Next Article in Journal
Computer Simulations and Network-Based Profiling of Binding and Allosteric Interactions of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Variant Complexes and the Host Receptor: Dissecting the Mechanistic Effects of the Delta and Omicron Mutations
Next Article in Special Issue
The Relaxin-3 Receptor, RXFP3, Is a Modulator of Aging-Related Disease
Previous Article in Journal
Metal Complexes in Diagnosis and Therapy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cardiovascular Characteristics of Zucker Fatty Diabetes Mellitus Rats, an Animal Model for Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 8
10.3390/ijms23084378
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

New Insights into Green Protocols for Oxidative Depolymerization of Lignin and Lignin Model Compounds

by
Cecilia Scimmi
1,
Luca Sancineto
1,
Jozef Drabowicz
2,3 and
Claudio Santi
1,*
1
Group of Catalysis Synthesis and Organic Green Chemistry, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Perugia, Via del Liceo 1, 06122 Perugia, Italy
2
Institute of Chemistry, Jan Dlugosz University in Czestochowa, Armii Krajowej 13/15, 42-200 Czestochowa, Poland
3
Division of Organic Chemistry, Center of Molecular and Macromolecular Studies, Polish Academy of Sciences, Sienkiewicza 112, 90-363 Lodz, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(8), 4378; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23084378
Submission received: 30 March 2022 / Revised: 12 April 2022 / Accepted: 13 April 2022 / Published: 15 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 25th Anniversary of IJMS: Advances in Biochemistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Oxidative depolymerization of lignin is a hot topic in the field of biomass valorization. The most recent and green procedures have been herein detailed. Photochemical and electrochemical approaches are reviewed highlighting the pros and cons of each method. Mechanochemistry activated strategies are able to combine oxidation and depolymerization in the deconstruction of lignin. Homogenous and heterogeneous catalytic systems are exemplified stressing the green aspects associated with both the procedures. Solvent-free approaches as well as those carried out in alternative media are listed. Finally, the few examples of selenium catalyzed lignin valorization reported so far are cited.

1. Introduction

Lignocellulosic biomass is one of the most abundant materials on earth and represents a major source of non-fossil carbon [1,2]. It is composed by three biopolymers: lignin (Figure 1A), cellulose and hemicellulose [3]. All of these are components of plant cell walls and lignin confers key properties such as rigidity, resistance against pests and pathogens, and is also essential for mineral transport [4,5]. Lignin biosynthesis starts in the cytoplasm where the three main monomers, sinapyl alcohol, coniferyl alcohol and p-coumaryl alcohol, are prepared (Figure 1B) [6]. They are successively transferred into the apoplast where the last step is carried out by two enzymes, peroxidase and laccase. It consists of the polymerization of the three monomers that are converted into the corresponding monolignols called p-hydroxyphenyl, guaiacyl and syringyl units [7] (Figure 1B). Recently, caffeyl alcohol was also identified as an unusual monolignol (C-monolignol) in the vanillin seeds [8] (Figure 1B). Monolignols are distributed in lignin in a varied way, that, for this reason, assumes a variable structural composition which depends on many factors such as the plant’s age and species [9]. For example, hardwood lignin is principally composed of sinapyl and coniferyl alcohol whereas in softwood the most abundant monomer in lignin is p-coumaryl alcohol [10]. The aromatic units of lignin are linked by linkages that are divided in two groups: C-C bond (β-5, β-β, β-1, 5-5) and the more abundant C-O bond (β-O-4, α-O-4, α-O-γ, 4-O-5) [11].
Industrially, lignin is waste from the pulp and paper industry that generates 50 million tons yearly as a side product known “black liquor” [12]. This huge amount of byproduct can serve as a source of energy. Indeed in a world with a continuously increasing energy demand and high energy costs [13], black liquor can be considered a good, clean and renewable alternative to fossil fuels [14]. As a result, lignin undergoes different treatments such as gasification [15], pyrolysis and combustion [16] to generate gas and heat. On the other hand, lignin could be treated to obtain valuable products such as materials (e.g., hydrogel and 3D printing lignin−plastic composites) [17] and fine chemicals [18] for the pharmaceutical, cosmetic and food industries [19].
Lignin has to be depolymerized to retrieve fine chemicals and the most diffuse depolymerization processes are represented by hydrogenolysis and oxidation [20]. Oxidation is the favorite method because it is often performed under mild conditions leading to cleaner end products [21]. The monomeric products that generally are isolated from the oxidative depolymerization of lignin are both aromatic compounds—such as aldehydes, acids and ketones—and aliphatic compounds [22].
The most commonly used methods in the lignin oxidation are performed with chlorine and nitrate, both of which are non-eco-friendly, toxic and polluting oxidants [21]. The need to develop greener depolymerization processes has led to the optimization of new oxidative methods [21]. In these protocols oxidants are replaced by hydrogen peroxide [23] and molecular oxygen [24]. Moreover, in respect to the principles of the green chemistry [25,26], a large part of these reactions are performed in the presence of catalysts, with a particular interest for the heterogeneous ones characterized by an improved recoverability and reusability, reducing the waste-production at the end of the process [27]. Similarly, non-green solvents, when possible, were substituted with water [28] or other eco-friendly media [29]. Non-conventional activation methods such as electrochemistry and photochemistry were also applied to the lignin oxidation [30].
Due to the large and growing interest in this topic, various reviews have appeared in recent years. Among the most recent, in 2019 Teong et al. provided a series of examples where lignin was oxidized with hydrogen peroxide [23]. In 2021 another article reviewed all the eco-friendly protocols applied for conversion of lignin into fine chemicals and fuels [31].
Among the most representative methods worth mentioning are those reported by Mottweiler and coworkers [32] that performed a successful oxidation of lignin using Fe-DABCO as catalyst combined with hydrogen peroxide; Crestini et al. [33,34] conducted oxidation using methyltrioxorenium(VII) (MTO, CH3ReO3) and four different heterogenous derivatives of MTO starting from hydrolytic sugar cane lignin, red spruce kraft lignin and hardwood organo-solvent lignin. The oxidations performed using polyoxometalates (POMs) as catalysts are considered green reactions [35] and one of the most efficient oxidation treatment of lignin carried out with these catalysts was developed by Voitl et al. [36] that tested the activity of H3PMo12O40. Very interesting are also the studies reported by Badamali et al. [37,38] where Co-salen complexes were used as catalysts. In particular, a heterogenous Co-salen complex called ([N,N’-bis(salicylidene)ethane-1,2-diaminato]Cobalt(II) immobilized on SBA-15 (Santa Barbara Mesoporous silica) was used and the oxidation was mediated by H2O2 under microwave irradiation as an alternative green energy source [39].
As this field is constantly developing, we here present an updated state of the art review focused on the most recent and sustainable protocols developed for lignin oxidation.

2. Novel Methods for the Green Oxidative Depolymerization of Lignin

2.1. Photochemical and Electrochemical Approaches

In recent years, several studies have been carried out on eco-friendly lignin oxidative depolymerization using photochemistry. This approach can be considered green as it can be theoretically envisioned the use of solar radiation as a renewable and non-polluting energy source [30]. One of the most recent and sustainable applications of photocatalysis was developed by Dai et al. [40]. In this work, lignin was oxidized by irradiation with different wavelengths using MnO2 as a catalyst and molecular oxygen as an oxidant. The reactions were initially performed starting with 1-phenylethanol (10) as a lignin model compound that was oxidized into the corresponding ketone (11) (Scheme 1). Different amounts of MnO2 were checked under UV and blue LED irradiation demonstrating that the final yields are directly proportional to the amount of catalyst. Moreover, the activity of the catalyst was tested screening α, β, γ and δ-manganese dioxide, and the δ-MnO2 turned to be the best-in-class since it can be recovered by treatment in a furnace at 230 °C for 15 min in air and reused without any loss in catalytic efficiency.
The optimized conditions (10 mL of acetonitrile, 870 mg of MnO2, 3 h with oxygen bubbled under blue light irradiation = 470 nm) were applied on 200 mg of lignin samples (kraft, organosolv, alkali lignin). The analyses performed by IR showed an increase in the bands of the C=O group while from the 2D-NMR spectrum the conversion of the benzylic alcohol (α-position) into the ketone was observed, together with a downfield shift of the proton at the β-position (Figure 2).
The depolymerization process was performed by treating oxidized lignin samples with 2-hydroxy ethylammonium formate. This treatment afforded a material with a strongly reduced molecular weight (from 1400 to 400) [41].
Another example of photocatalysis applied to lignin depolymerization was reported by Wu et al. [42]. In 2021 they developed a Z-scheme Ag3PO4-polymer carbon nitride nanocomposite that was tested in the oxidative cleavage of C-C bonds. Initially polymer carbon nitride (PCN) and other semiconductors (TiO2, ZnO, BiVO4, Cu2O, CeO2, BiOCl, BiOI and CdS) were screened for the oxidation of 1,2-diphenyl ethanol (14) as a β-1 lignin model compound (Scheme 2).
PCN was selected as the best catalyst reaching, after 6 h, 15% yield with benzaldehyde (15) as the main product with a chemoselectivity of 68%. Successively, different heterojunctions (10Ag3PO4-90PCN, 20Ag3PO4-80PCN, 40Ag3PO4–60PCN, 60Ag3PO4–40PCN and 80Ag3PO4–20PCN) were synthesized with the goal to increase the photocatalytic activity of PCN. Among them, 40Ag3PO4-60PCN showed the best catalytic performance affording 17 and benzaldehyde in 86%yield, without the formation of benzoic acid (16). Three different pathways were hypothesized to be involved in the oxidation mechanism. The first is the oxidation of benzylic alcohol 14 into the corresponding ketone 17, the second involves the C-C bond cleavage through the formation of a radical cation with the final formation of 15. The third pathway, that was supposed to be the major one, consists of the formation of a beta radical that successively interacts with superoxoradical creating a six membered transitional state that undergoes intramolecular electron transfer resulting in the C-C bond cleavage affording 15 (Scheme 3). Finally, this protocol was successfully applied to different lignin β-1 model compounds and on lignin samples in the presence of O2 and using a 300 W xenon lamp with AM 1.5 filter as a light source. When the z-scheme was tested on the raw lignin sample, the formation of aromatic aldehydes and acid monomers was observed confirming that this method is suitable for the cleavage of the C-C bonds present in lignin.
Another very recent case of oxidation of C-C bonds was reported by Yang et al. [43]. They reported a green alternative to the classic method that use stochiometric amounts of chromium trioxide. Essentially, this is a photocatalytic oxidation of 1,2 diols used as model compounds, and is based on the use of molecular oxygen as oxidant in the presence of various vanadium based photocatalysts. At first, a series of experiments using hydrobenzoin (18) as a substrate were performed adopting the following conditions: 0.1 g of substrate, 0.05 g of a catalyst in 10 mL of a solvent under 0.2 Mpa O2, Xe lamp with a light intensity of 220 mW cm−2, r.t. for 5 h. Intriguingly, different products were obtained depending on both the solvent and photocatalyst used in the reaction. When methanol was used, three main products were identified: benzaldehyde (15), methyl benzoate (19) and (dimethoxymethyl)benzene (20). In particular, the use of VOx/ZnO as a catalyst leads to the formation of benzaldehyde in 95% yield and a selectivity of 92%, while the photocatalysts VOx/TiO2 and VOx/NiO promote the conversion of the substrate into methyl benzoate in 94% and 54% yield, and a selectivity of 90% and 78%, respectively. Benzaldehyde (15) and benzoic acid (16) were obtained as two main products when the reaction was carried out in dichloromethane. Under these conditions using VOx/TiO2 as a catalyst, 16 was obtained as the main product in 96% yield and a selectivity of 90% (Scheme 4).
A protocol based on a combination of photochemistry and electrochemistry was recently described by Wang et al. In this work [44] a photoelectrochemical platform was developed to perform the green oxidation of lignin coupled to the green synthesis of value-added chemicals. This system consists of three different elements: a photoanode, a perovskite triple cation photovoltaic part (PV) and a carbon cloth cathode. The first component is a bismuth vanadate photoanode which oxidized lignin, the other two components were used to create a system to reduce NAD+ to NADH, that in turn acts as a cofactor of some reductive NADH-dependent enzymes such as formate dehydrogenase to reduce CO2 into formate (25), or the L-glutamate dehydrogenase to reduce α-ketoglutarate into L-glutamate (24). (Figure 3).
The oxidative reaction was performed on alkali lignin and lignosulfonate lignin for 12 h and was monitored by 2D-NMR and gel permeation chromatography. Depolymerization of lignin was demonstrated by the decrease in molecular weight of the alkali lignin from 51,000 to 15,000. At the same time the NMR spectrum evidenced a breakage of the linkages with low bond dissociation energies, such as the β-O-4 linkage. It is worth mentioning, the two samples of lignin gave different results. When the oxidation was performed on lignosulfonate, the disappearance of the absorption bands of the aromatic region and an appearance of signals of the C=O stretching bands was observed by FTIR. This suggests that the oxidation is able to open the aromatic rings to carbonyl groups. On the other hand, in the case of alkali lignin, an increase in the C=O stretching bands intensity without the ring opening was detected.
Recently electrochemistry was also employed by Lan et al. [45] on cornstalk lignin resulting in the formation of different aromatic compounds. The process consists of an oxidative depolymerization at the anode that is represented by a Pb/PbO2 electrode and subsequently the obtained lignin fragments are reduced by the nickel cathode. Twelve different compounds were individuated as products such toluene, anisole, o-Xylene and m-Xylene, which were obtained in 36.1 g, 9.5 g, 14.4 g and 11.7 g per kg-lignin, respectively.
Another example in which electrochemistry was used for the lignin depolymerization was reported by Di Fidio et al. in 2021 [46]. The authors investigated the use of three different electrodes, platinum, nickel peroxide hydroxide and graphite at different pH and substrate concentrations. The technical lignin was successfully depolymerized, affording as products sinapic acid (26, 64.3 mg L−1, 0.32 wt%), acetovanillone (27, 30.2 mg L−1, 0.15 wt%), vanillic acid (28, 23.4 mg L−1, 0.12 wt%) and vanillin (29, 23.8 mg L−1, 0.12 wt%) (Figure 4).
Cui et al. [47] reported an electrochemical based protocol using mild conditions and atomically dispersed Pt–N3C1 sites deposited on nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes (Pt1/N-CNTs) as a catalyst. They simulated the depolymerization using Pt1/N-CNTs as a catalyst and 2-phenoxy-1-phenyl ethanol (30) as a model compound using the conditions depicted in Scheme 5.
A mixture of ketone 31, 15 and phenol (32) were obtained with a conversion of 99%. Then, the developed protocol was applied on other different lignin model compounds. In all the cases a conversion >99% was observed with benzaldehyde as the main product, demonstrating the high versatility of this method. The only exception was compound 38 that was converted only in 78% yield, probably because of the steric hindrance caused by the chlorine in meta position (Table 1).

2.2. Mechanochemistry in Lignin Oxidation

Mechanochemistry represents a non-conventional technology that uses mechanical forces for the activation of chemical reactions addressing several principles of green chemistry [48,49]. The most recent examples applied to the oxidation of lignin and lignin model compounds were reported by Dabral et al. [50] in 2018 and Sun et al. [51] in 2020. The research group of Dabral pioneered the use of mechanochemistry for the degradation of lignin in 2013 [52], demonstrating that with this methodology the use of solvents and metal catalysts may be avoided. More recently [50], they reported a mechanochemically activated oxidation of lignin using Oxone® as an oxidant and TEMPO or two of its derivatives (4-acetamido-TEMPO (AcNH-TEMPO) and 4-hydroxy-TEMPO (HO−TEMPO)) as catalysts. The reactions were firstly carried out on the monolignol 46 that mimic the β-O-4 linkage. The best conditions were obtained using HO−TEMPO, KBr and Oxone® in ratio 0.2:0.2:1.5 and milling for 90 min at 30 Hz using as milling media tungsten carbide (WC). The corresponding ketone 47 was obtained in 97% yield a conversion of the starting material up to 99% (Scheme 6).
The same protocol was successively applied on beechwood lignin. NMR analysis showed that after milling for 180 min with a frequency of 30 Hz the oxidation degree reached 84%, while only 6% of oxidation was obtained performing the same reaction without the catalyst. The structural changes in the lignin after oxidation were also investigated trough IR spectroscopy. A decrease in intensity of the OH bands and a subsequent increase in the C=O bands was observed. At the same time the GC-MS analyses showed 3,5-dimethoxyquinone and 2-methoxybenzoquinone as the main products. Finally, it was demonstrated that this oxidative protocol can be applied on a large scale. In fact, when the reaction was performed on 10 g of beechwood lignin, gel permeation chromatography showed a strong reduction of the molecular weight demonstrating that lignin was successfully depolymerized.
Another mechanochemical, solvent-free and eco-friendly lignin oxidative depolymerization protocol was developed by Sun et al. [51]. It is characterized by two oxidative steps starting from a series of lignin β-O-4 model compounds (Scheme 7 and Table 2).
The first step was performed on compounds 48–57, using a DDQ/NaNO2 (0.15 eq/0.5 eq) as a catalytic system. In all the cases the corresponding ketones (58–67) were obtained in good yields, and they were subsequentially used as substrates for the second step. The mechanochemical depolymerization was performed using a strong base (NaOH) as a catalyst leading to the corresponding phenols (32, 41, 71) and aromatic carboxylic acids (28, 68–70) (Table 2). This protocol was then applied on raw lignin (diaxasolv lignin) and the results showed a successful depolymerization with some selectivity in the production of syringate (72, 7.5 wt%).

2.3. Metal Catalysts in the Lignin Oxidation

Iron-complexes are frequently used in the oxidation of lignin and Tong et al. provided a nice example [53]. They used the low- cost Fenton catalyst consisting of Fe3+ that activates the green oxidant H2O2, to oxidize lignin. The model reaction was carried out on the organosolv hardwood lignin in supercritical ethanol (7 Mpa, 250 °C). It was demonstrated that the Fenton catalyst is able to cleave the β-ether bonds through a radical process converting the lignin into organic oil, mainly composed of aromatic compounds but also dicarboxylic acids and their esters, with a yield up to 66%.
More recently, Arefieva et al. [54] synthetized a new heterogeneous catalyst containing Fe3+ using plant derived silica that was obtained from rice husk. The iron-based catalyst was tested on lignin (obtained from rice husk hydrolysate), using H2O2 as an oxidant in the presence of UV and visible light irradiation. The reactions were performed using different COD (chemical oxygen demand, oxidable organic compounds: H2O2 ratio ranging from 1:2 to 1:16) and it was demonstrated that after an exposition of UV light for 15 min and then under sun light for 7 days, in the presence of the catalyst, there was a 20-fold reduction of phenols of compared to the case without a catalyst.
Additionally, Patankar et al. in 2019 [55] used an iron-complex catalyst in the oxidation of kraft lignin performing the reaction in mild conditions and using water as a solvent. Fe@MagTEMPO is a heterogeneous catalyst that consists of TEMPO anchored in magnetic nanoparticle characterized by the presence of free amine groups. The interest on this approach is mainly focused on the facile recyclability of the catalyst that can be reused for at least five times without losing the activity.
Copper salts were also used as catalysts to selectively cleave the C-C bonds under mild basic conditions. Hu et al. [56] used compound 27 testing different bases and copper salts performing the reactions under air (1 atm) at 30 °C in water as a solvent (Scheme 8).
The reaction carried out without a base or without a catalyst showed conversions of 0.75% and of 8.07%, respectively, demonstrating that the presence of both the elements is essential. At the same time, the effect of different bases was tested using CuCl as a catalyst. It was observed that increasing the strength of the base induces a higher conversion. With NaOH as the best base, the catalytic activity of different copper salts was investigated. In general, higher conversions were obtained using the Cu(I) salts. With the optimized conditions, a conversion of 96.96% of 31 into phenol (32) and benzoic acid (16) in 89% and 85% yield, respectively, was observed. The versatility of the protocol was demonstrated performing the reactions on different model compounds and reaching in all the cases high conversions of the substrates into the corresponding oxidized derivatives (Table 3).
Additionally, in this case, the protocol was applied to raw lignin derivatives such as hardwood eucalyptus, softwood pine, herb corn stover, bamboo, pennisetum and bagasse performing the reactions using more drastic conditions (160 °C, 60 min, 5 bar air pressure). The results showed a very complex panel of products depending on the type of lignin used as a substrate even if, in all the cases, the main products were syringaldehyde and vanillin.
Metalloporphyrins are also an example of catalysts used for the green oxidation of lignin when the oxidant is hydrogen peroxide. These compounds are characterized by the presence of porphin pyrrole rings able to mimic the activity of various enzymes such as lignin peroxidase [57]. Artaud et al. [58] as early as in 1993 reported the use of Fe(TF5PP)Cl (meso-tetrakis-(pentafluorophenyl)porphyrin iron(III)) chloride as catalyst in the oxidation of 1,2 dimetoxyarenes. Some years later, the activity of metalloporphyrins immobilized on montmorillonite, was analyzed as biomimetic of lignin peroxidase. In particular, manganese meso-tetrakis(tetramethylpyridinio)porphyrinpentacetate (Mn(TmePyP)clay) immobilized onto montmorillonite was used as a catalyst. It was demonstrated that Mn(TmePyP)clay is able to convert apocinol (a lignin model compound) in 59% yield when the reaction was performed at 60 °C with reaction times from 30 min to 4 h using H2O2 as oxidant [57].
The most recent paper on the use of the metalloporphyrins is that by Xie at al. [59]. In their work, a series of metalloporphyrins were screened and CoTBrPPCl (74, Figure 5) was selected as the best catalyst. This compound was tested in the degradation of lignin in the presence of H2O2 as oxidant. The results showed a good catalytic activity with a yield in aromatic compounds up to 20.1% while the reaction performed without the metalloporphyrin gave the same compounds but only in 5.6% yield.
Phenanthroline–metal complexes were used in combination with H2O2 in alternative green oxidation processes [60]. In 2015, the catalytic activity of a 1,10 phenanthroline copper complex was investigated performing the reactions with H2O2 in basic conditions (0.05 M NaOH). Four different lignin model compounds were used as substrates (compounds 75–78, Figure 6) demonstrating that phenanthroline metal complexes are able to catalyze the oxidation of the OH group in Cα position but not the β-O-4 bond cleavage [60].
In 2020, Wu et al. [61] tested the reactivity of Cu(Oac)2/1,10-phenanthroline in a deep eutectic solvent, methanol-choline chloride (MeOH-ChCl). MeOH-ChCl was able to improve both the solubility of alkaline lignin and the catalytic activity of phenanthroline-metal catalyst obtaining acetovanillone and acetic acid (yield 87 and 12%, respectively) as products of oxidation in 3 h at 60 °C.
The use of polyoxometallates (POMs) as catalysts in lignin oxidation was also investigated in recent years. In 2013 the catalytic activity of H5Pmo10V2O40 was demonstrated in different substrates (pyrolytic lignin, hydrolytic lignin, alkali lignin, sodium lignosulfonate and calcium lignosulfonate). They were depolymerized using oxygen as green oxidant and leading to the formation of organic acids (dimethyl fumarate and dimethyl succinate) and aromatic compounds (aromatic aldehydes and acids). Moreover, it was also demonstrated that H5Pmo10V2O40 can be reused for five times without losing its catalytic activity [62].
Du et al. [63] recently developed a new eco-sustainable lignin fractionation and oxidation method using POMs. The fractionation process consists of the removal of lignin from lignocellulosic biomass and presents various issues. The most relevant is the recondensation of lignin in acidic conditions. In their work, they demonstrated that H3PMo12O40 (PMo12) could be used as a catalyst both in preventing the condensation during the fractionation and in the lignin depolymerization. To mimic the fractionation process, different lignin model compounds were selected and subjected to the following reaction conditions: 0.25 mmol of the model compound, 0.025 mmol of PMo12 catalyst, 10 mL of methanol, 30 bar oxygen/nitrogen (v/v 2:28). The reactions were stirred at 100 °C for 2 h. When the reaction was carried out with 1-phenylethanol (the simplest model compound), the hydroxyl group was quantitatively converted into the methoxyl derivatives. Taking into account these preliminary data, Du et al. applied the protocol on raw lignin (Scheme 9). The fractionation step was performed using different solvents and conditions in terms of oxygen pressure, catalyst and concentration of catalysts. The best conditions were selected using a solution of methanol and water (9:1), 2.5 mmol/mL of PMO, 9 bar of oxygen/1 bar of nitrogen at 100 °C. Delignification was obtained in 96% yield and NMR analysis evidenced that the extracted lignin was etherified at the alpha position. Then, the fractionated lignin was depolymerized at 140 °C for 4 h in a mixture of methanol and water (9:1) with 10 bar O2/N2 (9:1). The GC-MS analysis evidenced that lignin was converted into low molecular weight compounds such as vanillin (28), methylparaben (79), methyl syringate (80) and methyl vanillate (81).
In 2019 the possibility of using binuclear Rh complexes as catalysts for oxidative depolymerization was investigated starting with the model compounds 49. The reaction proceeds with a quantitative conversion of the substrates into the corresponding ketone 88 (86%), phenol derivative 41 (89%) and a very low quantity of the dehydrogenated intermediate 59 (8%) (Scheme 10) [64].
To demonstrate the versatility of the oxidative protocol, the optimized conditions were successively applied to different lignin model compounds. As a result, ketones (11, 27, 59, 89–92) and phenols (41, 71, 93) were obtained in good yields (Table 4).
Finally, the catalytic activity of the above-mentioned Rh complex was tested on raw basswood lignin reaching a monomer yield of 2.3 wt%. From the 2D-HSQC-NMR analyses, it was demonstrated that the oxidation cleaves the linkages of the side chain and the dehydrogenation of the Cα-OH group was detected. Wang et al. hypothesized the mechanism for the cleavage of lignin (Scheme 11). Initially, because of the presence of the base (NaOH), the chloride ligand in the Rh catalyst is substituted by a hydroxide. This new complex is responsible for the deprotonation of the Cα-OH group forming intermediate III that undergoes β-hydride elimination to produce ketone IV. The Rh hydride form successively cleaves IV after the addition of H2O giving a different cleaved product and the initial form of the Rh complex (I) [64].

2.4. Metal-Free Lignin Oxidative Depolymerization

The oxidative depolymerization of lignin based on the use of perfluorodecalin was reported in 2020. [29] This is a solvent usually used as artificial blood due to its ability to solubilize oxygen and low toxicity. Moreover, this is a non-flammable, non-bio-accumulating and non-ozone-depleting solvent, all aspects that make perfluorodecalin an eco-friendly and “green” solvent [29]. While with classical solvents (MeOH, MeCN, But-OH, EtOAc) and 300 psi of O2 lignin undergoes oxidation with yields ranging from 1.0 to 2.6%, in perfluorodecalin the yield was 10.5% in phenolic monomers (Scheme 12). The same reactions were performed in oxygen-free conditions leading to no product formation, this suggests that the perfluorodecalin is able to promote the lignin oxidation because of the high oxygen solubility. Moreover, it was discovered that oxygen is mandatory not only for the oxidation, but also to avoid the condensation of lignin. In fact, when the reaction was performed in the absence of O2 for 20 min, the formation of oligomers was detected. In the presence of O2, benzaldehyde (15) and benzoic acid (16) were the main products without any condensation reaction. The authors explained this behavior stating that molecular oxygen is an inhibitor of the free radical polymerization, the process that leads to the condensation of lignin. It is worth mentioning that after a liquid–liquid separation, perfluorodecalin can be recovered without any signs of degradations.
Wang et al. [65] considered a Baeyer–Villiger (BV) reaction as a first step in the conversion of a ketone used as a lignin model compound into the corresponding aryl ester and acetal ester. The latter then undergoes alcoholysis in the presence of K2CO3. Two oxidants were used in the BV reaction: metachloroperbenzoic acid (m-CPBA) and hydrogen peroxide. When the reactions were performed with m-CPBA on substrates 31 and 73, the corresponding acetal ester was obtained with a conversion of 100% and yield > 90%. Additionally, in the case of 17 the main product was the acetal ester with a 78% yield, while when the reactions were performed on the 58, 63 and 96, characterized by the presence of a methoxy group, aryl-ester was obtained as the main product. Substituting m-CPBA with hydrogen peroxide and using dibenzyldiselenide ((PhCH2Se)2) as a catalyst, similar results were obtained with the only exception of compound 17 converted in just 30% (Table 5).
The second step of this procedure consists of the alcoholysis that was carried out using K2CO3 in various alcohols: methanol, ethanol, butanol, benzyl alcohol and isopropyl alcohol affording higher yields for the less sterically hindered alcohols.
Recently, Hosoya et al. [66] developed an aerobic oxidation in a tetrabutylammonium hydroxide (Bu4NOH). The reactions were performed using the conditions previously optimized by the same authors with the addition of pure oxygen [67]. Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria japonica) wood flour was used as substrate and the reaction was carried out at 120 °C in a Bu4NOH aqueous solution (1.25 mol/L) fluxing pure O2. After 8 h, vanillin was obtained as major product with a yield of 19.8 wt% that is higher with respect to that obtained when the reaction was performed under air (15.4 wt% yield after 43 h). The proposed mechanism is depicted in Scheme 13. The first step is the cleavage of the β-O-4 ether linkage catalyzed by strong basic conditions with the formation of the glycerol end that, in a second step, is subsequently oxidized (by oxygen) and converted into the corresponding aldehyde end. In the last step, the aldehyde end is converted into vanillin through the second cleavage of the ether linkage.

2.5. Selenium Catalyzed Oxidation

Selenium-catalyzed oxidative procedures are conceived as green, bioinspired transformations, because when hydrogen peroxide is the oxidant, the catalytic cycle of the key antioxidant enzyme glutathione peroxidase, is mimicked. This paradigm has been implemented by us and others in synthetic organic chemistry [68,69,70,71,72,73].
The sole example of Se-catalyzed oxidative lignin transformations has been reported by Santos et al. [74]. They proposed a novel protocol for the oxidation of 1-(4-methoxyphenyl) ethanol (115). The procedure starts with a gold promoted oxidation of benzyl alcohol to afford the ketone (116) that acts as a substrate for a subsequent BV reaction catalyzed by an organoselenium derivative (Scheme 14). Au nanoparticles were prepared reducing AuCl4- with ascorbic acid and then immobilized on silica.
Initially, the reactions were performed using two different green oxidants (O2, H2O2) in THF both in the presence and in the absence of catalysts. From the results, it was evident that 4 mol% of gold nanoparticles are able to catalyze the oxidation of the alcohol into the ketone reaching a conversion of 99% in two hours when using H2O2 (40 mmol). To optimize the reactions, Au/SiO2 was tested in different solvents and the best conditions were selected when THF (conversion > 99%) and MTBE (methyl-tert-butyl ether) (conversion: 97%) were used as solvents. Then, the same reactions were performed under flow conditions, confining Au/SiO2 into a packed-bed reactor to enhance the recycling. Additionally, in this case different solvents and different amounts of H2O2 were tested reaching a maximum of 77% of conversion when the reaction was performed using MeOH and 40 eq of H2O2 at 40 °C. For the second step, different organoselenium compounds were evaluated as catalysts in oxidation of ketone 116. Initially the reactions were performed testing the activity of diphenyldiselenide ((PhSe)2) in different solvents and in the presence of different oxidants. The results showed that the best conversion (94%) into the ester (117) was achieved when the reaction was carried out using methanol as a solvent and hydrogen peroxide as an oxidant. The same analyses were performed in the presence of benzenseleninic acid immobilized on a resin (PAR, Table 6). Even PAR showed the ability to convert 116 into 117 in 58%. The reactions were also carried out in continuous flow conditions. In this case, a ratio of 0.2:0.02 between the substrate and H2O2 was used with MeOH as a solvent. With a resident time of 30 min, a conversion of 91% was observed but the ester (117) was recovered along with phenol (118) and the corresponding quinone. When reducing the residence time, the yield reduced, as well as the formation of side products.
Finally, the entire protocol was applied to 1-(4-(benzyloxy) phenyl) ethanol (119), 1-(4-(benzyloxy) phenyl)-2-phenyl-ethanol (120) and 1-(4-(benzyloxy)phenyl)-2-phenyl-propane-1,3-diol (121). These substrates were first oxidized with Au/SiO2 under continuous flow conditions, reaching 86%, 51% and 74% conversion yields, respectively. Then, the ketones 122, 123 and 124 were used as substrates in the BV reaction and the corresponding ester and the alcohol were prepared in good yields, with the only exception of substrate 121. In this case, the unsaturated ketone 125 was observed as a product and then was used as a substrate in the oxidative reaction, affording the corresponding esters, 126 and 127.

3. Conclusions

In this review article, the most recent and green oxidative protocols for lignin depolymerization and valorization are discussed. A critical analysis highlights their current adherence to some of the 12 principles of Green Chemistry. In some cases, classic oxidants such as nitrobenzene and chlorine can be replaced with the most ecofriendly hydrogen peroxide or molecular oxygen, even if metal catalysts cannot be totally avoided. The use of an organoselenium catalyst demonstrated that it can be a convenient alternative to metal catalysts in the activation of oxygen transfer reactions from peroxides to organic substrates.
Furthermore, mechanochemistry and heterogeneous catalysis enable the reduction of wastes production of the overall processes. In the first case the use of solvents can be avoided, and in the latter, catalysts can be easily recovered, recycled and reused in subsequent reactions.
The analysis of the results reported in the reviewed articles showed that even if the studies on model compounds are useful for the identification of some reaction mechanisms, their transability to biomass is often not totally applicable. The molecular complexity of the biomass still represents an issue deserving more investigation in order to develop protocols suitable for industrial scalability. Some of the reviewed protocols explored the scalability, demonstrating their efficiency at the level of the gram-scale [29,50]. In our opinion they could represent a good starting point to envision an effective industrial application of new green protocols for lignin treatment and valorization.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

This review is part of the editorial effort of the International Scientific Network Selenium Sulfur Redox and Catalysis (SeSRedCat). CS thanks MIUR for PhD fellowship under the frame of “PON Ricerca ed Innovazione 2014–2020).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zoghlami, A.; Paës, G. Lignocellulosic Biomass: Understanding Recalcitrance and Predicting Hydrolysis. Front. Chem. 2019, 7, 874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Calvo-Flores, F.G.; Dobado, J.A. Lignin as Renewable Raw Material. ChemSusChem 2010, 3, 1227–1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Isikgor, F.H.; Becer, C.R. Lignocellulosic Biomass: A Sustainable Platform for the Production of Bio-Based Chemicals and Polymers. Polym. Chem. 2015, 6, 4497–4559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Brethauer, S.; Shahab, R.L.; Studer, M.H. Impacts of Biofilms on the Conversion of Cellulose. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 104, 5201–5212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Liu, Q.; Luo, L.; Zheng, L. Lignins: Biosynthesis and Biological Functions in Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Vanholme, R.; Demedts, B.; Morreel, K.; Ralph, J.; Boerjan, W. Lignin Biosynthesis and Structure. Plant Physiol. 2010, 153, 895–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Ralph, J.; Lapierre, C.; Boerjan, W. Lignin Structure and Its Engineering. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2019, 56, 240–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chen, F.; Tobimatsu, Y.; Havkin-Frenkel, D.; Dixon, R.A.; Ralph, J. A Polymer of Caffeyl Alcohol in Plant Seeds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 1772–1777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Lu, Y.; Lu, Y.-C.; Hu, H.-Q.; Xie, F.-J.; Wei, X.-Y.; Fan, X. Structural Characterization of Lignin and Its Degradation Products with Spectroscopic Methods. J. Spectrosc. 2017, 2017, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Rowell, R.; Pettersen, R.; Tshabalala, M. Cell Wall Chemistry. In Handbook of Wood Chemistry and Wood Composites, 2nd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2012; pp. 33–72. ISBN 9781439853801. [Google Scholar]
  11. Subbotina, E.; Rukkijakan, T.; Marquez-Medina, M.D.; Yu, X.; Johnsson, M.; Samec, J.S.M. Oxidative Cleavage of C–C Bonds in Lignin. Nat. Chem. 2021, 13, 1118–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Demuner, I.F.; Colodette, J.L.; Demuner, A.J.; Jardim, C.M. Biorefinery Review: Wide-Reaching Products through Kraft Lignin. BioResources 2019, 14, 7543–7581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Verma, O.P.; Manik, G.; Sethi, S.K. A Comprehensive Review of Renewable Energy Source on Energy Optimization of Black Liquor in MSE Using Steady and Dynamic State Modeling, Simulation and Control. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 100, 90–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kim, C.-H.; Lee, J.-Y.; Park, S.-H.; Moon, S.-O. Global Trends and Prospects of Black Liquor as Bioenergy. J. Korea Tech. Assoc. Pulp Pap. Ind. 2019, 51, 3–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Demirbaş, A. Pyrolysis and Steam Gasification Processes of Black Liquor. Energy Convers. Manag. 2002, 43, 877–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gani, A.; Naruse, I. Effect of Cellulose and Lignin Content on Pyrolysis and Combustion Characteristics for Several Types of Biomass. Renew. Energy 2007, 32, 649–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yu, O.; Kim, K.H. Lignin to Materials: A Focused Review on Recent Novel Lignin Applications. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 4626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wendisch, V.F.; Kim, Y.; Lee, J.-H. Chemicals from Lignin: Recent Depolymerization Techniques and Upgrading Extended Pathways. Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem. 2018, 14, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Guo, Z.; Yan, N.; Lapkin, A.A. Towards Circular Economy: Integration of Bio-Waste into Chemical Supply Chain. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 2019, 26, 148–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cheng, C.; Shen, D.; Gu, S.; Luo, K.H. State-of-the-Art Catalytic Hydrogenolysis of Lignin for the Production of Aromatic Chemicals. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2018, 8, 6275–6296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, C.; Wu, S.; Zhang, H.; Xiao, R. Catalytic Oxidation of Lignin to Valuable Biomass-Based Platform Chemicals: A Review. Fuel Process. Technol. 2019, 191, 181–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Costa, C.A.E.; Vega-Aguilar, C.A.; Rodrigues, A.E. Added-Value Chemicals from Lignin Oxidation. Molecules 2021, 26, 4602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Teong, S.P.; Li, X.; Zhang, Y. Hydrogen Peroxide as an Oxidant in Biomass-to-Chemical Processes of Industrial Interest. Green Chem. 2019, 21, 5753–5780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mathieu, Y.; Vidal, J.D.; Arribas Martínez, L.; Abad Fernández, N.; Iborra, S.; Corma, A. Molecular Oxygen Lignin Depolymerization: An Insight into the Stability of Phenolic Monomers. ChemSusChem 2020, 13, 4743–4758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Anastas, P.; Eghbali, N. Green Chemistry: Principles and Practice. Chem Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 301–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Tang, S.L.Y.; Smith, R.L.; Poliakoff, M. Principles of Green Chemistry: PRODUCTIVELY. Green Chem. 2005, 7, 761–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Das, L.; Kolar, P.; Sharma-Shivappa, R. Heterogeneous Catalytic Oxidation of Lignin into Value-Added Chemicals. Biofuels 2012, 3, 155–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cheng, C.; Wang, J.; Shen, D.; Xue, J.; Guan, S.; Gu, S.; Luo, K. Catalytic Oxidation of Lignin in Solvent Systems for Production of Renewable Chemicals: A Review. Polymers 2017, 9, 240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Hafezisefat, P.; Lindstrom, J.K.; Brown, R.C.; Qi, L. Non-Catalytic Oxidative Depolymerization of Lignin in Perfluorodecalin to Produce Phenolic Monomers. Green Chem. 2020, 22, 6567–6578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Khan, A.; Nair, V.; Colmenares, J.C.; Gläser, R. Lignin-Based Composite Materials for Photocatalysis and Photovoltaics. Top. Curr. Chem. 2018, 376, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Kumaravel, S.; Thiruvengetam, P.; Karthick, K.; Sankar, S.S.; Karmakar, A.; Kundu, S. Green and Sustainable Route for Oxidative Depolymerization of Lignin: New Platform for Fine Chemicals and Fuels. Biotechnol. Prog. 2021, 37, e3111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mottweiler, J.; Rinesch, T.; Besson, C.; Buendia, J.; Bolm, C. Iron-Catalysed Oxidative Cleavage of Lignin and β-O-4 Lignin Model Compounds with Peroxides in DMSO. Green Chem. 2015, 17, 5001–5008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Crestini, C.; Pro, P.; Neri, V.; Saladino, R. Methyltrioxorhenium: A New Catalyst for the Activation of Hydrogen Peroxide to the Oxidation of Lignin and Lignin Model Compounds. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2005, 13, 2569–2578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Crestini, C.; Caponi, M.C.; Argyropoulos, D.S.; Saladino, R. Immobilized Methyltrioxo Rhenium (MTO)/H2O2 Systems for the Oxidation of Lignin and Lignin Model Compounds. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2006, 14, 5292–5302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Yang, W.; Du, X.; Liu, W.; Tricker, A.W.; Dai, H.; Deng, Y. Highly Efficient Lignin Depolymerization via Effective Inhibition of Condensation during Polyoxometalate-Mediated Oxidation. Energy Fuels 2019, 33, 6483–6490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Voitl, T.; Rudolf von Rohr, P. Oxidation of Lignin Using Aqueous Polyoxometalates in the Presence of Alcohols. ChemSusChem 2008, 1, 763–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Badamali, S.K.; Luque, R.; Clark, J.H.; Breeden, S.W. Microwave Assisted Oxidation of a Lignin Model Phenolic Monomer Using Co(Salen)/SBA-15. Catal. Commun. 2009, 10, 1010–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Badamali, S.K.; Luque, R.; Clark, J.H.; Breeden, S.W. Co(Salen)/SBA-15 Catalysed Oxidation of a β-O-4 Phenolic Dimer under Microwave Irradiation. Catal. Commun. 2011, 12, 993–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. de la Hoz, A.; Díaz-Ortiz, A.; Prieto, P. Chapter 1. Microwave-Assisted Green Organic Synthesis. In Green Chemistry Series; Stefanidis, G., Stankiewicz, A., Eds.; Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, UK, 2016; pp. 1–33. ISBN 9781782621409. [Google Scholar]
  40. Dai, J.; Patti, A.F.; Styles, G.N.; Nanayakkara, S.; Spiccia, L.; Arena, F.; Italiano, C.; Saito, K. Lignin Oxidation by MnO2 under the Irradiation of Blue Light. Green Chem. 2019, 21, 2005–2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Dai, J.; Patti, A.F.; Longé, L.; Garnier, G.; Saito, K. Oxidized Lignin Depolymerization Using Formate Ionic Liquid as Catalyst and Solvent. ChemCatChem 2017, 9, 2684–2690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wu, X.; Lin, J.; Zhang, H.; Xie, S.; Zhang, Q.; Sels, B.F.; Wang, Y. Z-Scheme Nanocomposite with High Redox Ability for Efficient Cleavage of Lignin C–C Bonds under Simulated Solar Light. Green Chem. 2021, 23, 10071–10078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Yang, G.; Shi, J.; Sun, H.; Tong, X. The Product-Controllable Aerobic Oxidative Cleavage of Vicinal Diols Using Vanadium-Based Photocatalysts. React. Chem. Eng. 2022, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wang, D.; Lee, S.H.; Han, S.; Kim, J.; Trang, N.V.T.; Kim, K.; Choi, E.-G.; Boonmongkolras, P.; Lee, Y.W.; Shin, B.; et al. Lignin-Fueled Photoelectrochemical Platform for Light-Driven Redox Biotransformation. Green Chem. 2020, 22, 5151–5160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Lan, C.; Fan, H.; Shang, Y.; Shen, D.; Li, G. Electrochemically Catalyzed Conversion of Cornstalk Lignin to Aromatic C ompounds: An Integrated Process of Anodic Oxidation of a Pb/PbO2 Electrode and Hydrogenation of a Nickel Cathode in Sodium Hydroxide Solution. Sustain. Energy Fuels 2020, 4, 1828–1836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Di Fidio, N.; Timmermans, J.W.; Antonetti, C.; Raspolli Galletti, A.M.; Gosselink, R.J.A.; Bisselink, R.J.M.; Slaghek, T.M. Electro-Oxidative Depolymerisation of Technical Lignin in Water Using Platinum, Nickel Oxide Hydroxide and Graphite Electrodes. New J. Chem. 2021, 45, 9647–9657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Cui, T.; Ma, L.; Wang, S.; Ye, C.; Liang, X.; Zhang, Z.; Meng, G.; Zheng, L.; Hu, H.-S.; Zhang, J.; et al. Atomically Dispersed Pt–N3C1 Sites Enabling Efficient and Selective Electrocatalytic C–C Bond Cleavage in Lignin Models under Ambient Conditions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 9429–9439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ardila-Fierro, K.J.; Hernández, J.G. Sustainability Assessment of Mechanochemistry by Using the Twelve Principles of Green Chemistry. ChemSusChem 2021, 14, 2145–2162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Baig, R.B.N.; Varma, R.S. Alternative Energy Input: Mechanochemical, Microwave and Ultrasound-Assisted Organic Synthesis. Chem Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 1559–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Dabral, S.; Wotruba, H.; Hernández, J.G.; Bolm, C. Mechanochemical Oxidation and Cleavage of Lignin β-O-4 Model Compounds and Lignin. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 3242–3254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sun, C.; Zheng, L.; Xu, W.; Dushkin, A.V.; Su, W. Mechanochemical Cleavage of Lignin Models and Lignin via Oxidation and a Subsequent Base-Catalyzed Strategy. Green Chem. 2020, 22, 3489–3494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kleine, T.; Buendia, J.; Bolm, C. Mechanochemical Degradation of Lignin and Wood by Solvent-Free Grinding in a Reactive Medium. Green Chem 2013, 15, 160–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zeng, J.; Yoo, C.G.; Wang, F.; Pan, X.; Vermerris, W.; Tong, Z. Biomimetic Fenton-Catalyzed Lignin Depolymerization to High-Value Aromatics and Dicarboxylic Acids. ChemSusChem 2015, 8, 861–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Arefieva, O.D.; Vasilyeva, M.S.; Zemnukhova, L.A.; Timochkina, A.S. Heterogeneous Photo-Fenton Oxidation of Lignin of Rice Husk Alkaline Hydrolysates Using Fe-Impregnated Silica Catalysts. Environ. Technol. 2021, 42, 2220–2228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Patankar, S.C.; Liu, L.-Y.; Ji, L.; Ayakar, S.; Yadav, V.; Renneckar, S. Isolation of Phenolic Monomers from Kraft Lignin Using a Magnetically Recyclable TEMPO Nanocatalyst. Green Chem. 2019, 21, 785–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Hu, Y.; Yan, L.; Zhao, X.; Wang, C.; Li, S.; Zhang, X.; Ma, L.; Zhang, Q. Mild Selective Oxidative Cleavage of Lignin C–C Bonds over a Copper Catalyst in Water. Green Chem. 2021, 23, 7030–7040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Crestini, C.; Pastorini, A.; Tagliatesta, P. Metalloporphyrins Immobilized on Motmorillonite as Biomimetic Catalysts in the Oxidation of Lignin Model Compounds. J. Mol. Catal. Chem. 2004, 208, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Artaud, I.; Ben-Aziza, K.; Mansuy, D. Iron Porphyrin-Catalyzed Oxidation of 1,2-Dimethoxyarenes: A Discussion of the Different Reactions Involved and the Competition between the Formation of Methoxyquinones or Muconic Dimethyl Esters. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 3373–3380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Xie, J.; Ma, G.; Ouyang, X.; Zhao, L.; Qiu, X. Metalloporphyrin as a Biomimetic Catalyst for the Catalytic Oxidative Degradation of Lignin to Produce Aromatic Monomers. Waste Biomass Valorization 2020, 11, 4481–4489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Halma, M.; Lachenal, D.; Marlin, N.; Deronzier, A.; Brochier, M.C.; Zarubin, M. H2O2 Oxidation of Lignin Model Dimers Catalyzed by Copper(II)–phenanthroline. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015, 74, 514–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Yu, Q.; Song, Z.; Chen, X.; Fan, J.; Clark, J.H.; Wang, Z.; Sun, Y.; Yuan, Z. A Methanol–Choline Chloride Based Deep Eutectic Solvent Enhances the Catalytic Oxidation of Lignin into Acetovanillone and Acetic Acid. Green Chem. 2020, 22, 6415–6423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhao, Y.; Xu, Q.; Pan, T.; Zuo, Y.; Fu, Y.; Guo, Q.-X. Depolymerization of Lignin by Catalytic Oxidation with Aqueous Polyoxometalates. Appl. Catal. Gen. 2013, 467, 504–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Du, X.; Tricker, A.W.; Yang, W.; Katahira, R.; Liu, W.; Kwok, T.T.; Gogoi, P.; Deng, Y. Oxidative Catalytic Fractionation and Depolymerization of Lignin in a One-Pot Single-Catalyst System. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 7719–7727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Liu, Y.; Li, C.; Miao, W.; Tang, W.; Xue, D.; Li, C.; Zhang, B.; Xiao, J.; Wang, A.; Zhang, T.; et al. Mild Redox-Neutral Depolymerization of Lignin with a Binuclear Rh Complex in Water. ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 4441–4447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Wang, Y.; Wang, Q.; He, J.; Zhang, Y. Highly Effective C–C Bond Cleavage of Lignin Model Compounds. Green Chem. 2017, 19, 3135–3141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Hosoya, T.; Yamamoto, K.; Miyafuji, H.; Yamada, T. Selective Production of Bio-Based Aromatics by Aerobic Oxidation of Native Soft Wood Lignin in Tetrabutylammonium Hydroxide. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 19199–19210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Yamamoto, K.; Hosoya, T.; Yoshioka, K.; Miyafuji, H.; Ohno, H.; Yamada, T. Tetrabutylammonium Hydroxide 30-Hydrate as Novel Reaction Medium for Lignin Conversion. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 10111–10115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Sancineto, L.; Mangiavacchi, F.; Tidei, C.; Bagnoli, L.; Marini, F.; Gioiello, A.; Scianowski, J.; Santi, C. Selenium-Catalyzed Oxacyclization of Alkenoic Acids and Alkenols. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2017, 6, 988–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Lenardão, E.J.; Santi, C.; Sancineto, L. New Frontiers in Organoselenium Compounds; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; ISBN 9783319924045. [Google Scholar]
  70. Sancineto, L.; Tidei, C.; Bagnoli, L.; Marini, F.; Lenardão, E.; Santi, C. Selenium Catalyzed Oxidation of Aldehydes: Green Synthesis of Carboxylic Acids and Esters. Molecules 2015, 20, 10496–10510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Cao, H.; Qian, R.; Yu, L. Selenium-Catalyzed Oxidation of Alkenes: Insight into the Mechanisms and Developing Trend. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2020, 10, 3113–3121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Rathore, V.; Upadhyay, A.; Kumar, S. An Organodiselenide with Dual Mimic Function of Sulfhydryl Oxidases and Glutathione Peroxidases: Aerial Oxidation of Organothiols to Organodisulfides. Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 6274–6278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Tan, K.H.; Xu, W.; Stefka, S.; Demco, D.E.; Kharandiuk, T.; Ivasiv, V.; Nebesnyi, R.; Petrovskii, V.S.; Potemkin, I.I.; Pich, A. Selenium-Modified Microgels as Bio-Inspired Oxidation Catalysts. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 9791–9796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Santos, W.C.C.; Dias, K.A.; Santos, L.P.; Kisukuri, C.M.; Rodrigues, T.S.; Geonmonond, R.S.; Camargo, P.H.C.; Andrade, L.H. Evaluating Gold and Selenium Chemistry for Selective Transformations of Lignin Model Compounds. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2018, 360, 1376–1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 23 04378 g001 550
Figure 1. (A) Lignin structure; (B) monomers and monolignols.
Figure 1. (A) Lignin structure; (B) monomers and monolignols.
Ijms 23 04378 g001
Ijms 23 04378 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Oxidation of 10 under optimized condition.
Scheme 1. Oxidation of 10 under optimized condition.
Ijms 23 04378 sch001
Ijms 23 04378 g002 550
Figure 2. Lignin samples oxidation.
Figure 2. Lignin samples oxidation.
Ijms 23 04378 g002
Ijms 23 04378 sch002 550
Scheme 2. β-1 lignin model compound oxidation.
Scheme 2. β-1 lignin model compound oxidation.
Ijms 23 04378 sch002
Ijms 23 04378 sch003 550
Scheme 3. Oxidation mechanisms.
Scheme 3. Oxidation mechanisms.
Ijms 23 04378 sch003
Ijms 23 04378 sch004 550
Scheme 4. C-C bonds cleavage products in methanol and dichloromethane.
Scheme 4. C-C bonds cleavage products in methanol and dichloromethane.
Ijms 23 04378 sch004
Ijms 23 04378 g003 550
Figure 3. Schematic representation of the photoelectrochemical platform.
Figure 3. Schematic representation of the photoelectrochemical platform.
Ijms 23 04378 g003
Ijms 23 04378 g004 550
Figure 4. Lignin depolymerization products.
Figure 4. Lignin depolymerization products.
Ijms 23 04378 g004
Ijms 23 04378 sch005 550
Scheme 5. Preliminarily investigation using 30 as model compounds.
Scheme 5. Preliminarily investigation using 30 as model compounds.
Ijms 23 04378 sch005
Ijms 23 04378 sch006 550
Scheme 6. Oxidation of 46.
Scheme 6. Oxidation of 46.
Ijms 23 04378 sch006
Ijms 23 04378 sch007 550
Scheme 7. Schematic representation of the mechanochemical oxidation and depolymerization.
Scheme 7. Schematic representation of the mechanochemical oxidation and depolymerization.
Ijms 23 04378 sch007
Ijms 23 04378 sch008 550
Scheme 8. Oxidation of 2-phenoxy-1-phenylethanone.
Scheme 8. Oxidation of 2-phenoxy-1-phenylethanone.
Ijms 23 04378 sch008
Ijms 23 04378 g005 550
Figure 5. CoTBrCCl (74) structure.
Figure 5. CoTBrCCl (74) structure.
Ijms 23 04378 g005
Ijms 23 04378 g006 550
Figure 6. Lignin model compounds.
Figure 6. Lignin model compounds.
Ijms 23 04378 g006
Ijms 23 04378 sch009 550
Scheme 9. Schematic representation of lignin fractionation and depolymerization.
Scheme 9. Schematic representation of lignin fractionation and depolymerization.
Ijms 23 04378 sch009
Ijms 23 04378 sch010 550
Scheme 10. Oxidation promoted by Rh binuclear complex catalyst.
Scheme 10. Oxidation promoted by Rh binuclear complex catalyst.
Ijms 23 04378 sch010
Ijms 23 04378 sch011 550
Scheme 11. Hypothesized mechanism.
Scheme 11. Hypothesized mechanism.
Ijms 23 04378 sch011
Ijms 23 04378 sch012 550
Scheme 12. Lignin degradation in perfluorodecalin.
Scheme 12. Lignin degradation in perfluorodecalin.
Ijms 23 04378 sch012
Ijms 23 04378 sch013 550
Scheme 13. Lignin oxidation proposed mechanism.
Scheme 13. Lignin oxidation proposed mechanism.
Ijms 23 04378 sch013
Ijms 23 04378 sch014 550
Scheme 14. Schematic representation of two steps oxidation.
Scheme 14. Schematic representation of two steps oxidation.
Ijms 23 04378 sch014
Table
Table 1. Set of tested model compounds.
Table 1. Set of tested model compounds.
Lignin Model CompoundsConversion %Products (Yield %)
Ijms 23 04378 i001>99 Ijms 23 04378 i002 Ijms 23 04378 i003
(52%)(31%)
Ijms 23 04378 i004>99 Ijms 23 04378 i005 Ijms 23 04378 i006
(86%)(65%)
Ijms 23 04378 i007>99
Ijms 23 04378 i008
Ijms 23 04378 i009
(46%)(23%)
Ijms 23 04378 i010>99 Ijms 23 04378 i011 Ijms 23 04378 i012
(36%)(34%)
Ijms 23 04378 i013>99 Ijms 23 04378 i014
(78%)
Ijms 23 04378 i01579 Ijms 23 04378 i016
(59%)
Ijms 23 04378 i017>99 Ijms 23 04378 i018
(36%)
Table
Table 2. Substrate scope.
Table 2. Substrate scope.
First Step
Product (Yield %)		Second Step
Product (Yield %)
Ijms 23 04378 i019 Ijms 23 04378 i020 Ijms 23 04378 i021
(94%)(80%)(95%)
Ijms 23 04378 i022 Ijms 23 04378 i023 Ijms 23 04378 i024
(95%)(92%)(99%)
Ijms 23 04378 i025 Ijms 23 04378 i026 Ijms 23 04378 i027
(78%)(88%)(98%)
Ijms 23 04378 i028 Ijms 23 04378 i029 Ijms 23 04378 i030
(91%)(87%)(96%)
Ijms 23 04378 i031 Ijms 23 04378 i032 Ijms 23 04378 i033
(92%)(84%)(88%)
Ijms 23 04378 i034 Ijms 23 04378 i035 Ijms 23 04378 i036
(91%)(70%)(92%)
Ijms 23 04378 i037 Ijms 23 04378 i038 Ijms 23 04378 i039
(80%)(73%)(90%)
Ijms 23 04378 i040 Ijms 23 04378 i041 Ijms 23 04378 i042
(82%)(83%)(96%)
Ijms 23 04378 i043 Ijms 23 04378 i044 Ijms 23 04378 i045
(86%)(68%)(87%)
Ijms 23 04378 i046 Ijms 23 04378 i047 Ijms 23 04378 i048
(88%)(58%)(92%)
Table
Table 3. Scope of the reaction.
Table 3. Scope of the reaction.
SubstratesConditionsProducts (Yields %)
Ijms 23 04378 i04930 °C-10 h Ijms 23 04378 i050 Ijms 23 04378 i051
(76.38%)(82.59%)
Ijms 23 04378 i05230 °C-15 h Ijms 23 04378 i053 Ijms 23 04378 i054
(80.58%)(78.23%)
Ijms 23 04378 i05530 °C-4 h Ijms 23 04378 i056 Ijms 23 04378 i057
(85.56%)(91.28%)
Ijms 23 04378 i05850 °C-8 h Ijms 23 04378 i059 Ijms 23 04378 i060
(76.06%)(83.57%)
Ijms 23 04378 i06150 °C-10 h Ijms 23 04378 i062 Ijms 23 04378 i063
(82.53%)(76.65%)
Table
Table 4. Substrate scope.
Table 4. Substrate scope.
SubstratesProducts (Yields %)
Ijms 23 04378 i064 Ijms 23 04378 i065 Ijms 23 04378 i066 Ijms 23 04378 i067
(86%)(8%)(89%)
Ijms 23 04378 i068 Ijms 23 04378 i069 Ijms 23 04378 i070
(61%) (86%)
Ijms 23 04378 i071 Ijms 23 04378 i072 Ijms 23 04378 i073
(85%) (90%)
Ijms 23 04378 i074 Ijms 23 04378 i075 Ijms 23 04378 i076
(88%) (92%)
Ijms 23 04378 i077 Ijms 23 04378 i078 Ijms 23 04378 i079
(82%) (86%)
Ijms 23 04378 i080 Ijms 23 04378 i081 Ijms 23 04378 i082
(76%) (90%)
Ijms 23 04378 i083 Ijms 23 04378 i084 Ijms 23 04378 i085 Ijms 23 04378 i086
(24%)(34%)(62%)
Ijms 23 04378 i087 Ijms 23 04378 i088 Ijms 23 04378 i089 Ijms 23 04378 i090
(26%)(33%)(61%)
Ijms 23 04378 i091 Ijms 23 04378 i092 Ijms 23 04378 i093 Ijms 23 04378 i094
(29%)(32%)(64%)
Table
Table 5. BV oxidation of lignin model compounds.
Table 5. BV oxidation of lignin model compounds.
Ijms 23 04378 i095
SubstrateConversion (%)Products 97–102 (Yield%)Products 103–108 (Yield%)
Ijms 23 04378 i096100 A92 B Ijms 23 04378 i097 Ijms 23 04378 i098
(99%) A(92%) B(0%) A(0%) B
Ijms 23 04378 i099100 A98 B Ijms 23 04378 i100 Ijms 23 04378 i101
(92%) A(94%) B(0%) A(0%) B
Ijms 23 04378 i102100 A>99 B Ijms 23 04378 i103 Ijms 23 04378 i104
(6%) A(24%) B(90%) A(66%) B
Ijms 23 04378 i105100 A>99 B Ijms 23 04378 i106 Ijms 23 04378 i107
(3%) A(9%) B(86%) A(82%) B
Ijms 23 04378 i108>99 A>99 B Ijms 23 04378 i109
Ijms 23 04378 i110
(26%) A(37%) B(66%) A(44%) B
Ijms 23 04378 i111>99 A30 B Ijms 23 04378 i112 Ijms 23 04378 i113
(78%) A(20%) B(7%) A(2%) B
Procedure A: Substrate (0.1 mmol, 1.0 eq.), m-CPBA (0.2 mmol, 2.0 eq.), NaHCO3 (0.2 mmol, 2.0 eq.), 2 mL CH2Cl2, at room temperature (∼25 °C), 15 h. Procedure B: Substrate (0.1 mmol, 1.0 eq.), 36 wt% H2O2 (0.4 mmol, 4.0 eq.), (PhCH2Se)2 (5 mol%), 0.5 mL THF, reflux for 12 h.
Table
Table 6. Lignin model compounds oxidation.
Table 6. Lignin model compounds oxidation.
Ijms 23 04378 i114
SubstrateFirst StepSecond Step
Product (Yield%)Product (Yield%)Product (Yield%)
Ijms 23 04378 i115 Ijms 23 04378 i116 Ijms 23 04378 i117 Ijms 23 04378 i118
(86%)(13%)(58%)
Ijms 23 04378 i119 Ijms 23 04378 i120 Ijms 23 04378 i121 Ijms 23 04378 i122
(51%)(40%)(46%)
Ijms 23 04378 i123 Ijms 23 04378 i124 Ijms 23 04378 i125
(74%)(90%)
Ijms 23 04378 i126 Ijms 23 04378 i127
(25%)
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Scimmi, C.; Sancineto, L.; Drabowicz, J.; Santi, C. New Insights into Green Protocols for Oxidative Depolymerization of Lignin and Lignin Model Compounds. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 4378. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23084378

AMA Style

Scimmi C, Sancineto L, Drabowicz J, Santi C. New Insights into Green Protocols for Oxidative Depolymerization of Lignin and Lignin Model Compounds. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(8):4378. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23084378

Chicago/Turabian Style

Scimmi, Cecilia, Luca Sancineto, Jozef Drabowicz, and Claudio Santi. 2022. "New Insights into Green Protocols for Oxidative Depolymerization of Lignin and Lignin Model Compounds" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 8: 4378. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23084378

APA Style

Scimmi, C., Sancineto, L., Drabowicz, J., & Santi, C. (2022). New Insights into Green Protocols for Oxidative Depolymerization of Lignin and Lignin Model Compounds. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(8), 4378. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23084378

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop