by the mild childhood form (3/20) [3,5,27].
The molecular screening of variants in the nebulin gene is very challenging, since this gene contains 183 exons, and in the middle of the gene, there is a triplicated region (TRI) consisting of a perfectly repetitive series of 8 exons (82–89, 90–97 and 98–105), and there are three regions with alternatively spliced exons (63–66, 143–144 and 167–177) [52,53]. NGS significantly improved the capacity to identify mutations in NEB, but in some cases, it can be insufficient, and it would be necessary to combine additional techniques, such as CGH microarray and RNA analysis [29]. In the present study, all patients with nebulin mutations showed biallelic mutations (P9–P28). Initially, in two patients (P21 and P22), we found only one mutation. However, we used the next-generation software for CNVs and/or the CGH array (Motor Chip v3) and could confirm the presence of two CNVs. The first CNV identified (P21) was a duplication of exons 82 to 105, which is located in the triplicated region of the NEB gene (TRI) and is frequently difficult to analyze in exome sequencing. In 2016, Kiiski et al. [28] used the NM-CGH microarray in 196 NM families and identified NEB TRI variation in 13% of the families and in 6% of the controls. They identified that the NEB gene tolerates deviation of one TRI copy, but two or more might be pathogenic. So, in our patient P21, we suggest that the CNV could be pathogenic. The exon 29 deletion (P22) was observed using the software XHNM but not when the Motor Chip v3 was used. This last mutation needs to be better studied.
The prevalence of different types of mutations in nebulin was estimated as follows: splice site mutations (34%), frameshift mutations (32%), small (<20 bp) deletions or insertions, nonsense mutations (23%) and missense mutations (7%). Large deletions and duplications (>1 Kb) were considered rare (4%) [27]. Similarly, in our cohort, we found that splice site and frameshift variants were the more frequent types of mutations. Importantly, in all NEB patients, at least one truncating mutation was found (frameshift, splice site or stop-gain).
Additionally, we identified eleven novel variants in Brazilian patients: eight were truncating, two CNVs and one non-frameshift duplication (VUS). In four patients, a novel truncating variant was associated with another previously described variant (P9, P10, P15, P26), and in two siblings, a novel truncating variant was found in homozygosity (P11/P12). So, in these five families, the genetic defect could probably lead to protein truncation or degradation. Among the identified CNVs, the duplication of exons 82–105 (P21) was associated with a previously described truncating mutation, and the segregation study showed this is a “de novo CNV”. The novel 29 exon deletion (P22) was also associated with a novel truncating mutation, and both were classified as pathogenic. In patient 13, the non-frameshift duplication, classified as VUS, was in association with a previously described truncating variant. However, in these last two patients, we could not perform a segregation study, and we need more studies to confirm the pathogenicity and consequence of mutation associations.
P20 was previously described in 2002, when we observed a lack of the C-terminal domain of the nebulin protein (antibody SH3) through Western Blot analysis in the muscle tissue of this patient [46]. In the present study, we could identify her molecular abnormality, which consisted of two novel truncating mutations in the C-terminal region of NEB: one frameshift mutation in exon 168 associated with a splice site mutation in exon 182, which could damage the SH3 domain. Similarly, a patient with a homozygous mutation in exon 185, which showed an absence of labeling with the SH3 antibody, was also described in 1999 [9]. On the other hand, in the NEB–SH3 mouse model, generated by knocking in a nonsense codon in the last exon, eliminating the C-terminal SH3 domain of nebulin, no nebulin expression abnormalities or altered localization of the interaction partners of the SH3 domain were observed [54]. The mouse presented a mild phenotype and was more susceptible to eccentric contraction-induced injury. Based on these data, it was suggested that the SH3 deletion in mouse could not be as detrimental as in human, similar to the milder phenotype observed in the mdx mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy [54]. It is important to notice, however, that both our patient and the patient described by Pelin et al., 1999 [9], presented mutations that can impair the SH3 region but also the serine-rich domain, which can be responsible for the clinical manifestation of the disease.
The most frequent mutation described in different populations is the p.Arg2478_Asp2512del deletion encompassing exon 55 (del55) [55]. Among our patients, we did not find the del55 mutation in any patient. On the other hand, we identified the nebulin mutation c.246843G>C in three unrelated patients (P14, P16 and P17). In fact, this mutation has been observed in other studies, including in one French family [39] and in two Korean patients [56]. Our three patients are from a region with many consanguineous marriages, and a common origin cannot be ruled out for this mutation.

3.2. ACTA1 Gene Mutations

The ACTA1 gene encodes the skeletal muscle alpha-actin protein, which is the predominant actin isoform in the sarcomeric thin filament. Mutations in ACTA1 are the second most frequent cause of nemaline myopathy. More than 177 mutations were described in the ACTA1 gene, including missense, nonsense, frameshift and splice site mutations. Most mutations are dominant and de novo; only 10% of the pathogenic variations are recessive. In our cohort, we identified five families with ACTA1 heterozygous mutations in sporadic cases. Four patients were clinically classified with the typical form and one with the severe form. Considering the type of mutations, four of them were missense mutations previously described in the literature [34,35].
One novel intronic splice site variant (intron 2) was found in P2 and was classified as a VUS. A variant in the same nucleotide (c.130-5T>C) was classified as benign due to the high frequency in two databases (GNOMAD, LOVD). However, the variant identified in our patient (c.130-5T>A) was analyzed using in silico prediction software, such as Human Splicing finder and MaxEntScan, and was also absent in the parents. This might indicate that this variant has a pathogenic effect but requires additional studies to fully prove its pathogenicity.
A severe clinical phenotype with the presence of intranuclear rods has been associated with variants in ACTA1 located in a cluster between amino acid residues 139 and 165 [35]. P3 in this study showed a severe form of NM, needing ventilatory support and gastrostomy in the neonatal period associated with a heterozygous mutation in exon 4, which is located inside the cluster between amino acid residues 139 and 165. Although ultrastructural analysis was not available in this case, to look for intranuclear rods, a phenotype–genotype correlation would be compatible with the literature in this case.
Our P3 presented an asymmetric weakness distribution, with a more intense weakness on the left side of the body and on the right side of the face. The cause of this asymmetry is not clear. Interestingly, two patients with asymmetric weakness due to a mosaic pattern of mutations in the ACTA1 gene have been described by Lonarge et al., 2020 [57]. However, our P3 showed no molecular evidence of a mosaic pattern of the mutation, corroborated by his very severe phenotype.

3.3. Mutations in Other Genes Related to NM

Other genes have been related to NM in a small percentage of patients, including TPM3, TPM2, TNNT1, KBTBD13, CFL2 (COFILIN2), KLHL40, KLHL41, LMOD3, MYO18B, MYPN, RYR3, TTN3, ADSSL1, Filamin C and MYH2 [2,5,14,39]. They are associated with autosomal dominant, recessive or sporadic cases. Our NM family with mutations in the TPM3 gene showed an autosomal dominant inheritance, with a father and a son presenting a proximal lower limb weakness. The son presented a severe progressive scoliosis requiring spine surgery. Our TPM2-related patient is a sporadic case, carrying the recurrent mutation p. K7del, presenting the typical NM form with limitation of the opening of the mouth [36].
Two of our patients with the severe NM form were compound heterozygous for the same two missense mutations (c.1405G>A; p.Gly469Ser and c.1498C>T; p.Arg500Cys) in KLHL40. This autosomal recessive nemaline myopathy (NEM8) was first described in 2013 in 20% of the patients with the very severe neonatal form, including fetal akinesia or hypokinesia, contractures, fractures and respiratory and swallowing difficulties apparent at birth. The average age at death was 5 months [14]. On the other hand, the first patient with a milder phenotype was described in 2016 [40], related to the mutation c.1498C>T; p.Arg500Cys in a homozygous state. Our patient P29 showed a phenotype compatible with the severe NEM8 form in the neonatal period. However, subsequently after birth, she was under the administration of pyridostigmine daily and with respiratory support (NIV), and her motor development improved, since she was able to sit with support at the age of 1,6 years. The other patient, P30, showed severe weakness and contractures at birth, also with motor improvement during the first three years of life. She was stable, receiving only supportive treatment. At five years of age, she is able to sit without support and using nocturnal NIV. The c.1405G>A; p.Gly469Ser mutation was previously associated with the severe phenotype, but the fact that mutation c.1498C>T; p.Arg500Cys was found in a milder patient suggests the possibility that the combination of these two mutations could explain their clinical improvement during these first years of life and longer survival.
Additionally, an interesting point is finding the same genotype in KLHL40 in two unrelated families, since it is a very rare condition. The families are from the same state in Brazil (Sao Paulo), which is very large and has an ethnically heterogeneous population. However, we could not exclude a possible founder effect of these mutations or unknown relatedness between these two families.

3.4. Muscle Imaging in NM

Magnetic resonance imaging has been considered a powerful method for the study of muscle diseases. In nemaline myopathy, some patterns of muscle involvement are related to the mutated gene; however, a complete correlation between the gene and muscle commitment is not recognized yet [30].
In the present study, among the patients with nebulin mutations, we observed a pattern of selective muscle involvement related to the clinical severity of the disease, independently of age. In patients with the typical form (mild phenotype), the thigh muscles were spared, and the anterior tibial and soleus muscles were more affected in the leg. In patients with a more severe weakness, the thigh muscles were also affected, including the vastus lateralis, rectus femoris, hamstring muscles, and in the leg, mainly the anterior tibial and soleus muscles were involved, similar to previously described findings [30]. In one patient (P16) with a typical form but progressive distal weakness, we observed a diffuse involvement in the thigh and leg muscles but more intense in the legs, which was compatible with her distal muscle involvement.
In the literature, muscle MRI in patients with ACTA1 mutations and the mild phenotype showed diffuse involvement in the thigh, mainly in the adductor magnus and vastus muscles, and in the legs, the tibial anterior and the soleus were more affected. We could perform muscle MRI in two patients with mutations in ACTA1, one with a typical form and mild weakness and the other with a severe form and accentuated weakness. In both patients, we observed that the pattern of fat infiltration in muscle MRI was related to the severity of the clinical phenotype.
Considering the patient with a TPM2 mutation, using whole-body MRI, we could confirm the classical pattern of muscle involvement, with the predominant alterations in masticatory and distal leg muscles [31].
Data on muscle imaging in TPM3-related myopathy are scarce. In 2014, Schreckenbach et al. [58] published data from a German family with cap myopathy and mutations in TPM3. The muscle MRI showed a more intense involvement of the posterior compartment in the thigh and in the legs; the more affected muscles were the tibial anterior and soleus. Differently, in our patient, the thigh muscles were mildly affected, more intensely in the sartorius and adductor magnus muscles, while in the legs, the anterior compartment was more involved.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Patients

Patients with NM were evaluated over the last 20 years in two reference centers for NMD in Sao Paulo and Minas Gerais. Additional patients were referred from several other states of the country.
The study included a total of 30 patients from 25 apparently unrelated Brazilian families. Patients were clinically evaluated, and some of them were followed for months to years by the same pediatric neurologist and multidisciplinary team. Based on clinical disease severity, the patients were classified into six groups: severe, intermediate and typical congenital forms, a mild childhood/juvenile-onset form, adult-onset NM and atypical forms.

4.2. Muscle Biopsy

Muscle biopsy was performed for diagnostic purposes. Cryostat sections of 8 μm were submitted to conventional histological and histochemical techniques: hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), modified Gomori trichrome (GO), periodic acid Schiff technique (PAS), Oil Red O (ORO), reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide dehydrogenase-tetrazolium reductase (NADH-TR), succinic dehydrogenase (SDH), cytochrome c oxidase (COX) and adenosine triphosphatase (ATPase) pre-incubated at pH 9.4, 4.63 and 4.35.
The presence of rods was analyzed in the GO stain and multiminicores or cores on NADH reaction. Type I predominance was considered when the proportion of type I fibers was more than 55% of the total fibers in quadriceps and more than 60% in deltoid muscles [40,48]. There was no sample available for electron microscopy.

4.3. Mutation Analysis

Genomic DNA was extracted from blood using standard protocols.
Next-generation sequencing was performed using a customized NGS panel with 95 genes involved in neuromuscular disorders (NMD) or whole-exome sequencing using Illumina’s Nextera kits for library preparation and custom capture of these genes or Agilent 44 Mv2 SureSelect Exon enrichment kit. Sequencing was performed on an Illumina MiSeq sequencer or Hiseq 2000. After filtering, the variants were compared to the control populations of the 1000-genome (NIH) and 6500-exome sequencing project from the Washington University and the recently created Online Archive of Brazilian Mutations—AbraOM [59] (http://www.abraom.ib.usp.br/, accessed on 22 August 2022). Rare variants, mainly in the ACTA1, TPM2 and TPM3 genes, were selected and analyzed using bioinformatics tools. Gene mutation databases HGMD, LOVD and ClinVar were consulted in search of previously described pathogenic variants. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) pathogenicity classification guidelines [60] were used for variant classifications.
The pathogenicity of de novo variants was analyzed on prediction sites, including: MutationTaster, Predict SNP1, CADD, DANN, FATHMM, FunSeq2, GWAVA, VEP, SIFT, Polyphen1, Polyphen2 and Human splicing finder3.0. Some of the patients were previously studied through Sanger sequencing.
In patients in whom we found only one mutation, we looked for deletions or duplications using the Next Gene Software/XHMM Software (XHMM (eXome-Hidden Markov Model, 2019) and through Motor Chip v3, a genomic hybridization microarray for copy number mutations in 245 genes related to neuromuscular disorders developed by Vincenzo Nigro’s Lab [41].
Mutations are reported according to the cDNA reference sequences of nebulin (NM_001164507.1), ACTA1 (NM_001100), TPM2 (NM_003289.4), TPM3 (NM_152263.4), KLHL40 (NM 152393.4).
We confirmed the inheritance in four families by Sanger sequencing samples from the parents.

4.4. Muscle Imaging

Muscle imaging was performed in patients able to collaborate without sedation. The imaging protocol was performed following the standard sequences: Axial T1-weighted (turbo/fast) spin echo, Axial T2-weighted (turbo/fast) spin echo with fat suppression. The slice thickness was 5–8 mm with interslice gap of 1–2 mm and in-plane resolution of 1–2 mm. We studied the lower extremities or the whole body.
Muscle tomography of the lower limb was performed in patients who could not tolerate the recumbent position.
For the image analysis, we used the semi-quantitative visual rating scale described by Mercuri et al. in 2002 and Wattjes et al. in 2010 [42,43].

5. Conclusions

The molecular analysis in the present study showed that mutations in the NEB gene were the most common cause of NM, followed by mutations in the ACTA1 gene, in this cohort of Brazilian patients. In total, 34 different variants were identified in this cohort, 12 of them being newly described mutations. The NEB mutation c.24579 G>C was recurrent in three unrelated patients, but from the same state of Brazil, with a high frequency of consanguinity, suggesting a common ancestor. Two patients with severe forms of the disease presented the same KLHL40 mutations in compound heterozygosity, although their families were not related.
The most frequent form of NM was the “typical form”, which can be caused by mutations in different genes, and phenotypic variability can be observed among patients with mutations in the same gene. Respiratory involvement was very common in NM patients and could be out of proportion with limb weakness. This aspect is very important and needs special attention in the follow-up of these patients.
Muscle MRI could show different patterns of muscle involvement associated with the affected gene, which can be useful in highlighting this gene for a more detailed analysis during the NGS screening for mutations. On the other hand, considering the same gene, this pattern can be variable with the severity of clinical presentation.
Considering the high frequency of NEB mutations and the complexity of this gene, NGS tools should be combined with techniques designed to detect CNVs, especially in patients with only one identified mutation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.G.-G. and M.V.; patient referral, R.d.C.M.P., M.Z., U.R., E.Z., E.B.C., M.C.M.-C. and A.B.O.; methodology, V.-L.L., C.W.-P., N.G.L., W.C. and V.N.; validation, G.L.Y., M.L. and L.S.S.; formal analysis, J.G.-G., M.B., G.L.Y., M.L., L.S.S. and M.V.; investigation, J.G.-G. and M.B.; writing—original draft preparation, J.G.-G. and M.V.; writing—review and editing, M.V. and J.G.-G.; funding acquisition, M.V. and J.G.-G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo-Centro de Pesquisa, Inovação e Difusão (FAPESP-CEPID—2013/08028-1), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq-INCT 465355/2014-5), Instituto Nacional de Ciencia e Tecnologia (INCT/FAPESP 2014/50931-3), Financiadora de Projetos (FINEP—01.08.0579.00) and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This work is in accordance and was approved by the ethic committee of the Biosciences Institute of the University of Sao Paulo, and the DNA samples are deposited in the biobank repository of the Human Genome and Stem Cells Research Center of IB-USP.

Informed Consent Statement

All patients signed an informed consent form when necessary.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the families for the participation in the study. We thank Leticia Nogueira for technical assistance. We would also like to offer thanks for the support from the NGS Diagnostic Laboratory of the Human Genome Research Center, and to the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo-Centro de Pesquisa, Inovação e Difusão (FAPESP-CEPID), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Instituto Nacional de Ciencia e Tecnologia (INCT), Financiadora de Projetos (FINEP) and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais for their financial support. N.L. was supported by Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Fellowship APP1117510. V.-L.L. and C.W.-P. were supported by the Folkhaelsan Insitute of Genetics, the Finska Läkaresällskapet and the Medicinska understödsföreningen Liv och Hälsa rf.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wallgren-Pettersson, C.; Laing, N.G. Report of the 70th ENMC International Workshop: Nemaline Myopathy, 11–13 June 1999, Naarden, The Netherlands. Neuromuscul. Disord. 2000, 10, 299–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Romero, N.B.; Sandaradura, S.A.; Clarke, N.F. Recent Advances in Nemaline Myopathy. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 2013, 26, 519–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Malfatti, E.; Romero, N.B. Nemaline Myopathies: State of the Art. Rev. Neurol. 2016, 172, 614–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Dubowitz, V.; Sewry, C.A. Congenital Myopathies in Muscle Biopsy. A Practical Approach, 3rd ed.; Elsevier: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  5. Laitila, J.; Wallgren-Pettersson, C. Recent Advances in Nemaline Myopathy. Neuromuscul. Disord. 2021, 31, 955–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Laing, N.G.; Majda, B.T.; Akkari, P.A.; Layton, M.G.; Mulley, J.C.; Phillips, H.; Haan, E.A.; White, S.J.; Beggs, A.H.; Kunkel, L.M.; et al. Assignment of a Gene (NEM1) for Autosomal Dominant Nemaline Myopathy to Chromosome I. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1992, 50, 576–583. [Google Scholar]
  7. Laing, N.G.; Wilton, S.D.; Akkari, P.A.; Dorosz, S.; Boundy, K.; Kneebone, C.; Blumbergs, P.; White, S.; Watkins, H.; Love, D.R.; et al. A Mutation in the α Tropomyosin Gene TPM3 Associated with Autosomal Dominant Nemaline Myopathy. Nat. Genet. 1995, 9, 75–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nowak, K.J.; Wattanasirichaigoon, D.; Goebel, H.H.; Wilce, M.; Pelin, K.; Donner, K.; Jacob, R.L.; Hübner, C.; Oexle, K.; Anderson, J.R.; et al. Mutations in the Skeletal Muscle α-Actin Gene in Patients with Actin Myopathy and Nemaline Myopathy. Nat. Genet. 1999, 23, 208–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pelin, K.; Hilpelä, P.; Donner, K.; Sewry, C.; Akkari, P.A.; Wilton, S.D.; Wattanasirichaigoon, D.; Bang, M.-L.; Centner, T.; Hanefeld, F.; et al. Mutations in the Nebulin Gene Associated with Autosomal Recessive Nemaline Myopathy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 2305–2310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Donner, K.; Ollikainen, M.; Ridanpää, M.; Christen, H.-J.; Goebel, H.H.; de Visser, M.; Pelin, K.; Wallgren-Pettersson, C. Mutations in the β-Tropomyosin (TPM2) Gene—A Rare Cause of Nemaline Myopathy. Neuromuscul. Disord. 2002, 12, 151–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Johnston, J.J.; Kelley, R.I.; Crawford, T.O.; Morton, D.H.; Agarwala, R.; Koch, T.; Schäffer, A.A.; Francomano, C.A.; Biesecker, L.G. A Novel Nemaline Myopathy in the Amish Caused by a Mutation in Troponin T1. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2000, 67, 814–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Agrawal, P.B.; Greenleaf, R.S.; Tomczak, K.K.; Lehtokari, V.-L.; Wallgren-Pettersson, C.; Wallefeld, W.; Laing, N.G.; Darras, B.T.; Maciver, S.K.; Dormitzer, P.R.; et al. Nemaline Myopathy with Minicores Caused by Mutation of the CFL2 Gene Encoding the Skeletal Muscle Actin–Binding Protein, Cofilin-2. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2007, 80, 162–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Sambuughin, N.; Yau, K.S.; Olivé, M.; Duff, R.M.; Bayarsaikhan, M.; Lu, S.; Gonzalez-Mera, L.; Sivadorai, P.; Nowak, K.J.; Ravenscroft, G.; et al. Dominant Mutations in KBTBD13, a Member of the BTB/Kelch Family, Cause Nemaline Myopathy with Cores. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2010, 87, 842–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Ravenscroft, G.; Miyatake, S.; Lehtokari, V.-L.; Todd, E.J.; Vornanen, P.; Yau, K.S.; Hayashi, Y.K.; Miyake, N.; Tsurusaki, Y.; Doi, H.; et al. Mutations in KLHL40 Are a Frequent Cause of Severe Autosomal-Recessive Nemaline Myopathy. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2013, 93, 6–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Gupta, V.A.; Ravenscroft, G.; Shaheen, R.; Todd, E.J.; Swanson, L.C.; Shiina, M.; Ogata, K.; Hsu, C.; Clarke, N.F.; Darras, B.T.; et al. Identification of KLHL41 Mutations Implicates BTB-Kelch-Mediated Ubiquitination as an Alternate Pathway to Myofibrillar Disruption in Nemaline Myopathy. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2013, 93, 1108–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Yuen, M.; Sandaradura, S.A.; Dowling, J.J.; Kostyukova, A.S.; Moroz, N.; Quinlan, K.G.; Lehtokari, V.-L.; Ravenscroft, G.; Todd, E.J.; Ceyhan-Birsoy, O.; et al. Leiomodin-3 Dysfunction Results in Thin Filament Disorganization and Nemaline Myopathy. J. Clin. Investig. 2014, 124, 4693–4708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sandaradura, S.A.; North, K.N. LMOD3: The “Missing Link” in Nemaline Myopathy? Oncotarget 2015, 6, 26548–26549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Malfatti, E.; Böhm, J.; Lacène, E.; Beuvin, M.; Romero, N.B.; Laporte, J. A Premature Stop Codon in MYO18B Is Associated with Severe Nemaline Myopathy with Cardiomyopathy. J. Neuromuscul. Dis. 2015, 2, 219–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Miyatake, S.; Mitsuhashi, S.; Hayashi, Y.K.; Purevjav, E.; Nishikawa, A.; Koshimizu, E.; Suzuki, M.; Yatabe, K.; Tanaka, Y.; Ogata, K.; et al. Biallelic Mutations in MYPN, Encoding Myopalladin, Are Associated with Childhood-Onset, Slowly Progressive Nemaline Myopathy. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2017, 100, 169–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Nilipour, Y.; Nafissi, S.; Tjust, A.E.; Ravenscroft, G.; Hossein Nejad Nedai, H.; Taylor, R.L.; Varasteh, V.; Pedrosa Domellöf, F.; Zangi, M.; Tonekaboni, S.H.; et al. Ryanodine Receptor Type 3 (RYR3) as a Novel Gene Associated with a Myopathy with Nemaline Bodies. Eur. J. Neurol. 2018, 25, 841–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sandaradura, S.A.; Bournazos, A.; Mallawaarachchi, A.; Cummings, B.B.; Waddell, L.B.; Jones, K.J.; Troedson, C.; Sudarsanam, A.; Nash, B.M.; Peters, G.B.; et al. Nemaline Myopathy and Distal Arthrogryposis Associated with an Autosomal Recessive TNNT3 Splice Variant. Hum. Mutat. 2018, 39, 383–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Saito, Y.; Nishikawa, A.; Iida, A.; Mori-Yoshimura, M.; Oya, Y.; Ishiyama, A.; Komaki, H.; Nakamura, S.; Fujikawa, S.; Kanda, T.; et al. ADSSL1 Myopathy Is the Most Common Nemaline Myopathy in Japan with Variable Clinical Features. Neurology 2020, 95, e1500–e1511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Evangelista, T.; Lornage, X.; Carlier, P.G.; Bassez, G.; Brochier, G.; Chanut, A.; Lacène, E.; Bui, M.-T.; Metay, C.; Oppermann, U.; et al. A Heterozygous Mutation in the Filamin C Gene Causes an Unusual Nemaline Myopathy With Ring Fibers. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 2020, 79, 908–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Madigan, N.N.; Polzin, M.J.; Cui, G.; Liewluck, T.; Alsharabati, M.H.; Klein, C.J.; Windebank, A.J.; Mer, G.; Milone, M. Filamentous Tangles with Nemaline Rods in MYH2 Myopathy: A Novel Phenotype. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 2021, 9, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Wang, K.; Knipfer, M.; Huang, Q.-Q.; van Heerden, A.; Hsu, L.C.-L.; Gutierrez, G.; Quian, X.-L.; Stedman, H. Human Skeletal Muscle Nebulin Sequence Encodes a Blueprint for Thin Filament Architecture. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 4304–4314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Lehtokari, V.-L.; Pelin, K.; Sandbacka, M.; Ranta, S.; Donner, K.; Muntoni, F.; Sewry, C.; Angelini, C.; Bushby, K.; van den Bergh, P.; et al. Identification of 45 Novel Mutations in the Nebulin Gene Associated with Autosomal Recessive Nemaline Myopathy. Hum. Mutat. 2006, 27, 946–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lehtokari, V.-L.; Kiiski, K.; Sandaradura, S.A.; Laporte, J.; Repo, P.; Frey, J.A.; Donner, K.; Marttila, M.; Saunders, C.; Barth, P.G.; et al. Mutation Update: The Spectra of Nebulin Variants and Associated Myopathies. Hum. Mutat. 2014, 35, 1418–1426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Kiiski, K.; Lehtokari, V.-L.; Löytynoja, A.; Ahlstén, L.; Laitila, J.; Wallgren-Pettersson, C.; Pelin, K. A Recurrent Copy Number Variation of the NEB Triplicate Region: Only Revealed by the Targeted Nemaline Myopathy CGH Array. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2016, 24, 574–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Piga, D.; Magri, F.; Ronchi, D.; Corti, S.; Cassandrini, D.; Mercuri, E.; Tasca, G.; Bertini, E.; Fattori, F.; Toscano, A.; et al. New Mutations in NEB Gene Discovered by Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing in Nemaline Myopathy Italian Patients. J. Mol. Neurosci. 2016, 59, 351–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jungbluth, H.; Sewry, C.A.; Counsell, S.; Allsop, J.; Chattopadhyay, A.; Mercuri, E.; North, K.; Laing, N.; Bydder, G.; Pelin, K.; et al. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Muscle in Nemaline Myopathy. Neuromuscul. Disord. 2004, 14, 779–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jarraya, M.; Quijano-Roy, S.; Monnier, N.; Béhin, A.; Avila-Smirnov, D.; Romero, N.B.; Allamand, V.; Richard, P.; Barois, A.; May, A.; et al. Whole-Body Muscle MRI in a Series of Patients with Congenital Myopathy Related to TPM2 Gene Mutations. Neuromuscul. Disord. 2012, 22, S137–S147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Quijano-Roy, S.; Avila-Smirnow, D.; Carlier, R.-Y.; Bevilacqua, J.A.; Romero, N.B.; Fischer, D. Congenital Myopathies. In Neuromuscular Imaging; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2013; pp. 147–176. [Google Scholar]
  33. North, K.N.; Wang, C.H.; Clarke, N.; Jungbluth, H.; Vainzof, M.; Dowling, J.J.; Amburgey, K.; Quijano-Roy, S.; Beggs, A.H.; Sewry, C.; et al. Approach to the Diagnosis of Congenital Myopathies. Neuromuscul. Disord. 2014, 24, 97–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Sparrow, J.C.; Nowak, K.J.; Durling, H.J.; Beggs, A.H.; Wallgren-Pettersson, C.; Romero, N.; Nonaka, I.; Laing, N.G. Muscle Disease Caused by Mutations in the Skeletal Muscle Alpha-Actin Gene (ACTA1). Neuromuscul. Disord. 2003, 13, 519–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Laing, N.G.; Dye, D.E.; Wallgren-Pettersson, C.; Richard, G.; Monnier, N.; Lillis, S.; Winder, T.L.; Lochmüller, H.; Graziano, C.; Mitrani-Rosenbaum, S.; et al. Mutations and Polymorphisms of the Skeletal Muscle Alpha-Actin Gene (ACTA1). Hum. Mutat. 2009, 30, 1267–1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Mokbel, N.; Ilkovski, B.; Kreissl, M.; Memo, M.; Jeffries, C.M.; Marttila, M.; Lehtokari, V.-L.; Lemola, E.; Grönholm, M.; Yang, N.; et al. K7del Is a Common TPM2 Gene Mutation Associated with Nemaline Myopathy and Raised Myofibre Calcium Sensitivity. Brain 2013, 136, 494–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Clarke, N.F.; Kolski, H.; Dye, D.E.; Lim, E.; Smith, R.L.L.; Patel, R.; Fahey, M.C.; Bellance, R.; Romero, N.B.; Johnson, E.S.; et al. Mutations in TPM3 Are a Common Cause of Congenital Fiber Type Disproportion. Ann. Neurol. 2008, 63, 329–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Pelin, K.; Donner, K.; Holmberg, M.; Jungbluth, H.; Muntoni, F.; Wallgren-Pettersson, C. Nebulin Mutations in Autosomal Recessive Nemaline Myopathy: An Update. Neuromuscul. Disord. 2002, 12, 680–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Malfatti, E.; Lehtokari, V.-L.; Böhm, J.; de Winter, J.M.; Schäffer, U.; Estournet, B.; Quijano-Roy, S.; Monges, S.; Lubieniecki, F.; Bellance, R.; et al. Muscle Histopathology in Nebulin-Related Nemaline Myopathy: Ultrastrastructural Findings Correlated to Disease Severity and Genotype. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 2014, 2, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Seferian, A.M.; Malfatti, E.; Bosson, C.; Pelletier, L.; Taytard, J.; Forin, V.; Gidaro, T.; Gargaun, E.; Carlier, P.; Fauré, J.; et al. Mild Clinical Presentation in KLHL40-Related Nemaline Myopathy (NEM 8). Neuromuscul. Disord. 2016, 26, 712–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Piluso, G.; Dionisi, M.; del Vecchio Blanco, F.; Torella, A.; Aurino, S.; Savarese, M.; Giugliano, T.; Bertini, E.; Terracciano, A.; Vainzof, M.; et al. Motor Chip: A Comparative Genomic Hybridization Microarray for Copy-Number Mutations in 245 Neuromuscular Disorders. Clin. Chem. 2011, 57, 1584–1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Mercuri, E.; Talim, B.; Moghadaszadeh, B.; Petit, N.; Brockington, M.; Counsell, S.; Guicheney, P.; Muntoni, F.; Merlini, L. Clinical and Imaging Findings in Six Cases of Congenital Muscular Dystrophy with Rigid Spine Syndrome Linked to Chromosome 1p (RSMD1). Neuromuscul. Disord. 2002, 12, 631–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wattjes, M.P.; Kley, R.A.; Fischer, D. Neuromuscular Imaging in Inherited Muscle Diseases. Eur. Radiol. 2010, 20, 2447–2460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Jungbluth, H.; Treves, S.; Zorzato, F.; Sarkozy, A.; Ochala, J.; Sewry, C.; Phadke, R.; Gautel, M.; Muntoni, F. Congenital Myopathies: Disorders of Excitation–Contraction Coupling and Muscle Contraction. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2018, 14, 151–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Gurgel-Giannetti, J.; Reed, U.; Bang, M.-L.; Pelin, K.; Donner, K.; Marie, S.K.; Carvalho, M.; Fireman, M.A.T.; Zanoteli, E.; Oliveira, A.S.B.; et al. Nebulin Expression in Patients with Nemaline Myopathy. Neuromuscul. Disord. 2001, 11, 154–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Gurgel-Giannetti, J.; Bang, M.-L.; Reed, U.; Marie, S.; Zatz, M.; Labeit, S.; Vainzof, M. Lack of the C-terminal Domain of Nebulin in a Patient with Nemaline Myopathy. Muscle Nerve 2002, 25, 747–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Gurgel-Giannetti, J.; Reed, U.C.; Marie, S.K.; Zanoteli, E.; Fireman, M.A.T.; Oliveira, A.S.B.; Werneck, L.C.; Beggs, A.H.; Zatz, M.; Vainzof, M. Rod Distribution and Muscle Fiber Type Modification in the Progression of Nemaline Myopathy. J. Child Neurol. 2003, 18, 235–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Gonorazky, H.D.; Bönnemann, C.G.; Dowling, J.J. The Genetics of Congenital Myopathies. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 2018, 148, 549–564. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  49. Sasaki, M.; Yoneyama, H.; Nonaka, I. Respiratory Muscle Involvement in Nemaline Myopathy. Pediatr. Neurol. 1990, 6, 425–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lindqvist, J.; Cheng, A.J.; Renaud, G.; Hardeman, E.C.; Ochala, J. Distinct Underlying Mechanisms of Limb and Respiratory Muscle Fiber Weaknesses in Nemaline Myopathy. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 2013, 72, 472–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Joureau, B.; de Winter, J.M.; Stam, K.; Granzier, H.; Ottenheijm, C.A.C. Muscle Weakness in Respiratory and Peripheral Skeletal Muscles in a Mouse Model for Nebulin-Based Nemaline Myopathy. Neuromuscul. Disord. 2017, 27, 83–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Donner, K.; Sandbacka, M.; Lehtokari, V.-L.; Wallgren-Pettersson, C.; Pelin, K. Complete Genomic Structure of the Human Nebulin Gene and Identification of Alternatively Spliced Transcripts. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2004, 12, 744–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Pelin, K.; Wallgren-Pettersson, C. Nebulin-a Giant Chameleon. In The Sarcomere and Skeletal Muscle Disease; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2008; Volume 642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yamamoto, D.L.; Vitiello, C.; Zhang, J.; Gokhin, D.S.; Castaldi, A.; Coulis, G.; Piaser, F.; Filomena, M.C.; Eggenhuizen, P.J.; Kunderfranco, P.; et al. The Nebulin SH3 Domain Is Dispensable for Normal Skeletal Muscle Structure but Is Required for Effective Active Load Bearing in Mouse. J. Cell Sci. 2013, 126, 5477–5489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Lehtokari, V.-L.; Greenleaf, R.S.; DeChene, E.T.; Kellinsalmi, M.; Pelin, K.; Laing, N.G.; Beggs, A.H.; Wallgren-Pettersson, C. The Exon 55 Deletion in the Nebulin Gene–One Single Founder Mutation with World-Wide Occurrence. Neuromuscul. Disord. 2009, 19, 179–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Park, Y.; Shin, J.; Kim, H.; Lee, C.; Kim, D. Characterization of Congenital Myopathies at a Korean Neuromuscular Center. Muscle Nerve 2018, 58, 235–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lornage, X.; Quijano-Roy, S.; Amthor, H.; Carlier, R.-Y.; Monnier, N.; Deleuze, J.-F.; Romero, N.B.; Laporte, J.; Böhm, J. Asymmetric Muscle Weakness Due to ACTA1 Mosaic Mutations. Neurology 2020, 95, e3406–e3411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Schreckenbach, T.; Schröder, J.M.; Voit, T.; Abicht, A.; Neuen-Jacob, E.; Roos, A.; Bulst, S.; Kuhl, C.; Schulz, J.B.; Weis, J.; et al. Novel TPM3 Mutation in a Family with Cap Myopathy and Review of the Literature. Neuromuscul. Disord. 2014, 24, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Naslavsky, M.S.; Yamamoto, G.L.; Almeida, T.F.; Ezquina, S.A.M.; Sunaga, D.Y.; Pho, N.; Bozoklian, D.; Sandberg, T.O.M.; Brito, L.A.; Lazar, M.; et al. Exomic Variants of an Elderly Cohort of Brazilians in the ABraOM Database. Hum. Mutat. 2017, 38, 751–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Richards, S.; Aziz, N.; Bale, S.; Bick, D.; Das, S.; Gastier-Foster, J.; Grody, W.W.; Hegde, M.; Lyon, E.; Spector, E.; et al. Standards and Guidelines for the Interpretation of Sequence Variants: A Joint Consensus Recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet. Med. 2015, 17, 405–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Muscle biopsy showing the presence and distribution of nemaline bodies inside myofibers: on the left picture, from P1, there are predominantly large rods in subsarcolemmal region; on the right picture, from P20, there are predominantly small intermyofibrillar rods (magnification ×20).
Figure 1. Muscle biopsy showing the presence and distribution of nemaline bodies inside myofibers: on the left picture, from P1, there are predominantly large rods in subsarcolemmal region; on the right picture, from P20, there are predominantly small intermyofibrillar rods (magnification ×20).
Ijms 23 11995 g001
Figure 2. MRI pattern in patients with mutations in the ACTA1 and NEB genes: (A,B) patients with mutations in the ACTA1 gene. In (A), there is a diffuse infiltration in the thigh and legs in P3 (severe form); in (B), there is isolate involvement of tibial anterior in the legs in P2 (typical form). (C,D) patients with nebulin mutations; in (C), we observe a diffuse infiltration in the thigh and legs in a patient with severe weakness who never walked (P21); In (D), we observe that the predominant involvement was in the anterior tibial and soleus muscles, while the thigh muscles were spared (P15).
Figure 2. MRI pattern in patients with mutations in the ACTA1 and NEB genes: (A,B) patients with mutations in the ACTA1 gene. In (A), there is a diffuse infiltration in the thigh and legs in P3 (severe form); in (B), there is isolate involvement of tibial anterior in the legs in P2 (typical form). (C,D) patients with nebulin mutations; in (C), we observe a diffuse infiltration in the thigh and legs in a patient with severe weakness who never walked (P21); In (D), we observe that the predominant involvement was in the anterior tibial and soleus muscles, while the thigh muscles were spared (P15).
Ijms 23 11995 g002
Figure 3. MRI pattern in patients with mutations in the TPM2 and TPM3 genes. In P6 with TPM2 mutation, the whole-body MRI showed facial involvement, mainly temporal and lateral pterygoid muscles, and distal involvement in lower legs. In P7 with TPM3, the muscle MRI showed fat infiltration in thigh muscles, especially sartorius and adductor magnus, and predominant involvement of the anterior compartment of the leg.
Figure 3. MRI pattern in patients with mutations in the TPM2 and TPM3 genes. In P6 with TPM2 mutation, the whole-body MRI showed facial involvement, mainly temporal and lateral pterygoid muscles, and distal involvement in lower legs. In P7 with TPM3, the muscle MRI showed fat infiltration in thigh muscles, especially sartorius and adductor magnus, and predominant involvement of the anterior compartment of the leg.
Ijms 23 11995 g003
Table 1. Clinical and molecular data of the patients. Abbreviations: ACMG: American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics; NIV: Non-invasive ventilation; VUS: Variant of uncertain significance.
Table 1. Clinical and molecular data of the patients. Abbreviations: ACMG: American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics; NIV: Non-invasive ventilation; VUS: Variant of uncertain significance.
Case, SexFamilyClinical PhenotypeMolecular Analysis
Age at Last Evaluation and Clinical FindingsGeneMutationsType/Segregation
Parental
ACMG 6/2022
Classification
1
Male
Family 1Typical
20 years:
Not Ambulant since 11 years of age
NIV at night, Scoliosis
ACTA1NM_001100.4:exon4:c.541G>C:
p.(Asp181His)
Missense
heterozygous
Previously described [34]
Likely Pathogenic
PM2
PP2
PP3 PS4_Supporting PP4
2
Male
Family 2Typical
13 years:
Ambulant
No VNI, No Scoliosis
ACTA1NM_001100.4:c.130-5T>ASplice site
Heterozygous
Novel
Not present in the parents
VUS
PM2
PP2
PP3
PP4
3
Male
Family 3Severe
15 years:
Not Ambulant (never)
Permanent Invasive ventilation (tracheostomy)
Gastrostomy, Scoliosis
ACTA1NM_001100.4:exon4:c.478G>A:
p.(Gly160Ser)
Missense
heterozygous
Previously described [35]
Likely Pathogenic PM2
PP2
PP3 PS4_Supporting PP4
4
Male
Family 4Typical
3 years:
Ambulant
No VNI/
No scoliosis
ACTA1NM_001100.4:c.478G>A:
p.(Arg198His)
Missense
heterozygous
Previously described [35]
Likely Pathogenic PM2
PP2
PP3 PS4_Supporting PP4
5
Female
Family 5Typical
14 years:
Ambulant
No VNI/
No scoliosis
ACTA1NM_001100.4:c.854T>G:
p.(Met283Arg)
Missense
heterozygous
Previously described [35]
Likely Pathogenic PM2
PP2
PP3 PS4_Supporting PP4
6
Male
Family 6Typical
13 years:
Ambulant
No VNI/ Mild scoliosis
TPM2NM_003289.4:c.20_22 del:
p.(Lys7del)
Frameshift
heterozygous
Previously described [36]
Pathogenic
PM2
PS4
PP3
PM6
7
Male
Family 7
AD
Typical
19 years:
Ambulant/Nocturnal VNI/Severe scoliosis
TPM3NM_152263.4:c.502C>T:
p.(Arg168Cys)
Missense
heterozygous
Previously described [37]
Pathogenic
PM2
PS4
PM5
PM6
8
Male
(father)
Typical
62 years:
Ambulant with support
Permanent VNI (>16 h/day), Scoliosis
NM_152263.4:c.502C>T:
p.(Arg168Cys)
9
Female
Family 8Mild
27 years:
Ambulant
No VNI
NEBNM_001164507.1:c.8501delA: p.(Lys2834ArgfsTer28)Frameshift
heterozygous
Novel
Pathogenic
PVS1
PM2
PP4
NM_001164507.1:c.1674+2T>CSplice site
heterozygous
Previously described [27]
Pathogenic PVS1 PM2 PS4_Supporting PP4
10
Male
Family 9Typical
Dead at 25 years old:
Not ambulant
Permanent invasive ventilation (tracheostomy) Severe scoliosis
NEBNM_001164507.1:exon170:c.24189_24192dup
p.(Glu8065SerfsTer5)
Frameshift
heterozygous
Previously described [38]
Pathogenic PVS1 PM2 PS4_Supporting PP4
PP4
NM_001164507.1:exon134:c.20466+2T>ASplice site
heterozygous
Novel
Pathogenic PVS1 PM2 PM3_Supporting PP4
11
Female
Family 10
consanguineous
Typical
4 years:
Ambulant,
No VNI
NEBNM_001164507.1:exon172:c.24304_24305dup:
p.(Leu8102PhefsTer44)
Frameshift
homozygous
Novel
Pathogenic
PVS1
PM2
PP4
12
Male
(brother)
Typical
6 years:
Ambulant,
No VNI
NM_001164507.1:exon172:c.24304_24305dup:
p.(Leu8102PhefsTer44)
Frameshift
homozygous
Novel
Pathogenic
PVS1
PM2
PP4
13
Male
Family 11Typical
14 years:
Ambulant/
No VNI
NEBNM_001164507.1:exon 63 c.8889+1G>A p.(?)Splice site
heterozygous
Previously described [27]
Pathogenic PVS1 PM2 PS4_Moderate PP4
NM_001164507.1:c.6869_6870insTGC:
p.(Ala2290dup)
Non-frameshift duplication
heterozygous
Novel
VUS
PM2 PM3_Supporting PP4
14
Female
Family 12Typical
19 years:
Ambulant
Nocturnal NIV
Scoliosis
NEBNM_001164507.1:exon151:c.22170G>A:
(p.Tyr7390Ter
Stop-gain
Heterozygous
Previously described [38]/maternal
Pathogenic PVS1 PM2 PS4_Supporting PM3_Supporting PP4
NM_001164507.1:exon174: c.24579G>C;
p.(Ser8193Ser)
Splicing
heterozygous
Previously described [39]/paternal
Likely Pathogenic PM2 PS4_Supporting PP3 PM3_Supporting PP4
15
Female
Family 13Typical
23 years:
Ambulant
Permanent NIV
(> 16 h a day)
Scoliosis
NEBNM_001164507.1:exon176:c.24735_24736del:
p.(Arg8245fsTer2)
Frameshift deletion
heterozygous
Previously described [27,39]
Pathogenic PVS1 PM2 PS4_Supporting PP4
NEB_NM_001164507.1:IVS122:c.19102-8_19102-4delSplice site
heterozygous
Novel
VUS
PM2
PP4
16
Female
Family 14Typical
25 years:
Lost the ambulation at 17 years of age
Permanent NIV
(>16 h a day)
Severe Scoliosis
NEBNM_001164507.1:exon174: c.24579G>C;
p.(Ser8193Ser)
Splice site
heterozygous
Previously described [39]/paternal
Likely Pathogenic PM2 PS4_Supporting PP3 PM3_Supporting PP4
NM_001164507.1:exon48:c.6078delA
p.(Lys2026fs)
Frameshift
heterozygous
Previously described [26]/Maternal
Pathogenic PVS1, PM2 PS4_Supporting PP4 PM3_Supporting
17
Female
Family 15Typical
20 years:
Ambulant
Nocturnal NIV
Scoliosis
NEBNM_001164507.1:exon151:c.22170G>A:
p.(Tyr7390Ter)
Stop-gain
heterozygous
Previously described [38]—nonsense mutation/paternal
Pathogenic PVS1 PM2 PS4_Supporting PP4
NM_001164507.1:exon174: c.24579G>C;
p.(Ser8193Ser)
Splice site
heterozygous
Previously described [39]/maternal
Likely Pathogenic PM2 PS4_Supporting PP3 PM3_Supporting PP4
18
Female
Family 16Typical
4 years:
Ambulant
No NIV
NEBNM_001164507.1: exon173: c.23601_23602del:
p.(Lys7867AsnfsTer3)
Frameshift
heterozygous
NM consortium
Previously described [38]
Pathogenic
PVS1
PM2
PP4
19
Female
(sister)
Typical
2 years:
Ambulant
No NIV
NM_001164507.1Int28:c.2835+5G>CSplice site
heterozygous
NM consortium
VUS
PM2
PP4
20
Female
Family 17Typical
Dead at 15 years:
Ambulant
No NIV
Acute respiratory failure
NEBNM_001164507.1:c.23878_23881dup
p.(Thr7961AsnfsTer16)
Frameshift
heterozygous
Novel
Pathogenic
PVS1
PM2
PP4
NM_001164507.1:c.25405-1G>CSplice site
heterozygous
Novel
Pathogenic
PVS1 P
M2
PP4
21
Female
Family 18Typical
12 years:
Not ambulant
Permanent NIV
(had tracheostomy) Gastrostomy
Scoliosis
NEBNM_001164507.1:c.1623delT:
p.(Asp541IlefsTer15)
Frameshift heterozygous
Previously described [26]/maternal
Pathogenic
PVS1
PM2 PS4_Supporting PP4
Motor Chip (V. Nigro): duplicação 82 a 105CNV
heterozygous
Novel
22
Male
Family 19Typical
13 years:
Ambulant
No NIV
NEBNM_001164507.1:exon34:c.3648del
p.(Lys1218ArgfsTer6)
Frameshift
heterozygous
Novel
Pathogenic
PVS1
PM2
PP4
del exon 29CNV
Novel
Not confirmed by Motor Chip
Pathogenic
PVS1
PM2
PP4
23
Male
Family 20Mild
27 years:
Ambulant
No VNI
NEBNM_001164507:exon43:c.5343+5G>ASplicing
homozygous
Previously described [26]
Likely pathogenic
PM2 (rara) PS4_sup PM4, PM3_sup, PP4
24
Female
(sister)
Mild
25 years:
Ambulant
No VNI
NM_001164507:exon43:c.5343+5G>ASplicing
homozygous
Previously described [26]
Likely pathogenic
PM2 (rara) PS4_sup PM4, PM3_sup, PP4
25
Male
Family 21Typical
8 years:
Not ambulant (never walked) Progressive weakness (loss of head control and the capacity to sit) Permanent NIV (>16 h a day) Gastrostomy
Severe scoliosis
NEBNM_001164507.1:c.21076C>T
p.Arg7026Ter
Stop-gain
heterozygous
Previously reported [27]
Pathogenic PVS1 PM2 PS4_Moderate PP4
NM_001164507.1:c.24192_24193insTCAA
p.Glu8065Serfs5
Frameshift
heterozygous
Previously reported [27]
Pathogenic
PVS1
PM2
PS4
PM3
PP4
26
Male
Family 22Typical
Dead at 5 years old:
Ambulant
No NIV
(Acute respiratory failure)
NEBNM_001164507.1:exon129:c.19944G>A:
p.(Ser6648Ser)
Splice site
heterozygous
Previously reported [27]
Likely Pathogenic PM2
PS4
PP3
PP4
NM_001164507.1:exon105:c.16423A>T:
p.(Lys5475Ter)
Stop-gain
heterozygous
Novel
Pathogenic
PVS1
PM2
PP4
27
Female
Family 23Typical
18 years:
Ambulant
No NIV
No scoliosis
NEBNM_001164507:exon43:c.5343+5G>ASplice site
heterozygous
Previously reported [26]
Likely Pathogenic PM2
PS4_sup
PM4
PM3_sup
PP4
28
Male
(brother)
Typical
13 years:
Ambulant
No NIV
No scoliosis
NEB:NM_001164507:exon29:c.2943G>A
p.Glu981Glu
Splice site
heterozygous
Previously reported by Invitae on Clinvar
rs398124170
Likely pathogenic
PM2
PS4_sup
PP3
PM3
PP4
29
Female
Family 24Severe
1,5 years:
sits with support
Nocturnal VNI
Scoliosis
KLHL40NM_152393.4:c.1405G>A:
p.(Gly469Ser)
Missense
heterozygous
Previously reported [14]/paternal
VUS
PM2
PP3
PP4
NM_152393.4:c.1498C>T:
p.(Arg500Cys)
Missense
heterozygous
Previously reported [40]/maternal
VUS
PM2 PS4_Supporting PP3
PP4
30
Female
Family 25Severe
5 years:
Not ambulant
Distal Arthrogryposis
Nocturnal VNI
Scoliosis
KLHL40NM_152393.4:c.1405G>A:
p.(Gly469Ser)
Missense
heterozygous
Previously reported [14]
VUS
PM2
PP3
PP4
NM_152393.4:c.1498C>T:
p.(Arg500Cys)
Missense
heterozygous
Previously reported [40]
VUS
PM2 PS4_Supporting PP3
PP4
Table 2. Muscle MRI: Pattern of muscle involvement in nemaline patients.
Table 2. Muscle MRI: Pattern of muscle involvement in nemaline patients.
Case Age at
Muscle MRI
GeneMuscle MRI or CT (Mercuri Grade *)
Thigh:Legs:
P24 yearsACTA1No involvementTibialis anterior muscle: grade IIa
Soleus muscle: no involvement
P38 yearsACTA1Diffuse fat infiltration of thigh muscles: grade III
Biceps femoris and vastus lateralis muscles: grade IIb
Diffuse fat infiltration: grade III
Tibialis posterior muscle: grade IIb
P612 yearsTPM2Vastus lateralis and rectus femoris muscles: grade I
OBS: Axial T1 image of the head: Involvement of temporal, masseter and pterygoid lateral muscles: grade II
Soleus muscle: grade IIb
Gastrocnemius muscle: grade IIa
P713 yearsTPM3Sartorius muscle: grade IIb
Adductor magnus muscle: grade IIa
Hamstring muscles: grade I
Soleus muscles: grade I
Gastrocnemius muscle: grade I
Tibialis anterior muscle: grade IIb
Tibialis posterior muscle: grade IIb
P1417 yearsNEBDiffuse fat infiltration of thigh muscles: grade ITibialis anterior muscle: grade III
Soleus muscle: grade IIa
P1515 yearsNEBDiffuse fat infiltration of thigh muscles: grade ITibialis anterior muscle: grade IIa
Soleus muscle: grade IIb
Fibular muscle: grade IIa
P1617 yearsNEBAdductor longus muscle: grade III
Adductor magnus muscle: grade III
Rectus femoris muscle: grade IIa
Vastus lateralis muscle: grade IIa
Tibialis anterior muscle: grade IV
Soleus muscle: grade IV
Fibular muscle: grade IV
P1714 yearsNEBDiffuse fat infiltration of thigh muscles: grade ITibialis anterior muscle: grade II
Soleus muscle: grade II
Fibular. muscle: grade II
P217 yearsNEBAdductor longus muscle: grade I
Adductor magnus muscle: grade IIb
Rectus femoris muscle: grade IIb
Vastus lateralis muscle: grade IIb
Tibialis anterior muscle: grade IIa
Tibialis posterior muscle: grade IIa
Soleus muscle: grade III
Gastrocnemius muscle: grade III
Fibular muscle: grade III
* Semi-quantitative visual rating scale described by Mercuri et al., 2002 and Watjjes et al., 2010 [42,43].
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gurgel-Giannetti, J.; Souza, L.S.; Yamamoto, G.L.; Belisario, M.; Lazar, M.; Campos, W.; Pavanello, R.d.C.M.; Zatz, M.; Reed, U.; Zanoteli, E.; et al. Nemaline Myopathy in Brazilian Patients: Molecular and Clinical Characterization. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 11995. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231911995

AMA Style

Gurgel-Giannetti J, Souza LS, Yamamoto GL, Belisario M, Lazar M, Campos W, Pavanello RdCM, Zatz M, Reed U, Zanoteli E, et al. Nemaline Myopathy in Brazilian Patients: Molecular and Clinical Characterization. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(19):11995. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231911995

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gurgel-Giannetti, Juliana, Lucas Santos Souza, Guilherme L. Yamamoto, Marina Belisario, Monize Lazar, Wilson Campos, Rita de Cassia M. Pavanello, Mayana Zatz, Umbertina Reed, Edmar Zanoteli, and et al. 2022. "Nemaline Myopathy in Brazilian Patients: Molecular and Clinical Characterization" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 19: 11995. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231911995

APA Style

Gurgel-Giannetti, J., Souza, L. S., Yamamoto, G. L., Belisario, M., Lazar, M., Campos, W., Pavanello, R. d. C. M., Zatz, M., Reed, U., Zanoteli, E., Oliveira, A. B., Lehtokari, V. -L., Casella, E. B., Machado-Costa, M. C., Wallgren-Pettersson, C., Laing, N. G., Nigro, V., & Vainzof, M. (2022). Nemaline Myopathy in Brazilian Patients: Molecular and Clinical Characterization. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(19), 11995. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231911995

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop