Next Article in Journal
Ononitol Monohydrate—A Glycoside Potentially Inhibit HT-115 Human Colorectal Cancer Cell Proliferation through COX-2/PGE-2 Inflammatory Axis Regulations
Next Article in Special Issue
Genetic Modulation of the Erythrocyte Phenotype Associated with Retinopathy of Prematurity—A Multicenter Portuguese Cohort Study
Previous Article in Journal
Brucella BtpB Manipulates Apoptosis and Autophagic Flux in RAW264.7 Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
Deglycosylation Increases the Aggregation and Angiogenic Properties of Mutant Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinase 3 Protein: Implications for Sorsby Fundus Dystrophy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

TGF-β/Smad Signalling Activation by HTRA1 Regulates the Function of Human Lens Epithelial Cells and Its Mechanism in Posterior Subcapsular Congenital Cataract

1
Department of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Eye Disease Prevention and Treatment Center, Shanghai Eye Hospital, Shanghai 200040, China
2
Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200031, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(22), 14431; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232214431
Submission received: 30 September 2022 / Revised: 16 November 2022 / Accepted: 17 November 2022 / Published: 20 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetics and Epigenetics of Eye Diseases)

Abstract

:
Congenital cataract is the leading cause of blindness among children worldwide. Patients with posterior subcapsular congenital cataract (PSC) in the central visual axis can result in worsening vision and stimulus deprivation amblyopia. However, the pathogenesis of PSC remains unclear. This study aims to explore the functional regulation and mechanism of HTRA1 in human lens epithelial cells (HLECs). HTRA1 was significantly downregulated in the lens capsules of children with PSC compared to normal controls. HTRA1 is a suppression factor of transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) signalling pathway, which plays a key role in cataract formation. The results showed that the TGF-β/Smad signalling pathway was activated in the lens tissue of PSC. The effect of HTRA1 on cell proliferation, migration and apoptosis was measured in HLECs. In primary HLECs, the downregulation of HTRA1 can promote the proliferation and migration of HLECs by activating the TGF-β/Smad signalling pathway and can significantly upregulate the TGF-β/Smad downstream target genes FN1 and α-SMA. HTRA1 was also knocked out in the eyes of C57BL/6J mice via adeno-associated virus-mediated RNA interference. The results showed that HTRA1 knockout can significantly upregulate p-Smad2/3 and activate the TGF-β/Smad signalling pathway, resulting in abnormal proliferation and irregular arrangement of lens epithelial cells and leading to the occurrence of subcapsular cataract. To conclude, HTRA1 was significantly downregulated in children with PSC, and the downregulation of HTRA1 enhanced the proliferation and migration of HLECs by activating the TGF-β/Smad signalling pathway, which led to the occurrence of PSC.

1. Introduction

Congenital cataract is among the most common eye diseases causing blindness in children [1,2,3], accounting for 5–20% of cases [4,5,6]. Worldwide, about 200,000 children with blindness caused by congenital cataract, and approximately 20,000–40,000 children with congenital cataract are born every year [7,8,9]. Regional differences are significant in the incidence of congenital cataract, with the incidence in Asia being higher compared to other parts of the world at 7.43/1,000,000 [7]. Therefore, early prevention and treatment of congenital cataract are critical to reducing the burden on children, their families and society.
At present, surgery is the only effective way to treat congenital cataract. However, such surgery is difficult and expensive, and postoperative complications cannot be completely avoided. These complications can include visual axis opacification, secondary glaucoma, iris injury, and refractive error. Retinal detachment and endophthalmitis may even occur [10]. Therefore, it is crucial to clarify the pathogenesis of congenital cataract to prevent and predict the occurrence and development of this condition.
Different types of cataracts can lead to different degrees of visual impairment. Posterior subcapsular congenital cataract (PSC) is one of the most common types of congenital cataract. PSCs seriously affect visual development and account for 26.8% of congenital cataracts worldwide [7]. PSC is characterized by mass opacity under the posterior capsule without other ocular developmental abnormalities and is the simplest subtype of posterior polar cataract; however, the mechanism remains unknown. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to explore the potential mechanism of its occurrence and development. Previously, we performed transcriptome sequencing of capsules from patients with PSC and normal controls and found that HTRA1 was the most significant candidate pathogenic gene in lens epithelial cells [11]. HTRA1 has been previously detected in the lenses of mice [12]. Results based on the iSyTE2.0 database showed that the expression of HTRA1 in the lens of mice increased gradually with increasing gestational age, and the expression in the lenses was significantly higher than that in other tissues [13]. This indicates that HTRA1 may play an important role in lens development and cataract formation.
HTRA1 is a serine protease, and an important regulator of the TGF-β signalling pathway. GST pulldown experiments show that HTRA1 binds to many proteins of the TGF-β family and inhibits its function [14,15]. The relationship between HTRA1 and the TGF-β signalling pathway has been confirmed in a variety of diseases [16,17,18,19]. However, the function, expression characteristics and mechanism of HTRA1 in the lens have not been elucidated. Changes in the TGF-β signalling pathway represent an important pathogenesis in the formation of fibrous cataract [20]. Fibrous cataract mainly includes posterior cataract, anterior polar cataract and posterior polar cataract. The TGF-β superfamily members regulate important processes of lens development and promote the differentiation of lens fibre cells [21,22]. It has been considered that the TGF-β signalling pathway is key to the terminal differentiation of lens fibre cells [23]. TGF-β1 can induce rapid elongation of lens cells, abnormal accumulation of extracellular matrix, deposition of smooth muscle actin and apoptosis. TGF-β can affect the structure of the lens in the late stage of lens development, thus causing pathological changes in subcapsular opacification [24,25]. Transgenic mice with specific overexpression of lens TGF-β1 showed subcapsular plaque formation, posterior subcapsular nucleation and vacuole formation, which are similar to the pathological features of PSC [26,27,28]. However, whether changes in the TGF-β signalling pathway play a key role in the formation of PSC remains to be verified.
HTRA1 plays a key regulatory role in a variety of cell processes, such as cell proliferation, migration and apoptosis [29,30,31]. Previous nervous system studies have shown that the inhibition of HTRA1 protease activity activates the TGF-β signalling pathway, resulting in the upregulation of downstream target protein PAI-1 and eventually leading to neuronal apoptosis [16]. The expression of HTRA1 is downregulated in a variety of tumours, such as ovarian tumours [32], thyroid tumours [33] and non-small cell lung tumours [34], which activates the TGF-β signalling pathway to promote tumour cell proliferation [19]. However, the function of HTRA1 in lens epithelial cells needs to be further studied.
In the present study, we investigate the roles of HTRA1 and the TGF-β signalling pathway in the formation of PSC and lens epithelial cells.

2. Results

2.1. Downregulation of HTRA1 in Human Lens Epithelial Cells of Subjects with PSC

To verify the HTRA1 expression in human lens epithelial cells (HLECs), the anterior lens capsules of 36 eyes with PSC and 29 eyes with normal controls were analysed. Age (48.77 ± 29.35 months in the PSC group vs. 54.58 ± 36.65 months in the control group, p > 0.05) and sex (p > 0.05) were comparable for the two groups. Downregulation of HTRA1 was validated using human lens epithelial samples by RT-qPCR (p < 0.001, Figure 1A), Western blotting (p < 0.001, Figure 1B), and immunofluorescence staining (Figure 1C).

2.2. HTRA1 Expression Levels in the Normal Human Lens at Different Layers and in Different Age Groups

The expression levels of HTRA1 were measured in central lens epithelial cells, equatorial epithelial cells and fibre cells in normal controls. The level was highest in fibre cells and lowest in central lens epithelial cells (Figure 2A). Furthermore, HTRA1 decreased with age before 40 years of age in normal HLECs and was stable after 40 years of age (Figure 2B). The immunofluorescence staining of frozen sections showed that HTRA1 was expressed in both the cytoplasm and the nucleus of HLEC from normal controls (Figure 2C).

2.3. TGF-β/Smad Signalling Pathway Was Activated in HLECs of PSC Patients

To establish whether TGF-β/Smad signalling contributed to the formation of PSC, the RNA and protein expression of the key signalling molecules were determined. RT-qPCR results showed that TGF-β1 (p = 0.015) and TGF-β2 (p = 0.014) were upregulated in the lens epithelia of PSC patients. The key signalling molecules, including TGF-βR1 (p = 0.023), PAI-1 (p = 0.027) and CTGF (p = 0.002), were also significantly upregulated in PSC patients (Figure 3A). The protein levels of TGF-β2 (p = 0.008), TGF-βR1 (p = 0.040), p-Smad2/3 (p = 0.017) and PAI-1 (p = 0.040), the key signalling molecules, were significantly upregulated in lens epithelia of PSC patients (Figure 3B).

2.4. Downregulation of HTRA1 and Activated TGF-β/Smad Signalling Promotes HLEC Proliferation and Migration

HLEC were transfected with LV-HTRA1-RNAi lentivirus to downregulate the expression of HTRA1. After transfection, RT-qPCR and Western blotting were performed to verify the downregulation of HTRA1 (Figure 4A,B). A CCK-8 assay was used to explore the role of HTRA1 in the regulation of HLEC growth. The results showed that downregulated expression of HTRA1 significantly promotes the growth ability of HLEC (p < 0.001, Figure 5A). Moreover, a scratch healing assay showed that the knockdown of HTRA1 promoted the migration of HLEC (p = 0.022, Figure 5D). However, the ectopic expression of HTRA1 did not influence the apoptosis of HLEC (p > 0.05, Figure 5B,C).
Furthermore, HLECs were treated with 5 ng/mL TGF-β1 for 24 h. TGF-β1 treatment significantly promoted HLEC proliferation and migration, based on a CCK-8 assay and a scratch healing assay (Figure 6A,B).
In the mouse model, aberrant proliferation and migration of lens epithelial cells were also observed after knocking down HTRA1 by recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV) injection (Figure 7). Downregulation of HTRA1 induced the formation of subcapsular cataract (Figure 8).

2.5. Downregulation of HTRA1 Directly Activated TGF-β/Smad Signalling in Primary Lens Epithelial Cells

We investigated the possible regulatory relationship between HTRA1 and TGF-β/Smad signalling. In primary HLECs, the amount of colocalization between HTRA1 and TGF-β1, as well as HTRA1 and TGF-β2 was analysed after immunofluorescence staining. The Pearson’s correlation coefficient (PCC) was 0.62 for HTRA1 and TGF-β1 and 0.58 for HTRA1 and TGF-β2 (Figure 6E).
HTRA1 knockdown elevated the protein expression of p-Smad2/3, TGF-β1 and TGF-β2 in primary HLECs (p = 0.014, 0.021 and 0.039, respectively, Figure 4B,C). In contrast, the TGF-βR1/2 inhibitor attenuated the HTRA1-induced upregulation of p-Smad2/3 in primary HLECs (Figure 4D). And the growth and migration of HLEC were also attenuated by the TGF-βR1/2 inhibitor (Figure 5A,D), implying that the TGF-β/Smad pathway might play a role in regulating the aberrant proliferation and migration of HLECs induced by HTRA1. In addition, the downregulation of HTRA1 promoted the mRNA expression of the downstream target of TGF-β/Smad signalling, including α-SMA, PAI-1 and CTGF (p = 0.022, 0.005 and 0.038, respectively, Figure 4E). The protein expression of FN1 and α-SMA was also upregulated (p = 0.017 and 0.031, respectively, Figure 4F).
In primary mouse lens epithelial cells, HTRA1 knockdown also elevated the protein expression of p-Smad2/3, FN1 and α-SMA (p = 0.024, 0.002 and 0.002, respectively, Figure 9B,C).

3. Discussion

In this study, we found that HTRA1 is significantly downregulated in the lens capsules of PSC patients. In HLECs, the downregulation of HTRA1 expression can significantly promote cell proliferation and migration. The increase in the proliferation and migration of lens epithelial cells is closely related to the formation of cataract [21,35]. However, the mechanism of the effect of HTRA1 on cell proliferation and migration remains unclear. Wang et al. found that HTRA1 played an important role in regulating the stability and dynamics of microtubule assembly through the binding of the PDZ domain to microtubule [36]. It has also been found that the effect of HTRA1 on cell proliferation depends on the Notch-1 signalling pathway or the Wnt signalling pathway [37,38]. However, many studies have also suggested that the process of cell proliferation and migration regulated by HTRA1 is mediated by the TGF-β signalling pathway. HTRA1 can bind to multiple molecules of the TGF-β signalling pathway to inhibit its function, thus inhibiting cell proliferation, migration and invasion [19,39,40]. HTRA1 is closely related to members of the TGF-β family [39], and the TGF-β signalling pathway plays an important role in lens development and fibroblast differentiation [23].
The TGF-β signalling pathway was activated in the anterior capsule of PSC. In primary lens epithelial cells, downregulation of HTRA1 can promote the proliferation and migration of lens epithelial cells by activating the TGF-β/Smad signalling pathway and inducing significant activation of downstream FN1, α-SMA and other genes. Knockout of HTRA1 in the eyes of mice can activate the TGF-β signalling pathway and can subsequently cause subcapsular cataract. As a proteolytic enzyme, HTRA1 plays a role in protein quality control by identifying abnormal proteins and cutting them into smaller fragments [41]. HTRA1 plays a key role in many signalling pathways through the degradation of specific components. The results of in vitro experiments have shown that HTRA1 can bind to TGF-β family members and decompose TGF-β1, TGF-βR1, TGF-βR2, BMP2, BMP4 and other proteins [16,42]. When HTRA1 is downregulated, it causes the activation of TGF-β1 and its receptor, which leads to the significant upregulation of downstream p-Smad2/3. Many studies have obtained similar findings. For example, downregulation of HTRA1 leads to a significant increase in the expression of TGF-β1 during odontoblast differentiation, and the expression of downstream factors such as TGF-βR1, TGF-βR2, Smad2 and Smad4 are also significantly increased in the late stage of mineralization induction [43]. HTRA1 can inhibit bone formation by antagonizing the signal transduction mediated by TGF-β family proteins, regulating the activity of the TGF-β/BMP pathway and inhibiting the expression of downstream genes, such as RUNX2, CTGF and PAI-1 [39,42]. These results are consistent with the results of this study.
In the animal experiment, after HTRA1 knockdown we found subcapsular cataract and observed the abnormal proliferation of lens epithelial cells, with irregular cell arrangement and cell morphology. In addition, the fibre cells under the anterior capsule became loose and irregular. Robertson et al. injected an adenovirus vector carrying TGF-β1 into the anterior chamber of mice and found that adenovirus can successfully mediate the action of adenovirus on lens epithelial cells and cause abnormal proliferation of lens epithelial cells and cataract under the anterior capsule; this is consistent with the results of this study [44]. Compared with the adenovirus vector, ocular injection of the AAV vector can reduce the local and systemic immune response to the virus vector to the greatest extent and has stability in long-term expression [45]. The results of RT-PCR and Western blotting showed that AAV injection into the anterior chamber can successfully knock down the expression of HTRA1 in lens epithelial cells and activate the TGF-β signalling pathway.
The results also showed that downregulation of HTRA1 can regulate the expression of downstream FN1, α-SMA, PAI-1 and CTGF. FN1, α-SMA, PAI-1 and CTGF are the markers of tissue fibrosis and epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) [21,46,47,48], while EMT is the key factor in organ fibrosis [49]. TGF-β has been shown to mediate EMT in lens epithelial cells and to play a key role in lens fibrosis [50]. Anterior polar cataract is a kind of fibrous cataract. The expression of PAI-1 and α-SMA can be observed in the anterior capsule of anterior polar cataract [47]. In the process of EMT, the proliferation and migration of lens epithelial cells increase, which leads to the transformation of lens epithelial cells to fibroblasts, the deposition of α-SMA and the production of extracellular matrix, such as FN1, which eventually leads to the formation of plaques under the anterior capsule or posterior capsule of the lens [51,52]. In cell experiments, TGF-β can induce the expression of PAI-1 and mediate EMT induced by TGF-β1 [47,53]. At the same time, TGF-β2 can also induce lens epithelial cells to express α-SMA, type I collagen, type IV collagen and FN1 [48]. HTRA1 can degrade a variety of extracellular matrix components, such as type I, II and III procollagen peptides, fibronectin and proteoglycans, which play an important role in extracellular matrix remodelling [54,55]. Therefore, the downregulation of HTRA1 may mediate the expression of FN1, α-SMA and other proteins by activating the TGF-β/Smad pathway, resulting in the increased proliferation and migration of lens epithelial cells, lens fibrosis and PSC. However, the specific regulatory mechanism needs to be further studied.
There are some shortcomings in this study. One is that the specific regulation mechanism of HTRA1 needs to be explored more deeply. In addition, there is a lack of research on the ultrastructure of the lens in this animal experiment and on the effect of different injection sites on the morphology of cataract. The next step is to conduct an electron microscope examination on animal tissues and add the vitreous infection group to observe the changes in the morphology and the molecular level more comprehensively.

4. Materials and Methods

This study was approved by the Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat (ENT) Ethics Committee. Informed consent was obtained from each child’s guardian prior to surgery. All procedures followed the Declaration of Helsinki, and animal experiments were approved by the Ethics Committee for Animal Studies.

4.1. Patients and Tissue Sample Collection and Preservation

Patients under 10 diagnosed with bilateral or unilateral PSC and who were planning to undergo congenital cataract surgery at the Eye & ENT hospital, Shanghai, China were enrolled. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) ocular inflammation, (2) combined persistent foetal vasculature (PFV), persistent hyperplastic primary vitreous (PHPV) or pre-existing posterior capsule defect and (3) having a developmental disorder or a history of ocular surgery or trauma. The congenital cataract surgery was performed by the same surgeon (Y.L.). Anterior lens capsules of PSC patients were obtained using capsulorhexis during cataract surgery. The normal control group consisted of transparent lenses of children under 10 that were obtained from the Eye Bank. The anterior lens capsules were obtained using Vannas scissors and micro-forceps. To verify HTRA1 expression changes with age, normal adults without eye diseases were also included.
For RT-qPCR and Western blotting, samples were stored at −80 °C immediately after collection until use. For immunofluorescence staining, samples were collected in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA). For primary culture, samples were kept in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM, #12430054, Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) supplemented with 20% foetal bovine serum (FBS, #10099141, Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA).

4.2. Construction of Recombinant Lentiviral Vectors and Adenoviral Vector

The GV493 vector (frame structure: hU6-CBh-gcGFP-IRES-puromycin, Genechem Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) was used to construct the lentiviral vectors. Three recombinant lentiviral vectors expressing HTRA1-RNAi were constructed for the human HTRA1 gene knockdown: LV-HTRA1-RNAi (Lentivirus 1, 5′-GAAGTATATTGGTATCCGAAT-3′), LV-HTRA1-RNAi (Lentivirus 2, 5′-CGCCATCATCAACTATGGAAA-3′) and LV-HTRA1-RNAi (Lentivirus 3, 5′-CGTGGTTCATATCGAATTGTT-3′). A non-silencing targeting sequence (negative control: 5′-TTCTCCGAACGTGTCACGT-3′) was also cloned into GV493 as a control.
Recombinant adenoviral GV478 vectors (frame structure: U6-MCS-CAG-EGFP, Shanghai Genechem Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) were constructed to silence the mouse HTRA1 gene. The target sequence is 5′-GGTTCACATTGAACTATATCG-3′, and the negative control sequence is 5′-CGCTGAGTACTTCGAAATGTC-3′. The working solution was prepared to 1 μL of the vehicle containing 2.0 × 1010 PFU.

4.3. Cell Line and Primary HLEC Culture

An HLEC line, SRA 01/04, was propagated in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and cultured at 37 °C in a 5 % CO2 atmosphere. The SRA 01/04 was obtained from Dr. Dan Li [56]. For the culture of primary paediatric HLECs, the lens capsules were attached to 35 mm cell culture dishes (Sigma-Aldrich Corp., Darmstadt, Germany) after collection during congenital cataract surgery, and 6 mm glass coverslips were used to cover the sample to promote attachment. About 0.5 mL DMEM supplemented with 20% FBS was carefully added to the surface of the samples. After 24 h, 0.5 mL culture medium was added, and the medium was changed every 3 d. The cultural atmosphere was the same as SRA 01/04. After reaching confluence, the cells were seeded on two or three culture dishes. SRA 01/04 was used for cell proliferation assay, scratch healing assay, as well as Annexin V/7-AAD staining and flow cytometry. And primary paediatric HLECs were used for the RNA and protein expression changes by RT-qPCR, Western blotting and immunofluorescence staining.

4.4. Lentivirus Transfection

A culture medium containing LV-HTRA1-RNAi was added to the cultured SRA 01/04 and primary HLEC. The cells were cultured for 72 h, and the expression of green fluorescent protein (GFP) was observed. The cells were then selected with 1.0 µg/mL puromycin after 48 h of incubation. The suppression of HTRA1 expression was analysed using RT-qPCR. The most efficient lentivirus was used for subsequent experiments.

4.5. Mouse Model and Sample Acquirement

Four-week-old male C57BL/6J mice obtained from JieSiJie Laboratory Animal Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) were used for in vivo gene transfer. DMEM containing 2 × 1010 rAAV was slowly delivered into the anterior chamber of the mice using a microinjector (Hamilton, Reno, NV, USA) with a 33-gauge needle (Hamilton, Reno, NV, USA). Animals were sacrificed and examined 4 weeks after rAAV administration. The lens capsules were obtained using Vannas scissors and micro-forceps.

4.6. RT-qPCR

Total RNA from the anterior lens capsules was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA). cDNA was then synthesized using the PrimeScript™ RT Kit and gDNA Eraser (TaKaRa, Tokyo, Japan). The mRNA expression levels were quantified by RT-qPCR (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The primers for RT-qPCR are listed in Table S1. The 2−ΔΔCt method was used to analyse the results.

4.7. Western Blotting and Immunofluorescence Staining

The protein levels of the samples were analysed using traditional Western blotting, the Wes-Protein simple system (ProteinSimple, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and immunofluorescence staining. The anterior lens capsules were lysed for total protein extraction by using radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) lysis buffer (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) supplemented with 1% cocktail protease inhibitors (MCE, Monmouth Junction, NJ, USA). The protein samples were denaturalized at 95 °C for 5 min, separated with sodium dodecylsulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA). The membrane was blocked with 5% non-fat milk and incubated with primary and secondary antibodies (Table S2). It was then rinsed three times with TBST and visualized using an electrochemical luminescence kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Band density was normalized to the loading control (β-actin) for further statistical analysis.
For immunofluorescence staining, anterior lens capsules or frozen sections were fixed in 4% PFA for 30 min. They were then permeabilized and blocked with PBS containing 0.3% Triton X-100 and 5% bovine serum albumin. Samples were then incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C. Subsequently, the secondary antibody and DAPI were applied. The samples were attached to the slides and observed using a confocal microscope (Leica, Richmond, IL, USA). The amount of colocalization between HTRA1 and TGF-β1, as well as HTRA1 and TGF-β2, was analysed using ImageJ processing software (v1.53c). The antibodies and dilution information are listed in Table S2.

4.8. Cell Proliferation Assay

Cell proliferation was detected using Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK8, Dojindo Laboratories, Kumamoto, Japan). After lentivirus transfection, HLECs (SRA 01/04) were grown in 96-well plates with 5 × 103 cells per well. After incubation for 24 h, a CCK8 assay was performed at 37 °C. The optical density (OD) value at 450 nm was measured every 1 h and three times.

4.9. Scratch Healing Assay

After lentivirus transfection, HLECs (SRA 01/04) were seeded into 6-well plates and cultured until 90% confluent. The cells were then scratched carefully with 200 μL pipette tips at multiple sites. The suspended cells were washed with PBS, and the culture medium was changed to DMEM containing 1% FBS. The area of wound healing was observed and photographed at 0 h and 24 h after scratching at the same area.

4.10. Annexin V/7-AAD Staining and Flow Cytometry

After lentivirus transfection, HLECs (SRA 01/04) were digested into cell suspensions and adjusted to 1 × 106~3 × 106 cells/mL. The cells were washed with PBS, and 5 μL Annexin V-APC or 10 μL 7-AAD was added following the manufacturer’s protocol (Multisciences Biotech Co., Ltd., Taiwan, China). A flow cytometer (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Lake Franklin, NJ, USA) was used to test immediately after the reaction was completed.

4.11. TGF-β1 and TGF-βR1/2 Inhibitor Treatment

Primary HLECs were treated with recombinant human TGF-β1 (7666-MB-005, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) in a concentration gradient of 10 ng/mL for a duration of 24 h.
The selective TGF-βR1/2 inhibitors (LY2109761, Selleck, Shangai, China) were added to primary HLECs after lentivirus transfection at a working concentration of 10 μM for 24 h.

4.12. Haematoxylin and Eosin Staining

The eyeballs of mice were fixed in paraformaldehyde, and paraffin sections were made for further staining. The sections were stained with standard haematoxylin–eosin staining, and a microscope (Carl ZEISS, Oberkochen, Germany) was used to observe and capture images.

5. Conclusions

HTRA1 is significantly downregulated in lens epithelial cells of PSC. HTRA1 can promote the proliferation and migration of lens epithelial cells by activating the TGF-β/Smad signalling pathway, which may play an important role in the pathogenesis of PSC.

Supplementary Materials

The supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms232214431/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.L. and X.L. (Xiaolei Lin); methodology, X.L. (Xiaolei Lin) and F.F.; software, H.L.; validation, X.L. (Xiaolei Lin) and T.Y.; resources, Y.L.; writing—original draft preparation, X.L. (Xiaolei Lin); writing—review and editing, X.L. (Xiaolei Lin) and X.Z.; funding acquisition, Y.L. and X.L. (Xin Liu). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No 81870645.

Institutional Review Board and Statement

This study was conducted adhering to the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration. Both the studies involving human participants and animals obtained the Ethics Committee’s approval. The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Eye and ENT Hospital of Fudan University (protocol code: 2020076, date of approval: August 2020), Shanghai, China. And the animal study was reviewed and approved by the Eye and ENT Hospital Animal Research Committee (protocol code: 2019031, date of approval: March 2019), Shanghai, China.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from the guardians of all the participants involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, Y.L., upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mohammadpour, M.; Shaabani, A.; Sahraian, A.; Momenaei, B.; Tayebi, F.; Bayat, R.; Mirshahi, R. Updates on managements of pediatric cataract. J. Curr. Ophthalmol. 2019, 31, 118–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Churchill, A.; Graw, J. Clinical and experimental advances in congenital and paediatric cataracts. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2011, 366, 1234–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Li, J.; Chen, X.; Yan, Y.; Yao, K. Molecular genetics of congenital cataracts. Exp. Eye Res. 2020, 191, 107872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Santana, A.; Waiswo, M. The genetic and molecular basis of congenital cataract. Arq. Bras. Oftalmol. 2011, 74, 136–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Rechsteiner, D.; Issler, L.; Koller, S.; Lang, E.; Bähr, L.; Feil, S.; Rüegger, C.M.; Kottke, R.; Toelle, S.P.; Zweifel, N.; et al. Genetic Analysis in a Swiss Cohort of Bilateral Congenital Cataract. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2021, 139, 691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Messina-Baas, O.; Cuevas-Covarrubias, S.A. Inherited Congenital Cataract: A Guide to Suspect the Genetic Etiology in the Cataract Genesis. Mol. Syndromol. 2017, 8, 58–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Wu, X.; Long, E.; Lin, H.; Liu, Y. Prevalence and epidemiological characteristics of congenital cataract: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 28564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Sheeladevi, S.; Lawrenson, J.G.; Fielder, A.R.; Suttle, C.M. Global prevalence of childhood cataract: A systematic review. Eye 2016, 30, 1160–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bell, S.J.; Oluonye, N.; Harding, P.; Moosajee, M. Congenital cataract: A guide to genetic and clinical management. Ther. Adv. Rare Dis. 2020, 1, 1726979822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cao, K.; Wang, J.; Zhang, J.; Yusufu, M.; Jin, S.; Hou, S.; Zhu, G.; Wang, B.; Xiong, Y.; Li, J.; et al. Efficacy and safety of vitrectomy for congenital cataract surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized and controlled trials. Acta Ophthalmol. 2019, 97, 233–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lin, X.; Li, H.; Yang, T.; Liu, X.; Fan, F.; Zhou, X.; Luo, Y. Transcriptomics Analysis of Lens from Patients with Posterior Subcapsular Congenital Cataract. Genes 2021, 12, 1904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tocharus, J.; Tsuchiya, A.; Kajikawa, M.; Ueta, Y.; Oka, C.; Kawaichi, M. Developmentally regulated expression of mouse HtrA3 and its role as an inhibitor of TGF-β signaling. Dev. Growth Differ. 2004, 46, 257–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kakrana, A.; Yang, A.; Anand, D.; Djordjevic, D.; Ramachandruni, D.; Singh, A.; Huang, H.; Ho, J.; Lachke, S.A. iSyTE 2.0: A database for expression-based gene discovery in the eye. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, D875–D885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Li, Y.; Yuan, J.; Rothzerg, E.; Wu, X.; Xu, H.; Zhu, S.; Xu, J. Molecular structure and the role of high-temperature requirement protein 1 in skeletal disorders and cancers. Cell Proliferat. 2020, 53, e12746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Tossetta, G.; Fantone, S.; Licini, C.; Marzioni, D.; Mattioli-Belmonte, M. The multifaced role of HtrA1 in the development of joint and skeletal disorders. Bone 2022, 157, 116350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Launay, S.; Maubert, E.; Lebeurrier, N.; Tennstaedt, A.; Campioni, M.; Docagne, F.; Gabriel, C.; Dauphinot, L.; Potier, M.C.; Ehrmann, M.; et al. HtrA1-dependent proteolysis of TGF-beta controls both neuronal maturation and developmental survival. Cell Death Differ. 2008, 15, 1408–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, L.; Lim, S.L.; Du, H.; Zhang, M.; Kozak, I.; Hannum, G.; Wang, X.; Ouyang, H.; Hughes, G.; Zhao, L.; et al. High Temperature Requirement Factor A1 (HTRA1) Gene Regulates Angiogenesis through Transforming Growth Factor-β Family Member Growth Differentiation Factor 6. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 1520–1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Tosi, G.M.; Caldi, E.; Neri, G.; Nuti, E.; Marigliani, D.; Baiocchi, S.; Traversi, C.; Cevenini, G.; Tarantello, A.; Fusco, F.; et al. HTRA1 and TGF-beta1 Concentrations in the Aqueous Humor of Patients with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Investig. Opthalmology Vis. Sci. 2017, 58, 162–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Tang, H.; Leung, L.; Saturno, G.; Viros, A.; Smith, D.; Di Leva, G.; Morrison, E.; Niculescu-Duvaz, D.; Lopes, F.; Johnson, L.; et al. Lysyl oxidase drives tumour progression by trapping EGF receptors at the cell surface. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 14909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hu, H.; Chen, D.; Wang, Y.; Feng, Y.; Cao, G.; Vaziri, N.D.; Zhao, Y. New insights into TGF-β/Smad signaling in tissue fibrosis. Chem.-Biol. Interact. 2018, 292, 76–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kubo, E.; Shibata, T.; Singh, D.; Sasaki, H. Roles of TGF-β and FGF Signals in the Lens: Tropomyosin Regulation for Posterior Capsule Opacity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. de Iongh, R.; Gordon-Thomson, C.; Chamberlain, C.G.; Hales, A.M.; Avoy, J.W.M.C. TGFβ Receptor Expression in Lens: Implications for Differentiation and Cataractogenesis. Exp. Eye Res. 2001, 72, 649–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. de Iongh, R.U.; Lovicu, F.J.; Overbeek, P.A.; Schneider, M.D.; Joya, J.; Hardeman, E.D.; Mcavoy, J.W. Requirement for TGFbeta receptor signaling during terminal lens fiber differentiation. Development 2001, 128, 3995–4010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wernecke, L.; Keckeis, S.; Reichhart, N.; Strauß, O.; Salchow, D.J. Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transdifferentiation in Pediatric Lens Epithelial Cells. Investig. Opthalmology Vis. Sci. 2018, 59, 5785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Du, Y.; Guo, D.; Wu, Q.; Liu, D.; Bi, H. Zinc Chloride Inhibits Human Lens Epithelial Cell Migration and Proliferation Involved in TGF-β1 and TNF-α Signaling Pathways in HLE B-3 Cells. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2014, 159, 425–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Srinivasan, Y.; Lovicu, F.J.; Overbeek, P.A. Lens-specific expression of transforming growth factor beta1 in transgenic mice causes anterior subcapsular cataracts. J. Clin. Investig. 1998, 101, 625–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Flügel-Koch, C.; Ohlmann, A.; Piatigorsky, J.; Tamm, E.R. Disruption of anterior segment development by TGF-β1 overexpression in the eyes of transgenic mice. Dev. Dynam. 2002, 225, 111–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Banh, A.; Deschamps, P.A.; Gauldie, J.; Overbeek, P.A.; Sivak, J.G.; West-Mays, J.A. Lens-Specific Expression of TGF-β Induces Anterior Subcapsular Cataract Formation in the Absence of Smad3. Investig. Opthalmology Vis. Sci. 2006, 47, 3450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Baldi, A.; De Luca, A.; Morini, M.; Battista, T.; Felsani, A.; Baldi, F.; Catricalà, C.; Amantea, A.; Noonan, D.M.; Albini, A.; et al. The HtrA1 serine protease is down-regulated during human melanoma progression and represses growth of metastatic melanoma cells. Oncogene 2002, 21, 6684–6688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zurawa-Janicka, D.; Skorko-Glonek, J.; Lipinska, B. HtrA proteins as targets in therapy of cancer and other diseases. Expert. Opin. Ther. Targets 2010, 14, 665–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, N.; Eckert, K.A.; Zomorrodi, A.R.; Xin, P.; Pan, W.; Shearer, D.A.; Weisz, J.; Maranus, C.D.; Clawson, G.A. Down-regulation of HtrA1 activates the epithelial-mesenchymal transition and ATM DNA damage response pathways. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e39446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Chien, J.; Staub, J.; Hu, S.; Erickson-Johnson, M.R.; Couch, F.J.; Smith, D.I.; Crowl, R.M.; Kaufmann, S.H.; Shridhar, V. A candidate tumor suppressor HtrA1 is downregulated in ovarian cancer. Oncogene 2004, 23, 1636–1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zurawa-Janicka, D.; Kobiela, J.; Galczynska, N.; Stefaniak, T.; Lipinska, B.; Lachinski, A.; Skorko-Glonek, J.; Narkiewicz, J.; Proczko-Markuszewska, M.; Sledzinski, Z. Changes in expression of human serine protease HtrA1, HtrA2 and HtrA3 genes in benign and malignant thyroid tumors. Oncol. Rep. 2012, 28, 1838–1844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, W.; Zhao, M.; Cui, L.; Ren, Y.; Zhang, J.; Chen, J.; Jia, L.; Zhang, J.; Yang, J.; Chen, G.; et al. Characterization of a novel HDAC/RXR/HtrA1 signaling axis as a novel target to overcome cisplatin resistance in human non-small cell lung cancer. Mol. Cancer 2020, 19, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Su, J.; Li, H. RAC1 overexpression promotes the proliferation, migration and epithelial-mesenchymal transition of lens epithelial cells. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2015, 8, 10760–10767. [Google Scholar]
  36. Chien, J.; Ota, T.; Aletti, G.; Shridhar, R.; Boccellino, M.; Quagliuolo, L.; Baldi, A.; Shridhar, V. Serine protease HtrA1 associates with microtubules and inhibits cell migration. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2009, 29, 4177–4187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Cheng, H.; Zhu, H.; Cao, M.; Lu, C.; Bao, S.; Pan, Y. HtrA1 suppresses the growth of pancreatic cancer cells by modulating Notch-1 expression. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 2019, 52, e7718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Globus, O.; Evron, T.; Caspi, M.; Siman-Tov, R.; Rosin-Arbesfeld, R. High-Temperature Requirement A1 (Htra1)—A Novel Regulator of Canonical Wnt Signaling. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 17995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Oka, C.; Tsujimoto, R.; Kajikawa, M.; Koshiba-Takeuchi, K.; Ina, J.; Yano, M.; Tsuchiya, A.; Ueta, Y.; Soma, A.; Kanda, H.; et al. HtrA1 serine protease inhibits signaling mediated by Tgfbeta family proteins. Development 2004, 131, 1041–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Poulsen, E.T.; Nielsen, N.S.; Scavenius, C.; Mogensen, E.H.; Risør, M.W.; Runager, K.; Lukassen, M.V.; Rasmussen, C.B.; Christiansen, G.; Richner, M.; et al. The serine protease HtrA1 cleaves misfolded transforming growth factor β–induced protein (TGFBIp) and induces amyloid formation. J. Biol. Chem. 2019, 294, 11817–11828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Truebestein, L.; Tennstaedt, A.; Mönig, T.; Krojer, T.; Canellas, F.; Kaiser, M.; Clausen, T.; Ehrmann, M. Substrate-induced remodeling of the active site regulates human HTRA1 activity. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2011, 18, 386–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Massagué, J.; Wotton, D. Transcriptional control by the TGF-beta/Smad signaling system. EMBO J. 2000, 19, 1745–1754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Li, X.; Ban, G.; Al-Shameri, B.; He, X.; Liang, D.; Chen, W. High-temperature Requirement Protein A1 Regulates Odontoblastic Differentiation of Dental Pulp Cells via the Transforming Growth Factor Beta 1/Smad Signaling Pathway. J. Endodont. 2018, 44, 765–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Robertson, J.V.; Nathu, Z.; Najjar, A.; Dwivedi, D.; Gauldie, J.; West-Mays, J.A. Adenoviral gene transfer of bioactive TGFbeta1 to the rodent eye as a novel model for anterior subcapsular cataract. Mol. Vis. 2007, 13, 457–469. [Google Scholar]
  45. Takahashi, K.; Igarashi, T.; Miyake, K.; Kobayashi, M.; Katakai, Y.; Hayashita-Kinoh, H.; Fujimoto, C.; Kameya, S.; Takahashi, H.; Okada, T. Amount of Green Fluorescent Protein in the Anterior Chamber after Intravitreal Injection of Triple-Mutated Self-Complementary AAV2 Vectors is Not Affected by Previous Vitrectomy Surgery. J. Nippon. Med. Sch. 2021, 88, 103–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Krieglstein, K.; Strelau, J.; Schober, A.; Sullivan, A.; Unsicker, K. TGF-beta and the regulation of neuron survival and death. J. Physiol. Paris 2002, 96, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hori, K.; Matsuda, A.; Ebihara, N.; Imai, K.; Mori, K.; Funaki, T.; Watanabe, Y.; Nakatani, S.; Okada, K.; Matsuo, O.; et al. Involvement of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 in the pathogenesis of atopic cataracts. Investig. Opthalmology Vis. Sci. 2012, 53, 1846–1851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Chen, X.; Xiao, W.; Chen, W.; Liu, X.; Wu, M.; Bo, Q.; Luo, Y.; Ye, S.; Cao, Y.; Liu, Y. MicroRNA-26a and -26b inhibit lens fibrosis and cataract by negatively regulating Jagged-1/Notch signaling pathway. Cell Death Differ. 2017, 24, 1431–1442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Thiery, J.P.; Acloque, H.; Huang, R.Y.; Nieto, M.A. Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in development and disease. Cell 2009, 139, 871–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lovicu, F.J.; Shin, E.H.; Mcavoy, J.W. Fibrosis in the lens. Sprouty regulation of TGFβ-signaling prevents lens EMT leading to cataract. Exp. Eye Res. 2016, 142, 92–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Nathu, Z.; Dwivedi, D.J.; Reddan, J.R.; Sheardown, H.; Margetts, P.J.; West-Mays, J.A. Temporal changes in MMP mRNA expression in the lens epithelium during anterior subcapsular cataract formation. Exp. Eye Res. 2009, 88, 323–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. de Iongh, R.U.; Wederell, E.; Lovicu, F.J.; Mcavoy, J.W. Transforming growth factor-beta-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition in the lens: A model for cataract formation. Cells Tissues Organs 2005, 179, 43–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Ghosh, A.K.; Vaughan, D.E. PAI-1 in tissue fibrosis. J. Cell. Physiol. 2012, 227, 493–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Murwantoko; Yano, M.; Ueta, Y.; Murasaki, A.; Kanda, H.; Oka, C.; Kawaichi, M. Binding of proteins to the PDZ domain regulates proteolytic activity of HtrA1 serine protease. Biochem. J. 2004, 381, 895–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Grau, S.; Richards, P.J.; Kerr, B.; Hughes, C.; Caterson, B.; Williams, A.S.; Junker, U.; Jones, S.A.; Clausen, T.; Ehrmann, M. The role of human HtrA1 in arthritic disease. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 6124–6129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Li, D.; Han, X.; Zhao, Z.; Lu, Y.; Yang, J. Functional analysis of deleterious EPHA2 SNPs in lens epithelial cells. Mol. Vis. 2021, 27, 403–414. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. HTRA1 expression downregulated in PSC patients. (A) The mRNA level of HTRA1 in anterior lens capsules based on RT-qPCR analyses (p < 0.01). (B) The protein levels of HTRA1 in anterior lens capsules based on Western blotting (p < 0.001). (C) Immunofluorescence images of HTRA1 staining in anterior lens capsules (n = 3). *** p < 0.001, Scale bar: 20 μm.
Figure 1. HTRA1 expression downregulated in PSC patients. (A) The mRNA level of HTRA1 in anterior lens capsules based on RT-qPCR analyses (p < 0.01). (B) The protein levels of HTRA1 in anterior lens capsules based on Western blotting (p < 0.001). (C) Immunofluorescence images of HTRA1 staining in anterior lens capsules (n = 3). *** p < 0.001, Scale bar: 20 μm.
Ijms 23 14431 g001
Figure 2. HTRA1 expression levels in normal human lenses at different layers and for different age groups. (A) The mRNA levels of HTRA1 expressed in central lens epithelial cells, equatorial epithelial cells and fibre cells in normal human lenses. (B) The mRNA levels of HTRA1 expressed in different age groups. (C) Immunofluorescence images of HTRA1 staining in HLECs (n = 3). Scale bar: 10 μm.
Figure 2. HTRA1 expression levels in normal human lenses at different layers and for different age groups. (A) The mRNA levels of HTRA1 expressed in central lens epithelial cells, equatorial epithelial cells and fibre cells in normal human lenses. (B) The mRNA levels of HTRA1 expressed in different age groups. (C) Immunofluorescence images of HTRA1 staining in HLECs (n = 3). Scale bar: 10 μm.
Ijms 23 14431 g002
Figure 3. TGF-β/Smads signalling activated in lens of PSC patients. (A) The mRNA levels of TGF-β1, TGF-β2, TGF-βR1, CTGF and PAI-1 in human lens epithelial cells based on RT-qPCR analyses (p = 0.015, 0.014, 0.023, 0.002 and 0.027, respectively). (B) The protein expression of TGF-β1, TGF-β2, TGF-βR1, CTGF, PAI-1, Smad2/3 and p-Smad2/3 (p = 0.261, 0.008, 0.040, 0.321, 0.040, 0.487 and 0.017, respectively) based on Western blotting. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Figure 3. TGF-β/Smads signalling activated in lens of PSC patients. (A) The mRNA levels of TGF-β1, TGF-β2, TGF-βR1, CTGF and PAI-1 in human lens epithelial cells based on RT-qPCR analyses (p = 0.015, 0.014, 0.023, 0.002 and 0.027, respectively). (B) The protein expression of TGF-β1, TGF-β2, TGF-βR1, CTGF, PAI-1, Smad2/3 and p-Smad2/3 (p = 0.261, 0.008, 0.040, 0.321, 0.040, 0.487 and 0.017, respectively) based on Western blotting. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Ijms 23 14431 g003
Figure 4. Downregulation of HTRA1 directly activated the TGF-β/Smad signalling in primary HLECs. (A) Primary HLECs after LV-HTRA1-RNAi lentivirus transfection, the middle image showed the GFP expression, and the right image showed the mRNA levels of HTRA1 after transfection. (B,C) Changes of HTRA1, Smad2/3, p-Smad2/3, TGF-β1 and TGF-β2 gene expression detected by Western blotting (Smad2/3 p > 0.05, p-Smad2/3 p = 0.014, TGF-β1 p = 0.021, TGF-β2 p = 0.039) in primary HLECs collected from PSC eyes after treatment of HTRA1 knockdown (Htra1 KD). (D) Changes of p-Smad2/3 expression detected by Western blotting with HTRA1 knockdown ± TGF-βR1/2 inhibitor treatment (10 ng/mL for 24 h) in primary HLECs (p-Smad2/3 p = 0.042, 0.027, respectively). (E) The mRNA levels of α-SMA, PAI-1 and CTGF elevated in HLECs after treatment of HTRA1 knockdown (p = 0.022, 0.005, and 0.038, respectively). (F) The protein levels of FN-1, and α-SMA in HLECs after treatment of HTRA1 knockdown (p = 0.017 and 0.031, respectively). * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001.
Figure 4. Downregulation of HTRA1 directly activated the TGF-β/Smad signalling in primary HLECs. (A) Primary HLECs after LV-HTRA1-RNAi lentivirus transfection, the middle image showed the GFP expression, and the right image showed the mRNA levels of HTRA1 after transfection. (B,C) Changes of HTRA1, Smad2/3, p-Smad2/3, TGF-β1 and TGF-β2 gene expression detected by Western blotting (Smad2/3 p > 0.05, p-Smad2/3 p = 0.014, TGF-β1 p = 0.021, TGF-β2 p = 0.039) in primary HLECs collected from PSC eyes after treatment of HTRA1 knockdown (Htra1 KD). (D) Changes of p-Smad2/3 expression detected by Western blotting with HTRA1 knockdown ± TGF-βR1/2 inhibitor treatment (10 ng/mL for 24 h) in primary HLECs (p-Smad2/3 p = 0.042, 0.027, respectively). (E) The mRNA levels of α-SMA, PAI-1 and CTGF elevated in HLECs after treatment of HTRA1 knockdown (p = 0.022, 0.005, and 0.038, respectively). (F) The protein levels of FN-1, and α-SMA in HLECs after treatment of HTRA1 knockdown (p = 0.017 and 0.031, respectively). * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001.
Ijms 23 14431 g004
Figure 5. The proliferation, migration and apoptosis changes of HLECs (SRA 01/04) after treatment of HTRA1 knockdown. (A) CCK-8 assay showed promoted growth ability of HLECs after downregulated expression of HTRA1 (p < 0.001) and was attenuated after treatment of HTRA1 knockdown and the TGF-βR1/2 inhibitor (p < 0.001). (B) Annexin V/7-AAD staining and flow cytometry did not show significant apoptotic cell changes after treatment of HTRA1 knockdown. (C) The protein levels of BAX, Bcl2 and cleaved Caspase-3 in HLECs after treatment of HTRA1 knockdown (p > 0.05). (D) The scratch healing assay showed knockdown of HTRA1 promoted the migration of HLECs (p = 0.022), and was attenuated after treatment of HTRA1 knockdown and the TGF-βR1/2 inhibitor. * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001.
Figure 5. The proliferation, migration and apoptosis changes of HLECs (SRA 01/04) after treatment of HTRA1 knockdown. (A) CCK-8 assay showed promoted growth ability of HLECs after downregulated expression of HTRA1 (p < 0.001) and was attenuated after treatment of HTRA1 knockdown and the TGF-βR1/2 inhibitor (p < 0.001). (B) Annexin V/7-AAD staining and flow cytometry did not show significant apoptotic cell changes after treatment of HTRA1 knockdown. (C) The protein levels of BAX, Bcl2 and cleaved Caspase-3 in HLECs after treatment of HTRA1 knockdown (p > 0.05). (D) The scratch healing assay showed knockdown of HTRA1 promoted the migration of HLECs (p = 0.022), and was attenuated after treatment of HTRA1 knockdown and the TGF-βR1/2 inhibitor. * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001.
Ijms 23 14431 g005
Figure 6. Elevated proliferation and migration of lens epithelial cells by TGF-β1 and the colocalization between HTRA1 and TGF-β1, as well as TGF-β2. (A) CCK-8 assay of human lens epithelial cells after TGF-β1 treatment (p < 0.001). (B) Scratch healing assay of human lens epithelial cells after TGF-β1 treatment (24 h, p = 0.007). (C) Anterior lens capsules were obtained via capsulorhexis during cataract surgery. (D) Cultured primary lens epithelial cells showed migration from the rim of lens capsules. (E) Immunofluorescence images of HTRA1, TGF-β1, and TGF-β2 staining. The amount of colocalization was analysed. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, Scale bar: 20 μm.
Figure 6. Elevated proliferation and migration of lens epithelial cells by TGF-β1 and the colocalization between HTRA1 and TGF-β1, as well as TGF-β2. (A) CCK-8 assay of human lens epithelial cells after TGF-β1 treatment (p < 0.001). (B) Scratch healing assay of human lens epithelial cells after TGF-β1 treatment (24 h, p = 0.007). (C) Anterior lens capsules were obtained via capsulorhexis during cataract surgery. (D) Cultured primary lens epithelial cells showed migration from the rim of lens capsules. (E) Immunofluorescence images of HTRA1, TGF-β1, and TGF-β2 staining. The amount of colocalization was analysed. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, Scale bar: 20 μm.
Ijms 23 14431 g006
Figure 7. Images of haematoxylin and eosin staining after knocking down HTRA1 by rAAV injection in mouse eyes. Aberrant proliferation and migration of lens epithelial cells were observed in (A,A1) (Arrow). (A,B): Scale bar: 200 μm, (A1,B1): Scale bar: 50 μm. A and A1, as well as B and B1, were images from the same position.
Figure 7. Images of haematoxylin and eosin staining after knocking down HTRA1 by rAAV injection in mouse eyes. Aberrant proliferation and migration of lens epithelial cells were observed in (A,A1) (Arrow). (A,B): Scale bar: 200 μm, (A1,B1): Scale bar: 50 μm. A and A1, as well as B and B1, were images from the same position.
Ijms 23 14431 g007
Figure 8. Images of mouse eyes after treatment of HTRA1 knockdown. (A,A1) showed that downregulation of HTRA1 induced the formation of subcapsular cataract. (A,A1), as well as (B,B1), were images from the same position.
Figure 8. Images of mouse eyes after treatment of HTRA1 knockdown. (A,A1) showed that downregulation of HTRA1 induced the formation of subcapsular cataract. (A,A1), as well as (B,B1), were images from the same position.
Ijms 23 14431 g008
Figure 9. Downregulation of HTRA1 activated the TGF-β/Smad signalling in primary mouse lens epithelial cells. (A) Changes of HTRA1, TGF-β1 and TGF-β2 gene expression detected by RT-qPCR (HTRA1 p = 0.045) in primary mouse lens epithelial cells after treatment of HTRA1 knockdown. (B) Changes of HTRA1, p-Smad2/3, TGF-β1 and TGF-β2 gene expression detected by Western blotting (HTRA1 p = 0.029, p-Smad 2/3 p = 0.024) in primary mouse lens epithelial cells after treatment of HTRA1 knockdown. (C) The protein levels of FN-1 and α-SMA in primary mouse lens epithelial cells after treatment of HTRA1 knockdown (p = 0.002 and 0.002, respectively). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Figure 9. Downregulation of HTRA1 activated the TGF-β/Smad signalling in primary mouse lens epithelial cells. (A) Changes of HTRA1, TGF-β1 and TGF-β2 gene expression detected by RT-qPCR (HTRA1 p = 0.045) in primary mouse lens epithelial cells after treatment of HTRA1 knockdown. (B) Changes of HTRA1, p-Smad2/3, TGF-β1 and TGF-β2 gene expression detected by Western blotting (HTRA1 p = 0.029, p-Smad 2/3 p = 0.024) in primary mouse lens epithelial cells after treatment of HTRA1 knockdown. (C) The protein levels of FN-1 and α-SMA in primary mouse lens epithelial cells after treatment of HTRA1 knockdown (p = 0.002 and 0.002, respectively). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Ijms 23 14431 g009
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lin, X.; Yang, T.; Liu, X.; Fan, F.; Zhou, X.; Li, H.; Luo, Y. TGF-β/Smad Signalling Activation by HTRA1 Regulates the Function of Human Lens Epithelial Cells and Its Mechanism in Posterior Subcapsular Congenital Cataract. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 14431. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232214431

AMA Style

Lin X, Yang T, Liu X, Fan F, Zhou X, Li H, Luo Y. TGF-β/Smad Signalling Activation by HTRA1 Regulates the Function of Human Lens Epithelial Cells and Its Mechanism in Posterior Subcapsular Congenital Cataract. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(22):14431. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232214431

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lin, Xiaolei, Tianke Yang, Xin Liu, Fan Fan, Xiyue Zhou, Hongzhe Li, and Yi Luo. 2022. "TGF-β/Smad Signalling Activation by HTRA1 Regulates the Function of Human Lens Epithelial Cells and Its Mechanism in Posterior Subcapsular Congenital Cataract" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 22: 14431. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232214431

APA Style

Lin, X., Yang, T., Liu, X., Fan, F., Zhou, X., Li, H., & Luo, Y. (2022). TGF-β/Smad Signalling Activation by HTRA1 Regulates the Function of Human Lens Epithelial Cells and Its Mechanism in Posterior Subcapsular Congenital Cataract. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(22), 14431. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232214431

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop