Next Article in Journal
A Novel Biocidal Nanocomposite: Spherical Silica with Silver Ions Anchored at the Surface
Next Article in Special Issue
Genomics, Proteomics, and Metabolomics Approaches to Improve Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Tomato Plant
Previous Article in Journal
Inclusion of 11-Oxygenated Androgens in a Clinical Routine LC-MS/MS Setup for Steroid Hormone Profiling
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cold Stress Response Mechanisms in Anther Development
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 24
Issue 1
10.3390/ijms24010542
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Functional Characterization of the CpNAC1 Promoter and Gene from Chimonanthus praecox in Arabidopsis

by
Xiaoyan Zhao
†,
Jiahui Zhao
†,
Qing Yang
,
Min Huang
,
Yangjing Song
,
Mingyang Li
,
Shunzhao Sui
* and
Daofeng Liu
*
Chongqing Engineering Research Center for Floriculture, Key Laboratory of Horticulture Science for Southern Mountainous Regions of Ministry of Education, College of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(1), 542; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24010542
Submission received: 25 November 2022 / Revised: 23 December 2022 / Accepted: 26 December 2022 / Published: 29 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Advances in Plant Abiotic Stress)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The NAC (NAM, ATAF, and CUC) gene family is one of the largest plant-specific transcription factor families. Its members have various biological functions that play important roles in regulating plant growth and development and in responding to biotic and abiotic stresses. However, their functions in woody plants are not fully understood. In this study, we isolated an NAC family member, the CpNAC1 promoter and gene, from wintersweet. CpNAC1 was localized to the nucleus and showed transcriptional activation activity. qRT-PCR analyses revealed that the gene was expressed in almost all tissues tested, with the highest levels found in mature leaves and flower buds. Moreover, its expression was induced by various abiotic stresses and ABA treatment. Its expression patterns were further confirmed in CpNAC1pro:GUS (β-glucuronidase) plants. Among all the transgenic lines, CpNAC1pro-D2 showed high GUS histochemical staining and activity in different tissues of Arabidopsis. Furthermore, its GUS activity significantly increased in response to various abiotic stresses and ABA treatment. This may be related to the stress-related cis-elements, such as ABRE and MYB, which clustered in the CpNAC1pro-D2 segment, suggesting that CpNAC1pro-D2 is the core segment that responds to abiotic stresses and ABA. In addition, CpNAC1-overexpressed Arabidopsis plants had weaker osmosis tolerance than the wild-type plants, demonstrating that CpNAC1 may negatively regulate the drought stress response in transgenic Arabidopsis. Our results provide a foundation for further analyses of NAC family genes in wintersweet, and they broaden our knowledge of the roles that NAC family genes may play in woody plants.

1. Introduction

During their long period of growth and development, plants are inevitably affected by various adverse environmental factors, including abiotic stresses, such as cold, high temperature, drought, and high levels of salt, which are important limiting factors [1]. To resist adversity, plants can respond by transmitting stress signals, which involves complex physiological and genetic changes, including changes in the expressions of a series of stress-resistance-related genes. These are precisely controlled by molecular regulation networks in plants to ensure growth, development, and survival [2,3,4]. Transcriptional regulation is the most important part of gene expression, and it is a key step in the plant response to stress [5]. Transcription factors (TFs) are a class of protein factors that play a role in this process by combining with specific cis-acting elements to regulate the expressions of downstream genes. As key regulators, TFs are widely involved in the stress response, helping to regulate the expression of stress-resistance-related genes in signal transduction pathways [6]. The TF families involved in responses to abiotic stress in plants include MYB, bZIP, DREB, NAC, and WRKY [7].
NAC proteins constitute one of the largest families of plant-specific TFs. They share a conserved N-terminal DNA-binding domain called the NAC domain, whose name is derived from three TFs (no apical meristem (NAM), Arabidopsis thaliana transcription activation factor (ATAF1/2), and cup-shaped cotyledon proteins (CUC2)) [8]. In 1996, the NAC TF was first cloned from Petunia hybrida, and it was found that it plays a role in the formation and differentiation of the apical meristem [9]. Since then, NAC TFs have been identified in many plants [10]. The structure of NAC TFs is characterized by the highly conserved NAC domain at the N-terminus, which is responsible for binding to DNA and other proteins. The C-terminal parts of NAC proteins are highly diverse and do not contain any known protein domains [11]. The NAC domain consists of approximately 150–160 amino acid residues and five subdomains (A–E). The A, C, and D subdomains are highly conserved, and the nuclear localization signals are located in the C and D subdomains, which mainly bind to DNA and determine the characteristics of NAC TFs. The B and E subdomains are not strongly conserved, which is related to the functional diversity of NAC TFs [12,13].
The NAC family members are widely involved in a variety of biological functions in plants, such as growth [14,15], fiber development [16], secondary wall synthesis [17,18], lateral root development [19], embryonic development [20], hormone responses [21], cell expansion [22,23], leaf senescence [24,25,26], pathogen resistance [27,28], and fruit ripening [29]. They also play key roles in the regulation of abiotic stresses, such as cold, high temperature, drought, and high levels of salt [30]. For example, GmNAC8 overexpressed lines exhibit higher drought tolerance than wild-type plants, whereas GmNAC8 knockout lines are drought-sensitive, indicating that GmNAC8 acts as a positive regulator of drought tolerance in soybean [31]. The ectopic expression of HaNAC1 from Haloxylon ammodendron promotes growth and drought tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis [32]. SlNAP1 positively regulates salt tolerance in tomato by regulating ion homeostasis and ROS metabolism [33]. Moreover, the overexpression of TaNAC2L in transgenic Arabidopsis may improve heat tolerance by regulating the expression of stress-responsive genes [34]. SlNAC1 can be induced by cold, heat, high levels of salt, osmotic stress, and other conditions in tomato, and its overexpression can enhance resistance to cold stress in transgenic Arabidopsis [35]. Unlike the above NACs, ATAF1 in Arabidopsis is a negative regulator of defense responses against necrotrophic fungal and bacterial pathogens [36]. OsNAC2 overexpressed lines of rice have lower resistances to high levels of salt and drought [37]. The knockout mutants of ATAF1 show a higher tolerance to heat stress than the wild type, revealing a negative regulatory role [38].
To date, NAC TFs have been widely studied in model plants and major crops, such as Arabidopsis thaliana [11], rice [39], wheat [40], Zea mays [41], soybean [42], pepper (Capsicum annuum) [43], and peanut (Arachis hypogaea) [44]. However, studies on NAC family genes in woody plants are still limited. Wintersweet (Chimonanthus praecox) is a unique, precious, traditional ornamental landscape plant in China. It blooms in cold winters, and it shows strong cold and drought resistance [45]. Some genes related to the abiotic stress responses [46,47], flower development [48,49], senescence [40,50], shoot branching [51,52], and volatile compound regulation [48,53] of wintersweet have been identified and characterized. In this study, we isolated an NAC family member, the CpNAC1 promoter and gene, from wintersweet [54], and we identified its tissue-specific and induction expression patterns. Moreover, its function was analyzed in overexpression transgenic lines of Arabidopsis.

2. Results

2.1. Isolation and Characterization of CpNAC1

CpNAC1 was screened using the wintersweet transcriptome database [54], and full-length cDNA sequences of CpNAC1 were successfully cloned. CpNAC1 has an open reading frame (ORF) of 891 bp, which encodes a peptide of 296 amino acid residues. The molecular weight and theoretical isoelectric point of CpNAC1 were 35 kDa and 8.54, respectively. Multiple sequence alignments indicated that CpNAC1 showed high similarity with its homologous sequences, including ZmNAC1 (Zea mays), GmNAC2 (Glycine max), ANAC072 (Arabidopsis thaliana), ATAF1 (Arabidopsis thaliana), ATAF2 (Arabidopsis thaliana), GmNAC4 (Glycine max), and NnNAC2 (Nelumbo nucifera). CpNAC1 has a conserved N-terminal domain of approximately 160 amino acid residues with five subdomains (A–E), and the C-terminal domain is highly differentiated (Figure 1A). The phylogenetic tree of CpNAC1 and other NAC proteins was constructed using MEGA 7.0. The results classified NAC proteins into three groups: SNAC, VND, and CUC. CpNAC1 was clustered with SNAC subgroup proteins, and it was most closely related to GmNAC2 and ATAF1 (Figure 1B).

2.2. CpNAC1 Is a Nuclear Protein with Transcriptional Activation Activity in Yeast

To identify the location of CpNAC1, the control vector 35S:GFP and recombinant vector 35S:CpNAC1-GFP were transformed into tobacco epidermal cells using a needleless syringe. In a confocal microscopic analysis, GFP fluorescence was observed only in the nucleus of 35S:CpNAC1-GFP, while it was observed in both the cytoplasm and nucleus in the controls (Figure 2A). In addition, a yeast assay was used to investigate the transcriptional activity of CpNAC1. The plasmids pGBKT7-CpNAC1, pGBKT7-VP, and pGBKT7 were introduced into the AH109 yeast strain. The transformed yeast strain grew normally on SD/-Trp medium, indicating that these plasmids were introduced successfully. When grown on SD/-His+X-α-gal selective medium, yeast cells harboring pGBKT7-CpNAC1 and pGBKT7-VP grew and showed α-galactosidase activity, whereas those harboring pGBKT7 did not (Figure 2B). Collectively, these results indicate that CpNAC1 is a nuclear-localized protein with transcriptional activation abilities in yeast.

2.3. Expression Patterns of CpNAC1 in Wintersweet

qRT-PCR was performed to analyze the expression patterns of CpNAC1 in the different tissues and flower development stages of wintersweet. As shown in Figure 3A, the expression of CpNAC1 was most abundant in mature leaves, followed by cotyledons, pistils, and young leaves. Its expression in different flower stages was also analyzed. It was expressed during flower development in all stages, with the highest expression in flower buds, at which point it was nearly 4-fold higher than in other stages.

2.4. Isolation and cis-Element Analysis of the CpNAC1 Promoter

We isolated approximately 1.4 kb genomic DNA sequences upstream of the CpNAC1 gene, including 87 bp of the 5′ untranslated region of mRNA and the 1242 bp promoter sequence, CpNAC1pro (Figure 4A). The analysis of the cis-acting regulatory elements showed that CpNAC1pro contained basic promoter elements, such as TATA-box and CAAT-box; the abscisic acid (ABA) response element abscisic-acid-responsive element (ABRE); the jasmonic acid (JA) response element TGACG-motif; the growth hormone response element AuxRR-core; the gibberellin (GA) response element GARE-motif; and the P-box, MYB, and MYC motifs, which respond to dehydration ABA signals and abiotic stress signals (Figure 4; Table S2). To further verify the function of CpNAC1pro, the promoter sequence was divided into three segments: CpNAC1pro-D1/D2/D3, with 1025 bp, 513 bp, and 266 bp, respectively (Figure 4B).

2.5. Analysis of CpNAC1 Promoter Activity

To verify the promoter activity and tissue-specific expression pattern of CpNAC1, CpNAC1pro and the three segments of CpNAC1pro-D1/D2/D3 were fused to the GUS reporter gene in order to generate transgenic Arabidopsis plants. A histochemical GUS staining of these plants showed that all transgenic lines had GUS activity in leaves and roots after seed germination from 1 to 10 days (Figure 5A). Among them, CpNAC1pro had weaker activity than CpNAC1pro-D1/D2/D3, while CpNAC1pro-D2 had the strongest activity. In addition, the GUS activity of the different tissues was observed in the transgenic lines (Figure 5B). In roots, the activity of CpNAC1pro-D2 was approximately twice that of CpNAC1pro-D1 and CpNAC1pro-D3 (Figure 5C). In stems, it was approximately twice as high as that of CpNAC1pro (Figure 5C). In leaves, it was approximately three times higher than that of CpNAC1pro and CpNAC1pro-D3 (Figure 5C). In petals, it was approximately four times higher than that of CpNAC1pro (Figure 5C). The negative control wild-type Arabidopsis had almost no GUS activity in all tissues; the positive control pCAMBIA1305.1:GUS transgenic Arabidopsis had relatively low GUS activity in all tissues (Figure 5C). In general, these results indicate that GUS activity was the highest in the CpNAC1pro-D2 transgenic lines.

2.6. Expression Profiles of CpNAC1 under Abiotic Stress and Hormone Treatments

To investigate the effects of abiotic stresses and exogenous hormones on CpNAC1 expression, the transcriptional levels of CpNAC1 under various abiotic stresses, including cold (4 °C), high-temperature (42 °C), salt (NaCl 1 M), drought (30% PEG6000), and ABA (50 µM) treatments, which were chosen according to the cis-acting elements of the CpNAC1 promoter, were detected using qRT-PCR (Figure 6).
For the high-temperature treatment, the expression of CpNAC1 was slightly upregulated at the 0.25 h time point; it then decreased at 1 h. For the cold treatment, the expression of CpNAC1 was gradually induced and reached a peak at 12 h, which was about six times higher than that before the treatment. For the salt and ABA treatments, the expression level of CpNAC1 was induced and peaked at 1 h, and then it decreased to the lowest point at 12 h but remained higher than the expression level before the treatment. For the PEG6000 treatment, the expression level of CpNAC1 was induced at 1 h and reached a peak at 6 h, with a 4-fold higher expression than that before the treatment.
To further study the expression patterns of the CpNAC1 promoter under abiotic stresses and hormone treatments, the responses of CpNAC1pro and CpNAC1pro-D1/D2/D3 to the above treatments were also examined (Figure 7). Ten-day-old homozygous CpNAC1pro:GUS transgenic Arabidopsis seedlings were used for the assay. The expression of the GUS gene was significantly increased when the transgenic seedlings were treated with PEG, ABA, and NaCl (Figure 7A). The GUS activity of CpNAC1pro was significantly increased in the ABA, NaCl, and PEG treatments (Figure 7B–D). However, the activity of CpNAC1pro-D2 was significantly increased in all treatments (Figure 7B–F). This may be related to the stress-related cis-elements, such as ABRE and MYB, which clustered in the CpNAC1pro-D2 segment (Figure 4B). These results suggest that CpNAC1pro-D2 is the core segment that responds to abiotic stresses and ABA.

2.7. Heterologous Overexpression of CpNAC1 Negatively Regulates Tolerance to Osmotic Stress in Transgenic Arabidopsis

To further investigate the function of CpNAC1, it was overexpressed in Arabidopsis, and transgenic lines were obtained via hygromycin selection and PCR identification. Three homozygous T3 transgenic lines (OE8, OE9, and OE7) with high, medium, and low CpNAC1 expression levels were selected for further phenotypic analyses and PEG osmotic stress treatment (Figure 8A); wild-type plants were used as controls. Wild-type and the three transgenic Arabidopsis lines were treated with 30% PEG6000. After 3 days of PEG treatment, both the wild-type and transgenic Arabidopsis were partially wilted and dehydrated (Figure 8B). The proline and chlorophyll contents of the transgenic lines were significantly lower than those of the wild-type line (Figure 8C,D). The relative electrical conductivities were 42.51%, 55.66%, 59.03%, and 53.3% in the wild-type and OE (OE8, OE9, and OE7) lines, respectively (Figure 8E). These results demonstrate that CpNAC1 may negatively regulate the osmotic stress response in transgenic Arabidopsis.

3. Discussion

NAC TFs, unique to plants, are one of the largest groups of TFs, and they play an important role in plant responses to biotic and abiotic stresses [55]. Therefore, the study of the molecular mechanisms underlying the responses of NAC genes to various stresses will aid the development of plants with increased stress resistance in the future. Here, we report the isolation of an NAC family gene, CpNAC1, from wintersweet. It shows a high similarity to sequences of other plant SNAC subfamily genes, and it has a high number of conserved domains (Figure 1A). Phylogenetically, it clusters with GmNAC2 and ATAF1, belonging to the evolutionary clade SNAC (Figure 1B). GmNAC2 functions as a negative regulator during abiotic stress, and it participates in ROS signaling pathways [56]. ATAF1 in Arabidopsis as a transcriptional regulator negatively regulates the defense response against pathogens [36], thermorecovery [38], and the expression of stress-responsive genes under drought stress in Arabidopsis [57].
Like other NAC TFs, such as CaNAC064 [58], ZmNAC55 [59], and GhNAC2 [60], the CpNAC1-GFP fusion protein is located in the nucleus (Figure 2A), which concords with its putative function as a transcriptional regulator. In addition, CpNAC1 shows transcriptional activation in yeast (Figure 2B). Moreover, CpNAC1 is expressed specifically in different tissues and stages, with the highest expressions in mature leaves and sprouts (Figure 3). The results suggest that CpNAC1 may function in flower organ development and abiotic stress in early plant growth. In maize, the expression of ZmSNAC1 is significantly higher in roots and leaves in the seedling and early flowering stages than in other organs [61]. The expression of CaNAC064 of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) is abundant in roots but low in fruits and seeds [58]. CpNAC68 has different levels of expression, being the highest in old leaves during the bloom stage [45]. In sum, the expression levels of NAC TFs in different plant organs and developmental stages are different. This may be related to their functional diversity.
Studies have shown that 20–25% of NAC genes respond to at least one or several stresses [39]. DgNAC1-overexpressed chrysanthemum is obviously more resistant to salt than the wild type [62]. The overexpression of HhNAC54 of Hibiscus hamabo in Arabidopsis thaliana significantly increases its tolerance to salt [63]. In our study, the expression of CpNAC1 was significantly induced by the cold, NaCl, PEG, and ABA treatments (Figure 6), suggesting that the gene may be involved in resistance to these stressors. Further, the cis-element analysis of the CpNAC1 promoter showed that it contained 11 ABRE, 2 MYB, and 4 MYC elements (Table S2), which respond to dehydration ABA signals and abiotic stress signals [64]. We hypothesized that CpNAC1 is involved in abiotic stress tolerance and is related to the ABA pathway. The MYB binding site (MBS) element in the ZmSOPro region of maize is responsible for ABA- and drought-stress-induced expressions [65]. In the GUS histochemical staining analysis, we found that almost the whole seedling was stained from day 1 to 10 days after germination, and GUS activity was observed in nearly all organs, including flowers, in transgenic Arabidopsis (Figure 5), indicating that this gene may be constitutively expressed during both vegetative and reproductive growth [65]. These results are inconsistent with the specific expression results of CpNAC1 in the tissues of wintersweet. CpNAC1 is derived from the genome of wintersweet. There are differences in organ structure between woody plants and herbaceous plants, and the upstream regulatory sequences of the two plants are different, so the efficiency and location of the promoter may also be different. In addition, GUS activity in CpNAC1pro was significantly increased after the ABA, NaCl, and PEG treatments (Figure 7). However, the activity in CpNAC1pro-D2 was significantly increased under all treatments, which may be related to the stress-related cis-elements, such as ABRE and MYB (Figure 4 and Figure 7). CpNAC1pro-D2 was the core segment responding to abiotic stresses and ABA. The promoters of multiple stress-responsive genes have a number of regulatory elements that respond to multiple stresses, such as ABRE, MYB, and MYC; these are the potential targets for regulating the stress-inducible expression of transgenes in transgenic plants [66]. This is basically consistent with our observations of the expression of CpNAC1 under different stress treatments (Figure 6), but different results were obtained for the cold treatment, which may be related to the absence of cold response elements in the promoter of CpNAC1. Moreover, the expression of the CpNAC1 promoter and gene were significantly induced by the PEG and ABA treatments, and the overexpression of the CpNAC1 gene decreased tolerance to osmotic stress in Arabidopsis. Studies have also shown that transgenic plants may recover the phenotype if osmotic stress duration is prolonged, which is negatively correlated with the concentration and treatment time of the PEG solution [19]. We hypothesize that CpNAC1 might negatively regulate osmotic stress tolerance by regulating ABA-related genes. Previous studies have shown that OsNAC095 and OsNAC2 play negative roles in drought stress tolerance in transgenic rice [37,67]. Hence, our study lays a good foundation for a further analysis of NAC family genes in wintersweet. Additionally, the identification and functional characterization of the CpNAC1 promoter and gene broaden our knowledge of how it responds to abiotic stresses.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials and Growth Conditions

Wintersweet (Chimonanthus praecox [L.] Link) in the 4–6 leaf stage was used in this study. The plants were grown in a nursery at Southwest University, Chongqing, China. Tissues (roots, stems, cotyledons, young leaves, mature leaves, inner petals, outer petals, stamen, and pistils) and flowers at different stages (sprout, flower bud, display petal, bloom initiation, bloom, and wither periods [68]) were collected, and the samples were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, followed by storage at −80 °C until RNA isolation.
Wild-type Arabidopsis (ecotype Columbia−0) was used for plant transformation. Arabidopsis seeds were sterilized, rinsed in sterile distilled water, sown on solid Murashige–Skoog medium (MS), vernalized at 4 °C for 3 days, and then grown for 12 days in an environment under a 16 h light/8 h dark photoperiod at a temperature of 22 ± 1 °C and 70% relative humidity. After 10 days, the seedlings were planted in a mixture of vermiculite and peat (1:1 ratio) and maintained in a growth chamber (22 °C, 16/8 h day/night photoperiod).

4.2. Cloning of the CpNAC1 Gene and Promoter of Wintersweet

Total RNA was extracted using a Plant RNAprep Pure kit (Tiangen Biotech, Beijing, China), and it was used to synthesize the first-strand cDNA with a PrimerScript RT reagent kit with gDNA Eraser (TaKaRa, Dalian, China). PCR amplification was carried out using cDNA as the template and CpNAC1-F/R (Table S1) as specific primers with high-fidelity polymerase (SMARTer RACE 5′ 3′ Kit). Then, the samples were sent to Huada Gene Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) for sequencing.
Total DNA was extracted from the leaves using the CTAB method [69]. The 5′-upstream region of CpNAC1 was isolated using Universal Genome Walker™ 2.0 (TaKaRa). The specific primers CpNAC1pro-F/R (Table S1) were designed based on the sequence at the 5′ end of CpNAC1. Then, the cloned segment was inserted into a pMD19-T vector for validity sequencing. Using the PlantCARE program (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/, accessed on 18 August 2022) found in plant cis-acting regulatory DNA elements, we analyzed and annotated the cis-elements in the sequence of the CpNAC1 promoter.

4.3. Subcellular Localization and Transactivation Activity Analysis

The ORFs of CpNAC1 without stop codons were cloned into the pCAMBIA1300-GFP vector harboring CaMV35S using the BamHI and SacI sites to generate the 35S:CpNAC1-GFP. The specific primers used are listed in Table S1. The fusion vector 35S:CpNAC1-GFP or empty vector 35S:GFP (control) was transformed into epidermal cells from tobacco (Nicotiana benthamiana) in the 4–6 leaf stage, using the Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101. They were incubated for 36 h under a dark and moist environment, and GFP fluorescence was observed under a laser scanning confocal microscope [70].
To perform the transactivation activity in yeast cells, the CDS sequence of the CpNAC1 gene was constructed onto the pGBKT7 vector using XmaI and SalI sites to form a plasmid pGBKT7-CpNAC1. The plasmid pGBKT7-VP and empty vector pGBKT7 were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. The plasmids were introduced into the AH109 yeast strain using the LiAc-mediated transformation method according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Clontech). Positive transformants were selected on SD/-Trp plates and then cultured on SD/-His and SD/-His/X-α-gal plates to assess transcriptional activity; this was performed according to the yeast protocol handbook (Clontech).

4.4. Expression Patterns of CpNAC1 in Wintersweet

Wintersweet seedlings in the 4–6 leaf stage were used to study the CpNAC1 expression patterns under different abiotic and hormone treatments [45]. Cold and heat treatments were conducted by transferring the seedings to a growth chamber set at 4 °C or 42 °C under a 16 h light/8 h dark cycle. For the salt, drought, and ABA stress treatments, the seedlings were grown in soil irrigated with 1 M NaCl, 30% PEG6000, or 50 µM ABA [47]. Then, we collected the leaves at 0 h, 0.25 h, 1 h, 6 h, and 12 h after treatment. Control plants were mock-treated at room temperature (25 °C) and with water. All samples were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until RNA isolation. The expression patterns of CpNAC1 in the collected samples were determined using quantitative real-time (qRT)-PCR on a Bio-Rad CFX96 Real-time system using the qCpNAC1-F/R specific primers (Table S1), according to the methods described by Liu et al. [49]. Wintersweet Actin and Tublin genes served as internal references. For each tested tissue, three biological replicates were included by harvesting samples from three different plants.

4.5. GUS Histochemical and GUS Activity Assays

The CaMV35S promoter of the pCAMBIA1305.1 vector was replaced by the CpNAC1 promoter using PstI and NcoI sites to form a plasmid CpNAC1pro:GUS. To conduct a promoter deletion analysis, we constructed a series of vectors using promoter fragments of different lengths (D1, D2, and D3) to replace the CaMV35S promoter; these were named CpNAC1pro-D1/D2/D3:GUS. To further analyze the expression patterns of the CpNAC1 promoter, the recombinant plasmid was cloned into the Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 and transformed into Arabidopsis using the floral-dip method [71]. The seeds of the transgenic plants were selected on solid MS containing 50 μg/L hygromycin, and then they were confirmed using real-time PCR. The wild-type and pCAMBIA1305.1:GUS transgenic Arabidopsis were used as negative and positive controls.
To explore the expression patterns of the GUS gene driven by the CpNAC1 promoter and each deletion fragment, we analyzed the different growth stages (seeds 1 to 10 days after germination) and tissues (inflorescences, flowers, petals, calyx, stamens, styles, stems, fruit pods, rosette leaves, and stem leaves) from the transgenic Arabidopsis plants using GUS histochemical staining [72]. The samples were immersed in GUS staining solution and incubated overnight at 37 °C. After staining, the plants were completely depleted of chlorophyll using 70% ethanol and then photographed using a stereomicroscope (Nikon, Japan). GUS enzyme activity was detected following a previously reported method [73].
Ten-day-old transgenic Arabidopsis seedlings were transferred into solid MS containing 50 µM ABA, 150 mM NaCl, and 10% PEG6000 for 24 h to analyze GUS enzyme activity. For the cold and heat treatments, the 10-day-old transgenic Arabidopsis seedlings were moved to a growth chamber set at 4 °C or 42 °C for 24 h or 4 h, respectively. The expression levels of GUS in the CpNAC1pro:GUS transgenic Arabidopsis under hormonal and abiotic stresses were determined using quantitative real-time (qRT)-PCR on a Bio-Rad CFX96 real-time system using GUS-F/R specific primers (Table S1). The Arabidopsis Actin gene served as an internal reference. For each tested tissue, three biological replicates were included by harvesting samples from three different plants, and qRT-PCR was performed using three technical replicates for each sample.

4.6. Osmotic Stress of Transgenic Arabidopsis

The plant overexpression vector was constructed by inserting CpNAC1 into the pCAMBIA1300 vector (containing the CaMV35S promoter) using specific primers pCAMBIA1300-CpNAC1-F/R (Table S1) with SacI and Xbal sites and then transformed into the Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 via electroporation. Arabidopsis was transformed as described in Section 4.5. The seeds of the wild-type and CpNAC1 transgenic Arabidopsis were sterilized and sown on MS plates; after 14 days, they were transferred to a mixture of vermiculite and peat (1:1 ratio) and placed in a greenhouse under a 16 h light/8 h dark cycle at 22 °C for 3 weeks. The wild-type and three transgenic Arabidopsis lines were irrigated with 30% PEG6000 for 3 days. The phenotype was observed and photographed. The proline content was calculated as described in a previous study [74]. The chlorophyll content of the plants was determined according to the method devised by Mokhtar et al. [75]. The relative electrical conductivity was determined according to previously published methods [76,77]. The experiment was repeated three times, each time with three control pots and nine treatment pots with four seedlings per pot.

4.7. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software, and the significance of differences between the control and transgenic Arabidopsis plants was analyzed using Student’s t-test. A p value of 0.05 was considered to be significant. Statistical significance was tested using Duncan’s test at 0.05 probability levels.

Supplementary Materials

The supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms24010542/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: D.L.; Methodology: X.Z., J.Z. and M.H.; Formal analysis and investigation: X.Z., J.Z., M.H., Q.Y. and Y.S.; Writing—original draft preparation: X.Z., J.Z. and Q.Y.; Writing—review and editing: S.S. and D.L.; Funding acquisition: S.S. and D.L.; Supervision: D.L., S.S. and M.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 32101575 and No. 31971711) and the Natural Science Foundation Project of Chongqing (No. cstc2020jcyj-msxmX0754).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, H.; Zhu, J.; Gong, Z.; Zhu, J.K. Abiotic stress responses in plants. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2022, 23, 104–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Swindell, W.R. The association among gene expression responses to nine abiotic stress treatments in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 2006, 174, 1811–1824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Shalem, O.; Dahan, O.; Levo, M.; Martinez, M.R.; Furman, I.; Segal, E.; Pilpel, Y. Transient transcriptional responses to stress are generated by opposing effects of mRNA production and degradation. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2008, 4, 4–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Shinozaki, K.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K.; Seki, M. Regulatory network of gene expression in the drought and cold stress responses. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2003, 6, 410–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kawaura, K.; Mochida, K.; Ogihara, Y. Genome-wide analysis for identification of salt-responsive genes in common wheat. Funct. Integr. Genomic. 2008, 8, 277–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Alshareef, N.O.; Wang, J.Y.; Ali, S.; Al-Babili, S.; Tester, M.; Schmockel, S.M. Overexpression of the NAC transcription factor JUNGBRUNNEN1 (JUB1) increases salinity tolerance in tomato. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 140, 113–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Erpen, L.; Devi, H.S.; Grosser, J.W.; Dutt, M. Potential use of the DREB/ERF, MYB, NAC and WRKY transcription factors to improve abiotic and biotic stress in transgenic plants. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. 2018, 132, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Aida, M.; Ishida, T.; Fukaki, H.; Fujisawa, H.; Tasaka, M. Genes involved in organ separation in Arabidopsis: An analysis of the cup-shaped cotyledon mutant. Plant Cell 1997, 9, 841–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Souer, E.; Van Houwelingen, A.; Kloos, D.; Mol, J.; Koes, R. The no apical meristem gene of petunia is required for pattern formation in embryos and flowers and is expressed at meristem and primordia boundaries. Cell 1996, 85, 159–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Chen, S.; Lin, X.; Zhang, D.W.; Li, Q.; Zhao, X.Y.; Chen, S. Genome-wide analysis of NAC gene family in Betula pendula. Forests 2019, 10, 741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ooka, H.; Satoh, K.; Doi, K.; Nagata, T.; Otomo, Y.; Murakami, K.; Matsubara, K.; Osato, N.; Kawai, J.; Carninci, P.; et al. Comprehensive analysis of NAC family genes in Oryza sativa and Arabidopsis thaliana. DNA Res. 2003, 10, 239–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kikuchi, K.; Ueguchi-Tanaka, M.; Yoshida, K.T.; Nagato, Y.; Matsusoka, M.; Hirano, H.Y. Molecular analysis of the NAC gene family in rice. Mol. Gen. Genet. 2000, 262, 1047–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wu, H.; Fu, B.; Sun, P.P.; Xiao, C.; Liu, J.H. A NAC transcription factor represses putrescine biosynthesis and affects drought tolerance. Plant Physiol. 2016, 172, 1532–1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Hibara, K.; Takada, S.; Tasaka, M. CUC1 gene activates the expression of SAM-related genes to induce adventitious shoot formation. Plant J. 2003, 36, 687–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jia, D.F.; Gong, X.Q.; Li, M.J.; Li, C.; Sun, T.T.; Ma, F.W. Overexpression of a novel apple NAC transcription factor gene, MdNAC1, confers the dwarf phenotype in transgenic apple (Malus domestica). Genes 2018, 9, 741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Laubscher, M.; Brown, K.; Tonfack, L.B.; Myburg, A.A.; Mizrachi, E.; Hussey, S.G. Temporal analysis of Arabidopsis genes activated by Eucalyptus grandis NAC transcription factors associated with xylem fibre and vessel development. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 10983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Zhang, J.; Huang, G.Q.; Zou, D.; Yan, J.Q.; Li, Y.; Hu, S.; Li, X.B. The cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) NAC transcription factor (FSN1) as a positive regulator participates in controlling secondary cell wall biosynthesis and modification of fibers. New Phytol. 2018, 217, 625–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Huang, D.B.; Wang, S.G.; Zhang, B.C.; Shang-Guan, K.K.; Shi, Y.Y.; Zhang, D.M.; Liu, X.L.; Wu, K.; Xu, Z.P.; Fu, X.D.; et al. A gibberellin-mediated DELLA-NAC signaling cascade regulates cellulose synthesis in rice. Plant Cell 2015, 27, 1681–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Zhang, L.; Yao, L.; Zhang, N.; Yang, J.W.; Zhu, X.; Tang, X.; Calderon-Urrea, A.; Si, H.J. Lateral root development in potato is mediated by stu-mi164 regulation of NAC transcription factor. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dalman, K.; Wind, J.J.; Nemesio-Gorriz, M.; Hammerbacher, A.; Lunden, K.; Ezcurra, I.; Elfstrand, M. Overexpression of PaNAC03, a stress induced NAC gene family transcription factor in Norway spruce leads to reduced flavonol biosynthesis and aberrant embryo development. BMC Plant Biol. 2017, 17, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. He, X.; Zhu, L.F.; Xu, L.; Guo, W.F.; Zhang, X.L. GhATAF1, a NAC transcription factor, confers abiotic and biotic stress responses by regulating phytohormonal signaling networks. Plant Cell Rep. 2016, 35, 2167–2179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Kim, Y.S.; Kim, S.G.; Park, J.E.; Park, H.Y.; Lim, M.H.; Chua, N.H.; Park, C.M. A membrane-bound NAC transcription factor regulates cell division in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2006, 18, 3132–3144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Zhao, Y.J.; Sun, J.Y.; Xu, P.; Zhang, R.; Li, L.G. Intron-mediated alternative splicing of WOOD-ASSOCIATED NAC TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR1B regulates cell wall thickening during fiber development in Populus species. Plant Physiol. 2014, 164, 765–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Mao, C.J.; Lu, S.C.; Lv, B.; Zhang, B.; Shen, J.B.; He, J.M.; Luo, L.Q.; Xi, D.D.; Chen, X.; Ming, F. A rice NAC transcription factor promotes leaf senescence via ABA biosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 2017, 174, 1747–1763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Liang, C.Z.; Wang, Y.Q.; Zhu, Y.N.; Tang, J.Y.; Hu, B.; Liu, L.C.; Ou, S.J.; Wu, H.K.; Sun, X.H.; Chu, J.F.; et al. OsNAP connects abscisic acid and leaf senescence by fine-tuning abscisic acid biosynthesis and directly targeting senescence-associated genes in rice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 10013–10018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Ma, X.M.; Zhang, Y.J.; Tureckova, V.; Xue, G.P.; Fernie, A.R.; Mueller-Roeber, B.; Balazadeh, S. The NAC transcription factor SlNAP2 regulates leaf senescence and fruit yield in Tomato. Plant Physiol. 2018, 177, 1286–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. McGrann, G.R.; Steed, A.; Burt, C.; Goddard, R.; Lachaux, C.; Bansal, A.; Corbitt, M.; Gorniak, K.; Nicholson, P.; Brown, J.K. Contribution of the drought tolerance-related stress-responsive NAC1 transcription factor to resistance of barley to Ramularia leaf spot. Mol. Plant. Pathol. 2015, 16, 201–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Lv, Z.Y.; Wang, S.; Zhang, F.Y.; Chen, L.X.; Hao, X.L.; Pan, Q.F.; Fu, X.Q.; Li, L.; Sun, X.F.; Tang, K.X. Overexpression of a novel NAC domain-containing transcription factor gene (AaNAC1) enhances the content of artemisinin and increases tolerance to drought and botrytis cinerea in Artemisia annua. Plant Cell Physiol. 2016, 57, 1961–1971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Liu, X.W.; Wang, T.; Bartholomew, E.; Black, K.; Dong, M.M.; Zhang, Y.Q.; Yang, S.; Cai, Y.L.; Xue, S.D.; Weng, Y.Q.; et al. Comprehensive analysis of NAC transcription factors and their expression during fruit spine development in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Hortic. Res.-Engl. 2018, 5, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Shen, Q.Q.; Qian, Z.F.; Wang, T.J.; Zhao, X.T.; Gu, S.J.; Rao, X.B.; Lyu, S.Z.; Zhang, R.Q.; He, L.L.; Li, F.S. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the NAC transcription factor family in Saccharum spontaneum under different stresses. Plant Signal. Behav. 2022, 17, 2088665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yang, C.F.; Huang, Y.Z.; Lv, W.H.; Zhang, Y.Y.; Bhat, J.A.; Kong, J.J.; Xing, H.; Zhao, J.M.; Zhao, T.J. GmNAC8 acts as a positive regulator in soybean drought stress. Plant Sci. 2020, 293, 110442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Gong, L.; Zhang, H.W.; Liu, X.; Gan, X.Y.; Nie, F.J.; Yang, W.J.; Zhang, L.; Chen, Y.C.; Song, Y.X.; Zhang, H.X. Ectopic expression of HaNAC1, an ATAF transcription factor from Haloxylon ammodendron, improves growth and drought tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 151, 535–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Du, N.S.; Xue, L.; Xue, D.Q.; Dong, X.X.; Yang, Q.; Jahan, M.S.; Guo, H.; Fu, R.K.; Wang, Y.H.; Piao, F.Z. The transcription factor SlNAP1 increases salt tolerance by modulating ion homeostasis and ROS metabolism in Solanum lycopersicum. Gene 2023, 849, 146906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Guo, W.W.; Zhang, J.X.; Zhang, N.; Xin, M.M.; Peng, H.R.; Hu, Z.R.; Ni, Z.F.; Du, J.K. The wheat NAC transcription factor TaNAC2L is regulated at the transcriptional and post-translational levels and promotes heat stress tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0135667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ma, N.N.; Zuo, Y.Q.; Liang, X.Q.; Yin, B.; Wang, G.D.; Meng, Q.W. The multiple stress-responsive transcription factor SlNAC1 improves the chilling tolerance of tomato. Physiol. Plant. 2013, 149, 474–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, X.; Basnayake, B.M.; Zhang, H.; Li, G.; Li, W.; Virk, N.; Mengiste, T.; Song, F. The Arabidopsis ATAF1, a NAC transcription factor, is a negative regulator of defense responses against necrotrophic fungal and bacterial pathogens. Mol. Plant. Microbe. Interact. 2009, 22, 1227–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Shen, J.B.; Lv, B.; Luo, L.Q.; He, J.M.; Mao, C.J.; Xi, D.D.; Ming, F. The NAC-type transcription factor OsNAC2 regulates ABA-dependent genes and abiotic stress tolerance in rice. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 40641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Alshareef, N.O.; Otterbach, S.L.; Allu, A.D.; Woo, Y.H.; de Werk, T.; Kamranfar, I.; Mueller-Roeber, B.; Tester, M.; Balazadeh, S.; Schmockel, S.M. NAC transcription factors ATAF1 and ANAC055 affect the heat stress response in Arabidopsis. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 11264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Nuruzzaman, M.; Manimekalai, R.; Sharoni, A.M.; Satoh, K.; Kondoh, H.; Ooka, H.; Kikuchi, S. Genome-wide analysis of NAC transcription factor family in rice. Gene 2010, 465, 30–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Uauy, C.; Distelfeld, A.; Fahima, T.; Blechl, A.; Dubcovsky, J. A NAC gene regulating senescence improves grain protein, zinc, and iron content in wheat. Science 2006, 314, 1298–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Peng, X.J.; Zhao, Y.; Li, X.M.; Wu, M.; Chai, W.B.; Sheng, L.; Wang, Y.; Dong, Q.; Jiang, H.Y.; Cheng, B.J. Genomewide identification, classification and analysis of NAC type gene family in maize. J. Genet. 2015, 94, 377–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Hussain, R.M.; Ali, M.; Feng, X.; Li, X. The essence of NAC gene family to the cultivation of drought-resistant soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) cultivars. BMC Plant. Biol. 2017, 17, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Diao, W.; Snyder, J.C.; Wang, S.; Liu, J.; Pan, B.; Guo, G.; Ge, W.; Dawood, M. Genome-wide analyses of the NAC transcription factor gene family in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.): Chromosome location, phylogeny, structure, expression patterns, cis-elements in the promoter, and interaction network. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Li, P.X.; Peng, Z.Y.; Xu, P.L.; Tang, G.Y.; Ma, C.L.; Zhu, J.Q.; Shan, L.; Wan, S.B. Genome-wide identification of NAC transcription factors and their functional prediction of abiotic stress response in peanut. Front. Genet. 2021, 12, 630292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Lin, J.; Liu, D.; Wang, X.; Ahmed, S.; Li, M.; Kovinich, N.; Sui, S. Transgene CpNAC68 from wintersweet (Chimonanthus praecox) improves Arabidopsis survival of multiple abiotic stresses. Plants 2021, 10, 1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Liu, Y.L.; Xie, L.X.; Liang, X.L.; Zhang, S.H. CpLEA5, the Late embryogenesis abundant protein gene from Chimonanthus praecox, possesses low temperature and osmotic resistances in prokaryote and eukaryotes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 26978–26990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wu, H.; Wang, X.; Cao, Y.; Zhang, H.; Hua, R.; Liu, H.; Sui, S. CpBBX19, a B-Box transcription factor gene of Chimonanthus praecox, improves salt and drought tolerance in Arabidopsis. Genes 2021, 12, 1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Aslam, M.Z.; Lin, X.; Li, X.; Yang, N.; Chen, L. Molecular cloning and functional characterization of CpMYC2 and CpBHLH13 transcription factors from wintersweet (Chimonanthus praecox L.). Plants 2020, 9, 785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Liu, H.M.; Huang, R.W.; Ma, J.; Sui, S.Z.; Guo, Y.L.; Liu, D.F.; Li, Z.N.; Lin, Y.C.; Li, M.Y. Two C3H type zinc finger Protein Genes, CpCZF1 and CpCZF2, from Chimonanthus praecox affect stamen development in Arabidopsis. Genes 2017, 8, 199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Li, R.; Ma, J.; Liu, H.M.; Wang, X.; Li, J.; Li, Z.N.; Li, M.Y.; Sui, S.Z.; Liu, D.F. Overexpression of CpSIZ1, a SIZ/PIAS-Type SUMO E3 ligase from wintersweet (Chimonanthus praecox), delays flowering, accelerates leaf senescence and enhances cold tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 2021, 39, 301–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wang, X.; Liu, D.F.; Lin, J.; Zhu, T.; Liu, N.; Yang, X.M.; Ma, J.; Sui, S.Z. Carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase genes of Chimonanthus praecox, CpCCD7 and CpCCD8, regulate shoot branching in Arabidopsis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 8750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Zhang, H.; Hua, R.; Wang, X.; Wu, H.; Ou, H.; Lu, X.; Huang, Y.; Liu, D.; Sui, S. CpMAX1a, a cytochrome P450 monooxygenase gene of Chimonanthus praecox regulates shoot branching in Arabidopsis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 10888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Zhao, R.; Song, X.X.; Yang, N.; Chen, L.Q.; Xiang, L.; Liu, X.Q.; Zhao, K.G. Expression of the subgroup IIIf bHLH transcription factor CpbHLH1 from Chimonanthus praecox (L.) in transgenic model plants inhibits anthocyanin accumulation. Plant Cell Rep. 2020, 39, 891–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Liu, D.F.; Sui, S.Z.; Ma, J.; Li, Z.N.; Guo, Y.L.; Luo, D.P.; Yang, J.F.; Li, M.Y. Transcriptomic analysis of flower development in wintersweet (Chimonanthus praecox). PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e86976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Nuruzzaman, M.; Sharoni, A.M.; Kikuchi, S. Roles of NAC transcription factors in the regulation of biotic and abiotic stress responses in plants. Front. Microbiol. 2013, 4, 248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Jin, H.X.; Huang, F.; Cheng, H.; Song, H.N.; Yu, D.Y. Overexpression of the GmNAC2 gene, an NAC transcription factor, reduces abiotic stress tolerance in tobacco. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 2013, 31, 435–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lu, P.L.; Chen, N.Z.; An, R.; Su, Z.; Qi, B.S.; Ren, F.; Chen, J.; Wang, X.C. A novel drought-inducible gene, ATAF1, encodes a NAC family protein that negatively regulates the expression of stress-responsive genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol. Biol. 2007, 63, 289–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hou, X.M.; Zhang, H.F.; Liu, S.Y.; Wang, X.K.; Zhang, Y.M.; Meng, Y.C.; Luo, D.; Chen, R.G. The NAC transcription factor CaNAC064 is a regulator of cold stress tolerance in peppers. Plant Sci. 2020, 291, 110346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Mao, H.D.; Yu, L.J.; Han, R.; Li, Z.J.; Liu, H. ZmNAC55, a maize stress-responsive NAC transcription factor, confers drought resistance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2016, 105, 55–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Gunapati, S.; Naresh, R.; Ranjan, S.; Nigam, D.; Hans, A.; Verma, P.C.; Gadre, R.; Pathre, U.V.; Sane, A.P.; Sane, V.A. Expression of GhNAC2 from G-herbaceum, improves root growth and imparts tolerance to drought in transgenic cotton and Arabidopsis. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 24978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Lu, M.; Ying, S.; Zhang, D.F.; Shi, Y.S.; Song, Y.C.; Wang, T.Y.; Li, Y. A maize stress-responsive NAC transcription factor, ZmSNAC1, confers enhanced tolerance to dehydration in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Rep. 2012, 31, 1701–1711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Wang, K.; Zhong, M.; Wu, Y.H.; Bai, Z.Y.; Liang, Q.Y.; Liu, Q.L.; Pan, Y.Z.; Zhang, L.; Jiang, B.B.; Jia, Y.; et al. Overexpression of a chrysanthemum transcription factor gene DgNAC1 improves the salinity tolerance in chrysanthemum. Plant Cell Rep. 2017, 36, 571–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Wang, Z.Q.; Ni, L.J.; Liu, D.N.; Fu, Z.K.; Hua, J.F.; Lu, Z.G.; Liu, L.Q.; Yin, Y.L.; Li, H.G.; Gu, C.S. Genome-wide identification and characterization of NAC family in Hibiscus hamabo sieb. et Zucc. under various abiotic stresses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 3055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Imtiaz, M.; Yang, Y.; Liu, R.; Xu, Y.; Khan, M.A.; Wei, Q.; Gao, J.; Hong, B. Identification and functional characterization of the BBX24 promoter and gene from chrysanthemum in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol. Biol. 2015, 89, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Xu, Z.; Wang, M.; Guo, Z.; Zhu, X.; Xia, Z. Identification of a 119-bp promoter of the maize sulfite oxidase gene (ZmSO) that confers high-level gene expression and ABA or drought inducibility in transgenic plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Maruyama, K.; Todaka, D.; Mizoi, J.; Yoshida, T.; Kidokoro, S.; Matsukura, S.; Takasaki, H.; Sakurai, T.; Yamamoto, Y.Y.; Yoshiwara, K.; et al. Identification of cis-acting promoter elements in cold- and dehydration-induced transcriptional pathways in Arabidopsis, rice, and soybean. DNA Res. 2012, 19, 37–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Huang, L.; Hong, Y.B.; Zhang, H.J.; Li, D.Y.; Song, F.M. Rice NAC transcription factor ONAC095 plays opposite roles in drought and cold stress tolerance. BMC Plant Biol. 2016, 16, 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Sui, S.Z.; Luo, J.H.; Ma, J.; Zhu, Q.L.; Lei, X.H.; Li, M.Y. Generation and analysis of expressed sequence tags from Chimonanthus praecox (wintersweet) flowers for discovering stress-responsive and floral development-related genes. Comp. Funct. Genom. 2012, 2012, 134596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Siegel, C.S.; Stevenson, F.O.; Zimmer, E.A. Evaluation and comparison of FTA card and CTAB DNA extraction methods for non-agricultural taxa. Appl. Plant Sci. 2017, 5, 1600109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.J.; Yang, B.J.; Yu, X.X.; Wang, D.; Zu, S.H.; Xue, H.W.; Lin, W.H. Functional characterization of GmBZL2 (AtBZR1 like gene) reveals the conserved BR signaling regulation in Glycine max. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 31134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Clough, S.J.; Bent, A.F. Floral dip: A simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1998, 16, 735–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Khan, M.A.; Meng, Y.; Liu, D.; Tang, H.; Lu, S.; Imtiaz, M.; Jiang, G.; Lu, P.; Ji, Y.; Gao, J.; et al. Responses of rose RhACS1 and RhACS2 promoters to abiotic stresses in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Rep. 2015, 34, 795–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Niu, G.; Gou, W.; Han, X.; Qin, C.; Zhang, L.; Abomohra, A.E.; Ashraf, M. Cloning and functional analysis of phosphoethanolamine methyltransferase promoter from maize (Zea mays L.). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Bates, L.S.; Waldren, R.P.; Teare, I.D. Rapid determination of free proline water-stress studies. Plant Soil 1973, 39, 205–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Ghobadi, M.; Taherabadi, S.; Ghobadi, M.E.; Mohammadi, G.R.; Jalali-Honarmand, S. Antioxidant capacity, photosynthetic characteristics and water relations of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) cultivars in response to drought stress. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2013, 50, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Qin, X.Q.; Zeevaart, J. Overexpression of a 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase gene in Nicotiana plumbaginifolia increases abscisic acid and phaseic acid levels and enhances drought tolerance. Plant Physiol. 2002, 128, 544–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Ghosh, N.; Das, S.P.; Mandal, C.; Gupta, S.; Das, K.; Dey, N.; Adak, M.K. Variations of antioxidative responses in two rice cultivars with polyamine treatment under salinity stress. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2012, 18, 301–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 24 00542 g001 550
Figure 1. Sequence analysis of CpNAC1. (A) Multiple sequence alignment of CpNAC1 and its orthologs from other plants. The N-termini of CpNAC1 conserved domains in five subdomains (A–E) are marked with blue lines below the sequence alignment. (B) Phylogenetic tree of CpNAC1 and NAC proteins. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using MEGA 7.0 software and the neighbor-joining (NJ) method (1000 bootstraps). CpNAC1 is indicated by a dot. Zea mays ZmNAC1 (ABY67929.1), Glycine max GmNAC2 (NP_001240958), GmNAC4 (NP_001238424), ANAC072 (OAO97067), Arabidopsis thaliana ATAF1 (CAA52771), ATAF2 (AAM65967), VND1 (OAP07379.1), VND2 (OAO96839.1), VND3 (OAO91397.1), VND4 (OAP17154.1), VND5 (OAP18936.1), CUC1 (ACB31158.1), CUC2 (ACB31182.1), Nelumbo nucifera NnNAC2 (XP_010268987), Chimonanthus praecox CpNAC1, and Vitis vinifera VvNAC2 (XP_002285870.2).
Figure 1. Sequence analysis of CpNAC1. (A) Multiple sequence alignment of CpNAC1 and its orthologs from other plants. The N-termini of CpNAC1 conserved domains in five subdomains (A–E) are marked with blue lines below the sequence alignment. (B) Phylogenetic tree of CpNAC1 and NAC proteins. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using MEGA 7.0 software and the neighbor-joining (NJ) method (1000 bootstraps). CpNAC1 is indicated by a dot. Zea mays ZmNAC1 (ABY67929.1), Glycine max GmNAC2 (NP_001240958), GmNAC4 (NP_001238424), ANAC072 (OAO97067), Arabidopsis thaliana ATAF1 (CAA52771), ATAF2 (AAM65967), VND1 (OAP07379.1), VND2 (OAO96839.1), VND3 (OAO91397.1), VND4 (OAP17154.1), VND5 (OAP18936.1), CUC1 (ACB31158.1), CUC2 (ACB31182.1), Nelumbo nucifera NnNAC2 (XP_010268987), Chimonanthus praecox CpNAC1, and Vitis vinifera VvNAC2 (XP_002285870.2).
Ijms 24 00542 g001
Ijms 24 00542 g002 550
Figure 2. Subcellular localization and transactivation activity analysis of CpNAC1. (A) Subcellular localization of CpNAC1 protein. The fusion proteins 35S:GFP and 35S:CpNAC1-GFP were expressed in tobacco leaf epidermis cells via Agrobacterium-mediated infection. 35S:GFP was used as the control. Bars denote 50 µm. (B) Transactivation activity analysis of CpNAC1. The plasmids of pGBKT7-CpNAC1, pGBKT7-VP (positive controls), and pGBKT7 (negative control) were transformed into the AH109 yeast strain. Growth and β-galactosidase activity were examined on SD/-Trp, SD/-His, and SD/-His/X-α-gal media.
Figure 2. Subcellular localization and transactivation activity analysis of CpNAC1. (A) Subcellular localization of CpNAC1 protein. The fusion proteins 35S:GFP and 35S:CpNAC1-GFP were expressed in tobacco leaf epidermis cells via Agrobacterium-mediated infection. 35S:GFP was used as the control. Bars denote 50 µm. (B) Transactivation activity analysis of CpNAC1. The plasmids of pGBKT7-CpNAC1, pGBKT7-VP (positive controls), and pGBKT7 (negative control) were transformed into the AH109 yeast strain. Growth and β-galactosidase activity were examined on SD/-Trp, SD/-His, and SD/-His/X-α-gal media.
Ijms 24 00542 g002
Ijms 24 00542 g003 550
Figure 3. Expression patterns of CpNAC1 in wintersweet. (A) Expressions of CpNAC1 in different tissues, including roots, stems, cotyledons, young leaves, mature leaves, inner petals, outer petals, stamen, and pistils. (B) Expressions of CpNAC1 in different flower development stages (stages 1–6): stage 1, sprout period; stage 2, flower-bud period; stage 3, display-petal period; stage 4, bloom-initiation period; stage 5, bloom period; stage 6, wither period (Sui et al., 2012). CpActin and CpTublin were used as internal controls. Data represent means of three biological repeats ± standard deviations (SDs). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 3. Expression patterns of CpNAC1 in wintersweet. (A) Expressions of CpNAC1 in different tissues, including roots, stems, cotyledons, young leaves, mature leaves, inner petals, outer petals, stamen, and pistils. (B) Expressions of CpNAC1 in different flower development stages (stages 1–6): stage 1, sprout period; stage 2, flower-bud period; stage 3, display-petal period; stage 4, bloom-initiation period; stage 5, bloom period; stage 6, wither period (Sui et al., 2012). CpActin and CpTublin were used as internal controls. Data represent means of three biological repeats ± standard deviations (SDs). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Ijms 24 00542 g003
Ijms 24 00542 g004 550
Figure 4. Isolated genomic DNA sequences and different segments with various cis-elements of CpNAC1 promoter. (A) Schematic diagram of the CpNAC1 promoter with putative cis-element sites. (B) Schematic diagram of CpNAC1 promoter divided into different segments. The dotted line indicates the position of the deletion segment: CpNAC1pro-D1, CpNAC1pro-D2, and CpNAC1 pro-D3.
Figure 4. Isolated genomic DNA sequences and different segments with various cis-elements of CpNAC1 promoter. (A) Schematic diagram of the CpNAC1 promoter with putative cis-element sites. (B) Schematic diagram of CpNAC1 promoter divided into different segments. The dotted line indicates the position of the deletion segment: CpNAC1pro-D1, CpNAC1pro-D2, and CpNAC1 pro-D3.
Ijms 24 00542 g004
Ijms 24 00542 g005 550
Figure 5. GUS activity of the different segments of the CpNAC1 promoter in Arabidopsis. (A) GUS activity under the control of CpNAC1pro or CpNAC1pro-D1/D2/D3 in transgenic Arabidopsis seeds from 1 to 10 days after germination. T3 homozygous lines were used for GUS staining analysis. (B) Tissue specificity of GUS histochemical staining for transgenic Arabidopsis. (C) GUS activity of different tissues in different transgenic Arabidopsis lines. Data represent means of three biological repeats ± standard deviations (SDs). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 5. GUS activity of the different segments of the CpNAC1 promoter in Arabidopsis. (A) GUS activity under the control of CpNAC1pro or CpNAC1pro-D1/D2/D3 in transgenic Arabidopsis seeds from 1 to 10 days after germination. T3 homozygous lines were used for GUS staining analysis. (B) Tissue specificity of GUS histochemical staining for transgenic Arabidopsis. (C) GUS activity of different tissues in different transgenic Arabidopsis lines. Data represent means of three biological repeats ± standard deviations (SDs). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Ijms 24 00542 g005
Ijms 24 00542 g006 550
Figure 6. Expression patterns of CpNAC1 in response to abiotic stress. The wintersweet plants were exposed to treatments at 42 °C, 4 °C, 1 M NaCl, 30% PEG6000, and 50 µM ABA. Data represent means of three biological repeats ± standard deviations (SDs). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 6. Expression patterns of CpNAC1 in response to abiotic stress. The wintersweet plants were exposed to treatments at 42 °C, 4 °C, 1 M NaCl, 30% PEG6000, and 50 µM ABA. Data represent means of three biological repeats ± standard deviations (SDs). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Ijms 24 00542 g006
Ijms 24 00542 g007 550
Figure 7. CpNAC1 promoter activity in response to abiotic stress and hormone treatments. (A) Expression patterns of the GUS gene in CpNAC1pro:GUS transgenic Arabidopsis plants. (B–F) Transgenic Arabidopsis GUS enzyme activity after different treatments. Ten-day-old T3 homozygous transgenic Arabidopsis seedlings were treated with 50 µM ABA, 150 mM NaCl, 10% PEG for 24 h; heat stress at 42 °C for 6 h; or cold stress at 4 °C for 24 h. Plants grown under normal conditions were used as controls. Data represent means of three biological repeats ± standard deviations (SDs). Asterisks denote statistically significant differences compared to controls, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Figure 7. CpNAC1 promoter activity in response to abiotic stress and hormone treatments. (A) Expression patterns of the GUS gene in CpNAC1pro:GUS transgenic Arabidopsis plants. (B–F) Transgenic Arabidopsis GUS enzyme activity after different treatments. Ten-day-old T3 homozygous transgenic Arabidopsis seedlings were treated with 50 µM ABA, 150 mM NaCl, 10% PEG for 24 h; heat stress at 42 °C for 6 h; or cold stress at 4 °C for 24 h. Plants grown under normal conditions were used as controls. Data represent means of three biological repeats ± standard deviations (SDs). Asterisks denote statistically significant differences compared to controls, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Ijms 24 00542 g007
Ijms 24 00542 g008 550
Figure 8. Heterologous overexpression of CpNAC1 negatively regulates tolerance to osmotic stress in transgenic Arabidopsis. (A) Relative expression of CpNAC1 in wild-type and transgenic Arabidopsis. Data represent means of three biological repeats ± standard deviations (SDs). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). (B) Phenotypes of wild-type and CpNAC1 transgenic Arabidopsis under 30% PEG6000 treatment. (C–E) Proline content, chlorophyll content, and relative electrical conductivity of wild-type and CpNAC1 transgenic Arabidopsis under 30% PEG6000 treatment. Data represent means of three biological repeats ± standard deviations (SDs). Asterisks denote statistically significant differences compared to controls, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Figure 8. Heterologous overexpression of CpNAC1 negatively regulates tolerance to osmotic stress in transgenic Arabidopsis. (A) Relative expression of CpNAC1 in wild-type and transgenic Arabidopsis. Data represent means of three biological repeats ± standard deviations (SDs). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). (B) Phenotypes of wild-type and CpNAC1 transgenic Arabidopsis under 30% PEG6000 treatment. (C–E) Proline content, chlorophyll content, and relative electrical conductivity of wild-type and CpNAC1 transgenic Arabidopsis under 30% PEG6000 treatment. Data represent means of three biological repeats ± standard deviations (SDs). Asterisks denote statistically significant differences compared to controls, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Ijms 24 00542 g008
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, X.; Zhao, J.; Yang, Q.; Huang, M.; Song, Y.; Li, M.; Sui, S.; Liu, D. Functional Characterization of the CpNAC1 Promoter and Gene from Chimonanthus praecox in Arabidopsis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 542. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24010542

AMA Style

Zhao X, Zhao J, Yang Q, Huang M, Song Y, Li M, Sui S, Liu D. Functional Characterization of the CpNAC1 Promoter and Gene from Chimonanthus praecox in Arabidopsis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(1):542. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24010542

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhao, Xiaoyan, Jiahui Zhao, Qing Yang, Min Huang, Yangjing Song, Mingyang Li, Shunzhao Sui, and Daofeng Liu. 2023. "Functional Characterization of the CpNAC1 Promoter and Gene from Chimonanthus praecox in Arabidopsis" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 1: 542. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24010542

APA Style

Zhao, X., Zhao, J., Yang, Q., Huang, M., Song, Y., Li, M., Sui, S., & Liu, D. (2023). Functional Characterization of the CpNAC1 Promoter and Gene from Chimonanthus praecox in Arabidopsis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(1), 542. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24010542

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop