Next Article in Journal
The Glioblastoma CircularRNAome
Next Article in Special Issue
Non-Steroidal Estrogens Inhibit Influenza Virus by Interacting with Hemagglutinin and Preventing Viral Fusion
Previous Article in Journal
Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase and Exploratory Nuclear Receptor Crosstalk in Cancer Immunotherapy
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Novel Time-Resolved Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer Assay for the Discovery of Small-Molecule Inhibitors of HIV-1 Tat-Regulated Transcription
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Current Perspectives in Antiviral Research

Laboratory of Structure-Function Based Drug Design, Institute of Biomedical Chemistry, 10 Bldg. 8, Pogodinskaya Str., 119121 Moscow, Russia
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(19), 14555; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241914555
Submission received: 15 September 2023 / Accepted: 22 September 2023 / Published: 26 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antiviral Agents and Antiviral Defense)

Editorial

Studies on virus–host interactions are of high significance for a number of reasons. First, comparing the molecular mechanisms of virus–host interactions allows researchers to reveal the complex relationships between specific viral infections and other pathologies that may develop after a particular viral infection and be associated with it. Meanwhile, for some viruses, their role in the development of cancer is shown and widely discussed, and some new potential associations between viral infections and tumor development are under active investigation. Specifically, for viruses such as Human Papilloma Viruses (HPV), their impact in the development of cervical cancer has been demonstrated and discussed [1]. The role of hepatitis B and C viruses in hepatocyte inflammation followed by necrosis and regeneration, associated with the fibrotic remodeling of hepatic tissue, leading to hepatocellular carcinoma has also been revealed [2]. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is often associated with Hodgkin lymphoma [3,4], lung cancer [5], skin cancer [6], and Kaposi sarcoma [7]. An increased risk of gastric [8] and esophageal [9] cancers, and Hodgkin lymphoma [10,11] has been found to be associated with an Epstein–Barr virus-positive status. Potential associations between viruses and several tumor types are currently under investigation [12,13]. The role of different viruses in skin cancer is of interest to researchers and is under active study [12]. In a publication by Sara Becerril and co-authors, papillomaviruses responsible for the development of different skin tumors are discussed [12]. The impacts of several viruses, including influenza A, respiratory syncytial viruses, rhinoviruses, and some others on asthma development are discussed in the publication by Tuomas Jartti et al. [13]. The investigation of signaling pathways common to different pathologies can shed light on the relationships between virus–host interactions and the potential development of pathologies which develop as a consequence of viral infections, even when there are no known associations between them. For example, a study by Suguru Kadomoto and colleagues [14] demonstrates the involvement of chemokine receptors in viral infections and tumor pathogenesis. Additionally, Sidney Iriana et al. [15] reviewed the role of the Hedgehog signaling pathway in both cancer and viral infections. Another approach is to analyze the influence of virus-induced immune damage on the potential development of non-viral pathology. While the influence of HIV and SARS-CoV-2 on immune function continues to attract researchers’ attention [16,17], other viruses, such as herpesviruses, hepatitis C, influenza A, lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus and some others, have been studied for several years in terms of their impact on the immune response to infections [18,19,20,21,22]. An important field of research includes studies aimed at modeling the dynamics of viral copy spread in the host’s body [23].
Second, an analysis of virus–host interactions provides a basis for the search for new drugs with a pathogenesis-directed mechanism of action and symptomatic treatment. This makes it possible to alleviate symptoms in the severe course of viral infections and increase the clinical effectiveness of treatment. A thorough investigation of virus–host interactions for various viruses will enable researchers to increase the efficacy and decrease the potential time and costs of searching for novel medications for upcoming threats associated with the spread of zoonotic viral infections among the human population.
An estimation of the contribution of individual patient factors to the response of the immune system and other organs and tissues (nervous system, liver, kidneys, gut, endocrine system, etc.) at the genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic levels will make it possible to predict the potential host’s response to viral infection and antiviral therapy due to a complex of factors. Additionally, such an analysis allows a determination of the possible level of progression of viral infection according to a set of individual characteristics of the patient [24], and a prediction of the development of complications and associated comorbidities that worsen quality of life [20,25,26,27].
Experimental knowledge about proteins and genes involved in the host response to viral infection provides a basis for predicting viral tropism, pathogenicity levels, and the ability of viruses capable of infecting animal tissues to also infect human organs and tissues. This knowledge also assists in the estimation of the risks associated with the spread of a specific virus within the human population.
An important area of current antiviral research is the search for new drugs, including analogs of known viral enzyme inhibitors with lower toxicity and susceptibility to the development of resistance [28,29,30,31]. The application of in silico methods allows for time and cost reductions, and the filtering out of potentially toxic chemical compounds, decreasing the probability of side effects for novel drugs. On the other hand, the application of in silico methods requires the production and collection of a lot of experimental data. The accumulated experimental data on antiviral activity available in scientific publications and large repositories has led to the development of new methods aimed at information extraction, collection, integration, and processing [32,33]. An analysis of data consistency and reproducibility would help to improve the accuracy of the models and the creation of benchmark data sets, which could be used by researchers worldwide for the validation of computational methods.
The prediction of viral drug resistance is highly significant and relevant for clinical practice, as it helps to optimize and increase the efficacy of antiviral therapy in a short time, improving patient prognosis. While there is great demand for studies analyzing and predicting, HIV drug resistance [34,35], investigations of the susceptibility of SARS-CoV-2 variants to pharmaceuticals [36] and their response to vaccines [37] are of high significance due to the pandemic.
Since solving all of the aforementioned issues depends on high-quality experimental data, it is important to consolidate the efforts of the international scientific community to create, develop, and annotate/curate freely available repositories, and maintain previously developed ones containing experimental data [38,39,40]. These data may encompass information on the interaction of the virus with the human body, the antiviral activity of low-molecular-weight and macromolecule compounds, the drug resistance of viruses, etc. An analysis of the negative results of experiments (failure to accept the initial hypothesis regarding the interaction between viruses and the human body, or the low affinity of a chemical compound against a viral target) could be of particular interest for researchers in related fields.
The development and evaluation of models aimed at understanding how viruses spread in the human body and virus–host interactions are beneficial for further antiviral drug research, including in the development of novel pharmaceutical agents, drug repositioning, as well as for the prevention of new threats associated with infectious diseases.

Funding

This work was financed by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation within the framework of state support for the creation and development of World-Class Research Centers ‘Digital Biodesign and Personalized Healthcare’ (No 75-15-2022-305).

Acknowledgments

The author is grateful to Vladimir Poroikov for useful and supportive comments on the content of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bhattacharjee, R.; Das, S.S.; Biswal, S.S.; Nath, A.; Das, D.; Basu, A.; Malik, S.; Kumar, L.; Kar, S.; Singh, S.K.; et al. Mechanistic Role of HPV-Associated Early Proteins in Cervical Cancer: Molecular Pathways and Targeted Therapeutic Strategies. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2022, 174, 103675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Forner, A.; Reig, M.; Bruix, J. Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Lancet 2018, 391, 1301–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Grewal, R.; Irimie, A.; Naidoo, N.; Mohamed, N.; Petrushev, B.; Chetty, M.; Tomuleasa, C.; Abayomi, E.-A. Hodgkin’s lymphoma and its association with EBV and HIV infection. Crit. Rev. Clin. Lab. Sci. 2018, 55, 102–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Biernat, M.M.; Wróbel, T. Bacterial Infection and Non-Hodgkin B-Cell Lymphoma: Interactions between Pathogen, Host and the Tumor Environment. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sigel, K.; Makinson, A.; Thaler, J. Lung Cancer in Persons with HIV. Curr. Opin. HIV AIDS 2017, 12, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Latini, A.; Alei, L.; Magri, F.; Eibenschutz, L.; Cota, C.; Dona’, M.G.; Cameli, N.; Cristaudo, A.; Zaccarelli, M. Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer and Melanoma in HIV-1-Infected Patients. AIDS 2020, 34, 1570–1572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yarchoan, R.; Uldrick, T.S. HIV-Associated Cancers and Related Diseases. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 378, 1029–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Naseem, M.; Barzi, A.; Brezden-Masley, C.; Puccini, A.; Berger, M.D.; Tokunaga, R.; Battaglin, F.; Soni, S.; McSkane, M.; Zhang, W.; et al. Outlooks on Epstein-Barr Virus Associated Gastric Cancer. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2018, 66, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Chang, C.; Worrell, S.G. Viruses and Esophageal Cancer. Dis. Esophagus 2020, 33, doaa036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Faizan, M.; Kashif, R.U.A.; Anwar, S.; Safdar, M. Familial Hodgkin Lymphoma. J. Coll. Physicians Surg. Pak. 2017, 27, 572–573. [Google Scholar]
  11. Chua, H.-H.; Kameyama, T.; Mayeda, A.; Yeh, T.-H. Epstein-Barr Virus Enhances Cancer-Specific Aberrant Splicing of TSG101 Pre-MRNA. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 2516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Becerril, S.; Corchado-Cobos, R.; García-Sancha, N.; Revelles, L.; Revilla, D.; Ugalde, T.; Román-Curto, C.; Pérez-Losada, J.; Cañueto, J. Viruses and Skin Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jartti, T.; Bønnelykke, K.; Elenius, V.; Feleszko, W. Role of Viruses in Asthma. Semin. Immunopathol. 2020, 42, 61–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kadomoto, S.; Izumi, K.; Mizokami, A. The CCL20-CCR6 Axis in Cancer Progression. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Iriana, S.; Asha, K.; Repak, M.; Sharma-Walia, N. Hedgehog Signaling: Implications in Cancers and Viral Infections. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Grebennikov, D.; Karsonova, A.; Loguinova, M.; Casella, V.; Meyerhans, A.; Bocharov, G. Predicting the Kinetic Coordination of Immune Response Dynamics in SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Implications for Disease Pathogenesis. Mathematics 2022, 10, 3154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bessonov, N.; Bocharov, G.; Volpert, V. Space and Genotype-Dependent Virus Distribution during Infection Progression. Matematics 2021, 10, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mifsud, E.J.; Kuba, M.; Barr, I.G. Innate Immune Responses to Influenza Virus Infections in the Upper Respiratory Tract. Viruses 2021, 13, 2090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gu, Y.; Zuo, X.; Zhang, S.; Ouyang, Z.; Jiang, S.; Wang, F.; Wang, G. The Mechanism behind Influenza Virus Cytokine Storm. Viruses 2021, 13, 1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Moretti, S.; Schietroma, I.; Sberna, G.; Maggiorella, M.T.; Sernicola, L.; Farcomeni, S.; Giovanetti, M.; Ciccozzi, M.; Borsetti, A. HIV-1-Host Interaction in Gut-Associated Lymphoid Tissue (GALT): Effects on Local Environment and Comorbidities. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 12193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kikkert, M. Innate Immune Evasion by Human Respiratory RNA Viruses. J. Innate Immun. 2020, 12, 4–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Pedragosa, M.; Riera, G.; Casella, V.; Esteve-Codina, A.; Steuerman, Y.; Seth, C.; Bocharov, G.; Heath, S.; Gat-Viks, I.; Argilaguet, J.; et al. Linking Cell Dynamics with Gene Coexpression Networks to Characterize Key Events in Chronic Virus Infections. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Bocharov, G.; Meyerhans, A.; Bessonov, N.; Trofimchuk, S.; Volpert, V. Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Virus Infection Spreading in Tissues. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0168576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ivanov, S.; Filimonov, D.; Tarasova, O. A Computational Analysis of Transcriptional Profiles from CD8(+) T Lymphocytes Reveals Potential Mechanisms of HIV/AIDS Control and Progression. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 2021, 19, 2447–2459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liu, X.; Huuskonen, S.; Laitinen, T.; Redchuk, T.; Bogacheva, M.; Salokas, K.; Pöhner, I.; Öhman, T.; Tonduru, A.K.; Hassinen, A.; et al. SARS-CoV-2-Host Proteome Interactions for Antiviral Drug Discovery. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2021, 17, e10396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tarasova, O.; Biziukova, N.; Shemshura, A.; Filimonov, D.; Kireev, D.; Pokrovskaya, A.; Poroikov, V.V. Identification of Molecular Mechanisms Involved in Viral Infection Progression Based on Text Mining: Case Study for HIV Infection. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 1465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Zheng, Y.; Li, S.; Li, S.-H.; Yu, S.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, K.; Qu, L.; Sun, Y.; Bi, Y.; Tang, F.; et al. Transcriptome Profiling in Swine Macrophages Infected with African Swine Fever Virus at Single-Cell Resolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2022, 119, e2201288119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Vilas Boas, L.C.P.; Campos, M.L.; Berlanda, R.L.A.; de Carvalho Neves, N.; Franco, O.L. Antiviral Peptides as Promising Therapeutic Drugs. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2019, 76, 3525–3542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Aiello, T.F.; García-Vidal, C.; Soriano, A. Antiviral Drugs against SARS-CoV-2. Rev. Esp. Quimioter. 2022, 35 (Suppl. S3), 10–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tompa, D.R.; Immanuel, A.; Srikanth, S.; Kadhirvel, S. Trends and Strategies to Combat Viral Infections: A Review on FDA Approved Antiviral Drugs. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 172, 524–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kaptein, S.J.F.; Goethals, O.; Kiemel, D.; Marchand, A.; Kesteleyn, B.; Bonfanti, J.-F.; Bardiot, D.; Stoops, B.; Jonckers, T.H.M.; Dallmeier, K.; et al. A Pan-Serotype Dengue Virus Inhibitor Targeting the NS3-NS4B Interaction. Nature 2021, 598, 504–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Petersen, E.J.; Elliott, J.T.; Gordon, J.; Kleinstreuer, N.C.; Reinke, E.; Roesslein, M.; Toman, B. Technical Framework for Enabling High Quality Measurements in New Approach Methodologies (NAMs). ALTEX 2023, 40, 174–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Fourches, D.; Muratov, E.; Tropsha, A. Trust, but Verify: On the Importance of Chemical Structure Curation in Cheminformatics and QSAR Modeling Research. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2010, 50, 1189–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Clutter, D.S.; Jordan, M.R.; Bertagnolio, S.; Shafer, R.W. HIV-1 Drug Resistance and Resistance Testing. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2016, 46, 292–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Blassel, L.; Zhukova, A.; Villabona-Arenas, C.J.; Atkins, K.E.; Hué, S.; Gascuel, O. Drug Resistance Mutations in HIV: New Bioinformatics Approaches and Challenges. Curr. Opin. Virol. 2021, 51, 56–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Iketani, S.; Mohri, H.; Culbertson, B.; Hong, S.J.; Duan, Y.; Luck, M.I.; Annavajhala, M.K.; Guo, Y.; Sheng, Z.; Uhlemann, A.-C.; et al. Multiple Pathways for SARS-CoV-2 Resistance to Nirmatrelvir. Nature 2023, 613, 558–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Araf, Y.; Akter, F.; Tang, Y.-D.; Fatemi, R.; Parvez, M.S.A.; Zheng, C.; Hossain, M.G. Omicron Variant of SARS-CoV-2: Genomics, Transmissibility, and Responses to Current COVID-19 Vaccines. J. Med. Virol. 2022, 94, 1825–1832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Nikitina, A.A.; Orlov, A.A.; Kozlovskaya, L.I.; Palyulin, V.A.; Osolodkin, D.I. Enhanced Taxonomy Annotation of Antiviral Activity Data from ChEMBL. Database 2019, 2019, bay139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Rhee, S.-Y.; Kassaye, S.G.; Jordan, M.R.; Kouamou, V.; Katzenstein, D.; Shafer, R.W. Public Availability of HIV-1 Drug Resistance Sequence and Treatment Data: A Systematic Review. Lancet Microbe 2022, 3, e392–e398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tarasova, O.A.; Ivanov, S.M.; Biziukova, N.Y.; Kabieva, S.S.; Poroikov, V.V. Computational Methods in the Analysis of Viral-Host Interactions. In Cheminformatics, QSAR and Machine Learning Applications for Novel Drug Development; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2023; pp. 285–302. ISBN 978-0-443-18638-7. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tarasova, O.A. Current Perspectives in Antiviral Research. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 14555. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241914555

AMA Style

Tarasova OA. Current Perspectives in Antiviral Research. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(19):14555. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241914555

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tarasova, Olga A. 2023. "Current Perspectives in Antiviral Research" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 19: 14555. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241914555

APA Style

Tarasova, O. A. (2023). Current Perspectives in Antiviral Research. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(19), 14555. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241914555

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop