Next Article in Journal
Association of HDL Subfraction Profile with the Progression of Insulin Resistance
Next Article in Special Issue
The Change in Whole-Genome Methylation and Transcriptome Profile under Autophagy Defect and Nitrogen Starvation
Previous Article in Journal
Identification of a Non-Invasive Urinary Exosomal Biomarker for Diabetic Nephropathy Using Data-Independent Acquisition Proteomics
Previous Article in Special Issue
Analyzing the Antinociceptive Effect of Interleukin-31 in Mice
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Brief Report

Marine Bacterioplankton Community Dynamics and Potentially Pathogenic Bacteria in Seawater around Jeju Island, South Korea, via Metabarcoding

1
Library of Marine Samples, Korea Institute of Ocean Science & Technology, Geoje 53201, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Oceanography and Marine Research Institute, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Republic of Korea
3
Department of Ocean Science, University of Science & Technology, Daejeon 34113, Republic of Korea
4
Vessel Operation & Observation Team, Korea Institute of Ocean Science & Technology, Geoje 53201, Republic of Korea
5
Ecological Risk Research Department, Korea Institute of Ocean Science & Technology, Geoje 53201, Republic of Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(17), 13561; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241713561
Submission received: 10 August 2023 / Revised: 23 August 2023 / Accepted: 24 August 2023 / Published: 1 September 2023

Abstract

:
Understanding marine bacterioplankton composition and distribution is necessary for improving predictions of ecosystem responses to environmental change. Here, we used 16S rRNA metabarcoding to investigate marine bacterioplankton diversity and identify potential pathogenic bacteria in seawater samples collected in March, May, September, and December 2013 from two sites near Jeju Island, South Korea. We identified 1343 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) and observed that community diversity varied between months. Alpha- and Gamma-proteobacteria were the most abundant classes, and in all months, the predominant genera were Candidatus Pelagibacter, Leisingera, and Citromicrobium. The highest number of OTUs was observed in September, and Vibrio (7.80%), Pseudoalteromonas (6.53%), and Citromicrobium (6.16%) showed higher relative abundances or were detected only in this month. Water temperature and salinity significantly affected bacterial distribution, and these conditions, characteristic of September, were adverse for Aestuariibacter but favored Citromicrobium. Potentially pathogenic bacteria, among which Vibrio (28 OTUs) and Pseudoalteromonas (six OTUs) were the most abundant in September, were detected in 49 OTUs, and their abundances were significantly correlated with water temperature, increasing rapidly in September, the warmest month. These findings suggest that monthly temperature and salinity variations affect marine bacterioplankton diversity and potential pathogen abundance.

1. Introduction

Marine bacterioplankton have essential ecosystem functions owing to their ecological connections with other organisms, and their distribution and abundance in marine environments are affected by several environmental and geographic factors [1,2]. Understanding how these environmental factors affect their composition and distribution may help to elucidate their relationships with other organisms and improve predictions of ecosystem responses to environmental changes [3]. In particular, examining the effects of seasonal variations in environmental and geographic factors on community dynamics is essential to elucidate their ecological roles [4,5,6].
Temporal and spatial changes in bacterioplankton communities in response to environmental change have been examined in recent studies [7,8]. Marine bacterioplankton communities, which are finely structured, exhibit discrete phylogenetic clustering and abundant diversity [9]. Metabarcoding, which characterizes taxonomic diversity and community structure based on the analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences, has been used to reveal the high diversity of marine bacterioplankton [10,11,12]. We previously applied metabarcoding to investigate bacterioplankton communities and species composition, monthly changes, and potential pathogenic bacteria [13,14,15,16,17,18]. For instance, in Goseong Bay (South Korea), Bacteroidetes and Actinobacteria were identified as the most abundant phyla [19]. Studies on year-round bacterioplankton diversity may help in forecasting seasonal changes [6], and metabarcoding may provide insights into the intricate relationships within bacterioplankton communities owing to changes in various environmental factors [5].
To elucidate these factors, we used metabarcoding to investigate marine bacterioplankton community dynamics and identify potentially pathogenic bacteria in seawater around Jeju Island, South Korea, in four months in 2013. Our findings elucidated the distribution of marine bacterioplankton in the waters around this site and established a baseline for further studies. These findings will improve the prediction of marine bacterioplankton responses to changes in environmental factors.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Seawater Environmental Characteristics

We sampled seawater around Jeju Island, South Korea, in March, May, September, and December 2013 to characterize the bacterioplankton community in this area, considering seasonal changes in seawater temperature and salinity. Water temperature (range 17.0–25.3 °C) varied seasonally, consistent with the patterns commonly observed for temperate environments: highest in summer and lowest in winter [20,21]. Salinity ranged from 18.5 to 34.4 and was lowest in September. In South Korea, the summer–autumn rainy season corresponds to the period from mid-August to mid-September, when typhoons affect the Korean Peninsula directly or indirectly [22]. The large input of rainwater during this period rapidly reduces seawater salinity, and this affects the microbial community in this area [23,24].

2.2. Metabarcoding Results

2.2.1. OTU Diversity

Following quality control filtering, we obtained 8003 reads (average number of reads per sample) (Table 1). These reads corresponded to 1343 bacterioplankton operational taxonomic units (OTUs). Ranking by month showed the highest number of OTUs in September, followed by May, December, and March (Figure 1). The high taxonomic diversity and richness in September may be related to the low salinity and high temperature of the seawater within this month. These findings are consistent with those of other studies, which revealed that bacterial species diversity is particularly high in September owing to these climate conditions [25,26]. In autumn, interspecific interactions between bacterioplankton weaken, resulting in lower diversity [24]. Further, the active mixing of the water column during this period alters the water column’s physical and chemical parameters; this, in turn, leads to significant seasonal differences in diversity and composition [27].

2.2.2. Diversity of Bacterioplankton

The identified bacterioplankton OTUs were assigned to 21 phyla. The most abundant phyla, accounting for 98.25% of the total relative abundance, were Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Cyanobacteria (Figure 2a). The relative abundance of Proteobacteria was slightly lower in May (at 78.86%) but was >85% in the other months. The second most abundant phylum was Bacteroidetes. Its abundance increased from 12.54% in March to 19.23% in May and declined to 6.39% in September. Further, Cyanobacteria were two to five times more abundant in September (3.62%) than in the other months.
Class-level diversity varied considerably between months (Figure 2b). Specifically, 47 classes were identified, with Alphaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, Flavobacteriia, and Cyanophyceae showing dominance in all of the months. Alphaproteobacteria was more abundant in September (61.84%) and December (62.83%) than in May (35.58%) and March (53.61%). Gammaproteobacteria and Flavobacteriia were more abundant in May (42.66% and 19.03%, respectively) than in the other months. Cyanophyceae exhibited 1.48% relative abundance in May and was more abundant in September (3.59%). However, in December, its abundance decreased (1.25%).

2.2.3. Changes in Common Bacterioplankton

The genus-level heat map of the bacterioplankton community revealed distinct changes in diversity over the months (Figure 3a). Of the 719 genera identified, 12 accounted for >5% of the total bacterioplankton relative abundance. Via nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) analysis, the bacterioplankton community was classified into two groups, considering a 35% similarity level (Figure 3b). Thus, Candidatus Pelagibacter (Alphaproteobacteria) was identified as the most abundant genus in all the months and was most abundant in December (29.24%). Aestuariibacter (Gammaproteobacteria), the second most abundant genus, was detected in all months except September and was most abundant in March (23.18%). Further, the highest abundances of Lentibacter (8.33%), Nereida (7.20%), Loktanella (5.54%), and Aliiroseovarius (5.44%), belonging to Alphaproteobacteria, were recorded in March, and the highest abundances of Marinomonas (11.17%; Gammaproteobacteria) and Aurantivirga (10.16%; Bacteroidetes) were recorded in May. September showed the highest abundances of Vibrio (7.80%) and Pseudoalteromonas (6.53%), which are Gammaproteobacteria. Furthermore, Citromicrobium (6.16%; Alphaproteobacteria) was detected only in September, and December showed the highest abundance of Leisingera (22.0%; Alphaproteobacteria).
Candidatus Pelagibacter ubique, which accounts for most species of the genus Pelagibacter, is distributed in marine environments at temperatures in the range of 12–15 °C and can be cultured at 18 °C [28,29]. In this study area, the water is slightly warmer in September, but still within this range; however, salinity varies substantially, in the range of 18–34. Reportedly, Candidatus Pelagibacter ubique grows under oligohaline–mesohaline conditions at salinity values ≥ 30 [29,30]. Thus, the temperature and salinity conditions of the seawater at our study site favor the growth of species of the genus Pelagibacter.
For Aestuariibacter halophilus, the most abundant species of this genus, the optimum temperature and pH for growth are 40 °C and pH 7–8, respectively, but its growth is still possible at 15–40 °C. This species exhibits strict halophilicity; hence, it requires the saline conditions of seawater for growth [31]. Low salinity, therefore, limited its growth in this region in the month of September. Citromicrobium, detected only in September, comprised one species, C. bathyomarinum, which grows under temperature, salinity, and pH conditions in the ranges 20–42 °C, 0–10, and 6.0–8.0, respectively [32]. Thus, the water around Jeju Island is most suitable for C. bathyomarinum in September. Given that bacterial growth is affected by various environmental factors, it is difficult to clarify the effects of water temperature and salinity in this regard. In this study, however, these two factors were identified as the most important factors affecting bacterial growth and distribution.
We performed LEfSe (Linear discriminant analysis Effect Size) analyses to identify the abundant bacterioplankton taxon based on a comparison between September and the other months (March, May, and December) (Figure 4; Table S1). Based on the results obtained, Cyanophyceae, Alphaproteobacteria (Kiloniellales, Rhodospirillales, Sphingomonadales), Saprospirales, and Pseudomonadales were identified as the major bacterioplankton in September. Conversely, Bacteroidetes and Gammaproteobacteria (Pseudomonadales, Alteromonadales, and unclassified Gammaproteobacteria) constituted the common taxa in Jeju seawaters in the other months.

2.3. Identification of Potential Pathogens

At the class level, we identified the following potentially pathogenic bacteria: Gammaproteobacteria (44 OTUs), Flavobacteriia (three OTUs), Betaproteobacteria (one OTU), and Epsilonproteobacteria (one OTU) (Table S2). In particular, Vibrio (28 OTUs) and Pseudoalteromonas (six OTUs) were the most abundant potentially pathogenic genera (Figure 5, Table S2), and were most abundant in September. Further, potential pathogenic bacteria showed significantly increased relative abundances in September (p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA).
The relative abundance of potentially pathogenic bacteria was significantly and positively correlated with water temperature (Spearman correlation analysis; p < 0.05). In particular, the relative abundance of Pseudoalteromonas showed a highly significant correlation with water temperature (p < 0.01, ρ = 0.835). For Pseudoalteromonas, the optimal temperature for growth is >20 °C [33]. Further, Vibrio spp. were 3.5–14 times more abundant in September than in the other months. Reportedly, Vibrio grows at temperatures > 20 °C (similar to the temperature of the seawater around Jeju Island in September) and can tolerate salinity in the range 3–37 [34]. It has also been reported that Vibrio abundance is strongly associated with water temperature [35,36]. Vibrio and Pseudoalteromonas were the most common potential pathogens detected in the waters of Kaneohe Bay, Hawaii [37]. These potentially pathogenic bacteria can infect various marine plants and animals, including humans (Table S2). In particular, V. kanaloae, V. tasmaniensis, V. chagasii, P. tetraodonis, and P. nigrifaciens infect marine animals, such as lobsters, fish, oysters, and sea cucumbers.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Sample Collection

Seawater samples (1 L) were collected from a 1 m depth at two sites around Jeju Island (Site 1, 33°22′89″ N, 126°56′53″ E; Site 2, 33°23′53″ N, 126°56′53″ E) on 10 March, 21 May, 8 September, and 10 December 2013 (Figure 6). The seawater temperature and salinity at these sampling points were obtained from the Marine Environment Information System of Korea (http://www.meis.go.kr, accessed on 15 May 2014). Thereafter, 1 L samples of the collected seawater were each passed through a polycarbonate filter (3 µm pore size) (TSTP04700, Millipore, Ireland), harvested, and further passed through a 0.2 µm filter (A020A047A, Advantec MFS Inc., Tokyo, Japan). Next, they were stored at 4 °C until genomic DNA extraction.

3.2. Metabarcoding Analysis

The filters containing the microbes were cut into eight pieces before DNA extraction. Thereafter, total microbial DNA was isolated using the PowerSoil DNA Isolation Kit (MoBio, Solana Beach, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The extracted genomic DNA was then subjected to PCR amplification using primers targeting the V1–V3 region of the 16S rRNA gene [18], i.e., 27F forward primer, 5′-GAG TTT GAT CMT GGC TCA G-3′ and 518R reverse primer, 5′-ATT ACC GCG GCT GCT GG-3′. Partial 16S rDNA gene sequences were used to analyze bacterial diversity. Given that the divergence level varies between the regions of the 16S rDNA gene, the choice of partial sequence regions can significantly affect analysis results [38]. Thus, it was important to determine whether a partial 16S rDNA sequence region could support bacterial characterization as reliably as nearly full-length 16S rDNA genes.
Each primer was tagged using multiplex identifier (MID) adaptors (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The use of MID adaptors enabled the automatic sorting of metabarcoding-derived sequencing reads. Further, amplification was performed under the following conditions: pre-denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min; 30 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, primer annealing at 55 °C for 30 s, elongation at 72 °C for 30 s; and final elongation at 72 °C for 5 min. The PCR products were purified using a QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (cat. 28106; Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Similar amounts of extracted PCR products were pooled, and short fragments (non-target products) were eliminated using the AMPure Bead Kit (Agencourt Bioscience, Beverly, MA, USA). PCR product size and quality were further evaluated using a Bioanalyzer 2100 device (Agilent, Palo Alto, Foster City, CA, USA). Thereafter, sequencing was conducted using the 454 GS Junior Sequencing System (Roche Applied Science, Penzberg, Germany) following the manufacturer’s instructions.

3.3. Bioinformatics Analysis

Following metabarcoding, bioinformatics analysis was performed as previously described [18]. After sequencing, the quality check was performed to remove short sequence reads (<150 bp), low-quality sequences (quality score < 25), singletons, chloroplast sequences, non-bacterial ribosomal sequences, and chimeras [39,40]. Then, using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST v. 2.14.0), the sequence reads obtained were compared to the sequences in the Silva rRNA database. Similar sequence reads (E-value < 0.0001) were considered partial 16S rDNA sequences, and the taxonomic level (class or genus) of the most similar sequence in the rRNA database was assigned to each of the identified sequence reads. To analyze OTUs, CD-HIT-OTU software was used for clustering [41], while Mothur platform (v 1.35.1) was used to estimate Shannon–Weaver diversity and Chao1 richness [42]. The taxonomy of the sequence with the highest similarity was assigned to the sequence read (species or genus levels with >98 or >94%, respectively).

3.4. Statistical Analysis and Selection of Potentially Pathogenic Bacteria

Data were presented as the mean of samples from two sampling sites. To compare bacterioplankton community abundances among the four months, hierarchical clustering analysis was performed via “group average” clustering using the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity method. This generated a ranked similarity matrix in which the rows represented the rankings of the column cases based on their similarity to the corresponding row case. OTU class and family relative abundances were square-root normalized for comparison. Normal distributions were assessed using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. We also considered OTUs with a relative abundance > 1% in at least one sample as ‘abundant’ and pooled the remainder.
To examine the relationships between measured parameters, Spearman correlation analysis was employed. An ordination plot was produced via nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) using a ranked similarity matrix. Further, the clustering, NMDS, and correlation analyses were performed using PRIMER 6 (v 6.1.13). Alpha diversity metrics and OTUs were analyzed using the ‘vegan’ package [43] in R Studio (v. 1.3.959). Heat maps of the relative abundances of the most abundant OTUs were plotted using ggplot2 [44] in R Studio. The investigated months were compared via one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Scheffe’s post hoc test. p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
To perform linear discriminant analysis (LDA), the Kruskal–Wallis test was employed to assess differences among classes (α < 0.05), while the pairwise Wilcoxon test, acting as a non-parametric analog, was conducted to compare subclasses (α < 0.05) [45,46]. The threshold on the logarithmic LDA score was set to 2.0 to determine discriminative features [47,48]. After the analysis was completed, the number of differentially abundant OTUs identified using each tool was assessed at an α level of 0.05. Finally, the potential presence of taxonomic groups that may explain the difference between bacterioplankton communities in different samples was explored using Linear discriminant analysis Effect Size (LEfSe, v 1.0) in the Galaxy framework.
The selection of potentially pathogenic bacteria was based on the literature. The characteristics and references on the basis of which these potential pathogenic bacteria were chosen are shown in Table S2.

4. Conclusions

In this study, we examined the variation in bacterioplankton diversity, community composition, and the presence of potentially pathogenic bacteria in the waters around Jeju Island for four months in 2013. Thus, we observed that community diversity was highest in September, within which the highest abundance of potentially pathogenic bacteria was also observed. This is the first study describing species-level diversity and several pathogenic bacteria in seawater in the study region. These findings regarding potentially pathogenic bacteria can be used to develop an early warning system with respect to marine pathogens.

Supplementary Materials

The supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms241713561/s1. References [49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104] are cited in the supplementary materials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: S.W.J., and T.-K.L.; data curation: H.-J.K., K.E.K., Y.J.K., H.K., J.W.S., S.K. and S.H.L.; writing—original draft preparation: H.-J.K., S.H.L., S.W.J. and T.-K.L.; formal analysis: H.-J.K., K.E.K., Y.J.K., H.K., J.W.S. and S.K.; data visualization: H.-J.K., K.E.K., Y.J.K., H.K. and J.W.S.; funding acquisition: S.W.J. and T.-K.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Research Foundation of South Korea, grant number NRF-2020R1A2C2005970, and a project titled “Diagnosis, treatment and control technology based on big data of infectious virus in the marine environment” by the Korea Institute of Marine Science and Technology Promotion (KIMST) funded by the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, South Korea (Ref. No. 21210466).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The repository and accession number PRJNA999943 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank, accessed on 1 August 2023).

Acknowledgments

We deeply appreciate the Library of Marine Samples of the Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology (KIOST), Republic of Korea, for storing the genomic DNA samples.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Nemergut, D.R.; Costello, E.K.; Hamady, M.; Lozupone, C.; Jiang, L.; Schmidt, S.K.; Fierer, N.; Townsend, A.R.; Cleveland, C.C.; Stanish, L. Global patterns in the biogeography of bacterial taxa. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 13, 135–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Baek, S.H.; Son, M.; Kim, D.; Choi, H.-W.; Kim, Y.-O. Assessing the ecosystem health status of Korea Gwangyang and Jinhae bays based on a planktonic index of biotic integrity (P-IBI). Ocean Sci. 2014, 49, 291–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lee, O.O.; Wang, Y.; Yang, J.; Lafi, F.F.; Al-Suwailem, A.; Qian, P.-Y. Pyrosequencing reveals highly diverse and species-specific microbial communities in sponges from the Red Sea. ISME J. 2011, 5, 650–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Chow, C.-E.T.; Sachdeva, R.; Cram, J.A.; Steele, J.A.; Needham, D.M.; Patel, A.; Parada, A.E.; Fuhrman, J.A. Temporal variability and coherence of euphotic zone bacterial communities over a decade in the Southern California Bight. ISME J. 2013, 7, 2259–2273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cram, J.A.; Chow, C.-E.T.; Sachdeva, R.; Needham, D.M.; Parada, A.E.; Steele, J.A.; Fuhrman, J.A. Seasonal and interannual variability of the marine bacterioplankton community throughout the water column over ten years. ISME J. 2015, 9, 563–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Gilbert, J.A.; Steele, J.A.; Caporaso, J.G.; Steinbrück, L.; Reeder, J.; Temperton, B.; Huse, S.; McHardy, A.C.; Knight, R.; Joint, I. Defining seasonal marine microbial community dynamics. ISME J. 2012, 6, 298–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Schauer, M.; Balagué, V.; Pedrós-Alió, C.; Massana, R. Seasonal changes in the taxonomic composition of bacterioplankton in a coastal oligotrophic system. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 2003, 31, 163–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pinhassi, J.; Hagström, Å. Seasonal succession in marine bacterioplankton. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 2000, 21, 245–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Acinas, S.G.; Klepac-Ceraj, V.; Hunt, D.E.; Pharino, C.; Ceraj, I.; Distel, D.L.; Polz, M.F. Fine-scale phylogenetic architecture of a complex bacterial community. Nature 2004, 430, 551–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kirchman, D.L.; Cottrell, M.T.; Lovejoy, C. The structure of bacterial communities in the western Arctic Ocean as revealed by pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA genes. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 12, 1132–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Ladau, J.; Sharpton, T.J.; Finucane, M.M.; Jospin, G.; Kembel, S.W.; O’dwyer, J.; Koeppel, A.F.; Green, J.L.; Pollard, K.S. Global marine bacterial diversity peaks at high latitudes in winter. ISME J. 2013, 7, 1669–1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Aravindraja, C.; Viszwapriya, D.; Karutha Pandian, S. Ultradeep 16S rRNA sequencing analysis of geographically similar but diverse unexplored marine samples reveal varied bacterial community composition. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e76724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jeong, G.; Kim, H.-J.; Kim, K.E.; Kim, Y.J.; Lee, T.-K.; Shim, W.J.; Jung, S.W. Selective attachment of prokaryotes and emergence of potentially pathogenic prokaryotes on four plastic surfaces: Adhesion study in a natural marine environment. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2023, 193, 115149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kim, H.-J.; Jeoung, G.; Kim, K.E.; Park, J.S.; Kang, D.; Baek, S.H.; Lee, C.Y.; Kim, H.; Cho, S.; Lee, T.-K. Co-variance between free-living bacteria and Cochlodinium polykrikoides (Dinophyta) harmful algal blooms, South Korea. Harmful Algae 2023, 122, 102371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kim, H.-J.; Park, J.S.; Lee, T.-K.; Kang, D.; Kang, J.-H.; Shin, K.; Jung, S.W. Dynamics of marine bacterial biofouling communities after initial Alteromonas genovensis biofilm attachment to anti-fouling paint substrates. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2021, 172, 112895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Jung, S.W.; Kang, J.; Park, J.S.; Joo, H.M.; Suh, S.-S.; Kang, D.; Lee, T.-K.; Kim, H.-J. Dynamic bacterial community response to Akashiwo sanguinea (Dinophyceae) bloom in indoor marine microcosms. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 6983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Kang, J.; Park, J.S.; Jung, S.W.; Kim, H.J.; Joo, H.M.; Kang, D.; Seo, H.; Kim, S.; Jang, M.C.; Lee, K.W. Zooming on dynamics of marine microbial communities in the phycosphere of Akashiwo sanguinea (Dinophyta) blooms. Mol. Ecol. 2021, 30, 207–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kim, H.J.; Jung, S.W.; Lim, D.-I.; Jang, M.-C.; Lee, T.-K.; Shin, K.; Ki, J.-S. Effects of temperature and nutrients on changes in genetic diversity of bacterioplankton communities in a semi-closed bay, South Korea. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2016, 106, 139–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Suh, S.-S.; Park, M.; Hwang, J.; Kil, E.-J.; Jung, S.W.; Lee, S.; Lee, T.-K. Seasonal dynamics of marine microbial community in the South Sea of Korea. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0131633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Jang, S.H.; Jeong, H.J.; Du Yoo, Y. Gambierdiscus jejuensis sp. nov., an epiphytic dinoflagellate from the waters of Jeju Island, Korea, effect of temperature on the growth, and its global distribution. Harmful Algae 2018, 80, 149–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kim, S.H.; Choi, B.K.; Kim, E. Study on the behavior of the water temperature inversion layer in the northern East China Sea. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2020, 8, 157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Qian, W.; Kang, H.-S.; Lee, D.-K. Distribution of seasonal rainfall in the East Asian monsoon region. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 2002, 73, 151–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yu, B.; Xie, G.; Shen, Z.; Shao, K.; Tang, X. Spatiotemporal variations, assembly processes, and co-occurrence patterns of particle-attached and free-living bacteria in a large drinking water reservoir in China. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 13, 1056147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Jiao, C.; Zhao, D.; Zeng, J.; Guo, L.; Yu, Z. Disentangling the seasonal co-occurrence patterns and ecological stochasticity of planktonic and benthic bacterial communities within multiple lakes. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 740, 140010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Rooney-Varga, J.N.; Giewat, M.W.; Savin, M.C.; Sood, S.; LeGresley, M.; Martin, J. Links between phytoplankton and bacterial community dynamics in a coastal marine environment. Microb. Ecol. 2005, 49, 163–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Riemann, L.; Winding, A. Community dynamics of free-living and particle-associated bacterial assemblages during a freshwater phytoplankton bloom. Microb. Ecol. 2001, 42, 274–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Zhang, Y.; Chen, W.; Yang, D.; Jiang, J. The current water environment of Tianmuhu Lake and countermeasures for the sustainable development of the ecological tourism. Ecol. Environ. 2003, 12, 405–408. [Google Scholar]
  28. Rappé, M.S.; Connon, S.A.; Vergin, K.L.; Giovannoni, S.J. Cultivation of the ubiquitous SAR11 marine bacterioplankton clade. Nature 2002, 418, 630–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lankiewicz, T.S.; Cottrell, M.T.; Kirchman, D.L. Growth rates and rRNA content of four marine bacteria in pure cultures and in the Delaware estuary. ISME J. 2016, 10, 823–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Herlemann, D.P.; Woelk, J.; Labrenz, M.; Jürgens, K. Diversity and abundance of “Pelagibacterales”(SAR11) in the Baltic Sea salinity gradient. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2014, 37, 601–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yi, H.; Bae, K.S.; Chun, J. Aestuariibacter salexigens gen. nov., sp. nov. and Aestuariibacter halophilus sp. nov., isolated from tidal flat sediment, and emended description of Alteromonas macleodii. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2004, 54, 571–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yurkov, V.V.; Krieger, S.; Stackebrandt, E.; Beatty, J.T. Citromicrobium bathyomarinum, a novel aerobic bacterium isolated from deep-sea hydrothermal vent plume waters that contains photosynthetic pigment-protein complexes. J. Bacteriol. 1999, 181, 4517–4525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sanchez-Porro, C.; Mellado, E.; Bertoldo, C.; Antranikian, G.; Ventosa, A. Screening and characterization of the protease CP1 produced by the moderately halophilic bacterium Pseudoalteromonas sp. strain CP76. Extremophiles 2003, 7, 221–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Brinkmeyer, R.; Knittel, K.; Jurgens, J.; Weyland, H.; Amann, R.; Helmke, E. Diversity and structure of bacterial communities in Arctic versus Antarctic pack ice. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003, 69, 6610–6619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Park, K.-I.; Paillard, C.; Le Chevalier, P.; Choi, K.-S. Report on the occurrence of brown ring disease (BRD) in Manila clam, Ruditapes philippinarum, on the west coast of Korea. Aquaculture 2006, 255, 610–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Osaka, K.; Komatsuzaki, M.; Takahashi, H.; Sakano, S.; Okabe, N. Vibrio vulnificus septicaemia in Japan: An estimated number of infections and physicians’ knowledge of the syndrome. Epidemiol. Infect. 2004, 132, 993–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Aeby, G.; Ross, M.; Williams, G.; Lewis, T.; Work, T. Disease dynamics of Montipora white syndrome within Kaneohe Bay, Oahu, Hawaii: Distribution, seasonality, virulence, and transmissibility. Dis. Aquat. Org. 2010, 91, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Kunin, V.; Engelbrektson, A.; Ochman, H.; Hugenholtz, P. Wrinkles in the rare biosphere: Pyrosequencing errors can lead to artificial inflation of diversity estimates. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 12, 118–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gontcharova, V.; Youn, E.; Wolcott, R.D.; Hollister, E.B.; Gentry, T.J.; Dowd, S.E. Black box chimera check (B2C2): A windows-based software for batch depletion of chimeras from bacterial 16S rRNA gene datasets. Open Microbiol. J. 2010, 4, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Huse, S.M.; Huber, J.A.; Morrison, H.G.; Sogin, M.L.; Welch, D.M. Accuracy and quality of massively parallel DNA pyrosequencing. Genome Biol. 2007, 8, R143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Li, W.; Fu, L.; Niu, B.; Wu, S.; Wooley, J. Ultrafast clustering algorithms for metagenomic sequence analysis. Brief Bioinform. 2012, 13, 656–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Schloss, P.D.; Westcott, S.L.; Ryabin, T.; Hall, J.R.; Hartmann, M.; Hollister, E.B.; Lesniewski, R.A.; Oakley, B.B.; Parks, D.H.; Robinson, C.J.; et al. Introducing mothur: Open-Source, Platform-Independent, Community-Supported Software for Describing and Comparing Microbial Communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 7537–7541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Oksanen, J.; Simpson, G.L.; Blanchet, F.G.; Kindt, R.; Legendre, P.; Minchin, P.R.; O’Hara, R.B.; Simpson, G.L.; Solymos, P.; Stevens, M.H.H.; et al. “Package ‘Vegan’,” in Community Ecology Package. 2022. Available online: https://github.com/vegandevs/vegan (accessed on 17 June 2023).
  44. Schwarzer, G. Meta-Analysis in R. In Systematic Reviews in Health Research: Meta-Analysis in Context, 3rd ed.; Matthias, E., Julian, P.T.H., George, D.S., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2022; pp. 510–534. [Google Scholar]
  45. Wilcoxon, F. Individual comparisons by ranking methods. In Breakthroughs in Statistics: Methodology and Distribution; Kotz, S., Johnson, N.L., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1992; pp. 196–202. [Google Scholar]
  46. Kruskal, W.H.; Wallis, W.A. Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1952, 47, 583–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Benjamini, Y.; Yekutieli, D. The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Ann. Stat. 2001, 29, 1165–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Audic, S.; Claverie, J.-M. The significance of digital gene expression profiles. Genome Res. 1997, 7, 986–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yang, M.; Wang, Q.; Chen, J.; Wu, H. The occurrence of potential pathogenic bacteria on international ships’ ballast water at Yangshan Port, Shanghai, China. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2022, 184, 114190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Houf, K.; Stephan, R. Isolation and characterization of the emerging foodborn pathogen Arcobacter from human stool. J. Microbiol. Methods 2007, 68, 408–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Johnson, L.G.; Murano, E.A. Arcobacter Isolates from Various Sources. J. Food Prot. 2002, 65, 1789–1795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Levican, A.; Alkeskas, A.; Günter, C.; Forsythe, S.J.; Figueras, M.J. Adherence to and Invasion of Human Intestinal Cells by Arcobacter Species and Their Virulence Genotypes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79, 4951–4957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Goecke, F.; Labes, A.; Wiese, J.; Imhoff, J.F. Phylogenetic analysis and antibiotic activity of bacteria isolated from the surface of two co-occurring macroalgae from the Baltic Sea. Eur. J. Phycol. 2013, 48, 47–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Piñeiro-Vidal, M.; Riaza, A.; Santos, Y. Tenacibaculum discolor sp. nov. and Tenacibaculum gallaicum sp. nov., isolated from sole (Solea senegalensis) and turbot (Psetta maxima) culture systems. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2008, 58, 21–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Fernández-Álvarez, C.; Santos, Y. Phenotypic and Molecular Characterization of Lacinutrix venerupis Isolated from Atlantic Horse Mackerel Trachurus trachurus. J. Aquat. Anim. Health 2019, 31, 320–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kozińska, A.; Paździor, E.; Pękala, A.; Niemczuk, W. Acinetobacter johnsonii and Acinetobacter lwoffii—The emerging fish pathogens. J. Vet. Res. 2014, 58, 193–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Seifert, H.; Strate, A.; Schulze, A.; Pulverer, G. Vascular Catheter—Related Bloodstream Infection Due to Acinetobacter johnsonii (Formerly Acinetobacter calcoaceticus var. lwoffii): Report of 13 Cases. Clin. Infect. Dis. 1993, 17, 632–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Manan, H.; Rosland, N.A.; Deris, Z.M.; Hashim, N.F.C.; Kasan, N.A.; Ikhwanuddin, M.; Suloma, A.; Fauzan, F. 16S rRNA sequences of Exiguobacterium spp. bacteria dominant in a biofloc pond cultured with whiteleg shrimp, Penaeus vannamei. Aquac. Res. 2022, 53, 2029–2041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Jalali, S.; Kohli, S.; Latka, C.; Bhatia, S.; Vellarikal, S.K.; Sivasubbu, S.; Scaria, V.; Ramachandran, S. Screening Currency Notes for Microbial Pathogens and Antibiotic Resistance Genes Using a Shotgun Metagenomic Approach. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0128711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kazar, J. Coxiella burnetii infection. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2005, 1063, 105–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Løvoll, M.; Wiik-Nielsen, C.; Tunsjø, H.; Colquhoun, D.; Lunder, T.; Sørum, H.; Grove, S. Atlantic salmon bath challenged with Moritella viscosa—Pathogen invasion and host response. Fish Shellfish. Immunol. 2009, 26, 877–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Martins, P.; Cleary, D.F.R.; Pires, A.C.C.; Rodrigues, A.M.; Quintino, V.; Calado, R.; Gomes, N.C.M. Molecular Analysis of Bacterial Communities and Detection of Potential Pathogens in a Recirculating Aquaculture System for Scophthalmus maximus and Solea senegalensis. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e80847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Urbanczyk, H.; Ogura, Y.; Hendry, T.A.; Gould, A.L.; Kiwaki, N.; Atkinson, J.T.; Hayashi, T.; Dunlap, P.V. Genome Sequence of Photobacterium mandapamensis Strain svers. 1.1, the Bioluminescent Symbiont of the Cardinal Fish Siphamia versicolor. J. Bacteriol. 2011, 193, 3144–3145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Fichi, G.; Cardeti, G.; Perrucci, S.; Vanni, A.; Cersini, A.; Lenzi, C.; De Wolf, T.; Fronte, B.; Guarducci, M.; Susini, F. Skin lesion-associated pathogens from Octopus vulgaris: First detection of Photobacterium swingsii, Lactococcus garvieae and betanodavirus. Dis. Aquat. Org. 2015, 115, 147–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Li, J.; Weinberger, F.; Saha, M.; Majzoub, M.E.; Egan, S. Cross-Host Protection of Marine Bacteria Against Macroalgal Disease. Microb. Ecol. 2021, 84, 1288–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Weiland-Bräuer, N.; Pinnow, N.; Langfeldt, D.; Roik, A.; Güllert, S.; Chibani, C.M.; Reusch, T.B.H.; Schmitz, R.A. The Native Microbiome is Crucial for Offspring Generation and Fitness of Aurelia aurita. mBio 2020, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Li, J.; Mou, Z.; Yang, H.; Mao, Y.; Yan, Y.; Mo, Z. Isolation and identification the pathogen of Pyropia yezoensis green spot disease. Prog. Fish. Sci. 2019, 40, 140–146. [Google Scholar]
  68. Wang, Y. Etiology of skin ulcer syndrome in cultured juveniles of Apostichopus japonicus and analysis of reservoir of the pathogens. J. Fish. Sci. China 2006, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Simidu, U.; Kita-Tsukamoto, K.; Yasumoto, T.; Yotsu, M. Taxonomy of four marine bacterial strains that produce tetrodotoxin. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 1990, 40, 331–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ivanova, E.P.; Romanenko, L.A.; Matte, M.H.; Matte, G.R.; Lysenko, A.M.; Simidu, U.; Kita-Tsukamoto, K.; Sawabe, T.; Vysotskii, M.V.; Frolova, G.M. Retrieval of the species Alteromonas tetraodonis Simidu et al. 1990 as Pseudoalteromonas tetraodonis comb. nov. and emendation of description. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2001, 51, 1071–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Liu, H.; Zheng, F.; Sun, X.; Hong, X.; Dong, S.; Wang, B.; Tang, X.; Wang, Y. Identification of the pathogens associated with skin ulceration and peristome tumescence in cultured sea cucumbers Apostichopus japonicus (Selenka). J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2010, 105, 236–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Popović, N.T.; Kazazić, S.; Bilić, B.; Babić, S.; Bojanić, K.; Bujak, M.; Bujak, I.T.; Jadan, M.; Strunjak-Perović, I.; Kepec, S.; et al. Shewanella spp. from wastewater treatment plant-affected environment: Isolation and characterization. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 82986–83003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Labreuche, Y.; Lambert, C.; Soudant, P.; Boulo, V.; Huvet, A.; Nicolas, J.-L. Cellular and molecular hemocyte responses of the Pacific oyster, Crassostrea gigas, following bacterial infection with Vibrio aestuarianus strain 01/32. Microbes Infect. 2006, 8, 2715–2724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Costa, J.C.C.P.; Floriano, B.; Villegas, I.M.B.; Rodríguez-Ruiz, J.P.; Posada-Izquierdo, G.D.; Zurera, G.; Pérez-Rodríguez, F. Study of the microbiological quality, prevalence of foodborne pathogens and product shelf-life of Gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata) and Sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) from aquaculture in estuarine ecosystems of Andalusia (Spain). Food Microbiol. 2020, 90, 103498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Li, S.-Y.; Huang, Y.-E.; Chen, J.-Y.; Lai, C.-H.; Mao, Y.-C.; Huang, Y.-T.; Liu, P.-Y. Genomics of Ochrobactrum pseudogrignonense (newly named Brucella pseudogrignonensis) reveals a new bla OXA subgroup. Microb. Genom. 2021, 7, 000626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Li, S.; Wang, S.; Xie, L.; Liu, Y.; Chen, H.; Feng, J.; Ouyang, L. Identification and Optimization of the Algicidal Activity of a Novel Marine Bacterium Against Akashiwo sanguinea. Front. Mar. Sci. 2022, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Wang, L.; Chen, Y.; Huang, H.; Huang, Z.; Chen, H.; Shao, Z. Isolation and identification of Vibrio campbellii as a bacterial pathogen for luminous vibriosis of Litopenaeus vannamei. Aquac. Res. 2015, 46, 395–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Austin, B.; Austin, D.; Sutherland, R.; Thompson, F.; Swings, J. Pathogenicity of vibrios to rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss, Walbaum) and Artemia nauplii. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 7, 1488–1495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Pérez-Cataluña, A.; Lucena, T.; Tarazona, E.; Arahal, D.R.; Macián, M.C.; Pujalte, M.J. An MLSA approach for the taxonomic update of the Splendidus clade, a lineage containing several fish and shellfish pathogenic Vibrio spp. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2016, 39, 361–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Bruto, M.; James, A.; Petton, B.; Labreuche, Y.; Chenivesse, S.; Alunno-Bruscia, M.; Polz, M.F.; Le Roux, F. Vibrio crassostreae, a benign oyster colonizer turned into a pathogen after plasmid acquisition. ISME J. 2016, 11, 1043–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Song, J.; Liu, X.; Wu, C.; Zhang, Y.; Fan, K.; Zhang, X.; Wei, Y. Isolation, identification and pathogenesis study of Vibrio diabolicus. Aquaculture 2020, 533, 736043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Ramamurthy, T.; Chowdhury, G.; Pazhani, G.P.; Shinoda, S. Vibrio fluvialis: An emerging human pathogen. Front. Microbiol. 2014, 5, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Wang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Qin, G.; Luo, W.; Lin, Q. A novel pathogenic bacteria (Vibrio fortis) causing enteritis in cultured seahorses, Hippocampus erectus Perry, 1810. J. Fish Dis. 2016, 39, 765–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Roux, F.L.; Goubet, A.; Thompson, F.; Faury, N.; Gay, M.; Swings, J.; Saulnier, D. Vibrio gigantis sp. nov., isolated from the haemolymph of cultured oysters (Crassostrea gigas). Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2005, 55, 2251–2255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Sicuro, B.; Luzzana, U. The state of Seriola spp. other than yellowtail (S. quinqueradiata) farming in the world. Rev. Fish. Sci. Aquac. 2016, 24, 314–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Harrison, J.; Nelson, K.; Morcrette, H.; Morcrette, C.; Preston, J.; Helmer, L.; Titball, R.W.; Butler, C.S.; Wagley, S. The increased prevalence of Vibrio species and the first reporting of Vibrio jasicida and Vibrio rotiferianus at UK shellfish sites. Water Res. 2022, 211, 117942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Huang, B.; Zhang, X.; Wang, C.; Bai, C.; Li, C.; Li, C.; Xin, L. Isolation and characterization of Vibrio kanaloae as a major pathogen associated with mass mortalities of Ark Clam, Scapharca broughtonii, in cold season. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 2161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Schaeck, M.; Duchateau, L.; Broeck, W.V.D.; Van Trappen, S.; De Vos, P.; Coulombet, C.; Boon, N.; Haesebrouck, F.; Decostere, A. Vibrio lentus protects gnotobiotic sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax L.) larvae against challenge with Vibrio harveyi. Vet. Microbiol. 2016, 185, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Farto, R.; Armada, S.; Montes, M.; Guisande, J.; Pérez, M.; Nieto, T. Vibrio lentus associated with diseased wild octopus (Octopus vulgaris). J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2003, 83, 149–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Andree, K.B.; Carrasco, N.; Carella, F.; Furones, D.; Prado, P. Vibrio mediterranei, a potential emerging pathogen of marine fauna: Investigation of pathogenicity using a bacterial challenge in Pinna nobilis and development of a species-specific PCR. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2021, 130, 617–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Torres, M.; Reina, J.C.; Fuentes-Monteverde, J.C.; Fernández, G.; Rodríguez, J.; Jiménez, C.; Llamas, I. AHL-lactonase expression in three marine emerging pathogenic Vibrio spp. reduces virulence and mortality in brine shrimp (Artemia salina) and Manila clam (Venerupis philippinarum). PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0195176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Mondal, S.K.; Lijon, B.; Reza, R.; Ishika, T. Isolation and identification of Vibrio nereis and Vibrio harveyi in farm raised Penaeus monodon marine shrimp. Int. J. Biosci. 2016, 8, 55–61. [Google Scholar]
  93. Ruiz, P.; Balado, M.; Fuentes-Monteverde, J.C.; Toranzo, A.E.; Rodríguez, J.; Jiménez, C.; Avendaño-Herrera, R.; Lemos, M.L. The Fish Pathogen Vibrio ordalii Under Iron Deprivation Produces the Siderophore Piscibactin. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Amin, A.M.R.; Feng, G.; Al-Saari, N.; Meirelles, P.M.; Yamazaki, Y.; Mino, S.; Thompson, F.L.; Sawabe, T.; Sawabe, T. The First Temporal and Spatial Assessment of Vibrio Diversity of the Surrounding Seawater of Coral Reefs in Ishigaki, Japan. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Villamil, L.; Figueras, A.; Aranguren, R.; Novoa, B. Non-specific immune response of turbot, Scophthalmus maximus (L.), experimentally infected with a pathogenic Vibrio pelagius. J. Fish Dis. 2003, 26, 321–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Guisande, J.A.; Lago, E.P.; Prado, S.; Nieto, T.P.; Seguín, R.F. Genotypic Diversity of Culturable Vibrio Species Associated with the Culture of Oysters and Clams in Galicia and Screening of Their Pathogenic Potential. J. Shellfish. Res. 2008, 27, 801–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Verschuere, L.; Heang, H.; Criel, G.; Sorgeloos, P.; Verstraete, W. Selected bacterial strains protect Artemia spp. from the pathogenic effects of Vibrio proteolyticus CW8T2. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66, 1139–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Ray, A.; Kinch, L.N.; Santos, M.d.S.; Grishin, N.V.; Orth, K.; Salomon, D. Proteomics Analysis Reveals Previously Uncharacterized Virulence Factors in Vibrio proteolyticus. mBio 2016, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Gökbulak, F. Effect of American bison (Bison bison L.) on the recovery and germinability of seeds of range forage species. Grass Forage Sci. 2002, 57, 395–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Qiao, G.; Jang, I.-K.; Won, K.M.; Woo, S.H.; Xu, D.-H.; Park, S.I. Pathogenicity comparison of high- and low-virulence strains of Vibrio scophthalmi in olive flounder Paralichthys olivaceus. Fish. Sci. 2012, 79, 99–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Duperthuy, M.; Schmitt, P.; Garzón, E.; Caro, A.; Rosa, R.D.; Le Roux, F.; Lautrédou-Audouy, N.; Got, P.; Romestand, B.; de Lorgeril, J.; et al. Use of OmpU porins for attachment and invasion of Crassostrea gigas immune cells by the oyster pathogen Vibrio splendidus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 2993–2998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Kesarcodi-Watson, A.; Kaspar, H.; Lategan, M.; Gibson, L. Two pathogens of Greenshell™ mussel larvae, Perna canaliculus: Vibrio splendidus and a V. coralliilyticus/neptunius-like isolate. J. Fish Dis. 2009, 32, 499–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Robino, E.; Poirier, A.C.; Amraoui, H.; Le Bissonnais, S.; Perret, A.; Lopez-Joven, C.; Auguet, J.C.; Rubio, T.P.; Cazevieille, C.; Rolland, J.L. Resistance of the oyster pathogen Vibrio tasmaniensis LGP32 against grazing by Vannella sp. marine amoeba involves Vsm and CopA virulence factors. Environ. Microbiol. 2020, 22, 4183–4197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Ho, H.T.; Lipman, L.J.; Gaastra, W. Arcobacter, what is known and unknown about a potential foodborne zoonotic agent! Vet. Microbiol. 2006, 115, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Variation of the number of sequences, operational taxonomic units, and diversity indices (Chao1, Shannon, and Simpson indices) for the marine bacterioplankton community in seawater around Jeju Island, South Korea, in four months in 2013.
Figure 1. Variation of the number of sequences, operational taxonomic units, and diversity indices (Chao1, Shannon, and Simpson indices) for the marine bacterioplankton community in seawater around Jeju Island, South Korea, in four months in 2013.
Ijms 24 13561 g001
Figure 2. Monthly variation of bacterioplankton community relative abundance in seawater around Jeju Island, South Korea, in four months in 2013. (a) Phylum and (b) class level. Taxa with relative abundance < 1.0% were categorized as other bacterioplankton groups.
Figure 2. Monthly variation of bacterioplankton community relative abundance in seawater around Jeju Island, South Korea, in four months in 2013. (a) Phylum and (b) class level. Taxa with relative abundance < 1.0% were categorized as other bacterioplankton groups.
Ijms 24 13561 g002
Figure 3. Heatmap of the relative abundances of the operational taxonomic units (OTUs) of common bacterioplankton (for OTUs with relative abundance > 1% in at least one sample) in seawater samples collected around Jeju Island, South Korea, in four different months in 2013. (a) Hierarchical agglomerative clustering results based on the group average of the relative abundances of the bacterioplankton OTUs. (b) Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) plot for the bacterioplankton community based on the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity method. The relative abundances were square-root normalized.
Figure 3. Heatmap of the relative abundances of the operational taxonomic units (OTUs) of common bacterioplankton (for OTUs with relative abundance > 1% in at least one sample) in seawater samples collected around Jeju Island, South Korea, in four different months in 2013. (a) Hierarchical agglomerative clustering results based on the group average of the relative abundances of the bacterioplankton OTUs. (b) Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) plot for the bacterioplankton community based on the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity method. The relative abundances were square-root normalized.
Ijms 24 13561 g003
Figure 4. Cladograms of attached bacterioplankton lineages differ significantly between September and other months. The associated bacterioplankton groups at phylum to genus levels are listed from the center to the outside. The circle diameters are proportional to bacterioplankton taxon abundance. Significant discriminatory nodes are colored, and branch areas are shaded according to the highest-ranked group for the given taxon. Green and red areas indicate September and other months, respectively.
Figure 4. Cladograms of attached bacterioplankton lineages differ significantly between September and other months. The associated bacterioplankton groups at phylum to genus levels are listed from the center to the outside. The circle diameters are proportional to bacterioplankton taxon abundance. Significant discriminatory nodes are colored, and branch areas are shaded according to the highest-ranked group for the given taxon. Green and red areas indicate September and other months, respectively.
Ijms 24 13561 g004
Figure 5. Genus-level relative abundances of potentially pathogenic bacteria in seawater around Jeju Island, South Korea, in four months in 2013. For each genus listed, >1% of the species in the genus are potentially pathogenic. These results were obtained by performing one-way ANOVA and Scheffe’s post hoc test. The letters A and B indicate significant differences among months (p < 0.05).
Figure 5. Genus-level relative abundances of potentially pathogenic bacteria in seawater around Jeju Island, South Korea, in four months in 2013. For each genus listed, >1% of the species in the genus are potentially pathogenic. These results were obtained by performing one-way ANOVA and Scheffe’s post hoc test. The letters A and B indicate significant differences among months (p < 0.05).
Ijms 24 13561 g005
Figure 6. Seawater sampling sites around Jeju Island, South Korea, in four different months in 2013.
Figure 6. Seawater sampling sites around Jeju Island, South Korea, in four different months in 2013.
Ijms 24 13561 g006
Table 1. Mean read counts, observed operational taxonomic units (OTUs), and alpha-diversity (Chao1, Shannon, and Simpson indices) for marine bacterioplankton in seawater around Jeju Island, South Korea, in four months in 2013.
Table 1. Mean read counts, observed operational taxonomic units (OTUs), and alpha-diversity (Chao1, Shannon, and Simpson indices) for marine bacterioplankton in seawater around Jeju Island, South Korea, in four months in 2013.
MonthTrimmed ReadsOTUsChao1ShannonSimpson
March6673272406.12.920.88
May9782393603.43.510.91
September9813567784.24.090.93
December5745369625.13.160.86
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, H.-J.; Kim, K.E.; Kim, Y.J.; Kang, H.; Shin, J.W.; Kim, S.; Lee, S.H.; Jung, S.W.; Lee, T.-K. Marine Bacterioplankton Community Dynamics and Potentially Pathogenic Bacteria in Seawater around Jeju Island, South Korea, via Metabarcoding. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 13561. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241713561

AMA Style

Kim H-J, Kim KE, Kim YJ, Kang H, Shin JW, Kim S, Lee SH, Jung SW, Lee T-K. Marine Bacterioplankton Community Dynamics and Potentially Pathogenic Bacteria in Seawater around Jeju Island, South Korea, via Metabarcoding. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(17):13561. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241713561

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Hyun-Jung, Kang Eun Kim, Yu Jin Kim, Hangoo Kang, Ji Woo Shin, Soohyun Kim, Sang Heon Lee, Seung Won Jung, and Taek-Kyun Lee. 2023. "Marine Bacterioplankton Community Dynamics and Potentially Pathogenic Bacteria in Seawater around Jeju Island, South Korea, via Metabarcoding" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 17: 13561. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241713561

APA Style

Kim, H. -J., Kim, K. E., Kim, Y. J., Kang, H., Shin, J. W., Kim, S., Lee, S. H., Jung, S. W., & Lee, T. -K. (2023). Marine Bacterioplankton Community Dynamics and Potentially Pathogenic Bacteria in Seawater around Jeju Island, South Korea, via Metabarcoding. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(17), 13561. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241713561

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop