Next Article in Journal
Candesartan Does Not Activate PPARγ and Its Target Genes in Early Gestation Trophoblasts
Next Article in Special Issue
Serum Starvation Accelerates Intracellular Metabolism in Endothelial Cells
Previous Article in Journal
Repurposing SGLT-2 Inhibitors to Target Aging: Available Evidence and Molecular Mechanisms
Previous Article in Special Issue
EVOO’s Effects on Incretin Production: Is There a Rationale for a Combination in T2DM Therapy?
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Role of Micronutrients and Gut Microbiota-Derived Metabolites in COVID-19 Recovery

by
Teresita de Jesús Hernández-Flores
1,2,
Eliza Julia Pedraza-Brindis
3,
Jhonathan Cárdenas-Bedoya
1,4,
José Daniel Ruíz-Carrillo
5,
Anibal Samael Méndez-Clemente
2,
Marco Alonso Martínez-Guzmán
3,* and
Liliana Iñiguez-Gutiérrez
2,3,*
1
Departamento de Disciplinas Filosófico, Metodológicas e Instrumentales, Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara 44340, Jalisco, Mexico
2
Instituto de Investigación de Inmunodeficiencias y VIH, Hospital Civil de Guadalajara “Fray Antonio Alcalde”, Guadalajara 44280, Jalisco, Mexico
3
Departamento de Aparatos y Sistemas I, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de Guadalajara, Guadalajara 44670, Jalisco, Mexico
4
Laboratorio de Inmunodeficiencias y Retrovirus Humanos, Centro de Investigación Biomédica de Occidente, Centro Médico Nacional de Occidente, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Guadalajara 44340, Jalisco, Mexico
5
Clínica Medicina Familiar 1 del ISSSTE “Dr. Arturo González Guzmán”, Guadalajara 44340, Jalisco, Mexico
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(20), 12324; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232012324
Submission received: 26 September 2022 / Revised: 11 October 2022 / Accepted: 11 October 2022 / Published: 14 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nutrient Metabolites and Their Receptors in Human Diseases)

Abstract

:
A balanced and varied diet provides diverse beneficial effects on health, such as adequate micronutrient availability and a gut microbiome in homeostasis. Besides their participation in biochemical processes as cofactors and coenzymes, vitamins and minerals have an immunoregulatory function; meanwhile, gut microbiota and its metabolites coordinate directly and indirectly the cell response through the interaction with the host receptors. Malnourishment is a crucial risk factor for several pathologies, and its involvement during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 pandemic has been reported. This pandemic has caused a significant decline in the worldwide population, especially those with chronic diseases, reduced physical activity, and elder age. Diet and gut microbiota composition are probable causes for this susceptibility, and its supplementation can play a role in reestablishing microbial homeostasis and improving immunity response against Coronavirus Disease 2019 infection and recovery. This study reviews the role of micronutrients and microbiomes in the risk of infection, the severity of disease, and the Coronavirus Disease 2019 sequelae.

1. Introduction

The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) [1]. The disease is mainly characterized by inflammation and necrosis of lung tissue, although the virus has proved a surprisingly high pleiotropism. The target cells so far reported include pneumocytes, lung parenchyma epithelial cells, airways, and cells from the blood vessels, small intestine, central nervous system, kidney, and liver, where angiotensin II converting enzyme ACE2 gene codes for ACE2 cell receptor (SARS-CoV-2 binding receptor) in a wide variety of human tissues. Therefore, individuals may experience different symptoms due to SARS-CoV-2 infection. In addition, there is a high chance of sequels after recovery that manifest in the respiratory system and other organs that may have been infected [2]. Some groups are particularly vulnerable during the pandemic, especially those older than 60, individuals with reduced physical activity, and those with chronic degenerative diseases such as type II diabetes (T2D), cardiovascular disease (CVD), overweight, and obesity [3]. Most people with these conditions have poor nutrition and deteriorated immunity [4]. Remarkably, one out of three senior adults in developed countries has nutritional deficiencies due to sensory or mental issues, systemic chronic diseases, extreme poverty, low variability in diets, poor absorption, polypharmacy, and other related factors [4,5]. Several international institutions state that “no foods or dietary supplements can prevent or cure COVID-19 infection”; however, the nutritional state plays a vital role in the health of individuals, especially regarding their ability to overcome infections since the timely onset of an immune response is dependent on the nutrition [6]. In addition, the probability of developing into a severe stage of COVID-19 increases significantly in adults with malnutrition, according to a scientific report that included 102,099 hospitalized patients in the United States of America (USA) [7]. It is worth mentioning that malnutrition is a condition generally accepted as an insufficient amount of calories, but other vital nutrients, such as vitamins and minerals, are just as crucial for good health. Even individuals with overweight or with obesity are at risk of malnutrition derived from a lack of micronutrients [8]. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) highlighted the importance of micronutrients for the proper functioning of the immune system, which remarks on the role of Vitamins D, A, B6, B9, B12, and C, as well as the minerals such as iron (Fe), copper (Cu), selenium (Se), and zinc (Zn) [9].
The interest of healthcare professionals is to promote the ingestion of varied foods rich in nutrients to prevent micronutrient deficiency. Furthermore, a changing diet is a key “modifiable” factor capable of inducing changes in gut microbiota (GM). This microbiota is composed of a diverse group of viruses, fungi, parasites, and bacteria; of these microorganisms, bacteria are of great interest because 99.1% of the genes in the catalog of the GM are of bacterial origin [10], according to the proportion and quantity of microorganisms, a different type and load of metabolic products will be obtained. Therefore, an adequate food intake can modulate GM composition and its metabolites in COVID-19 infection and reestablish immunity response to infections [11]. Current nutritional research perspectives include studying the molecular mechanisms involved in nutrients’ impact on the immune system and the levels of interaction between the microbiome and the human organism, such as genomic, epigenetic, cellular, tissular, organic, and systemic.
In this work, we will review the role of micronutrients, microbiota, and their metabolites in the process of infection and recovery from COVID-19.

2. Role of Micronutrients in Individual Health and Disease

Micronutrients are elements classified as vitamins and minerals. Optimal concentrations can function as co-factors and coenzymes and participate in metabolic activity in biochemical processes. Its concentrations depend on the metabolic activity and the life cycle stage, as well as specific dietary habits and infectious processes [12]. An inappropriate pool of micronutrients in the individual may lead to a deficiency, increasing the risk of certain diseases and may lead to other micronutrient deficiencies. This nutritional lack may go unnoticed, and the signs and symptoms usually appear only in the advanced stages of the disease, such as anemia, pellagra, beriberi, and others [13]. Figure 1 spotlights the actions of micronutrients carried out in the human body when they are balanced and in adequate quantities.
Vitamins are micronutrients with particular physical-chemical features; classified as fat-soluble and water-soluble, which include vitamins A, C, D, and K, and vitamins of the B complex: thiamin (B1), riboflavin (B2), niacin (B3), pantothenic acid (B5), pyridoxine (B6), biotin (B7), folic acid (B9), and cobalamin (B12). These vitamins have diverse functions depending on the cell target [14,15]. On the other hand, minerals are inorganic elements in the soil or water, essential for organisms but highly toxic in excess. These elements are critical for the body’s construction and functioning of biomolecules. Even though they do not provide energy, they are necessary to maintain biochemical processes in the body. Based on human requirements, there are two types: macrominerals (calcium (Ca), sodium (Na), magnesium (Mg), potassium (K), and phosphorus (P)) and microminerals (trace elements such as Fe, chlorine (Cl), cobalt (Co), Cu, Zn, iodine (I), and (Se) (Table 1) [14,16,17,18,19].

2.1. Water-Soluble Vitamins

Vitamin B is a cofactor in diverse cellular reactions and mediates amino acid synthesis. Within this group are vitamins B2, B3, B6, and B12, essential in the immune system against infection response; moreover, vitamin B2 is involved in the metabolic processes of cellular energy production [18].
Vitamin C or ascorbic acid relies on its potent antioxidant capacity, which regulates stress and oxidative damage in the body by controlling reactive oxygen species (ROS) acting as an electron donor [20]. At the immune system level, vitamin C and Zn are responsible for regulating cell division and adequate proliferative response [21].

2.2. Fat-Soluble Vitamins

Vitamin A, or retinoic acid, acts as a hormone at the systemic level and regulates Type-I interferons (IFN) synthesis in the immune system through nuclear retinoic acid receptors (RAR and RXR) signaling. Also, it is responsible for permanent immune system responses to viral infections through the Retinoic-acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I) signaling pathway. Additionally regulates Nuclear factor κB (NF-kB) activation [22,23]. Vitamin D improves innate immunity through cathelicidins and defensins synthesis by neutrophils and macrophages. These actions control viral replication and downregulate Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha and IFN gamma expression [24,25]. Low levels of vitamin D (<20 ng/mL) are related to the development and progression of chronic diseases such as CVD, T2D, cancer, and depression, and also to poor bone health [26,27]. Vitamin E can affect immune system cells because of its antioxidant activity, protein kinase C (PKC) inhibition, and signal transduction through enzymatic modulation. In macrophages, vitamin E modifies cyclooxygenase activity, which controls peroxynitrite synthesis. This results in lower prostaglandin E2 production and upregulated T lymphocyte response that is T cell-mediated. Additionally, it improves Natural Killer (NK) cell activity through nitric oxide regulation [28]. Vitamin K is critical for synthesizing some clotting factors and blood homeostasis for chronic, low-inflammatory diseases such as CVD, osteoarthritis, dementia, and cognitive impairment, among others. It can naturally be found as phylloquinone (vitamin K1) and menaquinones (vitamin K2), which differ in source, absorption rate, tissue distribution, bioavailability, and target activity [29,30].

2.3. Macrominerals

Calcium is an essential element in bone mineralization and recently was related to influencing the wound healing process. Together with Vitamin D and adequate water intake (limited mineral water consumption), it allows excellent bioavailability, developing its optimal functions [31,32,33]. Sodium is a critical mineral in maintaining appropriate blood volume and pressure. It regulates the expression of the β-myosin heavy chain, α/β-myosin heavy chain, and myocyte enhancer factor 2/nuclear factor of activated T cell transcriptional activity [34]. Magnesium acts as a cofactor in the enzymatic reactions in the liver and kidneys; it blocks painful stimuli by sensory neurons, an antagonist action at the N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor. It is also a mediator of the physiological stress response, and its balance in the body help in the prevention of oxidative stress and chronic conditions associated with aging; together with vitamin D, it regulates calcium and phosphate homeostasis to influence the growth and maintenance of bones. Therefore, alleviates fibromyalgia, dysmenorrhea, headaches, and acute migraine attacks. In a vicious cycle, it limits its intestinal absorption and allows renal wasting when it is deficient. It can also induce skeletal deformities, CVD, and metabolic syndrome, including high blood pressure (HBP) and stroke, cardiometabolic syndrome and T2D, airway constrictive syndromes and asthma, and age-related symptoms such as asthenia, sleep disorders, hyperemotionality, and cognitive disorders [35,36,37,38]. Potassium, the principal cation inside cells, maintains cellular osmolarity and acid–base equilibrium, nerve stimulation transmission, and regulates cardiac and muscle functions. It is key to blood pressure homeostasis, being a regulator agent of ACE2 inhibitors and angiotensin I, promoting sodium excretion. It is also beneficial for conditions such as heart failure and chronic kidney disease, independent of their effect on blood pressure [39,40,41]. Phosphorus plays an important role, principally when it is in homeostasis with calcium and vitamin D, in maintaining bone health by directly becoming part of the bone mineral matrix affecting osteoblast and osteoclast proliferation. Lack of this homeostasis also increases the risk of infection, T2D, CVD, obesity, asthma, inflammatory bowel disease, colon, breast, prostate, and ovarian cancer, and some neurological diseases [42,43].

2.4. Microminerals

Zinc is the second most abundant mineral in the human body. It acts as a retinol cofactor in the immune system. Its availability in the organism significantly regulates the survival, differentiation, and proliferation of innate and adaptive immune systems; therefore, its deficiency seriously compromises the immune response of patients [44]. Zn can be free or linked to human and viral metalloenzymes. Supplementing this oligo element (and its ionophores) can help destabilize viral metalloenzymes. ACE2 is a metallopeptidase and the virus’s principal entrance pathway to the human host [45]. Fe is essential, but when in excess, potentially toxic micronutrient for all living cells. It is tightly controlled at cellular and systemic levels to prevent both deficiency and overload. Fe regulates post-transcriptionally the genes encoding proteins that modulate Fe uptake, recycling, and storage. The liver peptide hepcidin controls serum Fe through the degradation of ferroportin in enterocytes and macrophages. Also, the immune system requires Fe to sustain its function, metabolism, and proliferation, both invading pathogens and mammalian [46,47].
Micronutrients participate from initial interaction with pathogen–host to activation of the immune system [48], which requires interaction among micronutrients (vitamins A, C, D, E, B6, B12, B9) and trace minerals (such as Fe, Zn, Cu, Se, and Mg), acting as regulators of innate immune cell. They also produce pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines, response to inflammation, oxidative burst function, reductive hemodynamic, T-cell differentiation, proliferation, interaction with viral antigens, and antibody production (Table 2) [16].

2.5. Water and Electrolyte Homeostasis

Water and electrolyte homeostasis mainly focuses on fluid body regulation, secretion, or absorption of minerals, which regulates water uptake and excretion by tissues and organs, where the kidney is the organ responsible for electrolyte and fluid status [49].
When fluid and electrolytes are in an electroneutrality state, they have an essential role in mechanisms that protect cell pH and produce normal gastrointestinal and renal secretions. Moreover, impacts physical performance and health in exercise, epithelial transport, history of physiology, hypoxia, and muscle performance, among others. Also have an essential role in the cardiovascular, central nervous, endocrinology, respiratory and gastrointestinal systems [50].
Sodium is the primary electrolyte in the extracellular compartment, with a serum range of 134–145 mmol/L. The Na+-K+ ATPase pump processes this mineral [51], allowing it to regulate blood volume, blood pressure, acid–base balance, and osmosis processes, and it is also a regulator of nerve and muscle function [52]. Potassium is a cation located at 98% in the intracellular fluid, and only 2% remains outside it [53]. With a serum range of 3.6–5.5 mmol/L, it is involved in several physiological mechanisms, such as insulin secretion by binding to specific cell receptors, causing glucose insertion to transporter type 4 (GLUT4), which facilitates glucose absorption in insulin-dependant tissues [54]. Calcium is present in the extracellular fluid with a range of 8.8–10.7 mmol/L, usually remaining 99% at the skeleton [55], while magnesium mainly settles the intracellular compartment with a range of 1.46–2.68 mg/dl and is mainly concentrated in the mitochondria. Together and in balance, these electrolytes are essential in regulating QT and JT intervals [56].
On the other hand, acid–base disturbances typically result in diseases such as HBP, cardiomyopathy, heart failure, arrhythmias, and even imbalances in the coagulation cascade [53,57]. Sodium is also the most prevalent electrolyte disturbance in hospitalized patients [52]. A high intake of sodium through the diet increases extracellular volume and cardiac output, leading to increased blood pressure and the risk of left ventricular hypertrophy, endothelial dysfunction, vascular remodeling, and kidney disease [58]. Furthermore, low calcium and high magnesium prolong QT and JT intervals, causing ventricular repolarization, which is associated with an increased risk of CVD and mortality [56].

3. Role of Micronutrients in COVID-19 Infection and Post-COVID-19 Syndrome Recovery

COVID-19 is an infectious disease caused by SARS-CoV-2 virus, characterized by a wide range of severity of respiratory symptoms, and in most severe cases, it can progress to pneumonia and systemic organ failure leading to death. According to the World Health Organization, around the world, 617,597,680 confirmed cases of COVID-19 have been reported, and of them, 6,532,705 resulted in death [59]. At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, clinical features were dry cough, fever, fatigue, sore throat, headache, muscle pain, sore eyes, anosmia, ageusia, diarrhea, and difficulty breathing. Signs and symptoms remained for about 5–14 days even though some symptoms (cough, fatigue, dyspnea, myalgia, joint pain, and confusion) remained for weeks, up to three months after active SARS-CoV-2 infection [59,60,61,62]. Recent studies investigating the long-term effects of COVID-19 have found that a significant portion of patients continue to experience symptoms even after their acute infection has resolved. These post-COVID-19 effects can include fatigue, shortness of breath, and difficulties with cognition and concentration. While the severity of these symptoms varies from person to person, they can significantly impact the quality of life [63]. Sudre and collaborators with the COVID Symptom Study app found that those patients who presented more than five symptoms during the first weeks of the disease were associated with long COVID or post-COVID sequelae, in which symptoms are present for more than four weeks [64].
People with chronic diseases such as T2D, HBP, CVD, and older adults stage are susceptible to developing severe COVID-19, which is also related to a slow recovery [65]. During acute infection by COVID-19, a cytokine storm occurs as a response of the immune system to combat SARS-CoV-2 infection, which initiates an inflammatory state, that translates into high-demand energy or a hypermetabolic state [66]. Additional symptoms, such as gastrointestinal damage, anxiety, loss of appetite, and reduced physical condition, impact the patient’s nutritional status [67]. Therefore, physical activity, quality diet, and immune status factors influence COVID-19 and its sequelae recovery, which delays in patients whose nutrition has not been adequate [21].
Micronutrient deficiency suppresses the immune system by altering the T cells and the immune response mediated by antibodies. Vitamins in respiratory disease reduce cellular load and expression of viral antigens, diminish the expression of interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF3) and mitochondrial antiviral signaling (MAVS) genes, and increase the expression of NF-κB. On the other hand, Sufficient intake of vitamins regulates both immune responses and, in specific cases, protects against the risk of infections by blocking the activity of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α. Moreover, Interleukin 6 (IL-6) and IFNγ can reduce the incidence, severity, and risk of death from infections such as COVID-19 [19]. The immune system’s timely response to this infection determines the severity of the disease; therefore, micronutrients as immunoregulators are related to the response to COVID-19 infection [17]. Trace elements, such as Zn, Fe, and Se, are essential as protein cofactors that carry out activities such as immunoregulatory agents, cytoprotection, and growth factors. They also have anti-inflammatory, antiapoptotic, antiviral, and antibacterial activity [18,19]. Recent studies evaluate the nutritional status and the effect of dietary supplements on people during post-COVID-19 recovery. Micronutrient supplements that positively affect respiratory diseases, sepsis, and even COVID-19 are vitamins D, C, and B, and some minerals such as Zn [27]. Therefore, an approach to nutritional status and a specific diet to combat post-COVID-19 micronutrient deficiencies, such as vitamin D and Se, becomes necessary in these patients’ management [68].

3.1. Water-Soluble Vitamins

Serum concentrations of vitamin C can rapidly decrease depending on the body’s demand (e.g., infections). Its supplementation in patients decreases susceptibility to respiratory tract infections produced by COVID-19, and high intravenous doses (>24 g/dL daily) reduce the severity. Since ascorbic acid can inhibit the ACE2 expression in small alveolar epithelial cells, it is a form of regulating the entry of the SARS-CoV-2 into its target cells [20,69,70]. In patients with COVID-19, symptoms such as fatigue, pain, cognitive disorders, and depressive symptoms are linked to vitamin C deficiency. The same symptoms correlate with the most commonly present post-COVID syndrome. Its intravenous supplementation improves, reduces, and alleviates COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 symptoms [71,72]; however, more studies are needed to define the specific benefits and doses.
In silico analysis carried out by Wu et al. [73] predicted that B2 acts as an inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2 replication through the inhibition of PLpro (Papain-Like proteinase). This protein is essential for the N-terminal cleavage of the viral replicase polyprotein; a critical step for the subsequent release of factors (Nsp1, Nsp2, and Nsp3) required in viral replication. Vitamin B12, or methylcobalamin, has an affinity for the Nsp12 active site of SARS-CoV-2, which could cause inhibition of Nsp12 polymerase activity. In a study by Tan et al. [74] combined administration of vitamin B12, vitamin D, and magnesium in older COVID-19 patients, reduced the clinical deterioration prevalence, oxygen support need, and intensive care occupancy. The beneficial effects of vitamin B on post-COVID-19 syndrome also has been evaluated. Naureen et al. [61] selected a group of 20 people with post-COVID-19 syndrome (chronic fatigue as the primary symptom). Patients were supplemented daily with hydroxytyrosol, acetyl L-carnitine, and vitamins B, C, and D for 15 days; at the end of supplementation, they had almost doubled increase its energy levels and reduce fatigue and tiredness.

3.2. Fat-Soluble Vitamins

Like vitamin C, retinoic acid pool storage is rapidly consumed in response to viral load, resulting in an increase in fever [22,23]. Despite reports about the excellent regulation vitamin A has on the immune system and viral replication, there are no studies of its effect in COVID-19 or post-COVID syndrome patients.
Vitamin D deficiency allows for the survival and replication SARS-CoV-2 virus in the host. In addition, severe COVID-19 symptoms correlated with the most significant vitamin D deficiencies compared to mild COVID-19 [75,76]. This vitamin’s recommended daily intake doses are superior to 400 IU in patients with its depletion, particularly those hospitalized or with low sun exposure [77]. Recent works describe vitamin D deficiency affects cytokine synthesis, such as IL-6, IL-8, IL-12, TNF alpha, and IFN-gamma, altering cytokine storm in severe COVID-19 patients [78]. Although a few studies have studied vitamin D supplementation in COVID-19 patients, the authors report a mean serum concentration of 25-hydroxyvitamin D of 23–35 ng/mL. Biomarkers associated with the post-COVID-19 syndrome, such as D-dimer, IL-6, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and neutrophil count, did not show variations [25]. Only Gönen et al. [79] studied 95 hospitalized COVID-19 patients in Turkey, supplemented them with 25-hydroxyvitamin D, and showed a decrease in fibrinogen concentrations and vitamin D supplementation reduced hospital stays even in the presence of comorbidities.
Vitamin E effectively controls reactive species during active SARS-CoV-2 infection, which could be an essential regulator in this condition. Nevertheless, in ferroptosis process can be helpful, a common condition in COVID-19 patients. This Fe-dependent programmed cell death plays a vital role in multiple systemic diseases and damages the nervous system, lung, kidney, heart, liver, and gut, associated with the intracellular Fe and glutathione levels as if glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4) function capacity. COVID-19 patients suffer from GPX4 depletion, confirming ferroptosis; the principal mechanism behind the anti-ferroptosis effect of vitamin E is that it can detoxify oxidized lipids compensating for the lack of detoxification derived from GPX4 deficiency. It is worth mentioning that alpha-tocopherol hydroquinone is a more potent antioxidant than alpha-tocopherol [80]. Despite this, no studies have defined its role in the post-COVID-19 syndrome.

3.3. Minerals

About microminerals, till now, only one study has been published talking about their effect on COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 syndrome patients. The study, reported by Finci et al. [81] in 2020, showed that high doses of Zn salts (<200 mg daily) in COVID-19 patients improved oxygenation and decreased fever 24 h after treatment. Despite the small number of cases evaluated, this work establishes the possible beneficial effects of Zn in the viral control of SARS-CoV-2 and complications in COVID-19.
Additionally, for micronutrient management in post-COVID-19 patients, it is vital to maintain adequate hydration during the recovery phase, with a daily fluid intake of 2.5–3 L [77].

3.4. Water and Electrolyte Imbalance

The most severe patients affected by COVID-19 often present dehydration [53], diarrhea, and vomiting [82], which are potential factors for fluid distribution and electrolyte imbalance. Moreover, the main cardiovascular symptoms experienced by COVID-19 patients are heart palpitations and chest pain [83]. Some cardiovascular risk factors are also prevalent in hospitalized COVID-19 individuals, such as HBP at 56.6%, T2D at 33.8%, and acute myocardial injury at 12% [84,85,86].
Due to the high prevalence of CVD with COVID-19, researchers found that both conditions are strongly related [53]. The relationship might be due to SARS-CoV-2’s main entrance to the human host being through the ACE2 receptor, which participates in the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS). Moreover, RAAS is one of the principal causes of heart failure [87]. Therefore it is reasonable to admit that COVID-19 exacerbates and triggers early-onset CVD; likewise, patients with previous CVD may develop a more severe form of COVID-19; both scenarios significantly impact their post-COVID-19 syndrome recovery [53].
Lack of fluid electroneutrality, such as hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, hyponatremia, and hypocalcemia, are pathophysiological alterations shared among CVD and COVID-19 [88]. Low sodium levels relate to an increased risk of mechanical ventilation in COVID-19 patients [89] and cause an inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion syndrome (SIADH), which is common in atypical viral pneumonia, such as SARS-CoV-2 infection [90]. Magnesium deficiency increases the incidence of CVD [91] and, in patients hospitalized with COVID-19, appears to be significantly correlated to patients’ unfavorable prognosis, especially those with a severe form of infection [92]. Alamdari et al. [93] demonstrated that hospital-admitted patients with this mineral deficiency have a higher mortality risk due to COVID-19. On the other hand, lower levels of serum K in confirmed cases of COVID-19, compared with non-infected patients [94,95], have more extended hospitalization and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) permanence, which represents an independent predictor of invasive mechanical ventilation [96]. In a retrospective study, only 51% of patients survived hospital discharge; almost 18% of all individuals developed a new-onset arrhythmia, and of them, 43% were mechanically ventilated [97]. A plausible mechanism linking COVID-19 to hypokalemia could be related to ACE2 receptor degradation after the virus has entered host cells [98]. Likewise, serum calcium imbalance as electrolyte role is still unknown; a possible explanation of its role is that high viral load may cause its depletion because calcium ions are involved in viral life processes, such as regulating virus cell entry, gene expression, and virion formation [99].

4. Role of the Gut Microbiome and Its Metabolites in Health and Disease

4.1. Human and Gut Microbiome

The human microbiome is a collection of microbial genomes (consisting of bacteria, bacteriophages, fungi, protozoa, and viruses) living in and around the human body. The Human Microbiome Project (HMP) made it possible to characterize microbial communities across the human body, harboring these microbial cells’ trillions [100]. The human body and microbial undergo a symbiont dynamic to cut conflicts and maximize benefits to the microbiota and the human host, playing essential roles in human health [101].
The gastrointestinal microbiome is the most studied due to its relationship with health and abundance in the human body. This complex and dynamic ecosystem includes different microbial communities and is one of Earth’s most populated microbial communities [102].
The colon is the most densely populated microbial in the gastrointestinal tract; meanwhile, only a few species of bacteria are present in the stomach and small digestive tract. There are more than 1500 species comprising 50 phyla [103]. Despite a high degree of interindividual variability in species that varies in abundance and diversity across the digestive tract, the GM has a microbial core microbiome dominated by taxa derived from Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes, followed by Proteobacteria, Fusobacteria, Tenericutes, Actinobacteria, and Verrucomicrobia, comprising 90% of the total microbial population in humans [103,104].
The microbiome can be resident and transient; resident microbiota consists of persistent and long-staying microbes, while the transient microbiota consists of temporal and variable harboring time microbes; several factors influence both microbiotas composition, such as environment, diet, age, antibiotic use, and host genetics [105].
The bacterial species in the gastrointestinal tract have a particular function for human health. They influence digestion, metabolism, the immune system, intestinal epithelium’s barrier functions, and antibacterial chemical synthesis. In nutrition, the microbiome influences food energy balance and partitioning, fiber digestion, vitamin and mineral synthesis, and bile acid metabolism [106].
The GM develops alongside the immune system and matures during the first few years of life. This bacterial influence is essential for innate immunity (a nonspecific form of immunity) and adaptive immunity (a specific response to an invading pathogen) [107].
Some tissues related to microbiota modulation are the spleen, thymus, and lymph nodes. Also, macrophage phagocytosis changes its activity depending on microbiota modulation [82]. Additionally, specific bacteria have a modulatory effect on T cell development as Th1 and Th2 cells, mediated by Type 2 receptor/Type 1 receptor (TLR2/TLR1) heterodimer on lamina propria dendritic cells [108].

4.2. Gut Microbiota-Derived Metabolites and Their Function in the Human Host

The GM primarily interacts with the host through gut-derived metabolites, which are small molecules that result from microbial metabolism of dietary substrates and the modification of host molecules such as bile acids (BA) or bacteria, which play an essential role in influencing immune maturation, homeostasis, host energy metabolism, and maintenance of mucosal integrity of the human body [109,110]. Those metabolites have a back-and-forth relationship in maintaining energy and metabolism homeostasis. On one side, gut bacteria profit from the nutrients absorbed by the host; meanwhile, the host relies on gut bacteria metabolites as a substrate for ATP production in the colon [111]. Finally, bacterial metabolites drain from the gut and into the circulation, interfering with the host’s cellular mechanism. Specifically, signals from microbial metabolites influence immune maturation, homeostasis, host energy metabolism, and maintenance of mucosal integrity [112]. Gut-derived metabolites can be broadly classified into three categories: those produced by gut bacteria from dietary sources, those produced by the host and modified by GM, and those generated de novo by gut bacteria (such as polysaccharide A) [113]. At present, it is relevant to understand how metabolites derived from GM are essential regulators of processing and absorbing several nutrients and metabolites such asBA, lipids, amino acids, vitamins, and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) [112]. Table 3 mentions how GM-derived metabolites affect host function, which bacterial species are related to, and the association with diseases.
SCFAs, including formate, acetate, propionate, butyrate, isobutyrate, valerate, and isovalerate 2-methyl butyrate, hexanoate, and heptanoate, are formed via dietary fermentation in the mammalian gut. Gram-positive anaerobic bacteria, such as Faecalibacterium, Eubacterium, and Roseburia species, degrade amino acids valine, leucine, and isoleucine, generating branched-chain fatty acids and producing butyrate. Propionate may be produced from carbohydrate fermentation either by succinate or acrylate pathway by Bacteroides, Prevotella, Alistipes, Ruminococcus, Phascolarctobacterium, Dialister, Akkermansia species. Meanwhile, a wide range of gut microbes, for example, Bacteroides, Bifidobacterium, Clostridium, and Ruminococcus species, produce acetate by pyruvate after the release of CO2 [114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128]. Primary BA are amphipathic molecules from cholesterol stored in the liver. Once there is food intake, BA can be released into the small intestine facilitating the dissolution and absorption of dietary fats, lipids, and lipophilic vitamins. Additionally, BA plays an essential role in the innate immune system by regulating energy regulation and inflammation [129]. Bidirectional interactions between BA synthesis and GM are close and complementary. BA controls gut bacteria overgrowth and protects against inflammation. Meanwhile, the GM helps in the biotransformation of BA through deconjugation, dehydroxylation, and reconjugation processes [130,131,132,133,134,135]. Lipids are organic biomolecules produced and maintained in homeostasis by mammal organisms, dietary fat intake, and bacterial origins in GM [136]. There are eight categories of lipids: fatty acyls, glycerolipids, glycerophospholipids, sphingolipids, sterol lipids, prenol lipids, saccharolipids, and polyketides [136]. Imbalance lipids affect the GM as substrates for bacterial metabolic processes by inhibiting bacterial growth by toxic influence, increasing serum endotoxin load, and exacerbating a severe nonspecific inflammatory response, leading to fat accumulation and redistribution of nutrients in the host defense during the acute phase [137,138,139]. Amino acids are the essential elements of proteins and peptides that regulate signaling pathways and metabolism. GM produces amino acids, including de novo biosynthesis, accessible to the host to balance some amino acid deficiencies in low-quality protein intake [140,141]. Additionally, GM ferment protein and amino acids; the Clostridium genus is a fundamental bacteria for lysine or proline utilization, whereas bacteria of the Peptostreptococcus genus are the critical driver of glutamate or tryptophan use. Other important bacteria of the genera are Fusobacterium, Bacteroides, and Veillonella, and the species Megasphaera elsdenii and Selenomonas ruminantium [142,143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150,151,152,153,154]. GM is also capable of producing essential vitamins for human health, including vitamins B2 and B7. Phylas such as Bacteroidetes, Fusobacteria, and Proteobacteria had the potential to produce both vitamins. In the case of vitamin B12, all the Fusobacteria examined were found to be producers [143,155,156,157]. Also can modulate neurotransmitters, resulting in behavioral, neurodegenerative, cerebrovascular, and neuroimmune changes. There have been described pathways as “gut–brain-axis” that produce or consume a wide range of mammalian neurotransmitters, including dopamine, norepinephrine, serotonin, or gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) [11,140,158,159,160,161,162,163,164,165,166]. Gases are other GM metabolites, such as CO2, H2, and H2S. Although they are not as abundant as other metabolites, they play an important role in human mammal organisms’ functions [11,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,178]. Figure 2 focuses on the bioavailability of vitamins, minerals, and microbiota metabolites. The compositional changes highlight three states: individuals without COVID-19, individuals with asymptomatic COVID-19, and patients with severe COVID-19 form.
Table 3. Gut microbiota-derived metabolites and their effect on human health and disease.
Table 3. Gut microbiota-derived metabolites and their effect on human health and disease.
GroupMetaboliteSpeciesTargetFunction or EffectRelated DiseaseReferences
Bile acidsCholate, hyocholate, deoxycholate, taurohyocholate, ursodeoxycholate, taurocholate, tauro-α-muricholate, glycocholate, hyodeoxycholate, tauro-β-muricholate, lithocholate, taurodeoxylcholateBifidobacterium, Clostridium, and Escherichia colifarnesoid X receptor (FXR), vitamin D receptor (VDR), steroid and xenobiotic receptor (SXR), constitutive androstane receptor, The Bile Acid Membrane Receptor (TGR5), sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor 2, formyl-peptide receptor, muscarinic acetylcholine receptorGI mobility and gut permeability, facilitate lipid and vitamin absorption, regulation of GM composition, gut hormones, intestinal immunity, intestinal electrolyte and fluid balance, gut motility, lipid homeostasis, glucose homeostasis, amino acid homeostasis, circadian clocks; influence neurotransmission and physiologyPrimary biliary cholangitis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, obesity, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, atherosclerosis, ulcerative colitis, cancer, hepatic encephalopathy, multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, traumatic brain injury, stroke, and amyotrophic lateral, Inflammatory Bowel Disease[130,131,132,133,135,179,180]
GasesH2S, H2, CO2, CHA, NODesulfovibrio piger, Desulfovibrio desulfuricans, Escherichia coli, Enterobacter aerogenes, Enterobacter cloacae, Citrobacter freundii, Proteus vulgaris, Edwardsiella tarda, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus shirota, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Bifidobacterium bifidus, Bifidobacterium breve, Bifidobacterium infantis, Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus anthracis, Deinococcus radioduransGuanylate cyclaseSlows gut motility, regulates gut inflammation, promotes epitelial secretion
and susceptibility to infections, mediation of gastric mucosal, protection and regulate mucosal blood flow
Parkinson’s disease, colitis,
ulcer
[11,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,178]
LipidsLipopolysaccharides (LPS), Conjugated fatty acids, Cholesterol, Phosphatidylcholines, Triglycerides, LPS targets directly Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)Triggering systemic inflammation, regulation of hyperinsulinemia, immune system, lipoprotein profiles, material bases for bile acid synthesis.T2D, obesity, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, hyperinsulinemia, hypercholesterolemia, chronic hepatitis C.[179]
Neurotransmitters and choline metabolitesGABA, Dopamine, Serotonin and Catecholamines, Methylamine, Dimethylglycine, DimethylamineEscherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Shigella sonnei and Staphylococcus aureus, Lactobacillus brevis and Bifidobacterium dentium
Anaerococcus hydrogenalis, Clostridium asparagiforme, Clostridium hathewayi, Clostridium sporogenes, Desulfitobacterium hafniense, Escherichia fergusonii, Proteus penneri, Providencia rettgeri, Providencia alcalifaciens, Providencia rustigianii, Edwardsiella tarda, Yokenella regensburgei, Citrobacter freundii, Escherichia coli, Proteus vulgaris
Adrenergic receptors, Serotonine (5-HT) receptors, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptors
Activate NF-KB, protein kinase C, NLR family pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3), and inflammasome
Visceral pain, inflammation, and visceral hypersensitivity
Inflammation, visceral pain, GI mobility, and psychological factors
Changes in Enteric nervous system ENS and gut–brain axis, visceral pain, and visceral hypersensitivity
“Regulate gut motility, memory
and stress responses, immune
function of nervous system”
Inhibits bile acid synthesis, promote inflammation,
thrombosis, affects myocardial hypertrophy and fibrosis, exacerbates mitochondrial dysfunction
Parkinson’s disease, autism
Nonalcoholic fatty liver
disease, obesity,
aterosclerosis, T2D,
heart failure, HBP, Aterosclerosis, Fatty Liver
[100,101,102,103,104]
OthersEthanol, Methane, Triphosadenine, Lantibiotic, Microcin, Organic acids, Polyamines, HypoxanthineMethaninobrevibacter mithii, Methanosphaera stadtmanae, Lachnospiracea strainsTriphosadenine activate Purigenic (P2X and P2Y) receptorsEnhance or damage gut barrier, regulate intestinal or systemic immune response, act as antibiotics to modulate GM composition, supply the nutrients, be toxic to host cells, exacerbating obesity manifestationsFatty liver disease, C. difficile and H. pylori infections, irritable bowel syndrome, ulcerative colitis, obesity[179,180,181]
Short-chain fatty acidsAcetate, propionate, butyrate, hexanoate, isovalerate, isobutyrate, 2-methylpropionate, valerateAkkermansia muciniphila, Alistipes putredinis, Anaerostipes hadrus, Bacteroides fragilis, Bacteroides ovatus, Bacteroides uniformis, Bacteroides vulgates, Bifidobacterium adolescentis, Bifidobacterium longum, Blautia obeum, Clostridium bifermentans, Clostridium perfringens, Coprococcus catus, Coprococcus comes, Dialister invisus, Eubacterium hallii, Eubacterium rectale, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Megasphaera elsdenii, Phascolarctobacterium succinatutens, Prevotella copri, Roseburia hominis, Roseburia intestinalis, Roseburia inulinivorans, Ruminococcus bromii, Ruminococcus gnavus, Ruminococcus lavefaciensG protein-coupled receptors (GPR41, GPR43, GPR109A, GPR81, GPR91) and Histone deacetylases (HDAC1 and HDAC3)Visceral hypersensitivity and inflammation, regulation of GM composition, gut barrier integrity, appetite, energy homeostasis, gut hormone production, circadian clocks, inhibit proinflammatory cytokines, stimulate water and sodium absorption, modulate systemic immune responseObesity, T2D, pancreatitis, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, HBP, atherosclerosis, chronic kidney disease, ulcerative colitis, radiation proctitis, Crohn’s disease, colorectal cancer, autism spectrum disorder, sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease, asthma, diarrhea, hepatocellular carcinoma insulin Resistance [114,128,179,180]
Tryptophan and
indole derivatives
Indole, Imidazole propionate, Indole propionic acid, Indole acetamide, Metyl-indole, Indole acetic acid, Indole lactic acid, Indole pyruvic acid, indoxyl sulfuric acid, Indole aldehyde, Indole-acrylic
acid, Indole carboxaldehyde and Tryptamine
Bacteroides ovatus, Bacteroides Adolescentis, Bacteroides fragilis, Bacteroides pseudolongum, Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron, Bacteroides eggerthii, Bifidobacterium adolescentis, Bifidobacterium pseudolongum, Burkholderia pvrrocinia, Burkholderia Thetaiotaomicron, Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens, Clostridium botulinum, Clostridium caloritolerans, Clostridium paraputrificum, Clostridium sporogenes, Clostridium bartlettii, Clostridium bifermentans, Clostridium cadaveris, Clostridium difficile, Clostridium lentoputrescens, Clostridium limosum, Clostridium lituseburense, Clostridium melanomenatum, Clostridium paraputrificum, Clostridium saccharolyticum, Clostridium sporogenes, Clostridium tetani, Enterobacter cloacae, Escherichia Albertii, Escherichia coli, Eubacterium cylindroides, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Lactobacillus acidophillus, Lactobacillus johnsoni, Lactobacillus murinus, Lactobacillus reuteri, Parabacteroides distasonis, Peptostreptococcus anaerobiusm Peptostreptococcus asscharolyticus, Peptostreptococcus russelli, Rauschbrand bacillus, Ruminococcus gnavusaryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) and PXRInfluence on gut permeability, promotes spore formation, drug resistance, biofilm formation, and virulence; regulate intestinal barrier functions, gut
hormone secretion, gut motility, systemic immune response inducing inflammation
T2D, Ulcerative colitis, Crohn’s disease, obesity, stroke, mucosal candidiasis, autism spectrum disorder, Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, migraine, schizophrenia, irritable bowel syndrome, chronic kidney disease, hepatitis, impaired liver function[142,143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150,151,152,153]
VitaminsVitamin D, Vitamin B2. Vitamin, B3, Vitamin B5, Vitamin B6, Vitamin B9, Vitamin B12, Vitamin KSalmonella typhimurium, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Proteobacteria phylaVitamin receptorsInflammation and gut permeability
Inflammation
“Involved in cellular
metabolism: modulate immune
function and cell proliferation;
supply vitamins for hosts”
Schizophrenia, autism, dementia[143,155,156]

5. Gut Microbiota in the COVID-19 Infection and Post-COVID-19 Syndrome Recovery

After microbiota is in dysbiosis, Firmicutes reduce in quantity, while Alistipes and Proteobacteria increase. This phenomenon also occurs when external pathogen agents such as SARS-CoV-2 gain access to the organism. The proportion of the coexisting phyla remains mostly stable and unique within an individual, but it may get altered when the health state is modified. For example, the microbiome of elder populations is considerably decreased in Firmicutes and increased in Proteobacteria and Alistipes [179]. Siew & Herbert [179], determined that individuals infected by SARS-CoV-2 suffer an increase in opportunistic pathogens, including Streptococcus y Actinomyces, Rothia, and reduced Bifidobacterium bifidum and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, that also is characterized by an immunomodulator potential that contributes to the host defense with important anti-inflammatory properties, showed a negative correlation. Also, Ruminococcaceae, Bacteroidaceae, and Lachnospiraceae are associate with better health conditions due to their production of short-chain fatty acids; but are considerably reduced in patients with COVID-19 [180,181,182]; meanwhile, opportunistic pathogens such as Collinsella, Staphylococcaceae, Enterococcaceae, and Coriobacteriaceae are found in the gut microbiota of critical COVID-19 patients. This overwhelming quantity of microorganisms could be a factor that affects the clinical state of patients due to their intrinsic resistance to several antibiotics and their quick adaptability to chemotherapy [181,183]. Patients in a critical state by COVID-19 admitted into the ICU with concomitant bloodstream infection show an increase in Enterococcus and reduced microbial diversity, especially Bacteroides, Ruminococcaceae and Lachnospiraceae [181,184,185]. Similarly, when ICU-admitted patients were compared among COVID-19+ and COVID-19–, Enterococcus was overrepresented in COVID-19+ patients; but COVID-19– individuals possessed Enterobacteriaceae and Klebsiella primarily, as Enterococcus was mostly absent [181,182]. Several studies show the relationship between GM composition and COVID-19 symptoms severity. Chakraborty et al. [186,187,188,189] analyzed the composition of this microbiota in 100 hospitalized patients while trying to understand the severity of COVID-19. Findings were: reduced bifidobacterial and commensal microbiota; increased levels of C reactive protein (CRP) and inflammatory cytokines, aspartate aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, and γ-glutamyl transferase. Likewise, there is evidence of enhancement of Clostridium ramosum, Coprobacillus, and Clostridium hathewayi, microorganisms directly related to the severity of disease, while Faecalibacterium prausnitzii is inversely correlated; meanwhile, the intestinal virome correlates inversely to COVID-19 severity [190].
The gut microbiome is involved in several biosynthetic pathways, including the biosynthesis of amino acids and nucleotides de novo, carbohydrates metabolism, and glycolysis. The COVID-19-derived dysbiosis shows functional changes due to the disruption of the microorganisms’ ecosystem. Feces samples of COVID-19 patients with mild symptoms and healthy subjects have a microbiome abundantly represented by Morganella morganii, Collinsella tanakaei, Collinsella aerofaciens, and Streptococcus infantis, along with some bacteria that produce short-chain fatty acids such as Bacteroides stercoris, Lachnospiraceae, Parabacteroides merdae, and Alistipes [189,191].
A study performed on SARS-CoV-2-infected primates to analyze the 16S rRNA profile and β diversity was able to find significant changes in the metabolism and composition of GM, coupled with differences in the concentrations ofBA, a reduction in short-chain fatty acids, and alterations on the metabolism of lipids [192]. Similarly, another study analyzed the gut microbiome of SARS-CoV-2 patients and observed a deteriorated biosynthesis of short-chain fatty acids and L-isoleucine, implying that these functions are essential factors during the development of pathogenesis [193].

6. Gut Microbiota Metabolites in the COVID-19 Infection and Post-COVID-19 Syndrome Recovery

The gut microbiome metabolizes nutrients from the diets and transforms them into metabolites that interact with the host cells either directly or indirectly. Some of the most important metabolites, due to their impact on the host’s health, include tryptophan-derived metabolites, SCFAs, and BA-derived metabolites [194]. Next, we will discuss the role and participation of these metabolites in the context of COVID-19.

6.1. L-Tryptophan-Derived Microbiota Metabolites

L-tryptophan is an essential amino acid metabolized through three pathways: The Kynurenine pathway is performed by immunological and epithelial cells; the serotonin pathway occurs in enterochromaffin or enteroendocrine cells; lastly, it may get directly converted by GM [195]. Microbiota transforms L-tryptophan into tryptamine, indole-3-ethanol (IE), indole-3-propionic acid (IPA), indole-3-lactic acid (ILA), indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), 3-methylindole, indol-3-aldehyde (IAld), índole-3-acrilic acid (IA), and 3-indoxyl sulfate (I3S) [196]. Each of these molecules serves as a specific ligand for the host cells.
The relevance of tryptophan-derived metabolites relies on their ability to stimulate the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR), a transcription factor expressed in immune cells. AHR is known as an environmental sensor since it will exert a pro-inflammatory or anti-inflammatory effect according to the presence of the molecules from the diet, microorganisms, or contaminants in the microenvironment [197]. There are no studies of tryptophan-metabolizing bacteria in individuals with post-COVID-19 syndrome, but differences are reported in GM between healthy subjects and patients at different stages of COVID-19 severity. These studies show that SARS-CoV-2 infection disrupts gut microbiome equilibrium, increases the number of opportunistic pathogens, and reduces the proportion of beneficial bacteria [198,199]. Therefore, we can assume that during COVID-19, there may be an alteration in the metabolism of tryptophan. Accordingly, Tan et al. [200] described that the population of indole-producing aerobic bacteria increases during dysbiosis episodes, for example, E. coli. This is associated with higher production of the atherosclerotic metabolite 3-indoxyl sulfate, which causes damage to vascular cells and induces the expression of IL-6 upon access into the bloodstream. The bacterial species Lactobacillus, Ruminoccocus, Brautia, Bifidobacterium, and Spore-Forming Bacteria are beneficial to the host’s health. Tryptophan-decarboxylase (TrpD), tryptophanase (TnaA), tryptophan monooxygenase, and phenyllactate dehydratase (fldAIBC), enzymes are responsible for the production of tryptamine, IAld, IAA, IPA, and IA, respectively [201]. These metabolites have shown anti-inflammatory effects both in vitro and in vivo; for example, their interaction with AHR stimulates IL-22 synthesis and, as a consequence, the production of antimicrobial peptides; they also enhance the expression of IL-10 in the gut epithelial cells, diminish the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β and IL-6 from peripheral blood mononuclear cells, and reduce the inflammatory effects of hepatocytes in response to TNF-α [202]. In addition, tryptamine acts as a neurotransmitter, vasoconstrictor, vasodilator, antioxidant, and antibacterial agent [203].
Liu et al. [204] described that in COVID-19 patients, dysbiosis is related to the susceptibility to develop long-term complications. Regarding tryptophan metabolism, the microbiota from patients with sequelae possessed a marked decrease of the bacterial species Brautia (responsible for degrading tryptophan into tryptamine) and Bifidobacterium longum (responsible for degrading tryptophan into indole-3-lactic acid). A low expression of Solute Carrier Family 6 Member 19 (SLC6A19) has been observed on the surface of the small intestine cells of COVID-19 patients because of its co-internalization along the ACE2, the preferred receptor for SARS-CoV-2. Whenever SARS-CoV-2 meets its receptor, SLC6A19 is internalized as well and thus reduces the absorption of tryptophan by the small intestine epithelial cells [205,206]. The reduced SLC6A19 activity disrupts the activation of mTOR, which leads to lower secretion of antimicrobial peptides from the Paneth cells in the small intestine, thereby altering the equilibrium of the GM and thus increasing the susceptibility towards gut inflammation [207,208]. These data suggest that tryptophan increases in the lumen and bloodstream due to gut dysbiosis and the response of the infected gut cells. Gagandeep Kaur et al. [209] confirm the latter finding a higher serum concentration of tryptophan and its metabolites in COVID-19 patients compared to healthy controls by ultraperformance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS) quantification.
In addition to the epithelial cells, the immune system cells express Indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) 1 in response to pro-inflammatory cytokines [210]. Usually, the goal after activation of IDO/AHR in the gut cells is to metabolize the tryptophan to reduce its availability in the microenvironment and thus affect the survival of bacterial, parasitic, and viral pathogens, thereby controlling acute and chronic infections [211]. However, in the COVID-19 context, the greater availability of tryptophan will allow for its metabolism through the kynurenine pathway, whose metabolites will induce the expression of the pro-inflammatory IL-1β, IL-10, TNF-α, IL-6 by AHR, further increasing the local and systemic inflammation [196,212].
In the groups vulnerable to developing severe COVID-19, such as elderly populations and individuals with the comorbidities Diabetes Mellitus II and Cerebrovascular Disease, the kynurenine in this pathway is highly activated [196,212], which could lead to an increase of pro-inflammatory cytokines and constitutive AHR activation, which is related to the reduced antiviral response by INF-1 [213,214].

6.2. SCFAs

SCFAs are biologically active metabolites produced by the GM. Exogenously, they derive from fermenting dietetic fiber [215]; endogenously, to a lesser extent, they are formed by the host through lipid oxidation and metabolism of branched-chain amino acids [216]. Up to 95% of total SCFAs produced in the intestinal lumen are acetate, butyrate, and propionate [217].
Butyrate is the primary energy source for colonocytes; thus, it is an indispensable molecule for their proper functioning [218]. Around 70% of acetate is metabolized in the liver and transformed into an energy source for hepatocytes and a substrate for synthesizing cholesterol, long-chain fatty acids, glutamine, and glutamate. Between 30–50% of propionate is absorbed in the liver, where it serves as a precursor for gluconeogenesis [219,220]. Besides the energetic output, a critical activity attributed to these metabolites is their ability to modulate the immune system. This occurs mainly in specific receptors interaction such as free acid receptor (FFAR) such as FFAR2R (GPR43), FFA3R (GPR41), GPR109A, and Olfactory receptor (Olfr78), which are differentially expressed across the host cells [221]. In addition, they can regulate gene expression through the inhibition of HDAC regardless of GPR receptors [222].
Production of SCFA is proven beneficial, especially regarding immune tolerance and establishing an anti-inflammatory environment [223]. Some mechanisms involved include promoting differentiation of Treg cells stimulated by butyrate, regulation of the FOXP3+ transcription factor, or inhibiting HDAC [224,225]. In addition, they modulate the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines by intestinal dendritic cells and macrophages [226]. Moreover, the activation of B lymphocytes produces antibodies [227]. Their effects also extend to innate immunity, where they regulate the microbicide mechanisms of neutrophils, which constitute up to 60% of total circulating leukocytes. Moreover, the cell migration of neutrophils, their expression of adhesion molecules, apoptosis, ROS production, and cytokines release [228]. Furthermore, extracellular trap formation will depend on the concentration and proportion of SCFA [229].
The concentration and proportion of SCFAs in the intestinal lumen and bloodstream vary according to diet, GM, and physiological status [230]. As a consequence of COVID-19-derived dysbiosis, SCFAs have been proposed as a support treatment to prevent the cytokine storm and multiorgan failure in COVID-19, especially butyric acid due to its immunoregulatory activities [231].
COVID-19 patients with dysbiosis suffer from a decrease in SCFA-producing bacteria. A cohort performed in two hospitals in Hong Kong (n = 100) identified an important reduction of F. prausnitzii and Bifidobacterium bifidum, which was negatively correlated to the severity of the disease [188]. Similar results were observed by Lingling Tang et al. [198], who studied COVID-19 patients with pneumonia and discovered an increase in opportunistic bacteria such as Enterococcus and Eneterobacteriacea coupled with a decrease of butyrate-producing bacteria (BPB) such as F. prausnitzii compared to patients with only mild symptoms. The reduction of BPB was correlated to a higher presence of inflammatory markers such as C reactive protein and the number of neutrophils in the group of severe COVID-19.
Ruquin Lin et al. [232] reported last June an article wherein they compared the GM of 81 individuals, including asymptomatic and ambulatory cases, as well as those with adverse results and severe acute respiratory syndrome. They observed that SCFA-producing species were enriched in healthy subjects and asymptomatic COVID-19 patients compared to the other groups. These species also correlated negatively with adverse outcomes. They analyzed the profile of metabolic pathways and observed that in these individuals, the pathways of sucrose were enriched. They also observed that in all groups infected with SARS-CoV-2, the expression of carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes) decreased, suggesting an inadequate degradation of polysaccharides. In addition, in all individuals with COVID-19, except in the asymptomatic group, the abundance of SCFA-producing species decreased markedly.
Fen Zhang did observe similar results in their study population. They found depletion of SCFA-producing bacteria in COVID-19 patients as well as disruption of microbial functional pathways in the more severe states of disease. The Bifidobacterium pathways for acetic acid synthesis were especially affected by the 2.4-fold reduction. In addition, they found negative correlations between the functionality of four pathways involved in the production of SCFAs and the presence of the heath failure marker NT-proBNP, a metabolite previously associated with COVID-19 severity [193].
In order to study whether the dysbiosis would remain in patients after COVID-19, they evaluated the GM and its functions 30 days after hospital discharge. The microbiota of patients with severe disease was still affected and, even though recovery of bacterial species was similar to the reference group, nine pathways involved in the biosynthesis of SCFAs were persistently exhausted 30 days after disease resolution [193].
After identifying that SARS-CoV-2 infection disrupts the GM, in vitro experiments were conducted to study whether the colonocytes were also affected. Lívi Pascoal et al. observed that expression of RIG-I and IFN-β was significantly enhanced in colon biopsies of COVID-19 patients compared to the control group. In addition, the expression INF-III, IFNLR1, DDX58, and TMPRSS2 was reduced after incubating with SCAFs. However, no differences in SARS-CoV-2 viral load were observed after incubating the cells either with or without SCFAs [233].
The differences in the GM and the production of SCFAs have been well described in the context of COVID-19. However, further clinical and preclinical studies are required to dilucidated the specific mechanisms of the local and systemic effect of SCFAs during infection by SARS-CoV-2 and the recovery from the disease.

6.3. Microbial Metabolites Derived from Bile Acids

Lipids are macronutrients that need to get through emulsification and hydrolysis in order to get absorbed, processes that require a group of steroid molecules known as BA [234]. Primary BA are synthesized in the liver from cholesterol, cholic acid, and chenodeoxycholic acid through their conjugation with glycine or taurine. Then they are secreted onto the small intestine where they become transformed by the GM into secondary BA, mainly deoxycholic acid (DCA) and lithocholic acid (LCA) [235].
Secondary BA act as ligands for the nuclear receptors FXR, VDR, and PXR in epithelial and endothelial cells as well as hepatocytes. They also interact with TGR5, a membrane-bound receptor expressed in the gut, pancreas, lymphoid tissue, and brain. Both DCA and LCA are important molecules derived from the GM due to their ability to regulate the immune system through the above-mentioned receptors [221].
The aforementioned study by Ruquin Lin et al. [232] grouped COVID-19 patients according to the severity of disease in a wide range from asymptomatic patients and up to those in the critical stage. They reported that the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio in the GM from patients gets progressively more affected as the severity of disease increases. In addition, the GM from asymptomatic patients preserves the probiotic species Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Bifidobacterium longum, Blautia obeum, Roseburia hominis, and Ruminococcus. These bacteria are negatively correlated to the adverse outcomes derived from COVID-19. Furthermore, their microbiota, unlike the critical patients’ microbiota, was characterized by a high expression of genes involved in the metabolic pathways for the biosynthesis of secondary BA. Harry Sokol et al. [192] observed the effect of SARS-CoV-2 infection on primate microbiota and found that the quantity of total BA increased along with disease severity. Notably, the ratio of primary/secondary BA was also acutely higher.
These data suggest that the disruption of the GM by SARS-CoV-2 infection gets worse as the disease advances in severity. As the dysbiosis grade increases, the intrinsic functions of the ileum get further altered, leading to higher intestinal transit that prevents the complete reabsorption of BA, thereby increasing its concentration in the colon. Moreover, the GM in critical COVID-19 patients is functionally limited and thus, the BA gets concentrated in the feces of these patients [236].
The high concentration of BA at the intestinal lumen promotes epithelial cell dysfunction derived from failures at the membrane transporters [236], which leads to mitochondrial stress and cell death. In turn, tight junction proteins, specifically occludin, get downregulated and provoke higher cell and paracellular permeability among enterocytes, increasing the BA concentration in the bloodstream and peripheral tissues [237].
The serum BA profile shows that patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) match these observations [238], so it could be inferred that, in the critical COVID-19 context, the elevated concentration of BA may damage the intestinal barrier and reach peripheral tissues including lungs, heart, kidneys, and endothelium through the bloodstream. Their cytotoxic activity may injure the cell membranes in peripheral tissues, leading to a local and systemic inflammatory response that shows up clinically.

7. Conclusions

Accumulated data on the role of micronutrients in response to viral infections and specifically to SARS-CoV-2 demonstrate their role in immune regulation as a crucial therapeutic support tool. Asymptomatic Patients with COVID-19 have greater availability of micronutrients and microbial metabolites than those patients with severe complications.
Whether individuals obtain vitamins and minerals through diet or supplementation, a correct diet as primary care stimulates homeostasis in the micronutrient pool in the individuals as in the GM and its synergic derived metabolites. Research highlights the importance of promoting micronutrients as therapy, coupled with pharmacological treatment for the prevention, severity reduction, and boost recovery from COVID-19 and the post-COVID-19 syndrome. However, clinical studies are lacking to determine the dosage, outcome, and efficacy of use.

Author Contributions

L.I.-G. and M.A.M.-G. contributed equally to visualization, writing—review and editing, writing—original draft preparation, supervision. T.d.J.H.-F. worked in project administration, visualization, writing—review and editing and conceptualization; J.C.-B., A.S.M.-C., E.J.P.-B. and J.D.R.-C. worked equally in visualization, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The APC was funded by the Consejo Estatal de Ciencia y Tecnología de Jalisco (COECYTJAL) grant number [Project FODECIJAL 2021-9761].

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Consejo Estatal de Ciencia y Tecnología de Jalisco (COECYTJAL) and Universidad de Guadalajara (Project FODECIJAL 2021-9761).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Guan, W.J.; Ni, Z.Y.; Hu, Y.; Liang, W.H.; Ou, C.Q.; He, J.X.; Liu, L.; Shan, H.; Lei, C.L.; Hui, D.S.C.; et al. Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 1708–1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Li, W.; Zhang, C.; Sui, J.; Kuhn, J.H.; Moore, M.J.; Luo, S.; Wong, S.K.; Huang, I.C.; Xu, K.; Vasilieva, N.; et al. Receptor and viral determinants of SARS–coronavirus adaptation to human ACE2. EMBO J. 2005, 24, 1634–1643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. CDC. Understanding Risk. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019–ncov/need–extra–precautions/index.html (accessed on 20 September 2022).
  4. Di Renzo, L.; Gualtieri, P.; De Lorenzo, A. Diet, Nutrition and Chronic Degenerative Diseases. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Volkert, D.; Beck, A.M.; Cederholm, T.; Cruz–Jentoft, A.; Goisser, S.; Hooper, L.; Kiesswetter, E.; Maggio, M.; Raynaud–Simon, A.; Sieber, C.C.; et al. ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition and hydration in geriatrics. Clin. Nutr. 2019, 38, 10–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. WHO. Healthy Diet. Available online: https://www.who.int/campaigns/connecting–the–world–to–combat–coronavirus/healthyathome/healthyathome–––healthy–diet (accessed on 20 September 2022).
  7. Kurtz, A.; Grant, K.; Marano, R.; Arrieta, A.; Grant, K., Jr.; Feaster, W.; Steele, C.; Ehwerhemuepha, L. Long–term effects of malnutrition on severity of COVID–19. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 14974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. NIH. Diccionario de cáncer del NCI. Available online: https://www.cancer.gov/espanol/publicaciones/diccionarios/diccionario–cancer/def/desnutricion (accessed on 20 September 2022).
  9. EU Register of Nutrition and Health Claims Made on Foods (v.3.6). Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/food/safety/labelling_nutrition/claims/register/public/?event=register.home (accessed on 20 September 2022).
  10. Attaye, I.; Warmbrunn, M.V.; Boot, A.; van der Wolk, S.C.; Hutten, B.A.; Daams, J.G.; Herrema, H.; Nieuwdorp, M. A Systematic Review and Meta–analysis of Dietary Interventions Modulating Gut Microbiota and Cardiometabolic Diseases–Striving for New Standards in Microbiome Studies. Gastroenterology 2022, 162, 1911–1932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. McCarville, J.L.; Chen, G.Y.; Cuevas, V.D.; Troha, K.; Ayres, J.S. Microbiota Metabolites in Health and Disease. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2020, 38, 147–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Akram, M.; Munir, N.; Daniyal, M.; Egbuna, C.; Găman, M.-A.; Onyekere, P.F.; Olatunde, A. Vitamins and Minerals: Types, Sources and their Functions. In Functional Foods and Nutraceuticals; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2020; pp. 149–172. [Google Scholar]
  13. Biesalski Hans, K.; Jana, T. Micronutrients in the life cycle: Requirements and sufficient supply. NFS J. 2018, 11, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhao, A.; Xue, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Li, W.; Yu, K.; Wang, P. Nutrition Concerns of Insufficient and Excessive Intake of Dietary Minerals in Lactating Women: A Cross–Sectional Survey in Three Cities of China. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0146483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hanna, M.; Jaqua, E.; Nguyen, V.; Clay, J. B Vitamins: Functions and Uses in Medicine. Perm. J. 2022, 26, 89–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gasmi, A.; Tippairote, T.; Mujawdiya, P.K.; Peana, M.; Menzel, A.; Dadar, M.; Gasmi Benahmed, A.; Bjorklund, G. Micronutrients as immunomodulatory tools for COVID–19 management. Clin. Immunol. 2020, 220, 108545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gombart, A.F.; Pierre, A.; Maggini, S. A Review of Micronutrients and the Immune System–Working in Harmony to Reduce the Risk of Infection. Nutrients 2020, 12, 236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Junaid, K.; Ejaz, H.; Abdalla, A.E.; Abosalif, K.O.A.; Ullah, M.I.; Yasmeen, H.; Younas, S.; Hamam, S.S.M.; Rehman, A. Effective Immune Functions of Micronutrients against SARS–CoV–2. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ahmed, M.H.; Hassan, A.; Molnar, J. The Role of Micronutrients to Support Immunity for COVID–19 Prevention. Rev. Bras. Farmacogn. 2021, 31, 361–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lai, Y.J.; Chang, H.S.; Yang, Y.P.; Lin, T.W.; Lai, W.Y.; Lin, Y.Y.; Chang, C.C. The role of micronutrient and immunomodulation effect in the vaccine era of COVID–19. J. Chin. Med. Assoc. 2021, 84, 821–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Childs, C.E.; Calder, P.C.; Miles, E.A. Diet and Immune Function. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Blomhoff, R.; Blomhoff, H.K. Overview of retinoid metabolism and function. J. Neurobiol. 2006, 66, 606–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sarohan, A.R. COVID–19: Endogenous Retinoic Acid Theory and Retinoic Acid Depletion Syndrome. Med. Hypotheses 2020, 144, 110250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ali, N. Role of vitamin D in preventing of COVID–19 infection, progression and severity. J. Infect. Public Health 2020, 13, 1373–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Barrea, L.; Verde, L.; Grant, W.B.; Frias–Toral, E.; Sarno, G.; Vetrani, C.; Ceriani, F.; Garcia–Velasquez, E.; Contreras–Briceno, J.; Savastano, S.; et al. Vitamin D: A Role Also in Long COVID–19? Nutrients 2022, 14, 1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Melamed, M.L.; Michos, E.D.; Post, W.; Astor, B. 25–hydroxyvitamin D levels and the risk of mortality in the general population. Arch. Intern. Med. 2008, 168, 1629–1637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Moscatelli, F.; Sessa, F.; Valenzano, A.; Polito, R.; Monda, V.; Cibelli, G.; Villano, I.; Pisanelli, D.; Perrella, M.; Daniele, A.; et al. COVID–19: Role of Nutrition and Supplementation. Nutrients 2021, 13, 976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lee, G.Y.; Han, S.N. The Role of Vitamin E in Immunity. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Araki, S.; Shirahata, A. Vitamin K Deficiency Bleeding in Infancy. Nutrients 2020, 12, 780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Simes, D.C.; Viegas, C.S.B.; Araujo, N.; Marreiros, C. Vitamin K as a Diet Supplement with Impact in Human Health: Current Evidence in Age–Related Diseases. Nutrients 2020, 12, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Fischer, V.; Haffner–Luntzer, M.; Amling, M.; Ignatius, A. Calcium and vitamin D in bone fracture healing and post–traumatic bone turnover. Eur. Cell. Mater. 2018, 35, 365–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Vannucci, L.; Fossi, C.; Quattrini, S.; Guasti, L.; Pampaloni, B.; Gronchi, G.; Giusti, F.; Romagnoli, C.; Cianferotti, L.; Marcucci, G.; et al. Calcium Intake in Bone Health: A Focus on Calcium–Rich Mineral Waters. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Subramaniam, T.; Fauzi, M.B.; Lokanathan, Y.; Law, J.X. The Role of Calcium in Wound Healing. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 6486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Patel, Y.; Joseph, J. Sodium Intake and Heart Failure. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 9474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Uwitonze, A.M.; Razzaque, M.S. Role of Magnesium in Vitamin D Activation and Function. J. Am. Osteopath. Assoc. 2018, 118, 181–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Pickering, G.; Mazur, A.; Trousselard, M.; Bienkowski, P.; Yaltsewa, N.; Amessou, M.; Noah, L.; Pouteau, E. Magnesium Status and Stress: The Vicious Circle Concept Revisited. Nutrients 2020, 12, 3672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Shin, H.J.; Na, H.S.; Do, S.H. Magnesium and Pain. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Barbagallo, M.; Veronese, N.; Dominguez, L.J. Magnesium in Aging, Health and Diseases. Nutrients 2021, 13, 463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Momoniat, T.; Ilyas, D.; Bhandari, S. ACE inhibitors and ARBs: Managing potassium and renal function. Cleve. Clin. J. Med. 2019, 86, 601–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Nomura, N.; Shoda, W.; Uchida, S. Clinical importance of potassium intake and molecular mechanism of potassium regulation. Clin. Exp. Nephrol. 2019, 23, 1175–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Yamada, S.; Inaba, M. Potassium Metabolism and Management in Patients with CKD. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. De La Puente–Yague, M.; Cuadrado–Cenzual, M.A.; Ciudad–Cabanas, M.J.; Hernandez–Cabria, M.; Collado–Yurrita, L. Vitamin D: And its role in breast cancer. Kaohsiung. J. Med. Sci. 2018, 34, 423–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ciosek, Z.; Kot, K.; Kosik–Bogacka, D.; Lanocha–Arendarczyk, N.; Rotter, I. The Effects of Calcium, Magnesium, Phosphorus, Fluoride, and Lead on Bone Tissue. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Bonaventura, P.; Benedetti, G.; Albarede, F.; Miossec, P. Zinc and its role in immunity and inflammation. Autoimmun. Rev. 2015, 14, 277–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Doboszewska, U.; Wlaz, P.; Nowak, G.; Mlyniec, K. Targeting zinc metalloenzymes in coronavirus disease 2019. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2020, 177, 4887–4898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Camaschella, C.; Nai, A.; Silvestri, L. Iron metabolism and iron disorders revisited in the hepcidin era. Haematologica 2020, 105, 260–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Nairz, M.; Weiss, G. Iron in infection and immunity. Mol. Aspects. Med. 2020, 75, 100864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Tina Suksmasari, B.H. Multivitamin Supplementation Supports Immune Function and Ameliorates Conditions Triggered By Reduced Air Quality. Vitam. Miner. 2015, 04, 1318–2376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Nanovic, L. Electrolytes and fluid management in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Nutr. Clin. Pract. 2005, 20, 192–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Pollock, J.S.; Ryan, M.J.; Samson, W.K.; Brooks, D.P. Water and electrolyte homeostasis brings balance to physiology. Am J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2014, 307, R481–R483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Ryan, D.P.; Hong, T.S.; Bardeesy, N. Sodium and Cardiovascular Disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014, 371, 2134–2139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Spasovski, G.; Vanholder, R.; Allolio, B.; Annane, D.; Ball, S.; Bichet, D.; Decaux, G.; Fenske, W.; Hoorn, E.J.; Ichai, C.; et al. Clinical practice guideline on diagnosis and treatment of hyponatraemia. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant 2014, 29 (Suppl. 2), i1–i39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Severino, P.; D’Amato, A.; Prosperi, S.; Myftari, V.; Labbro Francia, A.; Onkaya, M.; Notari, C.; Papisca, I.; Canuti, E.S.; Yarden Revivo, M.; et al. The Mutual Relationship among Cardiovascular Diseases and COVID–19: Focus on Micronutrients Imbalance. Nutrients 2022, 14, 3439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Palmer, B.F.; Clegg, D.J. Physiology and Pathophysiology of Potassium Homeostasis: Core Curriculum 2019. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2019, 74, 682–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Singh, S.; Dodt, J.; Volkers, P.; Hethershaw, E.; Philippou, H.; Ivaskevicius, V.; Imhof, D.; Oldenburg, J.; Biswas, A. Structure functional insights into calcium binding during the activation of coagulation factor XIII A. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 11324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Noordam, R.; Young, W.J.; Munroe, P.B. Electrolytes and electrophysiology: What’s next? Aging 2019, 11, 7329–7330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Mohammadifard, N.; Gotay, C.; Humphries, K.H.; Ignaszewski, A.; Esmaillzadeh, A.; Sarrafzadegan, N. Electrolyte minerals intake and cardiovascular health. Crit. Rev. Food. Sci. Nutr. 2019, 59, 2375–2385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Aaron, K.J.; Sanders, P.W. Role of dietary salt and potassium intake in cardiovascular health and disease: A review of the evidence. Mayo. Clin. Proc. 2013, 88, 987–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. WHO. Coronavirus. Available online: https://www.who.int/health–topics/coronavirus (accessed on 20 September 2022).
  60. Carfi, A.; Bernabei, R.; Landi, F.; Gemelli Against, C.-P.-A.C.S.G. Persistent Symptoms in Patients After Acute COVID–19. JAMA 2020, 324, 603–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Naureen, Z.; Dautaj, A.; Nodari, S.; Fioretti, F.; Dhuli, K.; Anpilogov, K.; Lorusso, L.; Paolacci, S.; Michelini, S.; Guda, T.; et al. Proposal of a food supplement for the management of post–COVID syndrome. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2021, 25, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Vishnupriya, M.; Naveenkumar, M.; Manjima, K.; Sooryasree, N.V.; Saranya, T.; Ramya, S.; Harysh Winster, S.; Paulpandi, M.; Balachandar, V.; Arul, N. Post–COVID pulmonary fibrosis: Therapeutic efficacy using with mesenchymal stem cells–How the lung heals. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2021, 25, 2748–2751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Tenforde, M.W.; Kim, S.S.; Lindsell, C.J.; Billig Rose, E.; Shapiro, N.I.; Files, D.C.; Gibbs, K.W.; Erickson, H.L.; Steingrub, J.S.; Smithline, H.A.; et al. Symptom Duration and Risk Factors for Delayed Return to Usual Health Among Outpatients with COVID–19 in a Multistate Health Care Systems Network–United States, March–June 2020. MMWR Morb. Mortal Wkly. Rep. 2020, 69, 993–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Sudre, C.H.; Murray, B.; Varsavsky, T.; Graham, M.S.; Penfold, R.S.; Bowyer, R.C.; Pujol, J.C.; Klaser, K.; Antonelli, M.; Canas, L.S.; et al. Attributes and predictors of long COVID. Nat. Med. 2021, 27, 626–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Gao, Y.D.; Ding, M.; Dong, X.; Zhang, J.J.; Kursat Azkur, A.; Azkur, D.; Gan, H.; Sun, Y.L.; Fu, W.; Li, W.; et al. Risk factors for severe and critically ill COVID–19 patients: A review. Allergy 2021, 76, 428–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Whittle, J.; Molinger, J.; MacLeod, D.; Haines, K.; Wischmeyer, P.E.; Group, L.-C.S. Persistent hypermetabolism and longitudinal energy expenditure in critically ill patients with COVID–19. Crit. Care 2020, 24, 581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Pironi, L.; Sasdelli, A.S.; Ravaioli, F.; Baracco, B.; Battaiola, C.; Bocedi, G.; Brodosi, L.; Leoni, L.; Mari, G.A.; Musio, A. Malnutrition and nutritional therapy in patients with SARS–CoV–2 disease. Clin. Nutr. 2021, 40, 1330–1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Cawood, A.L.; Walters, E.R.; Smith, T.R.; Sipaul, R.H.; Stratton, R.J. A Review of Nutrition Support Guidelines for Individuals with or Recovering from COVID–19 in the Community. Nutrients 2020, 12, 3230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Liu, F.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Li, Y.; Peng, Z. Intravenous high–dose vitamin C for the treatment of severe COVID–19: Study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2020, 10, e039519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Zhao, B.; Ling, Y.; Li, J.; Peng, Y.; Huang, J.; Wang, Y.; Qu, H.; Gao, Y.; Li, Y.; Hu, B.; et al. Beneficial aspects of high dose intravenous vitamin C on patients with COVID–19 pneumonia in severe condition: A retrospective case series study. Ann. Palliat. Med. 2021, 10, 1599–1609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Vollbracht, C.; Kraft, K. Feasibility of Vitamin C in the Treatment of Post Viral Fatigue with Focus on Long COVID, Based on a Systematic Review of IV Vitamin C on Fatigue. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Xing, Y.; Zhao, B.; Yin, L.; Guo, M.; Shi, H.; Zhu, Z.; Zhang, L.; He, J.; Ling, Y.; Gao, M.; et al. Vitamin C supplementation is necessary for patients with coronavirus disease: An ultra–high–performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry finding. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2021, 196, 113927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Wu, C.; Liu, Y.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, P.; Zhong, W.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Q.; Xu, Y.; Li, M.; Li, X.; et al. Analysis of therapeutic targets for SARS–CoV–2 and discovery of potential drugs by computational methods. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2020, 10, 766–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Tan, C.W.; Ho, L.P.; Kalimuddin, S.; Cherng, B.P.Z.; Teh, Y.E.; Thien, S.Y.; Wong, H.M.; Tern, P.J.W.; Chandran, M.; Chay, J.W.M.; et al. Cohort study to evaluate the effect of vitamin D, magnesium, and vitamin B12 in combination on progression to severe outcomes in older patients with coronavirus (COVID–19). Nutrition 2020, 79–80, 111017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Mercola, J.; Grant, W.B.; Wagner, C.L. Evidence Regarding Vitamin D and Risk of COVID–19 and Its Severity. Nutrients 2020, 12, 3361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Pereira, M.; Dantas Damascena, A.; Galvao Azevedo, L.M.; de Almeida Oliveira, T.; da Mota Santana, J. Vitamin D deficiency aggravates COVID–19: Systematic review and meta–analysis. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 62, 1308–1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Barrea, L.; Grant, W.B.; Frias–Toral, E.; Vetrani, C.; Verde, L.; de Alteriis, G.; Docimo, A.; Savastano, S.; Colao, A.; Muscogiuri, G. Dietary Recommendations for Post–COVID–19 Syndrome. Nutrients 2022, 14, 1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Ilie, P.C.; Stefanescu, S.; Smith, L. The role of vitamin D in the prevention of coronavirus disease 2019 infection and mortality. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 2020, 32, 1195–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Gonen, M.S.; Alaylioglu, M.; Durcan, E.; Ozdemir, Y.; Sahin, S.; Konukoglu, D.; Nohut, O.K.; Urkmez, S.; Kucukece, B.; Balkan, I.I.; et al. Rapid and Effective Vitamin D Supplementation May Present Better Clinical Outcomes in COVID–19 (SARS–CoV–2) Patients by Altering Serum INOS1, IL1B, IFNg, Cathelicidin–LL37, and ICAM1. Nutrients 2021, 13, 4047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Tavakol, S.; Seifalian, A.M. Vitamin E at a high dose as an anti–ferroptosis drug and not just a supplement for COVID–19 treatment. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2022, 69, 1058–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Finzi, E. Treatment of SARS–CoV–2 with high dose oral zinc salts: A report on four patients. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2020, 99, 307–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Pan, L.; Mu, M.; Yang, P.; Sun, Y.; Wang, R.; Yan, J.; Li, P.; Hu, B.; Wang, J.; Hu, C.; et al. Clinical Characteristics of COVID–19 Patients With Digestive Symptoms in Hubei, China: A Descriptive, Cross–Sectional, Multicenter Study. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2020, 115, 766–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Luo, J.; Zhu, X.; Jian, J.; Chen, X.; Yin, K. Cardiovascular disease in patients with COVID–19: Evidence from cardiovascular pathology to treatment. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. 2021, 53, 273–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Azevedo, R.B.; Botelho, B.G.; Hollanda, J.V.G.; Ferreira, L.V.L.; Junqueira de Andrade, L.Z.; Oei, S.; Mello, T.S.; Muxfeldt, E.S. Covid–19 and the cardiovascular system: A comprehensive review. J. Hum. Hypertens. 2021, 35, 4–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Maestrini, V.; Birtolo, L.I.; Francone, M.; Galardo, G.; Galea, N.; Severino, P.; Alessandri, F.; Colaiacomo, M.C.; Cundari, G.; Chimenti, C.; et al. Cardiac involvement in consecutive unselected hospitalized COVID–19 population: In–hospital evaluation and one–year follow–up. Int. J. Cardiol. 2021, 339, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Mitacchione, G.; Schiavone, M.; Curnis, A.; Arca, M.; Antinori, S.; Gasperetti, A.; Mascioli, G.; Severino, P.; Sabato, F.; Caracciolo, M.M.; et al. Impact of prior statin use on clinical outcomes in COVID–19 patients: Data from tertiary referral hospitals during COVID–19 pandemic in Italy. J. Clin. Lipidol. 2021, 15, 68–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Iravanian, S.; Dudley, S.C., Jr. The renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS) and cardiac arrhythmias. Heart Rhythm 2008, 5, S12–S17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Pourfridoni, M.; Abbasnia, S.M.; Shafaei, F.; Razaviyan, J.; Heidari–Soureshjani, R. Fluid and Electrolyte Disturbances in COVID–19 and Their Complications. Biomed. Res. Int. 2021, 2021, 6667047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Frontera, J.A.; Valdes, E.; Huang, J.; Lewis, A.; Lord, A.S.; Zhou, T.; Kahn, D.E.; Melmed, K.; Czeisler, B.M.; Yaghi, S.; et al. Prevalence and Impact of Hyponatremia in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 in New York City. Crit. Care. Med. 2020, 48, e1211–e1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Cuesta, M.; Slattery, D.; Goulden, E.L.; Gupta, S.; Tatro, E.; Sherlock, M.; Tormey, W.; O’Neill, S.; Thompson, C.J. Hyponatraemia in patients with community–acquired pneumonia; prevalence and aetiology, and natural history of SIAD. Clin. Endocrinol. 2019, 90, 744–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Severino, P.; Netti, L.; Mariani, M.V.; Maraone, A.; D’Amato, A.; Scarpati, R.; Infusino, F.; Pucci, M.; Lavalle, C.; Maestrini, V.; et al. Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: Screening for Magnesium Deficiency. Cardiol. Res. Pract. 2019, 2019, 4874921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Quilliot, D.; Bonsack, O.; Jaussaud, R.; Mazur, A. Dysmagnesemia in Covid–19 cohort patients: Prevalence and associated factors. Magnes. Res. 2020, 33, 114–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Alamdari, N.M.; Afaghi, S.; Rahimi, F.S.; Tarki, F.E.; Tavana, S.; Zali, A.; Fathi, M.; Besharat, S.; Bagheri, L.; Pourmotahari, F.; et al. Mortality Risk Factors among Hospitalized COVID–19 Patients in a Major Referral Center in Iran. Tohoku. J. Exp. Med. 2020, 252, 73–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Chen, D.; Li, X.; Song, Q.; Hu, C.; Su, F.; Dai, J.; Ye, Y.; Huang, J.; Zhang, X. Assessment of Hypokalemia and Clinical Characteristics in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Wenzhou, China. JAMA. Netw. Open 2020, 3, e2011122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Szoke, D.; Caruso, S.; Aloisio, E.; Pasqualetti, S.; Dolci, A.; Panteghini, M. Serum potassium concentrations in COVID–19. Clin. Chim. Acta 2021, 512, 26–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Alfano, G.; Ferrari, A.; Fontana, F.; Perrone, R.; Mori, G.; Ascione, E.; Magistroni, R.; Venturi, G.; Pederzoli, S.; Margiotta, G.; et al. Hypokalemia in Patients with COVID–19. Clin. Exp. Nephrol. 2021, 25, 401–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Coromilas, E.J.; Kochav, S.; Goldenthal, I.; Biviano, A.; Garan, H.; Goldbarg, S.; Kim, J.H.; Yeo, I.; Tracy, C.; Ayanian, S.; et al. Worldwide Survey of COVID–19–Associated Arrhythmias. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. 2021, 14, e009458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Muhanna, D.; Arnipalli, S.R.; Kumar, S.B.; Ziouzenkova, O. Osmotic Adaptation by Na(+)–Dependent Transporters and ACE2: Correlation with Hemostatic Crisis in COVID–19. Biomedicines 2020, 8, 460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Zhou, Y.; Frey, T.K.; Yang, J.J. Viral calciomics: Interplays between Ca2+ and virus. Cell Calcium 2009, 46, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Hughes, R.L.; Holscher, H.D. Fueling Gut Microbes: A Review of the Interaction between Diet, Exercise, and the Gut Microbiota in Athletes. Adv. Nutr. 2021, 12, 2190–2215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Rajagopala, S.V.; Vashee, S.; Oldfield, L.M.; Suzuki, Y.; Venter, J.C.; Telenti, A.; Nelson, K.E. The Human Microbiome and Cancer. Cancer Prev. Res. 2017, 10, 226–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Rosier, B.T.; Marsh, P.D.; Mira, A. Resilience of the Oral Microbiota in Health: Mechanisms That Prevent Dysbiosis. J. Dent. Res. 2018, 97, 371–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Martinez–Guryn, K.; Leone, V.; Chang, E.B. Regional Diversity of the Gastrointestinal Microbiome. Cell Host Microbe 2019, 26, 314–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Belizário, J.E.; Faintuch, J. Microbiome and Gut Dysbiosis. In Experientia Supplementum; Springer International Publishing: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; pp. 459–476. [Google Scholar]
  105. Zmora, N.; Suez, J.; Elinav, E. You are what you eat: Diet, health and the gut microbiota. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019, 16, 35–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Luo, Y.; Ren, W.; Smidt, H.; Wright, A.-D.G.; Yu, B.; Schyns, G.; McCormack, U.M.; Cowieson, A.J.; Yu, J.; He, J.; et al. Dynamic Distribution of Gut Microbiota in Pigs at Different Growth Stages: Composition and Contribution. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022, 10, e00688-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Zong, X.; Fu, J.; Xu, B.; Wang, Y.; Jin, M. Interplay between gut microbiota and antimicrobial peptides. Anim. Nutr. 2020, 6, 389–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Mazmanian, S.K.; Liu, C.H.; Tzianabos, A.O.; Kasper, D.L. An Immunomodulatory Molecule of Symbiotic Bacteria Directs Maturation of the Host Immune System. Cell 2005, 122, 107–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Lavelle, A.; Sokol, H. Gut microbiota–derived metabolites as key actors in inflammatory bowel disease. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020, 17, 223–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Tomasova, L.; Grman, M.; Ondrias, K.; Ufnal, M. The impact of gut microbiota metabolites on cellular bioenergetics and cardiometabolic health. Nutr. Metab. 2021, 18, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Ma, Y.; Liu, X.; Wang, J. Small molecules in the big picture of gut microbiome–host cross–talk. eBioMedicine 2022, 81, 104085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Ohno, H. The impact of metabolites derived from the gut microbiota on immune regulation and diseases. Int. Immunol. 2020, 32, 629–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Sittipo, P.; Shim, J.-W.; Lee, Y. Microbial Metabolites Determine Host Health and the Status of Some Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Barbara, G.; Feinle–Bisset, C.; Ghoshal, U.C.; Santos, J.; Vanner, S.J.; Vergnolle, N.; Zoetendal, E.G.; Quigley, E.M. The Intestinal Microenvironment and Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders. Gastroenterology 2016, 150, 1305–1318.e1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Barcenilla, A.; Pryde, S.E.; Martin, J.C.; Duncan, S.H.; Stewart, C.S.; Henderson, C.; Flint, H.J. Phylogenetic Relationships of Butyrate–Producing Bacteria from the Human Gut. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66, 1654–1661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  116. Canfora, E.E.; Meex, R.C.R.; Venema, K.; Blaak, E.E. Gut microbial metabolites in obesity, NAFLD and T2DM. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2019, 15, 261–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Crost, E.H.; Le Gall, G.; Laverde–Gomez, J.A.; Mukhopadhya, I.; Flint, H.J.; Juge, N. Mechanistic Insights Into the Cross–Feeding of Ruminococcus gnavus and Ruminococcus bromii on Host and Dietary Carbohydrates. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Dalile, B.; Van Oudenhove, L.; Vervliet, B.; Verbeke, K. The role of short–chain fatty acids in microbiota–gut–brain communication. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019, 16, 461–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. De Vuyst, L.; Leroy, F. Cross–feeding between bifidobacteria and butyrate–producing colon bacteria explains bifdobacterial competitiveness, butyrate production, and gas production. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2011, 149, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Feng, W.; Ao, H.; Peng, C. Gut Microbiota, Short–Chain Fatty Acids, and Herbal Medicines. Front. Pharmacol. 2018, 9, 1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Huart, J.; Leenders, J.; Taminiau, B.; Descy, J.; Saint–Remy, A.; Daube, G.; Krzesinski, J.-M.; Melin, P.; de Tullio, P.; Jouret, F. Gut Microbiota and Fecal Levels of Short–Chain Fatty Acids Differ Upon 24–Hour Blood Pressure Levels in Men. Hypertension 2019, 74, 1005–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Louis, P.; Young, P.; Holtrop, G.; Flint, H.J. Diversity of human colonic butyrate–producing bacteria revealed by analysis of the butyryl–CoA:acetate CoA–transferase gene. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 12, 304–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Macfarlane, S.; Macfarlane, G.T. Regulation of short–chain fatty acid production. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2003, 62, 67–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Pan, L.-I.; Li, B.-B.; Pan, X.-H.; Sun, J. Gut microbiota in pancreatic diseases: Possible new therapeutic strategies. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2021, 42, 1027–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Ridaura, V.K.; Faith, J.J.; Rey, F.E.; Cheng, J.; Duncan, A.E.; Kau, A.L.; Griffin, N.W.; Lombard, V.; Henrissat, B.; Bain, J.R.; et al. Gut Microbiota from Twins Discordant for Obesity Modulate Metabolism in Mice. Science 2013, 341, 1241214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. Tahara, Y.; Yamazaki, M.; Sukigara, H.; Motohashi, H.; Sasaki, H.; Miyakawa, H.; Haraguchi, A.; Ikeda, Y.; Fukuda, S.; Shibata, S. Gut Microbiota–Derived Short Chain Fatty Acids Induce Circadian Clock Entrainment in Mouse Peripheral Tissue. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Macfarlane, G.T.; Gibson, G.R. Metabolic Activities of the Normal Colonic Flora. In Human Health; Springer London: London, UK, 1994; pp. 17–52. [Google Scholar]
  128. Tan, J.; McKenzie, C.; Potamitis, M.; Thorburn, A.N.; Mackay, C.R.; Macia, L. The Role of Short–Chain Fatty Acids in Health and Disease. In Advances in Immunology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 91–119. [Google Scholar]
  129. Ridlon, J.M.; Kang, D.J.; Hylemon, P.B.; Bajaj, J.S. Bile acids and the gut microbiome. Curr. Opin. Gastroenterol. 2014, 30, 332–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Dior, M.; Delagrèverie, H.; Duboc, H.; Jouet, P.; Coffin, B.; Brot, L.; Humbert, L.; Trugnan, G.; Seksik, P.; Sokol, H.; et al. Interplay between bile acid metabolism and microbiota in irritable bowel syndrome. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2016, 28, 1330–1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Duboc, H.; Rainteau, D.; Rajca, S.; Humbert, L.; Farabos, D.; Maubert, M.; Grondin, V.; Jouet, P.; Bouhassira, D.; Seksik, P.; et al. Increase in fecal primary bile acids and dysbiosis in patients with diarrhea–predominant irritable bowel syndrome. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2012, 24, 513-e247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Govindarajan, K.; MacSharry, J.; Casey, P.G.; Shanahan, F.; Joyce, S.A.; Gahan, C.G.M. Unconjugated Bile Acids Influence Expression of Circadian Genes: A Potential Mechanism for Microbe–Host Crosstalk. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0167319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  133. Poland, J.C.; Flynn, C.R. Bile Acids, Their Receptors, and the Gut Microbiota. Physiology 2016, 36, 235–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Wei, W.; Wang, H.-F.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.-L.; Niu, B.-Y.; Yao, S.-K. Altered metabolism of bile acids correlates with clinical parameters and the gut microbiota in patients with diarrhea–predominant irritable bowel syndrome. WJG 2020, 26, 7153–7172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Zhao, M.; Zhao, L.; Xiong, X.; He, Y.; Huang, W.; Liu, Z.; Ji, L.; Pan, B.; Guo, X.; Wang, L.; et al. TMAVA, a Metabolite of Intestinal Microbes, Is Increased in Plasma From Patients With Liver Steatosis, Inhibits γ–Butyrobetaine Hydroxylase, and Exacerbates Fatty Liver in Mice. Gastroenterology 2020, 158, 2266–2281.e2227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Baptista, L.C.; Sun, Y.; Carter, C.S.; Buford, T.W. Crosstalk Between the Gut Microbiome and Bioactive Lipids: Therapeutic Targets in Cognitive Frailty. Front. Nutr. 2020, 7, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  137. Jia, X.; Xu, W.; Zhang, L.; Li, X.; Wang, R.; Wu, S. Impact of Gut Microbiota and Microbiota–Related Metabolites on Hyperlipidemia. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2021, 11, 685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Schoeler, M.; Caesar, R. Dietary lipids, gut microbiota and lipid metabolism. Rev. Endocr. Metab. Disord. 2019, 20, 461–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Nicholson, J.K.; Holmes, E.; Kinross, J.; Burcelin, R.; Gibson, G.; Jia, W.; Pettersson, S. Host–gut microbiota metabolic interactions. Science 2012, 336, 1262–1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Lin, R.; Liu, W.; Piao, M.; Zhu, H. A review of the relationship between the gut microbiota and amino acid metabolism. Amino. Acids 2017, 49, 2083–2090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Portune, K.J.; Beaumont, M.; Davila, A.-M.; Tomé, D.; Blachier, F.; Sanz, Y. Gut microbiota role in dietary protein metabolism and health–related outcomes: The two sides of the coin. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 57, 213–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  142. Agus, A.; Planchais, J.; Sokol, H. Gut Microbiota Regulation of Tryptophan Metabolism in Health and Disease. Cell Host Microbe 2018, 23, 716–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  143. Elsden, S.R.; Hilton, M.G.; Waller, J.M. The end products of the metabolism of aromatic amino acids by clostridia. Arch. Microbiol. 1976, 107, 283–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Lee, J.-H.; Wood, T.K.; Lee, J. Roles of Indole as an Interspecies and Interkingdom Signaling Molecule. Trends Microbiol. 2015, 23, 707–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Liu, W.-H.; Chen, F.-F.; Wang, C.-E.; Fu, H.-H.; Fang, X.-Q.; Ye, J.-R.; Shi, J.-Y. Indole–3–Acetic Acid in Burkholderia pyrrocinia JK–SH007: Enzymatic Identification of the Indole–3–Acetamide Synthesis Pathway. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  146. Liu, Y.; Hou, Y.; Wang, G.; Zheng, X.; Hao, H. Gut Microbial Metabolites of Aromatic Amino Acids as Signals in Host–Microbe Interplay. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2020, 31, 818–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Modoux, M.; Rolhion, N.; Mani, S.; Sokol, H. Tryptophan Metabolism as a Pharmacological Target. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2020, 42, 60–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Roth, W.; Zadeh, K.; Vekariya, R.; Ge, Y.; Mohamadzadeh, M. Tryptophan Metabolism and Gut–Brain Homeostasis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 2973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Russell, W.R.; Duncan, S.H.; Scobbie, L.; Duncan, G.; Cantlay, L.; Calder, A.G.; Anderson, S.E.; Flint, H.J. Major phenylpropanoid–derived metabolites in the human gut can arise from microbial fermentation of protein. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2013, 57, 523–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Smith, E.A.; Macfarlane, G.T. Enumeration of human colonic bacteria producing phenolic and indolic compounds: Effects of pH, carbohydrate availability and retention time on dissimilatory aromatic amino acid metabolism. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 1996, 81, 288–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Vangipurapu, J.; Silva, L.F.; Kuulasmaa, T.; Smith, U.; Laakso, M. Microbiota–related Metabolites and the Risk of Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2020, 43, 1319–1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Vujkovic–Cvijin, I.; Dunham, R.M.; Iwai, S.; Maher, M.C.; Albright, R.G.; Broadhurst, M.J.; Hernandez, R.D.; Lederman, M.M.; Huang, Y.; Somsouk, M.; et al. Dysbiosis of the Gut Microbiota Is Associated with HIV Disease Progression and Tryptophan Catabolism. Sci. Transl. Med. 2013, 5, 193ra91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  153. Zhang, J.; Zhu, S.; Ma, N.; Johnston, L.J.; Wu, C.; Ma, X. Metabolites of microbiota response to tryptophan and intestinal mucosal immunity: A therapeutic target to control intestinal inflammation. Med. Res. Rev. 2021, 41, 1061–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Dai, Z.; Wu, Z.; Hang, S.; Zhu, W.; Wu, G. Amino acid metabolism in intestinal bacteria and its potential implications for mammalian reproduction. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2015, 21, 389–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  155. Lagier, J.-C.; Hugon, P.; Khelaifia, S.; Fournier, P.-E.; La Scola, B.; Raoult, D. The Rebirth of Culture in Microbiology through the Example of Culturomics To Study Human Gut Microbiota. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2015, 28, 237–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  156. Wu, S.; Liao, A.P.; Xia, Y.; Chun Li, Y.; Li, J.-D.; Sartor, R.B.; Sun, J. Vitamin D Receptor Negatively Regulates Bacterial–Stimulated NF–κB Activity in Intestine. Am. J. Pathol. 2010, 177, 686–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Rowland, I.; Gibson, G.; Heinken, A.; Scott, K.; Swann, J.; Thiele, I.; Tuohy, K. Gut microbiota functions: Metabolism of nutrients and other food components. Eur. J. Nutr. 2018, 57, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  158. Mazzoli, R.; Pessione, E. The Neuro–endocrinological Role of Microbial Glutamate and GABA Signaling. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  159. Morais, L.H.; Schreiber, H.L.I.V.; Mazmanian, S.K. The gut microbiota–brain axis in behaviour and brain disorders. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2021, 19, 241–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Mossad, O.; Nent, E.; Woltemate, S.; Folschweiller, S.; Buescher, J.M.; Schnepf, D.; Erny, D.; Staeheli, P.; Bartos, M.; Szalay, A.; et al. Microbiota–dependent increase in δ–valerobetaine alters neuronal function and is responsible for age–related cognitive decline. Nat. Aging 2021, 1, 1127–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Mousa, W.K.; Athar, B.; Merwin, N.J.; Magarvey, N.A. Antibiotics and specialized metabolites from the human microbiota. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2017, 34, 1302–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Perruzza, L.; Gargari, G.; Proietti, M.; Fosso, B.; D’Erchia, A.M.; Faliti, C.E.; Rezzonico–Jost, T.; Scribano, D.; Mauri, L.; Colombo, D.; et al. T Follicular Helper Cells Promote a Beneficial Gut Ecosystem for Host Metabolic Homeostasis by Sensing Microbiota–Derived Extracellular ATP. Cell Rep. 2017, 18, 2566–2575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  163. Strandwitz, P. Neurotransmitter modulation by the gut microbiota. Brain Res. 2018, 1693, 128–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Walther, D.J.; Peter, J.-U.; Bashammakh, S.; Hörtnagl, H.; Voits, M.; Fink, H.; Bader, M. Synthesis of Serotonin by a Second Tryptophan Hydroxylase Isoform. Science 2003, 299, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Wang, Y.; Li, N.; Yang, J.-J.; Zhao, D.-M.; Chen, B.; Zhang, G.-Q.; Chen, S.; Cao, R.-F.; Yu, H.; Zhao, C.-Y.; et al. Probiotics and fructo–oligosaccharide intervention modulate the microbiota–gut brain axis to improve autism spectrum reducing also the hyper–serotonergic state and the dopamine metabolism disorder. Pharmacol. Res. 2020, 157, 104784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Zhao, Y.; Wu, J.; Li, J.V.; Zhou, N.-Y.; Tang, H.; Wang, Y. Gut Microbiota Composition Modifies Fecal Metabolic Profiles in Mice. J. Proteome Res. 2013, 12, 2987–2999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Adak, S.; Aulak, K.S.; Stuehr, D.J. Direct Evidence for Nitric Oxide Production by a Nitric–oxide Synthase–like Protein from Bacillus subtilis. J. Biol. Chem. 2022, 277, 16167–16171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  168. Barrett, E.L.; Clark, M.A. Tetrathionate reduction and production of hydrogen sulfide from thiosulfate. Microbiol. Rev. 1987, 51, 192–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Guarneros, G.; Ortega, M.V. Cysteine desulfhydrase activities of Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA-Enzymol. 1970, 198, 132–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Kalantar–Zadeh, K.; Berean, K.J.; Burgell, R.E.; Muir, J.G.; Gibson, P.R. Intestinal gases: Influence on gut disorders and the role of dietary manipulations. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019, 16, 733–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Mars, R.A.T.; Yang, Y.; Ward, T.; Houtti, M.; Priya, S.; Lekatz, H.R.; Tang, X.; Sun, Z.; Kalari, K.R.; Korem, T.; et al. Longitudinal Multi–omics Reveals Subset–Specific Mechanisms Underlying Irritable Bowel Syndrome. Cell 2020, 183, 1137–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Ostojic, S.M. Inadequate Production of H2 by Gut Microbiota and Parkinson Disease. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2018, 29, 286–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Pacher, P.; Beckman, J.S.; Liaudet, L. Nitric Oxide and Peroxynitrite in Health and Disease. Physiol. Rev. 2006, 87, 315–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  174. Sen, N. Functional and Molecular Insights of Hydrogen Sulfide Signaling and Protein Sulfhydration. J. Mol. Biol. 2016, 429, 543–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  175. Siegel, L.M.; Murphy, M.J.; Kamin, H. Reduced Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide Phosphate–Sulfite Reductase of Enterobacteria. J. Biol. Chem. 1973, 248, 251–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Singh, S.; Lin, H. Hydrogen Sulfide in Physiology and Diseases of the Digestive Tract. Microorganisms 2015, 3, 866–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  177. Sobko, T.; Reinders, C.I.; Jansson, E.Å.; Norin, E.; Midtvedt, T.; Lundberg, J.O. Gastrointestinal bacteria generate nitric oxide from nitrate and nitrite. Nitric Oxide 2005, 13, 272–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  178. Rabus, R.; Venceslau, S.S.; Wöhlbrand, L.; Voordouw, G.; Wall, J.D.; Pereira, I.A.C. A Post–Genomic View of the Ecophysiology, Catabolism and Biotechnological Relevance of Sulphate–Reducing Prokaryotes. In Advances in Microbial Physiology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 55–321. [Google Scholar]
  179. Ng, S.C.; Tilg, H. COVID–19 and the gastrointestinal tract: More than meets the eye. Gut 2020, 69, 973–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  180. Koh, A.; De Vadder, F.; Kovatcheva–Datchary, P.; Backhed, F. From Dietary Fiber to Host Physiology: Short–Chain Fatty Acids as Key Bacterial Metabolites. Cell 2016, 165, 1332–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Gaibani, P.; D’Amico, F.; Bartoletti, M.; Lombardo, D.; Rampelli, S.; Fornaro, G.; Coladonato, S.; Siniscalchi, A.; Re, M.C.; Viale, P.; et al. The Gut Microbiota of Critically Ill Patients With COVID–19. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2021, 11, 670424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Zuo, T.; Liu, Q.; Zhang, F.; Lui, G.C.; Tso, E.Y.; Yeoh, Y.K.; Chen, Z.; Boon, S.S.; Chan, F.K.; Chan, P.K.; et al. Depicting SARS–CoV–2 faecal viral activity in association with gut microbiota composition in patients with COVID–19. Gut 2021, 70, 276–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Dubin, K.; Pamer, E.G. Enterococci and Their Interactions with the Intestinal Microbiome. Microbiol. Spectr. 2014, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  184. Bardi, T.; Pintado, V.; Gomez–Rojo, M.; Escudero–Sanchez, R.; Azzam Lopez, A.; Diez–Remesal, Y.; Martinez Castro, N.; Ruiz–Garbajosa, P.; Pestana, D. Nosocomial infections associated to COVID–19 in the intensive care unit: Clinical characteristics and outcome. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2021, 40, 495–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Bonazzetti, C.; Morena, V.; Giacomelli, A.; Oreni, L.; Casalini, G.; Galimberti, L.R.; Bolis, M.; Rimoldi, M.; Ballone, E.; Colombo, R.; et al. Unexpectedly High Frequency of Enterococcal Bloodstream Infections in Coronavirus Disease 2019 Patients Admitted to an Italian ICU: An Observational Study. Crit. Care Med. 2021, 49, e31–e40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Huang, C.; Wang, Y.; Li, X.; Ren, L.; Zhao, J.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Fan, G.; Xu, J.; Gu, X.; et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet 2020, 395, 497–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  187. Moreira–Rosario, A.; Marques, C.; Pinheiro, H.; Araujo, J.R.; Ribeiro, P.; Rocha, R.; Mota, I.; Pestana, D.; Ribeiro, R.; Pereira, A.; et al. Gut Microbiota Diversity and C–Reactive Protein Are Predictors of Disease Severity in COVID–19 Patients. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 705020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Yeoh, Y.K.; Zuo, T.; Lui, G.C.; Zhang, F.; Liu, Q.; Li, A.Y.; Chung, A.C.; Cheung, C.P.; Tso, E.Y.; Fung, K.S.; et al. Gut microbiota composition reflects disease severity and dysfunctional immune responses in patients with COVID–19. Gut 2021, 70, 698–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Chakraborty, C.; Sharma, A.R.; Bhattacharya, M.; Dhama, K.; Lee, S.S. Altered gut microbiota patterns in COVID–19: Markers for inflammation and disease severity. World J. Gastroenterol. 2022, 28, 2802–2822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  190. Zuo, T.; Zhang, F.; Lui, G.C.Y.; Yeoh, Y.K.; Li, A.Y.L.; Zhan, H.; Wan, Y.; Chung, A.C.K.; Cheung, C.P.; Chen, N.; et al. Alterations in Gut Microbiota of Patients With COVID–19 During Time of Hospitalization. Gastroenterology 2020, 159, 944–955.e948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  191. Zuo, T.; Liu, Q.; Zhang, F.; Yeoh, Y.K.; Wan, Y.; Zhan, H.; Lui, G.C.Y.; Chen, Z.; Li, A.Y.L.; Cheung, C.P.; et al. Temporal landscape of human gut RNA and DNA virome in SARS–CoV–2 infection and severity. Microbiome 2021, 9, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Sokol, H.; Contreras, V.; Maisonnasse, P.; Desmons, A.; Delache, B.; Sencio, V.; Machelart, A.; Brisebarre, A.; Humbert, L.; Deryuter, L.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection in nonhuman primates alters the composition and functional activity of the gut microbiota. Gut Microbes 2021, 13, 1893113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Zhang, F.; Wan, Y.; Zuo, T.; Yeoh, Y.K.; Liu, Q.; Zhang, L.; Zhan, H.; Lu, W.; Xu, W.; Lui, G.C.Y.; et al. Prolonged Impairment of Short–Chain Fatty Acid and L–Isoleucine Biosynthesis in Gut Microbiome in Patients With COVID–19. Gastroenterology 2022, 162, 548–561.e544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Hill, J.H.; Round, J.L. SnapShot: Microbiota effects on host physiology. Cell 2021, 184, 2796.e2791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Ghiboub, M.; Verburgt, C.M.; Sovran, B.; Benninga, M.A.; de Jonge, W.J.; Van Limbergen, J.E. Nutritional Therapy to Modulate Tryptophan Metabolism and Aryl Hydrocarbon–Receptor Signaling Activation in Human Diseases. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Thomas, T.; Stefanoni, D.; Reisz, J.A.; Nemkov, T.; Bertolone, L.; Francis, R.O.; Hudson, K.E.; Zimring, J.C.; Hansen, K.C.; Hod, E.A.; et al. COVID–19 infection alters kynurenine and fatty acid metabolism, correlating with IL–6 levels and renal status. JCI Insight 2020, 5, e140327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Beischlag, T.V.; Luis Morales, J.; Hollingshead, B.D.; Perdew, G.H. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor complex and the control of gene expression. Crit. Rev. Eukaryot. Gene Expr. 2008, 18, 207–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  198. Tang, L.; Gu, S.; Gong, Y.; Li, B.; Lu, H.; Li, Q.; Zhang, R.; Gao, X.; Wu, Z.; Zhang, J.; et al. Clinical Significance of the Correlation between Changes in the Major Intestinal Bacteria Species and COVID–19 Severity. Engineering 2020, 6, 1178–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Venzon, M.; Bernard–Raichon, L.; Klein, J.; Axelrad, J.; Hussey, G.; Sullivan, A.; Casanovas-Massana, A.; Noval, M.; Valero-Jimenez, A.; Gago, J.; et al. Gut microbiome dysbiosis during COVID–19 is associated with increased risk for bacteremia and microbial translocation. Res. Sq. 2021. Preprint. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Tan, Y.Q.; Wang, Y.N.; Feng, H.Y.; Guo, Z.Y.; Li, X.; Nie, X.L.; Zhao, Y.Y. Host/microbiota interactions–derived tryptophan metabolites modulate oxidative stress and inflammation via aryl hydrocarbon receptor signaling. Free. Radic. Biol. Med. 2022, 184, 30–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Gao, K.; Mu, C.L.; Farzi, A.; Zhu, W.Y. Tryptophan Metabolism: A Link Between the Gut Microbiota and Brain. Adv. Nutr. 2020, 11, 709–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Paeslack, N.; Mimmler, M.; Becker, S.; Gao, Z.; Khuu, M.P.; Mann, A.; Malinarich, F.; Regen, T.; Reinhardt, C. Microbiota–derived tryptophan metabolites in vascular inflammation and cardiovascular disease. Amino Acids 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Kousara, S.; Anjuma, S.N.; Jaleela, F.; Khana, J.; Naseema, S. Biomedical Significance of Tryptamine: A Review. J. Pharmaco. 2017, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Liu, J.; Geng, W.; Sun, H.; Liu, C.; Huang, F.; Cao, J.; Xia, L.; Zhao, H.; Zhai, J.; Li, Q.; et al. Integrative metabolomic characterisation identifies altered portal vein serum metabolome contributing to human hepatocellular carcinoma. Gut 2022, 71, 1203–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Camargo, S.M.R.; Vuille–Dit–Bille, R.N.; Meier, C.F.; Verrey, F. ACE2 and gut amino acid transport. Clin. Sci. 2020, 134, 2823–2833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Nataf, S.; Pays, L. Molecular Insights into SARS–CoV2–Induced Alterations of the Gut/Brain Axis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 10440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Perlot, T.; Penninger, J.M. ACE2–from the renin–angiotensin system to gut microbiota and malnutrition. Microbes Infect. 2013, 15, 866–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. De Oliveira, A.P.; Lopes, A.L.F.; Pacheco, G.; de Sa Guimaraes Noleto, I.R.; Nicolau, L.A.D.; Medeiros, J.V.R. Premises among SARS–CoV–2, dysbiosis and diarrhea: Walking through the ACE2/mTOR/autophagy route. Med. Hypotheses 2020, 144, 110243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Kaur, G.; Ji, X.; Rahman, I. SARS–CoV2 Infection Alters Tryptophan Catabolism and Phospholipid Metabolism. Metabolites 2021, 11, 659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Le Floc’h, N.; Otten, W.; Merlot, E. Tryptophan metabolism, from nutrition to potential therapeutic applications. Amino Acids 2011, 41, 1195–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Mehraj, V.; Routy, J.P. Tryptophan Catabolism in Chronic Viral Infections: Handling Uninvited Guests. Int. J. Tryptophan Res. 2015, 8, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  212. Shen, B.; Yi, X.; Sun, Y.; Bi, X.; Du, J.; Zhang, C.; Quan, S.; Zhang, F.; Sun, R.; Qian, L.; et al. Proteomic and Metabolomic Characterization of COVID–19 Patient Sera. Cell 2020, 182, 59–72e15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  213. Gutierrez–Vazquez, C.; Quintana, F.J. Regulation of the Immune Response by the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor. Immunity 2018, 48, 19–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  214. Gardinassi, L.G.; Souza, C.O.S.; Sales–Campos, H.; Fonseca, S.G. Immune and Metabolic Signatures of COVID–19 Revealed by Transcriptomics Data Reuse. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  215. Hamaker, B.R.; Tuncil, Y.E. A perspective on the complexity of dietary fiber structures and their potential effect on the gut microbiota. J. Mol. Biol. 2014, 426, 3838–3850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Macfarlane, G.T.; Macfarlane, S. Bacteria, colonic fermentation, and gastrointestinal health. J. AOAC Int. 2012, 95, 50–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Tolhurst, G.; Heffron, H.; Lam, Y.S.; Parker, H.E.; Habib, A.M.; Diakogiannaki, E.; Cameron, J.; Grosse, J.; Reimann, F.; Gribble, F.M. Short–chain fatty acids stimulate glucagon–like peptide–1 secretion via the G–protein–coupled receptor FFAR2. Diabetes 2012, 61, 364–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  218. Scheppach, W. Effects of short chain fatty acids on gut morphology and function. Gut 1994, 35, S35–S38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  219. Den Besten, G.; van Eunen, K.; Groen, A.K.; Venema, K.; Reijngoud, D.J.; Bakker, B.M. The role of short–chain fatty acids in the interplay between diet, gut microbiota, and host energy metabolism. J. Lipid. Res. 2013, 54, 2325–2340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  220. Rios–Covian, D.; Ruas–Madiedo, P.; Margolles, A.; Gueimonde, M.; de Los Reyes–Gavilan, C.G.; Salazar, N. Intestinal Short Chain Fatty Acids and their Link with Diet and Human Health. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Kim, C.H. Immune regulation by microbiome metabolites. Immunology 2018, 154, 220–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Licciardi, P.V.; Ververis, K.; Karagiannis, T.C. Histone deacetylase inhibition and dietary short–chain Fatty acids. ISRN Allergy 2011, 2011, 869647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  223. Parada Venegas, D.; De la Fuente, M.K.; Landskron, G.; Gonzalez, M.J.; Quera, R.; Dijkstra, G.; Harmsen, H.J.M.; Faber, K.N.; Hermoso, M.A. Short Chain Fatty Acids (SCFAs)–Mediated Gut Epithelial and Immune Regulation and Its Relevance for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  224. Cao, T.; Zhang, X.; Chen, D.; Zhang, P.; Li, Q.; Muhammad, A. The epigenetic modification during the induction of Foxp3 with sodium butyrate. Immunopharmacol. Immunotoxicol. 2018, 40, 309–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Kibbie, J.J.; Dillon, S.M.; Thompson, T.A.; Purba, C.M.; McCarter, M.D.; Wilson, C.C. Butyrate directly decreases human gut lamina propria CD4 T cell function through histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibition and GPR43 signaling. Immunobiology 2021, 226, 152126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Nastasi, C.; Candela, M.; Bonefeld, C.M.; Geisler, C.; Hansen, M.; Krejsgaard, T.; Biagi, E.; Andersen, M.H.; Brigidi, P.; Odum, N.; et al. The effect of short–chain fatty acids on human monocyte–derived dendritic cells. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 16148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  227. Sanchez, H.N.; Moroney, J.B.; Gan, H.; Shen, T.; Im, J.L.; Li, T.; Taylor, J.R.; Zan, H.; Casali, P. B cell–intrinsic epigenetic modulation of antibody responses by dietary fiber–derived short–chain fatty acids. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  228. Vinolo, M.A.; Hatanaka, E.; Lambertucci, R.H.; Newsholme, P.; Curi, R. Effects of short chain fatty acids on effector mechanisms of neutrophils. Cell Biochem. Funct. 2009, 27, 48–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Iniguez–Gutierrez, L.; Godinez–Mendez, L.A.; Fafutis–Morris, M.; Padilla–Arellano, J.R.; Corona–Rivera, A.; Bueno–Topete, M.R.; Rojas–Rejon, O.A.; Delgado–Rizo, V. Physiological concentrations of short–chain fatty acids induce the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps in vitro. Int. J. Immunopathol. Pharmacol. 2020, 34, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Correa–Oliveira, R.; Fachi, J.L.; Vieira, A.; Sato, F.T.; Vinolo, M.A. Regulation of immune cell function by short–chain fatty acids. Clin. Transl. Immunol. 2016, 5, e73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Jardou, M.; Lawson, R. Supportive therapy during COVID–19: The proposed mechanism of short–chain fatty acids to prevent cytokine storm and multi–organ failure. Med. Hypotheses 2021, 154, 110661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  232. Lin, R.; Xiao, M.; Cao, S.; Sun, Y.; Zhao, L.; Mao, X.; Chen, P.; Tong, X.; Ou, Z.; Zhu, H.; et al. Distinct gut microbiota and health outcomes in asymptomatic infection, viral nucleic acid test re-positive, and convalescent COVID-19 cases. mLife 2022, 1, 183–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Pascoal, L.B.; Rodrigues, P.B.; Genaro, L.M.; Gomes, A.; Toledo–Teixeira, D.A.; Parise, P.L.; Bispo–Dos–Santos, K.; Simeoni, C.L.; Guimaraes, P.V.; Buscaratti, L.I.; et al. Microbiota–derived short–chain fatty acids do not interfere with SARS–CoV–2 infection of human colonic samples. Gut Microbes 2021, 13, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  234. Iqbal, J.; Hussain, M.M. Intestinal lipid absorption. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2009, 296, E1183–E1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  235. Chiang, J.Y. Bile acid metabolism and signaling. Compr. Physiol. 2013, 3, 1191–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  236. Beaudoin, J.J.; Bezencon, J.; Sjostedt, N.; Fallon, J.K.; Brouwer, K.L.R. Role of Organic Solute Transporter Alpha/Beta in Hepatotoxic Bile Acid Transport and Drug Interactions. Toxicol. Sci. 2020, 176, 34–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Huang, D.; Xiong, M.; Xu, X.; Wu, X.; Xu, J.; Cai, X.; Lu, L.; Zhou, H. Bile acids elevated by high–fat feeding induce endoplasmic reticulum stress in intestinal stem cells and contribute to mucosal barrier damage. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2020, 529, 289–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Harnisch, L.O.; Mihaylov, D.; Bein, T.; Apfelbacher, C.; Kiehntopf, M.; Bauer, M.; Moerer, O.; Quintel, M. Determination of individual bile acids in acute respiratory distress syndrome reveals a specific pattern of primary and secondary bile acids and a shift to the acidic pathway as an adaptive response to the critical condition. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2022, 60, 891–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Micronutrients role in healthy individuals. Whether micronutrients’ daily intake requirements are grams or as much as micrograms, their presence is critical to several body systems regulations. Their stand-out tasks are oxidation-reduction process modulation, immunoregulation, cell differentiation, water and electrolyte balance, homeostasis in arterial pressure, well-functioning coagulation factors, and the synthesis and absorption of some macronutrients and micronutrients. Its bioavailability, absorption, and synthesis rely on factors such as age, gender, diet, GM, pharmaceutical prescriptions, and pre-existing metabolic or pathological conditions (created with BioRender.com).
Figure 1. Micronutrients role in healthy individuals. Whether micronutrients’ daily intake requirements are grams or as much as micrograms, their presence is critical to several body systems regulations. Their stand-out tasks are oxidation-reduction process modulation, immunoregulation, cell differentiation, water and electrolyte balance, homeostasis in arterial pressure, well-functioning coagulation factors, and the synthesis and absorption of some macronutrients and micronutrients. Its bioavailability, absorption, and synthesis rely on factors such as age, gender, diet, GM, pharmaceutical prescriptions, and pre-existing metabolic or pathological conditions (created with BioRender.com).
Ijms 23 12324 g001
Figure 2. Micronutrient availability, gut microbiota, and its derived metabolites modifications according to COVID-19 severity. Patients with severe complications from COVID-19 have lower availability of micronutrients such as vitamin C, A, D, B12, and Zn compared to asymptomatic and healthy subjects. On the other hand, the dysbiosis of GM seems to worsen as the complications of the disease progress. (A) Healthy subjects have an adequate balance in the Firmicutes: Bacteroidetes ratio, as well as an abundance of beneficial species belonging to the Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria phyla, such as Lachnospiraceae, Bacteroidaceae, Ruminococcaceae, Eubacterium, and Roseburia. Therefore, there is an adequate production of metabolites from the processing of host nutrients: SCFAs, secondary BA, tryptamine, and indole-3-lactic acid. Additionally, some molecules that regulate immune cell function are present, including the balance between Th cell subtypes and their role in controlling a tolerogenic environment and the intestinal barrier. (B) In asymptomatic people with COVID-19, no micronutrient deficiency is observed; in addition, although there is an alteration in the GM when compared to uninfected individuals, it is not as marked; the Firmicutes–Bacteroidetes ratio decreases, mainly affecting immunological regulation since there is a decrease in the production of IL-22 and IL-10. Also, an increase in IFNγ IL-17, the latter cytokines are necessary for the antiviral response. (C) In patients with severe COVID-19, there is a deficiency of vitamins C, A, D, B12, and Zn. In addition, the ratio of Firmicutes–Bacteroidetes decreases significantly, the abundance of pathogenic bacteria increases, and those beneficial in pathways decrease nutrient metabolism, which reduces beneficial host metabolites synthesis, such as SCFAs and tryptophan-derived metabolites synthesized by bacteria, such as tryptamine and indole-3-lactic acid. This set of events, together with the intrinsic failure of intestinal transit, also causes the accumulation of primary BA in the colon and an increase in the circulation of primary and secondary BA. Therefore, it increases the damage to the intestinal barrier and bacterial translocation, which leads to a proinflammatory environment with high serum levels of C-reactive protein, IL-6 and IL-1β, proinflammatory cytokines that promote the continuous activation of AHR-IDO-1 and reduces the antiviral response of INF type 1 (α and β) (created by BioRender.com).
Figure 2. Micronutrient availability, gut microbiota, and its derived metabolites modifications according to COVID-19 severity. Patients with severe complications from COVID-19 have lower availability of micronutrients such as vitamin C, A, D, B12, and Zn compared to asymptomatic and healthy subjects. On the other hand, the dysbiosis of GM seems to worsen as the complications of the disease progress. (A) Healthy subjects have an adequate balance in the Firmicutes: Bacteroidetes ratio, as well as an abundance of beneficial species belonging to the Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria phyla, such as Lachnospiraceae, Bacteroidaceae, Ruminococcaceae, Eubacterium, and Roseburia. Therefore, there is an adequate production of metabolites from the processing of host nutrients: SCFAs, secondary BA, tryptamine, and indole-3-lactic acid. Additionally, some molecules that regulate immune cell function are present, including the balance between Th cell subtypes and their role in controlling a tolerogenic environment and the intestinal barrier. (B) In asymptomatic people with COVID-19, no micronutrient deficiency is observed; in addition, although there is an alteration in the GM when compared to uninfected individuals, it is not as marked; the Firmicutes–Bacteroidetes ratio decreases, mainly affecting immunological regulation since there is a decrease in the production of IL-22 and IL-10. Also, an increase in IFNγ IL-17, the latter cytokines are necessary for the antiviral response. (C) In patients with severe COVID-19, there is a deficiency of vitamins C, A, D, B12, and Zn. In addition, the ratio of Firmicutes–Bacteroidetes decreases significantly, the abundance of pathogenic bacteria increases, and those beneficial in pathways decrease nutrient metabolism, which reduces beneficial host metabolites synthesis, such as SCFAs and tryptophan-derived metabolites synthesized by bacteria, such as tryptamine and indole-3-lactic acid. This set of events, together with the intrinsic failure of intestinal transit, also causes the accumulation of primary BA in the colon and an increase in the circulation of primary and secondary BA. Therefore, it increases the damage to the intestinal barrier and bacterial translocation, which leads to a proinflammatory environment with high serum levels of C-reactive protein, IL-6 and IL-1β, proinflammatory cytokines that promote the continuous activation of AHR-IDO-1 and reduces the antiviral response of INF type 1 (α and β) (created by BioRender.com).
Ijms 23 12324 g002
Table 1. Function and clinical uses of micronutrients.
Table 1. Function and clinical uses of micronutrients.
VitaminsFood SourcesDeficiency SymptomsRisk Factors for Micronutrient DeficiencyFunctions and Clinical UsesReferences
Water-soluble vitamins
Thiamin (B1)Whole grains
Pork
Fish
Yeast
Fatigue
Anorexia
Beriberi
Endocarditis
Arrhythmias
Sleep disorders
Irritability
Neuropathy
Wernicke–Korsakoff syndrome
Chronic alcoholism
Malnutrition
Bariatric surgery
Pregnancy
Breastfeeding
Diarrhea
Chronic kidney disease
Wernicke–Korsakoff syndrome
Carbohydrate metabolism (thiamine pyrophosphate)
[12,13,14,16]
Riboflavin (B2)Eggs
Dairy
Green vegetables
Meat
Mushrooms
Almonds
Ariboflavinosis (stomatitis, cheilitis and glossitis)
Photophobia
Dermatitis
Cataracts
Migraines
Changes in personality
Anorexia nervosa
Malabsorption syndromes
Prolonged use of barbiturates
Pregnancy
Dialysis
Diarrhea
Migraine prophylaxis
Cataract prevention
Coenzyme in multiple biochemical processes
[12,13,14]
Niacin (B3)Animal and plant foods
Soy
Nuts
Seeds
Legumes
Grains
Pellagra
Depression
Anxiety Memory loss Psychotic symptoms
Low Tryptophan Intake
High Corn Diet
Hartnup Disease
Carcinoid syndrome
Coenzyme in oxidation-reduction reactions[12,13,14]
Pantothenic acid (B5)Fortified cereals
Fish
Avocado
Eggs
Beef and pork
Sunflower seeds
Lentils
Alopecia Dermatitis Numbness Encephalopathy Behavior changesDeficiency associated with another B complex vitaminAcne, Allergies Rheumatoid Arthritis[12,13,14]
Pyridoxine (B6)Beef
Poultry
Starchy vegetables
Fortified cereal
Anemia
Irritability Depression Seizures
Peripheral neuropathy
Alcoholism Kidney failure
Rheumatoid arthritis Malabsorption syndromes
Nausea and vomiting during pregnancy[12,13,14]
Biotin
(B7)
Meat
Eggs
Fish
Seeds
Soy
Nuts
Dermatitis and tremor in extremities Depression Irritability Seizures Cognitive impairmentAlcoholism Epilepsy medications Pregnancy Biotinidase enzyme deficiencyHereditary enzyme deficiency
Brittle hair syndrome
Fatty acid synthesis
Glucose utilization
Protein metabolism
[12,13,14]
Folic acid (B9)Green leafy vegetables
Nuts
Beans
Dairy
Meat
Poultry
Brussels
Megaloblastic anemia
Behavioral changes
Psychosis Dementia
Genetic polymorphisms Malabsorption
Poor intake Hemodialysis Hemolysis
Megaloblastic anemia Prevents neural tube defects in pregnancy Dialysis
Malabsorption
[12,13,14,16]
Cobalamin (B12)Animal foods
Fortified foods
Megaloblastic anemia
Behavioral changes Psychosis Dementia
Pernicious anemia Malabsorption Vegan dietMegaloblastic anemia Malabsorption syndromes
Maintenance dose for deficiency in vegans Essential in red blood cell production
[12,14,16]
Vitamin COranges
Lemons
Grapefruit
Green vegetables
Beef liver
ScurvyConsumption deficitCollagen formation Wound healing Immune system
Antioxidant Free radical scavenger
Skin disorders (Redness, hyperpigmentation)
[12,14,16]
Fat-soluble vitamins
AAnimal foods
Human milk
Fish
Liver
Eggs
Green and yellow vegetables
Yellow and orange non-citrus fruits
Visual impairment Bitot spots Keratomalacia Follicular hyperkeratosis Growth retardation Respiratory and intestinal infectionsMalnutrition
Poverty
Maintenance of visual sharpness
Growth and development
Formation of red blood cells
Formation of skin and bones Immunity
[12,14,16]
DExposure to sunlight
Milk
Cheese
Fortified cereals
Egg yolks
Salmon
Osteomalacia
Rickets
Decreased exposure to UV rays
Absorption disorders
Stimulates bone mineralization
Antioxidant
Improves the absorption of phosphorus and calcium
[12,13,14,16]
EWheat germ
Oil nuts
Cereal
Meat
Egg
Milk
Green leafy vegetables
Cystic fibrosis Ataxia Abetalipoproteinemia
Hemolysis
Macrocytic anemia in premature infants
Poor food intakeAntioxidant
Wound healing Immunity
[12,14,16]
KFresh green leafy
Vegetables
Egg yolk
Soybean oil
Liver
Generalized bleeding Haemorrhagic disease in the newborn Prolongation of coagulation timesPoor food intake Coagulation factor deficiencyFormation of prothrombin and other K-dependent coagulation factors[12,14,16]
Minerals
ZnRed meat
Fish
Poultry
Nuts
Whole grains
Gastrointestinal diseases
Decreased immune function
Alcoholism Chronic
Kidney disease
Cell-mediated immunity
Bone formation
Tissue growth
Brain functions
Sexual maturation Fertility
[12,14]
CalciumSeafood (salmon and sardines)
Green leafy vegetables
Milk
Egg
Fractures Osteoporosis Osteomalacia RicketsAlterations in parathormone and calcitonin
Chronic kidney disease
Alcoholism Magnesium deficiency
Bone growth and development
Nerve function
Muscle contraction Blood clotting
[13,14]
Table 2. Role of micronutrients in immunomodulation and their deficiency effects on immune system.
Table 2. Role of micronutrients in immunomodulation and their deficiency effects on immune system.
NutrientImmunomodulating PropertyDeficiency Effect on Immune SystemReferences
Vitamin AIt maintains the integrity of the barrier and the normal differentiation of epithelial tissues
Mucosal immune response and anti-inflammatory agent
It regulates the functions of NK cells and the activities of macrophages
Differentiation and development of T helper 1 (Th1) and T helper 2 (Th2) cells
Supports the production of antibodies by B cells
Increases susceptibility to virus-induced infections of the respiratory tract, measles, and diarrhea
Failure of immune responses to vaccines
[17,18,19]
Vitamin CIt contributes to the maintenance of the redox integrity of cells and protection against (ROS) generated by inflammatory responses
Regenerates other antioxidants
It stimulates the functions of leukocytes
It contributes to the integrity of the epithelial barrier by promoting collagen synthesis
Antimicrobial Activities: Increases serum complement protein and IFN γ production
Role in antibody production
Increases the risk and severity of some respiratory infections, including pneumonia[17,18,19,20,21]
Vitamin DProduction of antimicrobial peptides (catelicidin and defensin) responsible for modifying the GM
Promotion of anti-inflammatory cytokines
Inhibition of IFN γ nuclear factor kB
It improves innate immunity by increasing the differentiation of monocytes to macrophages
Promotes the growth and phagocytic capacity of macrophages
They increase the risks, severity, and mortality of various respiratory conditions, such as rhinitis, asthma, tuberculosis, chronic lung disorders, viral respiratory infections, including COVID-19[17,18,19,21]
Vitamin ELipid-soluble antioxidant that protects cell membranes against oxidative damage
Supports the integrity of airways and epithelial barriers
Enhances the cytotoxic activity of Nκ cells
It modulates the expression of IFN γ and Interleukin 2
It decreases the expression of prostaglandin E2 by macrophages
Optimizes and improves Th1 function
It impairs the functions of humoral and cellular adaptive immunity, thus facilitating viral infection with highly virulent strains, and conditions serious subsequent pathologies together with abnormal immune responses[17,18,19]
B6Participates in biosynthesis of fatty acids and proteins along with B12 and B9
Maintains Th1 response
Involved in the proliferation of T lymphocytes
The deficiency is accompanied by suppression of the Th1 response and promotion of Th2 as well as a decrease in pro-inflammatory cytokines[17,19]
B12Participates in biosynthesis of fatty acids and proteins along with B6 and B9
Effects on cytotoxic cells (NK, CD+, T cells)
Suppresses NK cell activity, decreases the number of lymphocytes and abnormal CD4+/CD8+ cell ratio[17,19]
Folic acid Participates in biosynthesis of fatty acids and proteins along with B12 and B9
Maintains innate immunity (NK cell activity)
It causes an impaired immune response and resistance to infection
Increased carcinogenicity due to reduced cytotoxic activity
[17,19]
MagnesiumInvolved in nucleic acid metabolism, DNA replication, leukocyte activation, regulation of apoptosis
Protects DNA from oxidative damage
Increases susceptibility to upper respiratory tract infections
It promotes low-grade chronic inflammation through the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, acute phase proteins, and free radicals.
[17,19]
SeKey role in redox and antioxidant regulation through glutathione peroxidases by scavenging free radicals
Essential for the optimal immune response through the regulation of IFN α, IFN γ, and IFN β production
Participates in the production of Immunoglobulin G
Influences the functions and differentiation of NK cells, T cells, and antibodies
Increases the risk and virulence of viruses including lung infections, particularly in infants, during their first six weeks of life[17,18,21]
ZnIt modulates the function of approximately 2000 enzymes and 750 transcription factors, which include immune, growth, and development processes
Antiviral properties: Inhibits the enzyme RNA polymerase
Maintains the integrity of the immune barrier Improves the cytotoxic activity of NK cells
Participates in complement protein activities and IFN γ production
It intervenes in the cytotoxic defense against oxidative stress
It increases the risk and morbidity of inflammatory disorders, infections, and viral pneumonia, particularly in children and the elderly
Increases the risk of bacterial and fungal infections (particularly diarrhea and pneumonia)
[17,18,19,20]
FeEssential for cell differentiation and growth. Involved in DNA synthesis
Involved in the process of destruction of bacteria by neutrophils through the formation of toxic hydroxyl radicals
It decreases the secretion of cytokines (IFN γ, TNFα, Interleukin 2 [IL-2])
It attenuates the activity of NK cells and lymphocytes
[17,19]
CuMaintains intracellular antioxidant balance
Important role in innate immunity (macrophages, neutrophils, and monocytes)
It decreases the proliferation of T cells and increases the circulation of B cells
There are no reports of increased incidence of infections during decreased intake
[17,19]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hernández-Flores, T.d.J.; Pedraza-Brindis, E.J.; Cárdenas-Bedoya, J.; Ruíz-Carrillo, J.D.; Méndez-Clemente, A.S.; Martínez-Guzmán, M.A.; Iñiguez-Gutiérrez, L. Role of Micronutrients and Gut Microbiota-Derived Metabolites in COVID-19 Recovery. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 12324. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232012324

AMA Style

Hernández-Flores TdJ, Pedraza-Brindis EJ, Cárdenas-Bedoya J, Ruíz-Carrillo JD, Méndez-Clemente AS, Martínez-Guzmán MA, Iñiguez-Gutiérrez L. Role of Micronutrients and Gut Microbiota-Derived Metabolites in COVID-19 Recovery. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(20):12324. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232012324

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hernández-Flores, Teresita de Jesús, Eliza Julia Pedraza-Brindis, Jhonathan Cárdenas-Bedoya, José Daniel Ruíz-Carrillo, Anibal Samael Méndez-Clemente, Marco Alonso Martínez-Guzmán, and Liliana Iñiguez-Gutiérrez. 2022. "Role of Micronutrients and Gut Microbiota-Derived Metabolites in COVID-19 Recovery" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 20: 12324. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232012324

APA Style

Hernández-Flores, T. d. J., Pedraza-Brindis, E. J., Cárdenas-Bedoya, J., Ruíz-Carrillo, J. D., Méndez-Clemente, A. S., Martínez-Guzmán, M. A., & Iñiguez-Gutiérrez, L. (2022). Role of Micronutrients and Gut Microbiota-Derived Metabolites in COVID-19 Recovery. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(20), 12324. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232012324

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop