Next Article in Journal
Type I–IV Halogen⋯Halogen Interactions: A Comparative Theoretical Study in Halobenzene⋯Halobenzene Homodimers
Next Article in Special Issue
Allosteric Inhibition of c-Abl to Induce Unfolded Protein Response and Cell Death in Multiple Myeloma
Previous Article in Journal
Ocular Surface Infection Mediated Molecular Stress Responses: A Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Bortezomib-Induced Epigenetic Alterations in Nerve Cells: Focus on the Mechanisms Contributing to the Peripheral Neuropathy Development
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Pathogenesis and Treatment of Myeloma-Related Bone Disease

1
Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan
2
Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
3
Department of Biology, University of Rutgers-Camden, Camden, NJ 08102, USA
4
Cancer Center, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan
5
Center for Cancer Research, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
6
Faculty of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(6), 3112; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23063112
Submission received: 14 February 2022 / Revised: 4 March 2022 / Accepted: 9 March 2022 / Published: 14 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Multiple Myeloma: Focus on Molecular and Epigenetic Aspects)

Abstract

:
Multiple myeloma is a hematologic malignancy of plasma cells that causes bone-destructive lesions and associated skeletal-related events (SREs). The pathogenesis of myeloma-related bone disease (MBD) is the imbalance of the bone-remodeling process, which results from osteoclast activation, osteoblast suppression, and the immunosuppressed bone marrow microenvironment. Many important signaling cascades, including the RANKL/RANK/OPG axis, Notch signaling, the Wnt/β-Catenin signaling pathways, and signaling molecules, such as DKK-1, sclerostin, osteopontin, activin A, chemokines, and interleukins are involved and play critical roles in MBD. Currently, bisphosphonate and denosumab are the gold standard for MBD prevention and treatment. As the molecular mechanisms of MBD become increasingly well understood, novel agents are being thoroughly explored in both preclinical and clinical settings. Herein, we will provide an updated overview of the pathogenesis of MBD, summarize the clinical management and guidelines, and discuss novel bone-modifying therapies for further management of MBD.

1. Introduction

Multiple myeloma (MM), also known as plasma cell myeloma, is the second-most common hematological malignancy and is characterized by the malignant proliferation of monoclonal plasma cells in the bone marrow, leading to bone destruction, marrow failure, and associated end organ damage (hypercalcemia, renal insufficiency, anemia, or bone lesions) [1]. According to statistics for the United States, MM accounts for about 1.8% of all cancers and 18% of hematologic malignancies. MM is most frequently diagnosed in people aged 65 to 74 years; the median age is 69 years [2]. The incidence of MM is increasing worldwide, but the rate of increase is greatest in Asia. In Taiwan, the age-adjusted incidence of MM increased by 13% between 2007 and 2012 [3]. The overall survival of patients with MM has improved significantly in the last two decades because of novel therapeutic agents, but it remains an incurable disease in the majority of patients. For newly diagnosed patients, the median overall survival is approximately six years [4].
MM-related bone disease (MBD) is a hallmark of MM. More than 80% of MM patients develop osteolytic bone lesions at diagnosis [5]; these patients are at high risk of skeletal-related events (SREs), including pathological fractures, spinal cord compression, and the need for surgical or radiotherapeutic intervention [6]. Up to 60% of MM patients will develop pathologic fracture during the disease course [7]. SREs have a negative impact on patient survival, quality of life, and public health costs [6].
The pathogenesis of MBD is the imbalance and uncoupling of the bone-remodeling process, due to the dysregulation of the bone marrow microenvironment [8,9], increased osteoclast formation and activity, and osteoblast suppression [10]. Both the direct and indirect interactions between MM cells and osteocytes, osteoclasts, osteoblasts, immune cells, and bone mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) participate in the complex pathogenesis event.
Regarding the MBD therapeutics, the current guidelines suggests that bisphosphonates (namely zoledronic acid or pamidronic acid) should be administered to all patients with active MM, regardless of the presence of MBD in imaging study; denosumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody directed against RANKL, is used for patients with MBD on imaging or for patients with renal impairment [11]. In addition, novel agents have been developed from the understanding of the molecular pathways of MBD pathogenesis.
Here, we review the pathogenesis, treatment modalities, and preclinical research and clinical trials for investigating novel bone-modifying agents for MBD management.

2. Increased Bone Resorption by Osteoclasts

2.1. RANKL/RANK/OPG Axis

The pathogenesis of MBD is primarily in the upregulation of osteoclast differentiation and activity resulting in unbalanced bone resorption, which causes characteristic osteolytic lesions [12]. The two main factors required for osteoclast differentiation are macrophage-colony stimulating factor (M-CSF) and receptor activator of NFκB (RANK) ligand (RANKL) [13,14]. The key pathway, receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL)/RANK/osteoprotegerin (OPG), regulates the formation of multinucleated osteoclasts from their precursors, as well as their activation and survival in normal bone remodeling [15,16]. Osteocytes produce the majority of RANKL, but activated lymphocytes, BMSCs, and endothelial cells also produce RANKL. RANKL promotes osteoclast activity by binding to RANK on the membrane of osteoclastic lineage cells [15]. OPG, a soluble decoy receptor and a member of the TNF receptor family [17], is secreted by osteoblasts, BMSCs, and osteocytes; it protects bone from excessive resorption by binding to RANKL and preventing it from binding to RANK [15].
MM cells degrade OPG through the membrane syndecan (CD138)-1 system [18]. The RANKL/OPG ratio is a critical regulator of the bone resorption rate; increased RANKL/OPG is found in the MM microenvironment and serum RANKL/OPG is negatively correlated with patient survival [15,19,20]. Increased osteoclast activity, induced by osteoclast-derived osteopontin and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) from myeloma cells, appears to contribute both to the increased angiogenesis and tumor growth in MM [18,21].

2.2. Notch Signaling Pathway

The Notch signaling pathway is also implicated in MM-induced osteoclastogenesis [22,23]. Four transmembrane receptors (Notch 1–4) are included in the Notch family, and they bind to their ligands (Jagged 1,2 and Delta-like 1,3,4) expressed by neighboring cells. The Notch family, expressed in the membranes of MM cells, and its activation by homotypic or heterotypic interactions and the subsequent intracellular cascade are important for the differentiation of pre-osteoclasts, which trigger the secretion of angiogenic factors by BMSCs [22]. The inhibition of Notch pathway causes decreased MM cell proliferation, induces MM cell apoptosis, and inhibits osteoclastogenesis [24]. The systemic inhibition of Notch with γ-secretase inhibitors (GSIs) decreases multiple myeloma tumor growth. A novel agent forbone-targeted Notch inhibition (BT-GSI) has both anti-myeloma and anti-resorptive properties, and is under investigation [25].

2.3. Chemokines: CCL-3 (MIP-1α)/CCR1, CCR5

Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 3 (CCL-3), also called macrophage inflammatory protein-1α (MIP-1α), is a chemokine with inflammatory and chemokinetic properties secreted by MM plasma cells that plays a critical role in the pathogenesis of MBD [26]. The binding of CCL-3 to its G-protein coupled receptors, CCR1 and CCR5, activates the ERK and AKT signaling pathways and contributes to the development of bone disease in MM by supporting tumor growth and regulating osteoclast differentiation [26,27]. In MM human cell lines with translocation t(4;14), the overexpression of fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) is induced by MIP-1α promoter activity, as well as the MIP-1α gene and protein expression/secretion [28]. CCL3 induces osteoclast formation in a RANK/RANKL-dependent manner both in vivo and in vitro studies [29,30]. A higher level of CCL-3 in the bone marrow is positively associated with the increased presence of osteolytic bone disease [31]. On the other hand, CCL3 also inhibits osteoblastogenesis through the Runx2/osterix pathway and causes the suppression of mineralization activation and osteocalcin expression [32]. Treatment with the CCR1-specific antagonist MLN3897 inhibits the interaction of multiple myeloma cells and osteoclasts and impedes osteoclastogenesis in vitro [33].

2.4. Chemokines: CCL-20(MIP-3α)/CCR6

Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 20 (CCL-20), also known as macrophage inflammatory protein-3α (MIP-3α), and its receptor CCR6 are upregulated in the bone microenvironment by MM cells and contribute to osteoclast formation and osteolytic bone lesions in MM patients [34]. The CCL-20 level in the bone marrow has a significant predictive value for osteolytic bone lesions [31].

2.5. BTK and CXCL-12 (SDF-1)/CXCR4

Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) is a nonreceptor tyrosine kinase of the TEC family and plays a crucial role in oncogenic signaling that is critical for the proliferation and survival of leukemic cells in many B cell malignancies and osteoclast differentiation [35,36]. CXCL-12 [stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1)] is a homeostatic chemokine that binds primarily to the CXC receptor 4 (CXCR4; CD184) [37]. After CXCL-12 and CXCR4 binding, the homing of myeloma cells and osteoclastogenesis are triggered [38]. BTK is found to be expressed in MM cells, and has a positive correlation with CXCR4 expression. In an in vitro study, BTK inhibition reduced the migration of myeloma cells toward SDF-1 [39]. The interesting role of BTK activity in myeloma cell clonogenicity and metastasis and in osteoclast-mediated bone resorption may have therapeutic potential in MBD. The BTK inhibitor ibrutinib is now in use in combination with other anti-myeloma agents in relapse and refractory clinical trial settings.

2.6. Annexin II (AnxA2, A2)

Annexin II (AnxA2, A2) is a Ca2+-dependent, anionic phospholipid-binding protein that belongs to the ubiquitous multigene annexin family, expressed on most of the endothelial cells, mononuclear macrophage, marrow cells, and some tumor cells [40]. Preclinical studies show that AnxA2 is highly expressed in myeloma cells from MM patients and can promote myeloma cell growth, reduce apoptosis in myeloma cell lines, and increase osteoclast formation [41,42]. Higher AnxA2 expression in myeloma cells is associated with significantly more adverse prognostic features, and inferior event-free and overall survival [42].

2.7. Osteopontin (OPN)

Osteopontin (OPN) is a non-collagenous matrix protein produced by a variety of cells, including osteoblasts, osteoclasts, and several types of tumor cells [43]. OPN is associated with inflammation and tissue remodeling [44]. Osteoclast-derived OPN and VEGF from myeloma cells cooperatively enhance angiogenesis and induce osteoclastogenic activity by vascular endothelial cells [45]. High OPN expression correlates with higher tumor burden, and greater bone destruction [46]; OPN may also play a critical role in MM progression and osteoclastogenesis [47].

2.8. Interleukins (IL-3, IL-6, IL-17)

2.8.1. Interleukin 3 (IL-3)

Interleukin 3 (IL-3) acts as a bifunctional cytokine that indirectly increases osteoclastogenesis and suppresses osteoblastogenesis in MM cells in vitro [48]. The IL-3 level in bone marrow serum significantly elevated in MM patients. IL-3 can induce osteoclastogenesis in human bone marrow cultures, which was inhibited by a blocking antibody to IL-3 [49]. In addition, IL-3 influences indirectly the growth of osteoclasts by inducing activin A production [48] and increasing RANKL and MIP-1α [49].

2.8.2. Interleukin 6 (IL-6)

Interleukin 6 (IL-6), an inflammatory cytokines, can modulate skeletal homeostasis and osteoclast differentiation [50]. IL-6 stimulates osteoclast differentiation only when IL-6 binding with soluble IL-6 receptor (sIL-6R) via enhancing the expression of RANKL and OPG, but decreasing RANK expression [51]. In addition, IL-6 enhances bone resorption by promoting the proliferation of Dickkopf-1 (DKK-1)-secreting myeloma cells, but DKK-1 secretion is blocked after IL-6 neutralizing agents [52].

2.8.3. Interleukin 17 (IL-17)

Interleukin-17 (IL-17) and IL-17-producing cells (T-helper cells, Th17) play important roles in inflammation and the immune response [53]. Research conducted in MM cell models shows that IL-17–producing T cells induce osteoclast activation and that IL-17 production directly correlates with lytic bone disease, irrespective of the tumor burden, indicating that the Th17 T-cell phenotype is a key predictor of lytic bone disease in MM [54].

2.9. TGFβ Superfamily and Activin-A

Activin-A is a dimeric multifunctional glycoprotein that belong to the transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) superfamily and regulates a broad spectrum of biological functions, including bone remodeling [55]. Activin-A has growth stimulatory effects on osteoclasts by inducing RANK expression and activating the NF-κB pathway [56], and medicates osteoblast function inhibition [57,58]. Increased bone marrow plasma activin A levels are associated with MM patients developing extensive osteolytic disease [57]. In addition, higher circulating Activin-A in myeloma patients is correlated with more advanced disease and poorer prognosis [59]. In preclinical studies in mouse models, the administration of anti-Activin-A agents, the Activin-A chimeric inhibitor (RAP-011) derived from the fusion of the extracellular domain of activin receptor IIA and the constant domain of the murine IgG2a or a soluble Activin-A receptor type IIA fusion protein (ActRIIA.muFc) successfully inhibits osteolytic bone lesions developing by both inhibiting osteoclastogenesis and stimulating osteoblastogenesis [60]. A Phase II clinical trial investigating MM patients with osteolytic lesions treated with Sotatercept (ACE-011) combined with other anti-MM agents revealed that it was safe and well tolerated [61].

2.10. TNF (Tumor Necrosis Factor) Superfamily

TNF-α is one of the most potent osteoclastogenic cytokines produced in inflammation, and directly targets macrophages within a stromal environment that expresses permissive levels of RANKL [62]. B-cell-activating factor of the TNF family (BAFF; also known as B lymphocyte stimulator and TNFSF-13B), is secreted and expressed predominantly by macrophages, dendritic cells, osteoclasts, and BMSCs, and provides a key survival signal for the maturation of peripheral B cells that play a regulatory role in osteoblast differentiation [63,64]. The ligation of BAFF to its receptor can cause constitutive activation of either the canonical or non-canonical NF-κB pathways, resulting in the upregulation of anti-apoptotic proteins and the downregulation of pro-apoptotic proteins [64,65], enhanced MM cell survival, and MBD progression [66,67]. A Phase II clinical trial of the anti-BAFF monoclonal antibody, tabalumab, used in previously treated MM, did not show PFS benefit compared to placebo [68].

3. Suppression of Bone Formation by Osteoblasts

3.1. Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling Pathway

The Wnt signaling is very important in skeletogenesis as it promotes the proliferation, expansion, and survival of immature osteoblastic cells [69]; it also plays an important role in MBD pathogenesis [70]. The formation of the Wnt-Frizzled-low-density lipoprotein-related protein (LRP) complex activates Wnt/β-catenin signaling in the canonical pathway by the activation of Disheveled (Dvl), which inhibits glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3β) from phosphorylating β-catenin. The cytoplasmic level of β-catenin consequently rises, and β-catenin translocates into the nucleus to bind with the transcriptional factor T-cell factor (Tcf)/lymphoid enhancer-binding factor (Lef-1), upregulating the expression of target genes such as cyclin D1, axin2, c-Myc, and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPARδ), causing bone formation, and impeding bone resorption [71,72]. On the other hand, the existence of Wnt antagonists, Dickkopfs-1 (DKK-1), sclerostin, and secreted frizzled-related proteins (sFRPs), impairs osteoblastogenesis and blocks bone formation by impeding the Wnt signaling cascade [69,72,73]. In MM, soluble canonical Wnt inhibitors produced from MM cells and BMSCs that interrupt Wnt signaling are increased, which causes severe osteoblast/osteoclast imbalance via the upregulation of the RANKL/OPG ratio [74,75,76].

3.2. DKK-1, Sclerostin

Dickkopf-1 (DKK-1) is a secreted protein, a member of the DKK family, and is important in vertebrate development, including osteoblastogenesis [76]. DKK1 is secreted by MM cells and BMSCs; it blocks the maturation of osteoblasts and the formation of mineralized matrix by antagonizing the canonical Wnt pathway through binding to LRP5/6 [70,71,72,74,75,76]. In addition, DKK-1 prevents the differentiation of MSCs into osteoblasts, and the undifferentiated MSCs produce IL-6, which stimulates the proliferation of DKK1-secreting MM cells. This vicious cycle continues, resulting in more extensive osteolytic lesions [52]. In MM, BMSCs produce increased amounts of DKK-1 [77]. DKK-1 serum and bone marrow plasma concentrations correlate with the extent of MBD [78]. Anti-DKK-1 strategies are valuable since high serum levels of DKK1 are correlated with osteolytic lesion formation. A variety of DKK-1 antibodies has emerged; most have shown encouraging results in MM cell lines in both preclinical and clinical trials [76]. The DKK1-neutralizing antibody BHQ880 upregulates β-catenin levels, downregulates NF-κB activity, increases osteoblast differentiation, neutralizes the negative effect of osteoblastogenesis, and reduces IL-6 secretion [70,79]. In a Phase II trial, BHQ880 administered as a monotherapy was well tolerated in previously untreated high- and intermediate-risk SMM patients with increased anabolic bone activity [80]. The DKK1-DNA vaccine can be used for immunotherapy of patients with MM, and was effective in reducing tumor burden in mice with established MM in a preclinical study [81].
Sclerostin is a small glycoprotein expressed by the SOST gene, and is secreted by osteocytes during bone remodeling [82]. During bone formation, sclerostin binds to LRP5/6 to inhibit the Wnt signaling pathway, completing a negative feedback loop of osteogenesis [82,83]. Sclerostin competed with the type I and type II bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) receptors for binding to BMPs, de-regulated BMP signaling, and suppressed the mineralization of osteoblastic cells [84]. Sclerostin, also secreted by MM cells, mediates the upregulation of RANKL and the downregulation of OPG in osteoblasts and contributes to the suppression of bone formation in the MBD [73,85]. Dkk-1 and sclerostin have synergic effects, resulting in osteoblast dysfunction [72]. Many clinical studies have shown the positive correlation the levels of circulating sclerostin and the presence of osteolytic fractures, disease stage, and biochemical markers of bone remodeling in MM patients [86,87,88]. Anti-sclerostin antibodies (Scl-Ab), such as romosozumab and blosozumab, have been tested in osteoporosis treatment, revealing potent activity in stimulating bone formation and reducing bone resorption [89,90]. The combination of Scl-Ab and anti-myeloma agents, or the osteoclast inhibitor zoledronic acid, has been investigated in preclinical studies [91,92,93].

3.3. Runt-Related Transcription Factor 2 (RUNX2)

Runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2) belongs to the family of runt-related transcription factors, and plays an essential role in both osteoblast differentiation and the expression of osteoblast-specific genes [94]. RUNX2/CBFA1 (core-binding factor Runt domain alpha subunit 1) is a critical osteoblast transcription factor in the inhibition of osteoblastogenesis in MM [95]. Increased Runx2 expression is significantly associated with a high-risk myeloma population, and promotes MBD progression [96].

3.4. EphrinB2/EphB4 Signaling Pathway

Together, Eph tyrosine kinase receptors and their ephrin ligands form a critical cell communication system in normal physiology and disease pathogenesis [97]. The bidirectional signaling between the cell-surface ligand EphrinB2 (expressed in osteoblasts) and its receptor, EphB4 (expressed in osteoblasts and BMSCs), is involved in the coupling of osteoblastogenesis and osteoclastogenesis and in angiogenesis [98,99]. EphrinB2/EphB4 signaling links the suppression of osteoclast differentiation by suppressing Fos and Nfatc1 transcription to the stimulation of bone formation by RhoA downregulation [99]. In MM patients, both EphrinB2 and EphB4 expression is decreased in BMSCs. In murine MM models, the use of EphrinB2-Fc and EphB4-Fcs can enhance bone formation, inhibit myeloma growth, and reverse the pathogenesis of MBD.

4. Current Myeloma-Related Bone Disease Treatment

4.1. Bisphosphonates

Bisphosphonates (BPs) are the cornerstone for MBD treatment because they can prevent, reduce, and delay MM-related skeletal complications [11,100,101]. During bone remodeling, bisphosphonates act as pyrophosphate analogs that bind to exposed areas of hydroxyapatite crystals, and osteoclasts endocytose bisphosphonates, which are potent inhibitors of intracellular farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase, impairing osteoclastogenesis and enhancing osteoblostogenesis [102]. The FDA-approved BPs for MBD are zoledronic acid and pamidronate [103]. Clodronate (oral non-nitrogenous BP), which is used for reducing SREs in MM patients, yielded inferior survival outcomes compared with zoledronic acid in the Myeloma IX trial [104,105,106]. Zolendronic acid may have an anti-myeloma effect through the inhibition of protein prenylation and the inhibition of antiangiogensis or by the indirect downregulation of BMSC-related adhesion molecules and the blocking of osteoclast activation [8,107,108]. According to the long-term follow-up data in one large Phase III trial, zoledronic acid was more effective than pamidronate in MM patients with bone metastases. The advantages of zoledronic acid (4 mg) include lower mean skeletal morbidity rate, increased median time to first SRE, and reduced risk of developing an SRE compared with pamidronate (90 mg) [109]. BPs are recommended as standard treatment of MM patients with either osteolytic bone lesions or osteopenia in many current guidelines, including those from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) [110], the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) [111], the Mayo Clinic [112], the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) [113], and the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) [11]. Zoledronic acid or pamidronate once monthly, at least for the first 1 to 2 years, is recommended for almost all patients with MM who have evidence of MBD [11,111,112,113] (Table 1). The standard dosing schedule for symptomatic MM patients with normal renal function is 4 mg intravascular infusion over 15 min every 3 to 4 weeks for zoledronic acid, and 30 mg or 90 mg administered over 45 min (for 30 mg) or 2 h (for 90 mg) every 3 to 4 weeks for pamidronic acid [11]. Dose adjustments for renal impairment are required both at diagnosis and during treatment. Zoledronic acid is not recommended for patients with severe renal impairment, while pamidronic acid can be administered increasing the time of administration to 4–6 h for them (whose creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min) [114]. Approximately 40% of patients treated with intravascular nitrogen-containing BPs may have a flu-like syndrome [114]. Some patients might develop severe hypocalcemia, so calcium and vitamin D supplements should be administered to all patients receiving BPs [11]. Some MM patients receiving BPs might have renal toxicity. Zoledronate has mainly been associated with acute tubular necrosis (ATN), and pamidronate causes collapsing focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) and other patterns of glomerular disease [115]. Another well-known adverse effect of BPs is osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ), primarily associated with the long-term use of BPs, a tooth extraction or other surgical or invasive dental procedure, or a history of glucocorticoid use [11,114,116,117,118].

4.2. Denosumab

Denosumab is a fully human and highly specific monoclonal IgG2 antibody against RANKL, which inhibits the development and activity of osteoclasts, decreases bone resorption, and increases bone density [119]. Denosumab imitates the physiological effect of OPG by directly competing against the interaction of RANKL with RANK, and inhibits osteoclastogenesis [120]. Denosumab given 60 mg every 6 months subcutaneously was initial investigated for osteoporosis in postmenopausal osteoporosis and other metabolic bone diseases [119]; it successfully prevented fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis [121], and had clinical benefit in patients with bone metastases from prostatic, breast, and lung malignancies [122]. In clinical trials, denosumab also shows clinical benefit in MM patients (Table 2) [123,124]. Denosumab 120 mg administered subcutaneously every 4 weeks was non-inferior to zoledronic acid 4 mg given as an intravenous infusion, delaying the time to first SRE after a multiple myeloma diagnosis in an international Phase III, randomized, double-blind 20090482 trial (Table 2) [125]. In the exploratory result of the 20090482 trial, the autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT)-intent subgroup demonstrated the largest PFS benefit for denosumab compared with zoledronic acid [126]. Denosumab is also a hypercalcemia therapeutic strategy for MM patients [127]. For patients with renal dysfunction, denosumab is preferable over BPs, and denosumab can be safely administered with close monitoring of patients’ renal function [127,128,129]. As for safety issues, there appears to be slightly greater renal toxicity with zoledronic acid, but higher rates of hypocalcemia with denosumab [129]. Denosumab should be administered continuously until unacceptable toxicity occurs [11], because the rebound phenomenon may contribute to the resultant high soluble RANKL/OPG ratio, which is associated with an expanded pool of osteoclast precursors [130,131]. In contrast to BPs, denosumab does not incorporate into bone matrix; therefore, bone turnover is not suppressed after its cessation [130]. Denosumab discontinuation leads to reduced bone mineral density and increased risk of fracture [131]. The IMWG recommends that a single dose of zoledronic acid be given at least 6 months after the last dose of denozumab to prevent rebound effects [11].

5. Proteasome Inhibitors in Myeloma Bone Disease

Proteasome inhibition has emerged as an essential therapeutic strategy in the treatment of MM. Over the past decades, a variety of new proteasome inhibitors (PIs) have led to great progress in treatment and improved the survival of patients with MM [133]. Proteasome inhibition regulates bone metabolism through the reduction of RANKL-mediated osteoclast differentiation [134]. As mentioned above, RANKL binds to RANK on the surface of osteoclast precursors and subsequently causes NF-κB activation; therefore, PIs can block this pathway and inhibit osteoclastogenesis and suppress bone resorption [135,136]. In addition to the anti-myeloma effect, PIs have an anabolic effect on bone formation by inhibition of the ubiquitin–proteasome pathway [134]. PIs also induce the activation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling-independent Wnt ligands [134]. Bortezomib, a potent proteasome inhibitors, inhibits MM-BMSC interactions, and can activate β-catenin/TCF signaling in inducing osteoblast differentiation, and also upregulate RUNX-2 expression and enhance osteoblastogenesis [137,138]. Second-generation PIs, such as carfilzomib (PR-171), which selectively and irreversibly inhibits proteasome enzymatic activities in a dose-dependent manner, and ixazomib (MLN9708), which was the first oral PI with a robust efficacy and favorable safety profile, demonstrate clinical benefit in myeloma bone diseases through the inhibition of bone resorption and the promotion of osteoblastogenesis [133,139].

6. Supportive Intervention

Palliative radiotherapy also plays an important role for MM patients with MBD, as most have painful bone lesions. Radiotherapy is also used for the prophylactic treatment of impending pathological fractures, spinal cord compression, and the management of local neurological symptoms [140]. Surgical interventions with percutaneous vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty are also applied to patients with vertebral compression fractures that have a poor response to conservation treatment [141,142].

7. Novel Therapeutic Agents in Preclinical Research and Ongoing Trials

Wnt pathway signaling has a strong influence on MBD (Figure 1). The soluble Wnt inhibitor DKK-1, produced by MM cells, inhibits osteoblast activity, and its serum level correlates with focal bone lesions in MM [70]. BHQ880, a DKK1-neutralizing antibody, can increase osteoblast differentiation, neutralize the negative effect of MM cells on osteoblastogenesis, reduce IL-6 secretion, upregulate β-catenin levels, and downregulate nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) activity in BMSCs in in vitro study [70,79]. In a Phase I/II study, BHQ880 and zoledronic acid in combination with anti-MM therapy were used in patients with relapsed or refractory MM with a prior SRE. The safety of BHQ880 was determined and BHQ880 results in a general trend towards increased bone mineral density over time [143,144] (Table 3). BHQ880 monotherapy in previously untreated patients with high- and intermediate-risk smoldering MM can cause anabolic bone activity, as shown using a novel imaging modality in one Phase II trial (NCT01302886) [80] (Table 3). Activin, which belongs to the TGF β superfamily, regulates bone remodeling and is involved in osteoclast development and differentiation. Sotatercept (formerly known as ACE-011), a recombinant activin receptor type IIA (ActRIIA) ligand trap comprising the extracellular domain of the human ActRIIA and human immunoglobulin G, has positive effects on bone metabolism and hematopoiesis in newly diagnosed and relapsed MM patients [61] (Table 3). RAP-011, a murine ortholog of sotatercept (Activin receptor type II Murine Fc Protein), combined with lenalidomide resulted in the effectively restoration of osteoblast function and inhibited MM-induced osteolysis in a preclinical setting [145] (Table 3).
B-cell activating factor (BAFF) is a member of the tumor necrosis factor superfamily (TNFSF). Tabalumab is a human IgG4 anti-BAFF monoclonal antibody [153]. Treatment of mice with tabalumab resulted in a significant reduction in tumor burden, prolonged survival, decreased osteoclast recruitment and activation, which caused fewer lytic lesions in the bone by a reduction in NF-κB signaling [154]. In Phase I studies, tabalumab in combination with bortezomib was well tolerated for patients with relapsed/refractory MM [147,148]. In a Phase II trial, patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive placebo, tabalumab 100 mg, or tabalumab 300 mg, each in combination with dexamethasone and bortezomib. There was no PFS benefit during treatment with tabalumab compared to placebo. A higher dose of 300 mg tabalumab did not improve efficacy compared to the 100 mg dose [68] (Table 3).
Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors impaired osteoclastogenesis and suppressed bone resorption activity in an in vitro study [155]. Ibrutinib is a first-in-class, oral, covalent inhibitor of BTK that has produced notable responses in combination with dexamethasone in heavily pre-treated MM patients in a Phase II trial [149] (Table 3).
Anti-sclerostin antibody (Scl-Ab), such as romosozumab (AMG785), is well-studied in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis [89]. Sclerostin is a glycoprotein inhibitor of osteoblast Wnt signaling produced by osteocytes, which causes a decrease in bone formation [156]. Preclinical studies showed that treatment with anti-sclerostin antibody prevented myeloma-induced bone loss, reduced osteolytic bone lesions, and increased fracture resistance [91] (Table 3).
The γ-secretase inhibitor XII (GSI XII) impaired murine osteoclast differentiation in an in vitro study [151]. RO4929097 is a potent γ-secretase inhibitor (GSI), blocks Notch signaling, and reduces expression of the Notch transcriptional target gene, which is associated with osteoclastogenesis in MM [150] (Table 3). Clinical studies of GSIs are ongoing in different malignancies.
CCL3 (MIP-1α) enhances osteoclast formation and promotes MM cell migration and survival [27]. MLN3897, a specific antagonist of the chemokine receptor CCR1, impaired osteoclastogenesis and interfered with the interactions between osteoclasts and MM cells in a preclinical setting [33] (Table 3).

8. Future Perspectives

The progress of new anti-myeloma drugs has contributed to excellent treatment outcomes, prolonging MM patients’ progression-free survival and overall survival, and improving their quality of life. There is still limited effective management and strong evidence regarding the restoration of bone formation or the prevention of SREs, one of the most devastating complications of MM. Furthermore, the current guidelines list the most up-to-date recommendations for MBD, but there are inconsistencies in the duration of treatment among the different guidelines. With the pathogenesis of MBD well studied and reported, emerging novel agents have recently been utilized in real-world clinical practice, including BHQ880, sotatercept, and ibrutinib. We are looking forward to positive clinical outcomes of novel agents in the future, which will offer better treatment choices for MM patients and for the prevention and therapy of MBD.

9. Summary

We discussed the pathogenesis of myeloma-related bone disease, the current treatment and the novel agents in development for the treatment of MBD. We also illustrated the important signaling cascades, including the RANKL/RANK/OPG axis, Notch signaling, the Wnt/β-Catenin signaling pathways, and key signaling molecules, such as DKK-1, sclerostin, osteopontin, activin A, chemokines, and interleukins, associated with osteoclast, osteoblasts, and BMSCs in the BM microenvironment. The complexity of cross relationships between MM cells and the surrounding cells has a critical role in MBD. Bisphosphonates and denosumab remain the first-line standard therapy for MM patients to prevent SREs. In development, there are new bone-modifying agents that target different molecular pathways for restoring bone metabolism; some of these are currently in clinical trials and may help meet patients’ needs in the near future.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.-H.H. and Y.-C.G.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.-C.G.; writing—review and editing, H.-H.H., S.Y.H. and C.-M.H.; visualization, T.-J.Y.; supervision, H.-H.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kazandjian, D. Multiple myeloma epidemiology and survival: A unique malignancy. Semin. Oncol. 2016, 43, 676–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Siegel, R.L.; Miller, K.D.; Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2020, 70, 7–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Tang, C.H.; Liu, H.Y.; Hou, H.A.; Qiu, H.; Huang, K.C.; Siggins, S.; Rothwell, L.A.; Liu, Y. Epidemiology of multiple myeloma in Taiwan, a population based study. Cancer Epidemiol. 2018, 55, 136–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Rajkumar, S.V. Myeloma today: Disease definitions and treatment advances. Am. J. Hematol. 2016, 91, 90–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Silbermann, R.; Roodman, G.D. Myeloma bone disease: Pathophysiology and management. J. Bone Oncol. 2013, 2, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Terpos, E.; Berenson, J.; Cook, R.J.; Lipton, A.; Coleman, R.E. Prognostic variables for survival and skeletal complications in patients with multiple myeloma osteolytic bone disease. Leukemia 2010, 24, 1043–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Roodman, G.D. Pathogenesis of myeloma bone disease. J. Cell. Biochem. 2010, 109, 283–291. [Google Scholar]
  8. Terpos, E.; Ntanasis-Stathopoulos, I.; Dimopoulos, M.A. Myeloma bone disease: From biology findings to treatment approaches. Blood 2019, 133, 1534–1539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Yen, C.-H.; Hsu, C.-M.; Hsiao, S.Y.; Hsiao, H.-H. Pathogenic mechanisms of myeloma bone disease and possible roles for nrf2. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 6723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Giuliani, N.; Ferretti, M.; Bolzoni, M.; Storti, P.; Lazzaretti, M.; Dalla Palma, B.; Bonomini, S.; Martella, E.; Agnelli, L.; Neri, A.; et al. Increased osteocyte death in multiple myeloma patients: Role in myeloma-induced osteoclast formation. Leukemia 2012, 26, 1391–1401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Terpos, E.; Zamagni, E.; Lentzsch, S.; Drake, M.T.; García-Sanz, R.; Abildgaard, N.; Ntanasis-Stathopoulos, I.; Schjesvold, F.; de la Rubia, J.; Kyriakou, C.; et al. Treatment of multiple myeloma-related bone disease: Recommendations from the Bone Working Group of the International Myeloma Working Group. Lancet Oncol. 2021, 22, e119–e130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Valentin-Opran, A.; Charhon, S.A.; Meunier, P.J.; Edouard, C.M.; Arlot, M.E. Quantitative histology of myeloma-induced bone changes. Br. J. Haematol. 1982, 52, 601–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Lacey, D.L.; Timms, E.; Tan, H.L.; Kelley, M.J.; Dunstan, C.R.; Burgess, T.; Elliott, R.; Colombero, A.; Elliott, G.; Scully, S.; et al. Osteoprotegerin Ligand Is a Cytokine that Regulates Osteoclast Differentiation and Activation. Cell 1998, 93, 165–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Yoshida, H.; Hayashi, S.-I.; Kunisada, T.; Ogawa, M.; Nishikawa, S.; Okamura, H.; Sudo, T.; Shultz, L.D.; Nishikawa, S.-I. The murine mutation osteopetrosis is in the coding region of the macrophage colony stimulating factor gene. Nature 1990, 345, 442–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Boyce, B.F.; Xing, L. Functions of RANKL/RANK/OPG in bone modeling and remodeling. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2008, 473, 139–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Sezer, O.; Heider, U.; Zavrski, I.; Kühne, C.A.; Hofbauer, L.C. RANK ligand and osteoprotegerin in myeloma bone disease. Blood 2003, 101, 2094–2098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Shipman, C.M.; Croucher, P.I. Osteoprotegerin Is a Soluble Decoy Receptor for Tumor Necrosis Factor-related Apoptosis-inducing Ligand/Apo2 Ligand and Can Function as a Paracrine Survival Factor for Human Myeloma Cells. Cancer Res. 2003, 63, 912–916. [Google Scholar]
  18. Standal, T.; Seidel, C.; Hjertner, Ø.; Plesner, T.; Sanderson, R.D.; Waage, A.; Borset, M.; Sundan, A. Osteoprotegerin is bound, internalized, and degraded by multiple myeloma cells. Blood 2002, 100, 3002–3007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Boyle, W.J.; Simonet, W.S.; Lacey, D.L. Osteoclast differentiation and activation. Nature 2003, 423, 337–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Terpos, E.; Szydlo, R.; Apperley, J.F.; Hatjiharissi, E.; Politou, M.; Meletis, J.; Viniou, N.; Yataganas, X.; Goldman, J.M.; Rahemtulla, A. Soluble receptor activator of nuclear factor kappaB ligand-osteoprotegerin ratio predicts survival in multiple myeloma: Proposal for a novel prognostic index. Blood 2003, 102, 1064–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Roodman, G.D. Pathogenesis of myeloma bone disease. Leukemia 2009, 23, 435–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Colombo, M.; Mirandola, L.; Platonova, N.; Apicella, L.; Basile, A.; Figueroa, A.J.; Cobos, E.; Chiriva-Internati, M.; Chiaramonte, R. Notch-directed microenvironment reprogramming in myeloma: A single path to multiple outcomes. Leukemia 2013, 27, 1009–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Colombo, M.; Galletti, S.; Garavelli, S.; Platonova, N.; Paoli, A.; Basile, A.; Taiana, E.; Neri, A.; Chiaramonte, R. Notch signaling deregulation in multiple myeloma: A rational molecular target. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 26826–26840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Mirandola, L.; Apicella, L.; Colombo, M.; Yu, Y.; Berta, D.G.; Platonova, N.; Lazzari, E.; Lancellotti, M.; Bulfamante, G.; Cobos, E.; et al. Anti-Notch treatment prevents multiple myeloma cells localization to the bone marrow via the chemokine system CXCR4/SDF-1. Leukemia 2013, 27, 1558–1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Sabol, H.M.; Ferrari, A.J.; Adhikari, M.; Amorim, T.; McAndrews, K.; Anderson, J.; Vigolo, M.; Lehal, R.; Cregor, M.; Khan, S.; et al. Targeting Notch Inhibitors to the Myeloma Bone Marrow Niche Decreases Tumor Growth and Bone Destruction without Gut Toxicity. Cancer Res. 2021, 81, 5102–5114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Terpos, E.; Politou, M.; Viniou, N.; Rahemtulla, A. Significance of macrophage inflammatory protein-1 alpha (MIP-1α) in multiple myeloma. Leuk. Lymphoma 2005, 46, 1699–1707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Vallet, S.; Pozzi, S.; Patel, K.; Vaghela, N.; Fulciniti, M.T.; Veiby, P.; Hideshima, T.; Santo, L.; Cirstea, D.; Scadden, D.T.; et al. A novel role for CCL3 (MIP-1α) in myeloma-induced bone disease via osteocalcin downregulation and inhibition of osteoblast function. Leukemia 2011, 25, 1174–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Masih-Khan, E.; Trudel, S.; Heise, C.; Li, Z.; Paterson, J.; Nadeem, V.; Wei, E.; Roodman, D.; Claudio, J.O.; Bergsagel, P.L.; et al. MIP-1α (CCL3) is a downstream target of FGFR3 and RAS-MAPK signaling in multiple myeloma. Blood 2006, 108, 3465–3471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Brylka, L.J.; Schinke, T. Chemokines in Physiological and Pathological Bone Remodeling. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 2182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Oyajobi, B.O.; Franchin, G.; Williams, P.J.; Pulkrabek, D.; Gupta, A.; Munoz, S.; Grubbs, B.; Zhao, M.; Chen, D.; Sherry, B.; et al. Dual effects of macrophage inflammatory protein-1α on osteolysis and tumor burden in the murine 5TGM1 model of myeloma bone disease. Blood 2003, 102, 311–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Palma, B.D.; Guasco, D.; Pedrazzoni, M.; Bolzoni, M.; Accardi, F.; Costa, F.; Sammarelli, G.; Craviotto, L.; De Filippo, M.; Ruffini, L.; et al. Osteolytic lesions, cytogenetic features and bone marrow levels of cytokines and chemokines in multiple myeloma patients: Role of chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 20. Leukemia 2016, 30, 409–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Fu, R.; Liu, H.; Zhao, S.; Wang, Y.; Li, L.; Gao, S.; Ruan, E.; Wang, G.; Wang, H.; Song, J.; et al. Osteoblast inhibition by chemokine cytokine ligand3 in myeloma-induced bone disease. Cancer Cell Int. 2014, 14, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Vallet, S.; Raje, N.; Ishitsuka, K.; Hideshima, T.; Podar, K.; Chhetri, S.; Pozzi, S.; Breitkreutz, I.; Kiziltepe, T.; Yasui, H.; et al. MLN3897, a novel CCR1 inhibitor, impairs osteoclastogenesis and inhibits the interaction of multiple myeloma cells and osteoclasts. Blood 2007, 110, 3744–3752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Giuliani, N.; Lisignoli, G.; Colla, S.; Lazzaretti, M.; Storti, P.; Mancini, C.; Bonomini, S.; Manferdini, C.; Codeluppi, K.; Facchini, A.; et al. CC-chemokine ligand 20/macrophage inflammatory protein-3α and CC-chemokine receptor 6 are overexpressed in myeloma microenvironment related to osteolytic bone lesions. Cancer Res. 2008, 68, 6840–6850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Shinohara, M.; Koga, T.; Okamoto, K.; Sakaguchi, S.; Arai, K.; Yasuda, H.; Takai, T.; Kodama, T.; Morio, T.; Geha, R.S.; et al. Tyrosine Kinases Btk and Tec Regulate Osteoclast Differentiation by Linking RANK and ITAM Signals. Cell 2008, 132, 794–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Pal Singh, S.; Dammeijer, F.; Hendriks, R.W. Role of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase in B cells and malignancies. Mol. Cancer 2018, 17, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Teicher, B.A.; Fricker, S.P. CXCL12 (SDF-1)/CXCR4 Pathway in Cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2010, 16, 2927–2931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Ullah, T.R. The role of CXCR4 in multiple myeloma: Cells’ journey from bone marrow to beyond. J. Bone Oncol. 2019, 17, 100253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bam, R.; Ling, W.; Khan, S.; Pennisi, A.; Venkateshaiah, S.U.; Li, X.; van Rhee, F.; Usmani, S.; Barlogie, B.; Shaughnessy, J.; et al. Role of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase in myeloma cell migration and induction of bone disease. Am. J. Hematol. 2013, 88, 463–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Bao, H.; Jiang, M.; Zhu, M.; Sheng, F.; Ruan, J.; Ruan, C. Overexpression of Annexin II affects the proliferation, apoptosis, invasion and production of proangiogenic factors in multiple myeloma. Int. J. Hematol. 2009, 90, 177–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. D’Souza, S.; Kurihara, N.; Shiozawa, Y.; Joseph, J.; Taichman, R.; Galson, D.L.; Roodman, G.D. Annexin II interactions with the annexin II receptor enhance multiple myeloma cell adhesion and growth in the bone marrow microenvironment. Blood 2012, 119, 1888–1896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Seckinger, A.; Meiβner, T.; Moreaux, J.; Depeweg, D.; Hillengass, J.; Hose, K.; Rème, T.; Rösen-Wolff, A.; Jauch, A.; Schnettler, R.; et al. Clinical and prognostic role of annexin A2 in multiple myeloma. Blood 2012, 120, 1087–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Standal, T.; Hjorth-Hansen, H.; Rasmussen, T.; Dahl, I.M.; Lenhoff, S.; Brenne, A.T.; Seidel, C.; Baykov, V.; Waage, A.; Børset, M.; et al. Osteopontin is an adhesive factor for myeloma cells and is found in increased levels in plasma from patients with multiple myeloma. Haematologica 2004, 89, 174–182. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  44. Lund, S.A.; Giachelli, C.M.; Scatena, M. The role of osteopontin in inflammatory processes. J. Cell Commun. Signal. 2009, 3, 311–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Tanaka, Y.; Abe, M.; Hiasa, M.; Oda, A.; Amou, H.; Nakano, A.; Takeuchi, K.; Kitazoe, K.; Kido, S.; Inoue, D.; et al. Myeloma Cell-Osteoclast Interaction Enhances Angiogenesis Together with Bone Resorption: A Role for Vascular Endothelial Cell Growth Factor and Osteopontin. Clin. Cancer Res. 2007, 13, 816–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Valković, T.; Babarović, E.; Lučin, K.; Štifter, S.; Aralica, M.; Pećanić, S.; Seili-Bekafigo, I.; Duletić-Načinović, A.; Nemet, D.; Jonjić, N. Plasma Levels of Osteopontin and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Association with Clinical Features and Parameters of Tumor Burden in Patients with Multiple Myeloma. BioMed Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 513170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Robbiani, D.F.; Colon, K.; Ely, S.; Ely, S.; Chesi, M.; Bergsagel, P.L. Osteopontin dysregulation and lytic bone lesions in multiple myeloma. Hematol. Oncol. 2007, 25, 16–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Silbermann, R.; Bolzoni, M.; Storti, P.; Palma, B.D.; Bonomini, S.; Anderson, J.; Roodman, G.D.; Giuliani, N. Bone Marrow Monocyte / Macrophage Derived Activin A Mediates the Osteoclastogenic Effects of IL-3 in Myeloma. Blood 2011, 118, 3933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lee, J.W.; Chung, H.Y.; Ehrlich, L.A.; Jelinek, D.F.; Callander, N.S.; Roodman, G.D.; Choi, S.J. IL-3 expression by myeloma cells increases both osteoclast formation and growth of myeloma cells. Blood 2004, 103, 2308–2315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Harmer, D.; Falank, C.; Reagan, M.R. Interleukin-6 Interweaves the Bone Marrow Microenvironment, Bone Loss, and Multiple Myeloma. Front. Endocrinol. 2018, 9, 788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Palmqvist, P.; Persson, E.; Conaway, H.H.; Lerner, U.H. IL-6, leukemia inhibitory factor, and oncostatin M stimulate bone resorption and regulate the expression of receptor activator of NF-kappa B ligand, osteoprotegerin, and receptor activator of NF-kappa B in mouse calvariae. J. Immunol. 2002, 169, 3353–3362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Gunn, W.G.; Conley, A.; Deininger, L.; Olson, S.D.; Prockop, D.J.; Gregory, C.A. A crosstalk between myeloma cells and marrow stromal cells stimulates production of DKK1 and interleukin-6: A potential role in the development of lytic bone disease and tumor progression in multiple myeloma. Stem Cells 2006, 24, 986–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Xu, S.; Cao, X. Interleukin-17 and its expanding biological functions. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2010, 7, 164–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Noonan, K.; Marchionni, L.; Anderson, J.; Pardoll, D.; Roodman, G.D.; Borrello, I. A novel role of IL-17–producing lymphocytes in mediating lytic bone disease in multiple myeloma. Blood 2010, 116, 3554–3563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Luisi, S.; Florio, P.; Reis, F.M.; Petraglia, F. Expression and secretion of activin A: Possible physiological and clinical implications. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2001, 145, 225–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Sugatani, T.; Alvarez, U.M.; Hruska, K.A. Activin A stimulates IkappaB-alpha/NFkappaB and RANK expression for osteoclast differentiation, but not AKT survival pathway in osteoclast precursors. J. Cell Biochem. 2003, 90, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Vallet, S.; Mukherjee, S.; Vaghela, N.; Hideshima, T.; Fulciniti, M.; Pozzi, S.; Santo, L.; Cirstea, D.; Patel, K.; Sohani, A.R.; et al. Activin A promotes multiple myeloma-induced osteolysis and is a promising target for myeloma bone disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 5124–5129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Fuller, K.; Bayley, K.E.; Chambers, T.J. Activin A is an essential cofactor for osteoclast induction. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2000, 268, 2–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Terpos, E.; Kastritis, E.; Christoulas, D.; Gkotzamanidou, M.; Eleutherakis-Papaiakovou, E.; Kanellias, N.; Papatheodorou, A.; Dimopoulos, M.A. Circulating activin-A is elevated in patients with advanced multiple myeloma and correlates with extensive bone involvement and inferior survival; no alterations post-lenalidomide and dexamethasone therapy. Ann. Oncol. 2012, 23, 2681–2686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Oranger, A.; Carbone, C.; Izzo, M.; Grano, M. Cellular Mechanisms of Multiple Myeloma Bone Disease. Clin. Dev. Immunol. 2013, 2013, 289458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Abdulkadyrov, K.M.; Salogub, G.N.; Khuazheva, N.K.; Sherman, M.L.; Laadem, A.; Barger, R.; Knight, R.; Srinivasan, S.; Terpos, E. Sotatercept in patients with osteolytic lesions of multiple myeloma. Br. J. Haematol. 2014, 165, 814–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Lam, J.; Takeshita, S.; Barker, J.E.; Kanagawa, O.; Ross, F.P.; Teitelbaum, S.L. TNF-alpha induces osteoclastogenesis by direct stimulation of macrophages exposed to permissive levels of RANK ligand. J. Clin. Investig. 2000, 106, 1481–1488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Schneider, P.; MacKay, F.; Steiner, V.; Hofmann, K.; Bodmer, J.L.; Holler, N.; Ambrose, C.; Lawton, P.; Bixler, S.; Acha-Orbea, H.; et al. BAFF, a novel ligand of the tumor necrosis factor family, stimulates B cell growth. J. Exp. Med. 1999, 189, 1747–1756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Hengeveld, P.J.; Kersten, M.J. B-cell activating factor in the pathophysiology of multiple myeloma: A target for therapy? Blood Cancer J. 2015, 5, e282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Hemingway, F.; Taylor, R.; Knowles, H.J.; Athanasou, N.A. RANKL-independent human osteoclast formation with APRIL, BAFF, NGF, IGF I and IGF II. Bone 2011, 48, 938–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Fragioudaki, M.; Tsirakis, G.; Pappa, C.A.; Aristeidou, I.; Tsioutis, C.; Alegakis, A.; Kyriakou, D.S.; Stathopoulos, E.N.; Alexandrakis, M.G. Serum BAFF levels are related to angiogenesis and prognosis in patients with multiple myeloma. Leuk. Res. 2012, 36, 1004–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Sanchez, E.; Li, M.; Kitto, A.; Li, J.; Wang, C.S.; Kirk, D.T.; Yellin, O.; Nichols, C.M.; Dreyer, M.P.; Ahles, C.P.; et al. Serum B-cell maturation antigen is elevated in multiple myeloma and correlates with disease status and survival. Br. J. Haematol. 2012, 158, 727–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Raje, N.S.; Moreau, P.; Terpos, E.; Benboubker, L.; Grząśko, N.; Holstein, S.A.; Oriol, A.; Huang, S.Y.; Beksac, M.; Kuliczkowski, K.; et al. Phase 2 study of tabalumab, a human anti-B-cell activating factor antibody, with bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with previously treated multiple myeloma. Br. J. Haematol. 2017, 176, 783–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Westendorf, J.J.; Kahler, R.A.; Schroeder, T.M. Wnt signaling in osteoblasts and bone diseases. Gene 2004, 341, 19–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Fulciniti, M.; Tassone, P.; Hideshima, T.; Vallet, S.; Nanjappa, P.; Ettenberg, S.A.; Shen, Z.; Patel, N.; Tai, Y.-t.; Chauhan, D.; et al. Anti-DKK1 mAb (BHQ880) as a potential therapeutic agent for multiple myeloma. Blood 2009, 114, 371–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Kim, J.H.; Liu, X.; Wang, J.; Chen, X.; Zhang, H.; Kim, S.H.; Cui, J.; Li, R.; Zhang, W.; Kong, Y.; et al. Wnt signaling in bone formation and its therapeutic potential for bone diseases. Ther. Adv. Musculoskelet. Dis. 2013, 5, 13–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Baron, R.; Kneissel, M. WNT signaling in bone homeostasis and disease: From human mutations to treatments. Nat. Med. 2013, 19, 179–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Brunetti, G.; Oranger, A.; Mori, G.; Specchia, G.; Rinaldi, E.; Curci, P.; Zallone, A.; Rizzi, R.; Grano, M.; Colucci, S. Sclerostin is overexpressed by plasma cells from multiple myeloma patients. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2011, 1237, 19–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Spaan, I.; Raymakers, R.A.; van de Stolpe, A.; Peperzak, V. Wnt signaling in multiple myeloma: A central player in disease with therapeutic potential. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2018, 11, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Qiang, Y.-W.; Chen, Y.; Stephens, O.; Brown, N.; Chen, B.; Epstein, J.; Barlogie, B.; Shaughnessy, J.D. Myeloma-derived Dickkopf-1 disrupts Wnt-regulated osteoprotegerin and RANKL production by osteoblasts: A potential mechanism underlying osteolytic bone lesions in multiple myeloma. Blood 2008, 112, 196–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Zhou, F.; Meng, S.; Song, H.; Claret, F.X. Dickkopf-1 is a key regulator of myeloma bone disease: Opportunities and challenges for therapeutic intervention. Blood Rev. 2013, 27, 261–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Fowler, J.A.; Mundy, G.R.; Lwin, S.T.; Edwards, C.M. Bone Marrow Stromal Cells Create a Permissive Microenvironment for Myeloma Development: A New Stromal Role for Wnt Inhibitor Dkk1. Cancer Res. 2012, 72, 2183–2189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Kaiser, M.; Mieth, M.; Liebisch, P.; Oberländer, R.; Rademacher, J.; Jakob, C.; Kleeberg, L.; Fleissner, C.; Braendle, E.; Peters, M.; et al. Serum concentrations of DKK-1 correlate with the extent of bone disease in patients with multiple myeloma. Eur. J. Haematol. 2008, 80, 490–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Heath, D.J.; Chantry, A.D.; Buckle, C.H.; Coulton, L.; Shaughnessy, J.D., Jr.; Evans, H.R.; Snowden, J.A.; Stover, D.R.; Vanderkerken, K.; Croucher, P.I. Inhibiting Dickkopf-1 (Dkk1) removes suppression of bone formation and prevents the development of osteolytic bone disease in multiple myeloma. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2009, 24, 425–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Munshi, N.C.; Abonour, R.; Beck, J.T.; Bensinger, W.; Facon, T.; Stockerl-Goldstein, K.; Baz, R.; Siegel, D.S.; Neben, K.; Lonial, S.; et al. Early Evidence of Anabolic Bone Activity of BHQ880, a Fully Human Anti-DKK1 Neutralizing Antibody: Results of a Phase 2 Study in Previously Untreated Patients with Smoldering Multiple Myeloma At Risk for Progression. Blood 2012, 120, 331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Qian, J.; Zheng, Y.; Zheng, C.; Wang, L.; Qin, H.; Hong, S.; Li, H.; Lu, Y.; He, J.; Yang, J.; et al. Active vaccination with Dickkopf-1 induces protective and therapeutic antitumor immunity in murine multiple myeloma. Blood 2012, 119, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Van Bezooijen, R.L.; ten Dijke, P.; Papapoulos, S.E.; Löwik, C.W. SOST/sclerostin, an osteocyte-derived negative regulator of bone formation. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2005, 16, 319–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Lewiecki, E.M. Role of sclerostin in bone and cartilage and its potential as a therapeutic target in bone diseases. Ther. Adv. Musculoskelet. Dis. 2014, 6, 48–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Winkler, D.G.; Sutherland, M.K.; Geoghegan, J.C.; Yu, C.; Hayes, T.; Skonier, J.E.; Shpektor, D.; Jonas, M.; Kovacevich, B.R.; Staehling-Hampton, K.; et al. Osteocyte control of bone formation via sclerostin, a novel BMP antagonist. EMBO J. 2003, 22, 6267–6276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Colucci, S.; Brunetti, G.; Oranger, A.; Mori, G.; Sardone, F.; Specchia, G.; Rinaldi, E.; Curci, P.; Liso, V.; Passeri, G.; et al. Myeloma cells suppress osteoblasts through sclerostin secretion. Blood Cancer J. 2011, 1, e27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Wang, X.T.; He, Y.C.; Zhou, S.Y.; Jiang, J.Z.; Huang, Y.M.; Liang, Y.Z.; Lai, Y.R. Bone marrow plasma macrophage inflammatory protein protein-1 alpha(MIP-1 alpha) and sclerostin in multiple myeloma: Relationship with bone disease and clinical characteristics. Leuk. Res. 2014, 38, 525–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Eda, H.; Santo, L.; Wein, M.N.; Hu, D.Z.; Cirstea, D.D.; Nemani, N.; Tai, Y.T.; Raines, S.E.; Kuhstoss, S.A.; Munshi, N.C.; et al. Regulation of Sclerostin Expression in Multiple Myeloma by Dkk-1: A Potential Therapeutic Strategy for Myeloma Bone Disease. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2016, 31, 1225–1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Terpos, E.; Christoulas, D.; Katodritou, E.; Bratengeier, C.; Gkotzamanidou, M.; Michalis, E.; Delimpasi, S.; Pouli, A.; Meletis, J.; Kastritis, E.; et al. Elevated circulating sclerostin correlates with advanced disease features and abnormal bone remodeling in symptomatic myeloma: Reduction post-bortezomib monotherapy. Int. J. Cancer 2012, 131, 1466–1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Cosman, F.; Crittenden, D.B.; Adachi, J.D.; Binkley, N.; Czerwinski, E.; Ferrari, S.; Hofbauer, L.C.; Lau, E.; Lewiecki, E.M.; Miyauchi, A.; et al. Romosozumab Treatment in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016, 375, 1532–1543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Recker, R.R.; Benson, C.T.; Matsumoto, T.; Bolognese, M.A.; Robins, D.A.; Alam, J.; Chiang, A.Y.; Hu, L.; Krege, J.H.; Sowa, H.; et al. A randomized, double-blind phase 2 clinical trial of blosozumab, a sclerostin antibody, in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2015, 30, 216–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. McDonald, M.M.; Reagan, M.R.; Youlten, S.E.; Mohanty, S.T.; Seckinger, A.; Terry, R.L.; Pettitt, J.A.; Simic, M.K.; Cheng, T.L.; Morse, A.; et al. Inhibiting the osteocyte-specific protein sclerostin increases bone mass and fracture resistance in multiple myeloma. Blood 2017, 129, 3452–3464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Delgado-Calle, J.; Anderson, J.; Cregor, M.D.; Condon, K.W.; Kuhstoss, S.A.; Plotkin, L.I.; Bellido, T.; Roodman, G.D. Genetic deletion of Sost or pharmacological inhibition of sclerostin prevent multiple myeloma-induced bone disease without affecting tumor growth. Leukemia 2017, 31, 2686–2694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Toscani, D.; Bolzoni, M.; Ferretti, M.; Palumbo, C.; Giuliani, N. Role of Osteocytes in Myeloma Bone Disease: Anti-sclerostin Antibody as New Therapeutic Strategy. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 2467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Bruderer, M.; Richards, R.G.; Alini, M.; Stoddart, M.J. Role and regulation of RUNX2 in osteogenesis. Eur. Cell Mater. 2014, 28, 269–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Giuliani, N.; Colla, S.; Morandi, F.; Lazzaretti, M.; Sala, R.; Bonomini, S.; Grano, M.; Colucci, S.; Svaldi, M.; Rizzoli, V. Myeloma cells block RUNX2/CBFA1 activity in human bone marrow osteoblast progenitors and inhibit osteoblast formation and differentiation. Blood 2005, 106, 2472–2483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Trotter, T.N.; Li, M.; Pan, Q.; Peker, D.; Rowan, P.D.; Li, J.; Zhan, F.; Suva, L.J.; Javed, A.; Yang, Y. Myeloma cell-derived Runx2 promotes myeloma progression in bone. Blood 2015, 125, 3598–3608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Pasquale, E.B. Eph-Ephrin Bidirectional Signaling in Physiology and Disease. Cell 2008, 133, 38–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Pennisi, A.; Ling, W.; Li, X.; Khan, S.; Shaughnessy, J.D., Jr.; Barlogie, B.; Yaccoby, S. The ephrinB2/EphB4 axis is dysregulated in osteoprogenitors from myeloma patients and its activation affects myeloma bone disease and tumor growth. Blood 2009, 114, 1803–1812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Zhao, C.; Irie, N.; Takada, Y.; Shimoda, K.; Miyamoto, T.; Nishiwaki, T.; Suda, T.; Matsuo, K. Bidirectional ephrinB2-EphB4 signaling controls bone homeostasis. Cell Metab. 2006, 4, 111–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Terpos, E.; Sezer, O.; Croucher, P.I.; García-Sanz, R.; Boccadoro, M.; San Miguel, J.; Ashcroft, J.; Bladé, J.; Cavo, M.; Delforge, M.; et al. The use of bisphosphonates in multiple myeloma: Recommendations of an expert panel on behalf of the European Myeloma Network. Ann. Oncol. 2009, 20, 1303–1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Anderson, K.; Ismaila, N.; Flynn, P.J.; Halabi, S.; Jagannath, S.; Ogaily, M.S.; Omel, J.; Raje, N.; Roodman, G.D.; Yee, G.C.; et al. Role of Bone-Modifying Agents in Multiple Myeloma: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update. J. Clin. Oncol. 2018, 36, 812–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Van Beek, E.; Pieterman, E.; Cohen, L.; Löwik, C.; Papapoulos, S. Farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase is the molecular target of nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1999, 264, 108–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Vannala, V.; Palaian, S.; Shankar, P.R. Therapeutic Dimensions of Bisphosphonates: A Clinical Update. Int. J. Prev. Med. 2020, 11, 166. [Google Scholar]
  104. Morgan, G.J.; Davies, F.E.; Gregory, W.M.; Cocks, K.; Bell, S.E.; Szubert, A.J.; Navarro-Coy, N.; Drayson, M.T.; Owen, R.G.; Feyler, S.; et al. First-line treatment with zoledronic acid as compared with clodronic acid in multiple myeloma (MRC Myeloma IX): A randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2010, 376, 1989–1999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Morgan, G.J.; Child, J.A.; Gregory, W.M.; Szubert, A.J.; Cocks, K.; Bell, S.E.; Navarro-Coy, N.; Drayson, M.T.; Owen, R.G.; Feyler, S.; et al. Effects of zoledronic acid versus clodronic acid on skeletal morbidity in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MRC Myeloma IX): Secondary outcomes from a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2011, 12, 743–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Du, J.-S.; Yen, C.-H.; Hsu, C.-M.; Hsiao, H.-H. Management of Myeloma Bone Lesions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Guenther, A.; Gordon, S.; Tiemann, M.; Burger, R.; Bakker, F.; Green, J.R.; Baum, W.; Roelofs, A.J.; Rogers, M.J.; Gramatzki, M. The bisphosphonate zoledronic acid has antimyeloma activity in vivo by inhibition of protein prenylation. Int. J. Cancer 2010, 126, 239–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Santini, D.; Vincenzi, B.; Dicuonzo, G.; Avvisati, G.; Massacesi, C.; Battistoni, F.; Gavasci, M.; Rocci, L.; Tirindelli, M.C.; Altomare, V.; et al. Zoledronic acid induces significant and long-lasting modifications of circulating angiogenic factors in cancer patients. Clin. Cancer Res. 2003, 9, 2893–2897. [Google Scholar]
  109. Rosen, L.S.; Gordon, D.; Kaminski, M.; Howell, A.; Belch, A.; Mackey, J.; Apffelstaedt, J.; Hussein, M.A.; Coleman, R.E.; Reitsma, D.J.; et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid compared with pamidronate disodium in the treatment of skeletal complications in patients with advanced multiple myeloma or breast carcinoma. Cancer 2003, 98, 1735–1744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Callander, N.S.; Baljevic, M.; Adekola, K.; Anderson, L.D.; Campagnaro, E.; Castillo, J.J.; Costello, C.; Devarakonda, S.; Elsedawy, N.; Faiman, M.; et al. NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Multiple Myeloma, Version 3.2022. J. Natl. Compr. Cancer Netw. 2022, 20, 8–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Mikhael, J.; Ismaila, N.; Cheung, M.C.; Costello, C.; Dhodapkar, M.V.; Kumar, S.; Lacy, M.; Lipe, B.; Little, R.F.; Nikonova, A.; et al. Treatment of Multiple Myeloma: ASCO and CCO Joint Clinical Practice Guideline. J. Clin. Oncol. 2019, 37, 1228–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Rajkumar, S.V.; Kumar, S. Multiple Myeloma: Diagnosis and Treatment. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2016, 91, 101–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  113. Dimopoulos, M.A.; Moreau, P.; Terpos, E.; Mateos, M.V.; Zweegman, S.; Cook, G.; Delforge, M.; Hájek, R.; Schjesvold, F.; Cavo, M.; et al. Multiple myeloma: EHA-ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann. Oncol. 2021, 32, 309–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Pozzi, S.; Raje, N. The role of bisphosphonates in multiple myeloma: Mechanisms, side effects, and the future. Oncologist 2011, 16, 651–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Perazella, M.A.; Markowitz, G.S. Bisphosphonate nephrotoxicity. Kidney Int. 2008, 74, 1385–1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  116. King, A.E.; Umland, E.M. Osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients receiving intravenous or oral bisphosphonates. Pharmacotherapy 2008, 28, 667–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Urade, M. Bisphosphonates and osteonecrosis of the jaws. Clin. Calcium 2007, 17, 241–248. [Google Scholar]
  118. Zervas, K.; Verrou, E.; Teleioudis, Z.; Vahtsevanos, K.; Banti, A.; Mihou, D.; Krikelis, D.; Terpos, E. Incidence, risk factors and management of osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients with multiple myeloma: A single-centre experience in 303 patients. Br. J. Haematol. 2006, 134, 620–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Delmas, P.D. Clinical potential of RANKL inhibition for the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis and other metabolic bone diseases. J. Clin. Densitom. 2008, 11, 325–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Hanley, D.A.; Adachi, J.D.; Bell, A.; Brown, V. Denosumab: Mechanism of action and clinical outcomes. Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2012, 66, 1139–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Cummings, S.R.; Martin, J.S.; McClung, M.R.; Siris, E.S.; Eastell, R.; Reid, I.R.; Delmas, P.; Zoog, H.B.; Austin, M.; Wang, A.; et al. Denosumab for Prevention of Fractures in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009, 361, 756–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Gül, G.; Sendur, M.A.; Aksoy, S.; Sever, A.R.; Altundag, K. A comprehensive review of denosumab for bone metastasis in patients with solid tumors. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 2016, 32, 133–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Henry, D.H.; Costa, L.; Goldwasser, F.; Hirsh, V.; Hungria, V.; Prausova, J.; Scagliotti, G.V.; Sleeboom, H.; Spencer, A.; Vadhan-Raj, S.; et al. Randomized, Double-Blind Study of Denosumab Versus Zoledronic Acid in the Treatment of Bone Metastases in Patients With Advanced Cancer (Excluding Breast and Prostate Cancer) or Multiple Myeloma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2011, 29, 1125–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  124. Vij, R.; Horvath, N.; Spencer, A.; Taylor, K.; Vadhan-Raj, S.; Vescio, R.; Smith, J.; Qian, Y.; Yeh, H.; Jun, S. An open-label, phase 2 trial of denosumab in the treatment of relapsed or plateau-phase multiple myeloma. Am. J. Hematol. 2009, 84, 650–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Raje, N.; Terpos, E.; Willenbacher, W.; Shimizu, K.; García-Sanz, R.; Durie, B.; Legieć, W.; Krejčí, M.; Laribi, K.; Zhu, L.; et al. Denosumab versus zoledronic acid in bone disease treatment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: An international, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2018, 19, 370–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Terpos, E.; Raje, N.; Croucher, P.; Garcia-Sanz, R.; Leleu, X.; Pasteiner, W.; Wang, Y.; Glennane, A.; Canon, J.; Pawlyn, C. Denosumab compared with zoledronic acid on PFS in multiple myeloma: Exploratory results of an international phase 3 study. Blood Adv. 2021, 5, 725–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Cicci, J.D.; Buie, L.; Bates, J.; van Deventer, H. Denosumab for the Management of Hypercalcemia of Malignancy in Patients With Multiple Myeloma and Renal Dysfunction. Clin. Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2014, 14, e207–e211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Newswire, P. FDA Approves XGEVA® (denosumab) for the Prevention of Skeletal-Related Events in Patients with Multiple Myeloma. Available online: https://www.centralcharts.com/en/338-amgen/news/1240693-fda-approves-xgeva-denosumab-for-the-prevention-of-skeletal-related-events-in-patients-with-multiple-myeloma (accessed on 13 February 2022).
  129. Goldstein, D.A. Denosumab for bone lesions in multiple myeloma—What is its value? Haematologica 2018, 103, 753–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. Tsourdi, E.; Langdahl, B.; Cohen-Solal, M.; Aubry-Rozier, B.; Eriksen, E.F.; Guañabens, N.; Obermayer-Pietsch, B.; Ralston, S.H.; Eastell, R.; Zillikens, M.C. Discontinuation of Denosumab therapy for osteoporosis: A systematic review and position statement by ECTS. Bone 2017, 105, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Anastasilakis, A.D.; Makras, P.; Yavropoulou, M.P.; Tabacco, G.; Naciu, A.M.; Palermo, A. Denosumab Discontinuation and the Rebound Phenomenon: A Narrative Review. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Huang, S.Y.; Yoon, S.S.; Shimizu, K.; Chng, W.J.; Chang, C.S.; Wong, R.S.; Gao, S.; Wang, Y.; Gordon, S.W.; Glennane, A.; et al. Denosumab Versus Zoledronic Acid in Bone Disease Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: An International, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Phase 3 Study—Asian Subgroup Analysis. Adv. Ther. 2020, 37, 3404–3416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Ito, S. Proteasome Inhibitors for the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma. Cancers 2020, 12, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  134. Terpos, E.; Sezer, O.; Croucher, P.; Dimopoulos, M.A. Myeloma bone disease and proteasome inhibition therapies. Blood 2007, 110, 1098–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Roodman, G.D. Pathogenesis of myeloma bone disease. Blood Cells Mol. Dis. 2004, 32, 290–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Pennisi, A.; Li, X.; Ling, W.; Khan, S.; Zangari, M.; Yaccoby, S. The proteasome inhibitor, bortezomib suppresses primary myeloma and stimulates bone formation in myelomatous and nonmyelomatous bones in vivo. Am. J. Hematol. 2009, 84, 6–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  137. Qiang, Y.W.; Heuck, C.J.; Shaughnessy, J.D., Jr.; Barlogie, B.; Epstein, J. Proteasome inhibitors and bone disease. Semin. Hematol. 2012, 49, 243–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  138. Nishida, H. Bone-targeted agents in multiple myeloma. Hematol. Rep. 2018, 10, 7401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Accardi, F.; Toscani, D.; Bolzoni, M.; Dalla Palma, B.; Aversa, F.; Giuliani, N. Mechanism of Action of Bortezomib and the New Proteasome Inhibitors on Myeloma Cells and the Bone Microenvironment: Impact on Myeloma-Induced Alterations of Bone Remodeling. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 172458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  140. Rasch, S.; Lund, T.; Asmussen, J.T.; Lerberg Nielsen, A.; Faebo Larsen, R.; Østerheden Andersen, M.; Abildgaard, N. Multiple Myeloma Associated Bone Disease. Cancers 2020, 12, 2113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Panaroni, C.; Yee, A.J.; Raje, N.S. Myeloma and Bone Disease. Curr. Osteoporos. Rep. 2017, 15, 483–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Kyriakou, C.; Molloy, S.; Vrionis, F.; Alberico, R.; Bastian, L.; Zonder, J.A.; Giralt, S.; Raje, N.; Kyle, R.A.; Roodman, D.G.D.; et al. The role of cement augmentation with percutaneous vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of vertebral compression fractures in multiple myeloma: A consensus statement from the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG). Blood Cancer J. 2019, 9, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  143. Padmanabhan, S.; Beck, J.T.; Kelly, K.R.; Munshi, N.C.; Dzik-Jurasz, A.; Gangolli, E.; Ettenberg, S.; Miner, K.; Bilic, S.; Whyte, W.; et al. A Phase I/II Study of BHQ880, a Novel Osteoblat Activating, Anti-DKK1 Human Monoclonal Antibody, in Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM) Patients Treated with Zoledronic Acid (Zol) and Anti-Myeloma Therapy (MM Tx). Blood 2009, 114, 750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Iyer, S.P.; Beck, J.T.; Stewart, A.K.; Shah, J.; Kelly, K.R.; Isaacs, R.; Bilic, S.; Sen, S.; Munshi, N.C. A Phase IB multicentre dose-determination study of BHQ880 in combination with anti-myeloma therapy and zoledronic acid in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma and prior skeletal-related events. Br. J. Haematol. 2014, 167, 366–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Scullen, T.; Santo, L.; Vallet, S.; Fulciniti, M.; Eda, H.; Cirstea, D.; Patel, K.; Nemani, N.; Yee, A.; Mahindra, A.; et al. Lenalidomide in combination with an activin A-neutralizing antibody: Preclinical rationale for a novel anti-myeloma strategy. Leukemia 2013, 27, 1715–1721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Yee, A.J.; Laubach, J.P.; Nooka, A.K.; O’Donnell, E.K.; Weller, E.A.; Couture, N.R.; Wallace, E.E.; Burke, J.N.; Harrington, C.C.; Puccio-Pick, M. Phase 1 dose-escalation study of sotatercept (ACE-011) in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma. Blood 2015, 126, 4241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Raje, N.S.; Faber, E.A., Jr.; Richardson, P.G.; Schiller, G.; Hohl, R.J.; Cohen, A.D.; Forero, A.; Carpenter, S.; Nguyen, T.S.; Conti, I.; et al. Phase 1 Study of Tabalumab, a Human Anti-B-Cell Activating Factor Antibody, and Bortezomib in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2016, 22, 5688–5695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  148. Iida, S.; Ogiya, D.; Abe, Y.; Taniwaki, M.; Asou, H.; Maeda, K.; Uenaka, K.; Nagaoka, S.; Ishiki, T.; Conti, I.; et al. Dose-escalation study of tabalumab with bortezomib and dexamethasone in Japanese patients with multiple myeloma. Cancer Sci. 2016, 107, 1281–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  149. Richardson, P.G.; Bensinger, W.I.; Huff, C.A.; Costello, C.L.; Lendvai, N.; Berdeja, J.G.; Anderson, L.D., Jr.; Siegel, D.S.; Lebovic, D.; Jagannath, S.; et al. Ibrutinib alone or with dexamethasone for relapsed or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: Phase 2 trial results. Br. J. Haematol. 2018, 180, 821–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Pisklakova, A.; Grigson, E.; Ozerova, M.; Chen, F.; Sullivan, D.M.; Nefedova, Y. Anti-myeloma effect of pharmacological inhibition of Notch/gamma-secretase with RO4929097 is mediated by modulation of tumor microenvironment. Cancer Biol Ther. 2016, 17, 477–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  151. Schwarzer, R.; Nickel, N.; Godau, J.; Willie, B.M.; Duda, G.N.; Schwarzer, R.; Cirovic, B.; Leutz, A.; Manz, R.; Bogen, B.; et al. Notch pathway inhibition controls myeloma bone disease in the murine MOPC315.BM model. Blood Cancer J. 2014, 4, e217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Vallet, S.; Vaghela, N.; Fulciniti, M.; Veiby, P.; Patel, K.; Hideshima, T.; Pozzi, S.; Santo, L.; Mukherjee, S.; Cirstea, D.; et al. Abstract #318: The CCR1 inhibitor, MLN3897, enhances Velcade inhibition of multiple myeloma (MM)-bone cells interactions. Cancer Res. 2009, 69, 318. [Google Scholar]
  153. Manetta, J.; Bina, H.; Ryan, P.; Fox, N.; Witcher, D.R.; Kikly, K. Generation and characterization of tabalumab, a human monoclonal antibody that neutralizes both soluble and membrane-bound B-cell activating factor. J. Inflamm. Res. 2014, 7, 121–131. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  154. Neri, P.; Kumar, S.; Fulciniti, M.T.; Vallet, S.; Chhetri, S.; Mukherjee, S.; Tai, Y.; Chauhan, D.; Tassone, P.; Venuta, S.; et al. Neutralizing B-cell activating factor antibody improves survival and inhibits osteoclastogenesis in a severe combined immunodeficient human multiple myeloma model. Clin. Cancer Res. 2007, 13, 5903–5909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  155. Tai, Y.-T.; Chang, B.Y.; Kong, S.-Y.; Fulciniti, M.; Yang, G.; Calle, Y.; Hu, Y.; Lin, J.; Zhao, J.-J.; Cagnetta, A.; et al. Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibition is a novel therapeutic strategy targeting tumor in the bone marrow microenvironment in multiple myeloma. Blood 2012, 120, 1877–1887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Clarke, B.L. Anti-sclerostin antibodies: Utility in treatment of osteoporosis. Maturitas 2014, 78, 199–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic overview of myeloma bone disease and novel agents.
Figure 1. Schematic overview of myeloma bone disease and novel agents.
Ijms 23 03112 g001
Table 1. Current myeloma bone-targeting treatment recommendations.
Table 1. Current myeloma bone-targeting treatment recommendations.
GuidelineRecommendationsTreatment Duration
NCCN [110]All patients receiving primary myeloma therapy should be given bisphosphonates (category 1) or denosumab.
Both pamidronate and zoledronic acid have shown equivalence in terms of reducing risk of skeletal-related events in randomized trials.
Denosumab is preferred in patients with renal insufficiency.
Bisphosphonates (category 1) or denosumab for up to 2 years.
Continuing beyond 2 years should be based on clinical judgment.
EHA-ESMO [113]All patients with osteolytic disease at diagnosis should be treated with antiresorptive agents, i.e., zoledronic acid [I, A] or denosumab [I, A], in addition to specific anti-myeloma therapy.For patients who have not achieved a PR after initial therapy, zoledronic acid should be given for more than two years.
For patients who have achieved CR or VGPR, 12–24 months of therapy with zoledronic acid is adequate.
At relapse, zoledronic acid has to be reinitiated.
In cases of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ), bisphosphonates or denosumab should be discontinued and may be re-administered if ONJ has healed.
IMWG [11]Zoledronic acid (regardless of the presence of MBD on imaging) for patients with NDMM or RRMM; also consider for patients at biochemical relapse.
Denosumab (only in the presence of MBD on imaging; also consider for patients with renal impairment).
Monthly zoledronic acid during initial therapy and in patients with less than VGPR.
If patients achieve a VGPR or better after receiving monthly administration for at least 12 months, the treating physician can consider decreasing the frequency of dosing to every 3 months or, on the basis of osteoporosis recommendations, to every 6 months or yearly, or discontinuing zoledronic acid.
If discontinued, it should be reinitiated at the time of biochemical relapse to reduce the risk of new bone event at clinical relapse.
Continuous and monthly denosumab.
If discontinued, a single dose of zoledronic acid should be given to prevent rebound effects at least 6 months after the last dose of denosumab; also consider giving denosumab every 6 months.
CR: complete response; EHA-ESMO: European Hematology Association and European Society for Medical Oncology; IMWG: International Myeloma Working Group; MBD: myeloma-related bone disease; NCCN: National Comprehensive Cancer Network; NDMM: newly diagnosed multiple myeloma; PR: partial response; RRMM: relapsed or refractory myeloma; VGPR: very good partial response.
Table 2. Major trials of RANKL inhibitor denosumab in myeloma bone diseases.
Table 2. Major trials of RANKL inhibitor denosumab in myeloma bone diseases.
TrialStudy DesignPatient NumbersOutcomes/ResultsReferences
Phase II, open-label trialDenosumab 120 mg SC on days 1, 8, and 15 of cycle 1 (28 days), and then day 29 (day 1 of cycle 2) and on day 1 of every cycle (28 days) thereafter96Suppressed bone resorption, decreased sCTx both in relapsed and plateau-phase groups,
mPFS: 2.7 months (relapsed group), 8 months (plateau-phase group)
[124]
Phase III, international, double-blind, randomized, active-controlled trialDenosumab 120 mg SC Q4W vs Zoledronic acid 4 mg IV Q4W180Similar time to first on-study SRE; worse OS, similar rates of overall AEs; greater suppression of uNTx[123]
Phase III, international, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, active-controlled trialDenosumab 120 mg SC Q4W vs Zoledronic acid 4 mg IV Q4W1718Non-inferior in time to first SREs; similar incidence of ONJ; similar OS; similar time to first-and-subsequent SREs
Fewer first on-study SREs (in 196 Asian patients)
[125,132]
AEs: adverse events; IV: intravenously; SC: subcutaneously; sCTx: serum C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen; SRE: skeletal-related event; ONJ: osteonecrosis of the jaw; OS: overall survival; mPFS: median progression-free survival; uNTx: urinary N-terminal telopeptide of collagen type 1; NDMM: newly diagnosed multiple myeloma; RRMM: relapsed or refractory myeloma.
Table 3. Novel agents in preclinical research and clinical settings for MBD.
Table 3. Novel agents in preclinical research and clinical settings for MBD.
Drug NameMechanismTherapeutic ImplicationTrial StatusResultsReferences
BHQ880Human neutralizing IgG1 anti-DKK1 monoclonal antibody
Wnt pathway signaling
Reverse the effects of DKK1-induced osteoblast inhibition, leading to increased bone mass mediated via upregulation of osteoblastsPhase I/II, RRMM
Phase IB, RRMM
Dual therapy with zoledronic acid and BHQ880 may provide an effective treatment strategy for MBD[143,144]
Sotatercept
(ACE-011)
Decay receptor-neutralizing Activin-A, a recombinant activin receptor type IIA (ActRIIA) ligand trapReverse osteoblast inhibitionPhase I, RRMM
Phase IIa,
NDMM, RRMM
Increased hemoglobin levels (dose–response relationship), improved bone formation biomarkers[61,146]
RAP-011A murine ortholog of sotatercept (Activin receptor type II Murine Fc Protein)Reverse osteoblast inhibitionPreclinical setting [145]
Tabalumab
(LY2127399)
Human IgG4 anti-BAFF monoclonal antibody Decrease myeloma tumor burden, decrease osteoclastogenesisPhase I, RRMM
Phase II, RRMM
No PFS benefit
Higher dose of 300 mg tabalumab did not improve efficacy compared to the 100 mg dose
[68,147,148]
IbrutinibBruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi)Decrease myeloma tumor burden, decrease osteoclastogenesisPhase II, RRMMClinical benefit and favorable safety/tolerability profile[149]
Romosozumab
(AMG 785)
Humanized monoclonal IgG2 anti-Sclerostin monoclonal antibody Decreased RANKL/OPG ratio, decrease osteoclastogenesisPreclinical setting
Phase III, Osteoporosis
Decrease vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis[89,91]
RO4929097, γ-secretase inhibitor XII (GSI XII)Notch/γ-secretase inhibitor
Notch signaling
Downregulate CXCR4/SDF1 chemokine axis, decrease osteoclastogenesis, reduce angiogenesisPreclinical setting [150,151]
MLN3897Antagonist of the chemokine receptor CCR1
Akt signaling
Inhibit CCL3-induced osteoclast formation and functionPreclinical setting [33,152]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gau, Y.-C.; Yeh, T.-J.; Hsu, C.-M.; Hsiao, S.Y.; Hsiao, H.-H. Pathogenesis and Treatment of Myeloma-Related Bone Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 3112. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23063112

AMA Style

Gau Y-C, Yeh T-J, Hsu C-M, Hsiao SY, Hsiao H-H. Pathogenesis and Treatment of Myeloma-Related Bone Disease. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(6):3112. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23063112

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gau, Yuh-Ching, Tsung-Jang Yeh, Chin-Mu Hsu, Samuel Yien Hsiao, and Hui-Hua Hsiao. 2022. "Pathogenesis and Treatment of Myeloma-Related Bone Disease" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 6: 3112. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23063112

APA Style

Gau, Y. -C., Yeh, T. -J., Hsu, C. -M., Hsiao, S. Y., & Hsiao, H. -H. (2022). Pathogenesis and Treatment of Myeloma-Related Bone Disease. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(6), 3112. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23063112

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop