Next Article in Journal
Animal Models for Studying Protein-Bound Uremic Toxin Removal—A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Journal
Underfeeding Alters Brain Tissue Synthesis Rate in a Rat Brain Injury Model
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Pluripotential GluN1 (NMDA NR1): Functional Significance in Cellular Nuclei in Pain/Nociception

by
Terry A. McNearney
1,2,3 and
Karin N. Westlund
4,5,*
1
Department of Neuroscience and Cell Biology, University of Texas Medical Branch Galveston, Galveston, TX 77555-1043, USA
2
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch Galveston, Galveston, TX 77555-1043, USA
3
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Texas Medical Branch Galveston, Galveston, TX 77555-1043, USA
4
Department of Anesthesiology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001, USA
5
Biomedical Laboratory Research & Development (121F), New Mexico VA Health Care System, Albuquerque, NM 87108-5153, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(17), 13196; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241713196
Submission received: 16 July 2023 / Revised: 18 August 2023 / Accepted: 23 August 2023 / Published: 25 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Pharmacology)

Abstract

:
The N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) glutamate receptors function as plasma membrane ionic channels and take part in very tightly controlled cellular processes activating neurogenic and inflammatory pathways. In particular, the NR1 subunit (new terminology: GluN1) is required for many neuronal and non-neuronal cell functions, including plasticity, survival, and differentiation. Physiologic levels of glutamate agonists and NMDA receptor activation are required for normal neuronal functions such as neuronal development, learning, and memory. When glutamate receptor agonists are present in excess, binding to NMDA receptors produces neuronal/CNS/PNS long-term potentiation, conditions of acute pain, ongoing severe intractable pain, and potential excitotoxicity and pathology. The GluNR1 subunit (116 kD) is necessary as the anchor component directing ion channel heterodimer formation, cellular trafficking, and the nuclear localization that directs functionally specific heterodimer formation, cellular trafficking, and nuclear functions. Emerging studies report the relevance of GluN1 subunit composition and specifically that nuclear GluN1 has major physiologic potential in tissue and/or subnuclear functioning assignments. The shift of the GluN1 subunit from a surface cell membrane to nuclear localization assigns the GluN1 promoter immediate early gene behavior with access to nuclear and potentially nucleolar functions. The present narrative review addresses the nuclear translocation of GluN1, focusing particularly on examples of the role of GluN1 in nociceptive processes.

1. Introduction

The N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) glutamate receptors function as plasma membrane ionic channels and are part of very tightly controlled cellular processes activating neurogenic and inflammatory pathways. A large body of studies supports their functions in both normal physiology and disease states with a focus on the NMDA NR1 subunit (new terminology GluN1 subunit [1]) function in psychiatric and neurologic conditions. NMDA receptors are activated by excitatory amino acid (EAA) agonists, glutamate, aspartate, and NMDA. NMDA receptors in low levels are essential for neuronal development, differentiation, learning, survival, and plasticity [2,3]. NMDA receptors play a critical role in pre- and post-synaptic plasticity, especially learning and memory [4]. However, when glutamate receptor agonists are present in excess, binding to NMDA receptors produces neuronal/CNS/PNS excitotoxicity, pathology, conditions of acute pain [5,6], and ongoing severe, intractable pain [7,8]. Conditional deletion of the GluN1 subunit in the spinal cord dorsal horn reduces injury-induced pain [9]. Beyond this is involvement in anxiety/depression [10], disease states (schizophrenia, Parkinson’s [11,12]), dementia [13,14,15], and seizures [16,17].
Earlier studies established that the GluN1 subunit anchor component was necessary for heterodimer formation, cellular trafficking, and nuclear localization that was functionally specific [18,19]. Four subunits assemble the glutamate receptors, and each heterodimer strictly requires the GluN1 subunit to anchor GluN2 or GluN3 subunits, comprising a functional ionic channel. GluN1 subunits bind combinations of GluN2A, 2B, and GluN3A and 3B subunits that form heterodimers to anchor these components on the cellular plasma membrane [20,21,22]. The binding composition is noted as two obligatory GluN1 subunits, of which there are now reported at least eight distinct variant subunits and four or two variable subunits from the GluN2 (GluN2A-2D) and GluN3 (GluN3A-3B), respectively, producing 8 × 6 = 48 potential heterodimers.
The GluN1-1a subunits have a nuclear localization sequence (NLS) exclusive of tissue specificity [18,23]. Additional studies have reported the alternative splicing of messenger RNA producing similar proteins that target different tissues, determine its functional fate [24], and have expanded studies to include expression and functioning in non-neuronal tissues. Much of the recent research has focused on characterizing the GluN2 subunits of the GluN1/GluN2 heterodimer. Shifts in the composition of the heterodimer, based on GluN2 or N3 subunits, denote the functional roles of the receptor complex and promote the neuroplasticity of the glutaminergic system throughout the CNS [23,24].
Over 2800 articles are cited in PubMed pertaining to GluN1 subunits from 1990 to 2023. It should be noted that many of the citations in this work are reviews of the literature. Close to 800 report information on GluN1 subunit expression and function in human tissue. Many of the described cellular processes are in the context of inflammatory, ischemic, and/or neurogenic (nociceptive) milieux relevant to pain states. Likewise, increased GluN1 subunit staining occurs in activated non-neuronal cells, such as epithelial cells [25]; lymphocytes [26], macrophages, type A and B synoviocytes [27,28]; megakaryocytes [29,30], osteocytes, osteoblasts and osteoclasts [31].
Here, we review the GluN1 subunit containing subnuclear organelle organization and ribosomal DNA arrays regulated internally or by epigenetics and how their interactions impact cell nuclear structures and downstream implications for cellular function first introduced in 2015 [32,33]. We will build on current hypotheses for some of these regulatory and pathologic functions based on reported subnuclear interactions and immunochemical imaging. Much has been parsed and gleaned from published reports of GluN1 subunit binding to functional transcriptional sites and subsequent neuronal responses. The reader is also directed to several published reviews [3,5,12,34,35,36,37].

2. Potential Fates of GluN1 Subunit in the Cellular Nucleus

2.1. GluN1 Subunit Signaling Induces Nuclear Translocation

GluN1 subunit occupation in the cell nucleus has been reported since early 2000, and a resurgence of research is providing a better understanding to fill in the gaps. This has included reports of the bipartite NLS contained in the GluN1-1a subunit [18,38], protein isoforms, and sequence cassettes. For example, the GluN1/N2A/B functional tetramer is inserted into the cellular plasma membrane site as an ionic channel. When activated, the heterodimer is phosphorylated at the GluN2 cytoplasmic regions, and the GluN1 subunit transmembrane region protein undergoes intermembrane proteolysis, cleaving the cytoplasmic portion in the cell membrane. The heterodimer internalizes and translocates from the cell’s plasma membrane to the cell’s nuclear membrane [18,35]. This region contains a bipartite NLS with two clusters of short sequences of basic amino acids, mainly lysines (K) and arginines (R), separated by a link of a variable number of amino acids. The two regions of basic amino acids on the protein surface comprise the regions recognized for binding along the nuclear membrane and passing into the nucleus. In the case of GluN1-1a, the NLS sequence regions with basic amino acids in bold type are:
KRHK-spacer region—KKKATFRAITSTLASSFKRRR [38].

2.2. GluN1 Subunit Staining in the Cellular Nucleus

The nuclear translocation of the GluN1 subunit after glutamate activation suggests it also plays a direct role in the fast intracellular signaling responses to extracellular glutamate activation. Long-term potentiation (LTP) mediated facilitation requires an active importin nuclear import pathway [39]. Examination of the function of the GluN1 subunit in nuclear translocation has found the C1 domain binds calmodulin to assist calcium entry into the nucleus [19,23]. This regulates LTP and synaptic plasticity in hippocampal cultures. Glutamate-mediated (LTP-like) overactivation in pain states likely involves calcium entry into the nucleus through ion channels that include GluN1 subunits. The evidence for this appears below.
Detection of increased cell nuclear staining of GluN1 subunit in activated cells is easily appreciated in vivo or in vitro. For example, increased cell nuclear staining of the GluN1 subunit was observed with visual microscopic examination of human clonal neuroblastoma cell cultures (SH-SY5Y) activated with glutamate or NMDA for 4 h, and nuclear staining was inhibited by preincubation with active NMDA protein tyrosine kinase (PTK) inhibitors genistein or staurosporin in vitro [40]. Increased nuclear staining was also easily observed by 2 h after incubation with NMDA and ACPD in human synovial fibroblast cells [27]. Additionally, staining of the GluN1 subunit on the nuclear rim and nucleoplasm was appreciated in the presence of cycloheximide [40], demonstrating that nuclear localization is an incitement event for the subunit and not solely the purview of newly synthesized GluN1 subunit.
In complementary studies inducing synovial joint capsule inflammation, secondary tactile allodynia in the same hindlimb resulted in the same time span of two hours following excess glutamate released into the joint capsule from activated peripheral nerves in a rat intra-articular K/C arthritis model [41]. The afferent nerve and spinal glutamate neurons release glutamate into the spinal cord dorsal horn (SCDH) in response to activation or injury [42]. Models providing information on nociception/pain study either acute pain, where glutamate receptor stimulation is limited timewise, or chronic pain, where the glutamate receptor is overstimulated long-term. Many molecular, epigenetic, and inflammatory events are ongoing, accompanied by prolonged exposure to glutamate and overactivation of glutamate receptors. Continued activation of the glutamate receptors results in excessive intracellular chloride that increases the neuronal membrane potential above the threshold, resulting in the reversal of GABA from inhibitory to excitatory continuous firing, contributing to chronic pain [43,44].
Electron microscopic (EM) data demonstrating a shift in the distribution of the GluN1 subunit, which is typically on the cell membrane shifts to a subcellular location in the cytoplasm and nuclear membrane supports NR1’s role as a rapid intracellular mediator acting through direct communication with the nucleus (Figure 1) [38], nucleolus (Figure 2) [45], and is more easily seen in the cytoplasm in cell culture (Figure 3). In addition to increased levels of GluN1 subunit detected on the cellular nuclear membrane, previous studies have demonstrated its subcellular proximity to nuclear pores of the nuclear membrane in rat lumbar spinal cord spinothalamic tract neurons by immunolabeled EM (Figure 1D; Figure 2, long yellow arrows). In the next few hours, increased GluN1 subunit staining was also appreciated throughout the nucleoplasm containing densely and loosely packed chromatin, including the areas proximate to the cell nucleolus (Figure 2, light blue arrows [45]). GluN1-tagged immuno-EM showed GluN1 subunit along the chromatin borders of the cell nucleolus and in the nucleoplasm proximate to the nucleolus (Figure 2, light blue arrows [45]).
Human clonal SW892 synoviocyte cells activated with NMDA + ACPD also demonstrated GluN1 subunit immunostaining with light microscopic examination (Figure 3 and see [27]). Immunostaining for the GluN1 subunit is evident in naïve cultures only in the cytoplasm (Figure 3A). After activation with NMDA + ACPD, a marked increase in immunolocalization of the GluN1 subunit appears along the nuclear membrane and throughout the nucleoplasm (Figure 3B,C). After 3 h, the GluN1 subunit was localized throughout the nucleoplasm of densely and loosely packed chromatin. Increased staining was evident in the perinuclear region of the cytoplasm, along the borders of the nuclear envelope, and collecting along the edges of the nucleolus. In fact, the activation has induced multiple nucleoli rimed with the GluN1 subunit, indicative of its activated state (Figure 3 inset). When the synovial cultures were pretreated with inhibitor U0126 (5 µM) prior to the treatment with NMDA and ACPD for 3 h, the nuclear and nucleolar translocation was abrogated, including nuclear staining that would indicate nuclear translocation or subnuclear organelle activation. U0126 is a MAPK/ERK kinase and highly selective inhibitor of MEK 1 and 2 activity, that strongly abrogates GluN1 subunit cellular increases. Pretreatment with U0126 was shown previously to protect neurons against oxidative stress [46,47].

3. Selected Animal Models of Nociception, Cell Cultures, and Tissues Highlighting In Vitro Cellular GluN1 Subunit Activity

Changes in GluN1 subunit cellular localization in the spinal cord were followed in a rat arthritis model induced with intraarticular (i.a.) injection of irritants kaolin and carrageenan (K/C) [40]. Immediate dynamic neuronal communication between peripheral joints, the spinal cord, and the consequent central processing in the brain was assessed as changes in the animals’ behavior. By four hours after knee joint inflammatory insult, rats developed increased secondary footpad hypersensitivity to heat tested using the Hargreaves test and paralleled by dorsal horn glutamate release. Previous studies showed dorsal horn glutamate release could be blocked by spinal administration of NMDA receptor antagonist AP7 (60 µM, microdialysis) [48]. Sensitization of dorsal horn neurons was shown previously to be reversed by blocking NMDA receptors [49,50]. Elevated glutamate levels have been measured in the joints of patients with arthritis [51].
Increased GluN1 subunit expression in the lumbar spinal cord dorsal horn was evident ipsilateral to knee joint inflammation in individual neuronal cells with a shift in the concentration of staining from cellular membrane rim to perinuclear and nuclear regions [40,45]. This was determined by immunocytochemical localization with both light and electron microscopy. GluN1 subunit protein expression was increased, determined by Western Blot and immunolocalization utilizing both C- and N-terminal antibodies [40].
The effects of PTK inhibition on GluN1 subunit protein expression and subcellular localization were also examined in the acute experimental arthritis model [40]. The PTK inhibitors genistein and lavendustin A were administered into the lumbar spinal cord by microdialysis. The PTK inhibitors reduced pain-related behavior and the occurrence of cellular, histological GluN1 subunit expression that increases in the spinal cord within 4 h after inflammatory insult to the knee joint. Genistein and lavendustin A (but not inactive lavendustin B or daidzein) effectively reduced the shift of the GluN1 subunit from the cell membrane to a nuclear localization. Cycloheximide blocked most of the glutamate-activated upregulation GluN1 subunit content, confirming the synthesis of new protein in response to inflammatory insult contributions, but it was not essential since some nuclear rim staining remained.
These studies provide evidence that inflammatory activation of peripheral nerves initiates an increase in the GluN1 subunit in the spinal cord coincident with the development of pain-related behaviors through glutamate non-receptor, protein tyrosine kinase-dependent cascades.
Other studies have reported similar inhibition of GluN1 subunit nuclear translocation using PTK inhibitors in animal or cellular models of depression, anxiety, and Parkinson’s [52,53]. Table 1 lists a brief synopsis of experimental nociceptive/pain models of arthritis, formalin injection, colitis, and inflammatory bowel syndrome (IBS) that directly assess GluN1 subunit expression and function and expand the pain models and conditions. Studies demonstrating increased NMDA receptor agonists or inflammatory mediator levels, and preincubation with enhancing agents are also included. A comprehensive review, including NMDA receptor activation in nociceptive models for orofacial pain, has been recently published [54].

4. Roles and Potential Fates of GluN1 Subunit in The Cellular Nucleus

The regional and functional assignments provided in the GluN1/2 subunit heterodimers have been attributed mostly to the GluN2 subunits, after they are trafficked and delivered to the nucleus via the GluN1 receptor subunit. However, the GluN1 subunit has several indicators of its own potential to influence heterodimer and/or subnuclear organelle assignments.
1. The putative NLS and/or nucleolar localization sequences (NoLS) located in cassette 1 of the GluN1 subunit has two short regions rich in basic amino acids, which comprise the NLS and are potentially involved in nucleolar signaling [66,67]. GluN1 subunits are tightly subjected to multiple levels of regulation, affecting subunit expression, subcellular location, and assembly of functional receptors, and their signaling complexes [34].
2. The gene for the GluN1 subunit is expressed in early development in virtually all neurons, and is transcriptionally upregulated during neuronal differentiation. NMDA agonists and EAAs increase cellular GluN1 subunit levels, as demonstrated with widespread cell membrane, intracellular, and nuclear GluN1 subunit staining. GluN1 subunit nuclear translocalization is reported for both human synoviocytes (Figure 3) and for rat spinal cord nociceptive neurons at light and EM levels [40,45]. Nuclear translocation of GluN1 is reported for neurons in eye tissue [68,69]. Additionally, GluN1 subunit activation has been reported in models of ischemia, neurogenic, and inflammatory responses, which also stimulate EAA release and increase GluN1 subunit expression. Zhou and Duan have reported that both GluN1 and GluN2 are needed to translocate [23].
3. There is close coordination in neurons between the assembly of functional heteromeric to tetrameric receptors and the fates of these individual subunits. In addition, two pools of mRNA for the GluN1 subunit have been reported with distinct translational activities. These generate two stores of GluN1 subunits that are differentially assembled with GluN2 subunits to form heterodimers with distinct functions and turnover rates, providing an additional and possibly tissue-specific level of control for protein turnover and trafficking (Figure 4) [20]. Nuclear membrane translocation reportedly occurs by endocytotic and de novo mechanisms. Activity dependent clathrin mediated internalization of GluN1 subunit is reported [35]. Nociceptive neurons are overactivated in pain states with increased GluN1 subunit cellular and nuclear ring immunostaining [40]. Staining is greatly reduced by tyrosine kinase inhibition. Post-transcriptional mechanisms also contribute to GluN1 subunit regulation in brain development [70,71]. Studies have also reported the importance of post-translational histone modifications in epigenetic transcriptional control of nociceptive pathways [32,72].
4. Structurally, the GluN1 subunit promoter region is located directly upstream of the transcriptional start site (TSS) and is exceptional for the number of transcriptionally reactive binding regions close to the 3’ site. Transcriptionally active binding regions have been reported for SP-1, NFkB, MEF-2, GC-rich regions, CREB, REI, AP-1, egr-1, and ARC binding regions [5]. The GluN1 promoter allows a spectrum of potential responses, such as activation, de-repression, or suppression of downstream transcribable sequences.
5. GluN1 subunit activation is reported to consequently activate Immediate Early Genes (IEG), e.g., c-fos, zif268, and egr-1 [73,74], and conversely, IEG products are reported to activate GluN subunits. The term IEG describes viral regulatory proteins or cellular proteins generated immediately following stimulation of a resting cell by internal or external stimuli, triggering immediate gene transcription that does not require de novo protein synthesis. IEG products are usually transcription factors, which are DNA-binding protein activators of signaling pathways. They are rapidly and transiently activated to respond to a plethora of cellular and extracellular stimuli, serving as an important cellular first response system. The GluN1 subunit can direct downstream nuclear functioning via nuclear DNA binding sites, immediate early gene products, cytoplasmic input, and environmental signals.

5. Nucleolar Stress and Pain

Table 2 is a summary of reported locations on subnuclear organelles and interactions of DNA binding regions of the GluN1 subunit in the cell nucleus. Recent studies have described the nucleolus as an important and sensitive stress sensor, acting as a networking or signaling hub that can influence cell fates in adverse conditions such as nutrient deprivation, DNA damage, or oxidative stress [37]. Resultant impaired rRNA synthesis and alterations in ribosome formation can accompany nucleolar stress, triggering significant downstream alterations in the nucleolus. Ultimately, overall cellular function is altered by regulating a wide spectrum of cellular processes via selected kinases or enzymes. Nucleolar stress is reported with a variety of signaling transductions, including Mdm2-p53, NF-κB, and HIF-1α pathways. For example, molecular changes from aberrant nucleolar function might activate p53, which further triggers cell cycle arrest or apoptosis. Aberrant nucleolar structure and/or function from internal or external cell stressors can divert downstream cell processes to a variety of cell fates, including apoptosis, senescence, autophagy, or differentiation [37,72,75,76]. These and additional transcriptional modifications in nociceptive pathways are important for the development and maintenance of pain associated with tissue damage [54,77,78,79,80]. We speculate from our work that the GluN1 subunit plays a role in these events based on the ultrastructural finding of GluN1 subunit staining along the nucleolar border (Figure 2). Nucleolar stress, such as nutrient deprivation, can manifest by increased nucleolar number and/or changes in nucleolar shape (Figure 3). Nucleolar stress may be precipitating the GluN1 subunit staining increases in nuclear regions observed in pain models and in vitro overactivation of cells with NMDA or NMDA plus ACPD. Multiple contributing stressors can impact nucleolar number, size, and functioning [81]. GluN1 subunit has been reported to interact with p53 [4], NFkB [82], and HIF-α [83] pathways, as shown in Table 2.
Table 2 is a summary of selected studies where the nuclear localization of the cells and reactions were reported. Columns are divided into Cellular Nuclear Regions, and Proteins reported to bind to the GluN1 subunit, Added reagents or stressors, Cellular or tissue responses due to the GluN1 subunit effect, and References. The nuclear regions mentioned are the Nuclear membrane, Nuclear pore complex (NPC), Chromatin, and Nucleolus. The first table column identifies the GluN1 subunit localization on the nuclear membrane or nuclear pore complex (NPC). Two major subnuclear organelles include the nucleolus and the chromatin, with loosely contained or densely contained DNA genetic material located liberally throughout the nucleoplasm. The nucleolus is an organelle lacking a lipid membrane, usually solitary, although >1 may be seen in an activated eukaryotic cell. The nucleolus is the site responsible for the biogenesis of ribosomes as part of DNA-to-RNA transcription. Additional models reflecting epigenetic long-term changes are reported [4,33,83].

6. Epigenetic Influence on GluN1 Subunit in Nuclear Organelles

In the last 10 years, the concept of nucleolar stress has been described, defined, and thought responsible for directing cell machinery. Much has been reported on the involvement of GluN1 subunits in depression, seizures, psychosis, LTP, and memory. Depression and memory disruption are known to be a consequence of chronic pain. Epigenetic stress impacts nuclear chromatin and nucleolar operations of the cell. Pathways of relevance to epigenetic cell changes reported to impact GluN1 subunit expression and functions are histone deacetylase (HDAC) [86,87], NFkB/rel [82], and p53 [88]. DNA methylation, p53 activation, and post-transcriptional histone deacetylase are processes in the chromatin [86]. The GluN subunit has roles in cellular development and communication, reflecting dynamic cell retraction [34,67]. Early-life stress is a potent risk factor for the development of chronic pain, although the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. Studies of prenatal alcohol exposure in mice find the offspring have a greater risk for neuropathic pain, as one example [89,90]. Likewise, epigenetic changes and gene expression in the rat hippocampus are reportedly the response to novel environment exposure due to the interaction of D1/GluN subunits, phosphorylation of the NMDA and AMPA receptor subunits, and activation of ERK1/2 signaling [91].

7. Priming vs. Unprimed Target Activation: Or More of a Second Hit?

In addition to the impact of NMDA subunit heterogeneity, discrete cellular regions in oligodendritic cells in the brain have described glutaminergic differential physiologically active receptors, for example, AMPA receptors on the cell soma and GluN1 subunits on the oligodendrocyte processes. Pretreatment with MK801 prevented the excitotoxic effects on the processes normally seen in anoxic brain trauma [60,92].
The synopses below highlight the results from other studies and reinforce some observations: Priming vs. straight target activation. Many studies report the effects of long-term glutamate receptor activation. We also noted a much stronger, consistent downstream effect of GluN1 receptor activation in vitro when co-incubated with ACPD, or preincubated or co-incubated with PMA. Moreover, the timing or order of reagent exposure was important, in that PMA needed to be added first. In one set of studies, PMA was added in the first 6 h or last 6 h of the incubation. Much greater levels of TNF-α were detected in the cell culture supernatants of human clonal synoviocyte SW892 cell cultures if preincubated with nanomolar amounts of PMA [27]. Similarly, incubation with PMA is reported to prime the NFkB/Rel family in the nucleolus of non-neuronal HepG2 cells [65].
Priming exposure related to GluN1 subunit activation was reported in describing activation of BDNF as a contributor to colitis hypersensitivity, but low levels of BDNF provide protection from excitotoxicity [55,63,93,94]. Robust increases in TNF-α levels were evident when primary synoviocyte cultures derived from humans primed with active (inflammatory) synovitis were incubated with glutamate [95]. Co-incubation with phytohemagglutinin (PHA) and NMDA resulted in an increased global cell surface expression of GluN1 subunits and abrogation of interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) in the culture supernatant of lymphocytes [26]. The above suggests that at the level of the nucleolus, the ability of GluN1 subunit potential or membrane threshold changes that can direct changes to transcription and possibly cell fates is boosted or enhanced by priming or “first hit” to the nucleolus. Several reports describe cellular changes of weeks to months occurring from transcriptional diversions from the nucleolus [96,97].

8. Summary

This review was built on current hypotheses for some of these regulatory and pathologic functions, based on published subnuclear interactions and immunochemical imaging. Histological data demonstrating a shift in the subcellular location of the GluN1 subunit supports its role as a rapid intracellular mediator acting through direct communication with the nucleus and the nucleolus. Protein tyrosine kinase inhibitors can effectively reduce (i) pain-related behavior, (ii) GluN1 subunit expression increases in the spinal cord, and (iii) the shift of GluN1 subunit from a cell membrane to nuclear localization. Cycloheximide can block most of the glutamate-activated upregulation of GluN1 subunit content, confirming the synthesis of new protein in response to inflammatory insult contributions but not all content is necessarily de novo.
Both the in vitro and the in vivo findings indicated that activated GluN1 subunits could produce rapid downstream events and result in increased GluN1 subunit protein potentially required to mobilize the shift in GluN2 subunit composition and receptor numbers that promote hypersensitivity in the acute K/C arthritis model. The modulation of trafficking to the cell nucleus promoting transcriptional changes would impact GluN1 subunit function and cellular response direction. Subsequently, the GluN1 subunit can stimulate, enhance, suppress, and de-repress via promoters, resulting in increased GluN1 subunit protein expression. Its transport onto chromatin in the nucleoplasm and the nucleoli allows the GluN1 subunit to respond quickly and consequently influence downstream nucleolar, nuclear, cellular, and functional processes.

Author Contributions

T.A.M. and K.N.W. wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

These studies were funded by grants from the Sealy Endowment (KNW); NIH NS32778 (KNW), P01 NS11255 (KNW, TAM, GT), and R21 AR48371 AR48371 (KNW, TAM); the Dana Foundation (TAM, KNW), and an anonymous UTMB endowment (KNW, TAM). These studies were also supported by Merit Review Award BX002695, Office of Research and Development, Medical Research Service, United States Department of Veterans Affairs. This communication does not necessarily reflect the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the U.S. government.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Marena Montera for the production of the graphic illustration.

Conflicts of Interest

KWH is an unpaid consultant for Elixeria USA, Inc. (San Francisco, CA, USA) and NeuroChronix (Newark, DE, USA), although none of the contents of the review is related.

Abbreviations

Ab’sAntibodies.
ACPDAminocyclopentane-1,3-dicarboxylic acid
ACCAnterior cingulate cortex
ASPAspartic acid, aspartate
aCSFArtificial cerebrospinal fluid
AP-1Activating protein-1
ARCThe arcuate nucleus of the mediobasal hypothalamus
BDNFBrain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor
concconcentration
D1Dopamine receptor
DDay, as in D7 = Day 7
HDACHistone deacetylase
i.a.intra-articular
ICCImmunocytochemistry
IEImmediate Early
IEGImmediate Early Gene
IHCImmunohistochemistry
IPIntraparenchymal
K/Ckaolin/carrageenan
lncRNALong non-coding RNA, group of RNAs of >200 nucleotides, with limited protein-.coding potential, and having widespread biological functions, including regulation. of transcriptional patterns and protein activity, formation of endogenous small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), and natural microRNA (miRNA) sponges
LPSLipopolysaccharide
LTPLong term potentiation
MEF2Myocyte Enhancer Factor 2, is a transcription factor with four specific numbers such as MEF2A, B, C, and D. Each MEF2 gene is located on a specific chromosome
NFkB/RelNuclear Factor kappa B/Rel family
NGFNerve growth factor
NLSNuclear localization sequence (GluN1 amino acid sequence 82–99)
NMDAN-methyl-D-aspartate
NoLSNucleolar Localization sequence: (GluN1 amino acid sequence 84–95)
NORNucleolus organizing region of a specific chromosome located in the nucleolus
NPCNeuroprogenitor cells
NPM1Nucleophosmin-1
NR1NMDA receptor 1
NR2NMDA receptor 2
NR3NMDA receptor 3
Nrf1Nuclear respiratory factor 1 (transcription factor)
OFTOpen field testing
PC12Rat clonal cell line derived from a pheochromocytoma of the adrenal medulla
p53Phosphorylated 53: an oncogene involved in apoptosis
PKAProtein kinase A
PKCProtein kinase C
PMAPhorbol myristate acetate
Pol I: II, IIIPolymerase I, II, III
PTKNon-receptor protein tyrosine kinase
PVNParaventricular nucleus
PWLPaw withdrawal reflex
RE1Repressor element 1
REV-ERBNuclear transcriptional repressor
scsubcutaneous
siRNASmall interfering RNA
sol’nsolution
Sp1Specific protein 1
SH-SY5YHuman neuroblastoma clonal cells
TSSTranscription start site
UBFUpstream Binding Factor

References

  1. Harding, S.D.; Armstrong, J.F.; Faccenda, E.; Southan, C.; Alexander, S.P.H.; Davenport, A.P.; Pawson, A.J.; Spedding, M.; Davies, J.A.; Iuphar, N. The IUPHAR/BPS guide to PHARMACOLOGY in 2022: Curating pharmacology for COVID-19, malaria and antibacterials. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 50, D1282–D1294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Marini, A.M.; Rabin, S.J.; Lipsky, R.H.; Mocchetti, I. Activity-dependent Release of Brain-derived Neurotrophic Factor Underlies the Neuroprotective Effect of N-Methyl-d-aspartate. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 29394–29399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hansen, K.B.; Wollmuth, L.P.; Bowie, D.; Furukawa, H.; Menniti, F.S.; Sobolevsky, A.I.; Swanson, G.T.; Swanger, S.A.; Greger, I.H.; Nakagawa, T.; et al. Structure, Function, and Pharmacology of Glutamate Receptor Ion Channels. Pharmacol. Rev. 2021, 73, 1469–1658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chandrasekar, R. Alcohol and NMDA receptor: Current research and future direction. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2013, 6, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bai, G.; Hoffman, P.W. Chapter 5 Biology of the NMDA Receptor; Van Dongen, A.M., Ed.; CRC Press; Taylor & Francis: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  6. Willis, W.D., Jr. The role of TRPV1 receptors in pain evoked by noxious thermal and chemical stimuli. Exp. Brain Res. 2009, 196, 5–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Kristensen, J.D.; Svensson, B.; Gordh, T. The NMDA-receptor antagonist CPP abolishes neurogenic ‘wind-up pain’ after intrathecal administration in humans. Pain 1992, 51, 249–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Riccardi, A.; Guarino, M.; Serra, S.; Spampinato, M.D.; Vanni, S.; Shiffer, D.; Voza, A.; Fabbri, A.; De Iaco, F.; on behalf of the Study and Research Center of the Italian Society of Emergency Medicine. Narrative Review: Low-Dose Ketamine for Pain Management. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 3256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. South, S.M.; Kohno, T.; Kaspar, B.K.; Hegarty, D.; Vissel, B.; Drake, C.T.; Ohata, M.; Jenab, S.; Sailer, A.W.; Malkmus, S.; et al. A Conditional Deletion of the NR1 Subunit of the NMDA Receptor in Adult Spinal Cord Dorsal Horn Reduces NMDA Currents and Injury-Induced Pain. J. Neurosci. 2003, 23, 5031–5040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Hietamies, T.M.; McInnes, L.A.; Klise, A.J.; Worley, M.J.; Qian, J.J.; Williams, L.M.; Heifets, B.D.; Levine, S.P. The effects of ketamine on symptoms of depression and anxiety in real-world care settings: A retrospective controlled analysis. J. Affect. Disord. 2023, 335, 484–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Yang, J.; Hertz, E.; Zhang, X.; Leinartaité, L.; Lundius, E.G.; Li, J.; Svenningsson, P. Overexpression of α-synuclein simultaneously increases glutamate NMDA receptor phosphorylation and reduces glucocerebrosidase activity. Neurosci. Lett. 2016, 611, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, Z.; Zhang, S.; Fu, P.; Zhang, Z.; Lin, K.; Ko, J.K.-S.; Yung, K.K.-L. Roles of Glutamate Receptors in Parkinson’s Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lewerenz, J.; Maher, P. Chronic Glutamate Toxicity in Neurodegenerative Diseases—What Is the Evidence? Front. Neurosci. 2015, 9, 469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lipton, S.A. NMDA Receptors, Glial Cells, and Clinical Medicine. Neuron 2006, 50, 9–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Nagu, P.; Parashar, A.; Behl, T.; Mehta, V. Gut Microbiota Composition and Epigenetic Molecular Changes Connected to the Pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s Disease. J. Mol. Neurosci. 2021, 71, 1436–1455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rodríguez-Muñoz, M.; Sánchez-Blázquez, P.; Garzón, J. Fenfluramine diminishes NMDA receptor-mediated seizures via its mixed activity at serotonin 5HT2A and type 1 sigma receptors. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 23373–23389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Levite, M.; Goldberg, H. Autoimmune Epilepsy—Novel Multidisciplinary Analysis, Discoveries and Insights. Front. Immunol. 2022, 12, 762743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Holmes, K.D.; Mattar, P.; Marsh, D.R.; Jordan, V.; Weaver, L.C.; Dekaban, G.A. The C-terminal C1 cassette of the N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor 1 subunit contains a bi-partite nuclear localization sequence. J. Neurochem. 2002, 81, 1152–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhou, L.; Duan, J. The NMDAR GluN1-1a C-terminus binds to CaM and regulates synaptic function. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2021, 534, 323–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ulbrich, M.H.; Isacoff, E.Y. Rules of engagement for NMDA receptor subunits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 14163–14168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jeffrey, R.A.; Ch’Ng, T.H.; O’Dell, T.J.; Martin, K.C. Activity-Dependent Anchoring of Importin α at the Synapse Involves Regulated Binding to the Cytoplasmic Tail of the NR1-1a Subunit of the NMDA Receptor. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29, 15613–15620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Niu, M.; Yang, X.; Li, Y.; Sun, Y.; Wang, L.; Ha, J.; Xie, Y.; Gao, Z.; Tian, C.; Wang, L.; et al. Progresses in GluN2A-containing NMDA Receptors and their Selective Regulators. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 2023, 43, 139–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhou, L.; Duan, J. The C-terminus of NMDAR GluN1-1a Subunit Translocates to Nucleus and Regulates Synaptic Function. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Garraway, S.M.; Xu, Q.; Inturrisi, C.E. Design and Evaluation of Small Interfering RNAs That Target Expression of the N-Methyl-d-aspartate Receptor NR1 Subunit Gene in the Spinal Cord Dorsal Horn. Experiment 2007, 322, 982–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Samra, Y.A.; Kira, D.; Rajpurohit, P.; Mohamed, R.; Owen, L.A.; Shakoor, A.; Kim, I.K.; DeAngelis, M.M.; Sheibani, N.; Al-Shabrawey, M.; et al. Implication of N-Methyl-d-Aspartate Receptor in Homocysteine-Induced Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 9356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mashkina, A.P.; Cizkova, D.; Vanicky, I.; Boldyrev, A.A. NMDA Receptors are Expressed in Lymphocytes Activated Both In Vitro and In Vivo. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 2010, 30, 901–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. McNearney, T.A.; Ma, Y.; Chen, Y.; Taglialatela, G.; Yin, H.; Zhang, W.-R.; Westlund, K.N. A peripheral neuroimmune link: Glutamate agonists upregulate NMDA NR1 receptor mRNA and protein, vimentin, TNF-α, and RANTES in cultured human synoviocytes. Am. J. Physiol. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2010, 298, R584–R598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Flood, S.; Parri, R.; Williams, A.; Duance, V.; Mason, D. Modulation of interleukin-6 and matrix metalloproteinase 2 expression in human fibroblast-like synoviocytes by functional ionotropic glutamate receptors. Arthritis Rheum. 2007, 56, 2523–2534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Baatout, S.; Chatelain, B.; Staquet, P.; Symann, M.; Chatelain, C. Interaction between protein kinase C and actin in megakaryocyte polyploidization. Anticancer Res. 1999, 19, 4193–4198. [Google Scholar]
  30. Hitchcock, I.S.; Skerry, T.M.; Howard, M.R.; Genever, P.G. NMDA receptor–mediated regulation of human megakaryocytopoiesis. Blood 2003, 102, 1254–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chenu, C.; Serre, C.; Raynal, C.; Burt-Pichat, B.; Delmas, P. Glutamate Receptors Are Expressed by Bone Cells and Are Involved in Bone Resorption. Bone 1998, 22, 295–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ghosh, K.; Pan, H.-L. Epigenetic Mechanisms of Neural Plasticity in Chronic Neuropathic Pain. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2022, 13, 432–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Nasca, C.; Zelli, D.; Bigio, B.; Piccinin, S.; Scaccianoce, S.; Nisticò, R.; McEwen, B.S. Stress dynamically regulates behavior and glutamatergic gene expression in hippocampus by opening a window of epigenetic plasticity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 14960–14965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Gascón, S.; Deogracias, R.; Sobrado, M.; Roda, J.M.; Renart, J.; Rodríguez-Peña, A.; Díaz-Guerra, M. Transcription of the NR1 Subunit of the N-Methyl-d-aspartate Receptor Is Down-regulated by Excitotoxic Stimulation and Cerebral Ischemia. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 35018–35027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Cheng, F.; Li, X.; Li, Y.; Wang, C.; Wang, T.; Liu, G.; Baskys, A.; Uéda, K.; Chan, P.; Yu, S. α-Synuclein promotes clathrin-mediated NMDA receptor endocytosis and attenuates NMDA-induced dopaminergic cell death. J. Neurochem. 2011, 119, 815–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zidovska, A. The rich inner life of the cell nucleus: Dynamic organization, active flows, and emergent rheology. Biophys. Rev. 2020, 12, 1093–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Hua, L.; Yan, D.; Wan, C.; Hu, B. Nucleolus and Nucleolar Stress: From Cell Fate Decision to Disease Development. Cells 2022, 11, 3017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Holmes, K.D.; Mattar, P.A.; Marsh, D.R.; Weaver, L.C.; Dekaban, G.A. The N-Methyl-d-aspartate Receptor Splice Variant NR1–4 C-terminal Domain. Deletion analysis and role in subcellular distribution. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 1457–1468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Thompson, K.R.; Otis, K.O.; Chen, D.Y.; Zhao, Y.; O’Dell, T.J.; Martin, K.C. Synapse to Nucleus Signaling during Long-Term Synaptic Plasticity: A Role for the Classical Active Nuclear Import Pathway. Neuron 2004, 44, 997–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Westlund, K.N.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Pappas, T.C.; Zhang, W.-R.; Taglialatela, G.; McIlwrath, S.L.; McNearney, T.A. Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Reduce NMDA NR1 Subunit Expression, Nuclear Translocation, and Behavioral Pain Measures in Experimental Arthritis. Front. Physiol. 2020, 11, 440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lawand, N.B.; McNearney, T.; Westlund, K.N. Amino acid release into the knee joint: Key role in nociception and inflammation. Pain 2000, 86, 69–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sorkin, L.; Westlund, K.; Sluka, K.; Dougherty, P.; Willis, W. Neural changes in acute arthritis in monkeys. IV. Time-course of amino acid release into the lumbar dorsal horn. Brain Res. Rev. 1992, 17, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Pol, A.N.v.D.; Obrietan, K.; Chen, G. Excitatory Actions of GABA after Neuronal Trauma. J. Neurosci. 1996, 16, 4283–4292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Coull, J.A.M.; Boudreau, D.; Bachand, K.; Prescott, S.A.; Nault, F.; Sík, A.; De Koninck, P.; De Koninck, Y. Trans-synaptic shift in anion gradient in spinal lamina I neurons as a mechanism of neuropathic pain. Nature 2003, 424, 938–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Ye, Z.; Westlund, K.N. Ultrastructural localization of glutamate receptor subunits (NMDAR1, AMPA GluR1 and GluR2/3) and spinothalamic tract cells. Neuroreport 1996, 7, 2581–2586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Satoh, T.; Nakatsuka, D.; Watanabe, Y.; Nagata, I.; Kikuchi, H.; Namura, S. Neuroprotection by MAPK/ERK kinase inhibition with U0126 against oxidative stress in a mouse neuronal cell line and rat primary cultured cortical neurons. Neurosci. Lett. 2000, 288, 163–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Li, J.; Yan, D.; Liu, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, C. U0126 protects hippocampal CA1 neurons against forebrain ischemia-induced apoptosis via the ERK1/2 signaling pathway and NMDA receptors. Neurol. Res. 2018, 40, 318–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sluka, K.; Jordan, H.; Willis, W.; Westlund, K. Differential effects of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) and non-NMDA receptor antagonists on spinal release of amino acids after development of acute arthritis in rats. Brain Res. 1994, 664, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lucke, T.; Schaible, H.-G.; Zhang, J.; Mense, S.; Treede, R.-D.; Hoheisel, U.; Sun, R.-Q.; Lawand, N.B.; Lin, Q.; Willis, W.D.; et al. N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) and non-NMDA receptor antagonists block the hyperexcitability of dorsal horn neurons during development of acute arthritis in rat’s knee joint. J. Neurophysiol. 1993, 70, 1365–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Skilling, S.R.; Smullin, D.H.; Beitz, A.J.; Larson, A.A. Extracellular Amino Acid Concentrations in the Dorsal Spinal Cord of Freely Moving Rats Following Veratridine and Nociceptive Stimulation. J. Neurochem. 1988, 51, 127–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. McNearney, T.; Speegle, D.; Lawand, N.; Lisse, J.; Westlund, K.N. Excitatory amino acid profiles of synovial fluid from patients with arthritis. J. Rheumatol. 2000, 27, 739–745. [Google Scholar]
  52. Botto, R.; Callai, N.; Cermelli, A.; Causarano, L.; Rainero, I. Anxiety and depression in Alzheimer’s disease: A systematic review of pathogenetic mechanisms and relation to cognitive decline. Neurol. Sci. 2022, 43, 4107–4124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Flood, P.M.; Qian, L.; Peterson, L.J.; Zhang, F.; Shi, J.-S.; Gao, H.-M.; Hong, J.-S. Transcriptional Factor NF-κB as a Target for Therapy in Parkinson’s Disease. Park. Dis. 2011, 2011, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Liu, Y.-J.; Li, Y.-L.; Fang, Z.-H.; Liao, H.-L.; Zhang, Y.-Y.; Lin, J.; Liu, F.; Shen, J.-F. NMDARs mediate peripheral and central sensitization contributing to chronic orofacial pain. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2022, 16, 999509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Lipsky, R.H.; Xu, K.; Zhu, D.; Kelly, C.; Terhakopian, A.; Novelli, A.; Marini, A.M. Nuclear factor κB is a critical determinant in N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor-mediated neuroprotection. J. Neurochem. 2001, 78, 254–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Lee, I.-O.; Yukhananov, R.; Standaert, D.G.; Crosby, G. NMDA-R1 antisense oligodeoxynucleotides modify formalin-induced nociception and spinal c-Fos expression in rat spinal cord. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2004, 79, 183–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Peet, N.M.; Grabowski, P.S.; Laketić-Ljubojević, I.; Skerry, T.M. The glutamate receptor antagonist MK801 modulates bone resorption in vitro by a mechanism predominantly involving osteoclast differentiation. FASEB J. 1999, 13, 2179–2185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Tan, P.-H.; Yu, S.-W.; Lin, V.C.-H.; Liu, C.-C.; Chien, C.-F.C. RNA interference-mediated gene silence of the NR1 subunit of the NMDA receptor by subcutaneous injection of vector-encoding short hairpin RNA reduces formalin-induced nociception in the rat. Pain 2011, 152, 573–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sluka, K.; Westlund, K. An experimental arthritis model in rats: The effects of NMDA and non-NMDA antagonists on aspartate and glutamate release in the dorsal horn. Neurosci. Lett. 1993, 149, 99–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Salter, M.G.; Fern, R. NMDA receptors are expressed in developing oligodendrocyte processes and mediate injury. Nature 2005, 438, 1167–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Peng, J.-M.; Xu, L.-S.; Zhu, Q.; Gong, S.; Yu, X.-M.; Guo, S.-Y.; Wu, G.-C.; Tao, J.; Jiang, X.-H. Enhanced NMDA receptor NR1 phosphorylation and neuronal activity in the arcuate nucleus of hypothalamus following peripheral inflammation. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2011, 32, 160–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhou, Q.; Price, D.D.; Caudle, R.M.; Verne, G.N. Spinal NMDA NR1 subunit expression following transient TNBS colitis. Brain Res. 2009, 1279, 109–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Liu, M.; Kay, J.C.; Shen, S.; Qiao, L.-Y. Endogenous BDNF augments NMDA receptor phosphorylation in the spinal cord via PLCγ, PKC, and PI3K/Akt pathways during colitis. J. Neuroinflamm. 2015, 12, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Tan, L.-H.; Li, K.-G.; Wu, Y.-Y.; Guo, M.-W.; Lan, Y.; Wang, S.; Zhu, W.-L.; Ren, X.-X. Effect of Electroacupuncture at Different Acupoints on the Expression of NMDA Receptors in ACC and Colon in IBS Rats. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2019, 2019, 4213928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Kim, M.; Kim, H.; Kim, H. Anti-Inflammatory Effect of Protopine through MAPK and NF-κB Signaling Regulation in HepG2 Cell. Molecules 2022, 27, 4601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Kundu-Michalik, S.; Bisotti, M.-A.; Lipsius, E.; Bauche, A.; Kruppa, A.; Klokow, T.; Kammler, G.; Kruppa, J. Nucleolar Binding Sequences of the Ribosomal Protein S6e Family Reside in Evolutionary Highly Conserved Peptide Clusters. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2008, 25, 580–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Kass-Simon, G.; Zompa, M.A.; Scappaticci, A.A.; Zackroff, R.V.; Hufnagel, L.A. Nucleolar binding of an anti-NMDA receptor antibody in hydra: A non-canonical role for an NMDA receptor protein? J. Exp. Zool. Part A Ecol. Integr. Physiol. 2009, 311, 763–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Fan, W.; Xing, Y.; Zhong, Y.; Chen, C.; Shen, Y. Expression of NMDA receptor subunit 1 in the rat retina. Acta Histochem. 2013, 115, 42–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ishimaru, Y.; Sumino, A.; Kajioka, D.; Shibagaki, F.; Yamamuro, A.; Yoshioka, Y.; Maeda, S. Apelin protects against NMDA-induced retinal neuronal death via an APJ receptor by activating Akt and ERK1/2, and suppressing TNF-α expression in mice. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2017, 133, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Del Caño, G.G.; Gerrikagoitia, I.; Sarasa, M.; Matute, C.; Martínez-Millán, L. Ionotropic glutamate receptor subunits are differentially regulated in the motoneuronal pools of the rat hypoglossal nucleus in response to axotomy. J. Neurocytol. 2000, 29, 509–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Awobuluyi, M.; Lipton, S.A.; Sucher, N.J. Translationally distinct populations of NMDA receptor subunit NR1 mRNA in the developing rat brain. J. Neurochem. 2003, 87, 1066–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Irfan, J.; Febrianto, M.R.; Sharma, A.; Rose, T.; Mahmudzade, Y.; Di Giovanni, S.; Nagy, I.; Torres-Perez, J.V. DNA Methylation and Non-Coding RNAs during Tissue-Injury Associated Pain. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Loureiro, C.M.; Fachim, H.A.; Corsi-Zuelli, F.; Shuhama, R.; Joca, S.; Menezes, P.R.; Dalton, C.F.; Del-Ben, C.M.; Louzada-Junior, P.; Reynolds, G.P. Epigenetic-mediated N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor changes in the brain of isolated reared rats. Epigenomics 2020, 12, 1983–1997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Guglietti, B.; Sivasankar, S.; Mustafa, S.; Corrigan, F.; Collins-Praino, L.E. Fyn Kinase Activity and Its Role in Neurodegenerative Disease Pathology: A Potential Universal Target? Mol. Neurobiol. 2021, 58, 5986–6005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Kostopoulou, O.N.; Wilhelmi, V.; Raiss, S.; Ananthaseshan, S.; Lindström, M.S.; Bartek, J.; Söderberg-Naucler, C. Human cytomegalovirus and Herpes Simplex type I virus can engage RNA polymerase I for transcription of immediate early genes. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 96536–96552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Lafita-Navarro, M.; Conacci-Sorrell, M. Nucleolar stress: From development to cancer. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2023, 136, 64–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. He, J.; Qin, Z.; Chen, X.; He, W.; Li, D.; Zhang, L.; Le, Y.; Xiong, Q.; Zhang, B.; Wang, H. HIF-1α Ameliorates Diabetic Neuropathic Pain via Parkin-Mediated Mitophagy in a Mouse Model. BioMed Res. Int. 2022, 2022, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Nazari-Khanamiri, F.; Ghasemnejad-Berenji, M. Resveratrol may ameliorate rheumatoid arthritis via the STAT3/HIF-1/VEGF molecular pathway. J. Food Biochem. 2022, 46, e14182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Wang, S.; Lim, G.; Mao, J.; Sung, B.; Mao, J. Regulation of the trigeminal NR1 subunit expression induced by inflammation of the temporomandibular joint region in rats. Pain 2009, 141, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Wang, J.; Sun, Z.; Wang, Y.; Wang, H.; Guo, Y. The role and mechanism of glutamic NMDA receptor in the mechanical hyperalgesia in diabetic rats. Neurol. Res. 2017, 39, 1006–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Matos-Perdomo, E.; Machín, F. Nucleolar and Ribosomal DNA Structure under Stress: Yeast Lessons for Aging and Cancer. Cells 2019, 8, 779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Chakraborty, A.; Murphy, S.; Coleman, N. The Role of NMDA Receptors in Neural Stem Cell Proliferation and Differentiation. Stem Cells Dev. 2017, 26, 798–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Sharma, N.M.; Cunningham, C.J.; Zheng, H.; Liu, X.; Patel, K.P. Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1α Mediates Increased Sympathoexcitation via Glutamatergic N-Methyl-d-Aspartate Receptors in the Paraventricular Nucleus of Rats with Chronic Heart Failure. Circ. Heart Fail. 2016, 9, e003423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Tong, G.; Takahashi, H.; Tu, S.; Shin, Y.; Talantova, M.; Zago, W.; Xia, P.; Nie, Z.; Goetz, T.; Zhang, D.; et al. Modulation of NMDA Receptor Properties and Synaptic Transmission by the NR3A Subunit in Mouse Hippocampal and Cerebrocortical Neurons. J. Neurophysiol. 2008, 99, 122–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Hajdú, T.; Juhász, T.; Szűcs-Somogyi, C.; Rácz, K.; Zákány, R. NR1 and NR3B Composed Intranuclear N-methyl-d-aspartate Receptor Complexes in Human Melanoma Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Buchheit, T.; Van de Ven, T.; Shaw, A. Epigenetics and the Transition from Acute to Chronic Pain. Pain Med. 2012, 13, 1474–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Biswal, S.; Das, D.; Barhwal, K.; Kumar, A.; Nag, T.C.; Thakur, M.K.; Hota, S.K.; Kumar, B. Epigenetic Regulation of SNAP25 Prevents Progressive Glutamate Excitotoxicty in Hypoxic CA3 Neurons. Mol. Neurobiol. 2017, 54, 6133–6147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Vecino, R.; Burguete, M.C.; Jover-Mengual, T.; Agulla, J.; Bobo-Jiménez, V.; Salom, J.B.; Almeida, A.; Delgado-Esteban, M. The MDM2-p53 pathway is involved in preconditioning-induced neuronal tolerance to ischemia. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Noor, S.; Sanchez, J.J.; Vanderwall, A.G.; Sun, M.S.; Maxwell, J.R.; Davies, S.; Jantzie, L.L.; Petersen, T.R.; Savage, D.D.; Milligan, E.D. Prenatal alcohol exposure potentiates chronic neuropathic pain, spinal glial and immune cell activation and alters sciatic nerve and DRG cytokine levels. Brain Behav. Immun. 2017, 61, 80–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Sanchez, J.J.; Sanchez, J.E.; Noor, S.; Ruffaner-Hanson, C.D.; Davies, S.; Wagner, C.R.; Jantzie, L.L.; Mellios, N.; Savage, D.D.; Milligan, E.D. Targeting the β2-integrin LFA-1, reduces adverse neuroimmune actions in neuropathic susceptibility caused by prenatal alcohol exposure. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 2019, 7, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Sarantis, K.; Antoniou, K.; Matsokis, N.; Angelatou, F. Exposure to novel environment is characterized by an interaction of D1/NMDA receptors underlined by phosphorylation of the NMDA and AMPA receptor subunits and activation of ERK1/2 signaling, leading to epigenetic changes and gene expression in rat hippocampus. Neurochem. Int. 2012, 60, 55–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Stover, J.F.; Sakowitz, O.W.; Kroppenstedt, S.N.; Thomale, U.W.; Kempski, O.S.; Unterberg, A.W.; Flügge, G. Differential effects of prolonged isoflurane anesthesia on plasma, extracellular, and CSF glutamate, neuronal activity, 125I-Mk801 NMDA receptor binding, and brain edema in traumatic brain-injured rats. Acta Neurochir. 2004, 146, 819–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Jiang, X.; Tian, F.; Mearow, K.; Okagaki, P.; Lipsky, R.H. The excitoprotective effect of N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors is mediated by a brain-derived neurotrophic factor autocrine loop in cultured hippocampal neurons. J. Neurochem. 2005, 94, 713–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Xu, H.-N.; Li, L.-X.; Wang, Y.-X.; Wang, H.-G.; An, D.; Heng, B.; Liu, Y.-Q. Genistein inhibits Aβ25–35-induced SH-SY5Y cell damage by modulating the expression of apoptosis-related proteins and Ca2+ influx through ionotropic glutamate receptors. Phytother. Res. 2019, 33, 431–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. McNearney, T.; Baethge, B.A.; Cao, S.; Alam, R.; Lisse, J.R.; Westlund, K.N. Excitatory amino acids, TNF-α, and chemokine levels in synovial fluids of patients with active arthropathies. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2004, 137, 621–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Genever, P.G.; Maxfield, S.J.; Skerry, T.M.; Kennovin, G.D.; Maltman, J.; Bowgen, C.J.; Raxworthy, M.J. Evidence for a Novel Glutamate-Mediated Signaling Pathway in Keratinocytes. J. Investig. Dermatol. 1999, 112, 337–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Liu, L.; Yang, T.; Simon, S.A. The protein tyrosine kinase inhibitor, genistein, decreases excitability of nociceptive neurons. Pain 2004, 112, 131–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Nuclear localization of GluN1 subunit. (A) Electron micrograph illustrating the intracellular distribution of NMDA glutamate receptor GluN1 subunit in a spinal cord spinothalamic tract neuron 4 h after k/c induction of knee joint inflammation. The immunolocalization of the GluN1 subunit is evident in the nucleus at the rim of nuclear pores on the nuclear membrane rather than at the post-synaptic localization typical in spinal neurons of naive rats [45]. (B) The same EM image with red pseudocolor and yellow shadowing enhances the ability to observe the subcellular immunostaining of the colloidal gold particles found particularly in the nucleus, nuclear rim, and nuclear pores (arrowheads). (C) The GluN1 subunit in naïve animals is typically localized along the cell membrane. The arrowheads indicate the GluN1 subunit in the pre-synaptic region of terminals, and the large arrows indicate post-synaptic membrane immunoperoxidase labeling on a spinothalamic tract neuron identified by large dense crystals (open arrows) after WGA-HRP retrograde transport from the thalamus. (D) High power EM of the inset outlined in panel (B), with red pseudocolor (yellow shadowing) or arrows to indicate immunogold labeling of GluN1 subunit at the nuclear membrane and within the nucleus (n = 3). Scale Bar in (A,B) = 3 µm in panels; 1.33 µm in C; 0.3 µm in panel (D). Reprinted with copyright permission [40,45].
Figure 1. Nuclear localization of GluN1 subunit. (A) Electron micrograph illustrating the intracellular distribution of NMDA glutamate receptor GluN1 subunit in a spinal cord spinothalamic tract neuron 4 h after k/c induction of knee joint inflammation. The immunolocalization of the GluN1 subunit is evident in the nucleus at the rim of nuclear pores on the nuclear membrane rather than at the post-synaptic localization typical in spinal neurons of naive rats [45]. (B) The same EM image with red pseudocolor and yellow shadowing enhances the ability to observe the subcellular immunostaining of the colloidal gold particles found particularly in the nucleus, nuclear rim, and nuclear pores (arrowheads). (C) The GluN1 subunit in naïve animals is typically localized along the cell membrane. The arrowheads indicate the GluN1 subunit in the pre-synaptic region of terminals, and the large arrows indicate post-synaptic membrane immunoperoxidase labeling on a spinothalamic tract neuron identified by large dense crystals (open arrows) after WGA-HRP retrograde transport from the thalamus. (D) High power EM of the inset outlined in panel (B), with red pseudocolor (yellow shadowing) or arrows to indicate immunogold labeling of GluN1 subunit at the nuclear membrane and within the nucleus (n = 3). Scale Bar in (A,B) = 3 µm in panels; 1.33 µm in C; 0.3 µm in panel (D). Reprinted with copyright permission [40,45].
Ijms 24 13196 g001
Figure 2. Nucleolar translocation of GluN1 subunit. Electron micrograph of GluN1 subunit immunolocalized with nickel intensified diaminobenzidine after K/C induction of knee joint inflammation in a rat. The immunoperoxidase labeling is localized on the nuclear pore edge and within the nucleus (long yellow arrows). The GluN1 subunit has migrated into the nucleus and is also localized at the edge of the nucleolus (shorter blue arrows). Labeled enlarged portion of an electron micrograph published previously, with permission [45].
Figure 2. Nucleolar translocation of GluN1 subunit. Electron micrograph of GluN1 subunit immunolocalized with nickel intensified diaminobenzidine after K/C induction of knee joint inflammation in a rat. The immunoperoxidase labeling is localized on the nuclear pore edge and within the nucleus (long yellow arrows). The GluN1 subunit has migrated into the nucleus and is also localized at the edge of the nucleolus (shorter blue arrows). Labeled enlarged portion of an electron micrograph published previously, with permission [45].
Ijms 24 13196 g002
Figure 3. Human clonal synoviocytes with nuclear/nucleolar translocation of GluN1 subunit. Human synoviocytes (SW892), when untreated (A), displayed some cellular GluN1 subunit but no nuclear localization. Treatment of the synovial cultures with NMDA and ACPD for 1 h (B) and 3 h (C) increased nuclear GluN1 immunostaining over time. The nuclear immunostaining at 3 h is shown at higher power in the inset in (C) with an arrow indicating the same cluster of cells, each with multiple nucleoli surrounded by GluN1 subunit immunostaining. Multiple nucleoli in cells indicate high energy demands, ribosome biogenesis, and cellular stress. In panel (D), the synoviocytes were pretreated with MEK1/2 inhibitor U0126 (5 µM) prior to the treatment with NMDA and ACPD for 3 h, preventing the nuclear and nucleolar translocation. McNearney and Westlund, unpublished study, protocol per [27].
Figure 3. Human clonal synoviocytes with nuclear/nucleolar translocation of GluN1 subunit. Human synoviocytes (SW892), when untreated (A), displayed some cellular GluN1 subunit but no nuclear localization. Treatment of the synovial cultures with NMDA and ACPD for 1 h (B) and 3 h (C) increased nuclear GluN1 immunostaining over time. The nuclear immunostaining at 3 h is shown at higher power in the inset in (C) with an arrow indicating the same cluster of cells, each with multiple nucleoli surrounded by GluN1 subunit immunostaining. Multiple nucleoli in cells indicate high energy demands, ribosome biogenesis, and cellular stress. In panel (D), the synoviocytes were pretreated with MEK1/2 inhibitor U0126 (5 µM) prior to the treatment with NMDA and ACPD for 3 h, preventing the nuclear and nucleolar translocation. McNearney and Westlund, unpublished study, protocol per [27].
Ijms 24 13196 g003
Figure 4. Schematic depiction of nuclear translocation of GluN1 subunit in neurons. Nociceptive neurons are overactivated in pain states. In conditions of abundance of increased GluN1 subunit is observed as increased cellular and nuclear ring immunostaining but is greatly reduced by tyrosine kinase inhibition [40]. Nuclear membrane translocation reportedly occurs by endocytotic [35] and de novo mechanisms.
Figure 4. Schematic depiction of nuclear translocation of GluN1 subunit in neurons. Nociceptive neurons are overactivated in pain states. In conditions of abundance of increased GluN1 subunit is observed as increased cellular and nuclear ring immunostaining but is greatly reduced by tyrosine kinase inhibition [40]. Nuclear membrane translocation reportedly occurs by endocytotic [35] and de novo mechanisms.
Ijms 24 13196 g004
Table 1. A brief synopsis of the studies highlighting results from various exposure protocols in experimental models of arthritis, formalin injection, colitis, and inflammatory bowel syndrome (IBS) that directly assess GluN1 subunit expression and function in pain states, cell cultures, tissue explants, animal models [9,19,23,24,27,31,40,41,49,55,56,57,58] and humans [27,51]. Studies demonstrating increased GluN agonist or inflammatory mediator levels, and preincubation with enhancing or conditioning agents are also included.
Table 1. A brief synopsis of the studies highlighting results from various exposure protocols in experimental models of arthritis, formalin injection, colitis, and inflammatory bowel syndrome (IBS) that directly assess GluN1 subunit expression and function in pain states, cell cultures, tissue explants, animal models [9,19,23,24,27,31,40,41,49,55,56,57,58] and humans [27,51]. Studies demonstrating increased GluN agonist or inflammatory mediator levels, and preincubation with enhancing or conditioning agents are also included.
ModelInjury and/or
Activation
ResultsPretreatment,
Conditioning or
Intervention
New Results after Pretreatment,
Conditioning or Intervention
Reference
ARTHRITIS/
Inflammation
Rat
arthritis
Intraarticular (i.a.) kaolin/carrageenan (K/C) injection
hind leg
Increased spinal dorsal horn (SCDH) neuron excitability1. Ketamine
2. D-AP5
3. CNQX
Decreased spinal dorsal horn
neuron hyperexcitability
Neugebauer et al., 1993 [49]
Rat
arthritis
i.a., K/C injection
hind leg
Increased 2–4-fold, i.a. Glu conc 10–120 min after K/C injectionPretreat with i.a. CNQX, ketamine, lidocaine injectionIncreased i.a. GLU conc.
significantly blunted
Sluka and Westlund. 1993 [59]
Lawand et al., 2000 [41]
Rat primary cerebellar granule neuron cultures Glu incubation NeurotoxicityPre-Rx with:
1. NMDA
2. MK-801
3. Transfected with DS oligonucleotide
to BDNF NFkB binding site
Pretreatment and BDNF DNA
binding activity resulted in
neuroprotection
Lipsky et al., 2001 [55]
Mouse
Lumbar SCDH
(IPLformalin-induced nociception)
IPL micro-injection
rAAV-GFP
Lumbar SCDH
IPL injection, formalin hind paw
Increased licking, biting pain
behaviors
Increased EPSC current and synaptic response in Lamina II neurons of SCDH
Conditional
GluN1 deletion segments
Significant decrease in pain behaviors
Significant decrease in EPSC’s by 60–80%
South et al., 2003 [9]
Rat
(IPLformalin-induced nociception)
IPL injection, formalin hind pawIncreased number of hind paw flinchesGluN1 antisense mRNASignificant blunting in the number of flinches Lee et al., 2004 [56]
Rat Oligodendrocyte spinesAnoxic injury model in oligodendrocytes GluN1 activation, Intracell Ca2+ activation; cell injuryPretreat with CNQX or MK-801GluR blockade blunted cell inactivation and injury—Specific GluN1 subcellular function by cell regionSalter and Fern, 2005 [60]
Rat
arthritis
IPL injection,
CFA
hind paw
Nociceptive behavior, secondary mechanical allodyniaGluN1-coded siRNA-AAV vector injection into lumbar SCDHReduced pain behaviors by 60–75% for ≥6 mo Garraway et al., 2007 [24]
Mouse
spinal cord
injury
Direct, blunt trauma to spinal cord motoneuronsIncr cell GluN1 perinuclear and nuclear stainingAdd’n of PHA I
at BsL, then NMDA
Increased GluN1
Staining
Mashkina et al., 2010 [26]
Rat
arthritis
IPL injection
CFA hind paw
Incr pGluN1 protein and spontaneous firing discharge rates
in hypothalamic slices
Pre-injx MK801 or
CNQX
Decreased pGluN1 levels and spontaneous firing Peng et al., 2011 [61]
Rat
Subcutaneous (s.c.) formalin-induced nociception
s.c. injection,
formalin
hind leg skin
Significant increase in number of paw flinches and
in skin GluN1 staining
shRNA injection into the contralateral pawSignificant blunting of paw flinches and GluN1 stainingTan et al., 2011 [58]
Mouse hippocampal neurons NMDA added
to hippocampal neurons and
tissue slices
PreRx: neurons/slices transfect with GluN1 isoforms Incr GluN1 C1 staining, most in neuronal cell nuclei
-Incr EPSC activity
Zhou and Duan, 2018 [23]
Rat
K/C arthritis
i.a. K/C injx
hind leg
Secondary mechanical allodynia
Incr SCDH GluN1,
pGluN1, staining
Genistein
Lavendustin A
(PTK inhibitors)
Signif blunted pain behaviors,
Signif blunted GluN1 staining
Westlund et al., 2020 [40]
COLITIS
Rat
Transient
TNBS colitis
TNBS solution, intra-colonic Increased GluN1 variants in spinal cord T10-L1 after colitis resolution Zhou et al., 2009 [62]
Rat
TNBS colitis
Day1 TNBS sol’n enema
rectum to colon
D7: Incr pGluN1 in SCDH L1 and S1
D7: SCDH slices incubated w/BDNF-> increased pGluN1
D3: i.v. α-BDNF
neutralizing Ab
D7: slices pre-incubated P13/Akt, PLC-γ or PKC inhibition
D7: Colitis increased pGluN1
α-BDNF block decreased
Western blot pGluN1
and
pGluN1 immunostaining
Liu et al., 2015 [63]
Rat
IBS model
1. Neonatal maternal separation,
2. Acetic acid enema
3. colorectal distension
Increased abdominal withdrawal reflex
Decreased open-field activity test
Incr GluN1 staining: RT-PCR in ACC; protein by IHC in the colon
Electroacupuncture on Neiguan points PC6 and ST36-Decreased abdominal withdrawal reflex; Increased open field activity; Decreased GluN1 in ACC and colonTan et al., 2019 [64]
Non-neural cells, in vitro
Rat, mouse
osteoclasts
In vitro bone resorption model GluN1 levels noted with bone resorption by osteoclastsPretreat with
1 D-AP5
2. MK-801
3. Anti GluN1 Ab
In vitro bone absorption was inhibitedChenu et al., 1998 [31]
Rat
arthritis,
Human synoviocytes
NMDA, ACPD added to
human clonal synoviocyte cultures, SW892
Increased GluN1 staining by ICC Pre-incubated with microdose PMASignificant increase in GluN1, TNF-α, and RANTESMcNearney et al., 2010 [27]
Other models—NFkB translocation
InflammationHepG2 human
liver cells
Incubation with PMA
Increased levels of nuclear NFkB,
Cytoplasmic
COX-2,MMP-9
Pre-incubated with Protopine Significant decreases in nuclear NFkB, cytoplasm COX-2, and MMP-9 levelsKim et al., 2022 [65]
Table 2. Selected studies reporting GluN1 subunit subnuclear organelle locations.
Table 2. Selected studies reporting GluN1 subunit subnuclear organelle locations.
Cellular Nuclear Regions GluN1 Co-Expressed withExpression
System—
Host Cells, Tissues
Added Reagents
or Stressors
Cellular or Tissue Responses with NMDA NR1References
Nuclear membrane GluN2
GluN2
GluN3
Rat: primary neurons, dorsal and ventral horn tissue
Human: clonal neuro-blastoma cells, SH5YSY
Primary human synoviocyte cultures; Clonal human synoviocytes SW892
Clonal human synoviocytes, SW892
Human, mouse, rat brain tissue; Human clonal kidney cells, HEK-293
Kaolin/carrageenan (K/C) intra-articular (i.a.) rat arthritis model
Glutamate
Glutamate or NMDA
PMA, NMDA, ACPD
Elicited EPSC’s
EM: GluN1 increased at the nuclear membrane, secondary heat hyperalgesia
Confocal: Increased nuclear and cytoplasmic GluN1 staining
GluN1 staining: Increased at nuclear and cytoplasmic regions
Whole-cell enlargement
Increased supernatant levels: TNF-α, RANTES
(Figure 3: Increased nucleoli
number)
The proposed neuroprotective modulator of GluN1 containing heterodimer
Westlund et al., 2020 [40]
Westlund et al., 2020 [40]
McNearney et al., 2010 [27]
McNearney et al., 2010 [27]
Figure 3
Tong et al., 2008 [84]
Nuclear Pore ComplexGluNA/B Ipsilateral dorsal and ventral horns Rat K/C arthritis model, K/C, i.a.Nuclear access shuttle
EM: GluN1 increases at nuclear membrane pores
Westlund et al., 2020 [40]
ChromatinHIF-1 Rat brain PVN: (congestive heart failure model)
Rat clonal neuronal cells
NG108-15 * cells for hypoxia studies
Hypoxic stress, assess PVN for Glu neuro-excitation; NG108-15 cells for epigenetic changesHIF-1 binds to GluN1 promoter region;
Increased HIF-1 and GluN1 levels,
Increased cardiac excitation.
Sharma et al., 2016 [83]
Chromatin Mouse–depression and anxiety models–study hippocampusAcute restraint or forced swim stress on Chronic restraint- +/− increased P300 wave, BDNF levelsIncreased GluN1 transcripts in the hippocampus after an acute forced swim on chronic restraint background. Changed behaviorNasca et al., 2015 [33]
ChromatinGluN2BRat, mouse, and human neuronal cells and brain slicesIncubated with added ethanol (ethanol)Alcohol brain injury; decreased transcription; Increased histone modifications; DNA methylation; HDAC function, some long-term transcriptional changes Reviewed in Chandrasekar, 2013 [4]
NucleolusGluN2A
GluN3B
Human primary melanocytes Clonal melanoma cell lines Plated and harvested at the confluenceN1/N2A subunits on primary cultures N1/N3B subunits on melanoma cellsHajdu et al., 2018 [85]
NucleolusGluN3Hydra. (Hydra vulgaris) nematoblasts, neuroblasts, and epitheliomuscular cells Immunocytochemical staining with anti-fibrillarin ** and GluN1 Ab’s Shuttle mechanism to nucleolus based on putative NoLS in 1 of 2 splice variants detected and GluN1 staining of nucleoli. Kass-Simon et al., 2009 [67]
NucleolusImportin-α Mouse primary hippocampal and cortical neuron cultures;
Rat hippocampal slices
Cellular and tissue activation via electrical pulses Importin-α binds to NLS of 3’ tail of cytoplasmic GluN1; GluN1 subunit activation releases importin-α for binding to proteins entering through the nuclear pore complex Jeffrey et al., 2009 [21] ***
* NG108-15 is a hybrid cell line generated by fusing mouse N18TG2 neuroblastoma cells and rat C6-BU-1 glioma cells. ** Fibrillarin, is a component of a small nucleolar nuclear ribonucleoprotein particle localized to the nucleolus dense fibrillar component. *** Importin-α binds to cytoplasmic proteins and translocates to the cell’s nucleus [21].
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

McNearney, T.A.; Westlund, K.N. Pluripotential GluN1 (NMDA NR1): Functional Significance in Cellular Nuclei in Pain/Nociception. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 13196. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241713196

AMA Style

McNearney TA, Westlund KN. Pluripotential GluN1 (NMDA NR1): Functional Significance in Cellular Nuclei in Pain/Nociception. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(17):13196. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241713196

Chicago/Turabian Style

McNearney, Terry A., and Karin N. Westlund. 2023. "Pluripotential GluN1 (NMDA NR1): Functional Significance in Cellular Nuclei in Pain/Nociception" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 17: 13196. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241713196

APA Style

McNearney, T. A., & Westlund, K. N. (2023). Pluripotential GluN1 (NMDA NR1): Functional Significance in Cellular Nuclei in Pain/Nociception. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(17), 13196. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241713196

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop