Next Article in Journal
Atypical Intraparenchymal Meningioma with YAP1-MAML2 Fusion in a Young Adult Male: A Case Report and Mini Literature Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Regulation of Embden–Meyerhof–Parnas (EMP) Pathway and Tricarboxylic Acid (TCA) Cycle Concerning Aberrant Chilling Injury Behavior in Postharvest Papaya (Carica papaya L.)
Previous Article in Journal
Macrophage Profiling in Head and Neck Cancer to Improve Patient Prognosis and Assessment of Cancer Cell–Macrophage Interactions Using Three-Dimensional Coculture Models
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Impact of Elevated Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Exposure on Magic Tomatoes’ Nutrition–Health Properties

1
Qualisud, Université de Montpellier, Avignon Université, CIRAD, Institut Agro, IRD, Université de La Réunion, 34093 Montpellier, France
2
Laboratoire de Botanique, Phytochimie et Mycologie, CEFE, CNRS-Université de Montpellier-Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier-EPHE-IRD, 34093 Montpellier, France
3
IPSiM, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, INRAE, Institut Agro, 34080 Montpellier, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(16), 12815; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241612815
Submission received: 10 July 2023 / Revised: 8 August 2023 / Accepted: 9 August 2023 / Published: 15 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Genetics, Epigenetics and Postharvest Biology of Fruits)

Abstract

:
The release of carbon dioxide (CO2) into the atmosphere has accelerated during the last two decades. Elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration (eCO2) is known as an agent that improves plant photosynthesis. However, eCO2 was also correlated with alterations in the macronutrient and micronutrient compositions of various dietary crops. In order to explore the effect of eCO2 on the nutritional and health properties of tomatoes, three parental lines of the Magic population, which includes a large part of the genetic diversity present in large fruit varieties, were used as models. The plants were grown in growth chambers under ambient (400 ppm) or eCO2 (900 ppm) conditions. The macronutrient and micronutrient contents were measured. The anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory bioactivities were assessed in vitro on activated macrophages. These analyses highlighted that the carbohydrate content was not affected by the eCO2, whereas the protein, carotenoid, lycopene, and mineral contents decreased. Regarding the anti-oxidant properties, no influence of eCO2 exposure was observed. Similarly, the anti-inflammatory properties were not affected by the eCO2. These data are in contrast with previous studies conducted on different plant species or accessions, indicating that the effect of eCO2 on crops’ nutrition and health properties is based on complex mechanisms in which growth conditions and genetic backgrounds play a central role.

1. Introduction

Currently, human activities are directly and indirectly threatening the global ecosystem and natural balance [1]. Increased population growth and fossil fuel consumption have accelerated carbon dioxide (CO2) production in the last two decades. Elevated CO2 (eCO2) has a remarkable impact on plant yield, as expressed by the increased biomass of C3 plants [2,3]. Atmospheric CO2 enrichment is known to be a fertilizing agent [4] that improves photosynthesis, especially in C3 plants. This effect is based on the modulation of key enzymes: the higher carboxylation rate of Rubisco and the repression of Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate (RubP) [5]. Consequently, the biomass recorded in C3 plants may be twice as high as in other plants [6]. Furthermore, eCO2 was correlated with alterations in plant physiology, composition, and resistance, as well as decreases in nitrogen, phosphorus, and several trace elements [7]. Among the most noticeable changes at the macronutrient level, the plant composition under eCO2 exposure was characterized by a drop in protein content and a significant increase in carbohydrates [8]. The mechanism behind these alterations is not fully elucidated. Among the various hypotheses, a dilution effect and the inhibition of the transpiration process are proposed [8,9].
Such modifications may have an impact on agricultural productivity, plant quality, and food security. A higher sugar/protein ratio in eCO2 plants might be one of the primary drivers of nutrient imbalances in the human diet.
The high-sugar diets causing such alterations may have long-term health consequences on the population. An increased sugar intake may lead to the overconsumption of caloric intake and carbohydrate–homeostasis imbalance. It would contribute to the worsening of various pathophysiological conditions and metabolic disorders, such as insulin resistance, diabetes mellitus, metabolic syndrome, and associated comorbidities, e.g., cardiovascular diseases and cancers [10]. Similarly, a low-protein diet can negatively influence human health since proteins are involved in the homeostasis of bodily functions and structures. In addition, the high energy value of proteins reduces short-term food intake [11]. Several studies confirmed that a diet with an appropriate level of protein is recommended for weight loss and to reduce the risk factors for cardiovascular disease [12]. Zinc, nitrogen, and iron are considered key substances for many enzymatic reactions, modeling antioxidant defense and promoting organism balance [13]. A deficiency in these compounds could have a negative impact on biological homeostasis. Carotenoids and, in particular, lycopene, are known to be important metabolites with high free radical scavenging ability. Their protective effect against cardiovascular diseases and prostate cancer is well demonstrated [14]. Several studies have shown rising amounts of lycopene and β carotene in response to eCO2, while others have shown the opposite. Hence, the consequences of atmospheric CO2 enrichment for this type of pigment need further investigation [15].
All the previously demonstrated effects of eCO2 on crops’ quality and composition affect not only plants’ nutrient profiles, but also consumer health and bodily functions, such as redox status modulation and inflammatory responses. The changes in antioxidant activity induced by eCO2 were confirmed by several observations. Increases or decreases in this activity may vary as a function of the investigation method and of the molecules extracted [16]. Research about the impact of eCO2 on food plants and, consequently, on human health, is scarce. Few studies explored the influence of the level of plant exposure to CO2 on the potential modulation of these vegetal antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and immunomodulatory bioactivities [17].
The tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) is the second-most heavily consumed crop in the world. Tomato fruits are known to be significant antioxidant food crops, with high contents of lycopene, carotenoids, vitamins, and phenolic compounds [18]. They are also known for their antifungal and anticarcinogenic properties [19,20], as well as for modulating lipotoxicity disorders and associated inflammatory processes [21].
In the present study, the effect of elevated CO2 concentrations on food quality was explored in several tomato food crops. We investigated the impact of eCO2 exposure on three tomato accessions, i.e., STUPICE, PLOVID, and LA0147, to explore the influence of elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide on their phytochemistry and bioactivity potential in response to this climate change parameter. These accessions were chosen because they represent a large part of the genetic diversity that is present in large fruit varieties. These genotypes are three parent germplasm of the “multiparent advanced generation intercross” (Magic) tomato population, which was designed for precise quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping for geneticists and breeders [22,23].

2. Results

2.1. Mineral Contents

The dosage of the mineral content in Magic tomato is presented in Figure 1. Tomato fruit concentration in eight mineral elements was measured: calcium (Ca), copper (Cu), iron (Fe), magnesium (Mg), manganese (Mn), sodium (Na), zinc (Zn), and potassium (K). In LA147 accession, a significant decrease in Ca, Mn, Na, and Zn was associated with eCO2 exposure. In PLOV accession, eCO2 exposure decreased Na but increased Mg. Regarding STUP accession, eCO2 exposure induced a decrease in Na and Mg content while Ca was increased. The other minerals in each accession were not statistically influenced by eCO2 exposure.

2.2. Micronutrients: Total Carotenoids and Lycopene Contents

The dosage of the Magic content in carotenoids is presented in Figure 2A. Significant differences in total carotenoids were recorded between the three Magic accessions. PLOVID presented the highest carotenoid content, followed by LA0147 and STUPICE. Magic samples grown under eCO2 contained significantly lower carotenoids when compared with ambient CO2 conditions. Lycopene (Figure 2B) measures confirmed that PLOVID and STUPICE pigment contents were superior to LA0147 under ambient CO2. While the latter was not affected by eCO2 exposure, the PLOVID and STUPICE samples showed a significant decrease in their lycopene content.

2.3. Macronutrients

2.3.1. Sugars Content

The results’ sugar measures (sucrose, glucose, and fructose) are presented in Figure 3. Regarding sucrose (Figure 3A), our data showed a significant difference in the sucrose content between the three accessions. The higher range of sucrose was identified in STUPICE. PLOVID is the second-richest, while LA0147 presented the lowest amount. The difference between the control CO2 samples and the eCO2 samples was not significant in all three accessions. The results for glucose (Figure 3B) indicate that the three Magic accessions presented the same content.
No significant difference between the two CO2 exposures was recorded between the three varieties. Fructose, shown in Figure 3C, was similar to glucose. eCO2 did not seem to have any significant impact on fructose accumulation in the three studied accessions. The fructose content remained unchanged between 21 and 31% in the three tomato samples.

2.3.2. Total Lipid and Protein Content

Figure 4A shows the lipid measurement results. Magic varieties grown under ambient CO2 seemed to present the same quantity of total lipids. The total lipid remained unchanged after eCO2 exposure for the PLOVID variety. Conversely, the lipid content was significantly increased for both STUPICE and LA0147 upon eCO2 exposure. Protein content data are reported in Figure 4B. The results indicate that plants growing under eCO2 conditions present a significantly lower protein content compared with control conditions for the three Magic accessions.

2.4. Antioxidant Bioactivity

The total polyphenol contents of Magic tomato samples are represented in Figure 5A. The results indicate that the three tomato accessions had similar phenolic contents when exposed to ambient CO2. When considering eCO2 exposure, STUPICE and LA0147 TPC were not influenced by carbon dioxide enrichment. Conversely, the PLOVID variety was characterized by a significant decrease in TPC.
The antioxidant activity potential was further evaluated using two other methods: the DPPH and ORAC tests. The DPPH results are presented in Figure 5B. The free radical scavenging capacity was not affected by eCO2 in all of the tomato samples. Nonetheless, the PLOVID variety demonstrated a significantly higher antioxidant potential when compared to the STUPICE variety. The ORAC results are presented in Figure 5C. The eCO2 condition induced a significant increase in the antiradical activity of PLOVID accession, while it was not affected by eCO2 in both STUPICE and LA0147 tomato extracts.

2.5. Anti-Inflammatory—Immunomodulatory Bioactivity

2.5.1. Nitric Oxide Production

The immunomodulating effects of Magic ethanolic extracts were assessed on the STUPICE accession. The results are presented in Figure 6A. STUPICE ethanolic extracts decreased nitric oxide (NO) production using stimulated macrophage cells. A similar concentration-dependent inhibition of NO production was observed in both high and ambient CO2 conditions. However, no significant difference was recorded between 400 ppm and 900 ppm exposures.

2.5.2. Cytokines Interleukin-6 and TNF-α

The results of STUPICE ethanolic extract anti-inflammatory activity measured using the ELISA sandwich method on Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) are presented in Figure 7A,B. Regarding IL-6, tomatoes grown under ambient CO2 conditions significantly inhibited IL-6 production only at the highest concentration (100 µg/mL), while there was no inhibitory effect at lower concentrations. Under the eCO2 condition, STUPICE samples did not exhibit any repression effect on IL-6 production, whatever the concentration.
When considering TNF-α, macrophage cells treated with STUPICE extracts showed the same levels of TNF-α production than the control cells. Therefore, eCO2 treatment had no significant effect on the LPS/IFN-stimulated macrophage response.

3. Discussion

Our previous results on the MicroTom tomato model [23] confirmed a real alteration in tomato fruits’ composition and nutrition–health potential induced by elevated CO2 concentrations (eCO2: 900 ppm). The present study aimed to verify the impact of elevated atmospheric CO2 on other tomato accessions, i.e., Magic, which represent a large part of the genetic variability of all consumed tomato varieties with large fruits.
Tomato fruits and tomato products represent a good source of bioactive compounds. Minerals, vitamins C and E, β-carotene, lycopene, flavonoids, organic acids, and phenolics are some of the nutrients that support health functions and body balance [23,24].
Regarding tomato mineral content evolution as a function of CO2 exposure, the literature reports are scarce and indicate that it would influence plants’ mineral compositions, both directly and indirectly. Food crops’ mineral content alterations may therefore represent a potential health threat in the long run [1,23]. In this context, the recorded tendency indicates an irregular decrease or no modification as a function of the mineral observed. Our results for the Magic tomato suggest a trend of Na (sodium) content decrease in the three studied accessions. Minerals such as K, Cu, and Fe were not modified when Mn and Zn either decreased or were not modified. Finally, regarding Ca, it either decreased or strongly increased. When compared to our previous report [23], it appears that eCO2 exposure tends to have less impact on the mineral content of Magic tomato when compared to MicroTom. This observation is of great interest since Magic accessions are closer to large fruit consumed tomatoes. Considering that MicroTom is a small-fruit laboratory tomato model, it may suggest that marketed large-fruit tomatoes could be less impacted by eCO2 regarding their mineral content balance.
These variations of mineral content in response to eCO2, as a function of the cultivar, would be due to a modification in stomatal conductance, which in turn alters the transpiration-induced sap flow and thereby the uptake of mineral elements present in the soil [8,9]. Alternatively, it is also proposed that mineral content variations could be due to a dilution mechanism resulting from the positive effect of eCO2 on biomass [8]. It is not well established whether large-fruited plants have metabolic behavior that may result in a different response to the elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide. In the light of our results and of the literature, it is conceivable that not all cultivars respond as homogeneously as initially thought. Our differential results between small and large tomato fruits clearly suggest a significant variability in the effects of atmospheric CO2 levels on the phytochemistry and biological properties of tomato cultivars. In-depth multiparametric comparative investigations depending on cultivar, genetics, and growing conditions are required to understand the potential cultivar-dependent mechanisms involved in the consequences of rising atmospheric CO2.
In any case, modifications of mineral diet intake may have potential consequences for health. Sodium is a major electrolyte for cell homeostasis, the transmembrane electrochemical gradient, osmotic balance, neuron and cardiomyocyte functions, as well as many cellular and extracellular processes. Therefore, sodium balance disorders, and more particularly, hyponatremia, are related to numerous pathologies such as neuronal, cardiac, arterial blood pressure, and kidney, hepatic, and endocrine diseases [25,26,27]. Similarly, zinc, an intracellular and extracellular signaling messenger, is the second-most abundant mineral in the human body. It is a component of over 200 enzymes mainly involved in metabolism, the immune system, cognition, oxidative stress management (zinc superoxide dismutase), and cell proliferation. Zinc intake variations may alter the homeostasis of any of these numerous biological functions [28,29,30,31,32]. Finally, manganese, a homeostatic, tightly controlled mineral because of its potential toxicity, is involved in development, growth, oxidative stress management (manganese superoxide dismutase), and mitochondrial function. Manganese supply alterations may favor neurological disorders (Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, and Huntington’s disease) [32,33,34,35,36,37]. In consequence, variations in mineral intake associated with elevated CO2-induced vegetal composition may be linked to significant consequences for human health.
In addition to minerals, elevated CO2 was associated with a set of modifications in plant macronutrient composition. A high photosynthesis range resulting in carbohydrate accumulation was confirmed in several food crops [38]. The quantification of carbohydrate in Magic tomato accessions did not show any increase. This may be explained by downregulation processes in response to long-term exposition to eCO2 (4–5 months in our study). This so-called “acclimation phenomena” is considered a potential reason behind photosynthesis repression in a large range of vegetables [39]. Lipid accumulation is regulated by photosynthesis events. Two Magic tomato accessions, namely, STUPICE and LA0147, showed an increase in the total lipid content as a response to eCO2. Several pieces of research on multiple food crops have confirmed a high lipid content under eCO2 [40]. This effect was even more noticeable on microalgae species [41]. Some investigations related these results to a nutrient limitation mechanism [42]. Regarding proteins, several studies reported that plants grown under eCO2 presented a modified and low protein rate. Similarly, the total proteins of our three Magic accessions decreased significantly with eCO2 treatment, thereby affecting their nutritional value and potentially consumer physiological homeostasis [43]. It should be noted that with a decreased total protein, even though carbohydrate did not increase in our study, the carbon-to-nitrogen ratio increased anyway. Therefore, this general trend reported in the literature remains true for Magic tomato [38].
Considering micronutrients, tomato carotenoids and especially lycopene are considered key nutrients for antioxidant defenses. These pigments, which are present in Magic tomatoes, modulate antioxidant enzymatic reactions and protect against several diseases. Total carotenoids and lycopene content were significantly reduced in response to eCO2 in the three tomato samples, STUPICE, PLOVID, and LA0147. Our results are in agreement with other reports [44], demonstrating that lycopene accumulation also depends on CO2 levels. Furthermore, in a previous study, the tomato lycopene content was reported to be higher at 550 ppm and lower at 700 ppm in comparison with control conditions [45]. Our results obtained at 900 ppm suggest that increasing CO2 level exposure may further deteriorate tomato carotenoid compound content.
Based on Magic tomato chemical modifications induced by eCO2 exposure, biological properties were assessed to identify potential alterations. The literature reports suggest that the DPPH activity was improved by high CO2 concentrations. The antioxidant activity seems to be enhanced with CO2 in FRAP (Ferric Antioxidant Power) assays too [46]. Among other hypotheses, this might be explained by the upregulation of phenolic compounds, including flavonoids, such as in Labisia pumila leaves. ORAC scavenging properties and gluthation activity were also higher under eCO2 in strawberry fruits [47]. In tomato samples, elevated CO2 induced ROS inhibition, MDA (malondialdehyde) diminution, and antioxidant enzyme activation [48]. This could be explained by the fact that plants grown under eCO2 are characterized by a high photosynthesis rate and carbonic composite accumulation like phenolics and flavonoids. Conversely, other studies mentioned a reduction in phenolic, flavonoid, and FRAP activity under elevated CO2 [45,49]. Magic tomato demonstrated an anti-oxidant bioactivity, but in our case, eCO2 did not influence this capacity (except in the PLOVID accession). These observations, combined with the literature, suggest that the plant response to eCO2 may vary as a function of accessions and growth conditions, including the precise level of eCO2 and temperature [45,49].
Previous studies have demonstrated that tomato aqueous extracts promote an anti-inflammatory response in RAW macrophage cells by decreasing chemokine production (IL-6, TNF-α, …) and their regulation pathways [50]. It is well demonstrated that lycopene has antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. The inhibition of gene expression of several biomarkers is one of the proposed mechanisms [51]. Moreover, other mechanisms, such as the inhibition of NF-κB, might induce IL-6 and IL-8 downregulation, which may explain tomato potential bioactivity [52]. The anti-inflammatory properties of crops grown under high CO2 enrichment were improved in many species, like lemongrass [53]. For example, eCO2 significantly decreases COX-2 expression in broccoli [53]. In our case, the Magic tomato STUPICE demonstrated an anti-inflammatory effect characterized by NO scavenging capacity and inhibition of macrophage NO production. These properties were not influenced by eCO2. Regarding IL-6 and TNF-α productions, they were not influenced. These results may suggest that under eCO2 exposure, the type of accession and precise growth conditions at both plant nutrient, soil nature, temperature, and metabolic acclimation levels may be part of a complex and intricate network of influences leading to the specific response of the tomato plants.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials and Sample Preparation

Seeds of tomato variety Solanum licopersicum Magic (STUPICE, PLOVID, and LA0147) were sterilized according to the method described by Appenroth [54,55] and germinated as described by Boufeldja et al., 2022 [23]. After germination, the plants were transferred to soil potting and kept in culture chambers under the following conditions: temperature of 22–23 °C and two different concentrations of CO2 (ambient CO2: 400 ppm and eCO2: 900 ppm). The plants were sprinkled with a fertilizer solution (N,P,K 6-13-18 with oligo-elements). The tomato fruits were harvested at the last stage of ripening (red color) then stored at −80 °C to be freeze-dried in CryoneXt lyophilizer (Thermofisher, France).

4.2. Mineral Content

Samples were collected from three independent plants (each accession is represented by 3 plants). Freeze-dried tomato samples were used for analysis. Around 10 mg of each sample was digested with 250 μL of 30% H2O2 as well as 750 μL of 65% nitric acid in 15 mL Digestion Cups (VWR, Radnor, PA, USA), and the tubes were degassed overnight. On the following day, the samples were incubated in the HotBlock (OnBoard, Meylan, France) for 8 h at 85 °C. After cooling, 4 mL of MilliQ water was added, and the samples were transferred to a 16 mm OD polypropylene tube (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Mineral content of each sample was analyzed in technical triplicates using the 4100 MP-AES (microwave plasma atomic emission spectrometry, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) [23].

4.3. Micronutrients: Carotenoids and Lycopene Content

Extraction procedures and conditions for analysis were performed as follows: Freeze-dried Magic samples were weighed (50 mg) with 300 mg of sand in 15 mL tubes. The tomato samples were rehydrated with 1 mL of distilled water and homogenized. Then, 10mL of a solution of ethanol/hexane (4:3, v/v) containing 0.1% BHT was added. The mixture was homogenized using a Vortex and then Fast Prep® 24 type agitation/grinding were applied at a speed of 6 m/s for 3 × 50 s. The hexane phase was collected in a 15 mL conical bottom falcon tube. The mixture was re-extracted twice in a row with 5 mL of hexane and Fast Prep 2 × 50 s. The hexane phases were then evaporated to dryness under nitrogen. Finally, the residue was re-dissolved in 500 μL of methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)/methanol (80:20 v/v) and 500 μL of dichloromethane and placed in an amber vial prior to HPLC analysis.
Carotenoid identification was performed on a reverse-phase HPLC DAD Agilent 1100 system (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) with a diode array detector. Carotenoids were separated using a C30 column (250 × 4.6 mm i.d., 5 μm) (YMC EUROP GmbH, Dinslaken, Germany) with a guard column, and the mobile phases were H2O as eluent A, methanol as eluent B, and MTBE as eluent C. Operation temperature was set at 25 °C. The flow rate was set at 1 mL/min, and the injection volume was 20 μL. A solvent gradient was programmed as follows: 0–2 min, isocratic 40% A—60% B (initial conditions); 2–5 min, 20% A—80% B; 5–10 min, 4% A—81% B—15% C; 10–60 min, 4% A—11% B—85% C; 60–70 min, isocratic 4% A—11% B—85% C; 70–71 min, 100% B; 71–72 min, with a return to the initial conditions for rebalancing. E-β-carotene and its isomer were detected at 450 nm, and E-lycopene and its isomers were detected at 470 nm. Isomers were identified according to their relative retention times, i.e., elution order, and the combined use of their spectral data. The identifications were based on previously published data obtained with the same mobile phase (water/methanol/MTBE) and the same detection wavelength range [23].

4.4. Macronutrients

4.4.1. Sugars

Simple soluble sugars were analyzed by HPLC. Briefly, 500 mg of sample was rehydrated with 2 mL of distilled water and homogenized. Tomato samples were extracted three times with 10 mL ethanol (80%), then the mixture was heated at 70 °C for 10 min. After agitation for 20 min and centrifugation (4000× g, 5 min, 15 °C, Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA), the supernatant was filtered through a 0.45 μm membrane before injection in UPLC. Samples were analyzed using a UPLC–1290 System Infinity II (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) equipped with a refractometer detector. A SHODEX SH1011 column 300 × 8 mm (Tokyo, Japan) was used with an isocratic system of water with H2SO4 (0.01%) and a flow rate of 0.7 mL/min. Temperature was set at 30 °C, injection volume at 10 μL, and spectrophotometric detection at 210 and 245 nm. External calibration was established for each standard sugar for concentrations from 0 to 10 g/L.

4.4.2. Lipids

Lipid content was analyzed using the Folch method. A total of 500 mg of freeze-dried tomato samples were extracted three times with 15 mL of chloroform/methanol (2:1) solution. The mixture was agitated for 2 h and then centrifuged (6000 rpm, 10 min, 15 °C, Beckman Coulter). The supernatants were combined, then evaporated to dryness using a vacuum evaporation system (GeneVac EZ-2, SP Scientific, Warminster, PA, USA), and the tubes were weighed for the second time to determine the lipid content.

4.4.3. Proteins

Protein content was calculated from nitrogen content assessed by the Kjeldahl method (Tecator Kjeltec) using a 6.25 conversion factor.

4.5. Antioxidant Bioactivity

Three different measurements were used to assess the antioxidant bioactivity of Magic tomato samples: (i) the total polyphenol content, (ii) the ORAC (oxygen radical absorbance capacity) assay, and (iii) the DPPH (2,2-Diphenyl-L-picrylhydrazyl) assay.

4.5.1. Total Polyphenol Content

Total polyphenol assay was performed with Folin–Ciocalteu reagent, according to the method of Morel et al. [56]. Extracts of Magic and rosemary (Rosmarinus Officinalis) were prepared in DMSO at 4 mg/mL and then diluted in water to be tested at a concentration of 1 mg/mL. A calibration curve was generated on a concentration range from 1.56 to 75 μg/mL of gallic acid. In a 96-well plate, 50 μL of extract, 50 μL of gallic acid, and 50 μL of distilled water were distributed in triplicate. Then, 50 μL of 10% Folin–Ciocalteu reagent and 50 μL of sodium carbonate solution (1 M) were added. After 60 min in the dark, the absorbance was measured on a microplate reader (Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA) at a wavelength of 650 nm. Results were expressed as milligrams of gallic acid equivalents (GAEs) per gram of Magic extract.

4.5.2. ORAC (Oxygen Radical Absorbance Capacity) Assay

The ORAC assays were performed in 96-well opaque polypropylene plates as previously described [23]. Samples were solubilized in DMSO at a concentration of 1 mg/mL before being diluted to 25 μg/mL using phosphate buffer at pH 7.4. On the 96-well microplate, 20 μL of Trolox solutions at 0.6, 25, 12.5, 25, 50, and 75 μM as standard curve, or chlorogenic acid (0.01 mg/mL), or ethanolic extract of rosemary (12.5 μg/mL) as a positive control, or the extracts at a concentration of 25 μg/mL, were applied. Then, 100 μL of phosphate buffer and 100 μL of extemporaneously prepared fluorescein solution (0.1 μM in phosphate buffer) were added. The microplate was incubated at 37 °C for 10 min with shaking. The reaction was initiated with 50 μL of AAPH. Fluorescence was recorded at an excitation wavelength of 485 nm and an emission wavelength of 535 nm for 70 min using a Tristar LB 941 microplate reader. Final ORAC values were calculated using a regression equation between Trolox concentration and area under the curve of decreasing fluorescein. Data are expressed as μmoles of Trolox equivalents per gram of dry extract.

4.5.3. DPPH (2,2-Diphenyl-l-picrylhydrazyl) Assay

Antioxidant activity was evaluated using the DPPH assay according to the method described previously [56]. Extracts were solubilized in DMSO (4 mg/mL) before being diluted in absolute ethanol to reach a concentration of 1 mg/mL. A standard curve of Trolox was performed (75, 50, 25, and 12.5 μM). Ethanol was used as blank, and ethanolic extracts of rosemary (0.2 mg/mL) and chlorogenic acid (0.01 mg/mL) were used as positive controls.
In a 96-well plate, 100 μL of positive control or extract was placed in each well. The test was performed in triplicate for each extract. A total of 75 μL of absolute ethanol and 25 μL of extemporaneously prepared DPPH solution (0.4 mg/mL) were introduced into each well. The plate was incubated for 30 min at room temperature and protected from light. The absorbance was read at 550 nm with a microplate reader (MDS Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada). Results were expressed as the mean plus or minus standard error to the mean of three independent experiments and were expressed as Trolox equivalents (TE μmoles per gram of dry extract).

4.6. Immunomodulatory Anti-Inflammatory Activity on Macrophage Cells Culture

Anti-inflammatory activity was assessed on the Stupice accession under both ambient CO2 and eCO2 conditions.

4.6.1. Macrophage Culture

The macrophage cell line J774.A1 (ATCC and TIB67) was obtained from LGC Standards (Manchester, NH, USA). Cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 GlutaMAX® medium supplemented with streptomycin (100 μg/mL) and penicillin (100 units/mL), 10% inactivated fetal calf serum (complete RPMI medium), and cells were incubated at 37 °C, 5% CO2, and 95% humidity.

4.6.2. Cell Viability Assay

To test cytotoxicity, 6 × 105 cells/well were seeded in a 96-well culture plate in complete RPMI medium and incubated at 37 °C with different concentrations of extracts (25, 50, 75, and 100 μg/mL) for 20 h. After incubation, 20 μL/well of (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium), MTS, mixed with an electron coupling reagent, PMS in HBSS, was added. The plate was incubated for an additional 4 h, and the absorbance at 490 nm was measured in a microplate reader (Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA), as previously described [57].

4.6.3. Dosage of NO (Nitric Oxide), IL-6 (Interleukin-6), and TNF-α (Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha)

J774.A1 cells were seeded on a 24-well culture plate with complete RPMI medium. They were pretreated with various concentrations of Stupice extracts of 100, 75, 50, and 25 μg/mL for 4 h, stimulated with LPS (100 ng/mL) and interferon γ (10 ng/mL), and incubated for another 16–18 h at 37 °C. Supernatants were collected for nitrite determination or stored at −80 °C until use for TNFα and IL-6 dosages.

Determination of Nitrites (NO)

The presence of nitrite, a stable oxidized product of nitric oxide, was determined in the cell culture media as previously described [57]. Briefly, 100 μL of supernatant was combined with 100 μL of Griess reagent in a 96-well plate, and incubated for 10 min at room temperature. Nitrite concentration was determined by measuring absorbance at 550 nm and using a NaNO2 standard curve (from 1.56 to 100 μM). Results were expressed as a percentage of inhibition values.

Interleukin 6 (IL-6) Assay

IL-6 production by J774 cells was determined using the IL-6 ELISA kit (Mouse IL6 ELISA; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Vienna, Austria) after pretreatment with Stupice extracts at a determined concentration range (25, 50, 75, and 100 μg/mL) for 18 h. The cells were stimulated with 100 ng/mL LPS (Escherichia coli, 555B5) and 10 ng/mL mouse INF-γ for 4 h. IL-6 release in cell supernatants was tested according to the ELISA kit instructions. The results for IL-6 as well as for all other pro-inflammatory cytokines are expressed as a percentage of inhibition values.

Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNF-α) Assay

The TNF-α assay was performed according to the instructions contained in the ELISA kit (TNF alpha Mouse Uncoated ELISA kit; Thermo Fisher Scientific). After pretreatment with the different concentrations of Stupice extracts for 3 h, the cells were stimulated with LPS 100 ng/mL (E. coli, 555B5) and mouse INF-γ 10 ng/mL for 4 h. TNF-α release in cell supernatants was tested by sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent ELISA assay.

4.7. Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using XLSTAT software version 2019.4.1 (Addinsoft, Paris, France). All data were reported as means ± standard deviation to the mean (SD) from three replicates of each experiment. One-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey test or t-tests (significance: *, p < 0.05 and **, p < 0.01) were used.

5. Conclusions

In the present study, we investigated the impact of an elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration (eCO2: 900 ppm) on the nutrition–health properties of tomato Solanum lycopersicum L. Magic accessions. Taken together, our results reveal two main points: First, Magic tomato demonstrated differential behavior when exposed to eCO2. Indeed, surprisingly, sucrose, fructose, and glucose were not increased by eCO2 as one would have expected based on classical C3 plant reports. Conversely, the protein content decreased, as commonly observed with C3 plants in the literature, with a still increased carbon-to-nitrogen ratio. Similarly, carotenoid and lycopene contents also decreased in response to elevated CO2. Second, when considering antioxidant properties, i.e., TPC, DPPH, and ORAC tests, the results did not show any influence of eCO2 exposure when compared to ambient CO2 exposure. In addition, regarding anti-inflammatory properties, if Magic STUPICE inhibited NO production, the eCO2 growing condition did not influence neither NO production, NO scavenging, nor IL-6 or TNF-α production. Therefore, our results suggest that elevated atmospheric CO2 appears to have a differential impact on C3 plants as a function of the genetic background. Many hypotheses may be proposed to try to explain these observations, among which, but not restricted to, plants’ nutrient availability, plants’ short-term adaptation, etc. In any case, this could mean that the eCO2 impact on tomato and more generally C3 plant nutrition health potential may not be influenced in an identical monolithic way, i.e., decreased protein content, increased carbohydrate content, and decreased biological activities. Plant responses may be modulated in a more complex and accession-dependent way when exposed to eCO2.
Therefore, further investigations are clearly needed to unravel the differential impacts of atmospheric eCO2 on the different C3 plant species as well as the genetic and physiologic determinants of their respective specific adaptative responses. This would provide valuable insight to this fundamental research question. It would contribute to optimize decision-making about the management of agro-food health systems for food crops in general and for tomatoes in particular. This is of significant importance for population health as consumers have access to a wide variety of accessions with potentially large variations in their nutrition–health qualities. Such explorations on the influence of eCO2 on various tomato accession phytochemistry and nutrition–health profile variations would help anticipate the putative final impact on the health of healthy and pathological populations. With climate change becoming more significant over the years, these issues should be anticipated to better face the human need for healthy food, contributing to the prevention of non-communicable metabolic diseases.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.D. and P.P.; methodology, F.B., L.B., N.B., C.D., C.D.-M., C.G., K.P. and S.M.; validation, F.B., L.B., C.D., C.D.-M., C.G., K.P. and P.P.; formal analysis, L.B., C.D., C.D.-M. and P.P.; investigation, L.B., N.B. and O.D.; data curation, L.B., C.D. and P.P.; writing—original draft preparation, L.B., C.D. and P.P.; writing—review and editing, F.B., L.B., C.D., S.M. and P.P.; supervision, C.D. and P.P.; project administration, C.D. and P.P.; funding acquisition, C.D. and P.P. All authors contributed substantially to the work reported. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the “Université de Montpellier, Muse I-SITE Program Eco2Threat”.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge Dominique Pallet, Pierre Brat, Thierry Goli, and Sabine Galindo for their scientific advice and Manon Vitou for technical support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are available from the authors.

References

  1. Myers, S.S.; Zanobetti, A.; Kloog, I.; Huybers, P.; Leakey, A.D.B.; Bloom, A.J.; Carlisle, E.; Dietterich, L.H.; Fitzgerald, G.; Hasegawa, T.; et al. Increasing CO2 Threatens Human Nutrition. Nature 2014, 510, 139–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Swynghedauw, B.; Wemeau, J.-L. Rapport 20-07. Conséquences du changement climatique sur la santé humaine et animale. Bull. Acad. Natl. Med. 2021, 205, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Taub, D.R.; Miller, B.; Allen, H. Effects of Elevated CO2 on the Protein Concentration of Food Crops: A Meta-Analysis. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2008, 14, 565–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Müller, C.; Elliott, J.; Levermann, A. Fertilizing Hidden Hunger. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2014, 4, 540–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Drake, B.G.; Gonzàlez-Meler, M.A.; Long, S.P. More Efficient Plants: A Consequence of Rising Atmospheric CO2? Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1997, 48, 609–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Prior, S.A.; Brett Runion, G.; Rogers, H.H.; Allen Torbert, H.; Wayne Reeves, D. Elevated Atmospheric CO2 Effects on Biomass Production and Soil Carbon in Conventional and Conservation Cropping Systems. Glob. Change Biol. 2005, 11, 657–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Loladze, I. Rising Atmospheric CO2 and Human Nutrition: Toward Globally Imbalanced Plant Stoichiometry? Trends Ecol. Evol. 2002, 17, 457–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Taub, D.R.; Wang, X. Why Are Nitrogen Concentrations in Plant Tissues Lower under Elevated CO2? A Critical Examination of the Hypotheses. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2008, 50, 1365–1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Poorter, H.; Van Berkel, Y.; Baxter, R.; Den Hertog, J.; Dijkstra, P.; Gifford, R.M.; Griffin, K.L.; Roumet, C.; Roy, J.; Wong, S.C. The Effect of Elevated CO2 on the Chemical Composition and Construction Costs of Leaves of 27 C3 Species. Plant Cell Environ. 1997, 20, 472–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Johnson, R.J.; Segal, M.S.; Sautin, Y.; Nakagawa, T.; Feig, D.I.; Kang, D.-H.; Gersch, M.S.; Benner, S.; Sánchez-Lozada, L.G. Potential Role of Sugar (Fructose) in the Epidemic of Hypertension, Obesity and the Metabolic Syndrome, Diabetes, Kidney Disease, and Cardiovascular Disease. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2007, 86, 899–906. [Google Scholar]
  11. Moshe, S.; Shils Maurice, E.; Olson James, A. Modern Nutrition in Health and Disease, 8th ed.; Williams & Wilkins: Baltimore, MA, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  12. Anderson, G.H.; Moore, S.E. Dietary Proteins in the Regulation of Food Intake and Body Weight in Humans. J. Nutr. 2004, 134, 974S–979S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Foster, M.; Samman, S. Zinc and Regulation of Inflammatory Cytokines: Implications for Cardiometabolic Disease. Nutrients 2012, 4, 676–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Mariani, S.; Lionetto, L.; Cavallari, M.; Tubaro, A.; Rasio, D.; De Nunzio, C.; Hong, G.M.; Borro, M.; Simmaco, M. Low Prostate Concentration of Lycopene Is Associated with Development of Prostate Cancer in Patients with High-Grade Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 1433–1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Zhang, Z.; Liu, L.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Q. Effect of Carbon Dioxide Enrichment on Health-Promoting Compounds and Organoleptic Properties of Tomato Fruits Grown in Greenhouse. Food Chem. 2014, 153, 157–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. De Rezende, F.M.; de Souza, A.P.; Silveira Buckeridge, M.; Maria Furlan, C. Is Guava Phenolic Metabolism Influenced by Elevated Atmospheric CO2? Environ. Pollut. 2015, 196, 483–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Karimi, E.; Jaafar, H.Z.E.; Ghasemzadeh, A. Chemical Composition, Antioxidant and Anticancer Potential of Labisia Pumila Variety Alata under CO2 Enrichment. NJAS—Wagening. J. Life Sci. 2016, 78, 85–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. de Broglie, L.A.; Guéroult, D.; Buchard, S. Tomates D’hier et D’aujourd’hui; Hoëbeke: Paris, France, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  19. Agrawal, R.; Jain, R.; Raja, W.; Ovais, M. Anticarcinogenic Effects of Solanum Lycopersicum Fruit Extract on Swiss Albino and C57 Bl Mice. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2009, 10, 379–382. [Google Scholar]
  20. Kobayashi, F.; Ishida, K.; Ikeura, H.; Odake, S.; Hayata, Y. Application of Tomato (Solanum Lycopersicum) Leaf Volatiles as Antifungal Agents against Plant Pathogenic Fungi. J. Agric. Sci. 2012, 4, 231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, Y.-F.; Chang, Y.-Y.; Huang, H.-C.; Wu, Y.-C.; Yang, M.-D.; Chao, P.-M. Tomato Juice Supplementation in Young Women Reduces Inflammatory Adipokine Levels Independently of Body Fat Reduction. Nutrition 2015, 31, 691–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Pascual, L.; Desplat, N.; Huang, B.E.; Desgroux, A.; Bruguier, L.; Bouchet, J.P.; Le, Q.H.; Chauchard, B.; Verschave, P.; Causse, M. Potential of a tomato MAGIC population to decipher the genetic control of quantitative traits and detect causal variants in the resequencing era. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2015, 13, 565–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Boufeldja, L.; Brandt, D.; Guzman, C.; Vitou, M.; Boudard, F.; Morel, S.; Servent, A.; Dhuique-Mayer, C.; Ollier, L.; Duchamp, O.; et al. Effect of Elevated Carbon Dioxide Exposure on Nutrition-Health Properties of Micro-Tom Tomatoes. Molecules 2022, 27, 3592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Giovanelli, G.; Paradiso, A. Stability of Dried and Intermediate Moisture Tomato Pulp during Storage. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 7277–7281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Chandrasoma, P.; Taylor, C.R. Concise Pathology, 3rd ed.; Appleton & Lange: New York, NY, USA, 1995; pp. 1–993. [Google Scholar]
  26. Forbes, T.A.; Wallace, J.; Kumble, S.; Delatycki, M.B.; Stark, Z.J. Neonatal Bartter syndrome diagnosed by rapid genomics following low risk pre-conception carrier screening. J. Paediatr. Child Health 2022, 58, 758–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Linder, G.; Funk, G.C. Hypernatremia in critically ill patients. J. Crit. Care 2013, 28, 216.e11–216.e20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Beyersmann, D.; Haase, H. Functions of zinc in signaling, proliferation and differentiation of mammalian cells. Biometals 2001, 14, 331–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Roth, H.P.; Kirchgessner, M. Influence of zinc deficiency on the osmotic fragility of erythrocyte membranes of force-fed rats. Horm. Metab. Res. 1994, 26, 404–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kraus, A.; Roth, H.P.; Kirchgessner, M. Supplementation with vitamin C, vitamin E or beta-carotene influences osmotic fragility and oxidative damage of erythrocytes of zinc-deficient rats. J. Nutr. 1997, 127, 1290–1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Ibs, K.H.; Rink, L.J. Zinc-altered immune function. J. Nutr. 2003, 133, 1452S–1456S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Rajendran, R.; Minqin, R.; Ynsa, M.D.; Casadesus, G.; Smith, M.A.; Perry, G.; Halliwell, B.; Watt, F. A novel approach to the identification and quantitative elemental analysis of amyloid deposits–insights into the pathology of Alzheimer’s disease. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2009, 382, 91–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Finley, J.W.; Penland, J.G.; Pettit, R.E.; Davis, C.D. Dietary manganese intake and type of lipid do not affect clinical or neuropsychological measures in healthy young women. J. Nutr. 2003, 133, 2849–2856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Von Campenhausen, S.; Bornschein, B.; Wick, R.; Botzel, K.; Sampaio, C.; Poewe, W.; Oertel, W.; Siebert, U.; Berger, K.; Dodel, R. Prevalence and incidence of Parkinson’s disease in Europe. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2005, 15, 473–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Racette, B.A.; McGee-Minnich, L.; Moerlein, S.M.; Mink, J.W.; Videen, T.O.; Perlmutter, J.S. Welding-related parkinsonism: Clinical features, treatment, and pathophysiology. Neurology 2001, 56, 8–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Bates, G.P. History of genetic disease: The molecular genetics of Huntington disease—A history. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2005, 6, 766–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Kumar, K.K.; Goodwin, C.R.; Uhouse, M.A.; Bornhorst, J.; Schwerdtle, T.; Aschner, M.; McLean, J.A.; Bowman, A.B. Untargeted metabolic profiling identifies interactions between Huntington’s disease and neuronal manganese status. Metallomics 2015, 7, 363–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Jin, C.; Du, S.; Wang, Y.; Condon, J.; Lin, X.; Zhang, Y. Carbon Dioxide Enrichment by Composting in Greenhouses and Its Effect on Vegetable Production. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2009, 172, 418–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Morison, J.I.L.; Morecroft, M.D. Plant Growth and Climate Change; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  40. Sgherri, C.L.M.; Quartacci, M.F.; Menconi, M.; Raschi, A.; Navari-Izzo, F. Interactions between Drought and Elevated CO2 on Alfalfa Plants. J. Plant Physiol. 1998, 152, 118–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chiu, S.-Y.; Kao, C.-Y.; Tsai, M.-T.; Ong, S.-C.; Chen, C.-H.; Lin, C.-S. Lipid Accumulation and CO2 Utilization of Nannochloropsis Oculata in Response to CO2 Aeration. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 833–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Takagi, M.; Watanabe, K.; Yamaberi, K.; Yoshida, T. Limited Feeding of Potassium Nitrate for Intracellular Lipid and Triglyceride Accumulation of Nannochloris Sp. UTEX LB1999. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2000, 54, 112–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Medek, D.E.; Schwartz, J.; Myers, S.S. Estimated Effects of Future Atmospheric CO2 Concentrations on Protein Intake and the Risk of Protein Deficiency by Country and Region. Environ. Health Perspect. 2017, 125, 087002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Helyes, L.; Lugasi, A.; Neményi, A.; Pék, Z. The Simultaneous Effect of Elevated Co2-Level and Nitrogen-Supply on the Fruit Components of Tomato. Acta Aliment. 2012, 41, 265–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Mamatha, H.; Rao, N.K.; Laxman, R.H.; Shivashankara, K.S.; Bhatt, R.M.; Pavithra, K.C. Impact of Elevated CO2 on Growth, Physiology, Yield, and Quality of Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) Cv. Arka Ashish. Photosynthetica 2014, 52, 519–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jaafar, H.Z.E.; Ibrahim, M.H.; Karimi, E. Phenolics and Flavonoids Compounds, Phenylanine Ammonia Lyase and Antioxidant Activity Responses to Elevated CO2 in Labisia Pumila (Myrisinaceae). Molecules 2012, 17, 6331–6347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Wang, S.Y.; Bunce, J.A.; Maas, J.L. Elevated Carbon Dioxide Increases Contents of Antioxidant Compounds in Field-Grown Strawberries. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 4315–4320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Zhang, Y.; Yao, Q.; Shi, Y.; Li, X.; Hou, L.; Xing, G.; Ahammed, G.J. Elevated CO2 Improves Antioxidant Capacity, Ion Homeostasis, and Polyamine Metabolism in Tomato Seedlings under Ca(NO3)2-Induced Salt Stress. Sci. Hortic. 2020, 273, 109644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Pan, T.; Ding, J.; Qin, G.; Wang, Y.; Xi, L.; Yang, J.; Li, J.; Zhang, J.; Zou, Z. Interaction of Supplementary Light and CO2 Enrichment Improves Growth, Photosynthesis, Yield, and Quality of Tomato in Autumn through Spring Greenhouse Production. HortScience 2019, 54, 246–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Schwager, J.; Richard, N.; Mussler, B.; Raederstorff, D. Tomato Aqueous Extract Modulates the Inflammatory Profile of Immune Cells and Endothelial Cells. Molecules 2016, 21, 168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Herzog, A.; Siler, U.; Spitzer, V.; Seifert, N.; Denelavas, A.; Hunziker, P.B.; Hunziker, W.; Goralczyk, R.; Wertz, K. Lycopene Reduced Gene Expression of Steroid Targets and Inflammatory Markers in Normal Rat Prostate. FASEB J. 2005, 19, 272–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kim, G.-Y.; Kim, J.-H.; Ahn, S.-C.; Lee, H.-J.; Moon, D.-O.; Lee, C.-M.; Park, Y.-M. Lycopene Suppresses the Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Phenotypic and Functional Maturation of Murine Dendritic Cells through Inhibition of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases and Nuclear Factor-ΚB. Immunology 2004, 113, 203–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Almuhayawi, M.S.; Al Jaouni, S.K.; Almuhayawi, S.M.; Selim, S.; Abdel-Mawgoud, M. Elevated CO2 Improves the Nutritive Value, Antibacterial, Anti-Inflammatory, Antioxidant and Hypocholestecolemic Activities of Lemongrass Sprouts. Food Chem. 2021, 357, 129730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Appenroth, K.-J.; Lenk, G.; Goldau, L.; Sharma, R. Tomato Seed Germination: Regulation of Different Response Modes by Phytochrome B2 and Phytochrome A. Plant Cell Environ. 2006, 29, 701–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Gao, R.; Wu, Z.; Ma, Q.; Lu, Z.; Ye, F.; Zhao, G. Effects of Breaking Methods on the Viscosity, Rheological Properties and Nutritional Value of Tomato Paste. Foods 2021, 10, 2395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Morel, S.; Arnould, S.; Vitou, M.; Boudard, F.; Guzman, C.; Poucheret, P.; Fons, F.; Rapior, S. Antiproliferative and Antioxidant Activities of Wild Boletales Mushrooms from France. Int. J. Med. Mushrooms 2018, 20, 13–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Boudard, F.; Vallot, N.; Cabaner, C.; Bastide, M. Chemiluminescence and Nitrite Determinations by the MALU Macrophage Cell Line. J. Immunol. Methods 1994, 174, 259–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Minerals content of Magic tomato fruits (μg/g dry weight). Fruit samples were collected from 3 plants for each accession, and 30 fruits per plant grown under ambient 400 ppm of elevated 900 ppm atmospheric CO2 were used for analysis. One-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey test or t-tests (significance: *, p < 0.05 and **, p < 0.01) were used.
Figure 1. Minerals content of Magic tomato fruits (μg/g dry weight). Fruit samples were collected from 3 plants for each accession, and 30 fruits per plant grown under ambient 400 ppm of elevated 900 ppm atmospheric CO2 were used for analysis. One-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey test or t-tests (significance: *, p < 0.05 and **, p < 0.01) were used.
Ijms 24 12815 g001
Figure 2. Carotenoids content of Magic tomato fruits. Fruit samples were collected from plants grown under ambient 400 ppm of elevated 900 ppm atmospheric CO2. (A) Total carotenoid content. (B) Lycopene content. Means within each condition with the same letter are not significantly different according to one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey test or t-tests (significance: **, p < 0.01).
Figure 2. Carotenoids content of Magic tomato fruits. Fruit samples were collected from plants grown under ambient 400 ppm of elevated 900 ppm atmospheric CO2. (A) Total carotenoid content. (B) Lycopene content. Means within each condition with the same letter are not significantly different according to one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey test or t-tests (significance: **, p < 0.01).
Ijms 24 12815 g002
Figure 3. Carbohydrate content of Magic tomato fruits. Fruit samples were collected from plants grown under ambient 400 ppm of elevated 900 ppm atmospheric CO2. (A) Sucrose content; (B) glucose; and (C) fructose content. Means within each condition with the same letter are not significantly different according to one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey test or t-tests.
Figure 3. Carbohydrate content of Magic tomato fruits. Fruit samples were collected from plants grown under ambient 400 ppm of elevated 900 ppm atmospheric CO2. (A) Sucrose content; (B) glucose; and (C) fructose content. Means within each condition with the same letter are not significantly different according to one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey test or t-tests.
Ijms 24 12815 g003
Figure 4. Lipid and protein contents of Magic tomato fruits. Fruit samples were collected from plants grown under ambient 400 ppm of elevated 900 ppm atmospheric CO2. (A) Total lipids. (B) Protein contents. Means within each condition with the same letter are not significantly different according to one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey test or t-tests (significance: p < 0.05).
Figure 4. Lipid and protein contents of Magic tomato fruits. Fruit samples were collected from plants grown under ambient 400 ppm of elevated 900 ppm atmospheric CO2. (A) Total lipids. (B) Protein contents. Means within each condition with the same letter are not significantly different according to one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey test or t-tests (significance: p < 0.05).
Ijms 24 12815 g004
Figure 5. Antioxidant activity of Magic tomato fruit extracts. Fruit samples were collected from plants grown under ambient 400 ppm or elevated 900 ppm atmospheric CO2. (A) Total polyphenol content (Folin–Ciocalteu method); (B) 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyle (DPPH); (C) oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) assays. Means within each condition with the same letter are not significantly different according to one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey test or t-tests (*: significance: p < 0.05).
Figure 5. Antioxidant activity of Magic tomato fruit extracts. Fruit samples were collected from plants grown under ambient 400 ppm or elevated 900 ppm atmospheric CO2. (A) Total polyphenol content (Folin–Ciocalteu method); (B) 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyle (DPPH); (C) oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) assays. Means within each condition with the same letter are not significantly different according to one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey test or t-tests (*: significance: p < 0.05).
Ijms 24 12815 g005
Figure 6. Effect of Stupice tomato fruit extracts on nitric oxide liberation and scavenging capacity. Fruit samples were collected from plants grown under ambient 400 ppm or elevated 900 ppm atmospheric CO2. (A) Fruit extract inhibition rates on nitric oxide production by J774 macrophages; (B) fruit extract nitric oxide scavenging capacity. Means within each condition with the same letter are not significantly different according to one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey test or t-tests (significance: p < 0.05).
Figure 6. Effect of Stupice tomato fruit extracts on nitric oxide liberation and scavenging capacity. Fruit samples were collected from plants grown under ambient 400 ppm or elevated 900 ppm atmospheric CO2. (A) Fruit extract inhibition rates on nitric oxide production by J774 macrophages; (B) fruit extract nitric oxide scavenging capacity. Means within each condition with the same letter are not significantly different according to one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey test or t-tests (significance: p < 0.05).
Ijms 24 12815 g006
Figure 7. Anti-inflammatory activity of Stupice tomato fruit extracts. Fruit samples were collected from plants grown under ambient 400 ppm or elevated 900 ppm atmospheric CO2. (A) Interleukin 6 (IL-6); (B) tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) production by J774 macrophages stimulated with LPS (lipopolysaccharide) and interferon gamma (IFN-γ) were measured using ELISA technique. Means within each condition with the same letter are not significantly different according to one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey test or t-tests (significance: p < 0.05).
Figure 7. Anti-inflammatory activity of Stupice tomato fruit extracts. Fruit samples were collected from plants grown under ambient 400 ppm or elevated 900 ppm atmospheric CO2. (A) Interleukin 6 (IL-6); (B) tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) production by J774 macrophages stimulated with LPS (lipopolysaccharide) and interferon gamma (IFN-γ) were measured using ELISA technique. Means within each condition with the same letter are not significantly different according to one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey test or t-tests (significance: p < 0.05).
Ijms 24 12815 g007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Boufeldja, L.; Boudard, F.; Portet, K.; Guzman, C.; Morel, S.; Berger, N.; Duchamp, O.; Dhuique-Mayer, C.; Dubos, C.; Poucheret, P. The Impact of Elevated Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Exposure on Magic Tomatoes’ Nutrition–Health Properties. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 12815. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241612815

AMA Style

Boufeldja L, Boudard F, Portet K, Guzman C, Morel S, Berger N, Duchamp O, Dhuique-Mayer C, Dubos C, Poucheret P. The Impact of Elevated Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Exposure on Magic Tomatoes’ Nutrition–Health Properties. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(16):12815. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241612815

Chicago/Turabian Style

Boufeldja, Linda, Frederic Boudard, Karine Portet, Caroline Guzman, Sylvie Morel, Nathalie Berger, Orianne Duchamp, Claudie Dhuique-Mayer, Christian Dubos, and Patrick Poucheret. 2023. "The Impact of Elevated Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Exposure on Magic Tomatoes’ Nutrition–Health Properties" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 16: 12815. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241612815

APA Style

Boufeldja, L., Boudard, F., Portet, K., Guzman, C., Morel, S., Berger, N., Duchamp, O., Dhuique-Mayer, C., Dubos, C., & Poucheret, P. (2023). The Impact of Elevated Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Exposure on Magic Tomatoes’ Nutrition–Health Properties. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(16), 12815. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241612815

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop