Next Article in Journal
Immunopathologic Role of Eosinophils in Eosinophilic Chronic Rhinosinusitis
Next Article in Special Issue
Relative Contribution of Blood Pressure and Renal Sympathetic Nerve Activity to Proximal Tubular Sodium Reabsorption via NHE3 Activity
Previous Article in Journal
Hybrid Carbon Supports Composed of Small Reduced Graphene Oxide and Carbon Nanotubes for Durable Oxygen Reduction Catalysts in Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
Asprosin in the Paraventricular Nucleus Induces Sympathetic Activation and Pressor Responses via cAMP-Dependent ROS Production
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Stellate Ganglia and Cardiac Sympathetic Overactivation in Heart Failure

1
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA
2
Department of Cellular & Integrative Physiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(21), 13311; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232113311
Submission received: 16 October 2022 / Revised: 28 October 2022 / Accepted: 29 October 2022 / Published: 1 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sympathetic Nerves and Cardiovascular Diseases)

Abstract

:
Heart failure (HF) is a major public health problem worldwide, especially coronary heart disease (myocardial infarction)-induced HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), which accounts for over 50% of all HF cases. An estimated 6 million American adults have HF. As a major feature of HF, cardiac sympathetic overactivation triggers arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death, which accounts for nearly 50–60% of mortality in HF patients. Regulation of cardiac sympathetic activation is highly integrated by the regulatory circuitry at multiple levels, including afferent, central, and efferent components of the sympathetic nervous system. Much evidence, from other investigators and us, has confirmed the afferent and central neural mechanisms causing sympathoexcitation in HF. The stellate ganglion is a peripheral sympathetic ganglion formed by the fusion of the 7th cervical and 1st thoracic sympathetic ganglion. As the efferent component of the sympathetic nervous system, cardiac postganglionic sympathetic neurons located in stellate ganglia provide local neural coordination independent of higher brain centers. Structural and functional impairments of cardiac postganglionic sympathetic neurons can be involved in cardiac sympathetic overactivation in HF because normally, many effects of the cardiac sympathetic nervous system on cardiac function are mediated via neurotransmitters (e.g., norepinephrine) released from cardiac postganglionic sympathetic neurons innervating the heart. This review provides an overview of cardiac sympathetic remodeling in stellate ganglia and potential mechanisms and the role of cardiac sympathetic remodeling in cardiac sympathetic overactivation and arrhythmias in HF. Targeting cardiac sympathetic remodeling in stellate ganglia could be a therapeutic strategy against malignant cardiac arrhythmias in HF.

1. Introduction

Heart failure (HF) is a major public health problem worldwide, presented by an inability of the heart to provide metabolic demands and perfusion of organs/tissues and characterized by symptoms and signs, including shortness of breath, fatigue, rapid to irregular heart rate, lung crepitations, elevated jugular venous pressure, and peripheral tissue edema [1,2]. HF affects more than 26 million adults worldwide and an estimated 6 million American adults have HF [2,3], in which coronary heart disease (myocardial infarction, MI)-induced HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) accounts for about 50% of all HF cases [4,5,6,7]. Considering the stable incidence of HF with an annual increase, the actual burden of treatment and diagnosis in patients with HF has obviously exceeded the projected burden in the United States and worldwide, especially accounting for other factors, including an increased comorbidity burden and advancing age of the population [2,8,9]. Despite advances in diagnosis and therapeutic management of HF, HF still has a high morbidity and mortality rate. As a major feature of HF, cardiac sympathetic overactivation [10,11,12,13,14] triggers malignant arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23], which accounts for nearly 50–60% of the mortality in HF patients [20,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35]. The role of cardiac sympathetic hyperactivation in HF is highlighted by the use of β-blockers and cardiac sympathetic denervation as the key approach to the current therapy of HF [36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43]. However, such pharmacological treatment may not be ideal because some studies have demonstrated that β-blockers do not provide satisfactory protection against sudden cardiac death, and some patients are either intolerant or refractory to this therapy [44,45,46,47,48,49,50]. Additionally, despite being an alternative in managing refractory ventricular arrhythmias [38,43,51,52], cardiac sympathetic denervation has adverse complications (including Horner’s syndrome, hyperhidrosis, paresthesia, and sympathetic fight/fight response loss) that severely limit the use of procedures in HF patients [53,54]. These drawbacks have increased the focus on exploring the mechanisms responsible for HF-increased cardiac sympathetic activation and on identifying effective therapeutic interventions, which are crucial for improving prognosis of HF and reducing its mortality.
The regulation of cardiac sympathetic activation is highly integrated by the regulatory circuitry at multiple levels, including afferent, central, and efferent components of the sympathetic nervous system [55,56]. Much evidence, from other investigators and us, has confirmed the afferent and central neural mechanisms causing sympathoexcitation in HF [57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67]. The stellate ganglion is a peripheral sympathetic ganglion formed by the fusion of the 7th cervical and 1st thoracic sympathetic ganglion. As the efferent component of the sympathetic nervous system, cardiac postganglionic sympathetic neurons located in stellate ganglia provide local neural coordination independent of higher brain centers [56,68]. These neurons innervate the heart to regulate cardiac function through neurotransmitters (e.g., norepinephrine, NE) released from cardiac sympathetic nerve terminals [69]. Much evidence from clinical studies and animal experiments has demonstrated that the remodeling of cardiac postganglionic sympathetic neurons in stellate ganglia could contribute to cardiac sympathetic overactivation and malignant ventricular arrhythmias in HF. In this review, therefore, we discuss cardiac sympathetic remodeling in stellate ganglia and potential mechanisms and the role of cardiac sympathetic remodeling in cardiac sympathetic overactivation and arrhythmias in HF.

2. Anatomy and Physiology of Stellate Ganglia (Figure 1)

The sympathetic nervous system is one of the two divisions of the autonomic nervous system, the other being the parasympathetic nervous system. The sympathetic nervous system is composed of preganglionic and postganglionic neurons that are involved in signal transmission to regulate a variety of functions in all peripheral organs/tissues. The cardiac preganglionic sympathetic neurons originate in the intermediolateral column of the spinal cord in the thoracic region with the somata located in the gray rami communicantes bilaterally and symmetrically. Their axons are very short and pass through the white rami communicantes to form the synapses with cardiac postganglionic sympathetic neurons located in the lower cervical and upper thoracic paravertebral ganglia, releasing a neurotransmitter, acetylcholine, from cardiac preganglionic nerve terminals [70,71]. Usually, the 7th cervical and 1st thoracic paravertebral sympathetic ganglia fuse into stellate ganglia, and the latter play a key role in a substantial amount of cardiac neurotransmission [71,72,73]. When acetylcholine released from cardiac preganglionic sympathetic nerve endings activates nicotinic acetylcholine receptors on cardiac postganglionic sympathetic neurons in stellate ganglia, the longer cardiac postganglionic sympathetic nerve terminals innervated the heart release some neurotransmitters (such as norepinephrine, neuropeptide Y, and galanin) to regulate the functions of the heart through the activation of adrenergic receptors and other peptide receptors [72,74].
Figure 1. A schematic diagram illustrating the anatomy and physiology of stellate ganglia. ACh: acetylcholine; β-AR: β-adrenergic receptor; IML: intermediolateral nucleus; nAChR: nicotinic acetylcholine receptor; NE: norepinephrine; NPY: neuropeptide Y; Pre GSA: preganglionic sympathetic axon; Post GSA: postganglionic sympathetic axon; Post GSN: postganglionic sympathetic neuron; SG: stellate ganglion.
Figure 1. A schematic diagram illustrating the anatomy and physiology of stellate ganglia. ACh: acetylcholine; β-AR: β-adrenergic receptor; IML: intermediolateral nucleus; nAChR: nicotinic acetylcholine receptor; NE: norepinephrine; NPY: neuropeptide Y; Pre GSA: preganglionic sympathetic axon; Post GSA: postganglionic sympathetic axon; Post GSN: postganglionic sympathetic neuron; SG: stellate ganglion.
Ijms 23 13311 g001
In the physiological condition, the sympathetic nervous system is responsible for up/downregulating various homeostatic mechanisms in many organs/tissues, especially mediating the fight-or-flight response in situations in which survival is threatened [75,76]. Norepinephrine, which is released from cardiac postganglionic sympathetic neurons in stellate ganglia with their nerve terminals, binds with beta-adrenergic receptors to affect cardiac electrophysiological and contractile functions, including heart rate, cardiac conduction, and myocardial contraction, which finally regulates cardiac output to supply the whole body with oxygenated blood and nutrients [14,75]. It is widely recognized that cardiac postganglionic sympathetic nerve terminals innervate the sinoatrial node, atrioventricular node, His bundle, and contractile myocardium [77]. However, the innervation of the heart with cardiac postganglionic sympathetic neurons in the stellate ganglia presents lateral and regional variations (such as anterior/posterior and left/right divisions of the heart) [78]. In particular, there is an obvious variation and overlap in the innervation of the cardiac tissues from the left and right stellate ganglia [78,79]. The sinoatrial node is primarily innervated by cardiac postganglionic sympathetic nerve terminals from the right stellate ganglion [78]. The conduction system, including the sinoatrial node, atrioventricular node, and His bundle, is more densely innervated than the contractile myocardium [80,81]. Compared to the endocardium of the heart, there is a high density of postganglionic sympathetic innervation on the epicardium of the heart [78,81]. The posterior surface of the heart is mostly innervated by cardiac postganglionic sympathetic nerve terminals from the left stellate ganglion, whereas the anterior surface of the heart is principally innervated by sympathetic nerve terminals from the right stellate ganglion, measured by activation recovery internal (ARI) shortening as a probe of functional innervation [78]. Additionally, it is possible that certain areas of the heart are not innervated by cardiac postganglionic sympathetic nerve terminals from both sides of the stellate ganglia.
Although the amount of neurotransmitters, including norepinephrine, is primarily determined by the intensity of the cardiac postganglionic sympathetic nerve activity, the number of norepinephrine molecules that bind to cardiac adrenergic receptors and induce biological effects on the heart is not only determined by the release of norepinephrine from cardiac postganglionic sympathetic nerve terminals but also by its elimination from the synaptic cleft [82]. Normally, more than 90% of the norepinephrine released into the synaptic cleft is removed by the norepinephrine transporter (NET) [83]. NET (also named the noradrenaline transporter, NAT), a 617 amino acid protein, comprises 12 transmembrane domains at cardiac postganglionic sympathetic nerve terminals [84]. As a member of the sodium/chloride-dependent family of neurotransmitter transporters, NET can take up norepinephrine from the interstitial space to sympathetic nerve terminals with the stochiometric exchange of sodium and chloride against their electrochemical gradient [84]. Therefore, the expression and activity of NET are key factors affecting the level of norepinephrine molecules binding with cardiac adrenergic receptors and maintenance of the intrinsic myocardial electrophysiology and contractility.
In addition to cardiac postganglionic sympathetic neurons, satellite glial cells are also located in stellate ganglia. Satellite glial cells exist ubiquitously in peripheral ganglia, including sympathetic, parasympathetic, and sensory ganglia, which almost envelop peripheral ganglionic neuronal cell somata [85]. Although astrocytes, a counterpart of satellite glial cells in the central nervous system, have been widely studied, a few studies reported the morphology and function of satellite glial cells in peripheral ganglia, including stellate ganglia. Satellite glial cells are derived from the neural crest and have a relatively small volume with a thinner sheath and flattened processes [86]. Normally, satellite glial cells around a given neural cell body are in close contact with each other, which forms a neuron–glial unit to almost separate the connection between neuronal cells [85,86,87]. The distance between satellite glial cells and the membrane of peripheral ganglionic neuronal cells is about 20 nm, which is similar to that of the synaptic cleft [85]. This close synapse-like structural pattern could provide a structural basis for the neuron–satellite glial cell interaction, although little is known about the function of satellite glial cells in peripheral ganglia, especially stellate ganglia.
Although satellite glial cells are electrically non-excitable without voltage-gated sodium and calcium channels, the inwardly rectifying potassium channels (Kir4.1) are expressed in satellite glial cells [88]. Satellite glial cells also express gap junction channels (such as connexin 43, Cx43) and purinergic 2 (P2) receptors (such as P2X and P2Y receptors) on the cell membrane [85,86]. Modulation of Kir4.1 permeability and activation of Cx43 and P2 receptors might depolarize the membrane of satellite glial cells and increase the intracellular calcium concentration to induce the release of excitatory mediators (such as ATP and some cytokines) from these cells for further activation of adjacent neurons [85,87,89]. Additionally, the release of nerve growth factor (NGF) from satellite glial cells may be involved in the maintenance and restoration of adjacent neurons [90]. Moreover, using single-cell RNA sequencing, one recent study demonstrated that the mature satellite glial cells in stellate ganglia are classed into five subpopulations of satellite glial cells with different functions of the subclusters [91]. Therefore, satellite glial cells in stellate ganglia could play an important role in the regulation of sympathetic neuronal function and maintenance of these adjacent neurons.

3. Remodeling of Cardiac Postganglionic Sympathetic Neurons and Its Role in Cardiac Sympathetic Overactivation, Malignant Arrhythmias, and Cardiac Sudden Death in HF

Although cardiac sympathetic remodeling can contribute to cardiac sympathetic overactivation and has not been systematically explored during HF progression, scattered information about HF-triggered cardiac sympathetic remodeling is demonstrated by most previous studies, including our work. These include structural and functional changes in cardiac postganglionic sympathetic cell somata and their nerve terminals.

3.1. Structural Remodeling in Cardiac Postganglionic Sympathetic Neurons Located in Stellate Ganglia

The majority of sympathetic nerves projecting to the heart originate in cardiac sympathetic postganglionic neurons located in stellate ganglia. There are limited data on the actual remodeling of cardiac sympathetic neuronal structures in stellate ganglia. One previous study demonstrated that stellate ganglionic nerve sprouting and density are elevated at one to four weeks after coronary artery ligation-induced rabbit myocardial infarction, which is mediated by nerve growth factor [92]. In a porcine chronic myocardial infarction model (six weeks after left anterior coronary descending artery occlusion-induced myocardial infarction), chronic myocardial infarction significantly increased the size of neuronal somata in the left stellate ganglion [93]. Using growth-associated protein 43, synaptophysin, and tyrosine hydroxylase as immunohistochemistry markers of synapses and sympathetic neurons in stellate ganglia, Han et al. found that the synaptic density and size of sympathetic neurons in the left stellate ganglion increased in dogs two months post-myocardial infarction [94]. Tan et al. also reported that the sympathetic nerve density (immunoreactivity of tyrosine hydroxylase) in stellate ganglia was markedly increased in canines 12 weeks after premature ventricular contraction-induced cardiomyopathy [95]. Similarly, Ajijola et al. demonstrated that the size of stellate ganglionic neurons increased with an increase in the neuronal adrenergic phenotype and neuropeptide Y-positive neurons in pigs at 6 weeks post left circumflex or right coronary artery occlusion-induced myocardial infarction [96]. In humans with cardiomyopathy, the size of the stellate ganglionic neurons is significantly increased without ganglionic fibrosis and changes in the neuronal density (cell number/tissue area) and synaptic density [97]. Although these studies in myocardial infarction-induced animal HF models and humans with cardiomyopathy are not totally consistent and it is unclear how structural alterations of cardiac postganglionic sympathetic neurons affect the progression and prognosis of HF, the morphological changes in these neurons could be associated with increased stellate ganglionic nerve activities and further related to cardiac sympathetic overactivation and malignant arrhythmias. Certainly, investigation of the structures of subcellular organelles (including nucleus, mitochondria, lysosome, and secretory vesicles) by electron microscopy is necessary to explore the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying the structural remodeling of cardiac postganglionic sympathetic neuronal somata in HF.

3.2. Functional Remodeling in Cardiac Postganglionic Sympathetic Neurons Located in Stellate Ganglia

The function of neurons is to transmit electrical signals over long distances through the generation of action potentials. The left stellate ganglionic nerve activity is increased in ambulatory dogs with pacing- or coronary artery occlusion-induced HF [94,98]. Tu et al. demonstrated that the cell excitability in cardiac postganglionic sympathetic neurons located in stellate ganglia increases in coronary artery ligation-induced HF rats [99]. Although various types of ion channels (such as voltage-gated sodium, calcium, and potassium channels) can contribute to the generation of action potentials in cardiac postganglionic sympathetic neurons, voltage-gated calcium channels should be considered as the mechanism governing the increased cell excitability of these sympathetic neurons in HF because calcium influx through voltage-gated calcium channels is a key trigger for the release of neurotransmitters from neuronal nerve terminals [100,101,102]. There are five subtypes of voltage-gated calcium channels (T, L, N, P/Q, and R) functionally characterized in central and peripheral neurons [103,104]. A pore-forming α-subunit in all subtypes of calcium channels determines the biophysical and pharmacological properties of calcium channels [105]. There are three major families of α-subunits: (1) Cav1 (Cav1.1, Cav1.2, and Cav1.3) encodes L-type calcium channels; (2) Cav2 encodes P/Q (Cav2.1), N (Cav2.2), and R (Cav2.3) types of calcium channels; and (3) Cav3 encodes T-type calcium channels [105,106]. In fact, Tu et al. reported that the L, N, P/Q, and R types of calcium channels are expressed in cardiac postganglionic sympathetic neurons [99]. However, HF only increases N-type calcium currents and does not affect the mRNA and protein expression of all calcium channel subtypes in these sympathetic neurons [99]. Some previous studies demonstrated that N-type calcium channels, predominantly expressed in the nervous system, play an important role in modulating neurotransmitter release at sympathetic neve terminals [107,108]. More importantly, increased N-type calcium currents in cardiac postganglionic sympathetic neurons contribute to the elevated cell excitability of these neurons, cardiac sympathetic overactivation, and malignant arrhythmias in HF [109,110]. Until now, there has been no report about the involvement of other ion channels in HF-increased cell excitability of cardiac postganglionic sympathetic neurons.

3.3. Structural Remodeling in Cardiac Postganglionic Sympathetic Nerve Terminals

Cardiac sympathetic nerve terminals are directly embedded in the myocardium with a heterogeneous distribution. Most previous studies reported the information about structural remodeling in cardiac postganglionic sympathetic nerve terminals during HF progression from acute myocardial infarction to chronic HF, with no consistent conclusion. Acute myocardial infarction could result in sympathetic nerve terminal denervation in the scar and viable myocardium beyond the infarcted area [111,112,113]. Then, the regeneration of sympathetic nerve terminals in the heart has been characterized by nerve spouting and a high density of nerve fibers in the periphery of the necrotic myocardium of failed hearts [114,115,116]. Additionally, some previous studies also reported cardiac sympathetic nerve terminal denervation in HF [117,118]. Regions of cardiac sympathetic nerve terminal denervation and hyperinnervation are present in the same failed heart to form the heterogeneity of the cardiac sympathetic nerve distribution [119,120]. Iodine-123 meta-iodobenzylguanidine (123I-MIBG) or other radiolabeled neurotransmitter analogs (including the recently used F-18 meta-fluorobenzylguanidine) and cardiac neurotransmission imaging with single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET) have been employed to noninvasively assess the integrity of human NET and further evaluate cardiac sympathetic nerve innervation [121,122,123]. However, poor imaging quality, difficulty in distinguishing different cardiac structures, and high cost limit this technique’s application in animal studies, especially small animal studies. Additionally, previous studies used immunohistochemical staining in several myocardial slices to evaluate the structural remodeling of cardiac sympathetic nerve terminals, which cannot represent the distribution of cardiac sympathetic nerve terminals in the whole heart with a neglected heterogeneous distribution of nerve terminals. Although these structural alterations of cardiac postganglionic sympathetic nerve terminals are considered to create a high-yield substrate for malignant arrhythmias in HF [124], the conclusion from these previous studies should be questioned. Using three-dimensional assessment of the cardiac sympathetic network in cleared transparent murine hearts, one recent study demonstrated both cardiac sympathetic nerve terminal hyperinnervation and denervation in the whole heart at 2 weeks post myocardial infarction [125]. It is not clear whether the same phenomenon (sympathetic nerve terminal hyperinnervation and denervation) is also present in the whole heart with HF using three-dimensional assessment of the cardiac sympathetic network. Therefore, the timing and patterns of the cardiac sympathetic nerve terminal remodeling in HF should be re-evaluated in future studies. Indeed, structural remodeling and norepinephrine release in cardiac postganglionic sympathetic nerve terminals in HF should be combined to assess the association of cardiac sympathetic activation and malignant arrhythmias because it is unclear whether reinnervated cardiac sympathetic nerve terminals can release norepinephrine like mature sympathetic nerve terminals in the heart.

3.4. Functional Remodeling in Cardiac Postganglionic Sympathetic Nerve Terminals

The function of cardiac sympathetic nerve terminals is to release neurotransmitters, including norepinephrine, which bind to adrenergic receptors to regulate cardiac function in physiological and pathophysiological conditions. Cardiac norepinephrine spillover is measured by calculating the amount of plasma norepinephrine entering the heart and the amount of norepinephrine exiting the heart. An elevation in cardiac norepinephrine spillover occurs in HF [126,127,128,129,130,131], which primarily results from the increase in cardiac norepinephrine synthesis and release, and the decrease in norepinephrine reuptake [84,132]. By 123I-MIBG with SPECT and PET images, some clinical studies measured the heart-to-mediastinum (H/M) ratio and 123I-MIBG washout (WO) rate to demonstrate an increased level of sympathetic neurotransmitter in HF [133,134,135,136,137]. Although the above studies indirectly tested norepinephrine release and demonstrated that these measured scientific parameters are strong predictors of cardiac sympathetic overactivation, heart failure progression, life-threatening arrhythmias, and cardiac sudden death in HF, there is limited information available on the direct measurement of norepinephrine release from cardiac sympathetic nerve terminals during HF progression. In vivo cardiac microdialysis with HPLC can directly test norepinephrine release from cardiac sympathetic terminals [138,139,140], but it is hard to obtain stable data of norepinephrine release due to the heterogeneous distribution of cardiac sympathetic nerve terminals as described above. Zhang et al. recently reported an electrochemistry recording, patch-clamp technique with a carbon fiber electrode for the catecholamine release from adrenal chromaffin cells [141]. The development of this recording in in vivo cardiac slices could be an innovative technique for the direct measurement of norepinephrine release from cardiac sympathetic nerve terminals, which possibly avoids the interference of the heterogeneous distribution of cardiac sympathetic nerve terminals and also analyzes norepinephrine release kinetics (including the maximal amplitudes of norepinephrine release and reuptake).
Cardiac sympathetic activation is dependent on two major components, namely circulating catecholamines from the adrenal medulla and local norepinephrine release from cardiac postganglionic sympathetic nerve terminals. Stellate ganglion stimulation, including left, right, or bilateral stellate ganglion stimulation, produces distinct patterns of cardiac myocyte repolarization in the normal porcine heart, evaluated by the analysis of epicardial and endocardial electrograms, whereas marked dispersion of cardiac myocyte repolarization does not occur when exogenous norepinephrine is infused (circulating norepinephrine) [142]. From these data, it has been demonstrated that stellate-ganglion-stimulated dispersion of cardiac myocyte repolarization is highly arrhythmogenic, compared to the more uniform changes in cardiac myocyte repolarization triggered by circulating norepinephrine [142,143]. As described above, cardiac sympathetic denervation, a key approach to the current therapy of HF, highlights the role of cardiac sympathetic remodeling in cardiac sympathetic overactivation, malignant arrhythmias, and cardiac sudden death in HF [38,42,43]. Using in vivo shRNA transfection into stellate ganglia, Zhang et al. demonstrated that ion channel remodeling in cardiac postganglionic sympathetic neurons is involved in cardiac sympathetic overactivation and ventricular arrhythmogenesis in coronary artery ligation-induced HF [110].
Recent studies have reported that elevated neuropeptide Y and other sympathetic co-transmitters released from cardiac sympathetic neurons act on neuropeptide Y or other related receptors on the membrane of cardiac myocytes to cause the development of HF and ventricular arrhythmias [144,145,146,147,148]. As a result, cardiac postganglionic sympathetic remodeling, including alterations of the sympathetic co-neurotransmitter release (such as norepinephrine, neuropeptide Y, and galanin), could be associated with cardiac sympathetic overactivation, malignant arrhythmias, and cardiac sudden death in HF.

4. Mechanisms Underlying the Remodeling of Cardiac Postganglionic Sympathetic Neurons in HF

The mechanisms responsible for the remodeling of cardiac postganglionic sympathetic neurons in HF are not well understood and could be multifactorial. Additionally, cardiac postganglionic sympathetic nerve terminals are embedded in the myocardium. Therefore, the microenvironment surrounding cardiac postganglionic sympathetic nerve terminals in the myocardium should be the key factor for the structural and functional remodeling of these nerve terminals, although the factors that modulate cardiac postganglionic sympathetic cell somata might also affect their nerve terminals.

4.1. Mechanisms Associated with the Remodeling of Cardiac Postganglionic Sympathetic Cell Somata

Nerve growth factor (NGF), a prototypical member of the neurotrophin family, is normally involved in the maintenance, proliferation, and survival of neurons. The action of NGF in targeted cells is initiated by its high-affinity binding to the tropomyosin receptor kinase A (TrkA, also named neurotrophic tyrosine kinase receptor 1) receptors in mature sympathetic neurons [149,150]. NGF is usually produced by sympathetic innervated organ/tissues. A high level of NGF is present in stellate ganglia, in which NGF is accumulated by retrograde axonal transport to affect the function of neurons [151,152]. The local production of NGF by satellite glial cells in stellate ganglia could be another source because NGF mRNA is expressed in neurons and satellite glial cells from trigeminal ganglia [90]. Although a high level of NGF is probably involved in the structural and functional remodeling of cardiac postganglionic sympathetic cell somata, including an increased cell size of sympathetic neurons, synaptic density, and neuronal excitability in stellate ganglia in HF, further studies are needed to provide direct evidence.
As mentioned above, satellite glial cells exist ubiquitously in peripheral ganglia, including sympathetic, parasympathetic, and sensory ganglia. In addition to the local production of NGF by satellite glial cells in stellate ganglia, satellite glial cell–macrophage communication could be another mechanism responsible for the remodeling of cardiac postganglionic sympathetic neurons in HF. One recent study demonstrated that acute or chronic intestinal inflammation activates enteric glial cells to release macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) through the connexin-43 hemichannel-cytosolic PKC-MAPK-cell membrane TNFα-converting enzyme (TACE) signaling pathway [89]. M-CSF is a key factor for the regulation of macrophage survival, proliferation, migration, and activation through binding with M-CSF receptors on the macrophage membrane [153,154]. Chronic inflammation, with activation of both cytokines and immune cells (such as macrophages), is a major feature of HF [155,156,157]. Macrophages play a key role in mediating inflammatory responses in the post-myocardial infarction heart [158,159]. Our recent study already found that elevation of cytokines and macrophages in stellate ganglia is involved in cardiac sympathetic overactivation and ventricular arrhythmogenesis in HF [160]. Growing evidence suggests that inflammation-raised cytokines increase the expression and activation of cyclin-dependent kinase 5 (CDK5, a proline-directed serine/threonine kinase) in some tissues and cell lines [161,162,163]. CDK5 can phosphorylate the N-type calcium channels and the latter induce cardiac sympathetic overactivation and ventricular arrhythmias in HF [110,164,165]. Therefore, further understanding of the relations among satellite glial cells, macrophages, and cardiac postganglionic sympathetic neurons in stellate ganglia can provide therapeutic targets against cardiac sympathetic overactivation and malignant ventricular arrhythmias in HF.
Oxidative stress is also considered to be another factor for the remodeling in cardiac sympathetic neurons in HF. Ajijola et al. found that stellate ganglia from patients with cardiomyopathy and arrhythmias exhibit oxidative stress [166]. In small animal models of myocardial infarction-induced HF, oxidative signaling is increased in stellate ganglia [167]. Therefore, the effect of oxidative stress on the remodeling in cardiac sympathetic neurons and interaction between oxidative stress and inflammation-raised cytokines in HF should be explored in future studies.

4.2. Mechanisms Associated with the Remodeling in Cardiac Postganglionic Sympathetic Never Terminals

As described above, NGF is mainly produced in the sympathetic innervated organs/tissues. Western bolt analysis in the left ventricle demonstrated an elevation of NGF in explanted, failing human hearts compared to normal, donor hearts [168]. NGF overexpression in the sympathetic targeted organs/tissues causes sympathetic nerve hyperinnervation, which could be involved in nerve spouting and a high density of sympathetic nerve terminals in the periphery of the necrotic myocardium of failed hearts [116,149,152,169]. When NGF binds with TrkA receptors on sympathetic nerve terminals, activated TrkA receptors regulate cytoskeletal dynamics through successive activation of the MAPK and PI3K-Akt pathways, and endocytosed TrkA receptors promote sympathetic nerve growth and hyperinnervation through a calcineurin-dynamin 1 signaling pathway [170,171,172]. Although NGF could be considered as the key factor modulating sympathetic nerve innervation in targeted organs/tissues in physiological and pathophysiological conditions, some other factors also contribute to cardiac sympathetic hyperinnervation in either an independent style or by association with NGF [149,152]. These endogenous factors include growth differentiation factor 5 (GDF5), TNF receptor 1, leukemia inhibitory factor, cardiotrophin-1, and leptin [173,174,175,176]. Additionally, pro-NGF, pro-brain-derived neurotrophic factor (pro-BDNF), and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) activate the p75 neurotrophin receptors (p75NTRs) and death receptor 6 (DR6), two members of the TNF super-family, to stimulate sympathetic nerve denervation [177,178,179,180,181,182,183], which occurs in the cardiac infarcted area and myocardium adjacent to the scar in myocardial infarction-induced HF.
Using a mouse model of cardiac ischemia-reperfusion, one recent study demonstrates that therapeutics-restored sympathetic reinnervation of the infarcted area decreases M1-like macrophages and elevates the numbers of dendritic cells, M2-like macrophages, and Treg cells [184]. There are different contributions of M1-like and M2-like macrophages to cardiac sympathetic remodeling. Therefore, future studies are needed to assess the interaction between cardiac sympathetic remodeling and the different types of macrophages in HF
Functional remodeling in cardiac postganglionic sympathetic nerve terminals includes the change in norepinephrine synthesis, release, and reuptake in HF. For norepinephrine synthesis, normally, tyrosine is converted to 3,4-dihydrooxyphenyl alanine (DOPA) by the rate-limiting enzyme, tyrosine hydroxylase (TH). DOPA is then converted to dopamine by L-aromatic acid decarboxylase. After that, the vesicular monoamine transporter translocates dopamine into storage vesicles, in which dopamine is converted to norepinephrine by dopamine β-hydroxylase. Although it has been shown that cardiac norepinephrine synthesis is increased in HF [132], so far, it is unclear which enzyme and potential mechanism(s) are responsible for the increase in cardiac norepinephrine synthesis in HF. For norepinephrine release from sympathetic nerve terminals, Huang et al. demonstrated that the action potential modulates calcium-dependent and -independent (voltage-dependent) quantal norepinephrine release in the mammalian sympathetic nervous system [185]. Our recent studies found that the activated macrophage-triggered increase in the N-type calcium currents results in neuronal overexcitation of cardiac postganglionic sympathetic neurons in a myocardial infarction-induced HF animal model [110,160], which could contribute to the increase in the norepinephrine release from cardiac sympathetic nerve terminals in the HF state. For norepinephrine reuptake, it is responsible for the rapid removal of interstitial norepinephrine through the norepinephrine transporter (NET) after norepinephrine release from cardiac sympathetic nerve terminals. Much evidence confirms a reduction in the neuronal NET density and activity at cardiac sympathetic nerve terminals in the failing heart [186,187,188]. In cultured rat neuroblastoma cells (PC12 cell line), exogenous norepinephrine significantly reduces the expression of NET protein but not NET mRNA [189,190], which suggests post-transcriptional downregulation for NET in HF [82]. Normally, NET located in the cell membrane is regulated by glycosylation [191]. Therefore, the effect of norepinephrine on the reduction in the neuronal NET density in HF could be associated with endoplasmic reticulum stress-reduced glycosylation, causing the trafficking of NET to the cell membrane [190]. Additionally, endothelin binding with endothelin receptors also inhibits NET activity in HF by affecting NET phosphorylation because the NET activity is, in the short and long term, modulated by protein kinase A, C, and G and calcium-calmodulin-dependent protein kinase [191,192]. It is unclear whether NET activity and expression are modulated by other endogenous factors in HF, such as the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, bradykinin, nitric oxide, natriuretic peptides, etc.

5. Conclusions

In this review, we updated the information about the cardiac sympathetic remodeling in stellate ganglia and potential mechanisms and the role of cardiac sympathetic remodeling in cardiac sympathetic overactivation, arrhythmias, and cardiac dysfunction in HF (Figure 2). Using droplet-based high-throughput single-cell RNA sequencing, one recent study separated eight large clusters in the superior cervical ganglion (one type of peripheral sympathetic ganglia) from young adult mice based on the expression of canonical marker genes [193]. These clusters include satellite glial cells (Plp1, Fabp7), Schwann cells (Plp1, Ncmap), sympathetic neurons (Snap25, Th), vascular endothelial cells (Ly6c1), macrophages (C1qb), T cells (Trb2), fibroblasts (Dcn), and mural cells (Rgs5) [193]. Following the development of innovative techniques, including epigenetics, transcriptomics, proteomics, optogenetics, single-cell RNA sequence analysis, etc., more details on stellate ganglionic cell remodeling with related mechanisms in HF will be explored. Stellate ganglia could be a therapeutic target against cardiac sympathetic overactivation and myocardial electrophysiological and contractile dysfunction in HF.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Institute of Health’s National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, USA (R01HL-137832 and R01HL-144146 to Y-LL).

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sweitzer, N.K. Looking ahead: Circulation: Heart failure in 2022. Circ. Heart Fail. 2022, 15, e009405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Tsao, C.W.; Aday, A.W.; Almarzooq, Z.I.; Alonso, A.; Beaton, A.Z.; Bittencourt, M.S.; Boehme, A.K.; Buxton, A.E.; Carson, A.P.; Commodore-Mensah, Y.; et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2022 update: A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2022, 145, e153–e639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Savarese, G.; D’Amario, D. Sex differences in heart failure. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2018, 1065, 529–544. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Elgendy, I.Y.; Mahtta, D.; Pepine, C.J. Medical therapy for heart failure caused by ischemic heart disease. Circ. Res. 2019, 124, 1520–1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. He, J.; Ogden, L.G.; Bazzano, L.A.; Vupputuri, S.; Loria, C.; Whelton, P.K. Risk factors for congestive heart failure in US men and women: NHANESIepidemiologic follow-up study. Arch. Intern. Med. 2001, 161, 996–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Velagaleti, R.S.; Vasan, R.S. Heart failure in the twenty-first century: Is it a coronary artery disease or hypertension problem? Cardiol. Clin. 2007, 25, 487–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Virani, S.S.; Alonso, A.; Aparicio, H.J.; Benjamin, E.J.; Bittencourt, M.S.; Callaway, C.W.; Carson, A.P.; Chamberlain, A.M.; Cheng, S.; Delling, F.N.; et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2021 update: A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2021, 143, e254–e743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Emmons-Bell, S.; Johnson, C.; Roth, G. Prevalence, incidence and survival of heart failure: A systematic review. Heart 2022, 108, 1351–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Savarese, G.; Becher, P.M.; Lund, L.H.; Seferovic, P.; Rosano, G.M.C.; Coats, A. Global burden of heart failure: A comprehensive and updated review of epidemiology. Cardiovasc. Res. 2022; cvac013, online ahead of print. [Google Scholar]
  10. Creager, M.A.; Faxon, D.P.; Cutler, S.S.; Kohlmann, O.; Ryan, T.J.; Gavras, H. Contribution of vasopressin to vasoconstriction in patients with congestive heart failure: Comparison with the renin-angiotensin system and the sympathetic nervous system. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1986, 7, 758–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Floras, J.S. Sympathetic nervous system activation in human heart failure: Clinical implications of an updated model. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009, 54, 375–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Saul, J.P.; Arai, Y.; Berger, R.D.; Lilly, L.S.; Colucci, W.S.; Cohen, R.J. Assessment of autonomic regulation in chronic congestive heart failure by heart rate spectral analysis. Am. J. Cardiol. 1988, 61, 1292–1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Schwartz, P.J.; De Ferrari, G.M. Sympathetic-parasympathetic interaction in health and disease: Abnormalities and relevance in heart failure. Heart Fail. Rev. 2011, 16, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Triposkiadis, F.; Karayannis, G.; Giamouzis, G.; Skoularigis, J.; Louridas, G.; Butler, J. The sympathetic nervous system in heart failure physiology, pathophysiology, and clinical implications. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009, 54, 1747–1762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Du, X.J.; Cox, H.S.; Dart, A.M.; Esler, M.D. Sympathetic activation triggers ventricular arrhythmias in rat heart with chronic infarction and failure. Cardiovasc. Res. 1999, 43, 919–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Gilmour, R.F. Life out of balance: The sympathetic nervous system and cardiac arrhythmias. Cardiovasc. Res. 2001, 51, 625–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Kalla, M.; Herring, N.; Paterson, D.J. Cardiac sympatho-vagal balance and ventricular arrhythmia. Auton. Neurosci. 2016, 199, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Podrid, P.J.; Fuchs, T.; Candinas, R. Role of the sympathetic nervous system in the genesis of ventricular arrhythmia. Circulation 1990, 82, I103–I113. [Google Scholar]
  19. Schwartz, P.J. Cardiac sympathetic denervation to prevent life-threatening arrhythmias. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2014, 11, 346–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Thompson, B.S. Sudden cardiac death and heart failure. AACN Adv. Crit. Care 2009, 20, 356–365. [Google Scholar]
  21. Tomaselli, G.F.; Zipes, D.P. What causes sudden death in heart failure? Circ. Res. 2004, 95, 754–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Zhou, S.; Jung, B.C.; Tan, A.Y.; Trang, V.Q.; Gholmieh, G.; Han, S.W.; Lin, S.F.; Fishbein, M.C.; Chen, P.S.; Chen, L.S. Spontaneous stellate ganglion nerve activity and ventricular arrhythmia in a canine model of sudden death. Heart Rhythm 2008, 5, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zipes, D.P. Heart-brain interactions in cardiac arrhythmias: Role of the autonomic nervous system. Cleve. Clin. J. Med. 2008, 75, S94–S96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Carson, P.; Anand, I.; O’Connor, C.; Jaski, B.; Steinberg, J.; Lwin, A.; Lindenfeld, J.; Ghali, J.; Barnet, J.H.; Feldman, A.M.; et al. Mode of death in advanced heart failure: The Comparison of Medical, Pacing, and Defibrillation Therapies in Heart Failure (COMPANION) trial. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2005, 46, 2329–2334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Cygankiewicz, I.; Zareba, W.; Vazquez, R.; Vallverdu, M.; Gonzalez-Juanatey, J.R.; Valdes, M.; Almendral, J.; Cinca, J.; Caminal, P.; de Luna, A.B. Heart rate turbulence predicts all-cause mortality and sudden death in congestive heart failure patients. Heart Rhythm 2008, 5, 1095–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Doval, H.C.; Nul, D.R.; Grancelli, H.O.; Varini, S.D.; Soifer, S.; Corrado, G.; Dubner, S.; Scapin, O.; Perrone, S.V. Nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in severe heart failure. Independent marker of increased mortality due to sudden death. GESICA-GEMA Investigators. Circulation 1996, 94, 3198–3203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Engelstein, E.D.; Zipes, D.P. Sudden cardiac death. In Hurst’s The Heart; Alexander, R.W., Schlant, R.C., Fuster, V., Eds.; McGraw Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1998; Volume 9, pp. 1081–1112. [Google Scholar]
  28. Huikuri, H.V.; Castellanos, A.; Myerburg, R.J. Sudden death due to cardiac arrhythmias. N. Engl. J. Med. 2001, 345, 1473–1482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Jost, A.; Rauch, B.; Hochadel, M.; Winkler, R.; Schneider, S.; Jacobs, M.; Kilkowski, C.; Kilkowski, A.; Lorenz, H.; Muth, K.; et al. Beta-blocker treatment of chronic systolic heart failure improves prognosis even in patients meeting one or more exclusion criteria of the MERIT-HF study. Eur. Heart J. 2005, 26, 2689–2697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Maskin, C.S.; Siskind, S.J.; LeJemtel, T.H. High prevalence of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in severe congestive heart failure. Am. Heart J. 1984, 107, 896–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Podrid, P.J.; Fogel, R.I.; Fuchs, T.T. Ventricular arrhythmia in congestive heart failure. Am. J. Cardiol. 1992, 69, 82G–95G. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sami, M.H. Sudden death in congestive heart failure. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 1991, 31, 1081–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Singh, B.N. Significance and control of cardiac arrhythmias in patients with congestive cardiac failure. Heart Fail. Rev. 2002, 7, 285–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Singh, S.N.; Carson, P.E.; Fisher, S.G. Nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in severe heart failure. Circulation 1997, 96, 3794–3795. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  35. Teerlink, J.R.; Jalaluddin, M.; Anderson, S.; Kukin, M.L.; Eichhorn, E.J.; Francis, G.; Packer, M.; Massie, B.M. Ambulatory ventricular arrhythmias in patients with heart failure do not specifically predict an increased risk of sudden death. PROMISE (Prospective Randomized Milrinone Survival Evaluation) Investigators. Circulation 2000, 101, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Al-Gobari, M.; El, K.C.; Pillon, F.; Gueyffier, F. Beta-blockers for the prevention of sudden cardiac death in heart failure patients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord. 2013, 13, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Babick, A.; Elimban, V.; Zieroth, S.; Dhalla, N.S. Reversal of cardiac dysfunction and subcellular alterations by metoprolol in heart failure due to myocardial infarction. J. Cell. Physiol. 2013, 228, 2063–2070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. De Ferrari, G.M.; Schwartz, P.J. Left cardiac sympathetic denervation in patients with heart failure: A new indication for an old intervention? J. Cardiovasc. Transl. Res. 2014, 7, 338–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Fiuzat, M.; Wojdyla, D.; Kitzman, D.; Fleg, J.; Keteyian, S.J.; Kraus, W.E.; Pina, I.L.; Whellan, D.; O’Connor, C.M. Relationship of beta-blocker dose with outcomes in ambulatory heart failure patients with systolic dysfunction: Results from the HF-ACTION (Heart Failure: A Controlled Trial Investigating Outcomes of Exercise Training) trial. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2012, 60, 208–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Gheorghiade, M.; Colucci, W.S.; Swedberg, K. Beta-blockers in chronic heart failure. Circulation 2003, 107, 1570–1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Nevzorov, R.; Porath, A.; Henkin, Y.; Kobal, S.L.; Jotkowitz, A.; Novack, V. Effect of beta blocker therapy on survival of patients with heart failure and preserved systolic function following hospitalization with acute decompensated heart failure. Eur. J. Intern. Med. 2012, 23, 374–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Shah, R.; Assis, F.; Alugubelli, N.; Okada, D.R.; Cardoso, R.; Shivkumar, K.; Tandri, H. Cardiac sympathetic denervation for refractory ventricular arrhythmias in patients with structural heart disease: A systematic review. Heart Rhythm 2019, 16, 1499–1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Vaseghi, M.; Barwad, P.; Malavassi Corrales, F.J.; Tandri, H.; Mathuria, N.; Shah, R.; Sorg, J.M.; Gima, J.; Mandal, K.; Saenz Morales, L.C.; et al. Cardiac sympathetic denervation for refractory ventricular arrhythmias. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2017, 69, 3070–3080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Bhatt, A.S.; DeVore, A.D.; DeWald, T.A.; Swedberg, K.; Mentz, R.J. Achieving a maximally tolerated beta-blocker dose in heart failure patients: Is there room for improvement? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2017, 69, 2542–2550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Bos, J.M.; Bos, K.M.; Johnson, J.N.; Moir, C.; Ackerman, M.J. Left cardiac sympathetic denervation in long QT syndrome: Analysis of therapeutic nonresponders. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. 2013, 6, 705–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Coleman, M.A.; Bos, J.M.; Johnson, J.N.; Owen, H.J.; Deschamps, C.; Moir, C.; Ackerman, M.J. Videoscopic left cardiac sympathetic denervation for patients with recurrent ventricular fibrillation/malignant ventricular arrhythmia syndromes besides congenital long-QT syndrome. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. 2012, 5, 782–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Moss, A.J.; Zareba, W.; Hall, W.J.; Schwartz, P.J.; Crampton, R.S.; Benhorin, J.; Vincent, G.M.; Locati, E.H.; Priori, S.G.; Napolitano, C.; et al. Effectiveness and limitations of beta-blocker therapy in congenital long-QT syndrome. Circulation 2000, 101, 616–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Napolitano, C.; Priori, S.G. Diagnosis and treatment of catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. Heart Rhythm 2007, 4, 675–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Smith, K.V.; Dunning, J.R.; Fischer, C.M.; MacLean, T.E.; Bosque-Hamilton, J.W.; Fera, L.E.; Grant, J.Y.; Zelle, D.J.; Matta, L.; Gaziano, T.A.; et al. Evaluation of the usage and dosing of guideline-directed medical therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients in clinical practice. J. Pharm. Pract. 2022, 35, 747–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Veenis, J.F.; Rocca, H.B.; Linssen, G.C.M.; Erol-Yilmaz, A.; Pronk, A.C.B.; Engelen, D.J.M.; van Tooren, R.M.; Koornstra-Wortel, H.J.J.; de Boer, R.A.; van der Meer, P.; et al. Impact of sex-specific target dose in chronic heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction. Eur. J. Prev. Cardiol. 2021, 28, 957–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hofferberth, S.C.; Cecchin, F.; Loberman, D.; Fynn-Thompson, F. Left thoracoscopic sympathectomy for cardiac denervation in patients with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2014, 147, 404–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Schneider, H.E.; Steinmetz, M.; Krause, U.; Kriebel, T.; Ruschewski, W.; Paul, T. Left cardiac sympathetic denervation for the management of life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias in young patients with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and long QT syndrome. Clin. Res. Cardiol. 2013, 102, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Rathinam, S.; Nanjaiah, P.; Sivalingam, S.; Rajesh, P.B. Excision of sympathetic ganglia and the rami communicantes with histological confirmation offers better early and late outcomes in Video assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2008, 3, 50–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Webster, G.; Monge, M.C. Left cardiac sympathetic denervation: Should we sweat the side effects? Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. 2015, 8, 1007–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Lathro, D.A.; Spooner, P.M. On the neural connection. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 2001, 12, 841–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Verrier, R.L.; Antzelevitch, C. Autonomic aspects of arrhythmogenesis: The enduring and the new. Curr. Opin. Cardiol. 2004, 19, 2–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Zucker, I.H.; Xiao, L.; Haack, K.K. The central renin-angiotensin system and sympathetic nerve activity in chronic heart failure. Clin. Sci. 2014, 126, 695–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Zucker, I.H.; Schultz, H.D.; Patel, K.P.; Wang, W.; Gao, L. Regulation of central angiotensin type 1 receptors and sympathetic outflow in heart failure. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2009, 297, H1557–H1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Zhang, D.; Liu, J.; Tu, H.; Melleman, R.L.; Cornish, K.G.; Li, Y.L. In-vivo transfection of manganese superoxide dismutase gene or NFkB shRNA in nodose ganglia improves aortic baroreceptor function in heart failure rats. Hypertension 2014, 63, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Wang, W.; Chen, J.S.; Zucker, I.H. Carotid sinus baroreceptor sensitivity in experimental heart failure. Circulation 1990, 81, 1959–1966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Schultz, H.D.; Li, Y.L.; Ding, Y. Arterial chemoreceptors and sympathetic nerve activity: Implications for hypertension and heart failure. Hypertension 2007, 50, 6–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Patel, K.P.; Zheng, H. Central neural control of sympathetic nerve activity in heart failure following exercise training. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2012, 302, H527–H537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. May, C.N.; Yao, S.T.; Booth, L.C.; Ramchandra, R. Cardiac sympathoexcitation in heart failure. Auton. Neurosci. 2013, 175, 76–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Lymperopoulos, A.; Rengo, G.; Koch, W.J. Adrenergic nervous system in heart failure: Pathophysiology and therapy. Circ. Res. 2013, 113, 739–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Felder, R.B. Mineralocorticoid receptors, inflammation and sympathetic drive in a rat model of systolic heart failure. Exp. Physiol. 2010, 95, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Xu, B.; Li, H. Brain mechanisms of sympathetic activation in heart failure: Roles of the renin-angiotensin system, nitric oxide and pro-inflammatory cytokines (Review). Mol. Med. Rep. 2015, 12, 7823–7829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Doehner, W.; Ural, D.; Haeusler, K.G.; Čelutkienė, J.; Bestetti, R.; Cavusoglu, Y.; Peña-Duque, M.A.; Glavas, D.; Iacoviello, M.; Laufs, U.; et al. Heart and brain interaction in patients with heart failure: Overview and proposal for a taxonomy. A position paper from the Study Group on Heart and Brain Interaction of the Heart Failure Association. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2018, 20, 199–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Cuevas, J. Molecular mechanisms of dysautonomia during heart failure. Focus on “Heart failure-induced changes of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels and cell excitability in rat cardiac postganglionic neurons”. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2014, 306, C121–C122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Wallis, D.; Watson, A.H.; Mo, N. Cardiac neurons of autonomic ganglia. Microsc. Res. Tech. 1996, 35, 69–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wehrwein, E.A.; Orer, H.S.; Barman, S.M. Overview of the anatomy, physiology, and pharmacology of the autonomic nervous system. Compr. Physiol. 2016, 6, 1239–1278. [Google Scholar]
  71. Wink, J.; van Delft, R.; Notenboom, R.G.E.; Wouters, P.F.; DeRuiter, M.C.; Plevier, J.W.M.; Jongbloed, M.R.M. Human adult cardiac autonomic innervation: Controversies in anatomical knowledge and relevance for cardiac neuromodulation. Auton. Neurosci. 2020, 227, 102674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Hasan, W. Autonomic cardiac innervation: Development and adult plasticity. Organogenesis 2013, 9, 176–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Pardini, B.J.; Lund, D.D.; Schmid, P.G. Organization of the sympathetic postganglionic innervation of the rat heart. J. Auton. Nerv. Syst. 1989, 28, 193–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Hoang, J.D.; Salavatian, S.; Yamaguchi, N.; Swid, M.A.; David, H.; Vaseghi, M. Cardiac sympathetic activation circumvents high-dose beta blocker therapy in part through release of neuropeptide Y. JCI Insight 2020, 5, e135519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Borovac, J.A.; D’Amario, D.; Bozic, J.; Glavas, D. Sympathetic nervous system activation and heart failure: Current state of evidence and the pathophysiology in the light of novel biomarkers. World J. Cardiol. 2020, 12, 373–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. de Lucia, C.; Piedepalumbo, M.; Paolisso, G.; Koch, W.J. Sympathetic nervous system in age–related cardiovascular dysfunction: Pathophysiology and therapeutic perspective. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2019, 108, 29–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Coote, J.H.; Chauhan, R.A. The sympathetic innervation of the heart: Important new insights. Auton. Neurosci. 2016, 199, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Meng, L.; Shivkumar, K.; Ajijola, O. Autonomic regulation and ventricular arrhythmias. Curr. Treat Options Cardiovasc. Med. 2018, 20, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Chen, P.S.; Chen, L.S.; Cao, J.M.; Sharifi, B.; Karagueuzian, H.S.; Fishbein, M.C. Sympathetic nerve sprouting, electrical remodeling and the mechanisms of sudden cardiac death. Cardiovasc. Res. 2001, 50, 409–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Huang, W.A.; Boyle, N.G.; Vaseghi, M. Cardiac innervation and the autonomic nervous system in sudden cardiac death. Card. Electrophysiol. Clin. 2017, 9, 665–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Kimura, K.; Ieda, M.; Fukuda, K. Development, maturation, and transdifferentiation of cardiac sympathetic nerves. Circ. Res. 2012, 110, 325–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Backs, J.; Haunstetter, A.; Gerber, S.H.; Metz, J.; Borst, M.M.; Strasser, R.H.; Kübler, W.; Haass, M. The neuronal norepinephrine transporter in experimental heart failure: Evidence for a posttranscriptional downregulation. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2001, 33, 461–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Eisenhofer, G.; Friberg, P.; Rundqvist, B.; Quyyumi, A.A.; Lambert, G.; Kaye, D.M.; Kopin, I.J.; Goldstein, D.S.; Esler, M.D. Cardiac sympathetic nerve function in congestive heart failure. Circulation 1996, 93, 1667–1676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Liang, C.S. Cardiac sympathetic nerve terminal function in congestive heart failure. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2007, 28, 921–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Hanani, M.; Spray, D.C. Emerging importance of satellite glia in nervous system function and dysfunction. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2020, 21, 485–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Hanani, M. Satellite glial cells in sympathetic and parasympathetic ganglia: In search of function. Brain Res. Rev. 2010, 64, 304–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Hanani, M.; Verkhratsky, A. Satellite glial cells and astrocytes, a comparative review. Neurochem. Res. 2021, 46, 2525–2537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Durham, P.L.; Garrett, F.G. Development of functional units within trigeminal ganglia correlates with increased expression of proteins involved in neuron-glia interactions. Neuron Glia Biol. 2010, 6, 171–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Grubišić, V.; McClain, J.L.; Fried, D.E.; Grants, I.; Rajasekhar, P.; Csizmadia, E.; Ajijola, O.A.; Watson, R.E.; Poole, D.P.; Robson, S.C.; et al. Enteric glia modulate macrophage phenotype and visceral sensitivity following inflammation. Cell Rep. 2020, 32, 108100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Kurata, S.; Goto, T.; Gunjigake, K.K.; Kataoka, S.; Kuroishi, K.N.; Ono, K.; Toyono, T.; Kobayashi, S.; Yamaguchi, K. Nerve growth factor involves mutual interaction between neurons and satellite glial cells in the rat trigeminal ganglion. Acta Histochem. Cytochem. 2013, 46, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. van Weperen, V.Y.H.; Littman, R.J.; Arneson, D.V.; Contreras, J.; Yang, X.; Ajijola, O.A. Single-cell transcriptomic profiling of satellite glial cells in stellate ganglia reveals developmental and functional axial dynamics. Glia 2021, 69, 1281–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Nguyen, B.L.; Li, H.; Fishbein, M.C.; Lin, S.F.; Gaudio, C.; Chen, P.S.; Chen, L.S. Acute myocardial infarction induces bilateral stellate ganglia neural remodeling in rabbits. Cardiovasc. Pathol. 2012, 21, 143–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Nakamura, K.; Ajijola, O.A.; Aliotta, E.; Armour, J.A.; Ardell, J.L.; Shivkumar, K. Pathological effects of chronic myocardial infarction on peripheral neurons mediating cardiac neurotransmission. Auton. Neurosci. 2016, 197, 34–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Han, S.; Kobayashi, K.; Joung, B.; Piccirillo, G.; Maruyama, M.; Vinters, H.V.; March, K.; Lin, S.F.; Shen, C.; Fishbein, M.C.; et al. Electroanatomic remodeling of the left stellate ganglion after myocardial infarction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2012, 59, 954–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Tan, A.Y.; Elharrif, K.; Cardona-Guarache, R.; Mankad, P.; Ayers, O.; Joslyn, M.; Das, A.; Kaszala, K.; Lin, S.F.; Ellenbogen, K.A.; et al. Persistent proarrhythmic neural remodeling despite recovery from premature ventricular contraction-induced cardiomyopathy. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2020, 75, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Ajijola, O.A.; Yagishita, D.; Reddy, N.K.; Yamakawa, K.; Vaseghi, M.; Downs, A.M.; Hoover, D.B.; Ardell, J.L.; Shivkumar, K. Remodeling of stellate ganglion neurons after spatially targeted myocardial infarction: Neuropeptide and morphologic changes. Heart Rhythm 2015, 12, 1027–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Ajijola, O.A.; Wisco, J.J.; Lambert, H.W.; Mahajan, A.; Stark, E.; Fishbein, M.C.; Shivkumar, K. Extracardiac neural remodeling in humans with cardiomyopathy. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. 2012, 5, 1010–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  98. Ogawa, M.; Zhou, S.; Tan, A.Y.; Song, J.; Gholmieh, G.; Fishbein, M.C.; Luo, H.; Siegel, R.J.; Karagueuzian, H.S.; Chen, L.S.; et al. Left stellate ganglion and vagal nerve activity and cardiac arrhythmias in ambulatory dogs with pacing-induced congestive heart failure. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2007, 50, 335–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Tu, H.; Liu, J.; Zhang, D.; Zheng, H.; Patel, K.P.; Cornish, K.G.; Wang, W.Z.; Muelleman, R.L.; Li, Y.L. Heart failure-induced changes of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels and cell excitability in rat cardiac postganglionic neurons. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2014, 306, C132–C142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Augustine, G.J. How does calcium trigger neurotransmitter release? Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2001, 11, 320–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Borst, J.G.; Sakmann, B. Calcium influx and transmitter release in a fast CNS synapse. Nature 1996, 383, 431–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Zucker, R.S. Calcium and transmitter release. J. Physiol. Paris 1993, 87, 25–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Tsien, R.W.; Lipscombe, D.; Madison, D.; Bley, K.; Fox, A. Reflections on Ca(2+)-channel diversity, 1988–1994. Trends Neurosci. 1995, 18, 52–54. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  104. Tsien, R.W.; Lipscombe, D.; Madison, D.V.; Bley, K.R.; Fox, A.P. Multiple types of neuronal calcium channels and their selective modulation. Trends Neurosci. 1988, 11, 431–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Benarroch, E.E. Neuronal voltage-gated calcium channels: Brief overview of their function and clinical implications in neurology. Neurology 2010, 74, 1310–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Catterall, W.A. Structure and regulation of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2000, 16, 521–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Ino, M.; Yoshinaga, T.; Wakamori, M.; Miyamoto, N.; Takahashi, E.; Sonoda, J.; Kagaya, T.; Oki, T.; Nagasu, T.; Nishizawa, Y.; et al. Functional disorders of the sympathetic nervous system in mice lacking the alpha 1B subunit (Cav 2.2) of N-type calcium channels. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 5323–5328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  108. Molderings, G.J.; Likungu, J.; Gothert, M. N-Type calcium channels control sympathetic neurotransmission in human heart atrium. Circulation 2000, 101, 403–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Yamada, Y.; Kinoshita, H.; Kuwahara, K.; Nakagawa, Y.; Kuwabara, Y.; Minami, T.; Yamada, C.; Shibata, J.; Nakao, K.; Cho, K.; et al. Inhibition of N-type Ca2+ channels ameliorates an imbalance in cardiac autonomic nerve activity and prevents lethal arrhythmias in mice with heart failure. Cardiovasc. Res. 2014, 104, 183–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Zhang, D.; Tu, H.; Wang, C.; Cao, L.; Hu, W.; Hackfort, B.T.; Muelleman, R.L.; Wadman, M.C.; Li, Y.L. Inhibition of N-type calcium channels in cardiac sympathetic neurons attenuates ventricular arrhythmogenesis in heart failure. Cardiovasc. Res. 2021, 117, 137–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Barber, M.J.; Mueller, T.M.; Henry, D.P.; Felten, S.Y.; Zipes, D.P. Transmural myocardial infarction in the dog produces sympathectomy in noninfarcted myocardium. Circulation 1983, 67, 787–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Li, W.; Knowlton, D.; Van Winkle, D.M.; Habecker, B.A. Infarction alters both the distribution and noradrenergic properties of cardiac sympathetic neurons. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2004, 286, H2229–H2236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Zipes, D.P. Influence of myocardial ischemia and infarction on autonomic innervation of heart. Circulation 1990, 82, 1095–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Cao, J.M.; Fishbein, M.C.; Han, J.B.; Lai, W.W.; Lai, A.C.; Wu, T.J.; Czer, L.; Wolf, P.L.; Denton, T.A.; Shintaku, I.P.; et al. Relationship between regional cardiac hyperinnervation and ventricular arrhythmia. Circulation 2000, 101, 1960–1969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Oh, Y.S.; Jong, A.Y.; Kim, D.T.; Li, H.; Wang, C.; Zemljic-Harpf, A.; Ross, R.S.; Fishbein, M.C.; Chen, P.S.; Chen, L.S. Spatial distribution of nerve sprouting after myocardial infarction in mice. Heart Rhythm 2006, 3, 728–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Zhou, S.; Chen, L.S.; Miyauchi, Y.; Miyauchi, M.; Kar, S.; Kangavari, S.; Fishbein, M.C.; Sharifi, B.; Chen, P.S. Mechanisms of cardiac nerve sprouting after myocardial infarction in dogs. Circ. Res. 2004, 95, 76–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Kimura, K.; Kanazawa, H.; Ieda, M.; Kawaguchi-Manabe, H.; Miyake, Y.; Yagi, T.; Arai, T.; Sano, M.; Fukuda, K. Norepinephrine-induced nerve growth factor depletion causes cardiac sympathetic denervation in severe heart failure. Auton. Neurosci. 2010, 156, 27–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Lorentz, C.U.; Parrish, D.C.; Alston, E.N.; Pellegrino, M.J.; Woodward, W.R.; Hempstead, B.L.; Habecker, B.A. Sympathetic denervation of peri-infarct myocardium requires the p75 neurotrophin receptor. Exp. Neurol. 2013, 249, 111–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Clyburn, C.; Sepe, J.J.; Habecker, B.A. What gets on the nerves of cardiac patients? Pathophysiological changes in cardiac innervation. J. Physiol. 2022, 600, 451–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Herring, N.; Kalla, M.; Paterson, D.J. The autonomic nervous system and cardiac arrhythmias: Current concepts and emerging therapies. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2019, 16, 707–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Grkovski, M.; Zanzonico, P.B.; Modak, S.; Humm, J.L.; Narula, J.; Pandit-Taskar, N. F-18 meta-fluorobenzylguanidine PET imaging of myocardial sympathetic innervation. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 2022; online ahead of print. [Google Scholar]
  122. Li, J.; Zheng, L. The mechanism of cardiac sympathetic activity assessment methods: Current knowledge. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2022, 9, 931219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Orimo, S.; Yogo, M.; Nakamura, T.; Suzuki, M.; Watanabe, H. (123)I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) cardiac scintigraphy in α-synucleinopathies. Ageing Res. Rev. 2016, 30, 122–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Rubart, M.; Zipes, D.P. Mechanisms of sudden cardiac death. J. Clin. Investig. 2005, 115, 2305–2315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  125. Yokoyama, T.; Lee, J.K.; Miwa, K.; Opthof, T.; Tomoyama, S.; Nakanishi, H.; Yoshida, A.; Yasui, H.; Iida, T.; Miyagawa, S.; et al. Quantification of sympathetic hyperinnervation and denervation after myocardial infarction by three-dimensional assessment of the cardiac sympathetic network in cleared transparent murine hearts. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0182072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  126. Aggarwal, A.; Elser, M.D.; Socratous, F.; Kaye, D.M. Evidence for functional presynaptic alpha-2 adrenoceptors and their down-regulation in human heart failure. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2001, 37, 1246–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Kiuchi, M.G.; Nolde, J.M.; Villacorta, H.; Carnagarin, R.; Chan, J.J.S.; Lugo-Gavidia, L.M.; Ho, J.K.; Matthews, V.B.; Dwivedi, G.; Schlaich, M.P. New approaches in the management of sudden cardiac death in patients with heart failure-targeting the sympathetic nervous system. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  128. Latini, R.; Masson, S.; Jeremic, G.; LuvarAÿ, G.; Fiordaliso, F.; Calvillo, L.; Bernasconi, R.; Torri, M.; Rondelli, I.; Razzetti, R.; et al. Comparative efficacy of a DA2/alpha2 agonist and a beta-blocker in reducing adrenergic drive and cardiac fibrosis in an experimental model of left ventricular dysfunction after coronary artery occlusion. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 1998, 31, 601–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Minatoguchi, S. Heart failure and its treatment from the perspective of sympathetic nerve activity. J. Cardiol. 2022, 79, 691–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Ramchandra, R.; Hood, S.G.; Xing, D.; Lambert, G.W.; May, C.N. Mechanisms underlying the increased cardiac norepinephrine spillover in heart failure. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2018, 315, H340–H347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Tygesen, H.; Rundqvist, B.; Waagstein, F.; Wennerblom, B. Heart rate variability measurement correlates with cardiac norepin ephrine spillover in congestive heart failure. Am. J. Cardiol. 2001, 87, 1308–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Meredith, I.T.; Eisenhofer, G.; Lambert, G.W.; Dewar, E.M.; Jennings, G.L.; Esler, M.D. Cardiac sympathetic nervous activity in congestive heart failure. Evidence for increased neuronal norepinephrine release and preserved neuronal uptake. Circulation 1993, 88, 136–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  133. Bateman, T.M.; Ananthasubramaniam, K.; Berman, D.S.; Gerson, M.; Gropler, R.; Henzlova, M.; Mendoza, F.; Miyamoto, M.; Shah, M.; Weiland, F. Reliability of the (123)I-mIBG heart/mediastinum ratio: Results of a multicenter test-retest reproducibility study. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 2019, 26, 1555–1565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Jacobson, A.F.; Senior, R.; Cerqueira, M.D.; Wong, N.D.; Thomas, G.S.; Lopez, V.A.; Agostini, D.; Weiland, F.; Chandna, H.; Narula, J. Myocardial iodine-123 meta-iodobenzylguanidine imaging and cardiac events in heart failure. Results of the prospective ADMIRE-HF (AdreView Myocardial Imaging for Risk Evaluation in Heart Failure) study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2010, 55, 2212–2221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  135. Merlet, P.; Valette, H.; Dubois-Randé, J.L.; Moyse, D.; Duboc, D.; Dove, P.; Bourguignon, M.H.; Benvenuti, C.; Duval, A.M.; Agostini, D.; et al. Prognostic value of cardiac metaiodobenzylguanidine imaging in patients with heart failure. J. Nucl. Med. 1992, 33, 471–477. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  136. Rajapreyar, I.; Pamboukian, S.V. Cardiac sympathetic imaging in heart failure: Is revival possible? J. Nucl. Cardiol. 2021, 28, 86–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Silverio, A.; Polito, M.V.; Pace, L.; D’Auria, F.; Vitulano, G.; Scarano, M.; Citro, R.; Galasso, G.; Piscione, F. Predictors of outcome in patients with de novo diagnosis of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: Role of combined myocardial and lung Iodine-123 Meta–Iodobenzylguanidine imaging. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 2021, 28, 72–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Ardell, J.L.; Foreman, R.D.; Armour, J.A.; Shivkumar, K. Cardiac sympathectomy and spinal cord stimulation attenuate reflex-mediated norepinephrine release during ischemia preventing ventricular fibrillation. JCI Insight 2019, 4, e131648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Chan, S.A.; Vaseghi, M.; Kluge, N.; Shivkumar, K.; Ardell, J.L.; Smith, C. Fast in vivo detection of myocardial norepinephrine levels in the beating porcine heart. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2020, 318, H1091–H1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Gilinsky, M.A.; Faibushevish, A.A.; Lunte, C.E. Determination of myocardial norepinephrine in freely moving rats using in vivo microdialysis sampling and liquid chromatography with dual-electrode amperometric detection. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2001, 24, 929–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  141. Zhang, Q.; Liu, B.; Wu, Q.; Liu, B.; Li, Y.; Sun, S.; Wang, Y.; Wu, X.; Chai, Z.; Jiang, X.; et al. Differential co-release of two neurotransmitters from a vesicle fusion pore in mammalian adrenal chromaffin cells. Neuron 2019, 102, 173–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  142. Yagishita, D.; Chui, R.W.; Yamakawa, K.; Rajendran, P.S.; Ajijola, O.A.; Nakamura, K.; So, E.L.; Mahajan, A.; Shivkumar, K.; Vaseghi, M. Sympathetic nerve stimulation, not circulating norepinephrine, modulates T-peak to T-end interval by increasing global dispersion of repolarization. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. 2015, 8, 174–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  143. Zekios, K.C.; Mouchtouri, E.T.; Lekkas, P.; Nikas, D.N.; Kolettis, T.M. Sympathetic activation and arrhythmogenesis after myocardial infarction: Where do we stand? J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2021, 8, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Ajijola, O.A.; Chatterjee, N.A.; Gonzales, M.J.; Gornbein, J.; Liu, K.; Li, D.; Paterson, D.J.; Shivkumar, K.; Singh, J.P.; Herring, N. Coronary sinus neuropeptide Y levels and adverse outcomes in patients with stable chronic heart failure. JAMA Cardiol. 2020, 5, 318–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  145. Gibbs, T.; Tapoulal, N.; Shanmuganathan, M.; Burrage, M.K.; Borlotti, A.; Banning, A.P.; Choudhury, R.P.; Neubauer, S.; Kharbanda, R.K.; Ferreira, V.M.; et al. Neuropeptide-Y levels in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: Relationship with coronary microvascular function, heart Failure, and mortality. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2022, 11, e024850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Kalla, M.; Hao, G.; Tapoulal, N.; Tomek, J.; Liu, K.; Woodward, L.; Dall’Armellina, E.; Banning, A.P.; Choudhury, R.P.; Neubauer, S.; et al. The cardiac sympathetic co-transmitter neuropeptide Y is pro-arrhythmic following ST-elevation myocardial infarction despite beta-blockade. Eur. Heart J. 2020, 41, 2168–2179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Özkaramanli-Gür, D.; Sağbaş, M.; Akyüz, A.; Güzel, S.; Alpsoy, Ş.; Güler, N. Role of sympathetic cotransmitter galanin on autonomic balance in heart failure: An active player or a bystander? Anatol. J. Cardiol. 2017, 18, 281–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Tan, C.M.J.; Green, P.; Tapoulal, N.; Lewandowski, A.J.; Leeson, P.; Herring, N. The role of neuropeptide Y in cardiovascular health and disease. Front. Physiol. 2018, 9, 1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  149. Gardner, R.T.; Ripplinger, C.M.; Myles, R.C.; Habecker, B.A. Molecular mechanisms of sympathetic remodeling and arrhythmias. Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. 2016, 9, e001359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  150. Pannese, E.; Procacci, P. Ultrastructural localization of NGF receptors in satellite cells of the rat spinal ganglia. J. Neurocytol. 2002, 31, 755–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Korsching, S.; Thoenen, H. Nerve growth factor in sympathetic ganglia and corresponding target organs of the rat: Correlation with density of sympathetic innervation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1983, 80, 3513–3516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  152. Scott-Solomon, E.; Boehm, E.; Kuruvilla, R. The sympathetic nervous system in development and disease. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2021, 22, 685–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Hagan, N.; Kane, J.L.; Grover, D.; Woodworth, L.; Madore, C.; Saleh, J.; Sancho, J.; Liu, J.; Li, Y.; Proto, J.; et al. CSF1R signaling is a regulator of pathogenesis in progressive MS. Cell Death Dis. 2020, 11, 904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Pixley, F.J.; Stanley, E.R. CSF-1 regulation of the wandering macrophage: Complexity in action. Trends Cell Biol. 2004, 14, 628–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Bacmeister, L.; Schwarzl, M.; Warnke, S.; Stoffers, B.; Blankenberg, S.; Westermann, D.; Lindner, D. Inflammation and fibrosis in murine models of heart failure. Basic Res. Cardiol. 2019, 114, 19. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  156. Dick, S.A.; Epelman, S. Chronic heart failure and inflammation: What do we really know? Circ. Res. 2016, 119, 159–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Thackeray, J.T.; Hupe, H.C.; Wang, Y.; Bankstahl, J.P.; Berding, G.; Ross, T.L.; Bauersachs, J.; Wollert, K.C.; Bengel, F.M. Myocardial inflammation predicts remodeling and neuroinflammation after myocardial infarction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2018, 71, 263–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Hulsmans, M.; Clauss, S.; Xiao, L.; Aguirre, A.D.; King, K.R.; Hanley, A.; Hucker, W.J.; Walfers, E.M.; Seemann, G.; Courties, G.; et al. Macrophages facilitate electrical conduction in the heart. Cell 2017, 169, 510–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  159. Lambert, J.M.; Lopez, E.F.; Lindsey, M.L. Macrophage roles following myocardial infarction. Int. J. Cardiol. 2008, 130, 147–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  160. Zhang, D.; Hu, W.; Tu, H.; Hackfort, B.T.; Duan, B.; Xiong, W.; Wadman, M.C.; Li, Y.L. Macrophage depletion in stellate ganglia alleviates cardiac sympathetic overactivation and ventricular arrhythmogenesis by attenuating neuroinflammation in heart failure. Basic Res. Cardiol. 2021, 116, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Nohara, A.; Okada, S.; Ohshima, K.; Pessin, J.E.; Mori, M. Cyclin-dependent kinase-5 is a key molecule in tumor necrosis factor-alpha-induced insulin resistance. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 33457–33465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  162. Rozas, P.; Lazcano, P.; Pina, R.; Cho, A.; Terse, A.; Pertusa, M.; Madrid, R.; Gonzalez-Billault, C.; Kulkarni, A.B.; Utreras, E. Targeted overexpression of tumor necrosis factor-alpha increases cyclin-dependent kinase 5 activity and TRPV1-dependent Ca2+ influx in trigeminal neurons. Pain 2016, 157, 1346–1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  163. Utreras, E.; Futatsugi, A.; Rudrabhatla, P.; Keller, J.; Iadarola, M.J.; Pant, H.C.; Kulkarni, A.B. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha regulates cyclin-dependent kinase 5 activity during pain signaling through transcriptional activation of p35. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 2275–2284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  164. Su, S.C.; Seo, J.; Pan, J.Q.; Samuels, B.A.; Rudenko, A.; Ericsson, M.; Neve, R.L.; Yue, D.T.; Tsai, L.H. Regulation of N-type voltage-gated calcium channels and presynaptic function by cyclin-dependent kinase 5. Neuron 2012, 75, 675–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  165. Zhang, D.; Tu, H.; Hu, W.; Wadman, M.C.; Li, Y.L. CDK5 promotes ventricular arrhythmogenesis through phosphorylation of N-type calcium channels in cardiac sympathetic postganglionic neurons. FASEB J. 2020, 34, 03088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Ajijola, O.A.; Hoover, D.B.; Simerly, T.M.; Brown, T.C.; Yanagawa, J.; Biniwale, R.M.; Lee, J.M.; Sadeghi, A.; Khanlou, N.; Ardell, J.L.; et al. Inflammation, oxidative stress, and glial cell activation characterize stellate ganglia from humans with electrical storm. JCI Insight 2017, 2, e94715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Shanks, J.; Gao, L.; Zucker, I.H. Sympathomodulation in heart failure: A role for stellate ganglia Nrf2. FASEB J. 2019, 33, 564–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Singh, S.; Sayers, S.; Walter, J.S.; Thomas, D.; Dieter, R.S.; Nee, L.M.; Wurster, R.D. Hypertrophy of neurons within cardiac ganglia in human, canine, and rat heart failure: The potential role of nerve growth factor. J. Am. Heart. Assoc. 2013, 2, e000210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  169. Meloni, M.; Caporali, A.; Graiani, G.; Lagrasta, C.; Katare, R.; Van Linthout, S.; Spillmann, F.; Campesi, I.; Madeddu, P.; Quaini, F.; et al. Nerve growth factor promotes cardiac repair following myocardial infarction. Circ. Res. 2010, 106, 1275–1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  170. Atwal, J.K.; Massie, B.; Miller, F.D.; Kaplan, D.R. The TrkB-Shc site signals neuronal survival and local axon growth via MEK and P13-kinase. Neuron 2000, 27, 265–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Bodmer, D.; Ascaño, M.; Kuruvilla, R. Isoform-specific dephosphorylation of dynamin1 by calcineurin couples neurotrophin receptor endocytosis to axonal growth. Neuron 2011, 70, 1085–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  172. Spillane, M.; Ketschek, A.; Donnelly, C.J.; Pacheco, A.; Twiss, J.L.; Gallo, G. Nerve growth factor-induced formation of axonal filopodia and collateral branches involves the intra-axonal synthesis of regulators of the actin-nucleating Arp2/3 complex. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32, 17671–17689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  173. Kisiswa, L.; Osório, C.; Erice, C.; Vizard, T.; Wyatt, S.; Davies, A.M. TNFα reverse signaling promotes sympathetic axon growth and target innervation. Nat. Neurosci. 2013, 16, 865–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  174. O’Keeffe, G.W.; Gutierrez, H.; Howard, L.; Laurie, C.W.; Osorio, C.; Gavaldà, N.; Wyatt, S.L.; Davies, A.M. Region-specific role of growth differentiation factor-5 in the establishment of sympathetic innervation. Neural Dev. 2016, 11, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  175. Pellegrino, M.J.; Habecker, B.A. STAT3 integrates cytokine and neurotrophin signals to promote sympathetic axon regeneration. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 2013, 56, 272–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  176. Pellegrino, M.J.; McCully, B.H.; Habecker, B.A. Leptin stimulates sympathetic axon outgrowth. Neurosci. Lett. 2014, 566, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Gamage, K.K.; Cheng, I.; Park, R.E.; Karim, M.S.; Edamura, K.; Hughes, C.; Spano, A.J.; Erisir, A.; Deppmann, C.D. Death receptor 6 promotes wallerian degeneration in peripheral axons. Curr. Biol. 2017, 27, 890–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  178. Kohn, J.; Aloyz, R.S.; Toma, J.G.; Haak-Frendscho, M.; Miller, F.D. Functionally antagonistic interactions between the TrkA and p75 neurotrophin receptors regulate sympathetic neuron growth and target innervation. J. Neurosci. 1999, 19, 5393–5408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  179. Majdan, M.; Walsh, G.S.; Aloyz, R.; Miller, F.D. TrkA mediates developmental sympathetic neuron survival in vivo by silencing an ongoing p75NTR-mediated death signal. J. Cell Biol. 2001, 155, 1275–1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Nikolaev, A.; McLaughlin, T.; O’Leary, D.D.; Tessier-Lavigne, M. APP binds DR6 to trigger axon pruning and neuron death via distinct caspases. Nature 2009, 457, 981–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  181. Singh, K.K.; Park, K.J.; Hong, E.J.; Kramer, B.M.; Greenberg, M.E.; Kaplan, D.R.; Miller, F.D. Developmental axon pruning mediated by BDNF-p75NTR-dependent axon degeneration. Nat. Neurosci. 2008, 11, 649–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  182. Teng, K.K.; Felice, S.; Kim, T.; Hempstead, B.L. Understanding proneurotrophin actions: Recent advances and challenges. Dev. Neurobiol. 2010, 70, 350–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  183. Yong, Y.; Gamage, K.; Cheng, I.; Barford, K.; Spano, A.; Winckler, B.; Deppmann, C. p75NTR and DR6 regulate distinct phases of axon degeneration demarcated by spheroid rupture. J. Neurosci. 2019, 39, 9503–9520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Sepe, J.J.; Gardner, R.T.; Blake, M.R.; Brooks, D.M.; Staffenson, M.A.; Betts, C.B.; Sivagnanam, S.; Larson, W.; Kumar, S.; Bayles, R.G.; et al. Therapeutics that promote sympathetic reinnervation modulate the inflammatory response after myocardial infarction. JACC Basic Transl. Sci. 2022, 7, 915–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Huang, R.; Wang, Y.; Li, J.; Jiang, X.; Li, Y.; Liu, B.; Wu, X.; Du, X.; Hang, Y.; Jin, M.; et al. Ca(2+)-independent but voltage-dependent quantal catecholamine secretion (CiVDS) in the mammalian sympathetic nervous system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 20201–20209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  186. Beau, S.L.; Saffitz, J.E. Transmural heterogeneity of norepinephrine uptake in failing human hearts. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1994, 23, 579–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Böhm, M.; La Rosée, K.; Schwinger, R.H.; Erdmann, E. Evidence for reduction of norepinephrine uptake sites in the failing human heart. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1995, 25, 146–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  188. Liang, C.S.; Fan, T.H.; Sullebarger, J.T.; Sakamoto, S. Decreased adrenergic neuronal uptake activity in experimental right heart failure. A chamber-specific contributor to beta-adrenoceptor downregulation. J. Clin. Investig. 1989, 84, 1267–1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Mao, W.; Iwai, C.; Qin, F.; Liang, C.S. Norepinephrine induces endoplasmic reticulum stress and downregulation of norepinephrine transporter density in PC12 cells via oxidative stress. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2005, 288, H2381–H2389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Mao, W.; Qin, F.; Iwai, C.; Vulapalli, R.; Keng, P.C.; Liang, C.S. Extracellular norepinephrine reduces neuronal uptake of norepinephrine by oxidative stress in PC12 cells. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2004, 287, H29–H39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  191. Vatta, M.S.; Bianciotti, L.G.; Guil, M.J.; Hope, S.I. Regulation of the norepinephrine transporter by endothelins: A potential therapeutic target. Vitam. Horm. 2015, 98, 371–405. [Google Scholar]
  192. Backs, J.; Bresch, E.; Lutz, M.; Kristen, A.V.; Haass, M. Endothelin-1 inhibits the neuronal norepinephrine transporter in hearts of male rats. Cardiovasc. Res. 2005, 67, 283–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Mapps, A.A.; Thomsen, M.B.; Boehm, E.; Zhao, H.; Hattar, S.; Kuruvilla, R. Diversity of satellite glia in sympathetic and sensory ganglia. Cell Rep. 2022, 38, 110328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 2. Mechanisms underlying the remodeling of cardiac postganglionic sympathetic neurons in HF. SGC: satellite glial cell; Cx43: connexin 43; PKC: protein kinase C; MAPK: mitogen-activated protein kinase; TACE: tumor necrosis-converting enzyme; M-CSF; macrophage colony-stimulating factor; M-CSFR: macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor; NGF: nerve growth factor; TrkA: tropomyosin receptor kinase A; SG: stellate ganglion.
Figure 2. Mechanisms underlying the remodeling of cardiac postganglionic sympathetic neurons in HF. SGC: satellite glial cell; Cx43: connexin 43; PKC: protein kinase C; MAPK: mitogen-activated protein kinase; TACE: tumor necrosis-converting enzyme; M-CSF; macrophage colony-stimulating factor; M-CSFR: macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor; NGF: nerve growth factor; TrkA: tropomyosin receptor kinase A; SG: stellate ganglion.
Ijms 23 13311 g002
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, Y.-L. Stellate Ganglia and Cardiac Sympathetic Overactivation in Heart Failure. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 13311. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232113311

AMA Style

Li Y-L. Stellate Ganglia and Cardiac Sympathetic Overactivation in Heart Failure. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(21):13311. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232113311

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Yu-Long. 2022. "Stellate Ganglia and Cardiac Sympathetic Overactivation in Heart Failure" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 21: 13311. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232113311

APA Style

Li, Y. -L. (2022). Stellate Ganglia and Cardiac Sympathetic Overactivation in Heart Failure. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(21), 13311. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232113311

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop