Next Article in Journal
Phenol and Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons Are Stronger Drivers Than Host Plant Species in Shaping the Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungal Component of the Mycorrhizosphere
Previous Article in Journal
Importance of Micromilieu for Pathophysiologic Mineralocorticoid Receptor Activity—When the Mineralocorticoid Receptor Resides in the Wrong Neighborhood
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 20
10.3390/ijms232012588
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ectopic Expression of HbRPW8-a from Hevea brasiliensis Improves Arabidopsis thaliana Resistance to Powdery Mildew Fungi (Erysiphe cichoracearum UCSC1)

by
Xiaoli Li
1,
Qiguang He
2,
Yuhan Liu
1,
Xinze Xu
1,
Qingbiao Xie
3,
Zhigang Li
1,
Chunhua Lin
1,
Wenbo Liu
1,
Daipeng Chen
1,
Xiao Li
1 and
Weiguo Miao
1,*
1
School of Plant Protection/Key Laboratory of Green Prevention and Control of Tropical Plant Diseases and Pests, Ministry of Education, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
2
Hainan Provincial Key Laboratory of Tropical Crops Cultivation and Physiology, Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Resources of Rubber Tree, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Rubber Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou 571101, China
3
Hainan Key Laboratory for Sustainable Utilization of Tropical Bioresources, Institute of Tropical Crops, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(20), 12588; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232012588
Submission received: 4 September 2022 / Revised: 15 October 2022 / Accepted: 18 October 2022 / Published: 20 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Plant Sciences)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The RPW8s (Resistance to Powdery Mildew 8) are atypical broad-spectrum resistance genes that provide resistance to the powdery mildew fungi. Powdery mildew of rubber tree is one of the serious fungal diseases that affect tree growth and latex production. However, the RPW8 homologs in rubber tree and their role of resistance to powdery mildew remain unclear. In this study, four RPW8 genes, HbRPW8-a, b, c, d, were identified in rubber tree, and phylogenetic analysis showed that HbRPW8-a was clustered with AtRPW8.1 and AtRPW8.2 of Arabidopsis. The HbRPW8-a protein was localized on the plasma membrane and its expression in rubber tree was significantly induced upon powdery mildew infection. Transient expression of HbRPW8-a in tobacco leaves induced plant immune responses, including the accumulation of reactive oxygen species and the deposition of callose in plant cells, which was similar to that induced by AtRPW8.2. Consistently, overexpression of HbRPW8-a in Arabidopsis thaliana enhanced plant resistance to Erysiphe cichoracearum UCSC1 and Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC30000 (PstDC3000). Moreover, such HbRPW8-a mediated resistance to powdery mildew was in a salicylic acid (SA) dependent manner. Taken together, we demonstrated a new RPW8 member in rubber tree, HbRPW8-a, which could potentially contribute the resistance to powdery mildew.

1. Introduction

Plants have developed two unique pathways to response for pathogen attacks, namely pathogen-associated molecular pattern-triggered immunity (PTI) and effector-triggered immunity (ETI), which work together to protect plants [1,2,3]. The plant immune responses usually involve the burst of reactive oxygen species (ROS), activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling and downstream PATHOGENESIS-RELATED (PR) genes, regulation of phytohormone signaling pathways, and induction of hypersensitive response (HR) [4,5,6,7,8,9]. The ROS burst is one of the early cellular responses in plant cells, serving as a toxin barrier against subsequent pathogen infection [10]. Moreover, the ROS burst can also strengthen the plant cell walls through oxidative cross-link of polymers to inhibit pathogen growth [11,12,13]. While HR is a rapid cell death phenomenon induced by pathogen or their metabolites, occurring at the point of pathogen penetration to prevent further pathogen spreading [14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. The plant immune system is also regulated by plant hormones, especially jasmonic acid (JA) and SA, which play an important role in basic resistance against various plant pathogens. Furthermore, the phytohormone signaling pathways are thought to be a cost-effective manner for plant to coordinate biotic stress responses with growth and survival [21,22,23,24]. In plants, the recognition of pathogen avirulent (Avr) proteins by the resistance (R) proteins is an effective defense mechanism against pathogen infection [25,26,27,28]. AtRPW8.1 and AtRPW8.2 genes were conferred a broad-spectrum resistance to Erysiphe spp. in Arabidopsis Wa and Ms [29,30]. As atypical R proteins, they contain only the RPW8 domain, and lack of the nucleotide-binding site and leucine-rich repeats (NB-LRR) domain that appears in most of R proteins [31,32,33,34,35]. Although both AtRPW8.1 and AtRPW8.2 can mediate plant resistance through the SA and Enhanced Disease Susceptibility 1 (EDS1) signaling pathways [36], their underlying mechanisms seem different. AtRPW8.1 stimulated H2O2 accumulation in chloroplasts to enhance PTI, while AtRPW8.2 stimulated high concentration of H2O2 in the haustorium complex to achieve the disease resistance [37,38,39]. So far, various RPW8 proteins with positive effects on plant resistance have been identified in different plants [40,41,42,43].
The rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis Muell. Arg.) is mainly distributed in areas within 10° north-south latitude. Its production of latex is an important industrial raw material, which cannot be replaced by artificial synthesis [44]. However, both rubber tree growth and its latex production have been affected by biotic and abiotic stresses [45,46,47,48]. The powdery mildew caused by Erysiphe quercicola is one of the serious diseases among the biotic stresses. This disease can affect immature tissues such as young leaves, buds and inflorescences, leading to reduced latex yield of rubber trees [49,50,51]. At present, sulfur powder and magnetic levitation agents are mainly used to prevent powdery mildew in rubber trees [49]. However, the use of these agents has the disadvantages of poor adhesion and environmental pollution, and is not a long-term solution for powdery mildew resistance. The discovery of plant R genes (including their homologs and analogs) opened up new possibilities for managing plant diseases that are caused by pathogens; the recent advances in plant genome sequencing, allows for the identification of the novel R genes. To date, several powdery mildew resistant/susceptible genes of rubber trees have been reported, including HbSGT1a, HbSGT1b and HbHSP90.1. HbSGT1a and HbSGT1b were powdery mildew resistance-related genes. Moreover, HbMlo12 is a candidate gene conferring powdery mildew susceptibility [52,53]. However, the mechanism underlying E. quercicola and H. brasiliensis interaction and the defense-related genes in rubber tree remains elusive. Furthermore, compared with more than 80 powdery mildew resistance genes in wheat, the number of reported powdery mildew resistance genes in rubber trees was limited. Additionally, due to the rapid evolution of pathogen, R-genes are often temporally effective for specific pathogens [54,55,56,57]. Therefore, exploring resistance genes with a broad-spectrum resistance against pathogen may play an important role for screening new cultivated rubber tree varieties while retaining high-quality latex production.
Here, we identified four RPW8 genes, HbRPW8-a, b, c, d, from the powdery mildew mildly susceptible rubber tree cultivar Reyan 7-33-97 and analyzed their expression patterns during the period of E. quercicola infection. Of these genes, HbRPW8-a clustered with AtRPW8.1 and AtRPW8.2 of Arabidopsis was selected for further study. By transient expression in tobacco leaves and overexpression in Arabidopsis plants revealed HbRPW8-a induced plant immune responses associated with plant defense. Finally, we showed that HbRPW8-a mediated resistance in Arabidopsis was dependent on the SA signaling.

2. Results

2.1. Isolation and Identification of HbRPW8s

To identify RPW8 genes in rubber tree, AtRPW8.1 and AtRPW8.2 protein full-length sequence was used to blast against the genome of H. brasiliensis. Four HbRPW8 genes were obtained, and designated as HbRPW8-a, HbRPW8-b, HbRPW8-c and HbRPW8-d, respectively. Compared with the other three HbRPW8s (about 800 amino acids), HbRPW8-a was much smaller, with only 189 amino acids (Supplementary Table S1).
Protein domain analysis showed that HbRPW8-a only contained the RPW8 domain, whereas other HbRPW8s contained RPW8, NB-ARC and LRR domains (Figure 1a). As expected, phylogenetic analysis of HbRPW8s, AtRPW8s and VpRPW8s showed that HbRPW8-a, AtRPW8.1 and AtRPW8.2 were clustered together (Figure 1b).

2.2. Expression of HbRPW8s upon E. Quercicola Infection

To investigate the possible roles of HbRPW8s in powdery mildew disease, the transcriptional expression levels of HbRPW8s gene were measured at different times after E. quercicola infection (Figure 2). The expression patterns of HbRPW8-b and c were similar, with a strong reduction at 48 hours post infection (hpi) (the second penetration process of E. quercicola), while the expression of HbRPW8-d was relatively stable during the whole infection period.
Interestingly, the expression level of HbRPW8-a was significantly induced at 13 hpi (primary infection period of E. quercicola) and 24 hpi (the haustorium development stage during E. quercicola infection) compared to that of control. Combined with the high similarity between HbRPW8-a and AtRPW8.1/8.2, HbRPW8-a was selected for further investigate in plant defense.

2.3. Transient Expression of HbRPW8-a Induces Plant Immune Responses in N. benthamiana Leaves

AtRPW8.1 and AtRPW8.2 were reported to be localized in the endomembrane system to target the haustorium upon powdery mildew infection. To determine the subcellular localization of HbRPW8-a, the HbRPW8-a-mScarlet and RLK-GFP (a plasma membrane control) fusion proteins were transiently expressed in N. benthamiana leaves. Using confocal microscopy, we found that the fluorescence signal of HbRPW8-a-mScarlet fusion protein was co-localized with RLK-GFP at the plasma membrane (Figure 3), indicating HbRPW8-a is a membrane localized protein.
In addition to subcellular localization of HbRPW8-a, we also observed HbRPW8-a induced callose deposition in N. benthamiana leaves, similar to that induced by AtRPW8.2 (Figure 4a,b). Additionally, similar to that of AtRPW8.2-GFP, the HbRPW8-GFP fusion protein can also induce ROS burst in tobacco cells (Figure 4c,d). These results suggest that HbRPW8-a, like AtRPW8.2, could induce plant immune responses.

2.4. Over-expressing HbRPW8-a in Arabidopsis Col Enhances Resistance to Powdery Mildew

Different from the Arabidopsis Wa and Ms ecotypes containing AtRPW8.1/AtRPW8.2 with resistance to powdery mildew, the Arabidopsis Col is susceptible to powdery mildew due to the lack of AtRPW8.1/AtRPW8.2. To further investigate the role of HbRPW8-a in resistance to powdery mildew, we overexpressed HbRPW8-a in the Arabidopsis Col plants and obtained T3 transgenic homozygous lines (Supplementary Figure S1A). The high expression level of HbRPW8-a gene in these lines was confirmed by qRT-PCR (Supplementary Figure S1B).
Three T3 HbRPW8-a overexpression (#8, #16 and #27), Col-WT, Wa-WT and the Arabidopsis mutant pad4 at Col background (a susceptible mutant to powdery mildew), were inoculated with powdery mildew (E. cichoracearum UCSC1), respectively. After 7 days of inoculation (dpi), the pad4 displayed severe disease, with the entire leaves covered by powdery mildew fungi hyphae. Col-WT plants also had visible disease symptoms, with large areas of hyphae on the fully expanded leaves. While the HbRPW8-a overexpression lines (#8, #16 and #27) showed limited disease symptoms, with fewer hyphae on the leaves, and the resistant plant Wa-WT was basically disease free (Figure 5a). Additionally, we measured the basal immune responses in Arabidopsis plants after powdery mildew inoculation. Consistent with their disease symptoms, the callose deposition and ROS accumulation in leaves of HbRPW8-a overexpression lines were significantly higher than those in Col-WT and pad4 mutant (Figure 5b–e). By trypan blue, we observed that blue-stained necrotic cells were abundant in the leaves of HbRPW8-a overexpression lines, but only at the leaf margins in Col-WT (Figure 5c). We also counted the number of conidiophores per colony from these plants and revealed that the HbRPW8-a overexpression lines had a significantly fewer conidiophores than that of Col-WT (Figure 5f). Similar to that in AtRPW8.1-expressed Arabidopsis plants [39], the epidermal cells of HbRPW8-a overexpression lines were enriched in hydrogen peroxide surrounding germinating conidia (Figure 5g). These results reveal that overexpression of HbRPW8-a can induce the basal immune response in Arabidopsis Col and prevent powdery mildew colonization effectively.

2.5. Over-expressing HbRPW8-a in Arabidopsis Col Enhanced Plant Resistance to Bacteria

Flagellin 22 (flg22), as a conserved molecule pathogen-associated pattern, can trigger innate immune responses in plants [58]. After flg22 treatment, the accumulation of ROS and callose deposition in Col-WT leaves were continuously increased from 24 h to 72 h, and these responses were even stronger in the HbRPW8-a overexpression lines (Figure 6a–d).
To test whether HbRPW8-a could play a role in bacterial infection, we treated the HbRPW8-a overexpression lines with virulent PstDC3000. Col-WT plants displayed severe chlorosis in leaves with enhanced bacterial growth, whereas HbRPW8-a overexpression lines showed only mild disease symptoms with lower bacterial numbers (Figure 6e–f). These results indicate that the expression of HbRPW8-a could also enhance resistance to biotrophic bacteria P. syringae and inhibit the colonization of PstDC3000 in Arabidopsis Col plants.

2.6. Over-Expression of HbRPW8-a Cannot Improve Plant Resistance to Phytophthora Capsici and Botrytis Cinerea

Pathogen-induced cell death is important in plant resistance to biotrophic pathogens [59]. We used B. cinereal and P. capsici to investigate whether HbRPW8-a could also be involved in plant resistance to necrotrophic pathogens. The lesion diameters of B. cinerea spore infected leaves were measured at 3 dpi, however, no significant difference was observed between HbRPW8-a overexpression lines and Col-WT (Figure 7a,b).
P. capsici spores were inoculated on tobacco leaves that transiently expressed GFP, HbRPW8-a-GFP or AtRPW8.2-GFP protein after 24 h. Similarly, the lesions of the infected sites were indistinguishable between control and HbRPW8-a-GFP/ AtRPW8.2-GFP expressed regions at 3 dpi (Figure 7c,d). These results indicate that HbRPW8-a has no contribution to plant resistance to P. capsici and B. cinerea.

2.7. SA Is Required for HbRPW8-a-Mediated Powdery Mildew Resistance

SA, as one of the hormone signaling pathways, plays an important role in plant immune responses. Expressing a bacterial salicylate hydroxylase (encoded by NahG) in Arabidopsis plants was shown to convert SA to catechol [60], causing a decreased disease-resistance response due low accumulated SA [61].
To examine whether HbRPW8-a mediated plant resistance is dependent on SA signaling, we overexpressed HbRPW8-a in the NahG plants at Col background, and selected T3 transgenic homologous lines #1, #5 and #13 for further study (Supplementary Figure S2).
The disease symptom analysis in Figure 8 showed that the overexpression of HbRPW8-a in SA-deficient transgenic NahG plants failed to be resistant to powdery mildew, with similar numbers of hyphae distributed on the leaves compared to that of Col-WT (Figure 8a,g). Interestingly, the NahG plants and its HbRPW8-a transgenic lines had significantly higher ROS accumulation but less callose deposition than that of Col-WT, which caused a larger area of cell death at 3 dpi (Figure 8b–f), suggesting that SA signaling may contribute to the HbRPW8-a mediated plant resistance via regulating callose deposition.

3. Discussion

RPW8 genes were first reported as an atypical R gene in Arabidopsis in 2001 [30]. They encoded proteins containing an N-terminal transmembrane domain and one or two coiled-coil domains, known as the RPW8 domain [30]. In recent years, proteins with conserved RPW8 domains have also been found in Brassica napus, strawberries (Fragaria × ananassa), V. pseudoreticulata, Cucurbita pepo L., Akebia trifoliata and Lagenaria siceraria (Molina) Standl. (Figure 9); (for sequence information, see Supplemental Table S3) [40,41,42,62,63,64]. Among them, several RPW8s have been proved to be resistant to powdery mildew. In this study, we identified four HbRPW8s with the conserved RPW8 domain in rubber tree (Figure 1). By phylogenetic analysis, we showed that HbRPW8-a together with AtRPW8.1 and AtRPW8.2 were grouped into the same clade, indicating that HbRPW8-a protein was similar to that of AtRPW8.1 and AtRPW8.2 (Figure 1B). Similar to that of Lsi04g015960 (encoded RPW8-NBS-LRR protein) and Cp4.1LG10g02780 (encoded RPW8-NBS-LRR protein), HbRPW8-a was strongly induced by powdery mildew at 13 and 24 hpi, which corresponds to the early stages of the interaction between powdery mildew and host plants, suggesting the role of HbRPW8-a in rubber trees in response to powdery mildew.
AtRPW8 was reported as a broad-spectrum resistance gene [39,40], expression of AtRPW8 leads to enhanced resistance to four Arabidopsis powdery mildew species, tobacco powdery mildew, Hyaloperonospora parasitica, Cauliflower mosaic virus, Pyricularia oryza, Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae and other plant pathogens [30,65]. Homogeneously, the VpRPW8s could also enhance plant resistance to P. viticola, P. capsici, and P. parasitica [41]. Additionally, MdRNL2 and MdRNL6 (encode RPW8-NBS-LRR protein) were considered to be spectrum fungal resistance genes [66]. By transient expression in tobacco leaves and overexpression in Col-WT Arabidopsis, we showed that HbRPW8-a is a broad-spectrum resistance gene with resistance to E. cichoracearum UCSC1 and PstDC3000. Overexpression of AtRPW8.1 and AtRPW8.2 can active oxygen burst and callose deposition and induce plant HR response, which promotes neoplastic pathogens Alternaria and Botrytis spp. infection. In contrast, overexpressing of HbRPW8-a could not increase the sensitivity of plants to neoplastic pathogens B.cinerea and P. capsici. However, further study is required to understand the different roles between HbRPW8-a and AtRPW8.1/AtRPW8.2.
Plant RPW8s are diverse in terms of subcellular localization [41]. Both AtRPW8.1:YFP and AtRPW8.2:YFP appeared to be localized mainly in the endomembrane system [65], especially for AtRPW8.2:YFP, targeted to haustorium when powdery mildew infected, which is key to activation of resistance at the host-pathogen interface. BnHRa YFP and BnHRb-YFP were mainly localized to the extra-haustorial membrane [40]. VpRPW8s mainly located in the cytoplasm [41]. Interestingly, we found that HbRPW8-a was plasma membrane localized protein (Figure 3). AtADR1(RPW8-NBS-LRR protein), an Arabidopsis HeLo-/RPW8-like domain ‘helper’ NLR (RNL), was also localized on plasma membrane to induce immune signaling and cell death [67,68,69,70]. It will be interesting to investigate whether the plasma membrane-localization of HbRPW8-a is required for its induction of innate immune signaling.
Previous study showed that AtRPW8-mediated resistance to powdery mildew in Arabidopsis was dependent on SA signaling [71]. Similarly, we found that decreased SA in NahG plants blocked the function of HbRPW8-a in inhibiting fungal growth. Interestingly, ROS was significantly high accumulated in the leaves of NahG plants, which is probably because SA acts as direct or indirect antioxidants to protect cells from oxidative damage, observed in animal systems [72,73,74]. In addition to SA, it is very possible that other signaling pathways are also involved in HbRPW8-a mediated resistance to powdery mildew in Arabidopsis, which requires further study in the future.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Biological Materials and Growth Conditions

The Arabidopsis thaliana ecotype Columbia-0, pad4, Nicotiana benthamiana, and Hevea brasiliensis (Reyan 7-33-97) were all from our laboratory. The Arabidopsis thaliana ecotype Wa was kindly offered by Prof. Wenming Wang’s Lab. The Arabidopsis NahG was kindly offered by Chaozu He’s Lab. Rubber tree susceptible cultivar CATAS7-33-97 plants [40] were grown in the experimental plantation of Hainan University. N. benthamiana, A. thaliana wild type (Col-0 and Wa ecotype), and the pad4 mutant at Col background were grown in a greenhouse at 24 ± 2 °C under a 16 h light/8 h dark photoperiod. E. cichoracearum UCSC1 was cultured on A. thaliana pad4 mutant plants. PstDC3000 was preserved at −80 °C. B. cinerea and P. capsica were maintained at 28 °C on Potato Glucose Agar (PDA) in the dark.

4.2. Quantitative Real-Time PCR

For qRT-PCR, rubber tree bronze leaves inoculated with powdery mildew spores were sampled at 0, 4, 8,13, 24, 48, and 72 hpi. The total RNA was extracted by a plant total RNA extraction kit (Tiangen Biotech., Beijing, China). The first-strand cDNA was synthesized by the EasyScript® One-Step gDNA Removal and cDNA Synthesis SuperMix kit (TRAN, Beijing, China). qRT-PCR was then performed with SYBR green (TRAN, Beijing, China) in the LightCycler® 96 System (Roche, Switzerland). Hb18s was used as the internal control, and all used primers were listed in Supplementary Table S2. Relative expression level was calculated by 2−ΔΔCt method [75], in triplicates for each gene.

4.3. Sequence and Phylogenetic Analysis

ProtParam (http://web.expasy.org/protparam/, accessed on 16 December 2019), and NCBI-CDD (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/cdd/wrpsb.cgi, accessed on 20 December 2019), tools were used for searching RPW8s in the genome of rubber tree.
The phylogeny was inferred based on a multiple sequence alignment of the full-length amino acid sequences of the reported V. pseudoreticulata and A. thaliana RPW8s (AtRPW8.1/8.2, HR1-HR4). The phylogenetic tree was constructed via MEGA 6.0. The numbers at the end of protein names indicate the accession number of each sequence in the NCBI database.

4.4. Subcellular Localization and Transient Expression

For subcellular localization analysis, 35s-HbRPW8-a-mScarlet was constructed using a 35s-mScarlet plasmid. The RLK (At4g23740), a plasma membrane localized protein [76], was constructed as positive control (pcambia1300-35s-RLK-GFP). The recombinant plasmids were introduced into A.tumefaciens strain GV3101. Agrobacterium containing recombinant plasmids was then injected into N. benthamiana epidermal cells. The RLK-GFP and HbRPW8-a-mScarlet fusion proteins were observed after 48 h at 488 nm and 569 nm by confocal microscope (Leica TCS SP8, Germany), respectively [77].

4.5. Plant Transformation and Disease Assays

Plant transformation in Arabidopsis Col-WT and NahG was performed by the flower dip method [78]. Three T3 homozygous lines of 35s-HbRPW8-a-mScarlet were selected for subsequent experiments.
P. capsica, B. cinerea, PstDC3000, and E.cichoracearum were used for pathogenicity tests. Four-week-old tobacco leaves were inoculated with A.tumefaciens containing 35s-HbRPW8-a-GFP/35s-AtRPW8.2-GFP recombinant plasmids. After inoculation for 24 hpi, the tobacco leaves were inoculated with P. capsici spore suspension at a concentration of 5 × 104 spores mL−1 [79] and were kept under moisture retention in vitro. Five-week-old Arabidopsis leaves were inoculated with B. cinerea spores at the concentration of 1.5 × 106 spores mL−1 [80], which were also kept under moisture retention in vitro. The diameter of necrotic spots was measured after three days.
The transgenic Arabidopsis leaves were sprayed by B. cinerea spores at the concentration of 2 × 105 spores mL−1, and the size of lesion was measured after 3 days of treatment. PstDC3000 treatment with OD = 0.6 was used to observe the leave disease, the OD = 0.1 solution was used to count the bacterial concentration at the time of 0, 24, 48 and 72 hpi. For powdery mildew infection, E. cichoracearum grown for about 10 days was inoculated on transgenic lines for disease test [81]. For flg22 treatment, four-week-old Arabidopsis plants of Col-WT and transgenic lines were sprayed with 1 μM flg22 and harvested after 24, 48, 72 hpi.

4.6. ROS Measurement and Callose Staining

For ROS burst assay, four-week-old tobacco leaves and Arabidopsis leaves were collected and were stained with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB, 2 mg mL−1) solution overnight. To investigate ROS accumulation, cleaned leaves were boiled in ethanol (95%) until pigments were removed. Callose staining assay was performed as described previously [82]. In brief, treated leaves were collected and socked in ethanol (95%) overnight to remove the pigments, and then incubated in the staining solution (0.1% aniline blue, 67 mmol/L Na2HPO4, pH 12.0) for 1 h in dark at room temperature. Callose deposition was observed under an epifluorescence microscope (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) and photographed.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, we have identified four HbRPW8 genes from rubber tree in this study. By taking advantage of an Arabidopsis Col ecotype that lacks AtRPW8.1/8.2, we show that HbRPW8-a, a protein localized on the plasma membrane, has broad resistance to several plant pathogens including powdery mildew. Our study reveals a new member of the plant RPW8 family, providing a foundation for future studies and potential applications in rubber tree variety improvement.

Supplementary Materials

The supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms232012588/s1.

Author Contributions

X.L. (Xiaoli Li) carried out most of the experiments. Q.H. grew and harvested the Arabidopsis plants. Y.L. cloned the HbRPW8 genes. X.X. completed the microscope observation. Q.X. cloned the RLK gene. D.C. performed the vector construction. X.L. (Xiao Li) analyzed the data. X.L. (Xiaoli Li), Q.H. and Z.L. wrote the manuscript. C.L., W.L. and W.M. revised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was financially supported by Finance Science and Technology Project of Hainan Province (No. YSPTZX202018); National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC, grant No. 31660033); Hainan Yazhou Bay Seed Laboratory (project of B21HJ0905); Hainan Province Graduate Student Innovative Scientific Research Project (No. Hys2020-29).

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge Wenming Wang for the biological materials (Erysiphe. cichoracearum UCSC1 and Wa).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exist in this work.

References

  1. Yuan, M.H.; Ngou, B.P.M.; Ding, P.T.; Xiu-Fan, X. PTI-ETI crosstalk: An integrative view of plant immunity. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2021, 62, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Chang, M.; Chen, H.; Liu, F.Q.; Fu, Z.Q. PTI and ETI: Convergent pathways with diverse elicitors. Trends Plant Sci. 2022, 27, 113–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Naveed, Z.A.; Wei, X.Y.; Chen, J.J.; Mubeen, H.; Ali, G.S. The PTI to ETI Continuum in Phytophthora-Plant Interactions. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Katagiri, F.; Tsuda, K. Understanding the Plant Immune System. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2010, 23, 1531–1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Vakhrusheva, O.A.; Nedospasov, S.A. System of innate immunity in plants. Mol. Biol. 2011, 45, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cao, Y.Y.; Yang, M.T.; Ma, W.X.; Sun, Y.J.; Chen, G.Y. Overexpression of SSBXoc, a Single-Stranded DNA-Binding Protein from Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzicola, Enhances Plant Growth and Disease and Salt Stress Tolerance in Transgenic Nicotiana benthamiana. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Han, X.X.; Zhang, Y.H.; Zhang, Z.Y.; Xiao, H.; Wu, L.P.; Wu, L. Antiviral agent fTDP stimulates the SA signaling pathway and enhances tobacco defense against tobacco mosaic virus. Pest. Biochem. Physiol. 2022, 180, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. McNeece, B.T.; Sharma, K.; Lawrence, G.W.; Lawrence, K.S.; Klink, V.P. The mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) gene family functions as a cohort during the Glycine max defense response to Heterodera glycines. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 137, 25–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Mine, A. Structure and dynamics of the plant immune signaling network in plant-bacteria interactions. J. Gen. Plant Pathol. 2020, 86, 528–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Feng, B.M.; Shan, L.B. ROS Open Roads to Roundworm Infection. Sci. Signal. 2014, 7, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Torres, M.A.; Jones, J.D.G.; Dangl, J.L. Reactive oxygen species signaling in response to pathogens. Plant Physiol. 2006, 141, 373–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Sang, Y.; Macho, A.P. Analysis of PAMP-Triggered ROS Burst in Plant Immunity. In Methods in Molecular Biology; Humana Press: Clifton, NJ, USA, 2017; Volume 1578, pp. 143–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yu, X.; Feng, B.; He, P.; Shan, L. From Chaos to Harmony: Responses and Signaling upon Microbial Pattern Recognition. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2017, 55, 109–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Mur, L.A.J.; Kenton, P.; Lloyd, A.J.; Ougham, H.; Prats, E. The hypersensitive response; the centenary is upon us but how much do we know? J. Exp. Bot. 2008, 59, 501–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Balint-Kurti, P. The plant hypersensitive response: Concepts, control and consequences. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2019, 20, 1163–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Yuan, M.; Xin, X.-F. Bacterial Infection and Hypersensitive Response Assays in Arabidopsis-Pseudomonas syringae Pathosystem. Bio Protoc. 2021, 11, e4268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Wu, Q.; Jackson, D. Detection of MAPK3/6 Phosphorylation during Hypersensitive Response (HR)-Associated Programmed Cell Death in Plants. In Methods in Molecular Biology; Humana Press: Clifton, NJ, USA, 2018; Volume 1743, pp. 153–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kourelis, J.; Contreras, M.P.; Harant, A.; Pai, H.; Ludke, D.; Adachi, H.; Derevnina, L.; Wu, C.-H.; Kamoun, S. The helper NLR immune protein NRC3 mediates the hypersensitive cell death caused by the cell-surface receptor Cf-4. PLoS Genet. 2022, 18, e1010414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ross, B.T.; Zidack, N.K.; Flenniken, M.L. Extreme Resistance to Viruses in Potato and Soybean. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 658981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mei, Y.; Ma, Z.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, X. Geminivirus C4 antagonizes the HIR1-mediated hypersensitive response by inhibiting the HIR1 self-interaction and promoting degradation of the protein. New Phytol. 2020, 225, 1311–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ku, Y.S.; Sintaha, M.; Cheung, M.Y.; Lam, H.M. Plant Hormone Signaling Crosstalks between Biotic and Abiotic Stress Responses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Zeng, H.Q.; Bai, Y.J.; Wei, Y.X.; Reiter, R.J.; Shi, H.T. Phytomelatonin as a central molecule in plant disease resistance. J. Exp. Bot. 2022, 73, 5874–5885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Wan, S.W.; Xin, X.F. Regulation and integration of plant jasmonate signaling: A comparative view of monocot and dicot. J. Genet. Genom. 2022, 49, 704–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Collum, T.D.; Culver, J.N. The impact of phytohormones on virus infection and disease. Curr. Opin. Virol. 2016, 17, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Joosten, M.H.A.J.; Takken, F.L.W. Plant resistance genes: Their structure, function and evolution. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2000, 106, 699–713. [Google Scholar]
  26. Sett, S.; Prasad, A.; Prasad, M. Resistance genes on the verge of plant-virus interaction. Trends Plant Sci. 2022, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Ji, Z.Y.; Guo, W.; Chen, X.F.; Wang, C.L.; Zhao, K.J. Plant Executor Genes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 1524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Kaur, B.; Bhatia, D.; Mavi, G.S. Eighty years of gene-for-gene relationship and its applications in identification and utilization of R genes. J. Genet. 2021, 100, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Xiao, S.; Ellwood, S.; Findlay, K.; Oliver, R.P.; Turner, J.G. Characterization of three loci controlling resistance of Arabidopsis thaliana accession Ms-0 to two powdery mildew diseases. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 1997, 12, 757–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Xiao, S.; Ellwood, S.; Calis, O.; Patrick, E.; Li, T.; Coleman, M.; Turner, J.G. Broad-spectrum mildew resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana mediated by RPW8. Science 2001, 291, 118–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Urbach, J.M.; Ausubel, F.M. The NBS-LRR architectures of plant R-proteins and metazoan NLRs evolved in independent events. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 1063–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hetmann, A.; Kowalczyk, S. Effector proteins of phytopathogens recognized by intracellular immune receptors NB-LRR/NLR that activate second line of defence of the plant immune system. Postepy Biochem. 2019, 65, 72–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Meteignier, L.V.; El Oirdi, M.; Cohen, M.; Barff, T.; Matteau, D.; Lucier, J.F.; Rodrigue, S.; Jacques, P.E.; Yoshioka, K.; Moffett, P. Translatome analysis of an NB-LRR immune response identifies important contributors to plant immunity in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 3785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chen, X.J.; Zhu, M.; Jiang, L.; Zhao, W.Y.; Li, J.; Wu, J.Y.; Li, C.; Bai, B.H.; Lu, G.; Chen, H.Y.; et al. A multilayered regulatory mechanism for the autoinhibition and activation of a plant CC-NB-LRR resistance protein with an extra N-terminal domain. New Phytol. 2016, 212, 161–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kong, W.W.; Li, B.; Wang, Q.Q.; Wang, B.; Duan, X.K.; Ding, L.; Lu, Y.K.; Liu, L.W.; La, H.G. Analysis of the DNA methylation patterns and transcriptional regulation of the NB-LRR-encoding gene family in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol. Biol. 2018, 96, 563–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Xiao, S.; Calis, O.; Patrick, E.; Zhang, G.; Charoenwattana, P.; Muskett, P.; Parker, J.E.; Turner, J.G. The atypical resistance gene, RPW8, recruits components of basal defence for powdery mildew resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 2005, 42, 95–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wang, W.M.; Wen, Y.Q.; Berkey, R.; Xiao, S.Y. Specific Targeting of the Arabidopsis Resistance Protein RPW8.2 to the Interfacial Membrane Encasing the Fungal Haustorium Renders Broad-Spectrum Resistance to Powdery Mildew. Plant Cell 2009, 21, 2898–2913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Ma, X.F.; Li, Y.; Sun, J.L.; Wang, T.T.; Fan, J.; Lei, Y.; Huang, Y.Y.; Xu, Y.J.; Zhao, J.Q.; Xiao, S.Y.; et al. Ectopic Expression of RESISTANCE TO POWDERY MILDEW8.1 Confers Resistance to Fungal and Oomycete Pathogens in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2014, 55, 1484–1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Li, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Q.X.; Wang, T.T.; Cao, X.L.; Zhao, Z.X.; Zhao, S.L.; Xu, Y.J.; Xiao, Z.Y.; Li, J.L.; et al. Resistance to powdery mildew8.1 boosts pattern-triggered immunity against multiple pathogens in Arabidopsis and rice. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2018, 16, 428–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Li, Q.; Li, J.; Sun, J.L.; Ma, X.F.; Wang, T.T.; Berkey, R.; Yang, H.; Niu, Y.Z.; Fan, J.; Li, Y.; et al. Multiple Evolutionary Events Involved in Maintaining Homologs of Resistance to Powdery Mildew 8 in Brassica napus. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Lai, G.; Fu, P.; Liu, Y.; Xiang, J.; Lu, J. Molecular Characterization and Overexpression of VpRPW8s from Vitis pseudoreticulata Enhances Resistance to Phytophthora capsici in Nicotiana benthamiana. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zou, X.; Guo, R.; Zhang, L.; Duan, K.; Gao, Q. Identification of FaNBS-encoding genes responsive to Colletotrichum fructicola infection in strawberry (Fragaria xananassa Duchase). Austral. Plant Pathol. 2018, 47, 499–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Andolfo, G.; Villano, C.; Errico, A.; Frusciante, L.; Carputo, D.; Aversano, R.; Ercolano, M.R. Inferring RPW8-NLRs’s evolution patterns in seed plants: Case study in Vitis vinifera. Planta 2020, 251, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. van Beilen, J.B.; Poirier, Y. Guayule and Russian dandelion as alternative sources of natural rubber. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2007, 27, 217–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chen, W.J.; Wang, X.; Yan, S.; Huang, X.; Yuan, H.M. The ICE-like transcription factor HbICE2 is involved in jasmonate-regulated cold tolerance in the rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis). Plant Cell Rep. 2019, 38, 699–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sterling, A.; Rodriguez, N.; Quiceno, E.; Trujillo, F.; Clavijo, A.; Suarez-Salazar, J.C. Dynamics of photosynthetic responses in 10 rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis) clones in Colombian Amazon: Implications for breeding strategies. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Ma, X.W.; An, F.; Wang, L.F.; Guo, D.; Xie, G.S.; Liu, Z.F. Genome-Wide Identification of Aluminum-Activated Malate Transporter (ALMT) Gene Family in Rubber Trees (Hevea brasiliensis) Highlights Their Involvement in Aluminum Detoxification. Forests 2020, 11, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Qin, B.; Fan, S.L.; Yu, H.Y.; Lu, Y.X.; Wang, L.F. HbMYB44, a Rubber Tree MYB Transcription Factor With Versatile Functions in Modulating Multiple Phytohormone Signaling and Abiotic Stress Responses. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Liyanage, K.K.; Khan, S.; Mortimer, P.E.; Hyde, K.D.; Xu, J.; Brooks, S.; Ming, Z. Powdery mildew disease of rubber tree. For. Pathol. 2016, 46, 90–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wu, H.; Pan, Y.W.; Di, R.; He, Q.G.; Rajaofera, M.J.N.; Liu, W.B.; Zheng, F.C.; Miao, W. Molecular identification of the powdery mildew fungus infecting rubber trees in China. For. Pathol. 2019, 49, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Liyanage, K.K.; Khan, S.; Brooks, S.; Mortimer, P.E.; Karunarathna, S.C.; Xu, J.C.; Hyde, K.D. Morpho-Molecular Characterization of Two Ampelomyces spp. (Pleosporales) Strains Mycoparasites of Powdery Mildew of Hevea brasiliensis. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wang, M.; Xiao, H.X.; Li, X.N.; Wan, S.L.; Yang, Y.; Yu, H.Y.; Zhang, Y.; Qin, B. Functional characterization of powdery mildew resistance-related genes HbSGT1a and HbSGT1b in Hevea brasiliensis Muell. Arg. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2022, 7, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Qin, B.; Wang, M.; He, H.X.; Xiao, H.X.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, L.F. Identification and Characterization of a Potential Candidate Mlo Gene Conferring Susceptibility to Powdery Mildew in Rubber Tree. Phytopathology 2019, 109, 1236–1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Liu, X.Y.; Zhang, C.Q.; Zhang, L.L.; Huang, J.G.; Dang, C.; Xie, C.J.; Wang, Z.Y. TaRPP13-3, a CC-NBS-LRR-like gene located on chr 7D, promotes disease resistance to wheat powdery mildew in Brock. J. Phytopathol. 2020, 168, 688–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Bourguet, D.; Delmotte, F.; Franck, P.; Guillemaud, T.; Reboud, X.; Vacher, C.; Walker, A.S.; Consortium, R.E.X. Combining Selective Pressures to Enhance the Durability of Disease Resistance Genes. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Tian, J.J.; Xu, G.Y.; Yuan, M. Towards Engineering Broad-Spectrum Disease-Resistant Crops. Trends Plant Sci. 2020, 25, 424–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Pandolfi, V.; Neto, J.; da Silva, M.D.; Amorim, L.L.B.; Wanderley-Nogueira, A.C.; Silva, R.L.D.; Kido, E.A.; Crovella, S.; Iseppon, A.M.B. Resistance (R) Genes: Applications and Prospects for Plant Biotechnology and Breeding. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2017, 18, 323–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Jin, Y.; Tuang, Z.K.; Wang, Y.; Wu, Z.; Yang, W. Potential roles for pattern molecule of PAMP-triggered immunity in improving crop cold tolerance. Plant Cell Rep. 2022, 41, 337–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Lai, Z.; Wang, F.; Zheng, Z.; Fan, B.; Chen, Z. A critical role of autophagy in plant resistance to necrotrophic fungal pathogens. Plant J. 2011, 66, 953–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zhang, K.W.; Halitschke, R.; Yin, C.X.; Liu, C.J.; Gan, S.S. Salicylic acid 3-hydroxylase regulates Arabidopsis leaf longevity by mediating salicylic acid catabolism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 14807–14812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Sanchez, G.; Gerhardt, N.; Siciliano, F.; Vojnov, A.; Malcuit, I.; Marano, M.R. Salicylic Acid Is Involved in the Nb-Mediated Defense Responses to Potato virus X in Solanum tuberosum. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2010, 23, 394–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Wang, Y.L.; Qi, C.; Luo, Y.S.; Zhang, F.; Dai, Z.Y.; Li, M.; Qu, S.P. Identification and mapping of CpPM10.1, a major gene involved in powdery mildew (race 2 France of Podosphaera xanthii) resistance in zucchini (Cucurbita pepo L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 2021, 134, 2531–2545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Yu, X.J.; Zhong, S.F.; Yang, H.; Chen, C.; Chen, W.; Yang, H.; Guan, J.; Fu, P.; Tan, F.Q.; Ren, T.H.; et al. Identification and Characterization of NBS Resistance Genes in Akebia trifoliata. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Wang, J.; Yang, C.; Wu, X.Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, B.G.; Wu, X.H.; Lu, Z.F.; Li, G.J. Genome-wide characterization of NBS-LRR family genes and expression analysis under powdery mildew stress in Lagenaria siceraria. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2022, 118, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Wang, W.; Devoto, A.; Turner, J.G.; Xiao, S. Expression of the membrane-associated resistance protein RPW8 enhances basal defense against biotrophic pathogens. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. MPMI 2007, 20, 966–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Zhang, Q.L.; Wang, Y.H.; Wei, H.Y.; Fan, W.Q.; Xu, C.R.; Li, T.Z. CCR-NB-LRR proteins MdRNL2 and MdRNL6 interact physically to confer broad-spectrum fungal resistance in apple (Malus x domestica). Plant J. 2021, 108, 1522–1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Monteiro, F.; Nishimura, M.T. Structural, Functional, and Genomic Diversity of Plant NLR Proteins: An Evolved Resource for Rational Engineering of Plant Immunity. In Annual Review of Phytopathology; Leach, J.E., Lindow, S.E., Eds.; Annual Reviews: Palo Alto, CA, USA, 2018; Volume 56, pp. 243–267. [Google Scholar]
  68. Jacob, P.; Kim, N.H.; Wu, F.H.; El Kasmr, F.; Chi, Y.; Walton, W.G.; Furzer, O.J.; Lietzan, A.D.; Sunil, S.; Kempthorn, K.; et al. Plant “helper” immune receptors are Ca2+-permeable nonselective cation channels. Science 2021, 373, 420–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Wu, Z.S.; Tian, L.; Liu, X.R.; Zhang, Y.L.; Li, X. TIR signal promotes interactions between lipase-like proteins and ADR1-L1 receptor and ADR1-L1 oligomerization. Plant Physiol. 2021, 187, 681–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Saile, S.C.; Ackermann, F.M.; Sunil, S.; Keicher, J.; Bayless, A.; Bonardi, V.; Wan, L.; Doumane, M.; Stobbe, E.; Jaillais, Y.; et al. Arabidopsis ADR1 helper NLR immune receptors localize and function at the plasma membrane in a phospholipid dependent manner. New Phytol. 2021, 232, 2440–2456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Xiao, S.; Brown, S.; Patrick, E.; Brearley, C.; Turner, J.G. Enhanced transcription of the Arabidopsis disease resistance genes RPW8.1 and RPW8.2 via a salicylic acid-dependent amplification circuit is required for hypersensitive cell death. Plant Cell 2003, 15, 33–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Podhaisky, H.P.; Abate, A.; Polte, T.; Oberle, S.; Schroder, H. Aspirin protects endothelial cells from oxidative stress—Possible synergism with vitamin E. FEBS Lett. 1997, 417, 349–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Oberle, S.; Polte, T.; Abate, A.; Podhaisky, H.P.; Schroder, H. Aspirin increases ferritin synthesis in endothelial cells: A novel antioxidant pathway. Circ. Res. 1998, 82, 1016–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Castagne, V.; Barneoud, P.; Clarke, P.G. Protection of axotomized ganglion cells by salicylic acid. Brain Res. 1999, 840, 162–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Liu, J.; Elmore, J.M.; Lin, Z.J.D.; Coaker, G. A Receptor-like Cytoplasmic Kinase Phosphorylates the Host Target RIN4, Leading to the Activation of a Plant Innate Immune Receptor. Cell Host Microbe 2011, 9, 137–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Xiang, J.; Li, X.; Wu, J.; Yin, L.; Zhang, Y.; Lu, J. Studying the Mechanism of Plasmopara viticola RxLR Effectors on Suppressing Plant Immunity. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Clough, S.J.; Bent, A.F. Floral dip: A simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 1998, 16, 735–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. He, Q.G.; Liu, Y.; Liang, P.; Liao, X.M.; Li, X.; Li, X.; Shi, D.; Liu, W.B.; Lin, C.H.; Zheng, F.C.; et al. A novel chorismate mutase from Erysiphe quercicola performs dual functions of synthesizing amino acids and inhibiting plant salicylic acid synthesis. Microbiol. Res. 2021, 242, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Wang, X.; Guo, R.; Tu, M.; Wang, D.; Guo, C.; Wan, R.; Li, Z.; Wang, X. Ectopic Expression of the Wild Grape WRKY Transcription Factor VqWRKY52 in Arabidopsis thaliana Enhances Resistance to the Biotrophic Pathogen Powdery Mildew But Not to the Necrotrophic Pathogen Botrytis cinerea. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Adam, L.; Ellwood, S.; Wilson, I.; Saenz, G.; Xiao, S.; Oliver, R.P.; Turner, J.G.; Somerville, S. Comparison of Erysiphe cichoracearum and E. cruciferarum and a survey of 360 Arabidopsis thaliana accessions for resistance to these two powdery mildew pathogens. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. MPMI 1999, 12, 1031–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Gomez-Gomez, L.; Felix, G.; Boller, T. A single locus determines sensitivity to bacterial flagellin in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 1999, 18, 277–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 23 12588 g001 550
Figure 1. Protein domain and phylogenetic analysis of HbRPW8s. (a) Protein domain analysis of HbRPW8s. HbRPW8s contained RPW8 domain, conserved disease resistance domains NB (nucleotide binding sites) and LRR (leucine-rich repeats), except for HbRPW8-a, with only the RPW8 domain (7-128aa); (b) phylogenetic analysis of HbRPW8s with other RPW8s in V. pseudoreticulata and A. thaliana.
Figure 1. Protein domain and phylogenetic analysis of HbRPW8s. (a) Protein domain analysis of HbRPW8s. HbRPW8s contained RPW8 domain, conserved disease resistance domains NB (nucleotide binding sites) and LRR (leucine-rich repeats), except for HbRPW8-a, with only the RPW8 domain (7-128aa); (b) phylogenetic analysis of HbRPW8s with other RPW8s in V. pseudoreticulata and A. thaliana.
Ijms 23 12588 g001
Ijms 23 12588 g002 550
Figure 2. Transcriptional expression of HbRPW8s in response to E. quercicola. The relative expression of each gene was calibrated against 0 h uninoculated samples. The experiment was performed with three biological replicates, and six plants were used in each independent trial. The data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Duncan’s multiple comparison tests. Data were showed as means ± standard error. Bars with different lower-case letters show significant differences at the level of p < 0.05.
Figure 2. Transcriptional expression of HbRPW8s in response to E. quercicola. The relative expression of each gene was calibrated against 0 h uninoculated samples. The experiment was performed with three biological replicates, and six plants were used in each independent trial. The data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Duncan’s multiple comparison tests. Data were showed as means ± standard error. Bars with different lower-case letters show significant differences at the level of p < 0.05.
Ijms 23 12588 g002
Ijms 23 12588 g003 550
Figure 3. Subcellular localization of HbRPW8-a protein by transient expression in tobacco epidermal cells. The plasma membrane localized AtRLK-GFP was used as positive control. The 35S: mScarlet empty vector was used as negative control. Scale bar = 20 μm.
Figure 3. Subcellular localization of HbRPW8-a protein by transient expression in tobacco epidermal cells. The plasma membrane localized AtRLK-GFP was used as positive control. The 35S: mScarlet empty vector was used as negative control. Scale bar = 20 μm.
Ijms 23 12588 g003
Ijms 23 12588 g004 550
Figure 4. Plant immune responses induced by transient expression of HbRPW8-a in N. benthamiana leaves. A total of five plants were used for each treatment. Each test contained three biological replicates. (a) Callose deposition induced by HbRPW8-a and AtRPW8.2 genes in N. benthamiana leaves; scale bar = 100 μm. (b) Average numbers of callose deposits per 1 mm2; (c) ROS accumulation induced by HbRPW8-a and AtRPW8.2 genes in N. benthamiana leaves; (d) representation of DAB-positive stained clusters in tobacco leaves. Number of stained clusters was calculated per cm2 and repeated three times; (e) confirmed expression of fusion protein in N. benthamiana leaves. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three independent experiments. Columns with different letters represent significant difference according to Duncan’s multiple range test at p < 0.05.
Figure 4. Plant immune responses induced by transient expression of HbRPW8-a in N. benthamiana leaves. A total of five plants were used for each treatment. Each test contained three biological replicates. (a) Callose deposition induced by HbRPW8-a and AtRPW8.2 genes in N. benthamiana leaves; scale bar = 100 μm. (b) Average numbers of callose deposits per 1 mm2; (c) ROS accumulation induced by HbRPW8-a and AtRPW8.2 genes in N. benthamiana leaves; (d) representation of DAB-positive stained clusters in tobacco leaves. Number of stained clusters was calculated per cm2 and repeated three times; (e) confirmed expression of fusion protein in N. benthamiana leaves. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three independent experiments. Columns with different letters represent significant difference according to Duncan’s multiple range test at p < 0.05.
Ijms 23 12588 g004
Ijms 23 12588 g005 550
Figure 5. Overexpression of HbRPW8-a prevent powdery mildew colonization. (a) Over-expressing lines (#8, #16, #27), pad4 mutant, Col-WT and Wa-WT plants were infected with powdery mildew. Col-WT, as a control, leaves were covered with hyphae; pad4, as a sensitive line, leaves were covered layer of hyphae; The over-expression line leaves covered a few hyphae; Wa-WT, as a disease resistant plant, with almost no hyphae on leaves. Plants were photographed 7 dpi. Plant cell death induced by E. cichoracearum colonies was highlighted by the arrow; (b) The content of callose depositions in the leaves of over-expression lines was the highest, followed by Wa-WT, Col-WT, and pad4. Callose deposition were stained with DAB at 48 hpi, and observed under microscope UV light; scale bar = 100 μm. (c) A large number of reactive oxygen species accumulation clusters appeared in the leaves of overexpression lines, accompanied by densely cell death; Col-WT leaves showed a few reactive oxygen species accumulation clusters and cell death; pad 4 and Wa WT showed slight cell necrosis. The accumulation of ROS and cell death in different plants at 3 dpi. ROS was visualized with DAB. Plant cell death were stained with trypan blue; (d) representation of DAB-positive stained clusters in over-expressing lines, pad4, Col-WT and Wa-WT leaves of per cm2. Data were shown as the means ± SD from three independent experiments and columns with different letters indicate significant difference (p < 0.05). (e) average numbers of callose deposits per 1 mm2 are displayed in over-expressing lines, pad4, Col-WT and Wa-WT leaves at 48 hpi. Data were shown as the means ± SD from three independent experiments and columns with different letters indicate significant difference (p < 0.05); (f) quantitative analysis of conidiophore formation on over-expressing lines, pad4, Col-WT and Wa-WT leaves at 7 dpi. Data were shown as the means ± SD from three independent experiments and columns with different letters indicate significant difference (p < 0.05); (g) fungal structures on leaves of Col-WT, pad4 and #16 stained with trypan blue at 3 dpi and 7 dpi; From 3dpi to 7dpi, the number of hyphae on the leaves became more, especially on pad4 leaves, the fungal structures was densely spread on the leaves. The fungal structures of Col-WT was less than that of pad4, but more than that of #16. And the epidermal cells of #16 were enriched in hydrogen peroxide surrounding germinating conidia, which was not find in Col-WT or pad4 leaves; scale bar = 50 μm.
Figure 5. Overexpression of HbRPW8-a prevent powdery mildew colonization. (a) Over-expressing lines (#8, #16, #27), pad4 mutant, Col-WT and Wa-WT plants were infected with powdery mildew. Col-WT, as a control, leaves were covered with hyphae; pad4, as a sensitive line, leaves were covered layer of hyphae; The over-expression line leaves covered a few hyphae; Wa-WT, as a disease resistant plant, with almost no hyphae on leaves. Plants were photographed 7 dpi. Plant cell death induced by E. cichoracearum colonies was highlighted by the arrow; (b) The content of callose depositions in the leaves of over-expression lines was the highest, followed by Wa-WT, Col-WT, and pad4. Callose deposition were stained with DAB at 48 hpi, and observed under microscope UV light; scale bar = 100 μm. (c) A large number of reactive oxygen species accumulation clusters appeared in the leaves of overexpression lines, accompanied by densely cell death; Col-WT leaves showed a few reactive oxygen species accumulation clusters and cell death; pad 4 and Wa WT showed slight cell necrosis. The accumulation of ROS and cell death in different plants at 3 dpi. ROS was visualized with DAB. Plant cell death were stained with trypan blue; (d) representation of DAB-positive stained clusters in over-expressing lines, pad4, Col-WT and Wa-WT leaves of per cm2. Data were shown as the means ± SD from three independent experiments and columns with different letters indicate significant difference (p < 0.05). (e) average numbers of callose deposits per 1 mm2 are displayed in over-expressing lines, pad4, Col-WT and Wa-WT leaves at 48 hpi. Data were shown as the means ± SD from three independent experiments and columns with different letters indicate significant difference (p < 0.05); (f) quantitative analysis of conidiophore formation on over-expressing lines, pad4, Col-WT and Wa-WT leaves at 7 dpi. Data were shown as the means ± SD from three independent experiments and columns with different letters indicate significant difference (p < 0.05); (g) fungal structures on leaves of Col-WT, pad4 and #16 stained with trypan blue at 3 dpi and 7 dpi; From 3dpi to 7dpi, the number of hyphae on the leaves became more, especially on pad4 leaves, the fungal structures was densely spread on the leaves. The fungal structures of Col-WT was less than that of pad4, but more than that of #16. And the epidermal cells of #16 were enriched in hydrogen peroxide surrounding germinating conidia, which was not find in Col-WT or pad4 leaves; scale bar = 50 μm.
Ijms 23 12588 g005
Ijms 23 12588 g006 550
Figure 6. The responses of HbRPW8-a over-expressing lines and Col-WT to bacterial infection. (a,b), flg22 induced strong immune response in over-expressing lines (a) The callose deposition of Col-WT and over-expressing lines leaves induced by flg22 at 24, 48, 72 hpi; scale bar = 100 μm. (b) ROS accumulation in the overexpressing lines and Col-WT plants at 24, 48, 72 hpi; (c) average numbers of callose deposits per mm2 are displayed in Col-WT and over-expressing lines at 24, 48, 72 hpi; Data were shown as the means ± SD from three independent experiments (d) representation of DAB-positive stained clusters in Col-WT and over-expressing lines leaves. Number of stained clusters was calculated per cm2 and repeated three times; (e) phenotypes of Col-WT and overexpression lines infected with PstDC3000 at 7 dpi; (f) bacterial growth in the leaves was determined at 3 dpi. Data were shown as the means ± SD from three independent experiments and columns with different letters indicate significant difference (p < 0.05).
Figure 6. The responses of HbRPW8-a over-expressing lines and Col-WT to bacterial infection. (a,b), flg22 induced strong immune response in over-expressing lines (a) The callose deposition of Col-WT and over-expressing lines leaves induced by flg22 at 24, 48, 72 hpi; scale bar = 100 μm. (b) ROS accumulation in the overexpressing lines and Col-WT plants at 24, 48, 72 hpi; (c) average numbers of callose deposits per mm2 are displayed in Col-WT and over-expressing lines at 24, 48, 72 hpi; Data were shown as the means ± SD from three independent experiments (d) representation of DAB-positive stained clusters in Col-WT and over-expressing lines leaves. Number of stained clusters was calculated per cm2 and repeated three times; (e) phenotypes of Col-WT and overexpression lines infected with PstDC3000 at 7 dpi; (f) bacterial growth in the leaves was determined at 3 dpi. Data were shown as the means ± SD from three independent experiments and columns with different letters indicate significant difference (p < 0.05).
Ijms 23 12588 g006
Ijms 23 12588 g007 550
Figure 7. The responses of HbRPW8-a over-expressing lines and Col-WT to P. capsici or B. cinerea inoculation. (a) Macroscopic evaluation of symptoms 3 dpi with B. cinerea inoculation of Col-WT and transgenic lines; necrotic area was highlighted by the arrow; (b) and (d) measurement of lesion size at 3 dpi; Data were shown as the means ± SD from three independent experiments and no significant difference (p < 0.05). (c) macroscopic evaluation of symptoms at 3 dpi with P. capsici inoculation of tobacco leaf expressed with GFP, HbRPW8-a-GFP or AtRPW8.2-GFP.
Figure 7. The responses of HbRPW8-a over-expressing lines and Col-WT to P. capsici or B. cinerea inoculation. (a) Macroscopic evaluation of symptoms 3 dpi with B. cinerea inoculation of Col-WT and transgenic lines; necrotic area was highlighted by the arrow; (b) and (d) measurement of lesion size at 3 dpi; Data were shown as the means ± SD from three independent experiments and no significant difference (p < 0.05). (c) macroscopic evaluation of symptoms at 3 dpi with P. capsici inoculation of tobacco leaf expressed with GFP, HbRPW8-a-GFP or AtRPW8.2-GFP.
Ijms 23 12588 g007
Ijms 23 12588 g008 550
Figure 8. Phenotype of HbRPW8-a over-expressing lines in NahG background inoculated with E. cichoracearum. (a) Over-expressing lines (#1, #5, #13), NahG, Col-WT plants were infected with powdery mildew and photographed at 7 dpi; Col-WT as a control, its disease syptom was the same as that of transgenic lines. The NahG disease syptom was serious, with a large number of hyphae covered on leaves. (b) the accumulation of ROS and cell death in over-expressing lines, NahG and Col-WT leaves, photographed at 3 dpi; in NahG background, plant leaves with a large number of ROS clusters, but a few in Col-WT leaves (c) plant cell callose deposition were stained with DAB at 48 hpi in over-expressing lines, NahG and Col-WT leaves, and observed under microscope UV light; in Col-WT leaves, there were a large number of callose deposition, but a few in NahG background plant leaves, scale bar = 100 μm. (d) Severe cell death occured in NahG background plant leaves, photographed at 3 dpi; (e) representation of DAB-positive stained clusters in over-expressing lines, NahG and Col-WT leaves. Number of stained clusters was calculated per cm2; (f) average numbers of callose deposits per 1 mm2 are displayed in over-expressing lines, NahG and Col-WT leaves at 48 hpi. (g) quantitative analysis of conidiophore formation on over-expressing lines, NahG and Col-WT leaves at 7 dpi. All the data were shown as the means ± SD from three independent experiments and columns with different letters indicate significant difference (p < 0.05).
Figure 8. Phenotype of HbRPW8-a over-expressing lines in NahG background inoculated with E. cichoracearum. (a) Over-expressing lines (#1, #5, #13), NahG, Col-WT plants were infected with powdery mildew and photographed at 7 dpi; Col-WT as a control, its disease syptom was the same as that of transgenic lines. The NahG disease syptom was serious, with a large number of hyphae covered on leaves. (b) the accumulation of ROS and cell death in over-expressing lines, NahG and Col-WT leaves, photographed at 3 dpi; in NahG background, plant leaves with a large number of ROS clusters, but a few in Col-WT leaves (c) plant cell callose deposition were stained with DAB at 48 hpi in over-expressing lines, NahG and Col-WT leaves, and observed under microscope UV light; in Col-WT leaves, there were a large number of callose deposition, but a few in NahG background plant leaves, scale bar = 100 μm. (d) Severe cell death occured in NahG background plant leaves, photographed at 3 dpi; (e) representation of DAB-positive stained clusters in over-expressing lines, NahG and Col-WT leaves. Number of stained clusters was calculated per cm2; (f) average numbers of callose deposits per 1 mm2 are displayed in over-expressing lines, NahG and Col-WT leaves at 48 hpi. (g) quantitative analysis of conidiophore formation on over-expressing lines, NahG and Col-WT leaves at 7 dpi. All the data were shown as the means ± SD from three independent experiments and columns with different letters indicate significant difference (p < 0.05).
Ijms 23 12588 g008
Ijms 23 12588 g009 550
Figure 9. Various RPW8 proteins exist in plants. In Brassica napus, Akebia trifoliata and Lagenaria siceraria (Molina) Standl., they only had one type of RPW8 fusion protein (RPW8 or RPW8-NR-ARC-LRR). In V. pseudoreticulata and H. brasiliensis, they had two types RPW8 fusion protein (RPW8/RPW8-NR-ARC, RPW8-NR-ARC-LRR). In Cucurbita pepo L., it had three types RPW8 fusion protein (RPW8, RPW8-GRAM, RPW8-NR-ARC-LRR). In strawberries, it had seven types RPW8 fusion protein (RPW8-NR-ARC, RPW8-(NB-ARC)2, NB-ARC-RPW8, (NB-ARC)2 CC RPW8, RPW8-NB-ARC-CC-Pkinase_Tyr- Pkinase, NB-ARC- RPW8-zf-RING2, RPW8-CC-NB-ARC-Peptidase_C48).
Figure 9. Various RPW8 proteins exist in plants. In Brassica napus, Akebia trifoliata and Lagenaria siceraria (Molina) Standl., they only had one type of RPW8 fusion protein (RPW8 or RPW8-NR-ARC-LRR). In V. pseudoreticulata and H. brasiliensis, they had two types RPW8 fusion protein (RPW8/RPW8-NR-ARC, RPW8-NR-ARC-LRR). In Cucurbita pepo L., it had three types RPW8 fusion protein (RPW8, RPW8-GRAM, RPW8-NR-ARC-LRR). In strawberries, it had seven types RPW8 fusion protein (RPW8-NR-ARC, RPW8-(NB-ARC)2, NB-ARC-RPW8, (NB-ARC)2 CC RPW8, RPW8-NB-ARC-CC-Pkinase_Tyr- Pkinase, NB-ARC- RPW8-zf-RING2, RPW8-CC-NB-ARC-Peptidase_C48).
Ijms 23 12588 g009
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, X.; He, Q.; Liu, Y.; Xu, X.; Xie, Q.; Li, Z.; Lin, C.; Liu, W.; Chen, D.; Li, X.; et al. Ectopic Expression of HbRPW8-a from Hevea brasiliensis Improves Arabidopsis thaliana Resistance to Powdery Mildew Fungi (Erysiphe cichoracearum UCSC1). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 12588. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232012588

AMA Style

Li X, He Q, Liu Y, Xu X, Xie Q, Li Z, Lin C, Liu W, Chen D, Li X, et al. Ectopic Expression of HbRPW8-a from Hevea brasiliensis Improves Arabidopsis thaliana Resistance to Powdery Mildew Fungi (Erysiphe cichoracearum UCSC1). International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(20):12588. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232012588

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Xiaoli, Qiguang He, Yuhan Liu, Xinze Xu, Qingbiao Xie, Zhigang Li, Chunhua Lin, Wenbo Liu, Daipeng Chen, Xiao Li, and et al. 2022. "Ectopic Expression of HbRPW8-a from Hevea brasiliensis Improves Arabidopsis thaliana Resistance to Powdery Mildew Fungi (Erysiphe cichoracearum UCSC1)" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 20: 12588. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232012588

APA Style

Li, X., He, Q., Liu, Y., Xu, X., Xie, Q., Li, Z., Lin, C., Liu, W., Chen, D., Li, X., & Miao, W. (2022). Ectopic Expression of HbRPW8-a from Hevea brasiliensis Improves Arabidopsis thaliana Resistance to Powdery Mildew Fungi (Erysiphe cichoracearum UCSC1). International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(20), 12588. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232012588

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop