Next Article in Journal
The P2X7 Receptor in Autoimmunity
Next Article in Special Issue
Interaction between Rumen Epithelial miRNAs-Microbiota-Metabolites in Response to Cold-Season Nutritional Stress in Tibetan Sheep
Previous Article in Journal
Diabetic Endothelial Cell Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3β Activation Induces VCAM1 Ectodomain Shedding
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genomic Scan for Runs of Homozygosity and Selective Signature Analysis to Identify Candidate Genes in Large White Pigs
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

METTL3 Promotes the Differentiation of Goat Skeletal Muscle Satellite Cells by Regulating MEF2C mRNA Stability in a m6A-Dependent Manner

1
Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China
2
Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Multi-Omics, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(18), 14115; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241814115
Submission received: 9 August 2023 / Revised: 10 September 2023 / Accepted: 12 September 2023 / Published: 14 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Genetics and Breeding Mechanisms in Domestics Animals)

Abstract

:
The development of mammalian skeletal muscle is a highly complex process involving multiple molecular interactions. As a prevalent RNA modification, N6-methyladenosine (m6A) regulates the expression of target genes to affect mammalian development. Nevertheless, it remains unclear how m6A participates in the development of goat muscle. In this study, methyltransferase 3 (METTL3) was significantly enriched in goat longissimus dorsi (LD) tissue. In addition, the global m6A modification level and differentiation of skeletal muscle satellite cells (MuSCs) were regulated by METTL3. By performing mRNA-seq analysis, 8050 candidate genes exhibited significant changes in expression level after the knockdown of METTL3 in MuSCs. Additionally, methylated RNA immunoprecipitation sequencing (MeRIP-seq) illustrated that myocyte enhancer factor 2c (MEF2C) mRNA contained m6A modification. Further experiments demonstrated that METTL3 enhanced the differentiation of MuSCs by upregulating m6A levels and expression of MEF2C. Moreover, the m6A reader YTH N6-methyladenosine RNA binding protein C1 (YTHDC1) was bound and stabilized to MEF2C mRNA. The present study reveals that METTL3 enhances myogenic differentiation in MuSCs by regulating MEF2C and provides evidence of a post-transcriptional mechanism in the development of goat skeletal muscle.

1. Introduction

There is an increasing need for high-quality animal products as the world’s population continues to increase. Goat meat is rich in high-quality protein and unsaturated fatty acids, which help our body reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease [1,2]. Therefore, it is essential to explore the regulatory mechanisms underlying the regulation of muscle development in goats. Adults and domesticated animals generally weigh a considerable amount of their total weight in skeletal muscle, which is an essential body part [3]. It supports the body’s movement and fatigue relief [4,5]. Regarding human health, some muscle diseases (sarcopenia and muscular dystrophy) increase the risk of falls and fractures [2,6]. Notably, skeletal muscle is directly related to the production of meat. Myogenic regulatory factors (MRFs), paired box proteins (Paxs), myocyte enhancer factors (MEFs), and non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) cooperate to sustain the development of animal skeletal muscle and are even involved in repair and regeneration after muscle injury [7,8]. Skeletal muscle satellite cells (MuSCs) are crucial in muscle regeneration after injury. When the body suffers an acute injury, MuSCs are activated for mitosis and further differentiate to myoblasts. Such a process can aid muscle regeneration and healing of damaged muscles [9].
Since the discovery of epigenetics, it has been widely reported that DNA methylation, histone modification, chromatin remodeling, and RNA modifications regulate skeletal muscle development [10,11]. N6-methyladenosine (m6A) is a prevalent RNA modification handling a variety of biological functions [12], including stem cell differentiation [13], development [14], disease [15], and sex determination [16]. Methyltransferase 3 (METTL3) and Methyltransferase 14 (METTL14) catalyze m6A, with METTL3 as the catalytic core [17]. Deletion of METTL3 induces embryonic lethality in mice [18]. When METTL3 was knocked out, the self-renewal capacity and m6A methylation of mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) were reduced [19]. Recent research illustrates that METTL3 is necessary for the development of skeletal muscle. It has also been shown that the knockdown of METTL3 inhibited the differentiation of C2C12 by reducing myogenic differentiation (MyoD) at post-transcriptional processes [11]. In addition, METTL3 regulates global m6A levels and inhibits myogenic differentiation in C2C12 [20]. A recent study revealed that METTL3 inhibits activin 2a receptor (ACVR2A) synthesis, mediating skeletal muscle hypertrophy [21]. Additionally, METTL3 regulates tet methylcytosine dioxygenase 1 (TET1) mRNA stability and the myogenic differentiation process in an m6A manner [22]. Nevertheless, METTL3 may exhibit different expression levels in different cell types [23]. Thus, it is still necessary to fully understand how METTL3 and m6A influence the development of goat muscle.
Here, we reveal the dynamic change and function of METTL3 in goat MuSCs. METTL3 mRNA was highly enriched in postnatal goat muscle tissue. In particular, METTL3 was necessary for MuSCs myogenic differentiation and significantly regulated global m6A levels. Mechanistically, METTL3 promoted myocyte enhancer factor 2c (MEF2C) expression via m6A modification during myogenic differentiation, which depends on the protection of m6A reader YTH N6-methyladenosine RNA binding protein C1 (YTHDC1) on MEF2C mRNA stability. Our results unveil a post-transcriptional regulation mechanism and provide novel ideas on the role of m6A modification in the development of goat skeletal muscle.

2. Results

2.1. Homology Analysis of Goat METTL3 and Its Expression Profile in Tissues and MuSCs

To systematically understand the METTL3 protein, we analyzed the protein homology. According to the phylogenetic tree constructed by MEGA software [24], the goat (Capra hircus) METTL3 protein has a close homology to that of sheep (Ovis aries). Meanwhile, it is relatively distinct from the mouse (Mus musculus) and zebrafish (Danio rerio) METTL3 protein (Figure 1A). Using the SMART online tool [25], we analyzed the METTL3 domain in humans, mice, zebrafish, sheep, pigs, cattle, and goats. We found that METTL3 in all species mentioned above contained the MT-A70 domain (Figure 1B), which is the core region responsible for methyl transfer [17]. Based on the results of bioinformatics analysis, we hypothesized that the function of METTL3 was a methyltransferase in goats.
We performed qPCR to explore the spatio-temporal expression profile of METTL3 in goat tissues. Fetal development is vital for muscle development, forming the muscle fibers in the embryonic period [26]. Therefore, goat tissues at 105 embryonic days (E105) were selected for METTL3 expression assessment. METTL3 transcripts were most enriched in the lung, followed by the longissimus dorsi (LD) muscle (Figure 1C). We further quantified METTL3 levels in LD tissue from goats aged between 90 embryonic days (E90) and 3 days after birth (B3) and found that transcripts of METTL3 were gradually increased in the prenatal period and rose sharply at B3 (p < 0.05) (Figure 1D).
We successfully isolated and cultured MuSCs marked by Pax7 and the MyHC protein, respectively (Figure 1E). Compared with cells cultured in GM-3 (growth medium for 3 days), GM-5, and DM-2 (differentiation medium for 2 days), METTL3 was expressed at a higher level in DM-5 cells, a late stage of differentiation (p < 0.05) (Figure 1F). Intriguingly, the total m6A level initially reduced and then increased with the differentiation of MuSCs (Figure 1G). Moreover, compared with the control (siNC), small interfering RNA targeting METTL3 (siMETTL3) reduced METTL3 levels in goat MuSCs (Figure 1H and Figure S2), as well as the global m6A levels (p < 0.01) (Figure 1I). Our results suggest that METTL3 is functionally involved with skeletal muscle development in an m6A-dependent manner in goat MuSCs.

2.2. METTL3 Promotes Myogenic Differentiation in Goat MuSCs

To confirm the function of METTL3 in myogenic differentiation, we both silenced and overexpressed METTL3 in MuSCs to evaluate whether the METTL3 pathway drives MuSCs differentiation. As expected, qPCR and WB results showed that the knockdown of METTL3 (siMETTL3) significantly downregulated the myogenic differentiation (MyoD), myogenin (MyoG), and myosin heavy chain (MyHC) mRNA and MyHC protein expression level (p < 0.05) (Figure 2A,B). Meanwhile, the myotubes presented as MyHC immunofluorescence were rarely formed in siMETTL3-treated cells, and the fusion index was significantly retarded (p < 0.01) (Figure 2C).
On the contrary, ectopic METTL3 using a pEGFP-METTL3 overexpression vector (p < 0.01) (Figure 2D,E) promoted the expression of differentiation marker genes, including MyoD and MyoG. Consistently, the formation of myotubes was dramatically enhanced after METTL3 overexpression (p < 0.05) (Figure 2F,G). These imply that METTL3 is necessary for the differentiation of MuSCs.

2.3. mRNA-Seq and Methylated RNA Immunoprecipitation Sequencing (MeRIP-Seq) Identify MEF2C as an Underlying Target of METTL3

To systematically investigate the myogenic differentiation gene profile regulated by METTL3 in MuSCs, we performed mRNA-seq using METTL3-silenced cells. A total of 241, 219, and 162 clean reads were obtained with a mapping rate between 86.09 and 93.18% (Tables S4 and S5). The correlation and PCA analysis suggest that our experiments had good reproducibility of samples within the same group (Figure S3A,B). Then, 8050 genes were defined as differentially expressed genes (DEGs) (Figure S3C and Table S6). Among these, six genes were randomly selected to evaluate the accuracy of the mRNA-seq data, which was confirmed by performing qPCR analysis (Figure S4). Further, GO analysis revealed that RNA metabolism and methyltransferase activity of MuSCs were affected by METTL3 knockdown (Figure 3A). Additionally, these DEGs were significantly enriched in 18 signaling pathways, including Notch, MAPK, RNA degradation, fatty acid metabolism, AMPK, Hedgehog, and focal adhesion, according to KEGG enrichment analysis (Figure 3B and Table S7).
Among them, it was identified that the MAPK and Notch pathways are crucial for skeletal muscle growth [27,28]. Subsequently, the protein interaction networks of DEGs in MAPK and Notch pathways were constructed using the String tool and Cytoscape software [29,30]. MAPK3, MAPK14, AKT1, Notch3, Notch2, and MEF2C were important nodes related to muscle differentiation (Figure 3C). To mechanistically understand whether these METTL3-associated genes are related to m6A modification, we combined our previous MeRIP-seq data (LD muscle from embryonic 60 days (E60d) vs. birth 12 months (B12m)) and identified five genes (MYC, MEF2C, NOTCH2, HES1, and HEY1) showing a dynamic m6A modification pattern (Figure 3D and Table S8). MeRIP-seq data indicated that the m6A peak was found on MEF2C mRNA (Figure 3E). Based on this, MEF2C was selected for further validation.

2.4. METTL3 Promotes Myogenic Differentiation of MuSCs by Increasing the Expression of MEF2C

We quantified and found that MEF2C dramatically increased as myogenic differentiation progressed (p < 0.001) (Figure S5), coinciding with the previous study [31]. Further, we investigated whether knockdown and overexpression of METTL3 regulated the expression of MEF2C by qPCR and WB analysis. Expectedly, the levels of MEF2C transcripts and protein were significantly decreased in METTL3-knockdown MuSCs (p < 0.05) (Figure 4A,B). Conversely, ectopic METTL3 dramatically elevated the expression of MEF2C mRNA and protein in METTL3-overexpressing cells (p < 0.05) (Figure 4C,D).
Additionally, when MEF2C was overexpressed, the levels of differentiation marker gene MyoD and MyoG were significantly promoted (p < 0.05 or p < 0.01) (Figure 4E,F). Moreover, the myotube fusion was significantly increased by ectopic MEF2C (p < 0.01) (Figure 4G). Nevertheless, overexpressing MEF2C failed to alter levels of METTL3 mRNA or protein (Figure 4E,F). Furthermore, we overexpressed MEF2C in siMETTL3-transfected cells and found that deficiency of METTL3 significantly inhibited the myogenic differentiation gene MyoD and MyHC, while the addition of MEF2C partly rescued these negative effects (Figure 4H). In general, METTL3 supports myogenic differentiation through MEF2C in MuSCs.

2.5. METTL3-m6A-YTHDC1 Stabilizes MEF2C Transcripts

To precisely define the m6A modification of MEF2C, we used the online tool SRAMP [32] and found that MEF2C-1728A (XM_005683422.3 1728 A site) has the highest probability of m6A modification. (Figure 5A). Furthermore, we performed MeRIP-qPCR and found that the MEF2C-1728A was enriched on m6A antibody, compared to IgG (p < 0.05) (Figure 5B). This result indicated that m6A modification occurred at the MEF2C-1728A. In addition, the MeRIP-qPCR assay demonstrated that the m6A level of MEF2C was reduced when METTL3 knockdown (p < 0.01) (Figure 5C). To confirm whether METTL3 regulates the expression of MEF2C in an m6A-dependent manner, we performed the luciferase reporter assay using wild-type (WT) (MEF2C-1728A) and m6A motif mutant (MEF2C-1728T, MUT) vectors. As expected, the knockdown of METTL3 or overexpressing METTL3 reduced or elevated luciferase activity (p < 0.05), respectively, while MUT activity was insignificantly changed (Figure 5D). The results show that METTL3 promotes the expression of MEF2C through upregulating m6A methylation modification at the MEF2C-1728A.
It is well-known that the m6A-RNAs are recognized by m6A ‘readers’, consequently impacting their metabolism [8]. We used the catRAPID Omics v2.0 online tool [33] and found that YTHDC1 owns a higher interaction propensity with MEF2C mRNA (Figure 5E and Figure S6). Then, we performed RIP assay and found that MEF2C-1728A were significantly enriched in the YTHDC1 antibody (p < 0.05) (Figure 5F), suggesting that the YTHDC1 protein recognizes and binds to the m6A modification site of MEF2C. The expression pattern of YTHDC1 was similar to that of METTL3 and MEF2C during MuSCs differentiation (p < 0.05) (Figure S7A). When we successfully knocked down YTHDC1 using siYTHDC1 in MuSCs (Figure S7B), MyHC and MEF2C levels were significantly suppressed (p < 0.05) (Figure 5G,H). Moreover, MEF2C mRNA exhibited a shorter half-life in YTHDC1-deficiency cells (p < 0.05) (Figure 5I). In summary, our results suggest that METTL3 cooperated with YTHDC1 to regulate myogenic differentiation by increasing the stability of MEF2C mRNA.

3. Discussion

The intricate process of muscle development involves the combined participation of several transcription factors, growth factors, non-coding RNAs, and related pathways [34]. However, the post-transcriptional mechanism influencing muscle development still needs to be better understood. Previous research has indicated that m6A is critical in determining RNA fate [35,36,37,38]. Abundant m6A modifications were identified in the human brain, lung, and muscle tissues [39]. This present study found that the expression of METTL3 indicated the highest level in the lung, followed by muscle and heart, which was indirectly considered conservative among different species in terms of m6A modification.
Studies have shown that METTL3 controls the global m6A levels in both porcine-induced pluripotent stem cells and mouse cardiac fibroblasts [40,41]. Additionally, METTL3 and m6A abundance increase during skeletal muscle hypertrophy in mice, and the deletion of METTL3 suppresses muscle cell growth [21]. Knockdown of METTL3 significantly inhibits myoblast differentiation and decreases the expression of MYH3 in bovine [42]. Our study found a similar trend in that the expression of METTL3 of goat MuSCs gradually increased with the time of muscle differentiation. Furthermore, the knockdown of METTL3 reduced the total RNA m6A level, indicating that METTL3 regulated the global m6A level in MuSCs during myogenic differentiation. Meanwhile, METTL3 promoted MuSCs differentiation and boosted differentiation marker genes. The above findings suggest that m6A modification promotes muscle development in goats.
Next, we found that DEGs were enriched to Notch and MAPK pathways by analyzing mRNA-seq data from siMETTL3 and siNC cells. It is well known that Notch and MAPK pathways are essential for MuSCs’s self-renewal and differentiation [43,44,45]. Furthermore, METTL3 regulates the proliferation of mouse muscle stem cells by the Notch pathway [46]. Another study reported that m6A modification mediated by the demethylase FTO regulates mTOR-PGC-1α and p38 MAPK signaling pathways, thereby regulating muscle development [47,48]. In this study, we determined some DEGs enriched in Notch and MAPK pathways, so we used those DEGs to construct a protein interaction network. Interestingly, some critical nodes were focused, such as MAPK3, MAPK14, AKT1, Notch3, Notch2, and MEF2C. However, whether METTL3 directly regulates the conduction of these pathways in an m6A-dependent manner in goat muscle development requires further study.
We determined that METTL3 promotes MEF2C’s mRNA and protein levels. Based on MeRIP-seq and mRNA-seq, we found that MEF2C was the potential target gene of METTL3 and m6A modification gene and verified this using qRT-PCR and MeRIP-PCR. MEF2C was reportedly involved with cardiomyocyte repair, neural development, skeletal muscle regeneration, and smooth muscle migration [49,50,51,52]. During skeletal muscle development, MEF2C regulates muscle integrity and myoblast differentiation [53,54]. Additionally, MEF2C cooperates with MyoD to control myogenic gene expression, supporting muscle development [55]. In this study, we found that the expression level of MEF2C was higher in the DM of MuSCs than in the GM and that MEF2C overexpression promoted MuSCs myogenic differentiation.
METTL3-regulated m6A affects the expression of target gene mRNAs. METTL3 knockdown increases YTHDF2-dependent mRNA stability and promotes the adipogenesis of porcine BMSCs by reducing the m6A level of JAK mRNA [47]. The m6A-reader IGF2BP3 stabilizes RCC2 mRNA by recognizing m6A [56]. In our study, MeRIP-qPCR results showed that the MEF2C-1728A fragment was significantly enriched with the m6A antibody. The deficiency of METTL3 in MuSCs considerably reduced the m6A level of MEF2C. Then, the luciferase assay further verified that this m6A site played a central role in the regulation process of METTL3. These results suggest that METTL3-dependent m6A regulates the expression of MEF2C in MuSCs.
According to reports, YTHDC1 is essential in regulating mRNA export and splicing in the nucleus [57]. Additionally, the interaction of METTL3 with chromatin that governs the integrity of IAP heterochromatin was improved by YTHDC1 [58]. In addition, the loss of YTHDC1 promoted the binding of target mRNA to RRP6 and decreased mRNA stability, revealing the underlying mechanism of YTHDC1 regulating mRNA stability [59]. In this study, we verified that MEF2C could bind to YTHDC1 by RIP experiments, and the expression of YTHDC1 was higher in the differentiation cells. Furthermore, the silence of YTHDC1 significantly decreased MyHC and MEF2C, as well as the half-life of MEF2C transcripts. Our results demonstrate that YTHDC1 recognizes the m6A modification of MEF2C and increases mRNA stability.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Animals and Samples Collection

The Jianyang Dageda farm (Jianyang, China) provided Jianzhou big-eared goats for use as experimental animals in this study. The Jianzhou big-eared goat is a breed of meat sheep bred by crossing the American Nubian goat with the native goat in Sichuan province, which is the second meat goat species after the Nanjiang Huang goat in China [60]. A standard diet (forage to concentrate ratio, 65:35) was provided to all healthy ewes (2–3 years old) twice daily, and they received free access to water in their stalls, followed by simultaneous estrus and artificial insemination treatments [61]. Goat fetuses and kids (females, n = 3) at 90 embryonic days (E90), 105 days (E105), 120 days (E120), 135 days (E135), and 3 days after birth (B3) were randomly selected (not related) and humanely sacrificed. Different tissues (LD, lung, heart, spleen, liver, and kidney) were sampled.

4.2. MuSCs Isolation and Identification

According to previous methods, the LD of the E90 goat (male) was successfully used to isolate the MuSCs for this study [62]. Then, we used the antibody against myogenic marker genes Pax7 (Santa Cruz, CA, USA) and MyHC (myosin heavy chain, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) for immunofluorescence. MuSCs were stored in liquid nitrogen tanks.

4.3. Phylogenetic Tree Construction and Protein Domain Analysis

The neighbor-joining statistical method of MEGA software (version 11; https://megasoftware.net; (accessed on 7 January 2023)) was used to draw a METTL3 phylogenetic tree [24]. The phylogenetic tree was constructed by the online tools of EvolView (https://evolgenius.info//evolview-v2/#login; (accessed on 6 March 2023)) [63]. The SMART online tool was used to analyze the METTL3 protein domain [25]. The NCBI database was used to obtain the METTL3 amino acid sequences in several species.

4.4. Cell Culture and Transfection

MuSCs were cultured at 5% CO2 and 37 °C in GM (growth medium) containing 89% DMEM, 10% FBS (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA), and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Invitrogen, Bohemia, NY, USA). The DM (differentiation medium) containing 98% DMEM and 2% horse serum (Gibco) was changed daily to promote myogenic differentiation after the MuSCs density reached 80% to 90%. Plasmids and siRNAs were transfected into MuSCs using Lipofectamine 3000 (Life Technologies, Waltham, MA, USA).

4.5. Gene silencing and Plasmid Construction

RiboBio (Guangzhou, China) designed and synthesized the siRNAs used for this experiment, and the siRNA sequences are shown in Table S1. The CDS sequences of the MEF2C (NM_001314204.1) gene were amplified with specific primers, and the full-length of CDS was inserted into the pEGFP-N1 (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) vector by the homologous recombinant cloning kit (Vazyme, Nanjing, China) to construct overexpression plasmids. The METTL3 overexpression vector was synthesized by Hangzhou Youkang Biotechnology (Hangzhou, China). Table S2 shows the cloning primers.

4.6. Total RNA Isolation and qPCR

Total RNA was isolated from tissues and MuSCs using RNAiso Plus (Takara, Dalian, China). The cDNAs were obtained by the PrimeScript™ RT kit (Takara). In addition, SYBR Premix Ex TaqTM II (Takara) was used for qPCR. Using the GAPDH and 2−ΔΔCt method to normalize relative RNA expression [64]. All primers were detailed in Table S2.

4.7. Immunofluorescence Analysis

MuSCs were washed thrice with PBS (5 min per session) and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde. Then, 0.5% TritonX-100 was used to permeabilize the cells. Subsequently, the cells were incubated with primary antibodies (1:200, 4 °C, 12 h) and secondary antibodies (1:200, 37 °C, 2 h). Finally, ImageJ software (version 1.53; https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/; (accessed on 24 September 2021)) was used to count the fusion index [65]. Antibodies are as follows: anti-Pax7 (1:200, abs124153, absin), anti-MyHC (1:300, sc-378137, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), Cy3 Goat Anti-Mouse IgG (1:200, AS008, ABclonal, Wuhan, China), and FITC Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG (AS011, 1:200, ABclonal, Wuhan, China).

4.8. Western Blot Analysis

MuSC proteins were obtained by the total protein extraction kit (Beyotime, Shanghai, China). Proteins were denatured (100 °C, 5 min) by adding protein loading buffer (5× SDS-PAGE, Beyotime). ImageJ software (version 1.53; https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/; (accessed on 24 September 2021)) was used to perform the semi-quantitative study of proteins. The WB used the following antibodies: anti-β-tubulin (1:1000, 250007, ZENBIO, Chengdu, China), anti-MyHC (1:1000, sc-378137, Santa Cruz, Dallas, TX, USA), anti-MEF2C (1:500, 10056-1-AP, Proteintech, Wuhan, China), anti-YTHDC1 (1:1000, ab220159, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), anti-METTL3 (1:1000, A8370, ABclonal, Wuhan, China), MyoD (1:1000, 18943-1-AP, Proteintech, Proteintech, Wuhan, China), anti-Mouse IgG (1:5000, 511103, ZENBIO, Chengdu, China), and anti- Rabbit IgG (AS014, 1:5000, ABclonal, Wuhan, China).

4.9. Luciferase Reporter Assays

The wild-type (WT) and m6A motif mutant (A to T mutation at 1728 site, MUT) of the MEF2C-1728 region were inserted into the psiCHECK-2 vector. The WT and MUT vectors were transfected to pEGFP-METTL3 and siMETTL3-transfected MuSCs. The luciferase activity was quantified by the Double-Luciferase Reporter Assay Kit (Transgen, Beijing, China). The MUT vectors were synthesized by Tsingke (Beijing, China). These primers are shown in Table S3.

4.10. Total m6A Modification Level Analysis

Total RNA was isolated from MuSCs in the proliferative phase (GM-3, GM-5) and differentiation phase (DM-2, DM-5) using RNAiso Plus. The global m6A methylation level of RNA was detected using the m6A RNA Methylation Quantification Kit (Epigentek, Farmingdale, NY, USA).

4.11. RNA Immunoprecipitation (RIP) Assay

MuSCs were collected and lysed for RIP assays to assess the binding ability of YTHDC1 and MEF2C. Subsequently, the Magna RIP™ RNA-Binding Protein Immunoprecipitation Kit (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was used for RIP assays. These antibodies used in the RIP assay were YTHDC1 (1:20, 77422s, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) and IgG (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA).

4.12. RNA Stability Assays

Actinomycin D (AcTD, A1410, Sigma-Aldrich) was used on YTHDC1 knockdown or control MuSCs for 0 h, 1 h, 2 h, and 4 h to inhibit global mRNA transcription [66].

4.13. Methylated RNA Immunoprecipitation (MeRIP)

MuSCs were used to obtain m6A mRNA using the Magna MeRIPTM m6A Kit (Sigma-Aldrich).

4.14. mRNA-Seq and Bioinformatics Analysis

Novogene (Beijing, China) performed the library preparation and mRNA-seq. Briefly, MuSCs were cultured until day 3 of differentiation and transfected with siNC or siMETTL3 into cells (n = 3). Total RNA was isolated using RNA iso Plus. The Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer and agarose gel electrophoresis (1%) were used to evaluate the integrity of RNA samples (Figure S1). The NEBNext® Ultra™ RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina® (NEB, Beverly, MA, USA) was used for building the library. In addition, the Illumina HiSeq 2500 (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) was used to sequence (2 × 150 bp pair-end) qualified RNA.
Next, six mRNA-seq libraries (3 siNC and 3 siMETTL3 samples) generated 261,101,486 raw reads. Clean reads were obtained from raw reads, as described in previous studies [67]. Moreover, the Q30 value of all libraries was more than 92.39% (Table S4). Hisat2 mapped clean reads to the goat ARS1 reference genome (GCF_001704415.1) [68]. The DESeq2 R Package was used to carry out differential read count analysis for identifying differentially expressed genes (DEGs, | log2 (FoldChange) | > 0, and padj = 0.05) [69]. Finally, the clusterProfile package was used for GO and KEGG enrichment analysis, and padj < 0.05 was considered significantly enriched [70].

4.15. Bioinformatics Analysis of Networks and Genes

Protein interaction networks were constructed by String tool (https://cn.string-db.org (accessed on 6 January 2023)) and Cytoscape software (version 3.9.1; https://metascape.org/g-p/index.html#/main/step1 (accessed on 8 January 2023)) [29,30]. The m6A site of MEF2C mRNA was predicted by the online tool SRAMP (http://www.cuilab.cn/sramp (accessed on 18 February 2023)) [32]. Subsequently, the binding potential of YTHDC1 to MEF2C was predicted by catRAPID (http://service.tart-aglialab.com (accessed on 22 February 2023)) [33].

4.16. Statistical Analysis

At least three biological replicates were performed to ensure the experiment’s reproducibility. An unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test and one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s correction were used for two groups and multiple-group comparisons by GraphPad Prism (Version 9.0; https://www.graphpad.com (accessed on 16 August 2021)). All results were presented as mean ± SEM. Significance was denoted as * p ≤ 0.05.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, our findings demonstrate that METTL3 expression regulates the global m6A level in muscle and is critical to the process of MuSCs differentiation. Moreover, METTL3 promotes the differentiation of MuSCs by regulating the expression of MEF2C. Mechanistically, METTL3 directly regulates the m6A modification of MEF2C mRNA, which is recognized by YTHDC1 and protects the stability of mRNA, thereby promoting MuSCs myogenic differentiation (Figure 6).

Supplementary Materials

The supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms241814115/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, writing—original draft, and data curation, S.Z. (Sen Zhao); writing—review, editing, and validation, J.C.; methodology, Y.S.; visualization, H.Z. (Helin Zhou) and Q.Z.; software, D.D.; formal analysis, S.Z. (Siyuan Zhan) and J.G.; investigation and resources, T.Z. and L.W.; conceptualization, funding acquisition, and project administration, L.L. and H.Z. (Hongping Zhang) All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 32072715), the Young Scientists Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31802048), and the Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province (Grant No. 2022NSFSC1611).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The Institutional Animal Care and Utilization Committee of Sichuan Agricultural University approved all experimental schemes of this study. Moreover, the animals were sacrificed in accordance with the Regulations for the Administration of Affairs Concerning Experimental Animals, under permit NO DKY-2020202033.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data from the current study are exhibited in the manuscript and Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge BioRender, which was used to create the schematic Figure 6. We would like to thank Song Tianzeng’s contribution.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

METTL3Methyltransferase-like protein 3
m6AN6-methyladenosine
MuSCsSkeletal muscle satellite cells
LDLongissimus dorsi
DEGsDifferentially expressed genes
MEF2CMyocyte enhancer factor 2c
YTHDC1YTH Domain Containing 1
FBSFetal bovine serum
GMGrowth medium
DMDifferential medium

References

  1. de Sousa, S.V.; Diogenes, L.V.; Oliveira, R.L.; Souza, M.N.S.; Mazza, P.H.S.; da Silva Júnior, J.M.; Pereira, E.S.; Parente, M.O.M.; Araújo, M.J.; de Oliveira, J.P.F.; et al. Effect of dietary buriti oil on the quality, fatty acid profile and sensorial attributes of lamb meat. Meat Sci. 2022, 186, 108734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Cruz-Jentoft, A.J.; Bahat, G.; Bauer, J.; Boirie, Y.; Bruyere, O.; Cederholm, T.; Cooper, C.; Landi, F.; Rolland, Y.; Sayer, A.A.; et al. Sarcopenia: Revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing 2019, 48, 601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Li, J.; Pei, Y.; Zhou, R.; Tang, Z.; Yang, Y. Regulation of RNA N-methyladenosine modification and its emerging roles in skeletal muscle development. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2021, 17, 1682–1692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Brooks, S.V. Current topics for teaching skeletal muscle physiology. Adv. Physiol. Educ. 2003, 27, 171–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pinto, B.L.; McGill, S.M. Voluntary Muscle Relaxation Can Mitigate Fatigue and Improve Countermovement Jump Performance. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2020, 34, 1525–1529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mercuri, E.; Bönnemann, C.G.; Muntoni, F. Muscular dystrophies. Lancet 2019, 394, 2025–2038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zammit, P.S. Function of the myogenic regulatory factors Myf5, MyoD, Myogenin and MRF4 in skeletal muscle, satellite cells and regenerative myogenesis. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2017, 72, 19–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhan, S.; Qin, C.; Li, D.; Zhao, W.; Nie, L.; Cao, J.; Guo, J.; Zhong, T.; Wang, L.; Li, L.; et al. A Novel Long Noncoding RNA, lncR-125b, Promotes the Differentiation of Goat Skeletal Muscle Satellite Cells by Sponging miR-125b. Front. Genet. 2019, 10, 1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chang, N.C.; Rudnicki, M.A. Satellite cells: The architects of skeletal muscle. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 2014, 107, 161–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Massenet, J.; Gardner, E.; Chazaud, B.; Dilworth, F.J. Epigenetic regulation of satellite cell fate during skeletal muscle regeneration. Skelet Muscle 2021, 11, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kudou, K.; Komatsu, T.; Nogami, J.; Maehara, K.; Harada, A.; Saeki, H.; Oki, E.; Maehara, Y.; Ohkawa, Y. The requirement of Mettl3-promoted MyoD mRNA maintenance in proliferative myoblasts for skeletal muscle differentiation. Open Biol. 2017, 7, 170119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yue, Y.; Liu, J.; He, C. RNA N6-methyladenosine methylation in post-transcriptional gene expression regulation. Gene Dev. 2015, 29, 1343–1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chen, W.; Cui, Y.; Ning, M.; Zhang, H.; Yin, C.; He, Z. The mechanisms and functions of microRNAs in mediating the fate determinations of human spermatogonial stem cells and Sertoli cells. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2022, 121, 32–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Xu, T.; Xu, Z.; Lu, L.; Zeng, T.; Gu, L.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, S.; Yang, P.; Wen, Y.; Lin, D.; et al. Transcriptome-wide study revealed m6A regulation of embryonic muscle development in Dingan goose (Anser cygnoides orientalis). BMC Genom. 2021, 22, 270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Barbieri, I.; Tzelepis, K.; Pandolfini, L.; Shi, J.; Millán-Zambrano, G.; Robson, S.C.; Aspris, D.; Migliori, V.; Bannister, A.J.; Han, N.; et al. Promoter-bound METTL3 maintains myeloid leukaemia by m6A-dependent translation control. Nature 2017, 552, 126–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Haussmann, I.U.; Bodi, Z.; Sanchez-Moran, E.; Mongan, N.P.; Archer, N.; Fray, R.G.; Soller, M. m6A potentiates Sxl alternative pre-mRNA splicing for robust Drosophila sex determination. Nature 2016, 540, 301–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, X.; Feng, J.; Xue, Y.; Guan, Z.; Zhang, D.; Liu, Z.; Gong, Z.; Wang, Q.; Huang, J.; Tang, C.; et al. Structural basis of N6-adenosine methylation by the METTL3-METTL14 complex. Nature 2016, 534, 575–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Geula, S.; Moshitch-Moshkovitz, S.; Dominissini, D.; Mansour, A.A.; Kol, N.; Salmon-Divon, M.; Hershkovitz, V.; Peer, E.; Mor, N.; Manor, Y.S.; et al. Stem cells. m6A mRNA methylation facilitates resolution of naïve pluripotency toward differentiation. Science 2015, 347, 1002–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, Y.; Li, Y.; Toth, J.I.; Petroski, M.D.; Zhang, Z.; Zhao, J.C. N6-methyladenosine modification destabilizes developmental regulators in embryonic stem cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 2014, 16, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gheller, B.J.; Blum, J.E.; Fong, E.H.H.; Malysheva, O.V.; Cosgrove, B.D.; Thalacker-Mercer, A.E. A defined N6-methyladenosine (m6A) profile conferred by METTL3 regulates muscle stem cell/myoblast state transitions. Cell Death Discov. 2020, 6, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Petrosino, J.M.; Hinger, S.A.; Golubeva, V.A.; Barajas, J.M.; Dorn, L.E.; Iyer, C.C.; Sun, H.-L.; Arnold, W.D.; He, C.; Accornero, F. The m6A methyltransferase METTL3 regulates muscle maintenance and growth in mice. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yang, X.; Mei, C.; Raza, S.H.A.; Ma, X.; Wang, J.; Du, J.; Zan, L. Interactive regulation of DNA demethylase gene TET1 and m6A methyltransferase gene METTL3 in myoblast differentiation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 223, 916–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Shi, H.; Wei, J.; He, C. Where, When, and How: Context-Dependent Functions of RNA Methylation Writers, Readers, and Erasers. Mol. Cell 2019, 74, 640–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kumar, S.; Nei, M.; Dudley, J.; Tamura, K. MEGA: A biologist-centric software for evolutionary analysis of DNA and protein sequences. Brief. Bioinform. 2008, 9, 299–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Letunic, I.; Doerks, T.; Bork, P. SMART 6: Recent updates and new developments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, D229–D232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Du, M.; Yan, X.; Tong, J.F.; Zhao, J.; Zhu, M.J. Maternal obesity, inflammation, and fetal skeletal muscle development. Biol. Reprod. 2010, 82, 4–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Shi, H.; Verma, M.; Zhang, L.; Dong, C.; Flavell, R.A.; Bennett, A.M. Improved regenerative myogenesis and muscular dystrophy in mice lacking Mkp5. J. Clin. Investig. 2013, 123, 2064–2077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Liu, L.; Charville, G.W.; Cheung, T.H.; Yoo, B.; Santos, P.J.; Schroeder, M.; Rando, T.A. Impaired Notch Signaling Leads to a Decrease in p53 Activity and Mitotic Catastrophe in Aged Muscle Stem Cells. Cell Stem Cell 2018, 23, 544–556.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Szklarczyk, D.; Gable, A.L.; Nastou, K.C.; Lyon, D.; Kirsch, R.; Pyysalo, S.; Doncheva, N.T.; Legeay, M.; Fang, T.; Bork, P.; et al. The STRING database in 2021: Customizable protein-protein networks, and functional characterization of user-uploaded gene/measurement sets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, D605–D612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Saito, R.; Smoot, M.E.; Ono, K.; Ruscheinski, J.; Wang, P.-L.; Lotia, S.; Pico, A.R.; Bader, G.D.; Ideker, T. A travel guide to Cytoscape plugins. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 1069–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yang, J.H.; Chang, M.W.; Pandey, P.R.; Tsitsipatis, D.; Yang, X.; Martindale, J.L.; Munk, R.; De, S.; Abdelmohsen, K.; Gorospe, M. Interaction of OIP5-AS1 with MEF2C mRNA promotes myogenic gene expression. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020, 48, 12943–12956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhou, Y.; Zeng, P.; Li, Y.-H.; Zhang, Z.; Cui, Q. SRAMP: Prediction of mammalian N6-methyladenosine (m6A) sites based on sequence-derived features. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, e91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Armaos, A.; Colantoni, A.; Proietti, G.; Rupert, J.; Tartaglia, G.G. catRAPID omics v2.0: Going deeper and wider in the prediction of protein-RNA interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, W72–W79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Relaix, F.; Bencze, M.; Borok, M.J.; Der Vartanian, A.; Gattazzo, F.; Mademtzoglou, D.; Perez-Diaz, S.; Prola, A.; Reyes-Fernandez, P.C.; Rotini, A.; et al. Perspectives on skeletal muscle stem cells. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jia, G.; Fu, Y.; Zhao, X.; Dai, Q.; Zheng, G.; Yang, Y.; Yi, C.; Lindahl, T.; Pan, T.; Yang, Y.-G.; et al. N6-methyladenosine in nuclear RNA is a major substrate of the obesity-associated FTO. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2011, 7, 885–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Meyer, K.D.; Jaffrey, S.R. The dynamic epitranscriptome: N6-methyladenosine and gene expression control. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2014, 15, 313–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Meyer, K.D.; Saletore, Y.; Zumbo, P.; Elemento, O.; Mason, C.E.; Jaffrey, S.R. Comprehensive analysis of mRNA methylation reveals enrichment in 3’ UTRs and near stop codons. Cell 2012, 149, 1635–1646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tegowski, M.; Flamand, M.N.; Meyer, K.D. scDART-seq reveals distinct m6A signatures and mRNA methylation heterogeneity in single cells. Mol. Cell 2022, 82, 868–878.e10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Xiong, X.; Hou, L.; Park, Y.P.; Molinie, B.; Gregory, R.I.; Kellis, M. Genetic drivers of m6A methylation in human brain, lung, heart and muscle. Nat. Genet. 2021, 53, 1156–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wu, R.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Bi, Z.; Yao, Y.; Liu, Q.; Wang, F.; Wang, Y.; Wang, X. m6A methylation controls pluripotency of porcine induced pluripotent stem cells by targeting SOCS3/JAK2/STAT3 pathway in a YTHDF1/YTHDF2-orchestrated manner. Cell Death Dis. 2019, 10, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Li, T.; Zhuang, Y.; Yang, W.; Xie, Y.; Shang, W.; Su, S.; Dong, X.; Wu, J.; Jiang, W.; Zhou, Y.; et al. Silencing of METTL3 attenuates cardiac fibrosis induced by myocardial infarction via inhibiting the activation of cardiac fibroblasts. FASEB J. 2021, 35, e21162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yang, X.; Mei, C.; Ma, X.; Du, J.; Wang, J.; Zan, L. m6A Methylases Regulate Myoblast Proliferation, Apoptosis and Differentiation. Animals 2022, 12, 773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wen, Y.; Bi, P.; Liu, W.; Asakura, A.; Keller, C.; Kuang, S. Constitutive Notch activation upregulates Pax7 and promotes the self-renewal of skeletal muscle satellite cells. Mol. Cell Biol. 2012, 32, 2300–2311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kivelä, R.; Salmela, I.; Nguyen, Y.H.; Petrova, T.V.; Koistinen, H.A.; Wiener, Z.; Alitalo, K. The transcription factor Prox1 is essential for satellite cell differentiation and muscle fibre-type regulation. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 13124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Bernet, J.D.; Doles, J.D.; Hall, J.K.; Kelly Tanaka, K.; Carter, T.A.; Olwin, B.B. p38 MAPK signaling underlies a cell-autonomous loss of stem cell self-renewal in skeletal muscle of aged mice. Nat. Med. 2014, 20, 265–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Liang, Y.; Han, H.; Xiong, Q.; Yang, C.; Wang, L.; Ma, J.; Lin, S.; Jiang, Y.Z. METTL3-Mediated m6A Methylation Regulates Muscle Stem Cells and Muscle Regeneration by Notch Signaling Pathway. Stem. Cells Int. 2021, 2021, 9955691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wang, X.; Huang, N.; Yang, M.; Wei, D.; Tai, H.; Han, X.; Gong, H.; Zhou, J.; Qin, J.; Wei, X.; et al. FTO is required for myogenesis by positively regulating mTOR-PGC-1α pathway-mediated mitochondria biogenesis. Cell Death Dis. 2017, 8, e2702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Deng, K.; Fan, Y.; Liang, Y.; Cai, Y.; Zhang, G.; Deng, M.; Wang, Z.; Lu, J.; Shi, J.; Wang, F.; et al. FTO-mediated demethylation of GADD45B promotes myogenesis through the activation of p38 MAPK pathway. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 2021, 26, 34–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Xin, M.; Olson, E.N.; Bassel-Duby, R. Mending broken hearts: Cardiac development as a basis for adult heart regeneration and repair. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2013, 14, 529–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mohajeri, K.; Yadav, R.; D’Haene, E.; Boone, P.M.; Erdin, S.; Gao, D.; Moyses-Oliveira, M.; Bhavsar, R.; Currall, B.B.; O’Keefe, K.; et al. Transcriptional and functional consequences of alterations to MEF2C and its topological organization in neuronal models. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2022, 109, 2049–2067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Liu, N.; Nelson, B.R.; Bezprozvannaya, S.; Shelton, J.M.; Richardson, J.A.; Bassel-Duby, R.; Olson, E.N. Requirement of MEF2A, C, and D for skeletal muscle regeneration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 4109–4114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Lu, Y.W.; Lowery, A.M.; Sun, L.Y.; Singer, H.A.; Dai, G.; Adam, A.P.; Vincent, P.A.; Schwarz, J.J. Endothelial Myocyte Enhancer Factor 2c Inhibits Migration of Smooth Muscle Cells Through Fenestrations in the Internal Elastic Lamina. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2017, 37, 1380–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Potthoff, M.J.; Arnold, M.A.; McAnally, J.; Richardson, J.A.; Bassel-Duby, R.; Olson, E.N. Regulation of skeletal muscle sarcomere integrity and postnatal muscle function by Mef2c. Mol. Cell Biol. 2007, 27, 8143–8151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lv, W.; Jin, J.; Xu, Z.; Luo, H.; Guo, Y.; Wang, X.; Wang, S.; Zhang, J.; Zuo, H.; Bai, W.; et al. lncMGPF is a novel positive regulator of muscle growth and regeneration. J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2020, 11, 1723–1746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wang, D.Z.; Valdez, M.R.; McAnally, J.; Richardson, J.; Olson, E.N. The Mef2c gene is a direct transcriptional target of myogenic bHLH and MEF2 proteins during skeletal muscle development. Development 2001, 128, 4623–4633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhang, N.; Shen, Y.; Li, H.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, P.; Lou, S.; Deng, J. The m6A reader IGF2BP3 promotes acute myeloid leukemia progression by enhancing RCC2 stability. Exp. Mol. Med. 2022, 54, 194–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Roundtree, I.A.; Luo, G.Z.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, X.; Zhou, T.; Cui, Y.; Sha, J.; Huang, X.; Guerrero, L.; Xie, P.; et al. YTHDC1 mediates nuclear export of N6-methyladenosine methylated mRNAs. Elife 2017, 6, e31311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Xu, W.; Li, J.; He, C.; Wen, J.; Ma, H.; Rong, B.; Diao, J.; Wang, L.; Wang, J.; Wu, F.; et al. METTL3 regulates heterochromatin in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nature 2021, 591, 317–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Cheng, Y.; Xie, W.; Pickering, B.F.; Chu, K.L.; Savino, A.M.; Yang, X.; Luo, H.; Nguyen, D.T.; Mo, S.; Barin, E.; et al. N6-Methyladenosine on mRNA facilitates a phase-separated nuclear body that suppresses myeloid leukemic differentiation. Cancer Cell 2021, 39, 958–972.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Chen, J.; Niu, Y.; Wang, J.; Yang, Z.; Cai, Z.; Dao, X.; Wang, C.; Wang, Y.; Lin, Y. Physicochemical property, bacterial diversity, and volatile profile during ripening of naturally fermented dry mutton sausage produced from Jianzhou big-eared goat. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 961117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zheng, S.; Li, L.; Zhou, H.; Zhang, X.; Xu, X.; Dai, D.; Zhan, S.; Cao, J.; Guo, J.; Zhong, T.; et al. CircTCF4 Suppresses Proliferation and Differentiation of Goat Skeletal Muscle Satellite Cells Independent from AGO2 Binding. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 12868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Zhao, W.; Chen, L.; Zhong, T.; Wang, L.; Guo, J.; Dong, Y.; Feng, J.; Song, T.; Li, L.; Zhang, H. The differential proliferation and differentiation ability of skeletal muscle satellite cell in Boer and Nanjiang brown goats. Small Rumin. Res. 2018, 169, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Subramanian, B.; Gao, S.; Lercher, M.J.; Hu, S.; Chen, W.H. Evolview v3: A webserver for visualization, annotation, and management of phylogenetic trees. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, W270–W275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Antoun, E.; Garratt, E.S.; Taddei, A.; Burton, M.A.; Barton, S.J.; Titcombe, P.; Westbury, L.D.; Baczynska, A.; Migliavacca, E.; Feige, J.N.; et al. Epigenome-wide association study of sarcopenia: Findings from the Hertfordshire Sarcopenia Study (HSS). J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2022, 13, 240–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Chen, L.; Zhang, C.; Ma, W.; Huang, J.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, H. METTL3-mediated m6A modification stabilizes TERRA and maintains telomere stability. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022, 50, 11619–11634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Sun, Y.; Zhan, S.; Zhao, S.; Zhong, T.; Wang, L.; Guo, J.; Dai, D.; Li, D.; Cao, J.; Li, L.; et al. HuR Promotes the Differentiation of Goat Skeletal Muscle Satellite Cells by Regulating Myomaker mRNA Stability. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 6893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Kim, D.; Langmead, B.; Salzberg, S.L. HISAT: A fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat. Methods 2015, 12, 357–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Anders, S.; Huber, W. Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol. 2010, 11, R106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wu, T.; Hu, E.; Xu, S.; Chen, M.; Guo, P.; Dai, Z.; Feng, T.; Zhou, L.; Tang, W.; Zhan, L.; et al. clusterProfiler 4.0: A universal enrichment tool for interpreting omics data. Innovation 2021, 2, 100141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Characteristics and methylation transfer effects of goat METTL3. (A) Phylogenetic tree of METTL3. (B) Analysis of METTL3 protein domains. (C) qPCR analysis of METTL3 expression in different tissues of embryonic 105 days (E105) goats. (D) METTL3 expression in the longissimus dorsi (LD) tissue at different stages was measured using qPCR. (E) Pax7 (green) and MyHC (red) immunofluorescence staining were performed in MuSCs (scale bar: 200 μm). (F) METTL3 expression was determined by qPCR in the growth medium (GM) and differentiation medium (DM) of MuSCs. (G) Total RNA m6A levels in goat MuSCs at different stages were detected by methylation colorimetry. (H) qPCR analysis verified the knockdown of METTL3 in MuSCs. (I) Total RNA m6A levels in goat MuSCs were detected after transfection of siMETTL3 using methylation colorimetry. Results are represented as the mean ± SEM, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001, and ns indicates no significance.
Figure 1. Characteristics and methylation transfer effects of goat METTL3. (A) Phylogenetic tree of METTL3. (B) Analysis of METTL3 protein domains. (C) qPCR analysis of METTL3 expression in different tissues of embryonic 105 days (E105) goats. (D) METTL3 expression in the longissimus dorsi (LD) tissue at different stages was measured using qPCR. (E) Pax7 (green) and MyHC (red) immunofluorescence staining were performed in MuSCs (scale bar: 200 μm). (F) METTL3 expression was determined by qPCR in the growth medium (GM) and differentiation medium (DM) of MuSCs. (G) Total RNA m6A levels in goat MuSCs at different stages were detected by methylation colorimetry. (H) qPCR analysis verified the knockdown of METTL3 in MuSCs. (I) Total RNA m6A levels in goat MuSCs were detected after transfection of siMETTL3 using methylation colorimetry. Results are represented as the mean ± SEM, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001, and ns indicates no significance.
Ijms 24 14115 g001
Figure 2. METTL3 expression promotes the differentiation of MuSCs. (A) METTL3, MyoD, MyoG, and MyHC expression after the knockdown of METTL3 by qPCR. (B) METTL3 and MyHC protein expression were measured by Western Blot analysis (WB) in METTL3-knockdown MuSCs. (C) The formation of myotubes was detected using the MyHC (red) immunofluorescence analysis after the knockdown of METTL3 (scale bar: 200 μm). (D,E) METTL3 mRNA (D) and protein (E) expression were detected after transfecting pEGFP-METTL3. (F) qPCR analysis of METTL3, MyoD, MyoG, and MyHC expression after transfection of pEGFP-METTL3. (G) The formation of myotubes was detected using the MyHC (red) immunofluorescence analysis in pEGFP-METTL3-transfected cells (scale bar: 200 μm). Results are represented as the mean ± SEM, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and ns indicates no significance.
Figure 2. METTL3 expression promotes the differentiation of MuSCs. (A) METTL3, MyoD, MyoG, and MyHC expression after the knockdown of METTL3 by qPCR. (B) METTL3 and MyHC protein expression were measured by Western Blot analysis (WB) in METTL3-knockdown MuSCs. (C) The formation of myotubes was detected using the MyHC (red) immunofluorescence analysis after the knockdown of METTL3 (scale bar: 200 μm). (D,E) METTL3 mRNA (D) and protein (E) expression were detected after transfecting pEGFP-METTL3. (F) qPCR analysis of METTL3, MyoD, MyoG, and MyHC expression after transfection of pEGFP-METTL3. (G) The formation of myotubes was detected using the MyHC (red) immunofluorescence analysis in pEGFP-METTL3-transfected cells (scale bar: 200 μm). Results are represented as the mean ± SEM, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and ns indicates no significance.
Ijms 24 14115 g002
Figure 3. MEF2C is a potential target of METTL3 in goat MuSCs. (A) GO analysis of all differentially expressed genes (DEGs). (B) The top 20 enriched KEGG signaling pathways of all DEGs. (C) The String tool and the Cytoscape software were used for constructing the DEGs protein interaction network of the MAPK and Notch signaling pathways. (D) DEGs were analyzed by combining MeRIP-seq (E60d vs. B12m) and mRNA-seq data. (E) The m6A abundances in MEF2C transcript in goat E60d skeletal muscle as detected by MeRIP-seq.
Figure 3. MEF2C is a potential target of METTL3 in goat MuSCs. (A) GO analysis of all differentially expressed genes (DEGs). (B) The top 20 enriched KEGG signaling pathways of all DEGs. (C) The String tool and the Cytoscape software were used for constructing the DEGs protein interaction network of the MAPK and Notch signaling pathways. (D) DEGs were analyzed by combining MeRIP-seq (E60d vs. B12m) and mRNA-seq data. (E) The m6A abundances in MEF2C transcript in goat E60d skeletal muscle as detected by MeRIP-seq.
Ijms 24 14115 g003
Figure 4. METTL3 promotes the differentiation of MuSCs by upregulating the MEF2C expression. (A,B) METTL3 and MEF2C mRNA (A) and protein (B) expression were measured after the knockdown of METTL3. (C,D) METTL3 and MEF2C mRNA (C) and protein (D) expression were measured after transfecting pEGFP-METTL3. (E,F) MEF2C, MyoD, MyoG, and METTL3 mRNA (E) and protein (F) expression were detected after transfecting pEGFP-MEF2C. (G) The formation of myotubes was detected using the MyHC (red) immunofluorescence analysis after transfecting pEGFP-MEF2C (scale bar: 200 μm). (H) siMETTL3 and pEGFP-MEF2C were co-transfected into MuSCs, and MyoD and MyHC protein expression were measured by WB analysis. Results are represented as the mean ± SEM, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and ns indicates no significance.
Figure 4. METTL3 promotes the differentiation of MuSCs by upregulating the MEF2C expression. (A,B) METTL3 and MEF2C mRNA (A) and protein (B) expression were measured after the knockdown of METTL3. (C,D) METTL3 and MEF2C mRNA (C) and protein (D) expression were measured after transfecting pEGFP-METTL3. (E,F) MEF2C, MyoD, MyoG, and METTL3 mRNA (E) and protein (F) expression were detected after transfecting pEGFP-MEF2C. (G) The formation of myotubes was detected using the MyHC (red) immunofluorescence analysis after transfecting pEGFP-MEF2C (scale bar: 200 μm). (H) siMETTL3 and pEGFP-MEF2C were co-transfected into MuSCs, and MyoD and MyHC protein expression were measured by WB analysis. Results are represented as the mean ± SEM, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and ns indicates no significance.
Ijms 24 14115 g004
Figure 5. The METTL3-m6A-YTHDC1 axis promotes MEF2C mRNA stability during the myogenic differentiation of MuSCs. (A) The specific sites of m6A methylation modification in MEF2C (XM_005683422.3) mRNA were predicted by SRAMP. (B) MeRIP-qPCR was used to assess whether MEF2C-1728 had m6A modification. (C) MeRIP-qPCR measured the m6A level of MEF2C-1728 after the METTL3 knockdown. (D) Luciferase assay for silencing or overexpression of METTL3. (E) The potential of YTHDC1 to bind to MEF2C mRNA was predicted using the catRAPID. (F) RIP-qPCR analysis was carried out using anti-YTHDC1 (IP) or anti-IgG (negative control). (G) Expression of YTHDC1, MyoD, MyoG, MyHC, and MEF2C by qPCR analysis in YTHDC1-knockdown MuSCs. (H) YTHDC1, MyHC, and MEF2C protein expression were determined by WB analysis after transfecting siYTHDC1. (I) YTHDC1 knockdown or control MuSCs were treated with Actinomycin D (AcTD) and qPCR analysis of YTHDC1 expression. Results are represented as the mean ± SEM, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and ns indicates no significance.
Figure 5. The METTL3-m6A-YTHDC1 axis promotes MEF2C mRNA stability during the myogenic differentiation of MuSCs. (A) The specific sites of m6A methylation modification in MEF2C (XM_005683422.3) mRNA were predicted by SRAMP. (B) MeRIP-qPCR was used to assess whether MEF2C-1728 had m6A modification. (C) MeRIP-qPCR measured the m6A level of MEF2C-1728 after the METTL3 knockdown. (D) Luciferase assay for silencing or overexpression of METTL3. (E) The potential of YTHDC1 to bind to MEF2C mRNA was predicted using the catRAPID. (F) RIP-qPCR analysis was carried out using anti-YTHDC1 (IP) or anti-IgG (negative control). (G) Expression of YTHDC1, MyoD, MyoG, MyHC, and MEF2C by qPCR analysis in YTHDC1-knockdown MuSCs. (H) YTHDC1, MyHC, and MEF2C protein expression were determined by WB analysis after transfecting siYTHDC1. (I) YTHDC1 knockdown or control MuSCs were treated with Actinomycin D (AcTD) and qPCR analysis of YTHDC1 expression. Results are represented as the mean ± SEM, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and ns indicates no significance.
Ijms 24 14115 g005
Figure 6. BioRender was used for creating a schematic illustration of METTL3 regulating MuSCs myogenic development. Red arrows indicate upregulation of stability.
Figure 6. BioRender was used for creating a schematic illustration of METTL3 regulating MuSCs myogenic development. Red arrows indicate upregulation of stability.
Ijms 24 14115 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, S.; Cao, J.; Sun, Y.; Zhou, H.; Zhu, Q.; Dai, D.; Zhan, S.; Guo, J.; Zhong, T.; Wang, L.; et al. METTL3 Promotes the Differentiation of Goat Skeletal Muscle Satellite Cells by Regulating MEF2C mRNA Stability in a m6A-Dependent Manner. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 14115. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241814115

AMA Style

Zhao S, Cao J, Sun Y, Zhou H, Zhu Q, Dai D, Zhan S, Guo J, Zhong T, Wang L, et al. METTL3 Promotes the Differentiation of Goat Skeletal Muscle Satellite Cells by Regulating MEF2C mRNA Stability in a m6A-Dependent Manner. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(18):14115. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241814115

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhao, Sen, Jiaxue Cao, Yanjin Sun, Helin Zhou, Qi Zhu, Dinghui Dai, Siyuan Zhan, Jiazhong Guo, Tao Zhong, Linjie Wang, and et al. 2023. "METTL3 Promotes the Differentiation of Goat Skeletal Muscle Satellite Cells by Regulating MEF2C mRNA Stability in a m6A-Dependent Manner" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 18: 14115. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241814115

APA Style

Zhao, S., Cao, J., Sun, Y., Zhou, H., Zhu, Q., Dai, D., Zhan, S., Guo, J., Zhong, T., Wang, L., Li, L., & Zhang, H. (2023). METTL3 Promotes the Differentiation of Goat Skeletal Muscle Satellite Cells by Regulating MEF2C mRNA Stability in a m6A-Dependent Manner. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(18), 14115. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241814115

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop